How An Enslaved Woman Sued And Won Her Freedom In 18th-Century Massachusetts – WBUR

Nearly 250 years ago this month, 11 men gathered in a house on the Housatonic River to draft a document on equality and independence aimed at the British crown. A woman who was enslaved in the house overheard the discussion and determined the words applied to her too.

Elizabeth Freeman later used those ideas to win her freedom.

The house in Sheffield, Massachusetts, built in 1735, was home to Colonel John Ashley, his wife Hannah and their four children. People enslaved by the Ashleys lived there too. They included Brom, Zack, John, Harry and Freeman known then as Bett, and later MumBett.

Mark Wilson, curator of collections for the Trustees of Reservations which owns the house said the organization has shifted its focus from the story of Ashley, a prominent landowner and judge.

We began working on retelling the story from the perspective of the enslaved members of the household, he said. In terms of the story of Elizabeth, it wasnt being told properly and it wasnt being given its due.

Freeman was brought to the house in 1758 as a teenager. She helped keep the fires going. She cleaned, cooked and served.

In the upstairs study in January of 1773, Ashley and 10 other white men were writing a document called the Sheffield Resolves. Wilson said Freeman, in her 30s then, probably overheard the discussion while serving the men food or drinks.

The Sheffield Resolves, also known as the Sheffield Declaration, reads:

Resolved that Mankind in a State of Nature are equal, free, and independent of each other, and have a right to the undisturbed Enjoyment of their Lives, their Liberty and Property.

Historian Emily Blanck of Rowan University said about 2% of the population in Massachusetts was enslaved in the 1770s. At that same time, she says, white residents of the colonies, like Ashley, were arguing that America was a country of freedom.

They actually complained that they were being enslaved to the British, Blanck said. And so enslaved people also were starting to demand that they should be free because slavery was inconsistent with this new rhetoric and new idea of what America was going to be, as something separate from England.

Clark University historian Ousmane Power-Greene said these words of freedom may have inspired Freeman.

White men with power one of whom is a slave holder are writing these words that are saying these words, Power-Greene said. And that's what's going to give her the sort of impulse, right? Not the idea that her life is not one that was worth more than being a slave. It's the moment that these same white people are articulating that verbally, and are writing it down, and proclaiming it, that they're going to encourage her and try to see if those would manifest in her actual freedom.

About nine years after she heard these words, something happened in this house that changed everything for Freeman.

One day, bread was baked for the family. Lizzie, who was either Freemans daughter or sister historians disagree put a piece of dough in the hearth for herself. Ashleys wife, Hannah, got angry and grabbed a shovel from the fireplace. Freeman intervened.

Put her arm in the way and then was struck by this [shovel], which left a scar that she would, of course, hold out for people to sort of see, and wear it as a sort of illustration [of the] sort of violence that she endured as enslaved person in the household, Power-Greene said.

That act of violence was the last straw, according to Mark Wilson.

Elizabeth asked for an apology. She didn't receive it. So she walked away from the house, Wilson said.

The exact details vary, but the story goes that it was winter and a foot of snow blanketed her path. Freeman walked several miles to the home of one of the men she overheard writing the Sheffield Resolves.

She has the resilience to just bundle up and go to the house of the young Theodore Sedgwick, a lawyer, and ask for her suit for freedom, Wilson said.

Sedgwick agreed to represent her. And he added a man named Brom, also enslaved by the Ashleys, to the lawsuit. Brom & Bett v. Ashley was heard in the Berkshire County court.

Historian Emily Blanck said Sedgwicks argument was based on the new Massachusetts state constitution.

It declared that all men are born free and equal, and Sedgwick and others believed this was inconsistent with holding people in slavery in the state, Blanck said.

They won their freedom, and the judge ordered John Ashley to pay 30 shillings each to Brom and Freeman. After appealing and then dropping the appeal, Ashley paid the money.

Not long after, an enslaved man, Quock Walker, also sued for his freedom in Massachusetts and won.

Blanck said that in the aftermath, two facts point to a kind of quiet emancipation in the state.

One: nobody else sued for freedom. Two: when we get to the 1790 census, theres nobody else in the state of Massachusetts that will admit that they own slaves, Blanck said.

That doesnt mean slavery had disappeared, but Blanck said the states legal institutions did not support it.

After winning her lawsuit, Bett, who now called herself Elizabeth Freeman, went to work for Sedgwick, her lawyer. She ran his household for 20 years as a paid housekeeper.

When Freeman was in her 60s, she moved out onto her own property. She lived with her family on nearly 19 acres. She farmed and worked as a midwife.

Power-Greene said Freeman showed that one individual can make big change.

One can challenge authority, and end up shifting the way people think about the world, Power-Greene said. And so for me personally, I'm tremendously inspired by her. And I'm actually shocked that she's not memorialized in Massachusetts, particularly in western Massachusetts. You know, we need a MumBett statue in western Massachusetts.

But we do we have Freemans words, as written down by Catherine Maria Sedgwick, Theodore Sedgwicks daughter including this quote: "Any time, any time while I was a slave, if one minute's freedom had been offered to me & I had been told I must die at the end of that minute I would have taken it just to stand one minute on God's earth a free woman I would."

Freeman died at age 85 and was buried in the inner circle of the Sedgwick family plot in the Stockbridge cemetery.

The epithaph on Freeman's grave stone reads:

ELIZABETH FREEMAN known by the name of MUMBET Died Dec 28, 1829 Her supposed age was 85 Years. She was born a slave and remained a slave for nearly thirty years. She could neither read nor write, yet in her own sphere she had no superior nor equal. She neither wasted time nor property. She never violated a trust, nor failed to perform a duty. In every situation of domestic trial, she was the most efficient helper, and the tenderest friend. Good Mother, farewell.

This story is a production of New England News Collaborative. A version of this story was originally published by New England Public Radio.

Read the original:

How An Enslaved Woman Sued And Won Her Freedom In 18th-Century Massachusetts - WBUR

Sports: A Battlefield for Freedom of Expression and Political Change – besacenter.org

Mesut zil playing for Arsenal, photo via Wikimedia Commons

BESA Center Perspectives Paper No. 1,426, January 28, 2020

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: Athletes, executives, and fans are turning sports in anera of defiance and dissentinto a battleground for freedom of expression and political change, putting national and international sports associations that only nominally adhere to human rights on the spot.

The responses of sports associations to denunciations of repression in Chinas troubled northwestern province of Xinjiang and support for pro-democracy protesters in Hong Kong bysoccer celebrity Mesut zil,Houston Rockets basketball general manager Darryl Morey, andrugby superstar Sonny Bill Williams,alongside soccer fans in regions like Morocco and Hong Kong, highlight the willingness of those associations to sacrifice their values for commercial gain in their dealings with autocratic nations.

They also puncture the fiction of a separation of sports and politics that sports associations have long employed to justify their often-close ties to government and dealings with countries irrespective of their records in upholding basic rights.

By distancing themselves from the statements of zil and Morey (the former of whom hasties to Turkish president Recep Tayyip Erdogan), English Premier League clubArsenaland theUS National Basketball Association (NBA)have highlighted the discrepancy between their declared principles and their policies.

So has China with its penalizing of theNBAandzil.

The gap between professed principles and practice is even more yawning with the awarding of the 2021 FIFA Club World Cup to China despite Chinese president Xi Jinpings crackdown in Xinjiang and his moves to turn the Peoples Republic into a 21stcentury Orwellian surveillance state.

FIFA awarded the hosting rightsin a consultative rather than a transparent bidding process.

In a letter to Human Rights Watch,FIFA justified its decision by insisting that the Chinese football association as well as China as a nation have committed to respect human rights in their activities associated with the tournamentin accordance with internationally recognized human rights standards and FIFAs own Human Rights Policy.

It was not clear how human rights associated with the Club World Cup could be separated from the overall crackdown in China. Nor was it clear why FIFA would help Xi take a step toward fulfillinghis dream of China first qualifying for the World Cup, then winning it and ultimately hosting the tournament.

The awarding casts doubt onFIFAs campaign against racismin stadiums given that the crackdown in Xinjiang aims to force Turkic Muslims to violate principles of their faith and allow Xi Jinping to supersede Islam in their lives.

The re-emergence of sports as a battleground is not limited to the plight of Xinjiang.

Hong Kong fans recently took their struggle for greater democracy to a match in South Korea.

