Facebook Is Introducing New Tools to Protect Women in India – Fortune

They'll be available starting Wednesday. Courtesy of Facebook

Facebook on Wednesday is unveiling new features that it hopes will make women in India feel safer on its platform.

The social network is introducing two tools that will give users in the country more control over who can download and share their profile photosimages that Facebook users can often see even if they're not friends with the person pictured.

Facebook's research in the Indian market revealed that some users, especially women, are uncomfortable uploading a profile picture of themselves for fear it might be distributed more widely than they wish or otherwise misused online, according to Facebook product manager Aarati Soman. Instead, they use photos of something elsesay a dog or other animalwhich can make it hard for friends to find them on the site.

Subscribe to The Worlds Most Powerful Women, Fortunes daily must-read for global businesswomen.

The first feature is a photo guard that users can trigger. It will keep others from being able to download, share, or send the photo in a Facebook message. The latest version of the Facebook app on Android devices will also prohibit users from screen-shotting a guarded photo. Profile pictures with the added security will be displayed with a blue border and shield, which Soman calls "a visual cue so people understand you would like your picture to be protected."

The second feature is a design overlay that users can put on their profile pictures. There are several different pattern options that Soman says mimic "traditional art designs from around India." Facebook's decision to add the feature stems from a research finding that an extra design layer on a profile picture made other users 75% less likely to copy it.

Both tools will be promoted in Indian users' news feeds, and they'll be available in over 30 local Indian languages. Their gradual rollout starts Wednesday; they'll be available throughout India by June 27.

India is one of Facebook's fastest growing markets in terms of users , but low internet speeds, weak infrastructure, and a lack of consumer trust remain challenges there, according to Quartz . In May, Facebook launched its Express Wi-Fi Internet service in India with 700 hotspots. The company partnered with 500 local entrepreneurs to sell the service through vouchers that are priced by the day or the month. It's Facebook's second attempt to promote universal connectively in India. Its first, called Free Basics, was blocked by India's telecom regulator last year for not supporting net neutrality since the service favored some sites over others.

In explaining the rationale behind the two new tools being introduced Wednesday, Soman pointed to CEO Mark Zuckerberg's February manifesto , which called for the creation of a worldwide community. In it, he also mentioned the "real opportunity to build global safety infrastructure." Soman says that in India in particular, the risk of photo misuse "is a top-of-mind concern for women."

"A lot of what affects women offline affects women online," she says.

Anshul Tewari of New Delhi is founder and editor in chief of Youth Ki Awaaz, a content publishing site aimed at India's youth. His organization helped Facebook in the development of the new tools, and he told Fortune about the online risks that many Indian women face.

"Gender-based violence and sexual harassment is a big problem in India," he said, due in large part to "an extremely patriarchal way of thinking." Those attitudes are also present online.

Many men feel they command power over women, even in a virtual setting, Tewari explains. One rampant problem is the unsolicited online messages that women receive on social media from men who try to befriend or control them. Pushback against such advances has, in some instances, prompted men to download women's photos, create fake profiles based on the woman's identity and post unflattering, even pornographic, content, Tewari says.

" There's not clear information on how much it happens," he says, but "a lot of people are struggling [with it]." A legal system in India that's ill-equipped to combat this kind of cybercrime only exacerbates that problem, according to Tewari.

"One thing that a platform like Facebook can do," he says, "is identify ways to protect aspects of your profile that can lead to such violence happening online."

See the rest here:

Facebook Is Introducing New Tools to Protect Women in India - Fortune

Free Spider-Man: Homecoming Virtual Reality "Experience" Coming Next Week – GameSpot

Subscribe for the latest gaming news

Spider-Man Homecoming hits theaters in early July, and to mark the upcoming release, Sony is launching a tie-in experience for virtual reality headsets. It's coming a week ahead of the film's release date, and it's free.

Sony announced the experience with a short trailer which shows a bit of what you can expect. It looks like a series of mini-games that'll have you shooting webs, eliminating enemies, and, most importantly, swinging through the city. You can check out the video above.

Spider-Man Homecoming VR arrives on June 30, a week before the film's July 7 release. Although the game was produced by Sony Pictures Virtual Reality, it's not limited to PlayStation VR. It'll be available for all major VR systems, including the Oculus Rift and HTC Vive. If you don't own a VR headset, you can still try it out at certain Cinemark theaters in the United States.

In other news, the film appears to be set for a strong opening weekend, and we recently broke down its third trailer. The PS4-exclusive Spider-Man game in development at Insomniac recently got its first gameplay reveal. You can check it out here, and you can also watch our interview with the game's creative director here. It's coming sometime in 2018.

The rest is here:

Free Spider-Man: Homecoming Virtual Reality "Experience" Coming Next Week - GameSpot

Five ways virtual reality is improving healthcare – Phys.Org

June 21, 2017 by Wendy Powell, The Conversation Credit: chombosan/Shutterstock

Virtual reality is much more than just a new form of entertainment, it is increasingly being used in a wide range of medical applications, from treatments to training. Here are a few of them.

1. Pain management

There is good scientific evidence that virtual reality (VR) can help relieve pain. The parts of the brain that are linked to pain the somatosensory cortex and the insula are less active when a patient is immersed in virtual reality. In some instances, it can even help people tolerate medical procedures that are usually very painful.

Other studies have shown that amputees can benefit from VR therapy. Amputees often feel severe pain in their missing limb, which can be hard to treat with conventional methods, and often doesn't respond well to strong painkillers like codeine and morphine. However, a technique called "virtual mirror therapy", which involves putting on a VR headset and controlling a virtual version of the absent limb seems to help some patients cope better with this "phantom pain".

2. Physical therapy

VR can be used to track body movements, allowing patients to use the movements of their therapy exercises as interactions in a VR game. For example, they may need to lift an arm above their head in order to catch a virtual ball.

It's more fun doing exercises in virtual reality than it is in a gym, so people are more motivated to exercise. It can help in other ways too. For example, we found that for patients who are anxious about walking, we can control their virtual environment so that it looks as though they are moving much slower than they actually are. When we do this, they naturally speed up their walking, but they don't realise they are doing it and so it isn't associated with pain or anxiety.

Studying how people perceive and interact with VR systems helps us design better rehabilitation applications.

3. Fears and phobias

If you have an irrational fear of something, you might think the last thing you need is to see it in virtual reality, however, this is one of most established forms of medical VR treatment. Phobias are often treated with something called graded-exposure therapy, where patients are slowly introduced to their fear by a therapist. Virtual reality is perfect for this as it can be adjusted precisely for the needs of each patient, and can be done in the doctor's office or even at home. This is being used to treat phobias such as fear of heights and fear of spiders, but also to help people recover from post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD).

4. Cognitive rehabilitation

Patients with brain injury from trauma or illness, such as stroke, often struggle with the everyday tasks that we take for granted, such as shopping or making plans for the weekend. Recreating these tasks within virtual environments and allowing patients to practise them at increasing levels of complexity can speed up recovery and help patients regain a higher level of cognitive function.

Doctors can also use these same virtual environments as an assessment tool, observing patients carrying out a variety of real-world complex tasks and identifying areas of memory loss, reduced attention or difficulty with decision-making.

5. Training doctors and nurses

Virtual reality is, of course, not just for patients. It also offers benefits to healthcare professionals. Training doctors and nurses to carry out routine procedures is time consuming, and training generally needs to be delivered by a busy and expensive professional. But virtual reality is increasingly being used to learn anatomy, practise operations and teach infection control.

Being immersed in a realistic simulation of a procedure and practising the steps and techniques is far better training than watching a video, or even standing in a crowded room watching an expert. With low-cost VR equipment, controllable, repeatable scenarios and instant feedback, we have a powerful new teaching tool that reaches well beyond the classroom.

Explore further: Virtual reality eases phantom limb pain

This article was originally published on The Conversation. Read the original article.

Virtual reality can relieve the sensation of phantom limb pain. A new test devised by researchers at Aalborg University shows that VR technology can trick the amputee's brain into thinking that it is still in control of a ...

Virtual reality therapy is effective in significantly reducing pain for hospitalized patients, according to a new Cedars-Sinai study.

A mixed reality system which allows medical practitioners to view and interact with virtual replicas of patients' organs, bones or body parts is being developed by academics.

A growing body of evidence suggests that virtual reality (VR) technology can be an effective part of treatment for phobias, posttraumatic stress disorder, and other mental health conditions, according to a research review ...

Virtual reality headsets are often associated with video games and fun, but companies are also working to use them for mental health therapies, to treat phobias, anxiety or addictions.

The Big Ten network is making Saturday's football game between Minnesota and No. 21 Nebraska available in virtual reality.

A telecom company in the Netherlands has teamed up with the country's traffic safety authority to develop a bicycle lock that also blocks its mobile network, in a move aimed at protecting young riders who regularly pedal ...

A data analytics firm that worked on the Republican campaign of Donald Trump exposed personal information belonging to some 198 million Americans, or nearly every eligible registered voter, security researchers said Monday.

Researchers at UC Santa Barbara professor Yasamin Mostofi's lab have given the first demonstration of three-dimensional imaging of objects through walls using ordinary wireless signal. The technique, which involves two drones ...

From "The Jetsons" to "Chitty Chitty Bang Bang", flying cars have long captured the imagination.

Your next doctor could very well be a bot. And bots, or automated programs, are likely to play a key role in finding cures for some of the most difficult-to-treat diseases and conditions.

The long range of airborne drones helps them perform critical tasks in the skies. Now MIT spinout Open Water Power (OWP) aims to greatly improve the range of unpiloted underwater vehicles (UUVs), helping them better perform ...

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Read more from the original source:

Five ways virtual reality is improving healthcare - Phys.Org

YouTube Introduces Heatmaps for Virtual Reality Videos – Small Business Trends

YouTube recently introduced heatmaps for virtual reality (VR) videos with over 1,000 views. The Google-owned video site said the heatmaps will give you specific insight into how your viewers are engaging with videos created in VR.

With heatmaps, youll be able to see exactly what parts of your video are catching a viewers attention and how long theyre looking at a specific part of the video, wrote Frank Rodriguez, a Product Manager at YouTube, in a post announcing the new tool on the YouTube Creators Blog.

Small businesses looking to share new and unique experiences with their audience can take advantage of the emerging VR technology and start creating immersive videos in VR their audience will appreciate.

Check out this video on how to make a simple VR/360-degree video from your smartphone for YouTube:

For those businesses that want to go all in on VR and hone their skills, YouTube says its helpful to know how your viewers interact with these videos. The video-sharing site used its new heatmaps tool to conduct some early research on what makes an engaging VR video.

Apparently, people spend 75 percent of their time looking straight ahead (within the front 90 degrees) of a VR video. So when creating videos in VR, spend significant time on whats in front of the viewer.

While a lot of time is spent focusing on whats in front, people view more of the full 360-degree space with almost 20 percent of views actually being behind them. The more engaging the full scene is, the more likely viewers will want to explore the full 360-degree view, said Rodriguez. So dont forget to use markers and animations to draw attention to different parts of the scene.

The context in which people are viewing VR videos matters too, added Rodriguez. Some might be watching on a mobile and portable Cardboard, while others are watching on a desktop computer. Make sure to give your viewers a few seconds before jumping into the action.

