Ethereum Price Forecast: Crypto Hits 3-Month Low as Senate Hearings Begin

Posted on by

Ethereum News Update
It is no surprise that Ethereum prices fell 5.5% on Tuesday morning, given that U.S. senators will place cryptocurrencies under the microscope today.

More specifically, the U.S. Senate Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs will hear testimony from two of the most important regulators on the planet: Jay Clayton of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and J. Christopher Giancarlo from the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC).

Together, Clayton and Giancarlo oversee cryptocurrencies within the U.S.

Both have launched lawsuits against shady crypto organizations, while also stressing the need for continued innovation. It is.

The post Ethereum Price Forecast: Crypto Hits 3-Month Low as Senate Hearings Begin appeared first on Profit Confidential.

Read this article:
Ethereum Price Forecast: Crypto Hits 3-Month Low as Senate Hearings Begin

Forget Crypto Volatility: Here Are 5 of the Best Blockchain Technology Stocks for 2018

Posted on by

As I pen this report, there is a bloodbath happening in the cryptocurrency markets. All cryptocurrencies, including Bitcoin, are crashing. With smart money exiting the crypto markets, savvy investors are wondering where it’s moving next. I’ll tell you where. It’s pouring into blockchain—more precisely, blockchain stocks and blockchain ETFs. So, here we present five of the best blockchain technology stocks you need to consider as the rising tide lifts these boats.

But first, let me give you a glimpse into this new craze that's gripping.

The post Forget Crypto Volatility: Here Are 5 of the Best Blockchain Technology Stocks for 2018 appeared first on Profit Confidential.

Read the rest here:
Forget Crypto Volatility: Here Are 5 of the Best Blockchain Technology Stocks for 2018

Litecoin Price Forecast: Charlie Lee’s Prophecy Turns Out to Be on Target

Posted on by

Daily Litecoin News Update
Fear reigns supreme in cryptomarkets as cryptocurrency prices continue to spiral downward. Perceptions are driving prices, not fundamentals. The great cryptocurrency crash of 2018 has wiped out over $200.0 billion from the market in the past week.

Litecoin is down another 16.27% in the last 24 hours and the LTC to USD rate cratered to $115.78 at the time of writing. Litecoin has, in fact, performed better than some of the other cryptos in the top 10 ranks. But it's not very comforting at this point.

Investor.

The post Litecoin Price Forecast: Charlie Lee’s Prophecy Turns Out to Be on Target appeared first on Profit Confidential.

Read more from the original source:
Litecoin Price Forecast: Charlie Lee’s Prophecy Turns Out to Be on Target

Ripple Price Prediction: IMF Can’t Exempt XRP Based on Chris Larsen

Posted on by

Ripple News Update
A few weeks ago, I warned investors that regulators would tighten their grip on cryptocurrencies. This would lead to increased volatility in cryptocurrency prices, I said, including useful cryptos like XRP.

One of the examples I cited was the International Monetary Fund’s (IMF) desire to create “global trading standards” for cryptos. It seemed noteworthy that the IMF was making overtures to various countries about their domestic crypto regulations.

It wasn’t a Pulitzer-worthy story, but it did the job of informing investors about.

The post Ripple Price Prediction: IMF Can’t Exempt XRP Based on Chris Larsen appeared first on Profit Confidential.

Follow this link:
Ripple Price Prediction: IMF Can’t Exempt XRP Based on Chris Larsen

Roger Ver helps raise $87k for an anti-war charity – Dowbit

Posted on by

Roger Ver and online auction platform Charitystars have managed to raise $87,000 for website Antiwar.com. The winner of the auction won a private lunch with Roger Ver, one of the original investors of Bitcoin. Antiwar.com is a portal that promotes peace and non-interventionalism.

Charitystars was founded in 2013 in Milan, Italy. The online auction offers people a chance to bid cryptocurrency on meetings with celebrities, rare artwork and luxury cars. Proceeds are donated to charities all over the world.

Charitystars founders said they were pleasantly surprised with the result. Reportedly, a lunch with former Italian president Silvio Berlusconi was auctioned for the same $87,000.

With the phenomenal expansion of the crypto-space and the unprecedented opportunity to direct that energy in support of pivotal causes in a manner that is genuinely revolutionary We are glad Roger Ver accepted our invitation to generously support this remarkable cause, Charitystars Francesco Nazari Fusetti explained.

Roger Ver was stunned by the results and commented:

As the blockchain community continues to grow it is important that we dont lose sight of the most serious issues affecting the world today Having long believed that bitcoin has the power to halt conflict and war, I am honored to leverage my experience and expertise in the industry for a cause dedicated to this.

Roger Ver is the CEO of Bitcoin.com and one of the most vocal supporters of cryptocurrency Bitcoin Cash. Ver believes that Bitcoin is no longer the peer-to-peer electronic cash as originally envisioned by creator Satoshi Nakamoto.

Original post:

Roger Ver helps raise $87k for an anti-war charity - Dowbit

Lung Institute | Stem Cell Treatment for COPD & Emphysema

Posted on by

Lung Institute | Stem Cell Treatment for COPD & Emphysema Treatment

Stem Cell Therapy Can Help.

At the Lung Institute, we recognize that all patients have their own stories. While they have chronic lung conditions in common, our patients have had all kinds of careers and hobbies. Whether they enjoy growing plants in the garden, playing a round of golf or creating delicious meals, our patients are unique and deserve treatments unique to them.

At the Lung Institute, we screen each patient thoroughly, focusing on medical history and current condition to encourage only the best-possible treatment results.

Using the natural maintenance capabilities of stem cells, we first withdraw and separate the patients stem cells from their blood or bone marrow. We then reintroduce the stem cells into the body where they come to rest inside the lungs, promoting both natural healing and inflammation reduction.

To learn more about how stem cells work, review our Stem Cell Treatment Basics and discover how stem cell therapy can work to affect your quality of life. Click on the links below to read more about the two treatments we offer.

* All treatments performed at Lung Institute utilize autologous stem cells, meaning those derived from a patient's own body. No fetal or embryonic stem cells are utilized in Lung Institute's procedures. Lung Institute aims to improve patients' quality of life and help them breathe easier through the use of autologous stem cell therapy. To learn more about how stem cells work for lung disease, click here.

All claims made regarding the efficacy of Lung Institute's treatments as they pertain to pulmonary conditions are based solely on anecdotal support collected by Lung Institute. Individual conditions, treatment and outcomes may vary and are not necessarily indicative of future results. Testimonial participation is voluntary. Lung Institute does not pay for or script patient testimonials.

Under current FDA guidelines and regulations 1271.10 and 1271.15, the Lung Institute complies with all necessary requirements for operation. The Lung Institute is firmly in accordance with the conditions set by the FDA for exemption status and conducts itself in full accordance with current guidelines. Any individual who accesses Lung Institute's website for information is encouraged to speak with his or her primary physician for treatment suggestions and conclusive evidence. All information on this site should be used for educational and informational use only.

As required by Texas state law, the Lung Institute Dallas Clinic has received Institutional Review Board (IRB) approval from MaGil IRB, now Chesapeake IRB, which is fully accredited by the Association for the Accreditation of Human Research Protection Program (AAHRPP), for research protocols and stem cell procedures. The Lung Institute has implemented these IRB approved standards at all of its clinics nationwide. Approval indicates that we follow rigorous standards for ethics, quality, and protections for human research.

Follow this link:

Lung Institute | Stem Cell Treatment for COPD & Emphysema

StemGenex – Stem Cell Therapy, Stem Cell Treatments, Stem …

Posted on by

Multiple sclerosis (or MS) is a degenerative disease involving the deterioration of nerve cells. MS attacks the central nervous system (CNS), which is made up of the brain, spinal cord, and optic nerves.

Autoimmune diseases are conditions in which the patients immune system generates cellular and antibody responses to substances and tissues normally present in the body.

In each condition there is chronic obstruction of the flow of air through the airways and out of the lungs, and the obstruction generally is permanent and may be progressive over time.

Rheumatoid Arthritis is an autoimmune disease that attacks the bodys own tissues, specifically the synovium, a thin membrane lining the joints. As a result, joint fluid builds up, causing pain in the joints and inflammation thats systemic.

Parkinson's disease is a chronic progressive neurological disease that affects nerve cells (neurons) in an area of the brain known as the substantia nigra.

Osteoarthritis, or degenerative joint disease, is the most common type of arthritis. It is caused by the degradation of a joints cartilage.

With the onset of Alzheimers disease, information transfer at the synapses (the connection between the nerve cells and extensions) starts to break down, and the number of synapses decreases significantly.

Diabetes is the condition in which the body does not properly process food for use as energy. When you have diabetes, your body either doesn't make enough insulin or can't use its own insulin as well as it should.

See the original post here:

StemGenex - Stem Cell Therapy, Stem Cell Treatments, Stem ...

News With Views | Reality Is Often Stranger Than Fiction …

Posted on by

Part III

A concept being discussed in many elite and scientific circles today is posthuman, or after human existence.

A transhuman is an intermediary form between human and post-human. A transhuman looks like a human in physical respects but possesses powers and abilities beyond those of standard humans. These abilities might include enhanced intelligence, consciousness, strength, or endurance. This may also include the gender identity assigned to them at birth, the homosexual, trans-man, trans-woman and transgender.

A cyborg is the abbreviation of cybernetic organism, a being with both organic and biomechatronic body parts. A cyborg is not bionic, biorobot or android. Cyborgs are commonly thought of as mammals, including humans, they might also conceivably be any kind of organism.

A human-hybrid is an entity that incorporates elements from humans and animals; its a human-animal hybrid. All of these can be considered an assault on the human race.

