What’s Up in the Sky? How NASA missions are born – HollandSentinel.com

Voyager, Pioneer, the Curiosity Rover, the Hubble Telescope and the New Horizons space craft all have one thing in common they were all conceived, built, and delivered to NASA by its contractors. But not all missions are alike in these ways, and not all proposed missions even make it to the drawing board. Lets take a look at the process of getting an idea into space.

I talked with Dr. Harold Reitsema, a member of the Shoreline Amateur Astronomical Association and semi-retired rocket scientist who worked on both the Kepler and New Horizons spacecraft. He explained that NASA does science missions in two very different ways.

The first is known as a Principal Investigator Led Mission in which a team of knowledgeable scientists is formed, then becomes aligned with a spacecraft builder, some NASA scientists and even sometimes a NASA center, and finally puts together a complete mission design. The design includes the satellite, its instruments, who the operator will be, and how the data that comes from the spacecraft is stored and analyzed. The team then writes a proposal that was solicited by NASA through what is known as an Announcement of Opportunity.

This Announcement of Opportunity defines a broad area of science, such as cosmology or the origin of the solar system, and anyone with an idea that fits that objective can respond with a proposal for a full mission. Proposals can therefore be quite diverse. For example, one might be for an orbiter to study the atmosphere of Jupiter while another proposes a lander on Venus. Both fall under the category of planetary exploration.

NASA then creates two panels, one that evaluates the value of the science and one that studies the risks associated with building the hardware to actually accomplish the missions goals. The scientists submitting the proposals then approach private industries such as Lockheed or Ball Aerospace to work out the design and construction details. Often industries try to work with proposals from several teams to increase the chances of being approved since each announcement of opportunity can be met with a dozen or more proposals. The Kepler telescope and the New Horizons spacecraft were both missions of this type that Dr. Reitsema worked on for Ball Aerospace. Clearly, those proposals were accepted.

Such missions are relatively low in cost and risk. Larger, more expensive endeavors, such as the Mars Rovers or the Hubble Telescope, take a different course from conception to completion. In these cases, NASA puts out a list of requirements that a mission must meet and requests proposals from the aerospace industry that meet these requirements. The James Webb Telescope is a prime example. NASA knew they wanted to do a really big infrared telescope and it needed to be able to aim with a high accuracy, have a particular sensitivity, size, and life expectancy, and operate at extremely low temperatures. NASA then puts out a "Request for Proposals" to accomplish their mission.

Such endeavors require vast resources so the number of proposals is limited and they almost always come from the aerospace industry. Since these missions have never been done before and often require untested or even nonexistent technologies, NASA is willing to cover certain cost overruns. Again, the Webb is a good example. Originally proposed at a cost of around $1.6 billion in 1997, it jumped to $5 billion by 2007 and now is estimated at almost $9 billion! Part of the problem was that it is very difficult to perform tests here on Earth to evaluate how it will behave in a weightless environment, with its optics near absolute zero and electronics at room temperature.

So, to summarize, missions are the result of two processes. In the first, groups propose different ideas in response to an announcement of opportunity from NASA to study a broad branch of science. In the second, proposals are submitted for specific investigations as defined by NASA. Each scenario brings us a better understanding of whats up in the sky.

This month in history:

Peter Burkey is a Holland resident. Contact him at pburkey@comcast.net.

Read the original:

What's Up in the Sky? How NASA missions are born - HollandSentinel.com

WATCH: NASA Tapping University Teams for Innovative Ideas to Enhance Moon to Mars Missions | – SpaceCoastDaily.com

NASAs Advanced Exploration Systems division will offer multiple competitively- selected awards

ABOVE VIDEO: NASA, in collaboration with the National Space Grant Foundation, is giving university teams the opportunity to develop innovative design ideas that will assist NASAs Moon to Mars mission objectives.

(NASA) NASA, in collaboration with the National Space Grant Foundation, is giving university teams the opportunity to develop innovative design ideas that will assist NASAs Moon to Mars mission objectives.

The 2021 Moon to Mars eXploration Systems and Habitation (M2M X-Hab) Academic InnovationChallengeis an opportunity for NASA to build partnerships and tap into the ingenuity and creativity of the rising Artemis generation spaceexplorers.

This collaborative opportunity provides real-world, hands-on design, research and development opportunities for university students interested in aerospace careers while strengthening NASAs efforts to optimize technology investments, foster innovation and facilitate technology infusion.

NASAs Advanced Exploration Systems division will offer multiple competitively- selected awards ranging from $15,000- $50,000 to university teams to assist them in designing and producing studies, research findings or functional products that bridge strategic knowledge gaps, increase capabilities and lower technology risks related to NASAs Moon to Mars space exploration missions.

Proposals are due April 24, 2020.

M2M X-Hab 2021 Academic Innovation Challenge projects proposals will provide solutions for overcoming technology barriers and advancing technology in the following areas:

NASA is leading a sustainable return to the Moon with commercial and international partners to expand human presence in space and bring back new knowledge and opportunities.

The key components of the exploration campaign that will send astronauts to the Moon and beyond sustainably are being developed.

NASAs next big rocket, the Space Launch System, along with the Orion spacecraft and the mobile, lunar command moduleGatewaywill be the backbone for deep space exploration.

CLICK HERE FOR BREVARD COUNTY NEWS

Click here to contribute your news or announcements Free

See the article here:

WATCH: NASA Tapping University Teams for Innovative Ideas to Enhance Moon to Mars Missions | - SpaceCoastDaily.com

A Year of Surprising Science From NASA’s InSight Mars Mission – Jet Propulsion Laboratory

A batch of new papers summarizes the lander's findings above and below the surface of the Red Planet.

A new understanding of Mars is beginning to emerge, thanksto the first year of NASA's InSight lander mission. Findings described in a setof six papers published today reveal a planet alive with quakes, dust devilsand strange magnetic pulses.

Five ofthe papers were published in Nature. An additional paper in Nature Geoscience details the InSight spacecraft's landing site, a shallow crater nicknamed"Homestead hollow" in a region called Elysium Planitia.

InSight is the first mission dedicated to looking deepbeneath the Martian surface. Among its science tools are a seismometer fordetecting quakes, sensors for gauging wind and air pressure, a magnetometer,and a heat flow probe designed to take the planet's temperature.

A cutaway view of Mars showing the InSight lander studying seismic activity. Credit: J.T. Keane/Nature Geoscience Larger view

While the team continues to work on getting the probeinto the Martian surface as intended, the ultra-sensitive seismometer, calledthe Seismic Experiment for Interior Structure (SEIS), hasenabled scientists to "hear" multiple trembling events from hundreds tothousands of miles away.

Seismic waves are affected by the materials they movethrough, giving scientists a way to study the composition of the planet's innerstructure. Mars can help the team better understand how all rocky planets,including Earth, first formed.

Underground

Mars trembles more often - butalso more mildly - than expected. SEIS has found more than 450 seismicsignals to date, the vast majority of which are probably quakes (as opposed todata noise created by environmental factors, like wind). The largest quake was aboutmagnitude 4.0 in size - not quite large enough to travel down below the crust intothe planet's lower mantle and core. Those are "the juiciest parts of theapple" when it comes to studying the planet's inner structure, said BruceBanerdt, InSight principal investigator at JPL.

Scientists are ready for more: It took months afterInSight's landing in November 2018 before they recorded the first seismicevent. By the end of 2019, SEIS was detecting about two seismic signals a day,suggesting that InSight just happened to touch down at a particularly quiettime. Scientists still have their fingers crossed for "the Big One."

Mars doesn't have tectonic plates like Earth, but it doeshave volcanically active regions that can cause rumbles. A pair of quakes wasstrongly linked to one such region, Cerberus Fossae, where scientists see bouldersthat may have been shaken down cliffsides. Ancient floods there carved channels nearly 800miles (1,300 kilometers) long. Lava flows then seeped into those channels withinthe past 10 million years - the blink of an eye ingeologic time.

