Senate should aim to correct health care course – The Philadelphia Tribune

Once again, womens health is in the crosshairs.

The budget unveiled by the White House last month adds insult to the injury of the GOP health bill passed earlier by the House of Representatives, which the Congressional Budget Office says will lead to 23 million more uninsured Americans and cuts $800 billion from Medicaid legislation The New York Times dubbed, especially disastrous for women. Taken together, womens ability to access necessary treatment and services and to secure insurance to pay for it are at a risk unseen in the contemporary era.

Now, as the Senate returns from recess and gets to work drafting its measure, we must be sure to hold Congress accountable. A bill that puts women last is unacceptable.

Included in the disastrous House bill are provisions blocking women from going to Planned Parenthood for preventive care (including birth control and cancer screenings), gutting maternity care and other essential health benefits, and making health care unaffordable for millions by allowing insurance companies in states that waive coverage rules to charge women whove given birth, or survived cancer, more for their premiums. If this bill and the budget becomes law, all women but especially working-class women, and poor women, as well as their families will suffer dire consequences to their health and lives. We cant let this happen.

Given this reality, its time to reflect on what it really means to support women and girls, truly creating a country where every American thrives.

Lets be clear once and for all: The entire conversation is a nonstarter without full support for womens health. Its on us to make sure every senator understands this.

During my eight years in the White House, I chaired the White House Council on Women and Girls. I was responsible for bringing elected officials, business and community leaders together to help drive the economy, expand access to the middle class, and most importantly, working to ensure equality and opportunity for all Americans, especially women and girls.

Of all this work, that last point providing equality and opportunity to all drove the agenda of the council. President Obama created the council to ensure that federal agencies were prioritizing the needs of women and girls in their policies, programs and legislation with the understanding that it is the governments highest purpose to help ensure all Americans are able to compete on a level playing field and achieve their dreams. He knew that the issues women face today, such as access to paid family and medical leave, equal pay for equal work, and affordable health care, are all connected and intertwined.

Planned Parenthood has a key role to play in access to affordable health care for women, and by extension their access to equality. Yet, Republican leaders in Congress have continued to push to defund Planned Parenthood and block women from going there to receive care. That is the opposite of what the White House Council on Women and Girls stood for, and if enacted, would result in millions of women losing access to care.

While much about the House of Representatives efforts to repeal the Affordable Care Act was troubling, one of the most egregious moves was voting on the bill without even waiting for the Congressional Budget Office to update its analysis of the impact the legislation would have on the American people or the federal budget.

As the Senate has now turned to writing its version of the health care bill, as a former White House official who spent a lot of time focusing on women and girls, I am also troubled that Senate leaders appointed 13 men and zero women to their working group responsible for drafting their version of an ACA repeal bill. How could they not know that our interests cannot be adequately represented if we are not at the table?

As we wait for the Senate to produce its bill, it is tempting to give in to the anger and frustration that is so prevalent in our national discourse these days. But what motivates me to keep fighting are the incredible personal stories of access, treatment, recovery and hope that the Affordable Care Act made possible.

Planned Parenthood is a foundational part of that effort, and its work in providing access to care has helped people across our country take control of their health and lives. Two and a half million people visit Planned Parenthood each year for preventive health care, including birth control, cancer screenings and STD testing and treatment. One in five women in America relies on Planned Parenthood over her lifetime. For more than 100 years, it has helped women in this country get the care they need, which in turn has enabled women to contribute so much to this country.

The ACA was born of advocacy and I believe advocacy will save the ACA and health care for millions of women. Thats where voters come in. As the Senate drafts its version, I hope that millions of Americans tell their senators they must protect the health of women.

Valerie Jarrett is a former senior adviser to President Barack Obama and former chairwoman of the White House Council on Women and Girls. She wrote this commentary for CNN.

Go here to see the original:

Senate should aim to correct health care course - The Philadelphia Tribune

Rep. Knight, the GOP health-care plan would hurt your district: Guest commentary – LA Daily News

In early May, the American Health Care Act (ACHA) made its way out of the U.S. House of Representatives by a very tight vote. The bill, now under consideration by the Senate, made it through thanks to two critical amendments that garnered the support of key California Republicans.

The Congressional Budget Office (CBO) has now confirmed what we long knew: The amendments made a bad bill worse, not better. There was, indeed, no valid excuse for supporting the AHCA.

This bill is troubling. If passed, the CBO estimates 23 million people would lose health insurance by 2026, with low-income and elderly Americans hit the hardest. Insurance companies could charge more to persons with pre-existing conditions, and states could cut vital health benefits.

The latest CBO analysis further confirms that the AHCA would put millions in jeopardy, and that the amendments introduced by Rep. Tom MacArthur, R-N.J., and Rep. Fred Upton, R-Mich., championed by Republican House members as the reason they supported the bill, did little to change its projected devastating impact.

Here in Los Angeles County, weve spoken regularly with Rep. Steve Knight, R-Santa Clarita, our areas only Republican representative, on the impact of the Affordable Care Act (ACA) on his district, and the potential effects of replacing the ACA with the proposed AHCA.

More than 80,000 people in Knights district currently benefit from the ACA, with close to 21,000 enrolled in Covered California and almost 60,000 adults newly covered as part of the Medi-Cal expansion. These people could all lose coverage under the AHCA.

The ACAs massive expansions in coverage allowed community providers to dramatically expand access to care.

The Antelope Valley Community Clinic, for example, opened in 2010, the year the ACA was passed. In just five years, the clinic went from providing 12,000 patient visits and 25 employees to 100,000 visits and 235 employees. Thanks to the ACA, the clinic expanded its facilities and became a one-stop shop for physical, mental and oral health needs for the underserved in the High Desert.

Antelope Valley residents can finally access comprehensive preventive services that keep them healthy and productive in society. If patients lose coverage under the AHCA, the clinic would be forced to choose between scaling back services or laying off staff. This would cost taxpayers more in the long run, as the newly uninsured would delay care and rely on the emergency room when they experience an avoidable health emergency.

In addition to the impact on the clinics, the broader community would suffer under a repeal of the ACA. Health care is a major employment sector in Los Angeles, and health care comprises the bulk of our middle-skill job growth.

Advertisement

Congressman Knight has been very responsive to the clinics, hospitals, health plans and community partners in the district. Yet he ultimately supported the AHCA. He believed the Upton and MacArthur amendments would mitigate the impact of the bill on those with preexisting conditions.

Unfortunately, the CBO has debunked that myth, and its time for our legislators to look at the real impact of the bill.

There is no denying that these cuts are a serious attack on our nations healthcare system and will have a devastating impact on the most vulnerable among us, including children, women, seniors, people with disabilities, and low-middle class families.

As the Senate produces its version of the bill, in light of the analysis by the CBO its our hope that Knight and other House Republicans will reconsider their support for any bill that reduces coverage, disadvantages the sick, and leaves their communities worse off.