Chinese and Hong Kong broadcasters refrained from showing the playing of the national anthemswhen China and Hong Kong played each other in an East Asia Football Federation (EAFF) Championship match.

Hong Kong fans booed Chinas anthem, chanted Liberate Hong Kong, the revolution of our times, and displayed Hong Kongs British-era flag.

Support for national teams in autocracies like Egypt and Syria has dropped, with fans demanding the reform of regime-controlled football federations that are widely viewed as corrupt.

Egypts national team is also its national embarrassment Plenty of Egyptians are basking in the teams loss today, tweeted journalist Karim Zidan in July after host Egypt crashed out of the African Cup of Nations.

Privately, many fans assert that the team represents the repressive regime of general-turned-president Abdel Fattah Sisi rather than its historically huge fan base.

Sentiments in war-torn Syria are no different.

Anyone who knows Syria well knows that in Syria there are no independent institutions, and that includes sporting institutionsConsidering this (national) team as one that is above politics and a national team that unites people is a big lie and part of a certain propaganda, said Syrian journalist Hala Droubi.

In Morocco last year, during a match that was being broadcast live on television in the northern city of Tetouan, fans dressed in black booed the national anthem in protest against the killing by the Moroccan navy of a 20-year-old student as she tried to cross into Spain illegally.

These days, thenational anthem feels like a way to force patriotism onto us, so our reaction has been to boo, said Zakaria Kamal, a PhD student in sociology and supporter of Raja Athletic Club of Casablanca (RCA).

Fbladi Delmouni, a song chanted by RCA fans, has gone viral and become the anthem of disaffected Moroccan youth, garnering millions of hits on YouTube. Its lyrics read:

My country has wronged me

We live in a cloud in this country

They have rendered us orphans to be judged on Judgement Day

You stole the wealth of our country and shared it with strangers

Somebody understand me

This is my last word

I write it from my heart

Tears fall from my eyes

In a tweet to journalist Aida Alami, Gruppo Aquile, the composers of the song, said itexpressed a feeling among Moroccan youth that it does not matter whether they are dead or alive.

Behind the title Fbladi Delmouni hides the difficulty of living, the feeling of being a foreigner in your own country We are Moroccan citizens. We live in a dying society, and the youth is asphyxiated, the group said.

It is a sentiment shared by anti-government protesters across the globe from Latin America to Asia.

View PDF

Dr. James M. Dorsey, a non-resident Senior Associate at the BESA Center, is a senior fellow at the S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies at Singapores Nanyang Technological University and co-director of the University of Wrzburgs Institute for Fan Culture.

See the rest here:

Sports: A Battlefield for Freedom of Expression and Political Change - besacenter.org

Collings Foundation and FAA agree to temporary grounding of Wings of Freedom vintage planes – FOX61 Hartford

Please enable Javascript to watch this video

WINDSOR Big news Friday that the Collings Foundation has grounded the vintage planes used in their Wings of Freedom tour.

The ill-fated B-17 flying fortress that crashed at Bradley Airport back in October was a part of their exhibit.

The move is temporary. It's an agreement with the FAA to suspend the living history flights while the Collings Foundation responds to the FAA's concerns about operations and procedures.

The vintage planes of the Collings Foundation traveling Wings of Freedom tour will not be taking passengers on flights.

Im a fan of history myself, said Joe Roberts, whos brother Jim was killed in the B-17 crash. I dont want to see the whole industry shut down. At the same time, I dont want to see what happened happen again.

The Collings Foundation told FOX61, We have agreed to a temporary stand down with our LHFE flights (living history flight exemption) as we work with the FAA thoroughly addressing questions regarding operations. We hope to have this resolved soon.

Nearly four months after the tragic crash that killed 13 people at Bradley Airport, a video tour of the B-17 remains on the Collings Foundation website. I can see where some people may have a tough time, especially for anyone who perished, said Roberts.

To completely take out all the information and the amazing long history of "Nine 0 Nine" would be a disservice to all the people, crew, pilots, support staff, volunteers, veterans and family members who have a personal connection to this extraordinary aircraft. We are all in deep mourning, said a spokesperson for the Collings Foundation.

Andy Munson of Higganum is a sponsor of the Collings Foundation. He says preserving history is important.

Like my family, its three generations that we have thrilled at what these airman did in World War II and we cant lose that and bringing it to the people, Munson said.

Joe Roberts has been driving his brother Jims old car now. He said the holidays were hard.

We stilldid the holidays, my brother wouldve wanted that. But its really setting in now that hes not coming back.Roberts said hes formed a bond with other victims' family members. Everybody has a big loss so in some ways it does provide support.

Right now, the Collings Foundation Wings of Freedom tour is in Venice, Florida. As of now, they have no plans to come back to Connecticut this year. The NTSB is still months away from issuing a final report into the crash.

41.852598-72.643702

See the article here:

Collings Foundation and FAA agree to temporary grounding of Wings of Freedom vintage planes - FOX61 Hartford

Jon Moxley ‘1000 percent’ reinvigorated by creative freedom in All Elite Wrestling – WKYC.com

CLEVELAND Jon Moxley has gained a reputation in professional wrestling of being somebody that wants to handle his own business and not ask for help or support from other competitors to reach the top of the sport, and not much has changed now that he competes for All Elite Wrestling.

Moxley entered 2020 with a clear vision of doing what is best for his career, and when AEWs weekly show, Dynamite makes its Cleveland and Ohio debuts at Cleveland State Universitys Wolstein Center tonight, he will continue letting that be known in his own, unique, and often, physical way.

As much as I want to get in there with younger talent, help them make their name and build this brand -- I want to be one of the guys that helps us get to the next level -- theres a lot of self-interest right now, Moxley told WKYC.com Tuesday.

My career, at this point, for 2020 to be the year that it needs to be for me, it has to be about me. My focus has to be on me. I dont need any partners. I dont need anybody watching my back. I watch my own back. I want to be able to make decisions on the fly.

RELATED |Jon Moxley proud to bring AEW brand to home state of Ohio

Moxley made it clear during his AEW debut at the Double Or Nothing pay-per-view event back in May of 2019 that he was going to do things his way.

After the main event on the card, featuring a match between Chris Jericho and Kenny Omega, Moxley walked through the crowd and dropped Jericho, now the AEW world champion with his finishing move, The Paradigm Shift.

Moxley went on to battle Omega throughout the ring before gaining the upper hand.

Theyre in the main event, Moxley said. Theyre in the last match of the evening and competing for that top dog spot in the company, so if youre showing up on that first day, you want to come in on that prime spot in the main event. Whoever was standing there was going to get dropped on their head. It just happened to be those two.

The whole journey I went on to where Im sitting here with AEW now, Im going my own way and being my own person. I dont need to wear a white hat. I dont need to wear a black hat. I get to do what I want, when I want and to be able to have the ability to do that in AEW is definitely exciting. Everybodys got that spirit and that freedom here.

RELATED |Jon Moxley: AEW will bring energy, passion to wrestling fans in Cleveland debut tonight

Despite being on the wrong end of Moxleys debut, or maybe because of it, Jericho recently offered him a spot in his stable of talent, The Inner Circle. After initially accepting, Moxley smashed a bottle of champagne on Jericho in an act of defiance.

Instead, Moxley is focused on a path toward the AEW world title.

I aint no dummy, Moxley said. I know why he wanted tokeep your friends close and your enemies closer. Ive been in this game a long time. Ive known Chris Jericho for a long time. I knew that ploy, saw it coming from a mile away.

Nobody can tell me what I can and cant accomplish, what I can and cant do, and if I want Chris Jerichos AEW world title, Im going to get it. Thats what Im going to go for. I dont care if hes got four guys in his group, five guys in his group, 10 guys in his group, Im going to do what Ive got to do to get to the other side.

Original post:

Jon Moxley '1000 percent' reinvigorated by creative freedom in All Elite Wrestling - WKYC.com

Scientists create cyborg jellyfish with swimming superpowers – CNET

This artist illustration shows what the robotic-hybrid jellyfish look like.

Darth Vader and RoboCop now have some cyborg company in the form of superpowered jellyfish. Researchers at the California Institute of Technology have developed a swim controller that turns regular jellyfish into speed demons.

The device enhances a jellyfish's natural pulsing motion that it uses to move around in the water. "The new prosthetic uses electrical impulses to regulate -- and speed up -- that pulsing, similar to the way a cardiac pacemaker regulates heart rate," Caltech said in a release on Wednesday.

