NASA Gets Images of Ultra Bright, Distant Galaxies Thanks to Other … – The Epoch Times

NASAs Hubble Telescope has captured some of the universes brightest infrared galaxies on camera, thanks to some closer galaxies that act like magnifying glasses.

These luminous galaxies are up to 10,000 times brighter than our Milky Way galaxy, and we are able to see them because of a phenomenon called gravitational lensing. Galaxies or clusters of galaxies with large gravitational fields create a lense that magnifies what is behind them.

Gravitational lensing magnifies them so that you can see small details that otherwise are unimaginable, said said lead researcher James Lowenthal of Smith College in Northampton, Massachusetts in a NASA article. We can see features as small as about 100 light-years or less across.

Gravitational lenses also come with their problems. Like looking at something magnified through water, researchers must first understand how gravitational lensing is distorting the image.

The bright and distant galaxies are also incredibly industrious star factories, churning out 5,000 to 10,000 times the number of stars as the Milky Way. What is strange is that theyre doing it with the same amount of gas as the Milky Way. NASA researchers have a few theories as how this can be, but so far no answers.

Weve known for two decades that some of the most luminous galaxies in the universe are very dusty and massive, and theyre undergoing bursts of star formation, Lowenthal said. But theyve been very hard to study because the dust makes them practically impossible to observe in visible light. Theyre also very rare: they dont appear in any of Hubbles deep-field surveys. They are in random parts of the sky that nobodys looked at before in detail. Thats why finding that they are gravitationally lensed is so important.

As of June 6, Lowenthals team was halfway through its Hubble survey of 22 galaxies.

See the original post:

NASA Gets Images of Ultra Bright, Distant Galaxies Thanks to Other ... - The Epoch Times

Putin sees chance under Trump to ‘crack the NATO alliance’: Former … – ABC News

The former U.S. ambassador to NATO said the unpredictability of the Trump administration may open opportunities for opponents.

"This sort of unpredictability over the first five months of this administration possibly opens potential opportunities for opponents," Douglas Lute, former U.S. representative to NATO under President Obama, said in an interview on "This Week" Sunday. "Here, I think, Russia, in particular."

Asked by "This Week" co-anchor Martha Raddatz what Russian President Vladimir Putin thinks when he hears President Trump talk about Russia, Lute said Putin sees the chance to "crack the NATO alliance."

"I suspect he sees an opportunity to do what military force alone could never do, and that is crack the NATO alliance. If he can crack it politically or if he can provoke internal fissures inside the alliance, then Putin sees enormous opportunity to achieve a longstanding Russian goal," Lute said.

Lute added that Trumps failure during a speech in Brussels last month to reaffirm NATOs Article 5, which commits that an attack on one member of the alliance is an attack on all, will lead other members of NATO to hedge their bets.

They believe they cant rely on U.S. leadership as they have for the past 70 years, Lute said. We should think about what that 70 years has featured U.S. leadership, which has been the backbone of recovery from World War II all the way, seeing us all the way through the Cold War period. And then beyond the Cold War, seeing NATO as a stabilizing force outside NATO boundaries, so in the Balkans. And today, even today, in Afghanistan.

Read the original:

Putin sees chance under Trump to 'crack the NATO alliance': Former ... - ABC News

NATO war game defends Baltic weak spot for first time – Reuters

By Andrius Sytas | SUWALKI GAP, Polish-Lithuanian border

SUWALKI GAP, Polish-Lithuanian border U.S. and British troops have carried out the first large-scale NATO defensive drill on the border between Poland and Lithuania, rehearsing for a possible scenario in which Russia might try to sever the Baltic states from the rest of the Western alliance.

The frontier runs for 104 km (65 miles) through farmland, woods and low hills, in an area known as the Suwalki Gap. If seized by Russia, it would cut off Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania.

Over two days, U.S. helicopters and British aircraft took part in exercises that also involved troops from Poland, Lithuania and Croatia in a simulated defense of the potential flashpoint.

"The gap is vulnerable because of the geography. It's not inevitable that there's going to be an attack, of course, but ... if that was closed, then you have three allies that are north that are potentially isolated from the rest of the alliance", U.S. Lieutenant General Ben Hodges told Reuters.

Russia denies any plans to invade the Baltics, and says it is NATO that is threatening stability in Eastern Europe by building up its military presence there and staging such war games.

But Hodges, who commands U.S. forces in Europe, said it was crucial for the alliance to show it was ready.

"We have to practice, we have to demonstrate that we can support allies in keeping (the Gap) open, in maintaining that connection," he said.

GAME CHANGER

Russia's 2014 annexation of Ukraine's Crimea peninsula in the Black Sea has changed NATO's calculations, seeing Russia increasingly as an adversary. Before then, no forces from other alliance members were stationed in the Baltic states; now four battlegroups totaling just over 4,500 troops have been deployed in Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania and Poland.

The Poles have been pushing other NATO allies to use some of these troops to secure the vulnerable Suwalki corridor and deter potential Russian aggression. But while 1,500 troops took part in this weekend's exercises, a Lithuanian commander cautioned that it would take more to defend the gap in the event of a genuine conflict.

"This is only a small-scale drill compared to what would be needed in case of a real attack, but it is important for us because it shows that allies share our worries", said Brigadier General Valdemaras Rupsys, head of Lithuania's land forces.

Simulating a covert insertion of forces, three American helicopters landed in a field in rural Lithuania on Saturday, startling grazing horses and cows, in an area several hours' drive from where a U.S. battalion is stationed at Orzysz base in Poland.

"The training helps present a credible defense force that hopefully will deter aggression, but if not, we'll be prepared to move to defend the borders of NATO," said Lt. Col. Steven Gventer, who leads the U.S. battlegroup in Orzysz.

NATO officials believe Moscow will hold its own exercise in Russia and Belarus on a much greater scale in September, possibly involving 100,000 troops, under the codename "Zapad" (West). Baltic officials believe Moscow will also rehearse an attack on the Suwalki Gap during Zapad.

"I think it's important for the soldiers to train on land that they may have to defend some day," said Major General John Gronski, deputy commander, U.S. Army Europe, observing the exercise in Lithuania.

(Reporting by Andrius Sytas; Editing by Mark Trevelyan)

AMMAN/WASHINGTON A U.S. warplane shot down a Syrian army jet on Sunday in the southern Raqqa countryside with Washington saying the jet had dropped bombs near U.S. backed forces and Damascus saying the plane was downed while flying a mission against Islamic State militants.

MOSUL, Iraq Iraqi forces began storming the Islamic State-held Old City of Mosul on Sunday, in an assault they hope will be the last in the eight-month-old campaign to seize the militants' stronghold.

View post:

NATO war game defends Baltic weak spot for first time - Reuters

Preparing for Trident Juncture 2018: NATO Focuses on Its Core Mission – Second Line of Defense

2017-06-17 According to an article published on the Norwegian Ministry of Defence website, NATO will be focusing on its core mission of collective defense in the upcoming Trident Juncture exercise.

NATO needs to hold exercises on a large scale. Only this way are we able to test all the levels in the alliance: From the troops on the ground and all the way up to a strategic level, says General Denis Mercier, Supreme Allied Commander Transformation (SACT) in NATO.

General Mercier (right) together with Norways Chief of Defence, Admiral Haakon Bruun-Hanssen.

The French General thinks Norway will be ideal for an exercise on this scale.

NATO needs realistic training, where we can combine operations in the air, at sea and on land. In Norway we get everything, this is one of the best places to train in Europe, says Mercier.

The cold climate also brings extra challenges for the soldiers, that hones their skill.

For many years, NATO has been occupied with international conflicts, but recent developments have led to a renewed focus on the core of the alliance.

Collective defence and training for this will be key. This is one of NATOs core missions and we will spend more time on this in the future, says general Denis Mercier.

The General underlines the importance in focusing on the core mission: NATO as a defensive organisation.

