SHOP TALK: Eldar Shafir on the effects scarcity – centraljersey.com

Memorial Day weekend followed by Princeton University reunions and graduation is a time when most Princeton residents rarely think about scarcity. Generally, the conversation under tents and in backyards is filled with groans about too much food, too much drink, too many people, too many cars, and too much stuff loaded into those cars.

On the weekend of June 10, however, several Princetonians are going to be thinking a lot about scarcity, thanks to Princeton University Professor Eldar Shafir. Dr. Shafir who is speaking at a Housing Initiatives of Princeton Garden Party benefit June 10 is internationally renowned, along with his co-author Dr. Sendhil Mullainathan from Harvard University, for the 2013 book "Scarcity: Why Having Too Little Means So Much."

As a behavioral scientist whose main area of interest is behavioral economics and decision-making, Shafir will talk about the thesis of his book the scarcity vicious cycle and relate it to the mission of HIP. Individuals with a scarcity of funds fail to make smart decisions concerning their finances for a variety of cognitive reasons, including the lack of supportive resources, thus their lives spiral downward. It turns out that the work done by HIP could be a case study for Shafirs academic work.

Since 2004, the Housing Initiatives of Princeton has been helping to break that downward spiral for dozens of people by offering a holistic menu of services to those in dire financial circumstances. It is dedicated to transitioning low-income working families and individuals who are homeless or facing imminent homelessness to permanent housing and sustained self-sufficiency.

The charitable non-profit does far more than place a temporary roof over ones head. The organization becomes a supportive resource for clients by providing individualized case management services to enhance life skills needed to attain self-sufficiency and permanent housing and ultimately to succeed independently.

Most in Princeton have a comfortable life," Shafir said. "We can afford to hire accountants, investment brokers, mortgage brokers, psychologists, attorneys to help make smart decisions about our well being. But there are those who are struggling with a scarcity of funds and do not have the support systems. The problems associated with poverty consume mental energy and capacity. Those struggling financially often make decisions that perpetuate and exacerbate poverty."

The concept of scarcity and smart decision-making applies to more than financial decisions, and thus everyone can relate to the premise of the book, regardless of his or her economic situation, noted HIP Interim Board Chair Carol Golden. The authors research and conclusions describe how scarcity creates a similar psychology for everyone struggling to manage with less than they need. Busy people fail to manage their time efficiently for the same reasons the poor and those maxed out on credit cards fail to manage their money. The dynamics of scarcity reveal why dieters find it hard to resist temptation, why students and busy executives mismanage their time.

The book is so significant, in my opinion, because it gives individuals who have no financial problems a real understanding as to why it is extremely difficult for people with great financial challenges to change their lives unless they have access to outside help, said Golden, a Princeton resident and attorney who volunteers her services as the full-time chair of the organization, officially known as Housing Initiatives of Princeton Charitable Trust.

Shafir further elaborated on his thesis in a research paper, Poverty Impedes Cognitive Function, published in the August 2013 issue of Science (written with Anandi Mani and Jiaying Zhao).

According to the papers summary, the poor often behave in less capable ways, which can further perpetuate poverty.

We hypothesize that poverty directly impedes cognitive function and present two studies that test this hypothesis," the authors wrote. "First, we experimentally induced thoughts about finances and found that this reduces cognitive performance among poor but not in well-off participants. Second, we examined the cognitive function of farmers over the planting cycle. We found that the same farmer shows diminished cognitive performance before harvest, when poor, as compared with after harvest, when rich.

"This cannot be explained by differences in time available, nutrition, or work effort. Nor can it be explained with stress: Although farmers do show more stress before harvest, that does not account for diminished cognitive performance. Instead, it appears that poverty itself reduces cognitive capacity. We suggest that this is because poverty-related concerns consume mental resources, leaving less for other tasks. These data provide a previously unexamined perspective and help explain a spectrum of behaviors among the poor.

As Princeton University Professor of Behavioral Science and Public Policy, Shafir, who has been working at the university for the past 25 years, also serves as the director (its inaugural director) of Princetons Kahneman-Treisman Center for Behavioral Science and Public Policy, and co-founder and scientific director at ideas42, a social science research and development lab.

A $10 million anonymous gift created theCenter for Behavioral Science and Public Policy at Princeton, enabling the university to strengthen its leading role in this emerging field and improve the development of effective policymaking. The donor, a Princeton University parent, was a longtime admirer of the work of Dr. Daniel Kahneman, a Nobel laureate, and a Princeton University professor of psychology and public affairs emeritus, and Dr. Anne Treisman, a Princeton University professor of psychology emerita.

The center is building on the research that earned Kahneman the Nobel Prize in economic sciences in 2002. The award-winning work integrated insights from psychological research into economics, particularly concerning decision making under uncertainty.

In the traditional view, policies are designed for people who make rational decisions based on thorough consideration of the options and on well-informed cost-benefit analyses," the university stated in a release announcing the gift in 2015. "In the approach pioneered at Princeton, policies are developed with a focus on what really drives people in decision making the idiosyncratic and sometimes surprising ways in which they view their choices, perceive the social, economic and political world around them, and decide whether or not, and how, to act. Why do some people spend too much and save too little, choose unhealthy diets that might shorten their lives?"

Princeton University President Christopher Eisgruber said:

This generous gift will allow us to deepen and expand our efforts in an extremely promising area of teaching and research. . . . Princetons faculty members are applying behavioral science techniques to topics that include law, economics, health care, household finance and dispute resolution, Princeton University President Christopher Eisgruber said. "We expect that the research conducted at the center will directly influence local, national and global public policy, identifying new approaches to address social problems and improve lives.

And HIP clients and supporters offer an abundance, not scarcity, of thanks for the academic work and research that will help HIP serve the community in the most effective manner possible.

The Housing Initiatives of Princeton will host its annual Garden Party, June 10, beginning at 4 p.m. at a private residence in Princeton. Admission costs $95 and features Shafir's talk, cocktails and light fare. To register, go towww.housinginitiativesofprinceton.org.

Read this article:
SHOP TALK: Eldar Shafir on the effects scarcity - centraljersey.com

Why Mainstream Media Need to Be Careful About Criticizing Conservatives – Patheos (blog)

Image of newspapers (Wikipedia Commons)

Written by Dr. Gleb Tsipursky, Intentional Insights Co-Founder and President.

________________________________________________________________

Many mainstream media outlets criticized conservatives with a broad brush over the Montana Congressional special election winner Republican Greg Gianforte assaulting a reporter, Ben Jacobs. Yet, according to behavioral science research conducted by myself and others, such criticism may end up hurting the safety of journalists, instead of advancing freedom of the press and pursuit of the truth.

First, the facts of the incident itself. According to the evidence available, Gianforte grabbed Jacobs by the neck, slammed him to the ground, and punched him. The episode was witnessed and corroborated by multiple independent witnesses, including Fox News and BuzzFeed reporters. The local sheriff who earlier gave a financial contribution to Gianfortes campaign charged Gianforte with misdemeanor assault.

How did conservatives respond? The assault took place on the evening of May 24, and Fox News which had a reporter on scene quickly wrote up a fair and balanced account. The Fox News account specifically stated that at no point did any of us who witnessed this assault see Jacobs show any form of physical aggression toward Gianforte, which Fox News certainly did not have to do. In fact, the Fox News story contradicted the official statement offered by Gianfortes campaign, which accused Jacobs of starting the fight by grabbing Gianfortes wrist, a statement now widely seen as a lie. A conservative venue, TheBlaze, ran a piece critical of Gianfortes statement, and The New York Post ran a similar piece.

