Behavioral 'Nudges' Offer a Cost-Effective Policy Tool – Harvard Business School

Governments around the world have increasingly turned to behavioral science to help address various policy problems new research shows that some of the best-known strategies derived from behavioral science, commonly referred to as nudges, may be extremely cost effective. The new study, which examined the cost-effectiveness of nudges and typical intervention strategies like financial incentives side-by-side, found that nudges often yield particularly high returns at a low cost when it comes to boosting retirement savings, college enrollment, energy conservation, and vaccination rates.

The findings are published in Psychological Science, a journal of the Association for Psychological Science.

The changes in behavior produced by nudges tend be quite cost effective relative to those produced by traditional policy tools so there is a big opportunity to use nudging more widely in government in conjunction with traditional policy tools, says Professor Katherine L. Milkman of The Wharton School at the University of Pennsylvania, one of the authors of the new study.

Our findings show that its important to calculate and report the cost effectiveness of available policy tools, and not simply the impact of an intervention without an adjustment for cost, adds study co-author Professor John Beshears of Harvard Business School. This will facilitate wiser decisions by governments and other organizations regarding which policy tools to use under various circumstances.

Nudges which are now being tested and implemented by government agencies in the United Kingdom, Australia, Germany, the Netherlands, Singapore, and the United States diverge from traditional policy tools in that they encourage certain behaviors without restricting an individuals options or exacting financial penalties.

Read more about the findings in Psychological Science.

See the original post here:
Behavioral 'Nudges' Offer a Cost-Effective Policy Tool - Harvard Business School

New report: Social, behavioral, and economic sciences contribute to advancing NSF mission – Phys.Org

June 9, 2017

The social, behavioral, and economic (SBE) sciences make significant contributions to the National Science Foundation's mission to advance health, prosperity and welfare, national defense, and progress in science, says a new report from the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. NSF should undertake a systematic and transparent strategic planning process that defines SBE research priorities, the required resources, and how success in addressing SBE priorities will be evaluated over time.

Although it is commendable that NSF consults with advisory groups and the broader scientific community to identify needs and opportunities in the SBE sciences, such as those outlined in its "Rebuilding the Mosaic" document, in the absence of a strategic plan, it is unclear how this input is combined and integrated in the agency's SBE research priorities.

"Nearly every major challenge the United States facesfrom alleviating unemployment to protecting itself from terrorismrequires understanding the causes and consequences of people's behavior," said Alan Leshner, chief executive officer emeritus, American Association for the Advancement of Science, and chair of the committee that conducted the study and wrote the report. "The diverse disciplines of the social, behavioral, and economic sciences produce fundamental knowledge and tools that provide a greater understanding of why people and societies respond the way they do, what they find important, and what they believe and valuewhich is critical for the country's well-being."

In addition, the understanding, tools, and methods provided by the SBE sciencesincluding research supported by the NSFprovide an essential foundation that helps other agencies achieve their missions, the report says. For example, NSF-supported research has provided valuable information about the patterns of behavior of hackers and the vulnerabilities of the nation's cyber networks. These analyses served as the foundation for the development of tools and applications that contribute to military capability in current conflicts and the prevention of future conflicts, as well as to efforts to combat terrorism, which are central to the missions of the U.S. Department of Defense, intelligence agencies, and the U.S. Department of Homeland Security.

The SBE sciences have also provided advances applicable to business and industry and enhanced the U.S. economy, the report says. For example, social science methods such as polling and forecasting are routinely used to inform consequential business decisions related to marketing, customer relations, and product development. In addition, the original version of the Google search engine resulted from a formula developed with NSF funding in the late 1990s. Researchers recognized that the decision to link pages to each other required conscious effort and the need to reflect human judgment about the significance of the link's destination, which led researchers to treat the collection of links as a network.

The NSF should continue to support the development of tools, methods, and research teams that can be used to advance the SBE sciences, facilitate interactions with other scientific fields, and help NSF and other agencies and organizations more effectively address important national needs. The report also includes recommendations for NSF to support training to prepare the next generation of scientists to be more data-intensive, interdisciplinary, and team-oriented, as well as to undertake more systematic efforts to communicate the results and value of the SBE research it supports and how NSF grants advance its mission.

The committee emphasized that it could not conduct an exhaustive review and analysis of all SBE research funded at the NSF in the time allotted, and as a result, the report does not claim that all SBE research serves the NSF mission or national needs.

Explore further: Federal agencies need to prepare for greater quantity, range of biotechnology products

Provided by: National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine

A profusion of biotechnology products is expected over the next five to 10 years, and the number and diversity of new products has the potential to overwhelm the U.S. regulatory system, says a new report from the National ...

The U.S. Global Change Research Program (USGCRP) has made significant accomplishments to advance the science of global environmental change and improve the understanding of its impact on society through activities such as ...

Convergent research which crosses disciplinary boundaries, integrating tools and knowledge from the life sciences, physical sciences, engineering, and other fieldscould spur innovation and help tackle societal challenges, ...

The Mathematical Sciences in 2025, a new report from the National Research Council, finds that the mathematical sciences are an increasingly integral component of many disciplinesincluding biology, medicine, the social ...

Despite broad understanding of volcanoes, our ability to predict the timing, duration, type, size, and consequences of volcanic eruptions is limited, says a new report by the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and ...

As the nation discusses repealing and replacing the Affordable Care Act, the National Academy of Medicine today released a publication on crosscutting priorities that provides a succinct blueprint to address challenges to ...

(Phys.org)Online chemistry journal Synlett, which is published by Thieme, has tested the idea of intelligent crowd reviewing of scientific papers. The project was the brainchild of Benjamin List, a journal editor (and ...

(Phys.org)The transition from breastfeeding to a nonmilk diet is a developmental milestone, influencing future health and survival of mammals, including humans. Breast milk is highly beneficial to infants, conferring easily ...

Archaeologists have found that a 20-foot high mound in Slough, thought to be a Norman castle motte and for centuries the centrepiece of a bizarre Eton College ceremony, is actually a rare Saxon monument, built 1,500 years ...

Whales rely on a keen sense of hearing for their underwater existence. But whales show surprisingly vast differences in hearing ability. Baleen whales tune into infrasonic soundsat frequencies too low for humans to hearto ...

A giant temple to the Aztec god of the wind and a court where the Aztecs played a deadly ball game have been discovered in the heart of Mexico City.

An international research team led by Jean-Jacques Hublin of the Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology (Leipzig, Germany) and Abdelouahed Ben-Ncer of the National Institute for Archaeology and Heritage (INSAP, ...

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Continue reading here:
New report: Social, behavioral, and economic sciences contribute to advancing NSF mission - Phys.Org

Real Estate Weekly: Digital Realty Becomes A Cloud Computing Giant – Seeking Alpha

Weekly Review

The REIT ETF indexes (VNQ and IYR) finished the week lower by 0.3% as the 10-year yield climbed 7bps following the UK elections. The S&P 500 (NYSEARCA:SPY) gained 0.3%. The homebuilder ETFs (XHB and ITB) were lower by 1.0% on the week. The commercial construction ETF (NYSEARCA:PKB) gained 0.2%.

(Hoya Capital Real Estate, Performance as of 12pm Friday)

Across other areas of the real estate sector, mortgage REITs (NYSEARCA:REM) finished the week higher by 0.5% and the international real estate ETF (NASDAQ:VNQI) declined 0.6%. The 10-Year Treasury yield (NYSEARCA:IEF) gained 7 bps on the week, recovering from YTD low yields earlier this week.

REITs are now higher by 0.8% YTD on a price-basis and higher by roughly 3% on a total-return basis. The sector divergences are quite significant: the Data Center sector has surged 24% while the retail-focused REITs have fallen double-digits. REITs ended 2016 with a total return of roughly 9%, lower than its 20-year average annual return of 12%.

REITWeek Recap

This week was NAREIT's annual REITWeek conference in New York City, the biggest industry conference of the year. We listened to about 25 presentations across all the major REIT sectors.

We came away with a slightly more positive outlook on the REIT sector as a whole. Retail REITs were unquestionably the major focus for many investors. The bifurcation between high-quality and low-quality retail space has intensified. High quality retail space in desirable locations continue to perform very well and, in many cases, the apparel downsizing has actually been a net positive as the vacated space has been put to more productive and higher-traffic uses. We detailed our judgments in "Short Squeeze May Send Mall REITs Surging."

We also published, "Obamacare Uncertainty Remains A Drag On Healthcare REITs," our update on the Healthcare REIT sector. We discussed that healthcare REITs have outperformed over the past quarter, but this outperformance is entirely attributable to plunging interest rates. Healthcare REITs are up 8% as the 10-year yield fell 45bps. Hospitals and skilled nursing REITs, the sub-sectors most exposed to changes in healthcare policy, continue to trade at substantial discounts as Obamacare crumbles and its replacement appears politically infeasible. While much of the media focus is on drug prices, labor costs are the true drivers of healthcare inflation. This is a structural allocation-of-resources issue within the American education system.

Finally, we also published our Net Lease update, "Retail Contagion Continues To Trouble Net Lease REITs" where we discussed that despite the significant decline in interest rates over the past quarter, net lease REITs have badly underperformed the broader REIT indexes, a worrying development for the sector. Net lease REITs are the most yield-sensitive REIT sector, but these REITs have not acted as bond-proxies so far this year. Investors have been rudely reminded of the significant retail exposures of these names. Credit issues with key tenants at Spirit Capital has dragged down the entire Net Lease sector. More than other REIT sectors, net lease REITs depend on their cost of capital advantage for acquisition-fueled growth. Spirit's credit issues may have meaningfully impaired the sector's competitive advantage.