Some of these young lava flows show signs of having been fracturedby quakes less than 2 million years ago. "It's just about the youngesttectonic feature on the planet," said planetary geologist Matt Golombek ofJPL. "The fact that we're seeing evidence of shaking in this region isn'ta surprise, but it's very cool."

At the Surface

Billions of years ago, Mars had a magnetic field. It is nolonger present, but it left ghosts behind, magnetizing ancient rocks that arenow between 200 feet (61 meters) to several miles below ground. InSight isequipped with a magnetometer - the first on the surface of Mars to detect magneticsignals.

The magnetometer has found that the signals at Homestead holloware 10 times stronger than what was predicted based on data from orbitingspacecraft that study the area. The measurements of these orbiters are averagedover a couple of hundred miles, whereas InSight's measurements are more local.

Because most surface rocks atInSight's location are too young to have been magnetized by the planet's formerfield, "this magnetism must be coming from ancient rocksunderground," said Catherine Johnson, a planetary scientist at theUniversity of British Columbia and the Planetary Science Institute. "We'recombining these data with what we know from seismology and geology tounderstand the magnetized layers below InSight. How strong or deep would theyhave to be for us to detect this field?"

In addition, scientists are intriguedby how these signals change over time. The measurements vary by day and night;they also tend to pulse around midnight. Theories are still being formed as towhat causes such changes, but one possibility is that they're related to thesolar wind interacting with the Martian atmosphere.

In the Wind

InSight measureswind speed, direction and air pressure nearly continuously, offering more datathan previous landed missions. The spacecraft's weathersensors have detected thousandsof passing whirlwinds, which are called dust devils when they pick up grit andbecome visible. "This site has more whirlwindsthan any other place we've landed on Mars while carrying weather sensors,"said Aymeric Spiga, an atmospheric scientist at Sorbonne University inParis.

Despite all that activity andfrequent imaging, InSight's cameras have yet to see dust devils. But SEIScan feel these whirlwinds pulling on the surface like a giant vacuum cleaner. "Whirlwindsare perfect for subsurface seismic exploration," said Philippe Lognonn ofInstitut de Physique du Globe de Paris (IPGP), principal investigator of SEIS.

Still to Come: TheCore

InSight has two radios: one for regularly sending andreceiving data, and a more powerful radio designed to measure the"wobble" of Mars as it spins. This X-band radio, also known as theRotation and Interior Structure Experiment (RISE), can eventually revealwhether the planet's core is solid or liquid. A solidcore would cause Mars to wobble less than a liquid one would.

This first year of data is just a start. Watching over afull Martian year (two Earth years) will give scientists a much better idea ofthe size and speed of the planet's wobble.

About InSight

A division of Caltech inPasadena, JPL manages InSight for NASA's Science Mission Directorate. InSightis part of NASA's Discovery Program, managed by the agency's Marshall SpaceFlight Center in Huntsville, Alabama. Lockheed Martin Space in Denver built theInSight spacecraft, including its cruise stage and lander, and supportsspacecraft operations for the mission.

A number of European partners, including France's CentreNational d'tudes Spatiales (CNES), the German Aerospace Center (DLR) and theUnited Kingdom Space Agency (UKSA), are supporting the InSight mission. CNESprovided the Seismic Experiment for Interior Structure (SEIS) instrument toNASA, with the principal investigator at IPGP (Institut de Physique du Globe deParis). Significant contributions for SEIS came from IPGP; the Max PlanckInstitute for Solar System Research (MPS) in Germany; the Swiss FederalInstitute of Technology (ETH Zurich) in Switzerland; Imperial College Londonand Oxford University in the United Kingdom; and JPL. DLR provided the HeatFlow and Physical Properties Package (HP3)instrument, with significant contributions from the Space Research Center (CBK)of the Polish Academy of Sciences and Astronika in Poland. Spain's Centro deAstrobiologa (CAB) supplied the temperature and wind sensors.

News Media Contact

Andrew GoodJet Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena, Calif.818-393-2433andrew.c.good@jpl.nasa.gov

Alana JohnsonNASA Headquarters, Washington202-358-1501alana.r.johnson@nasa.gov

2020-039

See the article here:

A Year of Surprising Science From NASA's InSight Mars Mission - Jet Propulsion Laboratory

Op-ed | Is NASA ready to find life beyond Earth? – SpaceNews

The world is not ready for the discovery of life on Mars, NASA Chief Scientist Jim Green recently told a British newspaper. I dont think were prepared for the results.

Agreed. But we could take it one step further and ask, Is NASA ready to find life beyond Earth? The quest to find and investigate life beyond the Earth has reached a tipping point. We stand on the brink of changing the perspective of humanitys place in the universe and finally answering the question Are we alone?

The quest to find life beyond Earth is compelling. However, the capabilities to achieve the quest are distributed across the NASA organization, primarily in the Science Mission Directorate. They compete against other priorities for resources and urgency. This is a quest for all humanity. For NASA to succeed requires a new approach.

Why now? This current quest began in the mid-1990s. Swiss scientists Michel Mayor and Didier Queloz discovered the first planet orbiting another star in 1995, work recognized with the 2019 Nobel Prize for Physics. In 1996, the claim of a fossilized bacteria in a Mars meteorite sample created new momentum in the NASA planetary program. These discoveries set off a chain of missions and research that today is paying off handsomely.

The NASA Kepler mission science team has identified more than 2,700 confirmed extrasolar planets, the so-called exoplanets. Kepler and other observatories have demonstrated that our solar system is not typical, that planets come in many different types and orbits, and has identified candidates for Earthlike planets orbiting other suns. Those in the habitable zone where water is expected to be a liquid are of particular interest. These discoveries have created an enthusiastic and fast-growing exoplanet community, eager to find life beyond Earth.

Within our solar system, the Cassini mission team discovered geysers from Saturns moon Enceladus that are gushing salty water and possibly microbial life created in hydrothermal activity analogous to life found around deep ocean vents on the Earth. Astrobiology, an interdisciplinary scientific field concerned with the origins of and search for life in the universe, has gone from a speculative theoretical research initiative started at NASA over 20 years ago, to the observational mainstream with a thriving science community.

The time is now to create a new Life beyond Earth organization within the NASA Science Mission Directorate. This would bring together the NASA life-finding capabilities including both the relevant future telescopes and solar system exploration missions. This may seem like a radical proposal to combine such different capabilities. However, the common science objective should drive the organization, rather than capability or technique. And it is worth remembering that telescopes discovered the planets in our solar system and the large future life-finding telescopes will provide amazing high-resolution imaging capabilities not just of exoplanets, but also of solar system planets and moons.

A Life beyond Earth organization would include the science enabled by human exploration. Future Artemis astronauts will return samples from the ice-filled, permanently shadowed lunar craters that may hold clues to the origins of life. Robotic missions and eventually astronauts will return samples from Mars that may provide definitive evidence for life beyond Earth. The important advocacy for planetary protection to prevent false alarms from contaminating microbes brought from Earth would be an essential part of this organization. Astronauts will most likely be needed to assemble in space the large life finding telescopes required to make detailed studies of candidate extrasolar habitable planets.

Such reorganizations have been successfully undertaken in response to the shifting scientific landscape. Heliophysics at NASA was created 20 years ago bringing together the solar astronomers and the space physicists toward a common goal: studying the Sun-Earth magnetosphere system. While initially there were concerns about how the two different scientific cultures would coexist, it has been a resounding success exemplified by successful missions, such as the Parker Solar Probe.

This new organization will also inform decadal surveys, which set priorities for future science missions. The astrophysics decadal survey (Astro2020) is currently underway. New observatories are being considered to directly image exoplanets and search for the signatures of habitability. Astro2020 has a Hobsons choice to prioritize the search for life against other high priority astrophysics science. Likewise, the upcoming planetary science 2023 decadal will confront a similar dilemma (e.g., prioritizing returning samples from Mars against flagship missions to the ice giants.). Ultimately, under this new approach, there would be a search for life decadal survey that would focus on prioritizing resources toward this quest.