Many conservative politicians also responded in a worthy manner. Within 24 hours of the assault, Speaker of the House Paul Ryan stated that Theres never a call for physical altercations I think he should apologize. This length of time is quite reasonable, as Ryan needed to find out the relevant facts. Steve Daines, a Montana Senator and major supporter for Gianforte, also called on Gianforte to apologize, adding I do not condone violence in any way. Under such pressure, Gianforte rescinded his earlier deceptive official statement and instead apologized, saying I should not have treated that reporter that way, and Im sorry Ben Jacobs.

Meme saying People are most comfortable dealing with reality in terms of black or white, but reality tends to come in shades of gray (Made for Intentional Insights by Wayne Straight)

Certainly, some conservatives did not respond well. The conservative radio show host Rush Limbaugh practiced victim-blaming, implying that Gianfortes actions were not a big deal because the journalist was being insolent and disrespectful. The Daily Caller, a prominent conservative website, ran a story about some Montana voters supporting Gianfortes actions. A former Republican congressman defended Gianforte.

Such problematic responses that appeared to condone or ignore violence against reporters do not represent the majority of conservative responses. Nonetheless, The New York Times ran a story entitled A reporter was body slammed, but some conservatives want the news media to apologize. Chris Cuomo of CNN had harsh words for the Republican Party on the morning after the incident, asking You know what I hear? Silence. Where is the GOP? The Philadelphia Inquirer carried a piece entitled In Trumps America, that reporter body slam didnt come out of nowhere.

Other mainstream venues downplayed condemnation by conservatives of Gianfortes behavior and emphasized those standing by him. The Washington Post, in its editorial responding to the incident, quoted Ryans words supporting the right of people from Montanan to elect their representative, while failing to mention that he demanded an apology. In turn, The Atlantic quoted a joke made by Republican Representative Mark Sanford, while conveniently forgetting that Sanfords response also condemned the culture of hostility toward the media that contributed to Gianfortes behavior.

Meme saying Look for the actual truth, not for what just supports your beliefs (Made for Intentional Insights by Lexie Holliday)

Unfortunately, the content on these mainstream media venues fails to provide an accurate depiction of reality, which harms journalist safety. Most of the content does acknowledge in the depths of each piece that many conservatives condemned Gianfortes behavior. Yet behavioral science research on news consumption shows that 59 percent of Americans are casual readers who only read the headlines. Thus, many casual independent or conservative readers would fail to perceive the widespread condemnation by conservative leaders of Gianfortes assault.

This outcome harms the safety of journalists. Research shows that our minds interpret new information in accordance with our past beliefsa thinking error known as the confirmation bias. The confirmation bias is one of several thinking errorsknown in behavioral science scholarship as cognitive biasesthat lead to motivated reasoning, where people pre-select a certain conclusion and reach that conclusion regardless of the facts. Fortunately, we can fight the confirmation bias in such situations by evaluating the opinions of prominent influencers who have political motivations to support one side, but fail to do so or even support the other side. Such strategies have effectively changed peoples perspectives even in our current polarized environment. Unfortunately, many mainstream venues failed their readership by not conveying the data needed for them to draw accurate conclusions and thus advance press freedom.

Meme saying Lizard brain thinking is killing democracy, please think rationally (Made for Intentional Insights by Ed Coolidge)

Another problem comes from one of the strongest findings in behavioral science, which shows that human beings respond very strongly to positive reinforcement. Through the style of their coverage painting all conservatives with a broad brush, these mainstream venues fail to provide positive reinforcement to conservatives who behaved in a prosocial manner. Research suggests that optimal performance comes from a combination of internal and external motivations. External incentives according to research, are especially crucial for promoting prosocial behavior such as protecting freedom of the press.

A further issue is the equating of Trumps behavior with Gianfortes actions. Conservative venues such as Breitbart immediately took the opportunity to condemn such comparisons, and call out what the article depicted as media hypocrisy for failing to do the same when liberals used violence. As others have accurately pointed out, while Trumps actions help create a climate of hostility to the media, it is much more difficult to connect Gianfortes actions to Trumps words. Drawing such connections undermines the already-low media credibility. A much better model for reporting on this connection came from a conservative venue, The American Conservative. It ran a piece that accurately describes how the hostility to mainstream media among Republicans predated Trump, while acknowledging that Trump ramped up this hostility, and criticizing Gianforte for lacking anger management skills. Such reporting, by providing an accurate depiction that attributes only
a small part of the blame to Trumps actions, helps protect journalists.

Next time, these mainstream venues need to provide accurate reporting to avoid undercutting their credibility, to praise prosocial behavior to create incentives and positive reinforcement, and to have all readers take away accurate impressions from their headlines. You can make a difference by writing letters to the editor and making social media posts asking journalists to commit to accurate reporting and to take the Pro-Truth Pledge for the sake of protecting the safety and freedom of the press. What you can do right now is take the pledge yourself to show your own commitment to the truth.

Meme saying Why do we seek the truth? Because its the right thing to do (Made for Intentional Insights by Wayne Straight)

P.S. Want less lies in politics? Take the Pro-Truth Pledge, encourage your friends to do so, and call on your elected representatives to take it!

_______________________________________________________________

Connect with Dr. Gleb Tsipursky on Twitter, on Facebook, and on LinkedIn, and follow his RSS feed and newsletter.

See the original post here:
Why Mainstream Media Need to Be Careful About Criticizing Conservatives - Patheos (blog)

UB program for underrepresented minority students in biomedical PhD programs wins coveted renewal – UB News Center

BUFFALO, N.Y. The University at Buffalos ongoing efforts to recruit underrepresented students in science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) to its PhD programs has received a major boost from the National Institutes of Health, which renewed a $2.3 million, 5-year grant to help fully fund scholarships.

The grant will pay for the first two years of graduate school in the biomedical and behavioral sciences for four students a year. Over the past five years, the program is credited with bringing 20 underrepresented students to UB. And more importantly, it is part of a pipeline of catalysts that is helping the university attract underrepresented students to prepare the next generation of scientists and professors.

These students are highly recruited by other universities, said Margarita Dubocovich, PhD, SUNY Distinguished Professor in the Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology in the Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences and senior associate dean for diversity and inclusion.

The grant is part of the Initiative for Maximizing Student Development (IMSD), a student development program for research-intensive institutions funded by NIHs National Institute of General Medical Sciences. The prestigious grant was awarded to only 21 PhD training programs.

Numerous departments involved

Students admitted into UB's IMSD can enroll in any of the following UB programs or departments: biological sciences; biomedical engineering; chemistry; psychology; pharmacology and toxicology; pharmaceutical sciences; the PhD program in biomedical sciences; and the graduate division at Roswell Park Cancer Institute.

Dubocovich said the grant combined with UBs Institute for the Strategic Enhancement of Educational Diversity (iSEED) and its Collaborative Learning and Integrated Mentoring in the Biosciences (CLIMB) program has helped UB recruit 37 underrepresented students in STEM and related fields to its graduate programs over the past five years. And the deans of seven schools at UB have pledged to fund one underrepresented student a year.

These PhD graduate students are a cohort that helped win the grant renewal, she said. Helping diversify the ranks of the graduate programs has ramifications across the university.

When you recruit faculty, and they know we are actively recruiting underrepresented students, they are more apt to come here, Dubocovich said. They want to have a more diverse class.

National recruitment

Renewal of the grant was a significant win for the efforts of Dubocovich and her co-leader in the recruitment efforts, Rajendram V. Rajnarayanan, PhD, assistant professor of pharmacology and toxicology.

We must be doing something right, said Rajnarayanan, who likens the IMSD grant to a biological catalyst that helps keep students moving toward successful graduation and leadership roles in their scientific communities.

