Automation: Another Day Another Report – National Review

The latest report on the disruption that the automation wave may bring in its wake makes for no more cheery reading than its predecessors. It probably doesnt help that its produced by the International Bar Association. Lawyers are just one of the white collar professions that are going to find themselves at the sharpas in guillotine end of the automation revolution. Worlds smallest violin, I know.

The Guardian discusses the report here.

Some highlights:

The competitive advantage of poorer, emerging economies based on cheaper workforces will soon be eroded as robot production lines and intelligent computer systems undercut the cost of human endeavour, the study suggests.

While a German car worker costs more than 40 (34) an hour, a robot costs between only 5 and 8 per hour. A production robot is thus cheaper than a worker in China, the report notes. Nor does a robot become ill, have children or go on strike and [it] is not entitled to annual leave.

Thats not great news for China. The term premature deindustrialization is one worth keeping in mind when reading reports like this, and as for those emerging markets hoping to use cheap labor as their route to prosperity (or at least middle income status), well.

The Guardian:

Peering into the future, the authors suggest that governments will have to decide what jobs should be performed exclusively by humans for example, caring for babies. The state could introduce a kind of human quota in any sector, and decide whether it intends to introduce a made by humans label or tax the use of machines, the report says.

In January, I noted a report produced by the EUs parliament that included this recommendation (my emphasis added):

A new reporting structure for companies requiring them to report the contribution of robotics and AI to the economic results of a company for the purpose of taxation and social security contributions.

Back to The Guardian:

Even some lawyers risk becoming unemployed. An intelligent algorithm went through the European Court of Human Rights decisions and found patterns in the text, the report records. Having learned from these cases, the algorithm was able to predict the outcome of other cases with 79% accuracy According to a study conducted by [the auditing firm] Deloitte, 100,000 jobs in the English legal sector will be automated in the next 20 years.

Pushed by the necessity to adapt to an older, eventually smaller population (a change which wont always be easy, but in a post peak labor world will turn out, in the end, to be a happy accident) Japan, as so often, leads the way.

Robots may soon invade our home and leisure environments. In the Henn-na Hotel in Sasebo, Japan, actroids robots with a human likeness are deployed, the report says. In addition to receiving and serving the guests, they are responsible for cleaning the rooms, carrying the luggage and, since 2016, preparing the food.

The robots are able to respond to the needs of the guests in three languages. The hotels plan is to replace up to 90% of the employees by using robots in hotel operations with a few human employees monitoring CCTV cameras to see whether they need to intervene if problems arise.

Work in the hotel sector is, of course, allegedly one of those jobs that Americans wont do..

And education, that magic pill?

The surveysuggests that a third of graduate level jobs around the world may eventually be replaced by machines or software.

Oh.

Elite overproduction is not an ideal recipe for social peace. Mass unemployment is not so great either. History, of course, suggests that these things work out in the end, but what happens before they do?

View post:

Automation: Another Day Another Report - National Review

The Bright Side of Job-Killing Automation – Fortune

Fears that automation will kill more jobs continues to grow. An estimated 5 million U.S. factory jobs have evaporated since 2000 and most of those (88%) were lost to increased productivity due to automation, according to a study by Ball State University.

But opinions about what, if anything, can be done to reverse the trend differ greatly.

Real estate billionaire Jeff Greene, who hosted his second Managing the Disruption conference on the topic of job destruction and what to do about it in Palm Beach, Fla., this week, has some ideas. Last year, he raised a ruckus by saying that robotics and artificial intelligence would kill not just blue-collar factory jobs but also many white-collar careers. Paralegals, journalists, airline pilots, even surgeons could be impacted, for example.

Greene continued the drumbeat last week in a Washington Post article , warning that automation will kill jobs much faster than Steven Mnuchin , President Donald Trump's Treasury secretary, expects. Last week Mnuchin said, controversially, that he didn't think major automation-related job losses would kick in for another 50 to 100 years.

In contrast, a recent report by consultancy PricewaterhouseCoopers estimates that 38% of U.S. jobs have a "high risk" of being wiped out by automation by 2030.

Get Data Sheet , Fortune s technology newsletter

Greene's take is that automation isn't entirely bad if it can be perfected and deployed to lower the cost of living for the middle class so that they wouldn't need to earn as much money to get by. For example, using 3-D printers to build homes could cut the cost of housing to a more manageable level so that families wouldn't have to devote most of their income to mortgage payments, Greene told Fortune on Wednesday.

If machines could 3-D print homes using high-density resins, a structure that now costs $200,000 might cost $50,000, Greene said. That would take a big chunk of debt off the table for most families, he said.

Another huge drain on family budgets is energy. Part of that problem could be solved by using alternative energy. Families could save money if the U.S. used solar energy to power electric cars and heat homes. Of course that assumes that the cost of alternatives goes lower than the cost of oil.

The net impact, in his opinion, is that a couple would no longer have to work 80 to 90 hours a week to pay the bills. And if they can live on less money, the need for a two-income household is lessened, allowing one parent to stay home with any children. That, in turn, reduces the risk of children turning to drugs or getting pregnant.

Greene acknowledges that his ideas are "possibly Utopian" in that he's seeing the use of automation that poses risks to workers across the spectrum in the best possible light.

Many who worry about automation also tout universal basic income as a way to make up for lost jobs. In this scenario, all citizens who are too young for Social Security would receive a flat annual payment from the federal government. It's a trendy idea in Silicon Valley and other tech enclaves, where it's seen as a way to hedge against automation-induced job losses.

One small problem: It is unaffordable, according to former Treasury Secretary Lawrence Summers, who spoke at this week's event. It would cost about $5 trillion annually, or about $4 trillion more than the country's annual income tax revenue, to pay each American adult $25,000 a year.

"It's almost impossible to make the arithmetic work," Summers said, according to The Palm Beach Post.

Others see hope in smaller, more tactical steps, like improving tech education for students and re-training current workers. Last week, General Electric contributed $50 million to the Boston Public Schools to improve science technology engineering and math (STEM) education to train students to help fill what the company sees as a gaping skills gap.

That's a step in the right direction, but retraining people on a much broader scale is needed to address skills gap nation-wide. There does not seem to be much desire in the Republican-controlled Congress to boost funding on education.

Others say technologies like augmented reality, which layers information onto the real world through connected eye glasses or goggles, could help. For example, field repair technicians could get diagrams and instructions, even video, projected into their goggles so that they can work faster and better without having to stop to consult manuals. That's technology that Upskill, a Herndon, Va.-based tech company, already provides to customers like GE ( ge ) and Boeing ( ba ) , which just invested in the company.

"This technology can augment the skills of less specialized workers and help expert workers work faster," Upskill executive chairman Dr. Magid Abraham told Fortune at a GE event last week.

But back to the conference: Greene says he was struck about how optimistic most of the speakers werethe roster also included former British Prime Minister David Cameron and New York Times columnist Thomas Friedman. "If I were optimistic, I wouldn't spend all this time and energy on this conference," he said.

The difference between the industrial revolution of the 19th century and the current situation, he said, is that back then machines replaced physical labor but also created many retail, bookkeeping, machine repair, and accounting jobs related to the goods produced. Now, however, the world is dealing not only with robots that do physical labor but with AI that does mental labor as well.

Says Greene: "We can't compete with both physical machines and thinking machines."

Read the original post:

The Bright Side of Job-Killing Automation - Fortune

Methods Machine Tools Expands Automation Footprint In North … – AftermarketNews.com (AMN)

To meet the aggressively growing demand for automation and robotics in manufacturing, Methods Machine Tools Inc., a leading supplier of innovative precision machine tools, 3-D printing technology, automation and accessories, is expanding its automation capabilities, launching a new automation and integration center in its Charlotte, North Carolina, facility. The center, slated to open this spring, is staffed by systems integration engineers and will have a full range of equipment and capabilities from customer consultation to building cells and performing run-offs.

The 10,000-square-foot center will expand Methods existing automation program and provide innovative, state-of-the-art systems for customers throughout the U.S.

Automation is not a new concept at Methods. With existing automation centers in the companys Sudbury, Massachusetts, headquarters and in Wixom, Michigan, Methods says it has been committed to automation for years, applying leading-edge technology in a wide range of machine tool and robotic solutions from small automated centers to large, complex multi-function machining cells.

Manufacturers are increasingly realizing that incorporating automation and robotics are key to their productivity, profitability and future, said Bryon Deysher, president and CEO of Methods Machine Tools Inc. Our new automation and integration center will provide expanded capability for all projects spanning the U.S. and enhance the value of our customer experience at every level. I envision the future need for expanding this model in other regions of the U.S. as well.

Methods Automation, utilizing robotics and a full range of advanced machine tools via Productivity Partners FANUC, YASDA, Nakamura-Tome, KIWA and FEELER, designs, integrates and builds innovative, flexible automation solutions for customers throughout North America. Methods has 40 automation engineers nationwide, including design engineers, control engineers, systems integration engineers and field service/ installation engineers. In addition, Methods technology centers are strategically located across the U.S. in Boston; Charlotte, North Carolina; Detroit; Chicago; Phoenix; San Francisco; and Los Angeles. Mike Kierce, systems integration manager, will be managing the new Charlotte automation center.

Read the original here:

Methods Machine Tools Expands Automation Footprint In North ... - AftermarketNews.com (AMN)

Justin Trudeau Has a Plan to Save Jobs From Automation – Fortune

Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau is preparing his country to deal with the challenges new technologies place on the workforce.

The rise of artificial intelligence technologies has made it easier for companies like Google ( goog ) to automatically identify cats in photos. But as cutting-edge AI technologies amplify automation, people are increasingly worried that powerful software will replace the need for human workers .

Earlier this week, Trudeau addressed the subject of automation and labor on the question-and-answer website Quora and explained some of his ideas to help Canadian citizens keep their jobs in light of rapid technological advances.

Trudeau concedes that the job market is changing but instead of resisting in vain, Canada is going to fund research in the areas that are directly causing the change, like artificial intelligence.

Get Data Sheet, Fortunes technology newsletter.

