A New Token Lets You Save on Ethereum Fees by Storing Gas – Cointelegraph

Ethereum (ETH)s fees are hard-coded to only be payable in Ether, but a clever trick with smart contracts allows users to effectively pay for gas with a special token, which reduces the total fee they incur.

This principle was used by the team behind 1inch.exchange, a decentralized exchange aggregator, to introduce the Chi token. The technology was formally announced on June 5, and it builds on a previous iteration of the concept, called Gas Token (GST).

Chi takes advantage of a mechanism that refunds gas when storage space is freed on the Ethereum virtual machine. In the case of gas tokens, burning them destroys dummy sub-smart contracts that were created when the tokens were minted, which the team says is more efficient than erasing data directly.

Chi tokens are meant to be created when the gas fees on Ethereum are low, which allows the user to store that price for later use. As the CEO of 1inch.exchange, Sergej Kunz, explained at the ETHGlobal hackathon, this is especially useful for deploying smart contracts, an operation that can consume millions of gas. To put that in perspective, the total gas limit for a block is currently 10 million.

To save on fees, the token must be burned alongside the primary operation, which reduces the total amount of gas spent in that transaction. This is because the refund operation cannot result in zero or negative total gas usage meaning that it must be paired with another action to be effective.

Nevertheless, Chis developers say that the token can cut down the price of a transaction by as much as 50%.

The ability to lock in low gas prices during periods of inactivity could have important repercussions on Ethereums fee market.

As noted by Vitalik Buterin and other developers in their discussions around the earlier Gas Token, the mechanism could smooth out the price of gas between periods of high and low activity. Users would stock up on gas tokens when its cheap to do so, and unload them when gas fees rise thus balancing the overall demand for gas.

Anton Bukov, 1inch.exchanges CTO, was nevertheless skeptical that Chi would alter the fee economics of Ethereum:

I dont think this will change anything, except that users have a way of tokenizing the price of gas, and they will be able to speculate on it.

Bukov pointed out that Chi already has a use case on the 1inch platform, allowing users to save on fees with token swaps.

On the other hand, the Gas Token, born in 2018, largely failed to achieve adoption because few people understood how it works, Kunz told Cointelegraph.

Bukov said that GST also had an issue interacting with the ERC-20 standard, which resulted in wallets and even Etherscan showing the wrong balance.

While GST was primarily used by arbitrageurs, Kunz noted, the direct integration with 1inch.exchange resulted in interest from other users as well. He also revealed that some decentralized finance providers are looking to integrate Chi in their systems.

See original here:

A New Token Lets You Save on Ethereum Fees by Storing Gas - Cointelegraph

EOS, Ethereum and Ripples XRP Daily Tech Analysis June 9th, 2020 – Yahoo Finance

EOS

EOS fell by 1.00% on Monday. Reversing a 0.55% gain from Sunday, EOS ended the day at $2.7834.

It was bearish through most of the day. EOS fell from an early morning intraday high $2.8181 to a late afternoon intraday low $2.7542.

Falling short of the major resistance levels, EOS found support at the first major support level at $2.7537.

EOS managed to recover to $2.78 levels in the final hour, however, to limit the downside on the day.

At the time of writing, EOS was up by 0.47% to $2.7965. A bullish start to the day saw EOS rise from an early morning low $2.7924 to a high $2.8028.

EOS left the major support and resistance levels untested early on.

EOS would need to avoid sub-$2.7850 levels to take a run at the first major resistance level at $2.8163 into play.

Support from the broader market would be needed, however, for EOS to break back through to $2.81 levels.

Barring an extended crypto rally, the first major resistance level at $2.8163 and Monday high $2.8181 would likely cap any upside.

Failure to avoid sub-$2.7850 levels could see EOS struggle on the day once more.

A fall through the $2.7850 pivot would bring the first major support level at $2.7524 into play.

Barring a crypto meltdown, however, EOS should steer clear of sub-$2.70 levels. The second major support level at $2.7213 should limit any downside.

Major Support Level: $2.7524

Major Resistance Level: $2.8163

23.6% FIB Retracement Level: $6.62

38% FIB Retracement Level: $9.76

62% FIB Retracement Level: $14.82

Ethereum rose by 0.72% on Monday. Following on from a 1.20% gain on Sunday, Ethereum ended the day at $246.55.

It was a mixed start to the day. Ethereum rose to an early morning high $245.5 before hitting reverse.

Coming up short of the first major resistance level at $248.68, Ethereum fell to an early afternoon intraday low $240.82.

Finding late support, however, Ethereum rallied to a final hour intraday high $247.97 before wrapping up the day at $246 levels. In spite of the late rally, Ethereum came up short of the first major resistance level at $248.68.

At the time of writing, Ethereum was up by 0.93% to $248.85. A bullish start to the day saw Ethereum rise from an early morning low $246.55 to a high $249.99 before easing back.

Ethereum tested the first major resistance level at $249.41 early on.

Story continues

Ethereum would need to avoid sub-$245.10 levels to support another run at the first major resistance level at $249.41.

Support from the broader market would be needed, however, for Ethereum to break back through to $249 levels.

Barring an extended crypto rally, the first major resistance level and resistance at $250 should cap any upside.

Failure to avoid sub-$245.10 levels could see Ethereum see give up Mondays gain.

A fall back through the morning low $246.5 to sub-$245.10 levels would bring the first major support level at $242.26 into play.

Barring an extended crypto sell-off, however, Ethereum should continue to steer clear sub-$240 levels on the day.

The second major support level sits at $237.96.

Major Support Level: $242.26

Major Resistance Level: $249.41

23.6% FIB Retracement Level: $257

38.2% FIB Retracement Level: $367

62% FIB Retracement Level: $543

Ripples XRP rose by 0.44% on Monday. Reversing a 0.05% decline from Sunday, Ripples XRP ended the day at $0.20433.

It was a mixed start to the day. Ripples XRP rose to an early morning high $0.20375 before hitting reverse.