Deterrence is key for NATO. With large-scale exercises we can demonstrate our capacity and uphold our credibility.

https://forsvaret.no/en/taking-nato-back-to-its-core-mission

Editors Note: Norway is refocusing its efforts on its Article III commitments to self defense and encouraging NATO more broadly to enhance its collective defense capabilities.

We discussed this way ahead with the new Chief of Staff of the Norwegian Air Force earlier this year.

2017-02-24 By Robbin Laird

During the Norwegian Airpower Conference held at Trondheim in early February 2017, I had a chance to discuss with the new Chief the Royal Norwegian Air Force, Major General Tonje Skinnarland, and Brigadier General Jan Ove Rygg, chief of the National Air Operations Center (NAOC) their perspectives on the way ahead.

http://www.sldinfo.com/new-head-of-the-norwegian-air-force-in-a-period-of-significant-airpower-transition/

The Chief of the Royal Norwegian Air Force set the tone for much of the discussion during the Conference by focusing on the Norwegian Air Force in transition and the challenge of shaping integrated defense capabilities for the defense of Norway.

Norway being a small country with a large geography and a large neighbor on its border obviously needed to shape a defense capability highly interactive with its allies to ensure deterrence in depth for Norwegian defense.

Chief the Royal Norwegian Air Force, Major General Tonje Skinnarland, speaking at the Norwegian Airpower Conference, February 2017.

The perspective of the Chief of the Royal Norwegian Air Force on the F-35 was that this was not at all a replacement aircraft, but a strategic asset when properly integrated with the national defense force and NATO forces.

The Air Force is in the throes of significant modernization with the addition of the F-35, the P-8 as well as new helicopters, and the overall challenge was to ensure integration of these platforms into a joint force able to operate inthe integrated battlespace.

And she made it very clear that it was preparation for and training to ensure effective capabilities for the high-end fight, which was the core focus of attention.

She highlighted the need to reshape concepts of operations for Norwegian defense and to work across the Norwegian defense structure for integrated C2 which was crucial.

She also highlighted that with the F-35 distributed operations were possible so in reforming C2 part of the challenge was what is called mission command, namely, authorizing pilots for missions, rather than providing for overly centralized tactical operational control.

I asked both senior Air Force officers the same question to start the conversation, namely, the Air Force is in a period of significant transition, how do they view the challenges and the opportunities?

Major General Skinnarland: We are clearly modernizing our platforms but we need to transform our force, our culture and our processes as well.

The strategic decisions made in the long-term investment will make us, even though small, one of the most modern air forces in the world in some years to come.

https://forsvaret.no/en/newsroom/news-stories/new-long-term-plan-for-the-armed-forces

https://www.regjeringen.no/en/topics/defence/ltp/ny-langtidsplan-for-forsvarssektoren/langtidsplanen-for-forsvarssektoren-er-vedtatt/id2520659/

At the same time, the security situation is challenging. After the annexation of Crimea and the buildup of Russian capabilities over the last years has made us understand that we have need to revitalize the concept of actually defending Norway in high intensity operations.

It is not just about adding new platforms; it is about shaping joint capabilities for the defense of Norway in a high intensity operational setting.

To achieve integrated defense and joint operations will not be easy and certainly will not happen simply by adding new platforms.

There are a lot of different tasks to be done ranging from getting all the spare parts, logistics, the training, and, of course, shaping the national defense plan.

As we get all these new systems, which will make us even more capable of handling the current situation and current threats together with other allies and partners, there is another challenge.

From Left to Right, Major Morten Dolby Hanche, the first Norwegian F-35 pilot, Major General Tonje Skinnarland and Brigadier General Heckl, COS STRIKFORNATO at the Norwegian Airpower Conference.

How best to be able to manage the process of change?

A key challenge will be on the human capital side.

How do we best train and task our people in shaping our new integrated force? For it will depend on them to actually bring such a force into being.

When it comes to opportunities in the new systems and particularly in the F-35, the conference has alluded a lot to this, the capability in the aircraft itself with weapons technology and networking will come.

But how do we make sure that we are able to utilize these technologies fully and effectively?

We must shape the correct competencies, the correct concepts of operations, and develop and execute effective plans for joint operations as well.

Brigadier General Jan Ove Rygg then answered the same question from his operational responsibilities.

If I address the same question, but from my perspective, the challenge is to get the joint processes in Norway to the point where we can do targeting efficiently.

We need to build an effective national command and control capability which seamlessly works with core allies who are crucial to defense operations in the High North.

What makes this particularly challenging is what we are taking about is national integration and C2 for national defense ground, sea and air operations, which can operate with core allies in extended defense operations

Question: Clearly, with core allies in the region operating similar platforms, notably F-35 and P-8, there are significant opportunities for interoperability built in, but obviously these potentials need to become realities.

How best to ensure that happens?

Major General Skinnarland: With the UK, the US, the Danes and the Dutch operating the same combat aircraft, there are clear opportunities to shape new common operational capabilities.

Also crucial is to shape a strong European F-35 sustainment base to ensure that we get the kind of sortie generation capabilities inherent in the aircraft, but you need the right kind of logistical support to achieve the outcomes you want.

The P-8s operating from the UK, Iceland, and Norway can shape a maritime domain awareness data capability which can inform our forces effectively as well but again, this requires work to share the data and to shape common concepts of operations.

A key will be to exercise often and effectively together.

To shape effective concepts of operations will require bringing the new equipment, and the people together to share experience and to shape a common way ahead.

In this sense, we see Trident Juncture 2018 as especially important in shaping effective national C2 and working towards more integrated operations with allies coming to Norway for the exercise.

We should plug and play in terms of our new capabilities; but that will not happen by itself, by simply adding new equipment.

It will be hard work.

https://forsvaret.no/en/exercise-and-operations/exercises/nato-exercise-2018

We have regular exercises in Norway like the Arctic Challenge Exercise, which is an exercise building on the weekly trilateral fighter training between Finland, Sweden, and Norway.

In May/June 2017 this invitex will see more than one hundred fighter aircraft from 8 nations, including the UK and US, participating in high quality training in the Nordic countries.

You also have other national exercises which are important in shaping our concepts of operations.

We need to enhance engagement with core NATO allies, such as expanding our working relationship with allied airpower operating in Norway during exercises.

We would love to see a UK F-35B squadron and a USAF F-35A deploy to Norway during an exercise and operate in the northern part of Norway under Norwegian command and control to see how we can get them to work together.

They might fly either from home bases with air-to-air tanker or stage from Norway, and work on how we effectively can integrate those squadrons during joint operations.

Brigadier General Jan Ove Rygg: The C2 issue is really a strategic one.

We are very good at the tactical level in operating in a joint context with our C2; we need to be as capable at the strategic level.

With the fifth generation force, you have capabilities to off-board weapons and to direct fire from sea or land as well as air.

When you try to do targeting and actually engage targets with different resources it is a challenge.

How do we shape a C2 structure, which can take advantage of this capability?

For an interesting overview of the way ahead, see the following:

http://cms.polsci.ku.dk/events/airpower2014/Gjert_Lage_Dyndal.pdf

Gjert_Lage_Dyndal

Shaping a Way Ahead for Norwegian Defense

More here:

Preparing for Trident Juncture 2018: NATO Focuses on Its Core Mission - Second Line of Defense

Viewpoints: Trump’s position on NATO is absolutely correct – The … – Buffalo News

By Nicholas L. Waddy SPECIAL TO THE NEWS

On May 25, President Trump, during his visit to the headquarters of NATO in Brussels, Belgium, sharply criticized our European allies for, in effect, freeloading off the military dominance, and the military spending, of the United States. This is an accurate analysis, since only four of the 26 European countries in NATO currently spend the minimum level of GDP, 2 percent, judged by the organization itself to be sufficient to meet their obligations. (The U.S., by contrast, spends 3.5 percent of GDP on defense, and its defense budget roughly triples the spending of all other NATO countries combined.)