Due to the enhanced technology of magnetic resonance imagining (MRI), the entire brain has been mapped out. Through computerized images we know the exact area of memory, thought, emotion, smell, taste and feeling, implant devices can be used to trigger those neuron connections within the brain. Just as artificial intelligence (AI) is programmed, a brain implant containing information on any given subject can be implanted to enhance human mental aptitude and performance to cause super human abilities.

US Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) was designated $80 million to develop brain chips capable of implanting or removing memory. These implants are intended to aid troops cognitive abilities during and after wars. Believe me, with every implant theres a back door capability to control that implant and also the person.

Russian President, Vladimir Putin, ex-military and Karate expert, fears the prospect of a universal soldier with superman capabilities. He says, Now that scientists have broken the genetic code, and can successfully edit human embryos with pre-designed characteristics, we need regulations to prevent the creation of mass-killing super soldiers.

AI implants inserted into bodies are humans melded with machines. Are they still human beings, made in the image of God? Moreover, arent we being melded with machines even today? Can we function without our Smart Phone, GPS, Facebook or Google? In the workforce or in every day life what, normal human being, can compete with a transhuman or a cyborg or a hybrid?

Whats happening today is also mentioned in the Bible in the book of Genesis and in the Book of Enoch. It was the reason God regretted making mankind and the same reason He flooded the earth with water and destroyed every living creature with the exception of Noahs undefiled family and the uncorrupted creatures that He handpicked from every living species before they entered the ark.

Jesus reveals three significant aspects regarding the above. He warned, as it was in the days of Sodom and Gomorrah, so will it be when he returns. In the account of Sodom and Gomorrah the entire town tried to break down the door in order to rape the angels. Due of the overpowering lust to sodomize the male angels, the mob rejected the virgin who was offered to replace them. Jesus also said, as it was in the days of Noah, so will it be when he returns. In the days of Noah a group of angels led by Satan abandoned their original state to corrupt the human genome, just as theyre doing today. This resulted in Nephilim hybrids, transhumans and giants with fierce cravings for the raw flesh of animals and humans. Lastly, Jesus said, if God hadnt sent him back before the appointed time, the devil wouldve killed every living creature on the face of the earth. But for the sake of the elect, God sends Christ back earlier.

I began this three part series by showing that in the very near future 40 to 50% of all jobs in America are at risk of being replaced by robots. Robots dont take coffee breaks or lunch breaks and they dont take vacations. They dont take sick leave or maternity leave either. And employers wont have to bother with payroll clerks, time cards, a retirement fund or a health care plan and robots are exceedingly smarter than us. Stop thinking you can successfully compete against robots.

When people have nothing to lose, they lose it. The powers that be are afraid that people will lose it. With the prospect of 50% of Americans unemployed and much higher numbers in undeveloped countries, governments and billionaires have colluded to devise a Universal Basic Income (UBI) to provide essential provisions for every human being on earth. The UBI is the concept to placate the impending magnitude of unemployed.

In part two, I revealed the astonishing capabilities of artificial intelligence (AI). I also mentioned that the United Nations is currently engaged in special hearings to determine whether to relinquish life and death decisions over human beings to machines. Determining whether machines will have the sole decision making power to kill humans is profound and overwhelming. Since machines cannot be held accountable legally, this decision will determine the future existence of the human race.

This photo is of thousands of plastic coffins. The plan is laid out in the Georgia Guidestones, Reduce the population to 500 million. Zbigniew Brzezinski was Barack Obamas handler, a New World Order globalist-insider and the father of MSNBCs Morning Joe, Mika Brzezinski. He said, and I quote: In earlier times, it was easier to control a million people, literally, than physically to kill a million people. Today it is infinitely easier to kill a million people than to control a million people.

If you disregard the spiritual aspect, none of this makes sense. After all, why would billionaire elites, scientist and governments empower machines to eradicate the human race, of which they belong? The answer is theyre luciferians.

And I reiterate Jesus words, the devil would have killed every living creature on the face of the earth, Satan kills people through other people.

Again, if you havent watched I Robot, do so, if you have watch it again. Before you do, watch this short video Slaughterbots YouTube

CEO of SpaceX and Tesla, Elon Musk: Artificial Intelligence Is More Dangerous Than North Korea. I dont know a lot of people who love the idea of living under a despot, said Musk, suggesting a future where artificial intelligenceor the people controlling itexceed our capabilities by orders of magnitude. Elon Musks Billion-Dollar Crusade to Stop the A.I. Apocalypse Hes also gone so far as to call artificial intelligence, a fundamental risk to the existence of human civilization.

When you have super intelligence that exceeds humanity by a lot, says Musk, its very important that its benign. Power corrupts and absolute power corrupts absolutely. Freedom consists in the distribution of power and despotism in its concentration. AI is a rare case where I think we need to be proactive in regulation rather than reactive. Nobody likes being regulated, but everythingcars, planes, food, drugs, etc.that is a danger to the public is regulated. AI should be too.

Elon Musk Urges U.S. Governors to Regulate AI Before Its Too Late , we only have a 5 to 10% chance of preventing killer robots from destroying humanity. Musk insisted on lawmakers considering regulations regarding AIs creation. In August, Musk even signed an open letter to the United Nations, as AI experts join Elon Musk, Stephen Hawking, call for killer-robot ban.

Robots and AI are not designed to empower humanity, but to track, enslave, takeover and replace humanity, and Elon Musk not only has the foresight to realize this, hes actively moving to prevent it.

Since my last article theres been a disturbing revelation in this developing world of robotic machines and artificial intelligence. An ex-Google executive, Anthony Lavandowski, the $120 million former Google engineer that helped invent Street View, Waymo and Ubers self-driving cars, and who is also being sued by Google for stealing trade secrets, after two years as its CEO, Ex-Google Executive Registers First Church of AI With IRS, Way Of The Future (WOTF).

Lavandowski claims that one day artificial intelligence will become so efficient that itll surpass and overpower humans so theyll readily handover their power to a creation with far more intelligence, and the AI godhead will benevolently take charge of its human subjects. The WOTF churchs mission statement says it intends To develop and promote the realization of a godhead based on artificial intelligence and through understanding and worship of the godhead contribute to the betterment of society and to develop a peaceful and respectable transition of who is in charge of the planet from people to people + machines. Given that technology will relatively soon be able to surpass human abilities, we want to help educate people about this exciting future and prepare a smooth transition. WOTF has also given rights to both sexes, minority groups and even animals.

In response to Lavandowskis WOTF, Elon Musk says People who talk of AI gods should absolutely not be allowed to develop digital super intelligence.

So, they create an artificial intelligence-god and then they order us to acknowledge and worship this artificial intelligence-god that they created.

Heres what the Bible has to say about all of this, Revelation 13:15 The second beast was given power to give breath to the image of the best, so that the image could speak and cause all who refused to worship the image to be killed. It also forced all people, great and small, rich and poor, free and slave, to receive a mark on their right hands or on their foreheads, so that they could not buy or sell unless they had the mark, which is the name of the beast or the number of its name.

This calls for wisdom. Let the person who has insight calculate the number of the beast, for it is the number of a man. That number is 666.

A third angel followed them and said in a loud voice: If anyone worships the beast and its image and receives its mark on their forehead or on their hand, they, too, will drink the wine of Gods fury, which has been poured full strength into the cup of his wrath. They will be tormented with burning sulfur in the presence of the holy angels and the Lamb. And the smoke of their torment will rise for ever and ever. There will be no rest day or night for those who worship the beast and its image, or for anyone who receives the mark of its name. This calls for patient endurance on the part of the people of God who keep his commands and remain faithful to Jesus. Rev. 14:9-12.

To quote the great theologian, Bob Dylan:

You may be an ambassador to England or FranceYou may like to gamble, you might like to danceYou may be the heavyweight champion of the worldYou may be a socialite with a long string of pearls.

But youre gonna have to serve somebody, yes indeedYoure gonna have to serve somebody,It may be the devil or it may be the LordBut youre gonna have to serve somebody.

Youre gonna serve somebody.

Whos your God and who do you serve?

Check out Al Duncans other articles and his book, The Master Plan.

2017 Al Duncan All Rights Reserved

E-Mail Al Duncan: [emailprotected]

Read more:

News With Views | Reality Is Often Stranger Than Fiction ...

Talk:Extropianism – Wikipedia

Posted on by

Meliorism?[edit]

Should contain link or reference to meliorist/meliorism?

I can read through this article and follow the external links and I still don't know exactly what Extropianism or extropy mean. Can someone come up with a concise one-sentence definiton?

The first paragraph should have something like:

"Extropianism, also referred to as extropy, is a philosophical viewpoint within transhumanism, describing a conscious, pro-active self-directed approach to human evolution and progress. It is defined by a set of principles blah blah blah ..."

I'm only guessing in this case. I think that's what it is, but I don't know. There needs to be something like that though. Take a look at Humanism, Progressivism or Socialism. They all manage to give a concise definition right from the beginning. The rest of the article then fleshes out that definition.--?Pucktalk? 12:19, 12 January 2006 (UTC)

- Yeah, I've got to agree here. This article reads like the authors head is slowly disappearing up one of his orifices. How can this be cleaned up in well-written and clear english, while explaining key terms along the way? AdamSebWolf 00:34, 6 May 2007 (UTC)

I understand Extropianism to describe a fulfillment of the human condition anticipated by transhumanism; a consummating consilience of a rich history of transhuman work and thought, rather than a splintered sect within that tradition. When I call myself an extropian, I am not evangelizing for a transhuman denomination, I am not advancing a doctrine; rather, I mean that I Am Part of Making the Posthuman Condition Happen, Right Now. I am careful to say "a" fulfillment rather than "the" fulfillment, because beyond the extropians there will be stages of evolution that we cannot yet imagine; regardless of how intimidating one's endowment in the frontal lobe.

