Spacing Out: How AI Provides Astronomers with Insights of Galactic Proportions – IT News Online

Isha Salian, Corporate Communications, NVIDIA2020-02-01

The gallery of galaxy images astronomers produce is multiplying faster than the number of selfies on a teen's new smartphone.

Volunteers flocked to a recent crowdsource project, Galaxy Zoo, to help classify over a million galaxy images from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey. But citizen science can carry astrophysics only so far.

"Galaxy Zoo was a very successful endeavor, but the rate at which next-generation surveys will gather data will make crowdsourcing methods no longer scalable," said Asad Khan, a physics doctoral student at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. "This is where human-in-the-loop techniques present an approach to guide AI to data-driven discovery, including image classification."

Using transfer learning from the popular image classification model Xception, Khan and his fellow researchers developed a neural network that categorizes galaxy images as elliptical or spiral with expert-level accuracy. Classifying galaxy shapes helps scientists determine how old they are. It can also help them understand more complex questions about dark energy and how fast the universe is expanding.

Automating elements of galaxy classification enables astrophysicists to spend less time on basic labeling and focus on more complex research questions.

The research, the first application of deep transfer learning for galaxy classification, was one of six projects featured at the Scientific Visualization and Data Analytics Showcase at SC19, the annual supercomputing trade show.

AI Wrinkle in Time

The researchers trained the deep learning network on around 35,000 galaxy images from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey. Using Argonne National Laboratory's Cooley supercomputer, which is equipped with dozens of NVIDIA data center GPUs, the team accelerated neural network training from five hours to just eight minutes.

When tested on other images from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey, the AI achieved 99.8 percent accuracy for classifying images as either elliptical or spiral galaxies, an improvement compared to neural networks trained without transfer learning.

Using a single NVIDIA V100 Tensor Core GPU for inference, the team was able to classify 10,000 galaxies in under 30 seconds.

"We can already start using this network, or future versions of it, to start labeling the 300 million galaxies in the Dark Energy Survey," Khan said, "With GPU-accelerated inference, we could classify all the images in no time at all."

Khan and his team also developed a visualization to show how the neural network learned during training.

"Even if deep learning models can achieve impressive accuracy levels, when AI does make a mistake, we often don't know why," he said. "Visualizations like these can serve as a heuristic check on the network's performance, providing more interpretability for science communities."

The researchers next plan to study how the morphology of galaxies change with redshift, a phenomenon caused by the expansion of the universe.

Excerpt from:

Spacing Out: How AI Provides Astronomers with Insights of Galactic Proportions - IT News Online

I’d like to boldly go where everyone ought to be headed by now, by Susie Reing – The Keene Sentinel

It seems almost ridiculous to say this, but of all the cultural influences I was exposed to as a kid the books, the movies, the music, current events the one thats stuck with me is Star Trek. I still think about the alternative reality I was presented by a second-rate TV show that lasted all of three seasons and 79 episodes.

Its easy to forget how bad the ratings were for the original show, which ran from 1966 to 1969, since its gone on to spawn more movies, sequels, books, games and toys than I can keep track of. But at the heart of it was a vision for the future that seems distressingly absent today.

Im not trying to cast a wondrous glow over the entire Star Trek endeavor. Some of the episodes were strikingly thought-provoking. Most were a combination of entertainment and morality plays. And some just plain stunk up the galaxy.

Yes, the original series projected a lot of the prejudices of its time, particularly when it came to women. The female crew members were basically eye candy, even if they possessed degrees in astrophysics, geology or whatever. Im pretty sure there isnt a person alive who would want to show up for work on a daily basis in a push-up bra, micro-mini and dominatrix boots. (Unless shes a professional dominatrix.)

Then there were the special effects. If you think they look tacky from your 2020 perspective, believe me, they looked just as bad when they were first aired in 1966. The show was produced on a shoestring budget and it seemed like most of the money for props went toward rolls of aluminum foil, Styrofoam rocks and remnants of shag carpeting.

But what many people tend to forget was how darned hopeful it all was. The ship and crew were only a microcosm of Earth. Here we caught a glimpse of a multi-ethnic, multi-colored crew whose goal was to seek out new life and new civilizations. This implied we believed we might actually have something to learn from the rest of the universe. (Today, were all convinced we already know everything and theres nothing to be learned from anyone outside of our political party, gender, race, class or nationality, much less from off-worlders.) The Enterprise explored to expand human knowledge, not to look for planets where we might conveniently dump all our garbage, our prison populations or our undesirables. (You can fill in the blank on that last one.)

We had eliminated poverty. We had cured disease. We had embraced a society where basic human needs were met. We had no pollution. We had a planet-wide government and we had peace. Nationalism did not exist unless you want to count Scotty and Chekhovs occasional sparring over the relative merits of Scotch versus vodka. No one was arguing about religion, although there was a lot of dialogue about faith and ethics.

Racism as we understand it today did not exist. Its true that one crew member endured a fair amount of verbal abuse, but he was getting picked on for having green blood and pointy ears. Maybe this wasnt such a positive harbinger of human nature, but at least Spock proved to be a disarmingly different target than the usual suspects.

Most of all, Star Trek promoted the idea that humanity had actually kept pace with technology. We had the means to wreak destruction on an unimaginable scale, but we had become more ethical and thoughtful (unless provoked).

Now the future is suddenly becoming a lot closer. The original show was set during the 2260s. That means we have a little more than 200 years to get ourselves out of the spiral of self-destruction we seem to be caught in. Our planet may not survive climate change. Our technological advancements suddenly seem a lot more threatening than promising. We have a bunch of super-duper deadly toys but we still have a Stone Age mentality.

We have an awful lot of catching up to do. Please, make it so.

Former Sentinel editor Susie Reing writes from Saxtons River, Vt. She can be reached at smrunlimited@gmail.com.

Follow this link:

I'd like to boldly go where everyone ought to be headed by now, by Susie Reing - The Keene Sentinel

Is there a 2nd planet orbiting Proxima Centauri? – EarthSky

Artists concept of Proxima Centauri b, an Earth-sized exoplanet orbiting the nearest star to our sun, Proxima Centauri. Now researchers think there is a second, larger planet also orbiting the star. Image via ESO/ M. Kornmesser/ Wikipedia.

In 2016, astronomers announced the discovery of an exoplanet orbiting the closest star to our solar system, Proxima Centauri. Exciting, since the planet appeared to be close to the same size as Earth and not too far away, cosmically-speaking, at 4.2 light-years. Could there be other planets in this nearby system? On January 15, 2020, another research team published its evidence for a second, larger planet orbiting Proxima Centauri. At this point, this second object is still considered a candidate. It is not confirmed. But researchers do make a compelling case for its existence.

The potential discovery was announced by Mario Damasso of theNational Institute of Astrophysics and his colleagues on January 15. The new peer-reviewed paper appeared in Science Advances on the same day.

The planet dubbed Proxima Centauri c is a fair bit larger than the first planet, Proxima Centauri b, and is about six times more massive than Earth. This would make it a super-Earth, planets that are significantly larger and more massive than Earth but smaller and less massive than Neptune. It is estimated to orbit its star every 5.2 years. Proxima Centauri b, by comparison, is only about 1.3 times Earths mass.

The 2020 lunar calendars are nearly sold out! Order yours before theyre gone. Makes a great gift!

Proxima Centauri as seen by the Hubble Space Telescope in 2013. Image via ESA/ Hubble/ Wikipedia.

Even though Proxima Centauri is the closest star, part of the Alpha Centauri three-star system, it has been difficult to detect planets orbiting it. Thats because most exoplanets discovered so far have been glimpsed via the transit method; that is, theyre detected because they lie edge-on to our line-of-sight to their host stars, and astronomers can detect a minute dip in the host stars light when the planet crosses in front of it. No such dip in brightness has been seen for Proxima Centauri.

Instead, to find this stars planets, astronomers have had to use a second planet-hunting technique, called the radial velocity method. Radial velocity refers to a slight wobble in the stars motion as seen from Earth, caused by the gravity of unseen planets tugging on it. This is how Proxima Centauri b was found, and now, seemingly, Proxima Centauri c.

Two European Southern Observatory (ESO) telescope instruments, the High Accuracy Radial velocity Planet Searcher (HARPS) and the Ultraviolet and Visual Echelle Spectrograph (UVES), were used to obtain the data from Proxima Centauri.

Damasso and his team analyzed the stars light spectrum data, going back 17.5 years, to see if a previously reported light spectrum signal really was from a second planet. If the spectrum oscillates between the red and blue radial velocity, that typically means the star is moving slightly closer to and then farther away from Earth, due to the gravitational pull of a planet or planets. The researchers did find such a signal, occurring over a 1,900-day period. That would mean it is unlikely to be due only to other cyclical shifts in the stars magnetic field. It would be more consistent with a second planet orbiting the star.

Our suns closest neighbors among the stars, including Proxima Centauri. Image via NASA PhotoJournal.

So, could either of these planets be habitable?

At this point, we just dont know enough about them to answer that question. Proxima Centauri b is almost the same size as Earth, and is thought to have similar temperatures, but it orbits very close to its star, which is a red dwarf. Red dwarfs are known for being very active, emitting powerful solar flares. The radiation from those flares could strip away the atmosphere of any close-in planets. Proxima Centauri c is farther out, but may be too cold for life as we know it. It also may be more like Neptune, with a deep gaseous atmosphere and no real solid surface, rather than a super-Earth, which is rocky like Earth, but larger. We just dont know yet.

Another exciting aspect of Proxima Centauri c, however, is that it is far enough from the glare of its star that it should be able to be photographed directly by upcoming space telescopes. So far, only a handful of planets that are much larger than this have been successfully photographed, and even then, they are still just blobs of light.

Mario Damasso of the National Institute of Astrophysics, whose team found the possible new planet. Image via Breakthrough/ YouTube.

From the paper:

Proxima c could become a prime target for follow-up and characterization with next-generation direct imaging instrumentation due to the large maximum angular separation of ~1 arc second from the parent star. The candidate planet represents a challenge for the models of super-Earth formation and evolution.

If scientists can learn more about both Proxima Centauri c and b, including direct imaging for at least c (b would be a lot more difficult), then that should give them a better idea of what both Earth-sized and super-Earth exoplanets are actually like, in particular ones that orbit red dwarf stars. That would then help them figure how many could be potentially habitable, and what conditions would make that possible, an exciting endeavor.

Bottom line: Researchers from theNational Institute of Astrophysics have found new evidence for a second planet orbiting Proxima Centauri, the closest star to our sun.

Source: A low-mass planet candidate orbiting Proxima Centauri at a distance of 1.5 AU

Via EurekAlert!