Moreover, the U.S. faces most of its military challenges in the Middle East, and European countries consistently lack either the will or the capability to contribute meaningfully to those missions. Ergo, Europe continues to rely on the United States to provide for its collective defense, but it fails to spend adequately to supplement and support U.S. forces, and it fails also to support U.S. operations elsewhere in the world, even when those missions are clearly relevant to European security (e.g., the struggle against ISIS). In a nutshell, the U.S. pays to defend Europe, and gets little or nothing in return.

Those who favor a continuation of this ruinous policy do so largely because they are stuck in a Cold War mentality, and, indeed, during the Cold War NATO made excellent sense to all of its member states. NATOs core mission was and is collective defense, achieved by Article 5 of the North Atlantic Treaty, penned in 1948-49 at the start of the Cold War. Article 5 states that if a single NATO country is attacked, all NATO countries will respond as if they were themselves attacked, and consequently rush to the rescue. During the Cold War, this meant that if the Soviet Union attacked any country in Western Europe, all of Western Europe, plus the United States and Canada, would go to war with the Soviet Union.

Whether this pledge was genuine or merely a bluff, it succeeded in preventing Soviet aggression. And, in the tense atmosphere of the Cold War, although the United States bore the primary burden of defending Europe against Soviet assault, most NATO members took their defense obligations seriously and maintained militaries that could credibly have assisted U.S. forces. They also sometimes contributed substantially to anti-communist military operations around the world during the Korean War, for example. In short, during the Cold War, NATO imposed great burdens and risks on its members, but those burdens and risks were shared, and no one disputed the seriousness of the challenge posed by communist aggression.

Today, though, the Soviet Union no longer exists. For those panicked by the latest upsurge of Russophobia, this may seem like a hollow declaration, since Russia still possesses powerful military forces, and has proved willing to use them against several of its neighbors. The fact, though, is that no country, including Russia, poses a threat to Europe in any way analogous to that of the Soviet Union. European countries have the human, technological, industrial and economic resources to defend themselves, with ease, from any credible enemy. Yet, unsurprisingly, they choose not to do so, because the United States continues to provide Europe with a blank check in the form of a security guarantee.

Europes position is understandable, as is American resentment of European freeloading. But what is different about the administrations position is that Trump is pointedly insisting that European countries boost their defense spending, and Trump has not explicitly endorsed Article 5 and the concept of collective defense. In other words, he is being cagey about whether, if a European country was attacked, the U.S. would uphold its treaty obligations and use armed force to assist it. He has not disavowed the treaty, but he seems to regard its obligations as reciprocal and therefore contingent on European nations paying their fair share. They seem to be minimally receptive to this demand.

One can naturally criticize the message this policy sends to potential aggressors, since it calls into question NATOs reliability, but the only alternative is for the U.S. to fund Europes defense indefinitely and without conditions. Surely, this is unacceptable. Something has to give.

For diplomatic reasons, Trump has backed off the claim he made during the campaign that NATO is obsolete, but in many ways he was right. NATO was founded based on two presuppositions: that Europes freedom was in imminent jeopardy, and that Europeans were incapable of defending that freedom by themselves. Neither of these assumptions holds water today. Thus, we should applaud Trump for pushing NATO members to rethink their roles and obligations. His message may not have been a popular one, but it is ultimately in the best interests of Americans and Europeans to heed it.

Nicholas L. Waddy, Ph.D., is an associate professor of history at SUNY Alfred.

Continue reading here:

Viewpoints: Trump's position on NATO is absolutely correct - The ... - Buffalo News

Secretary of state expresses ‘serious concern’ with NSA after hacking document leaked – Eureka Times Standard

After a leaked National Security Agency document alleged Russian operatives attempted to hack into a Florida voter polling software company used by Humboldt County in the 2016 presidential election, California Secretary of State Alex Padilla sent a letter to the federal agency Thursday questioning why the state was not notified earlier.

As the chief elections officer in the most populous state in the nation, I am seriously concerned about the NSAs failure to provide timely and critical information to Americas elections officials, Padilla wrote to NSA Director Admiral Michael Rogers. ... We must be prepared and remain vigilant. Proper preparation requires clear and consistent collaboration among federal, state, and local officials. The NSA cannot afford to sit on critical information that could be used to defend against cyber-attacks.

The five-page classified National Security Agency memo from May that was leaked to the news website The Intercept stated Russias military intelligence unit, the GRU, hacked into the Florida-based voting software company, VR Systems, in August 2016. VR Systems provided voter polling software to Hart InterCivic, which the Humboldt County Elections Office contracted with to provide voter e-polling software.

County officials said that there is no evidence that the hacking attempts were successful or that Humboldt County was a target, and that the e-polling software is not involved in vote counting.

Humboldt County is the only county in the state that contracted through VR Systems, according to the Governors Office of Emergency Services.

The Office of Emergency Services and Secretary of States Office offered aid to the county last week to bolster its cyber-security systems, but County Clerk, Recorder and Registrar of Voters Kelly Sanders and Information Technology Division Director Jim Storm said they are confident in the protections already in place.

Yes, [the Secretary of State] did some preliminary checks looking at known email addresses, Storm said to the Times-Standard last week. There was no evidence that we were hacked or anything like that.

Will Houston can be reached at 707-441-0504.

Advertisement

Continued here:

Secretary of state expresses 'serious concern' with NSA after hacking document leaked - Eureka Times Standard

Posted in NSA

What Is the Fifth Amendment? | Plead the Fifth

The U.S. Constitution guarantees the inalienable rights of citizens.

"You have the right to remain silent, and anything you say can and will be used against you in a court of law."

Those familiar words, part of an accused's Miranda rights (and a staple of police dramas), came into play in a grand fashion this week as Bridget Anne Kelly, a former aide to embattled New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie, chose to remain silent about her role in the now-infamous lane closures on the George Washington Bridge in September 2013.

In refusing to testify, Kelly exercised her Fifth Amendment rights, one of the original provisions of the U.S. Constitution's Bill of Rights. Though it's been part of U.S. law since 1791, many Americans are still confused when a defendant decides to "plead the Fifth." [8 Supreme Court Decisions that Changed US Families]

Innocent until proven guilty

The Fifth Amendment contains several familiar protections against government intrusion, including the clause against double jeopardy (trying a defendant more than once for the same offense), the right to due process of law (including a fair trial) and the right to just compensation when the government takes private property for public use.

The clause regarding self-incrimination was developed to prevent anyone from being forced to testify against themselves, leaving the burden of proving that a person has committed a crime to the government. Thus, the Fifth Amendment enshrines the maxim that someone is "innocent until proven guilty."

John Lilburne, an obstreperous political firebrand who lived in 17th-century England, is sometimes regarded as the godfather of the right to remain silent. When brought before the Star Chamber court for the crime of circulating Puritan pamphlets, Lilburne refused to take an oath that he would answer every question asked of him.

For his intransigence, Lilburne was publicly whipped, dragged through the streets behind an ox cart, gagged and throw in prison, where he continued to campaign for what he called the "freeborn rights" of all people the precursor to what are now called civil rights.

The Miranda Decision

It's been argued that James Madison, who would eventually serve as the fourth U.S. president, had the experience of Lilburne and other English law-enforcement practices including torture and forced confessions in mind when he penned the original words of the Fifth Amendment: "No person shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation."

Madison took care to include the right to avoid self-incrimination in the Fifth Amendment, in part because several of the states did not include that protection in their original state constitutions.

This right was extended to U.S. citizens in a fundamental manner in the Supreme Court's 1966 Miranda v. Arizona decision. In that landmark ruling, the court found that the Fifth and Sixth Amendment rights of Ernesto Arturo Miranda had been violated after he was arrested and tried for rape and kidnapping.

While the Fifth Amendment protects an arrested person from being compelled to be a witness against himself (self-incrimination), the Sixth Amendment guarantees that a person will have access to legal counsel for his or her defense. It was deemed that Miranda was denied these rights.

Limits to the Fifth

Though the Fifth Amendment offers broad protections, there are limits to its use. An important exception was added in 1984, when the U.S. Supreme Court found, in New York v. Quarles, that if public safety is at immediate risk, a suspect's statements are admissible in court, even if his or her Miranda rights have not been explained.