Arguably the most significant piece of REIT news this week actually came after the conference, as Digital Realty (NYSE:DLR) announced a merger with DuPont Fabros (NYSE:DFT) to form a data center giant that appears more fortified to go head-to-head with the public cloud providers, Google (NASDAQ:GOOG) and Amazon (NASDAQ:AMZN). While demand has continued to be robust and outstripping supply, pricing power has been a concern among investors as companies have increasingly utilized public cloud solutions rather than using their own server racks in the data center. In many cases, both the public and private cloud are both located in these REIT data centers, but the rent per megawatt is lower when, for example, Amazon is the tenant rather than an individual mid-sized company. We think consolidation is the right move. We will write a full report on it early next week.

The six best performing REITs on the week were Dupont Fabros , LaSalle Hotels (NYSE:LHO), Diamondrock (NYSE:DRH), Pebblebrook (NYSE:PEB), Sunstone (NYSE:SHO), and CoreSite (NYSE:COR).

The six worst performers on the week were Care Capital (NYSE:CCP), National Retail Properties (NYSE:NNN), Store Capital (NYSE:STOR), Realty Income (NYSE:O), Digital Realty , and CubeSmart (NYSE:CUBE).

Economic Data

Every week, we like to dive deeper into the economic data that directly impacts real estate.

(Hoya Capital Real Estate, HousingWire)

Home Prices Continue To Rise As Mortgage Rates Continue To Fall

Core Logic's Home Price Index showed a 6.9% YoY rise in home prices in April, a slight deceleration from the 7.1% YoY rise in March."Mortgage rates in April dipped back to their lowest level since November of last year, spurring home-buying activity," said Dr. Frank Nothaft, chief economist for CoreLogic. "In some metro areas, there has been a bidding frenzy as multiple contracts are placed on a single home. This has led home-price growth to outpace rent gains. Nationally, home prices were up 6.9 percent over the last year, while rent growth for single-family rental homes recorded a 3 percent rise through April, according to the CoreLogic Single-Family Rental Index."

Zillow's April Case-Shiller forecast sees a 5.6% rise in home prices for April. Home price appreciation has reaccelerated in recent months after showing signs of slowing in early 2017 as mortgage rates shot up nearly 100bps from the summer 2016 lows. All else equal, lower mortgage rates lead to higher home prices.

Bottom Line

REITs fell 0.3% on the week as the 10-year yield climbed 10 bps. Hotels and retail REITs were the best performers. This week was the annual REITWeek conference in NYC. We came away with a more positive outlook on the REIT sector as a whole, especially the higher quality retail space.

Apartments and hotels have been upside surprises this year and have defied the headwinds from higher supply. Demand has been robust in both sectors and has largely offset higher supply. Digital Realty will merge with DuPont Fabros to form the largest data center REIT. Consolidation will allow these REITs to command better pricing power with the public cloud providers.

Please add your comments if you have additional insight or opinions. We encourage readers to follow our Seeking Alpha page (click "Follow" at the top) to continue to stay up to date on our REIT rankings, weekly recaps, and analysis on the REIT and broader real estate sector.

Disclosure: I am/we are long VNQ, SPY, CCP, COR, DLR, CUBE, SHO.

I wrote this article myself, and it expresses my own opinions. I am not receiving compensation for it (other than from Seeking Alpha). I have no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article.

Additional disclosure: All of our research is for educational purpose only, always provided free of charge exclusively on Seeking Alpha. Recommendations and commentary are purely theoretical and not intended as investment advice. Information presented is believed to be factual and up-to-date, but we do not guarantee its accuracy and it should not be regarded as a complete analysis of the subjects discussed. For investment advice, consult your financial advisor.

Here is the original post:

Real Estate Weekly: Digital Realty Becomes A Cloud Computing Giant - Seeking Alpha

Edge Computing Is New Cloud Computing Tech Investors Should Track – GuruFocus.com

The cloud computing industry is still in its early stages of adoption. In 2016, the Infrastructure as a Service (IaaS) segment recorded just $22 billion in annual revenues. Considering the hundreds of billions dollars the IT industry spends every year, it is very clear that IaaS still has a long way to go.

The Software as a Service segment is a bit older, but the model has now become the preferred method for software delivery. Microsoft has done an excellent job of ditching its old annual licensing model for SaaS, and the success of Office 365, their lead SaaS product, is ample validation of that. Oracle is targeting $10 billion in annual revenues from SaaS over the next few years.

With these and thousands of other companies in the fray, the SaaS segment is expected to continue its double-digit growth over the next several years.

The cloud software market reached $48.8 billion in revenue in 2014, representing a 24.4% year-over-year growth rate. IDC expects cloud software will grow to surpass $112.8 billion by 2019 at a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 18.3%. SaaS delivery will significantly outpace traditional software product delivery, growing nearly five times faster than the traditional software market and becoming a significant growth driver to all functional software markets. By 2019, the cloud software model will account for $1 of every $4.59 spent on software.IDC

As businesses around the world slowly started warming up to the idea of third party-managed infrastructure services (IaaS) and software products delivered over the cloud (SaaS), the segment has piqued the interests of all the major tech players. Early entrants Amazon (NASDAQ:AMZN) and Microsoft (NASDAQ:MSFT) have already crossed $13 billion in trailing 12-month revenues while IBM has, so far, kept pace. Google is still working toward getting its bona fides in the cloud game by building datacenters and increasing features and services while Oracle is slowly working on its IaaS portfolio as well.

But Amazon and Microsoft, the lead players in the cloud story, have now made it clear that they are already on their way to embracing the next level of cloud. Microsofts CEO Satya Nadella made a huge announcement during the recent Microsoft Build 2017 developer conference that the companys cloud strategy is moving toward edge computing:

It has been barely four years since Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella announced the companys Mobile First, Cloud First strategy. Instead of basking in the glory of newfound success in Cloud, Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella has now announced that the time has to come to move on from a Mobile First, Cloud First strategy toward a more cloud-focused Intelligent Cloud, Intelligent Edge strategy.1reddrop

Amazon made its edge computing/IoT-focused software, Amazon Greengrass, publicly available Thursday, making it loud and clear that they, too, are in the race to move computing closer to the edge.

But most investors in the stock market have barely begun to discover cloud computing so heres a little primer on the new wave of cloud computing.

What is edge computing?

In cloud computing, the processing power is always centralized. Data has to travel from a device to servers, where it gets processed; the output is then pushed back to the device. Edge computing moves these heavy processing tasks or as many of them as possible closer to the point of origin, hence the word "edge."

This reduces the time data needs to travel, thereby reducing latency and cutting reliance on internet connections. It results in improved reliability and faster, more reliable decision making at the edge.

Among its application areas are artificial intelligence, or AI, where it It completely transforms the way AI can be applied to various scenarios.

Thats probably an oversimplified description of edge computing, but its enough at this point to understand that the "edge" part of the equation takes the "computing" part of cloud computing away from massive data centers and brings it closer to the connected devices themselves.

There are several obvious advantages to adopting an edge computing model over a traditional cloud computing one, but the segment itself is in very early stages of its development. Edge computing also needs a robust IoT and AI device ecosystem to make its impact felt in full force. By moving in early on this new paradigm in cloud computing, Amazon and Microsoft, the top two cloud companies, have once again moved the cloud goal posts and significantly raised the bar.

Their competitors now have to take the risk to invest sufficient resources, time and money if they want to keep Amazon and Microsoft in check. Considering the fact that Google and Oracle are only now starting on the cloud computing segment itself, it is going to be an extremely difficult task to execute to keep expanding their cloud offerings while also working on edge computing and IoT technologies.

By putting a clear moat around their businesses, Amazon and Microsoft are further differentiating themselves from the now-crowded cloud computing space. Microsoft is even going so far as to redefine its very vision for the future of cloud computing and the direction that the companys cloud push is going to take.

Why do investors need to know this? Because these are the moves that will take Microsoft and Amazon from their annual cloud revenues of $13 billion to twice, thrice that and beyond. Its not something of which a serious tech investor can afford to be unaware.

Disclosure: I have no positions in the stock mentioned above and no intention to initiate a position in the next 72 hours.

Sangara Narayanan

View original post here:

Edge Computing Is New Cloud Computing Tech Investors Should Track - GuruFocus.com

The benefits of cloud computing, Rust 1.18, and intelligent tracking prevention in WebKit SD Times news digest … – SDTimes.com

The cloud is no longer an afterthought, it is a competitive advantage. According to a new Insight-sponsored report by Harvard Business Review Analytic Services, businesses are turning to the cloud for agility, data capabilities, customer and user experiences as well as cost savings.

A companys IT environment should work for them by enabling them to both run and innovate. Large and small to mid-sized companies need to focus on managing and modernizing their IT infrastructure, so that it becomes a transformative part of their business that can directly improve results, said David Lewerke, Director, hybrid cloud consulting practice at Insight. While we knew there were a number of benefits, we wanted to better understand from respondents exactly how cloud systems were impacting their business outcomes.

The report found 42% use a hybrid cloud approach, 40% host their systems in a private cloud, and 13% host in a public cloud. Other benefits of cloud adoption included time to market, ability to manage security, and the ability to mitigate risk.

Rust 1.18 releasedThe latest version of the systems programing language Rust has been released with new improvements, cleanups and features. The biggest changes in Rust 1.18 includes an update to the latest edition of The Rust Programming Language book. The book is being written in the open on GitHub. Version 1.18 features the first draft of the second edition, as well as 19 out of 20 draft chapters.