Its worth mentioning it is still early days in VR. Only five percent of people in North America own a virtual reality headset overall. But VR adoption is growing albeit slowly. Small businesses are already utilizing the technology to hold VR conferencing and also immerse customers in VR business events.

YouTube said its also launching its first ever VR intensive program at YouTube Space LA called the VR Creator Lab. Applications opened Friday, June 16, 2017.

Image: YouTube

View post:

YouTube Introduces Heatmaps for Virtual Reality Videos - Small Business Trends

St Luke’s patient gets dreams fulfilled with virtual reality Great Barrier Reef swim – Plymouth Herald

Comments(0)

A charity helping those with terminal illnesses granted a Plymouth patient their wish to swim in the Great Barrier Reef through virtual reality.

Matthew Hill, who was recently admitted to the St Luke's Hospice specialist unit in Turnchapel after previously being cared for at his home, had told nurses that it was always his dream to dive into the reef and swim amongst the coral and fish.

Those who were caring for the 37-year-old who has bowel cancer, passed on the message about his wishes which was when St Luke's kicked into action to see what they could do to make it a reality.

The hospice put in some phonecalls and contacted TruVision, a Plymouth based virtual reality company who work with the construction industry, to see if they could re-create the reef scene and bring it to Matthew.

Eager to get on board, the company agreed and were happy to offer their equipment and access the software to make the experience of a lifetime possible for Matthew.

Head of the specialist unit at St Luke's, Nicola Pereira said: "Matthew has really captured the hearts of us all at St Luke's and it was a pleasure to make his dream become a reality.

"Matthew was admitted to our specialist unit at Turnchapel last week for pain relief with bowel cancer.

"What is remarkable is that he also has spinal compression which means he is unable to sit upright in bed, so the technology has really made something which some people would have thought impossible, actually possible.

"Matthew will be returning home later this week with a smile on his face and will continue to receive specialist care from our home nurses".

The headset and technology allowed Matthew to be immersed in the virtual water of the Great Barrier Reef where he could swim and look around at moving fish, whales and coral.

A St Luke's spokesperson has said how the hospice, who help people with terminal illnesses, may look at putting together a grant to get funding for a virtual reality headset which could help to fulfil some of the bucket list items many of their staff so often hear about from their patients.

See the original post:

St Luke's patient gets dreams fulfilled with virtual reality Great Barrier Reef swim - Plymouth Herald

VR gets closer to reality – CNNMoney

Finnish startup Varjo Technologies is focused on developing VR and augmented reality solutions for professionals that match the human eye.

The company, which was announced on Monday, says its human eye resolution headset -- nicknamed "20/20" after 20/20 vision -- will be 70 times sharper than what's already on the market. That's 70 megapixels, compared to 1.2 megapixels for the Oculus Rift or HTC Vive. It's the difference between reading a poster on the wall of a room in virtual reality versus not being able to make out words.

Varjo aims to get a test version of the device into the hands of professionals by the end of the year. A consumer roll out is expected for 2018.

Related: This virtual reality startup is now worth $1 billion

According to Varjo CEO and founder Urho Konttori, a former product manager at Nokia and Microsoft, the technology can be used for training and simulations across many industries, from industrial design to medicine, aviation and real estate.

"For the first time, you actually see things as they will be or are," said Konttori.

For example, an architect could bring existing software programs to the virtual world to test changes, like new textures.

"Virtual workspaces are completely unusable with today's devices due to resolution and focus, and the next-generation devices from the dominant players aren't slated to be meaningfully better," Prashant Fonseka, investor at early-stage venture capital firm CrunchFund, told CNN Tech. "Varjo brings enough resolution and clarity [to VR] that you could actually throw away monitors and spend time in a virtual environment."

The 20/20 headset could also offer professionals more privacy. It can serve up screens from your laptop and desktop devices, without the concern someone peering over your shoulder or spying on open browsers.

I recently tried a Varjo prototype -- a retrofitted Oculus Rift with a clear rectangular display in the center of the device's screen. Anything viewed through the opening was incredibly life-like, even crisper than my naked eye. Everything outside the rectangle resembled a typical VR resolution experience: Not as clear. This was to highlight the difference between what's available now and Varjo's technology.

Related: The New York Times wants you to read the comments

Virtual reality experts believe it could take up to 20 years to "achieve resolutions that can match the human eye." But Konttori believes his company is well ahead of that curve.

Varjo holds three core VR patents, including one for tech that replicates how the human eye focuses inside a headset.

CNNMoney (New York) First published June 19, 2017: 2:56 PM ET

Read this article:

VR gets closer to reality - CNNMoney

Could San Diego Be The New Hub Of Virtual Reality? – NBC 7 San Diego

WATCH LIVE

NBC 7's Danielle Radin stopped by San Diego Startup Week and talked to a company taking virtual reality to a new level. (Published 2 hours ago)

The co-founder of San Diego Startup Week, Austin Neudecker,said Wednesday he believes San Diego could become a new leader in the world of virtual reality.

We have a tremendous engineers coming out of some of the best research institutions and companies here inSan Diego," said Neudecker.

One company, Ossic, ispaving the way, withnew types of headphones that take virtual reality sound fromtwo-dimensional, likeyou would hear from a television orvideo game,to 3-D sound.

3-D sound is kind of like how you hear in real life," said Sally Kellaway, creative director of Ossic. "When youre listening to anything in real life, you get 360 degrees: you can listen to anything at any time.

Kellaway said they do this by customizing the headsets to each person'shead and ears.

Ossic currently has a program thatdisplays musical orbs floating through the air. When you touch them with your controller in virtual reality, you can move them around, hearing the music from all sides.

Published 2 hours ago

Here is the original post:

Could San Diego Be The New Hub Of Virtual Reality? - NBC 7 San Diego

The plan to ‘reawaken’ cryogenically frozen brains and transplant them into someone else’s skull – National Post

Sergio Canavero, the Italian surgeon who audaciously plans to perform the worlds first human head transplant within the next 10 months (pending the availability of a donor body) is now preparing to reawaken cryogenically frozen brains and transplant them into someone elses skull.

In an interview with a German-language magazine, Canavero says he will attempt to bring the first brainsfrozen in liquid nitrogen at an Arizona-based cryogenics bank back to life not in 100 years, but three years at the latest.

Transplanting a brain only and not an entire head gets around formidable rejection issues, Canavero said, sincethere will be no need to reconnect and stitch up severed vessels, nerves, tendons and muscles as there is when a new head is fused onto abrain-dead donor body.

Canavero allows that one problematic issue with brain transplants, however, would be that no aspect of your original external body remains the same.

Your head is no longer there, your brain is transplanted into an entirely different skull, he told OOOM magazine, published by the same company that handles the Italian brain surgeonspublic relations.

The flamboyant neuroscientist who some ethicists have decried as nuts rattled the transplant world when he first outlined his plans for a human head transplant two years ago in the journal, Surgical Neurology International.

Bioethicist Arthur Caplan called Canaveros latest proposal to merge head transplants with resurrecting the frozen dead beyond ridiculous. People have their own doubts about whether anything can be salvaged from these frozen heads or bodies because of the damage freezing does, said Caplan, head of ethics at NYU Langone Medical Centre in New York City.

Then saying that he has some technique for making this happen, that has never been demonstrated in frozen animals, is absurd.

Caplan accused the maverick surgeon of playing to peoples fantasies, that somehow you can come back from death, fantasies that you can live forever if you just keep moving your head around and to fears science is out of control. Thats why I pay attention to him.

According to Canavero, the greatest technical hurdle to a head transplant is fusing the donor and recipients severed spinal cords, something never before achieved in humans, and restoring function, without causing massive, irreversible brain damage or death.

In an exclusive interview with the National Post last year, Canavero said what makeshisbrazen, and critics say ethically reckless, protocolpossible isa special fusogen, a waxy, glue-like substance developed by a young B.C.-born chemist that will be used to reconnect the severed spinal cord stumps and coax axons and neurons to regrow across the gap.

Canavero said the first head transplant will be performed in Harbin, China, and the surgical team led by Xiaoping Ren, a Chinese orthopedic surgeon who participated in the first hand transplant in the U.S. in 1999. Ren has been performing hundreds of head transplants in mice in preparation.

The first patient will be an unidentified Chinese citizen, and not, as originally planned, Valery Spiridonov, a 31-year-old Russian man who suffers from a rare and devastating form of spinal muscular dystrophy.

Canavero called Ren a close friend of mine and an extraordinarily capable surgeon.

At the moment, I can only disclose that there has been massive progress in medical experiments that would have seemed impossible even as recently as a few months ago, Canavero told OOOM. The milestones that have been reached will undoubtedly revolutionize medicine.

He declined to offer up exactly what those milestones are, saying that results of the most recent animal experimentshave been submitted for publication in renowned scientific medical journals.

Last September, the team reported they had succeeded in restoring functionality and mobility in mice with severed spinal cords using the special fusogen, dubbed Texas-PEG. Canavero claims the mice were able to run again.

Your head is no longer there, your brain is transplanted into an entirely different skull

He said numerous experiments have been conducted since then on an array of different animals in South Korea and China and the results are unambiguous: the spinal cord and with it the ability to move can be entirely restored, he told OOOM.

Canavero envisions the head (or, perhaps more accurately, body) grafting venture as a cure for people living with horrible medical conditions. The plan is to cut off the head of two people one, the recipient, the other, the donor whose brain is dead but whose body is otherwise healthy, an accident victim for example. Surgeons will then shift the recipients head onto the donor body using a custom-made swivel crane. They will have less than an hour to re-establish blood supply before risking irreversible brain damage.

In a few months we will sever a body from a head in an unprecedented medical procedure, Canavero said. At the moment of decapitation, the patient will be clinically dead. If we bring this person back to life, we will receive the first real account of what actually happens after death, he told the magazine, meaning, he said, whether there is an afterlife, a heaven, a hereafter or whatever you may want to call it or whether death is simply a flicking off of the light switch and thats it.

Canavero said a brain transplant has several advantages over a head-swap, including that there is barely any immune reaction, which means the problem of rejection does not exist. The brain is, in a manner of speaking, a neutral organ, he said.

Others are hugely skeptical of the prospect of reawakening brains, or bodies, frozen after death. In an interview with the Posts Joe OConnor two years ago, Eike-Henner Kluge, a bio-ethicist at the University of Victoria, refers to cryonics patients as corpsesicles.

Unless it is technically possible, and it is not, to replace all the water left in a bodys cells with glycol, unfreezing a frozen corpse will rupture the cell walls ensuring that you are mush a corpsesicle.

However, two years ago researchers with 21st Century Medicine, a California cryobiology research company, reported they had succeeded in freezing a rabbits brain using a flash-freezing technique to protect and stabilize the tissue. After the vitrified brains were rewarmed, electron microscope imaging from across the rabbit brains showed neurons and synapses were crisp and intact.

Canavero hopesto get his first brains from Alcor Life Extension Foundation in Scottsdale, Ariz. Alcors most famous patient is Red Sox baseball legend Ted Williams, the greatest hitter in baseball history, whose head was detached from his body and cryopreserved after his death at 83 in 2002.

Email: skirkey@nationalpost.com | Twitter:

View original post here:

The plan to 'reawaken' cryogenically frozen brains and transplant them into someone else's skull - National Post

Thirty years since its launch, Athens Photo Festival is ‘still searching’ – Kathimerini

Reconstruction, a project by Greek photographer Kosmas Pavlidis, explores the boundaries between documentation and fiction. The photograps that make up the project were taken over the course of six years.