The quest for life beyond Earth has entered a new phase and requires a bold new initiative. It presents an opportunity to raise the tide to lift all boats. This will prepare NASA and the public not just for the first discovery of life beyond the Earth, but for what follows. In doing so this will be a winwin for NASA, the scientific community and humanity.

Nicholas E. White Ph.D. is a research professor of physics at George Washington University and owner of Space Science Solutions LLC. He previously served as senior vice president for science at the Universities Space Research Association and director of science at NASAs Goddard Space Flight Center. He is a fellow of the American Physical Society.

This article originally appeared in the Dec. 23, 2019 issue of SpaceNews magazine.

Read more here:

Op-ed | Is NASA ready to find life beyond Earth? - SpaceNews

I Was the First Woman of Color in Space. Heres What Katherine Johnson Means to Me. – The New York Times

Two years after I joined NASA in 1987, I was preparing for a trip to Brazil to help the United States Information Service celebrate the 20th anniversary of the Apollo 11 moon landing. The souvenir posters I would give out referred to the first American men on the moon. I suggested it would be more appropriate if they read first humans on the moon.

A male astronaut sneered at the idea and said that it had been men who landed on the moon.

But it was women who helped put them there! I pushed back.

I was referring to the countless generations of women who have done so much to support human achievements but have gone unrecognized.

Even though I was soon to become the first woman of color who went to space, at that time I did not know of the mathematician Katherine Johnson, who died on Monday at the age of 101, or of the crucial calculations she made for the Mercury, Gemini and Apollo missions.

It would have put such a fierce smile on my face had I known about Katherine Johnson, her colleagues Mary Jackson and Jackie Vaughn and the other women mathematicians at NASA when I was growing up on the South Side of Chicago in the 1960s. I always assumed that I would go into space, even though the United States had no astronauts who were women or of color at the time. I could see on TV that the mission control rooms were filled with white men. Even at 8, 9 or 10 years old, I was sure that the picture misrepresented the capabilities women and I possessed.

Though I majored in African and African-American studies as well as chemical engineering at Stanford, when I joined the NASA astronaut corps I only knew vaguely of some African-American women at NASA and in aviation. I knew of African-American men and white women who were science and exploration legends. Yet I was unfamiliar with Bessie Coleman, who became the first black woman in the world to get a pilots license in 1921; or Willa Brown, an African-American and the first U.S. woman to get both a pilots and a mechanics license and who lobbied the government to integrate the Army Air Corps. That helped lead to the establishment of the Tuskegee Airmen, a number of whom she trained.

It fortified me to get to know and work with Christine Darden, Patricia Cowings and other women scientists, engineers and mathematicians of all ethnicities who worked at NASA centers throughout the nation.

I am so pleased the book and movie Hidden Figures allowed the world to meet and celebrate Katherine Johnson and her colleagues.

Katherine Johnson was a revelation. An inspiration. But she was not a one-off to be put on a shelf and admired for her singular genius. She was representative of the deep well of talent and potential that is so often buried by lack of opportunity, access, exposure and expectation for women and particularly women of color in science and technical fields.

She was a beacon who heralded the contributions made by women that were hidden and stymied by the deep institutional and societal bias that accredits achievements to white men, deemed by society to be the unique holders of genius.

Johnson today is a balm for the discomfort that arises when you stand up in a crowd a crowd that doubts your capabilities due only to your gender or race and press a point, disagree with a widely held premise or challenge the sugar coating of facts meant to make the powerful feel better while disregarding the less powerful, who need the truth revealed.

I have been working with a group of experts to understand what is needed to achieve the equitable participation and leadership of women in STEM fields. The insight may be uncomfortable for some allies, because effective, lasting solutions demand profound change in core beliefs and behaviors.

The changes require the dismantling of a gantlet: of persistent bias, obstacles and actions that block womens entry or push them out. It is a gantlet that has gone unacknowledged even decades after Katherine Johnsons accomplishments at NASA. Organizations value women for their work when it aligns with the organizations traditional perspectives; but they fall back on exclusionary behavior when new, diverse perspectives are generated or required.

Women have continued to advance within NASA Peggy Whitson is the American astronaut who has spent the most time in space. In October, a pair of female astronauts, Christina Koch and Jessica Meir, walked in space together.

Even great organizations may be blind to persistent intersectional bias that treats African-American women so differently. As I testified before the House space and science committee in May, there have been just six African-American women astronauts; three of them have flown in space. It is confounding that of 338 NASA astronauts, two of these African-American women, of stellar accomplishments and tenures of over 10 years each, are the only American astronauts who have been denied or pulled from a spaceflight assignment without any official explanation.

While I did not meet Katherine Johnson, when I channel her, I am jazzed. Katherine Johnson is the shining example. Through her I see the possibilities when the full scope of human experience, talent and perspectives are engaged to address the challenges and opportunities to improve life on Earth for all and push the limits of our knowledge.

Dr. Mae Jemison, an engineer and physician, was the first woman of color in space.

Read the original:

I Was the First Woman of Color in Space. Heres What Katherine Johnson Means to Me. - The New York Times

NASAs new gecko-robot can climb just about everything like the lizards feet – SYFY WIRE

What is more powerful than suction cup and even a vacuum pump, but was not invented by humans?

Answer: a geckos foot. NASA has decided to copy the lizards incredible gripping technology, which relies on electrostatic attractions, in its Gecko Gripper robot. This is not coming from an internet troll trying to sell car insurance. The space agency partnered with OnRobot, which specializes in finger-like robotic grippers, to create a device that can (so far) lift 14 pounds. The radiation-resistant pads could literally mean a huge step forward for getting around in space.

Moving around in microgravity is more of a climbing problem than a walking problem, said Aaron Parness, who had overseen the robotic climbers and grippers group at NASAs Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL) in Pasadena, CA.

If youve ever seen a spacewalk video, then you know that astronauts are not just walking outside to adjust something on the ISS. They have to climb and somehow make their bodies conform to the shape of whatever they are climbing if they expect to not float away into the cosmic void. Geckos feet automatically conform to whatever theyre climbing, which explains how you can find one hanging out on the ceiling with no problem at all. Each toe pad has a million ultrathin hairs with hundreds of even thinner nanohairs.

With hairs too small for the naked eye to see, a gecko creates a surprising amount of surface area that its feet will conform to with hardly any pressure. Replicating that was not nearly as easy for humans as crawling at weird angles may be for this lizard.

The Gecko Gripper is still being upgraded, but it could possibly challenge the reptile it was modeled after. Its ultrasonic sensor finds the target, and the weight of that target is figured out by a load sensor, which is beyond convenient for picking up and sticking to objects on Earth and in space. It can also switch adhesion on and off autonomously using the same tech that a geckos foot evolved over millions of years. Like gecko nanohairs, it has tiny fibers that stick out an an angle, so only moving in the right direction will allow them to grip.

Pulling in the opposite direction will release that grip. If nature hadnt come up with this, I dont think anyone would have ever thought of it, said Gareth Meirion-Griffith, current manager of the JPL climbers and grippers group, of this creation. The Gecko Gripper is also much more convenient than the vacuum-powered pump it will eventually replace in microgravity.

Its obvious that things crawling (or growing) on the planet we live on still have much to teach us about how we can advance technology.

(via NASA)

Read the original here:

NASAs new gecko-robot can climb just about everything like the lizards feet - SYFY WIRE

Conant teacher chosen for training in NASA observation plane – The Keene Sentinel

JAFFREY A local teachers career is reaching new heights.

Susan Rolke, who teaches science at Conant High, was one of 28 teachers nationwide selected to participate in the SETI Institutes NASA Airborne Astronomy Ambassadors program, according to a news release from the institute.

The program is a professional development opportunity for high-school science teachers, and aims to bolster science education and literacy. In addition to online and in-person training, teachers spend a week at a NASA research center in Palmdale, Calif.

While there, teachers accompany scientists on an overnight research flight on NASAs Stratospheric Observatory for Infrared Astronomy (SOFIA) a modified 747, equipped with a specialized infrared telescope, that flies at 35,000 to 45,000 feet, according to Rebecca McDonald, director of communications for the SETI Institute.

