Only from the 12th century onwards did knowledge begin to become self-referential. And this is exactly what the populists are now trying to turn around, Lars Jaeger writes in his essay on finews.first.
This article is published on finews.first, a forum for authors specialized in economic and financial topics.
It is sometimes quite banal experiences, conversations or incidents that open our eyes to the drama of social developments. A professionally esteemed colleague at work who doubts the theory of evolution, internet bloggers who loudly proclaim that Einsteins theory of relativity cannot be correct, the mother-in-law, who vehemently fights against the vaccination of her grandchildren or the friend who unexpectedly presents himself as a climate skeptic.
A cautious objection that in all these respects science makes unambiguous statements and that the experts agree to 99 percent is then wiped away with the reference Oh, the scientists, they dont know any better. They do not agree 100 percent or even They are paid to make these statements.
It is precisely the increasing dependence of science on commercial interests that should concern us
It seems contradictory: people trust science in principle but also associate it with strong conflicts of interest. Scientists are paid, they say, often with the appendix by the government. But what is supposed to sound scandalous on closer inspection turns out to be a banality: Should researchers perhaps work for free? The fact that most research institutions, and thus financial sponsors, are government institutions has proven to be very helpful for society.
For it is precisely the increasing dependence of science on commercial interests that should concern us. For all the positive developmental dynamics of the interaction of entrepreneurial spirit and scientific creativity that have triggered the enormous increase in economic prosperity over the last 200 years, it seems rather uncanny to most people to let the profit motives of technology investors, the ideology of the Silicon Valley transhumanists or, more generally, the capitalist (or military) logic of exploitation decide on our all future.
There is a second development within the sciences that accommodates its populist opponents
And the example of China shows us what we will encounter when an all-powerful state outside democratic structures controls scientific and technological progress.
In addition, there is a second development within the sciences that accommodates its populist opponents. Beginning with modern physics at the beginning of the 20th century, it increasingly abandoned any belief in the possibility of absolute certainty. Thus, Newtons idea of absolute space or absolute time had to be replaced by the relational space-time of Einsteins theory of relativity, which for non-physicists is barely comprehensible.
Even more drastic was the realization that a quantum object is both wave and particle at the same time and that the laws that apply in the microcosm are completely different from those of our macrocosm. The scientists had to learn to live with complementary truths, i.e. not A or B is true, but A and B can both be true at the same time.
The price for our knowledge gain is high we now have nothing left to hold on to
The final deathblow for the philosophical claim for ultimate and substantiating truths was the new concept of objects in quantum physics: Following that time is no longer absolute, physicists claim further that in the microcosm there should no longer be any real and independently existing objects, no objective reality and thus no absolute certainty. It is a paradox: The more knowledge we gained, the less we could hope that there is an ultimate truth.
Thus, the price for our knowledge gain is high we now have nothing left to hold on to. In a process lasting over three centuries, mankind has gradually robbed itself of all its laboriously built up certainties.
We have lost the absolute and eternal truth. This is a good thing because that is not the way the world works. All the more important are the scientific truths, they help us to find our way in our world. These truths are not dogmas, because they are constantly put to the test, for example through experiments and rational discourse with colleagues; they can be rejected and reformulated at any time, depending on the facts. As already Galilei recognized, this is the great strength of science.
These points play into the hands of today's populists, simplifiers and opponents of science
All these losses of truths have consequences for the human psyche. Unique truths, clear spiritual foundations, and unshakable principles are obviously important for us to find our way in the world. The vacuum left by the loss of old certainties creates deep insecurity within us. Thus, in view of the complexity of social, political, economic and scientific issues, for many people, an escape route leads to the past, where everything was supposedly easier and better.
Slogans like The theory of relativity is illogical. Newton was right are more attractive than struggling through the mathematical complexity of modern physics, just as Make America Great Again or There is no man-made climate change sounds better to many ears than the discussion about complex international trade relations or non-linear global meteorological effects caused by the warming of our atmosphere.