Read the original here:

Is there a 2nd planet orbiting Proxima Centauri? - EarthSky

Astronomers Have Caught a Star Literally Dragging Space-Time Around With It – ScienceAlert

One of the predictions of Einstein's general theory of relativity is that any spinning body drags the very fabric of space-time in its vicinity around with it. This is known as "frame-dragging".

In everyday life, frame-dragging is both undetectable and inconsequential, as the effect is so ridiculously tiny. Detecting the frame-dragging caused by the entire Earth's spin requires satellites such as the US$750 million Gravity Probe B, and the detection of angular changes in gyroscopes equivalent to just one degree every 100,000 years or so.

Luckily for us, the Universe contains many naturally occurring gravitational laboratories where physicists can observe Einstein's predictions at work in exquisite detail.

Our team's research, published today in Science, reveals evidence of frame-dragging on a much more noticeable scale, using a radio telescope and a unique pair of compact stars whizzing around each other at dizzying speeds.

The motion of these stars would have perplexed astronomers in Newton's time, as they clearly move in a warped space-time, and require Einstein's general theory of relativity to explain their trajectories.

An illustration of frame dragging. (Mark Myers/OzGrav ARC Centre of Excellence)

General relativity is the foundation of modern gravitational theory. It explains the precise motion of the stars, planets and satellites, and even the flow of time. One of its lesser-known predictions is that spinning bodies drag space-time around with them. The faster an object spins and the more massive it is, the more powerful the drag.

One type of object for which this is very relevant is called a white dwarf. These are the leftover cores from dead stars that were once several times the mass of our Sun, but have since exhausted their hydrogen fuel.

What remains is similar in size to Earth but hundreds of thousands of times more massive. White dwarfs can also spin very quickly, rotating every minute or two, rather than every 24 hours like Earth does.

The frame-dragging caused by such a white dwarf would be roughly 100 million times as powerful as Earth's.

That is all well and good, but we can't fly to a white dwarf and launch satellites around it. Fortunately, however, nature is kind to astronomers and has its own way of letting us observe them, via orbiting stars called pulsars.

Twenty years ago, CSIRO's Parkes radio telescope discovered a unique stellar pair consisting of a white dwarf (about the size of Earth but about 300,000 times heavier) and a radio pulsar (just the size of a city but 400,000 times heavier).

Compared with white dwarfs, pulsars are in another league altogether. They are made not of conventional atoms, but of neutrons packed tightly together, making them incredibly dense. What's more, the pulsar in our study spins 150 times every minute.

This mean that, 150 times every minute, a "lighthouse beam" of radio waves emitted by this pulsar sweeps past our vantage point here on Earth. We can use this to map the path of the pulsar as it orbits the white dwarf, by timing when its pulse arrives at our telescope and knowing the speed of light. This method revealed that the two stars orbit one another in less than 5 hours.

This pair, officially called PSR J1141-6545, is an ideal gravitational laboratory. Since 2001 we have trekked to Parkes several times a year to map this system's orbit, which exhibits a multitude of Einsteinian gravitational effects.

Mapping the evolution of orbits is not for the impatient, but our measurements are ridiculously precise. Although PSR J1141-6545 is several hundred quadrillion kilometres away (a quadrillion is a million billion), we know the pulsar rotates 2.5387230404 times per second, and that its orbit is tumbling in space.

This means the plane of its orbit is not fixed, but instead is slowly rotating.

When pairs of stars are born, the most massive one dies first, often creating a white dwarf. Before the second star dies it transfers matter to its white dwarf companion.

A disk forms as this material falls towards the white dwarf, and over the course of tens of thousands of years it revs up the white dwarf, until it rotates every few minutes.

A white dwarf being spun-up by the transfer of matter from its companion. (ARC Centre of Excellence for Gravitational Wave Discovery)

In rare cases such as this one, the second star can then detonate in a supernova, leaving behind a pulsar. The rapidly spinning white dwarf drags space-time around with it, making the pulsar's orbital plane tilt as it is dragged along. This tilting is what we observed through our patient mapping of the pulsar's orbit.

Einstein himself thought many of his predictions about space and time would never be observable. But the past few years have seen a revolution in extreme astrophysics, including the discovery of gravitational waves and the imaging of a black hole shadow with a worldwide network of telescopes. These discoveries were made by billion-dollar facilities.

Fortunately there is still a role in exploring general relativity for 50-year-old radio telescopes like the one at Parkes, and for patient campaigns by generations of graduate students.

Matthew Bailes, ARC Laureate Fellow, Swinburne University of Technology., Swinburne University of Technology and Vivek Venkatraman Krishnan, Scientific staff, Max Planck Institute.

This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.

Here is the original post:

Astronomers Have Caught a Star Literally Dragging Space-Time Around With It - ScienceAlert

Dear Jordan Peterson Fans, Try to Actually Be More Like Him – Merion West

Peterson is neither sacrosanct nor untouchable. He would agree with that statement himself.

Whenever there is a reaching down into innermost experience, into the nucleus of personality, most people are overcome by fear and many run awayThe risk of inner experience, the adventure of the spirit, is in any case alien to most human beings. The possibility that such experience might have psychic reality is anathema to them. Memories, Dreams, Reflections by Carl Jung and Aniela Jaff

On January 7th, an assistant professorand anti-fascistfrom the University of Calgary by the name of Ted McCoy tweeted his thoughts on the well-known Canadian psychologist, Jordan B. Peterson, in the form of a (McCoys words) joke. McCoy stated in his since-deleted tweet that: I heard it rumoured students will fail my class if they cite Jordan Peterson and Id like to clarify that this is absolutely correct. After much feedback, McCoy revisedhis view on Peterson by tweeting that he acknowledges his students right to hold a dissimilar political viewpoint than his own. Whether this is truly McCorys actual belief, however, remains unclear.

My issue is less with McCoy and people like him, who frequently criticize Peterson with little depth to their criticisms. (This is not to say, of course, that these people and their freedom-injuring attitude belong in academia.) However, any personal animosity that I have had towards Petersons critics is being increasingly redirected: towards Petersons followers and those of public intellectuals similar to Peterson. A portion of Petersons fanscertainly not all of themmake use of a method of argumentation by attacking disagreements with empty Petersonisms, which I define as thoughts, arguments, or ideas that Jordan Peterson has once articulated. Empty is the way that many deliver these sayings; they often amount to little more than grateful gestures towards Peterson, without fundamentally agreeing with the underlying ideas.

Nevertheless, Petersons views should be scrutinized and defended in a thought-out and considered manner. Unfortunately, the polarizing effects of Petersons work can be especially problematic for those seeking to engage with his ideas in a thorough way, given all of the knee-jerk assumptions about his body of work. However, engaging with his ideas superficially only serves to further polarize Peterson, as well as his followers (including those who are trying to engage with his ideas thoughtfully) by reinforcing stereotypes about Peterson and his followers. This further polarization alsodiminishes the significance of being an authentic Peterson follower.

In one of his lectures, Peterson mentions this idea of paying attention to what youre sayingresembling Rule 10 in his book 12 Rules for Life: An Antidote to Chaos: Be precise in your speech by describing a dichotomization of his mind between a judging part and a talking part. The former part was, as Peterson put it, watching the part that was talking and going: That isnt your idea; you dont really believe that; you dont know what you are talking about; and, that is not true. The same could be said when engaging with Petersons own ideas: Reconsidering your current alignment with Petersons views can be more beneficial than mindlessly reciting his work.

Now, Petersons latest book (12 Rules), as well as his Youtube lectures and debates, have proved helpful to many people. Without being redundant, the beneficial element of Petersons work has already been described in great detail at Merion West. Whether one supports Peterson or not, this part of his work is eminently significant and should not be seen as trivial or be discredited by those seeking to portray him as destructiveor immoral. To separate the wheat from the chaff an idiom often used by Peterson himselfis a crucial process when analyzing controversial thinkers like Peterson.

When we ignore this process, we risk becoming incapable of considering other points of viewlike how the 15-year-old teenager in the film The Rise of Jordan Peterson described it: After following him [Peterson] so much, he becomes like a legendary figure in your mind. One of the teenagers presumable friends (also 15 years of age) acknowledges that its understandable to hold such a view of Peterson in an environment where his ideas are less tolerated. The polarizing essence of Peterson, however, can result in one becoming trapped in a Peterson-vacuum.

To prevent that from happening, one ought to expose himself to refined criticisms of Petersons work. Many have triedor are tryingto produce such articles, videos, or books that contain constructive criticisms of Petersons ideas. Yet, a great many have failed to do so, resulting in numerous ad hominem attacks of Peterson himself, rather than engagements with his works. In November, 2019, four authors at Merion WestBen Burgis, Conrad Hamilton, Marion Trejo, and Matt McManusattemptedto comprehensively critique Petersons work, without dipping into thead hominem. This attempt is still ongoing; their upcoming book, Myth and Mayhem: A Leftist Critique of Jordan Peterson has yet to be published. Unfortunately, the annunciation of their book has mostly been met with backlash. However, both Petersons allies and adversaries may benefit from sophisticated criticisms of his work. Those attempting to criticize Peterson, however, should avoid exerting a fault-finding approach as a reply to the previous lack of effective critique on Peterson. If there is no smoking gun, its probably a signal that Petersons critics have to look somewhere else. Engaging in such a manner with any intellectual one disagrees with results in the tendency to act as an empty skeptic. (The empty skeptic is a concept I described in an earlier articleof mine at Merion West. This form of skepticism invokes thoughtlessly critiquing anothers thinking by using different fallacies in order to avoid actual confrontation with the opponents actual, fundamental ideas (e.g. Straw man fallacy or Red herring).)

Nevertheless, McManus and his colleagues have undertaken an ambitious task. They introduced the article by mentioning the many different approaches fellow left-leaning critics have taken when addressing Petersons mistakesand how these commentators have failed in discussing the complete Peterson-encyclopedia. I wont get into the different ways McManus and his colleagues have not (yet) met their promises; this can be read at length in the comment section. As Ive stated at the beginning, I am less interested in the critics themselves; however, for the sake of argument, it might be interesting to examine a bit their incentives to produce this bookbesides just their political disagreements with Peterson. One of the reasons stated by the authors was their, belief that it is necessary to argue against political opponents in as sustained a manner as possible. Not many will refute this justification. Both left-right or any other dichotomy prefers strong players on both sides of the game, irrespective of the type of game.

Furthermore, they proceed by reminding readers about Petersons relevance in todays intellectual climate: Peterson is the most significant anti-leftist critic in the Western world today, and answering his charges in a reasonable and popular manner is necessary if progressivism is to be convincing both practically and intellectually. These motives so far are not illogical by any means. In my opinion, we should give it time to see how the authors continue to analyze Petersons ideas. Jordan Peterson is not going away anytime soon.