Louise McCarthy is president and CEO of the Community Clinic Association of Los Angeles County. James A. Cook is CEO and founder of the Antelope Valley Community Clinic.

View original post here:

Rep. Knight, the GOP health-care plan would hurt your district: Guest commentary - LA Daily News

Lonza plugs EU cell and gene therapy manufacturing gap through PharmaCell buy – BioPharma-Reporter.com

The acquisition of Dutch commercial cell and gene therapy maker PharmaCell places Lonza as the leading CDMO in the space, the firm says.

The deal sees Switzerland-headquartered contract development and manufacturing organisation (CDMO) add the assets and staff of PharmaCell to strengthen its cell and gene therapy offerings.

We had a manufacturing gap in the European market, especially related to products requiring regional manufacturing like the new immunotherapy products, Andreas Weiler, head of Emerging Technologies at Lonza, told Biopharma-Reporter. The acquisition of PharmaCell helps bridge that gap.

Financials details were not divulged but the deal sees Lonza add a 1,400m2 multiple product facility in Maastricht, The Netherlands and a 4,800m2 cell therapy manufacturing plant nearby in Geleen to its personalised medicine manufacturing network.

Lonzas current cell and gene therapy capabilities are located in Tuas, Singapore and at its site in Walkersville, Maryland (which recently received a US FDA warning letter ). The CDMO is also constructing a facility set to open this year at its Houston, Texas site with 14,000m2 of space dedicated to cell and gene therapy manufacturing.

And with the addition of PharmaCell, Lonza is now the leading contract development and manufacturing organisation offering an international cell and gene therapy manufacturing network, spanning the US, Europe and Asia, Weiler told us.

PharmaCell

The European CDMO was targeted due to its expertise in autologous products, where cells and genes are taken, engineered and then placed back into the patient. This complements our current allogeneic cell manufacturing offerings, Weiler said.

PharmaCell has won a number of contracts to make both clinical and commercial volumes of such therapies, including deals with Orchard Therapeutics and Lion Biotech , both announced this year.

The firm also made European supply of Dendreons prostate cancer therapy Provenge (Sipuleucel-T) until Dendreons buyer Valeant withdrew the Marketing Authorisation in 2015.

Last year, the firm reported sales of around 11m ($12.3m).

Weiler said Lonzas acquisition will have no impact to current contracts. PharmaCell is now part of Lonza and the new legal entity name is Lonza Netherlands, B.V. The name change has no impact on existing contracts.

Continue reading here:

Lonza plugs EU cell and gene therapy manufacturing gap through PharmaCell buy - BioPharma-Reporter.com

Toyota Is Eager to Bring a Flying Car to the 2020 Olympics – Futurism

In Brief Toyota has partnered with Cartivator Resource Management to help develop a flying car that will play a special part in the upcoming Olympic games. A video of an unmanned test flight has surfaced online.

Toyota is amping up the race to make flying cars the vehicles of the future. Japans largest automobile company has invested nearly $400,000 in Cartivator Resource Management to develop a flying car for a very special purpose. Toyota is hoping that this single driver vehicle will be ready by 2020, in time to deliver the Olympic torch along its final stretch to open the 2020 Olympic Games in Tokyo.

A video was recently released showing an initial prototype being tested. These results, however, are less than spectacular, even with the interesting cinematography.

Toyota has also recently made headlines in acknowledging that their partnership with Elon Musks Tesla had come to a close at the end of last year. The automobile giant has since advanced their own electric car division tocompete with Teslaspopular line.

The team working on the flying car will use Toyotas investment to improve the design of the vehicle. With these improvements, they hope that a prototype will be ready to be piloted sometime in 2019.

Their work with Cartivatoris markedly more low-key than previous flying car concepts from Toyota. They introduced a futuristic concept car called the Concept-i at the most recent Consumer Electronics Show (CES). This concept had a lot more bells and whistles like an emotion reading artificial intelligence named Yui.

It is unclear at this point if either car will take off. Perhaps Toyota can give the flying car one last fighting chance to step out of the pages of science fiction and into reality.

See more here:

Toyota Is Eager to Bring a Flying Car to the 2020 Olympics - Futurism

House Freedom Caucus ties food stamp, TANF changes to tax reform – Politico

Adding in changes to food stamps and TANF would provide another $400 billion over 10 years, Rep. Mark Meadows said. | Getty

By Aaron Lorenzo

06/09/2017 08:15 AM EDT

Updated 06/09/2017 08:09 AM EDT

House Freedom Caucus members will push for changes to two major welfare programs food stamps and Temporary Assistance for Needy Families as part of tax reform legislation, the group's chairman told POLITICO.

Rep. Mark Meadows (R-N.C.) also said the hardline conservative group's still-in-development bill wouldn't include a controversial tax on imports or immediate write-offs for business investments known as full expensing backed by House GOP leaders. The first is too unpopular and the second too expensive, he said.

Story Continued Below

Meadows and others in the caucus expect to unveil more information about their plan at a Heritage Foundation event Friday

Republican congressional leaders and Trump administration officials have stepped up their efforts to reach a consensus on tax reform, hoping to enact the legislation this year. The Freedom Caucus's plans are likely to add another hurdle to that effort.

Sign up for our tax policy newsletter and stay informed weekday mornings, in your inbox.

By signing up you agree to receive email newsletters or alerts from POLITICO. You can unsubscribe at any time.

Meadows said it helps the tax reform math to leave out full expensing if the tax on imports, known as a border adjustment, is also jettisoned. House GOP leaders are counting on border adjustment which would also make exports tax-free in a bid to bolster domestic production to generate more than $1 trillion over 10 years to help keep tax cuts from blowing a hole in the federal budget.

But the idea has split business leaders, with import-heavy companies like retailers fiercely opposing it and exporters pushing for it. It has also caused fissures within the congressional GOP Meadows estimated 75-80 House Republicans oppose it, along with up to half of Senate Republicans.

Meadows said adding in changes to the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, or food stamps, and TANF would provide another $400 billion over 10 years, Meadows said.

Such additions and subtractions are aimed at a Freedom Caucus package that includes a corporate tax rate of 20 percent and an equal or just slightly higher rate on unincorporated businesses known as pass-throughs, Meadows said.

House Speaker Paul Ryan (R-Wis.) has pushed for a 20 percent corporate rate and 25 percent for pass-throughs. President Donald Trump has proposed a single 15 percent tax on all business income.

How do we get to a 20 percent corporate and make sure theres a pass-through to LLCs and sole proprietorships and at the same time making sure that its not just a corporate tax cut but we actually make it fundamentally better for the person on Main Street? Meadows said. We believe it has to have both components.

For similar reasons, Freedom Caucus members dont want to alter the mortgage interest deduction, said Meadows. It could have too much impact on consumption in the U.S. economy, he said. (Congressional leaders and the Trump administration have also kept the mortgage deduction off limits.)

Were trying to look at how to make it better for consumers, not worse, so we really havent looked at that at all, Meadows said.