The prime minister didnt point to any examples of government AI funding, but Canada has recently invested in several big AI policy projects. In March, Canada said it would spend $125 million on a new initiative designed to attract and retain top academic talent in Canada and boost the number of graduate students and researchers studying AI.

Canada is currently a hotbed of AI research , with some of the worlds leading experts in the AI technique of deep learning residing in the country and researching at various universities like the University of Montreal and the McGill University. Several big tech companies like Microsoft ( msft ) and Google have also recently invested in AI research projects in Canada involving the countrys top academics.

For Canadas unemployed, Trudeau said the government is proposing a plan that would allow citizens to pursue self-funded training while still receiving unemployment benefits. This unemployment plan would cost $132.4 million over four years, beginning next year, and $37.9 million per year thereafter, he wrote.

For unemployed workers receiving [Employment Insurance], this will mean that they can return to school to get the training they need to find a new jobwithout fear of losing the EI benefits they need to support themselves and their families, Trudeau wrote.

As for Canadas current workforce, Trudeau said that the country is expanding access to grants and access to interest-free student loans for adults, although he did not say how much it would cost.

This initiative, Trudeau said, will help make it cheaper for adults with children to go back to school on a part-time basis to keep their job skills up to date. He also said that Canada is going to invest in an initiative that would help students find jobs after they finish their education.

Trudeaus comments about how Canada is preparing for automation technologies contrast with recent statements made by U.S. Secretary of Commerce Steve Mnuchin. Mnuchin told news outlet Axios in March that he does not believe artificial intelligence would significantly impact jobs for around 50 to 100 years.

Besides increased government spending on education, several analysts also recommend that companies spend money on employee training projects as well for their own workers.

For example, a recent Accenture report on technological trends in the workplace recommends that business leaders instill a life-long" culture among their employees, reawarding those who seek outside training to increase their skills.

The rest is here:

Justin Trudeau Has a Plan to Save Jobs From Automation - Fortune

It’s not science fiction, it’s automation! – InfoWorld

Transform to a modern hybrid infrastructure with converged, hyperconverged, and composable infrastructure solutions from Hewlett Packard Enterprise.

sponsored

It's an exciting time to work in tech. With all of the advancements in areas like artificial intelligence and the Internet of Things, the world we live in is progressively becoming smarter. Even the things that seemed impossible and taken straight out of a science fiction movie (self-driving cars!) are now beginning to become a new normal.

With all these fantastic technology advancements, though, the management of new products and features can often become... a little complex. And this fact is no different in the IT infrastructure space. If you don't believe me, scroll through your Twitter feed and it wont be too long before you find one or two IT aficionado that you follow rallying around the cry of "Automate everything!"

Automation works to simplify typical tasks, so it's easy to imagine why IT teams seek out automation tools and products. After all, why spend three hours completing a mundane task when automation can save you the time and effort? Automation tools become especially important when used in a management capacity. There, they enable IT to drive more business value to the entire organization, meaning more services are delivered faster and without the strain on the administrators or the end users.

Just as the emergence of artificial intelligence and the Internet of Things has come with new products to manage devices leveraging these technologies, so too has the trend toward hybrid IT. Hybrid IT has resulted in new management and automation tools to further simplify and streamline the process across multiple technologies you are using both within and outside of your data center.

Perhaps there are no better examples of hybrid IT than hyperconverged and composable infrastructure. These solutions have transformed data centers and the IT teams who manage them from complexity connoisseurs into masters of simplicity. But even simple solutions can (and should) benefit from automation tools.

Take HPE OneView for example. HPE OneView is an infrastructure automation engine and an essential part of HPE's existing hyperconverged and composable infrastructure solutions. HPE OneView drives business value (the ultimate goal of any good IT solution, automation-related or otherwise) by allowing IT to deploy infrastructure faster, simplify operations, and increase productivity.

Template-based automation enables IT generalists to rapidly and reliably provision resources in response to applications requirements. This allows IT to deploy infrastructure faster with less human error. Agent-less monitoring, online firmware updates, and a new Global Dashboard deliver streamlined lifecycle operations at scale and simplify operations overall. And the unified API gives developers and ISVs the power to unify infrastructure automation with application and IT service delivery which increases their productivity.

While the world continues to get smarter and become more automated, the tools we use to manage new, innovative technologies have to evolve as well. By driving simplicity and decreasing time spent on management, automation tools are the key to the success of the future of IT.

To find out how you can take the next step in automating data center operations, watch this webinar detailing why and how to migrate to HPE OneView with ease.

Sponsored Links

See the article here:

It's not science fiction, it's automation! - InfoWorld

Automation: The Beat Goes On | National Review – National Review

The New York Times:

Who is winning the race for jobs between robots and humans? Last year, two leading economists described a future in which humans come out ahead. But now theyve declared a different winner: the robots.

The industry most affected by automation is manufacturing. For every robot per thousand workers, up to six workers lost their jobs and wages fell by as much as three-fourths of a percent, according to a new paper by the economists, Daron Acemoglu of M.I.T. and Pascual Restrepo of Boston University. It appears to be the first study to quantify large, direct, negative effects of robots.

The paper is all the more significant because the researchers, whose work is highly regarded in their field, had been more sanguine about the effect of technology on jobs. In a paper last year, they said it was likely that increased automation would create new, better jobs, so employment and wages would eventually return to their previous levels. Just as cranes replaced dockworkers but created related jobs for engineers and financiers, the theory goes, new technology has created new jobs for software developers and data analysts.

The first half of that last sentence points to one small problem:How many of those dockworkers became financiers and engineers?

The two researchers have now, the Times reports, turned their attention to real-world data and:

The researchers said they were surprised to see very little employment increase in other occupations to offset the job losses in manufacturing. That increase could still happen, they said, but for now there are large numbers of people out of work, with no clear path forward especially blue-collar men without college degrees.

The conclusion is that even if overall employment and wages recover, there will be losers in the process, and its going to take a very long time for these communities to recover, Mr. Acemoglu said.

A very long time.

As a reminder, real wages in Britain stagnated for most of the first half of the 19th Century even as GDP, boosted by new technology, grew rapidly, a pause (dubbed the Engels Pause by the British economist Robert Allen) that was to have very real political consequences. Who was that Engels fellow again?

The Guardian:

As of 2015, a typical production worker in the US earned about 9% less than a comparable worker in 1973. Over the same 42 years, the American economy grew by more than 200%, or a staggering $11tn.

Now think about the implications of self-driving trucks.

And then take a look at the chart here that shows themost common job in each state.

Read more:

Automation: The Beat Goes On | National Review - National Review

The solution to automation-related job loss starts with admitting it’s happening – TNW

Credit: Voodoo Manufacturing

Automation is coming? No, its already here

While the current administration focuses on bringing jobs back to the United States from China and Mexico, the real threat to job loss already resides within our borders.

Gary Vaynerchuk was so impressed with TNW Conference 2016 he paused mid-talk to applaud us.

According to a study by two Ball State University professors, 87 percent of all manufacturing jobs lost from 2000 to 2010 werent due to globalization, butrobots.All told, some five million fewer manufacturing jobs exist todaythan in 2000, a problem government leaders are mostly ignoring.TNW alum Martin Bryant likened it to recklessly putting their heads in the sand when describing politicians views on automation.

Brooklyn-based Voodoo Manufacturing offersa peek into whatthis future could look like.

The 3D printing company consists of nine printers mounted on server racks, a track where a robotic arm harvests finished plates, and a plate hopper that feeds new, clean plates to the robot as needed. This is forward thinking, as 3D printing isnt laborious, per se, but it does require human intervention.

Unfortunately for most humans,these are exactly the types of menial jobs best handled by robots.

Whether you choose to embrace it is up to you, but theres no denying its coming. Humans simply cant match robots in outputat scale.

Today we have about a 30- to 40-percent utilization rate of our factory, explainedVoodoo Manufacturing CPO Jonathan Schwartz. Were hoping to push that to 90- to 95-percent over the next three-to-five years.

This sort of efficiency before the automation age was unheard of. Now, itsnot only a possibility, its a near-certainty. And its hard to blame a company aiming to cut costswhile improving output. Business, after all, isnt charity, and global competition is making it harder to compete than ever. If robots offer an edge, businesses are likely to take it.

But maybe were focusing on the wrong things.

Once we let the cat out of the bag, which we assuredly did in the push toward automation, its not something we can undo. While we attempt to write off job loss to globalization a petty tactic used to distract, not inform maybe its time to recognize the true cause. And onceunderstand where our jobs are going, maybe then we can put our collective heads together to find out a solution for a newly unemployed workforce.

Its time to adapt, to create a future thats both cognizant of whats coming while impervious to the fear-based rhetoric that surrounds it. Automation is a good thing, or it will be at some point. There will be hurdles, and we will overcome them. But the conversation cant get underway, at least not in an impactful way, until we quit trying to shove the cat back into the bag.

As for the solution, I dont have one. But automation is coming, andits time we stop pretending we can stop it. Its time to leap, while at the same time figuring out what this new landing area looks like.

Bring on the robots.

Read next: Twitch's game store for streaming fans is now open

Continued here:

The solution to automation-related job loss starts with admitting it's happening - TNW

Caribbean Reparations Movement Must Put Capitalism on Trial – teleSUR English

The struggle for reparations in the Caribbean should become a site of the class struggle and organizing the people for socialism or communism.

Why is the reparations movement in the Anglophone Caribbean not putting capitalism on trial in its campaign to force British imperialism to provide financial compensation for its industrial and agricultural capitalists enslavement of Africans?

RELATED: Feminist Activism and the Caribbean Academy

To what extent is capitalism such a sacred spirit or god whose name should not be publicly called in order to avoid attracting its vindictive and punishing rebuke?

Are the advocates of reparations truly convinced that British imperialisms payment of financial compensation for the enslavement of Africans would end the economic marginalization of the labouring classes who are toiling under capitalist regimes throughout the region?

Why are we willing to place racism or white supremacy in the dock but not its creator capitalism?