And in an important child-abuse case, Baltimore City Department of Social Services v. Jacqueline Bouknight, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in 1990 that a parent with limited custody rights cannot refuse to tell a judge the child's whereabouts. Protections against self-incrimination did not apply because of the immediate risk to the safety of the child.

Follow Marc Lallanilla on Twitter and Google+. Follow us @livescience, Facebook & Google+. Original article on Live Science.

Read the original here:

What Is the Fifth Amendment? | Plead the Fifth

The Second Amendment & the Right to Bear Arms

At the center of the gun control debate, few things are as hotly disputed in the United States as the Constitution's Second Amendment.

History of the Second Amendment

The Second Amendment provides U.S. citizens the right to bear arms. Ratified in December 1791, the amendment says:

A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

James Madison originally proposed the Second Amendment shortly after the Constitution was officially ratified as a way to provide more power to state militias, which today are considered the National Guard. It was deemed a compromise between Federalists those who supported the Constitution as it was ratified and the anti-Federalists those who supported states having more power. Having just used guns and other arms to ward off the English, the amendment was originally created to give citizens the opportunity to fight back against a tyrannical federal government.

The U.S. Constitution guarantees the inalienable rights of citizens.

Interpretations of the Second Amendment

Since its ratification, Americans have been arguing over the amendment's meaning and interpretation. One side interprets the amendment to mean it provides for collective rights, while the opposing view is that it provides individual rights.

Those who take the collective side think the amendment gives each state the right to maintain and train formal militia units that can provide protection against an oppressive federal government. They argue the "well regulated militia" clause clearly means the right to bear arms should only be given to these organized groups. They believe this allows for only those in the official militia to carry guns legally, and say the federal government cannot abolish state militias.

Those with the opposite viewpoint believe the amendment gives every citizen the right to own guns, free of federal regulations, to protect themselves in the face of danger. The individualists believe the amendment's militia clause was never meant to restrict each citizen's rights to bear arms.

Both interpretations have helped shape the country's ongoing gun control debate. Those supporting an individual's right to own a gun, such as the National Rifle Association, argue that the Second Amendment should give all citizens, not just members of a militia, the right to own a gun. Those supporting stricter gun control, like the Brady Campaign, believe the Second Amendment isn't a blank check for anyone to own a gun. They feel that restrictions on firearms, such as who can have them, under what conditions, where they can be taken, and what types of firearms are available, are necessary.

The Supreme Court and the Second Amendment

While the right to bear arms is regularly debated in the court of public opinion, it is the Supreme Court whose opinion matters most. Yet despite an ongoing public battle over gun ownership rights, until recent years the Supreme Court had said very little on the issue.

The Supreme Court Building in Washington, D.C.

One of the first rulings came in 1876 in U.S. v. Cruikshank. The case involved members of the Ku Klux Klan not allowing black citizens the right to standard freedoms, such as the right to assembly and the right to bear arms. As part of the ruling, the court said the right of each individual to bear arms was not granted under the Constitution. Ten years later, the court affirmed the ruling in Presser v. Illinois when it said that the Second Amendment only limited the federal government from prohibiting gun ownership, not the states.

The Supreme Court took up the issue again in 1894 in Miller v. Texas. In this case, Dallas' Franklin Miller sued the state of Texas, arguing that despite state laws saying otherwise, he should have been able to carry a concealed weapon under Second Amendment protection. The court disagreed, saying the Second Amendment does not apply to state laws, like Texas' restrictions on carrying dangerous weapons.

All three of the cases heard before 1900 cemented the court's opinion that the Bill of Rights, and specifically the Second Amendment, does not prohibit states from setting their own rules on gun ownership.

Until recently, the Supreme Court hadn't ruled on the Second Amendment since U.S. v. Miller in 1939. In that case, Jack Miller and Frank Layton were arrested for carrying an unregistered sawed-off shotgun across state lines, which had been prohibited since the National Firearms Act was enacted five years earlier. Miller argued that the National Firearms Act violated their rights under the Second Amendment. The Supreme Court disagreed, however, saying "in the absence of any evidence tending to show that possession or use of a 'shotgun having a barrel of less than eighteen inches in length' at this time has some reasonable relationship to the preservation or efficiency of a well regulated militia, we cannot say that the Second Amendment guarantees the right to keep and bear such an instrument."

It would be nearly 70 years before the court took up the issue again, this time in the District of Columbia v. Heller in 2008. The case centered on Dick Heller, a licensed special police office in Washington, D.C., who challenged the nation's capital's handgun ban. For the first time, the Supreme Court ruled that despite state laws, individuals who were not part of a state militia did have the right to bear arms. As part of its ruling, the court wrote, "The Second Amendment protects an individual right to possess a firearm unconnected with service in a militia, and to use that arm for traditionally lawful purposes, such as self-defense within the home."

The court would rule on the issue again two years later as part of McDonald v. City of Chicago, which challenged the city's ban on private handgun ownership. In a similar 5-to-4 ruling, the court affirmed its decision in the Heller case, saying the Second Amendment "applies equally to the federal government and the states."

Despite the recent rulings, the debate on gun control continues. Incidents like those in Aurora, Colo., and Sandy Hook, N.J., only serve as motivation for both sides to have their opinions heard and considered.

Related:

Continue reading here:

The Second Amendment & the Right to Bear Arms

Steve Scalise shooting reignites gun control debate: Why Donald Trump has Second Amendment advocates overjoyed – Firstpost

A gunman opened fire at a community baseball practice game in Washington on Wednesday, critically wounding top Republican Congressman Steve Scalise and three others, before the police shot him dead.The attack provoked a wave of emotion on Capitol Hill, where Republicans and Democrats expressed concerns over a possible rise in verbal or physical violence, and president Donald Trump appealed for unity.

In addition to this, a man dressed in a UPS uniform opened fire at a package sorting hub in San Francisco, killing three people before turning the gun on himself, police said.

Representational image. Reuters

However, the despite the two incidents,the one issue that hasn't been spoken about is gun control. In a country wherethere are almost as many guns as people, gun ownership is fiercely defended by firearms industry lobbyists, and Republican politicians, who now control the Senate, the House of Representatives and the White House.

There was also no immediate indication that Trump or his fellow Republicans would shift from their position protecting gun ownership rights. House Republicans who attended a briefing following the shooting were asked by reporters about the need for gun control legislation. "Everyone was focused on the facts of the case, and what might be needed to enhance lawmakers' security," was all Republican representative Barbara Comstock would say.

Scalise was, ironically enough, part of efforts made by House Republicans that opposed federal gun control laws, which he saw as an assault on the Constitution's Second Amendment.

Even today, gun control groups are fighting federal legislation that would relax existing gun laws, especially after Republicans backed by the National Rifle Association (NRA) fared well in last November's elections.

Among the first things they did was roll back curbs imposed by former president Barack Obama's administration, that sought to restrict sale of firearms to people receiving social security checks for mental illnesses or people deemed unfit to handle their own financial affairs.

As pointed out in areport on NBC News, the rule was hotly contested by gun rights advocates.John Feinblatt, president of the Everytown For Gun Safety group, was quoted as saying he expected more gun control rollbacks. "(It is) just the first item on the gun lobby's wish list," he said, accusing the National Rifle Association of "pushing more guns, for more people, in more places".

The National Rifle Association was a generous supporter of the Trump campaign for presidency, donating $30 million. As mentioned by a Bloomberg report, Trump receivedan ecstatic reception from the lobbying group at its April convention in Atlanta. "You came through for me," Trump told his audience there, adding, "And I am going to come through for you."

He soon came good on his promise, the report mentioned, when he overturned another regulation imposed by his predecessor, that had stopped hunters from shooting down bears from airplanes on federal land in Alaska.

But Trump's critics have said that apart from the relaxation of these checks, there hasn't been any concerted effort on Trump's part. A report on CNN said that gun right advocatesare looking for Trump to help advance legislation making concealed-carry permits valid across state lines, as well as a measure that would loosen requirements for buying gun silencers.

