The Art of Noises

Dear Balilla Pratella, great Futurist composer,

In Rome, in the Costanzi Theatre, packed to capacity, while I was listening to the orchestral performance of your overwhelming Futurist music, with my Futurist friends, Marinetti, Boccioni, Carr, Balla, Soffici, Papini and Cavacchioli, a new art came into my mind which only you can create, the Art of Noises, the logical consequence of your marvelous innovations.

Ancient life was all silence. In the nineteenth century, with the invention of the machine, Noise was born. Today, Noise triumphs and reigns supreme over the sensibility of men. For many centuries life went by in silence, or at most in muted tones. The strongest noises which interrupted this silence were not intense or prolonged or varied. If we overlook such exceptional movements as earthquakes, hurricanes, storms, avalanches and waterfalls, nature is silent.

Amidst this dearth of noises, the first sounds that man drew from a pieced reed or streched string were regarded with amazement as new and marvelous things. Primitive races attributed sound to the gods; it was considered sacred and reserved for priests, who used it to enrich the mystery of their rites.

And so was born the concept of sound as a thing in itself, distinct and independent of life, and the result was music, a fantastic world superimposed on the real one, an inviolatable and sacred world. It is easy to understand how such a concept of music resulted inevitable in the hindering of its progress by comparison with the other arts. The Greeks themselves, with their musical theories calculated mathematically by Pythagoras and according to which only a few consonant intervals could be used, limited the field of music considerably, rendering harmony, of which they were unaware, impossible.

The Middle Ages, with the development and modification of the Greek tetrachordal system, with the Gregorian chant and popular songs, enriched the art of music, but continued to consider sound in its development in time, a restricted notion, but one which lasted many centuries, and which still can be found in the Flemish contrapuntalists most complicated polyphonies.

The chord did not exist, the development of the various parts was not subornated to the chord that these parts put together could produce; the conception of the parts was horizontal not vertical. The desire, search, and taste for a simultaneous union of different sounds, that is for the chord (complex sound), were gradually made manifest, passing from the consonant perfect chord with a few passing dissonances, to the complicated and persistent dissonances that characterize contemporary music.

At first the art of music sought purity, limpidity and sweetness of sound. Then different sounds were amalgamated, care being taken, however, to caress the ear with gentle harmonies. Today music, as it becomes continually more complicated, strives to amalgamate the most dissonant, strange and harsh sounds. In this way we come ever closer to noise-sound.

This musical evolution is paralleled by the multipication of machines, which collaborate with man on every front. Not only in the roaring atmosphere of major cities, but in the country too, which until yesterday was totally silent, the machine today has created such a variety and rivalry of noises that pure sound, in its exiguity and monotony, no longer arouses any feeling.

To excite and exalt our sensibilities, music developed towards the most complex polyphony and the maximum variety, seeking the most complicated successions of dissonant chords and vaguely preparing the creation of musical noise. This evolution towards noise sound was not possible before now. The ear of an eighteenth-century man could never have endured the discordant intensity of certain chords produced by our orchestras (whose members have trebled in number since then). To our ears, on the other hand, they sound pleasant, since our hearing has already been educated by modern life, so teeming with variegated noises. But our ears are not satisfied merely with this, and demand an abundance of acoustic emotions.

On the other hand, musical sound is too limited in its qualitative variety of tones. The most complex orchestras boil down to four or five types of instrument, varying in timber: instruments played by bow or plucking, by blowing into metal or wood, and by percussion. And so modern music goes round in this small circle, struggling in vain to create new ranges of tones.

This limited circle of pure sounds must be broken, and the infinite variety of noise-sound conquered.

Besides, everyone will acknowledge that all musical sound carries with it a development of sensations that are already familiar and exhausted, and which predispose the listener to boredom in spite of the efforts of all the innovatory musicians. We Futurists have deeply loved and enjoyed the harmonies of the great masters. For many years Beethoven and Wagner shook our nerves and hearts. Now we are satiated and we find far more enjoyment in the combination of the noises of trams, backfiring motors, carriages and bawling crowds than in rehearsing, for example, the Eroica or the Pastoral.

We cannot see that enormous apparatus of force that the modern orchestra represents without feeling the most profound and total disillusion at the paltry acoustic results. Do you know of any sight more ridiculous than that of twenty men furiously bent on the redoubling the mewing of a violin? All this will naturally make the music-lovers scream, and will perhaps enliven the sleepy atmosphere of concert halls. Let us now, as Futurists, enter one of these hospitals for anaemic sounds. There: the first bar brings the boredom of familiarity to your ear and anticipates the boredom of the bar to follow. Let us relish, from bar to bar, two or three varieties of genuine boredom, waiting all the while for the extraordinary sensation that never comes.

Meanwhile a repugnant mixture is concocted from monotonous sensations and the idiotic religious emotion of listeners buddhistically drunk with repeating for the nth time their more or less snobbish or second-hand ecstasy.

Away! Let us break out since we cannot much longer restrain our desire to create finally a new musical reality, with a generous distribution of resonant slaps in the face, discarding violins, pianos, double-basses and plainitive organs. Let us break out!

Its no good objecting that noises are exclusively loud and disagreeable to the ear.

It seems pointless to enumerate all the graceful and delicate noises that afford pleasant sensations.

To convince ourselves of the amazing variety of noises, it is enough to think of the rumble of thunder, the whistle of the wind, the roar of a waterfall, the gurgling of a brook, the rustling of leaves, the clatter of a trotting horse as it draws into the distance, the lurching jolts of a cart on pavings, and of the generous, solemn, white breathing of a nocturnal city; of all the noises made by wild and domestic animals, and of all those that can be made by the mouth of man without resorting to speaking or singing.

Let us cross a great modern capital with our ears more alert than our eyes, and we will get enjoyment from distinguishing the eddying of water, air and gas in metal pipes, the grumbling of noises that breathe and pulse with indisputable animality, the palpitation of valves, the coming and going of pistons, the howl of mechanical saws, the jolting of a tram on its rails, the cracking of whips, the flapping of curtains and flags. We enjoy creating mental orchestrations of the crashing down of metal shop blinds, slamming doors, the hubbub and shuffling of crowds, the variety of din, from stations, railways, iron foundries, spinning wheels, printing works, electric power stations and underground railways.

Nor should the newest noises of modern war be forgotten. Recently, the poet Marinetti, in a letter from the trenches of Adrianopolis, described to me with marvelous free words the orchestra of a great battle:

To attune noises does not mean to detract from all their irregular movements and vibrations in time and intensity, but rather to give gradation and tone to the most strongly predominant of these vibrations.

Noise in fact can be differentiated from sound only in so far as the vibrations which produce it are confused and irregular, both in time and intensity.

Every noise has a tone, and sometimes also a harmony that predominates over the body of its irregular vibrations.

Now, it is from this dominating characteristic tone that a practical possibility can be derived for attuning it, that is to give a certain noise not merely one tone, but a variety of tones, without losing its characteristic tone, by which I mean the one which distinguishes it. In this way any noise obtained by a rotating movement can offer an entire ascending or descending chromatic scale, if the speed of the movement is increased or decreased.

Every manifestation of our life is accompanied by noise. The noise, therefore, is familiar to our ear, and has the power to conjure up life itself. Sound, alien to our life, always musical and a thing unto itself, an occasional but unnecessary element, has become to our ears what an overfamiliar face is to our eyes. Noise, however, reaching us in a confused and irregular way from the irregular confusion of our life, never entirely reveals itself to us, and keeps innumerable surprises in reserve. We are therefore certain that by selecting, coordinating and dominating all noises we will enrich men with a new and unexpected sensual pleasure.

Although it is characteristic of noise to recall us brutally to real life, the art of noise must not limit itself to imitative reproduction. It will achieve its most emotive power in the acoustic enjoyment, in its own right, that the artists inspiration will extract from combined noises.

Here are the 6 families of noises of the Futurist orchestra which we will soon set in motion mechanically:

In this inventory we have encapsulated the most characteristic of the fundamental noises; the others are merely the associations and combinations of these. The rhythmic movements of a noise are infinite: just as with tone there is always a predominant rhythm, but around this numerous other secondary rhythms can be felt.

Read the original here:

The Art of Noises

Musk Just Promised To Solve This Country’s Energy Crisis in 100 Days or It’s Free – Futurism

In Brief

Elon Musk is never shy about making grand announcements and declaring his ambitious plans, especially when theyre anchored in his vision for a more sustainable future. His latestpromise is to help South Australia createa solar farm that will address the their energy issues in just one hundreddays orhell do the work for free.

In South Australia, energy prices continue to surge, andlocal companies remain unable to meet public energy demand mostly due to environmental concerns. Last year, storms led to a state-wide blackout that shut down operations for numerous ports and public transportation, as well as disrupting business operations in the fifth most populous state in the country.

To that end, co-founder of SolarCity (and Musks cousin) Lyndon Rive says theyre capable of installing 100 to 300 megawatt per hour battery storage, which could solve South Australias energy issues. And while Rivedoesnt have 300 MWh sitting there ready to go, he told AFR that he can certainly get them.

After making this statement, Mike Cannon-Brookes, CEO of Atlassian, tweeted Lyndon and Musk if they were indeed serious about the offer.

Musk replied:

On Cannon-Brookes end, he asked for seven days to sort out politics and funding, at which point he also requested that the Tesla CEO send an approximate quote on how much a 100MW battery farm at mates rates would cost.

According to Musk, it would cost $250 per kWh to produce over 100MWh. Hes confident that Tesla could get the system installed and working within one hundred days of signing a contract.

Assuming that Cannon-Brookes can indeed secure the paperwork needed to get the project underway, Tesla certainlyhas a reputationwhen it comes to delivering on its promises. Last year, Tesla took on a similar project in California: a 80MW farm that was completed in just 90 days that provided grid-scale power in response to possible power shortages.