The microelectronic prosthetic propels the cyborg jellyfish to swim almost three times faster while using just twice the metabolic energy of their unmodified peers. The prosthetics can be removed without harming the jellyfish.

The research team published its findings in the journal Science Advances on Wednesday.

The scientists aren't making superpowered jellies just for fun. The cyborg invertebrates could potentially carry sensors into the ocean to gather data from otherwise hard-to-reach locations.

The Navy funded a jellyfish-inspired robot project in 2012, but the biohybrid approach has some advantages. The cyborgs don't have the power limitations of full-on robots and don't need to be tethered to an external power source.

"If we can find a way to direct these jellyfish and also equip them with sensors to track things like ocean temperature, salinity, oxygen levels, and so on, we could create a truly global ocean network where each of the jellyfish robots costs a few dollars to instrument and feeds themselves energy from prey already in the ocean," said Caltech engineer and research lead John Dabiri.

It sounds like sci-fi, but an army of cyborg jellies may play a role in the future of ocean exploration and monitoring.

Now playing: Watch this: Watch a record-setting dive to the bottom of the ocean

3:11

See original here:

Scientists create cyborg jellyfish with swimming superpowers - CNET

B.C. Budd aims to unleash fine form on Cyborg in MMA cage at The Forum – Vancouver Sun

Julia Budd is finally ready to step into the cage to defend her Bellator MMA featherweight title against Cris Cyborg.

And the B.C. athlete will do it Saturday night at The Forum in Inglewood, Calif.

I cant wait to introduce myself to the world, said Budd, who hails from the Sunshine Coast and resides in Port Moody, where she trains under the watchful eye of her husband former UFC competitor Lance Gibson at Gibson MMA and kickboxing.

This fight has been a long time coming and what Im so excited about is that its at the perfect time in my career. Its at the perfect time of who I am.

The B.C. woman has spent several years answering questions about the Brazilian superstar and listening to the usual social media nonsense that suggests shes scared to face Cyborg, which is why she ended up signing with Bellator in the first place, despite the fact that nearly three years after the UFCs inaugural womens featherweight title fight, there still is no actual division.

This is the time where Im at the absolute best in my career Im a well-rounded martial artist and I believe in myself fully, said Budd, who was offered the chance to fight Cyborg twice before in her career once in the early days of her transition from kickboxing and again on short notice under the Invicta FC banner.

She declined on both offers, fuelling the social media spin cycle, but knew each time it was the correct decision.

Port Moodys Julia Budd battles with Arlene Blencowe at Bellator 189 in Thackerville, Okla., in 2017. Budd comes into her bout with Cris Cyborg riding an 11-fight win streak.PNG

After years of battling injuries and inactivity, the 36-year-old has been healthy and firing on all cylinders over the last several years. She enters Saturdays contest with a perfect 7-0 mark inside the Bellator MMA cage, with stoppage victories in each of her last two successful title defences. Shes also riding an 11-fight winning streak.

Despite those accomplishments, and having been the face of the division since claiming the title with a fourth-round finish of pioneer Marloes Coenen in March 2017, the run-up to this weekends championship clash at Bellator 238 has felt largely like The Cyborg Show, with special guest star, bantamweight champion Julia Budd.

In early September, I was choked, Budd said with a laugh, acknowledging the frustration that came with seeing how Cyborgs arrival in the company was handled. But you know what? I dont feel the chip on my shoulder anymore. I feel like I got through that.

When she first signed, I had all those emotions, but now that was so long ago and Ive been so focused on what Ive got to do and using everything as fuel. I respect the fact she and Scott Coker have a special relationship from the (Gina) Carano fight and what theyve done together in the sport.

Budd paused.

But this is my fing home!

The vitriol may be gone, but the desire to secure the biggest win of her career and make a statement in the process has fuelled the champion since even before the bout was announced.

For Budd, its not about beating a major name, silencing her critics, and finally getting the recognition shes long deserved. Instead, its about taking the next step on a martial arts journey that started decades ago and giving back to the friends, family, coaches and training partners who have been with her throughout the adventure.

This fight is so important to me, but it has nothing to do with popularity or the world, she said. Its for me, and this warrior spirit that Ive been strengthening for way more than half of my life now. This is about me facing my biggest test and showcasing my skills, doing what Ive got to do. But its for me, not anybody else.

This isnt a popularity contest. Its about me showing how good I am as a mixed martial artist and the champion and how great I can fight (on Saturday).

I dont even remember the feeling in September of Hey Im the champ! because all that energy has gone into doing this for myself and all the people who believe in me, support me, and love me and have been watching me since I was a little kickboxer fighting at the Croatian Cultural Centre.

A lot of those people will be in Inglewood Saturday, needing only the edge of their seats, if they can somehow remain seated, watching as Budd finally gets the chance to stand opposite Cyborg, ready to do whatever it takes to bring another victory back home to B.C.

Im ready for it to end in the first round, second round, third round doesnt matter, she said. I will do whatever it takes to leave that cage with my hand raised and the belt around my waist.

CLICK HERE to report a typo.

Is there more to this story? Wed like to hear from you about this or any other stories you think we should know about. Email vantips@postmedia.com.

See more here:

B.C. Budd aims to unleash fine form on Cyborg in MMA cage at The Forum - Vancouver Sun

Cyborg Smashes Budd at Bellator 238 to Win Title: Caldwell Taps Borics in Featherweight Grand Prix – BroBible

There were no Bellator cage jitters for Cris Cyborg Justino.

The multiple time world champion was successful in her Bellator debut, winning the featherweight title with an absolutely dominant performance against Julia Budd.

Having already won world titles in the UFC, Invicta FC, and Strikeforce, Cyborg looked as dominant as ever, out-muscling and out-striking Budd. It was a technical and violent performance that ended with a barrage of punches and kicks in the fourth round that sent Budd crumpling to the mat.

Starting slow, Cyborg managed her gas tank well, increasing her offensive output with every sequential round.

Budd looked good early on, controlling Cyborg against the fence. However, despite landing a few clean shots, Budd was never quite able to put Cyborg in any real trouble.

Cyborg was clinical in her approach, sweeping the first three rounds. In the fourth, Cyborg unloaded on Budd, landing almost everything she threw. And, after connecting on nearly a dozen consecutive strikes, Cyborg landed a heavy body punch that dropped Budd. The finish officially came at 1:14 of the fourth round.

In the Bellator 238 co-main event, former two-time bantamweight champion Darrion The Wolf Caldwell made short work of Adam Borics.

Competing in the quarterfinals of Bellators featherweight Grand Prix, Caldwell used his dominant wrestling to control Borics on the ground. And even with an unconventional approach and foot placement, Caldwell was able to slap on the rear naked choke.

The finish came 2:20 of the first round, ending Borics previously unbeaten record.

Sergio Pettis, another Bellator debutante and former UFC stalwart, looked sharp in his first performance inside the Bellator cage.

Needing all of three minutes to finish Alfred Kashakyan, Pettis showed crisp striking, dropping his opponent with a clean right hook before swarming in for the finish. First pouring on the ground strikes, Pettis quickly sunk in the guillotine choke. There was no official tapout, as Kashakyan was rendered unconscious from the jiu jitsu technique.

The Bellator cage now moves to Thackerville, Oklahoma, where welterweight Ed Ruth will face undefeated Ukranian Yaroslav Amosov on February 21.

Bellator 238 Results

Dan Shapiro is a writer, editor, musician, and producer currently based in Los Angeles. In addition to covering some of the biggest fights in combat sports history, hes also hunted down the worlds best sushi, skied the northern hemisphere in July, and chronicled Chinese underground music for publications like CNN, the New York Daily News, VICE, and Time Out. Dan also conjured up a ghost at the Chateau Marmont while out on assignment for RoadTrippers. Follow him on Twitter here.

The BroBible team writes about things that we think you want. Occasionally, we write about items that are a part of one of our affiliate partnerships and we will get a percentage of the revenue from sales.

Read the original here:

Cyborg Smashes Budd at Bellator 238 to Win Title: Caldwell Taps Borics in Featherweight Grand Prix - BroBible

New Bellator champ Cris Cyborg was as raw, violent and captivating as ever – The Athletic

INGLEWOOD, Calif. During the lead-up to Cris Cyborgs Bellator debut on Saturday, promotional videos featured highlights of the Brazilians fights in Strikeforce, which had been broadcast on Showtime dating back to 2009.