The caucus is trying to push the envelope on tax reform sooner rather than later.

Time is of the essence, Meadows said, who in recent days called for canceling the annual August recess for Congress in order to advance tax reform. Tax writers need to drop the discussion of border adjustment, he said, adding that White House officials have drawn the same conclusion.

Ryan and House Ways and Means Committee Chairman Kevin Brady (R-Texas) have yet to back off the idea, though. While the Freedom Caucus hasn't taken an official position on border adjustments, Meadows said the entire GOP conference needs to arrive at some type of an agreement on whats going to be included in a tax package and whats going to fall by the wayside.

Its important that we start discussing principles and concepts that need to be in place so that we act in the next few weeks, not the next few months, at least on starting the ball rolling with legislative text where we can all start to review it, Meadows said.

The Freedom Caucus had a hand in reshaping health care overhaul legislation that ultimately passed the House after weeks of fits and starts. The caucus, which Meadows said counts 36 members, wants to influence tax reform at an earlier stage in the debate, he has said.

To get tax reform, Republicans need to reach a budget agreement among various moderate and conservative factions on spending levels, Meadows said, pointing to a budget maneuver known as reconciliation that would let Republicans get around a Democratic filibuster in the Senate.

We do have a seat at the table, he said. Probably the biggest leverage has nothing to do with tax reform. It has more to do with the budget and budget reconciliation.

Missing out on the latest scoops? Sign up for POLITICO Playbook and get the latest news, every morning in your inbox.

Read the original:

House Freedom Caucus ties food stamp, TANF changes to tax reform - Politico

Trump Brings Out the Bible for Faith and Freedom – BillMoyers.com

With the countrys eyes on Comey, Trump enlists evangelicals to push Senate on health bill and says he'll prevail, as the Bible says.

Ralph Reed, founder of the Faith and Freedom Coalition, listens to remarks at the National Prayer Breakfast, where President Donald Trump spoke on Feb. 2, 2017. (Photo by Win McNamee/Getty Images)

As Washington sat transfixed before the image of former FBI Director James Comey spilling some beans on the president of the United States, Donald J. Trump went to work. An expert in creating crises, Trump is not the kind to let his handiwork go to waste.

At a conference of mostly evangelical Christians convened in Washington, DC, by Republican political operative Ralph Reed, Trump reminded attendees of the Faith and Freedom Coalitions annual Road to Majority conference of their agenda and his. If he made any reference to the drama unfolding before the Senate Intelligence Committee, it was this: As you know, were under siege; you understand that, the president said. But we will come out bigger, better and stronger than ever you watch.

BY Adele Stan | February 2, 2017

Expressing his appreciation to members of the Faith and Freedom Coalition for their work on his behalf during the 2016 presidential race, Trump cited some 22 million pieces of mail sent, 16 million videos shared, 10 million phone calls made and 1.2 million doors knocked on in the key battleground states. He quoted the Book of Isaiah from the teleprompter.

He went on to recount what he had already delivered for his religious supporters: a drastic reduction in illegal crossings on the southern border; the appointment of Neil Gorsuch, a foe of abortion rights, to the Supreme Court; an executive action on religious freedom, a withdrawal of aid to overseas humanitarian groups that dare to speak of abortion, and withdrawal from the Paris climate accord. That last one elicited a raucous and sustained cheer from the assembled, seeing as how its very name combines two mutually repugnant ideas: the fact of climate change and a city in which people speak French.

Without naming it as such, Trump noted the leaked draft of a rule revision, dated May 27, under consideration at the Department of Health and Human Services that would appear to definitively permit religious orders that run hospitals and social service agencies to flout the current mandate that employer-provided health insurance include coverage for prescription contraceptives. The Little Sisters of the Poor, Trump said, referring to a Catholic religious order that brought a lawsuit against the Obama administration that challenged the mandate, had just won big with his executive actions on behalf of religious freedom. The president pointed at two nuns in the audience. Stand up, he instructed them. You dont mess with the Little Sisters, he quipped. Never mind that the nuns obediently standing were from an entirely different order (the Dominican Sisters of Mary, Mother of the Eucharist); they were old women in habits. They would do. The optics worked.

BY Theo Anderson | April 20, 2017

He went on at length to describe his instruction to the IRS to refrain from investigating houses of worship for political activity that would threaten their non-profit status as an unleashing of free speech from the pulpits of the nation.

The audience then received an accounting of the agenda yet to be undertaken the part that requires legislation by Congress. Trump came to Road to Majority to set its army of socially conservative, mostly white churchgoers to work on Capitol Hill, lobbying senators and members of the House, as many groups do during national conference. But few get their marching orders directly from the president, even if not said in so many words.

First on the presidents list was the health care bill that is currently stalled in the Senate.

Restoring freedom and opportunity also means repealing and replacing the disaster known as He put his hand to is ear.

Obamacare! the crowd shouted.

That was easy, Trump replied. Something I hope great is going to come out through [Majority Leader] Mitch McConnell in the Senate.

The next big item was tax reform the biggest tax cut ever, he said. But sadly, Trump added, they would have to pass each of these measures without a single Democratic vote, because Democrats are obstructionists who are bad, right now, for the country.

The entrenched interests and failed bitter voices in Washington will do everything in their power to try and stop us from this righteous cause to try to stop all of you, Trump said. They will lie, they will obstruct, they will spread their hatred and their prejudice, but we will not back down from doing what is right. Because, as the Bible tells us, we know that the truth will prevail, that Gods glorious wisdom will shine through, and that the good and decent people of this country will get the change they voted for, and that they so richly deserve.

He patted himself on the back for deporting people he deemed gang members and drug dealers, and characterized his summit with Saudi leaders as a blow against global terrorism.

As the Bible tells us, we know that the truth will prevail, that Gods glorious wisdom will shine through, and that the good and decent people of this country will get the change they voted for, and that they so richly deserve.

He made a call for unity, noting that whether we are black, brown or white, we all bleed the same red blood.

In America, he said, we dont worship government; we worship God.

The speech, delivered at the conference luncheon, was well-received. Afterward, attendees boarded busses headed for the Capitol the Senates Dirksen Office Building, to be exact. There they would be treated to a town hall-style meeting with McConnell, House Speaker Paul Ryan and presidential counselor Kellyanne Conway, House Majority Leader Kevin McCarthy and other Republican lawmakers. The meeting was closed to the press.

Once it concluded, members of the group would lobby the senators from their respective states.

Milling outside the hearing room where the town hall would take place, Rebecca Clutter, a woman who looked to be in her 50s or 60s, offered her assessment of the presidents speech. [I]t was amazing and awesome and it hit all the points, said Clutter, who had traveled to Washington from Ohio, where she had knocked on doors during the campaign under the aegis of Women for Trump.

Casey Matta, a student at Liberty University in Lynchburg, Virginia, also loved the presidents speech, naming as his favorite points Trumps anti-abortion rhetoric and something about the Paris [climate accord].