Read the rest here:

Musk Just Promised To Solve This Country's Energy Crisis in 100 Days or It's Free - Futurism

Five of the Most Futuristic Cars Unveiled at the Geneva Motor Show – Futurism

The Cars of the Future

The cars of the future will run on renewable energy. Or, at the very least, will be hybrids. At the annual Geneva International Motor Show, the world was given a preview of the some of the most futuristic cars (or car concepts) in the works. Weve already shared the details onSedric, Volkswagens autonomous lounge on wheels,and Pop.Up, Airbus and Italdesigns car-drone hybrid, but here are five others from the total of 118 that are just as impressive.

Hyundais FE (short for Future Eco) Fuel Cell, slated for 2018, aims to be the future of SUVs. It will run on Hyundais improved hydrogen fuel cell technology and is a zero-emission vehicle, promising 30 percent greater energy density than the Tucson Fuel Cell. This futuristic-looking SUV is designed with a clean, flowing look thats inspired by water, according to Hyundai. On the inside, it has internal air humidifiers that can recycle some of its water emissions within the cabins atmosphere. Plus, it has a trunk that can stow and charge an electric scooter.

This onesa comeback concept. Initially unveiled by Bentley at the 2014 Geneva Motor Show, the EXP 12 Speed 6e is probably one of the fanciest EV concepts out there. Thats to be expected with British manufacturer Bentley, of course. This elegant two-seater has a better battery than its predecessor, cameras for side mirrors, and no roof making it perfect for a grand touring experience.

Heres another luxurious-looking sedan. Though not an electric car, the 2018 Lexus LS 500h makes the case for a hybrid large sedan, which is cleaner but packs the same powertrain found in the 2018 LC 500h sports coupe. It can run on pure electric power for a considerable distance.

Theres the regular Zoe, and then theres the E-Sport. Both are EVs from Renault, but the E-Sport is built to wow your racing genes. It has 460 bhp courtesy of its monstrous 450 kg battery, boosting this four-wheel drive EVs performance. To keep its weight down to 1,400 kg (3,086 lb), the E-Sport has a carbonfiber body. This working concept is intended to maintain Renaults commitment to the ongoing development of electric vehicles.

The GT by Mercedes-AMG is another high-performance hybrid car concept. The renowned car manufacturer is celebrating its 50th anniversary with a concept car that has a Formula 1-derived 805-hp hybrid powertrain.With the Mercedes-AMG GT concept, we are giving a preview of our third completely autonomously developed sports car, Tobias Moers, chairman of Mercedes-AMG, said during the unveiling. With our AMG GT concept, that means a combination of an ultramodern V8 petrol engine and a high-performance electric motor.

Originally posted here:

Five of the Most Futuristic Cars Unveiled at the Geneva Motor Show - Futurism

Could Universal Basic Income Be the ‘Social Vaccine’ of the 21st Century? – Futurism

For those not familiar with this old idiom, it means its less costly to avoid problems from ever happening in the first place, than it is to fix problems once they do. It also happens to be the entire logic behind the invention of the vaccine, and it is my belief that universal basic income has the same potential.

The savings provided by vaccines are staggering to the point of almost being beyond comprehension. The human suffering avoided through vaccinations are immeasurable, but the economic benefits are not, and in fact have been measured. Lets start with polio.

We estimate that the United States invested approximately US dollars 35 billionin polio vaccines between 1955 and 2005 The historical and future investments translate into over 1.7 billion vaccinations that prevent approximately 1.1 million cases of paralytic polio and over 160,000 deaths. Due to treatment cost savings, the investment implies net benefits of approximately US dollars 180billion, even without incorporating the intangible costs of suffering and death and of averted fear. Retrospectively, the U.S. investment in polio vaccination represents a highly valuable, cost-saving public health program.

For every $1 billion weve spent on polio vaccines, weve avoided spending about $6 billion down the road. And thats purely the economic costs, not the personal costs. You might think our investment in fighting polio is perhaps as good as it gets, but its not.

Most vaccines recommended are cost-saving even if only direct medical costsand not lost lives and sufferingare considered. Our country, for example, saves $8.50 in direct medical costs for every dollar invested in diphtheria-tetanus-acellular pertussis (DTaP) vaccine. When the savings associated with work loss, death, and disability are factored in, the total savings increase to about $27 per dollar invested in DTaP vaccination. Every dollar our Nation spends on measles-mumps-rubella (MMR) vaccination generates about $13 in total savingsadding up to about $4 billion each year.

Just $1 spent on a single MMR shot can save $13 and a DTaP shot can save $27 that would otherwise have been spent on the costs of the full-blown diseases they protect against.

These vaccinations save us incredible amounts of money and suffering as a society, as long as we continue vaccinating ourselves. But what kind of savings are there to be found, when we go all-in and invest in a massive vaccine program so large, its aim is to entirely eradicate something?

Reported as eradicated from the face of the Earth in 1977, and in possibly one of the greatest understatements of all time, the eradication of smallpox by the U.S. proved to be a remarkably good economic investment.

A total of $32 million was spent by the United States over a 10-year period in the global campaign to eradicate smallpox. The entire $32 million has been recouped every 2 months since 1971 by saving the costs of the smallpox vaccine, administration, medical care, quarantine and other costs. According to General Accounting Office (GAO) estimates from a draft report, Infectious Diseases: Soundness of World Health Organization Estimates to Eradicate or Eliminate Seven Diseases, the cumulative savings from smallpox eradication for the United States is $17 billion. The draft report also estimates the real rate of return for the United States to be 46 percent per year since smallpox was eradicated.

We also didnt stop at eradicating it from within our own borders. We invested our money in the world.

It has since been calculated that the largest donor, the United States, saves the total of all its contributions every 26 days, making smallpox prevention through vaccination one of the most cost-beneficial health interventions of the time.

Even if we let these numbers sink in for a bit, its a huge challenge to fully appreciate because these savings are what we dont experience. We arent spending tens of billions of dollars that we otherwise would have. Had we not spent millions then, wed be spending billions on all of the effects of smallpox to this day and long into the future.

Try to imagine a world where we didnt eradicate smallpox. Aside from the obvious increases in our already sky-high health care costs and the deaths of over 100 million people, millions every year would be calling in sick to work to care for themselves or a loved one with smallpox. Businesses would be paying more for sick leave and losing millions of hours of productivity (estimated at $1 billion lost every year). Medical bankruptcies would likely be higher. Crime would likely be higher. The entire economy would suffer along with all of society.

But we didnt take that path. We chose instead to pay for an ounce of prevention in order to avoid paying for a pound of cure.

Unfortunately we cant see the effects of what we did, because we made them never happen with the ounce of prevention. Were saving what will eventually be trillions of dollars, and dont even give this incredible fact a second thought.

Not only is it hard to see the pounds weve avoided, but we also have a really hard time recognizing the pounds were paying for, because we consider them normal, just as smallpox would today still be normal if wed never chosen to eradicate it through mass vaccinations. It would just be an ugly fact of life like poverty.

What if poverty is like smallpox?

What if the realities of hunger and homelessness arent just facts of life, but examples of those costly pounds that we currently consider normal that we could just instead eradicate with an ounce of cure? How much would it cost to eradicate? How much could we save?

As Ive written about before, a report by the Chief Public Health Officer in Canada looked at this question of potential savings, and estimated that:

$1 invested in the early years saves between $3 and $9 in future spending on the health and criminal justice systems, as well as on social assistance.

Its rare to see this kind of return on investment. That is, outside of vaccinations. Thats the power of immunizations. Spending $1 on a vaccine for a kid can save $10, but also just giving the same kid $1 can save $9 some decades down the road too. How can this be? Because childhood poverty is hugely expensive.

Our results suggest that the costs to the United States associated with childhood poverty total about $500 billion per year, or the equivalent of nearly 4 percent of GDP. More specifically, we estimate that childhood poverty each year:

Reduces productivity and economic output by about 1.3 percent of GDP;

Raises the costs of crime by 1.3 percent of GDP; and

Raises health expenditures and reduces the value of health by 1.2 percent of GDP.

The above numbers are from 2007, and since then the child poverty rate has increased from 17% to 25%, so we can safely assume the hit to GDP has increased as well. Assuming a proportional increase, the 2015 loss to economic growth of child poverty could now be 5.6% of GDP, or $981 billion. And thats only child poverty, not adult poverty.

For the same reason its cheaper to just spend $10,000 on the homeless providing a home, than it is to instead spend $30,000 in medical and criminal justice system costs, it is cheaper to prevent people from ever living in poverty, than it is to pay the full costs of poverty. In addition to the costs of child poverty above, these full costs include a significant portion of the estimated $1.4 trillion spent on crime, the $2.7 trillion spent on health care, and the trillions of dollars spent on its many other effects every single year in the U.S.

These numbers are just economic costs. There are biological costs as well. Poverty even rewires our brains. The new study of epigenetics show us such biological costs can be paid spanning entire lives.

Coming of age in poverty may lead to permanent dysfunction in the prefrontal cortex and the amygdalawhich, according to the researchers, has been associated with mood disorders including depression, anxiety, impulsive aggression and substance abuse.

Fortunately, the even newer study of neurogenesis (the growth of new neurons long thought to be impossible) shows us these effects also need not be permanent.

Chronic stress, predictably enough, decreases neurogenesis. As Christian Mirescu, one of Goulds post-docs, put it, When a brain is worried, its just thinking about survival. It isnt interested in investing in new cells for the future. On the other hand, enriched animal environmentsenclosures that simulate the complexity of a natural habitatlead to dramatic increases in both neurogenesis and the density of neuronal dendrites, the branches that connect one neuron to another. Complex surroundings create a complex brain.

Essentially, were recently learning that we can potentially reverse the long-term effects of poverty, if we eliminate it.

