The week in radio: Black Music in Europe; A History of the World in 100 Objects; Prison Bag review – The Guardian

Black Music in Europe: A Hidden History (Radio 4) | BBC Sounds

A History of the World In 100 Objects (Radio 4) | BBC Sounds

Prison Bag (Resonance FM)

Several Radio 4 fans, including Kathy Burke, have rightly been raving about Clarke Peterss series Black Music in Europe: A Hidden History. Last week, in the third and last episode of the third series, we got up to the 1970s.

The three series have been riveting, so check out the earlier shows. Peters presents beautifully, and I forgive him for being the standard reads out whats in front of you actor host, because he has a long connection with UK music (through Five Guys Named Moe), because he was Lester Freamon in The Wire and because, well, he does his job so well.

But, as ever, the true credit should go to the producer; this time, Tom Woolfenden from Loftus Media. It was Woolfenden who found the relevant archives, whether that be Neneh Cherry talking in 2011 about her father, the jazz musician Don Cherry; Martin Simpson, in 2005, explaining the Moroccan way of tuning a guitar; John Craven doing a Newsround round-up of the 1975 decolonisation of Suriname. And it was Woolfenden who did the interviews: with Johny Pitts, the British writer of Afropean; Surinamese flute player Ronald Snijders in the Netherlands; Patrick Bebey, son of Cameroonian guitarist and composer Francis Bebey; Janet Kay, of Silly Games fame So many excellent interviews: informative and detailed, well edited, revelatory. They underpin these shows.

The story, this series, is of post-colonialism, and how the people of former British, Spanish, Portuguese, French, Dutch and Belgian colonies used their newly given freedom (after the second world war, many colonial countries waived restrictions on visitors from colonies) to come to Europe. Many stayed. And over and over again, those that did stay explain how its this consequent mix of cultures that results in their brilliant music. They make us understand that its not just the bumping up of different musical techniques, but how the new arrivals optimism and hope were muddied and muddled with the racism that they encountered, and how they eventually reclaimed their musical heritage to show it off to Europe. Its this musical melange that creates the gorgeous soundtrack that we hear throughout the shows. And, in the background, the political culture is creaking. General Franco and Eric Clapton make passing appearances, as baddies.

A lot of work has gone into this series and it shows. When a flamenco dancer walks into a Spanish studio, we hear her footsteps; her voice is beautifully recorded. The levels of music and speech are impeccable, the sound moving from ear to ear in your headphones, but remaining clear at all times. Its all lovely stuff. Theres a list of the tracks played on the shows website: the BBC should make it into a playlist and put it up on Sounds.

For a different angle on colonialism, Neil MacGregors classic series The History of the World In 100 Objects is being repeated, reassuringly, on Radio 4. Were just in the early stages last week we had objects 6 through to 10 so a nice long way to go. Colonialism is relevant throughout the series, of course, with MacGregors none-more-educated, mellifluous voice telling the stories of far-flung objects that somehow, through Britains immensely mixed history, have ended up in London.

An interesting new documentary series on Resonance FM: Prison Bag. Josie Bevan, who writes a blog with the same name, is our host: shes telling the story of what its like to be a prison wife. Middle-class and a bit naive, Bevan confesses that, after her husband Rob was sentenced to nine years (for tax fraud), she expected a phone call from someone social services? The police? The prison system? asking her if she was OK. There was no phone call. There is not much help for anyone wanting to support their partner in prison. I spend my life trying to get into prison, she says, early on in the programme.

Bevan talks to Lisa, a university lecturer who has experience of addiction and prison. They are different, but connected. I talk about this stuff in front of a lot of people, says Lisa, but I feel overwhelmed and tearful. I think its because you understand.

Understanding people who come from a different place, being kind when theyre in a new alien environment. Its how great art comes about; more importantly, its how we all survive.

5 Live DriveDrive presenters Anna Foster and Tony Livesey have the unlovable job of broadcasting the daily 5pm government shamblathon slap in the middle of their regular three-hour show. They manage this by bringing on experts and politicians, then getting on with the more important job of making lockdown bearable. Theyve tackled at-home dentistry, small business loan applications, online haircuts. They have a daily homework quiz, Learner Drivers, and, on Thursdays, a whole hour of listener-generated positivity, The Extra Mile. A great mix of spiky current affairs and silly home life, just whats needed at the moment.

Fun Kids Fun Kids, the UKs best audio offering made especially for children, has seen an 80% increase in its streaming hours since the lockdown started. Fun Kids has a live radio station and loads of podcasts, and its specially made pandemic show, Stuck @ Home, is the first ever non-BBC podcast that the Beeb has listed on BBC Sounds. The website has a great selection of shows for younger children: from drama to the human body to the inevitable space exploration. And everything springs from a dedication to making audio programmes that children actually like.

LBC Radio has, broadly, benefited from people not going to work, as were listening for longer to the shows we like; and commercial radio is no different (advertising is another matter). All commercial broadcasters are reporting big jumps in reach and hours of listening, mostly around the 10% to 15% mark. But LBCs daily reach has gone up 43%, and its listening hours 17%. As with Brexit, the news-based station has gone big on coronavirus, with presenters taking politicians to task. And listeners are responding, whether by tuning in for longer, or by phoning in and asking silly, obvious, unexpected or intelligent questions.

Read more:

The week in radio: Black Music in Europe; A History of the World in 100 Objects; Prison Bag review - The Guardian

Bitcoin Cash Market Update: BCH/USD hangs in the balance at $230, where to next? – FXStreet

Bitcoin price is flirting with the resistance at $230 after retreating 1.24% on the day. The entire cryptocurrency market is mostly in red. For instance, Bitcoin (BTC) surge above $7,000 lost steam under $7,200 while Ethereum (ETH) is struggling to stay above $180. Meanwhile, Bitcoin Cash is facing resistance at the 50-day SMA. Slightly below the market price, the 23.6% Fibonacci retracement level of the last swing high at $498.58 to a swing low of $134.12.

According to the MACD, BCH/USD is likely to enter into consolidation. However, the sellers could continue to have an upper hand especially with the gap between the 50 SMA and the 200 SMA in the daily range still widening. The RSI also doubles-down the on the sideways trading as it levels at 50 (average).

If the support at the 23.6% Fibo gives in to the selling pressure, Bitcoin Cash bulls will have to seek balance at $210 and $200 respectively. In March, BCH plunged to $134.12 due to the Coronavirus triggered a selloff. As the pandemic continues such a devastating move is not out of the picture.

See the original post here:

Bitcoin Cash Market Update: BCH/USD hangs in the balance at $230, where to next? - FXStreet

The Crypto Daily Movers and Shakers -26/04/20 – Yahoo Finance

Bitcoin rose by 0.40% on Saturday. Following on from a 0.12% gain on Friday, Bitcoin ended the day at $7,538.5.

A bearish start to the day saw Bitcoin fall to an early morning intraday low $7,450.0 before finding support.

Steering clear of the first major support level at $7,414.27, Bitcoin rallied to a mid-afternoon intraday high $7,700.

Breaking through the first major resistance level at $7,608.17, Bitcoin came up against the second major resistance level at $7,708.03.

A late afternoon pullback saw Bitcoin fall back through the first major resistance level to sub-$7,500 and into the red.

Finding late support, however, Bitcoin moved back through to $7,500 to end the day in the green.

The near-term bearish trend, formed at late June 2019s swing hi $13,764.0, remained firmly intact, reaffirmed by the March swing lo $4,000.

For the bulls, Bitcoin would need to break out from $10,000 levels to form a near-term bullish trend.

Across the rest of the majors, it was another mixed day on Saturday.

Tezos led the way once more, rallying by 5.21%.

Binance Coin (+1.75%), Bitcoin Cash ABC (+0.67%), Cardanos ADA (+1.46%), Ethereum (+3.46%), Ripples XRP (+0.38%), Stellars Lumen (+1.62%), and Trons TRX (+0.02%) also found support.

Bitcoin Cash SV (-0.16%), EOS (-0.17%), Litecoin (-0.31%), and Moneros XMR (-0.13%) bucked the trend on the day.

Through the week, the crypto total market cap rose from Tuesday current week low $196.98bn to a Saturday high $220.28bn. At the time of writing, the total market cap stood at $219.55bn.

While Bitcoins dominance continued to hover at sub-64% levels, there had been an upward trend before easing back on Saturday. At the time of writing, Bitcoins dominance stood at 63.6%.

24-hour trading volumes rose from sub-$120bn levels to a current week high $155.9bn on Friday. At the time of writing, 24-hr volumes stood at $124.86bn.

At the time of writing, Bitcoin was up by 0.46% to $7,573.5. A bullish start to the day saw Bitcoin rise from an early morning low $7,522.3 to a high $7,573.5.

Bitcoin left the major support and resistance levels untested early on.

Elsewhere, it was a mixed start to the day.

Bitcoin Cash ABC (+1.12%), Bitcoin Cash SV (+2.14%), Moneros XMR (+1.34%), and Trons TRX (+1.16%) led the way.

Binance Coin (-0.11%), Stellars Lumen (-0.02%), and Tezos (-1.18%) struggled early on.

Bitcoin would need to move through to $7,600 levels to bring the first major resistance level at $7,675.67 into play.

Support from the broader market would be needed, however, for Bitcoin to break out from the morning high $7,573.5.

Barring a broad-based crypto rally, the first major resistance level and Saturdays high $7,700 would likely cap any upside.

In the event of a breakout, the 38.2% FIB of $7,730 and the second major resistance level at $7,812.83 would likely come into play.

Failure to move through to $7,600 levels could see Bitcoin hit reverse.

