A second term for Donald Trump? Michigan is at the center of the political universe – Detroit Free Press

WASHINGTON Tired of politics? Of politicians? Think elections dont matter?

Think again.

This years elections will be some of the most consequential in decades and Michigan is set up to be one of the most consequential states on the electoral map.

Consider:

Not only is it a foregone conclusion that Michigan will help decide whether President Donald Trump remains in office or not, its U.S. Senate race is expected to be one of the most contested in the nation and could help determine control of that chamber. There are also races in suburban Detroit congressional districts that could signal which party holds the majority in the U.S. House next year.

Not impressed?

Those elections will help shape decisions over access to health care, climate change, tax policy, the economy, immigration and U.S. relations with foreign powers, including Iran and North Korea. The people elected will manage or exacerbate a growing federal deficit. They will confirm Supreme Court justices who will decide questions about abortion, gun ownership, freedom of speech and expression. They will decide whether supermajorities will continue to be needed to pass legislation in the Senate. They will make policies affecting poor families, college students, automakers and business owners.

They could decide how to react to an economic slowdown if, as some experts believe, one is on the way. And they could be asked to respond to a foreign war or a nuclear threat to the U.S. or its allies.

War Powers Resolution: Rep. Slotkin to lead effort to rein in President Trump on Iran

Opinion: Trump needs a short leash as impeachment trial looms

I would consider it the most consequential election of my lifetime and Ive been watching politics since I was 13 years old, said Dee McBroom, a veteran Democratic campaign consultant.

Much of that is because ofTrump, who engenders fierce loyalty in those who see him as an antidote to trite traditions and political correctness, projecting American strength and decisiveness, and an equally fierce distaste in those who view him as a bully and a crackpot, spewing hate on Twitter and unfit for office.

But its not just about Trump, either.

Donald Trump takes shot at Debbie, John Dingell in Battle Creek rally

Donald Trump made a comment about Debbie Dingell and her late husband, John Dingell, during his "Merry Christmas" rally in Battle Creek.

Mandi Wright, Detroit Free Press

The elections will be a referendum on how divided the nation remains in what its people believe, what they want from their politics and politicians, and how they bothpoliticians and the people themselves comport themselves. It will help decide whether the nation believes a loss of civility in political discourse has been worth the upending of a status quo that, for many, wasn't working.

Is the Republican Party the party of Trump or is it the party of Romney or Bush? Is the Democratic Party the party of AOC (Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez) and Bernie Sanders or is it more Obama, Biden and Buttigieg? said Andrea Bitely, a consultant with Truscott Rossman, a communications firm in Lansing, who worked as spokeswoman for former state Attorney General Bill Schuette. Thats what this election is about:Who are we?

So, theres a lot riding on this years elections and Michigan will be at the center of it along with Wisconsin, Pennsylvania and a handful of other states. Heres a look at whats comingbetween now and Election Day, Nov. 3.

Unless youre really trying to avoid politics, you already know that President Trump, despite being impeached by the House in December, is running for reelection and has the Republican nomination in the bag. Even with recent dropouts, the Democrats have a cast of more than a dozen running to be their partys nominee.

Michigans presidential primary is Tuesday, March 10, and its at a potentially auspicious spot on the election calendar.

As the national polls stand now, the race for the Democratic nomination is really among a handful of candidates former Vice President Joe Biden, U.S. Sen. Bernie Sanders of Vermont, U.S. Sen. Elizabeth Warren of Massachusetts and South Bend, Indiana Mayor Pete Buttigieg. Those same four also hold the polling lead, though not necessarily in that order, in the first four states to vote: Iowa, on Feb. 3; New Hampshire, on Feb. 11; Nevada, on Feb. 22,and South Carolina, on Feb. 29.

Show caption Hide caption Democratic Presidential candidates line up waving to the crowd before the start of the debate at the Fox Theatre in Detroit, Michigan on Tuesday, July...Democratic Presidential candidates line up waving to the crowd before the start of the debate at the Fox Theatre in Detroit, Michigan on Tuesday, July 30, 2019. (L to R) Marianne Williamson, Tim Ryan, Sen. Amy Klobuchar, Mayor of South Bend, Indiana, Pete Buttigieg, Sen. Bernie Sanders, Sen. Elizabeth Warren, Beto O'Rourke, John Hickenlooper, John Delaney and Montana Governor, Steve Bullock.Eric Seals, Detroit Free Press

The outcome in those races will further narrow the field, though two billionaires former New York City Mayor Mike Bloomberg, who sits just behind the leaders in national polling,and entrepreneur Tom Steyer have enough cash of their own to stay in as long as they want. Then, on Tuesday, March 3, the race for the nomination will explode with 14 states including California, Texas and some other sizable states among themvoting, awarding about 40% of the total number of delegates available to the candidates.

If one candidate has taken over the race by then, it could be all but over. But if Super Tuesday leaves anunsettled nomination, the next weeks primary calendar includes six states, the biggest prize of which is Michigan.

It is impossibleto guess who will be in the lead at that point the early polling hasnt been conclusive and if some candidate takes a clear lead in the early voting, it could help swing support to him or her later.But if there is still a race, Michigan could matter and in unexpected ways.

Remember, in 2016, it was Sanders, not the favorite, Hillary Clinton, who won Michigans primary despite polls showing her ahead by double digits the weekend before the voting. Clinton ended up winning the nomination but her loss in Michigan's primary may have presaged her close loss to Trump in the state that November.

It's also worth mentioning: Any Michigan resident who is 17 1/2 or older (and will be 18 or older by Election Day) can registerto vote in person at their city or township clerk's office up to 8 p.m. the day of the election. If he or she wants to register by some other method, such as online or by mail, the deadline is 15 days before the election. There is no party declaration in Michigan, so in the March 10 primary, you can ask for whichever partys ballot you want to vote in the primary, regardless of whether you consider yourself a Democrat, a Republican or an independent. And under state law, you can now ask for an absentee ballot without giving any reason and submit your vote early, if you like.

As with any primary, however, an early vote makes it possible you'll be voting for someone no longer in the race by Election Day. If that happens and the candidate gets more than 15% of the vote, his or her delegates will be divided proportionallyamong the remaining candidates.

Even if the Democrats settle on a nominee early,Michiganders should reconcile themselves to being at the center of what is going to be a long, fractious and, at times, hard-to-stomach campaign.

Trump won Michigan, Wisconsin and Pennsylvania three states that together hadnt gone for a Republican presidential candidate since 1984 by about 77,000 votes combined in 2016, giving him an Electoral College edge but by the slimmest of voting margins. Itwill be difficult, if not impossible, for him to win in 2020 without doing well once again in the Rust Belt.

And while there has been little recent polling, the Real Clear Politics average of polls as of October showed Trump trailing Biden, Sanders and Warren in the state(there haven't been enough head-to-head polls between Trump and Buttigieg to say).

That could also explain why Trump reversed earlier threats to slash funding to clean up the Great Lakes and promised to green-light a new navigational lock at Sault Ste. Marie, as well as why he was in Toledo this week for a rally and will be back in Wisconsinnext week as he tries to boost his standing in the industrial Midwest.

But, as always with the president, expect him not only to come bearing praise for himself but attacks on his enemies,such as U.S. Rep. Rashida Tlaib, D-Detroit, who called for his impeachment the day she was sworn into office, and U.S. Rep. Justin Amash, I-Cascade Township, a former Republican who has repeatedly called Trump unfit.

Once the Democratic nomineeis determined, he or she will be barnstorming Michiganas well, given that Clintons campaign was widely criticized for taking the state for granted in 2016. But even before then, the shadow campaign iswell underway, with groups targeting voters and spending on outreach. Priorities USA, a pro-Democratic group, early last year announced a $100 million effort in Michigan, Wisconsin, Pennsylvania and Florida; America First Action, a group supporting Trump, said last May it was spending $250 million in Michigan,Pennsylvania, Florida, Ohio, North Carolina and Georgia.

Expect groups tofloodthe state with ads and social media posts, the major parties attacking each other and claims, true and false, flying through the airways.

The Republicans and the Trump campaign snuck up on the Democrats in the 2016 campaign by whatever means. But the Democrats will be more prepared in 2020, said Mike Traugott, with the Center for Political Studies at the University of Michigan.

In other words, buckle up. Its going to be a bumpy ride.

One thing about Trumps 16 win in Michigan:It came in a year when no U.S. Senate seat was up for grabs, meaning that while Clintons campaign was doing little in the state, there was no other statewide race going on for Democrats and their allies (such as labor unions) to pump up voter turnout.

That wont be the case this year.

U.S. Sen. Gary Peters, who was the only Democrat to win an open Senate seat in 2014, is up for reelection, and, as it stands now, will likely face off against John James, an African American businessman who lost in the 2018 election as the Republican nominee against Peters Democratic colleague, U.S. Sen. Debbie Stabenow.

U.S. Senator Gary Peters talks with media during visitation of former US Representative John D. Dingell at the Ford Community and Performing Arts Center in Dearborn on Monday, February 11, 2019.Ryan Garza, Detroit Free Press

There is much that makes it a compelling race. Peters is often ranked as one of the least known members of the Senate while James has made a name for himself appearing on Fox News as a pundit and proved himself an able fundraiser, raising $3.5 million to Peters' $2.5 million in the last three months of 2019 (though it's expected Peters has a good deal more cash on hand; the full finance reports won't out until the end of January.)

But James has also embraced Trump and after a long silence finally came out against impeachment and could be inextricably linked with the president and his fortunes, whatever they are in Michigan.

Peters, meanwhile, has long touted his bipartisan bona fides, calling for cuts in government waste and urging help for small businesses while at the same timeremaining a reliable Democratic vote. Heleaves little to chance when it comes to elections, however, winning his last four three to the U.S. House and one to the Senateeven in Republican wave years.

Show caption Hide caption Sen. Debbie Stabenow, D-Mich., left,and challenger John James shake hands after their debate at the Detroit Economic Club, Monday, Oct. 15, 2018, in Detroit. Stabenow...Sen. Debbie Stabenow, D-Mich., left,and challenger John James shake hands after their debate at the Detroit Economic Club, Monday, Oct. 15, 2018, in Detroit. Stabenow is seeking a fourth term and has led comfortably in polls, and James, a business executive and combat veteran, participated in their second debate before the November election.Carlos Osorio, AP

Still, for Republicans looking to keep control of the Senate, Peters seat is seen as a possible opportunity with James in the field. Some polls have shown James within striking distance of Peters, though the Real Clear Politics average of polls shows the incumbent ahead by about 8 percentage points.

As far as the impact of this race, meanwhile, its potentially huge: Republicans have a three-seat margin in the Senate and are defending 23 seats to the Democrats 12. Whichever party holds majority control, it will determine lifetime confirmations to the Supreme Court with two conservative justices, Neil Gorsuch and Brett Kavanaugh, already being confirmed during Trumps first term.

There alsoremain questions about whether either party could move to get rid of the filibuster that requires 60-vote margins on some of the most consequential pieces of legislation. If that happens, it means the party in control will have a much easier time enacting policy though that, in turn, could also make for an even-more volatile political situation.

In the House, Democrats hold a 36-seat majority after taking control of the chamber last year. The 2018 election saw the party flip 43 seats (and lose three of its own) nationally, including two districts in Michigan, both representing parts of Detroits western suburbs.

And while two may not sound like a lot, those seats could be a bellwether for Democrats in the House nationally.

The question will be whether U.S. Reps. Elissa Slotkin, D-Holly, and Haley Stevens, D-Rochester Hills, can hold on to them. Both districts have historically been Republican strongholds; both were drawn to protect Republican incumbents after the 2010 Census.

The Democratic women who won in each did so by talking about the need to protect health care, support businesses, invest in the state not by attacking Trump. But now they face Republican attacks carping on their support for impeaching Trump after he asked the Ukrainian president to investigate Biden, without any evidence that Biden had had done anything wrong. Its against federal law to solicit foreign aid in a U.S. election.

Slotkin, a former intelligence official and acting assistant defense secretary, has also been thrust into the limelight over Trumpordering a drone strike that killed an Iranian general and Iran's retaliatory strikes against U.S. personnel in Iraq, cautioning that escalation could lead to war. After speaking from experience over multiple tours of duty, Slotkin wasalso given the responsibility for managinga resolution calling for limits on the president's authority in taking military action in the Middle East.

Trump is almost assured of being acquitted by the Republican majority in the Senate, but the House impeachment could still be an issue for Slotkin and Stevens re-elections.

