Why AI and automation are among the key marketing trends to watch in 2017 – Marketing Tech

With mobile usage, virtual reality and voice-search on the rise, marketers must adapt to the changing landscape in which people search and consume information in order to stay ahead of the competition.

Below are five break-out trends that organizations will need to consider in 2017 in their marketing strategies. To start, lets look at one of the biggest and most controversial trends in marketing: The emergence of chat bots.

Throughout 2016, we saw a rise in the number of companies using intelligent live chat tools to automatically communicate with customers and users. This technology uses artificial intelligence to learn how to respond to questions in a way that mimics how a real person would respond.

So far, this technology is primarily used by a small subset of early-adopter companies in the software and media industries. As this technology continues to gain credibility and becomes increasingly accessible, its likely that we will start to see adoption break out of the early-adopter market and begin reaching the early-majority market.

Since Google Voice, Cortana and Siri have become increasingly embedded into devices, the usage of voice search has reached a point where many people now use it as a dominant way of searching for information.

As a result, marketers must consider how this impacts search marketing. For example, search queries are likely to become longer and more representative of natural language. Typed queries like Top beach holidays may instead be searched for like Where can I go thats hot and has a beach?

While Google has released several updates to its search algorithm to better understand the semantic relationships between queries, digital marketers will still need to consider an increasingly long-tail focused strategy for targeting voice search queries.

Another consideration is that, while Apple and Microsoft have enabled voice search on desktop devices, voice search is likely to be used primarily on mobile devices where typing is more cumbersome. As such, we can expect Google to continue increasing the importance of SEO ranking factors that impact the mobile user experience in 2017. We may even see Google announce AMP (accelerated mobile pages) as a ranking factor.

Forms havent changed much in 20 years.

For example, both of the forms below are from the same website, except one is a screenshot from 1996 and the other is from 2016. Despite 20 years of innovation, web forms still look just like paper forms.

Why should marketers care about forms? Well, forms represent the final step of the marketing funnel for most organisations. Theyre what separates anonymous web traffic from valuable leads. This means that any improvement in the form will improve the performance of all upstream marketing activity including PPC, SEO, content marketing, and native advertising.

Last year, my team ran a form A/B test on BrokerNotes. The new version of the form more than tripled the number of leads generated by the website improving the sites cost per acquisition and marketing ROI by 3X.

Like us, many organisations are starting to realize the impact that better forms can have on their bottom line. Hewlett Packard recently claimed that changing their web form resulted in a 186% uplift in leads. Expedia also generated an extra $12 million per year just by removing one field from their web form.

The ecosystem of tools and services around forms is also making it easier for organisations to upgrade the forms on your website. With services like Leadformly (for lead generation forms) and SamCart (for checkout forms), you no longer need to hire expensive consultants to get a high-converting form up and running on your website. There are also free or cheap tools like HotJar and Formismo for monitoring the performance of forms, making it easier to identify where the bottlenecks are in your forms.

Marketing automation has ballooned from a $225m industry to a multi-billion-dollar industry in just a few years, and its showing no signs of slowing down.

With the starting cost of marketing automation tools dropping from $100s per month down to as little as $10 per month, its now more accessible to small businesses looking to streamline their marketing and sales processes.

This increased adoption will mean that marketing automation shifts from being a competitive advantage to an expected tool in every marketers toolkit.

The amount of noise online is growing at an exponential rate. As a result, its becoming increasing difficult for organisations to stand out from the crowd and acquire quality leads through saturated social networking sites, blogs, and video channels.

One channel that seems to be going against the grain is podcasting. Podcast advertising has been noted as one of the most effective form of online advertising, due to the trust and familiarity that people have with the hosts of their favorite shows. This trust means that listeners are likely to consider adverts as endorsements from the hosts themselves.

Another option being pursued by number of forward-thinking organizations is creating a podcast to build an audience of prospects to share insights and learnings with. While some companies, like Intercom and Unbounce, offer monthly or weekly interviews with notable people in their industries, some companies are choosing to create a podcast series a set number of episodes focused around a specific topic.

Given the effectiveness and increasing popularity of podcasts, I think its fair to assume that this channel will continue to become more popular in 2017.

Digital marketing will only become more competitive. As acquisition costs continue to rise, we can expect more attention to be placed on optimising and automating as much of the marketing funnel as possible to enable a profitable return on investment, despite higher acquisition costs.

In addition to this, there are many emerging technologies that are ripe for savvy marketers to get a head start on.

Follow this link:

Why AI and automation are among the key marketing trends to watch in 2017 - Marketing Tech

The automation elephant in the room – Policy Options (registration)

Todays information technologies big data, artificial intelligence, robotics, and embedded computing (the so-called Internet of things) are transforming every industry and raising widespread concerns about job losses and economic inequality. Analysts differ on whether the issue is about jobs, tasks or work activities; they disagree on the extent of automation; and theyre not sure how long it will take.

Even the conservative forecasts are bleak. McKinsey and Company estimates that existing technologies could eventually automate about half the activities that people get paid nearly $15 trillion to do globally. This amounts to 1.2 billion full-time equivalent jobs (FTEs), of which 61 million are located in the US. If we apply a 10 percent rule of thumb our population is about one-tenth that of the US this could mean 6 million Canadian FTEs are at risk: equivalent to one-third of our workforce.

Should we worry? Likely not, say optimists (including McKinsey). Demographic trends are about to produce a shortage of human labour. The productivity and GDP growth associated with automation will not arrive any time soon, the optimists argue. And the full effects of job displacement will take several decades to unfold. In the meantime, humans should learn to manage and complement smart machines and do the sorts of things that only people can do.

The pessimists, on the other hand, say it wont be that easy. Tomorrows jobs will be insufficient in number, inferior in quality and badly paid. We must address the impacts of net growth in unemployment, underemployment, precarious jobs, and economic inequality, they say.

But there is an elephant in the room that no one is talking about. The focus on labour substitution in Canada and everywhere else vastly underestimates the breadth and numbers of at-risk jobs.

Labour substitution relates to the replacement of humans (e.g., car insurance sales representatives) by machines (e.g., car insurance sales apps.). But innovations dont just automate jobs and tasks. They can also make them functionally irrelevant or economically unviable. Its not just about labour substitution: its also about labour obsolescence.

Take the transportation sector. Soon a handful of global firms, such as Uber, may be the dominant providers of automated mobility (transportation) services, provided on demand. Many Canadians will refrain from owning vehicles, which sit unused over 95 percent of the time. They will reap huge cost savings, including over $1,000 per year on car insurance. On-demand, automated mobility, if adopted widely, will yield enormous environmental, safety, health, accessibility, financial and other benefits.

But global automated mobility companies wont buy personal car insurance. Some will self-insure. Others will cut big deals with big insurance firms. Demand for car insurance will plummet. Car insurance jobs wont just decrease as a result of labour substitution. They will become obsolete.

Changes like this have happened throughout history. A disruptive technology innovation facilitates business model innovations that transform entire industries. This results in old jobs (or tasks) becoming irrelevant or economically unviable. The changes also generate demand for new occupations and skills. But the balance these days is typically negative.

Online advertising, viewed from a labour substitution perspective, is the automation of print media ad advertising jobs. This is true in a minor way. But, for the most part, online advertising made those advertising jobs obsolete. More important, online advertising contributed to the collapse of print publications, eliminating or reducing the market value of all sorts of jobs, in areas ranging from home delivery to investigative journalism. Canadas production of newsprint, printing and writing paper declined by half over the 2005-15, and jobs went with it. These losses occurred at dizzying speed, belying the view that the changes would take many decades.

Rather than look exclusively at labour substitution to understand the impact of technology on jobs, we must define and analyze changes that affect changing labour demand in the extended ecosystem (or the business web), inside and outside a core sector. The result of this analysis is often a combination of job creation, job destruction and job displacement.

Changes that will result in labour obsolescence include:

To measure the size of this problem, I identified automotive ecosystem jobs and subsectors using the 2011 Census. Based on this initial assessment, business models built around self-driving vehicles will pose big job risks for 1.1 million Canadians over the coming decades. Half a million of these, again according to the 2011 Census, are professional drivers who face the prospect of labour substitution. They include transport truck drivers; delivery, courier and mail workers; and taxi/limousine drivers. (On-demand drivers for Uber and the like were not counted in the 2011 census.) For the remaining majority (600,000 jobs police; and insurance, auto service/body shop, dealership/distribution/rental/leasing, manufacturing and gas station workers), the main challenge isnt labour substitution, its functional obsolescence.

The automotive ecosystem is but one of many ecosystems. Similar changes are occurring across the economy in agriculture, natural resources, retail/distribution, professional services and many other sectors. In every case, labour obsolescence will exacerbate the challenges of labour substitution.

Clearly, we must get more creative if we are to understand our labour market challenges (and opportunities). We must face up to the likelihood that a new economy one with fewer good jobs and lower pay is upon us. And we must act now to minimize and mitigate the impact on Canadians. We owe it to our kids.

This article is part of the The Changing Nature of Workspecial feature.

Photo:AP Photo/Eric Risberg/The Canadian Press

Do you have something to say about the article you just read? Be part of thePolicy Optionsdiscussion, and send in your own submission.Here is alinkon how to do it. |Souhaitez-vous ragir cet article ? Joignez-vous aux dbats dOptions politiqueset soumettez-nous votre texte en suivant cesdirectives.

Visit link:

The automation elephant in the room - Policy Options (registration)

OpenConnect’s Enterprise Automation Presence Spotlighted by SSON Analytics Interactive Benchmarking – Benzinga

OpenConnect automation is trusted by multi-billion-dollar companies to handle many millions of complex tasks every year.

Dallas, Texas, and Orlando, Florida, (PRWEB) March 06, 2017

OpenConnect, a leader in enterprise software products that deliver efficiencies derived from objective workforce intelligence, analytics, and robotic process automation, announced today that an interactive benchmarking tool by SSON Analytics shows OpenConnect's robotic process automation (RPA) products have a significant presence in enterprise.

This information was first released during OpenConnect's participation in the 21st Shared Services & Outsourcing Week (SSOW), beginning today in Orlando, Florida. The SSON Analytics benchmarking tool uses vendor-verified data to assess the offerings from automation software vendors participating in the SSOW event.

In the case of OpenConnect, the benchmarking tool showed that OpenConnect enterprise RPA software's installed or piloted base consists of companies with total annual revenues in excess of $100 billion. Some of these OpenConnect automation customers are among the largest and best-known healthcare payers in their industry. OpenConnect automation serves these customers, in particular, by processing nearly 20 million complex medical claims a year. This points out a significant difference between the true enterprise RPA offered by OpenConnect and other vendors' more limited RPA tools, which cannot handle such complexity.

"We're pleased to see the results of the SSON Analytics benchmarking of automation software vendors," said Mark Dailey, OpenConnect's Chief Executive Officer. "This confirms OpenConnect's in-production market presence among some of the largest companies in their respective industries."