A fall through to sub-$7,560 levels would bring the first major support level at $7,425.67 into play.

Barring a crypto meltdown, however, Bitcoin should steer of the second major support level at $7,312.83.

This article was originally posted on FX Empire

Here is the original post:

The Crypto Daily Movers and Shakers -26/04/20 - Yahoo Finance

Ben Sasse has been strong supporter of Second Amendment, pro-life – Grand Island Independent

Ben Sasse is right for Nebraska!

During this time of pandemic, rather than playing political partisanship, Ben has worked hard for common sense solutions for Nebraskans and all of America. He fought for the small business Paycheck Protection Program, of which Nebraskans have had the highest percentage of any state. He also supported the tax deadline extension and battled to keep D.C.s regulation stranglehold off rural health care providers.

Ben is a strong supporter of the agricultural economy and is endorsed by the Nebraska Farm Bureau.

As one of the most conservative voters in the Senate, the values of the majority of Nebraskans and the strength of state and local governments will be a red line.

He is a strong supporter of the Second Amendment and pro-life values. Sen. Sasse was a sponsor for the Born Alive Abortion Survivors Protection Act and is endorsed by Nebraska Right to Life and Nebraska Family Alliance.

Ben was asked to serve on the Senate Judiciary Committee to get judges like Neil Gorsuch, Brett Kavanaugh, and Nebraskans Steve Grasz and Brian Buescher to the federal courts.

Ben has my support and vote.

Read the original post:

Ben Sasse has been strong supporter of Second Amendment, pro-life - Grand Island Independent

LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Re-elect Sheriff Kaber – Herald and News

Re-elect Sheriff Kaber

Throughout the last several years the Governor, State Legislature, and many other elected leaders have waged assault on our Second Amendment rights. Money from labor unions far and wide have influenced the Governor and many members of the super majority in Salem who seem to worry more about armed law-abiding citizens than they do armed career criminals.

I, like many of my fellow Klamath County residents, place a very high value on my Second Amendment rights. I expect my local elected leaders to stand up and defend my rights. Sheriff Chris Kaber has a proven track record supporting our rights and standing up to those who seek to infringe on them. He continues to be a very vocal opponent of the legislative overreach in Salem.

Sheriff Kabers opponent however, is a union leader while a deputy and before his law enforcement career was a union lobbyist who only stands with big union fat cats in supporting the type of candidates who have sought to erode the peoples Second Amendment rights.

Its clear to me that a vote for Corporal Krag is a vote for Governor Kate Browns ideals. Our rights are far too important to trust a union leader with the role of County Sheriff and for that reason I will support re-electing Sheriff Chris Kaber who has proven he stands for the rights of the people of Klamath County!

Thomas Brewster

Klamath Falls

The rest is here:

LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Re-elect Sheriff Kaber - Herald and News

3 Key Constitutional Questions We Have to Answer in Our Fight Against the Coronavirus – TIME

The coronavirus pandemic sweeping the globe has drastically altered American life. Much of the nation is still at home under shelter-in-place orders, businesses are closed, and more than 26 million people are now out of work. But along with the new, practical questions redefining the our lives When is it safe to see my family? How can I get my stimulus check? What cleaning products work best to keep my house safe? the virus impact is also raising complicated constitutional questions that are highlighting the countrys deep ideological divisions in the midst of the crisis.

As federal and state governments have had to shutter large swathes of the economy to slow the spread of the virus, some Americans feel they have gone too far, infringing on rights enshrined in the Constitution, such as the right to bear arms or to practice freedom of religion. The fight is playing out in courts around the country, where numerous lawsuits have been filed on questions ranging from whether religious gatherings are being singled out in social distancing restrictions to whether shuttering abortion clinics as nonessential medical providers violates womens right to the procedure.

President Donald Trump has tweeted the need to liberate some states from strict public health measures, but he also criticized Georgia for loosening restrictions too soon. In a White House briefing on April 17, Trump seemed to empathize with the sentiment of citizens chafing at restrictions, even as as his own advisors said the re-opening too quickly could be catastrophic. I think some things are too tough, he said.

Here are three emerging constitutional battles in the war to beat the coronavirus.

Restrictions on religious gatherings including limiting the number of people that are allowed to attend services have become a major issue in several states. In recent weeks, multiple lawsuits have been filed throughout the country arguing that the restrictions violate the First Amendments guarantee to freely exercise religion.

Churches and advocacy organizations have already filed lawsuits against governments in several states, including Kansas, New Mexico, Texas, Mississippi, Florida, and California. In Kansas, for example, the state placed a limit of 10 people at religious gatherings; the governors office says six deaths and 80 coronavirus cases in the state have been linked to religious gatherings. But a judges order has blocked enforcement of the governors order at two churches in the state, saying that churches and religious activities appear to have been singled out among essential functions for stricter treatment. The judge is considering whether he should issue a broader injunction, and other cases like it throughout the country are also ongoing.

The Trump Administration has taken a keen interest in these religious freedom cases. The Justice Department has filed a statement of interest in a similar case in Mississippi, siding with a church that claims authorities unfairly targeted it for enforcement when members of the congregation were fined for attending a drive-in service on April 8.

Attorney General William Barr says the religious freedom questions are an overall priority for the Justice Department during the pandemic. Whatever measures are placed against religion have to be placed against all comparable commercial and other activities, Barr told conservative radio host Hugh Hewitt on April 21. You cant single out religion for special burdens. In a call with more than 500 faith leaders hosted by the White House on April 23, Barr was very concerned, according to a source on the call, about situations where religious gatherings are restricted at a different level than other activities. This is the heart of the First Amendment, Barr said, according to the call participant, who also noted the attorney general said he has been in contact with U.S. attorneys throughout the country about other cases about similar issues.

Keep up to date on the growing threat to global health by signing up for our daily coronavirus newsletter.

Second Amendment issues are cropping up in states that have ordered non-essential businesses to close and deemed gun retailers non-essential.

Massachusetts, New York, Pennsylvania and New Jersey, for example, had ordered the closure of gun shops as part of the states efforts to slow down the virus transmission. Several lawsuits have been filed by gun groups, shops and owners challenging the closures, including one brought by the National Rifle Association in New York that claims Governor Andrew Cuomo effectively and indefinitely suspended a key component of the Second Amendment to the United States Constitution by classifying gun shops as non-essential and forcing them to close.

On March 28, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) published guidance designating workers supporting the operation of firearm, or ammunition product manufacturers, retailers, importers, distributors, and shooting ranges as part of the essential critical infrastructure workforce. The guidelines are advisory in nature, according to the document, and should not be considered, a federal directive or standard.

Nevertheless, Pennsylvania and New Jersey, which were both facing separate lawsuits over the closures, subsequently reversed their decisions and allowed gun stores to reopen. It wouldnt have been my definition, but thats the definition at the federal level, Democratic New Jersey Governor Phil Murphy said on March 30, announcing the reopening of gun stores.

In the midst of these debates, Trump has offered his support to gun sales, lambasting another states imposition of gun control measures during coronavirus, though they were not a direct response to the pandemic. What theyve done in Virginia with respect to the Second Amendment is just a horrible thing, he said in the April 17 briefing. (Virginias governor signed gun control measures into law in April, though most of the bills had been discussed and introduced before the coronavirus pandemic spread through the United States.)

Several states have temporarily banned non-essential medical procedures to help preserve medical supplies in the face of nationwide shortages. But states including Texas, Alabama, Ohio, Arkansas, Iowa and Oklahoma also put abortion in that category, leading to court challenges from abortion rights groups who say halting the service is opportunistic and unconstitutional.

The novel coronavirus managed exactly what anti-abortion activists struggled for nearly five decades to accomplish: it is the biggest threat to legal abortion in America ever imagined, Robin Marty, the communication director for Yellowhammer Fund, an abortion fund in Alabama, wrote in TIME.

Advocacy organizations and abortion providers have filed lawsuits in Alabama, Iowa, Ohio, Oklahoma and Texas, arguing that the orders violate the landmark abortion precedent set in the case Roe v. Wade that protects womens right to abortions.

Using this pandemic to ban abortion access is unconstitutional, Nancy Northup, President and CEO of the Center for Reproductive Rights, said in a statement. Abortion care is time-sensitive and essential health care that has a profound impact on a persons health and life, which is why it is protected as a constitutional right.

In early April, injunctions were granted in Ohio, Alabama and Oklahoma, allowing the procedures to go forward. The Iowa suit was dropped after the state clarified that not all surgical abortions would be banned. Some abortions can also resume in Texas after the governor loosened his original restrictions in a new order in late April.

Please send tips, leads, and stories from the frontlines to virus@time.com.

Thank you! For your security, we've sent a confirmation email to the address you entered. Click the link to confirm your subscription and begin receiving our newsletters. If you don't get the confirmation within 10 minutes, please check your spam folder.

Write to Tessa Berenson at tessa.berenson@time.com.

Follow this link:

3 Key Constitutional Questions We Have to Answer in Our Fight Against the Coronavirus - TIME

Guilford Commissioners Give Thumbs Up to Gun Rights – The Rhino TImes

The Constitution of the United States of America makes it perfectly clear that Americans have the right to bear arms however, in case there was any question about that, the Guilford County Board of Commissioners just weighed in on the matter and affirmed the countys support of the Second Amendment that grants people that right.

At the Guilford County Board of Commissioners Thursday, April 16 meeting, six of the nine commissioners declared their support of the amendment, but three commissioners questioned the rationale behind the gun-owner friendly motion.

Republican Commissioner Alan Branson brought the motion to the board and read it at the meeting, and he argued that, in this day and age when the Second Amendment often comes under attack, the county board would be wise to publically acknowledge its support.