Falling short of the major resistance levels, Ripples XRP fell to a late morning intraday low $0.20137.

Steering clear of the first major support level at $0.1993, Ripples XRP rallied to a final hour intraday high $0.20472. In spite of the late rally, Ripples XRP failed to test the first major resistance level at $0.2062.

At the time of writing, Ripples XRP was up by 0.21% to $0.20475. A bullish start to the day saw Ripples XRP rise from an early morning low $0.20422 to a high $0.20541.

Ripples XRP left the major support and resistance levels untested early on.

Ripples XRP will need to avoid sub-$0.2035 levels to support a run at the first major resistance level at $0.2056.

Support from the broader market would be needed, however, for Ripples XRP to break out from the morning high $0.20541.

Barring a broad-based crypto rally, the first major resistance level would likely cap any upside.

Failure to avoid sub-$0.2035 levels could see Ripples XRP return to the red.

A fall back through the morning low $0.20422 to sub-$0.2035 levels would bring the first major support level at $0.2022 into play.

Barring an extended crypto sell-off, Ripples XRP should avoid sub-$0.20 levels on the day. The second major support level at $0.2001 should limit any downside.

Major Support Level: $0.2022

Major Resistance Level: $0.2056

23.6% FIB Retracement Level: $0.3638

38.2% FIB Retracement Level: $0.4800

62% FIB Retracement Level: $0.6678

Please let us know what you think in the comments below.

Thanks, Bob

This article was originally posted on FX Empire

Visit link:

EOS, Ethereum and Ripples XRP Daily Tech Analysis June 9th, 2020 - Yahoo Finance

Ethereum Community Debates Raising the Block Size Limit, Once Again – Cointelegraph

Continuing congestion on the Ethereum (ETH) network has led some developers and community members to call for increasing the gas limit, which defines its transaction throughput.

Data from Etherscan shows that the average gas price rose more than three-fold since early May, with an average of about 30 Gwei in the last few days.

Source: Etherscan.io

According to EthGasStation, this results in an average of a $0.16 fee to send a simple ETH transaction, which uses the least gas possible. ERC-20 token transfers and smart contract calls can cost many times as much.

The fee increase is already having a significant impact on on-chain activity for gaming DApps. DappRadar statistics show that Ethereum gaming activity plummeted in May, while other chains made slight gains.

Source: DappRadar

Fees have increased primarily due to higher on-chain activity especially due to Tethers ongoing transition to the ERC-20 network. While the stablecoin provider is acting to fix the situation through sidechains, it may take some time for layer two solutions to establish themselves.

In the meantime, some Ethereum builders, like 1inch exchange, began calling for the gas limit to be raised by a factor of at least 2.5, up from the current 10 million gas ceiling. That would, in theory, increase the capacity of the network and reduce fees.

The gas limit in Ethereum defines the maximum number of calculations that can be inserted into a block, and is very similar to the block size concept in Bitcoin (BTC).

Gas is an abstract representation of the computing resources expended by each operation. Each calculations gas cost is manually set by Ethereum developers though they are generally close to the true computing cost.

Ethereums co-founder, Vitalik Buterin, directly replied to 1inch, suggesting they push for a more conservative increase to 12 to 15 million gas though he revealed that many client devs are concerned about risks even at those levels.

Anton Bukov, the CTO of 1inch, explained to Cointelegraph that the concerns stem from a possible overload of the nodes running the network:

Operations that cost little gas but require a lot of resources may be used to attack nodes. [...] If transaction processing starts taking 10-15 seconds, nodes will completely stagnate

Thus, increases in gas limit carry the risk of weaker nodes being thrown off the network as they cannot process transactions anymore. Thats why the limit is raised so conservatively, and even then, usually usually its done after achieving some optimization results in client implementations, he added.

The last gas limit increase occurred in September 2019, pushing it from 8 to 10 million.

Buterin proposed to change gas prices on some calculation types, like base transaction cost and storage operations, to effectively increase capacity by about 20%. However, that would require a network hard fork, which he acknowledged is more complex than miners agreeing on a new limit.

Others proposed to wait for more definitive solutions, like Ethereum 1.x or even Ethereum 2.0, which focuses on improving scalability. Both are still in heavy development, and the network may lose ground if it waits for them.

Research published by Buterin in 2018 asserts that Ethereum has a fairly high demand elasticity, showing that in high-congestion situations, the usage of the network decreased.

Bukovs belief is that the time has come for another increase:

I think in 8 months there has been a sufficient number of client releases with the necessary optimizations, and a 12 million [gas limit] network is certainly ready, and it would be great to test the full 15 million

Nevertheless, the decision will need to be agreed on by the wider Ethereum community of client developers, miners, and DApp builders.

View original post here:

Ethereum Community Debates Raising the Block Size Limit, Once Again - Cointelegraph

It’s a layer 2 world, and Ethereum is almost living in it – Decrypt

When Ethereum scaling? According to Vitalik Buterin, it might already be here.

The nomadic creator of Ethereum tweeted today that the blockchain network's "layer 2 strategy has basically succeeded."

The Ethereum network's lead developers have had an eye on increasing throughput for the network since before the dawn of CryptoKitties, ERC20-based digital collectibles whose popularity clogged the network in late 2017.

A January 2018 Ethereum Foundation blog post from Buterin identified the problem: "Blockchain scalability is difficult primarily because a typical blockchain design requires every node in the network to process every transaction, which limits the transaction processing capacity of the entire system to the capacity of a single node."

In that same post, he identified two strategies for scaling: sharding, which allows transactions to go through without every node process each whole transaction, and so-called "layer 2 protocols" in which transactions are made off chain. The foundation was willing to put money toward the efforts, in the form of $50,000 to $1 million grants to people who were either working on existing layer 2 strategies or looking into new ones.

At the time, plasma and state channels were two of the most promising systems. Within the last year, however, new solutions, such as optimistic rollups and their cousin, ZK rollups, have taken off.