This years Athens Photo Festival, spread across two floors of the Benaki Museums Pireos Street annex, provides insights into developments in contemporary international photography by bringing together the work of 85 photographers and other artists from 30 countries who are known for exploring photographic techniques in their work.

The show, now in its 30th year, also explores the evolution of the medium and the adoption of new techniques, as well as the growing relationship between photography and other art forms.

About 2,000 photographers submitted work following an open call for this years event, whose rather abstract title is Still Searching. After reviewing the proposals, the curators set up an exhibition that is divided into eight sections.

Among the highlights that are on display are Murray Ballards Prospect of Immortality, an investigation of cryonics the process of freezing a human body after death in the hope that scientific advances may one day bring him or her back to life.

The 34-year-olds project can be found in the section of the show titled Fluid Body.

In the same section, visitors can also see Lilly Lulays Liquid Portrait a photographic portrait that consists of a sculpture and a moving collage both sourcing visual content from a single Facebook account.

In the section Role Play, Luisa Whitton showcases part of her What About the Heart? project. Whitton, who has been selected as one of Magnums Top 30 Under 30, explores the relationship between humans and machines.

Among the festivals side events are portfolio reviews, projections, seminars, family labs and the established Athens Photo Marathon. Dates will be announced in the coming days.

The Athens Photo Festival runs through July 30 at the Benaki Museum (138 Pireos). For more information log into http://www.benaki.gr

Original post:

Thirty years since its launch, Athens Photo Festival is 'still searching' - Kathimerini

Mind, body, spirit: Nurse opens holistic health store to promote overall wellness – Muscatine Journal

MUSCATINE Working as a registered nurse, Muscatine resident Michelle Servadio learned how the mind, body and spirit are all connected when it comes to wellness.

Despite mostly helping patients with Western medicine, Servadio said a lot of nurses believe in a holistic approach to health.

"A lot of medicines actually started out from plants, like aspirin came from the willow tree," Servadio said. "The pharmaceutical industry synthesizes it and turns it into the pills we have today, but many of them were derived from something already in nature."

Servadio is still a registered nurse today but decided to stop practicing and focus more on alternative and plant-based healing methods. She opened a new holistic health store in Muscatine just for that purpose, called Limitless RN Apothecary.

"It's something I've wanted to do for about 10 years, have a business I believe in that's focused on treating the underlying cause and getting the body in alignment," she said.

Servadio said most Western medicine is reactive and taken after patients experience symptoms or become ill. She believes it is most important to take a preventative approach to health, by eating whole foods and living a lifestyle that could help ward off future diseases.

Her new store, Limitless RN, which will officially open July 1, will offer culinary and herb gardens, essential oils, aromatherapy and other healing products.

"There's a great need for it here in the area," Servadio said. "We basically only have the farmers market where people buy plants and try to get things from nature."

She said there are few options for Muscatine residents hoping to receive alternative medicine, such as Prairie Jewel Acupuncture, which focuses on Eastern healing practices.

Servadio hopes local residents are starting to gain more interest in holistic health, and her main goal is making healthy lifestyle changes as easy to implement as possible.

Servadio's main product she will sell are potted gardens, each with its own theme, including multiple plants to be used for teas, meals or aromatherapy.

She hand-picks each plant and organizes them in a recycled planter, making sure the plants will have enough room to grow.

One of Servadio's favorite creations is a citrus tea garden, including orange mint, lemongrass, peppermint and other tea leaves. She said the leaves can be used to make a tea, be added to a bath or placed under a pillow for a restful sleep.

She also creates culinary gardens, such as one including all the herbs you need for a flavorful Thanksgiving meal or one with all the herbs needed to spice up a French dinner.

"I think people usually grab the plastic bottle and sprinkle dried herbs on their food," she said. "But there's real benefit to taking something fresh. It's better for your family and your health and will encourage you to eat healthier food rather than processed food."

Servadio said she has personally seen the benefits of eating a plant-based diet. After suffering from stomach issues, she switched her diet two years ago and lost about 70 pounds.

"It also made me be more active," Servadio said. "And it's very therapeutic, taking care of the mind, body and spirit. It's really an act of self care and leads to taking better care of yourself and family."

Limitless RN also will sell photographs taken by Muscatine Community College instructor Jim Elias and jewelry made by Servadio's daughter, Alyssa. Servadio hopes to hold holistic health classes in the store as well.

Servadio said Limitless RN Apothecary is now open with limited hours. It will officially open July 1 and have hours Tuesday through Saturday, from 9 a.m. to 5 p.m.

Limitless RN Apothecary is at 209 W. 2nd St. For more information, call 563-506-8714 or visit limitlessrn.com.

Read more here:

Mind, body, spirit: Nurse opens holistic health store to promote overall wellness - Muscatine Journal

Alibaba Says Chinese Consumers Are Obsessed With Sneakers and Supplements – TheStreet.com

Alibaba's (BABA) data on its 500 million users in China will be invaluable to U.S. sellers looking to break into the $4.89 trillion China retail market.

Alibaba invited certain U.S. small businesses to its conference on Tuesday and Wednesday in Detroit to teach them more about breaking into the China market. The invite list was focused on fashion, apparel and everyday goods, including cosmetics, bicycles, fresh food, supplements, baby products and running shoes, Alibaba president Michael Evans told TheStreet.

Alibaba CEO Jack Ma and other company executives used the Gateway '17 conference to convince the selected U.S. businesses that they can no longer ignore the opportunity to sell goods to China's population of 1.4 billion. Ma noted China has 300 million in the middle class that wants to buy higher quality products from the U.S. He expects the middle class in China to double to 600 million in the next 15 to 20 years.

The company wants to reach 2 billion users in the next decade, meaning it needs more sellers to sign up for its platform.

Here's a look at two specific items Alibaba highlighted at the conference for their popularity in the current China retail market.

1. Sneakers

Demand for running shoesis surging in China and New York-based sneaker consignment shop Stadium Goods is benefiting big time.

Stadium Goods CEO John McPheters spoke on Wednesday at Gateway '17 and said he knew he wanted to sell in China after a customer came into his New York store and bought $10,000 worth of Nike Air Jordans to resell back in China. "That opened our eyes to the opportunity," he said.

Continued here:

Alibaba Says Chinese Consumers Are Obsessed With Sneakers and Supplements - TheStreet.com

Your vitamin D tests and supplements are probably a waste of money – Vox

At some point in the past decade, screening blood for vitamin D levels became a routine part of medical care. Feeling a little low this winter? Get a vitamin D test. Think you didn't get enough sun last summer? Check your vitamin D levels.

Between 2000 and 2010, the amount Medicare spent on vitamin D testing rose 83-fold, making the test Medicares fifth most popular after cholesterol. All that screening also led to an explosion in vitamin D supplement use, and millions of Americans now pop daily vitamin D pills.

They mightve been encouraged by media reports over the past few years about the perils of getting too little of the sunshine vitamin. The supplements also seemed to be a cure-all: Many of us are confined to our computers, spending little time outdoors, and may feel we arent eating enough of the foods, like fish, that deliver vitamin D.

But as the interest in and testing for vitamin D has exploded, researchers have been wondering why so many people bother. Most of us actually get enough vitamin D without even trying. No high-quality study has found a benefit to screening asymptomatic adults, and putting people on treatment with supplements has also failed to demonstrably improve health outcomes.

That means when people seek out vitamin D tests and pop the supplement to alleviate the winter blues or prevent cancer, theres no evidence suggesting itll help them.

It would be great if you said the reason we screen is that we find out if a patient is low on vitamin D and we do something about it, we can prevent disease, says Dr. Clifford Rosen, one of the country's foremost experts on the health impact of vitamin D screening. Right now doctors can't confidently make that case.

Vitamin D is an essential vitamin that you get from food, including fatty fish such as salmon and tuna, beef liver, cheese, and egg yolks. Of course, it's also found in fortified foods, such as milk, orange juice, and cereal, and you get it from exposure to UV light.

You need vitamin D to regulate the absorption of calcium and phosphorous in your body, which keeps your bones strong and protects against osteoporosis and rickets.

In recent years, researchers have found associations between low levels of vitamin D and increased risk for a range of health problems, including fractures and falls, cardiovascular disease, diabetes, colorectal cancer, depressed moods, and even cognitive decline. As awareness about the importance of vitamin D for health has spread, so has the demand for testing.

So how much do you need? Less than 10 nanograms per milliliter of vitamin D in the blood is considered much too little, a vitamin deficiency. When your levels hover around there, you might experience symptoms such as muscle weakness, bone pain, and fractures.

Most experts agree that you want your vitamin D blood level to be at least 20 nanograms per milliliter.

The good news: Most of us have this much in our bodies without even trying.

In 2010, the Institute of Medicine brought together an expert committee to review the evidence on the vitamin and figure out whether there was a widespread deficiency problem in North America. According to the 14-member panel, 97.5 percent of the population got an adequate amount of vitamin D from diet and the sun.

The panel did, however, identify a few key populations that seemed to have higher levels of deficiency: people with dark pigmentation (such as African Americans), older folks who live in nursing homes, melanoma patients, and people who cant absorb the vitamin as a result of diseases of the liver or bowel.

The controversies about the benefits of vitamin D reflect how science evolves, said Dr. Barry Kramer, director of the cancer prevention division at the National Cancer Institute.

Early research on the benefits of vitamin D was mostly observational large-scale, population-level studies and did not look at endpoints that are important for long-term health, like whether a high vitamin D intake reduces one's risk for particular diseases or death.

Researchers found associations between higher levels of vitamin D intake and a range of health benefits. "But with the observational studies especially when you're dealing with dietary supplements and diet taking supplements is also associated with many other confounding factors that predict the outcome: being wealthier, being health-conscious, having health insurance and access to the health care system, low smoking prevalence, increased physical exercise," said Kramer.

In other words, the people who were taking these vitamins were doing many other things that might have caused them to have better health outcomes. Still, this early science encouraged people to hop on the vitamin D bandwagon.

Since then, randomized trials that introduce vitamin D to one group and compare that group with a control group have been disappointing, showing little or unclear benefit for vitamin D testing and supplementation in healthy people. That Institute of Medicine report noted that randomized trials had uncovered no health benefit for healthy people with vitamin D blood levels that were higher than 20 nanograms per milliliter.

There are also well-documented costs associated with overtesting and getting too much vitamin D: the cost to the health system for all those tests, and the potential harms from high vitamin D levels, such as kidney stones and high calcium which can cause nausea, vomiting, and loss of appetite.

So until we have more and better studies on vitamin D, related testing and treatment are clouded with uncertainty and a lack of evidence for any benefit.

There's also the issue of defining vitamin D levels that are problematic. Experts agree that anything less than levels of 10 ng/mL of blood is worrisome or a deficiency, but when is someone insufficient? Is 20 ng/mL really enough? Should the minimum cutoff be 30 ng/mL?

According to the US Preventive Services Task Force whose recommendations set the tone for medical practice in this country this uncertainty led to a lot of inconsistency around how vitamin D insufficiency was defined in studies. Different professional bodies also back different minimum blood levels, usually ranging from 20 to 30 ng/mL.