The resolution, which recounts a little of the history of the amendment and the court proceedings upholding it, speaks of the boards wish to express a deep commitment to protecting all of the rights in the Constitution. It stated that the Board of Commissioners declares that Guilford County government will use all powers and authority to defend and protect the rights of all of our citizens, and it implores the North Carolina Legislature and the United States Congress to use all of their powers and authority to protect our citizens freedom under the Constitution and specifically the Second Amendment.

All five of the boards Republican Commissioners approved the resolution, as did Democratic Commissioner Kay Cashion; however, the other three Democrats Commissioners Carolyn Coleman, Carlvena Foster and Skip Alston did not. Those three didnt object to the Second Amendment, but they questioned why the commissioners would even take the vote.

Coleman asked, Id like to ask why is this necessary do we not afford enough Second Amendment rights through the Constitution as it is?

Branson replied, We certainly do, maam, but there have been certain instances throughout different states not specifically North Carolina, but states that adjoin us that have had opportunities to challenge this recently, and I think its just a good idea to reaffirm that we support our Second Amendment rights here in Guilford County.

Foster also questioned the move, stating, Im not getting the full understanding of why we are doing this either.

Alston had raised his concerns about the motion at an earlier meeting held to set the agenda for the April 16 meeting. Like the other two Democrats who voted no, Alston questioned why the Board of Commissioners should spend time reaffirming something that was ratified over two centuries ago.

View post:

Guilford Commissioners Give Thumbs Up to Gun Rights - The Rhino TImes

Right-Wing ‘Boogaloo Boys’ Spend Pandemic On Facebook, Plotting To Kill Us All In A Civil War – Wonkette

People have been picking up all sorts of hobbies during the COVID-19 pandemic. We're making sourdough starters, we're knitting, we're making masks, we're making Tik Tok videos, we're playing Animal Crossing, hoping that at some point it will start to get interesting (I've picked so much fruit! Why did I spend so much money to pick fruit and chop trees?), etc. etc.

Others, however, are planning a Civil War. Or, as they are calling it, Civil War 2: Electric Boogaloo. "Boogaloo' for short. Because they have to ruin everything.

While the whole "Let's do another Civil War and call it 'Boogaloo' thing started last year in response to people considering gun control measures to curb the near-constant mass shootings, it's really picked up steam during the last few months both because people have a lot of time on their hands and because they have "mounting frustrations" over being told to stay home so that other people don't get sick.

A recent study conducted by the Tech Transparency Project found 125 "Boogaloo" Facebook groups, nearly 60 percent of which were created since February. While most of the public pages mostly post memes, members in private groups "discussed tactical strategies, combat medicine, and various types of weapons, including how to develop explosives and the merits of using flame throwers." Many of them, it should come as no surprise, are virulent white supremacists.

The name and the proliferation of memes on the public "Boogaloo" pages make the whole idea seem like a viral internet joke that no one is taking seriously, but that is a calculated move. While there may be participants who do think of it as a joke, many of them take it extremely seriously. Earlier this month, 36-year-old Aaron Swenson was arrested after recording himself on Facebook Live driving around looking for a lone police officer to kill. Naturally, the Blue Lives Matter crowd was positively outraged by this (Kidding! The people in these groups are white and Republican so it's fine.).

The documents they share in their groups are also pretty damned serious.

Via Tech Transparency Project:

The document mentions "target selection," noting that assassinations of figureheads are "overrated" but "some people have to go." It discusses how to disrupt U.S. government supply lines, noting that "national guard depots, police stations and factories that produce munitions are all very solid targets." On propaganda, meanwhile, the document notes that the most important job is "to make the enemy (government forces) see that they are not fighting terrorists, they are fighting their own countrymen who simply love liberty."

That particular propaganda angle has become part of the Second Amendment debate over the last few years. Whenever a gun control measure is promoted and gun humpers start talking about how the Second Amendment actually gives them the right to overthrow the government if they want, we respond "You know they have like, tanks, right?" Well, they used to not really have a comeback for that, but lately, they've taken to responding with something like "You would want the government to deploy tanks on your fellow citizens?!? You monsters!," and then we stop interacting with them because it is going nowhere and we have other shit to do.

In many of these

The problem, of course, with this Civil War 2 scenario they've cooked up is that in order for it to actually be a Civil War, the rest of us would have to fight to keep them around.

GIF: Gene Wilder as Willy Wonka saying "Stop. Don't. Come back." Giphy

Now, I don't know about you, but I'm certainly not gonna do that. I've never even been in a bar fight, so it is highly unlikely that I will be taking up arms in order to keep a bunch of 4chan losers and wannabe Timothy McVeighs from "seceding." Who the hell is gonna do that? Who would bother? And if they try to Civil War us and we don't Civil War them back, isn't that just murder?

Additionally, in order to secede and have a Civil War, they need to have actual territory of some kind, which they do not. The "Boogaloo" people claim to have "sleeper cells" in every state (yes, they actually say "sleeper cells"), which is horrifying, but also rather unworkable in a Civil War scenario.

This is not to say that they're not dangerous, just that they're not planning a Civil War. Rather, they are planning mass murder. They are planning terrorism. If they were anyone other than a bunch of angry white dudes, they would almost definitely be in some amount of trouble right now, on account of how murdering people, planning to murder people and plotting terrorism is not only a violation of Facebook's ban of "Violence and Criminal Behavior," it is illegal.

Whether or not they actually get sent to prison for this, like they would if they were another class of people, we shall have to wait and see. In the meantime, Facebook might want to start cracking down on this shit.

[Tech Transparency Project]

Wonkette is independent and fully funded by readers like you. Click below to tip us! Also if you are buying stuff on Amazon, click this link!

Read more here:

Right-Wing 'Boogaloo Boys' Spend Pandemic On Facebook, Plotting To Kill Us All In A Civil War - Wonkette

NSSF on NY Gov’s Comments: King Cuomo Should Look in the Mirror – AmmoLand Shooting Sports News

By Larry Keane

U.S.A. -(AmmoLand.com)- Three-term New York Democratic Governor Andrew Cuomo recently bemoaned President Donald Trumps leadership during the coronavirus pandemic, stating We dont have a king in this country. We didnt want a king, so we have a Constitution and we elect a president.

Perhaps the Guv should look in the mirror before opening his mouth.

Gov. Cuomo has used his daily time in front of press conference bright lights to knock the president. But he has his own king-like history of overstepping as the Empire States top elected official. Thats especially true now during the pandemic, and especially when it comes to the Second Amendment and the Constitutional rights of New Yorkers.

One of Gov. Cuomos earliest actions to combat the spread of coronavirus in New York included shuttering hundreds of firearm manufacturers and retailers by deeming them non-essential, despite the fact that the Department of Homeland Security specifically included gun stores and those workers as essential in its guidance. The firearm and ammunition industry in New York has a significant footprint with 5,500 jobs generating $1.44 billion in economic impact. Across the nation, that figure is more than 330,000 jobs and $60 billion in economic impact. But Gov. Cuomo didnt think twice, instead using his authority to close them down. Its no wonder he ranks among the least popular governors in America.

Whats worse than unnecessarily leaving thousands of New Yorkers in the lurch? How about refusing their offer to help save the lives of their neighbors? Nope King Cuomo couldnt be bothered to even respond. Its not surprising. This is the same governor who despises pro-Second Amendment, law-abiding Americans, infamously mocking Who are they? Are they these extreme conservatives who arepro-assault-weapon? Because if thats who they arethey have no place in the state of New York.

Gov. Cuomos disdain for the Second Amendment is deep and his king-like antigun record is long. Most notably he utilized the never let a crisis go to waste mantra and forced New Yorks infamous gun-rights-restricting New York SAFE Act through in the middle of the night, the most restrictive anti-gun law in the country. It includes limits on magazine capacity that was too far even for a federal judge in New York who struck down the provision in 2013, and Gov. Cuomo was again denied by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit in 2015. His SAFE Act also included red flag laws that deny due process and bans on Americas most popular-selling centerfire rifle the modern sporting rifle. Second Amendment rights groups across the state roundly disapproved. But once again, Gov. Cuomo displayed his animosity to the legal process and protecting the Constitutional rights of law-abiding gun owners, stating You become sort of lawsuit immune, when challenged on his order shuttering firearm businesses.

Even Gov. Cuomos neighbor to the south recognized the limits to his executive authority. New Jersey Democratic Gov. Phil Murphy said he wasnt thinking of the Bill of Rights, when he initially shut down gun stores, before relenting when faced with a lawsuit.

But Gov. Cuomos antigun bona fides traces back to his time as the Secretary of Housing and Urban Development during the Clinton administration where he threatened to have over 3,200 public housing authorities sue members of the firearm industry for a crime committed in those housing projects. Congress quickly put a stop to his threatened litigation. He also violated antitrust law in 2000 by conspiring with several big-city mayors to politicize law enforcement purchasing by collectively refusing to buy from any handgun manufacturer that didnt sign a so-called code of conduct that sought to implement gun control that Congress would never pass. NSSF sued Cuomo and his allies in federal court prompting putting a stop to their illegal antitrust conspiracy.

Twenty-five years ago, New Yorks venerated Republican U.S. Congressman Gerald B. Solomon took to the floor of the U.S. House of Representatives and boomed in support of law-abiding gun owners. Now more than ever America needs more of that and Gov. Cuomo should take notice while running for a fourth term.