Eleven years later the premium cable network agreed to open its content vault to help Scott Coker promote Cyborgs challenge of Bellator womens featherweight champion Julia Budd, an inkling, perhaps, of the synergy that comes with deepening ties between Showtime and Bellator following the corporate merger of their overseers, Viacom and CBS.

These vintage images were classic Cyborg.

Raw, violent and captivating.

Telling, too.

Placing Budd (13-3) on the receiving end of the same explosive power and speed that flattened Gina Carano and Marloes Coenen a decade ago, Cyborg (22-2) captured her fourth major promotional title at 145 pounds with a rampaging fourth-round stoppage.

Ten years...

Link:

New Bellator champ Cris Cyborg was as raw, violent and captivating as ever - The Athletic

The J-curve of technology: From Snapchat to cyborgs – Media Update

Cyberspace is increasingly merging with more channels, providing an overlay on our current reality as the digital world stretches beyond televisions, smartphones and other ubiquitous screens.

It may seem like something out of a sci-fi movie, but over 4 000 people living in Sweden are currently considered as 'cyborgs'. They are classified as such due to the near field communication microchips (the type found on bank cards) being implanted in their hands. This means that they no longer need passcodes, physical banks or loyalty cards. They don't even have to physically sign documents.

Closer to home, more than 51% of South African business leaders who were interviewed said that they expect to travel in self-driving cars by 2030, and 59% say they welcome the idea of people partnering with machines or robots in order to enhance human capability. This is according to Dell's Future of Connected Living study, which was conducted by the Institute for the Future and market research firm Vanson Bourne.

If this is the trajectory of technology that is aimed at niche markets, we can expect that developments in social media and marketing technology will see even bigger changes in the years to come.

As AI and machine learning become a more integrated part of our everyday lives, the emergence of collaboration between humans and AI will certainly result in higher productivity and efficiency. This type of technology will never replace the human element but will free people up to work more efficiently creating time for even more creative thinking and growth.

The dream is for agencies and marketers to determine what niche platforms they may require and to begin experimenting with and developing them, building something that will be a perfect fit and will help their businesses operate more efficiently.

By experimenting with revolutionary new dynamic advertising formats, we can help our clients promote thousands of their products and services faster and more efficiently than ever before all while testing and learning.

For digital marketers, this type of development relates to customer experience, content creation platforms and media management tools. But to become a part of this future, there are crucial hurdles to address. These include data silos, data privacy and algorithmic inequality.

Marketers can also look forward to using extended reality (XR) and immersive media for their future campaigns. XR combines real and virtual environments and human-machine interactions through technology and wearables.

It merges body movements and the sense of touch to generate unparalleled media experiences that engage all the senses. As we enter a new decade, we look forward to exploring the many possibilities for finding new business solutions offered by technology and the arrival of 5G mobile data networks.

For more information, visitwww.brandtruth.co. You can also followBRANDTRUTH//DGTL on Facebook, Twitter or on Instagram.

The affects of J-curve of technology affect of technology on marketing 2020 how technology affects social media 2020 technology's affects on augmented reality

See more here:

The J-curve of technology: From Snapchat to cyborgs - Media Update

Bosniak Leader: Bosnian Serbs Will Eventually Agree to Join NATO – Balkan Insight

Bakir Izetbegovic. Photo: EPA-EFE/JUSTIN LANE

Bakir Izetbegovic, the leader of the Party of Democratic Action, SDA and a member of the upper house of Bosnias parliament, said on Tuesday that the leadership of the Bosnian Serbs will ultimately see the security value in joining NATO.

The position of the [Bosnian] Serbs will mature regarding [NATO membership], and together with other [ethnic groups], they will choose the path that brings stability and security, prevents new conflicts and improves living standards just like it happened in other countries that joined NATO, Izetbegovic told Glas Srpske newspaper.

In a reconciliatory tone, Izetbegovic said however that the country will not join the military alliance before its three main ethnic groups Bosniaks, Croats and Serbs all agree to pursue that path.

The wars that broke out because of Yugoslavias collapse and the NATO intervention ended 25 years ago. We need to move on, reconcile and make rational and responsible decisions, he said.

Bosnian Serb political leaders vehemently oppose the countrys bid to join NATO, and both ruling and opposition parties have a clear position that Bosnia cant join the alliance before Serbia does.

NATO intervened late in the Bosnian war of the 1990s by bombing Bosnian Serb Army positions in 1995, as part of a broader campaign to bring the warring parties to the negotiating table.

The campaign ended with the Dayton peace accords that year, which ended the bloodshed and carved Bosnia into two semi-autonomous entities, the mainly Bosniak and Croat Federation and the Serb-controlled Republika Srpska.

In 1999, NATO also intervened in the Kosovo war by bombing targets in Serbia and Montenegro, resulting in the withdrawal of Serbian forces from the province, which declared independence in 2008.

Bosnias NATO membership bid became a stumbling block in talks on forming a government following the elections in the country in 2018.

The Bosniak and Bosnian Serb parties that came out victorious in the election locked horns over a plan to send Bosnias first so-called Annual National Plan to NATO a step considered to necessary to activate the countrys NATO Membership Action Plan resulting in a year-long impasse that was resolved just recently, due to mediation by the European Union.

The leader of the main Bosnian Serb party, Milorad Dodik, who is also the Serb member of Bosnias tripartite presidency, agreed in December to send the plan to NATO without specifically mentioning the membership bid, but the document is considered to be the Annual National Plan in everything but name.

Original post:

Bosniak Leader: Bosnian Serbs Will Eventually Agree to Join NATO - Balkan Insight

The Long-Term Costs of NATO Expansion – The National Interest Online

"An alliance is like a chain. It is not made stronger by adding weak links to it." Walter Lippmann, Today and Tomorrow column, August 5, 1952

"An alliance is effective only to the extent that it reflects a common purpose and that it represents an accretion of strength to its members." Henry Kissinger, Nuclear Weapons and Foreign Policy

"Alliances are worthwhile when they put into words a real community of interests; otherwise they lead only to confusion and disaster." A.J.P. Taylor, Origins of the Second World War

The apogee of nuclear arms control occurred between 1986 and 1996. In 1986, Mikhail Gorbachev agreed to on-site inspections for conventional military exercises in Europe and the Reykjavik Summit happened. Both broke the dam holding back nuclear treaties. Ten years later, in 1996, President Bill Clinton oversaw the completion of negotiations on a Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty. In between, there were conventional and nuclear arms reduction treaties, the Chemical Weapons Convention, the indefinite extension of the Nonproliferation Treaty, and much more.

After this golden decade, we've headed downhill. Conventional and nuclear arms control compacts have unraveled. When did the conditions for this downhill slide fall into place, and what were the key contributors?

The Great Unraveling seemed to begin during the first Clinton administrationit just wasnt apparent at that time. Planted amidst the Clinton administrations success stories during its first term were the seeds that led to the demise of conventional and nuclear arms control. The most prominent markers on this downhill path were the Clinton administrations commitment in principle to expand NATO, aerial bombardment to stop Serbian aggression after the breakup of Yugoslavia, and the insistent pursuit by Republicans on Capitol Hill, codified in public law, for a national missile defense.

This seemed to be an essential step toward stopping Slobodan Miloevis war crimes. Unfortunately, it damaged U.S.-Moscow relations but that was just the necessary cost of humanitarian intervention. (There were also unnecessary costs to U.S.-China relations after the mistaken bombing of Beijings embassy, but thats another story.) It is unlikely that the Balkan Wars ensured the downturn of U.S.-Russian relations. That may have begin with NATO expansion and the death of the Anti-Ballistic Missile Treaty.

There were, of course, moral and ethical reasons to expand NATO's protective umbrella to states that yearned for freedom after the Soviet Union's dissolution. And if those reasons allowed for easy gains when Russia was in dire straits, then they would also be valid when Russia's fortunes revived, as NATO membership could serve as a deterrent to being overrun.

Advocates of NATO expansion didn't make that argument. To the contrary, they offered assurance that an era of confrontation had been replaced by an era of partnership, so no worries. Critics of NATO expansion were the worried ones. They argued that expansion invited clashes of interest with a stronger Russia while overextending U.S. military commitments.