Other features include an expansion of the pub keyword, library stabilizations, and cargo features.

More information is available here.

WebKits intelligent tracking prevention featureWebKit, an open source web browser engine, is providing a new feature called cross-site tracking. The Intelligent Tracking Prevention feature limits cookies and other website data to help users feel they can trust the privacy-sensitive data about their web activity again.

The success of the web as a platform relies on user trust. Many users feel that trust is broken when they are being tracked and privacy-sensitive data about their web activity is acquired for purposes that they never agreed to, John Wilander, security engineer for WebKit, wrote in a post.

Read more from the original source:

The benefits of cloud computing, Rust 1.18, and intelligent tracking prevention in WebKit SD Times news digest ... - SDTimes.com

Growing Patent Claim Risks in Cloud Computing – Lexology (registration)

This blog develops the themes of our February piece on cloud availability risks from software patent claims. It shows how the patent cloudscape is changing; how PAEs are increasingly active in Europe as well as in the USA; and how CSPs are starting to respond in their contract terms.

With increasingly recognised benefits of security, flexibility and reliability, cloud computing continues to carry all before it. Its aggregation of massive processing power also heralds deep, connected and transformative innovation in our daily lives. Intellectual property (IP) is at the centre of this wave of innovation, and an increasingly fierce battleground as the current high profile dispute between Alphabets Waymo and Uber over core autonomous vehicle technology shows.[1]

You might think that the cloud, built and running on shared environments and public standards, would be a safe space from intrusive IP disputes. But the evidence is mounting that the cloud is proving attractive for PAEs (Patent Assertion Entities, businesses who litigate their patents but generally dont otherwise use their patented technology). And whilst cloud users are increasingly aware of the importance of security and privacy, cloud IP risks are now equally important but still somewhat overlooked: many enterprises dont yet have complete clarity on their IP litigation strategy or IP innovation strategy, especially in a global context.

There are persuasive reasons for cloud customers to focus more on patent risks. PwC, in its most recent (May 2017) Patent Litigation Study[2] notes that damages awards for PAEs are almost four times greater than for other patent claimants and that damages awards at trial in patent disputes continue to rise.

Europe is quickly becoming a key jurisdiction for patent enforcement: the European Patent Office granted 96,000 patents in 2016, [3] up 40% from 2015, and the Unitary Patent along with EU-wide injunctions will soon be a reality.[4]

The cloud computing patent landscape is also developing rapidly. Cloud patent families are well-known in areas such file-storage and protocols but other areas like Fintech[5] are also growing quickly.

PAEs are acquiring cloud computing patents at a rapid pace according to IPlytics, an IP intelligence provider,[6] who note that:

PAEs often acquire patents in technological areas that will likely become strategically important for future markets.

This is borne out in a European Commission report on PAEs in Europe[7] which (on page 26) cites findings that:[8]

PAEs are overwhelmingly involved in the litigation of German and UK patents related to computer and telecommunications technology [and that] these findings are consistent with existing evidence on the activity of US PAEs, which also tend to enforce high-tech patents at a disproportionately high frequency, especially software patents.

Part of the attraction for PAEs is that patent infringement is increasingly easy to detect in the cloud: detailed documentation, APIs and the code for open source (the software that powers much of the cloud) are readily available, and can be read and analysed by anyone, making the cloud a soft target.

As the economic importance of the cloud rises, cloud customers make increasingly interesting targets for PAEs: customers generally dont have the same level of expertise in cloud tech as cloud service providers (CSPs), have a greater incentive to settle, are less prepared to fight an IP battle, and have little incentive to solve an IP Issue for others. Contrast this with the position of the CSP, who will want to avoid an IP threat becoming an issue across its customer base.

A measure of this growing cloud patent claim risk is the evolving approach of the largest global CSPs to this issue in their cloud service agreements.

Microsoft has taken an early lead through its recently announced Azure IP Advantage[9] programme with uncapped indemnification for its Azure cloud services, including open source incorporated in its services, and 10,000 (7,500 currently, 2,500 to come) patents that Microsoft is sharing with its consuming customers.

Google in its Cloud Platform Terms of Service[10] seeks (at section 14.2) to exclude open source software entirely from its IP infringement indemnification a big carve-out given the importance of open source in the cloud environment.

In Amazon Web Services (AWS) Customer Agreement,[11] the effect of section 10 is that AWS does not offer in its standard terms any IP protection at all for its services. Section 8.5 is an unusual IP non-assert term that requires the customer not itself or through others to assert any IP claim regarding the AWS services it has used. The clause continues without limit in time after the agreement has ended; and to the extent it could be said to amount to a patent no-challenge clause, could be problematic in Europe under EU competition law, for example.

The fact that all the largest CSPs are starting to address cloud patent risk expressly in their contract terms is perhaps the most compelling evidence that this PAE-fuelled risk is becoming increasingly relevant and material. Cloud customers, and their regulators in regulated sectors, should take note as well.

Continued here:

Growing Patent Claim Risks in Cloud Computing - Lexology (registration)

New Cloud Computing and IT Outsourcing Requirements in the Financial Sector – Lexology (registration)

On 17 May, 2017 the Luxembourg Financial Regulator (CSSF) published four new circulars concerning cloud computing and IT outsourcing. The new regulations will immediately affect credit institutions, professionals of the financial sector, payment service providers, and electronic money issuers (Entities). The four CSSF circulars, which came into effect on the date of their publication, introduce new rules and replace existing requirements set out in existing circulars.

Main novelties and amendments

Circular 17/654

This circular addresses the obligations that Entities must meet when their IT infrastructure uses or will rely on a cloud computing infrastructure.

The circular applies to the partial or full transfer of the activities and does not make many differences between an external provider and an internal provider within a group of companies.

The CSSF defines the term of material activity as any activity that, when not properly performed, reduces the ability of an Entity to meet regulatory requirements or continue its operations, and any activities that are necessary for the sound and prudent risk management.

Three different IT service models are described:

For each of the above service models, the CSSF provides an interpretation of the levels of control on the systems and the software that an Entity must respect when applying such model.

Within these service models the CSSF differentiates four different cloud types:

An Entitys outsourcing of IT matters will qualify for particular regulatory treatment, if it meets specific criteria set out by the CSSF and will be excluded from the scope of other existing regulations relating the Entitys central administration, accounting organization, internal governance and risk management (e.g. Circulars 12/552 or 17/656).

The criteria that the CSSF uses to define the specific regulatory treatment are:

If the above criteria are fulfilled an Entity must obtain the CSSFs prior approval (if a material activity is concerned). In case a Luxembourg based professional of the financial sector is used, an Entity must only file a prior notification to the CSSF.

Once the outsourcing is implemented, all the changes to the set-up and the service providers as well as the in-sourcing must be notified to the regulator before an Entity enacts them.

Entities under the supervision of the CSSF that would like to offer cloud computing services or related operating services to their clients must submit a program description to the CSSF to obtain its prior approval.

This circular amends the requirements applicable to credit institutions, investment firms and professional lenders. The amendments introduce Circular 17/654 and clarify that Circular 05/178 is repealed.

In addition, the amendments clarify that every time specific infrastructures are used or changed, authorized entities must observe data protection and professional secrecy rules.

The circular clarifies the conditions for the use of other group entities that are not authorized by the CSSF. The systems of such group entities may be used under the condition that no confidential information is stored in a readable manner on those systems. If this is the case, the supervised entity must inform its clients and, if required, collect their consent.

This circular aligns the IT outsourcing requirements for professionals of the financial sector other than investment firms, payment service providers and electronic money issuers to those applicable to credit institutions and investment firms. It copies the wording of the relevant sections of Circular 12/552 to ensure consistency and ease further alignments.

Finally, the circular introduces Circular 17/564 and clarifies that professionals of the financial sector that offer IT services to their clients, may use the infrastructure of a third party or sub-delegate a part of their services only with the prior consent of the concerned clients.

This circular amends Circular 06/240 and is applicable to all credit institutions and professionals of the financial sector. One important clarification of this circular consists of providing that only the production environment should contain confidential data, whereas the test and development environment(s) (that as per applicable regulation may be accessed by third parties) should not contain confidential data.

Future developments

As the four circulars came into effect on the date of their publication, the Entities auditors are expected to pay particular attention to the new requirements when carrying out their audits.

Entities supervised by the CSSF will have to carefully study the new circulars and analyze the impact on their existing administrative organization and IT infrastructure, because if affected, they must be aligned to the new requirements. Therefore, changes may need to be implemented at multiple levels:

As service providers located outside of Luxembourg will be required to accept contractual provisions that they have never been requested to comply with before, (for instance, amendments to certifications and controls), the time to implement the changes should not be underestimated.

More here:

New Cloud Computing and IT Outsourcing Requirements in the Financial Sector - Lexology (registration)

Scientists May Have Found a Way to Combat Quantum Computer Blockchain Hacking – Futurism

In Brief While quantum computers could improve the world by decreasing processing times, they could also be the ideal tool for hackers, which is a true threat to the success of blockchain. Russian scientists, though, may have found the solution. Russias Solution to Quantum Hacking

A serious concern in the computing industry is that when true quantum computers are produced, the principles of encryption will break down due to the dizzyingly superior processing power.

Although blockchain is a far more secure method of transaction than our current financial system, even it will become vulnerable to a brute force attack by a quantum computer. Andersen Cheng, co-founder of U.K. cybersecurity firm Post Quantum, told Newsweek, Bitcoin will expire the very day the first quantum computer appears.

