Freedom Project: Play highlights civil rights perspective of black women – Meridian Star

Fiveyoung peoplewith theSunflower CountyFreedom Project put on a play Saturday afternoon at the Meridian Arts+Entertainment Experience to highlight theperspectives of black, female activists.

A Song for Coretta, by Pearl Cleave, takes the audience to the outside of Atlantas Ebenezer Baptist Church, where people of different generations are waiting in line to pay their respects to Coretta Scott King.

The conversations that ensue, make up the play, with moments of serious discussion about past experiences, historical moments and generational differences, mixed with moments of light-hearted fun.

Each character was played by a young member of the Sunflower County Freedom Project.

The cast was comprised of Kennedye Rash, 13; Amyah Nash, 13; Phillystity Gray, 16; Braelyn Ingram, 14; and Jamiyah McCloud, 14.

After the play, the cast answered questions from the audience.

One person asked, Why this play?

InBlack History Month, people dont always talk about what the females did, and thats why I liked this play, because its about what she (Coretta) did, not what her husband (Dr. Martin Luther King Jr.) did, McCloud said.

The rest of the cast echoed that sentiment, as they believe that sometimes the classroom lessons dont always give credit where its due.

They also said the play was an effort to educate people.

The play is to inform people about black history and how much it changed from then to today, Rash said.

The group was led by Kandace Stevenson, director of programming for the Sunflower County Freedom Project.

I first wanted to find a play to reflect our history, and I noticed this was a group of young ladies auditioning, Stevenson said. This is my second year with this drama troupe. I noticed the growth and maturity, the raw emotion, dedication and trying to do better than last year.

Im super excited, I think it was fantastic. These five young ladies came to Meridian, out of their shell, totally unaware of what they would run into and they showed out, said Adrian Cross, executive director of the Meridian Freedom Project.

They were very open, especially during the question and answer segment, I think that was one of my favorite parts because they got a lot of feedback and they took their constructive criticism, but they were also able to express themselves even more.

The play was received with a standing ovation at its close.

Audience members took some thoughts back with them after viewing the performance.

I feel that we dont get the chance to hear from the female perspective on the civil rights movement, and I liked how they talked about the trauma during the Katrina hurricane, the young lady in the military, and it was all done from womens perspectives, Deborah Todd, of Meridian, said.

More information on the group can be foundwww.sunflowerfreedom.org. More information about The Meridian Freedom Project can be foundat TheMeridianFreedomProject.org.

Go here to see the original:

Freedom Project: Play highlights civil rights perspective of black women - Meridian Star

Case of Freedom Trail guides headed to the NLRB – The Boston Globe

LABORCase of Freedom Trail guides headed to the NLRB

Freedom Trail tour guides fighting for their first union contract are set to face their employer in a National Labor Relations Board hearing next month, following charges by the union that the Freedom Trail Foundation withheld tour guides scheduled pay raises. Lizzie Short said she was was one of several guides denied the extra $3.50 per tour they were entitled to, following a review process, after two years of service. The reason, Shorts boss told her each time she brought it up, was the ongoing contract negotiations. The union filed a complaint with the labor relations board late last summer, and in December, the board found that the Freedom Trail Foundation had failed to bargain in good faith and set a hearing date for March 3 in Boston. The board also ordered the foundation to provide back pay to guides who had been denied scheduled pay increases. In its response to the labor relations board, the foundation denied any wrongdoing. The 30-plus guides, who take visitors to local historic sites dressed in Colonial-era garb, voted to join Unite Here Local 26 a year ago. Their main demands: the ability to use microphones, to cancel tours during bad weather, to wear more weather-appropriate garb, and to call in sick without feeling obligated to find their own replacements. They also want more money. Guides base pay $45 for a 90-minute tour, plus time beforehand getting into costume and promoting their tours hasnt increased in 12 years, the guides said. KATIE JOHNSTON

The Baker administration has named Patrick Woodcock as its new Department of Energy Resources commissioner, following Judith Judsons departure to the private sector. Woodcock had been appointed interim energy resources commissioner in December because Judson took a job with Ameresco, the Framingham-based renewable energy company. Before joining the administration, Woodcock was director of Maines state energy office from 2013 through 2016. Woodcocks current boss, state energy and environmental affairs secretary Katie Theoharides, announced his new job at a meeting of the Massachusetts Clean Energy Center board on Wednesday. Also on Wednesday, the administration announced that Jim Montgomery has been appointed commissioner of the Department of Conservation and Recreation, and Shaun Santos was named colonel of the Massachusetts Environmental Police. Both roles are also overseen by Theoharides. JON CHESTO

L.L. Bean is eliminating 200 jobs across the company and closing its call center in Maines second-largest city as part of a reorganization. The outdoor retailers job cuts will occur at all levels, company spokeswoman Carolyn Beem said Wednesday. All 130 call center agents in Lewiston will be offered the opportunity to move to a call center in Portland or work from home, she said. The company has dealt with flat sales and a difficult era of belt-tightening that included a previous reduction in workforce, a tightening of its generous return policy, and a paring of product lines to refocus on the companys outdoors roots. But the company last year reported a small increase in sales. ASSOCIATED PRESS

Online mattress pioneer Casper Sleep Inc. is slashing the price of its initial public offering. The New York-based company said in a filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission on Wednesday that it now anticipates offering approximately 8.4 million shares at $12 to $13 per share. Last month Casper said it expected to price the IPO between $17 and $19 per share. Investors may be cautious after some recent IPO flops. The ride-hailing companies Uber and Lyft debuted on the market last year, but have continued to lose money and both have traded well below their IPO prices. Office-sharing company WeWork scuttled its IPO in September. ASSOCIATED PRESS

US companies added 291,000 jobs in January, a big increase from December, but much of that strength likely reflected unusually warm weather during the month. Payroll processor ADP said Wednesday that the January job gain, which was larger than had been expected, compared to a revised December figure of 193,000. Mark Zandi, chief economist at Moodys Analytics, said that warmer-than-normal weather for January played a big role in the increase. He said without that impact, the job gain would probably have been around 150,000. The ADP report is coming out ahead of the Labor Departments release of the January jobs report on Friday. ASSOCIATED PRESS

Spotify announced Tuesday that it had entered into an agreement to acquire The Ringer, a podcast-focused pop culture and sports company founded by former ESPN writer Bill Simmons. Terms of the deal which had been rumored for weeks were not announced, though Recodes Peter Kafka reports that Spotify intends to hire The Ringers 90 employees and keep its website up and running. But the audio companys main desire was to acquire The Ringers successful podcast network, which includes offerings such as Simmons eponymous podcast and shows covering the NBA, NFL, the media, and pop culture. WASHINGTON POST

Drug maker Merck beat Wall Streets fourth-quarter profit expectations, but investors werent as happy with the biggest move Mercks made in years: deciding to spin off its womens health division and other operations with $6.5 billion in annual revenues. The maker of cancer blockbuster Keytruda announced the plan along with its quarterly results, saying the two resulting companies each would be able to grow faster and develop more new medicines, benefiting patients. But investors sold off shares in heavy trading early Wednesday, pushing their price down more than 4 percent initially before closing 2.9 percent down. The maneuver culminates a steady shift of Mercks business the past several years from a primary care drug maker with more than 160 products, to a company which will have half as many, focused on its surging but young oncology business, and growing sales of its vaccine, hospital products, and veterinary medicines. ASSOCIATED PRESS

Walt Disney Co.s crusade to become a streaming giant is off to a swift start. Subscribers to the new Disney+ online service soared to 28.6 million by early February, suggesting the company founded nearly a century ago can challenge Netflix Inc. in the crowded market for online TV. Analysts were forecasting a year-end total of 20.8 million, according to Bloomberg Consensus. BLOOMBERG NEWS

Johns Hopkins University dislodged Harvard University as the top fund-raiser among US colleges, fueled by a $1.8 billion donation from Michael Bloomberg. Schools raised almost $50 billion in the 12 months ended June 2019, a record year and the 10th consecutive period of increased donations, according to a study released Wednesday by the Council for Advancement and Support of Education. Hopkins brought in $2.7 billion after Bloomberg in November 2018 announced the gift for his alma mater to help low- and moderate-income students attend. Harvard, the richest US college, had topped the list every year since fiscal 2016. It raised $1.4 billion, followed by Stanford University at $1.1 billion, according to the data. BLOOMBERG NEWS

Read the original here:

Case of Freedom Trail guides headed to the NLRB - The Boston Globe

Arts Wave partners with the National Underground Railroad Freedom Center to celebrate Black History Month. – WLWT Cincinnati