Buterin's tweet thread today came in response to Philippe Castonguay, a Montreal-based blockchain developer with Horizon Games, who noted the sheer volume of layer 2 scaling projects coming to fruition within the last week and in the coming month.

One curious addition was the inclusion of Tether's announcement that it would be processing transactions on OmiseGo's network, which on the surface looks like proof that network scalability is still a problem. "The Ethereum blockchain is a valuable but limited resource, which, under heavy traffic, is vulnerable to severe network congestion," the announcement read. "When transaction demand exceeds 12 TPS, settlement times increase and gas costs can rise significantly."

Castonguay told Decrypt that working on the main Ethereum layer is currently easier and has the most liquidity, but that it's not always necessary given the strengths of layer 2 technologies. In the long term, however, he says it should be reserved mostly for things like high-security projects, complex transactions, and for bridging and validating layer 2 chains.

Tether's move to OMG, which uses a More Viable Plasma method to batch transactions, makes sense in this view. Exchange transactions don't have to be on the main chain and therefore shouldn't be, goes the thinking behind this.

As to which layer 2 tech to use instead, that's a harder question. "Some L2s (most that are live today) only support a subset of what Ethereum can do, such as exchanging tokens or transferring assets," Castonguay said. "Other L2 solutions (e.g. optimistic rollup) would allow any application, just like Ethereum L1 (main chain), but these aren't live yet. Each L2 solution and implementation also has its own security risk profile that needs to be considered."

According to Buterin, token transfers must continue moving to layer 2 solutions as these take up a large chunk of network activity.

To him, the remaining hurdles aren't technical in naturethey're about getting them out and onboarding users. Referring to the need for users to have plasma- or rollup-based wallets, he said, "This is an adoption challenge, not a technical challenge. Though part of that adoption challenge is tightening the guarantees so users will feel comfortable 'living' inside and L2 system."

Read this article:

It's a layer 2 world, and Ethereum is almost living in it - Decrypt

Ethereum May Not Be Perfect, but Most DApps Still Like to Run With It – Cointelegraph

Years on and dozens of experiments later, Ethereum still remains the number one choice among developers of decentralized applications for deploying their products and services. The 2020 Q1 Dapp Market Report published by Dapp.com clearly demonstrates the ongoing trend, as the statistics show that 635 DApps, or roughly half of all functioning DApps on the market, are based on the Ethereum network with 616,369 active users.

Even despite the seemingly gloomy mood prevailing in the global economy, Ethereum is living through its Golden Age in the rapidly developing decentralized finance market. In the first quarter of 2020, the average daily rate of activity of wallets interacting with DApps on Ethereum increased by 16% compared with the previous quarter. The 2020 Q1 Dapp Industry Review report conducted by DappRadar clearly demonstrates the growing trend.

So, why exactly are DApps developers staying loyal to Ethereum despite its upgrade delays, poor scalability and strong competition from the likes of EOS?

Today, Ethereum is not the only platform offering developers tools to launch their own applications, but that was not always so. For the first DApps such as Bancor, which appeared back in 2017, Ethereum was the only proven and trustworthy solution. Nate Hindman, the head of growth at Bancor, told Cointelegraph: When Bancor launched in June 2017 as the first-ever DeFi protocol, there were no public contenders to Ethereum, so the choice was easy.

With $120,000 spent by its users in the DApp every day, Bancor remains committed to the choice of Ethereum, as its DeFi use and development remains the most mature and battle-tested, according to Hindman.

Aave, another large finance DApp that ranks ninth in the number of daily transactions, has also been building on Ethereum for a few years now. In an interview with Cointelegraph, Stani Kulechov, the platforms CEO, noted: When we started to build on Ethereum, it was the only network with smart contracts.

Both projects also pointed out that, being the pioneer platform for DApps, Ethereum has managed to retain its leadership in terms of liquidity and security, which has contributed to them staying loyal to the platform for many years.

Other blockchain projects have successfully improved the Ethereum tools, offering even more viable solutions. Among them is Ava Labs, a blockchain platform co-founded by Emin Gun Sirer a professor at Cornell University and a prominent blockchain scholar. He shared his vision with Cointelegraph on the matter:

"Before Ethereum, many would have scoffed at the very notion of decentralized finance, and written it off as a pipedream. Ethereum has proven whats possible when you combine a community of talented developers with a compelling sandbox that they could use to create their visions.

Kevin Sekniqi, a colleague of Sirer and a co-founder of Ava Labs, agreed that when the project started, there were no compelling alternatives that could solve the scalability and performance issues holding DeFi back from reaching its full potential.

The Ethereum network is known for its unique user experience that stands in a league of its own. The networks development kit includes numerous templates, MetaMask integration capabilities, transaction loggers and its own browser built on the Ethereum Virtual Machine known as EVM for faster onboarding.

The platform has extensive functionality capabilities, allowing developers to create hundreds of thousands of diverse applications, unlike Bitcoin applications, which are united by a single part of a multifunctional protocol.

Such versatility was achieved by using the unique EVM, which is a specialized software that supports the launch of any application, regardless of the written language, and allows the deployment of any application that doesnt have its own platform. It thus becomes redundant to create a separate network to take advantage of the blockchains capabilities for solving any problems, allowing developers to use the ready-made Ethereum system.

Consequently, a team developing a new DeFi product really wants to have all of these features when starting out in order to concentrate on building products, according to Francesco Vivoli of blockchain-based loan marketplace Raise. He added when speaking with Cointelegraph:

We chose Ethereum because of the strong, well-understood safety guarantees provided by the network, superior development tools and great sources of documentation available.

The functionality of the Ethereum network allows developers to create a vast scope of solutions, including but not limited to smart contracts for supply chain management, applications such as utilities or games, services for user identification, decentralized asset exchanges and even electronic voting systems for political elections.

