World's oldest super fruit delivers super anti-aging protection – Personal Liberty Digest

Goji berries are fairly new to the Western world, but theyve actually been around for more than 2,000 years. Legend claims they were favored by monks who lived high in the Himalayan mountains. Steeped in water, these miraculous berries were reputed to help in meditation and deliver health, energy, vitality and longevity to those who consumed them. Who doesnt want that?

The Chinese called them wolfberry fruit, and used them for their medicinal properties since around 200 B.C. Their benefits are detailed in the oldest known book on Chinese medicine, which records the medicinal knowledge and practices of the mythical Chinese emperor, Shen Nong.

The myriad of reputed attributes of goji berries have persisted through the centuries and withstood the scrutiny of science. We now know that goji berries which boast plenty of fiber, an abundance of antioxidants and more than 20 different vitamins and minerals can naturally treat all sorts of health concerns.

Goji berries are loaded with antioxidants, whose claim to fame is their ability to neutralize free radicals those un-neighborly molecules that, missing an ion, attack nearby molecules to steal one.

Of course, that leaves a robbed molecule with an uneven number of ions, turning it into another free radical and launching a frenzied, destructive chain reaction of molecule attacks.

Because free radical damage is a major cause of aging and disease, antioxidants are essential for good health and longevity. The goji berry is rich in health-promoting, antioxidant carotenoids: beta-carotene, lycopene, beta-cryptoxanthin, zeaxanthin and lutein.

The ORAC (Oxygen Radical Absorbance Capacity) table measures the antioxidant value of fruits and vegetables. The ORAC shows one ounce of goji berry juice has 10 times more free-radical destroying ability than most other fruits and vegetables. Comparatively, goji berries outstrip oranges for vitamin C, carrots for beta carotene and steak for iron. They have four times more potassium than bananas, and theyre loaded with vitamin C and zinc, both powerful health protectors.

The goji berrys ORAC score puts it in the same class as other superhero, super fruits such as Acai berries, Hawaiian Noni and Mangosteen.

Goji berries contain 18 amino acids, 21 trace minerals (zinc, iron, calcium selenium and phosphorus) and five unsaturated fatty acids (including linoleic and alpha-linolenic acids).

The antioxidants found in goji berries may protect you not only against free radicals but also against oxidative stress and inflammation (the damage free radicals cause). The vitamin C content of goji berries not only helps the common cold but helps wrinkled and sagging skin, cholesterol, blood flow, blood sugar plus, heart, cell and eye health.

Carotenoids convert to vitamin A, which boosts your immune system, eye health and helps build strong bones and teeth.

By preventing damage from UV light exposure and free radicals, the antioxidants zeaxanthin and lutein protect against age-related blindness.

The power of goji berry juice can protect your skin from free radical damage caused by sun exposure. It even provides photoprotection for those who are vulnerable to developing diseases of the skin.

Combined with a healthy diet, goji berries provide a natural approach to blood sugar by helping insulin. For people with blood sugar concerns, dried goji berries provide a preferable snack alternative to high-sugar processed foods.

Goji berries also improve liver and kidney detoxification, energy levels and fertility.

Want more? This super fruit can help support weight loss, boost energy levels, increase your resistance to fatigue, improve focus, strengthen your immune system and enhance sleep quality.

The next time you want a snack, pass on the potato chips and give your body a bonanza of health benefits by choosing dried goji berries. Or get your antioxidant boost every day by taking a high-quality supplement like Peak ResV+ Superfruits. It contains, not only Goji berry but Resveratrol, Acai, Hawaiian Noni, Mangosteen and six other super fruit, superheroes.

Sources: Axe, J. Goji Berry Benefits: Antioxidant & Anti-Inflammatory Superfruit. Dr.Axe.com. draxe.com/ goji-berry-benefits.

Benefits of Goji Berries: The Chinese Longevity Fruit. Antioxidants-for-Health-and-Longevity. antioxidants-for-health-and-longevity.com/benefits-of-goji-berries.html.

Chinese Wolfberry Benefits & Doses. SFGate. healthyeating.sfgate.com/chinese-wolfberry-benefits-doses-8671.html.

Rupavate, S. 15 ways Vitamin C keeps you healthy and fit! The Health Site. thehealthsite.com/fitness/health-benefits-of-vitamin-c-sh214/. Aug. 3, 2015

. Bookmark the

.

Read more from the original source:
World's oldest super fruit delivers super anti-aging protection - Personal Liberty Digest

Cloud first – Philippine Star

Last January, the Department of Information and Communications Technology (DICT) issued a circularaddressed to both the national and local government prescribing the Philippine governments Cloud First Policy.

The policy is aimed at reducing the cost of government information and communications technology (ICT), increasing employee productivity, and developing better citizen online services through the use of cloud computing technology.

Various governments such as the United States, Australia and the United Kingdom have done similar Cloud First Policies.

So what is cloud computing?

The DICT defines cloud computing as a model for enabling ubiquitous, convenient, on-demand network access to a shared pool of configurable computing resources (e.g. networks, servers, storage, applications and services) that can be rapidly provisioned and released with minimal management effort or service provider interaction.

Its characteristics include on-demand self service, broad network access, resource pooling, rapid elasticity and measured service, the department explained.

Business ( Article MRec ), pagematch: 1, sectionmatch: 1

What are the benefits that can be derived from using cloud computing technology? DICT says these are inter-agency collaboration, operational continuity and business recovery, faster deployment of services, greater budget control and decreased spending on legacy infrastructure.

The initial DICT GovCloud infrastructure was set up in 2013 by DOST-ICT Office as part of the Integrated Government Philippines (iGovPhil) Project which aims to provide cloud infrastructure access to government agencies.

And then, to pursue its cloud-first policy, government relaunched the Government Cloud or GovCloud initiative last March.

The DICT awarded the P373-million build, operate and transfer a complete cloud solution project to the Vibal Group, a cloud and education technology company which used to be known as a book publisher.

Vibal said GovCloud would use a hybrid cloud strategy that would use both private and public cloud, adding that creation of private in-country data center would ensure data security, while the off-premise public cloud would make online information and services readily available to government agencies.

The company then partnered with a number of technology firms, including Microsoft for the cloud undertaking. Vibal and Microsoft have been official partners since 2012, when Vibal made available its interactive e-books compatible to Windows OS.

Microsoft managing director Karrie Ilagan said their strength and commitment to security, privacy and transparency would empower the government to achieve the best for its citizens.

While cloud computing produces efficiency, productivity and would provide better citizen services, security is paramount to efficiency, especially with the advent of state-sponsored cyberattacks and cyber-espionage.

DICT launched the National CyberSecurity Plan of 2022 just last month in a bid to protect every single user of the internet in the country. This, of course, is timely especially since the Philippines is among the top 10 countries with malware threats.

With the increasing incidence of cyber espionage and cyberattacks initiated by nation-states, there is now a call for a Digital Geneva Convention, whereby governments should commit to avoiding attacking citizens, critical infrastructure and the private sector; reporting vulnerabilities rather than stockpiling, selling or exploiting them; pledging to aid in the containment and recovery from cyberattacks; and creating a trusted national and global IT infrastructure.

Microsoft offers what it calls a secure, trusted cloud which it emphasized is the most important value that it provides compared to other vendors.