In some cases, critics offered the stronger arguments. And to some extent, expanding NATO was a strategic mistake, one that may likely result in a weaker alliance, both militarily and politically. The Partnership for Peace concept of cooperation short of alliance was a sounder idea but wasn't politically sustainable.

The sentiments expressed by Lippmann, Kissinger and Taylor in the quotes listed above appear accurate in this light. It is unwise to expand military alliances with states that do not add appreciable military power and that are not defensible by conventional means. Also, it is unwise to expand a military alliance for the purpose of advancing democratic norms when a political-military alliance cannot defend itself against political backsliding. NATO now hasauthoritarian leaders within its ranks as Turkey, Hungary and Poland weaken the alliance from within.

Addition compounds weakness. NATO now has twenty-nine members, all of whom enjoy the core Article Five obligation of collective defense. Montenegro, the newest member, maintains an active duty force of twenty-four hundred soldiers.

The Clinton administration was under great pressure to expand NATO. One advocate was Henry Kissinger, whose view changed: he was wary of NATO expansion during the Cold War but in favor of it after the Cold War ended. Many Republican strategists and political leaders championed a "freedom agenda," while their Democratic counterparts embraced the goal of a Europe "whole and free."

The Clinton administration believed it could keep the pace of NATO expansion slow after postponing it to a second term in deference to Boris Yeltsin's woes. The first tranche was modestonly three central European states distant from Russias borders. But the door was now wide open, and the mantra of ending Cold War divisions opened that door to almost everyone.

NATO expansion was based on two mistaken assumptionsthat delicate balances could be struck between domestic political imperatives and national security interests, and that a weakened Moscow could only react with complaint, not strenuous countermeasures.

Then came the George W. Bush administration which pursued a different agenda. Bush and his advisers dispensed with Clintons hesitancy and put the pedal to the metal to expand NATO eastward. If Poland was in then so, too, were the Baltic states. Team Bush pushed for the inclusion of Ukraine and Georgia. Hard-nosed realists morphed into transformationalists. Over time, as Russia rebounded, there was strong pushback, as George Kennan and others predicted.

NATO expansion ensured that an era of confrontation would follow an abbreviated era of partnership, just the reverse of what advocates propounded. But not right away because Putin was still operating from a position of weakness. Even then, Russian proxies held territories in newly independent Moldova and Georgia, but the patina of U.S.-Russian cooperation remained. So did Putins resentment of the deals Gorbachev and Yeltsin made over the qualms of the General Staff of the Defense Forces of Georgia, which began to find its footing in the 2008 war.

Provisions of the Conventional Forces in Europe Treaty and its companion confidence- and security-building measures that reflected the Soviet Unions demise were the first to be disregarded. The INF Treatys disallowance of missiles deemed necessary for revived Russian chess-playing in Europe and Asia was violated. The umbrella agreement for Cooperative Threat Reduction projects expired, and so on.

Even so, the Ukrainian Revolution was a game changer, the proverbial last straw for Putin. The annexation of Crimea and hybrid warfare in eastern Ukraine followed. But what of the straws before it? Was Putin going to be Putin regardless, or might conventional and nuclear arms control have survived if Clinton and Bush 43 made different decisions?

Alas, the likelihood of different decisions was nil. There was only one Cabinet member on Clintons teamWilliam Perry at the Pentagonwho expressed serious qualms about NATO expansion, and Perrys position was to buy time rather than to staunchly oppose the expansion. As Perry recounts in his memoir, he was given the courtesy of a National Security Council meeting where he was met with silence and rebutted by Vice President Al Gore. The die was cast.

NATO expansion was pre-cooked in 1993. It would have taken an extraordinarily farsighted president, largely immune from political pressures, to have opted for political, military and economic engagement without NATO expansion. Even then, don't discount the possibility that Putin would have run roughshod over Ukrainian sovereignty after the Orange Revolution.

All of this is idle speculation. Not to have expanded NATO would have required great foresight and unnatural restraint against a prostrate foe after winning the Cold War. These conditions didnt exist at the outset of the Clinton administration. And even had Clinton chosen not to expand NATO, George W. Bush and his team of triumphalists and romantics were dead set on doing so. America is dealing with the consequences now.

Michael Krepon is the co-founder of the Stimson Center. He is writing a book on the rise, demise and revival of nuclear arms control.

Image: Reuters

See the rest here:

The Long-Term Costs of NATO Expansion - The National Interest Online

Trump Might Be Right About NATO Engagement in the Mideast – The National Interest Online

In his first White House address after the recent confrontation of the United States with Iran, President Donald Trump asked NATO to take a bigger role in the Middle East. His call for higher involvement in the processes of the troubled region was met with much skepticism. Yet, though many fail to acknowledge it, NATO and its European members have a stake in the events in the Middle East. By taking a more leading position in a region not so far away from Europe, the alliance has not only the chance to help in peace efforts but also to recalibrate its scope and capabilities in the face of increasingly hybrid and indirect threats and challenges.

Though different members of the organization may have diverging interests and concerns, everybody wants to prevent an escalation that could be devastating. Some of the suggestions floated by President Trump, including the possibility of expanding NATO to the Middle East is extreme and will likely be rejected a priori. But these wild suggestions should not distract from the concrete possibility of having an increased NATO presence and role in that region.

The North Atlantic alliance, with unparalleled military capabilities in the modern world, has served as a powerful deterrent against destabilizing activities and malignant actors in Europe, especially vis a vis Russia, and has contributed actively in the fight against terrorism. Now, with new challenges being presented in its close proximity, NATO has the possibility to gain capabilities in terms of strategic engagement in peace efforts and serve as a cohesive force in defusing conflicts that could indirectly affect many member states.

No one can negate the already great contribution in prior U.S. efforts in the Mideast. The first and only invocation of NATOs Article 5, which enshrines the principle of collective defense, was after the Al Qaeda terrorist attacks of September 11. The military alliance actively participated in the Afghanistan campaign. More recently, NATO has been an integral part of the U.S.-led campaign in the fight against the Islamic State.

Yet, while so far NATO has participated with active deployments and ground presence in these missions, the complexity of some conflicts, such as the one with Iran, would promote the development of new capabilities beyond merely military ones. New capacities in conflict prevention and peace efforts would not be a result of an artificial goal, but rather a natural inclination stemming from the acknowledgment that modern security concerns have evolved.

A potential military confrontation or a fully-fledged war could have unintended consequences for Europe. Conflicts in the Middle East and North Africa have shown that they can have side effects on the security and stability of Europe. The wars in Syria and in Libya were accompanied by an influx of migrants that destabilized Europe and resulted in a humanitarian crisis that tore European consensus apart.

In reacting to the news of the death of Soleimani, NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg took a measured and careful approach due to the sensitivity of the moment and the risk of escalation. Both the United States and Iran have stated that they do not want a military confrontation but there is still the danger that unforeseen events and miscalculations could lead to war. The opportunity is there for NATO to get actively involved in Mideast peace efforts.

Many Europeans might be skeptical about this new dimension of NATO but it is worth highlighting that European powers could elevate their geopolitical position and address security concerns through it. The need to revamp the military union has been emphasized by European leaders. French president Emmanuel Macrons provocation with his characterization of NATO as an organization experiencing a brain death aimed to increase awareness about the need for the recalibration of its role and mission.

For many decades, NATO has served as a peace tool that deterred hostile actors with its military might. In an increasingly changing world and with new complex challenges that asymmetrically and indirectly affect its members, the alliance needs to develop and enhance its capabilities in conflict prevention, conflict resolution, and peace efforts. By doing so, it could serve as a strategic force in containing current and future conflicts that could threaten the security and stability of its member states. The current Mideast is a good place to start.

Akri ipa is a foreign policy expert and researcher specialized in the Balkans and the Middle East. He holds a Master of Science degree in Negotiation and Conflict Resolution from Columbia University in New York. He can be found on Twitter @AkriCipa

Image: Reuters

Link:

Trump Might Be Right About NATO Engagement in the Mideast - The National Interest Online

Norway Will Solve Missions on Iceland with the Brand New F-35 Fighter Aircraft – High North News

Norway is now ready to solve missions both in Norway and abroad with the newfighter aircraft, the F-35, the NorwegianArmed Forces says in a press release.

In March, Norway will solve missions in the international operation Iceland Air Policing (IAP) with F-35. This is the first foreign mission to the 332 Squadron after the F-35 was declared initially operational in November.