OnDec. 17 2007, the United Nations General Assembly passed a resolution that made March 25 the annual commemorative International Day of Remembrance of the Victims of Slavery and the Transatlantic Slave Trade.

This day should be used as a rallying point by people of good conscience to press the former major slaving states such as Britain, Denmark, France, Germany, Holland, Portugal, Russia, Spain and Sweden to pay reparations for their participation in the economic exploitation and racist dehumanization of enslaved Africans. The General Assemblys initiative is an acknowledgement of the over fifteen million Africans who landed in the Americas and the over thirty million captives who died during the process of catching and delivering them into the Holocaust of Enslavement.

Capitalism and Slavery in the Caribbean

A key goal of all yearly progressive remembrance activities in the Caribbean and elsewhere should be to educate or remind people of the fact that capitalism was the primary force behind the extraction of the labour power of enslaved Africans. Of equal importance is the need to etch into the consciousness of the public that white supremacy or racism was simply an ideological tool used by the capitalist enslavers and various European states to morally justify the enslavement of Africans. Racism was deployed by these early capitalists and their respective national states to mask the purely economic motivation behind the development of an enslaved labour force.

In the seminal and classic book Capitalism and Slavery that was written by the late historian and statesman Dr. Eric Williams, he states that the brutal, exploitative and exacting labour condition of white indentured workers served as the template for the institution of African enslavement or slavery:

"Here then is the origin of [African] slavery. The reason was economic, not racial; it had not to do with the color of the laborer but the cheapness of the laborer. The features of the man, his hair, color and dentifrice, his 'subhuman'characteristics so widely pleaded, were only later rationalizations to justify a simple economic fact: that the colonies needed and resorted to [African] labour because it was the cheapest and the best. This was not a theory, it was a practical conclusion deduced from the personal experience of the planter."

Williams asserts that slavery, as basically an economic institution, gave birth to racism. He further states that Unfree labor in the New World was brown, white, black and yellow; Catholic, Protestant and pagan. Racism or white supremacy is now an autonomous system of oppression that intersects with patriarchy and capitalism to create differing degrees of labour exploitation within the ranks of the working-class.

RELATED: Caribbean Denounces Trump Nationalism, Vows Better Cooperation

The point that should be centred in the minds of revolutionaries and radicals in the Caribbean is that capitalism, the architect of racism, is still negatively impacting the lives of the working-class descendants of enslaved Africans as well as the societies that were built by their exploited labour. The late revolutionary, organic intellectual and historian Dr. Walter Rodney convincingly argues and documents in his ground-breaking text How Europe Underdeveloped Africa that capitalism was the main contributor to the stagnation of Africas economic development (see Chapter 4 Europe and the Roots of Africas Underdevelopment To 1885).

Rodneys indictment of capitalism and its retardation of the potentiality of the greater portion of humanity (the labouring classes) should be duly noted by the reparations activists or advocates who are playing footsie with capitalism:

"the peasants and workers of Europe (and eventually the inhabitants of the whole world) paid a huge price so that the capitalists could make their profits from the human labour that always lies behind the machine. That contradicts other facets of development, especially viewed from the standpoint of those who suffered and still suffer to make capitalist achievements possible. This latter group are the majority of [humanity]. To advance, they must overthrow capitalism; and that is why at the moment capitalism stands in the path of further human development. To put it another way, the social (class) relations of capitalism are now outmoded, just as slave and feudal relations became outmoded in their time."

Dr. Hilary Beckles, Vice-Chancellor of the University of the West Indies, has written an excellent and easily comprehended book, Britains Black Debt: Reparations for Caribbean Slavery and Native Genocide. It is a must read for people who would like to understand the basis of the claim for reparations from Britain for its role in the enslavement of Africans and genocide against Indigenous peoples in the Caribbean.

Unfortunately, Britains Black Debt has placed the misbegotten child of capitalism racism- on trial, but not the inherently exploitative and soul destroying parent capitalism. If we are going to throw the book at capitalism for chattel slavery, we are morally and politically obligated to do the same for the wage slavery of capitalism under which the Caribbean working-class is currently being exploited.

Caribbean States and Reparations

Today, we are witnessing the unconscionable, but politically understandable behaviour of the neocolonial states in the Caribbean Community (CARICOM) in divorcing their call for reparations from measures aimed at throwing capitalism into the cesspool of history. These members states of CARICOM are all committed to the implementation of social, economic and political policies that have enshrined capitalism in the region.

They are interested in reparations as a way to deal with their balance of payment, budgetary and development challenges as seen in the call for debt cancellation, technology transfer and a formal apology and not statements of regrets in this regional bodys Ten Point Action Plan for Reparatory Justice.

While these governments are acting like capitalism was not the real culprit behind the economic exploitation of enslaved Africans, progressive civil society groups and individuals who are advocating for reparations should not be silent or conveniently forgetful of this historical fact. We should expect the liberal petite bourgeois or middle-class reparations advocates to not indict capitalism.

RELATED: Decolonizing Culture and Politics with Derek Walcott

Their class interests and aspirations are totally immersed and dependent on the continued existence of capitalism. The petite bourgeois elements, unlike the labouring classes, display high levels of class consciousness and the former group tends to allow its class interests to guide its thoughts and actions.

However, radical and revolutionary reparations activists and supporters have no business not putting capitalism on the stand in their activism and general public education initiatives. As political activists who are committed to ending inequity and exploitation that are rooted in the social, economic, political and cultural structures of societys principal institutions, they should know that capitalist economic relations and practices are a major source of oppression.

As such, they ought to educate the public on the reality that the capitalism that exploited the labour of enslaved Africans is the same capitalism that exploited them as wage slaves after the end of slavery. Capitalism is still exploiting Caribbean workers and taking the lions share of the profit that comes from the labour power of the working-class.

CARICOMs ten-point reparations proposal is implicitly using the societies in the global North as the model of social and economic development. The mature capitalist societies in North America and Europe are characterized by widespread income inequality and concentration of wealth as well as the political marginalization of the working-class. How can such societies in good conscience serve as the standard of social, political and economic development for the Caribbean?

Reparatory Justice for Social Transformation and Dual Power

In the Caribbean, the revolutionaries and radicals must advance a reparations agenda that demands Britain/Europes financial compensation for the economic exploitation and racist dehumanization of enslaved Africans. It has been estimated that Britains reparations payment to Africans in the Caribbean would be in the region of 7.5 trillion. The 20 million paid to the enslavers of Africans after the 1838 abolition of slavery in the British Empire would be worth about 200 billion in todays currency.

The proposals below ought to be a part of the Caribbean reparations movements programme and be seen as a part of the general class struggle. The neocolonial Caribbean states do not need the immediate payment of reparations to undertake some of these demands. The social movements in the region must organize around these demands as a part of a dual power strategy or infrastructure of dissent or anarchist transfer cultures:

Promote labour self-management and economic democracy:The governments in the Caribbean must capitalize national and regional Worker Self-management and Entrepreneurship Funds from allotments out of the respective annual national budgets. These funds would be controlled by progressive civil society forces. These financial resources would be used to finance and support worker cooperatives and other labour self-managed companies as well as the work of the support organizations and structures that are necessary to ensure the viability of the workers ownership, control and management of their workplace.

It would be the duty of the revolutionary and radical organizers to ensure that a critical mass of the worker-cooperators embrace labour self-management as a part of the class struggle and the fight for socialism. The workers democratic control of the workplace combined popular assemblies would the laboratory or training ground for the self-management of the future stateless, classless and self-organized (communist) society.

RELATED: Youth Are Joining Cubas Communist Party in Droves Heres Why

Include labour self-management in school curriculum: The governments in the Caribbean should restructure the curriculum and place at its centre knowledge of the oppressive nature of chattel slavery and wage slavery as system of labour extraction and exploitation. Of equal importance is the strategic need to adequately educate the students in primary, secondary and tertiary educational institutions about workers control, ownership and management of the workplace.

Further, the students would be equipped with the knowledge, skills and attitude to collectively self-manage worker cooperatives and other worker self-managed companies. We must challenge the public education curriculum that prepares learners, at public expense, to work in capitalist enterprises. The worker self-management ideas and practices should be integrated throughout the curriculum.

Develop comprehensive land reform programme: According to Tony Weis in the paper Restructuring and Redundancy: The Impacts and Illogic of Neoliberal Agricultural Reforms in Jamaica: Jamaicas landscape still bears the scars of the most ferocious form of agricultural production ever devised, as plantations kept their vice-like grip on the best land after Emancipation in 1838, with all subsequent distribution programmes only ever acting on the margins of these inhumanly constructed yet sacrosanct institutions. The preceding state of affairs is essentially the situation in the rest of the Anglophone Caribbean. The governments in the Caribbean must undertake a comprehensive land reform programme that puts flat, arable land in the hands of the labouring classes. Enslaved Africans and indentured South Asians and the Indigenous peoples worked the land and their descendants must now exercise stewardship and control over it.

In order for them to take land out of the capitalist speculative market and to end the idea of the ownership of land by individuals, these governments must create the legislative framework for the establishment of community land trust (CLT). CLT are structures that are used to protect land from the rise or fall in the value of land based on speculation or the whims and fancies of capitalist demand and supply of land and housing. The access to land should be based on the right of collective use or usufructuary rights and not the right of private ownership. Each generation should be the steward of land and not its owners as under capitalism.

Create a cooperative housing programme: The condition of a large proportion of the housing stock in the Caribbean is an assault on human decency, especially for those who live in urban squatter settlements or overcrowded, ill-repaired housing in urban and rural communities. The state must create national funding programmes to support the development and maintenance of cooperative housing by the people through their organizations.

Cooperative housing is a way to engender popular, democratic and collective control and management over the housing by the people who live in these units and to undermine the idea of housing as a tradeable commodity. The members of cooperative housing would have security of tenure but would not be able to pass on the property to their heirs.

RELATED: Jamaica's Tambourine Army Fights Gender Violence, Rape Culture

Establish working-class friendly labour laws: The system of chattel slavery in the Caribbean and the rest of the Americas was a very vile form of labour exploitation. The slave masters did not simply exercise power over the labour power and the fruit of the labour (profit) of the enslaved African workforce. These capitalists also owned the enslaved Africans.