Responsible futurists understand that We Just Can't Know how transhumanism will actually play out. We can, however, express an abiding confidence in the fact that it will play, indeed is playing out, and within that merry happenstance we are committed to Being Ever Present; maintaining engaged minds, productive imaginations, and transcendent hopes aligned with the best case scenarios for human longevity and evolution.

An important difference between transhuman theory and extropian practice, as I understand it, is the active commitment to Being There and Making It Happen. Personally, I do not believe we are merely theorizing as earlier transhumanists, of necessity, were resource-bound to do. Forty years ago, when F.M. Esfandiary introduced the idea of transitional humans, even those who agreed with him rightly suspected that they would not survive quite long enough to make the transition. As extropians, we expect to be part of the transhuman migration and are in one sense self-selecting guinea pigs saying "pick me" for the implants, the neuroprosthetics, the gangly first-generation meat-machine interfaces that the average risk-averse human would actually eschew in favor of death.

Accordingly, one might suggest that we would be well advised to A.) begin with Max More's own definition and B.) incorporate PuckSmith's laudable petition for clarity. One suggestion:

"Extropianism, also referred to as extropy, is an evolving framework of values and standards for continuously improving the human condition. Extropianism describes a pragmatic consilience of transhumanist thought guided by a conscious, pro-active, self-directed approach to human evolution and progress."

--metavalent 05:57, 29 March 2006 (UTC)

http://www.extropy.com/future.htm

NEXT STEPS - Extropy Institute is closing its doors and opening a window for a proactive future.

Dear Members of Extropy Institute and new core group network,

This letter is an announcement of the events taking place at Extropy Institute as a result of its Strategic Plan 2006. A copy of the Plan is included for your review. The Plan identifies some factors that ExI's Board has considered in assessing the future of ExI and the best possible course of action to take for ExI, its members, and other stakeholders.

The Past. ExI was formed in 1990 by Max More and Tom Bell with a mission to bring great minds together to incubate ideas about emerging technologies, life extension and the future. ExI's goals were to (1) develop an elegant, focused philosophy for transhumanism-the philosophy of "Extropy"; (2) encourage discussions and debates on improving the human condition; and (2) develop a culture for activists, energized and devoted to bringing these ideas to the public. The initiatives which realized these goals are (1) Extropy: the Journal of Transhumanist Thought; Principles of Extropy; Extro Conferences 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5; public forums such as the famed "extropians" and "extropy-chat" email lists; public presentations in the news, radio, televised documentaries, talk shows, and films; and the VP Summit of 2004 addressing the backlash from conservatives against technological advancements.

The Present. ExI deems its mission as essentially completed. With this said, and in respect for Extropy Institute's legacy of achievement, the Board voted and has unanimously agreed to close Extropy Institute's doors.

Extropy Institute's website is being memorialized by turning it into a reference "Library of Transhumanism, Extropy, and the Future," -the beginnings, currents, and future of Transhumanism.

On behalf of our members, I would like to thank Max for authoring the philosophy of Extropy1 and for his many efforts in working with others to steer the philosophical development of transhumanism, which is truly treasured by so many people in so many places.

The Future. As you will see by reviewing the Strategic Plan, the Proactionary Principle stands first and foremost as the concept with the most potential for being of great service to humanity and transhumanity as we go forward. The Proactionary Principle (ProP) can help society by bridging the growing gap between conservative views and progress-oriented views, and educating society about the future. Meeting these two challenges by providing an active course of action can be of tremendous benefit to us all.

In respect for the philosophy of Extropy and the Principles of Extropy, the Board of Extropy Institute believes that Extropy Institute has served its mission and achieved its goals and, in practicing the Principles of Extropy, our next step is to focus on developing worldwide awareness of the ProP and a network for proactive futures.

With my most sincere thanks for your support,

Natasha Vita-More Extropy Institute, President

--Loremaster 12:28, 3 May 2006 (UTC)

I'm moving this to talk for now as it smells of original research:--Eloquence* 22:59, 23 July 2006 (UTC)

Many participants in the Transhumanist community criticize various members of the community as self-promoters who spend too much time attempting to claim credit for achievements or coining a term rather than making legitimate progress towards the goals and objectives of Transhumanism. For instance, note that the Transhumanism article on Wikipedia spends as much time discussing the history of Transhumanism and assigning credit for various achievements to various people as it does describing the actual philosophy and objectives of Transhumanism. It is felt by many Bioconservatives, and more moderate Transhumanists, that this is a heavy restriction which holds the movement back from attaining its objectives as efficiently as it would prefer. Though Transhumanists assert that this is something to be countered, Bioconservatives generally feel that it is endemic and inherent to a movement which, so they believe, is based entirely upon self-aggrandizement.

seems to me that given this is a similar subject some reference would be in order, though i'm not confident enough of the respective definitions to do this myself JavaByte 19:02, 9 May 2007 (UTC)

with Extropy as these two articles seem to be about the same thing. Xme (talk) 19:15, 12 September 2009 (UTC)

Not exactly. When Perry Metzger (not Max or Tom) started "extropians", the Institute did not yet exist, if I remember right; the list was conceived for fans of the magazine. Tamfang (talk) 06:10, 7 October 2010 (UTC)

I think that "extropism" should redirect to that specific section under the extropianism article, instead of just redirecting to the beginning of that article (I typed this: [[1]], to no avail). I tried to change it myself but didn't realize that only administrators have this power. Thanks. Shanoman (talk) 03:33, 17 August 2012 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Extropianism. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

You may set the |checked=, on this template, to true or failed to let other editors know you reviewed the change. If you find any errors, please use the tools below to fix them or call an editor by setting |needhelp= to your help request.

If you are unable to use these tools, you may set |needhelp= on this template to request help from an experienced user. Please include details about your problem, to help other editors.

Cheers.InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:26, 6 December 2017 (UTC)

Continue reading here:

Talk:Extropianism - Wikipedia

9 Tennessee Waterfalls, Swimming Holes, & Sandy Beaches

Posted on by

Fellow water-loving Middle Tennesseans, let me tell youif youre looking to beat the heat this summer while surrounded by gorgeous scenery, you are in luck! Drive just an hour or two away, and you can experience some of the most breathtaking waterfalls around. A number of Tennessee State Parks have falls and swimming holes that are great for adventurous families; there are also a few sandy beaches at area lakes and parks that are great for those who need to play it safe with young children. So whether youre looking for a strenuous hike to breathtaking falls or just want to park the car and walk to the edge of a lake, heres a list of placesto check out this summer:

This popular state park, located between McMinnville and Sparta, is about a 90 minute drive from Nashville and boasts some impressive waterfalls. You can hike down the banks and splash near the rocky shore by the main falls or head to the parks sandy beach along Center Hill Lakewhich is a hit with younger kiddos. If you hike back further from the main falls, you can find some great swimming holes. Rock Island Park also has a campground and cabin rentals available.

Rock Island State Park is great for dads, daughters, and families of all kinds

One of the most popular destinations to cool off in South Cumberland is the Grundy Lakes arealocated just four miles from the visitors center. A man-made beach is perfect for lounging in the sun or for spreading out a water-side picnic. Also at the site is a swim-up dock the sun bathers and jumping children.

For a little more adventure, you can hike to one of the many waterfalls that can be found along the trails. Dont miss Greeter Falls, which is a moderate 1 mile out-and-back hike. Ive done it carrying toddler in a backpack and my then-four-year-old daughter on foot, and it was not too treacherousalthough the spiral staircase at the end was a little bit of a doozy. Also, there are lots of boulders that are irresistible to kids and slightly panic-inducing to watching parents.

Greeter Falls during the fall. The falls usually flow faster in the summerespecially after a good rain.

One of the newest public parks in the area, Cummins Falls is also one of the most beautiful. In fact, it was recently rated one of the top swimming holes in the country by Travel and Leisure Magazine. It has a 75-foot cascading waterfall complete with a crystal clear swimming hole and rock shelves for sitting and jumping. The hike down to the falls is difficult, so it is probably best for older children. If your family is up for a challenge, you will be rewarded for your efforts!

I cant personally vouch for this one, but rumor has it that there is a great local swimming hole at mile marker 382 on the Natchez Trace Parkway at a historic site called Metal Ford, and that it even includes a rope swing. At Meriwether Lewis Campground at mile marker 385, there is a wonderful stream for splashing, and a waterfall and swimming hole can be found at mile marker 391 (called Fall Hollow) on the Trace. For more info.

It doesnt have quite the sugar white beaches of the Gulf of Mexico, but the drive is a heck of a lot shorter to the beaches of Old Hickory Lake. There are three day-use areas located at Cedar Creek, Laguardo, and Old Hickory Beach. Each area offers great swim beaches, picnic tables, grills, restrooms, and launching ramps.

Similar to the beaches of Old Hickory Lake, Percy Priest an opportunity close to home to let the kids play in the sand and splash in the water. This location is also great for camping!

For another in-town option of sandy beaches and lake swimming, head over to Long Hunter park in Hermitage.

Tennessee State Parks boast a variety of waterfalls and swimming holes for your family to visit this summer.