"It's unusual for us to share the kind of data that this benchmarking process required, but we felt it was important," said Kevin Culliton, OpenConnect's Vice President of Product Management. "It often surprises people when they learn just how much we do for our customers, as well as how big those customers are. This benchmarking tool brings that into clarity, especially considering what it shows and, in some cases, doesn't show about our competitors who also are participating in this SSOW."

About OpenConnect

OpenConnect is the leader in process intelligence and desktop analytics solutions that objectively identify and illuminate workforce activity, resulting in associated productivity gains. With OpenConnect's process automation software, the costliest processes performed by a workforce can be automated. Combining unparalleled experience and solution capabilities, OpenConnect enables its clients to more quickly address and adapt to today's operational and competitive challenges so they can accomplish more with fewer resources. Learn more about OpenConnect and its products at openconnect.com.

END ###

For the original version on PRWeb visit: http://www.prweb.com/releases/2017/OpenConnect-SSONAnalytics/prweb14122997.htm

Read this article:

OpenConnect's Enterprise Automation Presence Spotlighted by SSON Analytics Interactive Benchmarking - Benzinga

Wash Post: At Least 60000 Immigrants Were Forced to Work for $1 or Less Per Day – Newsmax

A class-action lawsuit alleges at least 60,000 immigrants detained byU.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement were forced to work for $1 per day or less at animmigrantdetention center, a violation of federal anti-slavery laws, the Washington Post reports.

The prison, the Denver Contract Detention Facility, detains immigrants waiting for court appearances. The lawsuit was filed in 2014 and gained class action status last week following a ruling by U.S. District Judge John Kane. The facility, operated out of Aurora, Colorado by GEO Group, is under contract with ICE.

It's the first time in history where a class-actionlawsuit accusing aU.S. prison company of forced labor has been allowed to progress.

"That's obviously a big deal; it's recognizing the possibility that a government contractor could be engaging in forced labor," Nina DiSalvo, executive director of Towards Justice, a Colorado-based nonprofit group that represents low-wage workers, told the Post. "Certification of the class is perhaps the only mechanism by which these vulnerable individuals who were dispersed across the country and across the world would ever be able to vindicate their rights."

GEO allegedly paysdetainees $8 less than the state's minimum wage in Colorado, which is set at $9, and has not denied doing so -- saying that paying $1 a day does not violate any laws.

"We intend to continue to vigorously defend our company against these claims," GEO Group spokesman Pablo Paez said in a statement, reports the Post. "The volunteer work program at immigration facilities as well as the wage rates and standards associated with the program are set by the federal government. Our facilities, including the Aurora, Colo. Facility, are highly rated and provide high-quality services in safe, secure, and humane residential environments pursuant to the federal governments national standards."

The nine plaintiffs who were part of the original lawsuit claim that detaineeswho refuse to workare threatened with solitary confinement.

The lawsuit allegessix prisoners are selectedevery day randomly and forced to clean the facilitys housing units. The practice, the suit claims, violates the federal Trafficking Victims Protection Act, which prohibits modern-day slavery.

"Forcedlabor is a particular violation of the statute that we've alleged,"Andrew Free, one of the plaintiffs'attorneys, told the Post. "Whether you're calling it forced labor or slavery, the practical reality for the plaintiffs is much the same. You're being compelled to work against your will under the threat of force or use of force."

2017 Newsmax. All rights reserved.

Read the rest here:

Wash Post: At Least 60000 Immigrants Were Forced to Work for $1 or Less Per Day - Newsmax

Carson receives backlash after appearing to compare slaves to immigrants – WCVB Boston

WASHINGTON (CNN)

Ben Carson appeared to liken slaves to immigrants who choose to come to the United States while addressing employees at the Department of Housing and Urban Development Monday.

Carson, who was confirmed to lead the department earlier this month, heralded the work ethic of immigrants before implying slaves who came to the United States worked harder than others.

Here is the full speech:

"Go to Ellis Island one of these days and go through that museum on Ellis Island and look at all the pictures of those people who are hanging up there. From every part of the world. Many of them carrying all their earthly belongings in their two hands. Not knowing what this country held for them. Look at the determination in their eyes. People who work 6 or 7 days a week. 10, 12, 16 hours a day. No such thing as a minimum wage. They work not for themselves but for their sons and daughters, grandsons and granddaughters so they might have an opportunity in this land. That's what America is about. A land of dreams and opportunities. There were other immigrants who came here in the bottom of slave ships. Worked even harder and even harder for less. But they too had a dream that one day their sons, daughter, grandchildren might pursue prosperity and happiness in this land. Do you know, of all the nations in the world, this one the United States of America is the only one big enough and great enough to allow all those people to realize their dream. This is our opportunity to enhance their dream."

Earlier in the remarks, Carson said: "That's what America is about, a land of dreams and opportunity."

HUD spokesman Brian Sullivan attempted to clarify Carson's statement, saying, "Nobody here believes he was equating voluntary immigration with involuntary servitude."

Critics quickly decried the comment.

"Ben Carson is also the guy who once compared Obamacare to slavery," tweeted Keith Boykin, a CNN political contributor. "I'm starting to think he may not understand the word 'slavery.'"

The NAACP declined to comment, but the group tweeted: "Immigrants?" in response to a story about Carson's comments.

This is not the first time Carson has likened something to slavery.

In 2013, Carson said that Obamacare -- the Obama administration's landmark healthcare law -- was the worst thing "since slavery."

"You know Obamacare is really, I think, the worst thing that has happened in this nation since slavery," Carson said at the Values Voter Summit in Washington. "And it is in a way, it is slavery in a way, because it is making all of us subservient to the government, and it was never about health care. It was about control."

Carson also compared abortion to slavery in an interview with NBC during his 2016 presidential run.

"During slavery -- and I know that's one of those words you're not supposed to say, but I'm saying it -- during slavery, a lot of the slave owners thought that they had the right to do whatever they wanted to the slave," Carson said in October 2015. "What if the abolitionists had said, 'I don't believe in slavery, I think it's wrong, but you guys do whatever you want to do?"

Later on Monday, Carson posted on his Facebook page in an effort to clarify his remarks.

"Im proud of the courage and perseverance of Black Americans and their incomprehensible struggle from slavery to freedom. Im proud that our ancestors overcame the evil and repression that we know as slavery. The slave narrative and immigrant narrative are two entirely different experiences. Slaves were ripped from their families and their homes and forced against their will after being sold into slavery by slave traders. The Immigrants made the choice to come to America. They saw this country as a land of opportunity. In contrast, slaves were forced here against their will and lost all their opportunities. We continue to live with that legacy. The two experiences should never be intertwined, nor forgotten, as we demand the necessary progress towards an America that's inclusive and provides access to equal opportunity for all. We should revel in the fact that although we got here through different routes, we have many things in common now that should unite us in our mission to have a land where there is liberty and justice for all."

Read this article:

Carson receives backlash after appearing to compare slaves to immigrants - WCVB Boston

Abolition Of Work | Prometheism.net – Part 7

No one should ever work.

Work is the source of nearly all the misery in the world. Almost any evil youd care to name comes from working or from living in a world designed for work. In order to stop suffering, we have to stop working.

That doesnt mean we have to stop doing things. It does mean creating a new way of life based on play; in other words, a ludic conviviality, commensality, and maybe even art. There is more to play than childs play, as worthy as that is. I call for a collective adventure in generalized joy and freely interdependent exuberance. Play isnt passive. Doubtless we all need a lot more time for sheer sloth and slack than we ever enjoy now, regardless of income or occupation, but once recovered from employment-induced exhaustion nearly all of us want to act. Oblomovism and Stakhanovism are two sides of the same debased coin.

The ludic life is totally incompatible with existing reality. So much the worse for reality, the gravity hole that sucks the vitality from the little in life that still distinguishes it from mere survival. Curiously or maybe not all the old ideologies are conservative because they believe in work. Some of them, like Marxism and most brands of anarchism, believe in work all the more fiercely because they believe in so little else.

Liberals say we should end employment discrimination. I say we should end employment. Conservatives support right-to-work laws. Following Karl Marxs wayward son-in-law Paul Lafargue I support the right to be lazy. Leftists favor full employment. Like the surrealists except that Im not kidding I favor full unemployment. Trotskyists agitate for permanent revolution. I agitate for permanent revelry. But if all the ideologues (as they do) advocate work and not only because they plan to make other people do theirs they are strangely reluctant to say so. They will carry on endlessly about wages, hours, working conditions, exploitation, productivity, profitability. Theyll gladly talk about anything but work itself. These experts who offer to do our thinking for us rarely share their conclusions about work, for all its saliency in the lives of all of us. Among themselves they quibble over the details. Unions and management agree that we ought to sell the time of our lives in exchange for survival, although they haggle over the price. Marxists think we should be bossed by bureaucrats. Libertarians think we should be bossed by businessmen. Feminists dont care which form bossing takes so long as the bosses are women. Clearly these ideology-mongers have serious differences over how to divvy up the spoils of power. Just as clearly, none of them have any objection to power as such and all of them want to keep us working.

You may be wondering if Im joking or serious. Im joking and serious. To be ludic is not to be ludicrous. Play doesnt have to be frivolous, although frivolity isnt triviality: very often we ought to take frivolity seriously. Id like life to be a game but a game with high stakes. I want to play for keeps.

The alternative to work isnt just idleness. To be ludic is not to be quaaludic. As much as I treasure the pleasure of torpor, its never more rewarding than when it punctuates other pleasures and pastimes. Nor am I promoting the managed time-disciplined safety-valve called leisure; far from it. Leisure is nonwork for the sake of work. Leisure is the time spent recovering from work and in the frenzied but hopeless attempt to forget about work. Many people return from vacation so beat that they look forward to returning to work so they can rest up. The main difference between work and leisure is that work at least you get paid for your alienation and enervation.

I am not playing definitional games with anybody. When I say I want to abolish work, I mean just what I say, but I want to say what I mean by defining my terms in non-idiosyncratic ways. My minimum definition of work is forced labor, that is, compulsory production. Both elements are essential. Work is production enforced by economic or political means, by the carrot or the stick. (The carrot is just the stick by other means.) But not all creation is work. Work is never done for its own sake, its done on account of some product or output that the worker (or, more often, somebody else) gets out of it. This is what work necessarily is. To define it is to despise it. But work is usually even worse than its definition decrees. The dynamic of domination intrinsic to work tends over time toward elaboration. In advanced work-riddled societies, including all industrial societies whether capitalist of Communist, work invariably acquires other attributes which accentuate its obnoxiousness.

Usually and this is even more true in Communist than capitalist countries, where the state is almost the only employer and everyone is an employee work is employment, i. e., wage-labor, which means selling yourself on the installment plan. Thus 95% of Americans who work, work for somebody (or something) else. In the USSR or Cuba or Yugoslavia or any other alternative model which might be adduced, the corresponding figure approaches 100%. Only the embattled Third World peasant bastions Mexico, India, Brazil, Turkey temporarily shelter significant concentrations of agriculturists who perpetuate the traditional arrangement of most laborers in the last several millenia, the payment of taxes (= ransom) to the state or rent to parasitic landlords in return for being otherwise left alone. Even this raw deal is beginning to look good. All industrial (and office) workers are employees and under the sort of surveillance which ensures servility.