The brutal legacy of exploitation of African workers continued after Emancipation in 1838. In the Anglophone Caribbean of today, progressive organizations ought to develop broad national and regional campaigns to force these neocolonial governments to create worker-friendly labour laws that make it easier for workers to join or form trade unions. Severe or prohibitive fines must be levied against employers who violate the rights of workers to form or join trade unions. It is hypocritical of governmental to demand reparations from British imperialism for slavery, while facilitating the exploitation of workers through laws that titled against the power of workers in the workforce.

The rate of unionization is very low in the Caribbean and it must become a priority of progressive social movement organizations, socialist organizations, the revolutionary petite bourgeoisie and trade unions to push for legislation that will give workers a greater level of bargaining power in the workplace-based class struggle.

Establish popular, democratic and horizontal assemblies of the oppressed: The revolutionary and radical forces in the Caribbeans reparations movement must work with other progressive forces throughout society to establish a federated system of popular, democratic and horizontal assemblies of the oppressed. These assemblies would function as the direct democratic structures of political self-management that seeks to approximate the communist self-organizing concept of the administration of things and not the governance of people.

The assemblies would be the local, regional and national organs through which the labouring classes discuss, plan and determine their economic and social priorities. The masses would implement their main concerns through their alternative and oppositional institution as well as organize and impose them on existing and domination economic, social, cultural and political institution. In this contestation for power, the peoples organizations would use all available and ethical means to advance their liberation.

Perry Mars documents in his book Ideology and Change: The Transformation of the Caribbean Left that a section of the The Left in the Caribbean has a tradition of using or advocating the deployment of assemblies to connect with the people: What these parties have in common is their strong advocacy of what are called variously peoples parliament or peoples assembly representing mass democratic participation in grass roots self organizations.

Further, The Left sees assemblies as political instruments that compensate for the fact that the liberal capitalist democracies in the region are not responsive or represent the needs of the people. Assemblies should not be used as consultative or information-sharing bodies by nationalist and socialist revolutionaries or radicals.

These political assemblies are supposed to be proactive and positive structures that familiarise the people with the idea and practice of shaping all decisions that impact their lives. Mars notes that in the Caribbean The problem with the peoples assembly is that the implementation does not necessarily eliminate the tendencies towards political centralization and elitism as far as leadership of the movement is concerned.

From the period of chattel slavery to the current period of neocolonial flag independence, the Caribbean labouring classes have yet to exercise substantive power over the political institutions that govern their lives. A system of popular assemblies with the capacity to challenge the authoritarian liberal capitalist democracies for power would be the one of the best expressions of reparatory justice in the Caribbean.

Conclusion

The struggle for reparations in the Caribbean should become a site of the class struggle and organizing the people for socialism or communism. Capitalism must be put on trial for aiding and abetting the enslavement of Africans and genocide against the Indigenous peoples.

The proposals that are outlined above for adoption by the Caribbean reparations will not become a reality in the absence of national campaigns that organize the people into their self-organized class-based and other popular organizations. We are seeking to build a counterhegemonic force or alternative power bloc to contest the existing forces of domination and to advance the long-term struggle of putting them out of business.

RELATED: Barbados: Teachers March for Respect

The neocolonial governments have jumped in front of the reparations bandwagon and are trying to set the agenda. It is incumbent on the popular forces to organize the people in order to wrest the agenda setting initiative from the state and impose their programme of action the state through the organizing of the labouring classes and other oppressed groups within its ranks.

It is critically necessary for the organizers who are organizing the people from below to do everything possible to utilize all available opportunity to build the capacity of the oppressed to challenge and undermine the existing white supremacist, patriarchal and capitalist political order. It is for this reason that a dual power strategy must build the embryonic economic, social and political structures of the future socialist society, while engaging and contesting the existing institutions of power.

It is in this light that the development of worker self-management over their workplaces and the establishment of a system of popular assemblies as the seat of working-class political power becomes necessary. The reparations movement can play an important catalytic role in helping to ideologically prepare the people for the completion of the Second Emancipation in the Caribbean and the rest of the Americas.

Here is the original post:

Caribbean Reparations Movement Must Put Capitalism on Trial - teleSUR English

Is Passover Broken Beyond Repair? – Forward

Its time to face facts: Passover is broken. Busted. Split in two. Half of us are celebrating one part of the holiday while the other half celebrates the other part. Most of us dont even realize were celebrating only half the holiday.

This shouldnt surprise us. The Jewish community worldwide is broken into pieces. Theres no reason to expect our favorite Jewish holiday will be exempt. The festival mirrors the community that observes it. Right now were a community thats marching in two opposite directions at once.

One side of the community observes Passover to recount the suffering and persistence of Jews in a hostile world, from ancient Egypt up to modern times and, we assume, into the future. For the other side, Passover is about expressing solidarity with victims of modern-day oppression by linking our peoples historic suffering with injustices done to others today.

The first type of Passover, the Jews-in-a-hostile-world version, looks pretty much like the Passover that Jews have celebrated throughout our two millennia of wandering. Theyre not identical, of course. Through most of our history Jews saw the Egyptian bondage as a foreshadowing of their own suffering. Passover expressed our yearning to be liberated as our forebears were. Most of us today havent experienced anything similar. The holiday now serves to remind us of our humble roots. It also reaffirms our sense that were still historys victims, even if we dont look like it lately.

Then again, the Passover of the European exile wasnt the original model either. The original Passover, the one commanded in the Bible, centered on sacrificing livestock at the Holy Temple in Jerusalem. It was only after the Babylonians and then the Romans demolished the Temple that the family dinner took center stage.

One unifying element in all traditional Passovers, ancient and modern, is the recitation of the traditional lessons of Passover: In each generation, each of us is obliged to see ourselves as if we personally had come out of Egypt. Liberation happens by divine miracle. In each generation they rise up against us to destroy us. And, as we tell the skeptical son: This happened to me, not to you.

The other Passover, the solidarity-with-the-downtrodden version, is a more recent phenomenon. Its key feature is a revising of the Haggadah text to spotlight modern-day struggles for liberation from bondage. These can range from the agony of the Holocaust and redemptive birth of Israel to civil rights, gender equity and, more recently, Palestinian rights. Sometimes these new narratives are woven into the text of the traditional Haggadah. Sometimes they replace it altogether.

Alternative Haggadahs began appearing about 100 years ago, initially in the labor movement. Diasporist socialists sang of liberating workers from the wage-slavery of Boss Pharaoh. Labor Zionists sang of liberating the Jews from the bondage of diaspora by returning to the redeeming soil of the Land of Israel.

Screenshot

Among Jews, the upheavals of late 1960s were a watershed, the beginning of our division into two factions. One of the earliest signs of the split was the appearance of two Haggadahs that embodied the two opposing worldviews. One was the Freedom Seder, published in 1970 by left-wing guru Arthur Waskow. It updated the Passover message by putting black Americas freedom struggle at the center of the holiday narrative, drawing parallels between the Exodus from Egypt and the civil rights movement. For the first time, Passovers main message was not the suffering of Jews but of others. It was the message of the Seders skeptical son turned on its head: These things happened to him, not to me.

Two years later, as if in reply to Waskow, came the Soviet Jewry-themed Haggadah Let My People Go. A traditional text with some new commentaries, its most memorable feature was the illustrations by physician Mark Podwal. Like Waskows Freedom Seder, it put modern events front and center. Unlike the Freedom Seder, it kept the holidays focus on Jews.

In the decades since, countless new Haggadahs have appeared, with and without the traditional text, focusing variously on gender equality, hunger, the environment and more. Each one tries explicitly to frame its contemporary cause as a modern version of the Exodus story.

The latest innovation, though, risks turning the Passover tradition on its head by connecting the Jews suffering in Egypt with the suffering of the Palestinians under Israeli occupation.

Some might see the analogy as a tad overdone. Certainly the Palestinians suffer under Israeli military rule. But its not the agony of Syria or Congo, and its not the suffering of the Hebrew slaves in Egypt.

In a way, though, the strength of the historical comparison is beside the point. Every analogy is imperfect. If juxtaposing our ancestors with modern-day victims helps draw our attention to injustices around us, thats for good.

Whats off-kilter about Palestinian-themed Passover texts is that they put the Jews back in the center of the story but as the oppressor, not the victim. If the Palestinians are todays Hebrew slaves, then the Jewish state is the modern Pharaoh. Where the Freedom Seder and its heirs asked us to see our neighbors as comrades in suffering, Palestinian-themed Passover texts ask us to go a step further and see ourselves and our family as the wicked enemy.

Its important to learn to see through Palestinian eyes. Learning to identify with the Palestinians helps us understand why they view Israel the way they do, and how Israel got into its current plight. It can help us to love Israel more, not less. Jews who love Israel should be trying to help Israel disentangle from its neighbors, not just for their sake but for Israels and ours.

If, however, we carry our solidarity to the point of viewing Israel as Pharaoh, as the enemy, then we undo whatever good we hope to achieve. When we make Israel our enemy, we make ourselves Israels enemy. When that happens, we lose any ability to contribute to peace. And we lose our family. Were left broken holidays, traditions and all.

J.J. Goldberg is the Forwards editor-at-large.

The views and opinions expressed in this article are the authors own and do not necessarily reflect those of the Forward.

See the article here:

Is Passover Broken Beyond Repair? - Forward

Small World: Ranking the rank – The Bridgton News

Henry Precht

By Henry Precht

BN Columnist

A historian friend of mine has listed the men he deems the ten worse American presidents. He didnt leave a vacant slot for the incumbent, but I wonder whether Mr. Trump might not soon fit in based on this countrys experience of the past two and a half months of his 48-month term of office.

Categorizing roughly, I would say that five of the historians ten baddies were listed because of their wrong-headed positions on slavery; two because of their toleration of corruption; two because of lying or criminal policy; and one because of ineptitude in dealing with a national crisis. Lets see how Mr. Trump makes it through this sieve. Chattel slavery is no longer on the agenda but we might easily substitute how the incumbent treats the middle and lower classes sometimes called wage slaves.