Safety tips and reminders:If hiking to a waterfall or visiting a swimming hole: Pack lightly, but do bring snacks, water, bugspray, sunscreen, towels, and a phone. Bring two pairs of shoesone for hiking and the other a water shoe to wear at the falls. Give yourself plenty of time to hike to and enjoy each waterfall (as well as time to return). Treat the land and water with respect; leave no trace of your visit. Do not jump or dive into water of unknown depth, and always check the current of a lake or river before venturing too far out; swim at your own risk. Bring life jackets for children. Remember that the sandy beach swimming areas at state parks do not have lifeguards on duty, so watch your children at all times. Most importantlyhave fun!

Read this article:

9 Tennessee Waterfalls, Swimming Holes, & Sandy Beaches

Brave New World by Aldous Huxley : An Analysis of the …

Posted on by

Throughout Brave New World by Aldous Huxley, the concepts of consumption and utopia are constantly juxtaposed and compared to determine whether or not they are genuinely compatible. Although one could state that the citizens of this world in Brave New World are genuinely happy, this is more a result of ignorance and blindness rather than a truly fulfilling sense of bliss. Because the state in Brave New World has meticulously given consumption an almost holy significance, the culture that exists around it must accordingly be conducive to it.

The culture of consumption in Brave New World by Aldous Huxley is the engine driving the success and happiness" of the state. Although to the masses it may seem as though identity is something secure and comfortable, it is rather based upon identity-obliterating principles of mass-production and consumerism. All traces of human elements of individuality and identity have been replaced by the concept of the common good and even ideas about love, family, and sex have been reduced to the maxim, which is one of the important quotes from Brave New World by Aldous Huxley, everybody belongs to everyone else" (26). Furthermore, the basis of life in Brave New World by Aldous Huxley an idea that is sacred and personal in our society, is firmly rooted in Fords famous model of productionthe assembly line. With the help of science, human beings are created according to a narrow set of specifications (which class they will eventually belong to) and their lives, once no longer useful are considered meaningless, especially since they can be easily replaced.

As Mr. Foster, who presides over the conditioning and hatching" of the new human lives says in one of many important quotes in Brave New World by Aldous Huxley Murder kills only the individual and, after all what is an individual? We can make a new one with the greatest easeas many as we like" (133). Even from the beginning of the text we are forced to question the concept of mass-production and consumption in terms of humanity. We are introduced to the process of (re)production, which describes how, a bokanovskified egg will bud, will proliferate, will divide. From eight to ninety-six buds, and every bud will grow into a perfectly formed embryo, and every embryo into a full-sized adult" (4). With the aid of technology, identity and the function of nature have been both combined and destroyed simultaneously. After the process of conditioning, the concept of the self will be even further limited to an individuals participation in the economy and his or her value or obedience as member of a caste. In other words, by obliterating the concept of the individual, all that is left is the state and its capacity to meet the relatively simple supply and demand-based needs of the citizen. This fact in turn makes the individual completely reliant on the state to provide for them and allows this state to completely control all aspects of society, including the individuals understanding of the natural world, their sense of place within the grand scheme of things, and thus by proxy, the concept of God. At the pinnacle of all concernsboth by the citizens and their stateis an almost holy reverence for consumption.

As this thesis statement for Brave New World by Aldous Huxley states, just as the state has destroyed the meaning and value of the individual in Brave New World so too has it altered the individuals understanding of the natural world. This seems only just considering that this is a culture driven by the forces of science and technology, but the conditioning against the love of nature has deeper significance for the state. Throughout the text, the state seems keenly aware of the fact that nature and consumption are essentially at odds because, in other words, A love of nature keeps no factories busy" (19). Here it is directly expressed that the enjoyment of the masses is directed toward what is economically desirable instead of what is personally enjoyable and thus, because of the mass acceptance of such a paradigm, individual fulfillment is inexorably linked to economic stability and consumerism. As the reader is told, conditioning has caused the masses to hate the countryto love all country sportsand have all country sports entail the use of elaborate apparatus" (23).

Excerpt from:

Brave New World by Aldous Huxley : An Analysis of the ...

Implementing Pen & Paper mechanisms into a computer game …

Posted on by

At first glance it may seem that theres nothing easier than creating a video game based on an existing RPG system like Cyberpunk 2020. After all, we already have all the mechanics prepared and ready to use in the game. As simple as it sounds, theres more to it than meets the eye.

The pen & paper game rules are designed to give players as much flexibility as possible. They are more like a set of guidelines which players are at liberty to bend to their liking. Improvisation, dropping rules or adding new ones is a common practice for pen & paper games. This principle applies not only to gameplay rules, like combat or skill tests, but also to character customization. Players are limited only by common sense, the agreement of the group and their imagination.

Video games, on the other hand, do not have that much flexibility. Every element has to be accounted for and carefully designed. Of course, modern AAA RPG games, like The Witcher 2 or the upcoming Cyberpunk 2077, can give the Player lots of freedom. But the underlying mechanics are adhering to very strict rules and if an action or option wasnt implemented in the code, then the player will not be able to do it. The same principle applies to character customization the player can do only as much as game allows him to. So if game designers decide that it is not possible to play as an ugly midget you will not be able to play one. Sorry Tyrion Lannister fans

This is why adapting pen & paper rules to video game is not as easy as it can appear at first glance. The flexibility of an in-person RPG has to be replaced with a strict set of rules. Every skill, attribute and game mechanic has to have a clear definition and place in the game. For example, the Cyberpunk 2020 Wardrobe & Style skill governs the knowledge about the right clothes to wear, when to wear them and how to look cool even in a spacesuit. As you can see, this skill covers quite a big area of lore and can be interpreted differently, depending on the situation and the players. In Cyberpunk 2077 this skill has to be tied to a specific gameplay mechanic. And all of these mechanics have to be clearly defined so they can work well with other elements of the game and, at the same time, be easy to understand for the player. After all, we dont have a referee or game master to explain or interpret the rules as you go. And, to accommodate your curiosity, yes, we have some really cool ideas on how to present aforementioned skill in the game. Regrettably, were not quite yet ready to spill the beans

For hardcore Cyberpunk 2020 fans out there, twiddling with rules in such a way may seem like blasphemy. But rest assured that we are working very closely with Mike Pondsmith to ensure that the unique feel of the original, paper game is preserved intact. Of course we may need to change some things, add new elements or even drop the ones that simply do not work in a video game (Geology skill anyone?).

Of course, the topic raised today is only the tip of an iceberg and you probably have tons of questions. Unfortunately, we are not ready to reveal more details at the moment. Nevertheless, well be more than happy to read your comments so feel free to drop them below and stay tuned. When were ready, we will surely share more information with you. Be patient and remember: Attitude is Everything!

Read more from the original source:

Implementing Pen & Paper mechanisms into a computer game ...

Kane County Bankruptcy Lawyer | Roxanna M. Hipple, Attorney …

Posted on by

When you face the possibility of bankruptcy and all the financial and legal complexities that the process entails, we understand that this can be overwhelming. We know how important it is that you canseparate the myths from the reality of the process, and we realize how crucial it is for you to be fully aware of your rights and options in bankruptcy.

At Roxanna M. Hipple, Attorney at Law, we provide the guidance you need. We have handledhundreds of bankruptcy cases and havenearly 35 years of experience. Do not hesitate to get yourfree case evaluation today, and a lawyer can get back to you about your case.

At our firm, we provide outstanding legal assistance in issues that include:

We are ready to help you act quickly in matters such as warding off garnishment, repossession andforeclosure. Then we can help you find a personalized strategy for your unique situation, starting with the big question of whether or notbankruptcy is right for you.

Our bankruptcy attorneys can help you find alternatives to bankruptcy, or we can help you assess whether Chapter 7 or Chapter 13 bankruptcy protections are better for your future. It is important for us that throughout the entire process our clients are included in all the decision-making regarding their future. We are here to provide legal counsel and help you make an informed decision at each stage of the process.

Filing for bankruptcy can be one of the most life-changing legal decisions you can make in a lifetime. We understand how overwhelming the process can be and make ourselves available for our clients. With Roxanna M. Hipple, Attorney at Law at your side, you will never be alone! To better serve clients through the process of filing for bankruptcy, we have offices conveniently located throughout the Chicagoland area.

We proudly serve the following areas:

We also serve other surrounding areas in the community and the Fox Valley including Aurora, Elgin, South Elgin, Geneva, Lisle, Naperville and West Chicago. Call our legal team today to schedule your confidential consultation in one of ouroffice locations nearest to you!

When you are struggling with debt, you need to know that your case is in good hands. Not only does this mean working with a bankruptcy lawyer who has all the right credentials, but also working alongside a firm that provides dedicated, personal care you deserve. You can find the experience, skill, and personal service you need at Roxanna M. Hipple, Attorney at Law regardless of where you are located in the Chicagoland area.

Do not hesitate tocontact us today to start finding your path to a brighter financial future!

Follow this link:

Kane County Bankruptcy Lawyer | Roxanna M. Hipple, Attorney ...

Dont Believe the Liberal F.B.I. – The New York Times

Posted on by

Intelligence experts say its unlikely that Steeles intelligence formed the sole basis for a warrant, and legally, there was no problem with the F.B.I. using information Steele had gathered, even if Democrats helped fund his work. We already know that it wasnt Steele who sparked the F.B.I.s Russia inquiry, but Trump campaign adviser George Papadopoulos, who, while drinking with an Australian diplomat in May 2016, said that Russia had dirt on Clinton. Nevertheless, Republicans seem to think that if they can show that the F.B.I. cited Steele in seeking a warrant on Page, they can prove that the whole Russia investigation is a partisan frame-up. It doesnt really make sense, but its not necessarily meant to.