About The National Shooting Sports Foundation

The National Shooting Sports Foundation is the trade association for the firearms, ammunition, hunting and shooting sports industry. Its mission is to promote, protect and preserve hunting and the shooting sports. Formed in 1961, NSSF has a membership of more than 10,000 manufacturers, distributors, firearms retailers, shooting ranges, sportsmen's organizations and publishers. http://www.nssf.org

See original here:

NSSF on NY Gov's Comments: King Cuomo Should Look in the Mirror - AmmoLand Shooting Sports News

Letter to the Editor, April 26, 2020: Red flag legislation missing key components – Richmond.com

Red flag legislation

missing key components

With regard to Virginia's new red flag law, here is what should have been included:

Criminal penalties for those who bring false or frivolous charges.

An order is granted when a judge makes the determination, by clear and convincing evidence, that the person poses a significant risk of danger to themselves or others.

A judge is required to make a determination of whether the person meets the state standard for involuntary commitment. Where the standard for involuntary commitment is met, this should be the course of action taken.

If an extreme risk protection order (ERPO) is granted, the person should receive community-based mental health treatment as a condition of the ERPO.

Any ex parte proceeding should include admitting the individual for treatment.

A persons Second Amendment rights should only be temporarily deprived after a hearing before a judge, in which the person has notice of the hearing and is given an opportunity to offer evidence on his or her behalf.

A mechanism for the return of firearms upon termination of an ERPO, when a person is ordered to relinquish firearms as a condition of the order.

The ERPO process should allow an individual to challenge or terminate the order, with full due process protections in place.

The process should allow firearms to be retained by law-abiding third parties, local law enforcement or a federally licensed firearms dealer when an individual is ordered to relinquish such firearms as a condition of the ERPO. The individual also must have the ability to sell his or her firearms in a reasonable time without violating the order.

Just seizing guns without including the above will result in more killings because a sick person might borrow or a steal a gun to kill.

Former Special Agent, United States Secret Service.

Read more:

Letter to the Editor, April 26, 2020: Red flag legislation missing key components - Richmond.com

Full of hot air: What happens when a president fans the flames | Daily Sabah – Daily Sabah

With elections coming up in November, United States President Donald Trump has seized the opportunity the coronavirus has presented to widen the already deep fissures in American society. In part, he has achieved this through his usual rhetoric that, according to him, simply tells it like it is. In the past, Americans have had to tolerate politicians as they spent hours lacing convincing words together only to say nothing of consequence in the end. After decades of long-winded speeches, lets face it, some were ready for public figures who speak their unfiltered minds. Combine that with the obsession for the drama-horror that is reality TV and maybe you can sympathize with where lines were crossed come election time in 2016.

Running the U.S., however or any country for that matter requires a certain amount of finesse. Finesse and tact are not Trumps strong suits, to say the least. And to be honest, he has never claimed they were. This approach, however, becomes dangerous when Trump purposefully uses inflammatory rhetoric to make a point, push an agenda or rally his base. Strong words expressed by a figure in power can be persuasive. I assume that he is well aware of his constituency, thus the continued use of certain language and tactics.

By relying on knee-jerk responses to drum up support, the instant exposure Twitter offers has made the platform his favorite online stage, starring 280-character, impromptu, boorish rants, inflated praise and equally inflated insults. Between April 13 and April 16 of this year alone, his tweets included the insults fake, crazy, incompetent, weak, pathetic, third-rate, losers and hack, all primarily targeting politicians and members of the press. Inflammatory language is distracting. Its a look-over-here tactic for when you need to do something over there. In other words, it is a defense mechanism. Instead of simply outlining the wrongs he feels have been made against him, he accuses, insults and belittles his targets. A great ongoing example of this behavior is his feud with the media or as he likes to call it, the Lamestream Media.

Trump has throughout his tenure repeatedly claimed that others around him are liars who spread fake information or news. These statements often follow news coverage or professional statements that contradict what the president has in the works. A classic, recent example on April 13 was when he took to Twitter to proclaim: I am working hard to expose the corruption and dishonesty in the Lamestream Media. That part is easy, the hard part is WHY? Lets take a closer look at this Trump tweet, a genre that has become classic in and of itself. This post was in response to a New York Times article about a ban on flights from China as a counter-COVID-19 measure, and the newspaper was the target of his hard work to expose corruption and dishonesty. Of course, Trump has the right to disagree. The main issue from the get-go with this rather tweet-obsessed leader is how he expresses his oppositions. Lets look past the fact that the 73-year-old president of the U.S. is using terms like Lamestream and rather address the tone. The all-caps WHY can only be read as a shouted whine. There is no other voice that would appropriately reflect its connotation. The use of all caps on the internet connotes virtual shouting, while the why leads one to believe he has little control over what is going on. Although he mentions the source of his angst in the same thread, where there should be an intelligent rebuttal, we are simply confronted with defensive insults and a needy query from someone who should be assuming a confident, leading role. There are countless more examples that mirror this.

A case in point comes from April 21, on MSNBCs news show Morning Joe, featuring host Joe Scarborough, whose criticism of the presidents coronavirus strategy prompted Trump to tweet: Watched the first 5 minutes of poorly rated Morning Psycho on MSDNC just to see if he is as nuts as people are saying. Hes worse. Such hatred and contempt! I used to do his show all the time before the 2016 election, then cut him off. Wasnt worth the effort, his mind is shot! Calling a respected reporter and former congressman a psycho and nuts, whether you agree or disagree with his reporting, only to go on to claim the broadcaster harbors hatred and contempt without reflecting on ones own explicitly negative commentary is both ironic and dripping with immaturity.

Luckily, the press in the U.S. is in no danger of being persuaded by Trumps hissy-fit tweeting style. His staunch supporters, on the other hand, are another story entirely. Timelines show that the Trump administration had ample time to prepare for the inevitable coronavirus outbreak in the U.S. The president spent this time claiming that he had everything under control, that the virus wasnt a major threat and that the U.S. had plenty of supplies if it did somehow find its way to American shores. He was wrong on all counts. The country has been the worst hit, with more than 800,000 infections and a staggering 45,000-plus deaths. The virus is quickly bringing the U.S. economy to its knees and has left millions of Americans out of work. The rapid spread of the virus has led many states to impose confinement orders and shut down businesses in efforts to lessen the death toll and the burden on struggling health care facilities.

Helplessly watching as his campaign platform based on economic gains slowly withers away, Trump has pushed for life to return to normal. He even proclaimed that everything would be fine by Easter Sunday on April 12. He was sorely mistaken.

When governors across the U.S. spoke out against Trumps push to restart the economy and his claim during a news conference on April 13 that, "When somebody is the president of the United States, the authority is total," the determined president once again hit Twitter running. To rally and assumedly rile up his supporters, he wrote a series of tweets on April 17 reiterating the slogan LIBERATE MINNESOTA in support of the planned protest against state-imposed COVID-19 measures and paired it with LIBERATE MICHIGAN and then LIBERATE VIRGINIA and save your 2nd Amendment. It is under siege! The three states in need of liberation are run by Democratic governors who have, according to Trump and some of the states citizens, violated personal liberties with stay-at-home recommendations and the mandatory closing of businesses in an effort to slow the spread of coronavirus.

These tweets hit two controversial nerves: the infringement of liberty and the Second Amendment. The concept of liberty holds a special place in the hearts of patriotic Americans, who associate it with their hard-won freedom from tyrants and foreign entities. The Second Amendment guarantees citizens the right to bear arms although the interpretations of just exactly how vary widely. Gun control has been an issue debated and thrown around in electoral campaigns for decades, with the electorate committed to one side or the other. In just a few words, Trump hit the right notes to encourage more citizens to rise up in actual revolt against their local governments. Many Americans now feeling the economic crunch the virus has caused want to believe what Trump is trying to hawk. Already frustrated with the lockdowns and the tumbling economys effect on jobs, they are vulnerable targets. Some heeded his call, and as a result, more protests against state governments have broken out across the country, with people waving placards with slogans like, Freedom without Fear, Land of the Free and Social Distancing = Communism.

State governors countrywide have spoken out against Trumps antagonistic tweets. Washington Gov. Jay Inslee, a Democrat, said, To have an American president encourage people to violate the law ... is dangerous. Others from the presidents own party also spoke out, with Marylands Republican governor, Larry Hogan, in a CNN interview saying, To encourage people to protest the plan that you just made recommendations on, on Thursday, it just doesnt make any sense. He also went on to stress that Trumps encouragement of protestors who picketed the Statehouse in Annapolis a day earlier was not helpful.

Countries worldwide are facing an unprecedented health crisis, and how leaders respond influences how the public deals with the looming biological threat. As the leader of a country, Trumps use of Twitter over the past four years to spew insults, comfort his fragile ego and issue threats has been disgraceful. Even more concerning is how he uses it to incite most often negative action from the public. Most recently, we must ask ourselves how someone who represents the unity of 50 states can encourage its citizens to revolt against local governments, which are the very glue that holds the countrys democratic structure together. At what point does a president stop becoming a leader and start becoming a self-serving, dividing force? The office of the president of the U.S. was founded on the premise of preserving what the countrys Founding Fathers envisioned for a free and flexible yet unified democracy an establishment that is now being undermined by a persistent flood of petty Oval Office tweets.

*Senior copy editor at Daily Sabah

Excerpt from:

Full of hot air: What happens when a president fans the flames | Daily Sabah - Daily Sabah

Choosing Optimism Over Oppression – Thrive Global

Photo by Ron Smith on Unsplash

Our ancestors lived through wars, the Great Depression, the bubonic plague and other cruel oppressors, but COVID-19 crushed our way of life and proved to be the ultimate stress test to our survival. It opened the door to the beast of poverty baying outside and gave rise to panic and heart-wrenching pain. But it made us revisit something else too the legacy of hope.

My parents were born during World War II against a backdrop of austerity and uncertainty. They inherited the bitter legacy of slavery but told me stories that reminded me to choose optimism over oppression. This hope plotted my own brand story.