On that score, I would say Mr. Trump shows every sign of becoming a modern day Buchanan. After his campaign appeal for better treatment of educationally poorly prepared and economically threatened whites, he turned on them in proposing health care legislation which would leave them worse off than with Obamacare. Programs that benefit them Meals on Wheels, regional development funds, etc. are slated to be cut back. Its early to say, but I doubt that Trump tax proposals will treat them as generously as they will the traditional big money folks in the Republican ranks the kind that have been named to fill Cabinet slots. So much for favoring the little guy against the elites.

There is one bit of business where Mr. Trump gives equal treatment to wage slaves and elites: both will suffer from his destruction of Obamas measures to limit the pace of global warming. They and their descendants will suffer equally.

The next failing among past leaders for which two are held culpable is corruption: Grant and Harding are listed as the major malefactors. Neither, however, dipped his own hands into the till; they simply turned a blind eye when cronies ripped off the public purse. Something like that may be starting under the present regime: the assets of our billionaire president have been turned over to his kin to manage. We may see court cases challenging these and other arrangements on conflict of interest grounds. Another source of foul aroma may be found when a billionaire investor profits from his closeness to the bunch in Washington and successfully advises the elimination of regulations that harm his business interests.

Two scorned ex-presidents (Nixon and the second Bush) have been reasonably accused of lying and putting or keeping us in disastrous wars. The latter was also been accused of wrecking the economy. Its too soon to accuse our president of pushing us into deeper conflicts, but there are signs in Iraq, Syria, and Yemen that a drift in that direction is building momentum. The economy is doing well during his brief tenure thanks in good part to inherited momentum and high hopes among investors, which may prove to be ill-founded. When it comes to lack of respect for truth, however, Mr. Trump may establish a new national record. Roll over, Mr. Nixon.

Finally, how might Mr. Trump rank compared to Herbert Hoover and his bungled efforts to deal with the Great Depression? Happily, he hasnt had to face that kind of severe test. But can anyone vouch for his interest in the mechanisms of government, his knowledge of foreign relations, his skill in persuading recalcitrant members of Congress, or talents for generating sound ideas and reassuring the panicky public? Mr. Trump has faced severe difficulties in the past. Unfortunately there is no bankruptcy court to rescue him if the national economy tanks.

Roosevelt came to the nations rescue in the Depression in large part because he picked a staff rich in creative talents. Trumps staff is just plain rich.

To wrap up this evaluation, I would say that Mr. Trump is headed down the trail to low or lowest ranking. In all fairness we should allow him some more months to manifest his true fitness and qualities for the job if, in fact, he can scrape up a few.

Henry Precht is a retired Foreign Service Officer.

Read the rest here:

Small World: Ranking the rank - The Bridgton News

LETTER: Getting our history wrong – Leavenworth Times

Robert Atwater Leavenworth

To the editor:

I am always fascinated how individuals can get our history wrong, how an individual can distort the facts through the fiction he or she creates. The Civil War from 1861-1865 was not a fight between political parties but over the issue of states rights and national authority. The issue of states rights and national authority had its inception in 1878 during the Constitutional Convention. The Articles of Confederation advocated the states authority over the national government while the constitution would establish a strong national government through a federation with supreme power resting in the national government.

In order to gain the support of most of the states for the new constitution, a number of compromises were made, including the Great Compromise on representation creating a Congress with two houses the Senate based upon equal representation and the House of Representatives based on the count of the population with an insertion of the Three-fifths Compromise, counting three out five slaves as a part of the population. At the time, many of the northern states favored states rights while many of the southern states were nationalistic.

When President George Washington issued his farewell address, he urged our nation to avoid the establishment of political parties because he believed they would divide the nation. At the time he left office in 1797, two political parties were already in existence. The Federalists supported a strong central government led by Alexander Hamilton that favored business interests, while the Republican-Democrats led by Thomas Jefferson favored states rights and the common man.

The Federalist Party evolved into the Whig Party and Republican-Democrat Party became the Democratic Party. As the nation grew so did the industrial and agricultural divisions. One of the economic issues involved slavery versus wage slaves. To maintain a balance between the slave and free states, the nation admitted new states to the union by admitting a slave state and a free state at the same time. The Compromise of 1820 (Missouri) and Compromise of 1850 changed the balance of slave vs. free states. Because of the Compromise of 1850, the Free State Party replaced the Whig Party.

The Free State Party platform promoted the abolition of slavery throughout the nation. In 1856, the Republican Party replaced the Free State Party but maintained the views on slavery. Hence, the southern states feared they were under attack. When Abraham Lincoln was elected as president in November 1860, the southern states believed their way of life was under attack. As a result, South Carolina seceded from the union in December 1860 because states rights allowed them to secede. This was prior to Lincoln being sworn in as president in March 1861. The Civil War was fought over the concept of states rights and national authority and not Republican versus Democrat. The result of the war was that states did not have the right to secede, and yet, some Republican states have talked about nullifying national laws or seceding from the union in the early years of the 21st century based on states rights.

It is interesting to note that the party of Lincoln has moved away from protecting the rights of the minority to accommodate corporations, banks and the wealthy in our society. The culmination of that movement has led to the election of Donald Trump as our president. It was evident that candidates for president in the election of 2016 were not acceptable and people had to hold their noses as they entered the polling booth. It is distressing that we have a president who has no concept of leading a nation and is an individual who is unwilling to accept fact rather than fiction. He has promoted fear of others rather than inclusion. However, he is our president and we will have to live with him for the next four years.

It is my hope that both political parties will be able to find more acceptable candidates in the 2020 election than we did in 2016 election.

Read more:

LETTER: Getting our history wrong - Leavenworth Times

It’s Alive! It’s Alive!: Our Film Critic Previews The 60th San Francisco International Film Festival – East Bay Express

The answer: They were trying to stay out of the way of Cannes. Thats right, the oldest and longest-running film festival in the Western Hemisphere evidently got so many complaints about close headways between S.F.s fest and the Festival de Cannes opening on May 17 this year, by the way that SFFILM decided to move its start date all the way up to April 5, running through April 19. So, all you Bay Area fans of foreign and esoteric movies can now comfortably fit both fests into your to-do lists with nothing lost. Thats a relief. Have fun on the Croisette.

As to the name change for the org: Dont worry, its only a routine re-branding. All businesses, including nonprofits in the highly competitive cultural-entertainment field, feel the need to put a new spin on things every few years. They want a change of image, so it doesnt look like theyre just sitting around booking obscure Third World rural-electrification sagas all the time, instead of hosting important events like the after-parties for Beauty and the Beast. So, now, the orgs name is officially SFFILM. (Anyone caught using the words San Francisco Film Society will be forcibly ejected from the theater and made to read the screenplay of Swiss Army Man.)

But seriously, folks, SFFILM is really coming out of the box with guns blazing, at eleven venues in San Francisco and the East Bay. One noticeable new wrinkle is the increase in Live & Onstage programs, such as the closing-night presentation of The Green Fog, by co-directors Guy Maddin, Evan Johnson, and Galen Johnson all of whom collaborated on Maddins The Forbidden Room. The Green Fog is a specially commissioned visual collage that re-imagines Alfred Hitchcocks Vertigo as a pastiche of moments from the original film, combined with snippets from a wide variety of other sources. And it takes place one time only: Sunday, April 16, at 7 p.m. at the Castro Theatre (429 Castro St, San Francisco, CastroTheatre.com). As a special added attraction, the Kronos Quartet accompanies the film with a score by composer-musician Jacob Garchik (son of San Francisco Chronicle columnist Leah Garchik). Maddin, both Johnsons, and Garchik also appear in person.

Why this heightened interest in film-and-live-music shows? Not unlike other previously film-only fests, the SFFILM Festival is trying to broaden its appeal, i.e., put younger butts in the seats. The hard-to-reach tech worker is in particular a marketing target, according to SFFILM Executive Director Noah Cowan. He told the Express during a phone interview that the age demographic for last years festival actually dropped a little, with the festivals much-touted venue move from the Kabuki in Japantown to the Alamo Drafthouses location in the rapidly gentrifying Mission District. Cowan also noted the appeal of being close to BART 20 percent of the festivals audience comes from the East Bay, with 10 percent from the Peninsula.

Let me tell you the demographic truth about [the SFFILM Festival], Cowan began. The two main groups who go to it are young professionals under thirty, and females over fifty. Adding live music is presumably one way to attract nightlife consumers who might not know, or care, much about Dziga Vertov. So, are millennials willing to watch obscure art films on a large screen in an auditorium full of strangers? We shall see.

Black Films Matter An impressive slate of socially aware films awaits audiences, led by Sabaah Folayans documentary Whose Streets?, which takes us to the embattled city of Ferguson, Missouri, in the summer of 2014. At that time, the killing of unarmed Black teenager Michael Brown by law enforcement ignited pent-up rage in the community against militarized police accustomed to gunning down people of color with impunity. The protests blossomed into the Black Lives Matter movement, and Folayans video crew was there to witness it, with input from parent-turned-activist Brittany Ferrell and rapper Tef Poe. The slogans are still with us today: Hands up! Dont shoot! and This is what democracy looks like! Whose Streets? plays in a special free outdoor screening on Friday, April 14, at Proxy (432 Octavia St, San Francisco, ProxySF.net). Women And Labor Another timely documentary, Peter Bratts Dolorestells the astounding story of labor organizer and feminist Dolores Huerta. She was co-founder of the United Farm Workers, was sometimes-rival to Cesar Chavez, and struggled to overcome everyday sexism, in addition to the exploitation of immigrant laborers in Californias San Joaquin Valley. Huerta, still feisty at age 86, has spent virtually her whole life fighting injustice, from what one colleague called the feudal wage slavery of agribusiness, to ingrained racism and police violence (she was severely beaten by San Francisco cops in 1988 while protesting President George H.W. Bush). And while she was at it, she played a key role in opening up labor movements to women. Huertas life story and mission are long overdue for celebrating, and this bracing doc by San Francisco filmmaker Bratt (La Mission) does the job movingly. Dolores screens Sunday, April 9, at the Castro, with Huerta in attendance.

