Focus on Islamic State and Libya as NATO foreign ministers …

ANTALYA, Turkey Preoccupied for more than a year by the Ukraine crisis, NATO foreign ministers meeting in Turkey this week will focus on instability on the alliances southern flank, ranging from Islamic State in Iraq and Syria to turmoil in Libya.

By meeting in Turkey, which shares a 1,200 km (750-mile) border with Iraq and Syria, NATO hopes to show it is responsive to the concerns of its southern members, as well as reinforcing eastern European allies worried by Russias actions in Ukraine.

"Turkey is the only country which neighbors areas under Islamic State control in Syria and Iraq," Turkish Foreign Minister Mevlut Cavusoglu told a news conference in the southern city of Antalya before the meetings on Wednesday and Thursday.

"This is not sustainable, and a big threat to Turkey. The summit will be an opportunity to share these views."

U.S. Ambassador to NATO Douglas Lute described an "arc of instability" around the east and south of the alliance, with the "maybe failed state of Libya" a funnel for illegal immigration from states such as northern Nigeria, Mali, Niger and Somalia.

"Youve got, to the east, to the southeast and to the south, pretty fundamental security challenges for NATO," he told reporters at a briefing late last week.

Libya has descended into lawlessness since rebels overthrew strongman Muammar Gaddafi in 2011 with the help of a NATO bombing campaign.

NATO as an organization has not been highly active militarily in the south recently, although all of its member nations are part of the U.S.-led coalition against Islamic State. It also sent Patriot anti-missile systems to defend Turkey from possible attack from war-torn Syria.

The alliance is considering a request from Iraq for help training its army. But it says the security situation in Libya must improve before it could help train Libyan security forces.

EU foreign policy chief Federica Mogherini is expectedto brief the NATO ministers on the EUs proposals for a military mission to capture and destroy smugglers boats used to ferry migrants on perilous Mediterranean crossings from Libya.

Go here to see the original:

Focus on Islamic State and Libya as NATO foreign ministers ...

NATO reportedly expels dozens of alleged Russian spies …

May 9, 2015: Russian army soldiers march along Red Square during the Victory Parade marking the 70th anniversary of the defeat of Nazi Germany in World War II in Moscow. (AP Photo/Ivan Sekretarev)

NATO reportedly has moved to expel dozens of suspected Russian spies from its headquarters in Brussels in the latest sign of a renewal of tensions between the western military alliance and Moscow.

The Guardian reported that NATO decided last month to mandate that all non-member state delegations reduce their staff to no more than 30 people. The new rule only affected Russia, though estimates of the exact number of Russian delegates vary. The Kremlin says it has only 37 people accredited to work in Brussels. However, a diplomat from a NATO member state told The Guardian that in fact 61 people were part of the delegation. Other NATO sources told the paper the number was as high as 90.

Regardless of the number, the paper reported that NATO diplomats estimate that approximately half of the Russian contingent was working on behalf of Moscow's intelligence service. In practice, the paper reported, only Russia's ambassador to NATO, his deputy, his secretary, and his driver, were allowed to traverse the alliance's offices without being escorted.

NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg denied in an interview that the new rule specifically targeted Russia, saying, "With the Russians we have decided to suspend all practical co-operation but to maintain the channels of political and military dialogue and contact. A delegation of 30 is more than enough to do that."

The Guardian also reported Sunday that NATO has revived the Cold War-era practice of using hotlines to the Kremlin and the Russian general staff in an effort to reduce the chances of military confrontation. Stoltenberg disclosed that NATO jets had intercepted an increasing number of Russian planes in recent months over the Black, Baltic, and Norwegian seas.

"Its important to have contacts military to military in a normal situation so that if something not normal happens, youre able to clarify misunderstandings, to avoid situations out of control," Stoltenberg told The Guardian.

NATO foreign ministers, including U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry, were due to gather for a meeting Wednesday in Antalya, Turkey. The meeting would come one day after Kerry planned to meet with Russian President Vladimir Putin and Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov in the Black Sea resort of Sochi.

However, while the State Department said Monday that Kerry would meet Putin and Lavrov, the Kremlin said Putin's attendance had yet to be confirmed. The Russian Foreign Ministry also blamed the U.S. for the ongoing civil war in Ukraine.

"The Obama administration chose the path of scaling back bilateral relations, proclaimed a course of isolating Russia on the international arena and demanded that those states that traditionally follow the lead of Washington support its confrontational steps," it said in a statement.

The rest is here:

NATO reportedly expels dozens of alleged Russian spies ...

Brantley Gilbert Inks His Love For The Second Amendment …

Model Erin Wasson attends "The Heimlich Maneuver" screening at Soho Grand Hotel in NYC on June 27, 2012 (Rob Kim/Getty photo)

Singer Rihanna attends the DKMS' 5th Annual Gala: Linked Against Leukemia honoring Rihanna & Michael Clinton hosted by Katharina Harf at Cipriani Wall Street on April 28, 2011 in New York City. (Andrew H. Walker, Getty Images)

Rihanna attends the "Alexander McQueen: Savage Beauty" Costume Institute Gala at The Metropolitan Museum of Art on May 2, 2011 in New York City. (Stephen Lovekin, Getty Images)

TV personality Kelly Osbourne (tattoo detail) attends the L.A. Gay & Lesbian Center's "An Evening" benefiting homeless youth services at Sunset Tower on January 23, 2012 in West Hollywood, California. (David Livingston, Getty Images)

TV personality Kelly Osbourne (tattoo detail) attends the L.A. Gay & Lesbian Center's "An Evening" benefiting homeless youth services at Sunset Tower on January 23, 2012 in West Hollywood, California. (David Livingston, Getty Images)

Singer Trisha Yearwood attends a Celebration of Paul Newman's Dream to Benefit the SeriousFun Children's Network at Avery Fisher Hall, Lincoln Center on April 2, 2012 in New York City. (Larry Busacca, Getty Images)

Trisha Yearwood performs onstage at the Songwriters Hall of Fame 42nd Annual Induction and Awards at The New York Marriott Marquis Hotel - Shubert Alley on June 16, 2011 in New York City. (Larry Busacca, Getty Images)

Actress Angelina Jolie arrives at the 18th Annual Screen Actors Guild Awards at The Shrine Auditorium on January 29, 2012 in Los Angeles, California. (Jason Merritt, Getty Images)

Actress Angelina Jolie arrives at the 18th Annual Screen Actors Guild Awards at The Shrine Auditorium on January 29, 2012 in Los Angeles, California. (Jason Merritt, Getty Images)

Actress Kyra Sedgwick arrives at the 18th Annual Screen Actors Guild Awards at The Shrine Auditorium on January 29, 2012 in Los Angeles, California. (Jason Merritt, Getty Images)

Go here to read the rest:

Brantley Gilbert Inks His Love For The Second Amendment ...