Here is one of their stories from Boss Branding: Seven Ways to Craft a Legendary Brand Story:

In 1877, a 22-year-old man got off a ship. His hazardous journey had not diminished his lean, athletic build, or the unruly black curls falling over his bronzed skin. Kartiks warm-brown eyes and megawatt smile lit his face into a beacon of hope. He looked at the emerald ocean, golden sands and blue skies, and took his nineteen-year-old brides hand in his. She was petite, barely reaching her husbands shoulder. They had left their families to seek a better life, in a land far, far away from their life of poverty and struggle. They both smiled at each other it was true. A land of such beauty felt like paradise. The promise of a sweet life lay before them. The only thing they had to do to enjoy this sweet life was work hard. This, they could do. Easily. Kartik was young, strong, hardworking, and determined. He would work his heart out to serve his employer in a five-year contract. His wife Vali would do the same, but she would be paid less than her husband (Im thinking the samewe are still 216 years away from gender parity). After that, they would renew their contract, return home, or become independent workers. However, the government knew they were cheap labour, so they tried to sweeten the deal and offered them land when their contract expired. Another passenger disembarked, he was thirty years old. Rams dove-grey eyes squinted against the brilliant sea, as the soft winter breeze cooled his skin. Like all the other passengers, he was dressed in filthy rags, but Ram had the gentle face of a poet.

Kartik, Vali and Ram were flogged, worked from before sunrise to after sunset, fed meagre, half-cooked rations and lived in crowded corrugated iron barracks, which provided no protection from the sweltering subtropical heat or the cold winter nights. Many of their co-workers committed suicide or deserted. These human rights violations meant that they went from indentured labourers to slaves. Of course, they had never signed up for this. Who signs up for slavery? The British government in the province of Natal, and the British in India, arranged for indentured labourers to work in the sugarcane plantations in South Africa. Indentured labourers signed their contracts with thumbprints. Right from the start, the implicit terms of trust and confidence were brokenTheir children and their childrens children fought for generations. They fought slavery, apartheid, bullying, victimisation, harassment

Their blood runs through my veins. Kartik and Vali were Dads grandparents. Ram Singhs eldest child was Mums father

He was fortunate as his generation broke free of slavery, and at sixteen, he secured his first job as a waiter at a hotel. He woke up at five every day, dressed and then, as the pipe often froze, he washed in icy water that trickled out reluctantly from the tap. He shivered beneath his threadbare coat and tucked his thick curls beneath his cap. His mum handed him freshly made bread and a mug of hot sweetened tea. He cycled to the hotel in the pitch dark, his only guide, the gleaming frost. Grandad dreamt of owning a little car one day, so his neatly pressed trouser hems didnt get wet in the spiky-cold grass. His meagre wage made a huge impact on the family budget.

Grandad went on to become a serial entrepreneur. He had five very different thriving companies. Public transport was one of them and he ended up owning five buses. He also had a live-in chauffeur. In his spare time, he pursued his first love sport and he eventually owned and managed a local football team.

I was born during the apartheid era, and like all African babies, together with our mothers sweet milk, we inadvertently sipped the insidious poison of racism. However, we were nourished by something else too.

We were fed hope. It is this legacy of hope that nurtures my children. Because hope means we will prevail. Even during the darkest of times as we battle the deadliest oppressor of them all.

More here:

Choosing Optimism Over Oppression - Thrive Global

Israel’s new government is being lauded despite Apartheid and annexation – Middle East Monitor

When it comes to Israel, the international community has once again been exposed for the double standards and hypocrisy it reserves to support the rogue state. Many so-called western democracies have fallen over each other to offer congratulations to an Apartheid state for forming a government that will entrench occupation, oppression, racism and land theft.

Settler-colonialism on steroids has thus been praised for spawning two politicians both of whom are suspected war criminals who have supposedly pushed personal animosity and ambition aside to form a government that will, from 1 July, begin to annex large swathes of illegally-occupied Palestinian lands in defiance of international law and conventions, aided and abetted by the US. This in itself is outrageous.

The longest serving Israeli Prime Minister and leader of the Likud party, Benjamin Netanyahu, has agreed to share a unity government with his rival and leader of Blue and White, Benny Gantz. Their agreement will keep the notorious racist Nation State Law which gives self-determination to some inhabitants of historic Palestine because of their religion and denies it to the rest. It further believes in the illegal settlement enterprise as a national value.

READ: Abbas warns US and Israel against annexation

The agreement also includes the application of Israeli Law to wide swathes of the illegally-occupied Palestinian land in the West Bank while US President Donald Trump is still in office. US Ambassador to Israel David Friedman will, bizarrely, be advising the Israelis on which parts of the West Bank to annex. Trumps bankruptcy lawyer he is bankrupt of ideas for peace will be using his legal training, not to draft a peace agreement to end the conflict between Palestinians and Israelis and deliver some justice, but to breach international law.

Freidman has form. When Trump decided to recognise the illegal annexation of Syrias Golan Heights he explained it thus: I said [to Friedman] How do you like the idea of me recognising exactly what were discussing? because I agree, you need it, you need the height. The ambassador reacted, said Trump, Like a wonderful, beautiful baby.

Trumps reasoning for accepting the annexation of the Golan was height. With the annexation of the Jordan Valley it will be depth, while emptying historic Palestine of Palestinians will be demography. In other words, what Israel wants, Israel gets. The pro-Israel Lobby in Washington will convince Trump, no matter what it takes.

Ambassador Friedman was one of the first to congratulate Israel on the formation of the Apartheid and annexation government. Delighted to see that Israels two leading political parties, led by PM Netanyahu & MK Gantz, have agreed to form a unity government, he tweeted. The United States looks forward to working closely with the new govt to advance our shared values and interests bilaterally and across the world.

READ: Russia rejects Israels plans to annex parts of the West Bank

Israels main lobby group in the US is the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC); it was just ahead of Freidman in its congratulations: AIPAC welcomes the announcement of the agreement to form a new Israeli government. We congratulate Prime Minister Netanyahu and Lt. Gen. Gantz for their significant achievement in forging a broad-based coalition government. It further lauded Israels democracy, claiming that, Israel has once again demonstrated the resiliency and vibrancy of the only genuine democracy in the region.

British hypocrisy was demonstrated by Middle East Minister James Cleverly MP. In a letter to the Chair of the Council for Arab-British Understanding on 16 April, he reiterated Britains official position that, Any unilateral annexation would be contrary to international law. Five days later, though, he tweeted his congratulations on the formation of the Israeli government without any caveats whatsoever: Congratulations Israel on @netanyahu & @gantzbe forming a new government. Keen to continue the important cooperation and build on our relationship. Looking forward to further and successes as we enter the 70th year of diplomatic relations!

Meanwhile, the EU has not been very explicit in its congratulations. It did, however, warn Gantz about agreeing to annexation plans which, if put into action, would bring a strong response from Europe.

The Palestinian Authority was as reactive as ever. It has known that both this move and the timing were likely in order to take advantage of Trumps first term in office, but appears to have no strategy of its own to deal with it. PA Prime Minister Mohammad Shtayyeh tweeted that, The formation of an Israeli annexation government means ending the two-state solution and the dismantling of the rights of the people of Palestine as established under international law and resolutions.

READ: Construction rate in Israel settlements up 25% since Trump took office in 2017

Chief Palestinian Negotiator Saeb Erekat added: A government coalition based on a commitment to annex more occupied Palestinian territory is a threat to a rules-based world order in general, but to peace, security and stability in the Middle East in particular. Annexation means the end of any possibility for a negotiated solution. It is an international responsibility to hold the new Israeli government accountable and to demand full implementation of its obligations under international law and signed agreements.

The PAs strategy thus appears to be more of the same. Hold the international community responsible and reiterate that the answer has to be based on a two-state solution. What, therefore, does Shtayyehs reference to ending the two state solution actually mean? What is the alternative strategy now?

The past three years have seen tectonic shifts in the Palestine-Israel conflict, due mainly to Washingtons total bias in favour of Israel and a US President who has showered Israel with illegal gifts. While no Palestinian accepts Trumps actions regarding Jerusalem, the UN Relief and Works Agency (UNRWA) or the annexation plans, there is a need to re-evaluate the Palestinian national project.

The PAs good performance during the coronavirus pandemic has been welcomed widely by Palestinians. That same energy, commitment and resolve to deal with a worldwide health crisis now needs to be brought to bear on the political front. Are the Palestinian leaders in Ramallah and Gaza going to sit back and recycle statements about their respective strategies for peace when no one is taking any notice? Or will they now set in train a national dialogue that brings Palestinians across the world together to re-evaluate the situation and agree on a united way forward?

Having dealt with the potentially existential threat from the coronavirus, the Palestinian leadership needs to change course on the political strategy as a leadership for liberation, or face a very real existential threat. At that point a new leadership must emerge from the highly educated and steadfast Palestinian people, all 13 million of them across the world. That would be the best and most effective response to Israels Apartheid and annexation government and its hypocritical supporters.

The views expressed in this article belong to the author and do not necessarily reflect the editorial policy of Middle East Monitor.

View post:

Israel's new government is being lauded despite Apartheid and annexation - Middle East Monitor

Biden predicts Trump will try to postpone the election – WWAY NewsChannel 3

(CBS News) Joe Biden predicted President Trump will try to push back Novembers general election in an effort to help the president win.

Mark my words, I think he is gonna try to kick back the election somehow, come up with some rationale why it cant be held, Biden said during a Thursday evening virtual fundraiser.