However, Trump's chief accomplishment, in gun advocates' view, was his successful nomination of Neil Gorsuch to the Supreme Court, which returned a conservative majority to the panel and opened the door for legal challenges to some restrictive gun laws in states around the country. Already, the NRA has launched legal actions against an assault weapons ban in California in the hope that it wouldbe eventually overturned by the court.

With inputs from Reuters

Read the rest here:

Steve Scalise shooting reignites gun control debate: Why Donald Trump has Second Amendment advocates overjoyed - Firstpost

Black Lives, and Black Second Amendment Rights, Matter – Townhall

|

Posted: Jun 18, 2017 12:01 AM

All lives matter. As do Second Amendment rights.

Which is why the killing of 32-year-old Philando Castile last July was disturbing, and the acquittal of St. Anthony, Minnesota, police officer Jeronimo Yanez, this past Friday, so troubling.

Castiles girlfriend, Diamond Reynolds, who live-streamed the chilling aftermath of the shooting on her cell phone, assumed the traffic stop was for a broken tail-light. But Officer Yanez, four years on the force, stopped Castile believing he might be the perpetrator of a recent robbery. Castile was not; he was merely the same race (black), roughly the same age, and had the same hair-style (dreadlocks).

Of course, many men in the Twin Cities metro area fit those characteristics.

Much about the incident remains unclear and in dispute. What seems indisputable is this: Philando Castile told the Latino officer that he was carrying a gun, for which he had a concealed carry permit. That doesnt sound like an admission someone would make if planning to whip out that pistol and start blasting away.

Also certain is the fact that Officer Yanez fired seven times into the automobile carrying Castile, Reynolds and Reynolds four-year-old daughter. Five bullets struck Castile, two in the heart. One bullet barely missed the toddler strapped into a car seat in the back. Castile later died at a local hospital.

The audio on the cellphone footage, which began after the shots were fired, has Yanez yelling: I told him not to reach for it! I told him to get his hand out.

You told him to get his I.D., sir, his drivers license, Ms. Reynolds responds, almost eerily calm. Please dont tell me, please dont tell me my boyfriend is gone. Please dont tell me hes gone. Please Jesus, no.

Yanez was charged with second-degree manslaughter and reckless discharge of a firearm. The officer testified in court that he fired his weapon after seeing part of the gun emerging from Castiles pocket. Reynolds told jurors that Castile was slowly pulling out his wallet in response to Officer Yanezs request, definitely not his handgun.

The jury was initially deadlocked, ten jurors voting to acquit and two to convict. But the judge urged them to continue deliberating. Though whites outnumbered African Americans on the jury five to one, some jurors told reporters that the two jurors initially favoring conviction were not the two black jurors.

Late in the deliberations, the jury requested to again review several videos introduced into evidence. The two videos the judge allowed them to re-watch were an interview of Diamond Reynolds and the dash-cam recording from the police car. The dash-cam recording has not been released to the public.

Last Friday, the jury unanimously acquitted Officer Yanez of all three charges.

Mistakes happen. Deadly ones, even. One can certainly sympathize with the plight of police fearing for their safety at traffic stops, which they know can turn deadly in an instant. Yet, law enforcement officers cannot go around blowing away innocent people because they are scared.

A young man who worked as a supervisor at a public school cafeteria and had no criminal record is dead. Many others black and white are dead in incidents that suspiciously lack good explanations. There is nothing in our American can-do spirit that accepts fatal errors. Especially repeated ones.

What to do?

Lets outfit police with body cameras. And lets write the rules for those cameras as voters in Ferguson, Missouri, did last April by passing a ballot initiative such that (1) police face repercussions for not having the cameras on, and (2) the footage is made publicly available, so people know there will be accountability and no cover-ups.

Then-President Obamas Justice Department investigated the 2014 shooting of Michael Brown in Ferguson and found that Brown was at fault, as the aggressor, not the police officer. Had body cam footage been publicly released the riots that followed may not have erupted. Citizens would have been saved millions in property damage and spared the divide along racial and political lines all across the nation.

In other instances, body cams might help convict the cops.

Still, even with body camera footage available, it seems difficult to gain convictions against police when they clearly err by killing innocent folks. Numerous cases of police shooting unarmed men have been caught on video and yet either not resulted in officers being prosecuted or with officers acquitted of charges.

Like Officer Yanez, the officers are often removed from the police force. But too late.

Police need better training on how to protect both themselves and citizens they encounter. Too much of the current training appears to encourage a warrior ethic of shoot-first and ask-questions-later. In fact, Officer Yanez attended a controversial seminar called the Bulletproof Warrior in 2014, which some police forces have discouraged their officers from attending.

Yet, even with better training, and with cameras always rolling, the problem wont be solved completely. I do not have all the answers, but as Americans we must find those answers.

Rarely do I agree with Washington Post columnist Eugene Robinson, but hes hard to rebut when, after police killed Philando Castile in Minnesota and Keith Lamont Scott in North Carolina, last year, he wrote, If you are a black man in America, exercising your constitutional right to keep and bear arms can be fatal.

Black lives matter. Blacks Second Amendment rights matter. If we cannot protect black lives and rights, we cannot protect white lives and rights. Much less all lives and rights.

UN Mission Official Says Terror Attack Underway in Mali Resort Area Popular With Foreigners

Read more from the original source:

Black Lives, and Black Second Amendment Rights, Matter - Townhall

Letters First Amendment not just for doctors; patients can opt out – Palm Beach Post

Now that the courts have ruled that doctors have a First Amendment right to ask their patients if they own guns, I want to remind the patients that they also have the same First Amendment right.

To keep your gun ownership private, do not tell the doctors you own guns as it will become part of your medical records and every agency of our federal government will have a ready-made list of gun owners.

If I am asked I would say:

Doc, it is none of your business but if I owned a gun, and I am not saying that I do, I want you to know that I am aware of how to store and handle guns and I would ensure that they are kept safe from children and other unauthorized people for their safety and mine.

BRUCE MILLS, NORTH PALM BEACH

I was appalled by the letter Words mattertake care with drug use (Wednesday) by professor George Stoupas. Though I agree that addicts deserve our compassion, his comparison to people on the autism spectrum is fundamentally wrong and misleading.

People on the autism spectrum are born that way and cannot be cured. They, however, are taught to make the most of their strong points and live productive lives.

Drug abusers, as well as alcohol abusers, become users as a choice. Yes, addiction is a disease, but they can be cured if they choose to go through the extremely difficult and rigorous detox process. I personally know people who made that choice and live happy and productive lives.

JOSEPH WILLINGER, BOYNTON BEACH

Kudos to my mayor, Jeri Muoio, for joining the Compact of Mayors on Climate and Energy. Within three years, participating cities will endeavor to report their greenhouse gas emissions, set emission reduction targets and develop climate action plans.

By withdrawing from the Paris Agreement, President Donald Trump has done damage to our countrys standing with the rest of the world. The original U.S.-Paris agreement actually expires in 2020. Hopefully, by then, a wiser public will have voted him out of office. In the meantime, much can be done by local governments.

A National Geographic report asserts that Floridas coastline could be radically changed by as much as a 5-foot sea-level rise by 2100, putting Miami and other coastal cities under water. This would impact Floridas major industries as well as $390 billion worth of properties. In the wake of climate change, temperature swings are projected to be more volatile by centurys end.

It is therefore imperative that the mayors do everything within their powers to countervail this imprudent step by the president.

MARCIA DE FREN, WEST PALM BEACH

A recent letter suggested President Donald Trumps decision to leave the global warming agreement was another slap in the face of President Barack Obama and more evidence of hatred. After all, the entire agreement was voluntary.

It allows China to continue its increase of pollution at any rate until 2030. What is clearly not voluntary is the U.S. commitment to provide billions of taxpayer dollars to other countries.

So unless you believe that its all Americas fault, and we should be punished financially, you should support an agreement that commits all the largest polluters to make progress today, not 13 years from now.

Similar to NATO, everyone has to meet commitments, not just wink and expect America to do it all with our money.