Dubocovich and Rajnarayanan attend conferences and speak to college groups to help recruit students to the university. In addition, they have established programs to bring promising undergraduate students to campus in the summer for a research training program.

We go and visit schools and speak passionately about research, so the students see it and want to be involved, said Rajnarayanan. Thats how it works.

We recruit nationally, Dubocovich said. We bring them here so they can learn about UB and see whether they want to come here for graduate school.

Owing to the IMSD program, the number of admissions offers made to students from diverse backgrounds has more than doubled, she said. The total number of underrepresented PhD students with thesis mentors in the Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology increased from 18 percent (2 out of 11) in 2011 to 58 percent (11 out of 19) in fall 2016.

Similarly, first year student enrollment in the PhD program in biomedical sciences has increased from 8 percent in 2008-2011 to 24 percent in 2012-2015. Together, these datahighlight the broader impact of the IMSD program in student enrollment at UB.

First two years are key

Rajnarayanan said the university has built a pipeline for the students, starting with the summer program and continuing through graduate school, that includes mentoring and research opportunities. Under the IMSD grant, PhD students have individual mentoring during the first two years of the program, and gather as a group regularly.

Statistically, if a student makes it through the first two years, they stay for the entire program, he said.

All students seeking an IMSD grant must first be accepted into a PhD program, and then the individual school that nominated them for the grant. Each year, up to 18 students are nominated and out of those, four students are accepted.

Continued here:
UB program for underrepresented minority students in biomedical PhD programs wins coveted renewal - UB News Center

Why Mainstream Media Need to Be Careful About Criticizing Conservatives – HuffPost

Written by Dr. Gleb Tsipursky, Intentional Insights Co-Founder and President.

________________________________________________________________

Many mainstream media outlets criticized conservatives with a broad brush over the Montana Congressional special election winner Republican Greg Gianforte assaulting a reporter, Ben Jacobs. Yet, according to behavioral science research conducted by myself and others, such criticism may end up hurting the safety of journalists, instead of advancing freedom of the press and pursuit of the truth.

First, the facts of the incident itself. According to the evidence available, Gianforte grabbed Jacobs by the neck, slammed him to the ground, and punched him. The episode was witnessed and corroborated by multiple independent witnesses, including Fox News and BuzzFeed reporters. The local sheriff - who earlier gave a financial contribution to Gianfortes campaign - charged Gianforte with misdemeanor assault.

How did conservatives respond? The assault took place on the evening of May 24, and Fox News - which had a reporter on scene - quickly wrote up a fair and balanced account. The Fox News account specifically stated that at no point did any of us who witnessed this assault see Jacobs show any form of physical aggression toward Gianforte, which Fox News certainly did not have to do. In fact, the Fox News story contradicted the official statement offered by Gianfortes campaign, which accused Jacobs of starting the fight by grabbing Gianfortes wrist, a statement now widely seen as a lie. A conservative venue, TheBlaze, ran a piece critical of Gianfortes statement, and The New York Post ran a similar piece.

Many conservative politicians also responded in a worthy manner. Within 24 hours of the assault, Speaker of the House Paul Ryan stated that There's never a call for physical altercations... I think he should apologize." This length of time is quite reasonable, as Ryan needed to find out the relevant facts. Steve Daines, a Montana Senator and major supporter for Gianforte, also called on Gianforte to apologize, adding "I do not condone violence in any way. Under such pressure, Gianforte rescinded his earlier deceptive official statement and instead apologized, saying I should not have treated that reporter that way, and Im sorry Ben Jacobs.

Certainly, some conservatives did not respond well. The conservative radio show host Rush Limbaugh practiced victim-blaming, implying that Gianfortes actions were not a big deal because the journalist was being insolent and disrespectful. The Daily Caller, a prominent conservative website, ran a story about some Montana voters supporting Gianfortes actions. A former Republican congressman defended Gianforte.

Such problematic responses that appeared to condone or ignore violence against reporters do not represent the majority of conservative responses. Nonetheless, The New York Times ran a story entitled A reporter was body slammed, but some conservatives want the news media to apologize. Chris Cuomo of CNN had harsh words for the Republican Party on the morning after the incident, asking You know what I hear? Silence. Where is the GOP? The Philadelphia Inquirer carried a piece entitled In Trump's America, that reporter body slam didn't come out of nowhere.

Other mainstream venues downplayed condemnation by conservatives of Gianfortes behavior and emphasized those standing by him. The Washington Post, in its editorial responding to the incident, quoted Ryans words supporting the right of people from Montanan to elect their representative, while failing to mention that he demanded an apology. In turn, The Atlantic quoted a joke made by Republican Representative Mark Sanford, while conveniently forgetting that Sanfords response also condemned the culture of hostility toward the media that contributed to Gianfortes behavior .

Unfortunately, the content on these mainstream media venues fails to provide an accurate depiction of reality, which harms journalist safety. Most of the content does acknowledge - in the depths of each piece - that many conservatives condemned Gianfortes behavior. Yet behavioral science research on news consumption shows that 59 percent of Americans are casual readers who only read the headlines. Thus, many casual independent or conservative readers would fail to perceive the widespread condemnation by conservative leaders of Gianfortes assault.

This outcome harms the safety of journalists. Research shows that our minds interpret new information in accordance with our past beliefsa thinking error known as the confirmation bias. The confirmation bias is one of several thinking errorsknown in behavioral science scholarship as cognitive biasesthat lead to motivated reasoning, where people pre-select a certain conclusion and reach that conclusion regardless of the facts. Fortunately, we can fight the confirmation bias in such situations by evaluating the opinions of prominent influencers who have political motivations to support one side, but fail to do so or even support the other side. Such strategies have effectively changed peoples perspectives even in our current polarized environment. Unfortunately, many mainstream venues failed their readership by not conveying the data needed for them to draw accurate conclusions and thus advance press freedom.

Another problem comes from one of the strongest findings in behavioral science, which shows that human beings respond very strongly to positive reinforcement. Through the style of their coverage painting all conservatives with a broad brush, these mainstream venues fail to provide positive reinforcement to conservatives who behaved in a prosocial manner. Research suggests that optimal performance comes from a combination of internal and external motivations. External incentives according to research, are especially crucial for promoting prosocial behavior such as protecting freedom of the press.

A further issue is the equating of Trumps behavior with Gianfortes actions. Conservative venues such as Breitbart immediately took the opportunity to condemn such comparisons, and call out what the article depicted as media hypocrisy for failing to do the same when liberals used violence. As others have accurately pointed out, while Trumps actions help create a climate of hostility to the media, it is much more difficult to connect Gianfortes actions to Trumps words. Drawing such connections undermines the already-low media credibility. A much better model for reporting on this connection came from a conservative venue, The American Conservative. It ran a piece that accurately describes how the hostility to mainstream media among Republicans predated Trump, while acknowledging that Trump ramped up this hostility, and criticizing Gianforte for lacking anger management skills. Such reporting, by providing an accurate depiction that attributes only a small part of the blame to Trumps actions, helps protect journalists.

Next time, these mainstream venues need to provide accurate reporting to avoid undercutting their credibility, to praise prosocial behavior to create incentives and positive reinforcement, and to have all readers take away accurate impressions from their headlines. You can make a difference by writing letters to the editor and making social media posts asking journalists to commit to accurate
reporting and to take the Pro-Truth Pledge for the sake of protecting the safety and freedom of the press. What you can do right now is take the pledge yourself to show your own commitment to the truth.

P.S. Want less lies in politics? Take the Pro-Truth Pledge, encourage your friends to do so, and call on your elected representatives to take it!