A team lead by Evgeny Kiktenko at the Russian Quantum Center in Moscow, though, may have found a way to protect blockchains by fighting fire with fire using quantum mechanics. They are designing a quantum-secured blockchain where each block, hypothetically, is signed by a quantum key rather than a digital one.

They propose that transmitting and encrypting information using quantum particles such as photons, which cannot be copied or meddled with without the particles being destroyed, ensures the blockchains safety. The principle is based on Zero-knowledge proofs which allow you to validate information without sharing it.

In recent months Russia has become increasingly interested in blockchain. The central bank is composing new laws focused on cryptocurrencies and is interested in developing one of its own. This research marks a step forward in these efforts because it concerns the protection of such systems.

If the quantum-secured blockchain proves successful it would be hugely beneficial to the rest of the world as well. Blockchain has the potential to do a lot of good for the world by streamlining the transaction system, making it more secure, and ensuring transparency like never before. Countries such as Senegal have developed currencies that are entirely digital, Japan is accepting bitcoin (which uses blockchain) as legal tender in 260,000 stores this summer, and Ukraine is considering using it to combat corruption.

If the advent of quantum computing could be the apocalypse for blockchain, it is therefore crucially important that we begin thinking about how to protect these system before entire countries and currencies could be subject to hacks from the abusers of quantum computers.

Link:

Scientists May Have Found a Way to Combat Quantum Computer Blockchain Hacking - Futurism

Purdue, Microsoft to Collaborate on Quantum Computer – Photonics.com

Photonics.com Jun 2017 WEST LAFAYETTE, Ind., June 9, 2017 Purdue University and Microsoft Corp. have signed a five-year agreement to develop a useable quantum computer.

Purdue is one of four international universities in the collaboration. Michael Manfra, Purdue University's Bill and Dee O'Brien Chair Professor of Physics and Astronomy, professor of materials engineering and professor of electrical and computer engineering, will lead the effort at Purdue to build by producing a "topological qubit."

"Someday, quantum computing will move from the laboratory to actual daily use, and when it does, it will signal another explosion of computing power like that brought about by the silicon chip," said Michael Daniels, president of Purdue. "Its thrilling to imagine Purdue at the center of this next leap forward.

With quantum computers, information is encoded in qubits, which are quantum units of information. With a qubit, however, this physical state isn't just 0 or 1, but can also be a linear combination of 0 and 1. Because of the quantum mechanic phenomenon of "superposition," a qubit can be in both states at the same time. This characteristic is essential to quantum computations potential power, allowing for solutions to problems that are intractable using classical architectures.

The team assembled by Microsoft will work on a type of quantum computer that is expected to be especially robust against interference from its surroundings, a situation known in quantum computing as decoherence. The scalable topological quantum computer is theoretically more stable and less error-prone.

Purdue and Microsoft entered into an agreement in April 2016 that extends their collaboration on quantum computing research, effectively establishing "Station Q Purdue," one of the Station Q experimental research sites that work closely with two Station Q theory sites. This new, multi-year agreement extends that collaboration and includes Microsoft employees being embedded in Manfra's research team at Purdue.

Manfras group at Station Q Purdue will collaborate with Redmond, Wash.-based Microsoft team members, as well as a global experimental group established by Microsoft including experimental groups at the Niels Bohr Institute at the University of Copenhagen in Denmark, TU Delft in the Netherlands and the University of Sydney, Australia. They are also coupled to the theorists at Microsoft Station Q in Santa Barbara. All groups are working together to solve quantum computings biggest challenges.

"What's exciting is that we're doing the science and engineering hand in hand, at the same time," Manfra says. We are lucky to be part of this truly amazing global team.

More:

Purdue, Microsoft to Collaborate on Quantum Computer - Photonics.com

So is Donald Trump secretly recording conversations or not? – CNN

Like many of Trump's tweets, this one immediately came to dominate the political conversation. Did he actually have a secret recording system in the White House? If not, why say it?

And, like many of Trump's tweets, it produced a chain reaction of events that backfired on Trump. The threat -- I guess that's the best way to describe what Trump did -- of the existence of recordings spurred Comey to pass along memos he had written detailing his conversations with Trump to a friend, with the express goal of them being leaked and, hopefully, triggering a special counsel to be appointed.

But, now, there's even more to the Trump tweet on "tapes" of his Comey conversations. Why? Because we have Comey and Trump saying absolutely contradictory things about the nature of those meetings and phone calls.

The easiest way to make this something other than a "he said, he said" situation is for Trump to authorize the release of any and all recorded conversations with Comey -- if, of course, they exist.

"Lordy, I hope there are tapes," Comey said in his testimony before the Senate intelligence committee Thursday. At another point, he added: "The President surely knows if there are tapes. If there are, my feelings aren't hurt. Release the tapes."

All of which makes the White House response to the question of whether a recording system exists all the more troubling. Asked Thursday about the possibility, deputy press secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders said she had "no idea" if there was a taping system in the White House. When a reporter questioned whether Sanders could find out the answer to that question, she joked: "Sure, I'll try to look under the couches."

That response is broadly consistent with how the White House has played this story since Trump's initial tweet. "The President has nothing further to add on that," White House press secretary Sean Spicer said about the possibility of a taping system in the immediate aftermath of Trump's tweet.

And Trump himself hasn't shed any more light on the tweet, either.

Given Comey's testimony -- under oath -- that stone-walling strategy is no longer sustainable. At least one person in the White House -- HINT: His initial are DJT -- knows whether or not the President has been secretly taping phone calls and meetings.

If such tapes exist, they need to be heard by both the congressional committees looking into Russia's meddling into the 2016 election and by Mueller's investigators. They are the one thing that could provide definitive evidence of whether Trump or Comey is telling the truth about their interactions.

If the tapes don't exist, we need to know that, too.

Past is usually prologue. If so, Trump and his senior staff will bunker down on the issue -- simply refusing to say anything either way about the existence of a recording system. At which point the ball will be in the hands of Congress and Mueller to get the tapes -- if any tapes actually exist.

The Trump tweet on "tapes" is now a central part of the investigation into what exactly happened between he and Comey. And that's not going to change until we get a clear answer on whether they actually exist -- and, if they do, what's on them.

Here is the original post:

So is Donald Trump secretly recording conversations or not? - CNN

9 questions Donald Trump needs to answer at today’s news conference – CNN

Typically in these sorts of joint pressers, the American media gets two questions and the foreign press gets two questions. But I've got a lot more than just two questions that Trump really needs to answer.

Below are the 9 questions Trump could -- and should -- be asked this afternoon.

1. "Did you record anything? Are there tapes?"

Given that he and Comey, who was under oath, are now painting very different pictures of their interactions, Trump simply refusing to answer questions about a secret taping system isn't really an option.

2. "Do you regret that May 12 'tapes' tweet? Or any tweet you have sent?"

3. "Do you have confidence in Attorney General Jeff Sessions?"

4. "Do you believe in global warming?"

5. "You responded 'no' when asked if you asked Comey to end the Flynn investigation. Did you say you 'hoped' he could end it? And is there a difference?"

The Trump White House -- and Republican elected officials who continue, generally speaking, to stand by the President -- are pinning a whole lot on the fact that Trump said he "hoped" Comey would find a way to end the investigation into the former national security adviser. Here's Idaho Sen. Jim Risch making that point in his questioning of Comey on Thursday: "(Trump) said, I hope ... Do you know of any case where a person has been charged for obstruction of justice or, for that matter, any other criminal offense, where they said or thought they hoped for an outcome?" Comey responded that regardless of the words Trump used that it was clear his intention was to ask for the investigation to be closed. Why doesn't Trump agree?

6. "British Prime Minister Theresa May has been one of your staunchest foreign defenders. In the final days of the UK election, you became an issue for her due to your comments about the London attacks. What message do you take from May's setback?"

7. "When you praised Saudi Arabia for severing all ties to Qatar due to allegations that the country finances terrorism, were you aware that Qatar also houses the largest US base in the region?

8. "Speaker Paul Ryan defended your meetings with Comey by saying, 'he's new to this.' Is Speaker Ryan accurate in that assessment?"

9. "You and your attorney, Marc Kasowitz, said that Comey falsely testified under oath about his conversations with you. Will you testify under oath about your conversations with Mr Comey?"

It's one thing to accuse someone else of lying. It's another to accuse them of lying under oath, which is what Trump and Kasowitz have done. Lying under oath means you could wind up in jail. Remember, too, that Trump and Comey are not playing by the same rules. Comey has testified under oath about his meetings and interactions with Trump. Trump has not done the same in regards those same meetings.

Original post:

9 questions Donald Trump needs to answer at today's news conference - CNN

5 times UK Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn slammed Donald Trump – Politico

Labour Party leader Jeremy Corbyn hasnt minced words when it comes to his views of President Donald Trump and his policies. | Getty

With U.K. election results showing a rocky road ahead for Prime Minister Theresa May, President Donald Trump may soon have to forge a closer relationship with a British politician who has repeatedly criticized him: Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn.

An election exit poll Thursday night, released as polls closed, projected that May would lose her majority in parliament. Final results are expected Friday morning.

Story Continued Below

The hard-left Labour leader hasnt minced words when it comes to his views of the president and his policies. Here are five not-so-nice things Corbyn has said about Trump:

1. An "erratic" administration

While campaigning last month, Corbyn said this of the months-old Trump administration: The U.S. is the strongest military power on the planet by a very long way. It has a special responsibility to use its power with care and to support international efforts to resolve conflicts with care and to support international efforts to resolve conflicts collectively and peacefully. Waiting to see which way the wind blows in Washington isnt strong leadership. And pandering to an erratic Trump administration will not deliver stability.