The presumptive Democratic nominee latched on to Mr. Trumps earlier resistance to grantCOVID-19federal relief money to the postal service, labeling the move un-American. On April 10, thepostmaster general requested help, saying the service was at a critical juncture and faced a net operating loss of more than $22 billion over the next 18 months.

Not financially assisting the postal service, Biden alleged, would be one way the Trump administration could impact proposed expansion of vote-by-mail efforts for the general election.

Imagine threatening not to fund the post office. Now what in Gods name is that about? Other than trying to let the word out that hes going to do all he can to make it very hard for people to vote. Thats the only way he thinks he can possibly win, Biden said.

The former vice president equated the administrations lack of enthusiasm for alternative voting options with the 2016 foreign election interference from Russia. I promise you the Russians did interfere in our election and I guarantee you they are doing it again with two other major actors, Biden said, adding, You can be assured between [Trump] and the Russians there is going to be an attempt to interfere.

This virtual fundraiser was the former vice presidents most celebrity-filled and financially successful event yet. He was joined by a big-name fundraising ensemble including actors Kristin Chenoweth and Billy Porter, tennis legend Billie Jean King, singer Melissa Etheridge and former Democratic rival Pete Buttigieg. The LGBTQ+ event brought together 670 donors raised more than $1.1 million, according to Porter, who served as the Zoom shows energetic emcee.

CBS News served as the press pool reporter at the fundraiser; the Biden campaign allows coverage of the usually-private donor events.

Wearing a black shirt and circular white glasses that matched the large white fireplace behind him, emcee Porter opened the virtual show with a warning that like any self-respecting extravaganza, the program might go longer than planned. It lasted around 46 minutes.

Porter said hes given his own version of the State of the Union speech the last two years because the thought of me just standing by and not speaking out about whats happening in our country just wasnt an option.

We need to elect a steady, experienced leader to guide us through this storm and forward. Someone with decency, character and empathy whose own life has taught him to persevere, Porter said.

We need to get to WORK! And put our friends to WORK! Porter added, accenting the words.

The Tony winner then raised the first Zoom curtain to reveal the first act, singer Melissa Etheridge. Coming from her Zoom window, Etheridge was holding a gold guitar and wearing rose-tinted sunglasses. She introduced her 2013 song Uprising of Love and said it was an anthem for people to rise up against the injustices and the oppression of Putins anti-LGBTQ regime in Russia.

I dont think we could have possibly imagined then that so much injustice and oppression at the hands of our own government was on the horizon, Etheridge added. The singer said it was time to rise up at the ballot box and elect Biden in November.

After the first musical event, Billie Jean King appeared in front of an entire wall of trophies. The tennis star called Biden a true leader who respects facts and science.

As a young athlete Joe, always said Give me the ball, give me the ball, coach! King said. He accepted responsibility as a young person and the most important thing now that we can do is step up and accept responsibility to make sure we are able to tell our children and our grandchildren that we gave all we had to protect the soul of this nation.

King then served the conversation to Mayor Pete Buttigieg: The ball is in your court, Pete.

Buttigieg listened to Bidens concern about the potential push by Mr. Trump to put off the election. And Biden said the younger politicians future is absolutely limitless and if I have anything to do with it, youre not going to get very far away.

Biden also said he spoke with another former rival, Massachusetts Senator Elizabeth Warren, after she announcedher brother died of complications from COVID-19.

The finale of the evening belonged to Tony Award winner Kristin Chenoweth. Streaming from her kitchen, she cued up a Biden-themed version of Popular, from the musical Wicked.

Visit link:

Biden predicts Trump will try to postpone the election - WWAY NewsChannel 3

The liberators that killed us; why the New Dispensation will decimate the poor – Nehanda Radio

By David Siampondo

While the liberation struggle remains indelible in the annals of Zimbabwean history, its aftermath however brought about new challenges that equal or surpass colonial oppression and suppression.

It must be acknowledged that the segregationist colonial administration generated inequalities, poverty and deprivation. Governance and resource allocation of the colonial regime was premised on racial inclusion and exclusion, the white minority constituted the greater portion of beneficiaries whilst the black majority were under served and left vulnerable.

By and large the post-colonial government inherited and perfected the very systems of oppression and repression which the masses had taken arms against. The historical question remains; where did we go wrong?

Upon attaining political Independence in 1980, the delirium and frenzy by a black minority of assuming political power without economic authority suffocated any chances of total emancipation and empowerment; the black majority remained impoverished, suppressed and cheated of the proceeds of the liberation struggle.

The liberation ethos was built on fighting inequalities, poverty and oppression, therefore total annihilation of the white race was the major objective of the oppressed natives. The new government however pulled a positive when it called for reconciliation and offered to turn swords into ploughshares. Nonetheless the majority remained in abject poverty and vulnerable.

The participation in the liberation struggle generated a sense of entitlement that bedevil the nation till today. Impunity deeply ingrained in the body politic and governance of the country, massive embezzlements, looting and corruption were condoned. Culprits were only transferred ministries and offices but the rot continued.

Upon independence the government adopted a socialist path/gutsaruzhinji. Basically pronouncing itself as a Welfare State. Simply defined, a Welfare State is a system of governance where the state undertake to protect the health and well-being of its citizens, especially those in financial or social need.

This can be achievable by means of grants, pensions and other benefits to cushion against vulnerabilities. Debate is however intense on whether the government as it existed in 1980 can be described as a Welfare state.

Although this is not the purpose of the article, it is pertinent to note that some characteristics of Welfarism did exist, such as subsidies on basic commodities, free amenities like primary education, primary health care and other pro-poor services.

These quickly vanished by the pronouncement of the Economic Structural Adjustment Program [ESAP] of October 1990 whose implementation began in March 1991. This exacerbated the conditions of the poor and the black majority who already were in the doldrums.

The summation of bad policies of governance and the predatory behaviour of the liberation struggle leaders transformed a cutthroat colonial regime into a vampire state. The insatiable acquisitiveness of the former guerrillas permeated their administration which sparked a scramble for looting.

Those who went to war and their cronies demanded positions of influence regardless of level of education and expertise. They positioned themselves strategically to loot and amass wealth, the countrys economy bled uncontrollably as pillaging went unchecked.

As the economy went south, political grip and power began to crumble, the emergence of an alternative solution in the form of the Movement for Democratic Change [MDC] worsened the situation. The MDC a labour movement successfully sold its manifesto to the people. Chief among its manifesto was the land question and the right of workers.

Evidently the MDC won the political hearts and conscience of many which sent ZANU PF panicking and without strategy usurped the land idea. They went on to violently grab land from white farmers and killing some of them in the process. This violence was not only targeted at white commercial farmers but all MDC members. Zimbabwe turned into an outpost of tyranny.

Minus the violence and murders that occurred the land grabbing didnt settle the fundamental deprivation that existed as land was parcelled to politicians as led by former liberators, ordinary or private citizen who did not belonged to Zanu PF could not get the land.

Up to the present day the once productive tracks of land lie idle and some who grabbed or benefitted have sublet the previous owners as they failed to work on it due to capacity issues.

Nepotism, patronage, cronyism and partisan governance defined the Mugabe regime till his removal via a military coup which occurred in November 2017. At gunpoint Mugabe was forced to ink his resignation and the leadership of his party ZANU PF and country was handed to another henchmen Emmerson Mnangagwa who was fired as Vice President and had skipped the border into South Africa via Mozambique.

Mnangagwa inherited the Mugabe system and returned the bulky of the dead wood which plundered the economy during Mugabes regime. He of course invited a few new faces from the army as a token of appreciation for the coup and some forgotten war veterans who were neglected by Mugabe some of them whose liberation credentials are doubtful such as Victor Matemadanda.

Mnangagwa intensified a reign of terror where on different occasions live bullets were used on peaceful protesters attacking and murdering them in day light before international media houses. Abduction of opposition members became the order of the day, treason charges escalated to cow opposition into submission to an extent of having 20 activists being charged with treason in less than six months of his rule.

The so called new dispensation is old wine in new packaging. It is still obsessed with power retention with no regard to peoples well-being. The new dispensation is marred by corruption and a fierce competition of looting.

The new dispensation remains captured by a cartel whose roots can be traced to a military establishment. The new dispensation is void of policies that generate public confidence and remain as loathed as Mugabes dispensation.

David Siampondo is a social scientist

Next article will discuss vulnerability in the context of a disbanded welfare system: Citizens at the mercy of political vultures.

Continued here:

The liberators that killed us; why the New Dispensation will decimate the poor - Nehanda Radio

Macri signs text accusing government of creeping ‘authoritarianism’ – Buenos Aires Times

Former president Mauricio Macri is among the signatories of an open letter that accuses Argentinas government of using the coronavirus pandemic as an excuse to introduce authoritarian measures.

The document, issued by the Madrid-based Fundacin Internacional para la Libertad (FIL), alleges that the governments marked ideological bias is showing in its actions and warns against the allegedly "authoritarian" measures being taken by various countries to tackle the spread of Covid-19.

Feted writer, Nobel Prize winner and ex-Peru presidential candidate Mario Vargas Llosa is also among the signatories.

Under the title Que la pandemia no sea un pretexto para el autoritarismo, FIL describes the text as a manifesto against "excessive attitudes" taken by different Latin American governments, among them the one headed by Alberto Fernndez in Argentina.

"While public and private health employees battle valiantly against coronavirus, many governments take measures indefinitely restricting liberties and basic rights. Instead of some understandable restrictions of freedom, several countries are imposing a confinement with minimal exceptions, the impossibility of working and producing and the manipulation of information," the document reads.

"Some governments have identified this as an opportunity to arrogate excessive power, suspending the rule of law and even representative democracy and the system of justice, the text adds.