Flying high in the atmosphere eliminates visual interference that happens closer to earth, aiding astronomers observations, she said.

After the program, participants teach a two-week module focused on the electromagnetic spectrum, using examples from SOFIA, according to the release.

McDonald said the teachers flight weeks typically happen in the spring.

The SETI Institute is a nonprofit research and education organization based in Mountain View, Calif.

Paul Cuno-Booth can be reached at 352-1234, extension 1409, or pbooth@keenesentinel.com. Follow him on Twitter @PCunoBoothKS

Continue reading here:

Conant teacher chosen for training in NASA observation plane - The Keene Sentinel

This NASA Engineer Is Bringing Math And Science To Hip Hop – NPR

Dajae Williams is a quality engineer at NASA's Jet Propulsion Lab. "I create music that fuses hip-hop and math as a tool to encourage underprivileged youth to explore STEM." NASA/JPL-Caltech hide caption

Dajae Williams is a quality engineer at NASA's Jet Propulsion Lab. "I create music that fuses hip-hop and math as a tool to encourage underprivileged youth to explore STEM."

NASA engineer Dajae Williams is using hip hop to make math and science more accessible to young people. We talk with Dajae about her path to NASA, and how music helped her fall in love with math and science when she was a teenager.

Follow Maddie on Twitter. Email the show at shortwave@npr.org.

Production note: This interview was originally recorded on October 11th, 2019.

This episode was produced by Brit Hanson and edited by Viet Le.

See original here:

This NASA Engineer Is Bringing Math And Science To Hip Hop - NPR

Katherine Johnsons Math Will Steer NASA Back to the Moon – WIRED

Katherine Johnson blazed trails, not just as a black female mathematician during the Cold War, but by mapping literal paths through outer space. Her math continues to carve out new paths for spacecraft navigating our solar system, as NASA engineers use evolved versions of her equations that will execute missions to the moon and beyond.

The retired NASA mathematician, who died Monday at the age of 101, calculated the trajectories of the agencys first space missions, including John Glenns 1962 spaceflight in which he became the first American to orbit the planet, and the first moon landing in 1969. But Johnsons contributions to spaceflight extend beyond such historic moments, several of which are dramatized in the 2016 movie Hidden Figures. Her work forms part of the mathematical foundation of NASAs missions today. She had a big contribution to trajectory design in general, says NASA aerospace engineer Jenny Gruber.

At NASA Johnson Space Center in Houston, Gruber works on the Artemis mission, which plans to send the first woman and the next man to the moon in 2024. Gruber plans trajectories for Artemis, just as Johnson did for the first lunar landing. Grubers basic task remains essentially the same as Johnsons was in 1962: to calculate the speed, acceleration, and direction required to lob a spacecraft of certain size and fuel capacity to hit a moving target, without a lot of room for extra maneuvering.

These missions are not unlike trying to hit a rotating bulls-eye with a dart while jumping off a carousel, the dart being the astronaut, the Earth the spinning carousel, and the bulls eye a spot on the moon. As Johnson told a PBS interviewer in 2011, It was intricate, but it was possible.

Once launched, astronauts have limited means for adjusting their trajectory, and small errors committed either by trajectory planners or the astronauts themselves can result in dire consequences. For example, Scott Carpenter, who replicated Glenns flight and was the sixth human in space, overshot his target landing spot in the Atlantic Ocean by 250 miles because he fell behind preparing for re-entry. (A US Navy team safely recovered him about three hours later.) So just as Johnson's team did in the 1960s, Gruber and her team are trying to calculate and plan for all possible scenarios on the way to the moon. If you get it wrong, people die, she says. And then people see it on TV.

The job has always had crazy high pressure. One of the most important aspects of Johnsons mathematical prowess is that her calculations involved real people, real objects interacting at the limits of human engineering. During these missions, human lives were at stake, and so was the outcome of the space race between the US and the former Soviet Union. The space program was in overdrive, trying to get ahead of the Russians, says NASA historian Bill Barry. And, of course, the whole world was watching the Apollo 11 moon landing on television.

Although the basics of space missions have remained the same, much has evolved in mission planning since Johnsons time. In 60s, NASA employed so-called human computersmostly women like Johnsonto perform the calculations. The main reason women were hired to be computers was that it was drudge work, says Barry. The engineers didnt want to do it.

But even if the public didnt know much about these mathematicians, the astronauts relied on them. While preparing for the 1962 Friendship 7 mission, Glenn famously did not trust NASAs new electronic computer, the multimillion-dollar IBM 7090, to plan his trip. He specifically requested that Johnson, who worked at NASAs Flight Research Division, double-check the IBMs computations with pen and paper. Get the girl, Glenn said, according to Barry. Everyone knew which girl he meant. Katherine Johnson was the premier mathematician doing this type of work.

Read the rest here:

Katherine Johnsons Math Will Steer NASA Back to the Moon - WIRED

Graphene-based stress sensor could help NASA in testing anxiety levels of astronauts – Graphene-Info

A new graphene-based sensor that measures stress via cortisol in sweat could be used by NASA to gauge the anxiety levels of astronauts.

Developed by Caltech assistant professor of medical engineering, Wei Gao, the device features a plastic sheet etched with a laser to generate a 3D graphene structure with tiny pores in which sweat can collect. Those pores create a large amount of surface area in the sensor, which makes it sensitive enough to detect compounds in the sweat that are only present in very small amounts. Those tiny pores are also coupled with an antibody sensitive to cortisol, allowing the sensor to detect the compound.

In October, NASA announced that Gao is one of six researchers selected to participate in studies of the health of humans on deep-space missions. Gao will receive funding to develop the sensor technology into a system for monitoring the stress and anxiety of astronauts as part of the programme.

We aim to develop a wearable system that can collect multimodal data, including both vital sign and molecular biomarker information, to obtain the accurate classification for deep space stress and anxiety, he said.

Our analysis time could be only a few minutes. Typically, a blood test takes at least one to two hours and requires stress-inducing blood draw. For stress monitoring, time is very important.

Aside from aerospace applications, the device could be used to help monitor and treat a range of conditions. Cortisol levels rise and fall in line with a regular daily rhythm, but according to Gao, various mental health conditions have subtle changes on these cycles. Monitoring cortisol over a number of days could help with the diagnosis of these conditions, potentially leading to better treatment.

Depression patients have a different circadian pattern of cortisol than healthy individuals do, said Gao. With PTSD patients, its another different one.

Read more:

Graphene-based stress sensor could help NASA in testing anxiety levels of astronauts - Graphene-Info

Space Photos of the Week: Venus Is the Spacecraft-Killer – WIRED

Its a star! Its a UFO! Nope its probably Venus. If youve ever gone outside for a late walk and spotted a big gorgeous bright star in the sky, its likely that you were looking at Venus. The planet is named after the Roman goddess of love, and NASA is giving Venus a little extra love right now: It's in the process of evaluating two possible missions to the planet, and both of them have the potential to reshape our understanding of how terrestrial planets form, Venus in particular. Venus is covered in a thick atmosphere primarily composed of carbon dioxide gas created in part by a runaway greenhouse gas effect. Hidden below this cloud cover is the most volcanic planet in the solar system.

The two proposed Venus missions are each very different and each would accomplish something unique. The first is VERITAS or (Venus Emissivity, Radio Science, InSAR, Topography, and Spectroscopy). This orbiter would map the surface of Venus to better understand the complex features and help determine more about Venuss plate tectonics and whether or not Venus is still geologically active. The other option is a one and done deal called DAVINCI+ or Deep Atmosphere Venus Investigation of Noble gases, Chemistry, and Imaging Plus. DAVINCI+ would drop a spherical spacecraft through the atmosphere, and during its descent the probe would collect data to help scientists better understand what the atmosphere is composed of and help complete the picture of how the planet was formed.