NATO country Iceland does not have its own defense and thus no capacity to meet the country's need for sovereignty and airspace surveillance. NATO therefore rolls with periodic air defense presence in peacetime.

"The fact that the F-35 can show operational capability in such an operation is an important milestone towards full operational capability in 2025," says Chief of the Air Force, Major General Tonje Skinnarland.

The tasks are similar to those carried out by the Norwegian F-16 from Bod (QRA), call-out to identify unknown aircraft. Norway, on behalf of NATO, will be responsible for this for a period of 3 weeks. The detachment consists of 130 soldiers, commanders, officers and civilians.

Colonel Stle "Steel" Nymoen, commander of the 332 Squadron, has been appointed as head of the Norwegian contribution, called Detachment Commander.

"The fact that Norway fulfills the mission of Iceland Air Policing shows that we are a reliable, high quality allied partner. Participation has a high symbolic effect, both for Norway and the rest of NATO," saysNymoen.

He adds that the personnel are now in the preparation phase at the Orland fighter jet base before departure.

"The F-35 is now in daily use in Norway, and we have come so far with the phasing in that we can now also solve missions for NATO. Thus, one of the milestones in phasing in the F-35 has been reached," he adds.

The QRA mission engages Norway on a daily basis. At one time there are two F-16 on15 minutes of standby time in Bod. The air defense is therefore well acquainted with the mission. In addition, the Air Force has performed Air Policing missions in the past, both in Lithuania and several times in Iceland. Both of these missions have been solved with the F-16.

Now it is the F-35 that will take over the baton. For the Armed Forces, the F-35 is an important part of the total defense, which will protect Norway and assert both our and NATO's borders in the north.

"The F-35 has proven to be a very good tool and works better than expected," concludes colonel Nymoen.

Continue reading here:

Norway Will Solve Missions on Iceland with the Brand New F-35 Fighter Aircraft - High North News

#NATO and EU must toughen up on #Balkan drug gangs – EU Reporter – EU Reporter

Earlier this month, the Greek capital was rocked when two men were murdered in cold blood at a popular Athens restaurant in front of their wives and children. The victims, Stevan Stamatovi and Igor Dedovi, were believed to be members of the infamous Montenegrin drug-smuggling Skaljari clan, with the hit allegedly ordered by their rivals, the Kavac outfit.

Depressingly, high-profile incidents such as this one have become increasingly commonplace in recent years. The spiraling violence is testament not only to the emergence of Balkan gangs as a force to be reckoned with in the importation of narcotics into Europe from South America, but its brazen nature also underlines the fact that those responsible feel theyre able to act with impunity outside of their national borders. For countries like Montenegro and Albania which harbor ambitions of joining the EU that kind of lawlessness should not be allowed to go on unchecked.

Par for an increasingly violent course

The Athens atrocity is only the latest in a concerningly lengthy list of overseas attacks. In January 2018, a prominent member of the Kavac gang was gunned down in his own vehicle in Belgrade. At the end of the same year, a Viennese restaurant became the battleground, as one man was killed and another grievously injured when gunmen opened fire at a famous Austrian eatery. No arrests have yet been made for any of these three incidents, which represent just the tip of the iceberg in this ever-bloodier spat between the two gangs.

The vendetta is still fairly fresh. Just ten years ago the two factions were united, but the assassination of high-ranking member Dragan Dudi in May 2010 followed by the subsequent arrests of kingpins Dusko and Darko ari left behind a power vacuum that tore the gang apart. The disappearance of around 250kg of cocaine in 2015 was the spark that lit the touchpaper which continues to fuel this raging inferno even to this day.

Drugs as the root cause

Of course, the drugs themselves are the real root cause of the problem. Taking into account the sums at stake, its little wonder that the feud is such an intense one. According to the latest figures, there are 3.6 million adults in the EU using cocaine each year, which fuels a demand of around 91 tons of the stuff flowing in from South America on an annual basis. With a market value of 5.7 billion, its easy to see why everyone is desperate for a piece of the pie.

The most recent Global Initiative report has highlighted how those Balkan gangs are commanding a bigger share than ever before. Given that a single kilo of cocaine can fetch up to 80,000, and that the average drug ring traffics between 500kg and 1,000kg per year, the potential gross profits can be substantial and the net is over half of that amount.

New kids on the bloc

As recently as 2014, 80% of the cocaine entering Europe came from Belgium, France, Italy, the Netherlands or Spain. However, times have changed, and the GI report has identified Balkan ports as new epicenters of the drug trade. In particular, Bar, Budva and Kotor (where the Kavac and Skaljari clans are originally from) in Montenegro and Drres, Vlor and Saranda in Albania have developed into so-called illicit transit zones, experiencing a high volume of illegal activity in recent years.

This is due to their ideal location, advanced infrastructure, high unemployment rates and, most significantly of all, weak governments. They are either situated in disputed territories where jurisdictions are unclear or, most concerningly of all, in areas where the authorities seem to be complicit in the crimes. Indeed, investigative reports in both nations have turned up incidences of political figures embroiled in unsavory stories linked to the drug trade, which paint their regimes in less than flattering colors.

Unbecoming behavior

In 2019, Saimir Tahiri was found guilty of abuse of his former position as Albanian Interior Minister but crucially, he escaped charges of corruption and drug trafficking. Instead of serving the 12-year prison sentence which prosecutors were hoping for, he was given a three-year probation. The verdict came just one month before the EU met to decide whether to allow Albanian accession to the bloc and the lax ruling can hardly have been met with approval.

Meanwhile, an expos from the OCCRP has revealed that First Bank of Montenegro which is controlled by the family of incumbent President Milo ukanovi counted the aforementioned kingpin ari among its most valued customers. ari is in control of a number of shell companies based in overseas locations like Delaware and the Seychelles, which have deposited vast sums into First Bank and received generous loans in return, with no due diligence done by the bank at the time. In just one example, one of those companies (Lafino Trade LLC) bailed out the bank when it was struggling to stay afloat in 2008, depositing 6 million for five years at a measly 1.5% interest rate. Clearly, First Bank has no qualms about taking money from one of the countrys biggest criminals, and the institutions connections to the highest echelons of power is even more troubling. Worth noting that President ukanovi himself was accused by Italian prosecutors of running a billion-dollar cigarette smuggling ring; he was never charged because of his diplomatic immunity.

EU must act

Given that both Albania and Montenegro are members of NATO and candidates for EU accession, such blatant fostering of a reckless drug trade cannot be allowed to continue. Not only does the practice increase the likelihood of bloodbaths like those seen in Athens, Vienna and Belgrade occurring, but it also destabilizes regions, discourages foreign investment, weakens tourism and exacerbates the brain drain effect.

In order to stop the rot and bring this damaging industry to heel, the eyes of the authorities must no longer be blind. If it means that NATO and the EU must intercede to bring about such a change, so be it but the change must come soon, or the wounds caused by the South American drug trade in Europe will continue to fester.

Facebook comments

Tags: Albania, Balkan drug gangs, eu, europe, European Union, featured, full-image, Greece, Montenergro, NATO, World

Category: A Frontpage, Crime, Law, Police, Victims of crime

Originally posted here:

#NATO and EU must toughen up on #Balkan drug gangs - EU Reporter - EU Reporter

Bolton told Republican donors Trump is mentally unstable and will pull the US out of NATO if reelected: report – AlterNet

In his book, The Room Where It Happened: A White House Memoir, former National Security Adviser John Bolton according to the New York Times tears apart one of President Donald Trumps main defenses against impeachment. Trump and his defenders have maintained that the president never tied military aid to Ukraine with an investigation of former Vice President Joe Biden and his son, Hunter Biden, but a leaked manuscript of his book shows Bolton asserting that Trump did, in fact, tie the two together. And Vanity Fairs Gabriel Sherman, in a January 28 article, sheds some more light on Boltons reasons for speaking out against Trump: the presidents mental state.

Sherman reports that according to his sources, Bolton has told Republican donors that he considers Trump mentally unstable and fears that the president would completely pull the U.S. out of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) if he wins a second term in November. Certainly, Trump has been a vehement critic of NATO and fails to see its value. And Joe Biden has warned that Trumps reelection could mean the end of NATO, which the former vice president believes would be disastrous for both the U.S. and Europe.