2. Fake anti-elitism

Not long after the 2016 election was settled, Corbyn jabbed both UKIP leader Nigel Farage and Trump as rich, white men who practiced fake anti-elitism. The fake anti-elitism of rich, white men, like Nigel Farage and Donald Trump, is farcical at one level but in reality its no joke at all, Corbyn said in a speech in November.

3. Neither the grace nor the sense to grasp communities' response to terror

Breaking his silence on last weeks London terror attacks that killed seven and injured dozens more, Corbyn both criticized Mays policies and Trumps Twitter response.

At this time it is more important than ever that we stay united in our communities. It is the strength of our communities that gets us through these awful times as London Mayor Sadiq Khan recognized, but which the current occupant in the White House has neither the grace nor the sense to grasp, Corbyn said.

4. Sorry, mate, youre wrong

Corbyn said if he were prime minister, his message to Trump on climate change would be simple: "youre wrong," BuzzFeed reported. Speaking at an election rally, Corbyn said: A Labour government wouldnt hesitate to ring up and write to Donald Trump to say, 'Sorry, mate, youre wrong stand by the Paris agreement.'"

5. Donald Trump should not be coming to the U.K.

In February, Corbyn said Donald Trump should not be coming to the U.K. Citing the presidents plan to build a wall along the U.S. southern border, among other things, Corbyn said Britains government should be challenging Trump on international law issues and we should also not be rolling the red carpet out. Trump is reportedly visiting the U.K. later this year.

Missing out on the latest scoops? Sign up for POLITICO Playbook and get the latest news, every morning in your inbox.

Go here to read the rest:

5 times UK Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn slammed Donald Trump - Politico

The Real Scandal Is Still Russia – Slate Magazine

Rep. Elijah Cummings walks past a photograph of President Donald Trump and Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov on May 17 in Washington, D.C.

Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images

Confronted by the glare of Thursdays dazzling Senate Select Committee on Intelligence hearing, we all focused on the bright shiny object that was and is former FBI Director James Comey. His dramatic testimony struck more than one observer as part recitation, part theatrical performance. In todays political discourse, good television counts almost as much as good substance, all but guaranteeing Comeys eclipse of everything else in the Washington universe.

However, for all of the revelations in Thursdays hearing, it failed to shine light on the most important set of questions relating to Russian activities and the extent to which Russia has degraded U.S. national security through its espionage, influence, and cyberwarfare campaigns over the past two years. Even while Comey performed before the Senate, Russias schemes continued to unfold, undermining U.S. national security in myriad ways and places around the world. It may be the case that Trump lied; it may even be the case that he criminally obstructed justice and should be impeached. And yet we cannot let those important political questions consume all our attention, lest Russia do more harm while we are distracted.

Laffaire Russe began during the 2016 election campaign with investigations into alleged ties between Trump campaign officials, Ukraine separatists, and potentially the Russian government. These investigations focused on former Trump campaign manager Paul Manafort and policy adviser Carter Page, as well as their commercial affiliates.

Any one of these encounters would raise serious questions about the intent of the meeting, and its outcomes, whether a private deal or foreign policy quid pro quo.

Since then, we have learned of a series of high-level meetings between close Trump associates and the Russian government. Attorney General Jeff Sessions reportedly met with Russian Ambassador Sergey Kislyak on three separate occasions during the campaign and transition. Deposed Trump National Security Adviser Michael Flynn met and talked repeatedly with senior Russian officials and also worked for myriad foreign interests during the campaign, actions that have now put him in considerable legal jeopardy. Trump aide and son-in-law Jared Kushner also met with senior Russian officials during this period, as well as prominent Russian bankers connected to Vladimir Putin and known for being agents of Russian influence abroad. Kushner reportedly went a step further, seeking to hide these communications at the time from U.S. intelligence agencies by asking to use Russian diplomatic facilities and secure communications channels. Of course, on the day after firing Comey, Trump met personally with Kislyak and Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov in the Oval Office, reportedly revealing highly classified intelligence to the Russians regarding ISIS and the situation in Syria.

Any one of these encounters would raise serious questions about the intent of the meeting, and its outcomes, whether a private deal or foreign policy quid pro quo. Together, they signal something much more significant: a deliberate change of U.S. policy toward Russia, with these meetings serving as public acts of consummation for the new relationship between the two countries.

Judging by Russias string of foreign policy triumphs since last November, Putin appears to have the upper hand in his new relationship with Trump and the U.S. Since the election, Trump feuded with his own security agencies, which he and his advisers alternately accused of acting as a deep state to oppose Trumps agenda and orchestrating leaks to humiliate and undermine Trump personally. Trumps ill-considered wordsincluding his obstinate refusal to affirm Americas commitment to collective self-defenseand amateurish diplomacy have sprained the NATO alliance, with the possibly of a fracture growing by the day. White House discussions of Afghanistan, Syria, and other national security subjects have stalled as Trump has been consumed by other priorities, including responding to self-inflicted crises like the Comey firing. Trumps nine-day foreign trip made for a few good television moments like his sword dance in Saudi Arabiabut appears to have left a trail of wreckage, including a massive dispute between the Gulf states and statements by European leaders and erstwhile allies that they could no longer rely on the U.S. and must instead fight for our own future and our fate ourselves as Europeans. And, in perhaps the most clear quid pro quos reported yet, Trump officials allegedly pushed in the earliest days of his administration to roll back sanctions on Russiasanctions imposed over the Russian intervention in Ukraine and Russias meddling in the 2016 election.

No one of these triumphs resulted directly from Putin pushing a button and having Trump act. They reflect a more subtle success, borne of Russian influence upstream in the Washington ecosystem. Russian intelligence agencies successfully interfered with and influenced the U.S. election, according to a consensus position of the U.S. intelligence community. By subtly influencing the election outcome, cultivating relationships with top Trump officials, and creating distrust of core U.S. national security institutions like the CIAincluding among the president himselfRussia set in motion a complex chain reaction that is now paying off for the Russian regime. Whether they actively colluded with the Trump campaign or not, the Russians got what they wanted: a president who was more friendly to their interests, and more pliable in their hands too.

Leaders have used spectacle for centuries to entertain and distract their people. As a reality television star who used spectacle to rebrand himself and seize the presidency, Trump understands that power. Trump wins by refocusing public attention on Comey and his status as a leaker and reframing laffaire Russe as laffaire Comey. This public relations campaign against Comey may be shortsighted if and when the president comes under legal scrutiny by special counsel Robert Mueller. But for now, every day the media cycle churns over Comeys leaks is a day the public debate isnt focusing on Trumps substantive actionsor failuresat home and abroad. This provides the cover Trump needs to continue his deconstruction of the administrative state and the darkness he needs to avoid scrutiny for his blunders too.

Top Comment

I think it's time to admit Reagan didn't win the Cold War. The autocratic dictator-for-life of Russia is a former KGB agent. Our one arguable win? We changed their economic system from a Communist-ish kleptocracy to a Capitalist-ish kleptocracy. Yah! More...

Trumps responseand the response of his longtime lawyer Marc Kasowitzillustrates how well Trump is playing this drama for his advantage. As the special counsels inquiry unfolds and reaches into the White House, touching close associates and family members, Trump understands the risk. As his agenda stalls, approval ratings sink, and his administration swirls in turmoil, Trump must know by this point he needs to act lest his presidency sink into the swamp. Although the possibility of impeachment for obstruction of justice looms, Trump appears to discount this threat. He probably doesnt believe Speaker Paul Ryan would bring impeachment proceedings, let alone that Republicans would actually vote to remove him from office. And so a spectacle over alleged obstruction of justiceincluding direct comparisons of Trumps word with that of Comeyis preferable to a spectacle over Trumps myriad policy and governance failures. Just as he did on the campaign, quite successfully, Trump is using spectacle to distract the masses and divert attention from substance.

For members of Congress, and the rest of us, the only way to win is not to play Trumps game; to remain focused on the broader threats posed to U.S. national security, rather than the narrow, petty political intrigues peddled by Trump and his henchmen. If Comey is telling an accurate story, then Trump likely acted to obstruct a Justice Department criminal investigation into Michael Flynn and possibly a broader inquiry into the Trump administrations Russia ties too. That in and of itself is a huge matter. But it is dwarfed by the national security significance of the Russia ties themselves and the broader damage caused so far by the Russian government and its proxies. We cannot afford the luxury of being entertained by Trumps spectacle while our national security crumbles in the background.

Read more:

The Real Scandal Is Still Russia - Slate Magazine

Karl Rove, Erick Erickson slam Donald Trump – Salon

Even before former FBI Director James Comey accused President Donald Trump of lying during his testimonybefore the Senate Intelligence Committee on Thursday,one prominent Republican had already come forward that he doubted Trumps fitness to be president.

That man was Karl Rove, the former top adviser to President George W. Bush.

On Wednesday, Rove wrote an op-ed for The Wall Street Journal,arguing that Trump may have mastered the modes of communication, but not the substance, thereby sabotaging his own agenda. The former GOP wunderkindclaims that Trump lacks the focus or self-discipline to do the basic work required of a president and argued that his chronic impulsiveness is apparently unstoppable and clearly self-defeating. He specifically cited Trumps tweets about his proposed travel ban against six Muslim-majority countries, observing how the presidents use of the phrase travel ban undermined his legal case. He added that various self-contradicting tweets suggests the president is disregarding basic fact checking and exacerbates the already considerable doubts Americans have about his competence and trustworthiness.