_______________________________________________________________

Connect with Dr. Gleb Tsipursky on Twitter, on Facebook, and on LinkedIn, and follow his RSS feed and newsletter.

Start your workday the right way with the news that matters most.

Link:
Why Mainstream Media Need to Be Careful About Criticizing Conservatives - HuffPost

IBM's Watson – Best Doctor In The World? – Anti Aging News

The Watson supercomputer, created by technology company IBM, uses the power of artificial intelligence (AI) in ways that benefit mankind. In 2011, the world was introduced to the potential of AI when Watson won the title of world champion on the popular game show Jeopardy! In 2011.

Since then, Watsons developers have focused on customizing the AI for medical use. Programmers have integrated thousands of patient records, scores of medical texts, and all the content in the PubMed and Medline databases into Watsons working memory. In all, the AI has consumed 2 million pages of text that represent over 600,000 pieces of medical evidence, 25,000 training cases, and 14,700 hours of clinical training.

The Benefits of Using AI in Medical Diagnoses

AI programs, like Watson, are gaining importance in information-heavy fields, like medicine. The supercomputer is able to store more information than a human brain and can access the information more quickly. In addition, a computer-generated diagnosis is based on evidence and established fact, while human doctors may be swayed by cognitive biases or confidence issues.

The Watson AI uses an interface that allows users to speak to it in a natural way. The machine is able to gather and analyze information from patients and compare it to stored information. Based on this inquiry, the AI can then make an accurate diagnosis.

More than just comparing bits of information, the Watson supercomputer is able to form hypotheses independently. In a process that is similar to the way humans learn, the machine can then test and evaluate its own hypotheses, disregarding what doesnt work and adjusting for error.

In 2011, McAfee wrote about the advantages of using AI for medical purposes. AI diagnoses are based on the complete published body of medical knowledge, making it the most up-to-date medical resource. Diagnostic programs are also accurate, consistent, cost very little to operate, and can be used anywhere in the world.

AI: The Future in Medical Care

When using AI for diagnostics, a physician describes symptoms and other contributing factors to the program. The computer then mines patient history and its own databases, and along with test results and other pieces of medically relevant data, creates a hypothesis. The hypothesis is tested against its information on treatments, hospital records, and published studies and research. Once satisfied that the hypothesis is valid, Watson can then give a customized treatment plan for the patient.

While Watson has incredible capacity, only a few companies are taking advantage of it. MD Anderson Cancer Center uses AI to develop treatment plans for leukemia patients. The medical company WellPoint uses Watson-based software to allow patients to evaluate their doctors treatment plans.

Currently, the Watson AI is not able to fully use all of the information it has access to. Developers are working with the program to help it develop the mental agility and versatility of thought that makes human doctors so effective.

More:
IBM's Watson - Best Doctor In The World? - Anti Aging News

The American Academy of Anti-Aging Medicine (A4M) and Metabolic Medical Institute (MMI) have been – PR Newswire UK (press release)

The Fellowship in Metabolic and Nutritional Medicine is an interactive educational experience that combines modular training with hands-on clinical practice and web broadcasts, while instilling practitioners with the necessary knowledge and skills to effectively practice regenerative and functional medicine. The Fellowship is comprised of the latest findings and research in the areas of endocrinology, cardiology, neurology, nutrition, and a variety of other health fields, and is available to all physicians and healthcare practitioners with active medical licenses.

As the world's largest non-profit society of physicians and scientists committed to research that helps optimize the human aging process, along with the advancement of techniques and technologies that detect, prevent, and treat aging-related diseases, The American Academy of Anti-Aging Medicine has collaborated with MMI to provide the RCGP with high quality information and guidance. The A4M is dedicated to the education of all healthcare professionals, and is proud to be in its 25th year of providing first-class continuing education conferences on anti-aging, regenerative, and functional medicine.

A4M & MMI work collectively to ensure that general practitioners are fully equipped with the knowledge and clinical skills in order to provide the best standards of care for patients.

Tolearn more,registerfor events,enrollin training programs, orexhibitat an A4M Conference, please contact the office of The American Academy of Anti-Aging Medicine at:

Toll-Free - US Only:(888) 997-0112International:(561) 997-0112Email: internationalevents@a4m.com

SOURCE American Academy of Anti-Aging Medicine

http://www.a4m.com

The rest is here:
The American Academy of Anti-Aging Medicine (A4M) and Metabolic Medical Institute (MMI) have been - PR Newswire UK (press release)

Turn college debt into an investment – Green Bay Press Gazette

Steve Van Remortel, For USA TODAY NETWORK-Wisconsin Published 2:02 p.m. CT June 1, 2017 | Updated 4 hours ago

Steve Van Remortel(Photo: Courtesy of Steve Van Remortel)

There is a lot of conversation and debate about college students who have an enormous amount of debt when they are finished with school.

A lot of those conversations are centered on the rising costs of a two- or four-year college education and the higher interest rates being charged on the future leaders of our country.These are legitimate concerns that need to be resolved.But I would suggest there is a larger problem with student debt, and it comes with a viable solution.

In a recent research study by Deloittes Center for the Edge, they determined that only 12.7 percentof the workforce is passionate about their work. Think about that for a minute.If more than 87 percent of the workforce is not passionate about what they do for a living, you could infer that most students are entering the workforce lacking passion about their career choice as well.In simple terms, students are taking on debt without a career plan they are passionate about.

The solution and process to develop a passionate career plan has four simple steps. The first step is to take a behavioral science assessment to understand your natural behavioral style.The next step is to define the top three passions in your life. The third step is to define career options that wrap your natural behavioral style around a passion in your life. The final step is to choose one of the career options that provide you the greatest opportunity for success.

This process can be completed at any age, but the best case scenario is early in high school. While high school students learn other important sciences like biology and chemistry, very few students understand behavioral science or their natural behavioral style, which is developed by the time you are 7 years old.

SM Advisors/Stop The Vanilla has partnered with the Howard-Suamico School District to change this through the Academic and Career Planning Initiative.The pilot program provides a behavioral style assessment and career counseling to juniors and seniors in high school to help them wrap their natural style around a passion in their life.It allows students to talk about who they are, and what they like to do.You can see the passion and enthusiasm pick up in every student in the class as they start getting clarity on their future.Several students came up to me after our class to talk about their specific careers like a pediatric nurse or a teacher.

It helps students set a course for their lives before they even set foot in a college or technical school.Prior to high school graduation every single student should have a career plan that wraps their natural style around a passion in their life. When you are passionate about what you do and you deliver it naturally, you excel at it and get rewarded for it.

We are planning to expand this program because it will lead to more passionate careers that will turn college debt into an investment.For example, I recently interviewed a young man who graduated with $88,000 in student loans and he paid it off in three years. The simple reason: he is passionate about and loves what he does for a living, excels at it and is getting rewarded for it.College debt turns into an investment when it leads to a passionate career.Its about living a passion, not just having a job.

Steve Van Remortel is a professional speaker, strategist, adviser and author of Stop Selling Vanilla Ice Cream. Contact him at steve@stopsellingvanillaicecream.com or go to http://www.smadvisors.com or http://www.stopsellingvanillaicecream.com. His column runs monthly.

Read or Share this story: http://gbpg.net/2sj6bm0

The rest is here:
Turn college debt into an investment - Green Bay Press Gazette

Quinn on Nutrition: Nutritional myths and half-truths – Journal Times

One of my treasured books is a gigantic volume of words and pictures that defines distinct elements in the English language.

Yes, I know I can Google the same information. But I find it satisfying to thumb through the pages of my American Heritage Dictionary for in-depth meanings to words. So, in my book, the thought that books are out of date is a myth.