Helping them, however, are several factors. First, both are in districts where Trump struggled relative to other Republican presidential candidates and that have been trending more Democratic. Second, no big-name, top-tier candidates with independent wealth or overwhelming Republican connections have stepped forward to face them possibly because a whole new set of congressional district lines will be drawn after this years Census, leaving anyone who runs now looking at a whole new district by 2022.

Third, both Slotkin and Stevens can raise plenty of money: As of the end of the last official reporting period on Sept. 30, Stevens, who worked on President Barack Obamas auto task force, had raised close to $2 million total. Slotkin had raised close to the same and said that as of the end of the year, she had raised another $1.28 million. (Official tallies for the third quarter arent due until Jan. 15.)

Much will ultimately depend on who wins the nominations to face them.

U.S. Rep. Elissa Slotkin speaks to a crowd while holding a constituent community conversation on Monday, December 16, 2019 at the Oakland Center at Oakland University in Rochester.Ryan Garza, Detroit Free Press

In Slotkins district, which includes northern Oakland County and Ingham and Livingston counties, the announced GOP candidates so far include state Board of Education member Nikki Snyder, who lives just outside the district boundaries in Dexter (a congressional candidate can legally live outside the district he or she is running for as long as he or she lives in Michigan); Paul Junge, a former Lansing TV anchor who also worked for U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services in Washington, D.C.; Kristina Lyke, a criminal defense and divorce lawyer in Lansing; Alan Hoover, whose website says he is an entrepreneur in Ortonville, and Mike Detmer of Howell, who works for an automotive supplier.

Running for the Republican nomination in Stevens district, which includes parts of Oakland and western Wayne counties, at present are former U.S. Rep. Kerry Bentivolio of Milford; Whittney Williams of Canton, who is an official with a local Republican group and first-generation immigrant from Taiwan;Frank Acosta, a Northville entrepreneur,and Birmingham lawyer Erick Esshaki.

More candidates could enter the races, however, with the filing deadline for the Aug. 4 primary which is for any offices other than president on April 21.

Outside of the state, Michigans two best-known members of Congress could well be Amash and Tlaib, given their loud, pointed criticisms of Trump and the presidents documented history of hitting back via Twitter.

Of the two of them, though, Amash faces the tougher road ahead.

As it stands now, no one with deep pockets, widespread support or high name recognition has stepped forward to challenge Tlaib in the Democratic primary, which will all but determine who wins in this predominantly Democratic district.

Its a much different case for Amash, a former Republican who last year broke with his party over the question of impeachment, believing, after a close reading of special counsel Robert Muellers report, that Trump obstructed justice. He later abandoned the party calling both parties toxic and became the Houses sole independent member.

As of now, Amash, of Cascade Township in west Michigan, is presumably running for reelection and not something else (such as a third-party bid for president). But hes something of a long shot despite being the incumbent.

Republicans have put forward a strong slate of candidates for their partys bid in a district that still favors the GOP, including Joel Langlois, who owns the DeltaPlex Arena in Grand Rapids; Peter Meijer, whose last name is synonymous with the grocery store chain started by his family; state Rep. Lynn Afendoulis, R-Grand Rapids, and former Sand Lake Village President Tom Norton.

Some Democrats, meanwhile, believing they could finally flip this district, have entered the race as well, including lawyer Nick Colvin, who worked in the Obama White House and for the city of Chicago, and Hillary Scholten, who worked in the Justice Department while Obama was president and with the Michigan Immigrant Rights Center. And then there is Amash, who has represented the district since 2011.

The Cook Political Report, a political handicapping site in Washington, lists the race as Lean Republican, which suggests an advantage for the GOP but, especially with Amash in the race, not a necessarily insurmountable one inthree-way balloting.

As for other congressional seats in Michigan this year, the only one that looks like a possible race is in southwestern Michigan, where U.S. Rep. Fred Upton, R-St. Joseph, has been in office since 1987.

The genial Upton is a well-liked politician, including by many Democrats in Congress, but this has also been a district that has trended more Democratic in some years, offering a pickup opportunity. Several Democrats are vying for the nomination but the one receiving the most attention is state Rep. Jon Hoadley of Kalamazoo, a member of the House Appropriations Committee who has pushed for getting rid of partisan redistricting and reducing the influence of money in politics.

The Cook Political Report still lists it as Likely Republican.

As for other races around the state, most are expected to stand pat the only congressman who has said he wont run for reelection is Rep. Paul Mitchell, R-Dryden, in a predominantly Republican district. With redistricting around the corner, it doesnt look at this early stage that many big name candidates will enter the races and challenge the incumbents.

Retired Brigadier Gen. Doug (Odie) Slocum, who previously commanded Selfridge Air National Guard Base in Harrison Township, andstate Rep. Shane Hernandez. R-Port Huron, areamong a group of candidates who have filed for Mitchell's seat. Former state Rep. Gretchen Driskell, D-Saline, will try for a third time to knock off U.S. Rep. Tim Walberg, R-Tipton.

But anything can happen, especially given the volatility of the president, an uncertain economy,andthe potential for instability in the Middle East and elsewhere.

All 110 seats in the state House of Representatives will be up for grabs as well this year, with Republicans hoping to keep the majority theyve held since 2011.

But the GOP, which currently has a58-52 majority in the House, lost five seats in the 2018 election and Democrats are hoping to flip the chamber this year.

It's also worth noting that, because of term limits, 12 Democrats and 10 Republicans will be leaving regardless.

In terms offundraising, meanwhile, Republicans have a distinct cash advantage with $2.2 million available cash in the House Republican Campaign Committee account, while the House Democratic Fund is far lighter at about $517,000.

Gov. Gretchen Whitmer is particularly interested in helping flip the Housein order to make more progress on herDemocratic agenda. But given the way districts have been drawn across the state, she could have a tough time doing so unless there is a Democratic wave election that swamps even local races.

Control of the Michigan Supreme Court, where Republican-nominated justices currently hold a 4-3 majority, is also at stake.Two seats on the court are up for election those filled by Chief Justice Bridget Mary McCormack, a Democratic nominee, and that of Justice Stephen Markman, a GOP nominee.

Markman cant run againbecause of the court's age limit of 70 at the time of a justice's election. That means it will be an open seat, and if Democrats win it while retaining McCormacks seat, they would have a 4-3 majority on the court.

While nothing has been certified for the November ballot yet, a number of ballot proposals are making the rounds.

A coalition of businesses, politicians and social justice leaders earlier this week proposed a ballot question that would expand the states civil rights law to protectmembers of the LGBTQ community from discrimination in housing and hiring.

The group could get the signatures it needs to get on the ballot. But it will still face opposition from some religious and conservative leaders, who have pledged to campaign against it. Former state Rep. Gary Glenn, R-Midland, is president of the American Family Association, which promotes what it calls traditional family values, and hassaid such measures have been used "to discriminate against and violate religious freedom.

Meanwhile, Right to Life of Michigan has been gathering signatures to ban an abortion procedure known asdilation and evacuation that isused to end some pregnancies in the second trimester, but voters may never see that question on their ballots.

If the Republican-led Legislature in Lansing approves it, then it bypasses Whitmer who has threatened a veto andit will go intoeffect without the referendum being held. On the other hand, legislators could do nothing and then it would be put to voters.

Finally, Voters Not Politicians, the group that won passage of a state constitutional amendment creating an independent redistricting commission in 2018, has been looking at a possible proposal requiringfinancial disclosure for elected state officials, as well as potentiallyextending Michigans legislative term limits.

Michigan currently requires no financial disclosures by state lawmakers and consistently ranks at or near the bottom of state rankings for transparency and ethics laws. Though no specific term limits plan has been unveiled, one reform proposal would allow lawmakers to serve a combined 20 years in the House and Senate. Currently, lawmakers are limited to six years in the House and eight years in the Senate.

There has also been talk of a constitutional amendment to create a graduated income tax or an initiative or bond proposal to fix the roads, thoughneither appears to be definite.

Voters in metro Detroit arealso going to face questions on public transit and the arts.

On the March 10 presidential primary ballot, voters in Wayne, Oakland and Macomb counties will be asked to support or reject a 0.2-mill renewal ballot proposal to support the Detroit Institute of Arts for 10 years.

The ask already has raised hackles in the region because the DIA had previously said it wouldnt request a millage hike again when it first asked in 2012 and now it is making the request two years before the initial millage is set to expire.But museum officials say it's needed to handle costs and that a lot such as the city of Detroit's trip through bankruptcy has happened in the meantime.

Another issue that will probably face voters in Wayne, Oakland and Washtenaw counties in November is a ballot proposal to improve and expand public transit in southeast Michigan. Some work is needed before that can be put on the ballot, however. Changes in the state law that govern municipal partnerships have to happen before the measure can get on the ballot.

As for the parties, both are gearing up for an explosive campaign season.

Last week, at a "Fems for Dems" event in Pontiac, Whitmer whipped up the troops saying, that the word important "doesn't even go far enough to explain how critical this year is."

"The world is going to be looking to Michigan," she said.

That is one of the few things in which she may agree with state Republican Party Chairwoman Laura Cox.

"The 2020 elections will be fought over the values that define our nation," Cox said. "Michigan will be center stage in the fight to preserve our American way of lifeand the Michigan Republican Party is ready."

Read the original here:

A second term for Donald Trump? Michigan is at the center of the political universe - Detroit Free Press

How Donald Trump thinks about Iran – Brookings Institution

On October 6, 1980 Donald Trump was interviewed by Rona Barrett, one of Americas most famous gossip columnists, on NBC. It was several weeks before Ronald Reagan defeated Jimmy Carter in the presidential election and near the end of the Iran hostage crisis in which the Iranian regime took 52 American diplomats and citizens prisoner after the embassy was stormed and then held them for 444 days.

It was a long and meandering interview about Trumps story to date (he was then 34). About half way though, Barrett asked Trump if he could make America perfect how would he do it. Trump replied that America should really be a country that gets the respect of other countries. The exchange continued:

Donald Trump: .The Iranian situation is a case in point. That they hold our hostages is just absolutely, and totally ridiculous. That this country sits back and allows a country such as Iran to hold our hostages, to my way of thinking, is a horror, and I dont think theyd do it with other countries. I honestly dont think theyd do it with other countries.

Rona Barrett: Obviously youre advocating that we should have gone in there with troops, et cetera, and brought our boys out like Vietnam.

Donald Trump: I absolutely feel that, yes. I dont think theres any question, and there is no question in my mind. I think right now wed be an oil-rich nation, and I believe that we should have done it, and Im very disappointed that we didnt do it, and I dont think anybody would have held us in abeyance.

As historians Brendan Simms and Charlie Laderman have observed, this interview is the first known comment by Trump on U.S. foreign policy.

Fast forward to January 4, 2020, a day after the U.S. drone strike that killed Qassem Soleimani. Trump tweeted:

One of the puzzles about Trumps strike on Soleimani is why he did it and what he will do next. His administration has pursued a very hawkish policy on Iran beginning with the travel ban, tough new sanctions, walking away from the Iran nuclear deal, and ratcheting up pressure in the year that followed. But, in recent months Trump tacked in a different direction. He did not fire back after the September attacks on Saudi oil facilities. He has professed not to care about the Middle East beyond the oil and ISIS. He seems to want to avoid war, particularly in an election year. And, he was desperate for talks with the Iranian leadership, going so far as to try to surprise the Iranians by dialing into a meeting between President Rouhani and President Macron on the sidelines of the U.N. General Assembly.

The historical record offers an answer. The Iranian revolution, which led to the hostage crisis and an energy crisis, was one of Trumps formative experiences in thinking about Americas role in the world. In the years that followed, he became obsessed with the symbolism of respect (and the acquisition of oil). He was furious that allies did not pay fealty to the United States. He was outraged when foreign leaders did not meet the American president at their plane. The only time he became frustrated with Vladimir Putin in office was when he looked as if he was disrespecting Trumps military strength such as when Russian planes buzzed Americas ships or when the Russians produced a map showing Mar-a-Lago within range of their nuclear weapons. Trump does not hate Iran per se his desire for talks is evidence of that but he does have an obsession with avoiding a humiliation. For Trump, the embassy protests looked like a mash-up of 1979 with Benghazi the ultimate challenge to his own perception of himself as a strongman.

There are contradictory reports of the decisionmaking process around the Soleimani strike. Some reports say that the Pentagon added the option as a throw-away to make the other option seem more reasonable. A report in the Washington Post says Mike Pompeo and Mark Esper had been trying to get Trump to sign on for some time. The Post report may be an attempt by Pompeo and Esper to claim credit and defuse charges of incompetence, but in any event, a consistent element of all reports is that Trump did not sign on to the strike until after the Iranian backed protests outside the embassy.