Describing its trusted cloud, Microsoft assured that it helps protect data and has the most comprehensive compliance cover all over the world, including solutions for compliance with the Data Privacy Act of the Philippines, protects major IT systems reliably with Microsoft Disaster Recovery, and offers the most IT flexibility with a truly consistent hybrid cloud.

To show its commitment to a secure, trusted cloud, Microsoft has signed the ICT for Shared Prosperity Technology Manifesto with the DICT. It identifies national challenges and issues that need to be addressed, and key technology pillars that can help in championing and driving economic progress in the country.

Microsoft earlier announced that it would continue to invest $1 billion yearly on cybersecurity research and development in the coming years. The amount excludes acquisitions which the company may make in the sector.

The cloud has allowed companies like Microsoft to create much more sophisticated tools to guard against increasingly cunning attackers. Instead of having to manage their own security, companies also now tap cloud service providers like Microsoft to keep their data secure.

Microsoft has what it calls the Enterprise Mobility + Security that allows its clients to get identity-driven protection against todays attacks.

Its product named Azure is said to have the most comprehensive compliance coverage. It is the most trusted cloud for US government institutions.

With the Data Privacy Act of 2012, Microsoft says it has already designed Azure with industry-leading security measures and privacy policies to safeguard data in the cloud, including categories of personal data identified by the Data Privacy Act.

There is also Microsoft Dynamics 365 which are intelligent cloud applications that connect data across sources.

Microsoft explains that its cloud product combines the companys current customer relationship management and enterprise resource planning cloud services into a single service, and includes new, purpose-built applications to help manage specific business functions.

At the end of the day, it is the citizenry who will decide whether or not governments new policies and programs on ICT have improved the delivery of public services.

For comments, e-mail at philstarhiddenagenda@yahoo.com

See more here:

Cloud first - Philippine Star

GDS Holdings Limited (GDS) Announces Strategic Partnership with Tencent Cloud – StreetInsider.com

Get inside Wall Street with StreetInsider Premium. Claim your 2-week free trial here.

GDS Holdings Limited (NASDAQ: GDS) today announced that it has signed a strategic partnership agreement (the Agreement) with Tencent Cloud Computing (Beijing) LLC (Tencent Cloud), under which GDS Holdings, recognized as preferred carrier-neutral data center provider, will provide secured and continuous data center resources to Tencent Cloud to support its ever-growing demand. The two parties will also work closely on cloud computing and related professional solution services to provide users with the best public cloud experiences.

Pertaining to the Strategic Partnership Agreement, GDS, as preferred carrier-neutral data center provider, will provide Tencent Cloud with secured and continuous data center resources to facilitate any incremental demand from Tencent Cloud. In addition, GDS will leverage its advantages in data center resources to facilitate Tencent Cloud in hybrid IT cooperation and jointly provide clients with hybrid IT total solutions that enable public cloud expansion and implementation, thus creating the most favorable platforms for Tencent Clouds deployment. The two parties will cooperate in data center design and high-quality operating standards while working closely in technology development, customer expansion and joint marketing activities, so as to drive and promote cloud-computing services in China.

It is a great pleasure to have GDS as our strategic partner in terms of carrier-neutral data center solutions and we welcome them as part of our cloud family, stated Mr. Yuepeng Qiu, Vice President of Tencent and President of Tencent Cloud. Our cloud business is undergoing rapid growth. GDSs extensive footprint in all key markets in China as well as its long track record of serving the most demanding customers, including ourselves, is exactly what we are looking for. We believe GDS can provide us with secured and continuous data center resources with high-quality operation standards as we accelerate our cloud deployment across China. The strategic partnership is beneficial to both parties. We look forward to providing more secured cloud solutions and services to our clients and helping to drive cloud adoption in China to a new level together with GDS.

We are delighted to be a strategic partner of Tencent Cloud, stated Mr. William Huang, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of GDS Holdings. Our recognition as preferred vendor by Tencent Cloud shows the extensive mutual trust and respect we have established with the Tencent organization. Cloud adoption is taking off in China and Tencent Cloud is a driving force. Our state-of-the-art data centers support this growth by functioning as hubs for cloud and enterprise customers, bringing both together with synergies that fuel growth and opportunities. We are proud to be working alongside Tencent Cloud, and together with our customers, look forward to paving the path for future cloud development in China.

Go here to read the rest:

GDS Holdings Limited (GDS) Announces Strategic Partnership with Tencent Cloud - StreetInsider.com

Donald Trump, Classy As Always – Mother Jones

Kevin DrumJun. 20, 2017 6:33 PM

Lets see. So far President Obama has (a) wiretapped Trump, (b) deliberately planned the destruction of Obamacare for 2017, (c) caused the Mike Flynn debacle by failing to properly vet Flynn,1 (d) personally organized anti-Trump protests around the country, and (e) caused the death of Otto Warmbier because he was too weak-kneed to stand up to North Korea.

Its standard practice for new presidents to declare that things are even worse than I thought, usually offered up as an excuse for why the country hasnt blossomed under new leadership within the first month.2 Its also standard to attack your predecessors policies. But its decidedly not standard to accuse your predecessor personally of illegal, unethical, and cowardly acts.

I suppose Obama will continue to stay quiet about this, partly because its tradition, partly because thats who he is, and partly because speaking up might be counterproductive at the moment. But Im pretty sure Im not the only one who wishes hed toss tradition aside and just lay into Trump. Id pay to see it.

1For the record, Flynn was fired by Obama in 2014 because he had become deranged. Obama personally warned Trump about this.

2Also newly elected governors, mayors, district attorneys, sheriffs, dogcatchers, and PTA presidents.

Mother Jones is a nonprofit, and stories like this are made possible by readers like you. Donate or subscribe to help fund independent journalism.

Visit link:

Donald Trump, Classy As Always - Mother Jones

Donald Trump No Longer Wants to ‘Stay Out’ of Syria – The Atlantic

During the 2016 election, many voters were dismayed by both major-party candidates. Hillary Clinton was the personification of the Washington establishment foreign-policy hawk, with her dismal track record of urging ill-conceived military interventions. And Donald Trump, who railed against squandering American blood and treasure abroad, possessed neither the knowledge nor the experience nor the discipline nor the character to steer Americas approach to geopolitics in a better direction.

As if those choices weren't dispiriting enough, I fretted that for all Donald Trumps denunciations of the Iraq War and promises to spend money at home rather than abroad, a careful assessment of his words showed that his own instincts were interventionistthat he was no less likely than his opponent to blunder into a major war.

In Syria today, President Trump is risking just such a conflict.

American forces and American allies are not only taking territory from ISIS, theyre holding that territory against regime forces, David French writes at National Review. Theres a word for what happens when a foreign power takes and holds territory without the consent of the sovereign state invasion. In many ways, current American policy is a lighter-footprint, less ambitious version of the invasion of Iraq in 2003. Were using local allies, but our own boots are on the ground, and were directly defending our forces and our allies from threats from Syrias own government. In his estimation, the key warring parties increasingly face a stark choiceagree to a de facto partition of the country or inch toward a great-power conflict.

To wit, an American fighter shot down a Syrian warplane on Sunday, the first time the American military has downed a Syrian aircraft since the start of the civil war in 2011. Observers immediately called the incident a marked escalation in the conflict.