Poverty currently affects almost 50 million Americans, 18 million of whom are kids coming of age impoverished. To allow poverty to continue in the 21st century or to eradicate it is the same choice between an ounce or a pound as smallpox was in the 20th century, and outside of an experiment in Manitoba, weve been choosing a pound of poverty for pretty much all of recorded history.

As another saying goes, so far were being penny-wise and pound-foolish.

Decades ago, we developed a vaccine for smallpox and we used it to eradicate smallpox.

Today, we may already have a vaccine for poverty. Its been tested, and the results are remarkable.

Its called universal basic income.

The idea is to give every citizen enough money to cover their basic needs like food and shelter, no strings attached. For the U.S. to guarantee these basic needs to assure no one would live in poverty would cost about $1,000 per adult and $300 per child every month.

For a significant portion of the population here in 2015, this is where the conversation can stop. Once the napkins are whipped out and its $3 trillion price tag is estimated, the idea can be hand-waved away as too expensive.But is it?

Remember how every $1 spent keeping a child out of poverty can save $3 to $9 as an adult? Well, that means if we started vaccinating kids with a basic income of $300 a month, we would not have to spend $900 to $2,700 a month on them as adults. This also means that when kids became adults, a basic income of $1,000 per month is a savings of up to $1,700 wed have otherwise spent. So why not start vaccinating our kids against poverty, and consider their basic incomes as adults a net savings?

What if we had hand-waved away the costs of eradicating smallpox as too expensive with napkin math? What if we today faced that same choice we did then? What if the price of smallpox eradication now was calculated on a napkin as being $3 trillion? What would we do? What should we do?

What if the discussion about smallpox eradication never included the reality the investment would be recouped every two months? What if no one talked about the 40% annual return on investment? What if we all kept pretending eradicating smallpox would just be too darn expensive and that its just one of those ugly facts of life we just have to deal with until we die?

A $3 trillion napkin-math price tag does not reflect a vaccines true value. The fact that its not even its true price tag doesnt even really matter (Note: its true price tag is more like $1 trillion after consolidation and elimination of many existing cash-replaceable federal programs) because even at $3 trillion instead of $1 trillion, its still an ounce instead of a pound.

Poverty is a disease. Its an illness that even doctors are beginning to recognize as something that requires the prescription of cash in order to successfully treat its many associated diseases:

I was treating their bodies, but not their social situations. And especially not their income, which seemed to be the biggest barrier to their health improving. The research evidence was pretty clear on this. Income, poverty, is intimately connected to my patients health. In fact, poverty is more important to my low-income patients than smoking, high cholesterol, high-blood pressure, obesity, salt, or soda pop. Poverty wreaks havoc on my patients bodies. A 17% increased risk of heart disease; more than 100% increased risk of diabetes; 60% higher rates of depression; higher rates of lung, oral, cervical cancer; higher rates of lung disease like asthma and emphysema It became pretty clear to me I was treating all of [my patients] health issues except for the most important onetheir poverty.Dr. Gary Bloch

We can do more than continually treat povertys many economically and physically expensive symptoms. We can eradicate it entirely with a social vaccine designed to immunize against it.

A social vaccine can be defined as, actions that address social determinants and social inequities in society, which act as a precursor to the public health problem being addressed. While the social vaccine cannot be specific to any disease or problem, it can be adapted as an intervention for any public health response. The aim of the social vaccine is to promote equity and social justice that will inoculate the society through action on social determinants of health.

Basic income is a tested social vaccine. Its been found to increase equity and general welfare. It has been found to reduce hospitalizations by 8.5% in just a few years through reduced stress and work injuries. Its been found to increase birth weights through increased maternal nutrition. Its been found to decrease crime rates by 40% and reduce malnourishment by 30%. Intrinsic motivation is cultivated. Students do better in school. Bargaining positions increase. Economic activity increases. Entrepreneurs are born.

With experiment after experiment, from smaller unconditional cash transfers to full-on basic incomes, the results point in positive directions across multiple measures when incomes are unconditionally increased.

Universal basic income is a social vaccine for the disease ofpoverty.

We can keep spending trillions every year to treat this disease and its many symptoms, or we can choose to eradicate poverty as we did smallpox through a mass social vaccination program known as basic income.

It costs real money for us to look the other way on poverty. Unlike smallpox and other diseases we can vaccinate ourselves against, the costs of poverty can be more invisible. We dont get bills in the mail from Poverty, Inc. telling us each month how much we owe, but we still pay these bills because they are included in our many other bills.

When we pay $10,000 in taxes instead of $7,000 because of welfare and health care, thats in large part a $3,000 poverty bill. When we pay $500 a month instead $400 on our private health insurance premiums, thats a $100 poverty bill. When we pay $50 on a shirt instead of $45 because of theft, thats a $5 poverty bill. When were taxed a percentage of our homes to pay for prisons, thats a poverty bill. What other examples can you think of personally? What might we all be spending on poverty every day?

These poverty bills are all around us, but were just not seeing them as they are. And lets not ignore the lack of opportunity bills either.

If just one Einstein right now is working 60 hours a week in two jobs just to survive, instead of propelling the entire world forward with another General Theory of Relativity that loss is truly incalculable. How can we measure the costs of lost innovation? Of businesses never started? Of visions never realized?

These are the full costs of not implementing universal basic income, and they will only increase as technology reduces our need for work as long as we continue requiring the little work thats left in exchange for income.

These are the full costs of being penny-wise and pound-foolish by not socially vaccinating ourselves against poverty.

These are the full costs of continuing to opt for a pound of cure instead of an ounce of prevention.

So now, let us consider a new question.

Is the question for us to answer in the 21st century, Can we afford basic income?

Or is the question, Can we not afford basic income?

More here:

Could Universal Basic Income Be the 'Social Vaccine' of the 21st Century? - Futurism

Scientists: Potatoes Can Grow on Mars – Futurism

In Brief

True to the sprit of humanitys early settlers, cultivating the land will probably be the best way to provide food for the Red Planets early colonists. But just how possible is it to plant seeds from Earth and grow them as Martian crops? To figure this out, the International Potato Center (CIP) yes, its a real institution launched an initiative last February called the Potatoes on Mars Project.

The effort is reminiscent of the scene from the movie The Martian in whichMatt Damons character plants potatoes to survive on Mars. Turns out, the sci-fi film may actually have been onto something. The CIP worked in tandem with NASAs Ames Research Center (NASA ARC) to discover if potatoes could be grown under Mars atmospheric conditions.

A tuber was planted in a CubeSat-contained environment that was especially designed by engineers from the University of Engineering and Technology (UTEC) in Lima. Soil taken from the Pampas de La Joya Desert in southern Peru, described as the most Mars-like soil found on Earth, was placed inside a hermetically sealed container that was installed in the satellite. To simulate the radiation found on Mars surface, the researchers used an LED. They built controls to alter the temperature to reflect Mars day and night cycles, as well as for adjusting air pressure, oxygen, and carbon dioxide levels.

Now, a month after the first tuber was planted, preliminary results have been positive.It was a pleasant surprise to see that potatoes weve bred to tolerate abiotic stress were able to produce tubers in this soil, said CIPs potato breeder Walter Amoros.

However, the CIPs experiment does more than just let us know that the Earths first Martian colonists may be snacking on potatoes when they reach the Red Planetin the next decade or so. It also helped us figure out if potatoes could survive in extreme conditions on Earth.This [research] could have a direct technological benefit on Earth and a direct biological benefit on Earth, says Chris McKay of NASA ARCin a press release.

By proving that potatoes can be cultivated under the harshest environments on Earth, the study could help the estimatedone in nine people on the planet suffering from chronic undernourishment. That problem is likely to get worse considering modern stressors on our environment. The results indicate that our efforts to breed varieties with high potential for strengthening food security in areas that are affected, or will be affected, by climate change are working, said Amoros.

All in all, potatoes may turn out to bea super food both in space and here on Earth.

Read the original here:

Scientists: Potatoes Can Grow on Mars - Futurism

Freedom Caucus head fires Obamacare warning shot – Politico

Freedom Caucus chair Mark Meadows said he is confident that conservatives will be able to negotiate with President Donald Trump. | AP Photo

By Kyle Cheney

03/10/17 11:35 AM EST

Updated 03/10/17 01:22 PM EST

If Republican House leaders are counting on conservatives to cave and back their version of an Obamacare replacement bill, they should think again, a top conservative lawmaker warned Friday.

That would be a faulty assumption, said Mark Meadows (R-N.C.), chairman of the House Freedom Caucus.

Story Continued Below

The caucus two-dozen members have enough clout to sink any pending Obamacare replacement bill, but theyre under heavy pressure from GOP leaders to back the current version, which conservatives say doesnt go far enough to undo Obamacares mandates and Medicaid expansion.

Some allies of Speaker Paul Ryan are confident that the House's conservative wing will ultimately support the bill in whatever form it takes. And in fact, at least two Freedom Caucus members Reps. Morgan Griffith (R-Va.) and David Schweikert (R-Ariz.) voted to advance the bill this week when it cleared two crucial committees. But conservatives have indicated they expect to negotiate for changes that could move the bill to the right.

Meadows, who met Thursday with President Donald Trump, said hes confident that the president is willing to negotiate in good faith with conservative lawmakers who would like to see changes to the pending legislation.

Do I expect all of the issues that many of the Freedom Caucus members would like to have will be in a final bill that passes? The answer is no, he said. And so its about a good-faith negotiation and I think all of our members are willing to do that.

House Speaker Paul Ryan and his top allies are warning that theres no room to make major changes to the bill, which relies on scaled back tax credits and a multi-year phase-out of Medicaid expansion to alter Obamacare. If they push the bill too far to the right, they risk losing support of House moderates, and the bill is already facing an uphill climb in the Senate, where only three GOP defections could sink its prospects.

Asked about leaderships reluctance to accept changes, Meadows said they may want to reconsider.