Rove also denounced Trumps language when pulling America out of the Paris climate accord, saying that instead of questioning the motives of international partners he should have instead heralded Americas success in reducing greenhouse-gas emissions.

While Roves editorial occurred before the Comey testimony, it touched on themes that were remarkably similar to those broached by another right-wing pundit, Erick Erickson, in his analysis of that eventafter it happened.

Although Erickson opens by saying that he doesnt believe Donald Trump obstructed justice, he added that we . . .know President Trump lies regularly.

As a result, when it comes to the question of whether Trump is lying about asking Comey to shut down the investigation into former national security adviser Michael Flynn, Erickson wrote he believedthat the public will latch on to Comey as the honest broker because Comey was willing to criticize both Democrats and Republicans. As Erickson concluded, the president only won because he convinced 70,000 people in Wisconsin, Pennsylvania, and Michigan that he was not as bad as Clinton, Erickson is concerned that if there are at least 70,001 voters who will take Comeys word over Trumps, the Republican Party will be in big trouble.

Read more here:

Karl Rove, Erick Erickson slam Donald Trump - Salon

Retailer BCBG Unveils Going-Concern Bankruptcy Sales – Wall Street Journal (subscription)

Retailer BCBG Unveils Going-Concern Bankruptcy Sales
Wall Street Journal (subscription)
Women's clothing retailer BCBG Max Azria Group LLC announced bankruptcy deals worth $165 million to sell off its core businesses, which would live on as a going concern. Marty Staff, BCBG's interim acting chief executive officer, said the proposed ...

Follow this link:

Retailer BCBG Unveils Going-Concern Bankruptcy Sales - Wall Street Journal (subscription)

For Hartford, bankruptcy not an easy way out – The CT Mirror

Carol M. Highsmith / Library of Congress

The Hartford skyline

At a May 22 town hall meeting on Hartfords dire budget situation, a resident urged Mayor Luke Bronin not to file for bankruptcy, saying it would be a death knell for the city.

Would it?

Almost since taking office at the beginning of last year, Bronin has proclaimed from the metaphorical rooftops that the capital city doesnt have the resources to meet its increasing financial obligations and is at risk of insolvency.

The city patched the last hole in the current budget with short-term borrowing and faces a projected $65 million gap in next years budget, with no new sources of revenue. Withoutadditional help $40 million more from the state and union concessions that mostly have yet to materialize Bronin has said he will not rule out filing for bankruptcy.

A Hartford bankruptcy is almost incomprehensible to those who remember the citys thriving downtown and humming factories in the post-World War II years. But the reality is that after decades of slow decline, marked by middle-class flight, rising costs and loss of its once-imposing manufacturing base, the city is tapped out.

Most agree that a bankruptcy filing by the states capital city would be a major embarrassment for the city and the state. That might not be the worst of it.

The prospect of bankruptcy is frightening enough that most distressed cities try mightily to avoid it.

Since Congress created what is now Chapter 9 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code in 1937 to allow political subdivisions of states (but not states themselves) to file for bankruptcy protection, relatively few have done so.

There have been only 673 filings under Chapter 9, fewer than nine a year, and most of those were special districts school, utility or sewer districts not cities or towns, said James Spiotto, a Chicago lawyer and bankruptcy specialist, and co-author of Municipalities in Distress: How States and Investors Deal with Local Government Financial Emergencies.

Keith M. Phaneuf / CTMirror.org

Hartford Mayor Luke Bronin and Corporation Counsel Howard Rifkin

Since 1980 only 54 counties, cities or towns have filed for Chapter 9 protection, and more than a third of those filings were withdrawn or dismissed. Nonetheless, some highly publicized municipal bankruptcy proceedings have gone forward in the past decade, the best known of which include Detroit; Vallejo, Stockton and San Bernardino, Cal.; Jefferson County, Ala.; and in New England, Central Falls, R.I.

These communities were out of options. The trend in Connecticut and across the country has been for states to intervene and help distressed communities right themselves (a couple of states, Georgia, for one, dont allow their towns to file for Chapter 9 protection).

State intervention is almost always a better option, said Spiotto in a telephone interview. Here are some reasons why:

If a city is willing to endure this array of unpleasantries, it can have its debts reduced to a sustainable level and get a new start.Vallejo slogged through bankruptcy with severe cuts in public safety and reductions in home values, among other challenges. But in the end, Acting City Manager Phil Batchelor told an NPR interview in 2012 that the experience has been good. We were able to save probably in excess of $30 million, but we had legal bills of over $12 million.

Detroit, whose $18 billion municipal bankruptcy in 2013 was the largest in U.S. history, has seen new investment in downtown and some neighborhoods some are calling it a comeback city though other neighborhoods are still abandoned and forlorn. The Motor City is recovering, but not recovered, said Spiotto.

University of Connecticut

A rendering of the UConn Hartford campus nearing completion downtown. The new campus will add vitality downtown, but it also will be exempt from city property taxes.

Central Falls, in the final year of its five-year recovery plan, has stabilized its finances, gotten its credit rating upgraded and begun a number of economic development initiatives, said Wilder Arboleda, the citys business outreach and public relations coordinator.

So although bankruptcy isnt quite a death knell, the more common response to a city in distress is fiscal and technical assistance from the state, along with a period of state oversight.Some states, such as Pennsylvania and North Carolina, have boards that regularly monitor the finances of their cities, to be able to intervene before troubles reach the crisis stage.

Gov. Dannel Malloy has proposed such an oversight board for Connecticut, which legislators are still considering.Such a board probably would have intervened in Hartford sooner than 2017; the city has been struggling for several years, selling assets and repackaging debt to balance its budget.

To date, Connecticut has responded ad hoc and usually late in the game when one of its municipalities has foundered on fiscal shoals. In the last three decades, the state has stepped in to oversee the finances of Bridgeport, Waterbury, West Haven and Jewett City, a borough of Griswold.

Bridgeport actually filed for bankruptcy in 1991, but its petition was rejected when the city could not prove it was insolvent, one of several requirements for bankruptcy approval.

State officials opposed Bridgeports petition, not wanting to see the states largest city go bankrupt, then offered help buying a park and a zoo to get the city through the crisis. In 1994 the General Assembly passed a law requiring the governors written approval before a municipality can file for bankruptcy. Gov. Malloy has said he hopes Hartford can avoid bankruptcy.

At this point it looks like there will be another ad hoc intervention. The legislature is working on a solution for Hartford, looking at a myriad of options, said House Democratic majority leader Matthew Ritter. All would include strings, some level of state oversight.

But its not clear that this approach will solve the real problem.

Bankruptcy or state receivership is the symptom of a larger problem that being whatever it was that caused the insolvency. Cities get into fiscal jams for a variety of reasons: mismanagement, a spectacularly poor infrastructure investment, loss of a major employer, unsustainable union contracts, corruption or a slowly declining tax base.

Bankruptcy can buy time, lower debt and protect the city from lawsuits, but it doesnt solve the underlying problem. Just because you go into Chapter 9 doesnt mean you have more revenue, said Spiotto.

Ideally, bankruptcy or receivership will result in a long-term fiscal plan that will align spending with revenues, and a plan to address the problem that put the city in the hole.

Hartford has awarded generous union contracts in the past a good number of police officers have retired with pensions that are higher that their working salaries and made some questionable investments (a baseball stadium that was finally built and a soccer stadium that wasnt) in recent years, but it has had nowhere near the mismanagement that plagued Bridgeport or Waterbury before those cities submitted to state oversight.

The citys fundamental problem is that it doesnt have enough taxable property to support itself.Connecticut is heavily reliant on the property tax; it is virtually the only way municipalities can raise revenue.

Hartford occupies only 18 square miles, and more than half of its property is off the taxable grand list hospitals, colleges, government buildings, etc. The city has far and away the highest tax rate for commercial property in the state, 74.29 mills, and Mayor Bronin is loathe to raise it.

Lack of an adequate tax base is a characteristic of several distressed cities. Central Falls, for example, has 19,000 people on an astoundingly small 1.2 square miles. One of the efforts to revive the city has been a task force aimed at getting foreclosed properties back on the tax rolls, said principal planner Trey Scott.

With less taxable property than some of its suburbs, but with the bills for many of its regions social ills, Hartford can only raise about half the money it spends, and must rely heavily on state assistance.

Bronin said he has cut 100 jobs and $20 million from the budget, but still has fixed costs pensions, health care and debt service that are rising. He said the city is being run efficiently, and he would welcome someone looking over his shoulder.

An oversight panel might give the city some leverage with its unions one of which voted down a contract last month that would have saved the city $4 million over six years. But though union concessions are probably essential to gaining more state help, they wont by themselves balance the budget.

A one-time bailout wont work either; the city needs a revenue source for a period of years to meet rising debt and pension obligations. The legislature could provide ongoing help by adding to the sales tax, or, as Bronin noted in his budget message, by fully funding state reimbursements for nontaxable property, known as payments-in-lieu-of-taxes, or PILOT, a program that has been chronically underfunded for decades. Fully funding PILOT would provide Hartford with enough money an estimated $50 million a year to stabilize its budget.

As Hartford officials are well aware, it is not a good time to ask. The state faces a daunting deficit of more than $5 billion over the next two years. Lawmakers have gone into special session to work on the budget, and are not expected to have a solution for Hartford until the state budget is completed.