Asked how the US withdrawal from the climate accord agreement fit in with the religious purpose of the Faith and Freedom Coalition event, Matta thought a minute. Well, I think its like a Republican religious convention so when he brings that kind of stuff for conservatives I agree with that.

What did he make of the probe of Russian meddling in the US election, and contacts between Trump campaign figures and Russian officials? Matta said he didnt believe that Russia had intervened in the election. By his lights, it was all a put-up job by Democrats.

I think [Trump] definitely is being targeted, with the Democrats and everything. I mean, they need to cool it, he said. Give him some time to worry about what hes got to worry about now.

Right now, Trump is worrying about, among other things, getting a legislative win. And Casey Matta, Rebecca Clutter, and hundreds of others came to the nations capital to help him get it, all in the name of God.

Follow this link:

Trump Brings Out the Bible for Faith and Freedom - BillMoyers.com

Tax Freedom Day is finally here, think-tank says – CTV News

Meredith MacLeod, CTVNews.ca Published Friday, June 9, 2017 12:16PM EDT Last Updated Friday, June 9, 2017 12:32PM EDT

Perhaps you feel unshackled today?

Aside from being a Friday on the cusp of summer, this Friday, June 9 is special because it is Tax Freedom Day, says the Vancouver-based Fraser Institute.

This is the day average Canadians officially start working to bring home the bacon to their own larders, rather than turning it over to tax collectors, according to the think-tank.

Tax Freedom Day is highly dependent on the province in which you live because provincial tax rates vary a great deal. The earliest comes in Alberta on May 21 and the latest in Newfoundland and Labrador on June 25.

The Fraser Institute has a tax freedom calculator that takes into account the province you live in, family status and income.

The average Canadian family (of two or more people) will earn $108,674 in income in 2017 and pay a total of $47,135 in taxes, says the Fraser Institute, based on models created from data from Statistics Canada and the Canada Revenue Agency. That translates to 43.4 per cent paid out in taxes of kinds income, property, fuel, sales, health, carbon, sin and a range of hidden taxes. If all that tax had to be paid up front, it would leave the average Canadian family paying every dollar earned until June 8 to local, provincial and federal taxes.

It's difficult for average Canadians to add up all the taxes they pay in a year because the different levels of government levy such a wide range of taxes, and thats why we do these calculations to give Canadians a better understanding of exactly how much they pay to government, said Charles Lammam, director of fiscal studies at the Fraser Institute, in a news release.

Tax Freedom Day helps put the total tax burden into perspective, and helps Canadians understand just how much of their money they pay in taxes every year.

A day later in 2017

This years national tax freedom celebration comes a day later than it did in 2016 because the average tax bill is expected to increase faster (at 2.4 per cent) than growth in income (2.2 per cent).

Canadas Tax Freedom Day has been as late as June 25 in 2000, according to the right-leaning Fraser Institute. In 1961, it was May 3 (thats the first time the calculation was made) and in 1981, it was May 30.

Pattie Lovett-Reid, chief financial commentator for CTV News, says there is disagreement about the Fraser Institutes calculation. The left-leaning Broadbent Institute in Ottawa, for instance, says its inflated and that only two per cent of working Canadians pay more than 30 per cent in income taxes and that the effective tax rate for the typical Canadian family is more like 24 per cent.

Bottom line is death, taxes, those are the only certainties we know for sure and taxes get paid because they go into healthcare, infrastructure and different programs, she told BNN Friday.

The Fraser Institute says its tax freedom calculation is not intended to question the value Canadians get for their taxes but to look at the price paid for a product government."

"Tax Freedom Day is not a reflection of the quality of the product, how much of it each of us receives, or whether we get our money's worth. These are questions only each of us can answer for ourselves."

Forecasts indicate Canadians will pay, on average, $1,126 more in taxes this year, says the think-tank. Almost half of that ($542) is income taxes, while sales taxes will increase $311 and energy-related taxes will climb $204.

But, according to the report, "liquor, tobacco, amusement, and other excise taxes, payroll and health taxes, and import duties," all will decline.

The Fraser Institute also calculates what it calls the Balanced Budget Tax Freedom Day. That marks when tax freedom would arrive - June 18 this year - if governments had to increase taxes to balance budgets, rather than using deficits to cover spending.

Read the full Tax Freedom Day report here.

More here:

Tax Freedom Day is finally here, think-tank says - CTV News

Freedom Plan gets load of criticism, some support at hearing – Carroll County Times

More than 100 people came out to Liberty High School on Thursday evening for the first of two public hearings on the Freedom Plan. More than 30 of those took to one of two microphones in order to read their comments into the official public record.

The majority of those comments were negative in some fashion, criticizing either certain components in the proposed plan, its overall theme or the process by which it had been drafted through the Carroll County planning commission.

"I don't believe this plan promotes a balance of environmental resources it seems biased towards business development," one woman told the planning commission, which was there to listen to comments but did not respond. "We do not need another grocery store or nail salon."

The Freedom Plan creates a guide for future long-term growth in the South Carroll area, in terms of roads, resources and future land use designations, which can then guide future zoning changes. State guidelines require the plan be updated every 10 years, but the Freedom Plan was last updated in 2001 the planning commission spent the past year drafting a new plan, which it accepted in April.

After a second public hearing on Tuesday, June 20, the planning commission will vote and could then approve the plan, which would send it to the County Board of Commissioners for another round of discussion. The commissioners can then reject the plan outright, alter it in some fashion or vote to adopt the plan, which would then be implemented.

Many of those who spoke were concerned about future land use designations for three properties the Wolf, Beatty and Gibson parcels from agricultural, industrial or low-density residential to medium density residential and how those potential additional homes could impact the community. They hoped the commission might take their comments and make changes to the plan before voting to approve it.

Patricia Dorsey, who lives along Md. 32, said she already has to time her walks with her dog around peak traffic times, and worries about how many more homes could lead to even worse traffic. She noted that she has been around long enough that it is not change alone, but the impact of certain changes, that concern her.

"I've lived here since 1976, even before Carrolltowne Mall was here," she said "I have seen a lot of changes."

Traffic was also a concern for George Gray, who lives on Monroe Avenue. He noted that traffic on Md. 32 and Md. 26 were already bad when he first moved to the area 17 years ago, but that the neighborhoods had always been quiet and safe. He worried that some proposed road changes could funnel much more traffic off of Md. 32 and into those same neighborhoods.

But Gray also noted that he had been to many such meetings and heard many of the same comments he was hearing from speakers Thursday.

"You are listening to us, but I am not sure there are a lot of changes being made," he said.

There were some speakers who voiced their support for the plan. Some, like Michael Reeves, were associated with developers he said he was with Williams Quarters LLC.

"I believe it's a good plan," Reeves told those assembled. "I have petitions from other citizens and business that support the plan, and depend on growth to survive."