A myth, according to my dictionary, refers to a popular belief, a fiction or half-truth. And boy, do we have them in the field of nutrition. Here are a few highlighted in Environmental Nutrition, a newsletter authored by registered dietitian nutritionists:

Gluten-free foods are healthier. Unless you have celiac disease or another medical reason to avoid gluten a protein that occurs naturally in wheat, rye and barley there is no additional nutrition benefit from eating gluten-free foods.

Whole wheat or wheat in general is bad for you. Again, if you are sensitive to gluten (a protein in wheat that gives structure to baked bread) or have a true allergy to wheat, any type of wheat product is not good for you. For the rest of us, whole wheat and other whole grain products have been found to lower internal inflammation, which can decrease our risk for cancer, diabetes, rheumatoid arthritis and heart disease.

We dont need to limit salt if we dont have high blood pressure. Its true that some people are more salt-sensitive than others. But even if salt does not raise your blood pressure, it can damage the lining of blood vessels and increase the stiffness of blood-carrying arteries, commonly known as hardening of the arteries. Too much salt can also weaken the heart muscle and do damage to kidneys, according to scientists at the University of Delaware. Our goal? Less than 2,300 milligrams a day is recommended for most healthy people.

Farm-raised fish is not healthy. According to experts with the Monterey Bay Aquarium Seafood Watch program (www.seafoodwatch.org), many popular types of seafood such as salmon and shrimp can be safely farm-raised in addition to being caught in the wild. Because of improved methods of aquaculture (fish farming), most talapia and catfish are now farm-raised; so are oysters and many clams and mussels. Safe farming methods may even help improve the quality of our water, says Seafood Watch.

Soy can cause cancer and feminize men. These charges simply are not true, say researchers. Human studies show that soy foods do not increase cancer risk and in some cases, may lower it. For example, consuming soy foods during childhood and adolescence may help lower ones risk for breast cancer. What about women recovering from a type of breast cancer known to be estrogen receptor positive? They can safely enjoy moderate amounts of soy foods one or two daily servings of soy beverage, edamame, tofu or soy nuts according to the latest research reported by the American Institute of Cancer Research.

Barbara Quinn, who writes this column for the Monterey County Herald, is a registered dietitian and certified diabetes educator affiliated with Community Hospital of the Monterey Peninsula. She is the author of Quinn-Essential Nutrition (Westbow Press, 2015). Email her at to barbara@quinnessentialnutrition.com.

Read more from the original source:
Quinn on Nutrition: Nutritional myths and half-truths - Journal Times

Bacterial pathogenesis Campylobacter follows the clues – Nature.com


Nature.com
Bacterial pathogenesis Campylobacter follows the clues
Nature.com
Campylobacter jejuni is a commensal bacterium that colonizes the intestinal tracts of avian species and other animals, but it is also an enteric pathogen in humans that causes diarrhoeal disease. C. jejuni can distinguish between different intestinal ...

and more »

See the original post:
Bacterial pathogenesis Campylobacter follows the clues - Nature.com

‘C. diff. Science’ Honors Microbiology Professionals Dedicated to … – Florida Newswire

TAMPA, Fla. /Florida Newswire/ The C Diff Foundation hosts C. diff. Science on Sept. 14 to honor professionals dedicated to the scientific research and development in the Clostridium difficile (C. difficile, C. diff.) community worldwide, chaired by Professor Simon M. Cutting, PhD, of Molecular Microbiology at Royal Holloway, University of London.

The free live webinar will take place from 8 a.m. 12 p.m. ET, Sept. 14, 2017.

Professor Cutting, Event Chair and guest presenter, shares the platform with seven fellow scientists focused on their contributions involving the most common pathogen identified, and leading healthcare-associated infection (HAI) Clostridium difficile.

C. difficile infections can be acquired and diagnosed in infants and across the life-span with a higher risk involving our senior citizens and that is why it is imperative to learn about a C. difficile infection, its most common symptoms, the treatments available, and environmental safety products to prevent the spread of this spore-bacteria and to help reduce C. difficile infection recurrences.

On September 14th fellow professionals in the C. diff. community, and those who share a common interest, will have the opportunity to gain knowledge from scientists around the globe who have dedicated their professional lives researching and developing new concepts, new theories, and the progress towards a better understanding pursuing future developments in Clostridium difficile (a.k.a., C. difficile, C.diff.) infection prevention, treatments, and environmental safety products worldwide, states Nancy C Caralla, Executive Director.

About the C Diff Foundation:

The C Diff Foundation, a 501(c)(3) non-profit, founded in 2012 by Nancy C Caralla, a nurse diagnosed and treated for Clostridium difficile (C. diff.) infections.

Through her own journeys and witnessing the passing of her father diagnosed with sepsis secondary to C. difficile infection involvement, Nancy recognized the need for greater awareness through education, the research being conducted by the government, industry, and academia and better advocacy on behalf of patients, healthcare professionals, and researchers worldwide working to address the public health threat posed by this devastating infection.

For webinar information contact event coordinators: info@cdiffscience.org and visit the event website: http://cdiffscience.org/ to register for this free webinar.

For C Diff Foundation information please visit: https://cdifffoundation.org/.

Read the original here:
'C. diff. Science' Honors Microbiology Professionals Dedicated to ... - Florida Newswire

FSU researchers receive $2.8 million grant to search for the origin of personality traits impacting longevity – Florida State News

Angelina Sutin, assistant professor in the department of behavioral sciences and social medicine, has received a $2.8 million grant from the National Institutes of Health.

Our personality predicts more than just the type of friends we may have. It also provides significant clues about our health and can even predict how long we might live.

Yet little is known about how our personality forms relative to what we know about its consequences on health across the lifespan.

Florida State University College of Medicine Assistant Professor Angelina Sutin is seeking answers with the help of a $2.8 million National Institutes of Health grant.

As part of a five-year study, her team will work to identify prenatal and childhood neighborhood risk factors contributing to the development of personality traits most consequential for healthy aging. A better understanding of these relationships is the first step toward earlier interventions for improving health outcomes.

A number of biological, social and behavioral influences affect pregnancy. Did the mother smoke, drink, use drugs, suffer from depression or experience physical or mental abuse?

In childhood, similar influences vary from child to child depending on where they lived and the relative socioeconomic factors in play.

The broader goal is to understand where personality comes from in childhood to have a better sense of how we could intervene, Sutin said. One thing we are looking at, for example, is what factors might be involved in helping some kids to be more resilient than others.

Sutin plans to integrate three established frameworks of health research addressing those factors into one theoretical model examining the influences on formation of personality and the eventual health consequences. She will be assisted by FSU College of Medicine faculty researchers from the departments of behavioral sciences and social medicine, biomedical sciences and geriatrics.

The research centers on three longtime behavioral and biological health studies conducted in the United States, United Kingdom and Australia. The studies, involving thousands of participants assessed over a span of several decades, look at risk factors ranging from prenatal health to childhood place of residence.

The U.S. study will allow Sutin to look more closely at relative neighborhood safety, family income and education and potential links with health outcomes.

Even though the participants in these studies are from three completely different cultural contexts, if you grow up in vulnerable circumstances, regardless of where it is, its still vulnerable circumstances, Sutin said. Were going to be able to look at that in early childhood with the Australian and the English data, young adulthood in the English data and middle adulthood into old age with the U.S. data.

Leslie Beitsch, chair of the department of behavioral sciences and social medicine, said Sutin is renowned for her exceptional research.

Dr. Sutins work is often cited in the lay press but is even more influential within health psychology academic circles, and its easy to understand why, Beitsch said. Projects like this offer the potential to unlock new therapeutic pathways that enable people to experience more optimal health across the life course.