Finally, there's some question of whether healthy (asymptomatic) adults who undergo routine screening for vitamin D actually see any health benefit as a result. The task force points out that there were no studies on the benefit of screening otherwise healthy adults, but it did find that putting them on treatment with supplements did not improve health outcomes for a range of issues, including cancer, Type 2 diabetes, and fractures.

"Although the evidence is adequate for a few limited outcomes, the overall evidence on the early treatment of asymptomatic, screen-detected vitamin D deficiency in adults to improve overall health outcomes is inadequate," the task force authors write in their latest guidance.

To clear up some of the uncertainty, the NIH has funded one of the largest randomized trials on vitamin D, with the results expected to be ready next year. Maybe then we'll have a better sense of what, if any, benefit this vitamin holds.

One of the authors on that study, Dr. JoAnn E. Manson, recently told the New York Times, A lot of clinicians are acting like there is a pandemic, of vitamin D deficiency. That gives them justification to screen everyone and get everyone well above what the Institute of Medicine recommends.

It's important to be clear that the task force is highlighting uncertainty around screening and treating asymptomatic people who don't have real signs of illness, such as broken bones, or other illnesses that can cause vitamin deficiencies, like liver disease or multiple sclerosis.

"For healthy individuals, if youre tired and weak, but its nondescript, this is a really tempting thing to do: measure vitamin D and then treat," Dr. Rosen, who is based at the Maine Medical Center Research Institute, warned. "But there just isn't enough evidence it does anything."

So, for example, if you were feeling a little low this winter and you ask for a vitamin D test, then find out your levels are hovering around 20 or 30 ng/mL, you can go on supplements. And there's no doubt that those supplements will raise your vitamin D levels, since researchers have found they are absorbed by the body very efficiently. Doctors just don't know whether that change actually has any health benefit.

Rosen also cautioned that the biggest misconception about vitamin D is the association between low vitamin D levels and disease risk. "There's this idea, if we treat you, not only will some of your symptoms get better but also your long-term health benefit will be enhanced," he said. Again, there's no good evidence that that's the case.

"Unless you really are truly symptomatic," Rosen summed up, "it might not be worthwhile to measure vitamin D, and tag you with the diagnosis of deficiency, when its not clear those levels make you deficient and youre not at risk for disease." In other words, beware of the vitamin D test.

Read this article:

Your vitamin D tests and supplements are probably a waste of money - Vox

Pop-culture-palooza – Mountain View Voice

As a veteran of comedy and music festivals, talk/game show/podcast host and comedian Chris Hardwick has participated in and attended many of these gatherings. But there hasn't been one yet that brings together the many interests he has as an omnivorous pop-culture enthusiast. So he created the ID10T Music Festival + Comic Conival, which debuts Saturday and Sunday (June 24-25) at the Shoreline Amphitheatre in Mountain View.

With Hardwick credited as its creator and host, ID10T has been marketed as a combination of "music, comics, gaming, comedy, technology and pop culture." Headliners include alternative rock favorites Weezer, electronic musician Girl Talk, Michael Che of "Saturday Night Live," musical comedy duo Garfunkel & Oates, Dan Harmon ("Rick & Morty," "Community"), Wil Wheaton ("Big Bang Theory," "Star Trek: The Next Generation"), writer Brenden Fletcher ("Gotham Academy") and comic-book artist Babs Tarr ("Batgirl of Burnside"), with a plethora of other famous names and faces on the bill.

"Bonnaroo is great. Outside Lands is great. SF Sketchfest is, I think, my favorite comedy festival in the country," Hardwick said, by phone from Southern California. "I like Bumbershoot, which was the first music festival I ever did comedy at. And a handful of years ago I did standup at Coachella, which is also great. But when I go to these festivals, I don't see a lot of stuff when I'm walking around the exhibitor booths that really resonates with me," he went on to admit. No souvenir "friendship bracelets, tie-dyed sweatshirts" or flower crowns for the host of the new game show "The Wall" and the AMC post-"Walking Dead" wrap-up talk show "Talking Dead."

"I always wondered, 'What would I want to be able to walk around and see?' That was the hypothesis: You could see panels early in the day, and you could walk around the exhibitor booths and see a lot of great local makers and artists and comic book people," he said.

"And then you could go see the comedy tent and the music," he continued. "There's also EDM and cosplay."

ID10T is being co-produced by SGE (which has presented the Oddball Comedy & Curiosity Festival and The Cure's Curiosa festival) and Live Nation, with input from SF Sketchfest.

"Everyone specializes in different areas and I don't think I would have just done a festival by myself if SGE hadn't come to me and said, 'Hey, we'll provide the infrastructure to make this happen,'" he said.

"I know that they can do it because I know how many tours they produce. And I actually did the Oddball Comedy tour with them," he recalled. "You see what happens when you're all passion and no infrastructure: You become the Fyre Festival" -- the ill-fated upstart event that infamously left patrons stranded on the Bahamian island of Great Exuma in April.

As for why this considerable undertaking is debuting in Mountain View and not somewhere in Los Angeles, Hardwick revealed that it was a question of demographics and both internal and external infrastructure.

The Entertainment Capital of the World has so much going on at any given point that it can be difficult for fans to come out to events (even the famed San Diego Comic-Con is out of town.) SoCal's traffic issues still eclipse greater Silicon Valley's, too, making it tricky at times to draw huge audiences, he observed.

"People in L.A. are spoiled, because there are just so many options," he said. "And the Bay Area is great. I come up and perform as often as possible. I mean, I shot my comedy special (2016's "Funcomfortable") in San Francisco.

"It has a good vibe, and it's a good area. People are literate and articulate and, I feel, like-minded," he said with a chuckle. "'Sure, why wouldn't you do a festival of this nature in Google's parking lot?'"

Hardwick has performed at the Shoreline (which is probably more in Google's back yard) and raves about its accommodations. The massive south parking lot will house a majority of the attractions, from the Comedy Tent and ID10T Festival Tent/Mad Decent Dance Stage to the Artists' Alley and Artisan Marketplace. Music on the main amphitheatre stage is scheduled to start at 3:40 p.m. on Saturday and 3:30 p.m. on Sunday.

"It just felt like the right place for the thing that I wanted to create," he said. "The Shoreline had all of the things that we needed parking, a big stage for music, a place for the comedy tent and ample room for the exhibitor booths -- the Comic-Con element."

Looking back at Hardwick's career, it's easy to see why he's the perfect person to conceive of and launch the ID10T festival. The "@midnight" comedy/game-show host was a chess champion in junior high school and a comedian before being a DJ on "the World Famous KROQ" alternative station in Los Angeles, acting in films and the musical "Rock of Ages" and writing for San Francisco-based "Wired" magazine

"It used to be you could only be defined by one thing. It's not like that anymore," he noted. "We're in an era where everyone's defined by a lot of things. People who like comic books are people who like 'Harmontown' and 'Mystery Science Theater 3000,'" he said, referencing two of the festival's live events. "They also like music and, obviously, comedy."

With social media providing bridges between members of once-niche communities, ID10T has the potential to become the real-life extension of those connections.

"I just really wanted to create a community. This festival represents a hodgepodge of all the different things I'm into," Hardwick concluded. "And I hope other people will also be into those things, too, and come out to enjoy themselves."

Freelance writer Yoshi Kato can be emailed at yoshiyoungblood@earthlink.net

What: ID10T Music Festival + Comic Conival

Where: Shoreline Amphitheatre, 1 Amphitheatre Parkway, Mountain View

When: June 24-25

Cost: $65-$99.50; two-day general admission lawn for $110; children 10 and under free with paid adult admission

Info: Go to ID10T Festival.

Read more:

Pop-culture-palooza - Mountain View Voice

‘Network Incompatibility with IPv6 Poses Threat to ICT Devt’ – THISDAY Newspapers

Emma Okonji

Information and Communications Technology (ICT) Experts have raised the alarm over possible threat to ICT development in the country, following what they described as network incompatibility to the current Internet Protocol Version 6 (IPv6).

They spoke at the international capacity building and enhancement workshop on IPv6, organised by the Association of Telecoms Companies of Nigeria (ATCON), in collaboration with African Network Information Centre (AFRINIC) in Lagos recently.

The experts warned that except network operators in the country align and migrate their networks to IPv6, the ICT sector would suffer major setbacks.

President of ATCON, Olusola Teniola, said the need to migrate to IPv6 was long overdue. He expressed the displeasure of ATCON members who are not particularly happy that majority of networks in Nigeria are not IPv6 compatible, which he said, posed serious threat to the Nigerian ICT development.

Stressing the importance of IPv6 to ICT development, the Executive Vice Chairman of the Nigerian Communications Commission (NCC), Professor Umar Garba Danbatta, said IPv4 addresses have been exhausted, and in order for the internet to continue sustaining its growth, IPv6 addresses are needed.

While the exhaustion of IPv4 addresses is a global phenomenon, the need for IPv6 is even more urgent in Nigeria being the fastest growing ICT Industry in Africa and beyond. IPv6 will enable an enormous increase in the number of internet addresses currently available under IPv4, Danbatta said.

According to him, the current generation of IPv4 has been in use and has supported internets growth over the last decades. With the increased use of mobile devices including wireless handheld devices, the increasing popularity of cloud computing and the emergence of the Internet Of Things, which connects everything like appliances and vehicles to the Internet, the need for IP addresses becomes even more prevalent, Danbatta said.

The Director General, National Information Technology Development Agency (NITDA), Dr. Isa Ali Pantami, said advanced countries have moved from natural resource-based economy to knowledge-based economy and that it was achieved through massive capacity development and implementation of information technology (IT). These countries have not only been able to develop IT, but have also utilised IT in the development of other social economic sectors of their countries, so that these sectors can generate wealth. I am optimistic that this can be achieved in Nigeria, with the implementation of NITDAs mandate and the implementation of issues raised at the IPv6 workshop, Pantami said. According to Teniola, the Nigerian ICT sector could no longer afford to take the back seat in the global ICT development. To leapfrog the adoption of IPv6, ATCON has taken a further step to involve NCC and NITDA to further lead the campaign for the adoption of IPv6.

The dividend pervasive broadband may be farfetched if as an industry or a country we are not working towards broadband meeting with technology. As we all know that when Internet of Things (IoTs) take their place in our country, an individual may need more than ten IP addresses to enjoy the benefits that come with IoTs, Teniola said.

Read this article:

'Network Incompatibility with IPv6 Poses Threat to ICT Devt' - THISDAY Newspapers

Should all Americans receive a guaranteed income? – 9NEWS.com

Magnify Money and Kalyn Wilson , KHOU 12:10 PM. MDT June 20, 2017

Photo: Thinkstock (Photo: Phekthong Lee)

Having a monthly, tax-free, no-strings-attached income that would cover the basics for life may sound too good to be true, but its no fantasy. The idea of universal basic income (UBI) already has been implemented in some regions, such as Canada, Europe, and even Alaska, and Facebook founder and CEO Mark Zuckerberg recently revitalized discussion about the concept.

Zuckerberg endorsed UBI during his 2017 commencement speech at Harvard University as a means of leveling the economic playing field and opening the doors of entrepreneurship to everyone.

"We should explore ideas like universal basic income to make sure that everyone has a cushion to try new ideas," Zuckerberg told graduates. Now its time for our generation to define a new social contract.