Reeves passed his petition to the planning commission and also stated that he believed the number of houses some speakers believed would be built on the Wolf, Gibson and Beatty properties if the plan passed, were not realistic.

"The density of 900 units on those three properties can't physically fit," he said.

One of the last people to speak was Heidi Beatty Condon, one-fourth owner of the Beatty property, who spoke of property rights while also acknowledging she was grieving for her father, who had held the property since 1958 and had recently died.

"I know a lot of people are upset because you are not going to have a farm in your backyard anymore and I get that, but it doesn't give you the right to ask that park be built there. You think that doesn't devalue the property for the property owner?" she asked.

"I hear a lot of people wanting to say what happens to other people's property. Well, maybe you should pull your money together and buy it."

jon.kelvey@carrollcountytimes.com

410-857-3317

twitter.com/CCT_Health

What: Last public hearing on the Freedom Plan

When: 8:30 to 9 a.m. Tuesday, June 20, Last call for written comment is 9 a.m.

Where: Reagan Room of the Carroll County Office Building, 225 N. Center St., Westminster.

More here:

Freedom Plan gets load of criticism, some support at hearing - Carroll County Times

Is there freedom in Orange Is The New Black’s riot? – A.V. Club

Welcome to The A.V. Clubs coverage of Orange Is The New Black season five. These reviews and their comment sections are intended for those who have seen up to this episodeplease refrain from revealing or discussing events from future episodes in the comments.

At the end of season three, as the inmates piled through the open fence to the lake, few understood it as freedom. It was a fleeting moment of opportunity, which most inmates understood was going to be short-lived. No one tried to escape other than Maureen and Suzanne, whose efforts were short-lived once Maureen discovered that freedom didnt suit Suzanne. Everyone else just filed back into the prison, not realizing that their world had been turned upside down by the arrival of new inmates while they were gone.

I return to this moment now because the riot was, at least as first, a similar moment of freedom. The structure of the prison disappeared, and restrictions that once kept them from roaming the halls or exploring the grounds were gone overnight. The difference was that there is no clear agreement on when this particular freedom should end, or what exactly constitutes freedom in this environment. For some, freedom means justice; for others, justice is standing in the way of how they would choose to use their freedom. And in the end, no one is really free as long as their lives are held as collateral for a private prison system, and as a renegade guard acts out an absurd horror movie revenge fantasy for no discernible reason.

The Tightening is invested in this question of freedom on a few levels, utilizing a flashback to Reds final months in the Soviet Union in 1977 to think about what it really means to be free. She is a meek factory worker who gets dragged to a college party where young students wear blue jeans and listen to rock music. She gets swept up in it, believing that the business of smuggling blue jeans into the Soviet Union was a way to encourage real and legitimate change among a younger generation. But then she sees the barriers to freedom: people like her boyfriend, who wilts at the first sign of a crackdown, opting to go into hiding instead of protesting when their salespeople start disappearing. When milquetoast Dmitri approaches Red with the possibility of escaping to America, she realizes that freedom is not about rock music or blue jeans: its about commitment to finding a way to break down orif that proves too difficultescape the system that is oppressing you.

The flashback serves as a basic origin story for Reds belief system in an episode where she is convinced Piscatella is in the prison but reads as a drugged-up crazy person to everyone around her. But more than that, its also the story of someone who has the appearance of freedom but is not in fact free, and who must understand her personal meaning of freedom in order to find her true self. She says in the flashback that she doesnt have a choice about working in the factory, but it would be wrong to call her a prisoner: her freedom is simply constricted by the social structure around her. And the state of the riot has the inmates in a similarly complicated position: they have more choice than theyve ever had before, but they are still prisoners, and struggling with how precisely to explore these new freedoms while unable to make truly independent choices. They are trying to do what Red advised, protesting and fighting for their rights, but how much faith should they have in the system? And, more importantly, how many people will value their self-interest over that of the group?

That is the situation Gloria finds herself in when she gets on the phone with MCC and is told she can visit her son in the ICU if she releases the hostages. Its a somewhat frustratingly simple storyline: Gloria has been suddenly placed into a compromised emotional state, is given a tempting offer with no guarantee of follow-through, and then seems willing to sacrifice the entire negotiations as a result. I buy that Gloria might feel that way, but its frustrating from a narrative perspective to see a situation out of left field dramatically change her character arc so quickly. It gets across the point that they have newfound access to the outside world, which will influence their decision-making, but there is a suddenness to the whole situation that strikes me as hollow when taking the entire seasons arc into account.

Im more interested in the notion of freedom being prescribed by Lorna Morello, who is exhibiting her right to live in her own fantasy. Its still possible shes actually pregnant, but Lorna doesnt actually want to take a test: she actually hides them from sight as she dispenses medication. Instead, she goes and visits Suzanne, who spends the episode tied up in her bunk after Leanne and Angie commit a hate crime by putting her in white face with baby powder. When she gets there, though, she decides that part of their freedom is freedom from the definition of normal forced onto them by doctors, convincing Suzanne not to take her medication. And while I am in full support of both Lorna and Suzanne in terms of treating them as something other than just crazy, there is an argument to be made for freedom within limits, rather than the anarchy of Suzanne without any medication at all. But at a time when the inmates are able to define their own sense of freedom, these types of decisions will become more common, and create even more chaos as the riot reaches its climax.

The actual negotiations get almost nowhere: they cover a single issue, the education program, parsing out the chain gang from season four which gets complicated by Black Cindy blabbing about the dead guard in the garden and requires Caputo to come in as an extra negotiator to help plead the inmates case. They dont even resolve the issue: as Linda from Purchasing notes in failing to fit in with the inmates, MCC would sue the state for breach of contract if they tried to raise the budget for the prison, meaning that there might not actually be any justice to be found at the end of this process. Taystee is working hard to make this negotiation happen, but the definition of freedom within limits that the inmates are seeking requires a level of investment that MCC is never going to willingly make.

The one variable, though, is the liability problems created by Piscatellas one-man horror show. Its a storyline that fundamentally bothered me: yes, I appreciated the play on the different horror tropes as the story progressed on some level, but at its core the horror homage makes light of a situation that I find fundamentally absurd in its violence. My whole issue with Piscatella last season was that he was a one-dimensional villain that had no clear motivation for his cruelty, so to reframe him as a literal monster and turn it into an horror homage only steered into the skid with the characters problems. Nothing the show has done this season has given us any additional context into who he is, and so giving in so wholly to Reds conception of him felt like the show abandoning the grounded realism that started this riot for a sensationalist turn. Its a freedom that the chaos of the riot gives the showwe saw similar horror aesthetics during the previous night with Judy Kingin terms of formal experimentation, but story wise for me the escalation was too sudden and too rooted in a troublingly thin character.

What it does do, though, is immediately raise the stakes: although you could argue that the guards have been in mortal danger throughout the riot, this is the first time where you feel like things could go very wrong very quickly. The clock is ticking on the feeling of freedom within this riot, and now its time to figure out what kind of world theyre going to return to when its all over.