And their view was quickly vindicated: Russia on Monday condemned the American militarys downing of a Syrian warplane, suspending the use of a military hotline that Washington and Moscow have used to avoid collisions in Syrian airspace and threatening to target aircraft flown by the United States and its allies over Syria.

Those skeptical of U.S. intervention in the Syrian civil war have long warned that it could escalate into a civilization-warping conflict between nuclear powers. But neither Vietnam nor Afghanistan nor Iraq nor Libya has persuaded todays hawks to sufficiently weight the unintended consequences that plague all complex military interventions. And there are so many varieties of hawks that are urging action.

The complexity of the civil war in Syria is underscored by the fact that the ascendant pro-war faction inside the Trump administration is composed of Iran hawks. According to reporters Kate Brannen, Dan De Luce and Paul McLeary at Just Security, antagonism toward Iran is causing two officials in the Trump White House to push for broadening the conflict, against the advice of officials at the Pentagon:

Ezra Cohen-Watnick, the senior director for intelligence on the National Security Council, and Derek Harvey, the NSCs top Middle East advisor, want the United States to start going on the offensive in southern Syria Their plans are making even traditional Iran hawks nervous, including Defense Secretary James Mattis, who has personally shot down their proposals more than once, the two sources said Despite the more aggressive stance pushed by some White House officials, Mattis, military commanders and top U.S. diplomats all oppose opening up a broader front against Iran and its proxies in southeastern Syria, viewing it as a risky move that could draw the United States into a dangerous confrontation with Iran, defense officials said. Such a clash could trigger retaliation against U.S. troops deployed in Iraq and Syria, where Tehran has armed thousands of Shiite militia fighters and deployed hundreds of Revolutionary Guard officers.

Put another way, Iran hawks in the Trump White House want to broaden the conflict there in a manner that pits the U.S. against another country that also seeks the defeat of ISIS, the ostensible reason the U.S. is involved in Syria in the first place.

Meanwhile, hawks in Iran are escalating that countrys role in Syria: Iran announced Sunday the Iran Revolutionary Guards had launched ballistic missile strikes on Saturday against ISIS targets in Syria, dramatically escalating the countrys role in the Syrian conflict. The mid-range ground-to-ground missiles targeted militants in eastern Syria in retaliation for the deadly terrorist attacks in Tehran earlier this month.

The American public does not want a major intervention in Syria.

There has never been a congressional vote authorizing U.S. military operations in Syria against anyone, and there has been scant debate over any of the goals that the U.S. claims to be pursuing there, Daniel Larison notes. The U.S. launches attacks inside Syria with no legal authority from the U.N. or Congress, and it strains credulity that any of these operations have anything to do with individual or collective self-defense.

And the push for escalation is a particular betrayal for Trump voters who supported the candidate based on rhetoric about quickly defeating ISIS and otherwise eschewing war. Here is what Trump had to say back when President Obama was contemplating a greater U.S. role in Syria: What I am saying is stay out of Syria AGAIN, TO OUR VERY FOOLISH LEADER, DO NOT ATTACK SYRIA - IF YOU DO MANY VERY BAD THINGS WILL HAPPEN & FROM THAT FIGHT THE U.S. GETS NOTHING!

Today, escalation in Syria risks those very bad things, along with American lives and treasure, but Trumps current rhetoric suggests he is more focused on his ongoing feud with the news media, Hillary Clinton, and whether he is under investigation. His approach carries all the risks of Washington establishment hawkery with none of the steadiness, experience or discipline that helps to mitigate them.

Were inching toward an outright invasion and extended occupation of northern Syria, French writes at National Review. All without congressional approval. All without meaningful public debate. Will Trumps base stand for this betrayal? So long as he is commander in chief, the U.S. will suffer from the worst qualities of the establishment and its antagonists. It is hard to imagine a president less fit to avoid catastrophe.

See the article here:

Donald Trump No Longer Wants to 'Stay Out' of Syria - The Atlantic

To stop Donald Trump, defeat the Republicans who enable him – Chicago Tribune

Jonathan Rauch in Lawfare writes on Republicans' continued devotion to President Donald Trump:

"Perhaps there are limits to Republicans' tolerance, but if Trump hasn't already triggered them, it is hard to imagine where they are. The firing of a special prosecutor? An indictment? Possibly, but one wonders if it might be literally true that Trump could, as he once boasted, shoot someone on Fifth Avenue and retain Republican support.

"The numbers support no predictions, but they offer a hint. Even under a worst-case scenario of presidential malfeasance, removing Trump would be no easy or quick task. It would require a sea-change in Republican partisans' attitude, a change of which there is no sign today. And it would require Republican leaders to take political risks that few have shown any appetite for."

GOP defeats in 2018 might give the Democrats the majority in the House, expediting impeachment, but removing Trump would require a vote of two-thirds of the Senate. Without substantial GOP defections, Trump will be there for the remainder of his four-year term.

Could Trump be forced to resign if, for example, the choice was between resignation and being held in contempt of court for refusal to turn over financial records? Perhaps, but it's far from clear that such a standoff would occur. If it did, Trump and his fleet of lawyers could certainly delay and appeal, in essence running out the clock on his presidency.

Whether in 2020 or before, the only surefire means to protect the country from Trump is to defeat his followers, and eventually him. A third-party candidate, as my colleague Michael Gerson recognizes, could throw the race to the Democrat. My reaction to that possibility is: So? We've made the case here and been proved correct that Trump's flaws as a human being and president surpass matters of policy and put the republic at risk.

While it is true that a primary has never defeated a sitting president in more than 100 years (Lyndon Johnson chose not to run in 1968, Jimmy Carter beat back Ted Kennedy and Gerald Ford held off Ronald Reagan), Trump is helping to rewrite the political playbook. An anti-Trump Republican unsullied by sycophancy and presenting a credible program for uniting the country and addressing policy problems that have befuddled Trump would have a historic opportunity.

In the short term, the most effective way of removing Trump is to defeat again and again lawmakers who refuse to remove him, thereby advancing the prospects for impeachment and putting optimum pressure on Republican senators. (Republicans pledging to vote for impeachment or removal in the Senate based on the facts available at the time might spare themselves.)

With Georgia's special election Tuesday in the 6th Congressional District, we'll get our first inkling of just how vulnerable Republicans might be in 2018. Between now and 2018, Democrats, independents and the small cadre of #NeverTrump Republicans need to pursue two tracks simultaneously keeping the special counselor in place (and assisting in the fact-finding process with open hearings, when possible) and generating momentum to defeat the greatest possible number of Trump protectors. That might entail fielding third-party candidates and primary challenges. Democrats certainly will need to keep their base energized, field an all-star list of candidates and make the case against the extreme Trump agenda while presenting reasonable alternatives of their own.

The only real guarantee, you see, of reversing the debacle of 2016 is to defeat Trump and his minions at the polls. The solution to democracy gone astray is always more democracy.

Jennifer Rubin writes the Right Turn blog for The Post, offering reported opinion from a conservative perspective.

RELATED ARTICLES:

Republicans, beware. The tables will turn.