These two points, the quite real danger of an exclusively capitalist logic of exploitation of new scientific knowledge and the flight into simple truths, play into the hands of todays populists, simplifiers and opponents of science. Their success lies in the distorting simplification of intellectually demanding social and scientific contexts and the conspiratorial reference to the belief that scientists only follow their own interests.
The populists, on the other hand, are not concerned with increasing knowledge, but with affirming faith
But who says that populists, relativity critics, opponents of evolution and climate change deniers are not allowed to know what they want with the same claim as scientists? What is the difference between scientific truth and populist truth? The difference lies in the motivation of those involved. Scientists want to increase their knowledge in a world full of uncertainties unconstrained, sincere, rational and methodical. To achieve this, they have powerful virtues of science at their disposal:
The populists, on the other hand, are not concerned with increasing knowledge, but with affirming faith. They presuppose clear, unquestionable truths; what does not correspond to their truth is fought with the means of power, not with those of argument or fact. This is literally a step back into the early Middle Ages when there was no self-referential attitude towards ones own knowledge. At that time, knowledge served a foreign purpose, mostly that of confirming particular beliefs.
Only from the 12th century onwards did knowledge begin to become self-referential. And this is exactly what the populists are now trying to turn around. Once again, we must counter this fatal trend!
Lars Jaeger is a Swiss-German author and investment manager. He writes on the history and philosophy of science and technology and has in the past been an author on hedge funds, quantitative investing, and risk management. He is the founder and CEO of Alternative Beta Partners and currently serves asset manager GAM as Head of Alternative Risk Premia. There is an extended version of this article.
Previous contributions: Rudi Bogni, Peter Kurer, Oliver Berger, Rolf Banz, Dieter Ruloff, Werner Vogt, Walter Wittmann, Alfred Mettler, Peter Hody, Robert Holzach, Craig Murray, David Zollinger, Arthur Bolliger, Beat Kappeler, Chris Rowe, Stefan Gerlach, Marc Lussy, Nuno Fernandes, Richard Egger, Maurice Pedergnana, Marco Bargel, Steve Hanke, Urs Schoettli, Ursula Finsterwald, Stefan Kreuzkamp, Oliver Bussmann, Michael Benz, Peter Hody, Albert Steck, Martin Dahinden, Thomas Fedier, Alfred Mettler,Brigitte Strebel, Peter Hody, Mirjam Staub-Bisang, Nicolas Roth, Thorsten Polleit, Kim Iskyan, Stephen Dover, Denise Kenyon-Rouvinez, Christian Dreyer, Kinan Khadam-Al-Jame, Robert Hemmi,Anton Affentranger,Yves Mirabaud, Katharina Bart, Frdric Papp, Hans-Martin Kraus, Gerard Guerdat, MarioBassi, Stephen Thariyan, Dan Steinbock, Rino Borini,Bert Flossbach, Michael Hasenstab, Guido Schilling, Werner E. Rutsch,Dorte Bech Vizard, Adriano B. Lucatelli, Katharina Bart, Maya Bhandari, Jean Tirole, Hans Jakob Roth,Marco Martinelli, Thomas Sutter,Tom King,Werner Peyer, Thomas Kupfer, Peter Kurer,Arturo Bris,Frederic Papp,James Syme, DennisLarsen, Bernd Kramer, Ralph Ebert, Armin Jans,Nicolas Roth, Hans Ulrich Jost, Patrick Hunger, Fabrizio Quirighetti,Claire Shaw, Peter Fanconi,Alex Wolf, Dan Steinbock, Patrick Scheurle, Sandro Occhilupo, Will Ballard, Michael Bornhaeusser, Nicholas Yeo, Claude-Alain Margelisch, Jean-Franois Hirschel, Jens Pongratz, Samuel