Per contra, adopting the notion that Jordan Petersons frequent misinterpretations are unalterable and that we should just move onas someone suggested in the comment section of McManus article on a sample chapter of the bookis simply admitting that Peterson is unable to be criticized. Peterson is neither sacrosanct nor untouchable. He would agree with that statement himself. In his earlier book, Maps of Meaning: The Architecture of Belief, Peterson describes different satanic traits, including arrogance:

It is not that easy to understand why the act of presuming omniscience is reasonably construed as precisely the opposite to the act of creative exploration (as the adversary is opposite to the hero). What knowing everything means, howeverat least in practiceis that the unknown no longer exists, and that further exploration hast therefore been rendered superfluous (even treacherous). This means that absolute identification with the known necessarily comes to replace all opportunity for identification with the process that comes to know [Petersons italics]. The presumption of absolute knowledge, which is the cardinal sin of the rational spirit, is, therefore, prima facie equivalent to rejection of the heroto the rejection of Christ, of the Word of God, of the (divine) process that mediates between order and chaos.

What unifies the so-far ineffective different criticisms of Peterson is that they usually take the form of the Poisoning the Well Fallacy, which describes using irrelevant, negative information related to a certain figureor what a certain figure has saidto discredit him as an individual, or to discredit his ideas. Weve seen this happening with Peterson regarding his stance on transgender pronouns, woman wearing lipstick in the workplace, and, of course,enforced monogamy. These mischaracterizations are not only ineffective, but they also act counterproductively if one is actually interested in assessing the essence of Petersons ideas.

Much of what Peterson espouses is seemingly politically neutral. Let us, for instance, take his eminent advice: clean your room (or in the book: Set your house in perfect order before you criticize the world). Whether one is on the Left or the Right should not impact ones decision to take that advice. Yet, in the May, 2019 debatebetween Jordan Peterson and Slavoj iek entitled: Happiness: Marxism vs. Capitalism, iek made the remark that it could be the case Petersons aforementioned piece of advice could not be practiced because of the way society is deranged. That is, much of the reason why they [someones house/room] are in disorder, is that there is some crisis in our society. Notably, ieks point does not imply that societys status is a justification for your chaotic room; rather, the understanding is that your personal choices are not the only factors that determine if such a state exists. ieks critique does not detract from the effectiveness of Petersons adviceor the reality that it has benefited many people who have taken his advice to heart. And, then there is the further important point that many of Petersons followers began to learn about psychology through Peterson and then embarked on a further exploration of the discipline.

Some of the means by which Peterson teaches others to view the world are theoretical constructs (e.g. paradigmatic assumptions or statistical information). These are mostly taken from his experience as a successful clinical psychologist. Petersonin both his latest book and his online Youtube lecturespresents information about the field of psychology in a truly accessible manner. Those who immerse themselves in Petersons work do indeed consume part of the theoretical (and religious) knowledge linked to Petersons expertise. On top of that, our intuitive psychology makes us predisposed towards information associated with the understanding of ourselves and others (the latter being known as folk psychology or theory of mind). These innate modulesas the cognitive psychologist Steven Pinker names them in his 1997 book How the Mind Worksare the underlying mechanisms that support the acquiring of knowledge. To clarify this function, Pinker makes a (relatively) dated comparison:

Learning involves more than recording experience; learning requires couching the records of experience so that they generalize in useful ways. A VCR is excellent at recording, but no one would look to this modern version of the black slate as a paradigm of intelligence.

This does not suggest that any psychologist who utters statistical knowledge related to the relation between IQ and job complexity, for example, is on the road to stardom. Most of Petersons listeners/followers presumably didnt initially come to follow a 2-hour long psychology 101 lecture. Titles like: How To Stop Procrastinating or What Women Dont Understand About Men are subjects that get you intrigued and before you know ityoure hooked on watching psychology lectures all day long. (I must mention that these videos and titles are often from third party channels, actively using clickbait titles without Petersons involvement.)

However, even with all of these upsides to Petersons work, there is still the need to view itin its totalitywith somesoberness. In The Road to Wigan Pier, George Orwell suggests that the only way to decipher Socialismand the reasons why people despised it was to step away from it. Similarly, we ought to play advocatus diaboli when dealing with similar attractive theorieslike Petersonismto save ourselves from groupthink or, worse, group polarization. Anyone familiar with the workings of academia knows that any group resisting criticism is sensitive to dogma. Evaluating your beliefs about a subject, of course, is hardly tantamount to rejecting that subject. If one ends up disagreeing with Peterson on a particular subjects, that does not mean he needs to adopt a complete distaste for everything the man has to say.

All these previously mentioned processescontemplating the strength of your belief in certain ideas or intellectuals, separating the usefulness from the less useful, and playing devils advocatecan be practically referred to as truisms when dealing with public intellectuals of a magnitude like Jordan Peterson. Making someone work on his personality is a complicated task in itself. Labeling it anything other than meaningfulor worthy of attentionhas shownto be ineffective. Yet, those who have benefitted from Petersons advice should be thankful for it in a manner that does not jeopardize their own moral and political attitudes.

Alessandro van den Berg is an economics teacher in the Netherlands.

Continued here:

Dear Jordan Peterson Fans, Try to Actually Be More Like Him - Merion West

Lawrence returns to Trans Am with Peterson Racing – RACER

Two-time Trans Am Series champion Cameron Lawrence has announced his return to the Trans Am Series presented by Pirelli. Following a two-year hiatus from the series, Lawrence will join Peterson Racing for a full-season championship effort in the 3Dimensional Services Group Chevrolet Camaro.

Lawrence competed in the Trans Am Series with Miller Racing from 2012 to 2015, where he clenched two back-to-back championships, and returned in 2017 for a full-season campaign with Class Auto Motorsports. Lawrences lengthy history in the Trans Am Series positions him in first for all-time TA2 class wins.

Im excited to join Peterson Racing for a full-season championship effort in the Trans Am Series, said Lawrence. Im very appreciative of Doug Peterson for this opportunity and the support of 3Dimensional Services Group as our primary sponsor for the season. Doug has assembled a strong team at Peterson Racing, combined with the support of a long-time partner, Howe Racing Enterprises, and I look forward to getting behind the wheel of our 3Dimensional Services Group Chevrolet Camaro next month at Sebring International Raceway.

Since departing Trans Am in 2017, Lawrence has competed in select races with GT World Challenge America, Intercontinental GT Challenge, IMSAs WeatherTech SportsCar Championship and Michelin Pilot Challenge, and Saleen Cup. Most notably, Lawrence won the 2015 IMSA Tequila Patron Endurance Championship in the GTD class after recording two wins in the four PNAEC races, including the Rolex 24 At Daytona.

The Trans Am Series season-opening event will take place at Sebring International Raceway from February 29-March 1.

More here:

Lawrence returns to Trans Am with Peterson Racing - RACER

BOYS BASKETBALL REPORT | Austin Peterson has a night to remember in Windham – Record-Courier

Of course Austin Peterson was happy.

Happy to score 36 points.

Happy to help Garfield move to 10-2 with an 84-63 win at Windham Jan. 14.

Happy to be complimented by legendary Bombers coach Marty Hill.

To truly understand what the moment meant, remember that the Garfield seniors dad, Terry, suited up for Hill and was a key member of the Windham team that made the Class A state semifinals in 1982.

A bunch of Windham guys would tell me my dad was a skilled player, Peterson said. I talked to Marty Hill a few times about my dad.

Tuesday marked Austins lone chance to play a varsity game at Marty Hill Court in the town where his father once starred.The Bombers and G-Men play once a year, alternating between Garrettsville and Windham, and an injury robbed Peterson of the chance to play at Marty Hill Court as a sophomore.

It feels good, Peterson said.Ive done a few open gyms out there because they invite me, so Ive had experience shooting on those hoops, but making those shots (in a game) feels good.

Given one last chance as a senior, Peterson took full advantage, scoring 19 points in the first quarter alone.

Everything felt good, Peterson said.Everything looked good.

For Terry, it was quite the scene.

I have a lot of friends over there and buddies that I played with over the years, Peterson said. Its a little bit weird, it is, but its always going back to the hometown. When you graduate and my son growing up and playing basketball and trying to teach him everything the right way and pass on what I learned and to see him do a great job, it was a feeling that a dad feels its always good when your son out-does you.

Peterson has served as an assistant coach with the G-Men for years, so hes been through many a Garfield-Windham game, but this one was different.His son versus his alma mater.For the first and only time.

Its always a special game because its going home, Peterson said. I like seeing Coach Hill and all the other coaches there. Ive known them for years. Its a great feeling.

SIMONS SIZZLES

It was three minutes into the second quarter and Waterloo, despite myriad missed layups, was already sitting on 31 points in 11 minutes against a very good Sebring McKinley team Jan. 14.

Then, Luke Simons buried a 3-pointer from well behind the arc.

A minute later, the Vikings sophomore sprinted across the paint, caught a pass and quickly flicked a reverse layup through twine as he rocketed away from the basket.

Hes for sure one of the guys that comes off the bench that we dont worry about offensively, Waterloo coach Jason Wise said.We know he can make shots and hes crafty. He can get to the rim and flip shots in from different angles and hes not very big, but hes not afraid of the moment either.

Twenty seconds later, Simons caught the ball in transition and sent a bounce pass behind him to Caleb Francis.Early in the fourth quarter, Francis and Simons passed the ball back and forth across the court, from well behind the 3-point line, until Simons ripped his second deep 3-pointer of the night.

Hes not afraid to shoot, thats for sure, Vikings senior forward Max Adelman said. He can pretty much do whatever. Hes one of our best shooters, even though he plays a quarter in JV. Everyone trusts him with the ball. Coming off the bench, he brings a lot of energy to us.

If Simons is going to shoot and score like that, the Vikings become that much more dangerous.

Defenses already have to double down in the paint where the 6-6 Adelman and the 6-8 Vaughn Dorsey roam.Adelman and Dorsey draw defenders, providing room to operate up top, where Francis and junior guard Kyle Shockley are dangerous shooters and two of the areas better guards.Joe Ward is another proven scorer in the starting lineup.Add another scorer like Simons and what can Waterloos opponents do?

The Vikings knew Simons would eventually be a big-time scorer after he averaged more than 20 points per game in junior high. He even earned a varsity uniform toward the end of his freshman campaign.

Towards the end of the year, we knew he could play, Wise said. He probably couldve been on the floor for us, but there really wasnt a need to force him into that situation as a freshman.

Going into his sophomore season, Simons was on the verge.

Going into the summer we thought he could be a guy that came off the bench and gave us points, which hes done multiple times this year, Wise said.After the first scrimmage, I looked at our coaches and Im like, Uh, he looks scared, Im not sure if hes ready,' and then he just gets better every single day.

As shown against the Trojans.

Hes had multiple games now in double digits, Wise said.Were not afraid to put him on the floor.