JOHN GIGANTI, BOYNTON BEACH

Read the original:

Letters First Amendment not just for doctors; patients can opt out - Palm Beach Post

GUEST COLUMN: Confederate monuments protected by First Amendment – St. Augustine Record

Katherine Owens

St. Augustine

There are some who are offended by the Confederate monuments in our Plaza and/or in other cities. These monuments serve only as a reminder of that which has come before. If every generation destroyed what it found offensive, there would be nothing left. It is a guarantee that something we believe in today will be looked upon with disgust and horror by future generations.

I have family who fought on both sides of the Civil War. I am proud of the service of all my ancestors because they defended their values. My family has lived in Florida for the last 190 years, so I ask: Why are we discussing the taking down of monuments to men who fought for Florida?

Why are we not, instead, raising up more monuments and memorials to Floridians around the state not just in the Oldest City? Instead of tearing down the Confederate monuments, why not build a monument to Union Soldiers from northeast Florida? The Civil War was a war that divided families including the Northeast Florida branch of my own family.

Both Confederate monuments in the Plaza were erected when Florida was either occupied territory or a state within the Union, and hence are protected by the Constitution and the Bill of Rights, specifically the First Amendment freedom of speech. They cannot, nor should they be taken down or removed. The builders of those monuments are no longer alive to defend their First Amendment rights. We, the succeeding generations, must do so. Additionally, the General William Loring Monument is under the protection of the Federal law against grave desecration, because he is buried under the memorial.

If in order to appease a few who are offended by the history of the United States, the State of Florida and the City of St. Augustine, an interpretive plaque must be erected, it will need to be worded very carefully. The wording needs to be such that we are neither putting words into the mouths of the erectors of the monuments, nor apologizing for what they believed.

For example: some people claim William Tecumseh Sherman was a hero and a liberator. However, many Southerners still think of him as a mass-murder of white and black Georgians and South Carolinians. It would be a violation of the Freedom of Speech of the erectors of those statues for me or anyone else to insist on a plaque that would cheapen his service to his country (as those who want an interpretive plaque for any Confederate monument or memorial are doing). We cannot know exactly what is in the minds of the men and women who erect and pay for monuments and memorials unless they write down their reasons.

We have been given a trust by proceeding generations to protect their memories. Are we up to that challenge? Or do we destroy the symbols of what they believed in just because we dont?

Read more:

GUEST COLUMN: Confederate monuments protected by First Amendment - St. Augustine Record

Michelle Carter Didn’t Kill With a Text – New York Times


New York Times
Michelle Carter Didn't Kill With a Text
New York Times
Moreover, speech that is reckless, hateful and ill-willed nevertheless enjoys First Amendment protection. While the Supreme Court has carved out narrowly tailored exceptions for literal threats of violence and incitement to lawless action, telling ...
Michelle Carter found guilty in landmark texting suicide caseBoston Herald
Michelle Carter: What the texting suicide case tells usBBC News
A Sad and Terrible Verdict in MassachusettsNational Review
Hot Air -Ars Technica -New York Times -CNN
all 401 news articles »

See original here:

Michelle Carter Didn't Kill With a Text - New York Times

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Cryptocurrency Mining at 65W Achieves 22 MH/s Rate Impressive and Silent Mining … – Wccftech

NVIDIAs partners are creating new Pascal graphics cards for cryptocurrency mining and while they do so, Legitreviews has posted a new guide on how to achieve some impressive mining rates on a single GeForce GTX 1060.

In a series of guides posted by Legitreviews, they have detailed some impressive techniques and tricks to get better hash rates on NVIDIA Pascal GPUs. The card tested by the site was a GeForce GTX 1060 FTW+ 6 GB which costs a little bit more compared to the SSC model. The card ships with a custom dual fan cooler and starts at a price of $249.99 US. These prices will vary since GeForce GTX cards are also affected by price inflation like the Radeon counterparts since the recent mining wave hit the market.

Running on stock frequencies, the card delivers a hash rate of 18.88 with a power consumption of 100W at 68C. With the memory overclocked to 10000 MHz, the card achieved 23.61 MH/s and was running at 70C while consuming 112.9W. The results you see below are obtained with the power target set at reference 100%. While the 10 GHz overclock wasnt stable as it started artifacting, the clocks on memory were toned down to 9.5 GHz for a hash rate of 22.77 MH/s at 109.9W.

By lowering the power target we managed to go from ~110 Watts of power at 22.8 MH/s to just ~65 Watts of power at 22.1 MH/s. As you lower the power target the hashrate does take a slight performance hit, but loosing roughly 0.5 MH/s for cutting the power use by 45 Watts is pretty slick. We also managed to drop our temperature from 70C down to 58C and on this 0dB graphics card model that means the fans stop spinning!

So, we are miningEthereumgetting 22 MH/s on a card using 65 Watts of power with no fan noise. That is pretty crazy! Fanless silent Ethrereum mining! If you go down to a power target of 40% the hashrate takes a major performance hit and it isnt worth going below 45%. via Legitreviews

Tuning the card can lead to some very astonishing results. With the memory still overclocked at 9.5 GHz and power target limited down to different ratios, we can see better efficiency results. Mining is all about making the best buck while consuming less power and the GTX 1060 shined here. With the power limit set to 45%, the card delivered 22.11 MH/s rate at 58C and consumed only 65W that makes a hugedifference. Its also worth noting that the fan speed was set to 0% which means that the card performed under 60C without the fan even operating which is impressive.

Compared to the 100% power limit, the 45% limit allows for a 45W power consumption difference to achieve a very similar hash rate. A single card can make a profit of $138 per month. Having six of these cards inside a custom machine like the one we detailed a while ago would yield$10,080 in a year if the current Ethereum prices are taken into account.

How much would it cost to build a Ethereum mining PC that can hold seven of these cards for around 155-160 MH/s of performance? Here is a quick example of the hardware youd need:

MSI Z170A Gaming M5 Motherboard $129.39 shipped

Intel Celeron G3930 Processor $41.00 shipped

PCIe 16x to 1x Adapters $8.99 eachand up to 7 needed

Cable Ties $5.99 shipped(Got to hold those video cards up to something)

EVGA GeForce GTX 1060 6GB SSC Graphics Card $266.11 shippedup to 7 needed

Crucial 4GB Single DDR4 2133MHz Memory Module $29.98 shipped

Seasonic Prime 1000W 80PLUS Platinum Power Supply $239.24 shipped(An 850W 80PLUS Platinum PSU is $128.49)

SATA to 8-pin PCIe power adapters $6 shipped(Most Power Supplies dont have 7 8-pin PCIe power connectors)

DREVO X1 Series 60GB SSD $39.99 shipped

AmazonBasics Wired Keyboard & Mouse $14.99 shipped

Case Wed suggest making your own with milk crates or something creative

OS Linux or Windows Grab an ISO and use what you prefer!

Power Meter To Make Power Adjustments $18.53 shipped

You are looking at around $2,450 to setup a system like this that should be capable of mining just shy of 3 Ether per month at the current difficulty levels. That means youd be making about $966 per month if all goes well. That means youd get your investment back in the hardware in right about 2.5 months. Not bad for 155-160 MH/s. Via Legitreviews

Expect to see mining specific graphics cards based on NVIDIAs Pascal GPUs that include P106-100 and P104-100 in the coming weeks.

Share Submit

Visit link:

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Cryptocurrency Mining at 65W Achieves 22 MH/s Rate Impressive and Silent Mining ... - Wccftech

Regulations Are Making it Harder For Security Experts to Use Bitcoin – Fortune

A major U.S. Bitcoin exchange, responding to regulations intended to stop criminals, appears to be suspending the accounts of "white hat" security consultants who use Bitcoin to help law-abiding clients.

As reported by CoinDesk , Night Lion Securitys Vinny Troia was contacted last year by Coinbase, an exchange for buying and selling cryptocurrency. The exchange wanted to know how he was using his Bitcoin. Troia told Coinbase that his security business sometimes involved either paying digital ransom on behalf of clients impacted by attacks like WannaCry , or verifying database breaches by buying data from malicious hackersall with client permission.