Next episode Orange Is The New Black refuses to add dimension to its worst villain

Continued here:

Is there freedom in Orange Is The New Black's riot? - A.V. Club

Watch live: Trump delivers remarks at Faith and Freedom Coalition conference – Los Angeles Times


Los Angeles Times
Watch live: Trump delivers remarks at Faith and Freedom Coalition conference
Los Angeles Times
Red state, blue state. Rural, citified. Black, white. Deep-breathing in a yoga pose, or slowly sipping an eye-opening Bloody Mary at a corner tavern. James B. Comey, the former FBI director-turned-Trump-tormenter, caused millions of Americans to halt ...
'I Was Right': As Trump Watches Comey on TV, Anxiety Yields to ReliefNew York Times
Unusually demure Trump quotes Bible as Comey hearing grips nationNew York Daily News
Trump To Address 'Faith And Freedom' Convention While Comey TestifiesWestern Journalism

all 10,138 news articles »

Link:

Watch live: Trump delivers remarks at Faith and Freedom Coalition conference - Los Angeles Times

The Nobel Prize Sperm Bank Was Racist. It Also Helped Change the Fertility Industry – Smithsonian

The sperm in the Repository for Germinal Choice was intended to create ideal children, but for some prospective parents, it just offered them control over the process of having a child.

smithsonian.com June 9, 2017 6:00AM

Robert Klark Graham made millions with shatterproof lenses for eyeglasses and contact lenses. But he didnt stop there.

Graham, born on thisday in 1906, went on to foundthe Repository for Germinal Choice, a sperm bank that was supposed to produce "super-kids" from the sperm of (white) high achievers, like Nobel Prize winners. This unprecedented attempt at controlling reproduction was quickly shunned by the broader public, but it helped to change the business of sperm donation in ways that continue to raise questions.

The Repository was opened in 1979 in Escondido, California, according to Lawrence Van Gelder for The New York Times. Among Grahams donors were three Nobel laureates. In fact, Nobel Prize sperm bank was the nickname that the initiative quickly gained in the press, according to David Plotz, writing inSlate. Ironic, considering that Graham himself walked away with a 1991 Ig Nobel for the repository.

After Graham tried to sell the press on his idea in 1980, Plotz writes, two of the laureates quickly backed out. Many saidwith reasonthat Grahams theories about to create "ideal" children seemed a lot like the eugenics movement of the early twentieth century that eventually shaped Nazism. All his donors were white and had to be married heterosexuals, among other criteria, and the bank would only supply sperm to women who were the same. In theory, Graham said, the bank would producechildren that were allwhite, intelligent, neurotypical and physically conforming to one ideal aesthetic.

William B. Shockley, the inventor of the transistor and recipient of the 1956 Nobel Prize in Physics, was the only one to publically admit to being in the Repository, although Plotz writes that he never donated again. Shockleys longstanding reputation for racism and espousing evolutionary pseudo-theories that strayed far outside his area of expertise helped to discredit the bank.

Over time, Graham downgraded his promises from Nobel-winning sperm, wrote Tom Gorman for the Los Angeles Times in 1992, a decade after the first Repository baby was born. No women ever chose a Nobel laureate's spermthe men were probably too old anyway, Graham rationalized laterand today there is no Nobel sperm in the bank, he wrote.

Although Grahams approach was quickly discredited, writes Plotz in a different article for The Guardian, some would-be parents still sought out Graham and his vials of so-called genius sperm. 218 children in all were born of sperm from the bank.

But the bank also had a wider influence on the fertility business itself, Plotz writes. Even for people who would find the ideals espoused by someone like Shockley morally repugnant, the prospect of having some control over the process of choosing a genetic parent for their child appealed to parents, he writes. Before Grahams sperm bank, receiving donor sperm was an anonymous experience that was entirely controlled by a physician. Parents knew little more than the eye color of their donor. Graham offered some parents an opportunity to feel safer about their choice of genetic material.

Today, sperm banks are more like Grahams approach than the previous one, and they offer significant donor details to prospective parents. The lure of choice is one of the marketing strategies of sperm banks, which are, after all, businesses. But the question of whether sperm banks are engaging in eugenics on some level has never really gone away.

Offering parents the chance to select for everything from health to intelligence means that sperm banks are still trying to make ideal children, writes George Dvorsky for Gizmodo. Its narrowing humanity at a time when were starting to accept many aspects of diversity, bioethicist Kerry Bowman told Dvorsky. For instance,creativity has a high association with some of the things banned by sperm banks, such as dyslexia.

Like this article? SIGN UP for our newsletter

See original here:

The Nobel Prize Sperm Bank Was Racist. It Also Helped Change the Fertility Industry - Smithsonian

Paleontologists discover lost ecosystem off the coast of southern California – Treehugger

The ecosystem had thrived for thousands of years but collapsed less than two centuries ago. The seabed off the coast of southern California is one of the most studied areas in the world, characterized by its high biodiversity and by its important roles in biogeochemical cycling and commercial fishing. Today, this seabed consists of soft sediments and is inhabited by mollusks, crustaceans, worms, and urchins that feed on organic matter. However, this was not always the case.

Paleontologists Susan Kidwell of the University of Chicago and Adam Tomaovch of the Slovak Academy of Sciences recently discovered a lost ecosystem off the coast of Southern California that once stretched for nearly 250 miles from San Diego to Santa Barbara. Kidwell and Tomaovch noticed an abundance of dead shells from scallops and marine organisms called brachiopods in the muddy California seabed and began examining the remains. Using geologic methods that Kidwell had developed since the 2000s, the researchers discovered that the now-muddy seabed was once decorated with shell-gravel habitats that housed these scallops and brachiopods for at least 4,000 years.

Kidwell and Tomaovch analyzed 190 shells using a molecular dating technique known as amino acid racemization. They found that all of the shells were older than 100 years and that most were over 200 years old. No similar shells have been produced in the region within the past century, indicating that the sea creatures died off recently and relatively quickly.

Scallops and brachiopods prefer colder waters than those found off the coast of southern California, but Kidwell and Tomaovch do not consider climate change to be a likely cause of the ecosystems collapse. Instead, they argue that the main culprit is siltation, the pollution of water by fine sediments such as silt.

In 1796, Spanish missionaries introduced livestock such as cattle and sheep to southern California. For the next century, the regions economy was dominated by cattle production, subjecting the land to unmanaged, open-range grazing. The researchers believe that siltation resulting from this unmanaged grazing altered the ecosystem in the coastal seabed during the 1800s, leading to the decline and eventual collapse of scallop and brachiopod populations.

This loss unfolded during the 19th century, Kidwell explained, Thus well before urbanization and climate warming. The disappearance of these abundant filter-feeding animals coincided with the rise of lifestock and cultivation in coastal lands, which increased silt deposition on the continental shelf, far beyond the lake and nearshore settings where we would expect this stress to have an impact.