Not Supposed To Happen In Oakland Filipino filmmaker Brillante Mendoza has been an SFFILM favorite for several years, with his ultra-realistic melodramas of life among the Philippines poorest. MaRosa fits the profile, with the tale scripted, but it looks exactly like a documentary of a woman named Rosa Reyes (veteran actress Jaclyn Jose), proprietor of a Metro Manila sari-sari neighborhood store. Rosa and her children may or may not be selling ice (meth) across the counter, but the cops think so. They haul Rosa and her husband down to the back room of the local police station, where they are pressured to come up with a payoff in lieu of being booked on narcotics charges. In other words: Pay a bribe or go to jail. Another significant conclusion: This is not supposed to happen in Oakland, either. MaRosa was released in 2016, a bit before the era of the Duterte death squads; otherwise, it might have had an even more tragic ending. Strong stuff. It shows Saturday, April 8, at BAMPFA.

Lions, Tigers, Missing Talismans Oh, My Tairo Caroli, the amiable main character/subject of Tizza Covi and Rainer Frimmels Mister Universo, stars in yet another festival entry that blurs the distinction between narrative and documentary. Caroli, a lion tamer in a cheap Italian circus, has his lucky talisman stolen, and suddenly hes worried about facing the lions and tigers in his act, spiritually unprotected. The talisman is an iron bar bent into a U by strong man Arthur Robin (playing himself), aka The Black Hercules, a real-life former Mister Universe now retired. The film follows Tairo on his search, and introduces us to two of the most likable people in Italy. It plays BAMPFA on Friday, April 14.

Weddings and Romance Actress Sena Kerslake turns in a remarkable performance as pugnacious ex-con Mary McArdle, the title character of A Date for Mad Mary. Mary returns from jail to her home town of Drogheda, Ireland with a massive chip on her shoulder, and now the opportunity to be maid of honor at her best friends wedding offers the chance of romance, among other benefits. But first she has to figure herself out no easy task. Directed with affection for its actors by newcomer Darren Thornton. See it at BAMPFA on Sunday, April 9.

New Wave Meets Family Xmas Tale Writer-director Cristi Puiu may be the most talented member of the recent Romanian New Wave. Hes certainly the most strongly attracted to difficult characters, as in Sieranevada, the improv-style chronicle of an exceptionally awkward family gathering to honor a grandfather. The camera pinwheels in a tight space, waiting for the priest, while the mourners pace like animals in a zoo. We grow claustrophobic as the family bickers. Oh yes, and its Christmas. But at about the two-hour mark (of a 173-minute running time), it actually becomes humorous. Lets hope Puiu never gets hired away to direct romantic comedies in Hollywood. By the way, the misspelled title does not to refer to either a geographical location or a brand of beer its apparently just a randomly appropriated name. Tuesday, April 11, at BAMPFA.

Meditating On China Director Zhang Hanyis tale of a man and his son trying to connect with the spirits of their dead ancestors in an uprooted village, Life After Life is a slow, purposeful, meditative portrait of one corner of Chinas deserted countryside. Its a place where dead ancestors can seemingly be reincarnated as dogs or birds but now tradition is being casually brushed aside to make way for industry. Somehow, it seems magical, with its wonderful high-def cinematography. Showing at BAMPFA on Friday, April 14.

The Obligatory Vampire Flick What film festival would be complete without a few midnight movies for stoner audiences? The festival calls this category Dark Wave, and Michael OSheas The Transfiguration certainly fits the profile. It concerns a Black teenager who fervently believes hes a vampire and the way he tears open peoples throats in his night-time jaunts, whos to argue with him, even though we suspect hes not a real vampire, just a convincingly disturbed serial killer. Sunday, April 9, BAMPFA. Spain And Surrealism The genuinely surrealistic survivalist story The Ornithologist is about a birdwatchers strange experiences just off the Camino de Santiago, near the Spain-Portugal border. Directed by Joo Pedro Rodrigues. Saturday, April 15, BAMPFA.

No Redemption The champion disturber has to be Travis Matthews Discreet, in which a lonely drifter returns to his Texas hometown to sort out his painful memories, involving pederasty, rape, and kidnapping. It is not a redemptive homecoming. America sure is a weird place. Saturday, April 8, Castro.

The rest is here:

It's Alive! It's Alive!: Our Film Critic Previews The 60th San Francisco International Film Festival - East Bay Express

European Parliament vote doesn’t mean abolition of visas yet – Poroshenko – Interfax

2017-04-06T17:21+02:00 17:21 06.04.2017

Ukrainian President Petro Poroshenko has said that a positive vote in the European Parliament on granting the visa-free regime for Ukrainians by the European Union still does not mean the abolition of visas, but the Ukrainian authorities are working to ensure that the final introduction of the visa-free travel is not postponed to a later date.

"I want to emphasize that this doesn't yet mean the opening of the border. We are still waiting for a decision of the EU Council, we are working hard so that no one postpones it or drags out this process," Poroshenko told journalists on the sidelines of the 10th Kyiv Security Forum, which takes place in Kyiv on Thursday.

According to him, "pro-Putin representatives" in the European Union are trying to prevent Ukraine from receiving the visa-free regime and the latest debate in the European Parliament confirmed this.

"Only the joint work of all political forces within the state and beyond gives us a firm belief that everything will be fine," the Ukrainian president said.

Poroshenko also believes that the presidential elections in France cannot affect the process of granting the visa-free regime to Ukrainians.

See the rest here:

European Parliament vote doesn't mean abolition of visas yet - Poroshenko - Interfax

The Quietus | Features | Craft/Work | Colouring Out: Queer British Art … – The Quietus

Henry Scott Tuke (1858-1929), The Critics, 1927, Oil on board, 412 x 514 mm, Warwick District Council (Leamington Spa, UK)

Queer British Art is the title of an exhibition that reveals itself to be a tamely closeted affair. And, if you bother to read the smaller subheader, giving the timespan covered youll see why. Despite its bold promise, this is a survey spanning an almost-century from 1861 to 1967 so well before queer theory and the reclaiming of a word that, by the 20th century, was a pejorative for any male who was slightly effeminate.

Starting from the year that saw the abolition of the death penalty for sodomy, the exhibition marks the 50th anniversary of the decriminalisation of male homosexuality under the Sexual Offences Act (lesbianism was never criminalised). And that end date doesnt just predate queer as a word embracing a radical political identity, but also the word gay, which doesnt really gain mainstream currency until as late as the early 70s (again, mainly for men).

This is why TV sitcoms and light entertainment programmes throughout that decade were full of gay double entendres. Gay lives were so under the radar that even though gay camp was the defining part of Saturday night entertainment, heterosexual audiences could still labour under the illusion, remarkable though it now seems, that camp entertainers were simply straight men pushing the envelope a bit with titillating What a gay day catch phases. Four years after decriminalisation, sober audiences could watch a serious film about a middle-class straight-bi-gay mnage in John Schlesingers Sunday Bloody Sunday (in which the two male characters were denuded of any sign of camp), but popular light entertainment was still straight out of music hall.

So naturally, camp, musical hall, vaudeville, and theatre all play a part in this exhibition, under the gaily euphemistic heading theatrical types and no surprises that its women, again, that this title excludes. Men dressed as women and women as men were a 19th century music hall staple for family audiences, though clearly once trousers, shirts, and short hair became common female attire, there was little demand for women as male impersonators. Meanwhile, drag acts such as Danny La Rue, as we see here, could go on to become one of the most highly paid and visible entertainers of the 60s, all the while keeping their sexuality under wraps, years after it was legal or, as were gently reminded, partially decriminalised. However bizarre the illusion La Rue, for instance, was known for starting every show with his gruff navvys catchphrase, Wotcha mates heteronormativity had to be maintained.

Keith Vaughan, Drawing of two men kissing, 195873, Tate Archive DACS, The Estate of Keith Vaughan

Meanwhile, plays still came under the censorship of the Lord Chamberlains Office until the 1968 Theatres Act abolished the censor. And its the ephemera that comes with all these details, the plays that escaped the cuts or which were performed uncensored in private clubs, the real lives of those depicted in largely dull, forgotten portraits, the details of the masquerades that were maintained for the sake of ones standing in society (though many seemed to be surprisingly open and unfettered) that prove absorbing; that is, its the reading between the pictures and the photos and the artefacts that largely detains you.

Youll find that Robert Harper Penningtons full-length portrait of Oscar Wilde, c. 1881, isnt half as absorbing as the story of its commission and its sorry fate after Wildes disgrace. Nor are the stilted pre-Raphaelite paintings of androgynous figures by Simeon Solomon, an artist who suffered a similar fate to Wilde and who died in disgrace in Solomons case he was arrested in a public lavatory for attempted buggery. Though even here the law has a human face. Duncan Grants portrait of PC Harry Daley, portrayed in his buttoned-up uniform and helmet, is identified as E.M. Forsters sometime casual lover, who later wrote a memoir detailing his exploits on both sides of the law. Forster had a thing for working-class bobbies, and indeed the sexually fetishised nature of both class and race are coyly hinted at.

But theres a difference between an exhibition that shows work by artists who are gay or queer or lesbian, and a thematic show that illustrates its subject or opens up a way of understanding its subject through mainly visual means. The former needs a lot more framing and scaffolding, and this is an exhibition that manages to work largely because of this framing though it also chooses to muddy the waters by including artists who dont fit under any queer labels at all. The heterosexual (probably) and married Laura Knight pops up, though of course, shes also an artist who punctured gender norms, albeit in a much broader sense, that is, by simply being a woman artist breaking the mould by painting female nudes in the first half of the 20th century. However, theres nothing really gender fluid about this.

Laura Knight (1877-1970), Self-Portrait, 1913, Oil on canvas, 152.4 x 127.6 cm, National Portrait Gallery (London, UK)

In the end, ones left with the impression that shes included because there simply arent enough women in this show so thank heavens for the overworked Bloomsbury Set and their associates for making up the numbers, I guess. Even so, one can have too many genteel drawing room paintings. And that the exhibition ends with its two biggest names, Hockney and Bacon, in a kind of showdown, underlines how much its skewed towards the male presence.