Italian Astronaut Shows Off Space Station’s Snack Supply …

When it comes to preparing for a long-duration space trip, forget the Tang; what you really need are some wholesome snacks.

Aspiring astronauts got a glimpse of spaceflyers' snack options when Italian astronaut Samantha Cristoforetti showed off her favorite space snacks in a videorecorded on the International Space Station and released the European Space Agency on April 21.

"Snack time is a great opportunity to put the right kind of rocket fuel in your body," Cristoforetti, the first Italian woman to fly in space, said in the video. "And, as always, don't panic eating healthy is not rocket science."

In the video, she casually grabs dried apples, macadamia nuts, a pumpkin-seed bar and other snacks from a rack in the space station's Node 1 (Unity) module, showing all of them before letting them float away off-camera. (Except for one macadamia nut, which Cristoforetti munched.)

All of these snacks have a long shelf life, which makes sense because astronauts don't have access to refrigeration on board the orbiting lab, and the spaceflyers routinely go months between cargo shipments.

Lastly, Cristoforetti displayed a "very special power bar" made just for her. It includes "plenty of healthy nutritious ingredients" such as nuts, seeds, full-grain cereals and the cyanobacterium spirulina.

Cristoforetti arrived at theInternational Space Station in November. She and fellow Expedition 43 crewmembers Anton Shkaplerov and Terry Virts are scheduled to come back to Earth Wednesday (May 13).

Follow Elizabeth Howell@howellspace, or Space.com@Spacedotcom. We're also onFacebookandGoogle+.Originally published onSpace.com.

Original post:

Italian Astronaut Shows Off Space Station's Snack Supply ...

Intel celebrates Moore’s Law… with Gordon Moore – Fortune

May 12, 2015, 9:13 AM EDT E-mail Tweet Facebook Google Plus Linkedin Share icons

It isnt every day that Silicon Valley celebrates its rich history with someone who created it. Yet at age 86, Intel co-founder Gordon Moore is very much around to remind people of the scientific and commercial breakthrough he made 50 years ago when he explained to the technical community how semiconductors would develop.

Intel INTC , together with the foundation Moore and his wife Betty started, threw a bash Monday night at San Franciscos Exploratorium museum to honor the 50th anniversary of Moores Law. Pundit Thomas Friedman interviewed Moore, still a spry and powerful speaker years into his retirement.

Moores Law began as a technical article in an electronics-industry trade publication. Moore, while still at Fairchild Semiconductor, posited that the number of transistors on a semiconductor would continue to double every year, a figure he revised to every two years. Moore noted that his prediction, which he had no idea would be relatively precise, was an economic observation as much as a scientific one. It took considerable engineering effort, by Intel and others, to make his law come true.

Moore also said he tried to get out of the prediction business as quickly as he got into it. Once youve made a successful prediction you avoid making another one, he said.

Moores Law became a guiding light for an industry. His original article also envisioned a future for cheaper, more powerful semiconductors. He envisioned PCs, cell phones, self-driving cars, and electronic wristwatchesall powered by ever-improving chips.

Intel co-founder Gordon Moore in conversation with columnist Thomas Friedman in San Francisco on May 11, 2015.

Brian Krzanich, the current CEO of Intel, opened the evening by putting the achievement of Moores Law into perspective. Intels chips have improved performance a factor of 3,500 since they were introduced, he said, reflecting a 90,000-times improvement in energy efficiency and at one-60,000th of the cost. Were a 1971 Volkswagen Beetle to undergo the same transformation, he said, it would travel at 300,000 miles per hour, achieve 2 million miles per gallon, and cost four cents.

The evening offered hundreds of Moores admirers the opportunity to honor his achievements. He recounted that he became interested in science because a neighbor received a gift of a chemistry set that included explosives.

Moore himself didnt coin the expression Moores Law, and he avoided it for decades. For the first 20 years I couldnt utter the words Moores Law, he said. It was embarrassing. Over time he relented and embraced his accomplishment. Asked by Friedman if he knew which Google search would elicit more responses, Moores Law or Murphys Law, Moore responded that Moores Law would win hands down.

Read the original post:

Intel celebrates Moore's Law... with Gordon Moore - Fortune

FAQ | Libertarian Party

What is a Libertarian?

Let's start with Webster's definition:

libertarian: A person who upholds the principles of individual liberty especially of thought and action. Libertarian: a member of a political party advocating libertarian principles.

Libertarians believe in, and pursue, personal freedom while maintaining personal responsibility. The Libertarian Party itself serves a much larger pro-liberty community with the specific mission of electing Libertarians to public office.

Libertarians strongly oppose any government interfering in their personal, family and business decisions. Essentially, we believe all Americans should be free to live their lives and pursue their interests as they see fit as long as they do no harm to another.

In a nutshell, we are advocates for a smaller government, lower taxes and more freedom.

Libertarians are neither. Unlike liberals or conservatives, Libertarians advocate a high degree of both personal and economic liberty. For example, Libertarians advocate freedom in economic matters, so we're in favor of lowering taxes, slashing bureaucratic regulation of business, and charitable -- rather than government -- welfare. But Libertarians are also socially tolerant. We won't demand laws or restrictions on other people who we may not agree because of personal actions or lifestyles.

Think of us as a group of people with a "live and let live" mentality and a balanced checkbook.

In a sense, Libertarians borrow from both sides to come up with a logical and consistent whole -- but without the exceptions and broken promises of Republican and Democratic politicians. That's why we call ourselves the Party of Principle.

In terms of political activity (i.e. number of candidates, access to the ballot, and elected office holders), the Libertarian Party is the third-largest political party in America. Were active in all 50 states andhave more than 250,000 registered voters.

Continued here:

FAQ | Libertarian Party

Eighty-fifth Amendment of the Constitution of India …

The Eighty-fifth Amendment of the Constitution of India, officially known as The Constitution (Eighty-fifth Amendment) Act, 2001, enables the State to make any provision for reservation in favour of the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes, giving them the benefit of consequential seniority in matters of promotion to any class of classes of posts in the services under the State, if they are not adequately represented.