If thats the best that they can do then perhaps they have a different whip count than I do, he said.

Still, Meadows acknowledged that if Trump mounts a lobbying effort aimed at individual conservative members, he may make inroads.

"It would be disingenuous to suggest that a call from the president doesnt make a difference," he said. "The policy differences are so strong right now that its not just a little nudge. It would have to be a shove to get us there. ... Thats why we have committed to the president to negotiate in good faith to find a reasonable compromise that makes both moderates and conservatives happy."

Asked about the Freedom Caucus' reputation for always saying no to major legislation, Meadows said in his previous occupation he used to run a real estate development company "I only got paid for a yes."

"So maybe thats what we have to get back to," he said, "only getting paid if youre a yes."

Originally posted here:

Freedom Caucus head fires Obamacare warning shot - Politico

House Freedom Caucus member Justin Amash breaks vote streak after blasting Ryan, health care bill – CNN

Rep. Justin Amash apologized to his followers on Twitter after missing his first vote in 4,293 while talking to a group of reporters outside the House chamber Friday.

Amash, who has dubbed the House Republican health care plan "Obamacare 2.0," was criticizing House Republican leaders for tightly controlling the crafting of the Obamacare replacement during an extended discussion with reporters.

At one point Amash, a House Freedom Caucus Member who was instrumental in former House Speaker John Boehner's departure in 2015, implied he wished he had Boehner back instead of Ryan.

"At the end of the day, the people at home are seeing this is run in a top-down fashion, that you have a few people who tell everyone this is what we're going to do and that's it. And ... the place may have been more open under Speaker Boehner, sadly," he said.

Rep. Steve Womack -- an Arkansas Republican probably best known for formally adopting the rules at the Republican Convention last year that cleared a path for President Donald Trump's nomination -- quickly boasted about overtaking Amash as holding the perfect voting record in the House -- now at 4,298 and counting.

"I am humbled by the opportunity to serve my constituents and thank God that no personal hardships have kept me from representing them on a single vote since taking office," Womack said in a statement Friday shortly after Amash's missed vote.

Read more here:

House Freedom Caucus member Justin Amash breaks vote streak after blasting Ryan, health care bill - CNN

Health care, GOP? Try freedom — it works! – WND.com

OK. I guess my four-step plan to end Obamacare was too difficult for the GOP, so let me make this easier. There is one thing you guys need to do to save medicine and therefore health care for Americans: Restore freedom. Its really that simple. Sadly, thats not what you in Congress do. Every move you make, every rule you adopt and every law you write whittles away at the liberties our forefathers tried to insure. So lets back up.

Step 1: Repeal Obamacare. Last I looked, you have a majority everywhere, and you therefore control the purse and the bills coming out of Congress. Just renounce Obamacare as the unconstitutional mess that it is. You said on the campaign you would do it. You have bills to do it. Just do it. We the American people who voted for Donald Trump expect you to honor that commitment.

Step 2: There is no step 2. You wont succeed in replacing one egregious law with another. There is a reason government medicine always fails of its own ponderous weight. All you self-proclaimed smart guys in Congress cannot know the facts of day-to-day medicine better than the doctors and patients who interact in the process of health care.

This is the same principle proposed by Adam Smith and reiterated by Hayek and other free-market economists a few people at the top cannot do as well as the millions and billions of participants in figuring out the best economic options for their daily lives. The principle that separates statism/communism from liberty is a simple one it is who makes decisions about your life. You? Or the government?

Weve seen for hundreds of years the problems when a few people at the top make economic decisions for the populace. The Soviets starved because the Politburo could not accurately predict how many tractors would be needed for harvest (among other errors). But the many farmers individually on a minute-to-minute basis know what to do. So too, all the Medicare bureaucrats and all the presidents men cannot figure out what health care should be worth. They cannot accurately predict how many doctors to train yet they try all the time by limiting money for graduate education. They try to set drug prices and surgery prices and regulate every sponge that is placed on every patient. We are drowning in over 160,000 pages of regulation and thats before we got to Obamacare! And now the Republicans think they are smarter than everyone who has tried to regulate medicine before?

We have a great food supply because (thank God!) Congress has not tried to control it. For now, food in America is cheap and abundant. It is sheer hubris for the gang of 535 to presume to direct knee replacement surgery or blood pressure care through the bureaucracy of Health and Human Services. And it is based on the false belief that before government there was no health care. In fact we built the finest health care in the world prior to 1964 because government was NOT involved. We treated the poor and the rich. We built charity hospitals and private hospitals. We didnt think we needed you government bureaucrats. But you came in anyway, and its been downhill every regulation since.

So heres the answer, GOP. Get the heck out of the business of health care. And it will correct itself. Just like the grocers who tailor their products for the area in which they live and work, doctors and hospitals and all health-care providers will figure ways to stay afloat and compete in a free market with lowered prices. Let Medicare patients choose to opt out for the free market. Get out of the insurance business. End the FDA control over our drugs. Freedom actually works. Give it a try.

Get Dr. Hiebs manual for living under a centralized health-care system order Surviving the Medical Meltdown: Your Guide to Living Through the Disaster of Obamacare

Read more from the original source:

Health care, GOP? Try freedom -- it works! - WND.com

China Vs. Taiwan’s Academic Freedom – The Diplomat

Last month, Taiwans government and mediacelebrated its accomplishment of perfect scores in the political rights and civil liberties categories on Freedom Houses 2017 Freedom in the World report. It was the first time that Taiwan has been able to earnthe highest rating in the two categories in 11years. The main reason for this achievement, according to Freedom House, was due to demonstrations of media independence and academic freedom in recent years.

Ironically, almost exactly a month after the release of thereport, news emerged that threw Taiwans recently-lauded academic freedom into question.

On March 2, media outlets began reportingthat in December, Shih Hsin Universitys School of Lifelong Learning signed a so-called One China pledge with several Chinese universities. In the pledge, Shih Hsin University promised to not offer classes containing politically sensitive activities or discussions pertaining to one China, one Taiwan or Taiwanese independence. The agreement was signed prior to the arrival of 11Chinese exchange students to Shih Hsin University. Since then, five other universities have been confirmed, and almost half of all Taiwanese universities aresuspected, to also have signed similar pledges to exclude politically sensitive topics from classes offered to Chinese students.

Of course, it can be said that this controversy over the state of academic freedom in higher education institutions in Taiwan is inevitable. Taiwans dramatic increase inuniversities during and after the mid-1990s has seen university acceptance rates rise to more than 90percent in 2006, among Asias highest. However, low birthrates and an aging populationover the pastdecade mean thatuniversities, particularly lower-ranked, private, and remote ones, face student shortages. With the threat of closure looming, universities are accepting an increasing number of international students. Chinese students, since they were allowed to enroll in Taiwanese universities in 2011, have been the main contributor to the surge in international students. In 2016, Chinese students made up more than one-third of all international students in Taiwan.

Taiwanese universities are eager to take in more students, and China seems happy to supply them. However, ideological disparities and diplomatic grievances between local and Chinese students create tensions that sometimes erupt in very public manners. Incidents such as Chinese students cussing at the Taiwanese student representative who referred to exchange students as Chinese rather than mainland, and the immense public pressure piled on a mainland student who hoped to run for her schools student government all point toward deep mistrust and differences between people on both sides of the strait, particularly in the area of higher education. The most recent controversy highlights again the existing problems.

To Sign or Not to Sign

There was immediate outcry and outrage following the revelation that Shih Hsin University and five other higher education institutions have signed the so-called One China pledges. While all six universities have made statementsannouncing that the agreements had in no way breached the Act Governing Relations between the People of the Taiwan Area and the Mainland Area, the declarations have done little to quell public anger and anxiety. Premier Lin Chuan noted that academic freedom should not be limited for political reasons, while Mainland Affairs Council Minister Katharine Chang criticized the request from Chinese universities to restrict speeches in the classroom as unnecessary, inappropriate, and unreasonable. Minister of Education Pan Wen-Chung went as far as to label the agreements illegal. Numerous academicsprotested against signing One China pledges as they see it as a step backwards on academic freedom.

This reaction is far from surprising. Freedom of any kind was hard-won in Taiwan, and any move seen to be curtailing free speech in classrooms and in research would invoke a backlash. Added to this is the growing tensionin cross-strait relations after the election of Democratic Progressive Party leader Tsai Ing-wen, and the rising percentage of Taiwanese who identify themselves as exclusively Taiwanese and neither Chinese nor both Chinese and Taiwanese. The fact universities are seemingly foregoing academic freedom in order togain more Chinese students is understandably troubling to the majority.

Academic freedom is undoubtedly important, but it is also important, for universities and citizens on both sides of the strait to ask some crucial questions. If signing One China pledges is the absolute precondition for enrolling Chinese students, should universities still be allowed to enter into such agreements based on their discretion? Moreover, what in reality could happen with the singing of such pledges?

There are many arguments to be made as to why higher education institutions should not sign One China agreements. For one, Taiwans robust democracy and freedom in the classrooms have allowed students to become critical thinkers who are increasingly more aware of and active in social movements and political causes. In fact, academic freedom as a whole is a fundamental element of a free and open society, a fact not lost on the protesting scholars, students, and the public. That the restrictions to what could be taught within a classroom seem to have come from China just added salt to the wound. Taiwan has suffered through numerous bullying incidents by China, from the missiles aimed at the island down to cyberbullying by Chinese netizens of a young Taiwanese pop star because she waved a Taiwanese flag on television. Any perceived attempts to influence, belittle, or coerce Taiwan would not be looked upon favorably, let alone what seems to be an outright attempt to control the academia.