But modern work has worse implications. People dont just work, they have jobs. One person does one productive task all the time on an or-else basis. Even if the task has a quantum of intrinsic interest (as increasingly many jobs dont) the monotony of its obligatory exclusivity drains its ludic potential. A job that might engage the energies of some people, for a reasonably limited time, for the fun of it, is just a burden on those who have to do it for forty hours a week with no say in how it should be done, for the profit of owners who contribute nothing to the project, and with no opportunity for sharing tasks or spreading the work among those who actually have to do it. This is the real world of work: a world of bureaucratic blundering, of sexual harassment and discrimination, of bonehead bosses exploiting and scapegoating their subordinates who by any rational-technical criteria should be calling the shots. But capitalism in the real world subordinates the rational maximization of productivity and profit to the exigencies of organizational control.

The degradation which most workers experience on the job is the sum of assorted indignities which can be denominated as discipline. Foucault has complexified this phenomenon but it is simple enough. Discipline consists of the totality of totalitarian controls at the workplace surveillance, rotework, imposed work tempos, production quotas, punching -in and -out, etc. Discipline is what the factory and the office and the store share with the prison and the school and the mental hospital. It is something historically original and horrible. It was beyond the capacities of such demonic dictators of yore as Nero and Genghis Khan and Ivan the Terrible. For all their bad intentions they just didnt have the machinery to control their subjects as thoroughly as modern despots do. Discipline is the distinctively diabolical modern mode of control, it is an innovative intrusion which must be interdicted at the earliest opportunity.

Such is work. Play is just the opposite. Play is always voluntary. What might otherwise be play is work if its forced. This is axiomatic. Bernie de Koven has defined play as the suspension of consequences. This is unacceptable if it implies that play is inconsequential. The point is not that play is without consequences. This is to demean play. The point is that the consequences, if any, are gratuitous. Playing and giving are closely related, they are the behavioral and transactional facets of the same impulse, the play-instinct. They share an aristocratic disdain for results. The player gets something out of playing; thats why he plays. But the core reward is the experience of the activity itself (whatever it is). Some otherwise attentive students of play, like Johan Huizinga (Homo Ludens), define it as game-playing or following rules. I respect Huizingas erudition but emphatically reject his constraints. There are many good games (chess, baseball, Monopoly, bridge) which are rule-governed but there is much more to play than game-playing. Conversation, sex, dancing, travel these practices arent rule-governed but they are surely play if anything is. And rules can be played with at least as readily as anything else.

Work makes a mockery of freedom. The official line is that we all have rights and live in a democracy. Other unfortunates who arent free like we are have to live in police states. These victims obey orders or-else, no matter how arbitrary. The authorities keep them under regular surveillance. State bureaucrats control even the smaller details of everyday life. The officials who push them around are answerable only to higher-ups, public or private. Either way, dissent and disobedience are punished. Informers report regularly to the authorities. All this is supposed to be a very bad thing.

And so it is, although it is nothing but a description of the modern workplace. The liberals and conservatives and libertarians who lament totalitarianism are phonies and hypocrites. There is more freedom in any moderately deStalinized dictatorship than there is in the ordinary American workplace. You find the same sort of hierarchy and discipline in an office or factory as you do in a prison or monastery. In fact, as Foucault and others have shown, prisons and factories came in at about the same time, and their operators consciously borrowed from each others control techniques. A worker is a part time slave. The boss says when to show up, when to leave, and what to do in the meantime. He tells you how much work to do and how fast. He is free to carry his control to humiliating extremes, regulating, if he feels like it, the clothes you wear or how often you go to the bathroom. With a few exceptions he can fire you for any reason, or no reason. He has you spied on by snitches and supervisors, he amasses a dossier on every employee. Talking back is called insubordination, just as if a worker is a naughty child, and it not only gets you fired, it disqualifies you for unemployment compensation. Without necessarily endorsing it for them either, it is noteworthy that children at home and in school receive much the same treatment, justified in their case by their supposed immaturity. What does this say about their parents and teachers who work?

The demeaning system of domination Ive described rules over half the waking hours of a majority of women and the vast majority of men for decades, for most of their lifespans. For certain purposes its not too misleading to call our system democracy or capitalism or better still industrialism, but its real names are factory fascism and office oligarchy. Anybody who says these people are free is lying or stupid. You are what you do. If you do boring, stupid monotonous work, chances are youll end up boring, stupid and monotonous. Work is a much better explanation for the creeping cretinization all around us than even such significant moronizing mechanisms as television and education. People who are regimented all their lives, handed off to work from school and bracketed by the family in the beginning and the nursing home at the end, are habituated to heirarchy and psychologically enslaved. Their aptitude for autonomy is so atrophied that their fear of freedom is among their few rationally grounded phobias. Their obedience training at work carries over into the families they start, thus reproducing the system in more ways than one, and into politics, culture and everything else. Once you drain the vitality from people at work, theyll likely submit to heirarchy and expertise in everything. Theyre used to it.

We are so close to the world of work that we cant see what it does to us. We have to rely on outside observers from other times or other cultures to appreciate the extremity and the pathology of our present position. There was a time in our own past when the work ethic would have been incomprehensible, and perhaps Weber was on to something when he tied its appearance to a religion, Calvinism, which if it emerged today instead of four centuries ago would immediately and appropriately be labeled a cult. Be that as it may, we have only to draw upon the wisdom of antiquity to put work in perspective. The ancients saw work for what it is, and their view prevailed, the Calvinist cranks notwithstanding, until overthrown by industrialism but not before receiving the endorsement of its prophets.

Lets pretend for a moment that work doesnt turn people into stultified submissives. Lets pretend, in defiance of any plausible psychology and the ideology of its boosters, that it has no effect on the formation of character. And lets pretend that work isnt as boring and tiring and humiliating as we all know it really is. Even then, work would still make a mockery of all humanistic and democratic aspirations, just because it usurps so much of our time. Socrates said that manual laborers make bad friends and bad citizens because they have no time to fulfill the responsibilities of friendship and citizenship. He was right. Because of work, no matter what we do we keep looking at our watches. The only thing free about so-called free time is that it doesnt cost the boss anything. Free time is mostly devoted to getting ready for work, going to work, returning from work, and recovering from work. Free time is a euphemism for the peculiar way labor as a factor of production not only transports itself at its own expense to and from the workplace but assumes primary responsibility for its own maintenance and repair. Coal and steel dont do that. Lathes and typewriters dont do that. But workers do. No wonder Edward G. Robinson in one of his gangster movies exclaimed, Work is for saps!

Both Plato and Xenophon attribute to Socrates and obviously share with him an awareness of the destructive effects of work on the worker as a citizen and a human being. Herodotus identified contempt for work as an attribute of the classical Greeks at the zenith of their culture. To take only one Roman example, Cicero said that whoever gives his labor for money sells himself and puts himself in the rank of slaves. His candor is now rare, but contemporary primitive societies which we are wont to look down upon have provided spokesmen who have enlightened Western anthropologists. The Kapauku of West Irian, according to Posposil, have a conception of balance in life and accordingly work only every other day, the day of rest designed to regain the lost power and health. Our ancestors, even as late as the eighteenth century when they were far along the path to our present predicament, at least were aware of what we have forgotten, the underside of industrialization. Their religious devotion to St. Monday thus establishing a de facto five-day week 150-200 years before its legal consecration was the despair of the earliest factory owners. They took a long time in submitting to the tyranny of the bell, predecessor of the time clock. In fact it was necessary for a generation or two to replace adult males with women accustomed to obedience and children who could be molded to fit industrial needs. Even the exploited peasants of the ancient regime wrested substantial time back from their landlords work. According to Lafargue, a fourth of the French peasants calendar was devoted to Sundays and holidays, and Chayanovs figures from villages in Czarist Russia hardly a progressive society likewise show a fourth or fifth of peasants days devoted to repose. Controlling for productivity, we are obviously far behind these backward societies. The exploited muzhiks would wonder why any of us are working at all. So should we.

To grasp the full enormity of our deterioration, however, consider the earliest condition of humanity, without government or property, when we wandered as hunter-gatherers. Hobbes surmised that life was then nasty, brutish and short. Others assume that life was a desperate unremitting struggle for subsistence, a war waged against a harsh Nature with death and disaster awaiting the unlucky or anyone who was unequal to the challenge of the struggle for existence. Actually, that was all a projection of fears for the collapse of government authority over communities unaccustomed to doing without it, like the England of Hobbes during the Civil War. Hobbes compatriots had already encountered alternative forms of society which illustrated other ways of life in North America, particularly but already these were too remote from their experience to be understandable. (The lower orders, closer to the condition of the Indians, understood it better and often found it attractive. Throughout the seventeenth century, English settlers defected to Indian tribes or, captured in war, refused to return. But the Indians no more defected to white settlements than Germans climb the Berlin Wall from the west.) The survival of the fittest version the Thomas Huxley version of Darwinism was a better account of economic conditions in Victorian England than it was of natural selection, as the anarchist Kropotkin showed in his book Mutual Aid, A Factor of Evolution. (Kropotkin was a scientist a geographer whod had ample involuntary opportunity for fieldwork whilst exiled in Siberia: he knew what he was talking about.) Like most social and political theory, the story Hobbes and his successors told was really unacknowledged autobiography.

The anthropologist Marshall Sahlins, surveying the data on contemporary hunter-gatherers, exploded the Hobbesian myth in an article entitled The Original Affluent Society. They work a lot less than we do, and their work is hard to distinguish from what we regard as play. Sahlins concluded that hunters and gatherers work less than we do; and rather than a continuous travail, the food quest is intermittent, leisure abundant, and there is a greater amount of sleep in the daytime per capita per year than in any other condition of society. They worked an average of four hours a day, assuming they were working at all. Their labor, as it appears to us, was skilled labor which exercised their physical and intellectual capacities; unskilled labor on any large scale, as Sahlins says, is impossible except under industrialism. Thus it satisfied Friedrich Schillers definition of play, the only occasion on which man realizes his complete humanity by giving full play to both sides of his twofold nature, thinking and feeling. As he put it: The animal works when deprivation is the mainspring of its activity, and it plays when the fullness of its strength is this mainspring, when superabundant life is its own stimulus to activity. (A modern version dubiously developmental is Abraham Maslows counterposition of deficiency and growth motivation.) Play and freedom are, as regards production, coextensive. Even Marx, who belongs (for all his good intentions) in the productivist pantheon, observed that the realm of freedom does not commence until the point is passed where labor under the compulsion of necessity and external utility is required. He never could quite bring himself to identify this happy circumstance as what it is, the abolition of work its rather anomalous, after all, to be pro-worker and anti-work but we can.