Get Data Sheet , Fortunes technology newsletter.

Coinbase, after asking whether Troia had U.S. Department of Justice authorization for those methodsauthorization which Troia couldnt confirm even existsCoinbase suspended his account. When he tried to open new accounts under the names of family members so he could continue conducting business, Coinbase shut those down, too.

The situation illustrates the growing pains of Bitcoin as its ecosystem matures. While there are plenty of good reasons that legitimate businesses might need to conduct Bitcoin transactions with shady charactersincluding, say, unlocking vital systems infected by a clever virusenabling such transactions could put an actor like Coinbase in conflict with regulations intended to prevent money laundering (often referred to by the acronym AML, for "anti-money laundering") and criminal activity (KYC, for "know your customer").

In a related incident in Dec. 2016, prosecutors in New York charged the operator of a Bitcoin exchange with violating anti-money laundering laws specifically because it facilitated ransomware payments. Coin Center, a cryptocurrency policy think tank, came out strongly against that move, pointing out both that everyone from police departments to hospitals have had to pay such ransoms in recent years, and that even the FBI has said that sometimes paying ransom is the sensible choice .

View post:

Regulations Are Making it Harder For Security Experts to Use Bitcoin - Fortune

International Banker Analyses Bitcoin’s Recent Fall – CryptoCoinsNews

Recently,Ramki Ramakrishnan, an international banker and treasury manager, who is also a contributor at Forbes, technically analyzed bitcoins recent fall with Elliott Waves.

Bitcoins Recent Correction

On Thursday, all the top 25 cryptocurrencies, including bitcoin, Ethereum, and Ripple, experienced a huge price fall. The average value drop exceeded ten percent in almost all cases. Both Ethereums and bitcoins market cap fell by billions of dollars, with BTC dropping to$37.4 billion and ETH to $28.9 billion.

However, one day later, on Friday, bitcoin recovered from$2,150 to $2,521, and is currently standing on $2,640 (as of Saturday 6:40 PM). Some people credited bitcoins tumble to Bitmainsannouncement saying that the network of bitcoin is at a high risk of being split. Although, analyst Nicola Duke predicted such a correction in May for both BTC and Ethereum. The analyst stated that bitcoin could experience a correction of 46.5 percent. Duke predicted that BTCs price will go as low as $1,470, however, that drop did not happen (yet).

According to Ramakrishnan, bitcoin experienced its biggest correction in two years. The banker had seen the opportunity in the fall to show traders and investors a technical analysis to demonstrate to you how traders can benefit enormously by paying attention to technical factors.

Elliott Wave Analysis is based on a theory put forward by Ralph Nelson Elliott back in the 1930s. He figured out that all bull cycles are made up of five waves, and once the five waves are complete, we will experience a correction that will bring the price down in three waves. The first wave is counted from a significant low, as shown here. The first and third waves are often related to each other by a standard ratio. And one of the three waves going upwards is extended to travel a distance that is much longer relative to the other two,Ramakrishnan explains.

The banker explains that, in his analysis, he started a wave count from a significant low in 2015. In the below chart, one can see that Wave 1 was corrected by Wave 2. The third wave surged quite high, exactly 361.8% of the first wave.

Once bitcoin reached the third wave, the cryptocurrency started in a correction move (as seen in the chart below).Ramakrishnan explained that Elliott Wave practitionersoften look for such correction to relate to the prior impulse wave by a Fibonacci ratio. In the current case, Wave 4 reached the 38.2% measure of the previous wave.

For a real-time bitcoin price chart, click here.

Featured image from Shutterstock.

Here is the original post:

International Banker Analyses Bitcoin's Recent Fall - CryptoCoinsNews

Peach Airline Decides to Accept Bitcoin after Japan Recognizes it as a Valid Currency – The Merkle

On May 22, Japans Peach Aviation announced it will soon start accepting Bitcoin as a legitimate form of payment.Peach will even go a step further and install Bitcoin ATMs in all of the airports within Japan. This move suggests the acceptance of the Bitcoin cryptocurrency, and it might also help with attracting even more tourists from Asia.

Accepting Bitcoin at Japanese airports will be beneficial for many passengers. For example, Peach doesnt only operate domestic flights, but also those to Korea, Thailand, and China as well. Now that the process has started, its expected that passengers will be able to pay with Bitcoin by the end of this year.

The decision to start accepting cryptocurrency as a form of payment is not unique to Peach, but its a significant decision nonetheless. The first airline to accept bitcoin wasin fact airBaltic, and it started using bitcoin over three years ago. This is due to the partnershipwith UATP (Universal Air Travel Plan) which is a payment network for the international airlines. Not only were they among the first services to accept Bitcoin, but they also supported other payment options like Alipay and PayPal.

Despite the fact that you technically can pay for your ticket with Bitcoin on a majority of airlines through third party services, it still comes down to the decision of each individual airline whether or not they willaccept this form of payment directly. Many have chosen not to do so for now. You can still pay with bitcoin for the tickets at online travel booking websites, but airports arent acting too supportive as of yet.

This announcement from Peach came soon after Japan itself officially recognized Bitcoin and accepted it as a legal form of payment. The country was debating the issue of cryptocurrencies for more than a year, and it resulted a positive resolution for the emerging sector.

This law will also improve the relationship between banks and cryptocurrency exchanges. That means that the same restrictions against money laundering will still be applied, as well as know-your-customer rules.

Still, Bitcoin existed in Japan for quite some time now, and merchants were using this currency even before its official recognition by the government. However, the number of merchants that are using it now has quadrupled over the past year. The number went from 900 in 2016, to 4600 today.

Japan has struggled with a stagnation in consumer spending for years now, despite multiple ideas to boost it. Some of those ideas involved sending money to the citizens via mail checks, or even a helicopter money method. However, acceptance of the new currency such as Bitcoin might just be the solution to increasing consumer spending.

If you liked this article, follow us on Twitter @themerklenews and make sure to subscribe to our newsletter to receive the latest bitcoin, cryptocurrency, and technology news.

See original here:

Peach Airline Decides to Accept Bitcoin after Japan Recognizes it as a Valid Currency - The Merkle

Bitcoin Gets the Attention of Goldman Sachs After Reaching New Heights – The Merkle

A new gold rush is picking up speed as bitcoin doubles the size of its fund under the BIT-XBTEs management. The fund that was around $50 million on May 1st has jumped to $100 million a few days ago, which is animpressive growth.

The head of trading and operations at XBT Provider, Jean-Marie Mognetti, has stated that during the last two months, the Providers exchange of the traded Bitcoin notes has seen a major demand increase from industrial as well as retail investors. Everyone is searching for exposure to bitcoin, which is a sure sign that its rise isnt going to stop anytime soon.

Bitcoins increase has gone up by 200% since the beginning of the year, but even that isnt as fast as the growth of other currencies. For example, Ethereum has gone up over 3,000% this year alone.

The Bitcoin Tracker Euro ETNs, as well as Bitcoin Tracker One, are currently available in both Euros, as well as in Swedish Krona.

This all happened very soon after Goldman Sachs, the US investment bank, decided to announce the need for analyst coverage concerning the cryptocurrencies. They stated that the client demands were simply too much. Despite the fact that the price of Bitcoin wasnt exactly specified, Goldman Sachs sees the buying opportunities somewhere in between $1,915 and $2,330.

However, Sheba Jafari, the chief technician has issued a warning for the clients, in which he advised against trading. The reason for this is that earlier this week, Bitcoin breached the $3,000. Instead, he advised waiting for it to go between $1,915 and $2,330.

Also, a few days ago, on June 13th, another report called Blockchain: Unchained was issued by Morgan Stanley. In the report, the commitment to exploring the technology on which Bitcoin and similar cryptocurrencies are built on was underlined. Caution is also advised due to the lack of any regulations in their price. Currently, that price is around $2,600.

According to Goldman Sachs, this attraction to the virtual currencies and Bitcoin in particular is due to the lack of volatility when it comes to other asset classes. The often changes in the currencies worth can also offer many opportunities for some.