Follow this link:

BOYS BASKETBALL REPORT | Austin Peterson has a night to remember in Windham - Record-Courier

As hemp production booms, Rep. Collin Peterson works to expand the CBD market – MinnPost

In Minnesota, hemp farming looks different these days. Joe Radinovich, the executive director of the Minnesota Hemp Association (MHA), has one word to describe it: an explosion.

In 2018, only 10 percent of the states 700 acres of hemp were used to produce CBD, according to the MHA. By 2019, the state grew 8,000 acres of hemp and used 400,000 indoor square feet of growing space, 78 percent of which was used to produce CBD.

Theres been this explosion, obviously, in the extraction market, said Radinovich, who previously ran to represent the Eighth District in Congress in 2018 and now leads the MHA.

But theres a problem for hemp farmers and refiners: Hemp prices are falling as CBD demand isnt matching production. At the same time, CBD products cannot be marketed as dietary supplements or health products, meaning they have very narrow opportunity to be sold.

Rep. Collin Peterson wants to help. Petersons bill, H.R.5587, would change the way the Food and Drug Administration regulates CBD-products, allowing CBD to be marketed as a dietary supplement. Additionally, it would require the U.S. Department of Agriculture to study market barriers for hemp.

I know folks in my district that are excited about the potential for hemp, and while I want them to recognize that theres still a ways to go yet, I also want to help establish a roadmap to get there, Peterson, the Chair of the House Agriculture Committee, told MinnPost.

Thats what the bill is about setting a path to viability for hemp and CBD that focuses on the people who produce it.

Petersons bill is a small chip at much larger barriers for the hemp market.

One thing thats kind of holding it back is still a sense that we dont know where these regulations are going. And I think that Chairman Petersons bill is a good step, said Radinovich.

MinnPost photo by Walker Orenstein

Rep. Collin Peterson

The history of hemp farming has been fraught with regulatory hurdles. Federal law passed in 1937, the Marihuana Tax Act, did not distinguish hemp from other cannabis, effectively making hemp production too expensive. There was a brief government effort to produce hemp during World War II, when the U.S. government released a documentary called Hemp for Victory, to encourage hemp production for the war. All forms of cannabis were banned under the Controlled Substances Act in 1970.

The growth of hemp on such a large scale is a recent development. Pilot programs were only recently authorized by the 2014 Farm Bill, which allowed allowed states to develop limited amounts of farm to grow and study the production of hemp in coordination with the U.S. Department of Agriculture. More recently, the 2018 Farm Bill, championed by Peterson, went further: allowing the transfer of hemp products across state lines and placing no restrictions on the sale or possession of hemp-derived products. It also created a legal pathway for creating products containing CBD.

In 2016, the Minnesota pilot program allowed six participants to grow hemp, the first time hemp was grown in Minnesota since the 1950s. By 2018, there were 51 participants.

Peterson said that he recently visited a plant in western Kentucky, in an area thats represented by Rep. James Comer, R-Kentucky, where theyre making flooring out of hemp. Theres a lot that we can do, but not much clarity on how were going to do it, he said. Farmers deserve a straight answer to the question of whats standing between them and developing this market.

His new bill has support from both sides of the aisle, with three initial co-sponsors: Comer, Rep. Chellie Pingree, D-Maine, and Rep. Thomas Massie, Thomas, R-Kentucky.

MinnPost photo by Brian Halliday

Joe Radinovich

While the relaxing of regulation for CBD is new, so is the research into what exactly CBD can effectively treat. There is not a lot of scientific consensus on what CBD is effective for, nor conclusive suggestions on how much of a dose should be taken for therapeutic use.

Under the Trump administration, Radinovich described a double edged sword. He said that while the 2018 Farm Bill signed by the president has undoubtedly allowed hemp to go from a pilot program to a full-scale program, recent interim rules issued by the USDA for hemp could damage the industry.

The key issue in the new proposed rules: requiring fields to be tested within 15 days of harvest and tested in a lab registered by the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA). Advocates for the industry, like the Minnesota Hemp Association, say thats entirely untenable when compared to the current 30-day rule.Additionally, the new rules require that the crop cannot be harvested until the results are returned.

The proposed rules are extremely problematic for hemp farmers, said Radinovich. And in my opinion, represent a clear step backward from the pilot program rules that we were operating under here, at least in Minnesota.

Peterson echoed Radinovich. I appreciate USDAs work getting the rule out, but folks I talk to says it misses the mark for a workable program. Thats why pioneering states like Minnesota and Kentucky are choosing to operate under the authorities contained in the 2014 Farm Bill. I have concerns with guidance USDA issued on testing, sampling, and the involvement of the DEA, he said.

We need a program that will work for states and growers, and we arent there yet.

Read more here:

As hemp production booms, Rep. Collin Peterson works to expand the CBD market - MinnPost

The Takeaway: San Antonio Pitmaster Brandon Peterson on Breaking From the Texas Barbecue Norm – San Antonio Current

Name: Brandon Peterson Job: Pitmaster and Owner, Bandit BBQ Birthplace: Lubbock, Texas Years in food service: Six Big impact: In February, Peterson will open his new barbecue spot inside Southtowns Freight Gallery, 1913 S. Flores St. Money quote:While touring [in rock band the Umbrellas], I got to try things from just about every state. I draw influences from all over the place.

Tell us about your background and how you got where you are?I moved to California to play music, but I eventually started cooking and teaching myself how to cook. I would call my mom and grandparents to learn how to make things, and I quickly decided to try my hand at barbecue. I eventually started catering company. I was looking to open a restaurant [in California], but the opportunity arose here, and we were looking to make a change. I took the leap of faith and moved here with my wife, my 21-month old daughter and our three pups.

Did you go to culinary school or are you self-taught?Im self-taught. I couldnt find the food I wanted in California, so I learned how to make the things that I wanted to eat.

Whats the best part of your job?The best part of this is making people smile through good food and connecting people. Hopefully well be seeing the same faces every week.

Whats your favorite ingredient to cook with and why? Probably brisket. Brisket is one of those things where some people can do it and some people cant. Its one of those things that, when you put the time and patience, you end up with a really great product at the end.

Whats your secret weapon at work?Apple cider vinegar works its way into a lot of recipes. Its good for everything, apparently.

Who was the mentor that had the biggest effect on your career?My mom is always trying to one-up herself, and both sets of grandparents were very good cooks. My grandpa on my moms side did barbecue catering. Wed sit out and make brisket together. My spicy barbecue sauce is based off his original sauce recipe. Its about 60 years old. Thats the sauce I grew up eating.

Whats next for you? I plan to open Bandit BBQ sometime in February.Well be open for breakfast and lunch, or until the meat runs out. Well have tacos and biscuits and sandwiches, with brisket and pulled pork available.

What are some unusual things that people can look forward to eating?Some of the things I do are not the Texas barbecue norm. Ill be doing smoked tri-tips, which is kind of a California specialty that Ill be testing out.My mustard-based barbecue sauce was inspired by my trips through the Carolinas. While touring [in the band], I got to try things from just about every state. I draw influences from all over the place. Its not necessarily a Texas thing, but people really dig it.

So many restaurants, so little time. Find out the latest San Antonio dining news with our Flavor Friday Newsletter.

The rest is here:

The Takeaway: San Antonio Pitmaster Brandon Peterson on Breaking From the Texas Barbecue Norm - San Antonio Current

Peterson leads by example on young team – The Sheridan Press

SHERIDAN At the end of last season, all of the players for the Sheridan College mens basketball team cleaned out their lockers and moved to a new school and played for a new team, leaving Hayden Peterson as the lone returning General.

Peterson and transfer Marcus Stephens are the only players that have been through a full season of college basketball. The rest of the team is made up of freshmen.

With Peterson being one of the few college veterans, he took on a leadership role for the Generals. Peterson said he is not a vocal leader but tries to lead by example.

The team had some struggles early on. Peterson said players needed tounderstand they are no longer the main player. Every player was the guy on their team in high school but needed to figure out what role they have on their new team. Players have figured out their roles for the Generals, leading to team success.

From where we started to where we are now is a huge jump and I think a lot of people did not even think we would be where we are now, Peterson said. We have definitely improved and still have a ways to go.

Head coach Cody Ball said Peterson is a player he completely trusts to understand the game plan and know the scouting report. Peterson remembered all the different ways the Generals guarded a ball screen last season.

There are multiple ways a ball screen can be guarded, it is all dependent on the opposing team and game situation.

This trust has led to Peterson receiving the toughest defensive assignment in each game. Against Laramie County Community College, Peterson was assigned to guard Edward Oliver in the second half and not let him catch the ball. Oliver had 16 points in the first half. Peterson held Oliver to 3 points and helped change the momentum in the game, Ball said. SC went on to win 96-74.

Throughout the season, Peterson has also been tasked with guarding post players that have at least a six-inch height advantage, sometimes more. Ball said Peterson is a tough player that will not back down from anyone.

Hayden [Peterson] is the kind of kid every coach wants on his team, Ball said. He is not a problem at all off the court, he is a 4.0 student. He is a kid you can tell him guard their best player regardless of position.

Peterson said his role on the team also includes helping space the floor, going after every ball, playing hard and making shots.

Whatever it is I am down for it; I just want to win, Peterson said,

The Generals have lost their last two games and hosts Western Wyoming Community College Feb. 1. WWCC is undefeated in Region IX North play. SC lost 103-84 on the road to WWCC Jan. 11.

Peterson said the Generals played with WWCC for most of the game in Rock Springs.

The team was within four or five points until the final few minutes when fouling to close the gap allowed WWCC to pull away, Ball said.

The trip to Rock Springs is the longest road trip for the Generals in conference play. WWCC has to make the trip this time and, hopefully, the team can find a way to win the game and take down a top 10 team in the nation, he said.

The first meeting was the first game SC played without freshman guard Brett Thompson, who averaged 18 points per game in his 17 games played this season. Thompson is out for the season with an injury.

Ball said the team had a string of bad luck with Thompson being injured and players missing games because of family emergencies and suspensions. The Generals need to work on closing out games and reducing turnovers committed.

SC hosts WWCC Saturday with the womens game at 2 p.m. and the mens game at 4 p.m.

Link:

Peterson leads by example on young team - The Sheridan Press

Peterson Companies Acquires The Shops at Stonewall in Gainesville – Prince William Living

Provided by Peterson Companies

Peterson Companies has acquired The Shops at Stonewall, a 322,000 square foot Wegmans-anchored shopping center in Gainesville, for $82.6 million.

The center is currently 100% occupied. It is co-anchored by several prominent national retailers, including Bed Bath & Beyond, Ross Dress for Less, Michaels and Dicks Sporting Goods. The centers service-based tenants include Novant Health, SunTrust and Expedia CruiseShipCenters. Dining options include Moes Southwest Grill, Dunkin, Jersey Mikes and The Bone BBQ, among others.