On the other hand, there does not seem to be any real-world impact yet. Despite having signed the agreements some time ago, there have been no reports by students of their lecturers deliberately avoiding politically sensitive topics. Of course, self-censorship by professors would be very difficult to detect, but no faculty at the six named schools have reported any attempts by the administrations to influence their research and teaching as of now. The universities have also pointed out that the pledges are informal and non-binding, which gives the hope that perhaps the universities only entered into the agreements to appease their Chinese counterparts and nothing more.

This then raises the question of what the Chinese universities could gain from the pledges. It is tough at this moment to see what the Chinese higher education institutions (or the Chinese government) could possibly hope to gain. Of course, it could be that the Chinese universities simply hope to create friendly learning environments for their students, or that they wish to preempt any situation that may put Chinese students in a difficult position. Or, as some commentators suggest, the Chinese universities may have the more nefarious aim of attempting to influence directly with academic freedom in Taiwan.

Either way, even if the Taiwanese universities follow the pledges down to the letter, which seems almost impossible given the public outcry and restrictions of existing laws,it will have limited effect. Bysimply being immersed in the Taiwanese society, Chinese students are already being exposed to democracy and debates on the future of cross-strait relations. To avoid subjects deemed too politically sensitive, Chinese students would have to never visit bookstores that have numerous works banned in China, never get too close to billboards on the streets that bear giant posters of both DPP and KMT politicians, and never turn on the TV or visit restaurants, where the locals sometimes talk about politics with great gusto. Exposure to politically sensitive materials for Chinese students in Taiwan is inevitable. Therefore, it is very difficult to see any tangible benefits forthe Chinese administration and universities in pushingfor such pledges. In fact, it may even cause the Taiwanese to further be suspicious and wary of Chinese students, an attitude that may not be helpful for China in the long run.

Maintaining principles such as academic freedom is imperative for a modern democracy to function. Yet it is also important for the Taiwanese government and public to consider whether signing pledges may actually ultimately be more beneficial. Compromise on paper has so far not yet translated to compromise in reality, and if this is the absolute precondition the Chinese government will ask for before sending their students across the strait, Taiwan should carefully consider the proposition. After all, what is going on outside of classrooms has as much, if not more, influence on students aslectures or textbooks.

When Chinese students see, and even experience, protests, open criticisms of the government, free debate in parliament, and the dynamic media, their views of Taiwan and of democracy may be changed. Interactions with locals in their daily lives could also help Chinese students understand how Taiwanese see themselves and the cross-strait issue and foster friendly relations. Therefore, it may be that in reality the controversial agreements have been more beneficial to fostering understanding and acceptance of the Taiwanese peoples desire to determine their own futures among young Chinese students on the island.

A pledge on a piece of paper has many political implications. What is clear, however, is no matter what the Chinese government or universities were trying to achieve when they asked for the agreements, they will not be successful in obtaining the goal. Ultimately, regardless of what actions areeventually taken by the Taiwanese government or by individual higher education institutions, the very public debates and discussions, criticisms, and reflections in light of the controversy have shown just how far Taiwan has managed to come in terms of democracy. Just decades ago, such a public defense of and impassioned and rational deliberations on academic freedom would not have occurred. That is something that Taiwan could be proud of and should hold onto as it grapples with the challenges a lager number of international students bring.

Pei-Yu Wei graduated from New York University with a Masters degree in politics. She is a Fulbright Foreign Studies Grant candidate for 2017-2018.

View original post here:

China Vs. Taiwan's Academic Freedom - The Diplomat

Suspect in Freedom Park attack has history of sex-related crimes, police say – Las Vegas Sun

Metro Police

Officers escort Joseph Warren, 34, into the Clark County Detention Center on Tuesday, March 7, 2017, after his arrest in the sexual assault of a woman at Freedom Park on March 1, 2017, according to MetroPolice.

By Ricardo Torres-Cortez (contact)

Friday, March 10, 2017 | 6 p.m.

Investigators used DNA to link a registered sex offender to a sexual assault of a woman at Freedom Park last week, according to a Metro Police arrest report released today.

Joseph Warren has a history of arrests on suspicion of sex-related crimes that date back about a decade, police said. He was linked to an incident in late January in which he was seen masturbating in the driveway of a home about half a mile from the scene of the crime.

That case remained open at the time of the attack on the woman he encountered walking near the park in the early hours of March 1, according to police.

The arrest report states that the victim was walking, smoking a cigarette and carrying a bag of fast food when Warren approached her and engaged in small talk: First he asked for a cigarette and then asked what she was doing out so late.

Warren continued talking and followed her through the park, police said. He told her he wanted to hang out and to hold up because he needed to use the bathroom.

When she told him she was going to keep walking, Warren pulled her from behind as he choked her, police said. He then pulled out a meth pipe and forced the victim to take a hit, she told detectives.

The attack lasted several minutes in which Warren kept telling her that she was making it worse than it needed to be, according to the report.

A woman sleeping at the park later told police that she'd heard a woman's screams for about 20 minutes and later saw what appeared to be the shadow of a man running from the bathroom area, police said.

The victim summoned police to the park, 850 N. Mojave Rd., about 3:30 a.m., immediately after the attack, according to the report.

Authorities had obtained Warren's DNA profile after a Las Vegas sexual assault case from 2006, police said.

Warren registered as a sex offender after a 2006 conviction in a sex assault case for which he was ordered to serve at least two years in prison on one count of coercion, court records show. The sexual assault charge was either amended or dropped, records show.

After Warren's latest arrest, he was identified as a suspect in a similar sexual assault case from last April, police said. Detectives were awaiting results of a DNA analysis to move forward.

In 2011, he was arrested for failing to register a new address with Metro Police, according to the report.

In October 2015, Warren was arrested in North Las Vegas on suspicion of peeping through the opening of a home, according to the arrest report. Information on the status of that case wasn't immediately available.

A few months later, he was arrested in Las Vegas and charged with a two counts of open and gross lewdness for a similar incident, police said. That case was later closed and the outcome of it wasn't clear, according to court records.

Metro said on Thursday that they released his photo to the public in an effort to try to identify other possible victims, spokeswoman officer Laura Meltzer said.

Anyone with information is asked to contact Metro at 702-828-3421. To remain anonymous, contact Crime Stoppers at 702-385-5555 or online at crimestoppersofnv.com.

Follow this link:

Suspect in Freedom Park attack has history of sex-related crimes, police say - Las Vegas Sun

HR 1313: part of the trend of eugenics – Patheos (blog)

Advocates for the rights of the disabled have already expressed concern about the direction taken by the Trump administration. Trump famously mocked a disabled reporter during the election, but this was not surprising to anyone familiar with both his bullying tactics and his tradition of promoting ideas that smack of eugenics:

Trumps father instilled in him the idea that their familys success was genetic, according to Trump biographer Michael DAntonio.

The family subscribes to a racehorse theory of human development, DAntonio says in the documentary. They believe that there are superior people and that if you put together the genes of a superior woman and a superior man, you get a superior offspring.

The Huffington Post dug back through the archives and found numerous examples of Trump suggesting that intellect and success are purely genetic qualities and that having the right genesgave him his very good brain.

The page about people with disabilities has been removed from the White House website. We have a Secretary of Education who had never even heard of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act, prior to her appointment, and an Attorney General who actively opposes it. Now, with the rolling-back of Medicaid expansion, we seethe likelihood that disabled and autistic children will be left without coverage. In short, thisregime is primed to move in the dangerous direction of creating an illusion of wealth and prosperity by weeding out the undesirables (immigrants, the poor, the disabled).

And now a new bill, HR 1313, has been proposed, which would allow employers to require genetic testing of its employees, and give them the right to access employees health and genetic records. This bill is unequivocally opposed by the American Society of Human Genetics:

If enacted, this bill would fundamentally undermine the privacy provisions of the Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act (GINA) and the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA).

We urge the Committee not to move forward with consideration of this bill, said ASHG president Nancy J. Cox, PhD. As longtime advocates of genetic privacy, we instead encourage the Committee to pursue ways to foster workplace wellness and employee health without infringing upon the civil rights afforded by ADA and GINA.

A key component of ADA and GINA is that they prevent workers and their families from being coerced into sharing sensitive medical or genetic information with their employer. For GINA, genetic information encompasses not only employees genetic test results but also their family medical histories. H.R.1313 would effectively repeal these protections by allowing employers to ask employees invasive questions about their and their families health, including genetic tests they, their spouses, and their children may have undergone. GINAs requirement that employees genetic information collected through a workplace wellness program only be shared with health care professionals would no longer apply.

The bill would also allow employers to impose financial penalties of up to 30 percent of the total cost the employees health insurance on employees who choose to keep such information private. According to the Kaiser Family Foundation, the average annual premium for employer-sponsored family health coverage in 2016 was $18,142. Thus, for such a plan, a wellness program could charge employees an extra $5,443 in annual premiums if they choose not to share their genetic and health information.

Recently I had genetic testing done, of my own volition, because of my familys history of breast cancer, associated with a gene mutation common in those of Ashkenazi Jewish descent. The conversations surrounding the decision to have testing done were fascinating, because questions about ancestry, genetics, and inherited traits lead one to conversations about the racial prejudice. Being Jewish means many wonderful things, but unfortunately it means being more at risk for carrying a killer gene, and this is exactly the sort of thing that anti-semitic eugenicists love to jump on. Among the semi-educated, the talk can slip from ancestry to ancestral curses, and all the vile reasons racists have concocted, to justify their hatred and oppression of the Jews.

Luckily, I tested negative for the gene. But what if I hadnt? What if, a few years from now, I suddenly found myself denied health coverage because of this curse? If this bill passes, how many women (and men) who carry the breast cancer gene are going to find themselves unable to procure health care? And would people of Ashkenazi Jewish descent or other genetically at-risk demographics be especially targeted for mandatory testing?