Sutin, College of Medicine Associate Professor of Geriatrics Antonio Terracciano and others have published research showing that those who show more conscientiousness generally experience better health outcomes and greater longevity. Neuroticism leads in the other direction.

Managing health behaviors associated with conscientiousness and neuroticism, then, could be an effective intervention to address health problems.

In the ongoing study, Sutin hopes to gain understanding about how these traits emerge, potentially leading to new ways of mitigating unwanted behaviors linked to personality.

This project really began with thinking about where personality traits come from, she said. It makes more sense to intervene at the source rather than later in life.

Read more from the original source:
FSU researchers receive $2.8 million grant to search for the origin of personality traits impacting longevity - Florida State News

Are Behavioral Science, Customer Centricity And Customer Experience Compatible? – Forbes


Forbes
Are Behavioral Science, Customer Centricity And Customer Experience Compatible?
Forbes
However, at the same time, many of those companies will also be leveraging a large number of the powerful insights that are coming out of behavioral science, behavioral economics and behavioral design and will be using them to help design and deliver a ...

and more »

Read more:
Are Behavioral Science, Customer Centricity And Customer Experience Compatible? - Forbes

To Counter Opioid Crisis, NIH Pushes Researchers to Invent More Drugs – The Chronicle of Higher Education (subscription)

At a time when opioid abuse is killing tens of thousands of Americans a year, government-funded university scientists are now being asked to pursue a solution many of them find deeply misguided: Invent even more drugs.

More than a dozen invited drug companies are eager to help, the NIHs director, Francis S. Collins, said of his agencys new opioid strategy. "They have all responded with a great deal of enthusiasm," he said.

But academic experts in opioid abuse are aghast, saying the NIH plan appears to greatly overemphasize the prospect of meaningful help from the drug companies which the scientists blame for creating the crisis in the first place to the near exclusion of nonpharmacological treatments, including lifestyle changes and economic development.

"This is a complex bio-psycho-social disease," said one opioid expert, Anna Lembke, an assistant professor of psychiatry and behavioral sciences at Stanford University, "and these interventions really are only looking at the biology piece."

This is a complex bio-psycho-social disease, and these interventions really are only looking at the biology piece.

For such researchers, the issue reflects a fundamental question about the role of the NIH: Should it direct research dollars mostly toward traditional "bench science" or take a more expansive and interdisciplinary approach to major matters of public health?

To some degree, the NIH accepts that wider definition. The NIH division that produced the new opioid strategy, the National Institute on Drug Abuse, has sponsored research into areas that include improving educational initiatives in schools and assessing programs to monitor prescription drugs.

But the NIH plan, published on Wednesday in The New England Journal of Medicine and written by Dr. Collins and Nora D. Volkow, director of the drug-abuse institute, spoke almost exclusively of ideas for developing new drugs and devices to improve upon and replace opioids, to vaccinate against the effect of opioids, and to improve post-overdose treatment.

The strategy is an outgrowth of an annual meeting, held in April, between pharmaceutical-industry leaders and officials at the NIH and other government health agencies. More details of the plan will be developed during three additional meetings over the next six weeks, all closed to the public, between industry scientists and NIH officials, Dr. Collins said.

The stars are aligning now between the science and the industry, seeing this as a potential market opportunity.

Dr. Collins and Dr. Volkow, in a briefing with reporters, also said the epidemic of opioid addiction now affecting at least 2.5 million Americans grew in large part because the dangers were not understood as recently as 20 years ago.

"The medical profession was very much kind of buying into the idea that this could be a way in which one could manage not just short-term but long-term pain," Dr. Collins said. "The realization of the addictive potential was much more limited then than it is now."

We've known for millennia that opioids are addictive and that they cause overdose when taken in too high a dose.

New drugs could be useful, said Richard B. Gunderman, a professor of radiology at Indiana University who holds appointments in several other fields, including medical education and philosophy. But rather than pursue new types of opioids as the holy grail, Dr. Gunderman said, scientists should look at psychological, spiritual, and even cultural factors that lead to opioid abuse, especially among people suffering from low incomes and a lack of fulfilling careers.

Such factors are critical, he said, "and we neglect them at our peril."

Dr. Volkow did mention some nonpharmacological goals, including improving training for emergency-room physicians and doctors in sexual-health clinics who treat opioid-abuse patients.

And the U.S. secretary of health and human services, Thomas E. Price, told a drug-abuse summit in April that improving access to treatment and recovery services was one of his top five priorities in fighting opioid abuse.

At the same time, a House-approved plan for meeting the Trump administrations request to overhaul federal health-care coverage would reduce patients eligibility for Suboxone, the leading long-term treatment for opioid addiction. Losing access to Suboxone "would definitely make the epidemic worse," Dr. Kolodny said.

The NIH plan is so worrisome, Dr. Lembke said, because the drug industry can already provide resources to develop new drugs. Federal money, by contrast, should be directed toward approaches that industry will not cover, such as studying the value of clean-needle-exchange programs, safe-injection facilities, decriminalization policies, and personal behaviors, including exercise, yoga, and tai chi, she said.

"Not a single one of their listed interventions addresses the psychosocial contextual problems that are so central to this" crisis, Dr. Lembke said of the NIH plan.

Paul Basken covers university research and its intersection with government policy. He can be found on Twitter @pbasken, or reached by email at paul.basken@chronicle.com.

See original here:
To Counter Opioid Crisis, NIH Pushes Researchers to Invent More Drugs - The Chronicle of Higher Education (subscription)

Eco-Pass fee increase fight ramps up – La Voz Weekly

Students at De Anza College are ramping up the fight to oppose the proposed increase of the Eco-pass fee from $9 to $40. The VTA board will vote on the issue at their June 1 board meeting.

Over this past week, organizers leading the opposition from De Anza have met with many VTA board members including Chappie Jones and Cindy Chavez.

They have also received endorsements from De Anza College, the Associated Students of San Jose State and Foothill College, Assemblymembers Evan Low and Ash Kalra, Congressman Ro Khanna, and the Amalgamated Bus Union.

Chi Tran, 21, environmental economics and public policy major; Neil McClintick, 20, political science major; Raphael Villagracia, 19, political science major, and Eddie Cisneros, 23, public health major, met board member Jones, who was not very receptive to students concerns, at the West Valley Branch Library for a second meeting.

We brought him our statistics and proposals for a solution, Tran said. He was very impressed with us and we might convince him a bit more than the first time.

Tran; McClintick; Cisneros; Desiree Humphers, 20, liberal arts and behavioral science major; and Patrick Ahrens, advisor to California Assemblymember Evan Low, met with board member Chavez at the Santa Clara County building. Tran said they had a very successful meeting and she was very impressed with Chavez.

She knows her stuff and she will take us very seriously, Tran said. Her goal is to keep public transportation floating, so she is seeking for a sustainable plan.

A few organizations on campus including the ES Committee, TRANSITion and the De Anza Political Revolution are very active on campus in preparation for the upcoming meeting.

TRANSITion is planning to host workshops to create posters, and the De Anza Political Revolution is planning to host workshops to prepare students to give testimonies during the meeting.

April Nicholson, 19, political science major, and member of the DASB Environmental Sustainability Committee and De Anza Political Revolution Club, has been circulating a petition and attending VTA board meetings. She presented the issue and gathered at least 2,180 signatures from 15 classrooms over three days.

Organizers are contacting as many council members as they can as well as receiving support from elected officials, and are trying to get more students involved in the issue.

We really hope students give more attention to this issue, said Tran. Many of us who are organizing this work are leaving the school. It wont affect us, but affect folks that are staying: the future students.