Sure it rains sulphuric acid and it kills all spacecraft that land there but NASA really wants to go to the planet anyway. So grab your spacesuit and get ready to show a little love to this bizarre world.

Beeline over here to look at more space photos.

More Great WIRED Stories

Read this article:

Space Photos of the Week: Venus Is the Spacecraft-Killer - WIRED

NMSU astronomers to analyze Jupiters atmosphere thanks to NASA grant – Las Cruces Sun-News

Minerva Baumann, New Mexico State University Published 8:30 a.m. MT Feb. 29, 2020

Hubble Space Telescope photo of Jupiter was taken when it was comparatively close to Earth, at a distance of 415 million miles. Hubble reveals the intricate, detailed beauty of Jupiters clouds as arranged into bands of different latitudes, known as tropical regions. These bands are produced by air flowing in different directions at various latitudes. Lighter colored areas, called zones, are high-pressure where the atmosphere rises. Darker low-pressure regions where air falls are called belts. The planets trademark, the Great Red Spot, is a long-lived storm roughly the diameter of Earth. Much smaller storms appear as white or brown-colored ovals. Such storms can last as little as a few hours or stretch on for centuries.(Photo: Images courtesy NASA, ESA, and A. Simon - NASA Goddard)

LAS CRUCES - The atmosphere of Jupiter is a colorful swirl of cloud bands in brown, yellow, red and white with an enormous red spot. To unlock some of the atmospheres mysteries on the gas giant planet, New Mexico State University researchers this week received a three-year, $283,800 grant from NASAs New Frontiers Data Analysis Program.

The New Frontiers research program, within NASAs Planetary Science Division, is aimed at enhancing the scientific return from New Frontiers class missions. The mission NMSU astronomers have chosen to investigate is the Juno mission, which is currently in orbit around Jupiter.

We proposed to analyze some infrared images and spectra of Jupiters atmosphere to try to understand the circulation patterns and the waves, and the transition between orderly and chaotic circulations in Jupiters atmosphere, said Nancy Chanover, astronomy professor and principal investigator on the project.

The team of researchers working with Chanover includes co-investigators Jason Jackiewicz, associate professor of astronomy; Wladimir Lyra, assistant professor of astronomy; and Ali Hyder, astronomy Ph.D. student.

The atmosphere of Jupiter is the largest in the solar system. Its called a gas giant because its atmosphere is made up of mostly hydrogen and helium gas, like the Sun. Each of the professors is approaching the data from a different perspective. Chanovers perspective is from the upper cloud deck of Jupiter, Jackiewicz studies the interior of Jupiter and vertical motions within the atmosphere, and Lyra creates numerical simulations of fluids of all astrophysical kinds.

My part is in the modeling of the atmosphere. In this case, we are going to apply my models to the atmosphere of Jupiter to better understand and explain the observations recorded by Juno, Lyra said as he described some of his previous simulations and how they could apply to the Jupiter project.

This a previous model, so you can see as the simulation proceeds, more vortices form, they grow, they merge with other ones, they tease each other. In the end, youre going to have one large vortex. So we are applying the same kind of calculations to the atmosphere of Jupiter.

Jason Jackiewicz, associate professor of astronomy, is part of the team of researchers studying the atmosphere of Jupiter. Jackiewiczs research, the NASA-funded Jovian Interiors from Velocimetry Experiment in New Mexico project, he has been using the Dunn Solar Telescope to measure winds in Jupiters atmosphere, in particular vertical motions with a very specific technique he pioneered.(Photo: Darren Phillips / New Mexico State University)

As part of Jackiewiczs research, the NASA-funded Jovian Interiors from Velocimetry Experiment in New Mexico project, he has been using the Dunn Solar Telescope to measure winds in Jupiter's atmosphere, in particular vertical motions, with a very specific technique he pioneered. The data from Juno are being supplemented with observations from JIVE.

What's happening at NMSU? Find out with a subscription to the Sun-News.

It's exciting that we can obtain data from observations carried out right here in New Mexico that complement the NASA Juno space data, providing us with new constraints about how the atmosphere of Jupiter is dynamically linked to interesting features like vortices, said Jackiewicz.

Little is known about the interior composition and structure of gas giant planets like Jupiter. One of NASAs planetary science goals is to understand how the suns family of planets originated and evolve.

The Juno images provide us sort of with east, west and north south motions of the clouds and Jasons data will provide us with the vertical motions of the clouds, Chanover said. Using that three-dimensional dataset, we will really be able to probe whats driving these vortices in the atmospheric circulation.

Ph.D. student Ali Hyder will be working with the team on all aspects of the research as part of his doctoral thesis.

Jupiters atmosphere is a dynamic and ever-changing system where we can observe fluid dynamic phenomenology on a scale inaccessible on Earth, so it provides a very unique environment in which to study such phenomena, Hyder said. Being part of this project, I will be working on all aspects of numerical modeling, the actual development of the code, modification of the model, analysis of the results from the numerical simulation, and the data reduction of the observations as well.

From left: Wladimir Lyra, assistant professor of astronomy, Ali Hyder, Ph.D. student, and Nancy Chanover, astronomy professor and principal investigator of a three-year, $283,800 grant from NASAs New Frontiers Data Analysis Program to analyze infrared images and spectra of Jupiter's atmosphere. (NMSU photo by )(Photo: Amanda Adame / New Mexico State University)

Results of this research will be published in peer reviewed journals and the new data generated through the mapping of some images or the inclusion of these other datasets will be archived in the Atmospheres Node of NASAs Planetary Data System, located at NMSU.

Chanover also leads that project, which is responsible for the acquisition, preservation and distribution of all non-imaging atmospheric data from all planetary missions (excluding Earth observations).

Once the data are archived in the PDS, they are accessible by any investigator worldwide, Chanover said. It really provides value to the existing mission data that are in the archive, because now were adding what is known as derived data or a kind of new data generated as a result of those mission data. So were adding another layer on top of the primary mission data.

The blending of different research specialties to make new discoveries about Jupiter is an important part of the project for Chanover.

One of the reasons I'm really excited about this project is because its a true collaboration among three faculty members in our department who come from varied academic research areas.

The collaborative nature is also a benefit for Hyder as a graduate student.

It is a really big deal for me to get exposure to such a varied domain of expertise, which is quite unusual for a single project, Hyder said. So Im getting information regarding the atmosphere, regarding the interior, and regarding numerical astrophysics all together.

EYE ON RESEARCH is provided by New Mexico State University. This weeks feature was written by Minerva Baumann of Marketing and Communications. Minerva Baumann can be reached at 575-646-7566 ormbauma46@nmsu.edu.

Keep reading:

Read or Share this story: https://www.lcsun-news.com/story/news/local/community/2020/02/29/nmsu-astronomers-analyze-jupiters-atmosphere-thanks-nasa-grant/4911403002/

Continue reading here:

NMSU astronomers to analyze Jupiters atmosphere thanks to NASA grant - Las Cruces Sun-News

Cryonics | Definition of Cryonics by Merriam-Webster

To save this word, you'll need to log in.

: the practice of freezing a person who has died of a disease in hopes of restoring life at some future time when a cure for the disease has been developed

1966, in the meaning defined above

earlier cryonic (from Greek kros "icy cold, frost" + -onicin bionic) + -ics) more at cryo-

Cite this Entry

Cryonics. Merriam-Webster.com Dictionary, Merriam-Webster, https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/cryonics. Accessed 29 Feb. 2020.

More Definitions for cryonics

medical : a procedure in which a person's body is frozen just after he or she has died so that the body can be restored if a cure for the cause of death is found

cryonics

: the practice of freezing the body of a person who has died from a disease in hopes of restoring life at some future time when a cure for the disease has been developed

Other Words from cryonics

Comments on cryonics

What made you want to look up cryonics? Please tell us where you read or heard it (including the quote, if possible).

See the article here:

Cryonics | Definition of Cryonics by Merriam-Webster

The False Science of Cryonics – MIT Technology Review

I woke up on Saturday to a heartbreaking front-page article in the New York Times about a terminally ill young woman who chooses to freeze her brain. She is drawn into a cottage industry spurred by transhumanist principles that offers to preserve people in liquid nitrogen immediately after death and store their bodies (or at least their heads) in hopes that they can be reanimated or digitally replicated in a technologically advanced future.