This is untenable from a pro-life standpoint. This is part of a larger plan which is driven, not by humanitarian motives or by any acceptable ethic, but by an insidious movement to remove support from the most vulnerable, for the sake of the evil dream of eugenics.

image credit: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/a/ad/Eugenics_congress_logo.png

Link:

HR 1313: part of the trend of eugenics - Patheos (blog)

Eugenics was a progressive cause | Editorial Columns | The News – The News (subscription)

The progressive mob that disrupted Charles Murrays appearance last week at Middlebury College was protesting a 1994 book read by few if any of the protesters. Some of them denounced eugenics, thereby demonstrating an interesting ignorance: Eugenics controlled breeding to improve the heritable traits of human beings was a progressive cause.

In The Bell Curve, Murray, a social scientist at the American Enterprise Institute, and his co-author, Harvard psychologist Richard J. Herrnstein, found worrisome evidence that American society was becoming cognitively stratified, with an increasingly affluent cognitive elite and a deteriorating quality of life for people at the bottom end of the cognitive ability distribution. They examined the consensus that, controlling for socioeconomic status and possible IQ test bias, cognitive ability is somewhat heritable, that the black/white differential had narrowed, and that millions of blacks have higher IQs than millions of whites. The authors were resolutely agnostic concerning the roles of genes and the social environment. They said that even if there developed unequivocal evidence that genetics are part of the story, there would be no reason to treat individuals differently or to permit government regulation of procreation.

Middleburys mob was probably as ignorant of this as of the following: Between 1875 and 1925, when eugenics had many advocates, not all advocates were progressives but advocates were disproportionately progressives because eugenics coincided with progressivisms premises and agenda.

Progressives rejected the Founders natural rights doctrine and conception of freedom. Progressives said freedom is not the natural capacity of individuals whose rights pre-exist government. Rather, freedom is something achieved, at different rates and to different degrees, by different races. Racialism was then seeking scientific validation, and Darwinian science had given rise to social Darwinism belief in the ascendance of the fittest in the ranking of races. The progressive theologian Walter Rauschenbusch argued that with modern science we can intelligently mold and guide the evolution in which we take part.

Progressivisms concept of freedom as something merely latent, and not equally latent, in human beings dictated rethinking the purpose and scope of government. Princeton University scholar Thomas C. Leonard, in his 2016 book Illiberal Reformers: Race, Eugenics & American Economics in the Progressive Era, says progressives believed that scientific experts should be in societys saddle, determining the human hierarchy and appropriate social policies, including eugenics.

Economist Richard T. Ely, a founder of the American Economic Association and whose students at Johns Hopkins included Woodrow Wilson, said God works through the state, which must be stern and not squeamish. Charles Van Hise, president of the University of Wisconsin, epicenter of intellectual progressivism, said: We know enough about eugenics so that if that knowledge were applied, the defective classes would disappear within a generation. Progress, said Ely, then at Wisconsin, depended on recognizing that there are certain human beings who are absolutely unfit, and who should be prevented from a continuation of their kind. The mentally and physically disabled were deemed defectives.

In 1902, when Wilson became Princetons president, the final volume of his A History of the American People contrasted the sturdy stocks of the north of Europe with southern and eastern Europeans who had neither skill nor energy nor any initiative of quick intelligence. In 1907, Indiana became the first of more than 30 states to enact forcible sterilization laws. In 1911, now-Gov. Wilson signed New Jerseys, which applied to the hopelessly defective and criminal classes. In 1927, the U.S. Supreme Court upheld Virginias law, with Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes saying that in affirming the law requiring the sterilization of imbeciles he was getting near to the first principle of real reform.

At the urging of Robert Yerkes, president of the American Psychological Association, during World War I the Army did intelligence testing of conscripts so that the nation could inventory its human stock as it does livestock. The Armys findings influenced Congress postwar immigration restrictions and national quotas. Carl Brigham, a Princeton psychologist, said the Armys data demonstrated the intellectual superiority of our Nordic group over the Mediterranean, Alpine and Negro groups.

Progressives derided the Founders as unscientific for deriving natural rights from what progressives considered the fiction of a fixed human nature. But they asserted that races had fixed and importantly different natures calling for different social policies. Progressives resolved this contradiction when, like most Americans, they eschewed racialism the belief that the races are tidily distinct, each created independent of all others, each with fixed traits and capacities. Middleburys turbulent progressives should read Leonards book. After they have read Murrays.

See original here:

Eugenics was a progressive cause | Editorial Columns | The News - The News (subscription)

IP Cameras vs. Nest, Arlo and integrated systems: Which security ecosystem should you invest in? – Android Central


Android Central
IP Cameras vs. Nest, Arlo and integrated systems: Which security ecosystem should you invest in?
Android Central
Whether you want something simple or need a complicated whole-house system, there is a security camera that will work for you. Home surveillance cameras are more popular than ever before. Whether you want cameras as part of a larger home security ...

Read more from the original source:

IP Cameras vs. Nest, Arlo and integrated systems: Which security ecosystem should you invest in? - Android Central

Guam’s Plague of Snakes Is Devastating the Whole Island Ecosystem, Even the Trees – ScienceAlert

In case you're unfamiliar withGuam'sinfamous 'snake problem', the island is known for hosting an invasion of venomous brown snakes that have wreaked havoc on its native animal population.

Now researchers have shown it's not just the birds and rodents that have suffered the growth of new trees could be falling by as much as 92 percent thanks to the snakes' appetites.

The tiny 544-square-kilometre (210-square-mile) island of Guam is a US territory sitting somewhat halfway between Australia and Japan, and is famous for being captured by the Japanese in World War II before being freed by American forces in 1944.

Its other item of notoriety is the fact it happens to be dripping with brown tree snakes (Boiga irregularis) that appeared roughly around the time of the island's liberation - most likely after hitching a ride with US military equipment from the neighbouring Papua New Guinea.

The species isn't overly dangerous to humans, though its venomous bite packs a punch on the small animals it preys upon.

Since the wildlife on Guam evolved without these kinds of scaly predators snacking on their eggs and young, the forests provided a veritable smorgasbord for the invaders, causing the population to expand to a whopping 2 million snakes, with densities of up to 5,000 individuals per square kilometre (or 13,000 per square mile).

Just to really creep out those with a serious case of ophiophobia (that's a fear of serpents), the snakes are so plentiful that the damage they've caused by shorting out electrical systems alone adds up to about $US4.5 million over the past seven years.

Yet it's the ecosystem that has suffered the most by the mid-1980s, 10 of the 12 bird species native to Guam had vanished, including a kingfisher that can't be found anywhere else on Earth.

ResearcherHaldre Rogers from from theUniversity of Coloradosays the bird song that echoes on neighbouring islands has fallen oddly quiet on Guam: "On Guam, it's silent it's an eerie feeling."

Now it seems the ravaging of the island's bird-life has had a knock-on effect on the surrounding tree population, according to new study by Rogers and his team.

The researchers placed large baskets beneath two species of tree throughout the forests on Guam and several nearby islands, keen to know how far the fruiting trees spread their seeds across the forest floor.

On Guam, fewer than 10 percent of the seeds made it beyond the immediate vicinity of their parent tree, compared with 60 percent of the seeds on the snake-free islands.

"Aside from fruit bats, which are also nearly extinct on Guam, nothing else can disperse seeds," said Rogers.

With more than two-thirds of the island's trees relying on animals to distribute and germinate their seeds, the impact of the reduction is expected to be a devastating drop of between 61 and 92 percent in new forest growth.

In recent years, the US Department of Agriculture has engaged in chemical warfare with the snakes in an $US8 million eradication program.

Their weapon of choice is a dose of paracetamol, also known as acetaminophen, which is toxic to many animals including brown snakes.

Rather than convince 2 million reptiles they had a headache, the program parachuted thousands of dead mice laced with the drug into the forests, where they hung from the branches until a snake hankering for a snack slithered by.

Early research shows the snakes do take the bait, but it's early days, so no news yet on how much of an impact the past couple of years of the program has had.

Since Guam is home to a number of military bases and has a large port, the fear is that snakes could once again hitch a ride to another island and cause a similar cascade of problems.

This research was published in Nature Communications.

Follow this link:

Guam's Plague of Snakes Is Devastating the Whole Island Ecosystem, Even the Trees - ScienceAlert

Painting the damage done to eco-system – The New Indian Express

KOCHI: When some of us go on preaching about sustainable development, three artists - Subair M, Ameen Khaleel, and T R Udayakumar - have shown a different way of portraying our way of life on Earth. Their works are on display at the Continuing Ephemera exhibition, organised by the Palette People, at Hotel Le Meridien.

The Alappuzha-based artist Subair uses photographs of streets and markets, and imprints the images of animals and birds, to create a tension between nature and the people.

In one of his works, you can see bats surround a vegetable market. It depicts the continuous felling of trees, so the bats are roaming around homeless, says Subair. Because of the use of strong pesticides in the fields, cranes have moved on to the fish markets to find their prey and fill their bellies. Cows cannot find any shrubs sprouting from the mud, in this concrete world, so they consume posters, pasted on the walls. What a pathetic situation, how cruel are we humans!

As for Ameen, he uses digital and video images in his paintings. A striking work is of a child and a dog sitting next to each other. However, in the middle, there is a cage. The title is, Who is in? Both have exhibited their works, in countries like Norway and Finland. Subair is also a writer who published two books of social criticism called Nano Kathakal. He has also proved his talent as an actor by acting in many Malayalam movies like Of The People, Bhramaram, Pakarnnattam, and Pullipulikalum Aankuttiyum. Interestingly, Subair and Ameen run Kream Korner Art Cafe at Allapuzha. It is a platform for contemporary artists, says Subair. We also organise exhibitions and various type of events.

As for the third artist, Udayakumar, he focuses on how each man is bothered only about his selfish needs. A man, painted like a tiger, lies on the ground, facing a dry vineyard. What I want to say is that he is not at all bothered about the happenings around him, says Udayakumar. He is living in his own dream world and absorbed with his self. In another work, titled Haunting Insights, the same tiger-painted men are sitting on a dilapidated boat. This too depicts the egoistic attitude of human beings, even when their boat is about to sink or their life is coming to an end, says Udayakumar.