Visitors to the National Underground Railroad Freedom Center were greeted today, by the sounds of jazz and treated to a day of art culture and history.Andre DuBois of Arts Wave said the Freedom Center was the perfect location to recognize the art of the Queen City.What better place than the Freedom Center during Black History Month to celebrate all the diverse arts that we have in our city. Dubois said.Docents guided tours, sharing lessons of the past and perhaps inspiring visions of a more perfect future.The National Underground Railroad Freedom Center, Arts Wave's community partner, offered free admission to the public, including its brand-new exhibition, "Motel X," a multimedia interactive experienced designed by Cincinnati artist Christine Shrum.Katie Branell of The National Underground Freedom Center describes Arts Wave's kickoff as a perfect compliment to the Freedom Centers mission.We are able to talk about Black History Month and tell people why we are here, the underground railroad, and feature our special exhibit Motel X which is an interactive multimedia exhibit on human trafficking.Arts Waves partnered with the museum as part of Lifting as We Climb in commemoration of Black History Month. Watching the reaction of patrons, DuBois said he is encouraged by the agencys mission. In this particularly event, I just love the interaction we have with different African-American artists. I think it is so important, because art is always a reflection of life.For many in the tri-state and even around the world, this Freedom Center has served throughout its 15 years as a beacon to talk about the social crises of humanity. Organizers say with Arts Wave, the internationally renowned research center serves as a bridgeWe want to be the premier institution that talks about what we call inclusive freedom. So we want to teach people about this history and then encourage them to become active on fighting against injustices today.Branell said. Arts Wave raises more than $12 million annually to support the fine arts in the Cincinnati region.

Visitors to the National Underground Railroad Freedom Center were greeted today, by the sounds of jazz and treated to a day of art culture and history.

Andre DuBois of Arts Wave said the Freedom Center was the perfect location to recognize the art of the Queen City.

What better place than the Freedom Center during Black History Month to celebrate all the diverse arts that we have in our city. Dubois said.

Docents guided tours, sharing lessons of the past and perhaps inspiring visions of a more perfect future.

The National Underground Railroad Freedom Center, Arts Wave's community partner, offered free admission to the public, including its brand-new exhibition, "Motel X," a multimedia interactive experienced designed by Cincinnati artist Christine Shrum.

Katie Branell of The National Underground Freedom Center describes Arts Wave's kickoff as a perfect compliment to the Freedom Centers mission.

We are able to talk about Black History Month and tell people why we are here, the underground railroad, and feature our special exhibit Motel X which is an interactive multimedia exhibit on human trafficking.

Arts Waves partnered with the museum as part of Lifting as We Climb in commemoration of Black History Month. Watching the reaction of patrons, DuBois said he is encouraged by the agencys mission.

In this particularly event, I just love the interaction we have with different African-American artists. I think it is so important, because art is always a reflection of life.

For many in the tri-state and even around the world, this Freedom Center has served throughout its 15 years as a beacon to talk about the social crises of humanity. Organizers say with Arts Wave, the internationally renowned research center serves as a bridge

We want to be the premier institution that talks about what we call inclusive freedom. So we want to teach people about this history and then encourage them to become active on fighting against injustices today.Branell said.

Arts Wave raises more than $12 million annually to support the fine arts in the Cincinnati region.

Go here to see the original:

Arts Wave partners with the National Underground Railroad Freedom Center to celebrate Black History Month. - WLWT Cincinnati

The freedom Bobby Hurley gives to players is often criticized, but it might end up saving ASU’s season – The Athletic

Associate head coach Rashon Burno sent the text at 5:49 p.m. Wednesday, about 27 hours before Arizona States home contest against UCLA.

Hey, are you getting shots up tonight?

Yeah I am, Kimani Lawrence answered.

Work on getting shots behind ball screens. Also, get some off the bounce one-dribble pull-up.

Aight, got you.

Lawrence was coming off perhaps his worst game of the season. In last Saturdays win at Washington, the junior forward attempted two shots. Both from 3-point range. Neither hit the rim. A capable shooter, Lawrence boarded the team bus 6 of 38 from the arc on the season.

A nightmare.

Once the Sun Devils returned to Tempe, Lawrence did the only thing he knew: He studied film from last season, watching himself drill 3-pointers. Then he went to the gym, turned on music and went to work, getting up nearly 1,000 shots a day. Before practice.

See more here:

The freedom Bobby Hurley gives to players is often criticized, but it might end up saving ASU's season - The Athletic

Taking the Freedom Out of Freelancing – Foundation for Economic Education – Foundation for Economic Education

As I headed to LAX after a recent trip to Los Angeles, my Lyft driver insisted that we stop at In-N-Out Burger so that I could enjoy one last California experience. We ate the burgers outside, as planes flew above us. My driver, a professional photographer, works for Lyft to supplement his irregular income. His story is common. Most drivers that Ive encountered in California and elsewhere drive as a side job, while also, say, working in restaurants or selling real estate.

But if Californias state government has its way, driving for Lyft or Uber wont be easy in the future. The passage of Assembly Bill 5 (AB5) aims to make contract workers, like my Lyft driver, regular employees.AB5 is well-intentioned but doesnt account for how the labor market has changed. This will bring higher pay and benefits to retained workers, but it will also increase costs, which means higher prices for customers. And if employers ultimately incur the costs of adding more regular staff, odds are that they will start to mandate when and where employees work, reducing gig-work opportunities.

Under the new law, to be permitted to hire someone as a contractorand not as an employeebusinesses must pass whats known as the ABC test, which involves proving, in court, that the contractor is free from control and direction of the hiring entity, that the contractor supplies similar services to other vendors, and that the work performed falls outside the usual course of the hiring entitys business. My Lyft driver, and many others, would be unable to satisfy those conditions.

AB5 is well-intentioned. Contract work, with its unconventional hours and pay, is risky and unpredictable, with no benefits, and the prospect of instant termination. The law originated in a 2018 lawsuit, Dynamex Superior West v. Superior Court, involving delivery employees at Dynamex. Though the company considered them contractors, they were expected to wear uniforms and supply their own cars. They sued to be recognized as employees and won, and the suit created the ABC test. Within a year, AB5 became law.

But AB5 doesnt account for how the labor market has changed. In an industrial economy, dependence on a single employer made sense, and attaining skills relevant to a single firm proved valuable. Finding other work, after all, could be difficult. But in a knowledge-oriented economy, where technology makes work easier to find and on-the-job skills are more commonly transferable across companies than in the past, independence can suit both employers and employees. Gig works flexibility also makes it valuable as a fallback, offering extra money when people might need it most.Nontraditional work relationships include a host of different arrangements.

In fact, most gig workers in the U.S. dont work full-time in this capacity. Over the past 15 years, the number of full-time contractors has been stable. According to a Federal Reserve Board survey, only 18 percent of Americans perform gig work as their primary source of income. The plurality, or 38 percent, use it to supplement income from their primary job.

Overall, 30 percent of Americans do some form of gig work, and its common across education levels. Though contract work makes up less than ten percent of household income for three-quarters of survey respondents, 45 percent consider it an important part of their income.

The Fed concludes:

The greater subjective value placed on this income may be related to its ability to smooth out unexpected changes in earnings from main jobs even if the actual amount of money earned is relatively small.

Gig works flexibility also makes it valuable as a fallback, offering extra money when people might need it most. Workers of all income levels find it valuable. Its also a helpful option for stay-at-home parents who want to keep a toe in the labor market. Turning gig work into a regular job undermines this value because it removes its most important characteristic: flexibility.

No wonder, then, that workers and employers are pushing back. Freelance journalists are mounting a challenge to AB5 after many lost jobs. Developing technology calls for better regulation of gig work, not effectively eliminating it.Uber and Lyft say that theyll continue to hire drivers as contractors, but they could face legal challenges, as some trucking companies did. The truckers prevailed in court because their business takes them across state lines.

Its true that technology is transforming the labor market, and employee protections have been reduced. But this development calls for better regulation of gig work, not effectively eliminating it. The leading Democratic presidential candidatesJoe Biden, Elizabeth Warren, Pete Buttigieg, and Bernie Sandershave all endorsed a national version of AB5. They should remember that most workers use gig work as a form of insurance. By eliminating contractors, laws like AB5 will increase risk rather than reduce it.

This article is republished from City Journal.

The rest is here:

Taking the Freedom Out of Freelancing - Foundation for Economic Education - Foundation for Economic Education

The basis of freedom – SC Times

Gary Hukriede, White Bear Lake Published 5:00 p.m. CT Feb. 5, 2020

The left does not understand President Trump because they do not understand the basis of freedom that he so well addresses. Let me explain.