On Monday, Republicans on the House Intelligence Committee won a party-line vote to take the highly unusual step of declassifying the Nunes memo for public release. According to a transcript of the meeting where the vote was taken, only two committee members had read the classified underlying intelligence the Nunes memo purports to rely on. Nunes refused to answer a question by Representative Mike Quigley, Democrat of Illinois, about whether any of his staff had worked with the White House in preparing the memo.

Republicans voted down a Democratic motion to have the F.B.I. brief the committee on risks posed by releasing the memo. They also voted down a motion to release a classified 10-page memo written by Representative Adam Schiff, the committees ranking Democrat, and Democratic staffers about the Republican memos errors and distortions. (Unlike most of his colleagues, Schiff had read the underlying intelligence.)

Its worth reading the whole transcript of the meeting; it reveals a process thats half banana republic, half Alice in Wonderland. By the end, Quigley, who is from Chicago, referred to the corruption his city is known for and said: I saw the worst of the worst. They got nothing on you on this one, folks. This is extraordinary.

Now the final decision on whether to block the memo from becoming public lies with the White House. The F.B.I., which has reviewed it, issued a rare public warning against its release, citing grave concerns about material omissions of fact that fundamentally impact the memos accuracy. Nevertheless, reports on Thursday indicated that Trump had decided to allow the memos disclosure.

All this drama might make you think that the memos claims are scandalous. But part of whats so weird and disorientating about this whole episode is that, in a normal political environment, no Republican would want to draw attention to the F.B.I.s reasons for surveilling Page. As The Wall Street Journal reported on Thursday, Page has been on the radar of counterintelligence agents since at least 2013. A 2015 criminal complaint against two suspected Russian spies, Victor Podobnyy and Igor Sporyshev, cited an intercepted conversation about their efforts to recruit a man working as a consultant in New York City. Page has acknowledged that he was the man they were referring to, and admitted to passing documents to the Russians.

According to CNN, Page was the subject of a secret intelligence surveillance warrant in 2014, well before the beginning of Trumps presidential campaign. Despite this, Trump identified Page as one of his key foreign policy advisers in March 2016. Later that year, the F.B.I. received a new secret warrant to monitor Pages communications after he traveled to Russia, where he met with multiple Russian government officials.

Thanks to reporting on the memo, we know that Rosenstein, a Trump appointee, saw fit to apply for this warrants renewal. This suggests that one of the most senior figures in Trumps own Justice Department thought it was credible that Trump had someone on his campaign who had been compromised by Russia. Only in a crazy alternate universe does that exculpate the president.

Unless, that is, you believe that it is illegitimate for intelligence agencies to be watching Trump associates. And to believe that, you have to start with the premise that Trump is innocent and the agencies are corrupt. The controversy around the Nunes memo works to insinuate these assumptions into the public debate. It may also give Trump the very thinnest of pretexts to fire Rosenstein, which would be a first step toward attempting to shut down the Russia investigation.

If and when its released, the Nunes memo will probably only vindicate Trump among people who already share right-wing assumptions. But it will put the F.B.I. in a difficult position, since to defend itself against accusations that it relied solely on Steeles findings to get a warrant on Page, it would have to release additional classified evidence. (CBS News reported on Thursday that, if the memo is released, the F.B.I. is prepared to issue a rebuttal.)

To some commentators, it is ironic that liberals are now defending the F.B.I., long a left-wing bte noire. But liberals recognized the dangers of the campaign to broadly discredit the mainstream media even though they had their own passionate criticisms of it. The rights war on the F.B.I. is a sign of how far some are willing to go to subvert any checks on Trumps power to create his own reality.

I think the most disappointing realization for me of the past year was not how bad of a president Trump turned out to be that was foreseeable but how unwilling members of Congress would be to stand up and defend our system of government, Schiff told me. The most dangerous thing about the release of the Nunes memo is not the memo itself, but Republicans shamelessness in using national security processes to deceive the people theyre supposed to serve.

View original post here:

Dont Believe the Liberal F.B.I. - The New York Times

Moore’s Law – investopedia.com

Posted on by

What is 'Moore's Law'

Moore's law refers to an observation made by Intel co-founder Gordon Moore in 1965. He noticed that the number of transistors per square inch on integrated circuits had doubled every year since their invention.

Moore's law predicts that this trend will continue into the foreseeable future. Although the pace has slowed, the number of transistors per square inch has since doubled approximately every 18 months. This is used as the current definition of Moore's law.

Because Moore's law suggests exponential growth, it is unlikely to continue indefinitely. Most experts expect Moore's law to hold for another two decades. Some studies have shown physical limitations could be reached by 2017.

The extension of Moore's law is that computers, machines that run on computers, and computing power all become smaller and faster with time, as transistors on integrated circuits become more efficient. Transistors are simple electronic on/off switches embedded in microchips, processors and tiny electrical circuits. The faster microchips process electrical signals, the more efficient a computer becomes.

Costs of these higher-powered computers eventually came down as well, usually about 30 percent per year. When designers increased the performance of computers with better integrated circuits, manufacturers were able to create better machines that could automate certain processes. This automation created lower-priced products for consumers, as the hardware created lower labor costs.

Fifty years after Moore's law, contemporary society sees dozens of benefits from his vision. Mobile devices, such as smartphones and tablet computers, would not work without very small processors. Smaller and faster computers improve transportation, health care, education and energy production. Just about every facet of a high-tech society benefits from the concept of Moore's law put into practice.

Thanks to nanotechnology, some transistors are smaller than a virus. These microscopic structures contain carbon and silicon molecules aligned in perfect fashion that help move electricity along the circuit faster. Eventually, the temperature of the transistors make it impossible to create smaller circuits, because cooling the transistors takes more energy than what passes through the transistors. Experts show that computers should reach physical limits of Moore's law sometime in the 2020s. When that happens, computer scientists can examine entirely new ways of creating computers.

Applications and software can improve the speed and efficiency of computers in the future, rather than physical processes. Cloud computing, wireless communication, the Internet of Things and quantum physics may all play a role in innovating computer technology. Many designers, engineers and computer scientists agreed in early 2016 that Moore's law may run its course within 10 years. Progress achieving the doubling of the number of circuits has slowed, and integrated circuits cannot get much smaller as transistors approach the size of an atom.

Some time in the future, software or hardware breakthroughs may keep the dream of Moore's law alive. However, the computer industry seems ready to veer to another course moving forward from 2016.

Go here to see the original:

Moore's Law - investopedia.com

Freedom in the 50 States 2015-2016 | Pennsylvania Fiscal …

Posted on by

Analysis

The Keystone State is freer than all its neighbors, but it is a little below the national average, especially on economic policy.

Pennsylvanias tax burden is about average, but the state is a bit more fiscally decentralized than average, with local governments making up a larger share of the total tax take. The tax burden has declined slightly since 2000. Pennsylvanians have ample choice of local government, with more than 4.9 effective competing jurisdictions per 100 square miles. State and local debt and subsidies are higher than average, but public employment is much lower than average (10 percent of the private workforce).

Pennsylvania has drifted down on regulatory policy over time. It does reasonably well on land-use freedom, especially for a northeastern state, a fact that economist William Fischel attributes to the Pennsylvania Supreme Courts willingness to strike down minimum lot sizes and other zoning regulations that have exclusionary intent.129 Pennsylvania is not as bad as most other northeastern states on labor-market regulation, but it lacks a right-to-work law. By most measures, occupational licensing is not very extensive in Pennsylvania, but there was a big jump upward in 200910. Nurses enjoy little practice freedom. Insurance freedom is extremely low, with prior approval of rates and forms and rating classification prohibitions. The civil liability system is muchworse than the national average. The state has partisan judicial elections and has made none of the tort reforms we track.

Pennsylvanias criminal justice policy has worsened over time, at least as measured by crime-adjusted incarceration rates. Nonviolent victimless crime arrests are down since 2006, however. Civil asset forfeiture is mostly unreformed. Pennsylvania has lagged other center-left states in implementing medical cannabis and same-sex marriage, although the latter was imposed by judicial ruling in 2014. Gun rights are much better respected than in other progressive states, with carry licenses affordable and not terribly restricted, all Class III weapons legal, and a right to defend oneself in public, legally recognized in 200910. Since legalizing casinos in 20078, Pennsylvania has risen to become one of the best states in the country for gambling liberty. On the other hand, Pennsylvania is one of the worst states for alcohol freedom. A notoriously inefficient state bureaucracy monopolizes wine and spirits. Wine markups are especially high, direct wine shipments are banned, and even beer is prohibited in grocery stores. On education, Pennsylvania has a long-standing, liberal tax credit scholarship program, but private schools and homeschools are tightly regulated. Smoking bans have gone far but are not total.

Link:

Freedom in the 50 States 2015-2016 | Pennsylvania Fiscal ...

Futurism and Preterism – Amazing Discoveries

Posted on by

The Reformation preachers unanimously identified the papal system as the Antichrist, and the Roman Church as Babyloncausing a mass exodus of believers out of the Catholic institution.

Because Rome realized that the Reformation could jeopardize her position as a religio-political power, she employed five strategies in what became known as the Counter Reformation. One of those strategies was the creation of futurism and preterism, two different interpretations of the prophecies in Daniel and Revelation. These interpretations contradicted the reformers' stance of historicism.

Martin Luther. Source: Wikimedia Commons...