Trump often lashes out at people after he thinks they criticized him, even if a fight does not serve his interests think about his attack on the parents of the fallen U.S. soldier Humayun Khan or his cruel comment about Debbie Dingel. He has the same reaction to actions that undermine his own image of America as a strong and unrivaled nation while he is at the helm. He would almost certainly not have responded the same way if Iran had continued to hit U.S. allies or to make strategic gains in Iraq.

The killing of Soleimani is a strategic error. It provides short-term gratification upon the demise of a man responsible for the deaths of many Americans, but it damages U.S. interests in the region and beyond. However, many of the downsides mean very little to Trump. He does not care that Iraq might kick U.S. troops out as long as they pay him back for the base. Likewise for Iran abrogating elements of the nuclear deal. He does not mind that this undermines the protest movement in Iraq or in Iran. He cannot envisage the return of ISIS. He couldnt care less that that the Saudis now feel in imminent danger and want a de-escalation. As for international law and creating a precedent for targeted killings of government officials, forget it.

And yet, having killed the second most important person in Iran, Trump now finds himself in a bind. If Iran reacts by attacking Americans, Trump will feel compelled to respond, but that runs the risk of the wider war that he wants to avoid. So he is trying to put the genie back in the bottle by threatening fire and fury if Iran retaliates, just as he is bombastic domestically when in a tight spot. It is unlikely to succeed and, paradoxically, makes all-out war with Iran more likely. In the Barrett interview, Trump spoke about a sparkle of war in the Middle East. The phrase is an apt one to sum up Trumps approach to foreign policy he likes the sparkle and hopes others will be scared into submission. But bluster does not always work.

All-out war between the United States and Iran is unlikely, primarily because it would not serve Irans interests. Iran may bide its time, target U.S. allies instead of Americans, or press the United States in other ways (such as by forcing it out of Iraq). If it does directly attack Americans, Trump might try to wriggle off the hook he has hoisted himself upon.

However, its easy to imagine how the situation could easily spiral into a war. There is little doubt that Trump is uniquely ill-suited to be a commander-in-chief during war time. He has no attention span, does not process information normally, is particularly prone to bad advice, and is deeply insecure. He has one of the weakest and least experienced national security teams since the United States became a global power. He will be fighting this war without many allies. Even the Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu was careful to distance himself from Trumps drone strike. Given his demonstrated proclivity for war crimes, if he were to decisively win the war, he would very likely do so in a way that would leave a permanent stain on the nations honor.

Trumps Iran crisis fits perfectly within his narrative arc. His administration has had three identifiable phases. The first was the age of constraint, as the so-called Axis of Adults shaped and limited Trumps options. The second was the age of hubris as Trump got rid of anyone who stood up to him so he could act as he wished this came in two variants, maximum pressure and deal-making. The third is the reckoning as Trump is forced to face the consequences and contradictions of his own actions. There have been inklings of this third phase for some time. It has now well and truly arrived.

Read the rest here:

How Donald Trump thinks about Iran - Brookings Institution

Statue mocking Donald Trump torched in Slovenia – NBC News

LJUBLJANA, Slovenia A wooden statue mocking U.S. President Donald Trump was burned to the ground Thursday in Slovenia, the birthplace of his wife Melania, authorities said.

The nearly eight-meter (26-foot) high construction, erected last year in a village in northeast of Slovenia, showed Trump with his trademark hair style, blue suit, white shirt and a long red tie. His right arm fist clenched was raised high like that of New Yorks Statue of Liberty.

Slovenian police are looking for the arsonist.

Let our news meet your inbox. The news and stories that matters, delivered weekday mornings.

When triggered, a mechanism inside the statue opened a red-painted mouth and shark-like teeth used to appear.

Like all populists, the statue has two faces, its creator, Tomaz Schlegl, said when he unveiled the statue last August. One is humane and nice, the other is that of a vampire.

Although the construction quickly became a tourist attraction, some local villagers were unhappy with its appearance, pledging to torch it by Halloween, Oct. 31. It had to be moved to another village in the area.

Milan Balazic, the mayor of Moravce where the statue ended up, said that unknown arsonists burned it.

He said the torching of the statue "is symbol of intolerance toward artistic projects in our society."

Its not the first time in Slovenia that a member of the Trump family has been carved in wood.

A life-size sculpture of the U.S. first lady cut from the trunk of a linden tree was unveiled in her hometown of Sevnica last June, drawing mixed reactions from residents.

The first lady, born Melanija Knavs, changed her name to Melania Knauss when she started modeling. She settled in New York in 1996 and met Trump two years later.

There are mixed feelings about Melania in Slovenia where hopes were high that she would promote her picturesque Alpine home country after Trump took office. But she has rarely mentioned Slovenia in her public appearances, and hasn't visited the small central European country since Trump's inauguration.

Original post:

Statue mocking Donald Trump torched in Slovenia - NBC News

For Trump, the Burden May Be Proving This Is Not the Moment His Critics Predicted – The New York Times

michael barbaro

From The New York Times, Im Michael Barbaro. This is The Daily.

Today: In the streets of Tehran, Iranians are mourning the loss of General Qassim Suleimani. My colleague Farnaz Fassihi on what they feel theyve lost.

Its Tuesday, January 7.

[CHANTING]

Monday morning was the start of the official state funeral for General Qassim Suleimani.

[SINGING]

By 8:00 a.m., there were millions of people out in downtown Tehran. He was being celebrated as a national hero, but also as a religious martyr and a saint.

[SINGING AND DRUMMING]

There were families. There were men, women, children. They had the symbolic Shia ritual symbols out feathers, swords, drums, music, eulogies, songs.

[CHANTING]

And the crowd also had a very anti-American and defiant mood. People were sad, but they were also very angry, and we heard a lot of revenge, revenge, and no more negotiations with the U.S., its time for battle, chanted by the crowd.

[SPEAKING]

Irans supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, recited the Muslim prayer of the dead on General Suleimanis coffin.

[SPEAKING]

In the middle of the prayer, several times he paused and openly cried.

[SPEAKING] [CROWD MOANING]

And the crowd also wept very loudly with him. As a reporter whos covered Iran for over 25 years, what struck me was that the people who had attended were not just supporters of the regime, but a lot of people who were generally very critical of the regime.

Hmm.

To be clear, there are plenty of Iranians who did not love or respect General Suleimani. But there were activists, there were opposition figures who had been jailed by the regime who attended. And when I asked them, why are you there? Why are you going? The response was, General Suleimani protected our national security. He transcended politics. He was a national hero. And I was talking to some young people who had attended his funeral, and I spoke to a 22-year-old young man, a university student, and I asked him, why are you at the funeral? And he said, knowing General Suleimani was out there made me feel safer. He was like a security umbrella above our country. And thats a sentiment that I heard over and over.

You know, what youre describing feels like the kind of unified national outpouring that is reserved for a small handful of figures in any country, right? I mean, a beloved president, a civil rights leader like Martin Luther King in the United States, not for what our colleagues have described as a general who specializes in covert operations in Iran.

I think its difficult for most people in the United States and outside of Iran, and perhaps the region, to grasp the unique place and role that General Suleimani played in Iran and in regional politics. He was singlehandedly the most revered and influential character in Iran.

So how did Suleimani cultivate that role? How did he make Iranians feel that way? Where does that story start?

In many ways, General Suleimanis story begins with the story of Irans revolution in 1979.

He was a young man working construction jobs in the small city of Kerman in the southwest, from a low-income family.

Mm-hmm.

His education was high school diploma level, and he got swept up in the revolution, in the promise of Islam becoming the foundation of a government, and of promises to empower the oppressed and low-income class in Iran, which had been neglected and sidelined under the pro-Western monarchy of the shah. So General Suleimani gets a job at the local water plant and volunteers for the local chapter of the Revolutionary Guards, and quickly rises up and shows a lot of promise as a military man. When the war with Iraq happened in the 1980s, he was a commander for eight years. And after the war ended, he was named the commander of the Quds Forces. And that was really the beginning of the Quds Forces, and the Islamic Republics ambition to create a paramilitary in the region, and to kind of export the idea of an Islamic revolution of Shia dominance outside of the borders of Iran.

And why does Iran, and someone like Suleimani, want to export this revolution?

The Islamic Republic theocracy was the first time that a Shia government had come to power in the Middle East. The Islamic faith is divided along Sunnis and Shias, and the division and rivalry go back all the way to the early days of Islam and the succession of Prophet Muhammad. And Shias have always been a minority in the faith. With Saudi Arabia sort of as the custodian of the Sunni faith, Iran has, for centuries, wanted to establish itself as the protector of the minority Shias. And the theocracy of the Islamic Republic gave them the foundation and the structure to do that. And as soon as they had established their government in power in the country, they started looking externally. And General Suleimani was pivotal in expanding the ambitions of Irans military and political apparatus in the Middle East.

And how exactly does he do that?

So General Suleimani was instrumental in elevating Irans strategy in the region through the proxy militia groups that it had created. And he started in Lebanon, where Iran had already created two Shia militia groups, Amal al-Islami and Hezbollah, and he helped them in their fight with Israeli soldiers that were occupying Lebanon, and later on in the battles that Hezbollah and Lebanon fought. General Suleimani also becomes very involved with Palestinian militant groups Hamas, Islamic Jihad who also see an alliance between their ideologies and Islamic Republic of Iran.

And when you say that Suleimani becomes involved in these groups, what does that actually mean? What is he doing?

He helps them come up with battlefield plans, and he dispatches his underlings to go and train and fund and form these groups, providing them with weapons, providing them with money, and providing them with strategy. And he gains this reputation of being the shadow commander, the man whos everywhere but nowhere. If General Suleimani is present on the ground, then Iran is present.

So under Suleimani, Iran is making itself felt across the Middle East through these relationships to these militias. Does that strategy succeed?

Irans strategy succeeds, but its limited to the shores of the Mediterranean with Lebanon and the Palestinian territories. But that changes in 2003 with the United States invasion of Iraq.

Well be right back.

U.S. warships and planes launched the opening salvo of Operation Iraqi Freedom. The attack came in waves

So Farnaz, how exactly did the U.S. invasion of Iraq provide an opportunity for Suleimani and for this strategy that hes pursuing for Iran?

Until the U.S. invasion of Iraq, the country was ruled by Saddam Hussein and Sunnis, and Shias who were aligned to Iran were marginalized. When the United States toppled Saddam Hussein, Shias rose to power, and many of these Shia leaders and political and religious figures had very close ties to Iran. And Iran really seized that opportunity. It used these contacts and networks and relationships to gain influence and penetrate Iraqi society. And General Suleimani once again becomes the pivotal character in helping realize this strategy and this aspiration.

So an unintended consequence of America invading Iraq is that it ends up empowering Iran.

When I was living and working in Iraq in those early days after the invasion, most of the Sunni Iraqis that we would meet and interview would say that the U.S. invasion delivered Iraq on a golden platter to Iran.

Wow. So what does Suleimani do with this opening that he sees in Iraq?

General Suleimani uses the opening to further expand Irans influence in Iraq and in the region. He helps create Shia militia. He recruits allies, a network of politicians, religious men and militant groups who were loyal to Irans ambitions in Iraq. The Shia militia that he helped create were also responsible for attacks on U.S. soldiers, for the killing of U.S. soldiers, and for civilian deaths.

When the Civil War started in Syria in 2011, Iran vowed to keep President Bashar al-Assad in power. Mr. Assad and his constituents are an offshoot of Shia Islam, and religiously and politically aligned with Iran. This is where Iraq comes in. Because of the relationships and networks and influence that General Suleimani had in Iraq, he was able to use Iraq by land and by air to funnel support for Syrias war. Weapons, missiles, even soldiers that were trained in Iran were shipped to Syria by way of Iraq.

So Suleimanis strategy in Iraq it doesnt just fend off the Americans who have invaded there. It means that Iran and Suleimani could use Iraq to assist allies like Assad in Syria and in all these other battles throughout the region.

Exactly. Iraq becomes a geographic extension of Iran and its interests in the region. And by the time ISIS takes over parts of Syria in Idlib and parts of Iraq in Mosul, the Iraqi government and even the Americans were at wits end on what to do to battle this growing threat of ISIS.

So what does the rise of ISIS mean for Iran, and what does that mean for Iranian influence and for Suleimanis role?