The aspiration to go backwards or forwards to a life without work is evident in every serious social or cultural history of pre-industrial Europe, among them M. Dorothy Georges England In Transition and Peter Burkes Popular Culture in Early Modern Europe. Also pertinent is Daniel Bells essay, Work and its Discontents, the first text, I believe, to refer to the revolt against work in so many words and, had it been understood, an important correction to the complacency ordinarily associated with the volume in which it was collected, The End of Ideology. Neither critics nor celebrants have noticed that Bells end-of-ideology thesis signaled not the end of social unrest but the beginning of a new, uncharted phase unconstrained and uninformed by ideology. It was Seymour Lipset (in Political Man), not Bell, who announced at the same time that the fundamental problems of the Industrial Revolution have been solved, only a few years before the post- or meta-industrial discontents of college students drove Lipset from UC Berkeley to the relative (and temporary) tranquility of Harvard.

As Bell notes, Adam Smith in The Wealth of Nations, for all his enthusiasm for the market and the division of labor, was more alert to (and more honest about) the seamy side of work than Ayn Rand or the Chicago economists or any of Smiths modern epigones. As Smith observed: The understandings of the greater part of men are necessarily formed by their ordinary employments. The man whose life is spent in performing a few simple operations has no occasion to exert his understanding He generally becomes as stupid and ignorant as it is possible for a human creature to become. Here, in a few blunt words, is my critique of work. Bell, writing in 1956, the Golden Age of Eisenhower imbecility and American self-satisfaction, identified the unorganized, unorganizable malaise of the 1970s and since, the one no political tendency is able to harness, the one identified in HEWs report Work in America, the one which cannot be exploited and so is ignored. That problem is the revolt against work. It does not figure in any text by any laissez-faire economist Milton Friedman, Murray Rothbard, Richard Posner because, in their terms, as they used to say on Star Trek, it does not compute.

If these objections, informed by the love of liberty, fail to persuade humanists of a utilitarian or even paternalist turn, there are others which they cannot disregard. Work is hazardous to your health, to borrow a book title. In fact, work is mass murder or genocide. Directly or indirectly, work will kill most of the people who read these words. Between 14,000 and 25,000 workers are killed annually in this country on the job. Over two million are disabled. Twenty to twenty-five million are injured every year. And these figures are based on a very conservative estimation of what constitutes a work-related injury. Thus they dont count the half million cases of occupational disease every year. I looked at one medical textbook on occupational diseases which was 1,200 pages long. Even this barely scratches the surface. The available statistics count the obvious cases like the 100,000 miners who have black lung disease, of whom 4,000 die every year, a much higher fatality rate than for AIDS, for instance, which gets so much media attention. This reflects the unvoiced assumption that AIDS afflicts perverts who could control their depravity whereas coal-mining is a sacrosanct activity beyond question. What the statistics dont show is that tens of millions of people have heir lifespans shortened by work which is all that homicide means, after all. Consider the doctors who work themselves to death in their 50s. Consider all the other workaholics.

Even if you arent killed or crippled while actually working, you very well might be while going to work, coming from work, looking for work, or trying to forget about work. The vast majority of victims of the automobile are either doing one of these work-obligatory activities or else fall afoul of those who do them. To this augmented body-count must be added the victims of auto-industrial pollution and work-induced alcoholism and drug addiction. Both cancer and heart disease are modern afflictions normally traceable, directly, or indirectly, to work.

Work, then, institutionalizes homicide as a way of life. People think the Cambodians were crazy for exterminating themselves, but are we any different? The Pol Pot regime at least had a vision, however blurred, of an egalitarian society. We kill people in the six-figure range (at least) in order to sell Big Macs and Cadillacs to the survivors. Our forty or fifty thousand annual highway fatalities are victims, not martyrs. They died for nothing or rather, they died for work. But work is nothing to die for.

Bad news for liberals: regulatory tinkering is useless in this life-and-death context. The federal Occupational Safety and Health Administration was designed to police the core part of the problem, workplace safety. Even before Reagan and the Supreme Court stifled it, OSHA was a farce. At previous and (by current standards) generous Carter-era funding levels, a workplace could expect a random visit from an OSHA inspector once every 46 years.

State control of the economy is no solution. Work is, if anything, more dangerous in the state-socialist countries than it is here. Thousands of Russian workers were killed or injured building the Moscow subway. Stories reverberate about covered-up Soviet nuclear disasters which make Times Beach and Three-Mile Island look like elementary-school air-raid drills. On the other hand, deregulation, currently fashionable, wont help and will probably hurt. From a health and safety standpoint, among others, work was at its worst in the days when the economy most closely approximated laissez-faire.

Historians like Eugene Genovese have argued persuasively that as antebellum slavery apologists insisted factory wage-workers in the Northern American states and in Europe were worse off than Southern plantation slaves. No rearrangement of relations among bureaucrats and businessmen seems to make much difference at the point of production. Serious enforcement of even the rather vague standards enforceable in theory by OSHA would probably bring the economy to a standstill. The enforcers apparently appreciate this, since they dont even try to crack down on most malefactors.

What Ive said so far ought not to be controversial. Many workers are fed up with work. There are high and rising rates of absenteeism, turnover, employee theft and sabotage, wildcat strikes, and overall goldbricking on the job. There may be some movement toward a conscious and not just visceral rejection of work. And yet the prevalent feeling, universal among bosses and their agents and also widespread among workers themselves is that work itself is inevitable and necessary.

I disagree. It is now possible to abolish work and replace it, insofar as it serves useful purposes, with a multitude of new kinds of free activities. To abolish work requires going at it from two directions, quantitative and qualitative. On the one hand, on the quantitative side, we have to cut down massively on the amount of work being done. At present most work is useless or worse and we should simply get rid of it. On the other hand and I think this is the crux of the matter and the revolutionary new departure we have to take what useful work remains and transform it into a pleasing variety of game-like and craft-like pastimes, indistinguishable from other pleasurable pastimes, except that they happen to yield useful end-products. Surely that shouldnt make them less enticing to do. Then all the artificial barriers of power and property could come down. Creation could become recreation. And we could all stop being afraid of each other.

I dont suggest that most work is salvageable in this way. But then most work isnt worth trying to save. Only a small and diminishing fraction of work serves any useful purpose independent of the defense and reproduction of the work-system and its political and legal appendages. Twenty years ago, Paul and Percival Goodman estimated that just five percent of the work then being done presumably the figure, if accurate, is lower now would satisfy our minimal needs for food, clothing, and shelter. Theirs was only an educated guess but the main point is quite clear: directly or indirectly, most work serves the unproductive purposes of commerce or social control. Right off the bat we can liberate tens of millions of salesmen, soldiers, managers, cops, stockbrokers, clergymen, bankers, lawyers, teachers, landlords, security guards, ad-men and everyone who works for them. There is a snowball effect since every time you idle some bigshot you liberate his flunkeys and underlings also. Thus the economy implodes.

Forty percent of the workforce are white-collar workers, most of whom have some of the most tedious and idiotic jobs ever concocted. Entire industries, insurance and banking and real estate for instance, consist of nothing but useless paper-shuffling. It is no accident that the tertiary sector, the service sector, is growing while the secondary sector (industry) stagnates and the primary sector (agriculture) nearly disappears. Because work is unnecessary except to those whose power it secures, workers are shifted from relatively useful to relatively useless occupations as a measure to assure public order. Anything is better than nothing. Thats why you cant go home just because you finish early. They want your time, enough of it to make you theirs, even if they have no use for most of it. Otherwise why hasnt the average work week gone down by more than a few minutes in the past fifty years?

Next we can take a meat-cleaver to production work itself. No more war production, nuclear power, junk food, feminine hygiene deodorant and above all, no more auto industry to speak of. An occasional Stanley Steamer or Model-T might be all right, but the auto-eroticism on which such pestholes as Detroit and Los Angeles depend on is out of the question. Already, without even trying, weve virtually solved the energy crisis, the environmental crisis and assorted other insoluble social problems.

Finally, we must do away with far and away the largest occupation, the one with the longest hours, the lowest pay and some of the most tedious tasks around. I refer to housewives doing housework and child-rearing. By abolishing wage-labor and achieving full unemployment we undermine the sexual division of labor. The nuclear family as we know it is an inevitable adaptation to the division of labor imposed by modern wage-work. Like it or not, as things have been for the last century or two it is economically rational for the man to bring home the bacon, for the woman to do the shitwork to provide him with a haven in a heartless world, and for the children to be marched off to youth concentration camps called schools, primarily to keep them out of Moms hair but still under control, but incidentally to acquire the habits of obedience and punctuality so necessary for workers. If you would be rid of patriarchy, get rid of the nuclear family whose unpaid shadow work, as Ivan Illich says, makes possible the work-system that makes it necessary. Bound up with this no-nukes strategy is the abolition of childhood and the closing of the schools. There are more full-time students than full-time workers in this country. We need children as teachers, not students. They have a lot to contribute to the ludic revolution because theyre better at playing than grown-ups are. Adults and children are not identical but they will become equal through interdependence. Only play can bridge the generation gap.

I havent as yet even mentioned the possibility of cutting way down on the little work that remains by automating and cybernizing it. All the scientists and engineers and technicians freed from bothering with war research and planned obsolescence would have a good time devising means to eliminate fatigue and tedium and danger from activities like mining. Undoubtedly theyll find other projects to amuse themselves with. Perhaps theyll set up world-wide all-inclusive multi-media communications systems or found space colonies. Perhaps. I myself am no gadget freak. I wouldnt care to live in a pushbutton paradise. I dont want robot slaves to do everything; I want to do things myself. There is, I think, a place for labor-saving technology, but a modest place. The historical and pre-historical record is not encouraging. When productive technology went from hunting-gathering to agriculture and on to industry, work increased while skills and self-determination diminished. The further evolution of industrialism has accentuated what Harry Braverman called the degradation of work. Intelligent observers have always been aware of this. John Stuart Mill wrote that all the labor-saving inventions ever devised havent saved a moments labor. Karl Marx wrote that it would be possible to write a history of the inventions, made since 1830, for the sole purpose of supplying capital with weapons against the revolts of the working class. The enthusiastic technophiles Saint-Simon, Comte, Lenin, B. F. Skinner have always been unabashed authoritarians also; which is to say, technocrats. We should be more than sceptical about the promises of the computer mystics. They work like dogs; chances are, if they have their way, so will the rest of us. But if they have any particularized contributions more readily subordinated to human purposes than the run of high tech, lets give them a hearing.

What I really want to see is work turned into play. A first step is to discard the notions of a job and an occupation. Even activities that already have some ludic content lose most of it by being reduced to jobs which certain people, and only those people are forced to do to the exclusion of all else. Is it not odd that farm workers toil painfully in the fields while their air-conditioned masters go home every weekend and putter about in their gardens? Under a system of permanent revelry, we will witness the Golden Age of the dilettante which will put the Renaissance to shame. There wont be any more jobs, just things to do and people to do them.

The secret of turning work into play, as Charles Fourier demonstrated, is to arrange useful activities to take advantage of whatever it is that various people at various times in fact enjoy doing. To make it possible for some people to do the things they could enjoy it will be enough just to eradicate the irrationalities and distortions which afflict these activities when they are reduced to work. I, for instance, would enjoy doing some (not too much) teaching, but I dont want coerced students and I dont care to suck up to pathetic pedants for tenure.