Gerber, Philipp Weckherlin, Anne Richards, Antoni Trenchev, Benoit Barbereau, Pascal R. Bersier, Shaul Lifshitz, Klaus Breiner, Ana Botn, Martin Gilbert, Jesper Koll, Ingo Rauser, Carlo Capaul, Claude Baumann, Markus Winkler, Konrad Hummler, Thomas Steinemann, Christina Boeck, Guillaume Compeyron, Miro Zivkovic, Alexander F. Wagner, Eric Heymann, Christoph Sax, Felix Brem, Jochen Moebert, Jacques-Aurlien Marcireau, Peter Hody, Ursula Finsterwald, Claudia Kraaz, Michel Longhini, Stefan Blum, Zsolt Kohalmi, Karin M. Klossek, Nicolas Ramelet, Sren Bjnness, Lamara von Albertini, Andreas Britt, Gilles Prince, Fabrizio Pagani, Darren Willams, Salman Ahmed, Stephane Monier, and Peter van der Welle, Swetha Ramachandran, Beat Wittmann, Ken Orchard, Michael Welti, Christian Gast, Didier Saint-Georges, Jeffrey Bohn, Juergen Braunstein, Jeff Voegeli, Grard Piasko, Fiona Frick, Jean Keller, Stefan Schneider, Lars Jaeger, Matthias Hunn, Andreas Vetsch, Teodoro Cocca, Fabiana Fedeli, Claude Baumann, Marionna Wegenstein, Kim Fournais, Carole Millet and Ralph Ebert.
See the original post:
Lars Jaeger: Science in the Fight Against Populist Programs - finews.asia
- The application of three-axis low energy spectroscopy in quantum physics research - Phys.Org - May 3rd, 2017 [May 3rd, 2017]
- Physicists breed Schrdinger's cats to find boundaries of the | Cosmos - Cosmos - May 3rd, 2017 [May 3rd, 2017]
- Scientists 'BREED' Schrodinger's Cat in massive quantum physics breakthrough - Express.co.uk - May 3rd, 2017 [May 3rd, 2017]
- Quantum Physics: Are Entangled Particles Connected Via An Undetected Dimension? - Forbes - May 3rd, 2017 [May 3rd, 2017]
- Quantum physics is oppressive - Patheos - Patheos (blog) - June 6th, 2017 [June 6th, 2017]
- It's widely abused as a buzzword. But can quantum mechanics explain how we think? - National Post - June 6th, 2017 [June 6th, 2017]
- Quantum Physics and Love are Super Weird and Confusing, but This Play Makes Sense of Them Both - LA Magazine - June 6th, 2017 [June 6th, 2017]
- One step closer to the quantum internet by distillation - Phys.Org - June 7th, 2017 [June 7th, 2017]
- UW Grad Student from Star Valley Earns Quantum Mechanics Fellowship - SweetwaterNOW.com - June 10th, 2017 [June 10th, 2017]
- Solving systems of linear equations with quantum mechanics - Phys.Org - June 10th, 2017 [June 10th, 2017]
- Quantum Computing Might Be Here Sooner Than You Think ... - Bloomberg - June 14th, 2017 [June 14th, 2017]
- Quantum Physics News - Phys.org - News and Articles on ... - June 14th, 2017 [June 14th, 2017]
- Chinese satellite breaks a quantum physics record, beams entangled photons from space to Earth - Los Angeles Times - June 16th, 2017 [June 16th, 2017]
- Popular Quantum Physics Books - Goodreads - June 16th, 2017 [June 16th, 2017]
- Cybersecurity Attacks Are a Global Threat. Chinese Scientists Have the Answer: Quantum Mechanics - Newsweek - June 17th, 2017 [June 17th, 2017]
- A quantum step to a great wall for encryption - The Hindu - June 18th, 2017 [June 18th, 2017]
- What Is Quantum Mechanics? - livescience.com - June 18th, 2017 [June 18th, 2017]
- Physicists Demonstrate Record Breaking Long-Distance Quantum Entanglement in Space - Futurism - June 20th, 2017 [June 20th, 2017]
- Viewpoint: A Roadmap for a Scalable Topological Quantum Computer - Physics - June 21st, 2017 [June 21st, 2017]
- How Schrdinger's Cat Helps Explain the New Findings About the Quantum Zeno Effect - Futurism - June 21st, 2017 [June 21st, 2017]
- BMW and Volkswagen Try to Beat Apple and Google at Their Own Game - New York Times - June 22nd, 2017 [June 22nd, 2017]