My application to replace Sean Spicer

Trump's voters were more motivated by nationalism than economic hardship

If Republicans lose the House, Trump will be impeached

Visit link:

To stop Donald Trump, defeat the Republicans who enable him - Chicago Tribune

Donald Trump’s Approval Rating Plummets to New Low as Republicans Grow Wary Amid Russia Investigation – Newsweek

Another day, another low point for Donald Trump. The president's approval rating, which has proved historically bad since he took office, has sunk again.

The latest survey from CBS Newsout Tuesday found his approval rating had hit a new low of 36 percent, while 57 percent disapproved of the job he is doing. Trump's approval rating has declined over the last few monthsin the CBS News poll. Forty-three percent approved of him in early April, a number that dropped to 41 percent by late April and now has hit the new low of 36 percent in late June. The previous low for Trump was 39 percent in February.

Trump's support among Republicans might have been a factor in the drop. Seventy-two percent of GOP respondents approved of the president's job performancewhich sounds like a lotbut actually represents an 11-percentage-point fall compared with April.

Daily Emails and Alerts- Get the best of Newsweek delivered to your inbox

The poll found that the investigation into Trump's potential ties with Russia, the country that interfered in the 2016 election as it aimed to helpget the GOP candidate into office, hasdragged down his popularity. His firing of FBI Director James Comey and comments suggesting the move was connected to the bureau's Russia probe, as well as his near-constant focus on the investigation, might not be helping him with the American people.Just 28 percent of respondents approved of the way he's handled the probe, according to CBS, while 63 percent disapprove. About one-third said Trump's approach on the process has left them thinking less of the president. Fifty-sevenpercent of GOP respondents approved of Trump's handling of the Russia investigation.

Thirty-nine percent of all respondents thought the Russia investigation was a critical national security issue, while 32 percent thought it was a distraction. Twenty-seven percent thought it was a serious issue but not as serious as other issues.

The CBS News survey, conducted bySSRS,sampled1,117 adults across the country though telephone interviews from June 15 through June 18. It had a margin of error of plus or minus 4 percentage points for the full sample.

Other recent surveys haven't brought good news for Trumpeither. The tracking poll from the generallyright-leaning Rasmussen Reports, a survey often cited by the president on Twitter, found Trump's approval rating had fallen 2 percentage points over the weekend, to 48 percent. Gallup's tracking poll, meanwhile, pegged Trump's approval at just 38 percent Monday, closing in on the president's lowest point in the survey35 percentwhich he hit in late March.

The weighted average from data-focused website FiveThirtyEighthad Trump's approval rating at 38.7 percent Tuesday morning, while his disapproval stood at 55.3 percent. FiveThirtyEightaggregates public polls to come up with the average figure and accounts for each survey's quality, timeliness, sample size and any partisan leanings.

Read the original:

Donald Trump's Approval Rating Plummets to New Low as Republicans Grow Wary Amid Russia Investigation - Newsweek

Sean Spicer: No Chance Yet To Ask Donald Trump About Russia Election Tampering – Deadline


Deadline
Sean Spicer: No Chance Yet To Ask Donald Trump About Russia Election Tampering
Deadline
Asked for a yes/no answer to the question, Does Trump believe the Russian government interfered in the 2016 presidential election, Spicer pulled out his I have not sat down and talked to his about that specifically gag, adding, I will be glad to ...
It's Not Sean SpicerU.S. News & World Report
What Donald Trump and Sean Spicer can learn from Al FrankenVox
Sean Spicer wants to stop doing Donald Trump's press briefingsThe Independent

all 474 news articles »

Link:

Sean Spicer: No Chance Yet To Ask Donald Trump About Russia Election Tampering - Deadline

Stephen Colbert Mocks Donald Trump’s Lawyer For Botching Investigation Denial – Deadline


Deadline
Stephen Colbert Mocks Donald Trump's Lawyer For Botching Investigation Denial
Deadline
UPDATED with video: President Donald Trump spent Father's Day Weekend at Camp David where, Stephen Colbert speculated, it must have been nice to get away from the Russia investigation. Last week Washington Post reported POTUS is under ...
Seth Rogen and Stephen Colbert Show Us the Best Way to Troll Donald Trump Jr.Slate Magazine (blog)
Seth Rogen and Stephen Colbert Troll Donald Trump Jr. With Twitter DMsHollywood Reporter
Stephen Colbert and Seth Rogen Just Trolled Donald Trump Jr. on TwitterTIME
EW.com -NewsBusters (press release) (blog) -Daily Beast
all 39 news articles »

Read this article:

Stephen Colbert Mocks Donald Trump's Lawyer For Botching Investigation Denial - Deadline

Who Is Jay Sekulow, and Why Is He Defending Donald Trump? – Slate Magazine

Jay Sekulow hosting an event at the Allen Arena at Lipscomb University on April 29, 2014, in Nashville, Tennessee.

Rick Diamond/Getty Images for GMA

Jay Sekulow had one job. He didnt do it. In fact, he did the opposite. The newest member of Donald Trumps private legal team, Sekulow was supposed to explain that, counter to the Washington Posts reporting, the president is not under investigation,. Instead, he told Fox News Chris Wallace that Trump is under investigationtwicebefore denying hed said any such thing.

This embarrassing flap raises two questions: Who is Jay Sekulow, and why is he defending Trump?

The first question is more easily answered than the second. Sekulow is a conservative litigator who has spent his career dismantling the constitutional separation of church and state. In 1986, he persuaded the Supreme Court to strike down an ordinance barring Jews for Jesus from proselytizing in Los Angeles International Airport. The issue was close to Sekulows heart: Although he was raised Jewish, he became a Messianic Jew while attending Atlanta Baptist College (now Mercer University). As he explained in an essay, Sekulow commit[ted] [his] life to Jesus at a performance by the Liberated Wailing Wall, the Jews for Jesus music group.

Sekulow served as the Jews for Jesus general counsel for several years and founded a nonprofit, Christian Advocates Serving Evangelism, or CASE, to fund his legal work. In 1991, he moved to the American Center for Law & Justice, a conservative Christian advocacy group founded by Pat Robertson to counteract the American Civil Liberties Union. In his capacity as ACLJ chief counsel, Sekulow continued to argue cases at the Supreme Court, usually defending school prayer and government subsidization of religion. Sekulow also repeatedly attacked buffer zones around abortion clinics that prevent protesters from accosting women. He lost that fight but won several high-profile religion cases by asserting that restrictions on religion in schools violate freedom of speech.

Sekulows profile rose precipitously in the 1990s thanks in large part to Paul and Jan Crouch, owners of the Trinity Broadcast Network. (Jan Crouch, the Los Angeles Times reported in 1993, referred to Sekulow as our little Jew.) The Crouches gave him a talk show on the network called Call to Action: Legal Issues Facing Christians Today, a platform that cemented his reputation as a top evangelical attorney. According to the LAT, donations to Sekulows nonprofit, CASE, quadrupled after he mentioned it on air.

Sekulows hiring may have been a gesture of goodwill to a group whose support Trump cannot afford to lose.

Over the next 15 years, Sekulow also transformed himself into a minor Republican powerbroker, working with the Bush White House to select conservative judicial nominees and push them through the Senate. In 2005, however, the Legal Times Tony Mauro published an investigative piece revealing that Sekulow had through the ACLJ and a string of interconnected nonprofit and for-profit entities built a financial empire that generates millions of dollars a year and supports a lavish lifestylecomplete with multiple homes, chauffeur-driven cars, and a private jet that he once used to ferry Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia.