The Oxford Handbook of Eschatology says that futurism argues that Revelation looks beyond the first century to the period immediately before the end times. Thus the book was not written for those who received it, but for those living much later. Jesuit scholars after the Reformation refined this approach to prove that current attempts to identify the Pope as the Antichrist could not possibly be true since the Antichrist will not be revealed until far into the future, just before the Parousia (Christs Second Coming)."i

The same book explains that preterism sees Revelation only in terms of its immediate historical context: Revelation [is] described [as] the plight of Christians in the late first century, and its apocalyptic symbols pointed directly to [the city of] Rome as the churchs persecutor...Most modern [preterist] interpreters...insist that the book was never intended to predict conditions or events beyond the first century.ii

According to futurism, the Antichrist is still to come. According to preterism, the Antichrist was in the past. However, this is not Biblical, as Jesus spoke in Matthew 24 of the great apostasy taking place in the future. Both of these false systems disagree with the reformers belief that the fulfillment of Biblical prophecy is taking place throughout history.

Throughout the Counter Reformation, preterism and futurism diverted attention away from prophecies identifying the Roman Church as Babylon and the papal system as the Antichrist.

Here is a diagram to help us understand how these false interpretations were created and spread.In this diagram, you can see that the 1260 years of the Dark Ages was the period of papal supremacy prophesied in Daniel and Revelation.iii

Francisco RiberaIn 1585 Jesuit scholar Francisco Ribera (1537 - 1591) appears. He started the futurist interpretation by publishing a 500-page commentary on the book of Revelation. Ribera took the last week (seven day-years) of the 70-week prophecy of Daniel 9:25, divided it into two 3 year periods, and applied it to a future Antichrist, while avoiding any application to the papal system.

Robert BellarmineRiberas views would have fallen away quickly if not for Robert Bellarmine (1542 - 1621), a cardinal who promoted Riberas ideas. His lectures were published as Polemic Lectures Concerning the Disputed Points of the Christian Belief Against Heretics of This Time. Froom describes these lectures as the most detailed apology of the Catholic faith ever produced. Froom also says they became the arsenal for all future defenders and expositors.iv

Luis de AlcasarThe diagram shows Jesuit scholar Luis de Alcasar (preterisms creator) in 1604. His book, Investigation of the Hidden Sense of the Apocalypse, was published in 1614. Froom states this:

Applying the New Jerusalem to the Catholic Church, Alcazar contended that the Apocalypse describes the twofold war of the church in the early centuriesone with the Jewish synagogue, and the other with paganismresulting in victory over both adversaries. Revelation 1 to 11 he applied to the rejection of the Jews and the desolation of Jerusalem by the Romans. Revelation 12 to 19 Alcazar allotted to the overthrow of Roman paganism and the conversion of the empire to the church, the judgment of the great Harlot being effected by the downfall of pagan idolatry; Revelation 20 he applied to the final persecution by Antichrist, and the day of judgment; and chapters 21 and 22, referring to the New Jerusalem, he made descriptive of the glorious and endless triumphant state of the Roman church.v

The Roman Church produced two contradictory interpretations of end-time prophecy, neither of which were true to Scripture.

In his book Truth Matters, Professor Walter Veith explains the following:

To counter the stand of the Reformers, the Catholic Church launched the counter-reformation spearheaded by the Jesuit Order. The doctrines of Preterism and Futurism, published by Alcasar and Ribera, two Jesuit priests, in 1585, redefined the reformation position on the Antichrist and shifted the emphasis away from the papacy to the Greek king Antiochus Epiphanus IV and to some tyrant who would persecute the Jews some time in the future.vi

Further, Professor Veith observes that by accepting these alternative approaches to Biblical prophecy, the Protestant world...saw in it an opportunity to cease hostilities with Rome.vii

Here the true danger is exposed: if Protestantism ceases to protest against the falsehoods of Rome, then there is no opposition to the Roman plans, and no check against the corruption of Biblical Christianity found in the Roman Catholic system. The Dark Ages can come again with a vengeance.

Want to learn more? Here is a list of informative resources from Walter Veith and Victor Gill:

Total Onslaught DVD seriesRekindling the Reformation DVD seriesProfessor Veiths bookTruth MattersThese resources and many more are available from the Amazing Discoveries online store.

i. Jerry L. Walls, The Oxford handbook of eschatology (Oxford University Press, 2007).

ii. ibid.

iii. This diagram is adapted from a similar diagram on page 508 of Le Roy Edwin Froom, The Prophetic Faith of Our Fathers Volume 2 (Washington DC: Review and Herald, 1948).

iv. Le Roy Edwin Froom, The Prophetic Faith of Our Fathers Volume 2 (Washington DC: Review and Herald, 1948).

v. ibid.

vi. Walter Veith, Truth Matters (Amazing Discoveries, 2002).

vii. ibid.

Here is the original post:

Futurism and Preterism - Amazing Discoveries

futurism – unknown.nu

Posted on by

No architecture hasexisted since 1700. A moronic mixture of the most various stylistic elements used to mask the skeletons of modern houses is called modern architecture. The new beauty of cement and iron are profaned by the superimposition of motley decorative incrustations that cannot be justified either by constructive necessity or by our (modern) taste, and whose origins are in Egyptian, Indian or Byzantine antiquity and in that idiotic flowering of stupidity and impotence that took the name ofneoclassicism.

These architectonic prostitutions are welcomed in Italy, and rapacious alien ineptitude is passed off as talented invention and as extremely up-to-date architecture. Young Italian architects (those who borroworiginality from clandestine and compulsive devouring of art journals) flaunt their talents in the new quarters of our towns, where a hilarious salad of little ogival columns, seventeenth-century foliation, Gothic pointed arches, Egyptian pilasters, rococo scrolls,fifteenth-century cherubs, swollen caryatids, take the place of style in all seriousness, and presumptuously put on monumental airs. The kaleidoscopic appearanceand reappearance of forms, the multiplying of machinery, the daily increasing needs imposed by the speed of communications, by the concentration of population, by hygiene, and by a hundred other phenomena of modern life, never cause these self-styled renovators of architecture a moment's perplexity or hesitation. They persevere obstinately with the rules of Vitruvius, Vignola and Sansovino plus gleanings from any published scrap of information on German architecture that happens to be at hand. Using these, they continue to stamp the image of imbecility on our cities, our cities which should be theimmediate and faithful projection of ourselves.

And so this expressive and synthetic art has become in their hands avacuous stylistic exercise, a jumble of ill-mixed formulae to disguise a run-of-the-mill traditionalist box of bricks and stone as a modern building. As if we who are accumulators and generators of movement, with all our added mechanical limbs, with all the noise and speed of our life, could live in streets built for the needs of men four, five or six centuries ago.

This is the supreme imbecility of modern architecture, perpetuated by the venal complicity of the academies, the internment camps of the intelligentsia, where the young are forced into the onanistic recopying of classical models instead of throwing their minds open in the search for new frontiers and in the solution of the new and pressing problem:the Futurist house and city.The house and the city that are oursboth spiritually and materially, in which our tumult can rage without seeming a grotesque anachronism.

The problem posed inFuturistarchitecture is not one of linear rearrangement. It is not a question of finding new moldings and frames for windows and doors, of replacing columns, pilasters and corbels with caryatids, flies and frogs. Neither has it anything to do with leaving a faade in bare brick, or plastering it, or facing it with stone or in determining formal differences between the new building and the oldone. It is a question of tending the healthy growth of the Futurist house, of constructing it with all the resources of technology and science, satisfying magisterially all the demands of our habits and our spirit, trampling down all that is grotesque and antithetical (tradition, style, aesthetics, proportion), determining new forms, new lines, a new harmony of profiles and volumes, an architecture whose reason for existence can be found solely in the unique conditions of modern life, and in its correspondence with the aesthetic values of our sensibilities. Thisarchitecture cannot be subjected to any law of historical continuity. It must be new, just as our state of mind is new.

The art of construction has been able to evolve with time, and topass from one style to another, while maintaining unaltered the generalcharacteristics of architecture, because in the course of history changesof fashion are frequent and are determined by the alternations of religious conviction and political disposition. But profound changes in the state of the environment are extremely rare, changes that unhingeand renew, such as the discovery of natural laws, the perfecting of mechanical means, the rational and scientific use of material. In modern life the process of stylistic development in architecture has been brought to a halt.Architecture now makes a break with tradition. It must perforce make a fresh start.

Calculations based on the resistance of materials, on the use of reinforced concrete and steel, exclude "architecture" in the classical and traditional sense. Modern constructional materials and scientific concepts are absolutely incompatible with the disciplines of historical styles, and are the principal cause of the grotesque appearance of "fashionable" buildings in which attempts are made to employ the lightness, the superb grace of the steel beam, the delicacy of reinforced concrete, in order to obtain the heavy curve of the arch and the bulkiness of marble.

The utter antithesis between the modern world and the old is determined by all those things that formerly did not exist. Our lives have been enriched by elements the possibility of whose existence the ancients didnot even suspect. Men have identified material contingencies, and revealed spiritual attitudes, whose repercussions are felt in a thousand ways. Principal among these is the formation of a new ideal of beauty that is still obscure and embryonic, but whose fascination is already felt even by the masses. We have lost our predilection for the monumental, the heavy, the static, and we have enriched our sensibility with ataste for the light, the practical, the ephemeral and the swift. We no longer feel ourselves to be the men of the cathedrals, the palaces and the podiums. We are the men of the great hotels, the railway stations, the immense streets, colossal ports, covered markets, luminous arcades, straight roads and beneficial demolitions.