Evidence shows that from the DNA, the greater number of people are destined to be either liberal or conservative. There is where it all begins.

A researcher, Jonathan Haidt,has synthesized five moral foundations from which all humans process their environment and existence through. Therefore, our polarized ideologies are given to us as a tendency to be one or the otherfrom the DNA.

Of these five moral foundationelements, liberals tend to process the most through predominantly two, while conservatives utilize all five. Functioning predominantly through only two moral foundations is more limiting to the true understanding of the functioning of community, economyand personal freedom.

Haidt states that morality suppresses selfishness [a survival instinct] and thus enables social groups to function.

Haidt has concluded from his research that all successful civilization has functioned through all five moral foundations for balance and success. He writes, Looking at the entire range of human societies, the statistically normal human society is built upon all five foundations. It is modern liberalismwhich requires a special explanation.

Its interesting to note that Haidt was a liberal, who, after his research, now refers to himself as a centrist.

Read or Share this story: https://www.sctimes.com/story/opinion/2020/02/05/basis-freedom/4659157002/

View post:

The basis of freedom - SC Times

Investors ‘are really excited about the Donald Trump presidency continuing’: top strategist – Yahoo Finance

A big week of wins for President Trump could mean a big win for investors, one top strategist thinks.

Donald Trump is helping the economy, he has helped the economy. Individuals who are really concerned about their investments are really excited about the Donald Trump presidency continuing, Hercules Investment CEO James McDonald said on Yahoo Finances The First Trade. Donald Trump is continuing to keep the market up. I think Donald Trump has something up his sleeves, and has a plan for keeping markets elevated.

Traders pause to watch a televised speech by President Donald Trump as they work the floor of the New York Stock Exchange in New York, Wednesday, Jan. 8, 2020. (AP Photo/Seth Wenig)

Trumps latest win following ones earlier this week in being acquitted of impeachment charges and the Iowa Democratic caucus debacle came on Friday via the latest read on the U.S. job market. Not only did the January jobs report blow past the high-end of Wall Streets estimates, but there were solid upward revisions to prior months.

Some top stats:

Change in nonfarm payrolls:+225,000 vs. +165,000 expected and +147,000 in December

Unemployment rate:3.6%vs. 3.5% expected and 3.5% in December

Average hourly earnings month on month:+0.2%vs. +0.3% expected and +0.1% in December

Average hourly earnings year on year:+3.1%vs. +3.0% expected and +3.0% in December

While the market sold off on the jobs numbers amid fears it reduces the chances of another rate from the Federal Reserve, there is no denying the strength of the labor market entering Trumps re-election bid. The jobs momentum suggests employment could bounce back sharply later this year once the effects of the coronavirus fade into the background.

Its a very good jobs number, and it really tells you the economy has momentum, former JPMorgan Chase Chief economist Anthony Chan told Yahoo Finance.

Added McDonald, Any risk of Trump losing is a risk to the market. Anyone who has bet against Trump strictly speaking economically has lost. They have lost big-time. This is not just the longest running bull market, but the acceleration of gains since November 2016 has been unprecedented.

Brian Sozzi is an editor-at-large and co-anchor of The First Trade at Yahoo Finance. Watch The First Trade each day here at 9:00 a.m. ET or on Verizon FIOS channel 604. Follow Sozzi on Twitter @BrianSozzi and on LinkedIn.

Read the latest financial and business news from Yahoo Finance

Follow Yahoo Finance on Twitter, Facebook, Instagram, Flipboard, SmartNews, LinkedIn, YouTube, and reddit.

Visit link:

Investors 'are really excited about the Donald Trump presidency continuing': top strategist - Yahoo Finance

Donald Trump’s Bright Orange Face Unsurprisingly Inspired All These Memes – ELLE.com

Sarah SilbigerGetty Images

On Friday, William Moon, who posts photos of Donald Trump on the account @photowhitehouse, added a photo of the president that captured peoples' attention pretty fast. The photo, of the president walking across the South Lawn after he returned from Charlotte, North Carolina, shows his face looking very...orange. It didn't take long for this simple photo to become a trending meme all over Twitter.

Just scroll through the replies to Moon's initial tweet, and you'll find some real winners.

Since he became president more than three years ago, Trump has fueled the meme community with countless opportunities. There was the "covfefe" meme of May 2017when the president clearly meant to write "negative press coverage" and instead made up a new word in a tweet. This one wasn't necessarily a meme, but Hillary Clinton trolled Trump hard with her response to "covfefe."

In October 2018, Trump boarded Air Force One with what appeared to be toilet paper stuck to his shoe. BuzzFeed reporter Claudia Koerner originally tweeted the shot, and the responses took off.

Sometimes, you don't even need a meme to get a point across.

Oh, and just in case you think there is one version of the bright-orange-face photo, it also comes in black and white.

Somehow, that doesn't make the effects any more subtle.

See the original post here:

Donald Trump's Bright Orange Face Unsurprisingly Inspired All These Memes - ELLE.com

Donald Trump tweets that Pete Rose should be in the Baseball Hall of Fame – USA TODAY

Share This Story!

Let friends in your social network know what you are reading about

President Donald Trump tweeted late Saturday that while MLB hits king Pete Rose gambled on the game, he should still be in the Baseball Hall of Fame.

A link has been sent to your friend's email address.

A link has been posted to your Facebook feed.

USA TODAY Sports Published 5:14 p.m. ET Feb. 8, 2020 | Updated 5:14 p.m. ET Feb. 8, 2020

USA TODAY Sports' Bob Nightengale breaks down Pete Rose's comments on MLB's sign-stealing scandal. USA TODAY

Now that President Donald Trump's impeachment trial has ended, he apparently has baseball on his mind.

Trump on Saturday tweeted that MLB's all-time hits leader, Pete Rose, should be in the Baseball Hall of Fame. Rose was banned from baseball in 1989 for gambling on games while he managed the Cincinnati Reds, but last weekpetitioned MLB commissioner Rob Manfred, arguinghe should be reinstated.

Rose and his attorney contend thatbecause no players involved in the Houston Astros cheating scandal are currently facing discipline, Rose's reinstatement should be on the table.

Trump mentioned Rose's gambling in his tweet but shrugged it off, writing, "He gambled, but only on his own team winning, and paid a decades long price. GET PETE ROSE INTO THE BASEBALL HALL OF FAME. It's Time!"

Trump was active on Twitter all day Saturday, and by lateafternoon,had sent 22tweets and retweets on a variety of topics --from the impeachment trial, to a photoshowing himwith a noticeabletan line,to Rose.

Even with Trump's support, Rose doesn't appear likely to win his reinstatement battle. Manfred denied his petition in 2015, and Rose's 2017 appeal to Hall of Fame officers was unsuccessful.

Autoplay

Show Thumbnails

Show Captions

See original here:

Donald Trump tweets that Pete Rose should be in the Baseball Hall of Fame - USA TODAY

The Donald Trump heresy – The Week

Sign Up for

Our free email newsletters

Of course Nancy Pelosi prays for President Trump. And of course President Trump doesn't understand why.

It's unlikely the Democratic speaker of the House is praying for Trump's political success, or his personal glory, so you can understand the president's confusion. His spiritual advisers veer toward the offshoot of Christianity known colloquially as the Prosperity Gospel, which preaches that good things come to those who pray. That is one form of prayer. But at least in the Catholic tradition from which Pelosi comes, you also pray for your enemies and your rivals. You pray for them especially. You pray for their soul, that they change their behavior and allow God to change their hearts before they meet their final justice.

Praying for people you hate or even merely dislike is hard. Trump said as much in his remarks Thursday at the National Prayer Breakfast, in an otherwise unholy speech The Washington Post's Michael Gerson dubbed "Trump's sermon at the Hilton." But the rest of his comments border on heretical, because they showed once again that Trump puts fealty to God beneath fealty to Trump.

Pelosi has drawn Trump's ire before by saying that she prays for him. He doesn't "like people who say, 'I'll pray for you,' when I know that is not so," Trump said. Later, celebrating in the White House, he said he doubted Pelosi "prays at all."

But perhaps more telling was Trump's salvo at Sen. Mitt Romney (R-Utah), from all accounts a pious man, who cited his "profoundly religious" beliefs in explaining why he voted to convict Trump for abuse of power. Romney knew it wouldn't remove Trump from office, and he knew he would be "vehemently denounced" and abused by Trump for his vote. But his explanation "I take an oath before God as enormously consequential" was that he swore to God that he would render impartial justice, and despite his selfish preference to acquit Trump, doing so would violate that oath, given what his mind and reason had discerned from the evidence.