While Sekulow struggled to maintain his image and fundraising capabilities, other groups began to outshine the ACLJ. The Alliance Defending Freedom and the Becket Fund for Religious Liberty, for example, became key players in conservative Christian litigation, creating a network of supporters and donors through more traditional channels. Sekulow retreated from the front lines of church-state lawsuits; he argued his last Supreme Court case in 2008.

But Sekulow and the ACLJ have continued advocating for their peculiar vision of evangelical conservatism. In 2011, the ACLJwhich purports to support religious and constitutional freedomssued New York to block the construction of what it called the Ground Zero mosque. Sekulow, who still serves as the organizations chief counsel, vocally supported the effort and contributed to both the lawsuit and the appeal. He lost.

In recent years, Sekulow has served as an informal adviser to Mitt Romneys 2012 presidential campaign, hosted a radio show, and contributed to the ACLJs blog. He has also used the ACLJs resources to promote conservative values in Africa. In 2010, Sekulow and his son set up ACLJ offices in Zimbabwe and Kenya as both countries were in the midst of revising their constitutions. The ACLJ lobbied for the inclusion of constitutional bans on homosexuality, same-sex marriage, and abortioneven in cases where the mother will die unless her pregnancy is terminated. While neither country wrote total bans on abortion or homosexuality into their constitutions, Zimbabwe did include a prohibition on same-sex marriage. (Homosexuality is already illegal in both countries by statute.)

Top Comment

" to block the construction of what it called the Ground Zero mosque." You know, because religious freedom. The hypocrisy of the current religious right is just pathetic. They wallow in it, like stink on a turd. More...

Sekulows career arc looks similar to that of a Trump hanger-on like Rudy Giuliani: fame and relevance followed by intense controversy and flagging fortunes that are suddenly reversed by affiliation with the president. Despite this surface resemblance, it might seem odd that Trump hired Sekulowa First Amendment lawyerto defend him against possible obstruction of justice charges. But the hire makes sense if Trump views Sekulow as less a litigator than a messenger. While Sekulow may not be an expert in obstruction, impeachment, or executive privilege, he seems to remain popular among the Christian right. His hiring may have been a gesture of goodwill to a group whose support Trump cannot afford to lose.

Whatever logic justified Sekulows recruitment was shattered on Sunday, when the fiery culture warrior of the 1990s was reduced to an incoherent propagandist. He tripped and stammered, then grew furious with Wallace, his relatively friendly interlocutor, for noting his contradictory statements. It was a humiliating performance, one that likely disqualified him from future TV appearances. Sekulows deflating stint as a surrogate-attorney serves as a reminder that Trumps habit of hiring unqualified, unprepared advisors doesnt just hurt the country. Sometimes, it hurts the president, too.

Read the rest here:

Who Is Jay Sekulow, and Why Is He Defending Donald Trump? - Slate Magazine

Exploding airbags: Takata shares plummet 17% on bankruptcy reports – CNNMoney

Shares in the Japanese auto parts company plunged 17% on Monday following multiple reports that its exploding airbags scandal may soon drive it into bankruptcy.

The stock was suspended Friday in response to the reports, which said the troubled company plans to file for bankruptcy protection as soon as this week.

Analysts have long warned that Takata may be forced into bankruptcy due to the huge cost of the deadly scandal, which resulted in the recall of tens of millions of vehicles around the world.

The company's defective airbag inflators, which can explode and send shrapnel into drivers and passengers, has been blamed for 11 deaths in the U.S. and several others elsewhere.

Related: Have an exploding airbag? You might get $500

As the crisis has mounted, Takata has been trying to figure out a way to survive and still keep supplying replacement parts to affected carmakers, such as Honda (HMC) and Toyota (TM). The process of making all U.S. vehicles safe again could last until 2023.

Takata said in February it was negotiating the sale of its business to Detroit-based Key Safety Systems, which is owned by a Chinese company.

According to Friday's reports in Japanese and international media, Takata would file for bankruptcy protection in Japan and then in the U.S. The sale of its business operations to Key Safety would take place after that.

In a statement late Friday, Takata said that "all options are being considered" for its restructuring and that "no decision of any kind has been made."

Related: U.S. firm is frontrunner to buy troubled airbag maker

The company's shares have lost more than half their value so far this year. They're worth only about an eighth as much as they were in early 2014.

In January, Takata pleaded guilty to corporate criminal charges in the U.S. and agreed to pay a $1 billion fine. Most of that money went to carmakers who have been handling the airbag repairs.

Three former Takata executives have been charged in the U.S. with wire fraud and conspiracy in relation to the sale of the faulty airbags.

CNNMoney (Hong Kong) First published June 19, 2017: 4:56 AM ET

Link:

Exploding airbags: Takata shares plummet 17% on bankruptcy reports - CNNMoney

Asbestos Exposure Attorneys – Mesothelioma Lawsuits …

Most people who have been diagnosed with mesothelioma or asbestosis have been exposed to asbestos from a job where they were breathing asbestos fibers.

However, there are also a growing number of cases involving family members and others who have contracted mesothelioma or other asbestos-related ailments through second-hand asbestos exposure. Common industrial fields where workers may be exposed to asbestos and increase the risk of mesothelioma for themselves andloved onesinclude:

In recent years, there have also been a growing number of mesothelioma cases caused by second-hand asbestos exposure, where the individual lived with someone who worked around asbestos and may have breathed fibers that were carried home on their clothing or in their hair. This has been found to occur among spouses who washed the workers clothes and among children who were held by their father after coming home covered in asbestos fibers.

The asbestos attorneys at Saiontz & Kirk, P.A. review potential injury lawsuits for individuals throughout the United States who have been diagnosed with mesothelioma or asbestosis. To review a potential claim for yourself, a friend or family member, request a free consultation.

The lawyers at Saiontz & Kirk are investigating potential claims for individuals throughout the United States who may be entitled to compensation through an asbestos lawsuit as a result of mesothelioma or asbestosis.

REVIEW A CASE

It is estimated that approximately 3,000 new cases of mesothelioma are diagnosed each year. Most begin in the chest cavity.

Because the signs of mesothelioma, asbestosis and other asbestos-related diseases often take a long time to manifest, diagnosis of these ailments often comes decades after exposure.

There is no cure for these asbestos exposure injuries and most of those who are diagnosed with mesothelioma from asbestos often only have a prognosis of one to five years after the illness is discovered.

In many cases, industries and employers knew for years that asbestos exposure was dangerous to their workers, but put profits ahead of worker safety and failed to warn them of the dangers of exposure and failed to provide the proper safety equipment.

Many individuals each year are able to obtain an asbestos settlement, as massive jury verdicts have repeatedly been handed down throughout the United States.

ASBESTOS LAWSUIT

Our lawyers can provide a free consultation and claim evaluation to determine what benefits your family may be entitled to for payment of medical costs, lost wages and personal injury damages as a result of injuries from exposure to asbestos. Numerous settlements and financial recoveries have been obtained for asbestos victims and their families nationwide. If you, a friend or family member have been diagnosed with mesothelioma, we can protect your rights and pursue the compensation you may be entitled.