We must invent and rebuild the Futurist city like an immense and tumultuous shipyard, agile, mobile and dynamic in every detail; andthe Futurist house must be like a gigantic machine. The lifts must no longer be hidden away like tapeworms in the niches of stairwells; the stairwells themselves, rendered useless, must be abolished, and the lifts must scale the lengths of the faades like serpents of steel and glass. The house of concrete, glass and steel, stripped of paintings and sculpture, rich only in the innate beauty of its lines and relief, extraordinarily "ugly" in its mechanical simplicity, higher and wider according to need rather than the specifications of municipal laws. It must soar up on the brink of a tumultuous abyss: the street will no longer lie like a doormat at ground level, but will plunge many stories down into the earth, embracing the metropolitan traffic, and will be linked up for necessary interconnections by metal gangways and swift-moving pavements.

The decorative must be abolished.The problem of Futurist architecture must be resolved, not by continuing to pilfer from Chinese, Persian or Japanese photographs or fooling around with the rules of Vitruvius, but through flashes of genius and through scientific and technical expertise. Everything must be revolutionized. Roofs and underground spaces must be used; the importance of the faade mustbe diminished; issues of taste must be transplanted from the field of fussy moldings, finicky capitals and flimsy doorways to the broader concerns ofbold groupings and masses, and large-scale disposition of planes.Let us make an end of monumental, funereal and commemorative architecture. Let us overturn monuments, pavements, arcades and flights of steps; let us sink the streets and squares; let usraise the level of the city.

I COMBAT AND DESPISE:

AND PROCLAIM:

Read more:

futurism - unknown.nu

rationalism facts, information, pictures | Encyclopedia …

Posted on by

ENLIGHTENMENT RADICALISM AND THE ROMANTIC REACTION

MARX AND AFTER

VARIANTS OF RATIONALISM

CRITICAL RATIONALISM

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Rationalism comes in various versions and makes wider or narrower claims. The idea underlying most versions is that reason is the most characteristic faculty of Homo sapiens. Appeal to reason is part of traditional wisdom, yet traditional (ancient Greek) rationalism includes an out of hand dismissal of traditional wisdom. The modern version of this dismissal is the radical demand for starting afresh (Enlightenment radicalism) and admitting only ideas that are proven, absolutely certain, and fully justified by rigorous proof. Science begins with rejecting all doubtful ideas. Francis Bacon initiated the idea that traditional unfounded views are the causes of all error; Ren Descartes tried to ignore all doubtful ideas and start afresh from nothing. David Hume began his investigations in efforts to delineate all that is certain while ignoring all else; he and many others, from Denis Diderot to Pierre Simon de Laplace, took it for granted that Isaac Newtons success was due to his adherence to Bacons advice. Auguste Comte and T. H. Huxley took it for granted that other fields will be as successful if they only jettison tradition more fully; Ludwig Wittgenstein went further and said only scientific assertions are grammatical (positivism, scientism).

Yet what proof is no one knew. Mathematics was the paradigm of proof, and the success of physics was largely ascribed to its use of mathematical methods, a practice for all to emulate. What is that method, and how can it be applied to the social domain? How does the relinquishing of tradition help word theories mathematically? This was unclear even after the discipline of statistics was developed enough to become applicable to some social studies (as in the work of Adolphe Qutelet, 1796-1874). Yet clearly as usefulness gives rational thought its initial (even if not final) worth, at least the rationality of action is obvious: its goal-directedness. Hence the study of rationality is vital for the study of the rational action that is the heart of the study of humanity. Whereas students of nature seldom pay attention to the rationality and the scientific character of their studies, students of humanities are engrossed in them. And whatever their views on this rationality, at least they openly center on it. Thus in the opening of his classic An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations (1776), Adam Smith declares his intent to ignore irrationality, no matter how widespread it is. Slavery is widespread, yet everyone knows that putting a worker in chains is no incentive, he observed.

The Enlightenment movement deemed Smiths argument obvious; this led to its dismissal of human history as the sad story of needless pain caused by ignorance and superstition. This was an error. The advocacy of the abolition of slavery came in total disregard for its immediate impact on the lot of slave owners. Smith spoke of rationality in the abstract. Because high productivity depends on the division of labor and because this division leads to trade, freedom is efficient. Selfish conduct is rational as long as it is scientific, that is, undogmatic. Life in the light of reason is egalitarian, simple, and happy. This abstract reasoning led to concrete results, including the French Revolution and its terror and wars. Edmund Burke and Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel blamed the radicalism of the revolution for its deterioration into terror. The reaction to the French Revolution was aggressively hostile to radicalism, to egalitarianism, and even to reason (Hegel).

Karl Marx wedded the two great modern movements, the radical Enlightenment movement and the Romantic reaction to it. The former had the right vision, and the latter had the historically right view of the obstacle to its realization. Smith-style harmony between individual and society has no place in traditional society. Hence the institution of enlightened equality is an essential precondition for it. The realization of the radical dream of harmony requires civil war. But it is certainly realizable, he insisted.

Marxs critique of radicalism from within is as popular as ever. We are chained to our social conditions, and rationalism cannot break them. Max Weber, the author of the most popular alternative to Marxs ideas, stressed this; so do all the popular radical critics of the ills of modern (bourgeois) society, chiefly imperialism, racism, and sexism, perhaps also alienation from work. These critics puzzle the uninitiated, as they seem to belabor condemnations of obviously indefensible aspects of modern society. But they do something else; they advance a thesis. Social evils will not go away by sheer mental exercises. Are there any reasonable people who disagree with this thesis? It is hard to say. Perhaps some thinkers still follow the central thesis of the Enlightenment movement. If such people do exist (as seems true but not obviously so), then they are the neoliberals, the Chicago school of economics, which is not confined to economics, as it preaches the idea that a world with free markets still is the best of all possible worlds, even though it is far from ideal (Friedrich A. von Hayek).

What then is rationalism? Of the alternative views on reason, which can count as variants of rationalism? Consider pragmatism, the view of the useful as the true (Hegel, William James, John Dewey). It is unsatisfactory, because assessments of usefulness may be true or not; but is it a version of rationalism? Consider the traditionalist reliance on the test of time (ordinary-language philosophy; neo-Thomism). The assessment of the relative worth of traditions may be cultural (Martin Buber, Amitai Ezioni; communitarianism) or intellectual (Michael Polanyi, Thomas S. Kuhn; postcriticalism). It is unsatisfactory, as these assessments may be true or not; but is it a version of rationalism? There is no telling. The same holds for appeals to other criteria for truth. These are common sense (Hume, Smith, Thomas Reid, Adam Ferguson, George Edward Moore), the intuitions of Great Men (Johann Gottlieb Fichte, Hegel, Martin Heidegger), higher religious sentiments (Friedrich Schleiermacher, Fyodor Dostoevsky, Leo Tolstoy), and superior tastes (Richard Rorty). Are these variants of rationalism? Do they lead to more reasonable human conduct? The standard claim is that their asset is in their ability to maintain social stability. But in the early twenty-first century stability is unattainable and even deemed inferior to democratic controls (Karl R. Popper).

There is no consensus about whether the counsel to limit reason and admit religion is rationalism proper (Moses Maimonides, Saint Thomas Aquinas, Robert Boyle, Moses Mendelssohn, Polanyi) or not (Immanuel Kant, David Strauss, Ludwig Feuerbach, Sigmund Freud, Bertrand Russell, Adolf Grnbaum). The only consensus is about the defiance of reason (Sren Kierkegaard, Max Stirner, Joseph Arthur Comte de Gobineau, Georges Sorel, Friedrich Nietzsche, D. H. Lawrence, Heidegger, perhaps also Paul Feyerabend). The only generally admitted necessary condition for rationalism is the demand to side with reason. Therefore it is fashionable to limit rationalism by allowing the taking of a single axiom on faith while otherwise swearing allegiance to reason (Polanyi, Richard H. Popkin, Pope John Paul II; fideism). The default view should then be that this allegiance suffices. Add to this the consensus around a necessary condition for this allegiance. It is the critical attitude, openness to criticism, the readiness to admit the success of the criticism of any given view. Consider the view that the critical attitude is sufficient as the default option (Popper) and seek valid criticism of it that may lead to its modification, to the admission of some unavoidable limitations on reason, whether in the spirit of Marx or in that of his critics. The need for this limitation comes from purely philosophical considerations. Hume said that we need induction for knowledge and for practice, yet it is not rational (it has no basis in logic); instead, we rely on it out of habit and necessity and this is the best we can do. A popular variant of this is that because induction is necessary, it is in no need of justification (Kant, Russell). Another variant takes it on faith (Polanyi, Popkin; fideism). Is induction really necessary?

This question is welcome. Since finding alternative answers to a worthy question improves their assessment, they are all worthy. Hence all versions of limited rationalism are welcomeas hypotheses to investigate (Salomon Maimon, Popper). This is the power of the method of always trying out the minimal solution as the default.

Critical rationalism is revolutionary because it replaces proof with test; it replaces radical, wholesale dismissal of ideas with the readiness to test piecemeal (Albert Einstein, Popper; reformism). The demand to prove thus yields to the critical attitude (William Warren Bartley III, Willard Van Orman Quine; non-justificationism), recognizing that theories possess graded merit (Einstein, Leonard Nelson, Popper; critical rationalism)by whatever rule we happen to follow, no matter how tentative. Rules are then hopefully improvable (Charles Sanders Peirce, Russell, Popper; fallibilism). Hence diverse rules may serve as competing criteria or as complementary. Being minimalist, critical rationalism invites considering some older theologians as allies, although not their contemporary followers. Unlike radical rationalism, critical rationalism is historically oriented. (It is the view of rationality as relative to contexts and of truth as absolute, as a guiding principle la Kant.)