In the work, called Chakoram Udayakumar portrays the crow pheasant, which is on the verge of extinction in the villages. He has used charcoal and acrylic paints on tea-washed papers. Udayakumar was the former Executive Committee Member of the Kerala Lalithakala Akademy. His paintings have been exhibited in 33 group shows and 10 solo shows. He has designed covers for more than two thousand books of renowned publishers. The exhibition will conclude on March 15.

Read the original post:

Painting the damage done to eco-system - The New Indian Express

Cris Cyborg not waiting for Germaine de Randamie, wants … – MMAmania.com

All clear.

Cristiane Justino is ready to say goodbye to the 140-pound catchweight fights once and for all and recently informed Ultimate Fighting Championship (UFC) that shes prepared to make her debut in the newly-created featherweight division.

With or without reigning 145-pound titleholder Germaine de Randamie.

Better late than never.

If Iron Lady is unable to heal up in time for a Cyborg fight, thanks to damage sustained in her UFC 208 win over Holly Holm last month in Brooklyn, New York, then Justino will settle for whoever has the courage to step up.

Are we going to find an opponent? I believe the UFC has the capability to make that happen, no doubt in my mind, head coach Jason Parillo told FanSideds Extra Rounds Podcast. We cant sit on the shelf and wait. It doesnt do us no good to sit back. Who knows how long wed have to wait on that too.

I hear this featherweight has nothing to do next month.

Read more:

Cris Cyborg not waiting for Germaine de Randamie, wants ... - MMAmania.com

Mars, Tomb of Futurism: The Hopes of Success Are Dependent on Cyborg Humans – Futurism

Tend Your Own Garden

If immortality is the Holy Grail of Futurism then the colonization of Mars is its Holy Sepulchrea big empty tomb. Both attract their pilgrims: the former is a fairytale; the latter is a real place just out of reach, a sort of tantalizing inspiration to hungry dreamers everywhere salivating for land that doesnt belong to them. These days, from the promises of Elon Musk to the heroics of Matt Damon, we positively fetishize Mars. Yet my advice to the 11th century crusader and the 21st century Martian colonist would be the same: tend your own garden.

Im afraid that this is blasphemy from someone who calls himself a Transhumanist. After all, the colonization of space is tangentially connected enough to other themes associated with technological progress that theyre ordinarily all lumped together under the general banner of Futurism. In an increasingly divisive political climate, the promises of SpaceX and Mars One shine like the hope of some long-awaited escape from ourselves.

More fundamentally, the allure of space colonization is at the heart of some of our most beloved cultural narratives, shaping the aspirations of explorers since the first days of NASA and the Soviet Space Program. Even the earliest films lionized astronauts. The moon landing was the greatest collective lived experience of the twentieth century, this perfect human achievement more majestic than the pyramids and just as pointless only to the cynical.

Today, we might not have cities on the moon, but the fruits of space programs enrich our lives immeasurably. And given our recklessness when it comes to the fragile environment of this planet, perhaps we could use another world as a backup, just in case. We already have the technology to achieve the goal of getting to Mars, though for a perfect storm of reasons, it has yet to happen. But isnt getting there a worthy goal? And wont the journey there (and not only the physical journey, but the technical refinements forged along the way) benefit the cause of Progress with a capital P? Then what the hell am I complaining about?

My intention here isnt to trash space exploration or regale you with clickbait about the top eleven reasons why the colonization of Mars would be a tragic mistake at this juncture in time. However, I want to seriously problematize the prospective colonization, if youll excuse a word that academics tend to overuse. I dont want to focus on the hackneyed and frankly shortsighted idea that the money spent on getting to Mars could be better employed for services here on earth.

My critique has to do with the repercussions of contemporary attitudes about the seemingly unrelated topics of imperialism in outer space on the one hand and Transhumanism on the other. Cultural prejudices enshrining heroic astronauts blazing across the sky and mad scientists forging abominations pose serious problems for Transhumanists of all stripes and would-be Martian colonists alike.

If the predominant image of space colonizers enshrined in our zeitgeist is heroic pioneers soaring across the galaxy in the name of science and adventure, the narratives surrounding genetic engineering and cyborgs are positively apocalyptic by comparisonjust think of Frankenstein, the Terminator, and GATTACA.

The reasons for this difference in our intuitions are varied. They partly have to do with the genealogy of our ideas about imperialism in outer space, which are grounded in discourse about the benefits of the exploration and exploitation of underdeveloped foreign lands, exotic travelogues, Cold War propaganda, epic films, etc. They also have to do with the attitudes that surround Transhumanism, grounded in skepticism about discredited fields like galvanism, the abuses of the eugenicists, deep-seated fears surrounding physiological dislocation and dismemberment, etc.

The end result of all this discourse is that, right now in the popular imagination, would-be cyborgs are monsters and would-be Martian colonists are heroes. Lets take it for granted that the exploration of Mars would provide net benefits for society at large. Nevertheless, whether from the vantage point of someone who wants to investigate Mars and preserve its landscape (lets call this the environmentalist perspective) or someone who wants to colonize and terraform it (the imperialist perspective, which incidentally seems to completely dominate the environmentalist one), the problem inherent in this tension is immense.

First, imagine you were an environmentalist who felt strongly against the radical transformation of Mars. Your reasons might be varied. To you, the urge to dominate nature with the clutter of terrestrial civilization might seem arrogant and intrusive. True, there are no indigenous Martians to despoil. But the process of terraforming the planets surface would still seem to be hugely rapacious.

Imagine drowning its pristine scarlet valleys in water and clouding its translucent atmosphere with chemicals. Wouldnt even the most single-minded developer preserve some of the planets original landscape rather than transform it all? Doesnt this intuition concede that there is inherent value and beauty in the wild state of the place? If advanced aliens exist within visitable distance of our planet, they are evidently the type to silently observe or ignore us rather than actively intervene in our affairs. How primitive it might seem to them that our conception of space travel in 2017 is still bound to the small-minded earthly impulse to barge in, dominate nature, and claim random parcels of it as our own.

From this perspective, the only visits to Mars should be undertaken for the sake of exploration rather than colonization. The best agents to do so would be robots and cyborgs rather than unenhanced human beings, whose imprint on the environment would be immense by comparison. Yet until the development of cyborgs, we are doomed to either only know Mars indirectly or permanently scar its landscape as successive generations of pioneers perish on its inhospitable surface.

Now, consider the imperialist perspective. To you, between climate change, nuclear war, plague, and pestilence, the existential threats to human civilization are great enough that you feel we need to colonize Mars as soon as possible or face the potential extermination of civilization as we know it. The preservation of the beauty of nature is all well and good, after all, but human interests come first.

Yet the conditions on Mars for the colonizers would be like something out of Dante; indeed, the first Martian immigrants should be prepared to die, warns Elon Musk.

As it is, we cant even control the weather yet here on Earth, let alone create a colony on another planet with an inhospitable atmosphere. The bright eyed and bushy tailed original colonists would be like Joseph Conrads Mr. Kurtz, fantasizing about the march of civilization but ending up the lonely dupes of capitalism wallowing in lunacy in a dark place where they shouldnt have ventured in the first place.

On closer reflection, the imperialist would realize that until it became feasible to travel to Mars on a mass scale, the original colonies could only remain pitiable outposts for misguided dying settlers and insanely rich tourists rather than anything like a safety net for civilization at large. The fastest and most efficient way to transform the landscape would be by the sweat of cyborgs. And yet ironically, with the advent of cyborgs, the need to terraform the environment to suit un-enhanced human needs would perhaps be moot.

While I might have misgivings about the subjugation of a planet ironically named for the god of conquest, I dont want to disparage a journey there as an admirable Futurist goal. But whether you are an advocate of peaceful exploration or large-scale colonization, the time has come to think realistically about the requisite intermediate steps. We need to make heroes of the pioneers who are willing to risk their lives and careers to overcome the hurdles on the way to our destination in this dark march toward whatever it is were approaching.

Cyborgs and space explorers are entirely akin in their willingness to risk their lives for the sake of challenging the boundaries of conceivability. Yet in 2017, we call volunteers for the journey to Mars heroes, and there are no volunteers at all for brain implants because no doctor would ever dream of performing such an operation or convening a conference to discuss plans for one.

If a prominent surgeon called for volunteers and warned, as Musk did, that they must be prepared to die, I wonder if the public would meet the declaration with the same resigned sigh in recognition of the heroism of all involved. The principle is precisely the same: a human life is at stake. Yet we are willing to sanctify the sacrificeof the astronaut and glorify him, but would rather reverse engineer a machine analogous to a human brain than implant a machine into one

Investment in Mars in the absence of Transhumanism as a vigorous social ideology doesnt necessarily come at the expense of Transhumanism, but it does come at the expense of the future of Mars. The most widespread current projections of the next century of human development imagine the needs of unenhanced humans predominating as a matter of course. Hence, long-term plans for Mars call for terraforming the planet to create a second Earth. Yet this limitation in our imaginations augurs great brutality and a great deal of human blood spilled along the way as we struggle to dominate conditions not meant for our bodies.

This, of course, does not mean I think there should be no exploration of Mars, or even that I am dead-set against eventual colonization. But I would hope that any such colonization would be undertaken in a spirit of great respect for nature, imposing upon it, let alone uprooting it, as little as possible. And I would also pray that the path toward colonization would be blazed with as few deaths as possible along the way.

Yet this can only take place after the ascendancy of Transhumanism and not a moment before it. For the time being, I would no more recommend a journey to Mars than I would a voyage across the Atlantic to an ancient Roman armed with nothing but a leaky triremeand his copy of Ptolemy.