BE it enacted by Parliament in the Fifty-second Year of the Republic of India as follows:-

1. Short title (1) This Act may be called the Constitution (Eighty-fifth Amendment) Act, 2001.

2. Amendment of article 16 In article 16 of the Constitution, in clause (4A), for the words "in matters of promotion to any class", the words "in matters of promotion, with consequential seniority, to any class" shall be substituted.[1]

Article 16 of the Constitution provides for equality of opportunity in matters of public employment. The 85th Amendment amended clause (4A) of the article replacing the words "in matters of promotion to any class" with the words "in matters of promotion, with consequential seniority, to any class" in order to enable the State to make any provision for reservation in favour of the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes, giving them the benefit of consequential seniority in matters of promotion to any class of classes of posts in the services under the State, if they are not adequately represented.[2]

The Bill of The Constitution (Eighty-fifth Amendment) Act, 2001 was introduced in the Lok Sabha on 26 November 2001, as the Constitution (Ninety-second Amendment) Bill, 2001 (Bill No. 105 of 2001). It was introduced by Vasundhara Raje, then Minister of State in the Ministry of Personnel, Public Grievances and Pensions. The Bill sought to amend article 16 of the Constitution.[2] The full text of the Statement of Objects and Reasons appended to the bill is given below:

The Government servants belonging to the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes had been enjoying the benefit of consequential seniority on their promotion on the basis of rule of reservation. The judgments of the Supreme Court in the case of Virpal Singh Chauhan (1995) 6 SCC 684 andAjit Singh No. I AIR 1996 SC 1189, which led to the issue of the O.M. dated 30th January, 1997, have adversely affected the interest of the Government servants belonging to the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes category in the matter of seniority on promotion to the next higher grade. This has led to considerable anxiety and representations have also been received from various quarters including Members of Parliament to protect the interest of the Government servants belonging to Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes.

2. The Government has reviewed the position in the light of views received from various quarters and in order to protect the interest of the Government servants belonging to the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes, it has been decided to negate the effect of O,M. dated 30th January, 1997 immediately. Mere withdrawal of the O.M dated 30th January, 1997 will not meet the desired purpose and review or revision of seniority of the Government servants and grant of consequential benefits to such Government servants will also be necessary. This will require amendment to article 16(4A) of the Constitution to provide for consequential seniority in the case of promotion by virtue of rule of reservation. It is also necessary to give retrospective effect to the proposed constitutional amendment to article 16(4A) with effect from the date of coming into force of article 16(4A) itself, that is, from the 17th day of June, 1995.

3. The Bill seeks to achieve the aforesaid objects.

The Bill was considered by the Lok Sabha on 28 November 2001, and passed on the same day with a formal amendment changing the short title from Ninety-second to Eighty-fifth. The Bill, as passed by the Lok Sabha, was considered and passed by the Rajya Sabha on 5 December 2001. The Bill, as passed by the Rajya Sabha, was considered and passed by the Lok Sabha on 22 August 2000. The Bill received assent from then President K. R. Narayanan on 4 January 2002, and was notified in The Gazette of India on the same date. It retroactively came into effect from 17 June 1995, as stated in clause (2) of Section 1 of the Amendment Act.[2]

Go here to read the rest:

Eighty-fifth Amendment of the Constitution of India ...

2nd Amendment advocates push to repeal switchblade, other …

Shown here is a spring-assisted knife.(AP)

Once overshadowed by the hot-button gun rights debate, laws restricting knife sales and possession are the new "second front" in the battle to preserve Second Amendment rights.

The issue has gained more attention in recent years -- most recently in Baltimore, where obscure knife laws have surfaced at the center of the Freddie Gray death case.Well before that case, though, the nonprofit advocacy group Knife Rights has been steadily working in state capitals across the country to roll back or repeal longstanding knife bans and restrictions.

And they've seen a string of successes.

Weve introduced the Second Amendment to a significant number of people who never considered it their amendment, said Doug Ritter, who founded Knife Rights in Arizona in 2009.

The group argues that possessing and carrying any kind of blade is, as with guns, a right enshrined in the Constitution.They've deployed that argument to, so far, help 10 states wipe most -- if not all -- knife restrictions from the books. It also has successfully advocated for so-called preemption laws in eight states, blocking local jurisdictions from circumventing state law with their own, stricter regulations.

Not all repeals are the same -- some leave laws against switchblades like stilettos on the books. But others are comprehensive, like in Oklahoma and Maine, which just legalized switchblades, in March and April respectively.

Knife Rights first victory was in 2010, when it worked to get all switchblades, dirks and daggers legalized in New Hampshire. Bills in several other states are currently pending.

Theres no blood running in the streets, no state has come back and said we shouldnt have done this and tried to reinstate [laws], Ritter said.

Contrary to the image of gang members carrying butterfly knives to the local rumble, people carry knives for a multitude of reasons, and it is not to maim or kill, Ritter said. The reality is, millions of Americans use and own knives at home, work, and recreation. But every once in a while someone uses a knife as an arm, to protect the family.

Read this article:

2nd Amendment advocates push to repeal switchblade, other ...

Nasdaq will start using Bitcoin technology – May. 11, 2015

Most people have heard of Bitcoin (XBT) as a system of electronic money -- one that hasn't really caught on yet.

But what gets less attention is blockchain, the technology that powers the Bitcoin system. It's a computer program that automatically processes transactions and creates a perfect, reliable digital record.

High-tech bankers are starting to realize this could revolutionize trading. Nasdaq (NDAQ), a favorite exchange among many technology companies, is making the first move.

On Monday, the stock market announced it will start using a blockchain system to keep records for its Nasdaq Private Market, which handles trading of shares in the pre-IPO phase before a company goes public.

Nasdaq sees the blockchain's perfect recordkeeping as a major step in the right direction for more transparency. The pre-IPO market doesn't typically see as much trading and what does occur is often by a tight circle of employees and early investors.

"Blockchain technology will provide extensive integrity, audit ability, governance and transfer of ownership capabilities," Nasdaq said in its public announcement.

This doesn't mean Nasdaq is using actual Bitcoins as currency. But Nasdaq will be interacting with the Bitcoin system to slip data into the blockchain.

By using Bitcoin's core technology, this is a major acknowledgment of Bitcoin's contribution to finance and trade. This is the first time the world has seen a trading system that doesn't require a trusted middleman. It sounds boring, but in the banking world, it's revolutionary.