The rise of ISIS was a threat to Iran. It was an existential threat to the Shia government of Iran, because ISIS represented the most extreme version of Sunni faith. And again, General Suleimani mobilizes. He goes to Iraq and he repeats a true and proven formula once again by recruiting volunteers, the instrumental ground force in helping the United States and Iraqs army to battle ISIS. Therefore, Mr. Suleimani, although hes seen as a foe of the United States, in the battle of ISIS actually becomes a default ally. For General Suleimani, the rise of ISIS was a turning point. He went from being a commander in the shadows, a mystery figure, to being a household name.

Hmm. And why is he suddenly a public figure because of ISIS?

Because Iran wanted to counter ISISs propaganda machinery.

ISIS is using its cash and media-savvy Western militants to recruit and radicalize.

The branded content. Theyre mixing graphics, moving images, music, chants, all the

cataloging and posting in near real time their war crimes.

They utilize social media and Twitter and Facebook to recruit, to spread their propaganda to target their messaging.

And this is a mujatweet, a short, promotional video which shows a softer side of jihad. Here, a Belgian hands out ice cream to excited Syrian children.

And they create a personality around their leader, Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi, the same way that Al Qaeda had created a personality around Bin Laden. So in response to ISISs very successful propaganda campaign, Iran decides to turn General Suleimani into the public face of the so-called resistance, and somebody that Shias could love and emulate and respect.

Enter Qassim Suleimani.

Here he is, celebrating gun in hand.

His pictures began appearing in public in battlegrounds, videos of him visiting soldiers unannounced.

Hes been up and down the country in the North, in the South, in the capital, checking up on the defenses, mobilizing the Shia militias, making sure that the Iraqi states are able to confront the threat from ISIS.

Videos of him reciting poetry, saying that he wants to become a martyr, the highest honor in Islam, and join his friends.

General Suleimani is increasingly being elevated and recognized as a key player on the world stage as Iranian influence in the region grows.

So by 2014, Mr. Suleimani is so well-known that his pictures are being printed on T-shirts, and his posters are sold in shops in Damascus and Beirut and Tehran.

Wow.

And that summer, his mother passed away, and the funeral of his mother in Tehran became the whos who event of every militant group in the Middle East. From the head of Hamas, to Islamic Jihad, to senior members of Hezbollah, all showed up to pay respects to the general that they saw as the patron of their cause and movement.

Hmm. So this is vivid evidence that he is very much the source of power in the Middle East that all these groups owe him. Theyre literally showing up at his door.

It was like watching a king hold court. And that was really the first public glimpse that we got of his status regionally, and what he means to these groups.

So at this point in 2014, how is Suleimani viewed by the U.S.? Im struck that all of these figures and groups that youre describing as turning out to pay respects to Suleimanis mother at this funeral, they are all pretty much mortal foes of the U.S.

So the U.S. was watching him, but not really taking action. And that was really in line with the previous administrations policies of engagement with Iran, and not escalating confrontation. That changed with the election of Donald Trump as president.

Right, and the withdrawal from the Iran nuclear deal that President Trump ordered.

Yes. Since the withdrawal of the Iran nuclear deal by the U.S., Iran and the U.S. have been on a collision path, increasingly taking provocative actions and policies toward one another.

The past 48 hours saw a dangerous escalation in the feud between Washington and Tehran.

Culminating these past few weeks of violence in Iraq

An American contractor was killed on an Iraqi base.

The Department of Defense took offensive actions by launching F-15 Strike Eagles against five targets.

Protesters stormed the American Embassy, and the U.S. says Iran is responsible.

that ultimately led to the decision by President Trump to assassinate General Suleimani.

Right. Because in the minds of U.S. officials, Suleimani is very much responsible for those actions.

Exactly.

And Farnaz, how much do you think that the very public role that Suleimani occupied, and that Iran created for him and wanted for him how much do you think that that played a role in the Trump administrations decision to take him out, the understanding of what it was he represented to Iran?

I think the Trump administration may have not known what he represented to Iran.

Hmm.

I think that they miscalculated the level of admiration, perhaps, or nationalistic sentiment that weve seen pouring out of Iran. I think the White House probably thought that it was taking out a military commander, that it may not be very popular with ordinary Iranians, that theres been a lot of discontent in November against the government, and maybe Iranians would support this decision. For sure, we have voices in Iran, outside and inside Iran, among Iranians, who think that taking Mr. Suleimani out is justified, and they didnt like him, but what weve seen is that the U.S. has effectively turned General Suleimani into a martyr.

So this response that we saw at the funeral on Monday are you saying that the United States may not have expected this? Because it sounds like the U.S. understood one aspect of Suleimanis role in Iran, as the leader of this military strategy, but perhaps they didnt understand something thats equally as important, which is what he meant in the hearts of Iranians.

I think thats absolutely right. And I think, you know, we have to remember Iran has been an island of stability in a region ablaze with terrorism and car bombs and beheadings and kidnappings and women being sold by ISIS. And Iranians have, like, watched the whole region unravel around them refugees and displacement for the past 20 years. And by and large, they credit General Suleimani for that. They say that they trusted him and respected him for protecting Iran, for keeping Iran safe. And I think the outpouring of emotion we see is related to that sentiment.

Help me understand this idea, because the strategy that you have described over the past decade of violence and provocation that Suleimani oversaw and he came to personify, it doesnt feel protective. Why did it feel that way to Iranians in a way that the U.S. might not have understood?

You know, Michael, thats a really good question, and its one that Ive struggled to understand myself. This is a man who was responsible for a lot of violence and a lot of mayhem in the region, and a lot of activity that most Iranians may not agree with, that do not like. But because they felt that it gave them a buffer between their day-to-day lives inside Iran and the instability and violence happening all around the Middle East, they came to respect him and view him as a protector.

What does Suleimanis meaning to people in Iran what does that mean for the response we should expect from the government there?

The public momentum is building, and pressure is building, on Irans leadership to take action. At the funeral this morning, millions of people were out.

[CHANTING]

They were carrying the red flag of Shia Islam, which is a call to battle. They were chanting, No to negotiations, no to a deal, only war with the United States.

[CHANTING]

And the combination of the publics defiant mood and calls for revenge, and the rhetoric were seeing from Iranian officials, increases the possibility that in the next few days or next few weeks, Iran will respond and retaliate. How it will do it, what it will do, we dont know.

Farnaz, thank you very much.

Thank you so much for having me, Michael.

The Times reports that Irans supreme leader has told advisors that the retaliation against the United States for General Suleimanis death should be carried out openly by Irans military, not through proxies or militias. Such a direct reprisal would be a major departure from Iranian tradition, and highlights the desire by the supreme leader to honor Suleimanis status and satisfy the mourners who have flooded the streets of Tehran.

Well be right back.

Heres what else you need to know today. In a surprise statement on Monday, former National Security Adviser John Bolton, said he is willing to testify at President Trumps impeachment trial if he is subpoenaed by the Senate. The announcement puts new pressure on Senate Republicans to call witnesses at the trial, something they have so far resisted doing. Bolton was blocked by the White House from testifying before House impeachment investigators, but is considered a vital witness in the case, because he has direct knowledge of Trumps actions and conversations regarding Ukraine. And in Los Angeles on Monday, prosecutors charged Harvey Weinstein with sex crimes just hours after prosecutors in New York began a trial against Weinstein on similar charges. The allegations in Los Angeles are from two women who allege that Weinstein sexually assaulted them in hotel rooms in 2013. The latest charges mean that even if Weinstein is acquitted in New York, he will face a second trial in California.

Thats it for The Daily. Im Michael Barbaro. See you tomorrow.

Read this article:

For Trump, the Burden May Be Proving This Is Not the Moment His Critics Predicted - The New York Times

Photo of Donald Trump Jr. holding a rifle raises flags with hate group researchers – CNN

Donald Trump Jr. posted the photo Sunday on Instagram with a nod in the caption to the controversial design, which included a Crusader Cross -- also known as a Jerusalem Cross -- and helmet on the lower receiver, as well as a magazine featuring the image of the former secretary of state and Democratic presidential nominee.

"Nice day at the range. @rarebreedfirearms and @spikes_tactical adding a little extra awesome to my AR and that mag," Trump Jr. wrote, tagging the companies that design and sell the gun.

While symbols and references to the Crusades still hold religious and historical significance -- the Crusader Cross is included on the flag of the country Georgia -- far right groups have seized upon them, using them to represent an anti-Muslim ideology, according to the Anti-Defamation League and the Southern Poverty Law Center, two organizations that study hate groups.

A spokesman for Trump denied on Monday that the symbol on the gun, named by its manufacturer the Crusader Rifle, carried a white supremacist meaning and cited its presence on the Georgian flag and on a medal bestowed by the Pope.

"Symbols on firearms depicting various historical warriors are extremely common within the 2nd Amendment community. Don's Instagram post was strictly about him using a famous meme to mock Hillary Clinton, as he and many others have done on numerous occasions and will surely do again in the future, so long as it continues triggering humorless liberals," Trump spokesman Andy Surabian told CNN.

An avid hunter, Trump has posted other images of himself with weapons on his social media feeds. His affinity for controversial memes has helped bolster his own popularity among a Republican Party reshaped by his father.

History of the symbols

Symbols and references to the Crusades -- the Middle Ages campaign by Christian armies to reclaim the Muslim-controlled Holy Land -- have circulated for years inside the far right movement, making appearances in a manifesto written by a far-right gunman who killed dozens in Norway in 2011.

"The adoption of these symbols is meant largely as a way of signaling anti-Muslim sentiment in particular, but also this notion that Christianity needs to retake western civilization," said Howard Graves, a senior research analyst at the SPLC.

The gun companies that make and sell the Crusader rifle say it was inspired by history.

Rare Breed Firearms -- the manufacturer of the gun -- did not respond to a request for comment, but says on their website that the design was "inspired by some of the most fierce warriors who fought in nearly 200 years of epic conflicts known as the Crusades."

"This lower honors the warrior mindset. Technology evolves, warriors never change," the company wrote.

In an email, the CEO of Spike's Tactical -- the Florida company that sells the Crusader gun -- said that the gun and another AR with a Spartan helmet on it that they sell were "referencing famed historical soldiers" and are of a design that are "common among gun manufacturers, popular with gun owners throughout the country and have nothing to do with political ideology."

"It's objectively silly and dishonest for leftwing groups, like the SPLC, to claim that this symbol on our Crusader model has anything to do with hate or an extremist ideology. In other words, these people have no idea what they're talking about and should apologize for their outrageous smears," Cole Leleux, the CEO, said.

Spike's Tactical drew criticism in 2015 when they sold another AR model that a company spokesman told news outlets at the time was built to ensure it "would never be able to be used by Muslim terrorists to kill innocent people or advance their radical agenda."

That gun, also called the Crusader, featured an etching of a Bible verse as well as the Latin phrase "Deus Vult," another medieval term meaning "God wills it" that has recently become a rallying cry for white supremacists, according to hate group researchers.

Dan Zimmerman, the managing editor of The Truth About Guns, a website about firearms with a pro-gun leaning, told CNN that adorning guns with symbols is not common, but called it a "niche design that some people find attractive."

"There are all kinds of designs for AR lowers, from skulls to Sparta helmets," Zimmerman said.

A spokesman for the ADL, Jake Hyman, said the Sparta helmet symbol has also been co-opted by some right-wing extremists, and symbols like the Crusader Cross have recently been used to deface mosques in the US, according to Graves. The man accused of killing scores of Muslims at prayer in Christchurch, New Zealand, last year inscribed his weapons with references to the Crusades.

When white supremacists appeared in the Charlottesville march with shields bearing a red cross and the words "Deus Vult,"a coalition of Medieval scholars groups denounced what they called an "appropriation" of medieval symbols in a "fantasy of a pure, white Europe that bears no relationship to reality."

"As scholars of the medieval world we are disturbed by the use of a nostalgic but inaccurate myth of the Middle Ages by racist movements in the United States," the groups wrote.

White supremacist voices have gained prominence in recent years, with analysts like the ADL and SPLC pointing to the President's refusal to condemn racial violence by alt-right protesters at a 2017 rally in Charlottesville, Virginia, as emboldening the movement.

After wide blowback to his remarks on Charlottesville, Trump later called neo-Nazis, white supremacists and other hate groups "repugnant to everything we hold dear as Americans" and a month later, he signed a resolution condemning white supremacy.

View original post here:

Photo of Donald Trump Jr. holding a rifle raises flags with hate group researchers - CNN

House approves measure to restrain Trump’s actions on Iran – The Associated Press

WASHINGTON (AP) Reigniting a debate over who has the power to declare war, the Democratic-controlled House on Thursday approved a resolution asserting that President Donald Trump must seek approval from Congress before engaging in further military action against Iran.