What Is Universal Basic Income?

Zuckerberg, Facebook co-founder Chris Hughes, and other tech executives, including Tesla CEO, Elon Musk, have turned to this notion in response to the re-emerging concern about unemployment in the tech sector.

But the concept was originally developed hundreds of years ago as a way to lift citizens out of poverty.

Universal basic income (UBI) actually dates to the 16th century and the Renaissance, when the idea of a minimum income guarantee originated as a way to help poor people. Then in the 18th century, the idea of a basic endowment emerged to help alleviate theft, murder, and poverty in Europe.

The concept has changed through the years. When people talk about UBI today, theyre referring to an unconditional cash grant regularly distributed to all members of a community without any means test or work requirements, according to the Basic Income Earth Network. The concept means that everyone receives a set amount of money each period, no matter their circumstances.

Photo: Thinkstock (Photo: stevanovicigor, (C)2016 Igor Stevanovic, all rights reserved)

Despite its existence for even centuries, UBI did not take the stage like other social assistance programs, such as Social Security, food stamps, and unemployment benefits, which some critics believe would be outperformed by UBI, if implemented.

Jason Murphy, assistant professor of philosophy at Elms College in Chicopee, Mass., and U.S. Basic Income Guarantee Network (USBIG) coordinating committee member, says UBI would remove the conditions placed on existing social assistance programs that limit who receives help and how. The program would better target communities that are especially vulnerable and overlooked ensuring that no one has to go hungry and everyone starts on equal footing, he adds.

Still, with UBI in place, Murphy says he thinks not only does it give everyone a chance to cover essential needs, but it also opens the door for others to invest, start businesses, and create more jobs for the economy.

Critics argue that UBI could cause inflation, cause people not to work, or be an unfair tax on the rich, but research shows this isnt likely. A study by MIT and Harvard economists found that "no systematic evidence that cash transfer programs discourage work" in poor countries and, in some cases, encourage it.

Karl Widerquist, an economist, philosopher, Basic Income Earth Network board member, and visiting associate professor at Georgetown University-Qatar, says he thinks with a decent tax policy, the program would serve as an automatic stabilizer, alleviate income inequality, and help everyone financially.

The average worker is no better off than they were in the 1970s when you adjust for inflation, Widerquist says.

Some Places Are Already Benefiting

Regions around the globe including Ontario, Canada, and Finland, and, in the U.S., North Carolina, and Alaska are putting UBI to the test.

In the late 1990s, a tribe of Cherokee Indians in North Carolina began distributing some of the profits from the tribes casino to its 8,000 members, the New York Times reported. It amounted to about $6,000 per year for each member.

A long-term study on the tribes universal income experiment was published in 2016 by Duke University epidemiologist E. Jane Costello. She found that children in communities with a basic income experienced improvement in the education system, better mental and physical health, lower stress levels and crime rates, and overall economic growth.

Finland began a similar experiment in 2017, promising to give 2,000 citizens $600 per month through 2019. And Alaska has offered a basic income to its residents since the early 1980s.

With these small, pilot projects, social scientists and politicians are observing the effects of a basic income on the economic, social, and personal well-being of residents before launching large-scale programs.

Can UBI Really Level the Playing Field?

With a cushion, Widerquist says people will be less likely to settle for certain jobs and living arrangements, causing employers and property owners to cut better deals and prioritize clients, customers, and employers.

I think it will promote growth, Murphy says.

The rich and well-off may use the extra money to invest, and possibly begin investing in low-income communities, which works in favor of those in both social classes, Murphy says. He also says it could revitalize local economies, because those who rely heavily on the cash grants are more likely to spend locally.

Whats the Catch?

Murphy says the tax reform needed to make UBI a reality must be progressive. That way, it will avoid a major concern for the middle class the upper class will evade taxes, and the middle class will have to fit the bill for the non-workers of the world.

Photo: Thinkstock (Photo: utah778)

Widerquist argues that implementing this program requires open minds that are willing to move away from an economic system where the upper class maintains control over the flow of cash through ownership and stringently structured government programs. Instead, he thinks the government and society should first focus on eradicating poverty, and the roads to economic prosperity will follow.

The con is that the devil is in the details, Widerquist says. There are some [programs] that want to redistribute less to the poor that would not be better than the programs we already have.

Is UBI Feasible?

The answer is yes, Widerquist says.

The net cost of a basic income, large enough to eliminate poverty in the United States, is $539 billion a year, Widerquist says. Thats only a fourth of what the government is spending on entitlements.

Although it would be a big item in the federal budget, Murphy says he thinks its even cheaper to implement and maintain than Widerquists projections suggest.

Its going to take a commitment, but some of the calculations that are out there are actually way too high, he says.

With no means testing, Murphy says, there is no need to hire people to interview citizens, which saves money compared to requirement-driven social assistance programs.

The money poured into a basic income program would represent about 3% of the gross domestic product, which would put everyone above the poverty line, Murphy says.

Also, Widerquist and Murphy suggest that while universal basic income is possible without drastically cutting other programs, like unemployment benefits or universal health care, there are other ways to keep costs down. Those include trading UBI for programs like food stamps (since it is a cash grant), or taxing items like pollution, traffic, and electronic financial transactions.

MagnifyMoneyis a price comparison and financial education website, founded by former bankers who use their knowledge of how the system works to help you save money.

MagnifyMoney

Go here to see the original:

Should all Americans receive a guaranteed income? - 9NEWS.com

HONEYWELL SOLUTION HELPS CUSTOMERS OVERCOME AUTOMATION LIFECYCLE AND EFFICIENCY … – Automation World

Honeywell (NYSE: HON) Process Solutions (HPS) today announced the introduction of LEAP for Operations, a program that utilizes the innovative and proven LEAP project execution methodology to help customers optimize, simplify and run ongoing industrial operations more efficiently. LEAP for Operations includes a variety of solutions with a flexible deployment strategy to get more value out of plant processes. HPS made the announcement at its annual Honeywell Users Group symposium. With companies in the process industries under increasing pressure to show return on investment earlier on automation projects, they are emphasizing the efficiency of operating expenses (OPEX) and their longer-term impact. Honeywell can resolve the complexities of todays industrial operations with LEAP methodology that applies efficiency to ongoing operations through edge device integration, cloud-enabled execution, and universal and connected assets. LEAP for Operations helps our customers take operational intelligence to the next level, said John Rudolph, vice president and general manager, HPS Projects and Automation Solutions. This program enables plant engineers to continue to use the LEAP principles to run their facility more efficiently, squeeze more out of the assets they have, and avoid major capital expansions. It provides a step change in productivity and throughput once an automation project is implemented. Honeywell is uniquely positioned to support customers throughout the entire lifecycle of an industrial facility. The companys focused new product development programs have expanded its capability to address more project and operational challenges in both brownfield and greenfield applications. Before evolving the LEAP methodology to include operations, LEAP for projects began with lean execution techniques to eliminate waste by removing repetition, rework, and redundant tasks. Honeywell revolutionized automation project execution by extending this approach through simplification with independent workflows, standardized design, and enabling engineering to be done from anywhere in the world. This keeps automation off the critical path. While a growing number of plant owners/operators are embracing technology advancements that are driving value in connectivity, the Industrial Internet of Things (IIoT), Industrie 4.0, and smart solutions, cyber security remains a concern for many. Honeywells holistic solutions in support of LEAP for Operations include not only automated documentation, collaboration tools, integrated controllers, advanced alarm management, real-time analytics, proactive asset management, but also cloud-based execution with built-in cyber security. Its certified development process ensures end users get cyber security right out of the box. Honeywell keeps control systems updated, provides management of change, offers up-to-date security and patches, simplifies troubleshooting and collaboration, and excels at field and control integration.

For more information, click here

Continue reading here:

HONEYWELL SOLUTION HELPS CUSTOMERS OVERCOME AUTOMATION LIFECYCLE AND EFFICIENCY ... - Automation World

CRM machine learning leaps forward, assisting process automation – TechTarget

If you think you've heard it all when it comes to new automation technologies -- artificial intelligence, advanced data analytics, chatbots powered by CRM machine learning -- you haven't. Robotics is next.

Simply put, CRM's flavor of software robotics encompasses chatbots, tools for back-end automation and even data collection tools that watch employees work. All have the ultimate goal of helping sales and service staff better serve customers, explains Pegasystems CTO Don Schuerman. The robotics push from Pega follows its 2016 acquisition of robotic process automation and workforce analytics software vendor OpenSpan.

Here's the dirty little secret. The vast majority of what everybody's really excited about with robotic automation are what we used to call macros.

"Here's the dirty little secret. The vast majority of what everybody's really excited about with robotic automation are what we used to call macros," Schuerman says. "They're elegant, [and] they're much more cloud-managed. You've got much more control over how you can use them and tie them into things like document recognition and text recognition -- but, at the end of the day, they're macros."

Robotics work invisibly in the background, and employees only see the result, such as a prompt in the CRM system suggesting they make a certain offer at a certain juncture in a customer conversation. In other cases, software robots might simply collect data and utilize cloud analytics systems to identify manual processes employees are undertaking that are ripe for automation.

In this podcast interview, we delve deep into this topic, as well as other observations and CRM implementation trends from the floor of the PegaWorld 2017 user conference in Las Vegas. Among them -- how AI and CRM machine learning will help cut down on companies over-communicating with customers, saving time for both the customer and the company.

View original post here:

CRM machine learning leaps forward, assisting process automation - TechTarget

Confessions of a marketing automation addict – MarTech Today

Let me get this out of the way: Im a technology geek and a marketing aficionado. I adore working with marketing automation to drive business. The bright thrill of success bubbles over when various marketing technologies are stacked together to improve the user experience and boost engagement that results in sales.

Nothing is better than building the digital pathway. For example, consider a lead who visits a well-designed Drupal web page and submits a form. Data runs directly to a marketing automation tool like Eloqua. Eloqua then engages with the lead through a variety of processes and sends pertinent information to Salesforce.Using Salesforce, the sales team can see who they should contact to close the sale.

My affinity for marketing automation is validated. Its the wave of the future. In fact, it continues to be one of the fastest-growing technologies in the marketing stack, according to Aberdeen Group.

And it works. A June 2016 survey highlighted that email one of the core uses for marketing automation had a median ROI of 122 percent, more than four times higher than other marketing formats examined.

But alas, marketing automation is not the only component of a marketing mix that effectively generates and converts leads to buyers.There are other non-digital options that, to a marketing automation disciple, are frightening.

Two shining stars that are on the rise for marketing effectiveness are direct mail and in-person events.Both techniques have greater longevity than marketing automation, and they have both evolved in order to remain valuable.

But how can these analog tactics be effective in a world where digital usage is on the rise?Without technology to pave the way, how can lead engagements be managed?

Below is a brief description of these tactics the how and why they produce successful results is included as a guidepost for digital junkies like me who want to begin taking advantage of these more tangible options in the marketing mix.

Known for high ROI results, in-person events deliver the opportunity for non-directive, face-to-face interaction and experience-sharing, helping to generate net-new leads.They are also key to escorting existing buyers through multiple stages of the funnel, recycling old buyers and delivering qualified, sales-ready leads.

These four tips from industry experts will ensure event participation produces results:

Direct mail is actually on the upswing. In 2016, customer response rates increased 43 percent year over year, and prospect response rates rose 190 percent.