CNN explains: What is Bitcoin?

It seems odd to equate Bitcoin with better security. The world's first true big digital currency is generally known for two things. One, its popularity in online black markets. Two, the epic fall of Mt. Gox, a major Bitcoin exchange market that wiped out $400 million in people's savings.

Read more from the original source:

Nasdaq will start using Bitcoin technology - May. 11, 2015

As Moore’s Law slows, better design engineering will win …

For 50 years, Moores Law has reliably described exponential advances in silicon speed, power and functionality. But with the cost per transistor rising for the first time in history, weve entered an era of diminishing returns.

We need to get smarter about hardware and software innovation in order to get the most value from the emerging Internet of Things. And perhaps the smart thing to do is to hit pause on the half-century race to cram ever more transistors onto a single slice of silicon.

If we are to achieve the vision of connecting tens of billions of devices to the Internet Cisco predicts 40 billion smart objects and another 10 billion traditional devices and machines with embedded smarts were going to need a huge supply of low-cost chips with communications capabilities. The good news is that innovation and growth can continue at the same pace but only if we take a break from the relentless pressure of doubling the transistor count every two years.

To date weve kept pace with Moores Law by shrinking chip features, or nodes, to ever-smaller, nanoscale dimensions. (How big is a nanometer? Its about as long as your fingernail grows in one second. Slice a human hair lengthwise about 100,000 times, and thats a nanometer.) The cost-effectiveness ratio seems to have hit the sweet spot at about 28 nanometers. Each incremental advance beyond that has required ever-greater investments, reducing the bang-per-buck calculus.

Chips will continue to shrink, of course. We, along with other semiconductor companies are continuing to push toward the next goal of 10nm, but going beyond 10nm will require the development of new technologies, materials, and manufacturing processes that are still being perfected. Extreme Ultraviolet (EUV) lithography, exotic semiconductor materials, multiple 3D chip-stacking and 450mm wafers are just a few of the new, breathtakingly expensive avenues of research.

However, there are many levers we can pull with 28nm silicon to propel the industry forward and enable the Internet of Things era of innovation and growth from literally thousands of developers. We can drive cost, size, and power-efficiency improvements through better design engineering versus better process engineering. IoT devices typically have much smaller transistor counts and therefore dont require the latest (and most expensive) process nodes.

Adhering to the premise that 28nm is the optimum node size, then solidifying that node as the platform of choice and integrating more functionality, such as analog and RF components, is the next logical step. Analog components dont scale as well as digital components, but integrating them into relatively mature 28nm platforms will accelerate the connection of everything from watches, personal healthcare, and home appliances to automotive, transportation, agriculture, manufacturing, and industrial controls.

As an industry, we have access to low-cost hardware, from sensors to signal conditioners and wireless interfaces. Innovators are developing the ideas and bringing them to life in amazing new applications. All we, as an industry, need to do now is focus on standardizing the interfaces to ensure interoperability and stand out of the way. Even with Moores Law on pause, the best days of the semiconductor industry are yet ahead.

Henry Samueli is CTO and cofounder of Broadcom and serves as Chairman of the Board. In this role, he is responsible for driving the vision of Broadcoms research and development activities as well as helping to lead corporate-wide engineering development strategies.

View post:

As Moore's Law slows, better design engineering will win ...

Does Artificial Intelligence Pose a Threat? – WSJ

May 10, 2015 11:08 p.m. ET

Paging Sarah Connor!

After decades as a sci-fi staple, artificial intelligence has leapt into the mainstream. Between Apple AAPL -0.85% s Siri and Amazon AMZN -0.76% s Alexa, IBM IBM -0.60% s Watson and Google GOOG -1.16% Brain, machines that understand the world and respondproductively suddenly seem imminent.

The combination of immense Internet-connected networks and machine-learning algorithms has yielded dramatic advances in machines ability to understand spoken and visual communications, capabilities that fall under the heading narrow artificial intelligence. Can machines capable of autonomous reasoningso-called general AIbe far behind? And at that point, whats to keep them from improving themselves until they have no need for humanity?

The prospect has unleashed a wave of anxiety. I think the development of full artificial intelligence could spell the end of the human race, astrophysicist Stephen Hawking told the BBC. Tesla founder Elon Musk called AI our biggest existential threat. FormerMicrosoft Chief Executive Bill Gates has voiced his agreement.

How realistic are such concerns? And how urgent? We assembled a panel of experts from industry, research and policy-making to consider the dangersif anythat lie ahead. Taking part in the discussion are Jaan Tallinn, a co-founder of Skype and the think tanks Centre for theStudy of Existential Risk and the Future of Life Institute; Guruduth S. Banavar, vice president of cognitive computing at IBMs Thomas J.Watson Research Center; and Francesca Rossi, a professor of computer science at the University ofPadua, a fellow at the Radcliffe Institute for Advanced Study atHarvard University and president of the International JointConferences on Artificial Intelligence, the main internationalgathering of researchers in AI.

Here are edited excerpts from their conversation.

WSJ: Does AI pose a threat to humanity?

MR. BANAVAR: Fueled by science-fiction novels and movies, popular treatment of this topic far too often has created a false sense of conflict between humans and machines. Intelligent machines tend to be great at tasks that humans are not so good at, such as sifting through vast data. Conversely, machines are pretty bad at things that humans are excellent at, such as common-sense reasoning, asking brilliant questions and thinking out of the box. The combination of human and machine, which we consider the foundation of cognitive computing, is truly revolutionizing how we solve complex problems in every field.

AI-based systems are already making our lives better in so many ways: Consider automated stock-trading agents, aircraft autopilots, recommendation systems, industrial robots, fraud detectors and search engines. In the last five to 10 years, machine-learning algorithms and advanced computational infrastructure have enabled us to build many new applications.

Link:

Does Artificial Intelligence Pose a Threat? - WSJ

The Left’s Crusade Against Free Speech | RealClearPolitics

In October 2009, the Obama White House launched a concerted attack against critical press coverage, one unparalleled since the days of the Nixon White House. In one respect, Barack Obama and Richard Nixon were in agreement: both perceived a distinctly liberal bias in the media. Nixon denounced the press for its leftism, Obama objected to the press's deviation from it. So Obama and his senior staff singled out for condemnation Fox News, the lone television network that did not serve up the fawning coverage the president and his team had come to expect.