The war powers resolution is not binding on the president and would not require his signature. But House Speaker Nancy Pelosi nonetheless insisted it has real teeth because it is a statement of the Congress of the United States.

The measure will protect American lives and values by limiting Trumps military actions, Pelosi said. The administration must de-escalate and must prevent further violence.

The White House called the resolution ridiculous and completely misguided.

And Trump, at a campaign rally in Toledo, Ohio, claimed he had no obligation to give lawmakers advance warning, saying Democrats like Pelosi want us to tell them so they can leak it to their friends in the corrupt media.

The House passed the measure, 224-194, with just three Republicans voting in support. Eight Democrats opposed the measure.

A similar proposal by Sen. Tim Kaine, D-Va., faces an uphill fight in the GOP-run Senate. Kaines efforts received a boost Thursday as Republican Sen. Todd Young of Indiana, an ex-Marine, said he might support the war powers measure. Two other Republican senators said Wednesday they would back Kaines plan.

We are members of a separate and distinct branch of government. It is our duty not to take anyones word for things as we are dealing with matters of life and death, Young said, adding that he wished Trump administration officials had provided more intelligence information during a briefing Wednesday on a U.S. drone strike that killed a top Iranian general.

Pelosi, in announcing the House vote, called the killing of Gen. Qassem Soleimani provocative and disproportionate.

Louisiana Rep. Steve Scalise, the No. 2 House Republican, denounced the Democratic measure as little more than a press release designed to attack President Trump, while House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy of California called it a meaningless vote on a measure that will never be sent to the president or limit his constitutional authority to defend the American people.

White House spokesman Hogan Gidley said, This House resolution tries to undermine the ability of the U.S. Armed Forces to prevent terrorist activity by Iran and its proxies, and attempts to hinder the Presidents authority to protect America and our interests in the region from the continued threats.

The House vote came a day after the Trump administration briefed lawmakers on its actions in Iran. Democrats and several Republicans called the briefings inadequate, adding that officials did not provide enough details about why the attack was justified.

Vice President Mike Pence said Thursday that Soleimani was traveling the region making plans to bring an attack against American personnel and American forces. He said it was not possible to share full details of the intelligence with lawmakers.

When it comes to intelligence we have to protect sources and methods, theres only certain amount we can share with every member of Congress, Pence said on ABCs Good Morning America. But those of us who have seen all the evidence know that there was a compelling case of imminent threat against American personnel.

Trump said Thursday that he had calls from numerous senators and numerous congressmen and women saying it was the greatest presentation theyve ever had.

Referring to criticism by GOP Sens. Mike Lee and Rand Paul, Trump said: They want information that honestly I think is very hard to get. ... It really had to do with sources and information that we had that really should remain at a very high level.

Lee, a conservative from Utah, said the briefing by Secretary of State Mike Pompeo and other officials was probably the worst briefing Ive seen, at least on a military issue, in the nine years hes served in the Senate.

Paul, of Kentucky, said administration officials justified killing Soleimani based on the 2002 authorization of force in Iraq. That is absurd. Thats an insult, he said.

Pelosi scheduled the House vote after Iran retaliated for the Soleimani killing by launching missiles at two military bases in Iraq that house American troops. No casualties were reported.

Congress hereby directs the President to terminate the use of United States Armed Forces to engage in hostilities in or against Iran or any part of its government or military unless Congress declares war on that country or enacts legislation authorizing use of force to prevent an attack on the U.S. and its forces, the five-page resolution states.

The resolutions sponsor, freshman Rep. Elissa Slotkin, D-Mich., said it is intended to make clear that if the president wants to take us to war, he must get authorization from Congress.

If loved ones are going to be sent to fight in a protracted war, the president owes the American people a public conversation about why, and for what ends, said Slotkin, a former CIA analyst and Pentagon official who served in Iraq.

Members of Congress have a constitutional responsibility to uphold in authorizing use of military force, Slotkin said, adding, We are owed concrete, specific details on strategy.

Trump did not consult with congressional leaders ahead of the attack that killed the Iranian general and afterward sent Congress a notification explaining the rationale, but kept it classified.

Congress has allowed its war powers role to erode since the passage of Authorization for Use of Military Force in 2001 to fight terrorism after the 9/11 attacks, and passage of another AUMF for the invasion of Iraq in 2002.

Fallout from those votes deeply divided Congress and the nation, with many lawmakers, particularly Democrats, now saying they were mistakes. Yet Congress has been paralyzed on the question of whether to repeal or change those authorities.

The strikes by Iran had pushed Tehran and Washington perilously close to all-out conflict and put the worlds attention on Trump as he weighed whether to respond with more military force.

Republicans have largely supported Trumps actions, saying the president was well within his power to take out Irans architect of proxy operations against Americans in the Middle East. The U.S. considered Soleimani a terrorist.

Democrats were unconvinced that the threat posed by Soleimani was imminent or that other alternatives to the killing were pursued in good faith. By not disclosing many details of the threat, Trump was asking the American public to trust the very intelligence reports he has often disparaged, Democrats said.

Young told reporters Thursday that lawmakers need to ensure that Congress is involved in future decision-making so we end up exactly where the president wants to end up, which is the avoidance of a major ground war in the Middle East.

He called Kaines resolution a mechanism to force us to debate this.

Three Republicans supported the measure: Reps. Matt Gaetz and Francis Rooney of Florida and Thomas Massie of Kentucky.

The eight Democrats who opposed it were Reps. Anthony Brindisi and Max Rose of New York, Joe Cunningham of South Carolina, Josh Gottheimer of New Jersey, Kendra Horn of Oklahoma, Ben McAdams of Utah and Stephanie Murphy of Florida.

Gaetz, one of Trumps strongest supporters, said killing Soleimani was the right decision, but engaging in another forever war in the Middle East would be the wrong decision.

Rose, an Army veteran who served in Afghanistan, said the resolution simply restates existing law and sends the message that war is imminent. I refuse to play politics with questions of war and peace and therefore will not support this resolution.

___

Associated Press writers Alan Fram, Kevin Freking and Deb Riechmann contributed to this story.

Link:

House approves measure to restrain Trump's actions on Iran - The Associated Press

Chris Cuomo Rips Every Lawmaker Who Voted Against Limiting Donald Trump’s War Powers – HuffPost

CNN anchor Chris Cuomo delivered a stinging rebuke to both Democratic and Republican House lawmakers who on Thursday voted against limiting President Donald Trumps war-making powers against Iran.

The House voted 224 to 194 to limit the presidents ability to launch an attack against Iran without getting approval first, Cuomo explained. This is not a new idea thats what is in the Constitution. My argument, I cant believe it wasnt unanimous.

Only three Republicans in the Democratic-controlled House supported the resolution. EightDemocratsvoted against. Cuomo said it wasnt about the GOP just choosing Trump over the truth.

Theres some of that, but Democrats have been anxious to give war power to presidents as well, he noted. This has been going on for a long time and its gotten worse and it is the worse example of congressional cowardice.

Now, though, were hearing really obnoxious comments that is making this partisan, he added, citing Rep. Doug Collins (R-Ga.) claim that Democrats are in love with terrorists for not backing Trumps military escalation with Iran.

Cuomo ripped Collins for trying to divide Americans at a time that it is life and death that we come together.

Shame on you and every Trumper and never-Trumper who voted against this, he added.

Calling all HuffPost superfans!

Sign up for membership to become a founding member and help shape HuffPost's next chapter

Read more here:

Chris Cuomo Rips Every Lawmaker Who Voted Against Limiting Donald Trump's War Powers - HuffPost

Donald Trump kicks off 2020 Flyover state campaign with Ohio rally today: The Flyover – cleveland.com

Republican President Donald Trump makes his 2020 Flyover state debut in Ohio. Wisconsin takes steps toward cleaner drinking water. And the fossil fuel industry is pushing back on the fracking attack in Flyover states.

Welcome to the show: Everybody has a comfort food in life and for Republican President Donald Trump, that happens to be campaigning in the state of Ohio, cleveland.coms Sabrina Eaton writes. Trump returns to the Buckeye State on Thursday with a rally in Toledo, his 15th visit to the state since his inauguration in January 2017. If Toledo seems like an odd choice, it shouldnt. As The Blades Liz Skalka writes, the city is right next to one of the premier bellwether counties in the state.

Catch me if you can: Ill be in Toledo covering Trumps visit, so check back with cleveland.com or Fridays edition of The Flyover. You can follow me on Twitter at @SethARichardson.

Turn on the water works: A bipartisan group of Wisconsin state lawmakers unveiled a $10 million plan to tackle water contamination in the state, the Milwaukee Journal Sentinels Molly Beck reports. The chief focus of the plan is reducing fertilizer runoff and mitigating PFAS contamination. The plan comes after Wisconsin Gov. Tony Evers, a Democrat, declared 2019 the year of clean drinking water, though failed to enact many of his proposals in the Republican-controlled legislature. It also comes the same day legislative Republicans passed a bill through committee restricting the use of PFAS-containing firefighting foam, but declined to regulate the forever chemicals, per the Wisconsin State Journals Chris Hubbuch.

Lifes a gas: The fossil fuel industry is feeling the crunch as more Americans grow concerned about climate change, but plans on pushing back as hard as possible, the Pittsburgh Post-Gazettes Daniel Moore reports. That includes in Pennsylvania, arguably the epicenter of fracking, where Pittsburgh Mayor Bill Peduto said he would oppose any new petrochemical facilities. American Petroleum Institute President and CEO Mike Sommers said fracking was one of the most important environmental achievements in this country because it lessened reliance on coal.

Dealers choice: Dont count former New York Mayor Mike Bloomberg, a Democrat running for president, among the fans of the USMCA trade deal. During stops in Chicago and Akron, Ohio, Bloomberg said the deal brokered between Democrats and Trump was basically just NAFTA, cleveland.coms Robin Goist reports. However, Bloomberg did appear to be a fan of NAFTA at least to some degree saying the much-maligned trade pact was something designed to help America, and by walking away from it, you help China.

Bonus question: Indiana teachers received a blow to their hopes of getting a pay bump, per the Northwest Indiana Times Dan Carden. Statehouse Republicans quashed a plan to give teachers a one-time bonus from state surplus funds. Its probably a safe bet that some of those 15,000 teachers who demonstrated on the steps of the statehouse will probably be returning soon.

Passing me by: A Wisconsin appeals court declined to rule on a lawsuit seeking to boot more than 200,000 people from the voter rolls before the 2020 election, the Milwaukee Journal Sentinels Patrick Marley reports. A county judge ruled on the conservative-backed lawsuit in December, ordering the state to start the purge. The appeals court declined to take the case since the Wisconsin Supreme Court is deciding itself whether to rule on the matter.

Survey says: Baldwin Wallace University in Berea, Ohio recognized the importance of Midwestern states in the 2020 election and announced the launch of the Great Lakes Poll, which will track opinions in four Flyover states, cleveland.coms Rich Exner reports. The universitys Community Research Institute will administer public opinion polls in Wisconsin, Michigan, Ohio and Pennsylvania periodically throughout 2020, with the first results expected before the Feb. 3 Iowa caucus.

A league of their own: This shouldnt come as a surprise to anyone, but professional sports leagues made sure to wet their beak with Michigans new sports betting law, the Detroit News Craig Mauger reports. Bookies must pay for official statistics that come from the professional leagues, which the leagues will undoubtedly make a killing from.

Former New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg was in Chicago and Akron, Ohio, on Wednesday, per the Chicago Tribune and cleveland.com.

Former Gov. Bill Weld of Massachusetts was in Nevada and Newton, Iowa, on Wednesday, per the Des Moines Register.

President Donald Trump will be in Toledo, Ohio, on Thursday, per cleveland.com. Vice President Mike Pence will join him.

Author Marianne Williamson will be in Des Moines on Thursday, per the campaign.

Sen. Cory Booker of New Jersey will be in North Liberty and Mount Vernon, Iowa, on Thursday, per the campaign. Booker got a family heirloom earlier this week from his cousin in Des Moines.

Weld will be in Sioux City, Denison and Des Moines, Iowa, on Thursday, per the Des Moines Registers candidate tracker.

Sen. Bernie Sanders of Vermont will be in Nevada and Perry, Iowa, on Friday, per the campaign.

Former Rep. John Delaney of Maryland will be in Boone and Des Moines, Iowa, on Friday, per the campaign.