David Vincent Kimel is a doctoral student in History at Yale. Connect with him on Twitter and Instagram (spqrkimel). Visit his blog at earthasitis.com.

Follow this link:

Mars, Tomb of Futurism: The Hopes of Success Are Dependent on Cyborg Humans - Futurism

Cris Cyborg Says She’s Ready to Fight Again | champions.co – champions.co

When Cris "Cyborg" Justino was cleared by USADA of her anti-doping issues, everyone had hoped a fight between her and the UFC women's featherweight champion, Germaine de Randamie, would be scheduled. After all, it was Cyborg that had campaigned for the division to be built in the first place. But de Randamie doesn't seem all the eager to face off with the powerhouse ... and who could blame her?

Now that Cris has recovered from two severe weight cuts, she says she it ready to return to the Octagon with or without Germaine.

Germaine has been insistent on a rematch with former UFC bantamweight champion, Holly Holm, after defeating her to become the first women's featherweight champion amid controversy and accusations of an unfair fight. She has also said that if she is not going to rematch Holly, she will be taking time off to have surgery.

What I heard in her speech after her fight, she already pre-meditated everything that happened in that, said Jason Parillo, Cyborg's head coach, on FanSideds Extra Rounds Podcast. As soon as Cris Cyborgs name came up, she went straight to hand surgery. I dont blame her. Ill be honest with you; I dont blame her. I dont blame any girl for not wanting to fight Cris Cyborg.

Cyborg had been offered the title shot initially, but due to medical issues has to turn down the fight. She was later flagged by USADA due to a medication she was prescribed to recover from two back to back tough weight cuts. She was cleared of any wrongdoing earlier this year.

But with Cris finally recovered and cleared to return to Octagon, she, and her coach, don't want to be waiting around for the champion.

"We cant sit on the shelf and wait," Parillo said. "It doesnt do us no good to sit back. Who knows how long wed have to wait on that too."

Cris has not fought since Septemeber when she defeated Lina Lansberg at UFC Fight Night 95 via a second round TKO.

Read the original here:

Cris Cyborg Says She's Ready to Fight Again | champions.co - champions.co

Alabama Beaches – Alabama Gulf Coast

Alabama Beaches

When the weather starts to heat up during the spring and summer seasons, the Alabama beaches see thousands of visitors who have laid-back vacations in mind. The Alabama Gulf Coast is an ideal vacation destination for a number of reasons, and spending time on the soft, white-sand beaches is just one thing to consider. In addition to swimming in the Gulf of Mexico, an Alabama beach vacation can see you dining on fresh seafood and enjoying side trips to historical forts. Dolphin cruises often make it into the picture as well. Whether it's a family trip that you have in mind or a romantic getaway for two, the Alabama Gulf Coast sets an ideal stage. There's something for everyone here, and there's never been a better time to visit.

Beaches in Alabama

While Spring Break and summer are the top seasons for Alabama Gulf Coast tourism, there's really never a bad time to visit this attraction-packed area. Mild winter temperatures mean that you can comfortably explore the region even when it's bitter cold up north. While swimming in the Gulf of Mexico might not be ideal come the winter months, you can still enjoy a dinner cruise, hit an area golf course, or do just about anything else that you could otherwise do when the weather is warmer. Some people plan their Alabama beach vacation around a specific annual event, and there are a few here that are sure to please. During late January and early February, the Alabama Mardi Gras celebrations in Mobile, Orange Beach, and Gulf Shores are in full swing, and Gulf Shores is also the site for a festive shrimp festival, which takes place in October. Of course, fresh seafood is always on the menu at many an Alabama Gulf Coast restaurant, so even if you miss the shrimp festival, you can satisfy your seafood cravings.

Beach Houses Alabama

Gulf Shores and Orange Beach are two of the top places to find some good Alabama beaches, and you can also make the drive out to Dauphin Island to find some sandy stretches as well. Gulf Shores and Orange Beach are adjacent to one another, and their lengthy beaches meet at a long pier, which stretches 825 feet out into the water. Strolls to the end of the pier award you with some excellent views, and this same pier is also a great place to do some fishing. Back down on the soft and sandy Alabama beaches, the usually gentle surf encourages family fun, and you can bet that building sand castles is a top beach activity. The Orange Beach hotels and the Gulf Shores hotels have plenty of beachfront establishments among them, so finding a place to stay near the water won't be an issue. You can also book a vacation rental near a beach in Alabama if you please, with condos being the predominant option.

When visiting Gulf Shores and Orange Beach, you can add some interesting attractions to your daily itinerary. The Gulf State Park is an excellent place to spend some time, and you can rent a cottage or cabin there if you so desire. Fishing at the park's 900-acre lake is a great way to relax during your visit, and there are plenty of walking trails here if you want to get some exercise. Golfers will be happy to know that there's an 18-hole public golf course at the Gulf State Park, and the two miles of sugar sand beaches only add to the park's allure. Another top attraction near Gulf Shores and Orange Beach is Fort Morgan, which is a historic landmark that history buffs will not want to miss. Now a museum, Fort Morgan was once an important outpost during the Civil War, and its primary role came during the 1864 Battle of Mobile Bay. If you are interested in including a visit to Fort Morgan in your Alabama Gulf Coast experience, you might also want to check out Fort Gaines on Dauphin Island. Together with Gulf Shores and Orange Beach, Dauphin Island is one of the best places to go when you want to spend some time on a beach in Alabama.

Beaches In Alabama

Dauphin Island is just 28 miles south of Mobile, so after you've taken in Mobile attractions like the USS Alabama, you can easily zip on down. The public beach in Dauphin Island is rarely overcrowded, and it's close to the main tourist area should you want to grab a bite to eat or do some shopping. Private beach access can be enjoyed if you camp at the Dauphin Island Campground, and you'll also enjoy proximity to the sand should you go with a beachfront vacation rental. There is a fishing pier near the public beach on Dauphin Island, and you can also book a sportfishing charter if you want to get out on the Gulf. Like Gulf Shores and Orange Beach, the Dauphin Island beaches generally offer gentle surf conditions, making them ideal for families with small children.

When planning your trip to the beach in Alabama, you might keep an eye out for special deals. Various Alabama vacation packages include time in the Gulf Coast area, and these packages often include a stay at a beach hotel. Should you take it upon yourself to find a beach hotel in Alabama, it's always a good idea to book in advance when possible. This is especially true during Mardi Gras and Spring Break, when the Alabama Gulf Coast is at its liveliest. As mentioned before, there's never a bad time to visit the Alabama Gulf Coast, so plan your trip today, and see why many visitors choose to come back time and again.

Continue reading here:

Alabama Beaches - Alabama Gulf Coast

Peaches to the Beaches Yard Sale hits high gear along US 341 – Florida Times-Union

BRUNSWICK, GA. | One mans trash is another mans treasure, the saying goes, and on the annual Peaches to the Beaches yard sale one mans rust is another mans patina.

The 200-mile yard sale that stretches from Barnesville to Brunswick got started Friday at stops at churches, in parking lots at businesses closed and running and a lot of front yards. It was the first time in years that there has been a stop so close to the beach because the Golden Isles Parkway Association Inc., which sponsors the annual March event, hadnt found an official sponsor there for years.

That changed this year when the Brunswick Downtown Development Authority sponsored a stop at Mary Ross Park on the waterfront.

Kay Lively was paying attention in Barnesville.

Lively said she and a couple of friends planned to do what they did last year, drive down to Jesup the night before and shop their way home. But after learning Jesup wouldnt be the end of the official road, they came on to Brunswick.

We learned a few years ago to go to the coast and work our way back, Lively said.

Lively said she likes to shop as far from home as possible because the bargains are different. With her in her Suburban were Mary Beth Burrell from back home and Connie Mercer from Alma. All three have eyes for different wares.

Im a sucker for old linens, said Lively while Mercer was looking for old dishes and Burrell runs an antique store.

They were pulling a rental trailer, that Lively said was getting full, and the Suburbans windows were painted saying among other things, Junkaholics on the road to recovery.

In the Sterling community, the Underwood family held their annual family reunion in conjunction with the yards sale. Lisa Isenhower ladled cups full of boiled peanuts from a steaming pot as wieners and sausages smoked on a grill.

Rene Osborne came from Clemson, S.C., to help her mother, Cheryl Dill, fill up a big rental van to stock Dills Treasure Seekers thrift store in Jonesboro, Ga.

We do it every year, Dill said. We shop this trail to carry back to the store.

Osborne tried out a hammock on the side of the road as cars whizzed past, but she didnt buy it.

Marvin Fowler was set up in Sterling for the second year with tables filled with old tools including wood planes, chisels, hand drills and bits.

Fowler said he drives his big motor home up from Florida to visit grandchildren near Jacksonville and then comes up to Georgia for the sale.

With the bad fuel mileage on his motor home, he has to make a few sales to help pay for gas, Fowler joked. We just have fun doing it, he said. Me and my wife like rambling and meeting people.

The trade goes back to his childhood.

My daddy had a used furniture store when I was a teenager, Fowler said.

A lot of the items have seen far better days, but Fowler said, You dont ever know what somebody wants.

In Brunswick, Penny Smith was selling bluebird houses and local honey he collects from his bees just north of Brunswick.

A rain shower came through and hurt business some, but Smith said he had sold enough honey to recover the rent and a little more before 9 a.m.

A few booths away, John Miles of Alma was decked out in a University of Georgia shirt and cap selling fried pecans made from an old family recipe that he sells as Popi &Mimis Pecans.

Bea and Don Skeens bought some, and Don Skeens, a University of Florida grad, asked, What if I was wearing my Florida cap?

Im here to sell pecans, Miles said. I dont care what you wear.

Terry Dickson: (912) 264-0405

More:

Peaches to the Beaches Yard Sale hits high gear along US 341 - Florida Times-Union