Direct mail, which provides a tangible medium through which leads can engage, helps shift the brain into a deeper level of engagement while building knowledge. Strong engagement and conversion rates are the results.

Even better, direct mail avoids many of the challenges of the digital world like (email) sender reputation, spam traps, bounce rates or IP-blocking.

While it evolved from spraying a batch of postcards to everyone, direct mail is now highly customized for the intended target (thanks to the digital world!).Forbes Summer Gould provides these four tips for customizing and engaging leads:

Yes, neither direct mail nor in-person events are digital-based.And maybe thats the point.

However, all is not lost for this marketing automation junkie. After all, marketing automation and other digital tools escalate the impact of direct mail and in-person events.

Marketing automation powers the invitations that drive attendees to in-person events.And it powers the follow-up communication that is a must to maintain the conversations started on the showroom floor.

Data from digital engagements provides the basis for direct mail campaigns to help you focus on a specific target.Not only does the data help with segmentation, but marketing automation enables you to personalize it in the online realm.

Though the trend for digital usage remains on the rise, we still live in a world of 360-degree interactions. And not all engagements can be managed by a marketing automation platform.

Some opinions expressed in this article may be those of a guest author and not necessarily MarTech Today. Staff authors are listed here.

See more here:

Confessions of a marketing automation addict - MarTech Today

Home Automation Trend Clicks with More and More Consumers – Noozhawk

By Paula Zamudio | June 21, 2017 | 12:05 p.m.

According to a 2016 survey, home automation such as home entry notifications and video monitoring is gaining in popularity among parents. Today, nearly one in four parents either uses a home automation system or plans to within one year.

The use of technology has become so prevalent that parents prefer using it to check on whats happening at home, rather than friends or neighbors. According to survey results, 73 percent of parents rely on texting to check in with teens and tweens who are home alone at least once or twice a month; 71 percent rely on phone calls, and only 18 percent rely on a friend or neighbor.

Home automation provides dependable, real-time, unfiltered information about whats happening at home.

For parents, it can provide peace of mind, especially during the summer months when kids are home alone. Parents may not realize the extent to which they are able to automate their home.

With Cox Homelife you are able to:

Lock and unlock doors from a keypad or mobile app

Detect carbon monoxide and smoke

See whats happening at home even when you are not there using secure video monitoring via a smart phone

Take a picture when the front door opens, or send a text message if the door does not open between certain times you expect your child to come home

Turn off small appliances remotely

Arm and disarm your system remotely

Turn lights on and off remotely

According to those surveyed, certain technologies are considered must haves for smart home technology:

Emergency alert, 89 percent

Home alarm control, 84 percent

Entry and lock control, 81 percent

Furthermore, four out of five parents surveyed are comfortable leaving teens and tweens home alone, and technology helps ease concerns.

Home automation isnt just for busy parents. Frequent travelers, pet lovers, energy-conscious consumers and budget managers will all find technology brings cost savings, peace of mind, remote monitoring and much more.

Click here for more information about Cox Homelife.

Paula Zamudio is a media and public relations specialist with Cox Communications.

See the rest here:

Home Automation Trend Clicks with More and More Consumers - Noozhawk

Abolition Of Work | Prometheism.net – Part 27

The Abolition of Work

Bob Black

No one should ever work.

Work is the source of nearly all the misery in the world. Almost any evil youd care to name comes from working or from living in a world designed for work. In order to stop suffering, we have to stop working.

That doesnt mean we have to stop doing things. It does mean creating a new way of life based on play; in other words, a *ludic* conviviality, commensality, and maybe even art. There is more to play than childs play, as worthy as that is. I call for a collective adventure in generalized joy and freely interdependent exuberance. Play isnt passive. Doubtless we all need a lot more time for sheer sloth and slack than we ever enjoy now, regardless of income or occupation, but once recovered from employment-induced exhaustion nearly all of us want to act. Oblomovism and Stakhanovism are two sides of the same debased coin.

The ludic life is totally incompatible with existing reality. So much the worse for reality, the gravity hole that sucks the vitality from the little in life that still distinguishes it from mere survival. Curiously or maybe not all the old ideologies are conservative because they believe in work. Some of them, like Marxism and most brands of anarchism, believe in work all the more fiercely because they believe in so little else.

Liberals say we should end employment discrimination. I say we should end employment. Conservatives support right-to-work laws. Following Karl Marxs wayward son-in-law Paul Lafargue I support the right to be lazy. Leftists favor full employment. Like the surrealists except that Im not kidding I favor full *un*employment. Trotskyists agitate for permanent revolution. I agitate for permanent revelry. But if all the ideologues (as they do) advocate work and not only because they plan to make other people do theirs they are strangely reluctant to say so. They will carry on endlessly about wages, hours, working conditions, exploitation, productivity, profitability. Theyll gladly talk about anything but work itself. These experts who offer to do our thinking for us rarely share their conclusions about work, for all its saliency in the lives of all of us. Among themselves they quibble over the details. Unions and management agree that we ought to sell the time of our lives in exchange for survival, although they haggle over the price. Marxists think we should be bossed by bureaucrats. Libertarians think we should be bossed by businessmen. Feminists dont care which form bossing takes so long as the bosses are women. Clearly these ideology-mongers have serious differences over how to divvy up the spoils of power. Just as clearly, none of them have any objection to power as such and all of them want to keep us working.

You may be wondering if Im joking or serious. Im joking *and* serious. To be ludic is not to be ludicrous. Play doesnt have to be frivolous, although frivolity isnt triviality: very often we ought to take frivolity seriously. Id like life to be a game but a game with high stakes. I want to play *for* *keeps*.

The alternative to work isnt just idleness. To be ludic is not to be quaaludic. As much as I treasure the pleasure of torpor, its never more rewarding than when it punctuates other pleasures and pastimes. Nor am I promoting the managed time-disciplined safety-valve called leisure; far from it. Leisure is nonwork for the sake of work. Leisure is the time spent recovering from work and in the frenzied but hopeless attempt to forget about work. Many people return from vacation so beat that they look forward to returning to work so they can rest up. The main difference between work and leisure is that work at least you get paid for your alienation and enervation.

I am not playing definitional games with anybody. When I say I want to abolish work, I mean just what I say, but I want to say what I mean by defining my terms in non-idiosyncratic ways. My minimum definition of work is *forced* *labor*, that is, compulsory production. Both elements are essential. Work is production enforced by economic or political means, by the carrot or the stick. (The carrot is just the stick by other means.) But not all creation is work. Work is never done for its own sake, its done on account of some product or output that the worker (or, more often, somebody else) gets out of it. This is what work necessarily is. To define it is to despise it. But work is usually even worse than its definition decrees. The dynamic of domination intrinsic to work tends over time toward elaboration. In advanced work-riddled societies, including all industrial societies whether capitalist of Communist, work invariably acquires other attributes which accentuate its obnoxiousness.

Usually and this is even more true in Communist than capitalist countries, where the state is almost the only employer and everyone is an employee work is employment, i. e., wage-labor, which means selling yourself on the installment plan. Thus 95% of Americans who work, work for somebody (or some*thing*) else. In the USSR or Cuba or Yugoslavia or any other alternative model which might be adduced, the corresponding figure approaches 100%. Only the embattled Third World peasant bastions Mexico, India, Brazil, Turkey temporarily shelter significant concentrations of agriculturists who perpetuate the traditional arrangement of most laborers in the last several millenia, the payment of taxes (= ransom) to the state or rent to parasitic landlords in return for being otherwise left alone. Even this raw deal is beginning to look good. *All* industrial (and office) workers are employees and under the sort of surveillance which ensures servility.

But modern work has worse implications. People dont just work, they have jobs. One person does one productive task all the time on an or-else basis. Even if the task has a quantum of intrinsic interest (as increasingly many jobs dont) the monotony of its obligatory exclusivity drains its ludic potential. A job that might engage the energies of some people, for a reasonably limited time, for the fun of it, is just a burden on those who have to do it for forty hours a week with no say in how it should be done, for the profit of owners who contribute nothing to the project, and with no opportunity for sharing tasks or spreading the work among those who actually have to do it. This is the real world of work: a world of bureaucratic blundering, of sexual harassment and discrimination, of bonehead bosses exploiting and scapegoating their subordinates who by any rational-technical criteria should be calling the shots. But capitalism in the real world subordinates the rational maximization of productivity and profit to the exigencies of organizational control.

The degradation which most workers experience on the job is the sum of assorted indignities which can be denominated as discipline. Foucault has complexified this phenomenon but it is simple enough. Discipline consists of the totality of totalitarian controls at the workplace surveillance, rotework, imposed work tempos, production quotas, punching -in and -out, etc. Discipline is what the factory and the office and the store share with the prison and the school and the mental hospital. It is something historically original and horrible. It was beyond the capacities of such demonic dictators of yore as Nero and Genghis Khan and Ivan the Terrible. For all their bad intentions they just didnt have the machinery to control their subjects as thoroughly as modern despots do. Discipline is the distinctively diabolical modern mode of control, it is an innovative intrusion which must be interdicted at the earliest opportunity.

Such is work. Play is just the opposite. Play is always voluntary. What might otherwise be play is work if its forced. This is axiomatic. Bernie de Koven has defined play as the suspension of consequences. This is unacceptable if it implies that play is inconsequential. The point is not that play is without consequences. This is to demean play. The point is that the consequences, if any, are gratuitous. Playing and giving are closely related, they are the behavioral and transactional facets of the same impulse, the play-instinct. They share an aristocratic disdain for results. The player gets something out of playing; thats why he plays. But the core reward is the experience of the activity itself (whatever it is). Some otherwise attentive students of play, like Johan Huizinga (*Homo* *Ludens*), *define* it as game-playing or following rules. I respect Huizingas erudition but emphatically reject his constraints. There are many good games (chess, baseball, Monopoly, bridge) which are rule-governed but there is much more to play than game-playing. Conversation, sex, dancing, travel these practices arent rule-governed but they are surely play if anything is. And rules can be *played* *with* at least as readily as anything else.

Work makes a mockery of freedom. The official line is that we all have rights and live in a democracy. Other unfortunates who arent free like we are have to live in police states. These victims obey orders or-else, no matter how arbitrary. The authorities keep them under regular surveillance. State bureaucrats control even the smaller details of everyday life. The officials who push them around are answerable only to higher-ups, public or private. Either way, dissent and disobedience are punished. Informers report regularly to the authorities. All this is supposed to be a very bad thing.

And so it is, although it is nothing but a description of the modern workplace. The liberals and conservatives and libertarians who lament totalitarianism are phonies and hypocrites. There is more freedom in any moderately deStalinized dictatorship than there is in the ordinary American workplace. You find the same sort of hierarchy and discipline in an office or factory as you do in a prison or monastery. In fact, as Foucault and others have shown, prisons and factories came in at about the same time, and their operators consciously borrowed from each others control techniques. A worker is a par-time slave. The boss says when to show up, when to leave, and what to do in the meantime. He tells you how much work to do and how fast. He is free to carry his control to humiliating extremes, regulating, if he feels like it, the clothes you wear or how often you go to the bathroom. With a few exceptions he can fire you for any reason, or no reason. He has you spied on by snitches and supervisors, he amasses a dossier on every employee. Talking back is called insubordination, just as if a worker is a naughty child, and it not only gets you fired, it disqualifies you for unemployment compensation. Without necessarily endorsing it for them either, it is noteworthy that children at home and in school receive much the same treatment, justified in their case by their supposed immaturity. What does this say about their parents and teachers who work?