Democratic presidential hopefuls will be on stage in Des Moines on Jan. 15 for the final debate before the Iowa caucus, per the Des Moines Register. CNNs Wolf Blitzer and Abby Phillip and the Des Moines Registers Brianne Pfannenstiel will moderate.

Trump will be in Milwaukee on Jan. 15 to hold a competing rally, per the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel.

Trump is expected to hold a re-election event in Iowa before the Feb. 3 caucus, per The Wall Street Journal.

Sen. Bernie Sanders of Vermont is scaring former Chicago Mayor Rahm Emanuel, per the Associated Press.

You can dump your legal dope at OHare and Midway airports now, per the Chicago Tribune.

Michigan courthouses will soon enter the 20th Century (yes, the 20th Century), per MLive.

Were having to resort to pretty drastic measures.

-Polk County, Iowa Democratic Party chairman Sean Bagniewski describing to the Des Moines Register the prep his party is doing for the upcoming Iowa caucus. Party officials are expecting record turnout driven by the high number of candidates.

Enjoying The Flyover? Be sure and subscribe here.

Email Seth at SRichardson@cleveland.com. Follow him on Twitter at @SethARichardson.

Original post:

Donald Trump kicks off 2020 Flyover state campaign with Ohio rally today: The Flyover - cleveland.com

Laura Ingraham Mocks Everybody But The Trumps For Profiting From Nepotism – HuffPost

Laura Ingraham blasted liberals with family connections on Fox News Thursday night for benefiting from nepotismand then defended President Donald Trumps children two of whom now run their fathers multibillion-dollar business and another who works in the White House.

The Ingraham Angle segment kicked off by blasting the British royals,Meghan Markle and Prince Harry,for stepping down from their full-time duties. The two announced earlier this week that they would work towards becoming financially independent even though they would retain their Frogmore Cottage residence, which was refurbished on the taxpayer dime for more than $3 million last year.

But dont worry. Harry and Meghan are starting a charitable foundation to help you little people, Ingraham said.

Ingraham then began to slam royal wannabes in the U.S., in particularly mocking the Clinton family for exploiting their former positions for piles of cash. She disparaged former President Bill Clinton for significantly growing his wealth after his presidency, and criticized the Clinton Foundation charity for its fundraising efforts, calling it a scam. This was followed by an onslaught on his daughter, Chelsea Clinton, for her prominent role in the foundation, saying she was best known for her last name.

Next came a usual Fox News target, Hunter Biden, who Ingraham claimed was profiting from his father Joe Bidens former role as vice president.

Middle-class Joe went from having possibly negative net worth to earning more than 15 million bucks since leaving office. And his son seems to have learned the secret of success: Nepotism, Ingraham said.

Ingraham also blasted the Biden-loving media for making claims, not unlike the ones shed just made, about the Trump children.

The Trump kids didnt get rich off being in public office, she said. They actually had made their money before the president was elected. It came from running something called a business.

Ivanka Trump and her husband Jared Kushner, who were appointed White House roles despite having no prior government experience,made $82 million in outside income while serving in the White House last year, the Washington Post reported.

Eric and Don Jr. were given complete control of the Trump Organization when their father took office. They have since sold off more than $100 million in real estate, including a $3.2 million sale of land in the Dominican Republic last year which Forbes called the clearest violation of their fathers pledge not to do new foreign deals while in office.

Taxpayers also paid hundreds of thousands of dollars for Eric and Trump Jr.s Secret Service protection as they traveled abroad for Trump Organization business trips.

The Ingraham Angle on nepotism begins 30 minutes into the broadcast below:

Calling all HuffPost superfans!

Sign up for membership to become a founding member and help shape HuffPost's next chapter

Read more here:

Laura Ingraham Mocks Everybody But The Trumps For Profiting From Nepotism - HuffPost

Trump-Tehran’s tussle decoded: How a share over oil spoils almost led to full-blown war – Economic Times

Much before a 230 mph laser-guided Hellfire missile almost pushed the US and Iran to a full-blown war, it is worth recalling a time when the two countries shared a rather different relationship. The genesis of the turmoil that lead to the recent killing of Iran's top military general Qassem Soleimani goes back to 1908 when the British founded the Anglo-Persian Oil Company to tap into Persia's oil reserves.

The Union Jack was then building an empire and US did not command the kind of presence it has now. The oil firm minted money from the oil it dug and shared a portion, reportedly a mere 16%, with Persia. The math was tilted in favour the Union Jack. Iran tried to negotiate a fair price but the British refused to budge.

A tide of nationalism in 1951 saw the emergence of Mohammed Mossadegh as Iran prime minister. Mossadegh pushed to seize what he believed was fair for Iran. A coup in 1953 done by the British and US intelligence agencies -- MI6 & CIA -- against Mossadegh created an animosity that has lasted for over 65 years now.

Here is the brief story a tussle that started from a partnership:1941: British InvasionBritain invade Iran and Mohammad Reza Pahlevi is installed as Irans political leader. Following the war and long negotiations, the Anglo-Iranian oil company is set up. The firm monopolized the oil production in the country amid protests from nationalists.

1951: Rise of Mohammed MossadeghMohammed Mossadegh gained popularity with nation-wide campaign against APAC. After he took charge as prime minister, Mossadegh cancelled Britains right to extract oil and ordered the seizure of its assets. The British Navy blocked Irans ports, stalling oil export and import of food. 1953: The dirty coupFearing loss of control over its oil companies, British MI6 and the CIA orchestrate a coup to oust Mossadegh. The move upsets Iranian public bolstering its anger against Mohammad Reza Pahlavi, the last king of Iran. Pahlavi was seen as an American puppet.

1963: White revolutionDespite the resentment, Pehlawi was a favourite with the Americans. Pehlawi drafts the White Revolution under which much of the land belonging to feudal landowners and the crown was distributed to landless villagers. The move upset the landowning class and the clergy.

The protests introduce Islamic religious leader Ayatollah Khomeini to the world.

1979: Civil War and rise of Ayatollah KhomeiniThe protests snowball into a full-blown civil war. Two weeks later, Khomeini returns from exile. Following a referendum, Iran becomes an Islamic Republic.1979-81: 52 Americans held hostageThe US embassy in Tehran is taken over by a group protesters in November 1979. 52 American hostages are held inside for 444 days. The hostages are freed in a dramatic manner in January, 1981, the day US President Ronald Reagan takes charge. Six Americans who had escaped the embassy attack are smuggled out of Iran by a team posing as film-makers. The Oscar-winning movie Argo is based on this rescue.

1980: Iraq's attack on IranSaddam Hussain's Iraq attacks Iran with American and British support.

1988: America shoots down Iranian passenger planeAmerican warship USS Vincennes shoots down an Iran Air flight, killing all 290 people on board. US says the Airbus A300 was mistaken for a fighter jet.

2002: Axis of EvilIn his State of the Union address, President George Bush denounces Iran as part of an "axis of evil" with Iraq and North Korea. The speech causes an outrage in Iran.

2013: First phone call from US PresidentIn 2013, a month after Iran's new moderate president Hassan Rouhani takes charge, US President Barack Obama calls him, the first such top-level conversation in more than 30 years.

2015: Iran Nuclear DealIran agrees to a long-term nuclear deal with a group of countries known as the P5+1 - the US, UK, France, China, Russia and Germany.

2018: Trump dumps the Iran nuclear dealUS President Donald Trump scraps the deal before reinstating economic sanctions against Iran and threatening to do the same to countries and firms that continue buying its oil. Iran's economy falls into a deep recession.

2019: Explosions at six oil tankers in the Gulf of OmanIranian forces shoots down a US military drone over the Strait of Hormuz. US says it was over international waters, but Iran says it was over their territory.

Iran begins rolling back key commitments under the nuclear deal in July.2020: Soleimani's assassinationIran's top military commander is killed by a US drone strike in Iraq. Three days after his death, Iran launches more than a dozen missile attacks on two US military bases in Iraq.

More here:

Trump-Tehran's tussle decoded: How a share over oil spoils almost led to full-blown war - Economic Times

Trump Jr and Ivanka Trump knew they were lying over ploy to sell condos, book claims – The Guardian

Donald Trump Jr and Ivanka Trump took part in a fraudulent scheme to sell units in a luxury New York condominium-hotel and knew they were lying, according to a new book that explores how the current US president built his business empire.

Questions have long surrounded a criminal investigation into the Trump familys dealings around the Trump SoHo that was dropped in 2011. Public disclosure of email correspondence revealed that Don Jr and Ivanka knowingly used figures that exaggerated how well the condos were selling in a ploy to lure more buyers.

The episode is re-examined with fresh reporting by the journalist Andrea Bernstein in her book American Oligarchs: The Kushners, The Trumps And The Marriage Of Money And Power, a copy of which was obtained by the Guardian.

Trump first previewed the 46-storey Trump SoHo in lower Manhattan with fanfare in 2006 on his reality TV show The Apprentice, boasting this brilliant $370m work of art will be an awe-inspiring masterpiece. But sales of units proved disappointing, especially after it was revealed one of Trumps partners, Russian-born Felix Sater, had a criminal past.

According to data filed with state and federal agencies, only 15% to 30% had been sold by the start of 2009, the New York Times reported. But in June 2008, Ivanka told the Reuters news agency that 60% had been sold, while in April 2009, Don Jr claimed in the Real Deal magazine that 55% had.

Buyers of units in Trump SoHo sued Trump, arguing that they had been defrauded by inflated claims of sales. The Manhattan district attorneys office then began investigating whether the allegations could also constitute a crime, issuing subpoenas and carrying out interviews.

The Trumps left a damaging email trail, first reported by the ProPublica website in 2017, that Bernstein writes showed a coordinated, deliberate and knowing effort to deceive buyers. In one email, the Trumps discussed how to coordinate false information they had given to prospective buyers. Because the sales levels had been overstated at the beginning of the sales process, any statement showing a lower level could reveal the untruths.

The author continues: In another email, according to a person who read them, the Trumps worried that a reporter might be on to them. In yet another email chain that included Don Jr and Ivanka, the younger generation of Trumps issued the email equivalent of a knowing chuckle, saying that nobody would ever find them out, because only people on the email chain or in the Trump Organization knew about the deception.

There was no doubt that the Trump children approved, knew of, agreed to, and intentionally inflated the numbers to make more sales, one person who saw the emails said. They knew it was wrong. It couldnt have been more clear they lied about the sales and knew they were lying, another person said.

Yet another said, I was shocked by the words Ivanka used. Was there any doubt the Trumps knew they were lying and that it was wrong? Ten thousand percent no.

Trump and his co-defendants settled the civil case in November 2011, agreeing to refund 90% of $3.16m in deposits while refusing to admit any wrongdoing. As part of the settlement, the buyers agreed to no longer help the Manhattan district attorneys investigation into whether Trumps alleged fraud broke any laws.

The buyers set out this agreement in a letter that, Bernstein writes, contained language insisted upon by Trumps lawyers. In an interview, the district attorney, Cyrus Vance Jr, said that he had never before seen a letter where plaintiffs in a civil case asserted that no crime had been committed. I dont think Id ever received a letter like it, Vance said.

The criminal case against Don Jr and Ivanka was eventually wound up because prosecutors feared it would be undermined by the buyers refusing to say they had been the victims of fraud. Ivanka is now in the White House as a senior adviser to the president. Don Jr has emerged as one his chief campaign surrogates for re-election.

Trumps hugely divisive presidency has seen some of his properties suffer lost custom as his name becomes a liability. In December 2017, the Trump SoHo was rebranded as the Dominick, which helped turn around its fortunes.

Bernsteins American Oligarchs also chronicles the family history of Ivankas husband, Jared Kushner.

Originally from a village in Belarus, many of his ancestors were murdered in the Holocaust. Survivors took refuge in Hungary and Italy and fled to America. The book tells how Jareds grandfather, Yossel Berkowitz, posed as his father-in-laws son, putting Kushner as his last name on US immigration paperwork. As a consequence, his grandson is named Jared Kushner rather than Jared Berkowitz.

Read more:

Trump Jr and Ivanka Trump knew they were lying over ploy to sell condos, book claims - The Guardian

Official Web | SENER – Aerospace

Cookies policy

What are cookies?

A "cookie" is a small file with browsing information that is downloaded to the user's computer, tablet or smartphone.

The combined total of cookies from all of our users helps us to improve the quality of our website, letting us identify which pages are useful and which might need to be improved.

There is no way in which cookies can cause damage to your device. On the contrary, their use helps us to identify and solve errors.

What type of cookies does this website use?