- How quantum physics could revolutionize casinos and betting if you can understand it - Casinopedia - June 22nd, 2017 [June 22nd, 2017]
- Quantum thermometer or optical refrigerator? - Phys.Org - June 22nd, 2017 [June 22nd, 2017]
- Physicists settle debate over how exotic quantum particles form - Phys.Org - June 23rd, 2017 [June 23rd, 2017]
- In 1928, One Physicist Accidentally Predicted Antimatter - Popular Mechanics - June 23rd, 2017 [June 23rd, 2017]
- Atomic imperfections move quantum communication network closer ... - Phys.Org - June 24th, 2017 [June 24th, 2017]
- DOE Launches Chicago Quantum Exchange - HPCwire (blog) - June 26th, 2017 [June 26th, 2017]
- Google to Achieve "Supremacy" in Quantum Computing by the End of 2017 - Big Think - June 26th, 2017 [June 26th, 2017]
- Physicists make quantum leap in understanding life's nanoscale ... - Phys.Org - June 27th, 2017 [June 27th, 2017]
- Berkeley Lab Intern Finds Her Way in Particle Physics - Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory - June 27th, 2017 [June 27th, 2017]
- Payments Innovation - A Quantum World Of Payments - Finextra (blog) - June 30th, 2017 [June 30th, 2017]
- Why can't quantum theory and relativity get along? - Brantford Expositor - June 30th, 2017 [June 30th, 2017]
- How quantum trickery can scramble cause and effect - Nature.com - June 30th, 2017 [June 30th, 2017]
- Telecommunications, Meet Quantum Physics - Electronics360 - June 30th, 2017 [June 30th, 2017]
- Stephen Colbert Gets a Lesson on Quantum Physics from Brian ... - Patheos (blog) - July 2nd, 2017 [July 2nd, 2017]
- Quantum physics for babies a different bedtime story - CBC.ca - August 24th, 2017 [August 24th, 2017]
- How quantum mechanics can change computing - San Francisco ... - San Francisco Chronicle - August 24th, 2017 [August 24th, 2017]
- Physicists Use Lasers to Set Up First Underwater Quantum Communications Link - Gizmodo - August 24th, 2017 [August 24th, 2017]
- Notable Quotes on Quantum Physics Quantum Enigma - February 15th, 2018 [February 15th, 2018]
- Nothing Is Solid & Everything Is Energy Scientists Explain The World ... - April 11th, 2018 [April 11th, 2018]
- The World Of Quantum Physics: EVERYTHING Is Energy - In5D ... - April 22nd, 2018 [April 22nd, 2018]
- Nothing Is Solid & Everything Is Energy Scientists ... - May 1st, 2018 [May 1st, 2018]
- Black Holes Bolster Case For Quantum Physics' Spooky Action ... - August 29th, 2018 [August 29th, 2018]
- Physics4Kids.com: Modern Physics: Quantum Mechanics - September 29th, 2018 [September 29th, 2018]
- Quantum Theory - Full Documentary HD - November 6th, 2018 [November 6th, 2018]
- Quantum mind - Wikipedia - February 6th, 2019 [February 6th, 2019]
- What is quantum theory? - Definition from WhatIs.com - May 5th, 2019 [May 5th, 2019]
- The Ultimate Mystery? Consciousness May Exist in the Absence of Matter (Weekend Feature) - The Daily Galaxy --Great Discoveries Channel - September 19th, 2019 [September 19th, 2019]
- Faculty Opening, Quantum Information and Condensed Matter Experiment - Physics - September 19th, 2019 [September 19th, 2019]
- Become the physicists the world needs with the help of a physics degree - Study International News - September 19th, 2019 [September 19th, 2019]
- Imec and NUS working on chip-based quantum cryptography - Optics.org - September 19th, 2019 [September 19th, 2019]
- Strong LightMatter Coupling in Molecular and Material Engineering - Advanced Science News - September 19th, 2019 [September 19th, 2019]