In other words, Romney was saying he honored his commitment to God over his partisan fealty to Trump. And judging by his response, Trump didn't get that distinction, or didn't agree with it. "I don't like people who use their faith as justification for doing what they know is wrong," Trump said, in what appears to be a quasi-official talking point.

The Bible has a lot of internal inconsistencies, but the Gospels are very clear on what Jesus wanted to communicate to his followers about loving God and loving other people. "You have heard that it was said, 'You shall love your neighbor and hate your enemy,'" Jesus said in his Sermon on the Mount (Mt 5:33-34). "But I say to you, love your enemies and pray for those who persecute you."

Jesus also makes clear that he wants his followers to avoid letting material possessions come between them and God and provide for those with fewer financial or spiritual resources. Christianity is a communitarian religion as well as a personal struggle. "You cannot serve God and wealth," Jesus said. Worshipping money is a form of idolatry, and idolatry is clearly heretical.

But Trump seems to view Christianity as a way to get what you want, not give what you can. Like most things with Trump, it is transactional: He will push policies favored by conservative Christians abortion, judges, prayer in school as long as they continue to believe in him, remain his most enduring base of support. If they have to choose between what Trump says and what Jesus says, Trump's faithful must go with Trump. Loyalty is the first commandment.

This may explain why Trump reacts so strongly and so negatively to Romney invoking his faith and Pelosi saying she is praying for him. He assumes they, too, are cynically using religion as a political cudgel; by invoking a more faithful Christianity, they are threatening his keys to the realm.

Trump's Christian proselytizers note, correctly, that the Bible is full of flawed people God used to achieve sometimes inscrutable ends. King David, for example, coveted a woman so fiercely he sent her husband to die in battle. When found out, though, he accepted the public humiliation and repented. When God told the prophet Jonah to warn the hated enemy city of Nineveh (in modern-day Iraq) to turn away from sin, he ran the other way; after an unfortunate holding period inside the belly of an aquatic beast, Jonah went and did God's bidding and he was furious when Nineveh listened and God spared the repentant city.

Jonah put God first, eventually and begrudgingly, and saved his foes. Maybe that's Pelosi's prayer for Trump.

Want more essential commentary and analysis like this delivered straight to your inbox? Sign up for The Week's "Today's best articles" newsletter here.

See the rest here:

The Donald Trump heresy - The Week

Donald Trump on Social Security: Everything You Need to Know – The Motley Fool

In case you haven't heard, America's most important social program, Social Security, is in a bit of trouble. A number of ongoing demographic changes have Social Security on track to completely exhaust its $2.9 trillion in asset reserves (i.e., net-cash surpluses built up since inception) by 2035. Should this happen, Social Security wouldn't be bankrupt, but it would mean sweeping benefit cuts to then-current and future retired workers of up to 23%.

Social Security needs a fix, and it's lawmakers on Capitol Hill who will have to deliver that resolution. That's why it's more important now than ever to know where the leading 2020 presidential candidates stand on Social Security. Today, we'll take a closer look at incumbent Republican Donald Trump's viewpoints on Social Security.

Image source: Getty Images.

The first aspect of Donald Trump's stance to tackle is how he stood on America's top social program while on the campaign trail prior to being elected the 45th president. In general, Trump views the federal government making good on payouts to workers who've paid into the program for decades as "honoring a deal," as he put in his book Time to Get Tough (2011).

What's more, the president has advised his fellow Republicans to approach the issue cautiously. While speaking at the Conservative Political Action Conference in 2013, Trump said the following:

As Republicans, if you think you are going to change very substantially for the worse Medicare, Medicaid, and Social Security in any substantial way, and at the same time you think you are going to win elections, it just really is not going to happen ... What we have to do and the way we solve our problems is to build a great economy.

In other words, Trump understands that if direct resolutions are made to Social Security (and other entitlement programs), some groups of people are going to be worse off than they were before. That makes direct fixes to the program a dangerous game to play when nearing an election.

President Trump signing paperwork at his desk in the Oval Office. Image source: Official White House Photo by Shealah Craighead.

So, what has Donald Trump done to improve Social Security while in office? With the president clearly averse to tackling the issue directly and potentially losing votes, Trump has instead focused his efforts on indirect solutions, the most notable of which is the passage of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA).

When signed into law in December 2017, the TCJA represented the most sweeping tax overhaul in the U.S. in over three decades. It lowered the tax liability of most working Americans, while capping the marginal corporate income-tax rate at 21%, down from a peak of 35%. In essence, it was a tax cut designed to stimulate economic growth by encouraging businesses to innovative, hire, and expand, as well as encourage consumer spending.

How does this help Social Security, you ask? The program has three sources of funding: a 12.4% payroll tax on earned income, the interest income earned on its asset reserves, and the taxation of benefits. The former, the payroll tax on earned income of up to $137,700 (in 2020), is the program's workhorse. In 2018, it was responsible for $885 billion of the $1 trillion in revenue collected. The thinking here is that if tax cuts can bolster economic growth, workers should see an increase in wages and/or income, leading to more payroll tax being collected. This increase in payroll tax collected should put Social Security on better financial footing.

If you're curious, the TCJA does appear to have had a very modest upward lift on the U.S. economy and Social Security over the past two years. For example, the 2018 Social Security Board of Trustees report had called for the program's first net-cash outflow since 1982 that year, but this forecast was ultimately proved wrong, with Social Security generating a net-cash surplus of $3 billion. Similarly, the program's net-cash surplus of a little over $2 billion in 2019 was slightly higher than the $1 billion net-cash surplus the Trustees report had projected for last year.

Image source: Getty Images.

Now for the big question: What happens to Social Security if Donald Trump is reelected as president?

While no one knows this answer with any certainty, we've been given a number of clues during his presidency to make logical guesses. Perhaps the biggest clue came in January 2020 at the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland. In an interview on CNBC's Squawk Box, host Joe Kernen asked Trump if "entitlements [would] ever be on your plate?" to which the president replied, "At some point they will be."

To be crystal clear, this doesn't mean that Trump has decreed Social Security spending cuts are coming. However, it does raise eyebrows given the contrasting nature by which Democrats and Republicans have approached fixing Social Security's imminent cash shortfall.

For instance, Democrats have predominantly been in favor of increasing revenue by raising or eliminating the earnings cap associated with the payroll tax. In 2020, all earned income (wages and salary) between $0.01 and $137,700 is subjected to the payroll tax, with earnings beyond $137,700 exempted. Raising or eliminating this cap would require the well-to-do to pay more into the system.

Meanwhile, Republicans have predominantly championed reducing long-term outlays (a fancy way of saying "cutting benefits"). The GOP has proposed gradually raising the full retirement age from 67 to as high as age 70 to account for increased longevity over the past eight decades. If the full retirement age were raised, future generations of retirees would either need to wait longer to claim their full monthly payout or accept a steeper reduction if claiming early. The point is that, no matter their choice, lifetime benefits paid by Social Security would be reduced, thereby saving the program money.

While Trump hasn't specifically mentioned raising the full retirement age, he and his administration have suggested amending the rules for the Social Security Disability Insurance (SSDI) program. In Trump's fiscal 2020 budget proposal, for example, Trump proposed cutting $26 billion from Social Security over a 10-year period. A good portion of this reduction ($10 billion) was to be made by cutting back SSDI retroactive pay to six months from 12 months.

Again, while Trump has not specifically said that spending cuts are going to happen, there is a good likelihood that outlay reductions would be how Trump would tackle Social Security's imminent cash shortfall.

President Trump speaking to reporters on the White House lawn. Image source: Official White House Photo by Joyce N. Boghosian.

Of course, it's also important to understand that Trump's views on Social Security have changed considerably over time, and he has, on occasion, tossed around a number of ideas that you may find surprising.

Back in 2000, in his book The America We Deserve, Trump proposed the idea of a one-time 14.25% tax on individuals with a net worth of more than $10 million. In Trump's view, this one-time tax would have allowed the federal government to collect enough revenue to pay off its national debt (at the time), saving it $200 billion annually on interest payments. Trump proposed taking $100 billion of this $200 billion in annual savings and adding it to the Social Security program over a 10-year time frame.

Donald Trump has also loosely tossed around the idea of means-testing for benefits. Means-testing would partially reduce or eliminate Social Security benefits once an individual or couple crosses above a preset earnings threshold. Since Social Security was designed to predominantly protect low-income workers during retirement, such a move would ensure that the rich aren't receiving payments they don't need.

Trump even once offered up the idea of partially privatizing Social Security -- a view he now steers clear of. In The America We Deserve, Trump suggests that workers have the option of utilizing personal accounts to invest in stocks, bonds, diversified mutual funds, and bonds funds.