The demeaning system of domination Ive described rules over half the waking hours of a majority of women and the vast majority of men for decades, for most of their lifespans. For certain purposes its not too misleading to call our system democracy or capitalism or better still industrialism, but its real names are factory fascism and office oligarchy. Anybody who says these people are free is lying or stupid. You are what you do. If you do boring, stupid monotonous work, chances are youll end up boring, stupid and monotonous. Work is a much better explanation for the creeping cretinization all around us than even such significant moronizing mechanisms as television and education. People who are regimented all their lives, handed off to work from school and bracketed by the family in the beginning and the nursing home at the end, are habituated to heirarchy and psychologically enslaved. Their aptitude for autonomy is so atrophied that their fear of freedom is among their few rationally grounded phobias. Their obedience training at work carries over into the families *they* start, thus reproducing the system in more ways than one, and into politics, culture and everything else. Once you drain the vitality from people at work, theyll likely submit to heirarchy and expertise in everything. Theyre used to it.

We are so close to the world of work that we cant see what it does to us. We have to rely on outside observers from other times or other cultures to appreciate the extremity and the pathology of our present position. There was a time in our own past when the work ethic would have been incomprehensible, and perhaps Weber was on to something when he tied its appearance to a religion, Calvinism, which if it emerged today instead of four centuries ago would immediately and appropriately be labeled a cult. Be that as it may, we have only to draw upon the wisdom of antiquity to put work in perspective. The ancients saw work for what it is, and their view prevailed, the Calvinist cranks notwithstanding, until overthrown by industrialism but not before receiving the endorsement of its prophets.

Lets pretend for a moment that work doesnt turn people into stultified submissives. Lets pretend, in defiance of any plausible psychology and the ideology of its boosters, that it has no effect on the formation of character. And lets pretend that work isnt as boring and tiring and humiliating as we all know it really is. Even then, work would *still* make a mockery of all humanistic and democratic aspirations, just because it usurps so much of our time. Socrates said that manual laborers make bad friends and bad citizens because they have no time to fulfill the responsibilities of friendship and citizenship. He was right. Because of work, no matter what we do we keep looking at out watches. The only thing free about so-called free time is that it doesnt cost the boss anything. Free time is mostly devoted to getting ready for work, going to work, returning from work, and recovering from work. Free time is a euphemism for the peculiar way labor as a factor of production not only transports itself at its own expense to and from the workplace but assumes primary responsibility for its own maintenance and repair. Coal and steel dont do that. Lathes and typewriters dont do that. But workers do. No wonder Edward G. Robinson in one of his gangster movies exclaimed, Work is for saps!

Both Plato and Xenophon attribute to Socrates and obviously share with him an awareness of the destructive effects of work on the worker as a citizen and a human being. Herodotus identified contempt for work as an attribute of the classical Greeks at the zenith of their culture. To take only one Roman example, Cicero said that whoever gives his labor for money sells himself and puts himself in the rank of slaves. His candor is now rare, but contemporary primitive societies which we are wont to look down upon have provided spokesmen who have enlightened Western anthropologists. The Kapauku of West Irian, according to Posposil, have a conception of balance in life and accordingly work only every other day, the day of rest designed to regain the lost power and health. Our ancestors, even as late as the eighteenth century when they were far along the path to our present predicament, at least were aware of what we have forgotten, the underside of industrialization. Their religious devotion to St. Monday thus establishing a *de* *facto* five-day week 150-200 years before its legal consecration was the despair of the earliest factory owners. They took a long time in submitting to the tyranny of the bell, predecessor of the time clock. In fact it was necessary for a generation or two to replace adult males with women accustomed to obedience and children who could be molded to fit industrial needs. Even the exploited peasants of the *ancien* *regime* wrested substantial time back from their landlords work. According to Lafargue, a fourth of the French peasants calendar was devoted to Sundays and holidays, and Chayanovs figures from villages in Czarist Russia hardly a progressive society likewise show a fourth or fifth of peasants days devoted to repose. Controlling for productivity, we are obviously far behind these backward societies. The exploited *muzhiks* would wonder why any of us are working at all. So should we.

To grasp the full enormity of our deterioration, however, consider the earliest condition of humanity, without government or property, when we wandered as hunter-gatherers. Hobbes surmised that life was then nasty, brutish and short. Others assume that life was a desperate unremitting struggle for subsistence, a war waged against a harsh Nature with death and disaster awaiting the unlucky or anyone who was unequal to the challenge of the struggle for existence. Actually, that was all a projection of fears for the collapse of government authority over communities unaccustomed to doing without it, like the England of Hobbes during the Civil War. Hobbes compatriots had already encountered alternative forms of society which illustrated other ways of life in North America, particularly but already these were too remote from their experience to be understandable. (The lower orders, closer to the condition of the Indians, understood it better and often found it attractive. Throughout the seventeenth century, English settlers defected to Indian tribes or, captured in war, refused to return. But the Indians no more defected to white settlements than Germans climb the Berlin Wall from the west.) The survival of the fittest version the Thomas Huxley version of Darwinism was a better account of economic conditions in Victorian England than it was of natural selection, as the anarchist Kropotkin showed in his book *Mutual* *Aid,* *A* *Factor* *of* *Evolution*. (Kropotkin was a scientist a geographer whod had ample involuntary opportunity for fieldwork whilst exiled in Siberia: he knew what he was talking about.) Like most social and political theory, the story Hobbes and his successors told was really unacknowledged autobiography.

The anthropologist Marshall Sahlins, surveying the data on contemporary hunter-gatherers, exploded the Hobbesian myth in an article entitled The Original Affluent Society. They work a lot less than we do, and their work is hard to distinguish from what we regard as play. Sahlins concluded that hunters and gatherers work less than we do; and rather than a continuous travail, the food quest is intermittent, leisure abundant, and there is a greater amount of sleep in the daytime per capita per year than in any other condition of society. They worked an average of four hours a day, assuming they were working at all. Their labor, as it appears to us, was skilled labor which exercised their physical and intellectual capacities; unskilled labor on any large scale, as Sahlins says, is impossible except under industrialism. Thus it satisfied Friedrich Schillers definition of play, the only occasion on which man realizes his complete humanity by giving full play to both sides of his twofold nature, thinking and feeling. As he put it: The animal *works* when deprivation is the mainspring of its activity, and it *plays* when the fullness of its strength is this mainspring, when superabundant life is its own stimulus to activity. (A modern version dubiously developmental is Abraham Maslows counterposition of deficiency and growth motivation.) Play and freedom are, as regards production, coextensive. Even Marx, who belongs (for all his good intentions) in the productivist pantheon, observed that the realm of freedom does not commence until the point is passed where labor under the compulsion of necessity and external utility is required. He never could quite bring himself to identify this happy circumstance as what it is, the abolition of work its rather anomalous, after all, to be pro-worker and anti-work but we can.

The aspiration to go backwards or forwards to a life without work is evident in every serious social or cultural history of pre-industrial Europe, among them M. Dorothy Georges *England* In* *Transition* and Peter Burkes *Popular* *Culture* *in* *Early* *Modern* *Europe*. Also pertinent is Daniel Bells essay, Work and its Discontents, the first text, I believe, to refer to the revolt against work in so many words and, had it been understood, an important correction to the complacency ordinarily associated with the volume in which it was collected, *The* *End* *of* *Ideology*. Neither critics nor celebrants have noticed that Bells end-of-ideology thesis signaled not the end of social unrest but the beginning of a new, uncharted phase unconstrained and uninformed by ideology. It was Seymour Lipset (in *Political* *Man*), not Bell, who announced at the same time that the fundamental problems of the Industrial Revolution have been solved, only a few years before the post- or meta-industrial discontents of college students drove Lipset from UC Berkeley to the relative (and temporary) tranquility of Harvard.

As Bell notes, Adam Smith in *The* *Wealth* *of* *Nations*, for all his enthusiasm for the market and the division of labor, was more alert to (and more honest about) the seamy side of work than Ayn Rand or the Chicago economists or any of Smiths modern epigones. As Smith observed: The understandings of the greater part of men are necessarily formed by their ordinary employments. The man whose life is spent in performing a few simple operations has no occasion to exert his understanding He generally becomes as stupid and ignorant as it is possible for a human creature to become. Here, in a few blunt words, is my critique of work. Bell, writing in 1956, the Golden Age of Eisenhower imbecility and American self-satisfaction, identified the unorganized, unorganizable malaise of the 1970s and since, the one no political tendency is able to harness, the one identified in HEWs report *Work* *in* *America*, the one which cannot be exploited and so is ignored. That problem is the revolt against work. It does not figure in any text by any laissez-faire economist Milton Friedman, Murray Rothbard, Richard Posner because, in their terms, as they used to say on *Star* *Trek*, it does not compute.

If these objections, informed by the love of liberty, fail to persuade humanists of a utilitarian or even paternalist turn, there are others which they cannot disregard. Work is hazardous to your health, to borrow a book title. In fact, work is mass murder or genocide. Directly or indirectly, work will kill most of the people who read these words. Between 14,000 and 25,000 workers are killed annually in this country on the job. Over two million are disabled. Twenty to twenty-five million are injured every year. And these figures are based on a very conservative estimation of what constitutes a work-related injury. Thus they dont count the half million cases of occupational disease every year. I looked at one medical textbook on occupational diseases which was 1,200 pages long. Even this barely scratches the surface. The available statistics count the obvious cases like the 100,000 miners who have black lung disease, of whom 4,000 die every year, a much higher fatality rate than for AIDS, for instance, which gets so much media attention. This reflects the unvoiced assumption that AIDS afflicts perverts who could control their depravity whereas coal-mining is a sacrosanct activity beyond question. What the statistics dont show is that tens of millions of people have heir lifespans shortened by work which is all that homicide means, after all. Consider the doctors who work themselves to death in their 50s. Consider all the other workaholics.

Even if you arent killed or crippled while actually working, you very well might be while going to work, coming from work, looking for work, or trying to forget about work. The vast majority of victims of the automobile are either doing one of these work-obligatory activities or else fall afoul of those who do them. To this augmented body-count must be added the victims of auto-industrial pollution and work-induced alcoholism and drug addiction. Both cancer and heart disease are modern afflictions normally traceable, directly, or indirectly, to work.

Work, then, institutionalizes homicide as a way of life. People think the Cambodians were crazy for exterminating themselves, but are we any different? The Pol Pot regime at least had a vision, however blurred, of an egalitarian society. We kill people in the six-figure range (at least) in order to sell Big Macs and Cadillacs to the survivors. Our forty or fifty thousand annual highway fatalities are victims, not martyrs. They died for nothing or rather, they died for work. But work is nothing to die for.

Bad news for liberals: regulatory tinkering is useless in this life-and-death context. The federal Occupational Safety and Health Administration was designed to police the core part of the problem, workplace safety. Even before Reagan and the Supreme Court stifled it, OSHA was a farce. At previous and (by current standards) generous Carter-era funding levels, a workplace could expect a random visit from an OSHA inspector once every 46 years.