Paul Weinschenk is President of Peterson Companies Retail Division. The acquisition of The Shops at Stonewall afforded us the opportunity to expand our footprint. We are very familiar with the market, given our twenty-plus-year history of developing retail, office and residential communities in Gainesville, he said. This high quality asset in a highly desirable Northern Virginia submarket is consistent with our investment strategy.

The 36-acre site is located on Lee Highway / U.S. Route 29 with 48,000 cars passing by daily. The property has an exceptionally strong demographic base, with average household incomes of $134,000 and a growing population.

The seller was represented by R. William Kent, Executive Vice President and Ryan Sciullo, Senior Vice President with CBREs Washington, D.C. office.

Go here to see the original:

Peterson Companies Acquires The Shops at Stonewall in Gainesville - Prince William Living

Filmmakers Discuss THE RISE OF JORDAN PETERSON On Tom Needham’s SOUNDS OF FILM – Broadway World

Canadian filmmakers, Patricia Marcoccia and Maziar Ghaderi, discuss their documentary, THE RISE OF JORDAN PETERSON, on Tom Needham's THE SOUNDS OF FILM this Thursday on WUSB. The show is also going to featuring the music of composer Thomas Newman, who is nominated for an Academy Award this year for Best Original Score.

THE RISE OF JORDAN PETERSON provides an intimate glimpse into the life and mind of Jordan Peterson, the academic and best-selling author who captured the world's attention with his criticisms of political correctness and his life-changing philosophy on discovering personal meaning.

Referred to by many as the most influential public intellectual in the western world, University of Toronto psychology professor Jordan Peterson skyrocketed to fame after he published a controversial viral video about political correctness in 2016. Within 2 years, he sold over 3 million copies of his self-help book, 12 Rules For Life, and became simultaneously branded by some as an academic rockstar selling out theatres around the world.

THE RISE OF JORDAN PETERSON intimately traces the transformative period of Peterson's life while visiting rare moments with his family, friends and foes who share their own versions of the Jordan Peterson story.

Patricia Marcoccia is a Toronto-based director, producer, editor and cinematographer nominated for best emerging filmmaker at the Golden Sheaf Awards. Maziar Ghaderi is a multimedia artist, director and producer that works with visual media and interactive technology.

In addition, THE SOUNDS OF FILM, will be featuring the film music of Thomas Newman, who is nominated for an Oscar for his score for 1917. The show will be featuring some his memorable music from movies like FINDING NEMO, SHAWSHANK REDEMPTION, WALL-E and many others.

THE SOUNDS OF FILM is the nation's longest running film and music themed radio show. For the past 30 years, the program has delivered a popular mix of interviews and music to listeners all over Long Island, parts of Connecticut and streaming live worldwide on the internet. Past people interviewed for the show include Don McLean, Nile Rodgers, Jimmy Webb, William H. Macy, Cheech & Chong, Hal Hartley, Carter Burwell, Laurie Anderson and Billy Joel.

Read the original post:

Filmmakers Discuss THE RISE OF JORDAN PETERSON On Tom Needham's SOUNDS OF FILM - Broadway World

Breaking News – All-New Series "Coyote Peterson: Brave the Wild" Premieres on Animal Planet Feb. 9 at 9PM ET/PT – The Futon Critic

ALL-NEW SERIES "COYOTE PETERSON: BRAVE THE WILD" PREMIERES ON ANIMAL PLANET FEB. 9 AT 9PM ET/PT

-Special Sneak Peek Episode to Premiere out of Puppy Bowl XIV on Sunday, Feb. 2-

Passionate about inspiring a whole new generation of animal enthusiasts, Coyote Peterson, host of the much-loved Brave Wilderness channel on YouTube (15.5MM subscribers), travels to all new destinations around the globe to share incredible animal experiences with the most fascinating, bizarre, and iconic animals on earth in his all-new Animal Planet series, COYOTE PETERSON: BRAVE THE WILD which premieres Sunday, Feb. 9 at 9 PM ET/PT. A special first-look at the series will premiere out of Puppy Bowl XIV on Sunday, Feb. 2 at 5PM ET/PT.

In COYOTE PETERSON: BRAVE THE WILD, Coyote brings the animal kingdom up close for the next wave of explorers in an entertaining way, while promoting compassion and welfare for the natural world. Together with wildlife biologist Mario Aldecoa and his crew, Coyote shares their breathtaking adventures with Animal Planet's audiences and his "Coyote Pack" across all platforms.

This season, Coyote travels to Australia's Devil Ark conservatory to reveal the history behind the critically endangered Tasmanian devil and discovers the manpower needed to conserve this species; to Brazil where Coyote encounters the Yacare Caiman, a cousin of the crocodile, and swims alongside the animal to study its perfect-predator behavior as jaguars and capybara lurk from the shoreline; and the swamplands of Texas to search for a giant alligator snapping turtle known as Raphael, among other destinations.

For more COYOTE PETERSON: BRAVE THE WILD, fans can also head to Animal Planet GO, YouTube, and Facebook to experience an all new mid-form series, Coyote Peterson: Brave The Wild Untamed, where audiences can hear from Coyote and his crew, first-hand, as they break down some of the most intense moments from season one.

Through the Brave Wilderness channel on YouTube, Coyote has hosted various adventure series including, the 2015 Emmy Award-winning "Breaking Trail", "Beyond the Tide", "On Location", "Dragon Tales" and the upcoming Universal Pictures "Jurassic World Explorers" digital franchise set to debut November 18 exclusively on YouTube. His first book, Coyote Peterson's Brave Adventures: Wild Animals in a Wild World! (Mango Media - 2017), was #1 Bookscan in Juvenile Non-fiction; and his upcoming second book, Coyote Peterson: The King of Sting! (Little, Brown Books for Young Readers), was published last year.

COYOTE PETERSON: BRAVE THE WILD is produced for Animal Planet by Wilderness Productions where Coyote Peterson and Mark Vins serve as executive producers; David Casey is showrunner and executive producer. For Animal Planet, Fay Yu is executive producer and Valerie Moss is associate producer.

About Wilderness Productions

Based out of Columbus, Ohio, Wilderness Productions was founded by show host Coyote Peterson and director Mark Vins. From adventures in the field filming with wild animals, to long hours in post-production, the duo and their fearless team of filmmakers are dedicated to making animal conservation and education entertaining for the next generation of explorers. Through the Brave Wilderness Channel, a No. 1 destination for animal enthusiasts on YouTube with 2.3 billion lifetime views, their goal is to promote a genuine compassion and welfare for the natural world through the curiosity it provokes. Follow Coyote and his crew at Brave Wilderness channel on YouTube and on Facebook, Twitter and Instagram (@CoyotePeterson).

About Animal Planet

Animal Planet, one of Discovery, Inc.'s great global brands, is dedicated to creating high quality content with global appeal delivering on its mission to keep the childhood joy and wonder of animals alive by bringing people up close in every way. Available to 360 million homes in more than 205 countries and territories, Animal Planet combines content that explores the undeniable bonds forged between animals and humans, optimized across all screens around the world. In the U.S., Animal Planet audiences can enjoy their favorite programming anytime, anywhere through the Animal Planet Go app which features live and on-demand access. For more information, please visit http://www.animalplanet.com.

About Discovery

Discovery, Inc. (Nasdaq: DISCA, DISCB, DISCK) is a global leader in real life entertainment, serving a passionate audience of superfans around the world with content that inspires, informs and entertains. Discovery delivers over 8,000 hours of original programming each year and has category leadership across deeply loved content genres around the world. Available in 220 countries and territories and in nearly 50 languages, Discovery is a platform innovator, reaching viewers on all screens, including TV Everywhere products such as the GO portfolio of apps; direct-to-consumer streaming services such as Eurosport Player and MotorTrend OnDemand; digital-first and social content from Group Nine Media; a landmark natural history and factual content partnership with the BBC; and a strategic alliance with PGA TOUR to create the international home of golf. Discovery's portfolio of premium brands includes Discovery Channel, HGTV, Food Network, TLC, Investigation Discovery, Travel Channel, MotorTrend, Animal Planet, and Science Channel, as well as OWN: Oprah Winfrey Network in the U.S., Discovery Kids in Latin America, and Eurosport, the leading provider of locally relevant, premium sports and Home of the Olympic Games across Europe. For more information, please visit https://corporate.discovery.com and follow @DiscoveryIncTV across social platforms.

Read the rest here:

Breaking News - All-New Series "Coyote Peterson: Brave the Wild" Premieres on Animal Planet Feb. 9 at 9PM ET/PT - The Futon Critic

49ers’ one-year turnaround has ties to Gophers – Minneapolis Star Tribune

The 49ers are heading to Super Bowl LIV with three former Gophers as central figures in the teams reconfigured efforts to break a string of injury-ravaged seasons in which San Francisco went 17-47 from 2015 to last season.

Plymouth native Ben Peterson, in whats believed to be a unique title and job description among NFL teams, was hired last February as head of player health and performance, overseeing athletic training, functional performance, nutrition and strength and conditioning.

Dustin Perry, who recommended Peterson to General Manager John Lynch, was promoted to head strength coach. And then Shea Thompson was hired away from the Bengals to be Perrys assistant.

All three of those guys were at the University of Minnesota in 2012-13, said Cal Dietz, head strength coach of the Gophers hockey teams. Ben was my intern while working on his PhD. Dustin and Shea were working as strength coaches for the football team. They must be doing something right out there.

Indeed.

After going 4-12 with the fourth-highest number of games lost to injury (105) a year ago, the 49ers enjoyed good health during their 8-0 start. Injuries did mount during the 5-3 finish, but things improved in time for the 49ers to wallop the Vikings and Packers with a postseason pair of 17-point shiners en route to Sundays matchup with Kansas City.

Peterson wasnt looking for an NFL job when Lynch and coach Kyle Shanahan lured him from the NHLs Philadelphia Flyers 11 months ago. But, in their opinion, he was the ideal candidate for a newly created position that would bring multiple departments together under one person.

Teams typically draw lines between departments, said Dietz, whos also an Olympics strength coach and a decorated speaker in his field. Its usually, We do this. You do that. Ben looks at all the data and makes them work together.

Peterson, a 2003 graduate of Robbinsdale Armstrong, was a 6-7, 310-pound offensive tackle for one season at Northwestern.

He was practicing one day and had just finished his block, said Petersons dad, Wayne, a pastor who 35 years ago founded St. Barnabas Lutheran Church in Plymouth. He was getting up when Noah Herron, the running back who went on to play for the Packers, caught Ben on the side of helmet with his knee.

The first concussion of Petersons career was enough to end it. But Peterson stayed on as a student assistant the next three years.

In 2009, he worked as a strength coach for the Twins Class A team in Beloit. Then he went to the University of Minnesota to get his masters degree and Ph.D. in kinesiology.