Request a free consultation and claim evaluation. There are no fees or expenses until we secure a recovery.

CONTACT OUR ASBESTOS LAWYERS ABOUT AN INJURY LAWSUIT

Read the rest here:

Asbestos Exposure Attorneys - Mesothelioma Lawsuits ...

Use of harmful chemicals for fish preservation harmful to consumers – Ghana News Agency

By Godwill Arthur-Mensah/ Bridget Denteh, GNA

Accra, June 20, GNA - Mrs Elizabeth Naa Afoley Quaye, Minister of Fisheries and Aquaculture Development, has warned fishmongers using Monosodium Glutamate to process expired fishes to halt the practice since it is harmful to human health.

She said fishmongers use monosodium glutamate on expired fish especially tilapia to let it look glossy to attract potential buyers.

The Sector Minister gave the warning at a Stakeholders Meeting on Fisheries Law Enforcement in Accra, on Tuesday, to deliberate on the best ways of halting unreported and unregulated fishing practices in the country

She said some fishmongers around the Volta Lake and other coastal communities had been buying rotten or expired fishes from some cold stores, the practice known in local parlance as Kodoso and used Monosodium Glutamate to make them attractive to potential buyers.

The Fisheries Minister said the indiscriminate use of explosives, chemicals, under-sized fishing nets, light fishing and other aggregating devices for fishing would collapse the fisheries sector if serious and pragmatic measures were not taken to address the menace.

The continuous use of various chemicals to harvest fish in the artisanal sector has serious health consequences for consumers.

"The practice of using chemicals is seriously wiping out our fishery resources because many of the poisoned fishes that are not harvested eventually rot at the bottom of the sea, and this pollute the environment.

This she explained if not stopped would lead to the total collapse of the fishery industry.

She warned that individuals or fishers who would be caught in any form of illegal fishing practices would have a brush with the law.

Mrs Quaye promised to subsidise fishing nets to fishermen and canoe owners as part of efforts to enhance their work.

She also entreated all owners of seized fishing vessels to report to the Ministry for identification and collection and warned them not to indulge in any illegal fishing practices again.

The Minister said under the Collaboratory Fisheries Management, fishermen have been given the authority to regulate fishing activities in their respective areas and to deal with people practising illegal fishing methods.

She noted that light fishing affected the reproductive system of the fishes and changed the temperature of the water body and, thus, made the water uncomfortable for habitation by marine life.

She explained that the current exploitation rate of the fisheries resources was not sustainable and urged all stakeholders in the fisheries industry to collaborate to stamp out unreported and unregulated fishing practices.

The Sector Minister said that the collapse of the fishery industry would have grave consequences on the national economy such as job losses, malnutrition and other negative socio-economic repercussions that would be difficult to quantify.

In the efforts to arrest and reverse the situation, the Minister said, her outfit had developed a comprehensive Fisheries Management Plan to address the challenge.

She mentioned some key measures like the effective enforcement of Fisheries legislation, improving information on fisheries biology and stock assessment to support the re-building strategy and reducing the current levels of fishing efforts and capacity.

Other measures include protecting marine habitat to conserve biodiversity and product certification and reducing post-harvest losses.

Mrs Quaye advocated the need for fishers to collaborate with the Fisheries Law Enforcement Unit to clamp down on "galamsey in the fishing sector" for sustainable fishery conservation.

Watch Committee members in Prampram in the Greater Accra Region, testified that, their vigilance against light fishing in the area, had yielded positive outcomes and enjoying bumper catch.

They suggested that the Ministry should replicate the setting up of such committees in other coastal communities, to protect marine life in the sea and other water bodies.

The stakeholders meeting concluded ended with major players in the fishing industry agreeing that light fishing, use of -chemicals, under-sized fishing nets and bamboo for fishing should be barred.

Ghana has been battling light fishing for a number of years now and consensus reached by the stakeholders would help in bringing an end to all forms of illegal fishing practices in the country.

GNA

See the original post:

Use of harmful chemicals for fish preservation harmful to consumers - Ghana News Agency

Nearly a half-million Rohingya refugees: UN report – Anadolu Agency

By Sorwar Alam

ANKARA

Nearly a half-million Rohingya from Myanmar have been displaced due to decades of oppression in southwestern Myanmar, according to a new UN report.

The report, published by the UN High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHRC) to mark June 20 World Refugee Day, says by the end of 2016 the number of Rohingya refugees rose to 490,300, up from 451,800 the previous year.

The report shows that Bangladesh hosts the largest number of Rohingya, 276,200, with 243,000 of them living in a refugee-like situation.

However, the government of Bangladesh estimates the population to be between 300,000 and 500,000, the UNHRC says.

The Rohingya minority is one of the most oppressed communities in the world, as they have been suffering from a state-run slow-motion cleansing operation in the southwestern Myanmars state of Rakhine, according to Human Rights Watch.

The southeastern city of Coxs Bazar in Bangladesh hosts Rohingya refugees in two registered and three unregistered camps.

International community must take action

Mirza Taslima Sultana, a researcher at the Refugee and Migratory Movements Research Unit (RMMRU), told Anadolu Agency in Bangladeshs capital Dhaka that the international community should take action to stop the oppression of the Rohingya.

Bangladeshs government will have to contact international organizations to stop the Rohingya torture, she added.

Sultana said that current situation in Myanmars Rakhine state makes sending the Rohingya back impossible.

In the current situation, we cannot send them back to Myanmar. The world as well as Bangladesh needs to come forward to solve the Rohingya problem.

She said Coxs Bazar authorities have faced difficulty ensuring public order due to thousands of unregistered refugees.

But we have to remember 1971 [Bangladeshs War of Independence], when people from Bangladesh took refuge in neighboring India. As India helped us at that time, we should also help the Rohingya, said Sultana.

Mohammad Rayhan, a Rohingya community leader in Coxs Bazar, told Anadolu Agency that Rohingya have been living in Bangladesh for decades without the benefit of education and other basic rights.

Our children dont have any future. They cant get any education, Rayhan said, adding that they want to return to their homeland but the international community should ensure our life and basic rights.

Monjur Mia, a Rohingya living in the Kutupalong unregistered camp near Coxs Bazar, said he would return to his country after his rights are ensured.

We want a normal life

Dudu Mia, a Rohingya in the Leda unregistered refugee camp in Teknaf, eastern Coxs Bazar, said Refugee Day means nothing for their lives.

We have been living in this camp for many years. But the conditions have not improved. We want to live a normal life like other people. We ask the international community to solve the issue so that we can go back to our homes, he said.

Besides Bangladesh, the countries of Pakistan, Thailand, Malaysia, Indonesia and Saudi Arabia also host Rohingya refugees.

Tens of thousands of Rohingya have fled their homes in Rakhine since last October, when Myanmar's military launched a crackdown whose brutality has drawn international criticism.

Rohingya have fled Rakhine -- one of the poorest states in Myanmar -- in droves for decades, with a new wave of migrations occurring since mid-2012 after communal violence broke out between ethnic Buddhists and the Muslim Rohingya minority.

Security forces have been accused of gang-rape, killings, beatings, disappearances and burning villages in the Maungdaw area of northern Rakhine since October.