Thanks to the large number of developers involved, the availability of extensive documentation and constant updates, Ethereum is considered to be the best platform for deploying any infrastructure, whether it be games, financial instruments or social networks. This task does not require much experience or fundamental knowledge in programming, as the applications for it are created on the basis of a basic decentralized architecture.

Such versatility and huge support from a community of experienced programmers allow developers to troubleshoot effectively and launch their applications with minimal bugs. A report published by Consensys on June 1, 2018, found that the Ethereum community had about 250,000 developers at the time, and 94% of all blockchain startups were built on the platform. It seems Ethereum is the only blockchain with such a large amount of technically educated engineers. This is, according to Bancors Hindman, the key to the smooth operation of the system:

The core Bancor team works mostly on the contracts, so it is helpful to have a robust ecosystem of third-party developers hacking on the contracts and deploying interfaces to engaged users, who are excited to experiment with new on-chain financial applications.

Many developers refer to the powerful network effect of Ethereum as a compelling factor for building DApps. Among them is MakerDAO, the most popular Ethereum-based DApp, according to Dapp.com. Niklas Kunkel, the head of backend services at MakerDAO, explained to Cointelegraph what this network effect means for DApps:

"Ethereum embodied the core ethos of decentralization very early on which attracted a large passionate developer community. Networking effects, especially the composability of protocols, are extremely powerful and cannot be understated. Developers choose to build on Ethereum because they inherit an entire ecosystem of primitives including Dai, Uniswap, Compound, and MetaMask. The moat is just too big, and growing larger every day."

Another blockchain platform, Status Network which ranks twelfth in the 30-day volume of transactions conducted by its users has also opted for Ethereum due to its networking effect. Jonathan Zerah, the head of marketing at Status Network, told Cointelegraph:

When new developers join the world of blockchain, they tend to gravitate towards the largest communities with the most experience, tools, and collaborative projects, and were seeing this phenomenon manifest in the rising DeFi movement right now.

Zerah added that the Ethereum community has the widest audience for the mass adoption of DeFi and Web 3.0 technologies. Beni Hakak, the CEO of LiquidApps a technology company focused on optimizing decentralized development shares the same point of view, stating: "The network effects of Ethereum, particularly in the DeFi sector, give the ecosystem a distinct advantage that keeps it growing.

The importance of the network effect for building financial applications is also demonstrated by Raise, a blockchain platform that built a loan marketplace on Ethereum. Its founder, Francesco Vivoli, explained to Cointelegraph the projects choice:

An incredibly strong developer community, which not only generates a network effect it allows new projects to leverage documentation, libraries and others expertise but also attracts the attention of larger businesses and venture funds as these do their own due diligence on the applicability and viability of blockchain solutions.

The availability of experienced users and developers in the community allows Ethereum to undergo constant testing and bug-fixing, thus contributing to the overall security and stability of the system.

Ethereums pride and joy is the decentralized virtual machine that any developer can use to deploy DApps. The smart contracts manage the resources of the EVM using the code written in the original Solidity programming language. Developers rely on scripts built on if-then principles, and nodes of the blockchain execute the commands automatically.

Related: Ethereum 2.0 Release Date Set for the Eleventh Hour as Issues Persist

The given approach made it possible to create applications based on Ethereum that work strictly in accordance with the established algorithm without failures, censorship, fraud or participation of third parties. If one of the nodes executing a smart contract fails, it will not affect the stability of the application as a whole, as the resulting data remains unchanged.

With $63.2 million in transactions made daily by its DApp users, 1inch.exchange explained its preference for Ethereum due to its 51% attack resistance. Sergej Kunz, the co-founder and CEO of 1inch.exchange, told Cointelegraph that the Ethereum network is the most reliable and secure from 51% attack than any other Proof-of-Work blockchain with smart contracts due to really high miner rewards.

Kunz added that its better to have a stable and less upgradable framework in order to keep the whole system very secure. Social network Sapien also opted for Ethereum due to its high level of protection against 51% attacks, according to Ankit Bhatia, the projects co-founder and CEO.

Ethereums stability is another factor mentioned by respondents. Michael Astashkevich, the chief technology officer of Smart IT a software development and consulting company explained to Cointelegraph why Ethereum is considered to be the most stable blockchain for DApps: Blockchain developers appreciate the complete, comprehensive and up-to-date documentation that is available for predictable development processes. It can also boast stable and resilient client applications. Astashkevich also noted that unlike other blockchain networks such as Waves or EOS, the Ethereum framework is truly decentralized, which is very important for engineers that both build and use DApps.

The monetization of an application is the ultimate essence of its creation and the guarantee of its continued existence. As such, developers often choose infrastructures for their apps based on the availability of a strong and reliable audience. Ethereum boasts a vast community and the ability to launch smart contracts for issuing versatile ERC-20 tokens.

The introduction of the ERC-20 standard provoked the explosive growth of token sales from 2016 to 2017. Despite the fact that token sales have dwindled in numbers and no longer rake in the same revenues as before, Ethereum-based applications still monetize their assets on crypto exchanges and even launch new exchanges. In particular, DeFi DApps including finance apps and decentralized exchanges are booming now, with a combined volume of over $11 billion in the first quarter of 2020, according to Dapp.coms market report.

Having a viable business model is the only way for any blockchain ecosystem to survive and become sustainable, according to Steven Pu, a serial Silicon Valley entrepreneur. He told Cointelegraph:

The most sustainable way to build an ecosystem of developers is to ensure that they can make money. A viable business model often overrides any technical advantages. In the case of Ethereum, it was the first blockchain ecosystem in which developers could make money, predominantly via issuing tokens.

Along with an extensive network of experienced developers, Ethereum attracts new projects and their large communities of users that are ready to use new tools in addition to helping and improving the monetization of products. 1inch.exchanges Kunz told Cointelegraph that for his exchange, the interaction with such a large community and participation in Ethereum hackathons provides priceless experience: The Ethereum community has people real people who are already onboarded and use it on a daily basis. Sapiens Bhatia further added:

Its consistently one of the most active open source projects on Github and the number of Ethereum dApps is always growing, proof that were not alone in laying our trust in Ethereum and its future.