Apart from Vargas Llosa and Macri, the document was signed by Spanish ex-premier Jos Mara Aznar, various former Latin American presidents and Daro Loprfido and Patricia Bullrich among Argentine politicians. Also among the signatories are businessman Alejandro Roemmers, writer Marcos Aguinis, ex-culture secretary Daro Loprfido and ex-defence and economy minister Ricardo Lpez Murphy.

Macri and Bullrich are both PRO hardliners against the policies of Alberto Fernndez, especially where security, the economy and the handling of the Covid-19 crisis are concerned. Their sector demands more testing to detect positive cases of coronavirus, greater speed in bringing home Argentines stranded abroad and more opening of the quarantine to permit economic activity. These demands have generated internal friction with the sector headed by Buenos Aires City Mayor Horacio Rodrguez Larreta, who gets on well with the President in his handling of the pandemic.

The FIL critique runs: "In the dictatorships of Venezuela, Cuba and Nicaragua the pandemic serves as a pretext to increase political persecution and oppression. In Spain and Argentina leaders with a marked ideological bias aspire to use these tough circumstances to grab political and economic prerogatives which the citizenry would reject resolutely in another context, the document alleges.

"In Mexico the pressure against private enterprise is spiking and the Grupo de Puebla [left-wing grouping] is being used to attack governments of different political lines, the text adds, assuring that "on both sides of the Atlantic state interventionism and populism are resurging with an impetus which makes one think of a change of model far removed from liberal democracy and the market economy.

We want to manifest with energy that this crisis must not be confronted by sacrificing the rights and liberties which cost so much to secure. We reject the false dilemma that these circumstances oblige us to choose between authoritarianism and insecurity, between the Philanthropic Ogre and death, the FIL manifesto concludes.

TIMES/PERFIL

Continued here:

Macri signs text accusing government of creeping 'authoritarianism' - Buenos Aires Times

COVID-19 | A boon and boost to the surveillance state – Moneycontrol.com

Rakesh Neelakandan

Members of the ruling political class in the West, largely in the United States and Europe, have apparently failed in their duties of preventing the spread of the SARS-CoV-2 or the novel coronavirus. However, instead of being held accountable for complacency, the political class, as a whole, is appallingly being empowered further at this critical juncture. They are being empowered as laymen are being asked to trade their privacy for health in subtle and sometimes pronounced ways as a matter of containment measures in multiple parts of the world.

If forced to choose between health and being brought under surveillance, people invariably choose the former over the latter for obvious reasons.

In other words, instead of a health and privacy solution, the ruling dispensation comes up with a health or privacy dilemma. The citizenry, on its part is conventionally conditioned to make trade-offs as it is a part of normal economic life. When presented with carefully filtered information, which give the impression that a person can only obtain one (health) at the expense of the other (privacy), all that people respond to would be by opting in for a death-to-privacy system.

This elicits the necessary compliance.

Crippling Factors

The other aspect is that one cannot take to the streets to protest against this conditioning even if one wants to, for fear of ill-health and facing the consequences of not abiding by COVID-19-specific laws and ordinances. A classic case of psychological oppression indeed, with no human agency one can point fingers at and thats the political beauty of it.

The use of technical concepts and jargon, and the high degree of knowledge required to frame the entire problem, constitute yet another set of issues preventing the formation of a collective political response by the public. Obviously, the known unknowns are overwhelming, starting with the behaviour and spread of the virus, not to speak of the unknown unknowns.

Additionally, the often confusing information deluge or recurring data avalanche in the media in conjunction with the above mentioned aspects give rise to a shifting-sand conundrum according to which no sound decision can be taken by a citizen, thereby forcing her to place trust in an authority in most cases, the government. This not only reinforces the governments grip on the system, but also empowers it to run roughshod over democratic norms and principles leading to the amassment of a greater degree of political power.

Importantly, citizens, estranged and harbouring mutual mistrust, will only look at one another as probable carriers of the virus. The social estrangement from physical distancing runs counter to the basic instinct of social assembly and can further vitiate the political atmosphere to the advantage of ruling authorities.

Herein also lies the threat of a social engineering pivoted towards the creation and sustenance of the other. The threat it need not be a pandemic can be a hostile community or an enemy country for that matter. It can even be a cocktail of both: pandemic and threats posed by aliens.

Threat Until Proven Otherwise

In a surveillance State, data generated is hoarded, sorted and sifted through for classified ends. Even as the data generated by a person is virtually her own property, the I Agree buttons tick away the terms and conditions governing hoarding, sorting and sifting. The citizen is stalked under the assumption that she can potentially become a threat, and if it happens, then the government should be in possession of the necessary data on the person at that point in time. The citizen is a treated as a threat until proven otherwise.

It should also be noted that a person by now is reduced to a digital identity, a number, a key, a thumb impression, an iris scan or a DNA sequence. When a citizen is thus equated with her identity enablers, the first casualty is her humanness in the eyes of the authority.

Ultimately, democratic freedom is lost not by a sudden attack carried out by a larger force, but by attrition rooted in a cacophony of silence and a passive consent to oppression. By the time we realise the same, the strategic pressure points of democracy would have been compromised beyond repair and healing.

It is mass testing for detecting the virus that is the answer, not mass-surveillance. The collective resources of the planet should be directed towards this end.

Moneycontrol Ready Reckoner

Now that payment deadlines have been relaxed due to COVID-19, the Moneycontrol Ready Reckoner will help keep your date with insurance premiums, tax-saving investments and EMIs, among others.

First Anniversary Offer: Subscribe to Moneycontrol PROs annual plan for 1/- per day for the first year and claim exclusive benefits worth 20,000. Coupon code: PRO365

Read the original post:

COVID-19 | A boon and boost to the surveillance state - Moneycontrol.com

Lenin’s murderous regime is nothing to celebrate – The Conservative Woman

THURSDAY marked 150 years since the birth ofVladimir Ilyich Ulyanov, better known as Lenin, the communist revolutionary and political theorist who served as head of the Soviet government from 1917 to his death in 1924. Just another day for most of us but for London Young Labour (LYL), a Labour-affiliated group with more than 15,000 members aged 14-26, it was a cause for celebration. Accompanied by a striking image of Marx and Lenin on a British National Union of Mineworkers flag, the group tweeted that Lenins legacy and the legacy of the Russian revolution still inspires millions around the world to fight. For peace and socialism!

At the time of writing the tweet had received almost 2,000 likes and has even been defended by former coalition Business Minister Sir Vince Cable.

Yet rehabilitating Lenin and his mission is not an option for a civilised society.

The October Revolution afforded rose-tinted praise in this tweet was not the romantic popular uprising immortalised in Eisensteins storming of the Winter Palace in the 1927 filmOctober: Ten Days That Shook the World.This episode was nothing more than an illegitimate putsch of Russias provisional government which, although imperfect, had already toppled the Tsarist regime in February of the same year. It occurred because Lenin and his comrades were unhappy with the results of the first free election in Russias history which failed to deliver a mandate for their policies. Lenins political vision was inaugurated by the evil and unnecessary murder of the Romanov children, whose bullet-riddled bodies were tossed into unmarked graves, probably on Lenins personal orders. As detailed in Robert ServicesA History of Modern Russia, the USSR that Lenins coup begat, rather than alleviating poverty and oppression, enforced the worst elements ofancien regimetyranny on Russia and eventually on its expansive colonies in Eastern Europe and Central Asia. The Tsarist gulags of Siberia were expanded and transformed into an empire of brutal forced labour, staffed by exiles who had been torn from their homes and families, with no access to appeal. Victor Sebestyens 2017 biography,Lenin the Dictator,details how, amid the Russian civil war that eventually delivered the Bolshevik victory, sailors at the Kronstadt naval base revolted, drawing up a list of demands such as freedom of the press and abolition of the secret police. At this news, Lenin ordered that 20,000 troops be sent to show them no mercy.

We must crush the myth that Lenin was inspired by a noble idealism that was simply perverted by Stalin. Lenin was as pitiless a tyrant as his successor and conscience-free in the face of that which threatened his mission toward enforcing socialism. He was no freedom-loving humanitarian, but a ruthless tyrant, happy to suppress any inkling of opposition for his cause, advocating the violent repression of religion and press freedoms. We do not promise any freedom, or any democracy, Lenin exclaimed at the Third Congress of the Comintern in 1921. We were never concerned with the Kantian-priestly and vegetarian-Quaker prattle about the sacredness of human life, his comrade Trotsky declared inThe Defence of Terrorism.

During his time in the number one spot, Lenin willingly facilitated Trotsky and Stalins brutal commitment to preserving Bolshevik power irrespective of the violence and oppression it required. His government founded the institutional apparatus Stalin would use to send tens of millions to their deaths. He established murder and arrest quotas that allowed the NKVD to murder ordinary citizens on a mass scale asenemies of the people, often for the most minor of civil offences. Stalin may have died with more blood on his hands than Lenin, but he had a whole 30 years to flex his muscles compared with Lenins seven. The terror of the Soviet system was systemic. Stalin was not the innovator of the one-party state, secret police or the forced labour camps, he was simply the happy heir to them, and any honest history admits that Lenin was the brains behind their foundation.

It must be emphasised that, despite a mass of backlash toward their tweet, from myself included,LYL made no attempt to defend or apologise for their statement, and in fact, nonchalantly exclaimed how their post blew up (thats Twitter-speak for awe at a posts unexpected popularity). Yet even this articles quick rundown of Lenin and the revolution he stood for is a testament to the fact that anyone wishing to celebrate its legacy is either misled or immoral. The replacement of absolutism with totalitarianism does not seem worthy of applause to me. There is no shame in admitting one was wrong, and in fact, such an admission when genuine requires courage and should be met with warmth rather than rebuke. I invite London Young Labour to do so.