Follow this link:
Eco-Pass fee increase fight ramps up - La Voz Weekly

Scientists Want a Vaccine to Protect Readers From Fake News – Sputnik International

Politics

01:35 01.06.2017(updated 10:42 01.06.2017) Get short URL

As those seeking topromulgate a biased point ofview label so much information "fake news," behavioral scientists are now studying whether the human mind can be induced torecognize and refute it.

In a recent study, 100 participants were provided witha scientific report, butwere also informed that intentional misinformation would be included. Participants inthe behavioral study, followingthe warning, were able toidentify the false facts 100 percent ofthe time, asnoted byRawstory.com.

The study participants were informed that "fake experts" are typically used byindustries seeking torefute scientific consensus, and the end results indicated that politics and values were not indicative ofthe study group's ability toidentify falsehoods.

"Nobody likes tobe misled, no matter their politics," said a researcher involved withthe project, an indicator, they added, that it is possible forpeople toavoid being led astray bylies.

Observing that humans instinctively reject facts that contradict their personal belief systems, Yale University professor Dan Kahan's identification ofwhat he calls identity-protective cognition, results ina person identifying withinformation aslong asit supports their own beliefs.

Now scientists are seeking a way toinoculate againstthe practice, toallow fora person torecognize a provable scientific truth astruth and alter their point ofview.

But what is truth?

Sputnik/ Vladimir Astapkovich

Previous studies byCambridge psychology professor Sander van der Linden have shown that simple acceptance ofthe existence ofanother point ofview can assist inallowing those withdefensively held beliefs toentertain the possibility ofchanging their viewpoint.

Scientists, including van der Linden, agree that acceptance ofanother's viewpoint can smooth overcombative defensive reactions, including amongthose who resist factual information merely because it challenges their belief system.

"Consensus messages don't ask people tochange their beliefs they ask them tochange their opinion aboutwhat other people believe, so they're not a direct threat totheir identity," van der Linden detailed.

Suggesting that, byaccepting that another point ofview can co-exist withyours, it is possible tobring climate change deniers aroundto the provable negative environmental truth, the scientists said, "We've found that they're one way toget people more aligned onthe side ofclimate science."

"You can't talk around [climate change denial]; otherwise it persists," van der Linden said, according toVox.

In offering a scientific truth, he observed, it is helpful tocome right outand say it.

"What's important is tolead withthe facts the facts are the headline then introduce the myth, and then explain why it's wrong."

"There is a consensus ofevidence that human activity is causing all ofrecent global warming. Not some ofit. Not even most ofit. All ofit," he explained.

Noting that it is "all-too-easy tomislead people intothinking that experts disagree onhuman-caused global warming," van der Linden suggested that, "If you want towork outwhether you're getting taken inwith the fake-expert strategy, take a closer look atthe experts' who are being cited."

Cognitive scientist and author ofthe Skeptical Science blog John Cook, an adjunct lecturer atAustralia's University ofQueensland speaking abouthow conflicting views can coexist withina person's belief system offered that people "want toknow how these two things can exist together. So you have toresolve it, and that turns intoa compelling story."

Original post:
Scientists Want a Vaccine to Protect Readers From Fake News - Sputnik International

Antibody Fights Fat, Fires up Metabolism – Anti Aging News

Two international research teams have determined an antibody decreases fat while simultaneously boosting metabolism. Their studies involved mice yet it is believed the findings will also apply to humans. It is hoped that this breakthrough will help treat osteoporosis, obesity and a number of other conditions.

About FSH

It is known that a specific antibody targets follicle-stimulating hormones (FSH). These hormones increase when menopause occurs. Menopause is tied to a number of different health problems in women like the loss of bone density and an increase in weight gain. FSH is generated by the pituitary gland in mammals of both sexes. It spurs the growth of ovarian follicles in females and also regulates several reproductive processes. The antibody in question heightens bone mass, increases metabolism and decreases body fat in mice. It is believed that blocking FSH to counteract menopause symptoms will help treat conditions like cardiovascular disease, obesity, cancer, and osteoporosis.

About the Study

The two international research teams were supervised by Clifford J. Rosen, Li Sun, and Mone Zaidi. The teams performed their work at the Maine Medical Center Research Institute and the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai. They used a synthetic mouse antibody to key in on a 13-amino-acid sequence of a single subunit of FSH. The antibody was tested on female mice whose ovaries were removed. The removal of the ovaries caused high levels of FSH. The antibody was also tested on female and male mice that were provided with high-fat foods.

The Findings

In both instances, treatment using the antibody spurred fat loss and a faster metabolism. The results have intrigued scientists and medical professionals around the world. More extensive studies will be performed in the near future to determine if the findings are relevant to human health.

Read this article:
Antibody Fights Fat, Fires up Metabolism - Anti Aging News

Behavioral neuroscience – Wikipedia

Behavioral neuroscience, also known as biological psychology,[1]biopsychology, or psychobiology[2] is the application of the principles of biology to the study of physiological, genetic, and developmental mechanisms of behavior in humans and other animals. [3]

Behavioral neuroscience as a scientific discipline emerged from a variety of scientific and philosophical traditions in the 18th and 19th centuries. In philosophy, people like Ren Descartes proposed physical models to explain animal and human behavior. Descartes, for example, suggested that the pineal gland, a midline unpaired structure in the brain of many organisms, was the point of contact between mind and body. Descartes also elaborated on a theory in which the pneumatics of bodily fluids could explain reflexes and other motor behavior. This theory was inspired by moving statues in a garden in Paris.[4]

Other philosophers also helped give birth to psychology. One of the earliest textbooks in the new field, The Principles of Psychology by William James, argues that the scientific study of psychology should be grounded in an understanding of biology:

Bodily experiences, therefore, and more particularly brain-experiences, must take a place amongst those conditions of the mental life of which Psychology need take account. The spiritualist and the associationist must both be 'cerebralists,' to the extent at least of admitting that certain peculiarities in the way of working of their own favorite principles are explicable only by the fact that the brain laws are a codeterminant of their result.

Our first conclusion, then, is that a certain amount of brain-physiology must be presupposed or included in Psychology.[5]

The emergence of both psychology and behavioral neuroscience as legitimate sciences can be traced from the emergence of physiology from anatomy, particularly neuroanatomy. Physiologists conducted experiments on living organisms, a practice that was distrusted by the dominant anatomists of the 18th and 19th centuries.[6] The influential work of Claude Bernard, Charles Bell, and William Harvey helped to convince the scientific community that reliable data could be obtained from living subjects.

Even before the 18th and 19th century, behavioral neuroscience was beginning to take form as far back as 1700 B.C.[7] The question that seems to continually arise is what is the connection between the mind and body. The debate is formally referred to as the mind-body problem. There are two major schools of thought that attempt to resolve the mindbody problem; monism and dualism.[4]Plato and Aristotle are two of several philosophers who participated in this debate. Plato believed that the brain was where all mental thought and processes happened.[7] In contrast, Aristotle believed that the brain served the purpose of cooling down the emotions derived from the heart.[4] The mind-body problem was a stepping stone toward attempting to understand the connection between the mind and body.

Another debate arose about was localization of function or functional specialization versus equipotentiality which played a significant role in the development in behavioral neuroscience. As a result of localization of function research, many famous people found within psychology have come to various different conclusions. Wilder Penfield was able to develop a map of the cerebral cortex through studying epileptic patients along with Rassmussen.[4] Research on localization of function has led behavioral neuroscientist to a better understanding of which parts of the brain control behavior. This is best exemplified through the case study of Phineas Gage.