So, despite the delays to the deployment of its 2.0 network, Ethereum has numerous success factors acting in its favor, many of which remain unattainable for the majority of its competitors. However, while Ethereum remains popular among many developers and projects, there are some that opt for alternative frameworks due to its poor scalability and throughput and slow development. These are the issues that might be decisive when it comes to building large-scale platforms with millions of transactions to be processed.

Read more:

Ethereum May Not Be Perfect, but Most DApps Still Like to Run With It - Cointelegraph

Whos Afraid of Ethereum? The Top 12 Smart Contract Platforms – Crypto Briefing

As Ethereum 2.0 continues to be delayed, competing smart contract platforms have emerged to try and compete. These are Crypto Briefing's top 12 competitors to Ethereum.Key Takeaways

Smart contract platforms now allow anyone to design programmable finance and apply them to a myriad of new use cases. For example, the decentralized finance (DeFi) movement, as well as other decentralized applications (dApps), are all dominated by Ethereum-based smart contracts.

One can think of smart contracts as dynamic if-then statements.

And if a developer or company combines enough of them together, they can build never-before-seen tools. The advantages arent just in this flexibility, either. Smart contracts eliminate many of the costs of intermediaries traditionally included in the fields of law, finance, supply chains, and much more.

Ethereum now has a host of competitors too. Though the project has enjoyed a first-mover advantage, faster, more advanced blockchain projects have emerged to try taking the throne.

In the following Guide, Crypto Briefing outlines the top smart contract platforms and offers readers a broad overview of the smart contract space.

Founder: Vitalik Buterin

Date of creation: Launched in July 2015.

Asset: ETH

One-liner: The first smart contract platform, and still the biggest in terms of developer activity.

Ethereum was the first blockchain to be developed with a Turing-complete scripting language, Solidity. It was the brainchild of programmer Vitalik Buterin, who recognized the vast potential of blockchain technology through his early engagement with Bitcoin. However, after failing to convince Bitcoin core developers that the platform needed application development functionality, he wrote the white paper for Ethereum.

The founding team comprises Buterin, Anthony Di Iorio, Charles Hoskinson, Mihai Alisie, Amir Chetrit, Gavin Wood, Joseph Lubin, and Jeffrey Wilke. Several of these members have since left Ethereum to work on their own projects.

Ethereum is the current leader of smart contract space and provided a blueprint for many of its successors. It was the first blockchain to gain any significant traction with enterprise adoption, thanks in part to the formation of the Enterprise Ethereum Alliance, which boasts members including Samsung, Intel, and JP Morgan.

Ethereum is also the central hub of the decentralized finance movement, home to some of cryptos biggest dApps, including Maker and Compound.

Over the years, Ethereum has weathered several significant events, the most notable of which is The DAO incident in 2016, where a hacker exploited a vulnerability in a smart contract and stole $50 million worth of ETH.

The fallout from the incident resulted in a divide in the Ethereum community, with one side supporting a rollback of the blockchain to reclaim the funds, and the other side declaring that code is law. A controversial hard fork ensued, resulting in the formation of the Ethereum Classic blockchain.

The biggest challenge facing Ethereum, however, has been its lack of scalability. Despite being one of the most-used blockchains, it frequently suffers from network congestion. Perhaps due to a highly decentralized approach to core development, upgrades are slow to arrive and often beset by delays.

The current upgrade, dubbed ETH 2.0, has been slated for the first phase of implementation in July 2020.

The native token of the platform is ether (ETH), which is the second-biggest cryptocurrency by market cap. Ether is also used to pay the gas fees required for transactions on the platform.

Founder: Diego Gutirrez Zaldvar (now CEO of IOV Labs), Sergio Lerner, Gabriel Kurman, Adrian Eidelman, and Ruben Altman

Date of creation: RSK was founded in 2016 and launched in 2018.

Asset: RBTC, RIF

One-liner: Smart contract platform running as a sidechain of the Bitcoin blockchain.

RSK operates as a sidechain of the Bitcoin blockchain and is merge-mined with Bitcoin. It was developed to bring Ethereum-like smart contract functionality to the Bitcoin network.

Diego Gutierrez Zaldivar, CEO and founder, describes the RSK vision to Crypto Briefing as:

We developed RSK to add value and expand functionality to the Bitcoin ecosystem by providing smart contracts functionality and greater scalability, establishing the layer needed for Bitcoin to become the financial system of the future.

The RBTC token is pegged 1:1 with Bitcoin and is the native token of the RSK platform, used to pay for the gas to execute transactions.

RSK now operates as part of a technology stack with the Bitcoin network as a base layer. The RSK Infrastructure Framework (RIF) layer runs on top of RSK, providing a marketplace of developer tools. These include storage, payments, and a naming service.

RSK hasnt gained the same traction as Ethereum in the North American and European markets. However, it does have a far bigger footprint in its native Latin America.

The company that operates RSK, IOV Labs, last year acquired Taringa, the biggest social network in Latin America with over 30 million users. Its also the platform of choice for Money on Chain, which operates the Dollar on Chain stablecoin and has recently expanded into offering stablecoins collateralized by the RIF token.

RSK can scale up to around 400 transactions per second. However, some of the tools available on the RIF layer can run even faster. For example, the Lumino payments protocol can handle up to 5,000 transactions per second.

The RBTC token is merge-mined with Bitcoin, and the RSK network has previously managed to gather around 45% of the Bitcoin network hashrate, making it highly secure compared to many other platforms dependent on a smaller number of miners or nodes.

Founders: Lior Yaffe, Kristina Kalcheva

Date of creation: Launched on mainnet in January 2018.

Asset: ARDR

One-liner: Parent-and-child chain architecture with lightweight smart contract capabilities and no blockchain bloat.

Ardor is operated by Jelurida and has its roots in the Nxt blockchain, which was one of the first PoS networks and has been running since 2013. Ardor was created by the same team to overcome the adoption challenges of traditional linear blockchain architecture.