Second, there are some things that people like to do from time to time, but not for too long, and certainly not all the time. You might enjoy baby-sitting for a few hours in order to share the company of kids, but not as much as their parents do. The parents meanwhile, profoundly appreciate the time to themselves that you free up for them, although theyd get fretful if parted from their progeny for too long. These differences among individuals are what make a life of free play possible. The same principle applies to many other areas of activity, especially the primal ones. Thus many people enjoy cooking when they can practice it seriously at their leisure, but not when theyre just fueling up human bodies for work.

Third other things being equal some things that are unsatisfying if done by yourself or in unpleasant surroundings or at the orders of an overlord are enjoyable, at least for a while, if these circumstances are changed. This is probably true, to some extent, of all work. People deploy their otherwise wasted ingenuity to make a game of the least inviting drudge-jobs as best they can. Activities that appeal to some people dont always appeal to all others, but everyone at least potentially has a variety of interests and an interest in variety. As the saying goes, anything once. Fourier was the master at speculating how aberrant and perverse penchants could be put to use in post-civilized society, what he called Harmony. He thought the Emperor Nero would have turned out all right if as a child he could have indulged his taste for bloodshed by working in a slaughterhouse. Small children who notoriously relish wallowing in filth could be organized in Little Hordes to clean toilets and empty the garbage, with medals awarded to the outstanding. I am not arguing for these precise examples but for the underlying principle, which I think makes perfect sense as one dimension of an overall revolutionary transformation. Bear in mind that we dont have to take todays work just as we find it and match it up with the proper people, some of whom would have to be perverse indeed. If technology has a role in all this it is less to automate work out of existence than to open up new realms for re/creation. To some extent we may want to return to handicrafts, which William Morris considered a probable and desirable upshot of communist revolution. Art would be taken back from the snobs and collectors, abolished as a specialized department catering to an elite audience, and its qualities of beauty and creation restored to integral life from which they were stolen by work. Its a sobering thought that the grecian urns we write odes about and showcase in museums were used in their own time to store olive oil. I doubt our everyday artifacts will fare as well in the future, if there is one. The point is that theres no such thing as progress in the world of work; if anything its just the opposite. We shouldnt hesitate to pilfer the past for what it has to offer, the ancients lose nothing yet we are enriched.

The reinvention of daily life means marching off the edge of our maps. There is, it is true, more suggestive speculation than most people suspect. Besides Fourier and Morris and even a hint, here and there, in Marx there are the writings of Kropotkin, the syndicalists Pataud and Pouget, anarcho-communists old (Berkman) and new (Bookchin). The Goodman brothers Communitas is exemplary for illustrating what forms follow from given functions (purposes), and there is something to be gleaned from the often hazy heralds of alternative/appropriate/intermediate/convivial technology, like Schumacher and especially Illich, once you disconnect their fog machines. The situationists as represented by Vaneigems Revolution of Daily Life and in the Situationist International Anthology are so ruthlessly lucid as to be exhilarating, even if they never did quite square the endorsement of the rule of the workers councils with the abolition of work. Better their incongruity, though than any extant version of leftism, whose devotees look to be the last champions of work, for if there were no work there would be no workers, and without workers, who would the left have to organize?

So the abolitionists would be largely on their own. No one can say what would result from unleashing the creative power stultified by work. Anything can happen. The tiresome debaters problem of freedom vs. necessity, with its theological overtones, resolves itself practically once the production of use-values is coextensive with the consumption of delightful play-activity.

Life will become a game, or rather many games, but not as it is now a zero/sum game. An optimal sexual encounter is the paradigm of productive play, The participants potentiate each others pleasures, nobody keeps score, and everybody wins. The more you give, the more you get. In the ludic life, the best of sex will diffuse into the better part of daily life. Generalized play leads to the libidinization of life. Sex, in turn, can become less urgent and desperate, more playful. If we play our cards right, we can all get more out of life than we put into it; but only if we play for keeps.

No one should ever work. Workers of the world relax!

Originally posted here:

THE ABOLITION OF WORK by Bob Black

Read more:

Abolition Of Work | Prometheism.net - Part 7

‘MARCH 4 TRUMP’: About 100 demonstrators gather at Kentucky Capitol – Hopkinsville Kentucky New Era

Saturday afternoons in Central Kentucky are usually reserved for watching college basketball. On this particular Saturday, however, national politics trumped basketball for some Wildcats fans.

About 100 supporters of President Donald Trump gathered on the steps behind the Capitol building in Frankfort one of 49 March 4 Trump demonstrations planned around the country Saturday.

Demonstrators took turns addressing the crowd with a bullhorn to share their personal reasons for voting for Trump. A bugler played Charge during pauses in the impromptu speeches, and demonstrators stopped to say both the Lords Prayer and the Pledge of Allegiance.

Many in the crowd were concerned with protecting Kentuckys coal industry. I want the coal miners back to work, said Jay Baumler of Taylorsville.

Others focused on national issues. Orsemus Bitely of Crestwood blamed the Affordable Care Act for causing him to lose his doctor of 35 years.

Shao Guoyin, an immigrant from China, said he is concerned most with providing law and order and education for his children. In China, they brainwash, he said, before calling for the abolition of Common Core national education standards, which he likened to brainwashing.

Tony Sammons brought his family to the state capital from Grayson over the matter of religious freedom. Sammons said he believes Christians have been to made to feel like a minority in recent years. I am tickled to death that we have someone in office who supports Christian values, he said.

More here:

'MARCH 4 TRUMP': About 100 demonstrators gather at Kentucky Capitol - Hopkinsville Kentucky New Era

Immigration under capitalism: Life and death along the US-Mexico border – World Socialist Web Site

Part Four By Eric London 7 March 2017

This is the fourth of a four-part series on the conditions facing immigrant workers on the US-Mexico border. The first part was posed February 28, the second was posted March 2 and the third posted March 6.

The World Socialist Web Site spoke to immigrants and leaders of non-profit organizations about the disastrous impact of Trumps immigration policies on tens of millions of undocumented workers living in the US.

The migrant working class lives under constant fear of raids by Immigration and Customs Enforcement [ICE] officers, who sweep into communities and workplaces making mass arrests. One such sweep took place earlier this month in Austin, Texas. The World Socialist Web Site spoke to Cristina Parker, immigrations programs director of the non-profit organization Grassroots Leadership.

There are two ways in which ICE raids happened recently. Either they knock on peoples doors at home or they follow them from home or work in their cars, pulling them over under the guise of a traffic stop.

WSWS reporters, in fact, witnessed local police joined by border patrol agents pulling over a car in what otherwise appeared to be a routine traffic stop.

Parker said that ICE officers are usually not in uniform, so all over they will try to trick or otherwise manipulate people into opening their doors. She continued: They will lie about why theyre there. A famous example came from Atlanta last year, where ICE agents in collaboration with police would hold up a photo of a black man, say there was a dangerous criminal in the house, and arrest all those without papers inside. Families only find out after a person has been detained, so people often come home from school or work to find that their parent or spouse isnt there.

The apparatus that Trump is now building his deportation machine on was built originally by the Obama administration. One of the most egregious examples was family detention and is something that will mark Obamas legacy. He opened these giant for-profit family detention centers where they exclusively hold women and children seeking asylum, and he didnt close them before handing the keys over to Trump. So everything were seeing weaponized right now was built by Obama.

These conditions did not emerge in a vacuum. Rather, they have been prepared over decades by the US ruling classs attempts to address the declining position of American capitalism through military adventures abroad, particularly since the dissolution of the Soviet Union in 1991. As David North wrote in the preface to A Quarter Century of War: The US Drive for Global Hegemony 1990-2016:

The belligerent response of the United States to the 1991 dissolution of the Soviet Union reflected the weakness, not the strength, of American capitalism. The overwhelming support within the ruling elite for a highly aggressive foreign policy arose from the delusion that the United States could reverse the protracted erosion of its global economic position through the deployment of its immense military power.

Over the course of this historical period, the nationalist and xenophobic run-off from the virtually unbroken series of US wars has come to dominate bourgeois politics. Immigrants provide a convenient scapegoat for a financial aristocracy that has plundered workers wages and living conditions to pay for its wars.

The language of the war on terror has provided the lexicon for the attack on immigrants, who are barred because they pose a threat to national security. In the process, billions of dollars will be diverted from social programs and regulatory agencies to fund the deportation machine.

The Democratic Party has been a primary champion of the attack on immigrants, bolstered by the AFL-CIO, which uses nationalism to turn workers against their class brothers and sisters of other nationalities. The Democrats are responsible for the passage of the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996, the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996 and the Secure Fences Act of 2006. They are also responsible for the mass deportation program of the Obama administration.

Moreover, last month 37 of 48 Senate Democrats voted to confirm the architect of Trumps anti-immigrant program, Gen. John Kelly, to head the Department of Homeland Security (DHS).

The attack on immigrants is an attack on the working class as a whole. Workers should have the right to travel freely in search of economic and physical security without facing harassment, deportation or hardship of any kind. Under the auspices of border security, the government is building the framework for a police state that will impact all elements of political, social and cultural life for immigrants and non-immigrants alike.

The nighttime raids, the mass detentions without trial, and the phony due process of immigration court proceedings all bear the markings of dictatorship. These are the methods that will be used in the near future against those who oppose the policies of the government, regardless of immigration status. Striking workers, student demonstrators and all those who engage in social protest will be labeled threats to national security and be targeted for state repression.

The attack on migrants is not only politically reactionary, it is also irrational. Leon Trotsky wrote in May 1940:

The world of decaying capitalism is overcrowded. The question of admitting a few hundred extra refugees becomes a major problem for such a world power as the United States. In an era of aviation, telegraph, telephone, radio and television, travel from country to country is paralyzed by passports and visas. The period of the wasting away of foreign trade and the decline of domestic trade is at the same time the period of the monstrous intensification of chauvinism, and especially of anti-Semitism. Today decaying capitalist society is striving to squeeze the Jewish people from all its pores; seventeen million individuals out of the two billion populating the globe, that is, less than one percent, can no longer find a place on our planet! Amid the vast expanse of land and the marvels of technology, which has also conquered the skies for man as well as the earth, the bourgeoisie has managed to convert our planet into a foul prison.

How all the more true this is today! In a world of instantaneous global communication, the human race is interconnected to a degree that would have been unimaginable just 30 years ago, let alone in 1940.

Advances in technology continue to facilitate human travel and international shipping, linking economic supply lines that deliver goods produced in dozens of different countries to every corner of the globe. Through the use of cellular phones, the residents of even the most isolated villages and hamlets can communicate with friends and relatives located in world metropolises and learn of world events at the swipe of a finger.

Even personal relationships are of an increasingly international character, with family trees commonly branching out across multiple continents. In 2011, 21 percent of US married couples included at least one foreign-born spouse. In 2006, data from the European Union showed eight countries where more than 15 percent of marriages involved spouses from two different countries (Belgium, Estonia, Cyprus, Luxembourg, the Netherlands, Austria, Slovakia, Sweden), and seven more where between 10 and 15 percent involved mixed national couples (Bulgaria, Denmark, Germany, Spain, France, Lithuania and Malta). These figures have undoubtedly increased in the intervening years.