Kidwell and Tomaovch published their findings online in the journal Royal Society Proceedings B, arguing that more research is needed to fully understand the ecological consequences of coastal land use and siltation.

Originally posted here:

Paleontologists discover lost ecosystem off the coast of southern California - Treehugger

Baidu’s Case for an AI Ecosystem – Wall Street Journal (subscription)

6/9/2017 5:14AM Recommended for you Film Clip: 'My Cousin Rachel' 6/7/2017 11:56AM Film Clip: 'The Mummy' 6/7/2017 11:50AM Film Clip: 'It Comes at Night' 6/7/2017 1:54PM Copycats of Chinese Tech Pop Up in U.S. 6/9/2017 1:03AM Opinion Journal: Comey Hearing: Not Good for Comey 6/8/2017 3:29PM Opinion Journal: Trumps Choice: Chaos or Success 6/8/2017 3:21PM Trump's Attorney Disputes Comey's Testimony Claims 6/8/2017 3:56PM Republicans Question to Comey Yields Tough News for Trump 6/8/2017 7:40PM Trumps Tweets Considered Official Statements Says Spicer 6/6/2017 7:17PM Comey Hearing in Two Minutes 6/8/2017 3:18PM Opinion Journal: When Is 'Unmasking' Legal? 6/8/2017 3:24PM Trump's Attorney Disputes Comey's Testimony Claims 6/8/2017 3:56PM

President Donald Trump's attorney Marc Kasowitz in a statement Thursday disputed former FBI Director James Comey's testimony that the president had indicated he wanted the FBI to back off its investigation of Flynn. Photo: AFP/Getty

Even as Islamic State is destroying antiquities in Syria, the militant group is also shipping them -- to intermediaries working with buyers in Europe and the U.S. The Wall Street Journal reveals a pattern of plunder that takes priceless relics from the battlegrounds of Syria to art traders in the West.

More U.S. tech companies including Apple and a startup called LimeBike are providing services, such as mobile wallets and bike-sharing apps, that imitate those offered by Chinese rivals, says venture capitalist Connie Chan at the WSJ D.Live Asia conference.

Watch highlights from former FBI Director James Comey's testimony before the Senate Intelligence Committee. Photo: Getty

President Donald Trump's attorney Marc Kasowitz in a statement Thursday disputed former FBI Director James Comey's testimony that the president had indicated he wanted the FBI to back off its investigation of Flynn. Photo: AFP/Getty

In a 2.5-hour keynote, Apple announced a slew of new hardware and software products. WSJ's Joanna Stern recaps what you need to know about the most important announcements.

Jessica and Cem Savas's London home includes partial walls and open bookcases to separate rooms. Floor-to-ceiling glass doors lead to the yard, which includes a vegetable garden and seating areas. Photo: Dylan Thomas for The Wall Street Journal

Tesla CEO Elon Musk outlines bold ambitions as the company's market value races past GM and Ford.

Read the original:

Baidu's Case for an AI Ecosystem - Wall Street Journal (subscription)

Life aloft: The unexplored ecosystem above your head – New Scientist

Petri Artturi Asikainen/Getty

By Lesley Evans Ogden

THE Federal Bureau of Investigation has a spectacular view of the city skyline from its Chicago office tower. But when special agent Julia Meredith arrived at work one Monday morning, her eyes were focused firmly on the ground. Thats where the bodies were more than 10 of them.

Some of the dead were Blackburnian warblers, birds with bright yellow and orange plumage that are rarely seen in the city. They had been on their way to their wintering grounds in South America when they had collided with the buildings glass facade. They had come all this way and here they were, dead, says Meredith.

Its not an isolated incident. Just last month, 395 migrating birds were killed in one building strike in Galveston, Texas. The world over, wherever humans are extending their buildings, machines and light into the sky, the lives of aerial creatures are at increasing risk. We dont have very accurate figures, but in the US, casualties are thought to run into the hundreds of millions every year. Yet while efforts to protect areas on land and in water have accelerated since the 1970s, the sky has been almost entirely ignored.

That could be about to change if a new wave of conservationists have their way. They want to reclaim the air for its inhabitants, creating protected areas that extend into the sky and designing buildings to avoid death. If this noble aim is to succeed, however, we must first address a more fundamental question: what exactly is it that we are

More here:

Life aloft: The unexplored ecosystem above your head - New Scientist

Women’s clothing brand cancels sponsorship with ‘Cyborg’ after Magana incident – Bloody Elbow

After lashing out at Angela Magana at last month's UFC Athlete Retreat, women's clothing company GRRRL has cancelled its sponsorship deal with Cris Cyborg

Cyborg, real name Cristinane Justino, was antagonized on social media by 'Your Majesty' and decided to hit the UFC strawweight contender after confronting her face to face.

'Don't talk sh-t', Justino said after hitting Magana at the Las Vegas retreat.

GRRRL released a public statement on its website, claiming that they no longer wish to represent Cyborg after her misconduct at the fighter summit.

Unfortunately, within a matter of hours of appearing and speaking at our event, Cris was involved in battery of another fighter on the street outside a UFC retreat, the statement read (h/t Marc Raimondi of MMA Fighting). Criss conduct in this regard has broadly been condemned by the fight industry and the organization by whom she is contracted as a fighter.

As a company with representation and brand ambassadors amongst girls as young as 6, we cannot publically [sic] condone this behaviour especially as the behaviour is directly in conflict with the messages Cris shared at the event, one of our speakers on cyber bullying and our company message to promote female harmony and unity.

Justino was originally signed to a 12-month contract but GRRRL says her behaviour does not align with the company's values.

This conduct has the potential to diminish the tireless work by our amazing network of women throughout the world to support female harmony and unity. As a consequence of these matters, it is with regret that our sponsorship of Cris has come to an end.

Shortly after the incident, Magana claimed to have filed charges for assault, posting on social media that the "criminal [Cyborg] is getting arrested soon." The Las Vegas police department cited Justino for battery and is currently deciding whether or not to press charges.

Cyborg, 31, responded to GRRRL on Thursday, claiming that the sports clothing company terminated her contract because they owe her $7,500 for a public appearance at a 'swingers hotel'.

My public appearance fee was 7500$ they don't have the money to pay this and are looking for excuses after the event wasn't profitable pic.twitter.com/SBnCvJgkW2

The meet and greet was at a swingers hotel and after weeks of advertising me for a speaking engagement they sold tixs and I did they dnt pay

Despite her recent troubles, the UFC are still looking to book Cyborg for the UFC 214 pay-per-view against an undisclosed opponent on July 29.

Read the original here:

Women's clothing brand cancels sponsorship with 'Cyborg' after Magana incident - Bloody Elbow

Cris Cyborg claims sponsor cut her after Angela Magana incident as excuse to not pay money owed to her – MMAmania.com

The fallout from the ugly incident between Cris Cyborg and Angela Magana that saw the fearsome Striker deck Your Majesty right on the mouth during a recent UFC Athlete Retreat in Las Vegas, Nevada (see it) is still going strong.