These include the use of a single token, a lack of customization capability, and blockchain bloating as a result of processing and storing every single transaction in the same way.

Ardor aims to overcome this with an architecture that comprises the main parent chain and child chains. Each child chain is entirely customizable according to user requirements and can use its own token. Ardor also makes use of stateless, lightweight smart contracts programmed in Java.

Lior Yaffe, Core Developer and Co-Founder of Ardor, explains the lightweight smart contracts as follows:

The contract code itself is a simple Java class uploaded to the blockchain and therefore digitally signed and time stamped. However, the execution of the contract is only performed by nodes who choose to run the Contract Runner addon. This removes the need for metered execution using the gas model and removes the risk of systematic failure in case the contract malfunctions.

He adds:

Furthermore, this enables contracts to work as oracles, to freely integrate with external systems and thus removes the need for a separate layer of oracles.

The first and main child chain of Ardor is Ignis, which offers unique features and functions across other child chains operating on the Ardor network. These include asset issuance and user account configuration. Ignis also provides various on-chain features, including a voting system, exchange, and data cloud.

Ardor and Ignis each operate their own tokens, under the tickers ARDR and IGNIS, respectively.

Applications running on Ardor include augmented reality game Triffic, art-focused DAO Tarasca, and real estate management platform Dominium.

Founders: Jaynti Kanani, Sandeep Nailwal, Anurag Arjun

Date of creation: 2018, mainnet launched in 2020.

Asset: MATIC

One-liner: Plasma and PoS side chains create a scalable layer 2 for the Ethereum network.

Matic Network is a layer 2 scaling solution that utilizes sidechains for off-chain computation. T

he network is secured through an adapted version of the Plasma framework and a decentralized network of Proof-of-Stake (PoS) validators.

Jaynti Kanani, a co-founder of Matic, describes the vision of the project as follows:

Matic aims to overcome the scalability and usability-related problems of the blockchain space by leveraging a combination of blockchain scaling, developer platform and tools, and a keen focus on user experience. We believe the answer to enabling widespread adoption of blockchain technology lies with second-layer solutions focused on scalability. Thus, Matic Network provides massive scaling capabilities whilst leveraging the security and decentralization of the Ethereum mainchain.

Matic Network achieves significant scalability, with a throughput of 65,000 transactions per second without compromising on decentralization.

The project achieved early recognition from some of the biggest names in crypto, with both Coinbase Venture and Binance Labs providing financial backing.

Before launching its mainnet on Jun. 3, 2020, Matic had already attracted more than 50 dApps, making it the most adopted layer 2 platform in the space. dApps on Matic encompass a variety of niches ranging from gaming to DeFi, with notable projects including Decentraland and whitelabel betting platform BetProtocol.

The networks token, MATIC, is used in a similar way to Ethereum to pay gas fees for transactions.

Whitepaper author: Douglas Horn (now founder of block producer, GoodBlock).

Date of creation: The Telos Mainnet was launched on Dec. 12, 2018, by the Telos Launch Group.

Asset: TLOS

One-liner: Telos is a dPoS blockchain based on EOSIO software with a focus on governance.

The Telos network was created to combine flexible governance and high transaction speeds using EOSIO software. Telos never held an ICO and has been a community-driven bootstrapped project since inception.

With a network capable of handling 8,000 transactions per second, the Telos platform attracted gaming apps Angry Warlords and BLOX to its platform.

With governance credentials that rival those of Tezos, Telos has also attracted several dApps for social good in its first year. Sesacash allows cross-currency conversions in Africa. Seeds is an experiment in regenerative money that incentivizes people to behave in environmentally-friendly ways. And, finally, Murmur, a blockchain-based social network, recently switched from EOS to Telos to take advantage of lower-cost transactions.

Telos lacks the profile of some of the other top smart contract platforms, but its feature-rich network and commitment to governance could give it an edge over the long run.

The network aligns itself with what it sees as a future economy built on interconnected smart contracts governed by its users. In the words of whitepaper author Douglas Horn:

The dApps coming to Telos or emerging from our own Telos Works incubator are leveraging the massive speed and capacity, functional governance, and unique tools available to any dApp on Telos, like the Telos Decide governance engine. A significant portion of developers has also expressed to us that the ethos of Telos as a truly decentralized, egalitarian, and forward-thinking platform that has managed to build itself and foster other projects without an ICO or centralized ownership is an important area of alignment with their own aims.

Founder: Dan Larimer, (now CTO of Block.one)

Date of creation: EOS was launched in January 2018.

Token: EOS

One-liner: EOS is a dPoS blockchain based on EOSIO software. It is also a top smart contract platform.

The EOS blockchain protocol is powered by the EOS token, which has consistently ranked in the top ten in terms of market cap since its launch in January 2018. Fueled by a record-setting $4 billion ICO, the EOS network emulates computing resources, including CPU, GPU, and RAM, all of which are supported by EOS token holders.

Larimer developed the delegated Proof-of-Stake (dPoS) consensus mechanism, whereby EOS token holders vote 21 block producers (BPs) to operate the network, with standby contenders on notice to assist if required.

Adrianna Mendez of Cypherglass, a founding EOS block producer and paid stand by BP, told Crypto Briefing that:

EOS continues to showcase the potential of delegated proof of stake. Two years after its launch, its the most used and fastest-growing blockchain in the world. The possibilities for developers are endless.

Delegated PoS offers speed and scalability advantages over pure PoS consensus mechanisms. Games and gambling apps dominate the top 20 apps on EOS, although a decentralized exchange, Newdex, boasts daily volumes around $15 million.

Block.one, the company behind the network, also operates a venture capital arm and launched a beta version of Voice in early 2019, a social media network poised to rival Facebook.

Founder: Silvio Micali

Date of creation: Mainnet launched Jun. 5, 2019.