Below are details of the types of cookies that are used in the sener.es website and their specific purposes:

Different sources:

Different lifespans:

Different purposes:

How do I delete cookies?

You can allow, block or delete cookies installed on your device by changing the settings of the browser installed on your device:

User's responsibilities:

By using this Website, the User expressly agrees to the use of information that is collected; the User also acknowledges awareness of the possibility to refuse the processing of such data or information by blocking Cookies in their browser settings. However, the option of blocking Cookies from the browser may inhibit full use of all of the Website's functions.

After reading all of the information provided, we inform the User that by continuing to browse our website without taking the appropriate measures to change the browser settings to block the installation of Cookies used by the website, under the terms included in article 22.2 of Law 34/2002 on Information Society Services and E-Commerce, in accordance with its drafting by RD 13/2012, of 30 March, the User contents to the use of the mechanisms referred to herein.

See the article here:

Official Web | SENER - Aerospace

Pierce Aerospace’s Flight Portal ID Successfully Demonstrated with Northrop Grumman and Liteye in US Army Experiment – AviationPros.com

Pierce Aerospace, a leading Remote ID UAS Service Supplier (RID-USS), participated in the first C-UAS engagement that confirmed positive ID of UAS with a Remote ID system. Pierce's Flight Portal ID (FPID), compliant with the ASTM F38 Workgroup UAS Remote ID and Tracking draft standard, delivered Identification Friend or Foe (IFF) information to Counter-UAS (C-UAS) operators, which resulted in the successful execution of an engagement against hostile UAS at the US Army Futures Command Maneuver and Fires Integration Experiment (MFIX).

The demonstration involved Northrop Grummans Sophisticated Counter Unmanned Systems Weapon Radio Frequency (SCUWR) C-UAS system of systems, consisting of a Liteye's Anti-UAV Defeat System AUDS and SCUWR's 30mm X 113mm Chain Gun mounted on a US Army Stryker armored vehicle. FPID was used to identify friendly aircraft during the engagement. The system of systems approach resulted in the FPID equipped UAS surviving the engagement and continuing its mission. The hostile aircraft did not survive. Operators in the Stryker were not briefed on which UAS was friendly, and relied on IFF information from the FPID display inside the Stryker to obtain positive identification of friend or foe prior to engagement.

Aaron Pierce, CEO Pierce Aerospace, said, This was the first time getting kinetic with FPID and the results were desirable. I had eyes on the operation from the pilots' location watching multiple UAS fly down range from the Stryker's position. I was enthused when the system engaged the hostile UAS with a high explosive round fired from the Chain Gun, leaving our friendly, FPID equipped UAS, to continue operating in an airspace that was no longer contested. The data from this operational demonstration with a deployed and proven C-UAS system, and other demonstrations recently conducted with the US Army, is instrumental for the continued development of FPID to serve both commercial and defense markets.

FPID is a dual-use Remote ID technology suite designed to serve commercial UTM and C-UAS systems. This demonstration reflects positive results for advancing and fielding FPID integrated efforts, including Northrop Grumman's Mobile Demonstrator a mobile C-UAS system designed for use in civilian environments.

Combining a kinetic and electronic attack capability continues to prove a reliable solution to defeat malicious drones, said Dan Olson, vice president, armament systems, Northrop Grumman. The reliability of our gun systems and the development of advanced ammunition types creates a very capable system that provides the ability to meet the future requirement to counter unmanned systems.

It was impressive to see the SCUWR demonstrate the integration of multiple defense capabilities into a layered solution, said Zac Neumayr, VP Strategic Accounts of Liteye Systems. With the threat of small UAS increasing this approach maximizes the ability to protect the warfighter. Liteye is committed to providing top level surveillance tracking, identification, jamming as well as cueing of additional defeat systems to complement this advanced defense platform. Were eager to get these capabilities to the field.

Pierce continued, I am very appreciative of Northrop Grumman and Liteye supporting our demonstrations. This was a big step in advancing FPID's practical application of Remote ID and I look forward to working with their teams to further develop and field integrated products.

Follow this link:

Pierce Aerospace's Flight Portal ID Successfully Demonstrated with Northrop Grumman and Liteye in US Army Experiment - AviationPros.com

Firefly Aerospace Preps for Debut Flight of Its Alpha Rocket in April – Space.com

Firefly Aerospace has pushed the planned debut launch of its Alpha rocket to April as the company prepares for a very busy 2020.

In particular, figuring out the two-stage rocket's avionics system "gave us fits," Firefly CEO Tom Markusic told Space.com in a recent interview. That's because the company was originally hoping to make Alpha's flight-termination system fully autonomous, he explained.

When the vendor couldn't qualify that advanced system in time, the vendor switched to the usual "human in the loop" system. But waiting for parts pushed back Firefly's December 2019 launch time frame to something closer to March 2020. Firefly then chose to take a little more time for further refinements and is now aiming for April 2020 for the first launch of the 95-foot-tall (29 meters) rocket, Markusic said.

Related: A Private Spaceflight Decade: Commercial Space Soared in the 2010s

The Firefly team is currently working on fully qualifying the Alpha's first stage, with all the components being fitted together on a stand for a test fire that should take place soon. If that goes according to plan, the first Alpha rocket should be ready for shipment to the launch site, California's Vandenberg Air Force Base, in February, Markusic said. If problems are found in qualification, more time will be needed for adjustments.

Firefly is seeking to help fill a launch niche that SpaceX left behind about 10 years ago, when Elon Musk's company traded in its 68-foot-tall (21 m) Falcon 1 rocket for the 230-foot (70 m) Falcon 9, which now routinely launches satellites to orbit and cargo toward the International Space Station. At the time, SpaceX cited a lack of market interest as a reason for moving on from Falcon 1, according to the NewSpace Journal.

But fast-forward a decade and the space market is a considerably different beast. Now there are dozens of small companies competing for launch opportunities and thousands more that have payloads they want flown into space. Markusic, who used to work for SpaceX, said he now sees a market opportunity to exploit with the Alpha, which is capable of lofting 2,200 lbs. (1,000 kilograms) of payload to low-Earth orbit. (For comparison, another small launcher, Rocket Lab's Electron booster, can get about 500 lbs., or 225 kg, to orbit on each mission.)

Alpha's first flight will include commercial payloads from Benchmark Space Systems and AstroGrams and a satellite provided by another customer whose identity has not been revealed. Firefly will also devote a share of its first rocket space to its Dedicated Research and Education Accelerator Mission (DREAM) program, which aims to give students and small companies a chance to get payloads to space.

The backlog of customer requests is immense, Markusic said, to the extent that the company is building three rockets simultaneously right now. The second mission, targeted for June 2020, will be fully filled with paying customers, as will the third mission that's targeted to fly this fall.

Alpha features composite materials instead of aluminum to save weight, Firefly representatives have said. The rocket's Reaver engines are also simpler than traditional engines, using one combuster instead of the usual two; indeed, Alpha will be the first orbital rocket ever to fly that technology.

"But otherwise, the rocket is a pretty conventional, two-stage, oxygen and kerosene [fuel], proven combination," Markusic said.

In future missions, Firefly plans to incorporate into Alpha an advanced upper stage, called the orbital transfer vehicle (OTV), to boost satellites into higher orbits. "We have to make a lot of progress on OTV next year," he said, referring to 2020. Some parts of the OTV will fly on the debut mission, with others going up on future flights.

Alpha isn't all that Firefly is working on. In late 2018, for example, the company was selected as a participant in NASA's Commercial Lunar Payload Services program. "We hope to have secured a full contract for our first lunar lander in this next year," Markusic said.

And in partnership with Aerojet Rocketdyne, Firefly is working on a 2.5-stage launch vehicle called Beta that can send 8,800 lbs (4,400 kg) to a 125-mile-high (200 km) orbit. That rocket is still in the early stages of design, but 2020 will be the time when at least some of the hardware is developed, Markusic said.

Follow Elizabeth Howell on Twitter @howellspace. Follow us on Twitter @Spacedotcom and on Facebook.

Read more from the original source:

Firefly Aerospace Preps for Debut Flight of Its Alpha Rocket in April - Space.com

TT acquires US aerospace and defence power supply business – evertiq.com

rawpixelimages dreamstime.comElectronics Production | January 09, 2020

The Covina operation provides power supplies only to defense and aerospace customers and is separate and distinct from Excelitas other high-voltage power supply business, which is not included in the sale, a press release from Excelitas reads.The acquisition of this business unit from Excelitas enhances TTs US presence in power electronics for aerospace and defence, providing access to growth programmes with sole-source positions. The acquisition adds a number of blue-chip US defence primes to the UK company's customer base. TT says in its own press release that it is committed to investing in the business to further improve its growth prospects and engineering capabilities.The Covina business is a clear fit with TTs strategy to build leading positions in the aerospace and defence markets where the proliferation of electronics is driving demand for our power solutions. We are excited to welcome Covina employees and customers to TT, and remain committed to providing value-added engineering solutions and world-class service through the development of strategic partnerships, says Michael Leahan, EVP Power Solutions North America, TT Electronics in the release.As part of the Covina transaction, TT Electronics acquired Excelitas wholly owned facility in Covina, California.

Read more:

TT acquires US aerospace and defence power supply business - evertiq.com

BGC Insurance’s Aerospace Broker Rebrands as ‘Piiq Risk’ with Spate of Key Hires – Insurance Journal

BGC Insurance Group (BGCI), a global broker and division of BGC Partners Inc., announced it has rebranded its global aerospace re/insurance brokerage as Piiq Risk Partners.

Since the division was launched during the second half of 2019, it has been building a select team of experts in the key aviation insurance hubs across the globe.

To date, Piiq has hired 28 individuals in the U.K. and U.S. and aims to attract additional talent into the organization in 2020.

The biographies of some of Piiq Risk Partners key hires made during the last six months include:

Commenting on the rebranding of the BGCs aviation brokerage, Piiqs CEO Philip Smaje said: Piiq is a bold and distinct name that matches our desire and ambition for this business. Our platform will provide an important independent and differentiated alternative for clients. We are committed to respecting the past as well as providing modern solutions for our clients. As we begin our journey as Piiq, we will be looking to invigorate the aerospace industry.

Piiqs President Marcel Chad said: Piiq has a unique opportunity to align the resources of our parent company, which is focused on the use of innovative technology, with an entrepreneurial spirit that puts clients outcomes first. We believe that we are the standout firm in the current evolution of the aerospace re/insurance sector.

In June, at the time the formation of aviation division (now called Piiq) was announced, Andrew Wallin, chief commercial officer, BGC Insurance Group, said: The current market is stacked against aviation clients, with three brokers dominating this line of business because of their scale. For a significant independent player like us with a client-focused approach, vision and technical prowess, the gap in the market offers huge disruptive potential. Our proposition will be compelling: a truly bespoke aviation offering from a concentration of the industrys top talent and tailored to clients, as opposed to the one-size fits all offered by many of our competitors.

The company said it aims to provide the market with an independent alternative, which will use advanced technology to drive down costs and drive up service.

BGC Insurance Group provides global wholesale specialty insurance and reinsurance broking solutions, operating a group of specialist brands: Besso, Cooper Gay France, Ed, Junge and PiiQ. The groups underwriting operations Epsilon, Globe Underwriting and Cooper Gay France provide specialist insurance products and services in the U.K., France and Australia. BGC Insurance Group is the insurance division of BGC Partners, a New York and London-based global financial brokerage and technology company.

Source: BGC Insurance Group

Related:

Get the latest insurance newssent straight to your inbox.

Read more:

BGC Insurance's Aerospace Broker Rebrands as 'Piiq Risk' with Spate of Key Hires - Insurance Journal

Aerospace Flight Control System Market 2019 SWOT Analysis and Key Business Strategies by Leading Players Honeywell International, Safran, Liebherr…

Contrive Datum Insights newly published a report, titled as Aerospace Flight Control System, which uses the primary and secondary research techniques to examine the different segments. The different evolutions, & recent trends that are responsible for the growth of the market have also been included in this report. This global Aerospace Flight Control System market is very highly inflamed in the regions such as North America, Latin America, Asia, China, Japan, Europe, and India. Facts and figures about the economic growth of the global competitors has been included in the statistical report. The data in terms of innovations, consumers, industries, and brands shape the future of the existing and upcoming businesses.

For Sample Copy of Reports: http://www.contrivedatuminsights.com/Home/RequestaSample/934

The report is elaborated by considering the various factors which has an impact on the businesses. It covers the applications of the global market along with the regional outlook throughout the different sectors. It gives some optimal solutions to tackle the risks and problems to the existing industries, which helps to discover the desired outcome.