The Room Where It Happened isnt due out until March 17. And Sherman reports in his Vanity Fair article that pro-Trump Republicans are going to great lengths to discredit Bolton and his book. An anonymous source close to Secretary of State Mike Pompeo told Vanity Fair, Pompeo and Bolton were at war with each other during the administration. Pompeo thought that Bolton was constantly trying to undercut him and the president.

But anti-Bolton histrionics coming from Team Trump, according to Sherman, doesnt necessarily mean that Bolton wont testify during Trumps impeachment trial. A GOP source told Vanity Fair that Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell is resigned to the fact there will be witnesses during the trial.

A source described by Sherman as close to Bolton told Vanity Fair, Boltons been out there trying to bring down Trump. Hes the ultimate passive/aggressive.

then let us make a small request. AlterNets journalists work tirelessly to counter the traditional corporate media narrative. Were here seven days a week, 365 days a year. And were proud to say that weve been bringing you the real, unfiltered news for 20 yearslonger than any other progressive news site on the Internet.

Its through the generosity of our supporters that were able to share with you all the underreported news you need to know. Independent journalism is increasingly imperiled; ads alone cant pay our bills. AlterNet counts on readers like you to support our coverage. Did you enjoy content from David Cay Johnston, Common Dreams, Raw Story and Robert Reich? Opinion from Salon and Jim Hightower? Analysis by The Conversation? Then join the hundreds of readers who have supported AlterNet this year.

Every reader contribution, whatever the amount, makes a tremendous difference. Help ensure AlterNet remains independent long into the future. Support progressive journalism with a one-time contribution to AlterNet, or click here to become a subscriber. Thank you. Click here to donate by check.

More here:

Bolton told Republican donors Trump is mentally unstable and will pull the US out of NATO if reelected: report - AlterNet

Poland calls for Nato ‘readiness’ on Russia – EUobserver

Nato troops in eastern Europe ought to be "combat ready" to deter Russian aggression, Poland's ruling party chief, Jarosaw Kaczyski, has said.

But he also defended his conservative views on homosexuals and Poland's judicial reforms in a turbulent weekend for Polish-EU relations.

"He [Russian leader Vladimir Putin] only attacks where he sees weaknesses and sees a chance to win," Kaczyski, the chairman of Poland's ruling Law and Justice (PiS) party, told German newspaper Bild on Saturday (25 January).

"Russia finds it difficult to face massive resistance, even of a diplomatic nature. This certainly applies to Poland and the Baltic states. That is why Nato presence is so important here," he added.

"Germany should send more troops to the Baltic States ... Good combat and operational readiness is required in eastern Europe," Kaczyski said.

The PiS chairman rarely gave interviews.

But he spoke out to rebuke Putin for "misusing history for his politics" after the Russian leader recently accused Poland of starting World War 2 [WW2] and of colluding in the Holocaust.

"The world knows the truth: It was Stalin's Soviet Union that attacked Poland on 17 September 1939. It was Soviet soldiers and hangmen of the NKVD [secret police] who murdered hundreds of thousands of Polish officers in Katy ... in 1940," Kaczyski said.

Poland is currently weighing up whether to seek WW2 reparations from Germany in a move that could further strain EU politics.

But Kaczyski also praised modern Germany by contrast to Putin's regime.

"Germany and Russia are not comparable! There is a democratically elected government in Berlin, where law and morality apply. This cannot be said of Russia," Kaczyski noted.

German WW2 transparency has also "made it really difficult for Russia and its president to continue telling lies and portraying us Poles in a bad light," he added.

Kaczyski spoke amid turbulent times also in Polish-EU relations.

EU institutions launched a sanctions procedure against Poland two years ago over allegations that PiS was undermining judicial independence.

The Polish constitutional court could no longer "give effective constitutional review", a European Commission spokesman also noted last Friday, while urging PiS to restore the court's "legitimacy".

That saw Polish deputy foreign minister Pawe Jaboski summon the EU envoy to Warsaw, Marek Prawda, for a telling off on Saturday.

The EU statements were "seriously inconsistent" and based on "double standards", Jaboski said.

They were a based on "a major misunderstanding", Kaczyski also told Bild, and the PiS judicial reforms were needed to purge "privileged groups" in Polish society who "originate from communist times", he added.

For her part, the EU commissioner for values, Vera Jourov, is in Warsaw on Monday to take part in a WW2 memorial prior to official meetings.

And she would continue to put pressure on Poland to respect EU norms, Prawda, the EU envoy, told Polish press.

"The European Commission is a community of law and cannot ignore the threats posed to [Polish] judges," he said on Saturday.

The PiS has also clashed with the EU on migrants and on liberal mores more broadly speaking.

Kaczyski himself, in the past, has said African migrants brought "parasites and [dangerous] protozoa" to Europe and that homosexuality was a "threat".

He did not mention migrants on Sunday.

But he told Bild: "Whoever questions the traditional family model - the coexistence of men and women - is not only endangering Poland or Europe, but actually also the foundations of our civilisation".

Kaczyski claimed "there is no violence against homosexuals" in Poland, even though police arrested 25 people for attacking a pride march in one Polish town last July, for instance.

And he belittled EU support for the gay rights movement by suggesting it was a fake cause.

"I could ask another question: 'Is the EU also addressing violence against small men?'," Kaczyski said.

Read the rest here:

Poland calls for Nato 'readiness' on Russia - EUobserver

Lord McConnell: After Brexit, the UK can lead the world by example – PoliticsHome.com

The announcement in the Queens speech before Christmas that there would be an integrated security, defence and foreign policy review covering all aspects of defence, diplomacy and development, prompted me to punch the air with delight. An extreme reaction perhaps, but it was a relief that ministers recognised the need to update the policy framework set out nearly a decade ago by William Hague and Andrew Mitchell.

As the UK leaves the European Union on 31 January, such a review is vital to ensure that the UK has the greatest possible positive impact working with others to build a safer, fairer and cleaner world.

Between 2005 and 2015 different UK governments were at the forefront of this approach. Labour created the Stabilisation Unit and introduced the Conflict Fund, pooling money from the Ministry of Defence, the Foreign Office and DfID. After 2010, the Tory/Lib Dem government developed this with the Building Stability Overseas Strategy, more dedicated resources and stronger leader-ship through the new National Security Council.

Internationally we were at the heart of discussions on Responsibility to Protect, better peacekeeping and more peacebuilding. Today, the Conflict, Security and Stabilisation Fund is a major investment in joint working, conflict prevention and peacebuilding. However, policy has not moved on. But there is now a real opportunity to breathe new life into the concept of closer working between the three departments.

Whether we see this through the lens of the Sustainable Development Goals particularly Goal 16 on Peace and Justice or from the viewpoint of British interests, there can be no doubt that the challenges of conflict prevention and peacebuilding in the modern world require a combination of defence, diplomacy, development skills and resources. There can be no sustainable peace without development, and there can be no sustainable development without peace.

The UK is ideally placed to lead by example. We are not the number one player at the United Nations but we have a seat at the top table and a diplomatic in-fluence far beyond our shores. We are not the dominant partner in Nato, but the scale of our defence forces gives us influence and reach way beyond most others. We are not the only top-level development funder in the world, but the quantity and quality of our aid that saves and changes lives means others listen to us. Put all three together and the UK can lead the way as an example of integrated foreign, defence and development policy, an example others can follow.

To maximise the impact of such an approach, our commitment to the Rule of Law and Human Rights must be firm; we need to step up our game on the Sustainable Development Goals; the Women, Peace and Security agenda must run through the veins of our strategy; and we need clarity on our priorities and the partners we seek.

Our relationship with the United States is special and our partnerships in Europe are very important but Japan, New Zealand, Canada, individual European countries like Sweden, and some of the stable democracies of Africa, South East Asia and Latin America could provide a basis for new global alliances committed to multilateralism, the Rule of International Law, better corporate behaviour, development to eradicate poverty and disease, and peacebuilding to relieve hundreds of millions from misery.

The climate emergency, global poverty, terrorism and people trafficking cannot be tackled unless we invest in defence, diplomacy and development and we persuade the rest of the world that all three must work together in the 21st Century.

Every major problem facing the UK and our world requires new thinking, new co-operation across professional disciplines and between nations, and new energy to turn words into action. The Queens Speech also said the UK would promote peace and security globally this review is fundamental to making that commitment meaningful.