The Rohingya in impoverished Rakhine have been effectively denied citizenship by a 1982 nationality law enacted by Ne Win, a military strongman who staged a coup and whose 1962-1988 leadership saw the adoption of xenophobic policies.

The official term for the unrecognized Rohingya had previously been Bengali, which suggests they are not from Myanmar but interlopers from neighboring Bangladesh.

Continue reading here:

Nearly a half-million Rohingya refugees: UN report - Anadolu Agency

Churchill Downs wins approval for new Trackside gambling parlor – Lexington Herald Leader


Lexington Herald Leader
Churchill Downs wins approval for new Trackside gambling parlor
Lexington Herald Leader
The Kentucky Horse Racing Commission voted Tuesday to approve plans for Churchill Downs to build a $50 million to $60 million gambling parlor at a former training track in Louisville. The new 85,000-square-foot venue will house 600 to 650 machines with ...
Churchill Downs wins initial approval for gambling machinesWashington Times
Churchill Downs to invest $60M in electronic gambling facilityInsider Louisville
Churchill investing $60 million in new gambling facilityWTVQ

all 16 news articles »

Read more here:

Churchill Downs wins approval for new Trackside gambling parlor - Lexington Herald Leader

Rep. Dent Tries Again to Sneak Online Gambling Ban Through Congress – Competitive Enterprise Institute (blog)

For the last four years, three states have had legal online gambling: Delaware, Nevada, and New Jersey. In that time, weve seen no negative results,despite doomsday predictions that allowingstates to legalize and regulate Internet betting would open the floodgates, allowing anyone in the U.S., regardless of their age, to gamble, become addicted, and ruin their lives.

In reality, however, online gambling in the states has been an unmitigated success: generating hundreds of millions in new tax revenue, thousands of jobs, and saving other flailing industries. In New Jersey, for example, the launch of online betting has been an unmitigated success. Prior to 2013, Atlantic City was in economic freefall with casinos closing (and putting people out of work) in droves. Since then, however, the city has posted its first revenue increase in more than a decade, thanks to the $20 million in tax revenue online gambling generates for the state every month. Since its launch in 2013, the new industry has generated around $125 million in new tax revenue for New Jersey 3,374 new jobs, and $219 million in wages to employees. Furthermore, the license-holders contributed over $1 million in funds for compulsive and problem gambling research and treatment.

Yet, Rep. Charlie Dent (R-PA) is now reportedly trying to put out the lights out on this economic ray of sunshine by inserting language into one of the congressional appropriations bills to create a national prohibition on Internet gambling. And hes doing this even as the legislature of his home state is working tirelessly to regulate the activity and where almost two thirds of voters say they want online gambling legalized.

Legislative dj vu

While details about Dents plan are scant, the tactic sounds like a repeat of the scheme he and other members of Congress cooked up in 2016. For years, prohibitionists have fought and failed to enact a ban on state-based Internet gambling through the normal legislative process. The Restoration of Americas Wire Act (RAWA), a bill created by prominent GOP mega-donor and casino owner Sheldon Adelson, managed to get a few hearings. However, the idea of a federal prohibition against the will of the states runs contrary to the core conservative principle of federalism and the blatant influence of industry money resulted in backlash from both sides of aisle.

If at first you dont succeed, cram it down their throats

Failing to obtain Congressional support on its merits, RAWA supporters switched gears, instead hoping to quietly sneak an Internet gambling ban into law by attaching RAWA language as a rider to one of the spending bills in 2016. Theyve also been trying to push Attorney General Jeff Sessions into creating a ban via administrative fiat.

As with RAWA, these attempts faced significant opposition from center-right groups (including CEI) who see them as gross violations of legislative procedure, a threat to foundational constitutional principles, and harmful to both consumers and the economy.

Undeterred, the anti-gambling cabal is reportedly taking another stab at cramming an online gambling ban down Americans throats by slipping it into the massive 1,000+ page spending bill that Congress must pass before the end of September.

They are nothingif not persistent.

But, so are we. All Americans, regardless of political affiliation or their opinion on gambling, should resist attempts like this to bypass the democratic process and take away states constitutionalright to decide for themselves how to regulate commerce within their borders, all in service of one special interest.

Read the original here:

Rep. Dent Tries Again to Sneak Online Gambling Ban Through Congress - Competitive Enterprise Institute (blog)

Australian A$11.3bn gambling merger gets go-ahead – BBC News


BBC News
Australian A$11.3bn gambling merger gets go-ahead
BBC News
A merger between Australian gambling giants Tabcorp and Tatts Group has been approved by authorities. Plans to form a business worth A$11.3bn ($8.6bn; 6.7bn) emerged last year. Despite objections from rival betting companies, the Australian ...
Australian gambling giants get approval to form powerhouseManila Bulletin

all 49 news articles »

See more here:

Australian A$11.3bn gambling merger gets go-ahead - BBC News

Asia Pacific Gambling Market 2017-2021 by Platform, Product, Traditional Gambling & Online Gambling – Research … – PR Newswire (press release)

The report forecasts that the gambling market in APAC to grow at a CAGR of 7.31% during the period 2017-2021.

The report covers the present scenario and the growth prospects of the gambling market in APAC for 2017-2021. To calculate the market size, the report considers the revenue generated from the sales of lottery tickets, betting games, and casino games. This report, Gambling Market in APAC 2017-2021, has been prepared based on an in-depth market analysis with inputs from industry experts. The report covers the market landscape and its growth prospects over the coming years. The report also includes a discussion operating in this market.

The latest trend gaining momentum in the market is availability of cash alternative. In the global gambling market, money does not have to be the only rewards. It can also be given in the form of physical goods along with monetary benefits. A major trend in the market is the use of cash alternatives such as virtual money. In Australia, the online gambling market lets the players use virtual money, which has reduced the risks related to cash. Payment options required for online cash transactions and virtual money are implemented by various gambling vendors.

According to the report, one of the major drivers for this market is rise in spending capability. The average per capita disposable income in developed countries cannot be accurately calculated because of the rise in the number of households with double income sources. This has led to a boost in the affordability of high-end products and spending capability of individuals, especially in developed countries. The increase in disposable incomes of the South Asian countries, such as Indonesia, Vietnam, and Malaysia, is expected to play a considerable role in propelling the market growth during the forecast period.

Further, the report states that one of the major factors hindering the growth of this market is growing addiction among low-income groups. One of the major factors for governments to be skeptical about legalizing gambling, especially online gambling in numerous countries, is due to the addictive behavior the game can invoke among the gamblers. These addicted players become prone to impulse control disorder, making them want to gamble more regularly and for higher stakes. By not legalizing online gambling, the governments are trying to control the reach of gambling games and addictive behavior, especially among the low-income population.