The point being that Trump may be more open to a middle-ground solution than most folks realize.

Additionally, it should be noted that the political makeup of Congress is going to play a big role as to whether or not major Social Security reforms are pursued. Without significant Republican gains in the House or Senate, Trump's push for direct reforms, assuming a successful reelection, would likely fall on deaf ears.

Go here to see the original:

Donald Trump on Social Security: Everything You Need to Know - The Motley Fool

Whoa, Donald Trump Just Gave a Genuinely Good Speech – The Daily Beast

It was, by far, Donald Trumps best, most optimistic, State of the Union speechthe kind of speech we can expect to see clips of in his re-election adsthe kind of speech that would be considered good even without the qualifier for Donald Trump at the end.

Of course everyone didnt think soa number of Democrats walked out, and Nancy Pelosi pointedly tore it up for the cameras to see after he finished. But even with all that, if the goal were to reset the narrative and take advantage of the debacle in Iowa and the end of impeachment (without explicitly saying so), Trump was successful. He had a lot to work with, stressing a strong economy and low unemployment rateand the killing of some prominent, high-value terrorists.

But he also also touted accomplishments on issues with broad, bipartisan appeal, such as criminal justice reform, paid family leave, and opportunity zones. These are feel-good issues that Trump (due to his penchant for distracting us with insane tweets) doesnt get enough credit for.

Conspicuously, there was lots of outreach to African-Americans, both in terms of rhetoric regarding policy goals and achievements, and via special guests sitting in the gallery.

Coming on the heels of his Super Bowl ad, this was clearly not an accident. As The New York Times conservative columnist Ross Douthat put it in a mid-speech tweet, Theme of the speech so far: Somebody at the White House thinks Trump can win more African-American votes in 2020.

Whether Trumps numbers crunchers really believe he can peel off African-Americans, or whether the real goal is to make suburban whites more comfortable with voting for Trump, we are witnessing what seems to be a significant moment: Trump is actually in the business of addition.

Think of it. For three years now, his strategy has been entirely based on energizing his base. For the first time, it seems, we are seeing a campaign that is attempting to add to the Trump coalition.

Not only was the speech an opportunity for Trump to do some outreach (as well as recount the usual laundry list of successes and promises), but it was a trap for Democrats, who had to choose between applauding the president they just impeached versus refusing to applaud talk about a good economy. This was basically a no-win scenario for them.

During one moment, Arizona Senator Kyrsten Sinema was shown delivering a standing ovation to good news about unemployment, while Kamala Harris and Kirsten Gillibrand sat on their hands. Another example was when representatives including Rashida Tlaib and Ilhan Omar reportedly did not stand to honor a former Tuskegee airman.

Thats not to say that Trump didnt occasionally play some of his greatest hits. One gets the sense that Stephen Miller got to ad a few lines, toward the end. This created some contradictions. Trumps talk about building an inclusive society was considerably undermined by his reversion to harsh rhetoric about walls and illegal aliens.

Though there was much less fan service than we are used to hearing from Trump, there was something for everybody, including fans of Rush Limbaugh, who was recognized and given a Congressional Medal of Honor in the gallery. This probably struck many as an intensely partisan move (imagine Obama having Michelle pin a Medal of Freedom on Al Sharpton), but the fact that Limbaugh was just diagnosed with advanced lung cancer made it more palatable.

For the first time, it seems, we are seeing a campaign that is attempting to add to the Trump coalition.

Trump also appeared to take a veiled swipe at Bernie Sanders. During a section of the speech that included welcoming the true and legitimate President of Venezuela, Juan Guaid, Trump declared that Socialism destroys nations. But always remember, freedom unifies the soul.

One had the sense that this wasnt just an attack on socialists from Venezuela, but also, a reminder that we have our very own from Vermont.

Still, putting aside that clever swipe at Bernie, and although he apparently snubbed Speaker Nancy Pelosis attempt to shake hands, Trump somehow stuck to the script, resisting what must have been an almost irresistible urge to ad-lib about impeachment, his approval numbers, or the Dems Iowa disaster.

At one point early in the night, Republicans in the chamber broke out with cheers of, Four more years! It was something that I have never witnessed in all my years of watching State of the Union addresses.

Yes, it was a sign of our partisan times. But If Trump can continue to stick to the script for the rest of this campaign (a very tall order), it will also be prophetic.

Read more from the original source:

Whoa, Donald Trump Just Gave a Genuinely Good Speech - The Daily Beast

Trump doesn’t really respect members of the military. He uses them as props. – Business Insider – Business Insider

Trump uses the military to polish his political credentials, but only when it suits him. Alex Wong/Getty Images

President Donald Trump isn't the first president to use the military as a prop, but it's become clear that he's the most brazenly cynical in doing so.

Ther latest examples of Trump's exploiting the military for his political benefit came at the State of the Union address this week.

Trump addressed Army Staff Sgt. Christopher Hake's widow, Kelli, relaying heartbreaking words from a letter Hake wrote to his then 1-year-old son, Gage, while on deployment to Iraq in 2008.

Hake never made it home. He was killed by a roadside bomb.

Trump told Kelli and Gage: "Chris will live in our hearts forever. He is looking down on you now. Thank you." That received thunderous applause from the chamber of a joint session of Congress.

The president then described giving the order to kill Iranian Gen. Qassem Soleimani, who Trump said was responsible for the bomb that took Hake's life.

Minutes later, Trump used another military family as a prop, this time pulling an Oprah-style stunt where he surprised Sgt. 1st Class Townsend Williams' wife and children with the news that he was not only back from a deployment to Afghanistan he was in the building and ready for an on-camera reunion.

Williams was one of the 14,000 US troops deployed to Afghanistan on Trump's orders as the administration has struggled to find a negotiated exit amid an upsurge of violence.

To recap: Trump used a Gold Star family as a prop to boast about an assassination that he ordered, then followed it up by using another family in a made-for-TV stunt to extol the sacrifices made by "extraordinary military families."

Nationally televised tributes to military families are lovely gestures, but by using what should have been a humble show of respect to a widow and her child to justify a military action he ordered, Trump explicitly politicized a soldier's death.

Trump loves to bask in the reflected glory of veterans, but his tune changes as soon as military personnel don't conveniently fit with his narrative.

Throughout his decades in public life, Trump has epitomized the idea of hollow, performative patriotism.

He's had a lifelong love affair with military pageantry. Despite receiving five deferments to avoid serving in Vietnam, Trump said he felt as if he truly was in the military because he attended an upstate New York military prep school. He's repeatedly touted the idea of military parades. As an adult, he was known to swoon in the presence of high-ranking generals. He's fond of quoting lines from the film "Patton."

But then Trump ran for president and his view of the institution changed, especially when it clashed with his ideas.

On the campaign trail, then candidate Trump infamously refuted pollster Frank Luntz in 2015 for calling Sen. John McCain a "war hero."

"He's not a war hero," Trump said. "He was a war hero because he was captured. I like people who weren't captured."

This was just the first time it became clear that Trump likes war heroes, unless they disagree with him.

In 2016 Trump lashed out at the parents of Army Capt. Humayun Khan a Muslim immigrant from Pakistan who was killed in Iraq in 2004 after Khan's father, speaking at the 2016 Democratic National Convention, gave a stirring denunciation of Trump's call to bar immigrants from majority-Muslim countries.

Khan's mother, who did not speak while standing onstage at the DNC, was "devoid of feeling the pain of a mother who has sacrificed her son," Trump said.

And as reported in Philip Rucker and Carol Leonnig's new book, "A Very Stable Genius," Trump in 2017 threw a fit at a meeting of the Joint Chiefs and other senior advisers, including then-Secretary of Defense James Mattis (a retired four-star Marine general), calling them "a bunch of dopes and babies" and declaring he "wouldn't go to war with you people."

What had they done to so offend Trump, who would normally fawn over such decorated veterans?

They were explaining things like the importance of the post-World War II international order as a security benefit for the US, and that it wasn't the military's job to act as the president's collection agent to shake down NATO allies who the real-estate mogul Trump believed weren't paying their "rent."

As commander-in-chief, Trump sent as many as 6,000 troops to the US-Mexico border, where he hoped he could use the military to detain illegal immigration. (It can't: That's forbidden by the Posse Comitatus Act of 1878, which prohibits the military from enforcing the law unless authorized by Congress or the Constitution.) But some of the troops who were deployed domestically were ordered to serve their country by painting portions of Trump's border wall.

More recently, he restored the rank of Eddie Gallagher, a convicted war criminal whose fellow Navy SEALs described as "freaking evil," "toxic," and "perfectly OK with killing anybody that was moving." Trump invited him to his Mar-a-Lago resort for a personal meeting, which Gallagher has used as a springboard for TV appearances and apparel sales.