We wrote a book together, said Dietz, referring to the book Triphasic Training: A systemic approach to elite speed and explosive strength performances.

I had the concept for the book for 10-12 years, but I cant write. Bens writing skills were off the charts. When I explained my system, Ben picked it up faster than anybody. I handed him a bunch of my bar napkins and grease board photos, and he produced a book.

Peterson got a job in sales with Catapult Sports, a world leader in GPS tracking systems designed to improve athletic performance.

Bens Ph.D. dissertation was something to do with oxygen levels and hockey players, Wayne said. He knew his stuff. The Philadelphia Flyers were one of the first teams in the United States to buy from Catapult. The Flyers created a position called director of sports science and hired Ben.

Wayne laughs and mentions his daughter-in-law, the former Michelle Maunu.

The irony is Ben gets a job with an NHL club even though hes never played hockey in his life, Wayne said. And his wife was the captain of the Gophers hockey team.

It wasnt long before the 49ers became interested in the advancements in sports science in general and Peterson in particular.

Bens ability to look at data and create stuff is pretty impressive, Dietz said.

How so?

It might sound crazy, but he sees things that cant be seen, Dietz said. Its the things that dont appear in the data, the human part of this, that he can see and make better decisions on for what a player needs that particular day. It sounds a little bit mystical, but its things that others cant see.

Read this article:

49ers' one-year turnaround has ties to Gophers - Minneapolis Star Tribune

Mother and Son Alumni Share Connection as Chargers, Passion for Learning – University of New Haven News

Beth Peterson 89 MBA was a professor at the University of New Haven at the same time that her son, Chad Peterson 18, was a student, and they are now colleagues at Electric Boat.

January 31, 2020

By Renee Chmiel, Office of Marketing and Communications

When Charles "Chad Peterson 18 was pursuing his bachelors degree in mechanical engineering, he often saw a familiar face among the Universitys professors: that of his mother, Beth Peterson 89 MBA.

"Professors at the University, like my mom, deeply care about their students, Chad said. "Some of them have even become lifetime mentors.

Teaching as an adjunct professor in the Universitys physics department enabled Beth to spend time with her son while he was in school, and to get to know his professors and roommates.

"I was so proud that he chose the University of New Haven," she said. "He said it was his first choice because liked the vibe and the small class sizes. Hes carrying on the Charger tradition."

Chad collaborated with Chong Qiu, Ph.D., an assistant professor of chemistry who later became the first University of New Haven professor to be awarded a National Science Foundation Early Career Award for his groundbreaking work as part of his Summer Undergraduate Research Fellowship (SURF) project.

The interactions and experiences he had during SURF and throughout his time as a Charger fueled his passion for more.

"I love helping people learn, and a big part of that comes from all the passionate teachers Ive had, Chad said.

Although mother and son no longer run into each other at the University, their paths have crossed again this time at Electric Boat, where Beth and Chad work as engineers.

Beth, who also owns a business as well as several manufacturing facilities with her husband, Charles Peterson Sr., says she felt the University prepared her and her son to excel in the field of engineering.

"While completing my MBA, I learned about many aspects of the engineering industry, she said. "I learned the importance of operations and efficiency to make companies more profitable, as well as program and project management, scheduling, and budgets. The MBA has helped me succeed throughout my career.

View original post here:

Mother and Son Alumni Share Connection as Chargers, Passion for Learning - University of New Haven News

The First Amendment and Supreme Court | Opinion | dailyitem.com – Sunbury Daily Item

Kendra Espinoza, a single mother of two young girls, never dreamed that sending her daughters to a Christian school in Kalispell, Montana, would lead her to the national stage. But on Wednesday, her lawsuit, Espinoza v. Montana Department of Revenue, was argued before the U.S. Supreme Court, and its far-reaching implications could impact Pennsylvanians education options.

Espinoza homeschooled her daughters until her husband unexpectedly left, forcing her to enroll them in the local public school. The school wasnt a good fit for her daughters they werent thriving. Stillwater Christian School seemed like the perfect solution, but tuition was more than she could afford. Still, she worked extra jobs, held a big yard sale, and raffled quilts to come up with the money. Her older daughter even mowed lawns to contribute.

It was barely enough.

Then, Espinoza learned of a recently enacted program in Montana, similar to Pennsylvanias tax credit scholarships, that could help her afford tuition for future school years. Her glimmer of hope was short-lived, though. Montanas program bars religious schools, and the state refused to grant her daughters scholarships.

Espinoza felt that amounted to discrimination. She and two other moms in similar situations sued the department with the help of nonprofit law firm, the Institute for Justice. But the Montana Supreme Court doubled down, ruling the entire scholarship program unconstitutional in 2018.

The families appealed and are now before the U.S. Supreme Court, arguing that ending the scholarship program because it included religious schools violates the First Amendment.

At issue is the Montana constitutions Blaine Amendment, which prohibits the government from giving public funds to religious schools. There are similar provisions in 36 other state constitutions, including right here in Pennsylvania. These amendments trace their roots to the late 1800s, when anti-Catholic sentiment was rampant and protestant legislators sought to starve them of public funds. Congressman James Blaine and many other anti-Catholic legislators required prospective states to adopt Blaine Amendments in order to be admitted to the union and persuaded many existing states to adopt similar amendments.

Now, the Supreme Court will decide if these provisions violate the U.S. Constitution.

The issues presented in Espinoza are not new to the Court. In Zelman v. Simmons-Harris, the Supreme Court upheld an Ohio school voucher program, ruling that it was neutral with respect to religion since parents not the government are the ones directing government aid to the schools.

And in Trinity Lutheran Church of Columbia, Inc. v. Comer, the Court found that Missouris denial of a church application for new playground surfacing was a violation of the churchs First Amendment protections by denying a generally available benefit solely on account of the [applicants] religious identity.

If the Court follows the same logic, Espinoza and the other Montana moms stand a good chance of winning. Similar to the situation in Zelman, the Montana program was impartial to religion and was designed to help disadvantaged students. Moreover, the ruling in Trinity Lutheran created a precedent for greater scrutiny when the state excludes a church from public benefits. With these cases setting the stage, the Supreme Court has the opportunity in Espinoza to defend the rights of parents to access public programs without compromising their constitutional rights. As a result, anti-Catholic Blaine Amendments in Montana and dozens of other states, may be laid to rest.

Such an outcome will liberate students across the country including in Pennsylvania to pursue broader educational choices that satisfy their needs. While Pennsylvanias tax credit scholarships pass constitutional muster, removing our Blaine Amendment will open the door to new educational freedoms for students.

If we win at the Supreme Court, it makes a difference for my girls and for so many other families, says Kendra Espinoza. I believe school choice is important for all families, not just for myself and my children. Its my right as a parent to choose how my children are educatednot the governments right.

Colleen Hroncich is a senior policy analyst for the Commonwealth Foundation (CommonwealthFoundation.org), Pennsylvanias free market think tank.

Read the original post:

The First Amendment and Supreme Court | Opinion | dailyitem.com - Sunbury Daily Item

Elizabeth Warren Would Like to Be Appointed as the Arbiter of Truth – National Review

Senator Elizabeth Warren speaks to the media in Washington, D.C., January 23, 2020. (Joshua Roberts/Reuters)

Elizabeth Warren has proposed repealing the First Amendment. (Again.) Per CNBC:

Democratic presidential candidate Elizabeth Warren on Wednesday released a plan to fight disinformation to hold tech companies accountable for their actions in light of the 2016 election.

Thats one way of putting it, certainly. Another would be: Having bought into the conspiracy theory that the 2016 election was meaningfully affected by people arguing stupidly online, Elizabeth Warren has released a plan for the federal government to regulate the press, the publishing industry, and the Internet.

Why? To save democracy, naturally:

Disinformation and online foreign interference erode our democracy, and Donald Trump has invited both, Warren said in a Tweet Wednesday. Anyone who seeks to challenge and defeat Donald Trump in the 2020 election must be fully prepared to take this on and Ive got a plan to do it.

Warren proposed to combat disinformation by holding big tech companies like Facebook, Twitter and Google responsible for spreading misinformation designed to suppress voters from turning out.

I will push for new laws that impose tough civil and criminal penalties for knowingly disseminating this kind of information, which has the explicit purpose of undermining the basic right to vote, Warren said in a press release.

It is difficult to know where to start here. No such democracy exemption exists within the First Amendment, and no such exemption should exist within the First Amendment. The merits of my doing so aside, if I wish to say or write that particular people should not vote, or that immigrants such as myself should be disenfranchised or that the 19th Amendment was a mistake, that is my right. Were this not the case were it the case, that is, that the First Amendment could be regulated in such cases as it were being used to attack other parts of the Constitution then Elizabeth Warren herself would be liable for prosecution. (Or, at the very least, for being held accountable by the president, whatever that means.)

Ironically enough, Warrens proposal would represent a boon to precisely the sort of corruption and entrenchment of power that she insists she wishes to fight. In the vast majority of cases it would be wholly impossible for the government to determine what sort of speech served to undermine the basic right to vote or to to polarize and disenfranchise particular groups or to disempower voters, such that any concerted attempt to do so would necessarily be driven by partisan interest and little else besides. Warren complains that the same tactics employed by the Russian government are just as easily accessible to domestic groups seeking to promote or oppose candidates and political or social issues. Those tactics, lest we forget, were . . . arguing about politics. There is simply no way for the federal government to superintend domestic groups seeking to promote or oppose candidates and political or social issues without the federal government controlling political speech.

It was recently proposed that it should be unconstitutional to vote Republican. Warrens idea is merely that scheme applied to the First Amendment. In effect, Warren is seeking the power to decide what is true and what is not and what may be disseminated and what may not and to apply this power to the elections in which she herself takes part. That she is chasing this authority while accusing the incumbent president of seeking to use his office for personal political gain (which he did) is startling.

Link:

Elizabeth Warren Would Like to Be Appointed as the Arbiter of Truth - National Review

First Amendment Challenge to Restrictions on Use of Falcons in Videos and Commercials – Reason

From Stavridanoudakis v. U.S. Dep't of Fish & Wildlife, decided Friday by Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill (E.D. Cal.):

The Migratory Bird Treaty Act ("MBTA") codifies the protections of migratory birds as outlined in various conventions between the United States and four foreign countries: Canada, Mexico, Japan, and Russia. The MBTA only applies to migratory birds native to the United States, which includes several types of Falconiformes (vultures, kites, eagles, hawks, caracaras, and falcons) and Strigiformes (owls). The MBTA authorizes the Secretary of the Interior ("Secretary") to adopt suitable regulations to determine, inter alia, when, and to what extent, it may be permissible to hunt, take, capture, possess, sale, and transfer protected birds, bird parts, nests, and eggs.