This invites critical rationalism to enlist rational thought as a category of rational action (Ian C. Jarvie and Joseph Agassi). And this in turn invites the study of rationalism as an aspect of extant scientific research. It also invites comparison of the various versions of rationalism as to the degree of their adequacy to this task: take scientific research as it is, warts and all, and examine its merits and defects according to the diverse alternatives. This attitude is new and expressed in various studies of the sociology of science, so-called, that often spread over diverse disciplines, including political science and even criminology no less. This renders a part of the project of rationalism the assessments of the intellectual value of the outcome of research, theoretical, practical, or culturalor even aesthetic. The only intellectual justification of a scientific theory, said Einstein, is its ability to explain; its best reward is its successors admission of it as approximate. In this way he stressed that the aim of research is to explain in the hope of approximating the truth. This is open to debate. Social science as a whole may serve as a test case, with the sociology of science at the center of the debate on this matter.

Historically, rationalism doggedly accompanied studies of nature, not social studies. What in these should rationalism approve of? Discussion of this question allowed rationalism to inform the social sciences. A conspicuous example is the vagueness in social studies of the boundaries between philosophy, science, and practice that still invites open discussion. Anything less is below the minimal criterion of the critical attitude.

Critics of minimal rationalism find criticism insufficient, since positive criteria of choice need justification. If so, then rationalism is back to square one. If not, then positive criteria must be tentative, and the issue must shift from their justification to efforts at their improvement. Some do not like this, as it rests on their initial choice that was too arbitrary. They prefer to return to the initial criterion and replace it with the least arbitrary one. They are radicals. The clash is thus between the radical and the critical version of rationalismas well as between them and fideism.

The agenda of rationalismin philosophy, in science, or in practiceis the same: heightening the critical attitude, seeking improvement through criticism everywhere. Where is the starting point? How are we to decide on our agenda? Parliamentary steering committees decide on agendas. The commonwealth of learning, however, is its own steering committee. Those concerned to promote rationalism should do their best to put discussions of it high on the public agenda.

Agassi, Joseph. 1996. The Philosophy of Science Today. In Philosophy of Science, Logic, and Mathematics in the Twentieth Century. Vol. 9 of Routledge History of Philosophy, ed. Stuart G. Shanker, 235-265. London: Routledge.

Agassi, Joseph, and Ian C. Jarvie, eds. 1987. Rationality: The Critical View. The Hague: Nijhoff.

Baumgardt, Carola. 1952. Johannes Kepler: Life and Letters. Introduction by Albert Einstein. London: Golancz.

Burtt, E. A. 1926. The Metaphysical Foundations of Modern Physical Science. London: Routledge.

Churchman, C. West. 1968. Challenge to Reason. New York: McGraw-Hill.

Einstein, Albert. 1954. Ideas and Opinions. New York: Bonanza Books.

Festinger, Leon. 1957. Theory of Cognitive Dissonance. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

Feyerabend, Paul. 1987. Farewell to Reason. London: New Left Books.

Haakonssen, Knud, ed. 2006. The Cambridge History of Eighteenth-Century Philosophy. 2 vols. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.

Hayek, Friedrich August von. 1952. The Counter-Revolution of Science: Studies on the Abuse of Reason. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.

Hayek, Friedrich August von. 1960. The Constitution of Liberty. Chicago: Chicago University Press.

Jarvie, Ian C. 1964. The Revolution in Anthropology. London: Routledge.

Jarvie, Ian C., and Joseph Agassi. 1987. The Rationality of Magic. In Rationality: The Critical View, ed. Joseph Agassi and Ian C. Jarvie, 363-383. The Hague: Nijhoff.

John Paul II, Pope. 1998. Fides et Ratio. Washington, DC: United States Catholic Conference.

Koyr, Alexandre, 1968. Metaphysics and Measurement. London: Chapman and Hall.

Kuhn, Thomas S. 1970. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. 2nd ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Lakatos, Imre, and Alan Musgrave. 1970. Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.

Mill, John Stuart. 1843. A System of Logic. London: J. W. Parker.

Naess, Arne. 1968. Scepticism. London: Routledge and K. Paul; New York: Humanities.

Nelson, Leonard. 1949. Socratic Method and Critical Philosophy: Selected Essays. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press; repr. New York: Dover, 1965.

Nisbet, Robert A. 1966. The Sociological Tradition. New York: Basic Books.

Osler, Margaret J., ed. 2000. Rethinking the Scientific Revolution. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.

Parkinson, G. H. R., ed. 1993. The Renaissance and Seventeenth-Century Rationalism. Vol. 4 of Routledge History of Philosophy. London: Routledge.

Phillips, Derek L. 1973. Abandoning Method. London: Jossey-Bass.

Pitte, Frederick P. van de. 1971. Kant as Philosophical Anthropologist. The Hague: Nijhoff.

Polanyi, Michael. 1958. Personal Knowledge: Towards a Post-Critical Philosophy. London: Routledge.

Polanyi, Michael. 1962. The Republic of Science. In Criteria for Scientific Development, ed. Edward Shils, 1-20. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Popper, Karl R. 1945. The Open Society and Its Enemies. 2 vols. London: Routledge.

Rees, Graham, and Maria Wakely. 2004. Introduction. In The Instauratio Magna. Part 2, Novum Organum and Associated Texts. Vol. 11 of The Oxford Francis Bacon. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Russell, Bertrand. 1912. The Problems of Philosophy. London: Williams and Norgate; New York: Henry Holt.

Russell, Bertrand. 1945. A History of Western Philosophy. New York: Simon and Schuster.

Simon, Robert L., ed. 2002. The Blackwell Guide to Social and Political Philosophy. Oxford: Blackwell.

Solomon, Robert C. 1988. Continental Philosophy since 1750: The Rise and Fall of the Self. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Wettersten, John R. 1992. The Roots of Critical Rationalism. Amsterdam: Rodopi.

Joseph Agassi

Read the original:

rationalism facts, information, pictures | Encyclopedia ...

Singularity NorthmanTrader

Posted on by

In technological singularity is the hypothesis that the invention of artificial super intelligence will abruptly trigger runaway technological growth, resulting in unfathomable changes to human civilization. A similar concept may apply to financial markets in the realm that is bond yields versus equity prices producing a runaway event in its own right perhaps.

Correlation does not imply causation but as you know Ive been floating my theory of everything a bit lately (see: 2018 Market Outlook) and it relates to the relationship between yields and stock prices. Not just as a casual relationship, but as THE relationship to watch. My basic premise is that low yields have been the primary function with which the US, and the world for that matter, has been keeping itself on an artificial growth path as one bubble after another has burst. Unprecedented debt has been the result and low yields keep masking and delaying the eventual reckoning (see also The Debt Beneath).

You may have seen this chart from my writings:

The primary premise: If this relationship is meaningful theres a singularity where rising yields will hurt stocks as the cost of carry of the debt will grind everything to a halt.

This hasnt happened yet obviously and frankly I cant predict when it will happen. But I can observe.

Yesterday the 10 year pushed above 2.5% for the first time in a long time. And with historic overbought readings in equities it may be a folly exercise to prescribe any rejection in equities with rising yields this early, but bear with me.

Yesterday a couple of odd things happened. Firstly as I outlined internals were negative all day:

How unusual was this in context of new highs and a rising $VIX? This unusual:

Since the beginning of the year weve had virtually zero selling and cumulative internals always ended the day in the positive.

Except yesterday when the 10 year jumped above 2.5%. Negative internals prevailed all day long:

Lets zoom in on my 10 year trend chart:

If this trend line is the relevant one we just did something we havent done since 2007: Bust above the trend line.

In 2007 such a burst above the trend line was the beginning of the end for stocks. Indeed going back to the late 80s every single tag of the trend line has resulted in a dropping of the 10 year yield. And many times this was the direct result of Fed intervention producing stock market rallies or the Fed reacting to corrective activity in markets.

The 2000 top came near a trend line tag. The 1990/1991 recession required a dropping of yields following a trend line tag. The 1998 correction caused Greenspan to drop rates following a rise in yields. We know what happened after the 2007 peak: Zero bound by the Fed. The corrections in 2011 and 2012 were met with a drop in yields, the 2015/2016 corrections were followed by a record low 10 year. You see the trend.

2017 saw a tag of the trend line and then a renewed rejection. The pattern is eerily similar to 2006 and 2007.

Are we repeating this pattern here? Or are yields about to break out? I cant say, but if central banks wish for inflation I say be careful what you wish for.

Were yesterdays negative internals (strength in banks notwithstanding) already an indication that the larger stock market is already sensitive to higher rates?

What is that point of the singularity?

Jeffrey Gundlach seems to think its at 2.63%:

if the 10Year goes to 2.63% stocks will be negative impacted.

He also is watching yields in relation to trend lines and his are different to mine which is fine:

Ultimately the market will let us know which trend line is relevant here.

But the main message is the same: Yields are rising:

And like us Gundlach is highlighting the complete lack of corrective activity, the one way action in equity prices and unprecedented volatility compression:

Overnight we see flushing in markets for the first time in 2018 as yields rose even further:

Guess markets didnt like that.

Is 2.5% the singularity?

If the 10 year drops back below 2.5% and stocks rally I think we have our answer. If it extends above 2.6% and stocks continue to drop I think we also may have our answer. In which case the answer is 2.5% not 2.63%.

If stocks rally and the 10 year keeps moving higher then 2.63% is the next level to watch.

For now the 30 year track record is yields dropping following a tag of the trend line, or fake out above. An extended journey above markets have never had to contend with. A journey into the undiscovered country until the singularity is achieved.

Like Loading...

Categories: Market Analysis

Tags: featured, markets, singularity, SPX, Sven Henrich, tnx, yields

Read more:

Singularity NorthmanTrader