Token: ALGO

One-liner: Algorand aims to build a trusted, public, and permissionless infrastructure for the borderless economy.

The Algorand network is operated by a pure proof-of-stake consensus mechanism with a transaction throughput rivaling large finance and payment networks. It is scalable to manage billions of users. It claims to be the worlds first blockchain to provide immediate transaction finality without the fear of forks.

The Singapore-based project attracted $4M in seed funding from Pillar and Union Square Ventures in early 2018. It then landed a second $64 million raise from a broad slate of investors that October.

Upon Coinbases listing of ALGO in 2019, the platforms native token was argued to be one of the fastest cryptocurrencies on the exchange.

Steve Kokinos, CEO of Algorand Inc., told Crypto Briefing that:

Smart contracts need to be scalable and secure. At Algorand weve developed smart contracts built directly into Layer-1 to operate securely without compromising scalability or security while maintaining low execution cost. By focusing on simplifying developer experiences, Algorand enables real-world use cases like cross-chain atomic transfers and regulated disbursements with rapid confirmation time and immediate finality. These use cases are made possible by our pure proof-of-stake protocol, which was designed from the ground-up to deliver a secure, scalable, and decentralized platform necessary for mainstream adoption of blockchain technology.

Early in 2020, Tether launched an Algorand version of its stablecoin on the platform, representing the first significant use of Aglorands Standard Asset (ASA) specification.

Other significant partnerships include one with World Chess, which intends to conduct a hybrid IPO and STO alongside a listing on the London Stock Exchange. AssetBlock also launched a real estate investment platform on the network in 2019, cementing Algorands reputation as a reliable partner for innovative corporate initiatives.

The high-profile smart contract platform has attracted RHOVIT, a gamified content platform, Meld Gold, an Australia-based tokenized golf asset trading network, and the tokenized investment platform, Republic.

Founders: Kathleen & Arthur Breitman

Date of creation: Mainnet launched Sep. 17, 2018.

Token: XTZ

One-liner: Tezos is the innovative brainchild of the Breitmans who wanted to create a self-amending cryptographic ledger.

The Tezos Foundation began the Tezos project with a lucrative ICO in 2017, raising some $232 million for the Swiss-based non-profit. It soon became embroiled in controversy, with a dispute between the Breitmans, who owned the IP, and Johann Gevers, the foundations president and the one in control of the projects funds.

The resultant delayed launch saw investors sue the project as confidence faded. Intended as a network that boasted unrivaled governance processes, internal governance itself had become an issue.

Despite its tumultuous start, the network was finally launched in 2018. Its governance processes were indeed innovative. With decision-making processes baked into the system, protocol upgrades proposed by developers are approved by stakeholders. Once approved, the developer is paid.

The process incentivizes decentralized development and improvements. The on-chain governance properties of the network extend to its Proof of Stake mechanism, with token stakers known as bakers earning rewards for securing the network.

As Alison Mangiero, president and co-founder of TQ Tezos told Crypto Briefing:

In Tezos, we already see widespread participation because unlike in proof of work and other stake networks, all stakeholders can help to secure the network (via baking or delegating), and avoid being diluted by inflation (of course all stakeholders can also participate in network upgrades by evaluating, proposing, or approving amendments to the protocol itself).

See more here:

Whos Afraid of Ethereum? The Top 12 Smart Contract Platforms - Crypto Briefing

Bitcoin Derivatives Exchanges to Have a Separate Page on Coinmarketcap – Ethereum World News

In brief:

There is no doubt that the rate at which changes occur in the crypto-verse is exciting. Sometimes it becomes difficult to keep up with all the transformations with respect to crypto projects as can be seen in the recent changes in the ranking system of crypto exchanges on Coinmarketcap.com. At the time of writing this, the popular Bitcoin derivatives platforms of BitMex, ByBit, and Deribit are ranked 175th, 177th, and 179th respectively.

The current rankings of BitMex, ByBit and Deribit have caused a stir in the crypto community with many traders wondering what is going on. Evidence of this can be seen in the following tweet by @CosmonautC.

Furthermore, the team at Deribit has jokingly voiced their concerns regarding the new rankings via a Tweet that stated the following.

We are glad to inform you that@CoinMarketCap has ranked Deribit exchange at #179 with a liquidity score of 0. We want to take this moment to congratulate all the exchanges on the list that weve never heard of. This is great work guys.

As shocking as the rankings of BitMex, ByBit and Deribit might be, the team at Coinmarketcap has explained that it is the first phase of changes being implemented in the exchange ranking algorithm on the platform.

In a June 8th update to the crypto community, the team at Coinmarketcap explained that the current exchange rankings apply to spot market pairs and a separate page will be added for derivative exchanges.

Please be reminded that the exchange ranking algorithm change below applies for spot market pairs and exchanges only. A separate page for derivative exchanges will be available in the near future.

In conclusion, the team at Coinmarketcap has clarified that the current exchange rankings are as a result of an initial phase of changes in the algorithm used to grade crypto exchange platforms. At the time of writing this, the algorithm is set for spot market pairs thus the discrepancies when it comes to ranking BitMex, ByBit, and Deribit. Although initially confusing to the crypto community, the changes will eventually include a separate page for derivatives exchanges and providing more accurate data with respect to BitMex, ByBit, and Deribit.

Disclaimer:This article is not meant to give financial advice. Any additional opinion herein is purely the authors and does not represent the opinion of EWN or any of its other writers. Please carry out your own research before investing in any of the numerous cryptocurrencies available. Thank you.

See the original post:

Bitcoin Derivatives Exchanges to Have a Separate Page on Coinmarketcap - Ethereum World News

Ethereum Network Hits Massive Milestone as Analyst Eyes 200% Rally | NewsBTC – newsBTC

Since the all-time highs that were seen at the start of 2018, the price of Ethereum has collapsed dramatically. From the $1,430 highs, the asset is now down approximately 85%, trading at $240 as of the time of this articles writing.