Pursuant to the authority of the MBTA, the Secretary promulgated regulations to regulate falconry standards and falconry permitting . 50 C.F.R. 21.29(f)(9)(i) prohibits photographing or filming falconry raptors for "movies commercials, or in other commercial ventures." 50 C.F.R. 21.29(f)(9)(ii) prohibits falconers from photographing or filming their birds for "advertisements; as a representation of any business, company, corporation, or other organization; or for promotion or endorsement of any products, merchandise, goods, services, meetings, or fairs"unless the promotion or endorsement is of "a nonprofit falconry organization or association" or "products or endeavors related to falconry."

50 C.F.R. 21.29(f)(8)(v) dictates that during conservation education programs, falconers "must provide information about the biology, ecological roles, and conservation needs of raptors although not all of these topics must be addressed in every presentation."

In Count III of the FAC, Plaintiffs claim that 50 C.F.R. 21.29(f)(9)(i) is a content-based restriction that violates the First Amendment. Section 21.29(f)(9)(i) states "You may not use raptors to make movies, commercials, or in other commercial ventures that are not related to falconry."

In Count IV, Plaintiffs contend that 50 C.F.R. 21.29(f)(9)(ii) is an unconstitutional restriction on commercial speech. ECF No. 16 at 15-16. 50 C.F.R. 21.29(f)(9)(ii) states that falconers may not use their raptors for "commercial entertainment; for advertisements; as representation of any business or for promotion of any products [or] services with the following exceptions: (A) to promote a nonprofit falconry organization [and] (B) to promote products related to falconry ."

In Count V, Plaintiffs challenge 50 C.F.R. 21.29(f)(8)(v) which requires falconers giving conservation education programs to provide "information about the biology, ecological roles, and conservation needs of raptors."

In Count VI, Plaintiffs challenge the prohibitions on charging fees that exceed the amount required to recoup costs under 50 C.F.R. 21.20(f)(8)(iv).

The Supreme Court has recognized that various forms of entertainment and visual expression are purely expressive activitiesincluding movies. Therefore, 50 C.F.R. 21.29(f)(9)(i)'s restrictions on movies and 21.29(f)(9)(ii)'s restriction on commercial entertainment go beyond restricting expressive conduct and restrict purely expressive activity.

The restriction compelling the content of falconers' conservation education program under 50 C.F.R. 21.29(f)(8)(v) is clearly a content-based restriction because it explicitly restricts the topic of the speech that can be discussed: "you must provide information about the biology, ecological roles, and conservation needs of raptors ." The regulation unequivocally discriminates based on the topic of the educational presentation.

"A statute is presumptively inconsistent with the First Amendment if it imposes a financial burden on speakers because of the content of their speech." Simon & Schuster, Inc. v. Members of N.Y. State Crime Victims Bd., 502 U.S. 105, 115 (1991). 50 C.F.R. 21.29(f)(8)(iv) limits the fee that falconers can charge when giving a conservation education program. Therefore, this regulation imposes a financial burden on falconers depending on the content of their presentation.

The Federal Defendants do not argue in the motion to dismiss that the regulations restrict excludable speech (i.e. obscenity), or that the regulations are valid time, place, and manner restrictions. See Ward v. Rock Against Racism, 491 U.S. 781, 791 (1989). It is inconsequential that falconers could merely use nonnative raptors to engage in the prohibited activities. Because the restrictions are content based, they are not subject to reasonable time, place, and manner restrictions. Id. (the government may impose reasonable time, place, and manner restrictions, provided the restrictions are justified without reference to the content of the regulated speech). The Federal Defendants provide no such support that the restriction on use of native raptors is no less a restriction on falconers' speech.

In addition, the Federal Defendants make no argument in the motion to dismiss that the content-based restrictions pass strict scrutiny. Thus, the Federal Defendants' motion to dismiss Counts III, IV, V, and VI on the grounds that the regulations do not restrict protected speech is DENIED.

Next, the Federal Defendants contend that, assuming the speech restricted by the regulations is protected speech, the regulations do not violate the First Amendment because they are permissible regulations on commercial speech. {As discussed below, even assuming the speech regulations are aimed at only commercial speech, the Court finds that Defendants are not entitled to dismissal. In light of that finding and because the First Amendment test for commercial speech is less stringent, at this stage, the Court is not required to determine definitively the commercial or noncommercial nature of speech being restricted.}

In the present case, the limits on "commercials," under 21.29(f)(9)(i) and "advertisements," under subsection (ii), standing alone, are restrictions on commercial speech. However, restrictions on film (movies), photography, or on commercial entertainment are not restrictions on commercial speech. See ETW v. Jireh Pub., Inc., 332 F.3d 915, 925 (6th Cir. 2003) (holding "prints," or copies, of paintings were not commercial speech because they did not propose a commercial transaction); see also Anderson, 621 F.3d at 1060 (recognizing various forms of entertainment and visual expressionincluding moviesare purely expressive activities). Thus, 21.29(f)(9)(i) & (ii) place restrictions on commercial speech advertisements, commercials, and promoting a business or productand on non-commercial, fully-protected speech.

The Court evaluates restrictions on commercial speech using the four-part test in Central Hudson: "(1) if the communication is neither misleading nor related to unlawful activity, then it merits First Amendment scrutiny as a threshold matter; in order for the restriction to withstand such scrutiny, (2) [t]he State must assert a substantial interest to be achieved by restrictions on commercial speech; (3) the restriction must directly advance the state interest involved; and (4) it must not be more extensive than is necessary to serve that interest."

Plaintiffs argue that Defendants cannot make the showing on the fourth prong that the restrictions fit the government's interest at the motion to dismiss stage. Where the challenged regulation is a content-based restriction subject to strict scrutiny, the issue of whether the challenged restrictions adequately fit the government interest was a question for summary judgment or trial. Frudden v. Pilling, 742 F.3d 1199, 1207-08 (9th Cir. 2014). The summary judgment process requires defendants to show a compelling government interest and permits plaintiffs an opportunity to present countervailing evidence.

The Court acknowledges Defendants have a substantial interest in protecting native raptors. In arguing that the regulations meet the fourth prong as a matter of law, the Federal Defendants claim that "the regulations are directed specifically at commercial endeavors, with a limited carve-out for falconry related undertakings." ECF No. 24-1 at 19. However, in light of Frudden, the present record is not developed sufficiently. Accordingly, the Federal Defendants' motion to dismiss the challenges to 50 C.F.R. 21.29(f)(9)(i) and (ii) (Counts III & IV) on the theory that they are permissible commercial speech restrictions is DENIED.

In Count VI (Second Count), Plaintiffs claim that the California regulation, 14 C.C.R. 670(h)(13)(A), violates the First and Fourteenth Amendments in the same way that the federal regulations do. This regulation states: "Education and Exhibiting. A licensee may use raptors in his or her possession for training purposes, education, field meets, and media (filming, photography, advertisements, etc.), as noted in 50 CFR 21, if the licensee possesses the appropriate valid federal permits, as long as the raptor is primarily used for falconry and the activity is related to the practice of falconry or biology, ecology or conservation of raptors and other migratory birds. Any fees charged, compensation, or pay received during the use of falconry raptors for these purposes may not exceed the amount required to recover costs."

Like the federal regulations in Counts III, IV, V, and VI, this regulation is also a restriction of expressive activity based on content. It demands that when using the raptors in presentations or media, the content must be related to falconry. Section 670(h)(13)(A) also imposes a restriction on compensation that corresponds to the federal regulations. The State Defendants argue that 670(h)(13)(A) does not ban speech. For the same reasons stated above that the federal regulations are content-based restrictions on expressive activity, the Court rejects this argument. Because the regulations are content based, they are presumptively unreasonable and subject to strict scrutiny review.

Next, the State Defendants contend that should falconers desire to use raptors for exhibiting or commercial uses not authorized in 670(h)(13)(A), they may obtain the appropriate permit to engage in such activity. It is somewhat unclear what State Defendants are pecking at. The Court has reviewed the falconry regulations raised by the parties. It is possible there is a separate regulatory regime that supports State Defendants' argument that falconers can obtain a separate permit to engage in the prohibited activities. State Defendants have not identified any such alternative regulations or laws.

The language of the regulations does not support the State Defendant's position.14 C.C.R. 670(h)(13)(A) provides "A licensee may use raptors in his or her possession for training purposes, education field meets, and media (filming, photography, advertisements, etc.), as noted in 50 CFR 21, if the licensee possesses the appropriate valid federal permits, as long as the raptor is primarily used for falconry and the activity is related to the practice of falconry or biology, ecology or conservation of raptors and other migratory birds." By this provision's plain language, it does not appear that a falconer could seek a permit to give a talk with the raptor that is unrelated to the practice of falconry. For instance, even with an exhibiting permit under 14 C.C.R. 671.1(b)(6), a falconer could not give a presentation using her raptor about her political or religious views, or throw a Harry Potter party for a relative, because these topics are not related to the practice of falconry or the biology, ecology, or conservation of raptors. Furthermore, it is notable that the provision requires the licensee to possess the "appropriate valid federal permits." Thus, the Court rejects the State Defendants' argument that Count VI (Second Count) fails to state a claim for relief on the theory Plaintiffs could simply get a separate federal permit.

[T]he strength of the government's interest for the challenged regulations and the fit of those interests to the speech restrictions at issue are material to the Court's preliminary injunction analysis for all three categories of the First Amendment challenges.

The Court tentatively finds that the government has a strong interest in protecting the native raptor species, but because the briefing has failed to sufficiently discuss any aspect of fit, and because the Court is responsible for evaluating how a preliminary injunction would impact the public interest, the Court must hear from the Federal and State Defendants before it takes any action.

For example, it is unclear from the present record whether prohibiting falconers from earning money for educational presentations is a narrowly-tailored solution to combat a marketplace for the protected birds. Federal and State Defendants must discuss why the restrictions on falconers' ability to give presentations and to film and photograph their birds meet strict scrutiny.

As with analyzing the restrictions on falconers' ability to give presentations and film their birds, the Court will need supplemental briefing to thoroughly analyze whether the compensation restrictions are narrowly tailored to achieve the government's interest. Federal and State Defendants must discuss why the compensation restrictions meets strict scrutiny.

As to the third category relating to commercial speech, the Federal Defendants contend that the regulations affecting commercial transactions of falconers are necessary to prevent a market for the protected birds from developing. Federal Defendants argue that lifting the regulations would undermine the goal of falconry raptor preservation and cause detrimental effects on the protected species.

Under Central Hudson, the restriction must not be more extensive than necessary to serve the government interest. The test is sometimes phrased as requiring a "reasonable fit" between the government's legitimate interests and the means it uses to serve those interests, or that the government narrowly tailors the means to meet its objective.

At present, the Federal and State Defendants' briefing does not explain how the regulations are not more extensive than necessary to serve an important state interest. The State Defendants similarly do not address how the restrictions on commercial speech are not more extensive than necessary to promote the health and welfare of raptors. Therefore, on the present record, the Court cannot determine if the restrictions on commercial speech are not more extensive than necessary to serve these interests.