In The Silencing: How the Left is Killing Free Speech, Kirsten Powers recounts that in the space of a few days, White House communications director Anita Dunn, her deputy Dan Pfeiffer, White House Senior Adviser David Axelrod, and White House Chief of Staff Rahm Emmanuel openly asserted that the administration properly excluded Fox reporters from press briefings because Fox was not a legitimate news organization. When asked for comment by NBC News, President Obama stood behind his team.

Grousing about criticism is only human, and presidential displeasure with the press is nothing new. But wielding the presidential bully pulpit to decree what counts as legitimate news coverage represented an ominous turn in American politics.

Separation of press and state is as essential to the American constitutional order as separation of church and state. In one respect, religious freedom depends on press freedom: a press that is answerable to, or in the pocket of, the government will be unwilling to report, or incapable of reporting accurately, when government exceeds its lawfully prescribed boundaries.

What could the president and his advisers have been thinking in orchestrating an assault on Fox News? Where could our president, a graduate of Columbia University and Harvard Law School and a former lecturer at the University of Chicago Law School, have gotten the idea that it was government's prerogative to determine who properly reports the news and to supervise the flow of opinion in the country?

Sad to say, they could have been thinking they were faithfully implementing the ideas about the need to regulate speech that they had learned in college. The smearing of opponents of the progressive party line as purveyors of hatred; the denigration of critics of left-liberal public policy as racists, sexists, and homophobes; and the ostracism of advocates of faith, tradition, and the virtues of America's experiment in self-government as minions of sinister forcesthese have become routine features of intellectual life at our leading universities. The development of doctrines designed to curtail nonconforming speech was already well under way by the time Obama attended college in the early1980s and law school in the early 1990s.

This is not to say that all members of the left today are instinctively intolerant and bent on stifling liberty of thought and discussion. Yet all too rare is the contemporary liberal who is instinctively appalled by the contempt for speech emanating from Democratic Party politicians, the university world and elite media, and who is willing to call his or her comrades to account.

Kirsten Powers is one of these rare liberals. In "The Silencing, she methodically documentsand exposes the hypocrisy, incoherence, and sheer contempt for evidence and argument that underliethe delegitimization of dissent that has become the stock in trade of what she characterizes as the "illiberal left."

A Fox News contributor and columnist for USA Today and the Daily Beast, Powers grew up in the conservative town of Fairbanks, Alaska, the daughter of politically engaged Democrats who taught her that reasoned debate is the life blood of the truly liberal spirit. "I can't remember anyone ever suggesting that conservative views were illegitimate and unworthy of debate," writes Powers of lively political conversations with her parents in Fairbanks.

I first encountered that attitude, she recalls, when I moved to New York City much later, where bumping into a conservative was less likely than spotting a unicorn.

Continued here:

The Left's Crusade Against Free Speech | RealClearPolitics

The Transhumanist Party Supports Bitcoin: Zoltan Istvan …

The Transhumanist candidate for President knows that he isnt going to win in 2016, or at least hes pretty sure. The party was only founded six months ago, so winning the top office in the land isnt necessarily the goal at this point. CCN spoke to Zoltan Istvan, a Californian who once sailed the open seas for seven years, via Skype one night recently. We talked about Bitcoin, politics, and, most interestingly, Transhumanism, or, according to Wikipedia:

an international cultural and intellectual movement with an eventual goal of fundamentally transforming the human condition by developing and making widely available technologies to greatly enhance human intellectual, physical, and psychological capacities.

Zoltan Istvan started out as a philosophy major. Hes been a freelance journalist for years, writing for such publications as Vice. He is the author of the novel The Transhumanist Wager. About Bitcoin, he says:

Basically, Id say most Transhumanists support cryptocurrencies and Bitcoin and new technologies that are coming that way. At the same time, Id say most of the Transhumanist emphasis is actually on the human body. On how to make it better so that we might not in the future make such [political] errors. [] A lot of Transhumanists are very interested in virtual currencies. []

I feel like encryption and ideas that resemble that with computers and technology, thats never going to go away. The further we get into the technological world, the more were going to need to protect ourselves, so that you cant falsify information [referring to the anti-counterfeit nature of Bitcoin], you cant just have hackers come in and take away your existence. We live in a world thats increasingly dominated by 1s and 0s and it requires a lot of security. So certainly I think thats one of the elements that, I think, Bitcoiners share with Transhumanists and people of that nature that are very interested in protecting the things that matter to them.

Many Transhumanists, including Istvan, support a future where robotic labor is the main source of production. Humankind has invented most of the solutions needed to eliminate human labor, they say, but has yet to fully take advantage of it, for economic reasons. Transhumanists propose that a Universal Basic Income is one possible solution to this.

A radical restructuring of the way things are taxed, and the things that are taxed, would lead to a situation where every person in a given economy would be afforded a monthly salary that would cover their basic needs and wants. This would not be akin to communism, as people would still be free to start businesses. The resources that belong to all people, such as air, water, and land, however, would be taxed such that everyone who owns them would be provided for. Income tax would become a thing of the past.

I think right now its not too early to discuss it, but its certainly too early to implement it, because, you know, robots are not taking all the jobs right now. Theyre taking some. But not nearly as much as theyre probably going to take in lets say ten years time. But that said, its a very important conversation to have. I think one of the main problems with futurist issues and technology and politics is that people always address everything too late. If we have designer babies here today, we should have been discussing this five years ago and implementing actual national policy. Instead, they havent even discussed national policy on this, except for a total moratorium or just, you know, not enough. And the point of the story is that we need to address these things ahead of time. And that takes courage, it takes know-how of the experts, and it just takes people kind of standing up and saying yes, politics is thorny and so is law, but lets get down to it and say, what is it that people feel comfortable doing.

And I think the same thing applies to Universal Basic Income. I think most reasonable people agree that youre going to need something like that if you are taking away all the jobs. Because without it, its a matter of basically becoming a dystopian society where the rich become richer and the poor become far, far poorer. [] I think it could come to a point where its so ludicrous that the poor literally say, hey, its worth revolting. Its worth fighting, rather than just saying, this is our piece in life.

The Transhumanist party is working on accepting Bitcoin donations for their political campaigns. Their primary purpose in politics is to advance technologies that will in the near term benefits humans. Things like the elimination of deadly diseases such as cancer are chief on their agenda. Most of their views are in line with libertarian social philosophies, although they do believe in utilizing the government to promote progress. Currently, theyre looking for a Bitcoin expert to help them develop digital currency policy as well as a system for making the most of their Bitcoin donations. For more information, visit their website.