Proponents have added a patina of scientific plausibility to this idea by citing the promise of new technologies in neuroscience, particularly recent work in connectomicsa field that maps the connections between neurons. The suggestion is that a detailed map of neural connections could be enough to restore a persons mind, memories, and personality by uploading it into a computer simulation.

Science tells us that a map of connections is not sufficient to simulate, let alone replicate, a nervous system, and that there are enormous barriers to achieving immortality in silico. First, what information is required to replicate a human mind? Second, do current or foreseeable freezing methods preserve the necessary information, and how will this information be recovered? Third, and most confounding to our intuition, would a simulation really be you?

I study a small roundworm, Caenorhabditis elegans, which is by far the best-described animal in all of biology. We know all of its genes and all of its cells (a little over 1,000). We know the identity and complete synaptic connectivity of its 302 neurons, and we have known it for 30 years.

If we could upload or roughly simulate any brain, it should be that of C. elegans. Yet even with the full connectome in hand, a static model of this network of connections lacks most of the information necessary to simulate the mind of the worm. In short, brain activity cannot be inferred from synaptic neuroanatomy.

Synapses are the physical contacts between neurons where a special form of chemoelectric signalingneurotransmissionoccurs, and they come in many varieties. They are complex molecular machines made of thousands of proteins and specialized lipid structures. It is the precise molecular composition of synapses and the membranes they are embedded in that confers their properties. The presence or absence of a synapse, which is all that current connectomics methods tell us, suggests that a possible functional relationship between two neurons exists, but little or nothing about the nature of this relationshipprecisely what you need to know to simulate it.

Additionally, neurons and other cells in the brain are in constant communication through signaling pathways that do not act through synapses. Many of the signals that regulate fundamental behaviors such as eating, sleeping, mood, mating, and social bonding are mediated by chemical cues acting through networks that are invisible to us anatomically. We know that the same set of synaptic connections can function very differently depending on what mix of these signals is present at a given time. These issues highlight an important distinction: the colossally hard problem of simulating any brain as opposed to the stupendously more difficult task of replicating a particular brain, which is required for the promised personal immortality of uploading.

The features of your neurons (and other cells) and synapses that make you you are not generic. The vast array of subtle chemical modifications, states of gene regulation, and subcellular distributions of molecular complexes are all part of the dynamic flux of a living brain. These things are not details that average out in a large nervous system; rather, they are the very things that engrams (the physical constituents of memories) are made of.

While it might be theoretically possible to preserve these features in dead tissue, that certainly is not happening now. The technology to do so, let alone the ability to read this information back out of such a specimen, does not yet exist even in principle. It is this purposeful conflation of what is theoretically conceivable with what is ever practically possible that exploits peoples vulnerability.

Finally, would an upload really be you? This is unanswerable, but we can dip our toes in. Whatever our subjective sense of self is, lets assume it arises from the operation of the physical matter of the brain. We could also tentatively conclude that such awareness is substrate-neutral: if brains can be conscious, a computer program that does everything a brain does should be conscious, too. If one is also willing to imagine arbitrarily complex technology, then we can also think about simulating a brain down to the synaptic or molecular or (why not?) atomic or quantum level.

But what is this replica? Is it subjectively you or is it a new, separate being? The idea that you can be conscious in two places at the same time defies our intuition. Parsimony suggests that replication will result in two different conscious entities. Simulation, if it were to occur, would result in a new person who is like you but whose conscious experience you dont have access to.

That means that any suggestion that you can come back to life is simply snake oil. Transhumanists have responses to these issues. In my experience, they consist of alternating demands that we trust our intuition about nonexistent technology (uploading could work) but deny our intuition about consciousness (it would not be me).

No one who has experienced the disbelief of losing a loved one can help but sympathize with someone who pays $80,000 to freeze their brain. But reanimation or simulation is an abjectly false hope that is beyond the promise of technology and is certainly impossible with the frozen, dead tissue offered by the cryonics industry. Those who profit from this hope deserve our anger and contempt.

Michael Hendricks is a neuroscientist and assistant professor of biology at McGill University.

Read the original here:

The False Science of Cryonics - MIT Technology Review

Osiris Cryonics

Cryonics is an effort to save lives by using temperatures so cold that a person beyond help by today's medicine might be preserved for decades or centuries until a future medical technology can restore that person to full health. Cryonics is a second chance at life. It is the reasoned belief in the advancement of future medicinal technologies being able to cure things we cant today.

Many biological specimens, including whole insects, many types of human tissue including brain tissue, and human embryos have been cryogenically preserved, stored at liquid nitrogen temperature where all decay ceases, and revived. This leads scientists to believe that the same can be done with whole human bodies, and that any minimal harm can be reversed with future advancements in medicine.

Neurosurgeons often cool patients bodies so they can operate on aneurysms without damaging or rupturing the nearby blood vessels. Human embryos that are frozen in fertility clinics, defrosted, and implanted in a mothers uterus grow into perfectly normal human beings. This method isnt new or groundbreaking- successful cryopreservation of human embryos was first reported in 1983 by Trounson and Mohr with multicellular embryos that had been slow-cooled using dimethyl sulphoxide (DMSO).

And just in Feb. of 2016, there was a cryonics breakthrough when for the first time, scientists vitrified a rabbits brain and, after warming it back up, showed that it was in near perfect condition. This was the first time a cryopreservation was provably able to protect everything associated with learning and memory.

See the original post here:

Osiris Cryonics

The cryonics dilemma: will deep-frozen bodies be fit for new …

My primary strategy for living through the 21st century and beyond is not to die, Ray Kurzweil, the futurologist and Google engineer has said. But in the event that plan A doesnt work out, he has opted to have his body cryogenically preserved at the worlds largest facility, the Alcor Life Extension Foundation in Scottsdale, Arizona.

Cryonics was first proposed in the 1960s by a Michigan professor, Robert Ettinger, in a book called The Prospect of Immortality, which argued that death could, in fact, be a reversible process. Ettinger, who died in 2011, went on to found the Cryonics Institute in Michigan where he, his mother and his first and second wives all now reside in metal flasks kept at 196 C.

While the concept has never become mainstream, the number of people choosing to sign up is steadily increasing year on year. There are now nearly 300 cryogenically frozen individuals in the US, another 50 in Russia, and a few thousand prospective candidates signed up.

The central idea is simple: preserve the body in a pristine condition until such times as medicine has developed a cure for whatever brought about death in the first place at which point the corpse is thawed and reanimated.

Calling someone dead is merely medicines way of excusing itself from resuscitation problems it cannot fix today, Alcors website states.

The real question, though, is not whether medicine will advance clearly it will but whether the frozen bodies will be in a fit state to bring back to life.

The worlds three major facilities - two in the US and KrioRus, a Russian centre on the outskirts of Moscow, differ slightly in price and ethos. Alcor has a reputation for celebrity clients, while KrioRus offers budget service, probably due to its communal approach to storage, with bodies sharing tanks with a menagerie of 20 or so pets (cats, dogs, birds) that owners have paid to preserve.

We have big cryostats, each about 3 cubic metres. About seven bodies fit in, says Danilo Medvedev, the companys CEO. Theyre placed in sleeping bags. Theres no point in having separate metal containers. It would only make it more complicated.

About half of KrioRuss 50 clients opted for entire body freezing, with the rest choosing to just preserve their heads. The bodies are placed vertically, with their heads at the bottom of the tank, where it is coldest, so the feet would thaw first in the case of a technical glitch.

The companies all use the same basic technology. First, the body is obtained as soon as possible after death, packed in ice and transported to the facility. Here the blood is drained and replaced with a mixture of anti-freeze and organ-preserving chemicals. This transforms the corpse into a glassy vitrified state, ready to be lowered into liquid nitrogen, at a temperature of -196C.