Against the objections of top Pentagon officials, Trump issued full pardons to two Army officers convicted of murder.

After the killing of Soleimani last month and Iran's retaliatory strike on an Iraqi base housing US military personnel, Trump said there were no US casualties. Two weeks later, the Defense Department said 34 troops had been diagnosed with concussions or brain trauma. Trump, normally one to luxuriate in the gory details of battle, downplayed their symptoms as "headaches" and "not very serious."

So while Trump attempts to use the military to polish his political credentials, he does so only when it suits him. When it doesn't, the president insults the dead, brushes off the wounded, uses the living as political pawns, and venerates the war criminal. It's a perverse way of showing respect for the military.

Read more:

Trump doesn't really respect members of the military. He uses them as props. - Business Insider - Business Insider

Donald Trump’s Sanity Has Retired and Met Its Maker – Esquire

As you undoubtedly know by now, El Caudillo del Mar-a-Lagos wounded musk-ox bellowing at the National Prayer Breakfast on Thursday morning was only an undercard attraction on the bill of CrazySlam 20. The main event came later, in the East Room of the White House, where the president* put on a performance that should have had copies of the 25th Amendment inscribed on tablets of gold falling from the sky around him.

His trolley went around the bend and off the tracks. His sanity had expired and met its maker. It has ceased to be. It was a stiff. Bereft of life, it rests in peace. Its kicked the bucket, rung down the curtain, and joined the bleeding choir invisible. But, alas, this is not yet an ex-administration*, and it still derives its only energy from the incredibly toxic stew of vengeful rage and inflamed victimhood that is the only sign of sentient life in the brain of its president*. A sample follows:

And the Republicans, all of them, sitting there like brain-dead fish all schooled in one spot, applauding on cue, accepting the president*s sourball compliments as though they were being blessed from Above. (There was one particularly weird passage when he congratulated Rep. Steve Scalise for surviving his gunshot wounds and then went into how lousy a second-baseman Scalise is and expressed amazement that Scalises wife was upset that Scalise had been shot. "He was not going to make it. I said, she loves you. Why? Because she was devastated. A lot of wives wouldnt give a damn. Ask the man who knows, I guess.)

I have resisted using the word cult to describe where the Republican party is at right now because I think it absolves too many of the people that made something like Trumpism inevitable. But, Lord above, were looking at a battalion of drill-thralls now, with no minds of their own and no souls to speak of.

Follow this link:

Donald Trump's Sanity Has Retired and Met Its Maker - Esquire

Donald Trump has been acquitted. Here are 3 winners and 3 losers from his impeachment trial. – Vox.com

President Donald Trump is the clear winner of the now-resolved Senate impeachment battle the question is at what cost.

He was acquitted by the Senate in his impeachment trial, and he even got his way on persuading the Senate to eschew any witnesses, defying Democratic requests and the overwhelming preference of public opinion.

Its a bit of a strange victory for Trump, whose approval rating at this point in his presidency is lower than that of Barack Obama, George W. Bush, Bill Clinton, George H.W. Bush, or Jimmy Carter at the same point in theirs. This is the case even while the economy is strong and the nation, while not exactly at peace, isnt suffering major casualties or threats from abroad.

Facing a structurally similar situation in 1998 and 1999, Clinton secured not only acquittal but a clear political triumph over his adversaries emerging from impeachment very popular even though his underlying conduct was sordid at best. Trump, by contrast, is truly skating by with underwater approval ratings and a path to reelection thats built on Electoral College bias rather than popularity.

But while Trumps standing remains ambiguous, impeachment and acquittal did generate a few other clear winners and losers.

To understand the impeachment 2020 drama, you have to understand it from the perspective of the key decision-makers House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and the vulnerable House Democrats on whose behalf shes acting.

From her point of view, as of last fall, impeachment was a problem, not an opportunity. Special counsel Robert Muellers report included clear evidence of obstruction of justice, but he punted on the question of whether thats what he found. That left a growing chorus of safe-seat Democrats agitating for impeachment, even as polling showed public support for impeachment was underwater.

Many pro-impeachment pundits argued at the time that if Democrats unified behind the cause, theyd sway public opinion to their side. Pelosi evidently didnt buy that. Then the Ukraine story broke, a key group of frontlines came out for impeachment, impeachments poll numbers improved to become slightly popular, and leadership got on board.

Still, frontline members and Pelosi were worried about Republican messaging that Democrats were so obsessed with impeachment that they werent getting anything done.

The strategy the House took to impeach Trump, to do it on a narrow grounds, and to conduct a fast investigation rather than litigate extensively over evidence was built around those political concerns. And if you share Pelosis key premises, her strategy worked. She went from a situation where she was facing base pressure to do something unpopular to one where she and her members did something popular and then moved on even while leaving Senate Republicans to take multiple unpopular votes against hearing witnesses.

Lots of people never shared Pelosis view of the issues, and to many of them, impeachment may look like a failure. But she achieved what she set out to, confirming her stature as a master tactician whether or not one agrees with her approach to broader strategic issues.

Senate Republicans made it pretty clear throughout this process that they were basically indifferent to the underlying question of what Trump did.

They listened with equanimity to Alan Dershowitz argue that theres no such thing as abuse of power unless it violates specific statutes. But then they also didnt care about a Government Accountability Office finding that holding up duly appropriated aid to Ukraine was illegal. They decided they didnt want to hear from John Bolton, Mick Mulvaney, or anyone else with relevant information. And indeed, despite a fair amount of speculation about possible deals to force Hunter Biden or someone else to testify, they ultimately didnt explore those ideas seriously either.

Their reasoning is easy enough to understand: They were committed to voting to acquit Trump, so a full and extended airing of the facts could only set them up for embarrassment.

Critically, Trump got himself acquitted without even a token gesture of contrition. Bill Clinton survived his sex and perjury scandal, but part of him doing so was to concede in public that what he did was wrong. Ronald Reagan survived Iran-Contra, but disposing of the situation involved identifying fall guys and an internal personnel shake-up. Trump didnt distance himself from Rudy Giuliani, hail internal dissenters for cutting short an inappropriate mingling of politics and foreign policy, or concede that there was any problem with holding up the aid in the first place, even though he eventually released it.

This was all fairly predictable to any observer of American politics, but we didnt know for sure until we saw it happen. Before acquittal, members of the Trump administration had to worry at least a little that getting caught doing something wrong would lead to consequences. And potentially, whistleblowers had to hope at least a little that spilling the beans would lead to positive change. Now we know that none of that is the case.

The concern that impeachment would only lead to acquittal and further erosion of the rule of law was aired in Democratic circles before the House acted, and the doubters turn out to have been entirely correct on this score. Still, its hard to see any other possible tactical course of action by Democrats generating a better result. The essence of the problem is that almost every Republican has decided to stand by Trump no matter what.

Cory Gardner narrowly won a Senate race in the blue-leaning swing state of Colorado in the context of a huge GOP wave back in 2014.

Since then, the same demographic shifts that have made heavily white working-class Midwestern states redder have only acted to make Colorado bluer. Thats an obvious problem for Gardner as he runs for reelection in 2020, but during his time in the Senate, hes done next to nothing to build a reputation for moderation or demonstrate any independence from Trump. The impeachment fight could have been an opportunity to do that, but Gardner once again preferred to play loyal foot soldier and avoid taking any kind of risk. The small-c conservative approach is understandable, but its also very hard to see how he wins reelection in a bluish state without taking some risks.

Arizonas Martha McSally and Maines Susan Collins benefit from more conservative electorates than Gardners but structurally speaking found themselves in the same position.

Mitt Romneys bold decision to vote for conviction only further underscores the extent to which vulnerable Republicans didnt display any courage or independence. Of course, theres a reason Romney can be bold. He has a personal political brand separate from Trump and isnt up for reelection in a Trump-unfriendly state until 2024.

Overall, the growing correlation of Senate elections with national politics is helpful to the GOP caucus. But these three specific members are disadvantaged by it, and especially so when party loyalty forced them to repeatedly take unpopular stands against hearing further evidence.

This tends to be a bit lost on liberals, but a key point for many Republicans in Congress is that at the end of the day, Ukraine got its aid money.

The whole reason Trump had to resort to things like Giulianis irregular diplomatic channel and eventually putting an illegal hold on the flow of assistance is precisely that support for giving Ukraine assistance was widespread among congressional Republicans. If Trumps personal skepticism of the merits of helping Ukraine were a widespread GOP stance, it could have been held up in Congress as a normal policy dispute. But it wasnt. And then the reason House Democrats were able to find compliant witnesses for their impeachment hearings was, again, that many of Trumps own appointees felt strongly about the aid on the merits.