One could wish for any number of different exhibitions, more exciting than this one, to celebrate a half a century of increasing visibility. One from 1967 to now might have served its title better. Or one less willing to dilute its subject. Some private, graphically erotic drawings by Duncan Grant, perhaps, shows another alternative. One thinks of the private, erotic drawings and paintings of artists such as Turner or Rodin which have long fascinated curators. How much more intriguing it would it be to explore the more intimate nature of queer desire that such a possibility presents. Another time, perhaps, and in a smaller space.

Queer British Art is at the Tate Britain until 1 October 2017

Read the original here:

The Quietus | Features | Craft/Work | Colouring Out: Queer British Art ... - The Quietus

President Trump needs to score some legislative wins – The Desert Sun

The Japan News 11:52 a.m. PT April 7, 2017

President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping walk together after their meetings at Mar-a-Lago, Friday, April 7, 2017, in Palm Beach, Fla. Trump was meeting again with his Chinese counterpart Friday, with U.S. missile strikes on Syria adding weight to his threat to act unilaterally against the nuclear weapons program of China's ally, North Korea. (AP Photo/Alex Brandon)(Photo: Alex Brandon, AP)

The Japan News by The Yomiuri Shimbum published this editorial on April 3:

Uncertainty over U.S. President Donald Trump's ability to implement his policies has grown further.

The repealing of the U.S. health insurance system, known colloquially as Obamacare, which Trump had touted as one of his campaign pledges, has foundered.

The Republican Party, the force that supports Trump, has been divided over a bill to replace the health care system. Despite the party having a majority in the House of Representatives, prospects for the bill's passage were dim, leading Republicans to give up taking a vote on the bill on the House floor. This was a blunder putting off a vote on a key policy.

The president is not authorized to submit a budget or other bills to Congress. The president is required to make approaches to Congress for the passage of these bills and make efforts to win support from a wide range of legislators on them. It can hardly be deniable that Trump, who had no political experience, underestimated such a reality and neglected to coordinate views with Congress.

Obamacare was enshrined into law under the previous administration led by President Barack Obama. In order to reduce the number of uninsured people, which was estimated to total as many as about 50 million, the government and other entities grant subsidies, while making it mandatory for people to be covered by the health care plan. Even those who had been denied coverage on the grounds of their medical history have become eligible for it.

During the presidential campaign last year, Trump criticized Obamacare as bringing about increased fiscal burdens and skyrocketing insurance premiums, and his slogan was "repeal."

Yet the Republican Party's hard-line conservatives regarded it problematic that some public subsidies are still kept in place in the replacement bill, saying this would not constitute a repeal of the present program, and opposed the bill.

Also among moderates, a rebellious move spread as they were concerned about a possible increase in the number of the uninsured, due to the abolition of mandatory insurance coverage and cuts in subsidies.

The issue of how deep government should get involved in social welfare programs is one that leaves U.S. public opinion divided. This is also at the root of ideological antagonism within the Republican Party. Trump may have failed to recognize that it would not be easy for the party to unite over this issue.

The building of a wall on the border with Mexico another of Trump's campaign pledges has also been put on hold. House Speaker Paul Ryan has announced that the chamber will put off budgeting for the cost of the work.

It is also inevitable that hard-line conservatives, who attach importance to a balanced budget, would oppose other campaign promises targeted next for approval: large tax cuts, massive infrastructure investments, and higher defense spending. The state of "indecisive politics," with Congress not functioning, is likely to continue.

Trump will not be able to retain his supporters if he only issues one executive order after another, which would only negate the previous administration in such areas as a review of global warming measures.

His approval rating has fallen below 40 percent. The rating, just over two months since taking office, is a record low compared with those of past presidents. The so-called "Trump rally" of higher stock prices and stronger dollar has lost momentum.

These demonstrate the fact that people's hopes over Trump's experience as a businessman and his negotiating skills have been betrayed, with his political capability being questioned. Top-priority issues for Trump would be to make up for the delay in his Cabinet appointments and solidify the lineup of policy experts and go-betweens to connect the Cabinet with Congress.

Read the original version of this onine at http://the-japan-news.com.

Read or Share this story: http://desert.sn/2oaVNN9

Read more:

President Trump needs to score some legislative wins - The Desert Sun

Inspirational Forum Is Highlight of the Montclair Center Women’s Empowerment Week – Baristanet

On Tuesday night at The Wellmont Theater, women gathered for a panel discussion with local women of distinction at the first Womens Empowerment Forum. The event was part of Montclair Centers Womens Empowerment Week, an annual eventto benefit SAVE of Essex, the countys only designated rape care center and a program of the Family Service League.

The Q&A was masterfully moderatedby local entrepreneur Donna Miller, founder & president of C3Workplace. Miller asked thoughtful questions and kept the dialogue moving with the five panelists and the audience.

Panelists were WOR radio host Joan Herrmann;nationally recognized career and life coach Laura Berman Fortgang;producer and activist Peg Cafferty; Executive director of the Montclair Fund for Education (MFEE) Masiel Rodriquez-Vars; and business owner and teacher Omni Kitts Ferrara. Fourth Ward Councilor Dr. Renee Baskerville was scheduled to appear, but wasnt on the panel Tuesday night.

Topics discussed were what empowerment means the panel agreed that itmeans something deeply personal and unique for everyone, how to deal with our inner negative thoughts to overcome fear of failure, how to raise boys to respect women, and how to build a culture of respect withour fellow women. The discussion was personal and meaningful.

Herrmann talked about her life and how she felt trapped in an unhappy marriage. She left her career to raise her children and when she was in her 40s, she realized she didnt know who she was. She made changes and started her own radio show. She shared her motto of Fake it to you make it, advising the audience to Think of what you want ot be, Act it, believe it, and then it WILL happen.

Cafferty talked about overcoming personal tragedy and moving forward with the help of support. She spoke of the problem of women demeaning and not supporting other women and said if we act with kindness, good things will happen.

And speaking of personal and meaningful, Israel Cronk, Executive Director of the Montclair Center BID and the organizer of this event, spoke about his inspiration for a Montclair Womens Empowerment Forum (he attended a similar panel at the UN) and why the SAVE of Essex benefit means so much to him personally.Getting choked up and having to stop several times, Cronk spoke about his sister being a victim of a sexual attack and the damage it does to the victimand their loved ones.

Looking over the intimate crowd at this inaugural event, Cronk asked everyone to close their eyes and envision being back in their seats a year later in a theater packed with local women. After attending the inspirational event, I dont doubt that it will happen.

Womens Empowerment Week continues with talks at various locations and a Ladies Night celebration on Friday. See the full scheudle here.

Read more from the original source:

Inspirational Forum Is Highlight of the Montclair Center Women's Empowerment Week - Baristanet

Anne Hathaway embraces her inner monster in this oddly appealing tale of errant girl power – NEWS.com.au

Watch the trailer for the film Colossal.

Anne Hathaway appears in a scene from Colossal.

Three stars

Director: Nacho Vigalondo

Starring: Anne Hathaway, Dan Stevens, Jason Sudeikis

Rating: M

Running time; 109 minutes

Verdict: Romantic monster mash

ANNE Hathaway doesnt so much wrestle with her personal demons as embody them in Colossal, a strange and unnatural union between a creature feature and a low-budget indie romance.

Thats one of the reasons its so intriguingly hard to read.

The beastly behemoth that materialises in Seoul one night, leaving a path of destruction in its wake, might reasonably be expected to be the villain of this piece.

Anne Hathaway lets rip in Colossal.Source:AP

But that line of inquiry is quickly exhausted when the films leading lady Gloria (Hathaway) makes the startling discovery that said creature is actually the physical manifestation of her monstrous internal conflict.

Becoming aware of her own power, Gloria sets out to makes amends to the good citizens of the South Korean capital putting on a decent show for good measure.

Dan Stevens, a man not unfamiliar with his own inner beast, plays Glorias boyfriend in the film, a condescending control freak.

Perhaps the character is unintentionally creepy, but when he boots her out of his New York apartment for her inveterate, hard-partying ways, you cant help but think good riddance.

Even if that means Gloria is forced to move back to her home town, where the empty family house lies waiting.

DANCE ACADEMY: This movie doesnt miss a step

Jason Sudeikis and Hathaway in a scene from the film.Source:AP

She hasnt been home 24 hours before she bumps into Jason Sudeikiss similarly slippery character, with whom she attended primary school.

It takes a long time for his true colours to emerge in fact, one might argue that the filmmakers get to that part of the story too late, not allowing enough time for it to develop.

There is much to recommend Colossal, a fresh and unexpected take on female empowerment and personal transformation that keeps its audience guessing right up until the not-so-bitter end.

Its easy to see why Hathaway signed up for the role, which is reminiscent of the one she played in Rachel Getting Married a rawer, more credible performance.

A wild and ambitious hybrid that ultimately fails to fulfil its promise.

Opens Thursday (April 13)

More:

Anne Hathaway embraces her inner monster in this oddly appealing tale of errant girl power - NEWS.com.au

Wright lectures on lemurs, female empowerment – Luther College Chips

Close

Wright giving her lecture, Girl Power: Ladies Lead in the Lemurs of Madagascar, in Valders 206.

Emily Turner (19) | Photo Bureau

Emily Turner (19) | Photo Bureau

Wright giving her lecture, Girl Power: Ladies Lead in the Lemurs of Madagascar, in Valders 206.

Olivia Enquist, Staff Writer April 5, 2017 Filed under News

Share on Facebook

Share via Email

Luther Colleges Phi Beta Kappa chapter hosted renowned primatologist and Distinguished Service Professor of Anthropology at Stony Brook University Patricia Wright on Feb. 20-21 as a part of the Visiting Scholars Program.

As part of her visit, Wright gave a lecture titled Girl Power: Ladies Lead in the Lemurs of Madagascar as well as attending a showing of the movie based in her work titled Island of Lemurs: Madagascar. In addition to these two events, Wright held several informal lectures and conversations with faculty and students across campus.