Though it will be challenging to find more money for Hartford, Bronin argues that it is essential that the state create more economic and social vibrancy in its major cities, making them a draw for bright young people, because thats what businesses are looking for today. The departure of GE from its suburban Fairfield campus to Boston and the impending departure of Aetnas headquarters from Hartford would appear to support his argument.

Some distressed cities across the country have gotten back on the road to prosperity, via sound economic planning. Pittsburgh, for example, invested in medicine and technology, along with arts, infrastructure and riverfront activity, which have helped the city recover from the crushing loss of the steel industry in the latter half of the last century.

Hartford has a number of initiatives underway downtown housing, a new UConn branch, bus and train transit, plus a longstanding riverfront revival program that should help its economic growth. It is one of four cities awarded a share of $30 million by CTNext to create high-tech innovation hubs.

It just needs, somehow, to bridge the budget gap.

This is not a drill. Hartford may once have been the richest little city in the country a comment attributed to the renowned novelist Henry James but it is no longer.

The Jan. 9 city council agenda had a proposed resolution urging the city to buy a re-usable tree for Christmas presentation and cease purchasing poinsettias and/or other plants to decorate city hall until the city is financially able to do so.

It has come to that.

Go here to read the rest:

For Hartford, bankruptcy not an easy way out - The CT Mirror

Abengoa Bankruptcy Liquidation Plan Confirmed – Bankrupt Company News (press release) (blog)

The U.S. Bankruptcy Court confirmed Abengoa Bioenergy US Holdings Third Amended Joint Plans of Liquidation.

As previously reported, The Plan as currently proposed, including the proposed treatment of the MRA Guarantee Claims, is premised on substantive consolidation and provides Bioenergy General Unsecured Creditors with a substantially higher recovery than they could otherwise expect to receive. The most important consideration for the Holders of the MRA Guarantee Claims was that their entitlement to the $32.5 million.

In addition, The proposed settlement allows the Plan Proponents to avoid costly, time consuming, and potentially uncertain litigation, whereby if unsuccessful certain creditors would receive no recovery in 2017 and little, if any recovery in 2018, or even later if the parties engage in protracted litigation. As reflected in the Liquidation Analysiswithout the proposed settlement of the MRA Guarantee Claims, most of the available proceeds for distribution to Holders of Bioenergy General Unsecured Claims would have been distributed to the Holders of MRA Guarantee Claims, leaving Holders of Bioenergy General Unsecured Claims with a small fraction of their projected recovery under the Plan as proposed.

The order states, Pursuant to section 1123 of the Bankruptcy Code and Bankruptcy Rule 9019, the Cofides Settlement is an integrated compromise and settlement of numerous issues and disputes designed to achieve a beneficial and efficient resolution of these Chapter 11 Cases for all parties in interest. The Court finds that the relief sought in the Cofides Settlement Motion is an exercise of sound business judgment, and is in the best interests of the Debtors, the Debtors estates, creditors, and all parties in interest, and that the legal and factual bases set forth in the Cofides Settlement Motion establish just cause for the relief granted herein, and that the Cofides Settlement Motion satisfies rules 2002 and 9019 of the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure.

This renewable energy plant operator filed for Chapter 11 protection on February 24, 2016, listing $648 million in pre-petition assets.

Read more Abengoa bankruptcy news.

Read the rest here:

Abengoa Bankruptcy Liquidation Plan Confirmed - Bankrupt Company News (press release) (blog)

15-year Mesothelioma Survivor Living Life By Design – Asbestos.com (blog)

Diagnosed with peritoneal mesothelioma at age 15, Alyssa Hankus adolescence was anything but normal.

She missed nearly her entire freshman year of high school and spent much of her sophomore and junior years in and out of hospitals dealing with the effects of aggressive cancer treatments.

I wanted everything that wasnt necessarily promised to me at that point in time, Hankus told Asbestos.com. I wanted to go to school and get married and have kids and to grow old and have grandkids. All of these different things, I wasnt going to take no for an answer.

The 15-year mesothelioma survivor, who is now 30, is making good on some of those goals.

Despite all the missed classroom time, Hankus graduated high school in four years. She later earned a bachelors degree in interior architecture from UNC Greensboro and recently got her first job in the industry, designing eating spaces for colleges, restaurants, businesses and health care facilities.

For a moment, she considered nursing as a way to give back, but her passion has always been design.

I thought maybe I could give back in that way through hospital design, she said. Being in there for as long as I was, its a way to make it better for all those involved patients, doctors, what have you.

Hankus hopes the position can be a stepping stone to one day designing patient rooms, as a way to touch the lives of patients and make them feel as comfortable and at home as possible when facing an illness.

Alyssa Hankus with her boyfriend, Eric.

Outside of her career, Hankus enjoys spending time with friends and her three young nephews. She looks forward to a future with her boyfriend in hopes of having kids and starting the next chapter of her life.

Its all a part of that continued fight of making it and achieving all of the things that at 15 I was told I never would, she said. Those little day-to-day simple joys are what mean so much, because those were never promised to me.

Mesothelioma has a long latency period, meaning it typically takes years often decades between a patients initial exposure to asbestos and the development of symptoms.

The overwhelming majority of cases are diagnosed at ages 75 to 84.

My doctors told me it takes at least 15 years to present symptoms, but I actually started showing symptoms around age 12, Hankus said.

She hasnt been able to pinpoint when or where her asbestos exposure occurred a common issue for women who dont fit the traditional mesothelioma patient profile of older men who worked high-risk jobs.

At the time of her diagnosis, Hankus was told she was one of 10 children in the world diagnosed and only the second to survive.

Im sure there are more out there, but all of the survivors Ive met are adults, she said. It is just so rare in children.

Because of the incredible odds, Hankus didnt receive her mesothelioma diagnosis until three years after she began showing symptoms.

The doctors thought that it was just growing pains, because it wasnt that severe at first, she said.

In the fall of her eighth-grade year, the pain intensified to the point where her mom had to rush her to the hospital.

They thought at first that it was my appendix because of where the pain was located, Hankus said.

During an appendectomy, doctors discovered a troubling sight.

The lining of my stomach was twisted like a dish rag, she said.

Doctors removed part of the lining attached to the back of the appendix but still couldnt determine the underlying issue.

The pain continued, which eventually led Hankus to Johns Hopkins Hospital in her hometown of Baltimore, Maryland. Pediatric physicians there determined she had irritable bowel syndrome and prescribed a corticosteroid that unfortunately made her undiagnosed cancer grow faster, causing more pain.

In October 2001, Hankus agreed to an exploratory surgery at Hopkins, but the pediatric surgeon involved had never seen mesothelioma before. An oncologist who specializes in adults later delivered the diagnosis.

Hankus treatment plan started with chemotherapy, but it was too much for her young body to take.

They were initially going to do six rounds of chemotherapy but were only able to do three because it was killing me, she said. I wasnt even able to keep ice cubes down. I was throwing up everything and losing a ton of weight.

Making matters worse, Hankus came down with a case of fungal pneumonia.

Everything was fighting against my body, she said.

The next option became exploratory surgery and hyperthermic perioperative chemotherapy (HIPEC). Hankus transferred to the National Institutes of Health in Bethesda, Maryland, and she was placed under the care of Dr. Richard Alexander, an internationally recognized surgical oncologist who specializes in treating abdominal cancers.

A week before her procedure in 2002, a CT scan revealed what doctors called a complete snowstorm around the lining of her stomach. They determined the mesothelioma cancer was in the most advanced stage.

Doctors released Hankus for the week to celebrate Easter with her family. It was her first holiday home from the hospital in five months.

When surgery day arrived, the unexplainable happened. The expected 10-hour surgery took only half that time. Alexander had to respond to an emergency, putting Hankus operation in the hands of another surgeon.

My family and people from our church were together praying, so the doctor waited to let them finish praying and give them the news, Hankus said. He told them the lining was pristine, that there were only three acorn-sized tumors and two microscopic specs.

The rest was clean. There was no snowstorm as previously described. Hankus surgical team couldnt explain it. Years later, the lead surgeon told her that he didnt expect shed make it off the operating table that day.

Honestly, I give it to God, Hankus said. To have such a different outcome and such little evidence of the mesothelioma, no one could explain with science.

Although the surgery went far better than expected, Hankus experienced residual pain for two years.

Return visits to NIH became frequent.

They tried all kinds of things like acupuncture and hypnosis and just kept increasing the narcotics, trying to get rid of the pain and not knowing what the source of it was, she said.

Hankus was eventually able to get on an adult program back at Johns Hopkins. Doctors there planned to get her off the high dosages of pain medications through three weeks of in-patient care and six weeks of out-patient care.

During the first few weeks of the program, doctors agreed to let Hankus parents take her to a healing service led by evangelical minister Kenneth Copeland and his wife, Gloria.

Gloria Copeland laid her hands on me and the pain went away that night and never came back, Hankus said. I was able to get off the medicine without any withdrawal symptoms. Doctors couldnt explain it. Its just been one miracle after another.

She was able to return to high school, but it took a toll on her immune system, which was readjusting to life outside of a hospital room. After graduating, the adjustments continued through community college.

It took me about four years to get a two-year degree, only because my stamina was too low, she recalled.

In her last year at the community college, Hankus challenged herself, taking on more classes and joining clubs to prepare her body and mind for the rigors she would face in the interior design program at UNC Greensboro.

Alyssa Hankus with her parents after graduating from UNC Greensboro.

I wanted to prove to myself that I could do it, she said.

She did and is now living her dream as a designer. Her next milestones: Marriage and starting a family.

Now 15 years in remission, she hopes her story will inspire other survivors and raise more awareness that mesothelioma doesnt only affect older men.