The world is pulsing with billions of people whose lives are burdened by the weight of decades of economic exploitation and war and yet are restricted from moving freely across the planet. At the root of this dilemma is the outdated nation-state system, which stands as a central obstacle to the rational organization of the world economy and the free flow of the worlds inhabitants.

Socialists stand irreconcilably opposed to the present division of the world into nation states. We call for bringing the geographical organization of the world into harmony with the international character of the globalized economy. In this manner, humans will be given the freedom to travel as they see fit without visas, border patrol, passports or fear of harassment. Families living in different countries will not be barred from visiting or living with one another simply on account of where people happened to be born or where they happen to live. As the 18th century philosopher Montesquieu said, I am necessarily a man, only accidentally am I French.

The abolition of the nation-state system requires the overthrow of capitalism, which entails nationalizing under public ownership the major international banks and corporations, placing control of production in the hands of the working class, and redistributing the worlds resources to meet the needs of the human race. It is on this basis that the fight against Trumps immigration program must be carried out.

Read more:

Immigration under capitalism: Life and death along the US-Mexico border - World Socialist Web Site

What Is Digital Twin Technology – And Why Is It So Important? – Forbes


Forbes
What Is Digital Twin Technology - And Why Is It So Important?
Forbes
While the concept of a digital twin has been around since 2002, it's only thanks to the Internet of Things (IoT) that it has become cost-effective to implement. And, it is so imperative to business today, it was named one of Gartner's Top 10 Strategic ...

Follow this link:

What Is Digital Twin Technology - And Why Is It So Important? - Forbes

IBM and Salesforce will start sharing their AI technology – Recode

Today, IBM and Salesforce announced they will connect their artificial intelligence platforms to help companies target and serve customers.

IBMs natural-language AI program Watson which conquered the television quiz show Jeopardy will be integrated with Salesforces Einstein, the AI that helps mine its hugely popular customer relationship management software, to provide customer purchasing habits and shopping data for businesses that run Salesforce.

That means that an insurance company that uses Salesforce, for example, can also use Watsons weather data to target customers before a snowstorm to help reduce potential damages. By combining Watsons data on local retail trends with specific customer data from Salesforce, companies will be able to send highly targeted campaigns to shoppers, according to the companies.

Salesforce customers will be able to start using Watsons smarts to refine their customer targeting starting in the second half of this year. Pricing for use of the new joint AI products was not disclosed.

As part of the agreement, IBM will start to use Salesforces cloud services to help organize its own customer support needs.

Other companies, like Facebook and Twitter, would probably love to provide that level of personalized engagement for businesses that target customers on their platforms, but this new partnership between Salesforce and IBM may prove hard to top.

Read more:

IBM and Salesforce will start sharing their AI technology - Recode

Technology hastening the Lord’s work – Deseret News

We live in a day when the gospel has been restored in its fullness. As Aaronic priesthood bearers it is our responsibility to prepare and spread this message of joy to the people of the earth.

To make that possible God has given us powerful technologies and media, with which youth are well acquainted. Elder David A. Bednar invoked this blessing: "Come to understand more fully the spiritual significance and blessing of living in the dispensation of the fullness of times, that you may have eyes to see clearly both the possibilities and the pitfalls of the remarkable technologies that are available to us today, that you may increase in your capacity to use these inspired tools appropriately, and that you may receive inspiration and guidance about the role you should play in helping to sweep the earth as with a flood of truth and righteousness. As you press forward in this holy work, I promise you will be blessed in mortality in the individual, specific, and necessary ways that will prepare you for eternity.

Blessings and promises from an apostle of the Lord Jesus Christ come to pass when we act on those promises. If our purpose is to become like our Heavenly Father why hold anything back from furthering His purposes.

Technology is hastening the work

What used to take sometimes weeks, days or hours can now be delivered in seconds, as a written phrase, voice message, picture, video or other media formats, in real or asynchronous time. Social media such as Facebook, Pinterest, YouTube, Twitter, Instagram and many other popular social media channels can be used to share gospel messages. Messages can be downloaded into your smart phone or other mobile devices, which can be carried with you at all times for study and sharing. Technology is a tool that is hastening the work. It lets us touch hearts, lift spirits and share testimonies beyond our physical borders to any who wish to hear our message.

Messages of inspiration can be shared online with family and friends. You can fill out your profile on Mormon.org and explain why you are a Mormon. Family records can be gathered and shared instantly across the world. More and more youth are gathering family names for temple work. The Gospel Library provides electronic access to general conference, church magazines, lesson manuals, handbooks, scriptures, etc. You can highlight verses, add notes, organize your study journal online and fill it with priceless truths, which can be accessed by your cell phone, tablet or computer. Treasuring up the things in your study journal that the Spirit teaches helps you retain what you learn and will add to your spiritual preparedness and progression.

Some spiritual and technical principles for the effective and safe use of technology

It is difficult to name all the good things that can be done using technology, but here are some spiritual principles that will help you to effectively use technology.

1. Use technology to do things that would be pleasing to God. Everything which inviteth to do good, and to persuade to believe in Christ, is sent forth by the power and gift of Christ; wherefore ye may know with a perfect knowledge it is of God (Moroni 7:16). If Jesus had had such a tool how would He use it? Asking the question, What would Jesus do? invites revelation. Along with prayerful consideration, the answer to that question will give us ideas as to how we can use these technologies for study, service and building His kingdom. Asking that question also helps us to keep the covenants we make each week to take upon ourselves the name of Jesus Christ and always remember Him.

2. Be respectful with the use of your smart phone or tablet in church. If Jesus were in a sacrament meeting, priesthood meeting or Sunday school class, how would He use His smart phone? Would He be playing a video game or texting friends, or would He be reading scriptures and thoughts related to the lesson? Would He be respectful of the speaker or teacher and those around Him who are learning the truths of the gospel? We all know the answer to those questions.

3. Remember, with technology you can learn, but you must also act and share. The Savior taught if we live the gospel we will know it is true and comes from God (John 7:17). Alma taught the principle that God will give us more knowledge about Him as we live what we learn (Alma 12:9). Learn by reading the scriptures, listening to general conference, studying lesson manuals, keeping a study journal, then living what you learn and sharing your experiences with others. That is what the Savior did. We can do the same. The closer you align your actions with His purposes, the more you will experience His power in your life.

4. Finally, remember who you are, a beloved son of your loving Heavenly Father who wants to give to you all that He has, the gift of Eternal Life. Now is the time to choose the right, even online, to fulfill your divine destiny. This is no dress rehearsal. Now is the time to prepare to meet God and prepare for the coming of His Son. Taking the challenge of Elder Bednar to recognize who we are, the special time in which we live and effectively using technology to learn, act upon and share the gospel, we will be blessed in mortality in the individual, specific, and necessary ways that will prepare us for missions and eternity.

The Young Men general presidency invites you to consecrate and sanctify your electronic device as a source of light in your life. We invite you to take advantage of these tools to both prepare yourselves to learn gospel principles and also to share them.

The LDS Church News is an official publication of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. The publication's content supports the doctrines, principles and practices of the Church.

Here is the original post:

Technology hastening the Lord's work - Deseret News

Three VCs on What’s Next in Technology – Wall Street Journal (subscription)


Wall Street Journal (subscription)
Three VCs on What's Next in Technology
Wall Street Journal (subscription)
What is the next wave of emerging technologies going to look like? The ones that chief information officers should be paying attention to? The Wall Street Journal's Rolfe Winkler spoke with Steve Herrod, managing director of General Catalyst, Peter ...

Continue reading here:

Three VCs on What's Next in Technology - Wall Street Journal (subscription)

New NOAA technology tracks lightning in real time from space – Christian Science Monitor

March 6, 2017 The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration hopes a new satellite in orbit will enlighten our understanding of a flashy weather phenomenon and lead to better forecasts of severe storms.

NOAA released on Monday the first images captured by the GOES-16 satellite, snapped on Valentine's Day from 22,300 miles above Earth. The images and video show lightning flashes across the Western Hemisphere over the course of an hour.

The new instrument, one of several aboard the satellite, marks a leap forward in monitoring and understanding lightning storms. In its first week in orbit, the instrument the Geostationary Lightning Mapper, or GLM recorded more lightning data than all previous data captured about the weather event from space combined.

NOAA hopes that more data will lead to better storm predictions.

"As you can imagine, we are pretty excited here at NOAA Satellites," spokeswoman Connie Barclay told NPR in an email. "Lightning strikes the US on average of 25 million times each year, and kills on average 49 people in the US each year."

The lightning detector is in geostationary orbit itremains in the same location relative to the ground below it allowing it tocontinuously track lightning storms.

It works by looking for flashes anywhere in the Western Hemisphere, so forecasters know when a storm is forming, intensifying, and becoming more dangerous, explains NOAA.

Rapid increases of lightning are a signal that a storm is strengthening quickly and could produce severe weather, the agency said in a press release. "When combined with radar and other satellite data, GLM data may help forecasters anticipate severe weather and issue flood and flash flood warnings sooner."

In addition, the instrument will help identify lightning-sparked wildfires in dry areas like the American West, which should lead to faster response times from fire crews.

The first images from the GLM reveal lightning flashes from the Gulf of Mexico to the southern coast of South America. In the image, brighter colors indicate more lightning energy (or more kilowatt-hours of total optical emissions) recorded.

NOAA also released a video that showed images of lightning storms developing over southeast Texas, as NPRs Rebecca Hersher reported. Tornadoes from that storm system destroyed homes near Houston, wrote Ms. Hersher.

Unlike traditional time-lapse animations that appear jerky because the images are presented more quickly than they were gathered, this video is a slower version of what the satellite sees, brought down from the satellite's 500 frames per second to a more human 25 frames per second.

NOAA also expects the instrument to provide better forecasting of lightning storms over oceans, benefiting those traveling in the air or water, as well as better predictions of in-cloud lightning, a precursor to lightning strikes that make landfall.

The GOES-16 satellite was launched in November with the GLM aboard, to the excitement of the weather community.

"For weather forecasters, GOES-R will be similar to going from a black-and-white TV to super-high-definition TV," said Stephen Volz, assistant administrator for NOAA's Satellite and Information Services division, using another name for the satellite.

"For the American public, that will mean faster, more accurate weather forecasts and warnings," he said, as well as "more lives saved and better environmental intelligence for state and local officials and all decision makers."

In addition to the lightning monitor, the satellite is outfitted with five other imaging and data-collection instruments. A Harris Corp. onboard camera can photograph inside the eye of a hurricane, a new perspective that promises forecasters the ability to measure the intensity and timeline of storms, The Christian Science Monitor previously reported. Another instrument monitors solar flares and space weather and fluctuations in radiation levels they cause.

Its a big deal," Fred Johnson, a National Weather Service meteorologist in Melbourne, Fla., told USA Today. "Its a big upgrade from what weve had in the past. This should save lives and property."