Wright has made strides in her work in anthropology, biology, and conservation but is best known for her career studying the social and familial interaction of lemurs. During her lecture, Wright spoke about her personal history, her work in biology as an undergraduate, her love of lemurs, and the creation of Ranomafana National Park.

Professor of English and President of Luthers Phi Beta Kappa chapter Kate Narveson explained the process behind choosing the visiting scholar and the desire to choose someone with interdisciplinary interests.

We were impressed with [Wrights] mix of scholarly expertise in anthropology and primatology, but also her service to the world, Narveson said. She went along so well with our mission statement of serving with distinction for the common good. We were also interested in the way that she would appeal to a wide range of departments as an interdisciplinary speaker.

Narveson added that she was pleased by Wrights ability to form meaningful connections to Luther students in a setting that is different from what many of the visiting scholars usually experience.

Some scholars just dont know how to think about where they are, Narveson said. Its just not a world they have any familiarity with. They come and they are wonderful in sharing their enthusiasm and experience, but they just dont make any connections to who we are. Dr. Patricia Wright was rare, unusual, and wonderful in being able to see what kind of school we are, think about the intersection of her values and our values, and how we mutually benefit.

The documentary Island of Lemurs (2014), which was narrated by Morgan Freeman, featured Wright and her work.

Biology and Environmental Studies major Isobel Michaud (19) attended the lecture and said she appreciated the fact that Wright was able to use more than intellectual jargon and connect to the audience through personal anecdotes.

A lot of the colloquiums are very analytical and research based, which is awesome, but theres no personality with research, Michaud said. I appreciated that she was a genuine person talking about her life story.

Sthela Holly Hanitrinirina (19) an international student from Madagascar where Wright conducted most of her research spoke about Wrights influence in emphasizing the importance of conservation to the people of Madagascar.

As a Malagasy person, I learned so much about whats going on in my own country, Hanitrinirina said. Having her working there has made that clear to people that its important to preserve the forest and value what we have.

Hanitrinirina said that while Wrights lecture illustrated the importance of imitating the unique matriarchal structure of lemurs and the gender equality of the Malagasy culture, the biggest message she took away is one of personal growth.

I think that what I learned from her is that she grew so much, Hanitrinirina said. I think that is something to say to students that when you travel and put yourself in an uncomfortable space, you grow. There is nothing bad in leaving your comfortable self, it helps you grow as person, even if its really hard.

Visit link:

Wright lectures on lemurs, female empowerment - Luther College Chips

Google’s epic legal battle with Uber over self-driving technology, explained – Vox

Uber and Google are locked in a legal battle that could have huge implications for the future of the self-driving car industry. If Uber loses its lawsuit, it could cost the company millions and set back Ubers self-driving car effort by months months Uber probably cant afford to lose.

The lawsuit started when Waymo, Googles self-driving car unit, alleged that Uber is using sensors based on stolen Waymo designs and asked the courts to block Uber from using the designs.

Uber fired back in a legal brief on Friday, denying that its sensors were based on Waymos technology and accusing Waymo of trying to tie up a legitimate competitor with frivolous litigation.

Its not uncommon for the invention of an important new technology to be followed by legal battles over rights to that technology. Apple, for example, fought a years-long legal battle with Samsung, Motorola, HTC, and other makers of Android-based phones in the early years of the smartphone industry. Apple won some money from these lawsuits, but strategically speaking, they ended in a draw. Apples competitors were able to continue churning out Android-based smartphones, and Android ended up controlling a large majority of the global smartphone market.

In contrast, theres a real possibility that Waymo could beat Uber decisively in court. This is an extraordinary case, said William Alsup, the California federal judge who is overseeing the case, on Wednesday. His take on Googles evidence: Ive never seen a record this strong in 42 years.

If the court orders Uber not to use technology similar to Waymos, it could set back Ubers self-driving car project by many months. And Uber CEO Travis Kalanick has said his company will be in big trouble if another company beats it to market with self-driving technology.

If we are not tied for first, then the entity that's in first then rolls out a ride-sharing network that is far cheaper or far higher-quality than Uber's, then Uber is no longer a thing, Kalanick said in a 2016 interview.

Uber hoped that hiring some of Waymos top engineers would help it catch up to Waymo. But if Waymo proves that this was really a ploy to copy its technology, the move could backfire spectacularly.

The central figure in the legal drama is Anthony Levandowski, a brilliant engineer and the driving force behind the business deal that ultimately led to Waymos lawsuit. Levandowski quit his job at Google (now Waymo) in early 2016 and immediately started a new company called Otto. Just a few months later, in May 2016, the company unveiled a prototype of its self-driving truck technology. In August, Otto was acquired by Uber for around $700 million a massive payout for a company that had existed for less than a year.

Waymo now claims that the reason Levandowski was able to get the new self-driving truck technology working so quickly is that key elements of the design were stolen from Waymo. According to Waymo, Levandowski downloaded 14,000 confidential documents from the Waymo network in the days before he left his old employer. And Waymo believes he illegally relied on those documents to guide the development of Ottos own technology.

Levandowski isnt well-known to the public, but in the industry it has long been obvious that he was a rising star. A 2003 profile of him as a 23-year-old UC Berkeley graduate student reported that he was already working to raise $600,000 for a startup.

In 2004, the militarys Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency, which brought you the internet, announced a competition to build a self-driving car that could make it across the desert. Levandowski organized a team to enter the competition, but for an extra challenge the team built a self-driving motorcycle instead of a car. They didnt win in fact, no ones vehicle completed the course that year but it was the start of Levandowskis involvement in the self-driving vehicle industry.

Levandowski went on to found a startup called 510 Systems with some Berkeley colleagues. It started out selling camera technology to Google for collecting Street View images. Levandowski joined Google to work on its mapping technology in 2007, but continued working closely with his 510 Systems colleagues on Google-related projects. Finally, in 2011 Google acquired 510 Systems, and its engineers became early members of Googles self-driving car project.

This early history may explain Levandowskis casual attitude about working on side projects at the same time he was on Googles payroll. Waymo now claims that in 2012, unbeknownst to Google, Levandowski took a stake in another startup called Odin Wave (for reasons that arent clear, its also went by Tyto Lidar in some documents) that was founded by one of his teammates from the DARPA Grand Challenge days. Lidar refers to a key sensor technology that allows a self-driving car to form a 3D picture of its surroundings.

Waymo says that in 2013, it heard from a third-party vendor that Odin Wave had submitted an order to build a custom lidar sensor that was suspiciously similar to Googles own design. When confronted in 2013, Waymo says, Levandowski denied having an ownership interest in the company.

The next year, Google considered buying Odin Wave and asked Levandowski to evaluate the possibility. Waymo now says that Levandowski never disclosed a relationship to the company even as he was advising Google about whether to buy it.

In summer 2015, Waymo alleges in a court filing, Levandowski started talking to Uber months before he officially left Waymo to found Otto. Pierre-Yves Droz, a 510 Systems co-founder who is now a senior Waymo engineer, stated in the filing that Levandowski spent months trying to recruit engineers on his Waymo team to join his startup, and that he expected from the outset to sell the company to Uber.

Droz wrote that over dinner in the summer of 2015, Levandowski told me that it would be nice to create a new self-driving car startup and that Uber would be interested in buying the team responsible for the LiDAR we were developing at Google.

Of course, theres nothing illegal about an experienced engineer leaving one company to work at another one. And especially in California, where the courts dont enforce noncompete agreements, theres nothing illegal about an engineer putting the skills and knowledge hed developed at one job to use for a new employer.

But Googles new Waymo division believes Levandowski crossed the line by actively recruiting employees for his new venture while he was still on Waymos payroll, and by taking confidential documents with him when he left Waymo.

Uber responded to Waymos accusations in a Friday court filing. Both of Waymos central premises that former Waymo employees brought thousands of confidential Waymo documents to Uber to build a copycat lidar and that Ubers lidar closely mimics Waymos single-lens design are demonstrably false, the company writes.

Uber says it has strict policies in place to ensure that employees dont bring confidential information with them when they join Uber from another technology company. And it says those safeguards worked: A search of Ubers network and the laptops of key employees did not turn up copies of the documents Waymo says were stolen by Levandowski.

However, this argument has a big, important caveat: Uber was unable to search Levandowskis personal computers because he had gotten his own lawyer and invoked his Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination.

Uber finds itself in a complicated situation due to Levandowskis lack of cooperation, the ride-hailing company admitted in its legal filing.

Uber also argues that its lidar technology cant have been copied from Waymos because there were significant differences between them. Lidar works by bouncing a laser off nearby objects and capturing it when it bounces back. One of Waymos key innovations was to use the same lens for both sending and receiving these laser pulses, significantly reducing the complexity and cost of the lidar system.

Waymo accused Uber of copying this innovation, but Uber says thats wrong. Uber says it began developing its own lidar in early 2015 and that it uses two lenses for transmitting laser pulses and two more for receiving them. Uber says thats one of several key differences that demonstrates that its technology isnt derived from Waymos.

Ubers reply is packed full of other technical details that the company says demonstrate that its lidar is not based on Waymos technology. However, most of these details are redacted in the public version of the document.

The document also leaves a big unanswered question: Why did Uber pay around $700 million for Otto if it wasnt trying to get its hands on key Waymo technologies? Its possible, of course, that Uber was just optimistic about Ottos self-driving truck business. Or perhaps Uber felt the Waymo veterans general knowledge about self-driving car technology knowledge not protected by trade secret laws was worth hundreds of millions of dollars.

But we can expect Waymo to press this point as the litigation continues. While Levandowski has a right to invoke the Fifth Amendment and refuse to testify, Waymo will be able to portray this as a sign that Levandowski did, in fact, break the law as he was leaving Waymo. And it will look for smoking gun evidence proving that Levandowski and his colleagues illegally incorporated elements of Waymos technology into Ubers own lidar sensors.

Disclosure: My brother works at Google.

Link:

Google's epic legal battle with Uber over self-driving technology, explained - Vox