Alcor acknowledges that the process is tricky and that sometimes the brittle corpses, or patients as it refers to them, can fracture on immersion. Medvedev says issues with hospitals and relatives means that the freezing process is not begun in an optimal timeframe.

The overall theory is extremely sound, Medvedev says. Its not correct to say there havent been experiments. His own team, he says, have shown that rats can be cooled to zero degrees and kept in suspended animation for several hours before being re-awoken. He cites another case, in which a rabbit brain was vitrified and then thawed, appearing structurally intact although the brain was first set in a formaldehyde-like substance, that would rule out it ever functioning as a living organ in the future.

These examples, and clinical advances in storing sperm and egg cells, bear little relation to the technical challenge of trying to perfuse the entire human circulatory system, and, crucially, the brain, with anti-freeze without causing any damage.

This is where the science of cryonics really falls apart, according to Clive Coen, a professor of neuroscience at Kings College London. The main problem is that [the brain] is a massively dense piece of tissue. The idea that you can infiltrate it with some kind of anti-freeze and it will protect the tissue is ridiculous.

Since the brain is so densely organised and so well shielded by the blood-brain barrier and the fatty myelin coating around neurons, the cocktail of cryonic chemicals would need to be vigorously pumped in to ensure every nook and cranny was infiltrated. Youre dealing with an organ that is deliberately protecting itself from things coming in, says Coen.

This means that achieving full vitrification is likely to lead to the exact kind of damage membranes being ruptured, neuronal connections being lost that the technique is designed to avoid.

Coen argues that by the time the cryogenic support team arrives at the side of the patients hospital bed it may already be too late. Within a few minutes of anoxia, your hippocampal neurons are dead. Gone, he says, adding that global brain damage would be inevitable.

Would you really want to wake up in 100 years time and be basically a cognitive vegetable and have your cancer fixed? he asks. These vulnerable people dont realise theyre paying for something to be stored that is massively damaged.

KrioRus charges $36,000 (29,000) for whole body storage or $18,000 (15,000) for just the head, and Medvedev says that after the running of the facility and its expansion is paid for, hes not making much profit. By contrast, Alcor charges $200,000 (162,000) for the full body and $80,000 (65,000) for head-only preservation, and also offers the option of clients taking out a life insurance that will pay out to the company.

Anders Sandberg, of Oxford Universitys Future of Humanity Institute, has such a life insurance policy that, for 15 each month, will pay for his head to be frozen in the hope that the brains contents might be downloaded into a robotic agent in the future. He gives the freezing, thawing and reanimation process maybe a 5% chance of working. Thats actually worth quite a lot, though, he says.

The funny thing about cryonics is that theyre selling immortality, but very few people buy it, he adds. Is this because people dont actually want to live for ever, or because people think its nonsense? I think its partially the nonsense part, he says.

Go here to read the rest:

The cryonics dilemma: will deep-frozen bodies be fit for new ...

Cryonics Pros and Cons – Vision Launch

Can people preserve themselves when at or near death? The goal of cryonics is to create circumstances where people who are dying or have just passed away could be potentially resurrected and cured when technology advances to the point that beneficial care could be provided. These cryonics pros and cons must be carefully evaluated to determine if the benefits of this science outweigh any risks.

1. It could revolutionize the medical industry.Cryonics could allow people with a deadly virus to be preserved so that the illness doesnt progress until a cure or treatment can be found. It could help ship donated organs awaiting a transplant across longer distances. If cancer becomes metastatic, the growth could be slowed or stopped. The theoretical benefits are literally too numerous to list.

2. It could preserve life on Earth. Natural disasters seem to be happening everywhere these days. Earthquakes, volcanoes, and tsunamis all have destructive powers that are sometimes beyond comprehension. Cryonics could preserve life so that after a disaster, the region could be repopulated with native plant and animal life.

3. It may provide an answer to space colonization. For generations, science fiction authors have theorized that cryonics could be the answer to how humans can travel safely in the stars. The science is starting to catch up with those theories.

1. Human cells may continue to age while cryonically preserved. Although the cryonics process slows down the metabolism of cells, it may not actually slow cell aging. Someone may emerge from being cryonically preserved only to rapidly age.

2. It interrupts the natural cycle of life.Death is a natural part of life. It is also one of the scariest things people face because there is so much unknown about dying. Cryonics might relieve those fears, but it also places a certain burden of false expectation on people.

3. It may not do anything. The costs and work to preserve people through cryonics may ultimately be pointless. The theories might not ever translate into facts.

These cryonics pros and cons show that there is still much work to do. The benefits show that further research may prove beneficial in a number of areas, but those benefits may not be what we think they will be.

Read more:

Cryonics Pros and Cons - Vision Launch

Work begins on first cryonics storage facility in southern …

Updated February 26, 2020 12:34:04

When Ron Fielding tells people he plans to be brought back to life long after he dies, he gets a few curious looks, but that is just what he has signed up for.

Cryonics has been a passion of Mr Fielding's for decades.

The 78-year-old from Goulburn in the Southern Tablelands of New South Wales, is a member with The Cryonics Institute in the United States.

He has spent years researching the process of having his body frozen, or put into a state of 'suspension' and is hoping that one day, his own frozen body will be brought back to life.

Mr Fielding had initially planned that at age 84 he would leave his family and move to the US to be closer to a cryonics storage facility.

But he is now hoping his move across the world may not need to go ahead as groundwork for the first cryonics storage facility in the southern hemisphere started this month in Holbrook, in southern NSW.

Mr Fielding visited the site on the weekend to take a sneak peek of the facility where he hopes to be kept in suspension and to start the long wait for science to maybe, one day, bring him back into the world of the living.

Mr Fielding said while he was used to facing scepticism about the possibility of being brought back from the dead, he remained an optimist.

"People might laugh, but someone had to be a pioneer," he said.

"They always laughed at people when they're going to do something [new], but I feel this is the start of another exploration.

"The way science and that are today, just ask yourself, 'why should you die?'"

Mr Fielding said he hoped he would not be waking up alone in the future if he ever is brought back to life.

But he should not worry too much as his son, Guy Fielding, has also signed on to be suspended.

Guy, who describes himself as having "an open mind", decided to be frozen after learning about the process from his father.

It was an exciting moment for Mr Fielding and his son to inspect the foundations of the storage facility in Holbrook this month.

"I'd rather Dad stayed in Australia if it's at all a possibility, rather than go to America at one the cryonics institutes in the States," Guy said.

"This is really exciting to keep Dad with us here in Australia.

"If one day we can be together again, that will be fantastic [and] if we're here in Australia, that will be a better option than being overseas."

The warehouse at Holbrook will be operated by Southern Cryonics and is expected to be completed by the end of 2020.

Zoning, location, and a reduced risk of natural disaster all helped lead to the small town becoming one of the cryonics capitals of the southern hemisphere.

The warehouse will only be around 100 square metres and will host up to 40 clients.

For those undergoing the process, a designated response team will step into action after a client is declared legally dead.

The body will be stabilised to help preserve the brain as best as possible and slowly cooled, before the body is wrapped in ice and injected with an anticoagulant to stop blood clotting.

Water will then be removed from cells and replaced with a glycerol-based chemical.

The body is cooled to dry-ice temperatures to about minus 130 degrees Celsius and is then placed upside down in a vacuum-sealed tank filled with liquid nitrogen.

Being upside down will protect the brain from any potential leaks in the tank, where temperatures hover around minus 200 degree Celsius.

Different specialist teams will be in charge of different steps of the suspension process, with Southern Cryonics in charge of the final storage stage.

"We have the technology for the suspension part," Southern Cryonics founder, director, and chairman Peter Tsolakides said.

"Where the technology does not exist, very clearly, is technology and science of the future, and that is to bring people back."

That has not deterred future clients, whom Mr Tsolakides described as "optimists".

"Most of the people who are interested in cryonics are male [and] either they've got a science or STEM-type background or they're interested in that," he said.

"They've got an interest in the future and normally they're very positive about the future, they have a positive aspect, they're optimistic type people generally."