Unfortunately, this time it will hit Cyborg right in her pocket as GRRRL, one of her sponsors, severed all ties with the fearsome striker due to the fact that the incident violated terms of her contract.

From the statement (via MMA Fighting).

In response to criticism of GRRRL in respect of our recent dealings with Cris Cyborg, we consider it is necessary to present the background to what SHOULD have remained a private matter in respect of our commercial sponsorship of Cris. A little over a month ago we entered into a 12 month sponsorship agreement with Cris, to cover a personal appearance at our GRRRL:Live event in Las Vegas combined with an ongoing 12 month commitment through Criss social media channels. Unfortunately, within a matter of hours of appearing and speaking at our event, Cris was involved in battery of another fighter on the street outside a UFC retreat. Criss conduct in this regard has broadly been condemned by the fight industry and the organization by whom she is contracted as a fighter. As a company with representation and brand ambassadors amongst girls as young as 6, we cannot publically condone this behaviour especially as the behaviour is directly in conflict with the messages Cris shared at the event, one of our speakers on cyber bullying and our company message to promote female harmony and unity. This conduct has the potential to diminish the tireless work by our amazing network of women throughout the world to support female harmony and unity. As a consequence of these matters, it is with regret that our sponsorship of Cris has come to an end. We wish Cris well with her continued professional career. And every success in the future. We are unable to comment any further in respect of this matter as it is now being handled by our legal team.

According to Cyborg, however, her release is nothing but an attempt from the company to avoid having to pay her money still owed to her.

My public appearance fee was 7500$ they don't have the money to pay this and are looking for excuses after the event wasn't profitable pic.twitter.com/SBnCvJgkW2

The meet and greet was at a swingers hotel and after weeks of advertising me for a speaking engagement they sold tixs and I did they dnt pay

When it rains, it pours.

Still, Cris can find comfort in knowing that Ultimate Fighting Championship (UFC) is still in business with her, as company president Dana White recently stated that she would definitely be competing at the upcoming UFC 214 pay-per-view (PPV) event in Anaheim, California against an opponent to be named later.

Until then, it looks like Cris has yet another legal battle on her hands to take care of.

Read the original:

Cris Cyborg claims sponsor cut her after Angela Magana incident as excuse to not pay money owed to her - MMAmania.com

Cris Cyborg loses sponsorship over Angela Magana incident, says company still owes her money – MMA Fighting

Cris Cyborg is down a sponsor after a messy incident with a fellow UFC fighter last month, one she says has yet to pay her for an appearance.

GRRRL, a womens athletic clothing brand, has cancelled its sponsorship with Cyborg after Cyborg punched Angela Magana during the UFC Athlete Retreat, the company announced on its website.

Unfortunately, within a matter of hours of appearing and speaking at our event, Cris was involved in battery of another fighter on the street outside a UFC retreat, the statement read. Criss conduct in this regard has broadly been condemned by the fight industry and the organization by whom she is contracted as a fighter.

As a company with representation and brand ambassadors amongst girls as young as 6, we cannot publically [sic] condone this behaviour especially as the behaviour is directly in conflict with the messages Cris shared at the event, one of our speakers on cyber bullying and our company message to promote female harmony and unity.

The GRRRL statement read that it had signed up Cyborg for a 12-month deal, but could not continue on with it after the physical altercation.

This conduct has the potential to diminish the tireless work by our amazing network of women throughout the world to support female harmony and unity, the statement read. As a consequence of these matters, it is with regret that our sponsorship of Cris has come to an end.

Cyborg was cited for misdemeanor battery by the Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department. She has said that she confronted Magana after Magana bullied her down multiple times on social media, including making fun of her looks in a picture taken while she was visiting kids at a cancer hospital. Video of the incident emerged and it did appear Cyborg hit the strawweight fighter.

The Las Vegas city attorney is still determining whether or not to pursue charges in the case.

Cyborg wrote Thursday on social media that she did an appearance for GRRRL that weekend and has yet to be paid. She insinuated that the company is using the punching incident as an excuse not to pay her. Cyborg said she was supposed to receive $7,500 and GRRRL sold tickets to her speaking engagement.

My public appearance fee was 7500$ they don't have the money to pay this and are looking for excuses after the event wasn't profitable pic.twitter.com/SBnCvJgkW2

The meet and greet was at a swingers hotel and after weeks of advertising me for a speaking engagement they sold tixs and I did they dnt pay

Visit link:

Cris Cyborg loses sponsorship over Angela Magana incident, says company still owes her money - MMA Fighting

2 St. Pete beaches remain closed after high levels of fecal bacteria found in water – WFLA


WFLA
2 St. Pete beaches remain closed after high levels of fecal bacteria found in water
WFLA
ST. PETERSBURG, Fla. (WFLA) Two St. Petersburg beaches remain closed because of high levels of fecal bacteria, as we head into the weekend. On Friday, the City of St. Petersburg announced it had reopened Northshore Beach, which was one of 3 ...
3 St. Petersburg, Florida beaches closed after high levels of fecal bacteria found in waterNBC4i.com

all 2 news articles »

Read more from the original source:

2 St. Pete beaches remain closed after high levels of fecal bacteria found in water - WFLA

Health advisories issued for several St. Pete beaches – FOX 13 News, Tampa Bay

ST. PETE BEACH (FOX 13) - Health advisories have been issued for several St. Pete beaches after waterways were found to have poor water quality.

Tests of the waterat NothshoreBeach, Maximo Beach and LassingPark all showed elevated levels of Enterococcibacteria.

The City of St. Petersburg says no one should swim at these three locations until further testing shows a drop in bacteria levels.

The Department of Health says there is also an advisory for waters at Fort DeSoto's North Beach because of enterococci bacteria.

Another water sampling will be conducted June 12.

The city of St. Petersburg said it is also conducting enhanced weekly testing, in an effort to better inform and educate citizens. Public Works officials have expanded the regularly-scheduled testing of recreational waterways that may have been impacted by runoff from recent rains.

For more information about the testing and potential dangers from increased enterococci levels, visit http://www.stpete.org/water/waterquality.php.

Read the original here:

Health advisories issued for several St. Pete beaches - FOX 13 News, Tampa Bay

Rough surf prompts red flag warnings at Virginia and OBX beaches – wtkr.com


wtkr.com
Rough surf prompts red flag warnings at Virginia and OBX beaches
wtkr.com
VIRGINIA BEACH, Va. Red flags are up along beaches in Virginia and in the Outer Banks on Friday due to rough surf and the risk of dangerous rip currents. Tom Gill, Chief of the Virginia Beach Lifesaving Service, says red flags are up at the Virginia ...

and more »

Read more from the original source:

Rough surf prompts red flag warnings at Virginia and OBX beaches - wtkr.com