Read the rest here:

The Transhumanist Party Supports Bitcoin: Zoltan Istvan ...

Space flight simulator game – Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

A space flight simulator game is a genre of flight simulator video games that lets players experience space flight. Examples of true simulators which aim at piloting a space craft in a manner that conforms with the laws of nature include Orbiter and Microsoft Space Simulator.

Other games involving space flight in 3D space, without restricting movement to a physics system and realistic behaviour, are also commonly called "space flight simulators". They aren't simulators in the strictest sense of the word. These games do differ from space-based arcade oriented shoot 'em up games that use side-scrolling or top-down perspectives. When the genre appeared in the early 1980s, the use of 3D graphics and 1st person perspective, with the player viewing out of the cockpit, gave a sense of realism. This the designation of space flight simulators, even though a better name for these games would be "pseudo simulators" or "space flight games". Most space combat simulators and space trading simulators can be placed in the "pseudo space flight simulator" category.

Space flight games and simulators, at one time popular, had for most of the new millennium been considered a "dead" genre.[1][2][3][4][5] However, open-source and enthusiast communities managed to produce some working, modern titles (see the free Orbiter Spaceflight Simulator), and 2011's commercially released Kerbal Space Program was notably well-received, even by the aerospace community.[6]

Some games in the genre have the aim of recreating a realistic portrayal of space flight, involving the calculation of orbits within a more complete physics simulation than pseudo space flight simulators. Others focus on gameplay rather than simulating space flight in all its facets. The realism of the latter games is limited to what the game designer deems to be appropriate for the gameplay, instead of focusing on the realism of moving the spacecraft in space. Some "flight models" use a physics system based on Newtonian physics, but these are usually limited to manoeuvring the craft in its direct environment, and do not take into consideration the orbital calculations that would make such a game a simulator. Most of the pseudo simulators feature faster than light travel.

Realistic space simulators seek to represent a vessel's behaviour under the influence of the Laws of Physics. As such, the player normally concentrates on following checklists or planning tasks. Piloting is generally limited to dockings, landings or orbital maneuvers. The reward for the player is on mastering real or realistic spacecraft, celestial mechanics and astronautics.

Classical games with this approach include Space Shuttle: A Journey into Space (1982), Rendezvous: A Space Shuttle Simulation (1982),[7]The Halley Project (1985), Shuttle (1992) and Microsoft Space Simulator (1994).

If the definition is expanded to include decision making and planning, then Buzz Aldrin's Race Into Space (1992) is also notable for historical accuracy and detail. On this game the player takes the role of Administrator of NASA or Head of the Soviet Space Program with the ultimate goal of being the first side to conduct a successful manned moon landing.

Most recently Orbiter and Space Shuttle Mission 2007 provide more elaborate simulations, with realistic 3D virtual cockpits and external views.

Kerbal Space Program can be considered a space simulator, even though it portrays an imaginary universe with tweaked physics, masses and distances to enhance gameplay. Nevertheless, the physics and rocket design principles are much more realistic than in the space combat or trading subgenres.

The game Lunar Flight simulates flying around the lunar surface in a craft resembling the Apollo Lunar Module.

Read the original here:

Space flight simulator game - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

New Jersey Freedom Sports

JOIN THEFREEDOM COMMUNITY Tired of the so called nationalsanctioningbodies of softball and other sports who put making money first?? FreedomSportsAssociation in it's fifth yearofexistence, has proven it can be done be right, and puts the teams first!!

Currently we offer adult slow pitch, and youth fast pitch and have plans for more sports in the near future.We are very excited to have this avenue of communication with players and coaches as well as visitors looking forFreedominformation We hope you find the website helpful and easy to navigate. If there's information you are looking for and can't find, pleasecontactus.

We appreciate your feedback!.

CLICK HERE FOR FSA CONVENTION NEWS AND WORLD DATES

Men's Comp (D) Worlds October 16th, Myrtle Beach , S.C.

To be eligible to play in our Slow Pitch Worlds, teams mustparticipatein their respective state tournament and a regional or NIT tournament in theirregion.Once a teamwins the berth, their roster is locked. At this point only two players can be added to the roster and still must be approvedto play the event and be an allowed player in that respected division. If a team adds more then 2 players they will losethe paid berth that may have been won. CLICK here for more information about the Freedom Slow Pitch program.

Freedom Sports is dedicated exclusively to the promotion and development of amateur sports for both youth and adult.

If you are interested in becoming a Tournament Director or wish to run a Freedom Sports Association program in your area, please contact us or call us at

732 200-0967.

2015 New Jersey Freedom Sports

See more here:

New Jersey Freedom Sports

Why Im Running for President As the Transhumanist Candidate

Its a wild request to ask a nation to consider electing you as their president, especially when youre a transhumanistsomeone who advocates for using science and technology to radically change and improve the human species. But Im doing it.

Last October, I declared my 2016 US candidacy under the newly formed Transhumanist Party, which I founded, and promised my community of techno-optimists Id do everything I could to use my campaign as a way to speed up the arrival of robotic hearts, brain implants, artificial limbs, exoskeleton suits, and indefinite lifespansall of which are just a small part of the radical science transhumanists aim to make a standard part of peoples lives.

The Transhumanist Party may seem fringe to some, but its not. Its mainly made up of scientists, engineers, futurists, and people who love technology. And while we dont have a formal paying membership process, my officers and I estimatebased on social media, event turnouts, and donationswe now have about 25,000 supporters in the US. We also have approximately 40 volunteers and more signing up every week. Globally, there are now almost 25 Transhumanist Parties on five different continents, each with its own rules that it determines best within its national framework.

My presidential campaign has been nothing short of a whirlwind. Take this morning for example. I woke up to my iPad beeping relentlessly with inbound messagesdozens of emails, Facebook posts, and tweets asking my policies on everything from artificial wombs, to a proposed moratorium on AI research, to the Baltimore riots. After brewing coffee, I answered as many requests as I could.

Later, I began the tedious business of negotiating a reality TV contract on my campaign. After taking my 4-year-old daughter to preschool, I returned to my desk and typed up a blog post supporting Chinese scientists editing the genome, then put together my slideshow for an upcoming speech in Vancouver, then worked with a designer on the Transhumanist Partys latest bumper sticker. Finally, I spent a half-hour checking out bus companies for my campaigns summer bus tour, scheduled to start this July on the West Coast.