Contrary to what you sometimes hear about Trump having completely taken over the Republican Party, he frequently gets pushback from congressional Republicans over policy issues they care about. Aiding Ukraine was just such an issue, and the reason the aid was eventually released is that Trump was facing internal and external pressure to turn it over.

What Democrats wanted was accountability for Trumps scheme. And they were hoping, at least initially, to find some allies among Republicans. But what Republican Russia hawks got instead was compliance with their policy preferences not only did Ukraine get its assistance, but the White House has reversed its position in budget proposals to now favor helping Ukraine.

This is cold comfort for those whose concerns about this matter was more focused on the integrity of the American political system than the alleged need to fight for Ukraines territorial integrity. But youd be misunderstanding the nature of GOP solidarity behind Trump if you miss the fact that there are ongoing tugs-of-war over the direction of American public policy, battles in which Trump bends to the Republican establishment far more than vice versa.

House Intelligence Committee Chair Adam Schiff has been a frequent cable news guest for a while.

But his dual roles first as the head of the main investigating committee and second as the lead impeachment manager gave him much wider public exposure. And while he didnt persuade enough Republican senators to call additional witnesses, he did get public opinion squarely on his side. More broadly, across hours and hours and hours of argumentation, he clearly stood out as not only the formal head of the Democratic impeachment team but also its most effective public spokesperson.

Given that Pelosi is not an incredibly commanding television presence and the No. 2 and 3 figures in the House leadership hierarchy are even worse, this suggests a potential larger role for Schiff as the caucuss informal public communications lead.

That Schiffs performance was widely praised by Democratic observers also sets him up well for a political future in the crowded space of California politics. Its not hard to imagine him running for Dianne Feinsteins Senate seat when she retires, or some other statewide office, or else making a play for a top role in the next generation of House Democratic leadership.

The Ukraine aid scandal happened to be the issue that tipped frontline Democrats over into supporting an impeachment inquiry. But its hardly the only Trump administration scandal that raises fundamental questions about his fitness for office.

Some of us called last fall for a broader impeachment inquiry that would more or less take for granted that conviction was impossible, and instead simply try to amass a full public record of Trumps misconduct. That would include looking into serious questions about the presidents personal business interests in Turkey and the Persian Gulf, as well as China and other foreign countries, along with the big-picture question of violations of the emoluments clause and his continued stonewalling of legally valid requests for his tax returns.

The Watergate inquiry, after all, ended up uncovering evidence of misdeeds that were actually much more wide-ranging and severe than helping cover up a burglary at the DNC. But that only came about because investigators decided to really kick the tires of the whole situation rather than maintaining a laser-like focus on the easiest-to-explain narrative.

Democrats wanted to avoid getting bogged down in litigation over witnesses or the perception that impeachment was all they were doing. And while in principle theres nothing stopping Democrats from doing more investigations, all signs are that the party leadership wants to focus attention on banal governance issues like a reauthorization of the federal surface transportation program. And even if Democrats do go back to issuing subpoenas, its clearer than ever that Republicans have no interest in trying to make the Trump administration comply.

Follow this link:

Donald Trump has been acquitted. Here are 3 winners and 3 losers from his impeachment trial. - Vox.com

Donald Trump Definitely Learned His Lesson – The Bulwark

We should have expected that a speech tasked with unpacking our Countrys VICTORY over the Impeachment Hoax! would be crazy.

But none of us could have possibly predicted just how crazy it turned out to be.

Imagine Watergate, if Republicans had refused to listen to the tapes and instead decided that Nixon was sorry and wouldnt do it again. Probably.

Imagine if there was no John Dean.

If Nixon were incredibly, shockingly, breathtakingly stupid and the father of two failsons, who spent their days tweeting and instagraming memes that degraded their daddys enemies.

Imagine if Nixon had an entire network devoted to pumping out propaganda to support his criming.

And then imagine if, instead of resigning in disgrace and retiring from public life, Nixon slugged it out, forced his party to walk the plank for him, and then took a victory lap where he basically danced to Edith Piaf, but with lots of sniffing and some Stage 3 dementia.

Because thats what Thursday was. Except that the reality of it was somehow more repulsive than the idea of it.

Trumps victory lap was, as usual, terrifying.

Remember what Bill Clinton did after he got off on impeachment? (yswidt?) He held a press conference, too. But it went like this:

Hes how Clinton opened his brief remarks:

Now that the Senate has fulfilled its constitutional responsibility bringing this process to a conclusion, I want to say again to the American people how profoundly sorry I am for what I said and did to trigger these events and the great burden they have imposed on the Congress and on the American people.

Yeah, thats right. He went out and apologized to the country. Did he learn his lesson? Who knows. If you choose to believe that Clinton never again stuck Slick Willy where he wasnt supposed to be, then thats up to you. But the point is that Clinton at least understood that he was supposed to be sorry for creating such a gigantic cock-up for the country.

But Trump?

He was jubilant.

And when hes jubilant hes high energy.

And when hes high energy, hes riffing.

And when hes riffing, you get the Full Trump, which is peak insane-boomer-internet-commenter Trump. All of his many Trumpism were in full display. Its like watching Lou Dobbs, minus a couple dozen IQ points.

It started out like a normal Trump rally speech. Then things devolved. (You may have noticed that this is a thing which happens a lot.) The president of the United States said bullshit on network television, in the middle of the day. Then it was on to Bob Mueller, poor broken-brained Devin Nunes, polls from the 2016 election, the Steele dossier, open borders, sanctuary cities, Democrats wanting to raise your taxes, Bob Mueller, Lisa Page and Peter Strzok, Russia, Russia, Russia, Alabama, Hillary Clinton, the DNC, and crazy Debbie Lesko.

In a funny way, its probably just as fruitful to examine Trumps East Room remarks by looking at the negative space: Who didnt Trump thank in his bizarro-world Oscar speech?

He thanks his lawyers. He thanked many of the less-intellectually vigorous members of Congress. He thanked his third wife and his daughter, Ivanka. He thanked the New York Post.

Whos missing? This guy!

Trump never mentioned his close personal friend and free lawyer and shadow secretary of State Rudy Giuliani.

If the fates of Michael Cohen and Paul Manafort and Roger Stone are any guide, this does not bode well.

But maybe Rudy will be okay. After all, while Trump was doing his thing, his other personal lawyersorry, personal lawyerBill Barr, sat in the front row, nodding along.

Full Trump is the only being in the universe powerful enough to make a normal person long Teleprompter Trump. But one of the things I keep wondering about is, now that Trump has proven that he is totally, absolutely, invincible, will we ever see Teleprompter Trump again?

I tend to think not.

The last time Trump was emboldened was after the Mueller report exonerated him. A day later he was trying to get Ukraine to announce an investigation into Hunter and Joe Biden.

So where does this all go? Will Trump try to get President XI to hack Nancy Pelosis emails? Will Trump try to get Kim Jong-un to investigate Mayor Pete? Earlier in the week Susan Collins mused that I hoped that the president wouldve learned from the fact that he was impeached by the House. By weeks end, Collins was conceding, I may not be correct on that. Its more aspirational on my part.

You dont say.

Anyone who has spent five minutes studying the life of Donald Trump knows that every time he dodges a bullet, he becomes more, not less, reckless.

Which means that the lesson he was destined to take from impeachment was that he can get away with everything and anything. Trump learned that he owns the Republican party, that they will do whatever he wants, that they will sign off on all his criming.

Trump learned a lesson this week, he learned that he is our mad king and nothing and no one can stop him. And the sad thing is: Hes right.

Here is the original post:

Donald Trump Definitely Learned His Lesson - The Bulwark

Ex-Obama Photographer Highlights Donald Trumps Vindictiveness With Old Prank Snap – HuffPost

Former White House photographer Pete Souza has imagined the vindictive way President Donald Trump would respond to a prank that was once pulled on his predecessor, former President Barack Obama.

In a photo from 2010 that Souza shared to Instagram on Friday, a man gave Obama bunny ears. Obama laughed out loud when he first saw the picture taken at Peggy Sues Cafe in Monroe City, Missouri, said Souza.

The shutterbug,who also documented Ronald Reagans time in the White House, predicted Trump would have had a very different reaction, however.

Im sure if this guy did this today to IMpotus, the Attorney General would be ordered to investigate his background and the IRS would audit his tax returns, he wrote.