A big part of your survival is your mindset, she said. Im just trying to make the most of a future that wasnt promised to me.

Visit link:

15-year Mesothelioma Survivor Living Life By Design - Asbestos.com (blog)

Nuclear war: the US took a highly bureaucratic response to preparing for it – The Australian Financial Review

Former US President Richard Nixon. After Nixon's first briefing on the use of nuclear weapons there were only five possible retaliatory or first-strike plans, and none involved launching fewer than 1000 warheads national security adviser Henry Kissinger said: "If that's all there is, he won't do it."

Garrett Graff says that his new book, Raven Rock, a detailed exploration of the United States' doomsday prepping during the Cold War, provides a history of "how nuclear war would have actually worked the nuts and bolts of war plans, communication networks, weapons, and bunkers and how imagining and planning for the impact of nuclear war actually changed ... as leaders realised the horrors ahead."

But if there is anything that Raven Rock proves with grim certitude, it is that we have little idea how events would have unfolded in a superpower nuclear conflict, and that technological limits, human emotion and enemy tactics can render the most painstaking and complex arrangements irrelevant, obsolete or simply obscene.

These contradictions are evident with each commander in chief Graff considers. During an apparent attack that proved to be a false alarm, Harry Truman refused to follow protocol and instead remained working in the Oval Office. Same with Jimmy Carter, who after a 1977 drill wrote in his diary that "my intention is to stay here at the White House as long as I live to administer the affairs of government, and to get Fritz Mondale into a safe place" to ensure the survival of the presidency.

And after Richard Nixon's first briefing on the use of nuclear weapons there were only five possible retaliatory or first-strike plans, and none involved launching fewer than 1000 warheads national security adviser Henry Kissinger was blunt about the president's dismay with his alternatives: "If that's all there is, he won't do it."

Graff, a former editor of Washingtonian and Politico magazines, covers every technicality of the construction of underground bunkers and secret command posts, every war game and exercise, every debate over presidential succession planning and continuity of government, every accident that left us verging on nuclear war. It is a thorough account, and excessively so; the detail is such that it becomes hard to distinguish consequential moments from things that simply happened. He describes one presidential briefing on nuclear tactics as "a blur of acronyms and charts, minimising the horror and reducing the death of hundreds of millions to bureaucratic gobbledygook", and at times this book commits the same offence.

Its power, however, lies in the author's eye for paradox. The plans for continuity of government and nuclear war are cumulative, developed in doctrines, directives and studies piling up over decades; yet it is up to short-lived and distracted administrations to deploy or reform them. War planning hinges on technology that constantly evolves, so plans invariably lag behind. More specifically, continuity of government depends on keeping top officials alive, yet "the precise moment when evacuating would be most important also was precisely when it was most important to remain at the reins of government", Graff writes.

Defence Secretary Donald Rumsfeld proved the point on September 11, 2001, when he stayed at the Pentagon and dispatched Paul Wolfowitz to Raven Rock, the Pennsylvania mountain hideaway north of Camp David that serves as the namesake for this book. "That's what deputies are for," the Pentagon chief explained, in a beautifully Rumsfeldian line.

There are more personal reasons people would choose not to leave Washington in the case of looming nuclear war. For years, evacuation plans excluded the families of senior officials. Apparently the wives of President Dwight Eisenhower's Cabinet members were less than pleased to learn that they had not made the list, even while their husbands' secretaries had. And when an administration representative handed Earl Warren the ID card that would grant him access to a secure facility in an emergency, the chief justice replied, "I don't see the pass for Mrs Warren." Told that he was among the country's 2000 most important people, Warren handed the card back. "Well, here," he said, "you'll have room for one more important official."

Perhaps the presence of the Supreme Court would prove inconvenient, anyway, because a post-nuclear America could easily become "an executive branch dictatorship", Graff explains. Eisenhower worried about this, though it did not stop him from establishing a secret system of private-sector czars who would step in to run massive sectors of the US economy and government, with the power to ration raw materials, control prices and distribute food.

When President John Kennedy discovered this system, he quickly dismantled it, even if his younger brother, Attorney General Robert F. Kennedy, carried around a set of pre-written, unsigned documents providing the FBI and other agencies sweeping powers to detain thousands of people who could be deemed security threats in wartime. And the Eisenhower-era Emergency Government Censorship Board, rechristened the Wartime Information Security Program under Nixon, was finally defunded after Watergate. However, as Graff notes, "the executive orders all still remained drafted ready for an emergency when it arrived".

For all the ominous directives and war scenarios, there is something random and even comical about planning for Armageddon. How many Export-Import Bank staffers rate rescuing? How many from the Department of Agriculture? A Justice Department public affairs official was once even tasked with compiling a lineup of Washington journalists who should be saved. "I remember painfully going over a list of people and wondering how do you balance a columnist I didn't think very much of as opposed to a reporter who I thought really did work," he said.

And then, what should the chosen few take along? The congressional bunker at the Greenbrier resort in West Virginia, for instance, included a stash of bourbon and wine; staffers "swore that the stockpile was to be used only to aid a hypothetical alcoholic congressmen who might need to be weaned off".

Raven Rock revels in the expensive machinery and elaborate contingency formulas presidents had at their disposal to command the nuclear arsenal. High-tech ships known as the National Emergency Command Post Afloat (nicknamed the "Floating White House") were ready for use from 1962 into the Nixon years, while a string of EC-135 aircraft flights (codenamed "Looking Glass") began continuous shifts on February 3, 1961, ensuring that one senior military leader with the proper authority would always be available to order a nuclear strike. Not "breaking the chain" of these overlapping flights became a US military obsession, and it remained unbroken until the end of the Cold War.

Some efforts were low-tech, too: In 2009, President Barack Obama signed an executive order decreeing that the Postal Service would be responsible for delivering "medical countermeasures" to homes across America in case of biological attacks, because it had a unique capacity for "rapid residential delivery". (Neither snow nor rain, nor germ warfare.)

Technology meant to defend can prove risky. In November 1979, NORAD computers detected a massive Soviet assault, targeting nuclear forces, cities and command centres. Turns out someone had mistakenly inserted a training tape into the system. Six months later, a faulty 46-cent computer chip briefly made it seem like 2200 Soviet missiles were soaring toward US targets. And in September 1983, Soviet satellites identified five US missiles heading toward the USSR except the satellites had mistaken the sun reflecting off cloud cover as the heat of a missile launch. "The Soviet early-warning system was a dangerous mess," Graff writes. Ours wasn't that great, either.

Over the decades, shifts in nuclear policy reflected presidents' views on what was possible, technologically and strategically. Eisenhower planned for "massive retaliation" attacks, Kennedy relied on the notion of mutually assured destruction, and Carter imagined a drawn-out war, in which an initial nuclear exchange could produce weeks of inaction before follow-up strikes. Ronald Reagan issued a presidential directive suggesting for the first time that the United States should "prevail" in a nuclear war, even if the 1983 television movie The Day After later left him feeling "greatly depressed", as he wrote in his diary.

For all the horrors it contemplates, Raven Rock proves most depressing for those of us left outside the bunkers. Though early on, Cold War administrations regarded civil defence as a priority, officials quickly realised how hard it would be to protect the American population from nuclear attack, especially as the shift from bombers to missiles reduced response times from hours to minutes. "Rather than remake the entire society," Graff writes, "the government would protect itself and let the rest of us die."

But every mushroom cloud has a silver lining: Graff reports that the IRS considered how it would collect taxes in the post-nuclear wasteland and concluded that "it seemed unfair to assess homeowners and business owners on the pre-attack tax assessments of their property".

Leave it to a nation founded in opposition to unfair levies to study the tax implications of the end of the world.

Washington Post

Raven Rock: The Story of the US Government's Secret Plan to Save Itself While the Rest of Us Die, by Garrett Graff, published by Simon & Schuster. Lozada is the non-fiction book critic of The Washington Post.

Washington Post Book World

Visit link:

Nuclear war: the US took a highly bureaucratic response to preparing for it - The Australian Financial Review

When is the Left ever Right – WSAU (blog)

In case you missed this blog from May 17th, I think it is a good time to bring it up again. Especially in the wake of the Media's lies about Trump being exposed yesterday.

Wednesday, May 17, 2017 11:24 a.m. by Ben Armstrong

It seems left can never be right. This is true when you are talking physically and politically!

Bigger Government helps freedom?

The bigger the government - the more rules and regulations. Automatically that reduces freedom.

Corporations oppress you?

Only the government can oppress you because they make the laws. When in history has corporations thrown people in jail and oppressed a nations population. You have to be a moron to believe this. Only forms of Government can do this. Every oppression in HISTORY has been done by some form of Government.

Abortion doesn't kill babies?

Do I EVEN have to say anything. No one, and I mean NOT one person, really believes this. They all know that when a woman is pregnant, she is Pregnant with a baby. They just don't care.

Boys and Girls are the Same?

.................... Um .........Yeah.......

Raising Taxes helps the economy?

Who are these people? I don't have to teach basic economics, do I? Taking money out of the economy can not boost it. Economies can grow despite taxes, not because of them.

Disarming people makes them safer?

Walls don't make people safer?

People sneaking into the country Illegally is a good thing?

Killing convicted murders is wrong - Killing babies is a right?

We are all going to die from global warming? (because we are outside of nature)

We came from Monkeys? (because we are of nature)

I could go on and on. Pick an issue, any issue you want. Guess what, the left isn't right.

Go here to see the original:

When is the Left ever Right - WSAU (blog)