Lord McConnells debate on the role played by defence, diplomacy, and development policy in building a safer, fairer, and cleaner world is scheduled for Thursday 30 January

See more here:

Lord McConnell: After Brexit, the UK can lead the world by example - PoliticsHome.com

Are Turkish ships working with the Libyan coastguard in the central Mediterranean? – InfoMigrants

The rescue organization Sea-Watch says Turkey has breached human rights by handing over a group of 30 migrants to the Libyan Coast Guard in the Mediterranean.

The picture is blurry and the Mediterranean looks misty, butsailing across a blue-gray sea in the center of the picture is a warship. It is a Turkish frigate, according to the crew of the Moonbird, Sea-Watch's surveillance aircraft in the Mediterranean. In the foreground, some distance away from the frigate, are two much smallercraftpossibly a migrant boat and the LibyanCoastguard, Sea Watch suggests in a Tweet.

The message posted on January 29 says: "The crew ofthe Moonbird recorded yesterday how a Turkish frigate intercepted 30 people andhanded them over to the so-called Libyan Coastguard. Turkey is a signatory tothe European Human Rights Convention, but with this action it has taken part in a severebreach of human rights."

The pressspokesman for Sea-Watch, Ruben Neugebauer, confirmed that this is what hiscolleagues saw. They have not yet released a press release on thesubject.

Turkish press confirms story

In theHurriyetarticle, much clearer pictures show uniformedtroops appearing to help a migrant, whose back is to the camera, step from onesmall inflatable dinghy to another. The article begins by confirming that aTurkish Navy frigate TCG Gazientep "which is on a Mediterranean duty to supportNATO's Operation Sea Guardian, rescued 30 migrants on a drifting dingy offLibya."

The Turkish navymission stepped in, "providing aid and medical support," according to Hurriyet. It says that theTCG Gaziantep is one of five Turkish ships currently operating as part of the NATOoperation in the Mediterranean. Alongside Gaziantep there are three other frigates, "TCG Gkova, TCG Gksu and TCG Gediz as well asa fuel ship TCG Yaray Kudret Gngr," the paper reports.

NATO mission

Operation Sea Guardian

The Sea Guardian operation was broadened in July 2016 at aNATO Warsaw Summit from NATOs "Active Endeavour counter-terrorism mission inthe Mediterranean to a broader maritime security operation." It said aimed at "workingwith Mediterranean stakeholders to maintain maritime situational awareness,deter and counter terrorism and enhance capacity building."

Avideo on the YouTube channel "Libya News"also purports to showthe Turkish crew "rescuing 30 immigrants in Libya."

France accuses Turkey of infringing agreement

The presence of Turkish warships in the central Mediterranean was also uppermost in French President Emanuel Macron's mind. The news agency AP reported on January 29 that Macron accused Turkey of "sending warships and mercenaries to[Libya]." After a meeting with the Greek Prime Minister Kyriakos Mitsotakis,Macron described the arrival of Turkish warships in Libyanwaters as "a serious and explicit infringement of what was agreed upon inBerlin." It is unclear to which ships he was referring.

However, APsaid that the Turkish military had confirmed that "four frigates and a refueling vessel were in the central Mediterranean,outside Libyas territorial waters, to support NATO operations in the regionwhile also conducting activities to ensure the security of maritime traderoutes."

In answer to Macron's claims, AP printed astatement from the TurkishForeign Minister,which attacked the French role in Libya. Itread: "It is no secret that [France] gaveunconditional support to Haftar [who is opposing the UN-backed government] in order to have a say concerning Libya'snatural resources, [Haftar's] attacks on the legitimate government, with thehelp of the military support of countries including France, pose the mostserious threat to Libyas territorial integrity and sovereignty. What isexpected of France is to assume a positive role for stability and security inLibya, instead of blaming Turkey."

The latest UNHCR data for Libya, updated onJanuary 24, says that this year "947 refugees and migrantshave been registered as rescued/intercepted at sea by the Libyan Coast Guardand disembarked in Libya." There are still 46,913 registered refugees andasylum seekers in Libya.

Read the rest here:

Are Turkish ships working with the Libyan coastguard in the central Mediterranean? - InfoMigrants

Cyberpunk 2077 dev says Cory Barlog’s frank delay explanation "hit the nail on the head" – GamesRadar

After news of the Cyberpunk 2077 release date delay sunk in, the rumors started flying. While developer CD Projekt Red said the delay was necessary to allow for "more time to finish playtesting, finishing and polishing" and give it "the precious months we need to make the game perfect", fans started speculating that there were more specific - and dire - reasons for the delay.

The rumors postulated that Cyberpunk 2077 didn't run brilliantly on PS4 and Xbox One. CD Projekt Red just wasn't willing to release it in its current condition, hoping that a few more months of work could shore it up. While CD Projekt Red itself didn't directly respond to the rumors at first, God of War creative director Cory Barlog sparked off a brief Twitter thread to debunk them from his own perspective as a game developer.

The whole thing is worth reading, but the gist of it is that Barlog says no game looks good or runs well until the developers set aside their normal work to just optimize the hell out of the thing in the months or weeks leading up to launch. There's nothing unusual or deceptive about a game looking bad and running poorly before then, even relatively close to its planned release date - it's just how modern games are made.

"Cory Barlog hit the nail on the head," CD Projekt Red senior quest designer Philipp Weber said on the studio's official forums. "Of course we're optimizing for the Xbox One, and for the PlayStation, and for the PC, because that's what you do in the last stretches of game development. While the game is made, lots of things are unoptimized, because they're all in flux, changing, and still not finished.

"So simple answers like 'They delayed the game because of X' might make for a good rumor, but don't hold a lot of truth. There's always many reasons. Among them, and I can speak for myself, simply fixing bugs, so the game is as polished as possible. No hidden agendas, just working on making the game better."

Maybe it doesn't make the extended wait for Cyberpunk 2077 any easier, but hopefully most fans can go back to the "arghh I can't wait" kind instead of the "oh no what if it sucks" kind.

At least there's plenty to play before September rolls around - check out our guide to the most promising upcoming games.

See the rest here:

Cyberpunk 2077 dev says Cory Barlog's frank delay explanation "hit the nail on the head" - GamesRadar

Cyberpunk 2077 will show "previously undisclosed content" next week and this could be a teaser for it – GamesRadar

Update: It looks like we may already have a teaser of what Cyberpunk 2077 is going to show off next week at the Taipei Game Show. CD Projekt Red put out a video for the Chinese-language audience that shows a few brief snippets of gameplay along with a behind-the-scenes look at the game's localization process. The video hasn't been officially shared on Cyberpunk 2077's Western platforms, but you can check it out via this unofficial YouTube upload. I'd say about half of the video is in Chinese while the other half is in English, but you can enjoy the peeks at gameplay regardless of what languages you speak.

Original story: After finding out in recent weeks that Cyberpunk 2077 was going to be delayed and that its multiplayer component wouldn't arrive until 2022 at the earliest, we're due for some more uplifting news about where the game is right now. Thankfully, it sounds like developer CD Projekt Red is ready to deliver. The company has confirmed that it will be in attendance at the Taipei Game Show starting on February 6, VG247 reports, and that it will premier "previously undisclosed content from Cyberpunk 2077" to a select audience while it's there.

"Previously undisclosed content" could be just about anything - a new trailer, new screenshots, new music, a behind-the scenes look at the modeling of Keanu Reeves' digital ghost chest hair. In the past, CD Projekt Red has used behind-closed-doors presentations like the one it's teasing for the Taipei Game Show to debut extensive new snippets of gameplay. There's a good chance that will be the case again, and if it is, folks who don't attend the show will probably have to wait a while longer to see it for themselves.

That said, even if CD Projekt Red holds back the juiciest "undisclosed content" for attendees, it typically has at least a little bit of new hotness to share with the general public around the same time. It would be nice to throw the rest of the world a bone while we're still moping around after that delay news, right? The studio has already confirmed that Cyberpunk 2077 won't be on next-gen consoles when they launch but some other tidbits would be welcome.

We'll keep our eyes peeled for any announcements to come from the showfloor. Keep your holo-vids jacked into our feed and various other pieces of cyberpunk terminology until then.

See what else is on the way next with our guide to video game release dates.

See the original post:

Cyberpunk 2077 will show "previously undisclosed content" next week and this could be a teaser for it - GamesRadar