By noon I was almost caught up on most urgent campaign matters and starting to look forward to my mid-day jog when the flow was broken by one my communications managers asking how I planned to answer inquiring press on 3D-printed guns. This is a sticky issue.

Generally, transhumanists love anything 3D-printedespecially when it concerns human organs and bionicsbut the question at hand was whether manufacturing a lethal weapon is going too far, especially when anyone could do it by buying a 3D-printer off Ebay for a under $2000?

Guns play an integral part in thousands of accidental deaths, murders, and armed robberies every year in America, so the ability to quickly, cheaply, and anonymously make them in your home or even in your car is highly contentious. I generally advocate for giving people nearly all liberties, but I had no idea how to answer this question, and neither did any of my staff. An advisor said we should check out what the US Constitutions Second Amendment (the right to bear arms) said about 3D-printers. We laughed, thinking it ridiculous to try governing a country with a 226-year old document in the transhumanist age.

People ask me all the timesince they know Im not going to win the presidency (third party candidates never win)if Im enjoying the campaign. Ive never thought about it like that.

See the original post:

Why Im Running for President As the Transhumanist Candidate

Court rules NSA program illegal – CNNPolitics.com

The government has argued it has the power to carry forward with the program under a section of the Patriot Act, which expires in June. Lawmakers are locked in a debate on whether or how to renew the authority, which was first passed shortly after the Sept. 11, 2001 terror attacks on New York and Washington, but has been renewed by both Presidents Bush and Obama in the intervening years.

Documents confirming the program's existence were first revealed in June of 2013 with the leaks by former government contractor Edward Snowden.

The decision by a three-judge panel that the phone record collection program, which was mostly secret for nearly a decade, is not supported by the current version of the law, will certainly enter into the brewing political debate over renewing it.

RELATED: Why the NSA decision matters

Judge Gerard E. Lynch, writing for a three judge panel of the Second Circuit Court of Appeals, said the program "exceeds the scope of what Congress has authorized."

Lynch wrote that the text of the Patriot Act "cannot bear the weight the government asks us to assign to it, and that it does not authorize the telephone metadata program."

The Court did not address the larger question of whether the program is constitutional and sent the case back down to a lower court for further proceedings. It noted that the section of the Patriot Act that the government said authorized the law - Section 215 - is set to expire in early June.

"In light of the asserted national security interests at stake, we deem it prudent to pause to allow an opportunity for debate in Congress that may (or may not) profoundly alter the legal landscape," Lynch wrote.

He was clearly concerned with the scope of the program. He wrote the "sheer volume of information sought is staggering."

Sen. Marco Rubio, the Florida Republican who is also running for president, defended the NSA program on the Senate floor shortly after the court decision was made public.

Continue reading here:

Court rules NSA program illegal - CNNPolitics.com

Posted in NSA

Program in Molecular Medicine – UMass Medical School …

Recent Molecular Medicine Publications

Hainer SJ, GU W, Carone BR, Landry BD, Rando OJ, Mello CC, Fazzio TG. Genes Dev. 2015 Feb 15;29(4):362-78. doi: 10.1101/gad.253534.114 PMID: 25691467. (Paper)

Perry RJ, Camporez JP, Kursawe R, Titchenell PM, Zhang D, Perry CJ, Jurczak MJ, Abudukadier A, Han MS, Zhang XM, Ruan HB, Yang X, Caprio S, Kaech SM, Sul HS, Birnbaum MJ, Davis RJ, Cline GW, Petersen KF, Shulman GI. Cell. 2015 Feb 12;160(4):745-58. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2015.01.012. Epub 2015 Feb 5. PMID: 25662011. (Paper)

Kearns NA, Pham H, Tabak B, Genga RM, Silverstein NJ, Garber M, Maehr R. Nat Methods. 2015 Mar 16. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.3325. [Epub ahead of print] PMID: 25775043 (Paper)

May-Simera HL, Petralia RS, Montcouquiol M, Wang YX, Szarama KB, Liu Y, Lin W, Deans MR, Pazour GJ, Kelley MW. Development 2015 Feb Feb 1;142(3):555-66. doi: 10.1242/dev.113696. PMID: 25605782 (Paper)

Sterling CH, Veksler-Lublinsky I, Ambros V. Nucleic Acids Res. 2015 Jan;43(1):e1. doi: 10.1093/nar/gku637. Epub 2014 Jul 23. PMID: 25056322 (Paper)

Illendula A, Pulikkan JA, Zong H, Grembecka J, Xue L, Sen S, Zhou Y, Boulton A, Kuntimaddi A, Gao Y, Rajewski RA, Guzman ML, Castilla LH, Bushweller JH. Science. 2015 Feb 13;347(6223):779-84. doi: 10.1126/science.aaa0314. PMID: 25678665 (Paper)

Schwarz EM, Hu Y, Antoshechkin I, Miller MM, Sternberg PW, Aroian RV. Nat Gent. 2015 Mar 2. doi: 10.1038/ng.3237 PMID: 25730766 (Paper)

Xue Y, Van C, Pradhan SK, Su T, Gehrke J, Kuryan BG, Kitada T, Vashisht A, Tran N, Wohlschlegel J, Peterson CL, Kurdistani SK, Carey MF. Genes Dev. 2015 Feb 15;29(4):350-5. doi: 10.1101/gad.256255.114. PMID: 25691465 (Paper)

Crouse JA, Lopes VS, Sanagustin JT, Keady BT, Williams DS, Pazour GJ. Cytoskeleton (Hoboken). 2014 May;71(5):302-10. doi: 10.1002/cm.21173. Epub 2014 Mar 25. PMID: 24619649 (Paper)

Original post:

Program in Molecular Medicine - UMass Medical School ...

Health care reform in the United States – Wikipedia, the …

Health care reform in the United States has a long history. Reforms have often been proposed but have rarely been accomplished. In 2010, landmark reform was passed through two federal statutes enacted in 2010: the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA), signed March 23, 2010,[1][2] and the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act of 2010 (H.R. 4872), which amended the PPACA and became law on March 30, 2010.[3][4]

Future reforms and ideas continue to be proposed, with notable arguments including a single-payer system and a reduction in fee-for-service medical care.[5] The PPACA includes a new agency, the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Innovation, which is intended to research reform ideas through pilot projects.

Here is a summary of reform achievements at the national level in the United States. For failed efforts, State based efforts, native tribes services and more details generally, see the main article History of health care reform in the United States.