Key vendors:

Other prominent vendors:

Key Topics Covered:

Part 01: Executive summary

Part 02: Scope of the report

Part 03: Research Methodology

Part 04: Introduction

Part 05: Market landscape

Part 06: Market segmentation by product

Part 07: Market segmentation by platform

Part 08: Market segmentation by traditional gambling

Part 09: Market segmentation by online gambling

Part 10: Key leading countries

Part 11: Decision framework

Part 12: Drivers and challenges

Part 13: Market trends

Part 14: Vendor landscape

Part 15: Appendix

For more information about this report visit https://www.researchandmarkets.com/research/xc4jdq/gambling_market

Media Contact:

Laura Wood, Senior Manager press@researchandmarkets.com

For E.S.T Office Hours Call +1-917-300-0470 For U.S./CAN Toll Free Call +1-800-526-8630 For GMT Office Hours Call +353-1-416-8900

U.S. Fax: 646-607-1907 Fax (outside U.S.): +353-1-481-1716

To view the original version on PR Newswire, visit:http://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/asia-pacific-gambling-market-2017-2021-by-platform-product-traditional-gambling--online-gambling---research-and-markets-300476625.html

SOURCE Research and Markets

http://www.researchandmarkets.com

Read the original:

Asia Pacific Gambling Market 2017-2021 by Platform, Product, Traditional Gambling & Online Gambling - Research ... - PR Newswire (press release)

Man Shot in Torso Over Money at Illegal Gambling Place in Queens: Cops – NBC New York

WATCH LIVE

A man was shot in the torso inside an illegal gambling place in Queens earlier in the month, police say.

The NYPD said the pair got into a heated argument over money that escalated into one of the men being shot inside the social club in Hollis on June 10 just after midnight.

The 29-year-old victim was shot at least three times by the suspect who then quickly fled the area, officials said.

The victim was taken to an area hospital, where he is listed in stable condition.

Video from the scene shows the pair struggling with each other while one of the men holds a gun in his hand.

Investigators released a surveillance photo of the suspect in the hopes of catching him.

Top Tri-State News Photos

Published at 5:29 AM EDT on Jun 20, 2017

See the article here:

Man Shot in Torso Over Money at Illegal Gambling Place in Queens: Cops - NBC New York

A Dutch euthanasia pioneer surveys the wreckage and despairs – Catholic Citizens of Illinois (press release)

Safeguards for the mentally ill and the demented are slipping away

By Michael Cook | Jun 20 2017 |

If there is anyone who could be called a patron saint of Dutch euthanasia, it is the psychiatrist Boudewijn Chabot. In 1991 he gave one of his patients, Mrs B, a lethal dose of medication. After accompanying her until she died he reported himself to the police and was subsequently tried. In 1993, the Supreme Court declare that he was guilty of assisting a suicide, but did not punish him and allowed him to keep practicing medicine.

Physically, there was nothing wrong with Mrs B. Nor did she have depression. But her personal life was tragic and Dr Chabot felt that she in a state of existential distress that she should be allowed to die. It was a landmark case in the steady advance towards legalisation in 2002.

That was 25 years ago. Now Dr Chabot looks back and is horrified. Writing in one of the leading Dutch newspapers, NRC Handelsblad, he says that legal safeguards for euthanasia are slowly eroding away and that the law no longer protects people with psychiatric condition and dementia.

The Dutch are complacent about their famous law, he says. But there is no room for complacency.

Under current legislation, euthanasia is only legal if a doctor believes that three conditions have been met: (1) the request must be voluntary and deliberate; (2) there must be unbearable suffering with no hope of improvement; and (3) there must no reasonable alternative to euthanasia.

However, as euthanasia has sunk its roots deeper and deeper into Dutch medicine, the second and third conditions have shrivelled up. Patients define what is unbearable and they define what is a reasonable alternative. Unhappiness can be unbearable and a nursing home may not be a reasonable alternative. So, as one ethicist has observed, requirements (1) and (2) add little to the requirement of a voluntary and thoughtful request. Autonomy has trumped medicine. As a result, the number of euthanasia cases roughly tripled between 2007 and 2016, from 2000 to 6000.

In itself, this does not bother Dr Chabot. After all, he is the Grand Old Man of Dutch euthanasia. He says that he is prepared to accept tens of thousands of euthanasia cases. But he is aghast at the rapid rise in the number of people with psychiatric illness or dementia who have been euthanised:

What does worry me is the increase in the number of times euthanasia was performed on dementia patients, from 12 in 2009 to 141 in 2016, and on chronic psychiatric patients, from 0 to 60. That number is small, one might object. But note the rapid increase of brain diseases such as dementia and chronic psychiatric diseases. More than one hundred thousand patients suffer from these diseases, and their disease can almost never be completely cured.

One sign of the changing times is the rapid expansion of the services of the End of Life Clinic Foundation (Stichting Levenseindekliniek). This organisation offers euthanasia to patients whose own doctors have refused. They never offer to treat the underlying illness, whether it is physical or mental.

By 2015, a quarter of euthanasia cases on demented patients were performed by these doctors; in 2016 it had risen to one third. By 2015, doctors of the End of Life Clinic performed 60 percent of euthanasia cases in chronic psychiatric patients, by 2016 that had increased to 75 percent (46 out of 60 people).

Last year, Dr Chabot points out, doctors from the End of Life Clinic each performed about one euthanasia every month. What happens to doctors for whom a deadly injection becomes a monthly routine? he asks.

Now the End of Life Clinic is recruiting psychiatrists to service the mentally ill and demented. One obvious problem is that there is a shortage of good psychiatric help in the Netherland which tends to take a long time have an effect, in any case because of budget cuts.

Without a therapeutic relationship, by far most psychiatrists cannot reliably determine whether a death wish is a serious, enduring desire. Even within a therapeutic relationship, it remains difficult. But a psychiatrist of the clinic can do so without a therapeutic relationship, with less than ten in-depth conversations? Well

Dr Chabot is deeply sceptical about euthanasia for the demented: we are dealing with a morally problematic act: how do you kill someone who does not understand that he will be killed?.

How? It turns out that sometimes a relative or doctor secretly laces their food or drink with a sedative to make it easier to give them a lethal injection. In one notorious case last year, the sedative didnt work and relatives pinned the terrified woman to the bed while the doctor gave the lethal injection. Dr Chabot was astonished to discover that surreptitious administration of medication has previously occurred, but has never been mentioned in an annual report.

Isnt anyone paying attention to these developments, Dr Chabot asks.

The euthanasia practice is running amok because the legal requirements which doctors can reasonably apply in the context of physically ill people, are being declared equally applicable without limitation in the context of vulnerable patients with incurable brain diseases. In psychiatry, an essential limitation disappeared when the existence of a treatment relationship was no longer required. In the case of dementia, such a restriction disappeared by making the written advance request equivalent to an actual oral request. And lastly, it really went off the tracks when the review committee concealed that incapacitated people were surreptitiously killed.

After surveying the wreckage of the euthanasia law, Dr Chabot concludes bitterly,

I dont see how we can get the genie back in the bottle. It would already mean a lot if wed acknowledge hes out.

_________________________________________

Michael Cook is editor of MercatorNet. Dr Chabots original article in NRC Handelsblad was translated by Professor Trudo Lemmens, of the University of Toronto Faculty of Law. Excerpts have been republished from his blog with permission.

See more at: https://www.mercatornet.com/careful/view/a-dutch-euthanasia-pioneer-surveys-the-wreckage-and-despairs/19992#sthash.ClTxHOn3.dpuf

Read the rest here:

A Dutch euthanasia pioneer surveys the wreckage and despairs - Catholic Citizens of Illinois (press release)