More here:

New NOAA technology tracks lightning in real time from space - Christian Science Monitor

TSA announces pat-down policy for fliers who refuse new technology – Fox News

The Transportation Security Administration (TSA) has just announced that it will be conducting a potentiallymore invasive physical pat-down procedure to customers who refuse to be scanned electronically.

On Monday, TSA says it decided to inform local police of the new pat-down in case a passenger calls to report abnormal federal frisking, Bloomberg reports, but the agencyhas declined to say exactly where-and how-employees will be touching air travelers.

Previously, if a flier was selected, one of five separate types of pat-downs were used but the new search procedure said is to replace all five of the other pat-downs.

According to the agencys website, TSA officers use the back of the hands for pat-downs over sensitive areas of the body.In limited cases, additional screening involving a sensitive area pat-down with the front of the hand may be needed to determine that a threat does not exist.

Now, security screeners will use the front of their hands on passengers in a private screening area if one of the prior screening methods indicates the presence of explosives.TSA requires all pat-downs to be conducted an officer of the same sex.

Two million people are screened by TSA daily throughout airports nationwide.. The searches normally occur when an imaging scanner detects one or more unknown objects on a person or if a traveler declines to walk through the scanner and instead for the physical screening.Passengers who decline the screening technology are automatically subject to enhanced physical searches.

FOLLOW US ON FACEBOOK FOR MORE FOX LIFESTYLE NEWS

The agency says the new screening procedure is not expected to increase overall airport security delays though TSA pre-check passengers may also receive an enhanced pat-down.

The change is partly due to the agencys study of a 2015 report criticizing different aspects of current agency screening procedures. That particular audit, conducted by the Department of Homeland Securitys Inspector General, reported that airport officers failed to detect handguns and other weapons.

Airline pilots, flight attendants and crew members are also subject to receiving the new pat-down but overall number of random searches for airline crews will remain at a very small percentage. Airport employees may also be subject to additional, random screenings.

More here:

TSA announces pat-down policy for fliers who refuse new technology - Fox News

Space energy technology restored to make power stations more efficient – Science Daily

Space energy technology restored to make power stations more efficient
Science Daily
Satellite-powering technology that was abandoned decades ago has been reinvented to potentially work with traditional power stations to help them convert heat to electricity more efficiently, meaning we would need less fossil fuel to burn for power. A ...

and more »

Read more:

Space energy technology restored to make power stations more efficient - Science Daily

Technology Center Coming to Mayfield – wnep.com

Please enable Javascript to watch this video

MAYFIELD -- A former school in Lackawanna County is being turned into a technology center with the goal of bringing people, ideas, and jobs to our area.

Renovations at the former Lackawanna Business Center in Mayfield will cost up to $1.5 million.

Once finished, the building will help grow businesses focused on the environment and technology.

The building in Mayfield used to be home to a school called Saint Rose Academy. The school closed in 2010.

Now, the building is being turned into a place for young businesses to learn and grow.

"It's really an existing building that was underutilized and brought back to life, and any economic activity is good for all," said Karl Phifenberger.

Phifenberger owns the building. He and his partners are converting the building into the Northeast Environmental and Technology Center or NEET.

The place will provide office and lab space for as many as 15 new businesses that focus on the environment and technology.

"The whole purpose is to attract offices here be an incubator, attract biosciences and other technology-related business," Phifenberger explained.

The 95,000-square-foot building includes classrooms, a shared cafeteria, and a presentation room.

"The capabilities with this building is there is a greenhouse that will support some agriculture programs, moving forward, wedding and events," Phifenberger added.

The Petal Pusher sits on the other side of Business Route 6. It's been around for more than 30 years.

Owner Gary Bruzuchalski has seen the building go through many changes.

"It used to be an environmental center years ago and it's very exciting for me to see new businesses in the area, new people in the area, traffic in the area, very exciting."

NEET is still accepting applications for businesses to work in the building.

Renovations are expected to wrap up in November.

41.538137 -75.536019

Read more from the original source:

Technology Center Coming to Mayfield - wnep.com

Five years of John Groce long enough to measure progress and it’s hard to find – Chicago Tribune

In one of the most poignant scenes from another disappointing Illinois basketball season, teardrops rolled down the cheeks of senior guard Malcolm Hill during a Big Ten Network interview after Wednesday's home victory against Michigan State.

It was real, raw and reflected everything we love about March.

"It means a lot," said Hill, a four-year starter who developed into Mr. Dependable for the Illini. "The last four years have done a lot for me."

Yet the program stands still.

Only three Illinois players have scored more points in their careers than Hill, an example of persistence coach John Groce can point to proudly when critics ask for evidence of progress. But the list after Hill isn't long enough and the bad losses under Groce too easily mounted, the latest Saturday against Rutgers the Big Ten's worst team. Remove emotion from the equation created by Hill's feel-good moment, and the numbers fail to add up to a sixth season for Groce.

The Illini never have finished with a winning Big Ten record or higher than seventh in the conference under Groce, who is 37-53 in the league and 97-74 overall. His overall winning percentage (.562) is lower than the Big Ten winning percentage of predecessor Bruce Weber (.578).

Perhaps the Illini (18-13, 8-10) can change the narrative and save Groce's job by shocking the world with two or three victories in the Big Ten tournament this week in Washington. But it seems hard to fathom an Illinois team that couldn't beat 14th-place Rutgers with a potential NCAA berth at stake can go on that kind of a roll with Purdue looming Friday on the bracket. The Illini open Thursday against Michigan, against which Groce has gone 2-8 during his tenure. As far as bad matchups go, the Wolverines qualify.

If the Illini fail to make the NCAA field as expected neither Jerry Palm of CBS Sports nor Joe Lunardi of ESPN projected them in as of Monday it would mark the first time in nearly four decades the once-proud program has missed four straight tournaments. To reward such futility in today's college sports culture, on a campus where basketball is big enough to approve a $170 million renovation to the State Farm Center, would defy logic.

Groce's players adhered to what a source on the Illinois board of trustees called a preseason edict from the administration to avoid the type of ugly off-the-court incidents that plagued the program last year. But that was a low bar to clear, and on the court, Illinois fell short of finishing among the top five in the Big Ten, as a prominent faction of the board believed Groce needed to do.

Groce supporters cling to a highly rated recruiting class arriving in the fall, but signing a group of blue-chippers to guarantee a couple of more seasons of unfulfilled potential hardly represents a valid reason to keep a coach. This experienced Illinois team, with all but Tracy Abrams signed by Groce, never encountered injuries or disciplinary issues yet enters the Big Ten tournament as the No. 9 seed in a year defined by league parity.

This season marked an opportunity for the Illini but will go down as another one missed. A four-game winning streak at the end of the regular season showed resilience but also made you wonder why it required a crisis for the Illini to reveal the trait.

As Northwestern bathes in the national spotlight under coach Chris Collins and Minnesota enjoys a resurgence under coach Richard Pitino, Illinois confronts an unsettling reality. A fair evaluation says the Illini have fallen further behind in the race to Big Ten supremacy during Groce's five seasons. Bringing Groce back likely would mean extending a contract that expires after 2018-19 no coach can effectively recruit without the cloak of contract security. A contract extension is a reward.

Is Illinois in the business of rewarding mediocrity?

Athletic director Josh Whitman, who has declined all media requests until after the season, surely grapples with this dilemma because Groce remains one of the most genuine coaches in the business, regardless of his record. Anybody who has spent time around the relentlessly optimistic 45-year-old comes away affected positively, the kind of interaction that gave Groce the reputation as an effective recruiter.

Any critical assessment of Groce's job performance at Illinois, like this one, likely comes from professional duty outweighing personal feelings. Groce is as amiable as he is energetic. His personality and perspective make him a terrific dinner guest and interview subject, but those qualities haven't helped Illinois basketball ascend to the next level.

Good guys don't always make great fits for major-college jobs, and five years under Groce has been enough time to suggest Illinois needs to move on. The school can afford Groce's $1.6 million buyout more than it can afford to risk embracing the status quo.

As people go, they don't come any more likable than Groce. As coaches go, Illini basketball can do better.

dhaugh@chicagotribune.com

Twitter @DavidHaugh

See the original post here:

Five years of John Groce long enough to measure progress and it's hard to find - Chicago Tribune

Pick-and-Pop: Parsons’ ‘progress,’ weekend notes, more – The Commercial Appeal

Grizzlies forward Chandler Parsons was hard on himself after playing a back-to-back for the first time this season. Ronald Tillery/The Commercial Appeal

Dallas Mavericks' Seth Curry (30) defends as Memphis Grizzlies forward Chandler Parsons (25) moves to the basket for a shot during the first half oin Dallas, Friday, March 3, 2017.(Photo: Tony Gutierrez/AP)

Some post-weekend Grizzlies thoughts:

Parsons Progress: Chandler Parsons played his first back-to-back of the season, and his second most individual-game minutes of the season against Dallas, with 9 points on 4-16 shooting in 44 minutes over both games and the same physical limitations weve seen all season.

Was simply playing the back-to-back a sign of progress, as it was touted, or a sign of the team trying to force some progress as the clock ticks toward the playoffs?

The storm and stress surrounding the Parsons question is getting a little tiresome. Its not about his now-dormant social media, his off-court adventures, how hard he works, how early he shows up or how late he stays at practice, or whether shutting down for the season would be theact of a coward, to choose his own word. This is not an issue of morality or machismo. Its a simple two-part question: 1. Is Parsons healthy enough to be on the court? The answer to that is apparently yes. 2. Is he healthy enough to help the team when hes there? So, far the answer to that is no, with no particular reason to believe that will change in the next few weeks. And yet context complicates.

One thing that props up an apparently indefinite patience with Parsons lack of progress is the battery of alternatives. Last week in this space, I worked through some lineup alternatives, which on the wing would mean James Ennis, Vince Carter, or Troy Daniels. None of them, at this stage, should be a starter on aplayoff team.

Theres a two-part opportunity cost to continuing to play Parsons despite his ineffectiveness: 1. That the team has consistently been worse with Parsons on the floor than with the players who would take his minutes, and the games now matter if the team cares about maximizing its playoff seeding. 2. If Parsons is still this player come mid-April, its hard to believe hell maintain this role in the playoffs, so the team is just delaying the process of settling on the lineup and rotation it will use in the postseason and getting that rotation some reps.

If were making this about the team, and not about Parsons, which is how the discussion should be centered, then theres this counter-argument in favor ofthe status quo: The alternatives arent much better than even the current Parsons. Carter and Daniels have each shot below 36 percent over their past 10 games, in a rotation role, and each has definite limitations at full health. Daniels isnt just squeezed by Parsons, but by Toney Douglas taking over a big chunk of back-up scoring guard minutes, a development that is lessabout Douglas individual production than abouthow his ball-handling has helped maximize Mike Conleys impact. Ennis has mostly been out of the rotation lately, but his own limitations are exposed when he gets heavy minutes.

The math for Parsons at this point: That the slim chance of him yet improving with playing time presents a greater path to post-season upside than the minor improvements to be found in benching him. No one with the Grizzlies is going to put it that plainly, but thats the calculation, and it could well be the right one.

A Two-Man Game Wed Love to See: In the playground of our dreams if not on an NBA court.