International comparisons of healthcare have found that the United States spends more per-capita than other similarly developed nations but falls below similar countries in various health metrics, suggesting inefficiency and waste. In addition, the United States has significant underinsurance and significant impending unfunded liabilities from its aging demographic and its social insurance programs Medicare and Medicaid (Medicaid provides free long-term care to the elderly poor). The fiscal and human impact of these issues have motivated reform proposals.

According to 2009 World Bank statistics, the U.S. had the highest healthcare costs relative to the size of the economy (GDP) in the world, even though estimated 50.2 million citizens (approximately 15.6% of the September 2011 estimated population of 312 million) lacked insurance.[11] In March 2010, billionaire Warren Buffett commented that the high costs paid by U.S. companies for their employees' health care put them at a competitive disadvantage.[12]

Further, an estimated 77 million Baby Boomers are reaching retirement age, which combined with significant annual increases in healthcare costs per person will place enormous budgetary strain on U.S. state and federal governments, particularly through Medicare and Medicaid spending (Medicaid provides long-term care for the elderly poor).[14] Maintaining the long-term fiscal health of the U.S. federal government is significantly dependent on healthcare costs being controlled.[15]

In addition, the number of employers who offer health insurance has declined and costs for employer-paid health insurance are rising: from 2001 to 2007, premiums for family coverage increased 78%, while wages rose 19% and prices rose 17%, according to the Kaiser Family Foundation.[16] Even for those who are employed, the private insurance in the US varies greatly in its coverage; one study by the Commonwealth Fund published in Health Affairs estimated that 16 million U.S. adults were underinsured in 2003. The underinsured were significantly more likely than those with adequate insurance to forgo health care, report financial stress because of medical bills, and experience coverage gaps for such items as prescription drugs. The study found that underinsurance disproportionately affects those with lower incomes 73% of the underinsured in the study population had annual incomes below 200% of the federal poverty level.[17] However, a study published by the Kaiser Family Foundation in 2008 found that the typical large employer preferred provider organization (PPO) plan in 2007 was more generous than either Medicare or the Federal Employees Health Benefits Program Standard Option.[18] One indicator of the consequences of Americans' inconsistent health care coverage is a study in Health Affairs that concluded that half of personal bankruptcys involved medical bills,[19] although other sources dispute this.[20]

There are health losses from insufficient health insurance. A 2009 Harvard study published in the American Journal of Public Health found more than 44,800 excess deaths annually in the United States due to Americans lacking health insurance.[21][22] More broadly, estimates of the total number of people in the United States, whether insured or uninsured, who die because of lack of medical care were estimated in a 1997 analysis to be nearly 100,000 per year.[23] A study of the effects of the Massachusetts universal health care law (which took effect in 2006) found a 3% drop in mortality among people 2064 years old - 1 death per 830 people with insurance. Other studies, just as those examining the randomized distribution of Medicaid insurance to low-income people in Oregon in 2008, found no change in death rate.[24]

In December 2011 the outgoing Administrator of the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Dr. Donald Berwick, asserted that 20% to 30% of health care spending is waste. He listed five causes for the waste: (1) overtreatment of patients, (2) the failure to coordinate care, (3) the administrative complexity of the health care system, (4) burdensome rules and (5) fraud.[25]

An estimated 3%10% of all health-care expenditures in the U.S. are fraudulent. In 2011, Medicare and Medicaid made $65 billion in improper payments (including both error and fraud). Government efforts to reduce fraud include $4.2 billion in fraudulent payments recovered by the Department of Justice and the FBI in 2012, longer jail sentences specified by the Affordable Care Act, and Senior Medicare Patrolsvolunteers trained to identify and report fraud.[26]

See the rest here:

Health care reform in the United States - Wikipedia, the ...

U.S. News Health Care Index Shows Massive Increase in …

During the last year, a compelling narrative has emerged about health care spending: Though it continues to rise each year, its rate of growth is slowing dramatically and unexpectedly. Projections show that this trend will continue during the coming decade, partially because the impact of the Great Recession has lingered.

It is unclear at this time what role President Barack Obamas health care law, the Affordable Care Act, played in the slowdown. Looking at various aspects of health spending will, however, help determine what factors can alleviate health care costs, which still grow at a faster rate than the rest of the economy and threaten the financial sustainability of government-sponsored health plans.

To analyze health cares changing role on the U.S. economy, U.S. News has created a new annual Health Care Index, which examines trends in specific health areas from 2000 to 2013.

As health care enters an unprecedented change in the way people are covered, how care is paid for and how its delivered, we want to better understand how it affects things like jobs and peoples economic well-being, says Brian Kelly, editor and chief content editor at U.S. News & World Report.

The U.S. News Health Care Index uses data from the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, the United States Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, the Department of Health and Human Services, the National Center for Educational Statistics and the World Health Organization. Its giving us the broadest measure of health cares impact on U.S. society, says Bob Morse, chief data strategist at U.S. News.

Changes to the health care system under the Affordable Care Act are not yet measured. Significant elements of the law, including mandated health insurance, Medicaid expansion and the requirement for employers to provide health insurance had not gone into effect when the data were collected. However, the health care industry anticipated some of the laws key measures and may have already implemented similar practices ahead of it. The 2013 budget sequester, which enacted automatic cuts to government spending, also is not taken into account.

For the index, U.S. News analyzed key economic factors, including expenditures, medical costs, insurance coverage, health employment, health care education and international comparisons. To be included, a specific health-related measure had to be generally published annually beginning in 2000 and had to hold enough statistical significance to provide a conclusive trend of some important aspect of the health care industry.

Like other major indices such as the S&P 500 and the Dow Jones Industrial Average, for example, or the Consumer Price Index the U.S. News Health Care Index has a base year from which changes in the underlying factors are measured. The Health Care Indexs base year is 2000 and was set to equal 100.0; it will be calculated annually by U.S. News and measures the yearly changes in the activity of its components in relation to the year 2000.

For the 2015 Index, overall results show a steady upward trend, although a slowdown in the rate of growth attributable to the Great Recession is noted from 2009 to 2013 in which expenditures and employment, the highest-weighted components, played a significant role.

But what stand out most are trends in the rates of spending for private and public health insurance. There was a decrease in the number of Americans covered by private plans since 2000, and an overall increase in those covered by public health insurance, including Medicaid, the governments insurance plan for poor or disabled Americans, and Medicare, which covers seniors.

Read the original here:

U.S. News Health Care Index Shows Massive Increase in ...