Souzas post came amid what pundits have described as the Friday night massacre Trumps dismissal of European Union Ambassador Gordon Sondland and Lt. Colonel Alexander Vindman, the top National Security Council official on Ukraine, in seeming revenge after they testified against him during the Houses impeachment probe into the Ukraine scandal.

The photographer frequently shares images he took during the Obama era to throw shade at Trump. On Wednesday, he mocked the president for snubbing House Speaker Nancy Pelosis (D-Calif.) handshake at the State of the Union.

How hard is this? he captioned this picture of Obama and then-GOP Speaker John Boehner before the 2011 address:

Excerpt from:

Ex-Obama Photographer Highlights Donald Trumps Vindictiveness With Old Prank Snap - HuffPost

20 years ago, Donald Trump came to St. Louis and unveiled his plans for universal health care – STLtoday.com

Trump chuckled when told that Bradley was going to appear at University City High School today, and added that he wanted Bradley to know what he thought of him. Trump called Bradley the most overrated of the major contenders. "He's got a bad way about him. He's bad on taxes."

Trump's health care plan, unveiled Tuesday, was the latest in a series of position papers that he has recently released.

His health care plan would require all companies to offer basic insurance plans to all employees. Workers could beef up their coverage with their own money saved in tax-free medical savings accounts. The government would provide vouchers for the unemployed. Medicare would be retained for the elderly.

Trump said his plan, patterned after government programs in Germany and Israel, would save billions of dollars and end the unfair system that the nation has.

Regardless of his decision, Trump won't be on Missouri's presidential primary ballot March 7. He missed the December filing deadline. Three candidates will be on the Reform Party ballot: conservative commentator Pat Buchanan, Natural Law Party nominee John Hagelin (who's seeking a dual candidacy) and Charles Collins of Georgia.

Still, Trump said he wouldn't ignore the state. State Reform Party leaders said only three of the state party's presidential delegates will be at stake March 7. Nine others will be committed at the party's state convention in St. Louis in April, said state party chairman Bill Lewin of Kansas City.

See the article here:

20 years ago, Donald Trump came to St. Louis and unveiled his plans for universal health care - STLtoday.com

Yang tells Dem rivals: ‘Donald Trump is the not the cause of all of our problems’ – Fox News

2020 presidential candidate entrepreneurAndrew Yangtold his fellow Democrats that President Trump is not the cause of all the country's problemsduring Friday's New Hampshire debateand advised againstobsessing over him heading into the November election.

"You are missing the lesson of Donald Trump's victory," he began. "Donald Trump is not the cause of all of our problems and we are making a mistake when we act like he is. He is a symptom of a disease that has been building up in our communities for years and decades. And it is our job to get to the harder work of actually curing the disease."

Yang said voter frustration is driving traditionally Democratic voters into the arms of the GOP in states like Iowa and Ohio.

"Most Americans feel like the political parties have been playing, 'You lose, I lose. You lose, I lose' for years," he continued. "Andyou know who's been losing this entire time? We have. Our communities have. Our communities' way of life is disintegrating beneath our feet."

STEPHANIE GRISHAM: DEMOCRATS 'UNHINGED' AND 'OBSESSED' WITH TAKING DOWN TRUMP

"That's why Iowa, a traditional swing state, went to Trump by almost 10 points. That's why Ohio, a traditional swing state, is now so red -- that I'm told we're not even going to campaign there," Yang added.

He also went after Amazon for not paying its fair share in taxes and said automation has hurt employment prospects for millions of Americans.

"These communities are seeing their way of life get blasted into smithereens," Yang explained. "We've automated away 4 million manufacturing jobs and counting. We're closing 30 percent of New Hampshire's stores and malls. And Amazon, the force behind that, is literally paying zero in taxes.

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

"These are the changes that Americans are seeing and feeling around us every day. And if we get to the hard work of curing those problems, we will not just defeat Donald Trump in the fall but we'll actually be able to move our communities forward."

Follow this link:

Yang tells Dem rivals: 'Donald Trump is the not the cause of all of our problems' - Fox News

Donald Trump Jr. Is Wrong. Mitt Romney’s ‘Mom Jeans’ Are Right on Trend – The Daily Beast

Donald Trump Jr. has some thoughtswell, a lame insult really, aimed at Mitt Romneyabout mom jeans. Like much about Don Jr., it was an embarrassing misfire.

After Romney announced that he would vote to convict Trump on an impeachment chargea mostly symbolic move which did little to influence Mitch McConnells Republican-led SenateTrump Jr. posted a throwback photo of the senator wearing high-waisted denim. It appeared to be taken in the 80s or 90s, when the cut was popular for men and women. The caption read, Mom Jeans, Because youre a pussy.

His mockery of Romney, of course, makes light of the infamous word his father used while bragging about assaulting women in the Access Hollywood tape. Along with that, he chose to feminize Romney as a form of insult. Trump Jr. could have referenced dad jeans, which Barack Obama frequently wore as president, but he decided to call him a girl instead. Good one, Junior!

Perhaps unsurprisingly for a connoisseur of plaid button-upswho appears to use an entire bottle of Gorilla Glue to slick back his hair every morningthe presidents son does not understand that the past six or so years have made the look cool again.

Here comes Kendall Jenner, just this week in sheer top and mom jeans! They have also been sighted on Kourtney Kardashian, Gigi Hadid, and Sienna Miller. The mom jean came to public attention in the late 90s, but it's been around, unnamed and unjoked about by presidential offspring, since the '50s.

Trump Jr., 42, knows nothing about fashion, which can be illustrated by the fact that he proposed to his first wife, Vanessa, with a ring he got for free from a jeweler at the Short Hills Mall in New Jersey. If he did understand trends, he would know that mom jeans have come a long way from the Tina Feys 2003 SNL sketch, which reportedly coined the term.

Today, the look is sold both euphemistically (see: Everlanes $78 Cheeky Straight Denima mom jean if I ever saw one) and proudly. Retailers like Mango, ASOS, and Madewell all use Mom to market their high-waist, tapered-leg options. It makes sense they would use the phrase in their marketing, as its highly sought-after. According to Google trends, California, Hawaii, and fittingly, Romneys state Utah, are the top three regions searching.

I searched through the Getty Image archives in an attempt to find photos of Trump Jr. in the same style. Unfortunately, the first son seems to have only worn suits and ties since his childhood, pairing the boss baby ensemble with a vacant glare that makes him look like a babysitters worst nightmare.

He does wear jeans, nondescript ones, on occasion, such as when sitting, looking as if he was constipated, on a tree stump.

This, then, is a short lesson and corrective for Don Jr. as he struggles to perfect his fashion zingers. The first time I tried on a pair of mom jeans, I felt instant, unadulterated bliss, a comfort Ive yet to recover from. Under the fluorescent lighting of a dusty Topshop dressing room, I stared into a dirty mirror and wondered how it was possible for my butt to both look and feel so good. Was I actually wearing denim, or just a great big hug?

I came of age during the era of low-rise, the-tighter-the-better skinny jeans, which I wore for nearly a decade. I risked friction rash and exposed my lower back to the wind and rain for the sake of fashion. Not too long ago, being stylish meant shoving our bodiesor as much of it that could fitinto a garment made for someone at least two sizes smaller.

Years later, its de rigueur to see Billie Eilish in shapeless cargo pants or Kaia Gerber in New Balance sneakers. Getting dressed no longer means risking life or limb to squish inside rayon. The gaze has changed, toobeing a mom is not a derogative, and parents can be hot, too. (Have you seen J.Lo?)

Jessica Simpson wore mom jeans back when that was an (unintentionally) feminist act, and for that, my flared pants and I salute her

Blame it on on #MeToo, the influence of VSCO girls, or sheer exhaustion with the state of the world. If we cant stay underneath a comforter all day, at least we can dress like one. I chose to credit the resurgence of mom jeans, which Fashionista dates to Topshops 2014 version, as the first time the mainstream fashion industry allowed women to be both comfortable and cute.

Les we forget: Jessica Simpson did not endure weeks of intense, unnecessary body shaming after performing in high-waisted bellbottoms back in 2009 for nothing. Is that entirely relevant to mention in this story? Maybe not, but I refuse to let it go unwritten. Jessica wore mom jeans back when that was an (unintentionally) feminist act, and for that, my flared pants and I salute her.

So, a word to Trump Jr. If, to quote the title of your book, you really want your insult to trigger, consider making better jokes. Not only was your meme misogynistic, its also just plain outdated. Mom jeans have been cool for a minute now, so pick a new object of ridicule. Until then, Ill be over here, swathed in supportive denim.

See the original post:

Donald Trump Jr. Is Wrong. Mitt Romney's 'Mom Jeans' Are Right on Trend - The Daily Beast