Some of the key players profiled in the Aerospace Flight Control System market include: Honeywell International, Safran, Liebherr Group, BAE Systems, Moog Incorporation, United Technologies, Rockwell Collins, Nabtesco Corporation, Parker Hannifin, West Star Aviation

Depth idea of the competitors is studied by using primary and secondary research techniques such as Aerospace Flight Control System, which gives a clear idea about the global competition to seek the best solutions. This report gives an extensive valuable data that gives a clear idea about the current scenario of the Aerospace Flight Control System market during the forecast period 2019 To 2026.

The report also gives detailed information on the global market in terms of its revenue and various dynamic aspects of the economic growth such as Aerospace Flight Control System. The annual volume of the market is examined from year 2019 to 2026. The overview of the market includes the applications of the latest technologies to enlarge the businesses rapidly.

Get Special Discount: http://www.contrivedatuminsights.com/Home/GetSpecialPricing/934

Globally, areas such as, like North America, Europe, Asia-Pacific, Latin America, and the Middle East & Africa are examined to take great decisions in businesses. Effective policies are included in the report which gives tremendous response to scale up the businesses. The statistics included in the report gives accurate data of drivers, restraints, and opportunities, which helps to balance the growth of the existing and upcoming industries.

Table of Content (TOC):

Chapter 1 Introduction and Overview

Chapter 2 Industry Cost Structure and Economic Impact

Chapter 3 Rising Trends and New Technologies with Major key players

Chapter 4 Global Aerospace Flight Control System Market Analysis, Trends, Growth Factor

Chapter 5 Aerospace Flight Control System Market Application and Business with Potential Analysis

Chapter 6 Global Aerospace Flight Control System Market Segment, Type, Application

Chapter 7 Global Aerospace Flight Control System Market Analysis (by Application, Type, End User)

Chapter 8 Major Key Vendors Analysis of Aerospace Flight Control System Market

Chapter 9 Development Trend of Analysis

Chapter 10 Conclusion

For More Information: http://www.contrivedatuminsights.com/Home/ProductReport/Global-and-Chinese-Aerospace-Flight-Control-System-Industry,-2018-Market-Research-Report=934

Any special requirements about this report, please let us know and we can provide custom report.

About Contrive Datum Insights:

Contrive Datum Insights (CDI) is the most comprehensive database of market-related research. Serious researchers from across the globe seeking up-to-date information on the latest market trends with in-depth analyses turn to Contrive Datum Insights. Our massive database boasts authentic reports published by leading authors and publications. Contrive Datum Insights highly motivated and expert in-house team undertakes rigorous screening of the credentials of publishers and authors before accepting their submissions. Such vetting is imperative for internal quality control.

Contact Us:

Alex Jones,

(Sales Manager),

Office: 4859 Slcan Street,

Vancouver,

British Columbia, Canada

+19084598372,

[emailprotected]

http://www.contrivedatuminsights.com

More:

Aerospace Flight Control System Market 2019 SWOT Analysis and Key Business Strategies by Leading Players Honeywell International, Safran, Liebherr...

Collins Aerospace to provide FAA with cost-effective, highly realistic training device for scientific research on pilot use of head-up display systems…

CEDAR RAPIDS, Iowa, Jan. 7, 2020 /PRNewswire/ --The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) has ordered a Head-Up Display (HUD) Virtual-Reality (VR) training device from Collins Aerospace Systems, a unit of United Technologies Corp. (NYSE: UTX), to be used in scientific research in areas such as pilot-HUD interface, pilot performance and crew workload.

The HUD VR trainer provides a unique out-of-the-window view of what a pilot would actually see when flying with a HUD that uses Collins Aerospace's Head-up Guidance System (HGS)and Enhanced Vision System(EVS). The design of this VR device provides the FAA scientists a great deal of flexibility, efficiency and effectiveness in conducting research in the domain of advanced vision systems on HUDs.

"The HUD VR system provides increased access to training, helping pilots get as much time as they need using a HUD on approaches and landing in difficult conditions," said Nick Gibbs, vice president and general manager, Simulation and Training Solutions for Collins Aerospace. "Our trainer can significantly reduce the length of time it takes for a pilot to become familiar with this technology, making them more productive once they enter the full-flight simulator or live flight."

Collins Aerospace is an industry-leader in providing HGS and EVS technologies to a variety of business, commercial and military aircraft operators. The technologies add an improved level of safety and confidence when flying at night, low visibility or adverse weather conditions. HGS and EVS can also help improve military mission success with aircraft such as the C-130J, helping aircrews more accurately see drop zones, runways or other targets regardless of the conditions.

About Collins AerospaceCollins Aerospace Systems, a unit of United Technologies Corp. (NYSE: UTX), is a leader in technologically advanced and intelligent solutions for the global aerospace and defense industry. Created in 2018 by bringing together UTC Aerospace Systems and Rockwell Collins, Collins Aerospace has the capabilities, comprehensive portfolio and expertise to solve customers' toughest challenges and to meet the demands of a rapidly evolving global market. For more information, visit CollinsAerospace.com.

About United Technologies CorporationUnited Technologies Corp., based in Farmington, Connecticut, provides high-technology systems and services to the building and aerospace industries. By combining a passion for science with precision engineering, the company is creating smart, sustainable solutions the world needs. For more information about the company, visit our website atwww.utc.comor follow us on Twitter: @UTC.

SOURCE Collins Aerospace

https://www.collinsaerospace.com

Read the original here:

Collins Aerospace to provide FAA with cost-effective, highly realistic training device for scientific research on pilot use of head-up display systems...

What’s New in Space? Components Designed to Weather Aerospace and Defense – News – All About Circuits

Many components for consumer electronics "live fast and die young," focusing on high-energy functions while alsoaccounting forcontinual turnover ofnew designs. But when it comes to devices for aerospace and defense, the focus shifts to longevity.

To this end, several recent products on the market aim to meet the engineering pain points for harsh environments, including processing, power usage, size, and weight. This article touches on a few recent devices built to operate in theextreme conditions of space and combat zones alike.

To withstand the extreme temperatures and radiation of space, VORAGO Technologies recently released two radiation-hardened, integrated 32-bit Arm Cortex-M4 microcontrollers: VA41620 and VA41630.

Both MCUs include a Floating Point Unit to 100MHz. Because of the devices'speed and size, VORAGO sees them being useful for manned and unmanned spacecraft control.

These MCUs are based on VORAGOs HARDSIL radiation-hardening technology, which immunizes semiconductors from harsh environments without special design techniques.

As far as memory, both devices include a Direct Memory Access (DMA) controller. Although the VA41620 requires external non-volatile memory (NVM), the VA41630 includes 256KB of NVM on-chip, SRAM EDAC, and memory scrubbing.

The MCUs are also said to address another key concern in aerospace design: communication. Some notable peripherals include I2C, UART, and SPI interfaces; CAN 20B; and Ethernet 10/100 MAC. The devices also integrate an 8-ch analog-to-digital converter and a 2-ch digital-to-analog converter.

The VP460 is an RF processing system from Abaco Systems composed of a unique hybrid of devices.The anatomy of the system includes one ofXilinxs Zynq Ultrascale+ RF system-on-chip(RFSoC)devices along with Xilinxs Virtex Ultrascale+ high-bandwidth memory (HBM) FPGA device.

The (PDF)RFSoC ZU29DR, built into VP460, includes:

Another notable component of the VP460 system is (PDF) HBM VU37P. This device is said to grant up to 460GB/s data transfer rates on-chip.

Abaco Systems has made clear that this processor is built for ruggedization. The system meets SOSA requirements for the US Air Force, Army, and Navy (for example, for communication systems, sensor processing, radar, and electronic warfare).

Abaco also claims that this system can handle MIMO and beamforming while reducing board count and minimizing SWaP.

The Data Device Corporation (DDC) recently released the SD-15901, a revamped version of its popular two-speed data combiner for synchro/resolver.Packaged in a 23mm x 23mm FBGA (Fine Pitch Ball Grid Array) package, the SD-15901 operates within the military temperature range of -55C to +125C.

The devices ball grid array surface mounting is designed to simplify assembly and PCB layout while optimizing SWaP.

The combiner offers 22-bit angle resolution by using coarse and fine digital angle inputs; DDC claims that this makes it a useful option for position control systems that necessitate real-time precision resolution. The SD-15901 can also be used with all 3.3V synchro/resolver converters and processors without any logic shifters.

DDC expects that the combiner will find a home in industrial and military position control systems, radar antenna positioning, fire control systems, precision aviation systems, and commercial aerospace.

In the past, manufacturers sometimes marketed their technology as specifically for aerospace applications or specifically for military applications.But as with these highlighted components, it seems that suppliers are increasingly emphasizing that their devices are more broadly suited for harsh environments in general.

GaN Heads to Space! VPT Introduces Radiation-Hardened DC-DC Converters Featuring GaN Technology

How Do Avionics Systems Communicate? New ARINC-429 Bus Board Announced by UEI

SiTime Introduces Rugged Endura MEMS Oscillators for Military and Aerospace Applications

DARPAs Subterranean Challenge Tasks Engineers with Communication and Sensor Issues

Highland Technologys Quadrature Modulator Geared for Aerospace Simulation

What parameters stand out to you when youre designing for longevity and durability? Share your thoughts in the comments below.

See more here:

What's New in Space? Components Designed to Weather Aerospace and Defense - News - All About Circuits

Aerospace and Automotive to Drive a Greater Mobility Ecosystem – APEX Media

Image: Courtesy ofJoshua Hirschheimer

FAST FACTSLocation: ATLSeatback or PED? PED I always use my iPadPassport stamp you wish you had: ThailandLatest obsession:The Atlanta restaurant scene as Im still new to this city.The future of flight will be: Green

Porsche is better known for its luxury sports cars than its consulting services. What kind of work does it do in aviation?Our experts support companies primarily with major transformations, performance improvement and innovative capacity enhancement to help them become the Porsche of their industry. Clients range from large corporations to medium-sized companies across many industries worldwide. One recent project in aerospace involves a major North American airline, for which we are helping improve irregular and day-of operations management and helping streamline Wi-Fi installation to reduce their aircraft downtime.

How does Porches innovation cross over between industries?Automotive OEMs and their suppliers are investing and developing technologies for a future mobility ecosystem that is increasingly autonomous, connected and electrified. The classical boundaries between aerospace and automotive are fading and partnerships are evolving under the umbrella of mobility. An example of this is the recent announcement from Porsche and Boeing, who are engaging in a joint research approach in vertical mobility.

Why did Porsche Consulting join APEX?We are excited to meet the people who are influential in helping shape and enhance the passenger experience. Its the opportunity to keep a pulse on the industry and trends so that we can be the best partners to our clients.

What do you look forward to most about APEX TECH? Im eager to learn how other companies are leveraging technology and data to innovate the passenger travel journey. Ive spent a great deal of my career on the technology side of the aviation business and I hope to gain new insights that can be applied to better the future of travel.

The classical industry boundaries between aerospace and automotive are fading and partnerships are evolving under the umbrella of mobility.

Did you choose the airline industry or did it choose you?I definitely chose the airline industry. Since I was young, Ive been fascinated with planes, airports and travel. I focused my education in Urban Planning and Transportation, ultimately to end up in an aviation school for my MBA.

Every job has a cool factor, whats yours?Being located at One Porsche Drive, which includes the Porsche Experience Center in Atlanta and being at the epicenter of the mobility transformation. It doesnt hurt that I have the driving track and a view of the runways at ATL in my backyard at work.

Do you have a ritual either pre- during or post-flight?For the last 10 years, I have kept track of every flight that I have flown in my phone. I document the airline, flight, class of service, runways used and any other special notes about the plane (like a special livery). Additionally, I collect my boarding passes. They are available digitally now but I still print them out. I havent quite decided what to do with them yet, but they will be used to make some type of artwork later in life.

What do you think is the most overlooked aspect of the airline passenger experience?A heavily overlooked aspect of the airline passenger experience is that which happens outside of the travel ribbon. Passenger needs are greater than the journey between departing and arrival airports. Expansion into end-to-end multimodal transportation is an inevitability as passengers will want their travel to be as connected as the rest of their calendars. Airlines, airports, and other mobility service providers will have to integrate further in order to properly serve them anywhere along the journey.

Click here to register for APEX TECH, January 2930, taking place at the Los Angeles Airport Marriott.

Originally posted here:

Aerospace and Automotive to Drive a Greater Mobility Ecosystem - APEX Media