State control of the economy is no solution. Work is, if anything, more dangerous in the state-socialist countries than it is here. Thousands of Russian workers were killed or injured building the Moscow subway. Stories reverberate about covered-up Soviet nuclear disasters which make Times Beach and Three-Mile Island look like elementary-school air-raid drills. On the other hand, deregulation, currently fashionable, wont help and will probably hurt. From a health and safety standpoint, among others, work was at its worst in the days when the economy most closely approximated laissez-faire.

Historians like Eugene Genovese have argued persuasively that as antebellum slavery apologists insisted factory wage-workers in the Northern American states and in Europe were worse off than Southern plantation slaves. No rearrangement of relations among bureaucrats and businessmen seems to make much difference at the point of production. Serious enforcement of even the rather vague standards enforceable in theory by OSHA would probably bring the economy to a standstill. The enforcers apparently appreciate this, since they dont even try to crack down on most malefactors.

What Ive said so far ought not to be controversial. Many workers are fed up with work. There are high and rising rates of absenteeism, turnover, employee theft and sabotage, wildcat strikes, and overall goldbricking on the job. There may be some movement toward a conscious and not just visceral rejection of work. And yet the prevalent feeling, universal among bosses and their agents and also widespread among workers themselves is that work itself is inevitable and necessary.

I disagree. It is now possible to abolish work and replace it, insofar as it serves useful purposes, with a multitude of new kinds of free activities. To abolish work requires going at it from two directions, quantitative and qualitative. On the one hand, on the quantitative side, we have to cut down massively on the amount of work being done. At present most work is useless or worse and we should simply get rid of it. On the other hand and I think this the crux of the matter and the revolutionary new departure we have to take what useful work remains and transform it into a pleasing variety of game-like and craft-like pastimes, indistinguishable from other pleasurable pastimes, except that they happen to yield useful end-products. Surely that shouldnt make them *less* enticing to do. Then all the artificial barriers of power and property could come down. Creation could become recreation. And we could all stop being afraid of each other.

I dont suggest that most work is salvageable in this way. But then most work isnt worth trying to save. Only a small and diminishing fraction of work serves any useful purpose independent of the defense and reproduction of the work-system and its political and legal appendages. Twenty years ago, Paul and Percival Goodman estimated that just five percent of the work then being done presumably the figure, if accurate, is lower now would satisfy our minimal needs for food, clothing, and shelter. Theirs was only an educated guess but the main point is quite clear: directly or indirectly, most work serves the unproductive purposes of commerce or social control. Right off the bat we can liberate tens of millions of salesmen, soldiers, managers, cops, stockbrokers, clergymen, bankers, lawyers, teachers, landlords, security guards, ad-men and everyone who works for them. There is a snowball effect since every time you idle some bigshot you liberate his flunkeys and underlings also. Thus the economy *implodes*.

Forty percent of the workforce are white-collar workers, most of whom have some of the most tedious and idiotic jobs ever concocted. Entire industries, insurance and banking and real estate for instance, consist of nothing but useless paper-shuffling. It is no accident that the tertiary sector, the service sector, is growing while the secondary sector (industry) stagnates and the primary sector (agriculture) nearly disappears. Because work is unnecessary except to those whose power it secures, workers are shifted from relatively useful to relatively useless occupations as a measure to assure public order. Anything is better than nothing. Thats why you cant go home just because you finish early. They want your *time*, enough of it to make you theirs, even if they have no use for most of it. Otherwise why hasnt the average work week gone down by more than a few minutes in the past fifty years?

Next we can take a meat-cleaver to production work itself. No more war production, nuclear power, junk food, feminine hygiene deodorant and above all, no more auto industry to speak of. An occasional Stanley Steamer or Model-T might be all right, but the auto-eroticism on which such pestholes as Detroit and Los Angeles depend on is out of the question. Already, without even trying, weve virtually solved the energy crisis, the environmental crisis and assorted other insoluble social problems.

Finally, we must do away with far and away the largest occupation, the one with the longest hours, the lowest pay and some of the most tedious tasks around. I refer to *housewives* doing housework and child-rearing. By abolishing wage-labor and achieving full unemployment we undermine the sexual division of labor. The nuclear family as we know it is an inevitable adaptation to the division of labor imposed by modern wage-work. Like it or not, as things have been for the last century or two it is economically rational for the man to bring home the bacon, for the woman to do the shitwork to provide him with a haven in a heartless world, and for the children to be marched off to youth concentration camps called schools, primarily to keep them out of Moms hair but still under control, but incidentally to acquire the habits of obedience and punctuality so necessary for workers. If you would be rid of patriarchy, get rid of the nuclear family whose unpaid shadow work, as Ivan Illich says, makes possible the work-system that makes *it* necessary. Bound up with this no-nukes strategy is the abolition of childhood and the closing of the schools. There are more full-time students than full-time workers in this country. We need children as teachers, not students. They have a lot to contribute to the ludic revolution because theyre better at playing than grown-ups are. Adults and children are not identical but they will become equal through interdependence. Only play can bridge the generation gap.

I havent as yet even mentioned the possibility of cutting way down on the little work that remains by automating and cybernizing it. All the scientists and engineers and technicians freed from bothering with war research and planned obsolescence would have a good time devising means to eliminate fatigue and tedium and danger from activities like mining. Undoubtedly theyll find other projects to amuse themselves with. Perhaps theyll set up world-wide all-inclusive multi-media communications systems or found space colonies. Perhaps. I myself am no gadget freak. I wouldnt care to live in a pushbutton paradise. I dont what robot slaves to do everything; I want to do things myself. There is, I think, a place for labor-saving technology, but a modest place. The historical and pre-historical record is not encouraging. When productive technology went from hunting-gathering to agriculture and on to industry, work increased while skills and self-determination diminished. The further evolution of industrialism has accentuated what Harry Braverman called the degradation of work. Intelligent observers have always been aware of this. John Stuart Mill wrote that all the labor-saving inventions ever devised havent saved a moments labor. Karl Marx wrote that it would be possible to write a history of the inventions, made since 1830, for the sole purpose of supplying capital with weapons against the revolts of the working class. The enthusiastic technophiles Saint-Simon, Comte, Lenin, B. F. Skinner have always been unabashed authoritarians also; which is to say, technocrats. We should be more than sceptical about the promises of the computer mystics. *They* work like dogs; chances are, if they have their way, so will the rest of us. But if they have any particularized contributions more readily subordinated to human purposes than the run of high tech, lets give them a hearing.

What I really want to see is work turned into play. A first step is to discard the notions of a job and an occupation. Even activities that already have some ludic content lose most of it by being reduced to jobs which certain people, and only those people are forced to do to the exclusion of all else. Is it not odd that farm workers toil painfully in the fields while their air-conditioned masters go home every weekend and putter about in their gardens? Under a system of permanent revelry, we will witness the Golden Age of the dilettante which will put the Renaissance to shame. There wont be any more jobs, just things to do and people to do them.

The secret of turning work into play, as Charles Fourier demonstrated, is to arrange useful activities to take advantage of whatever it is that various people at various times in fact enjoy doing. To make it possible for some people to do the things they could enjoy it will be enough just to eradicate the irrationalities and distortions which afflict these activities when they are reduced to work. I, for instance, would enjoy doing some (not too much) teaching, but I dont want coerced students and I dont care to suck up to pathetic pedants for tenure.

Second, there are some things that people like to do from time to time, but not for too long, and certainly not all the time. You might enjoy baby-sitting for a few hours in order to share the company of kids, but not as much as their parents do. The parents meanwhile, profoundly appreciate the time to themselves that you free up for them, although theyd get fretful if parted from their progeny for too long. These differences among individuals are what make a life of free play possible. The same principle applies to many other areas of activity, especially the primal ones. Thus many people enjoy cooking when they can practice it seriously at their leisure, but not when theyre just fueling up human bodies for work.

Third other things being equal some things that are unsatisfying if done by yourself or in unpleasant surroundings or at the orders of an overlord are enjoyable, at least for a while, if these circumstances are changed. This is probably true, to some extent, of all work. People deploy their otherwise wasted ingenuity to make a game of the least inviting drudge-jobs as best they can. Activities that appeal to some people dont always appeal to all others, but everyone at least potentially has a variety of interests and an interest in variety. As the saying goes, anything once. Fourier was the master at speculating how aberrant and perverse penchants could be put to use in post-civilized society, what he called Harmony. He thought the Emperor Nero would have turned out all right if as a child he could have indulged his taste for bloodshed by working in a slaughterhouse. Small children who notoriously relish wallowing in filth could be organized in Little Hordes to clean toilets and empty the garbage, with medals awarded to the outstanding. I am not arguing for these precise examples but for the underlying principle, which I think makes perfect sense as one dimension of an overall revolutionary transformation. Bear in mind that we dont have to take todays work just as we find it and match it up with the proper people, some of whom would have to be perverse indeed. If technology has a role in all this it is less to automate work out of existence than to open up new realms for re/creation. To some extent we may want to return to handicrafts, which William Morris considered a probable and desirable upshot of communist revolution. Art would be taken back from the snobs and collectors, abolished as a specialized department catering to an elite audience, and its qualities of beauty and creation restored to integral life from which they were stolen by work. Its a sobering thought that the grecian urns we write odes about and showcase in museums were used in their own time to store olive oil. I doubt our everyday artifacts will fare as well in the future, if there is one. The point is that theres no such thing as progress in the world of work; if anything its just the opposite. We shouldnt hesitate to pilfer the past for what it has to offer, the ancients lose nothing yet we are enriched.

The reinvention of daily life means marching off the edge of our maps. There is, it is true, more suggestive speculation than most people suspect. Besides Fourier and Morris and even a hint, here and there, in Marx there are the writings of Kropotkin, the syndicalists Pataud and Pouget, anarcho-communists old (Berkman) and new (Bookchin). The Goodman brothers *Communitas* is exemplary for illustrating what forms follow from given functions (purposes), and there is something to be gleaned from the often hazy heralds of alternative/appropriate/intermediate/convivial technology, like Schumacher and especially Illich, once you disconnect their fog machines. The situationists as represented by Vaneigems *Revolution* *of* *Daily* *Life* and in the *Situationist* *International* *Anthology* are so ruthlessly lucid as to be exhilarating, even if they never did quite square the endorsement of the rule of the workers councils with the abolition of work. Better their incongruity, though than any extant version of leftism, whose devotees look to be the last champions of work, for if there were no work there would be no workers, and without workers, who would the left have to organize?

So the abolitionists would be largely on their own. No one can say what would result from unleashing the creative power stultified by work. Anything can happen. The tiresome debaters problem of freedom vs. necessity, with its theological overtones, resolves itself practically once the production of use-values is coextensive with the consumption of delightful play-activity.

Life will become a game, or rather many games, but not as it is now a zero/sum game. An optimal sexual encounter is the paradigm of productive play, The participants potentiate each others pleasures, nobody keeps score, and everybody wins. The more you give, the more you get. In the ludic life, the best of sex will diffuse into the better part of daily life. Generalized play leads to the libidinization of life. Sex, in turn, can become less urgent and desperate, more playful. If we play our cards right, we can all get more out of life than we put into it; but only if we play for keeps.

No one should ever work. Workers of the world *relax*!

See the rest here:

The Abolition of WorkBob Black Primitivism

Read more from the original source:

Abolition Of Work | Prometheism.net - Part 27