- The key to bigger quantum computers could be to build them like Legos - MIT Technology Review - September 19th, 2019 [September 19th, 2019]
- Australian universities are accused of trading free speech for cash - The Economist - September 19th, 2019 [September 19th, 2019]
- APS Physics Career Center - Physics - September 19th, 2019 [September 19th, 2019]
- Assistant Professor of Physics, Employment - Physics - September 19th, 2019 [September 19th, 2019]
- A new approach to quantum gravity - Tech Explorist - September 19th, 2019 [September 19th, 2019]
- A Huge Experiment Has 'Weighed' the Tiny Neutrino, a Particle That Passes Right Through Matter - Gizmodo - September 19th, 2019 [September 19th, 2019]
- Many Worlds, But Too Much Metaphor - Forbes - September 19th, 2019 [September 19th, 2019]
- Iran to open 1st quantum physics lab in a year: AEOI head - Mehr News Agency - English Version - September 19th, 2019 [September 19th, 2019]
- Quantum Computing Breakthrough: New Detection Tool Uncovers Noise That Can Kill Qubits - SciTechDaily - September 19th, 2019 [September 19th, 2019]
- A quantum computing startup that spun out of a Harvard lab just came out of stealth mode with $2.7 million in seed funding from investors like Samsung... - September 19th, 2019 [September 19th, 2019]
- Important Quantum Algorithm May Be a Property of Nature - Technology Networks - September 19th, 2019 [September 19th, 2019]
- A New Perspective On Grover's Search Algorithm -- Quantum Physics & DNA - Analytics India Magazine - September 19th, 2019 [September 19th, 2019]
- Iran to open first quantum physics lab in a year: AEOI head - Quantaneo, the Quantum Computing Source - September 19th, 2019 [September 19th, 2019]
- Sean Carroll: Universe a 'tiny sliver' of all there is - PBS NewsHour - September 19th, 2019 [September 19th, 2019]
- IBM cuts ribbon on quantum computing centre wherein a 53-qubit monster lurks - The Register - September 19th, 2019 [September 19th, 2019]
- In 'Something Deeply Hidden,' Sean Carroll Argues There Are Infinite Copies Of You - NPR - September 19th, 2019 [September 19th, 2019]
- Physicists race to develop room-temperature quantum chips - The Next Web - September 19th, 2019 [September 19th, 2019]
- This One Experiment Reveals More About Reality Than Any Quantum Interpretation Ever Will - Forbes - September 19th, 2019 [September 19th, 2019]
- Our world is in need of the Mahatmas teachings: Dalai Lama - Livemint - October 2nd, 2019 [October 2nd, 2019]
- Quantum-inspired Beckman Institute celebration will be anything but small - Central Illinois Buzz - October 2nd, 2019 [October 2nd, 2019]
- Is It a Wave or a Particle? It's Both, Sort Of. - Space.com - October 2nd, 2019 [October 2nd, 2019]
- Princeton announces initiative to propel innovations in quantum science and technology - Quantaneo, the Quantum Computing Source - October 2nd, 2019 [October 2nd, 2019]
- Precision physics with 'tabletop' experiments - Stanford University News - October 2nd, 2019 [October 2nd, 2019]
- Andrea Young uncovers the strange physics of 2-D materials - Science News - October 2nd, 2019 [October 2nd, 2019]
- A Scientific Explainer of What Terrence Howard Was Talking About at the Emmys - VICE - October 2nd, 2019 [October 2nd, 2019]
- China's Silicon Valley aims to become the country's top research center - Abacus - October 16th, 2019 [October 16th, 2019]
- New Quantum-Mechanical Dissipation Mechanism Observed for the First Time - SciTechDaily - October 16th, 2019 [October 16th, 2019]
- Physicists have found quasiparticles that mimic hypothetical dark matter axions - Science News - October 16th, 2019 [October 16th, 2019]