Being frozen is more expensive than a standard funeral or cremation.

So far 27 founding members of Southern Cryonics have committed $50,000 each to help build the facility, and will receive a free suspension.

Founding memberships will be closing on March 31, this year and after that, associated members who want to be frozen will have to pay $150,000.

Mr Fielding and his son Guy have weighed up the financial obstacle and agree it was "an issue".

"Things like insurance and having something there when you pass away usually you have some assets saved up, and that's when you make the commitment to spend," Guy said.

"Certainly being able to raise the funds and do it now would be difficult while you're still living but I think it's something you have in place when you do pass."

Executive officer of the Cryonics Association of Australasia, Phil Rhoades, who joined the Fieldings on their tour of the site, is expecting cryonics to become more mainstream.

"I'm expecting a non-foundation member to happen relatively quickly in the next year or two," he said.

"I'm guessing the first person [to be frozen] is going to be a non-foundation member who is going to come out of the blue, finding out that the facility is working and wanting to take advantage of it.

"There's the possibility also of preserving pets, so I wouldn't be surprised if that happened sooner than a human as well."

Like the Fieldings, Mr Rhoades is also an optimist about what the future holds.

"People are starting to think that anything might be possible," he said.

Topics:science-and-technology,health,community-and-society,medical-research,death,holbrook-2644,goulburn-2580,united-states

First posted February 26, 2020 11:43:20

See original here:

Work begins on first cryonics storage facility in southern ...

Cryonics: hype, hope or hell? – The Conversation

A 14-year-old dying girl has won the right to have her body cryonically preserved immediately after she died, according to a recent UK High Court decision.

The girl, known as JS, hoped that sometime in the future, when doctors found a cure for her cancer, she might be brought back to life. She had spent several months researching the science of cryonics and the judge had no doubt that she had sound capacity when making her decision.

The judge noted that under the UKs Human Tissue Act cryonics is not illegal. However, it is unregulated. The closest the act comes to cryonics is regulating the freezing of sperm and embryos, in the form of cryopreservation. The judge did, however, acknowledge the need for new legislation relating to cryonics.

This case has received a huge amount of public attention.

But how realistic is cryonics chance of success? Is it a nonsensical waste of money and resources, selling snake oil for hope in dying patients? Or is it the new frontier of modern medical science, the path to post-humanism?

Cryonics involves freezing the body to preserve it immediately or very soon after death. The intention is to re-animate the body in the future, when doctors find a cure for the disease that caused death in the first place.

The general term cryogenics relates to the effects of low temperatures on materials. However, in this latest case, the judge referred to the practice of cryonics.

When a dead body is cryonically preserved, it is packed with ice and injected with anticoagulants, a treatment to stop blood from clotting. The body is then transported to one of three cryonic centres in the world.

There, in a process known as vitrification, the body is drained of its blood, which is then replaced with chemicals and anti-freeze. The body is placed in a sleeping bag and housed in a tank of liquid nitrogen at -196. The US company Alcor, for example, advertises cryonic preservation for the whole body costing about US$200,000 all up; preserving just the brain is cheaper, at around US$80,000. With some companies, people can pay with their life insurance.

The premise of cryonics is based on a possibility rather than a probability of success. There is no scientific evidence to suggest that it is possible to revive a person back to a living state.

Cryobiologists hope that with future technology, including nanotechnology, they will be able to repair cells and tissues that are damaged during the freezing process. But theyve not been successful yet.

There are some arguments in favour of cryonics, the simplest of which is one of free will and choice. As long as people are informed of the very small chance of success of future re-animation, and they are not being coerced, then their choice is an expression of their autonomy about how they wish to direct the disposal of their bodies and resources after death.

In this light, choosing cryonics can be seen as no different to choosing cremation or burial, albeit a much more expensive option.

However, this case raises several other ethical and problematic concerns. There is the issue of potentially exploiting vulnerable people. Some might argue vulnerable people are trading hype for hope.

But if we were to replace the science of cryonics with the promises of religious or spiritual healers made at the bedside of the dying of earlier access to eternal life in return for large payments known as indulgences would this be so different?

Legal and ethical issues aside, there are other serious issues to consider.

How can dying people have confidence in the ability of a company to keep their remains intact? If the cryonic company were to cease operating because of financial difficulties, what would happen to the frozen body?

Although highly unlikely to work, cryonics if successful might harm people. Depending on the length of time they were preserved, what would they wake up to? They would have no living family, social or support networks. People would be reanimated into a world that has radically changed, with little or very few resources to support them.

In the case of JS, if she is re-animated in the future, who would act as her parent or guardian? Assuming the company is able to trace any family descendants, would they consent to looking after her needs? Would JS consent to being placed in their care? These are all unanswered questions with no immediate answers.

The cryonic process might work, but imperfectly. During the process of re-animation, there may be some brain damage. That would mean rather than waking up as you, you might be unconscious or trapped in some disordered, uncontrollable painful stream of consciousness. Companies must be required to test the success of their product; it remains to be seen what the markers of success of re-animation are.

It might be heaven but it might also be hell. The key issue is that people must be made aware of the risks as well as the benefits, and are not exploited.

Most troubling are the questions of natural justice. How long should people live? What is a fair innings? A life of 80 years, 100 years, 500 years? Do we have an obligation to die at some point and turn the world over to the next generation, instead of hanging around indefinitely? This is fast becoming an unavoidable question not only because of cryonics, but also because of the prospect of gene editing and regenerative medicine to prolong life.

Cryonics raises issues about the meaning of life and the definition of death. If someone was frozen before their heart stopped, would they be dead or in a state of suspended animation? Freezing might be an attractive alternative to conventional euthanasia.

As early as 2017, New South Wales might see the launch of its first not-for-profit cryonic centre that hopes to also act a self-regulatory body for the cryonics industry in Australia.

The sad and worrying part of this is that the case of JS might influence some desperate parents whose children are suffering incurable diseases to consider cryonics as a last chance of hope.

However, without any regulation or certainty in the law, this would be a disaster. If the cryonic process is not successful for JS or others, then at least it seems like a considerable waste of money. If it misfires, it could be an unparalleled disaster for the person or society.

If it is successful, the lack of any regulation (now or in the future) might mean that it is effectively like placing a person in a time-capsule to be woken at some stage in the future, with no guarantees about what that future looks like technologically, materially, or socially.

It might not only be a hell for the individual it might be a hell for the next generation, who are left to decide and care for out of date members of a previous generation.

Read more from the original source:

Cryonics: hype, hope or hell? - The Conversation

If cryonics suddenly worked, wed need to face the fallout …

Immortality could also be cause for alarm. An uploaded brain, in a sense, will have beaten death, which raises basic psychological and philosophical questions. We can say that death is at the root of consciousness, normative law and human existence, Kauffman says. The loss of death is likely to radically alter who or what the being or creature is.

Theres no guarantee that this being would be the same one who first entered into the cryogenic process, either. As de Grey says, the question remains of whether scanning the brain and uploading it into a different substrate is revival at all, or if youd be creating a new individual with the same characteristics.

Regardless of who or what that ghost in the machine turned out to be, programming in a digital suicide option would likely be necessary just in case the experience proved too overwhelming or oppressive. I think theyd have to decide in advance what the escape hatch would be if it didnt work out, Callahan says. Is it that the company is authorised to kill you, or are you left to do it yourself?

Despite the unknowns, some would still be willing to give such an existence a shot. If the option was complete oblivion and nothingness or uploading my mind into a computer, Id like to at least try it, Kowalski says. It could be pretty cool.

--

Join 500,000+ Future fans by liking us on Facebook, or follow us on Twitter, Google+, LinkedIn and Instagram.

If you liked this story,sign up for the weekly bbc.com features newsletter, called If You Only Read 6 Things This Week. A handpicked selection of stories from BBC Future, Earth, Culture, Capital, Travel and Autos, delivered to your inbox every Friday.

Here is the original post:

If cryonics suddenly worked, wed need to face the fallout ...