Other Weekend Notes: Both weekend losses are easy to rationalize individually: This Dallas Mavericks team, with Nerlens Noel, Seth Curry and Yogi Ferrell all in the lineup, is far better than the teams full-season record indicates, and even that record is good enough to be in the playoff hunt. A four-point loss on the road to that team is no disgrace. Neither is running out of gas on the second night of a road back-to-back against a relentless Rockets team.

The problem with that, as noted after last weekends road split: Acceptable isnt good enough if the Grizzlies still harbor hopes of moving up in the Western Conference playoff race. Record-wise, the NBAs three best teams are all in the West, and getting into the 4-5 game and avoiding those teams should be the goal. The Grizzlies cant play at the level theyve shown since the All-Star break and get there.

While the attention has been on Parsons, the biggest concern at the moment might be Marc Gasol. The Grizzlies can hope for secondary help, but this season has shown they cant depend on it. They need the Gasol-Mike Conley-Zach Randolph trio to carry them.

Gasol struggled defensively with younger, quicker centers in Dallas Noel and Houstons Clint Capella over the weekend and has been erratic on the offensive end for the past month. Hes topped 23 points in a game 20 times this season, but only once in the past month, and that in a home routagainst Phoenix, one of the NBAs very worst defenses.

Over the weekend, Gasol played 36 minutes in each half of a back-to-back. Setting aside his recovery from foot surgery, hes a 32-year-old center. Hes 17th in the NBA so far this season in total minutes. The only older players in the Top 20(and both just barely) are Carmelo Anthony and Lebron James. The only centers who have played more are Karl-Anthony Towns and Rudy Gobert, ages 21 and 24, respectively. Gasol scoffs at such things, but is it unreasonable to wonder if hes worn down some?

Gasols three-point shooting percentages per month:

Regression to the mean? Slump? Random variance? Fatigue? All answers are possible. But for the Grizzlies to be good down the stretch and competitive in the playoffs, a return of All-NBA caliber Gasol is mandatory.

Elsewhere in the Playoff Race: The Grizzlies have been helped by Oklahoma Citys inability to win on the road. The Thunder went 0-3 on a long-weekend road trip and only the Indiana Pacers have been worse on the road among teams with winning records overall. This has helped the Grizzlies maintain a full game lead over the Thunder despite their own struggles, but the Thunder will play six of their next eight back at home.

The Clippers have been playing .500 ball for a while now, and the return of Chris Paul hasnt (yet) changed that. They have a tough one at home tonight against Boston before coming into Memphis for a big game on Thursday, on the second half of a road back-to-back.

The Jazz were my preseason pick to jump from the lottery to the Wests Top 4 and they seem to be strengthening their grip, building a three-game lead over the Grizzlies. But their schedule takes a much tougher turn after tonights home game against New Orleans. Standings as of today:

Game Minus Presentation?: So this happened over the weekend, and this reaction from Friend of Pick-and-Pop Tim Bontemps was common among full-time NBA media:

This would be a fun experiment for one game (and it happened in Memphis by accident for half a game last season), but I cant fully get behind the general idea. As a music nerd, I like the snippets Grizzlies DJs expertly sprinkle into game action (favorites: David Bowie, Tribe Called Quest, Pete Rock & C.L. Smooth). I like Mike Conleys Dad Jokes and Zach Randolphs Deep Thoughts. I like Bongo Lady and the Mike Conley Road Runner beep-beep, the ceremonial fourth quarter Whoomp! There It Is! and the occasional well-earned deployment of the Gap Band. This isnt just a Serious Sporting Event. Its a community party. There are elements of game presentation I dont like or, much more often, just dont care about, and I find it easy to tune those things out. No harm done.

All of that said, there is one aspect of game presentation Id march on the frontlines against: Can we please lower the volume on pre-game, in-arena music? I cant hear myself think, much less have a human conversation. I dont need to be engaged during the pregame shoot-around. I can fend for myself.

100 (Or So) Word Preview: The Grizzlies dont just need to start stringing together wins, they need to start playing better. But theres no upside tonight as the NBAs worst team, the Brooklyn Nets, make their lone FedExForum appearance of the season. The Grizzlies need to notch this win and to do so without strain or drama. A big win, as against Phoenix last week, wont really mean much. It just has to happen. If youre desperate for intrigue: Which center, Marc Gasol or Brooklyns Brook Lopez, makes more threes? If you want to worry: Best bet for being tonights Sam Dekker or Doug McDermott, the secondary wing scorer who has a career night? Keep an eye on Sean Kilpatrick.

More:

Pick-and-Pop: Parsons' 'progress,' weekend notes, more - The Commercial Appeal

Despite 2015 deficit, progress made in implementing reforms, Vatican says – Crux: Covering all things Catholic

ROME Although the Holy See reported a deficit of 12.4 million euros ($13.1 million) in 2015, significant progress has been made in the budgeting process and carrying out economic reform, the Vatican said.

Vatican City State, on the other hand, which has a separate budget, reported a surplus of 59.9 million euros ($63.4 million) largely due to continued revenue from cultural activities, especially those linked to the museums, a statement from the Vatican Secretariat for the Economy said March 4.

Established by Pope Francis in February 2014, the secretariat answers to the Council for the Economy and exercises authority over all economic and administrative activities within the Holy See and Vatican City State, including budgeting, financial planning, hiring, procurement and the preparation of detailed financial statements.

In its review of the 2015 budget, the economic secretariat said it informed the council that while new rules for transparency in budgeting and financial reporting are firmly underway, completion of the process and a full audit are a few more years away.

The 2015 annual accounts represent an important step for the economic reforms and along the journey toward new policies, which are progressing well, the secretariat said.

The secretariat also reported that, for the first time, the 2017 budget was presented to the economic council before the start of the new year.

Presenting the budget early for approval, it added, will allow further control on reviewing expenses, through the monitoring of actual performances against approved financial plans.

Read the original here:

Despite 2015 deficit, progress made in implementing reforms, Vatican says - Crux: Covering all things Catholic

Coalition forces make quick progress in Mosul; ISIS defeat expected soon – Washington Times

It was supposed to be a long hard slog, but top commanders within the U.S.-backed coalition battling the Islamic State now say Mosul, the terrorist groups last urban stronghold in Iraq, could be back under Baghdads control within weeks.

Iraqi military units, alongside Shiite militiamen and Kurdish peshmerga fighters, have spent the past four months in grueling urban combat against forces loyal to the Islamic State, also known as ISIS and ISIL, through the eastern half of Mosul.

With support from U.S. heavy artillery and air power, the Iraqi-led coalition capped the offensive late last month, seizing Mosuls main airport and a critical military base before setting its sights on the western side of Iraqs second-largest city.

Then came a flurry of fast-paced developments Monday as the coalitions suddenly closed in on a key provincial government complex in the Dawasa enclave of western Mosul, prompting a wave of optimistic projections from Iraqi commanders.

The Islamic States defenses are buckling under the pressure, said Iraqi Air Force Cmdr. Hamid Maliki. Given the speed and relative success of the Iraqi offensive, Mosul will likely fall to Iraqi forces within the next six weeks, Cmdr. Maliki told the Anadolu News Agency.

In Washington, Pentagon spokesman Capt. Jeff Davis would not offer a timeline for Mosuls recapture, but he did note that Iraqi forces had retaken over 1,500 square miles of territory from Islamic State control.

Iraqi forces had closed in on a key provincial government complex in the Dawasa enclave of western Mosul on Monday, with the Interior Ministrys Rapid Response units and Iraqi Federal Police taking the provincial police headquarters and court building, Reuters reported.

Iraqi forces also reportedly secured the second of five bridges spanning the Tigris River that connect eastern and western Mosul. Although all five bridges were destroyed by coalition airstrikes early in the campaign, maintaining control of those bridges on the citys western banks provides security for advancing Iraqi forces driving into Mosuls city center.

The western Mosul offensive had been delayed for several days because of inclement weather, which prevented American and coalition fighters and surveillance aircraft from providing support to ground forces. But the coalitions progress through the western half of Mosul has been relatively swift since operations began late last month.

Stiff resistance

Despite such progress, ground commanders still are confronting stiff resistance by Islamic State cells dug into western Mosuls bombed-out neighborhoods. Coalition fighters have been met with waves of suicide bombings, sniper and mortar fire and commercial drones armed with grenades and artillery shells. One Iraqi Federal Police unit was swarmed with six suicide car bombs as it moved through Dawasa toward the provincial government complex, Maj. Gen. Haider al-Maturi of the Federal Police Commandos Division told The Associated Press on Sunday.

In Dawasa, as well as Shuhada and Mansour neighborhoods in the citys southwest, Iraqi military and police are battling the Islamic State street by street, block by block. Iraqi forces are trying to clear nests of Islamic State snipers and mortar pits dug into civilian homes and buildings across western Mosul, Iraqi special forces Maj. Ali Talib told the AP.

Iraqi commanders are bracing for the most difficult fight of the campaign as coalition forces move toward the old city district of Mosul. The ancient city sector is home to the Mosuls Grand Nuri Mosque, where Islamic State leader Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi notoriously announced the groups caliphate after overrunning Mosul and most of northern Iraq in mid-2014. At the time, units of the regular Iraqi army broke and ran in the face of an advance from a much smaller Islamic State contingent.

Among the top concerns among U.S. and coalition commanders is the possible use of chemical weapons against advancing Iraqi troops.

Islamic State fighters reportedly deployed mustard gas against Iraqi forces and civilians in western Mosul last week, NBC News reported. Islamic State rockets laden with the chemical weapon were fired from the western Mosul, striking the Al-Zuhur and Al-Mishraq neighborhoods in the eastern portion of the city.

Officials from the International Committee of the Red Cross said 15 civilians had been treated for exposure to toxic chemical agents over the past week.

It was certainly [the result of] a toxic chemical agent, because their symptoms were absolutely clear. People had blisters, they vomited. They had irritation in the eyes and coughed, Iolanda Jaquemet, an ICRC spokeswoman, told NBC.

The World Health Organization issued a statement last week over the possible use of chemical weapons in Mosul, saying international aid groups and local health organizations have activated an emergency response plan to treat victims of chemical attacks.

WHO is extremely alarmed by the use of chemical weapons in Mosul, where innocent civilians are already facing unimaginable suffering as a result of the ongoing conflict, according to the statement, which noted that the use of such weapons is a clear violation of the international rules of war.

In September, American commanders suspected U.S. and Iraqi forces had been hit with a chemical strike. The attack, which took place near the main American military logistics hub at Qayyara airfield, was supposedly the first use of mustard gas against U.S. troops since World War I.

At the time, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Gen. Joseph Dunford told Congress that U.S. forces had been the target of a mustard blister agent attack.

Initial tests of two mortar rounds that struck near U.S. positions in Qayyara, about 40 miles south of Mosul, showed evidence of a chemical agent akin to mustard gas, the Pentagon said at the time. However, subsequent tests for mustard gas agents on one of the two mortar rounds proved inconclusive.

Visit link:

Coalition forces make quick progress in Mosul; ISIS defeat expected soon - Washington Times