Another big news related to this, is the new team up between XBT Provider and Xapo, a leading cryptocurrency custodian. Xapo is a very secure Bitcoin holder, and besides the wallet services, it also provides a vault insurance.

When it comes to protecting your Bitcoin, the safest way would be to hold them in the cold storage. What that means is that you would write the amount that you hold on a paper and store it on many different physical sites, or in wallets that dont have a connection to the internet.

XBT Providers head of investor relations, Ryan Radloff, has stated that adding Xapo to XBT Provider was a very critical step. Now that its done, the companys products will be sure to remain the most professional bitcoin investment product on a global scale.

If you liked this article, follow us on Twitter @themerklenews and make sure to subscribe to our newsletter to receive the latest bitcoin, cryptocurrency, and technology news.

Read the original post:

Bitcoin Gets the Attention of Goldman Sachs After Reaching New Heights - The Merkle

6 Bitcoin Apps That You Must Check Out – The Merkle

This article will go over some must have apps if you are a cryptocurrency enthusiast. Mainly, it will focus on those services that can be used for managing Bitcoin. The apps in question can accept Bitcoin as payment, serve as your Bitcoin wallet, or even just let you playgames that can let you earn some satoshis. The list is in no particular order.

This is a cryptocurrency tracker, and its able to track over 100 different coins allat once, bitcoin is of course included as well. For many crypto investors, its very important to get the latest market data as soon as possible. Any change in their currency of choice carries meaning, and its crucial to have reliable information regarding the coins price at all times.

However, what makes the app so special is the fact that it hit the top of the list of finance apps that people are willing to pay for, at least when it comes to Apple users. Having an app that you have to pay for, and whose only purpose is to track cryptocurrencies on top of the list shows how relevant these particular services are becoming.

The app can also be used on the Apple watch, and you can even use it to request bitcoin via a QR code. Other than that, it presents data about different cryptocurrencies in detailed and fully customizable graphs. Its a must have if youre in the world of cryptocurrencies.

Another very useful appand website. It tracks your location and then scans the area togive you the location of the closest bitcoin ATM. It supports both iOS and Android, which means that youll know where the nearest ATM is at any time.

Apart from the ATM map, it can also inform you about some of the details concerning a particular ATM. Its always useful to know as much as you can, and with this app youll know limits, fees, and even the type of the ATM.

Most of the bitcoin ATM types are covered, and that includes Robocoin, Genesis Coin, Lamassu, GeneralBytes, BitAccess, and SkyHook. The list of ATMs is growingwith the influence of cryptocurrencies, and you can track them all with this app.

A very promising app thats currently still in beta. It allows you to spend your Bitcoin in the real world. Many companies have already shown interest and signed up as partners. Those include Starbucks, Target, and Whole Foods. In all of their stores, you can pay for the services with bitcoin.

The process is simple, and all you have to do is load the amount of bitcoin that you plan on spending into the app. The app will make a barcode, and after scanning it, the money gets transferred to the services account.

This is the first bitcoin app that caughtthe interest of larger stores and services, which says enough about its potential. Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies are making their way into the modern society. More and more stores are accepting them, and apps like this will allow you to use them.

Think of this app as a marketplace. You can use it for selling and buying products or serviceswhile using only bitcoin. There are even different communities that you can join, and a message system that you can use to contact your friends.

Its compatible with several bitcoin wallets, and you can connect them to your account here. With this app, youll easily send payments, check your balances, and even scan QR codes.

The Gilph website itself describes the app as a sort of Swiss Army knife for bitcoin, and its not wrong. This is surely one of the apps with impenetrable security at its core.

The literal translation of this apps name in Japanese is flying monkey. Its a game where you earn bitcoin while playing, and the point is to swing Tobi from one vine to another. In the process, you collect bitcoin and bananas.

The game only has one level, but it gets harder the further you get. You must swing as far as you can, and to do that, you use power-ups that you pay for with bananas.

As mentioned, by playing the game, you collect coins, and at the end of the month, the games ad revenue converts them into a certain amount of bitcoin. The more coins you collect, the more bitcoin youll get. From time to time, you even get some tips about bitcoin from the game itself.

The game is pretty addictive, and along the way, you might even earn something. All in all, its a good way to attract a new audience and teach them about bitcoin.

This is another bitcoin-related game, it allowsyou to sell and trade virtual bitcoins. This game doesnt deal with actual bitcoin, which makes it more of a bonus to our list than a real bitcoin app.

Still, its fun to play, especially if you like progressing games. You start with nothing, as you play you can build up an entire fortune, you can buy new things and mine bitcoin when youre not playing. You can even get a T-Rex pet as an upgrade.

Its also a good way to promote and explain bitcoin without the danger of losing any real money.

The rising interest in cryptocurrencies is real and not just a hype or a short term trendanymore. You can tell by the number of different apps that are emerging for the ecosystem.

More and more services and stores are accepting them, and this new form of payment is what awaits us in the future. Check out these apps now and learn as much as you can, because youll need that knowledge very soon.

If you liked this article, follow us on Twitter @themerklenews and make sure to subscribe to our newsletter to receive the latest bitcoin, cryptocurrency, and technology news.

Follow this link:

6 Bitcoin Apps That You Must Check Out - The Merkle

What Bitcoin Investors Can Learn from Issac Newton’s Mistake – CryptoCoinsNews

Panos Mourdoukoutas,Professor and Chair of the Department of Economics at LIU Post in New York who is also a contributor to several professional journals and magazines, such as Forbes and The New York Times, recently published a write-up stating that bitcoin will make many more people millionaires before its fall. Now, the economics professor advises bitcoin investors not to commit the same mistake as Isaac Newton did back in the 1720s when he bought shares early on in the South Sea Company.

Sir Isaac Newton made a great fortune by investing in the South Sea Company, however, he was too greedy and lost more than three times the profits he made in the first round. According to Mourdouskoutas, thephysicists mistake was related to his emotions: he failed to resist a common temptation during bubble markets. He got back to a bubble asset at a higher price and stayed with it as the circumstances of the market changed watching as the bubble exploded.

Back in 1720, Sir Isaac Newton owned shares in the South Sea Company, the hottest stock in England. Sensing the market was getting out of hand, the great physicist muttered that he could calculate the motions of heavenly bodies, but not the madness of the people. Newton dumped his South Sea Company shares, pocketing a 100% profit totaling 7,000 pounds,Jason Zweig wrote in the commentary for the revised edition of Benjamin GrahamsThe Intelligent Investor.

Although, months later, Newton couldnt control his greed and enthusiasm, invested again into the South Sea Companys stocks at a much higher price. That investment resulted in the physicist losing 20,000 pounds (which is more than $3 million in todays money). Newton was so ashamed of this investment that he forbade anyone to speak the words South Sea Company in his presence.

Mourdouskoutas thinks, based on the findings of various financial experts, that this behavior is related to mental accounting. Mental accounting, unlike traditional accounting, causes individuals to treat gains in financial markets, lottery winnings, casino income, and other bets differently from funds earned from labor, interest income or other sources. The economics professor used the book Nudge as a reference for this behavior:

You can see mental accounting in a casino. Watch a gambler who is lucky enough to win some money early in the evening. You might see him take the money he has won and put it in one pocket, and put the money he brought with him to gamble that evening (yet another mental account) into a different pocket. Gamblers even have a term for this. The money that recently has been won is called house money because in gambling parlance the casino is referred to as the house. Betting some of the money that you have just won is referred to as gambling with the houses money as if it were somehow different from some other kind of money. Experimental evidence suggests that people are more willing to gamble with money they consider house moneylike buying into an inflated asset,Richard H. Thaler and Cass R. Sunstein explains in the book.

According toMourdouskoutas, committing the same mistake as Newton has nothing to do with intelligence but with emotions, such as greed, which often makes investors lose hard amounts of money.

Featured image from Shutterstock.

Read more:

What Bitcoin Investors Can Learn from Issac Newton's Mistake - CryptoCoinsNews