The Court will order the Federal and State Defendants to submit supplemental briefing with respect to these narrow issues. The Defendants should discuss the nature of the government interest involved and how the three categories of speech restrictions (falconers' presentations and media, compensation, and commercial speech) are drawn to meet such interest. Lastly, Defendants should provide an analysis for the third and fourth prongs of the Winter test: the balance of equities and the public interest. Plaintiffs will then have an opportunity to respond.

The State and Federal Defendants are ordered to file supplemental briefs addressing the state interest(s) in the regulations challenged under the First Amendment and how those speech restrictions are tailored to achieve those interests, and relatedly, the balance of equities and the public interest prongs under Winter. The Defendants shall have 30 days from the date of this order to file the briefs. Toucan, of course, play at this game, so Plaintiffs will then have 30 days from the date they are served with both State Defendants' and Federal Defendants' briefs to file a responsive brief.

Read more from the original source:

First Amendment Challenge to Restrictions on Use of Falcons in Videos and Commercials - Reason

INSIDE THE FIRST AMENDMENT: ‘Getting it right’ – on Kobe Bryant and everything else – Meridian Star

Getting it right is one reliable defense for a free press in todays media world against critics who often base objections and critiques more on political differences than factual error.

However, criticism for getting it wrong is fair game for press skeptics with wrong covering a multitude of alleged sins, as occurred following the Jan. 26 deaths of NBA superstar Kobe Bryant, his daughter and seven others in a helicopter crash.

Even though many times the news outlets themselves quickly corrected errors or apologized, those moves often fell short of placating many on social media.

The BBC apologized quickly Sunday for using video of NBA star LeBron James during a segment on Bryants death a mistake the harkened to an old racist saw that to whites, all black people look alike.

The BBCs quick apology: In tonights coverage of the death of Kobe Bryant on #BBCNewsTen, we mistakenly used pictures of LeBron James in one section of the report, BBC Editor Paul Royall tweeted hours later. We apologize for this human error, which fell below our usual standards.

A slew of online critics some starting an online petition calling for resignation have questioned the sincerity of an MSNBC anchors apology Sunday after she appeared to use the n-word when reporting on Bryants death. Alison Morris later posted on Twitter: Earlier today, while reporting on the tragic news of Kobe Bryants passing, I unfortunately stuttered on air, combining the names of the Knicks and the Lakers to say Nakers. Please know I did not & would NEVER use a racist term. I apologize for the confusion this caused.

Gossip site TMZ was the first to report Bryants death. Los Angeles County Sheriff Alex Villanueva later said, It would be extremely disrespectful to understand that your loved one perished and you learn about it from TMZ. Los Angeles County Undersheriff Tim Murakami tweeted that he understood the pressures related to getting the scoop, but please allow us time to make personal notifications to their loved ones. Its very cold to hear of the loss via media.

Less clear is why The Washington Post placed a national political reporter, Felicia Sonmez, on administrative leave Monday only to reverse the action Tuesday because of tweets that began with a link to a 2016 Daily Beast story titled, Kobe Bryants Disturbing Rape Case: The DNA Evidence, the Accusers Story and the Half-Confession.

It is unclear whether the Posts initial action was in response to many online critics who called the tweet insensitive some issuing death threats, Sonmez said or because one of her tweets on the subject included a screen shot of her work email inbox, showing the names of critics.

By Tuesday, newsroom colleagues were rallying around Sonmez and Post columnist Erik Wemple wrote that the newspapers concerns, per an email from management to Sonmez, were that they didnt pertain to the reporters coverage area and that your behavior on social media is making it harder for others to do their work as Washington Post journalists. In the same column, Sonmez was quoted as saying she was never told the suspension involved the screen grab of her work email box.

Wemple raised questions about the action, noting that if journalists at the Post are prone to suspension for tweeting stories off their beats, the entire newsroom should be on administrative leave.

On Tuesday evening, After conducting an internal review, we have determined that, while we consider Felicias tweets ill-timed, she was not in clear and direct violation of our social media policy, Tracy Grant, managing editor of the Post, said in a statement.

Several news outlets drew a line from an early Fox News report with the incorrect number of those who died to a President Trump tweet repeating the error. ABC News on Wednesday suspended correspondent Matt Gutman after he erroneously reported on Sunday that all four of Bryants daughters were on the helicopter that crashed. Gutman, who also reported strong criticism on social media, apologized: We are in the business of holding people accountable, and I hold myself accountable for a terrible mistake, which I deeply regret.

A common factor here is the desire for a speedy post, reaction or comment, seemingly based on an assumption that readers and viewers and listeners care most about hearing news and seeing reactions now. But what about the values of accuracy, deliberation and thoroughness in an era in which much of the nation considers the news media unreliable, if not deliberately manipulative and unduly provocative?

Yes, many major news operations got it right by waiting for information to be verified. The Los Angeles Times at least took the intermediate approach of acknowledging online the early accounts of Bryants death and advising its readers it still was investigating those reports.

Sonmezs incident is a more challenging call for the Post, for the public and for a free press generally. Certainly, there is the longstanding social pressure and even journalistic guidelines to avoid sensationalism and inflicting undue pain that seems to lean toward avoiding disparaging news of a person immediately after his/her death.

But then, to ignore a womans allegation and resulting legal action in the #MeToo era (or anytime) likely would have resulted in legitimate complaints that journalists were channeling gender bias and hero worship and sanitizing a life. For the record, criminal charges against Bryan were dropped and a civil lawsuit settled out of court.

There is not one perfect way to gather or report news. The tasks are too complex and dependent on facts of each instance to produce cookie-cutter rules. And to large degree, the First Amendment rules out the enforceable codes of conduct that govern professions such as law and medicine.

But having been a young reporter at one time whose on-deadline job all too often was to collect a photo and interview family members of a recently deceased newsworthy person, I know there is a better way, with sensitivity, honesty and an emphasis on getting things right the first time, even when giving audiences an accurate news account.

Those terms sensitivity, honesty, getting it right and accurate are not in the First Amendments 45 words, to be sure. But that doesnt mean those values arent as real or applicable to how a free press should operate.

Gene Policinski is president and chief operating officer of the Freedom Forum Institute. He can be reached at gpolicinski@freedomforum.org, or follow him on Twitter at @genefac.

Visit link:

INSIDE THE FIRST AMENDMENT: 'Getting it right' - on Kobe Bryant and everything else - Meridian Star

Former PFAW Senior Fellow and Then-Maryland State Senator Jamie Raskin On a Constitutional Amendment to Citizens United – People For the American Way

Ten years ago, the Supreme Court ruling in Citizens United unleashed a flood of corporate money into American politics, giving corporations and wealthy donors free rein to influence our elections. On February 6, 2020, the Democracy for All Amendment, a proposed constitutional amendment that would change campaign finance laws and limit the amount of money that can be used to influence elections, will have a public hearing for the first time in the 116th Congress. Learn about the history of Citizens United, previous attempts at passing a constitutional amendment, and other effects of the 2010 ruling by exploring the resources below, all contributed over the years by Rep. Jamie Raskin (Md. 8), a former senior fellow at People For the American Way.

The only effect of Citizens United was to give CEOs of business corporations the power to take unlimited amounts of money from corporate treasuries and spend it advancing or defeating political candidates of their choosing. Its real-world consequence was thus not to expand the political freedom of citizens but to reduce the political power of citizens vis--vis huge corporations with vast fortunes. These corporations, endowed with limited shareholder liability, perpetual life, and other privileges, may now freely engage in motivated political spending to enrich themselves and their executives, leaving workers and other citizens behind.

Read more here.

On March 25, 2015, PFAW Foundation Senior Fellow Jamie Raskin previewed his upcoming report, The Supreme Court in the Citizens United Era, during a member telebriefing. Executive Vice President Marge Baker and Senior Legislative Counsel Paul Gordon also joined the call to answer questions from members and discuss PFAW efforts to promote fair and just courts. Drew Courtney, former director of communications for PFAW, moderated.

Read more here.

The [proposed] 28th Amendment would reaffirm and restore congressional and state power to regulate campaign finance, but nothing in it could interfere in any way with the First Amendment doctrines of viewpoint and content neutrality as they would apply to such regulations. The 28th Amendment would, for example, empower Congress to restore the aggregate candidate contribution limits that had been in place under FECA for decades and were just invalidated by the Supreme Court in the 5-4 McCutcheon decision.

Read more here.

Thus, if the justification being offered forCitizens United is to allow individual citizens to associate and combine resources in the corporate for to participate more effectively in the political process, as the question posits, then this justification is hollow and specious because all Americans already had that right. Without a rationale for the decision that explains specifically why the managers of for-profit business corporations must have the power to spend corporate treasury resources on political campaigningthe power, that is, to convert economic wealth amassed in business by a corporation into political finance capitalwe are left with the implication that five justices on the Court overturned multiple constitutional precedents [] and struck down dozens of federal and state laws, all simply in order to increase the political power of corporate executives and the candidates they may choose to fund.

Read more here.

Four years ago, in Citizens United v. FEC, the Roberts Court majority bulldozed an essential block of the wall, the one that kept trillions of dollars in corporate treasury wealth from flowing into federal campaigns. In Arizona Free Enterprise Clubs Freedom Club PAC v. Bennett (2011), the Court stifled public debate and destroyed vast new opportunities for political speech by striking down public financing programs that use matching funds to amplify the voices of less affluent candidates competing to be heard over the roar of big wealth. In McCutcheon v. FEC (2014), the Court took a sledgehammer to the aggregate contribution limits, empowering political tycoons and shrewd business investors to max out to every Member of Congress and all their opponents. All of these assaults on political equality and free speech were justified in the name of the First Amendment.

Read more here.

If right-wing America had set out to design a Supreme Court case that combined all of its political fetishes, it could not have done better than to come up with Hobby Lobby Stores Inc. v. Sebelius, a devilishly complex assault on Obamacare, womens health care rights in the workplace, and the embattled idea that the Bill of Rights is for people, not corporations. The outlandish claims of the company involved would not have a prayer except for Citizens United, the miracle gift of 2010 that just keeps giving.

Read more here.

Now, in the bitterly divided Citizens United decision (2010), five Justices on the Roberts Court have held that corporations have the right to spend unlimited sums of money promoting or disparaging political candidates. This decision built on the dangerous fallacy that state-chartered corporations enjoy the same political free speech rights as the people strikes another dangerous blow against popular democracy. It is a blueprint for government of the big corporations, by the big corporations and for the big corporations.

Read more here.

Continue reading here:

Former PFAW Senior Fellow and Then-Maryland State Senator Jamie Raskin On a Constitutional Amendment to Citizens United - People For the American Way