- Advertisement -

See the rest here:

Lenin's murderous regime is nothing to celebrate - The Conservative Woman

April 26 Letters to the Editor, Part 3 | Opinion – Lewiston Morning Tribune

I write this in regard to a letter in the April 19 edition of the Opinion Page.

The letter by Sophie Henderson was well-written and for the most part spot on.

I do find it interesting that she states each legislator must consider his personal values, the values of his caucus, and his constituents best interest. So in her words, I believe her to say the legislator when looking at any legislation must see to his values, the partys interest, then the people who elected him/her to office interest. Really?

I do understand the personal value issue, but that should be last. The constituents best interest should be first. And the partys interest, if even considered at all, in 10th place. They are elected to do the peoples business, not yours, not the partys, not the corporation operating within the legislators area, but the peoples.

It is apparent that has been forgotten. And that, my good people, is the reason those in Washington, D.C., cannot work together.

Their interests first, then the partys.

In the meantime, we the people are forgotten. It is time to change this attitude. It is time for term limits on both national and the state levels. Think about it.

I am ready to get back to work. These are scary times and I worry for small businesses and the economy.

The facts are that we have a worldwide problem right now that is killing mostly the elderly. I believe that this has spread a lot further in Nez Perce County than the numbers suggest. I find it hard to believe that almost all of our cases of this virus are only in one little nursing home.

If testing were more available, who knows how many more cases (most likely hundreds) there would be.

We have a free country and need to get back to work on May 1.

I believe in social distancing and we need to slow down this contagious virus. But I also feel that confining people to their homes is slowly leading to a possible anarchy.

Maybe we can prove that we can gather in protests and work places while wearing masks or keeping a 6-foot distance.

We can give kind reminders to friends and coworkers to use the guidelines of social distancing.

Lets reopen the country but be smart about it.

On April 16, the New York Times published an article titled WHO warned Trump about coronavirus early and often.

The first three paragraphs stated: On Jan. 22, two days after Chinese officials first publicized the serious threat posed by the new virus ravaging the city of Wuhan, the chief of the World Health Organization held the first of what would be months of almost daily media briefings, sounding the alarm, telling the world to take the outbreak seriously.

On Jan. 22 in an interview on CNBC, President Donald Trump was asked if he was worried that the coronavirus outbreak might become a pandemic. Trumps response was: Its going to be just fine. ... We have it totally under control. Since then, history has shown that Trump lied. His administration had done little to control it.

Trump fails to recall the sign that President Harry Truman had on his desk: The buck stops here.

He refuses to accept the responsibility for events that have happened while he has been president. He blames everything on former President Barack Obama. While Obama officials walked Trump aides through a global pandemic exercise in 2017, Trump has rejected everything associated with Obamas administration.

If Trump is truly doing an excellent job of fulfilling his responsibilities, why is he interfering with the legal governing of states by their governors in their attempts to slow the outbreak of the coronavirus? Dont Trumps liberate tweets incite insurrection and federal laws against overthrow of government? Where are the flag wavers?

Disregards the vulnerable

I understand and appreciate the First Amendment allows us to assemble, speak freely and practice religion. It also includes the press.

I do not understand why a group of Idaho Freedom Foundation citizens would gather at the courthouse to protest Gov. Brad Littles proclamation regarding COVID-19.

As of April 20, Nez Perce County had 30 cases and 11 deaths.

Apparently these protesters neither know nor love their friends and relatives who are at high risk.

Did they consider taking thank you signs to the vulnerable hospital and care center employees who are working overtime without adequate protection?

How about expressing a word of appreciation to the many clerks in the essential businesses?

Did anyone suggest supporting our overworked volunteers at the food banks, the Salvation Army, Interlink, Snake River Clinic, YWCA, Boys and Girls Club, etc?

We know the Freedom Foundation dwells on oppression and far-out causes, particularly where our lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender and questioning brothers, sisters and friends are concerned.

So why would they be expected to care about old people who would like to celebrate their next birthdays? More than likely, we would never be given a second thought.

Survival depends on our adherence to the governors guidelines. Stay the course and be well.

This is a national emergency. Tell your senators, representatives, governor and president. I just did. Widespread testing was needed two months ago. How is it possible that only 1 percent of Americans have been tested? Testing is being done at 150,000 per day (New York Times, April 17).

At this pace, it will take six years to test everyone.

When everyone can get a test, we will proceed on a lighted path. Without it, we are stumbling in darkness.

Opportunities Unlimited Inc., is an organization in Lewiston that has helped my 8-year-old severely autistic son tremendously.

Before their staff members worked with him, my son could barely make it through an hour of school. Because of the amazing trained therapists at OUI, my son was going to school eight hours a day and was in the classroom 80 percent of the time before COVID-19 hit.

They have helped him and so many other children and adults so much.

They are at risk of losing their business if the Paycheck Protection Program loans are not granted. It is crucial that the government take care of the people in this country who did not ask to be shuttered away from working and are now losing their livelihoods from it.

These programs are vital to the disabled and disenfranchised. They must be funded.

Most county sheriffs are wimps. Thats not me saying that but a Montana sheriff who referred to his more than 3,000 fellow sheriffs across the nation. He said it in a private conversation with a sheriff, who in turn related that to me. ...

Most will swear they are constitutional sheriffs. ... When the chips are down, they either fail to recognize a constitutional infringement, lack the guts to stand in defiance of such or simply go along to get along, all at the expense of God-given rights of county citizens. ...

I want a sheriff who will draw a line in the sand and tell the government to go to hell if necessary. ...

That is to say, call out the power of the county to aid him an extraordinary power the sheriff and only the sheriff has in defending the rights of the people of the county. ...

Had Idaho sheriffs fought back as a whole when environmentalism took its toll on once vibrant logging communities or when wolves were unleashed on Idaho destroying the peoples elk and moose as well as the guiding industry and its tourism here, those communities likely would not have suffered as they have. ...

I will stick with Sheriff Doug Giddings in Idaho County because he has the guts to stand up to the government when he has to, and has done it. Lots of cheap talk, campaign signs up and down the roads and full-page ads do not a sheriff make.

On page 2F of your April 19 edition, Elizabeth Kendrick wrote a provision was included (in the stimulus package) that will allow the super wealthy, such as Donald Trump and his family, to avoid $170 billion in federal taxes during the next 10 years.

I note that she did not name Michael Bloomberg, the Gates, the Obamas, the Clintons, the Pelosis, etc.

But, on to my point: If such a provision was included, please name the specific bill, the section, subsection, page number, paragraph, etc., that would direct anyone, such as myself, to read the alleged provision(s) for ourselves and make our own assessment.

All too often it seems, we read really juicy items such as Kendricks letter in your paper or on social media. But when pressed, the authors cannot point to an authoritative source. Nor can they support their comment by reference to a second source. (Sources often present conflicting evidence.)

Without supporting sources referenced, their comments remain simply hearsay. Worse yet, the authors may have committed slander. For those of you not familiar with the term, slander is a sin.

And in cases involving money or finances, the accusation may also suggest an underlying motivation of envy, which also is a sin.

So, folks, if you are going to make accusative statements, please include your sources.

Keep it civil out there, folks. Well all be better off and better informed.

To the family and friends of Larry Schetzle:

We send our sincere thanks for all of the delicious food, beautiful flowers, kind cards and much needed phone calls.

See the original post here:

April 26 Letters to the Editor, Part 3 | Opinion - Lewiston Morning Tribune

Yemen government condemns diversion of aid to Houthi rebels – The National

Vital humanitarian aid for millions of people in Yemen is not reaching those in need because it is being diverted by the Iran-backed Houthi rebels, officials say.

Yemens internationally recognised government flagged the issue again on Thursday after a video circulated on social media purportedly showed piles of aid from the World Food Programme in the Houthi-held area of Sirwah in Marib province.

The UN agency said it was aware of a video of WFP-marked boxes in the frontline area.

WFP cannot confirm the source or authenticity of the video, a spokesperson told The National.

WFP food assistance is for the most vulnerable Yemeni civilians. WFP cannot tolerate any diversion of food assistance that undermines our mandate to respond to the serious humanitarian crisis in Yemen.

The agency, which feeds more than 12 million Yemenis a month, 80 per cent of whom are in areas controlled by the Houthis, said this month it would halve the amount of aid delivered to rebel-held zones due to a funding crisis.

The UN says some donors have stopped their aid over concerns that Houthi forces were obstructing deliveries.

Local NGOs that operate in Houthi-held areas are diverting WFPs aid to the rebels, Hamza Al Kamaly, Yemens deputy youth minister, told The National.

The problem is that WFP and United Nations Development Programme are treating the NGOs as neutral organisations but in reality they are one-sided, Mr Al Kamaly said.

They are giving the relief to Houthi fighters instead of giving to those in desperate need and the rebels are using it as a weapon of war, he said.

Yemens Information Minister, Moammar Al Eryani, urged the United Nations to co-ordinate with the government to find new mechanisms to deliver aid to those in need in Houthi-held areas.

The measures must include ways to prevent civilians from being held hostage, under extortion and to prevent them from starvation, oppression and disease, Mr Al Eryani said on Twitter.

UN officials have had trouble in dealing with the Houthis. In January, they accused the rebels of looting an aid warehouse under their control.

The UN last year partially suspended its aid programme in Sanaa, the countrys Houthi-controlled capital, after the rebels refused to accept the imposition of a registration system designed to ensure aid supplies reached their intended recipients.

Updated: April 23, 2020 08:00 PM

Original post:

Yemen government condemns diversion of aid to Houthi rebels - The National