The term "psychobiology" has been used in a variety of contexts, emphasizing the importance of biology, which is the discipline that studies organic, neural and cellular modifications in behavior, plasticity in neuroscience, and biological diseases in all aspects, in addition, biology focuses and analyzes behavior and all the subjects it is concerned about, from a scientific point of view. In this context, psychology helps as a complementary, but important discipline in the neurobiological sciences. The role of psychology in this questions is that of a social tool that backs up the main or strongest biological science. The term "psychobiology" was first used in its modern sense by Knight Dunlap in his book An Outline of Psychobiology (1914).[8] Dunlap also was the founder and editor-in-chief of the journal Psychobiology. In the announcement of that journal, Dunlap writes that the journal will publish research "...bearing on the interconnection of mental and physiological functions", which describes the field of behavioral neuroscience even in its modern sense.[8]

In many cases, humans may serve as experimental subjects in behavioral neuroscience experiments; however, a great deal of the experimental literature in behavioral neuroscience comes from the study of non-human species, most frequently rats, mice, and monkeys. As a result, a critical assumption in behavioral neuroscience is that organisms share biological and behavioral similarities, enough to permit extrapolations across species. This allies behavioral neuroscience closely with comparative psychology, evolutionary psychology, evolutionary biology, and neurobiology. Behavioral neuroscience also has paradigmatic and methodological similarities to neuropsychology, which relies heavily on the study of the behavior of humans with nervous system dysfunction (i.e., a non-experimentally based biological manipulation).

Synonyms for behavioral neuroscience include biopsychology, biological psychology, and psychobiology.[9]Physiological psychology is a subfield of behavioral neuroscience, with an appropriately narrower definition

The distinguishing characteristic of a behavioral neuroscience experiment is that either the independent variable of the experiment is biological, or some dependent variable is biological. In other words, the nervous system of the organism under study is permanently or temporarily altered, or some aspect of the nervous system is measured (usually to be related to a behavioral variable).

Different manipulations have advantages and limitations. Neural tissue destroyed as a primary consequence of a surgery, electric shock or neurotoxin can confound the results so that the physical trauma masks changes in the fundamental neurophysiological processes of interest. For example, when using an electrolytic probe to create a purposeful lesion in a distinct region of the rat brain, surrounding tissue can be affected: so, a change in behavior exhibited by the experimental group post-surgery is to some degree a result of damage to surrounding neural tissue, rather than by a lesion of a distinct brain region. [23][24] Most genetic manipulation techniques are also considered permanent.[24] Temporary lesions can be achieved with advanced in genetic manipulations, for example, certain genes can now be switched on and off with diet.[24] Pharmacological manipulations also allow blocking of certain neurotransmitters temporarily as the function returns to its previous state after the drug has been metabolized.[24]

In general, behavioral neuroscientists study similar themes and issues as academic psychologists, though limited by the need to use nonhuman animals. As a result, the bulk of literature in behavioral neuroscience deals with mental processes and behaviors that are shared across different animal models such as:

However, with increasing technical sophistication and with the development of more precise noninvas
ive methods that can be applied to human subjects, behavioral neuroscientists are beginning to contribute to other classical topic areas of psychology, philosophy, and linguistics, such as:

Behavioral neuroscience has also had a strong history of contributing to the understanding of medical disorders, including those that fall under the purview of clinical psychology and biological psychopathology (also known as abnormal psychology). Although animal models do not exist for all mental illnesses, the field has contributed important therapeutic data on a variety of conditions, including:

Nobel Laureates

The following Nobel Prize winners could reasonably be considered behavioral neuroscientists or neurobiologists. (This list omits winners who were almost exclusively neuroanatomists or neurophysiologists; i.e., those that did not measure behavioral or neurobiological variables.)

Kavli Prize in Neuroscience

Read the rest here:
Behavioral neuroscience - Wikipedia

Wright State spinoff closes on $680K in funding – Dayton Business Journal

Wright State spinoff closes on $680K in funding
Dayton Business Journal
The company has closed on a $680,000 Seed B convertible note, which brings the total amount of seed funding it has raised to $845,000. This comes on top of the $2 million in grants it landed as part of the Kno.e.sis center at Wright State, thanks to ...

Read more here:
Wright State spinoff closes on $680K in funding - Dayton Business Journal

Surgery Is No Longer Your Only Option! – The Clermont News Leader

Now That We Have Your Attention Did you know Orlando Spine and Joint offers regenerative therapy? When you hear of regenerative medicine, you may be thinking things such as anti-aging, hair restoration, and wrinkle reduction. While these things are technically classified as regenerative medicine, they are not at all that we do. In an effort to help your body heal itself, and regenerate lost or broken tissues, we employ 2 major techniques. One is PRP, which stands for Platelet Rich Plasma. By drawing some blood from your arm, then spinning it in a special centrifuge, we are able to gather just the platelets and some of the plasma. This is then used as an injection into the injured area of your body, acting like a boost or jump start to your natural healing ability. We also use stem cell type therapy. By partnering with the University of Miamis tissue bank, along with New Life Regenerative Medicine, we can offer the latest, most technically sound, and purest form of stem cell type therapy available to you today, called AlloGen. 100% natural, AlloGen contains components that enhance your bodys ability to heal and regenerate itself. Instead of simply managing pain, AlloGen may contribute to minimizing or eliminating pain all together. Both PRP and AlloGen are ideal choices for patients considering regenerative medicine therapy for conditions such as: sports injury, joint pain, arthritis, soft tissue tears, plantars faciitis, carpal tunnel, neck and back pain and many more. Call today for a free consultation with the doctor. 407-614-5900. Orlando Spine & Joint, 821 Oakley Seaver Drive, Clermont, FL 34711. http://www.OrlandoSpineAndJoint.com

View original post here:
Surgery Is No Longer Your Only Option! - The Clermont News Leader

How To Navigate Your Child's Adolescence46:37 – WBUR

wbur

With guest hostJane Clayson. This program originally broadcast on September 19, 2016.

Anew parents guide to navigating adolescence. Its still a minefield out there.

Eye rolls. Blow-ups. Slammed doors. The silent treatment. Parenting adolescents can be challenging. Discouraging. Exhausting. Especially when you cant get them to answer a simple question like, How was your day? Or even look up from their cell phones. Whats a parent to do? What should a parent never do? Does it sometimes feel like payback for what you put your own parents through? This hourOn Point, expert advice for parents of teens. Jane Clayson

Sara Villanueva, professor of psychology in the School of Behavioral and Social Sciences at St. Edward's University in Austin. (@SaraVillanueva_)

Rob Evans, psychologist and executive director of the Human Relations Service Inc. in Wellesley, Massachusetts.

New York Times: When Teenagers Bristle At 'How Was School?' "In reality, few days are entirely fine, and none are entirely empty. So how do we improve on this perennial flop of an exchange?As adults we can often forget how stressful middle and high school can be. While some students are energized by school, most find their days taxing, even under the best conditions."

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences: Harnessing adolescent values to motivate healthier eating -- "Behavioral science has rarely offered effective strategies for changing adolescent health behavior. One limitation of previous approaches may be an overemphasis on long-term health outcomes as the focal source of motivation. The present research uses a rigorous randomized trial to evaluate an approach that aligns healthy behavior with values about which adolescents already care: feeling like a socially conscious, autonomous person worthy of approval from ones peers."

Your Teen: Top 10 Things To Expect In Middle School "Talk toparents whove been through middle school and youll often hear them lament that they had no idea what was coming. Parents are frequently eager for some middle school tips to help them survive, too."

This program aired on May 29, 2017.

Go here to read the rest:
How To Navigate Your Child's Adolescence46:37 - WBUR