Despite the utter collapse in the market, the underlying network has seen dramatic growth. Data now shows that the number of Ethereum accounts has surpassed a key milestone: 100 million.

According to Mythos Capitals Ryan Sean Adams, the number of Ethereum addresses/accounts hit 100 million last week, just five years after the network was launched. Notably, the existence of 100 million addresses does not mean that 100 million people have used that cryptocurrency.

This milestone shows that adoption is taking place, even though it may be slower than some expected.

World powers will be forced to adapt. This is the next wave of the internet. 100m bankless bank accounts, Adams wrote with excitement on the matter.

Adams observation comes shortly after Spencer Noon, the head of crypto-native investment fund DTC Capital, identified 10 on-chain trends suggesting Ethereum is on bull market footing. Some of those are as follows:

Ethereums achievement of the 100 million account milestone comes on the back of a number of undercurrents pushing the usage of the network higher, such as growth in decentralized finance and in stablecoins.

The technical trends of Ethereum are also bullish.

Asreported by NewsBTC, Brave New Coins Josh Olszewicz shared the chart seen below just this weekend. It shows that Ethereum has entered into a key Ichimoku Cloud resistance for the first time ever.

Referencing how the asset is likely to rally to the other end of the resistance in a so-called end-to-end move, Olszewicz opined:

One-week Ethereum chart. End to end to $750 triggers within the next few months probably.

Chart of Ethereums macro price action from Brave New Coin analyst Josh Olszewicz.

According to Olszewicz, who is a specialist at Ichimoku Cloud analysis, the way in which the cloud is formed is likely to act as a price magnet pulling it to $750. Such a move would mean that Ethereum has retraced 50% of the established range while also satisfying Dow Theory.

Similarly bullish, Dan Tapiero the CEO of DTAP Capital shared on June 3rd that Ethereum is on [the verge] of explosive upmove. He noted how the cryptocurrency is about to break out of a downtrend that constrained price action over the past year, from the 2019 highs to the 2020 highs.

See original here:

Ethereum Network Hits Massive Milestone as Analyst Eyes 200% Rally | NewsBTC - newsBTC

ZCash (ZEC) Dev. Team: Chainalysis Cannot Track Shielded Transactions – Ethereum World News

In brief:

News of Chainalysis extending its reach of investigation and compliance to the ZCash and DASH blockchains stirred a few tough questions about the future of privacy in the digital asset industry. The announcement by Chainalysis was made yesterday with the team explaining that privacy features on both the ZCash and Dash blockchains were not entirely immune to scrutiny by investigators.

Dash and Zcash allow users to conduct transactions with greater privacy, but that doesnt mean they provide total anonymity. The two cryptocurrencies privacy features both in how theyre built as well as how theyre used in the real world leave room for investigators and compliance professionals to investigate suspicious or illicit activity and maintain compliance.

It is with the above background that the team at the Electric Coin Company has clarified that not all ZCash transactions can be tracked. In an elaborate Twitter thread, the Electric Coin Company, which supports the development of ZCash, explained that only transparent transactions can be tracked. However, if users of ZEC opt to use the privacy feature on ZCash, shielded transactions are completely anonymous.

Zcash is designed to give users options, by allowing them to choose Bitcoin-style (transparent) addresses or privacy-protecting (shielded) addresses. Transparent addresses work like Bitcoin transactions, which are also supported by Chainalysis.

Users of Zcash shielded addresses get stronger protection against data leakage than they would get with any other cryptocurrency today.

Chainalysis cannot trace shielded addresses, unless a specific user were to opt-in and let Chainalysis view their transaction data using their own Viewing Key (Selective Disclosure).

The team at the Electric Coin Company ended the Twitter thread by highlighting an increment in shielded transactions on the ZCash blockchain.

Disclaimer:This article is not meant to give financial advice. Any additional opinion herein is purely the authors and does not represent the opinion of EWN or any of its other writers. Please carry out your own research before investing in any of the numerous cryptocurrencies available. Thank you.

See the article here:

ZCash (ZEC) Dev. Team: Chainalysis Cannot Track Shielded Transactions - Ethereum World News

Ethereum (ETH) Down $3.22 in Last 4 Hours, Outperforms All Top Cryptos to Start the Day; Started Today Up 0.7% – CFDTrading

Ethereum 4 Hour Price Update

Updated June 09, 2020 03:20 AM GMT (11:20 PM EST)

The choppiness in the recent four-hour candle price action of Ethereum continues; to start the current 4 hour candle, it came in at a price of 243.25 US dollars, down 1.31% ($3.22) since the previous 4 hours. Those trading within the Top Cryptos asset class should know that Ethereum was the worst performer in the class during the previous 4 hours.

Ethereum is up 0.7% ($1.72) since the day prior, marking the 3rd day in a row it has gone up. This move happened on lower volume, as yesterdays volume was down 22.29% from the day before and down 38.06% from the same day the week before. On a relative basis, the day prior was pretty good: Ethereum bested all 5 of the assets in the Top Cryptos class Below is a daily price chart of Ethereum.

Trend traders will want to observe that the strongest trend appears on the 30 day horizon; over that time period, price has been moving up. For another vantage point, consider that Ethereums price has gone up 9 of the previous 14 trading days.

Behold! Here are the top tweets related to Ethereum:

We had the pleasure of hosting @sassal0x, Co-Founder of @ethhub_io, for our most recent Masterclass session on The Growth of DeFi.Anthony explained how #DeFi on Ethereum has evolved over the past 3 years, how it started, and where DeFi is headed in the next few years.

Airdrop update!Due to the high fees on the Ethereum network, sending airdrop is x10 of the original cost. We apologize to all airdrop participants for the delays.Airdrop will be distributed when the fee goes down a bit.Thank you all.@cctip_io airdrop 300 REMI 200

People will be taken completely off guard by the coming rise of $QNT.They will regret not doing their research and cant believe they didnt see it coming when it was so obvious.This will be an Ethereum type of run, and fact is, even at $100+, its still a great buy!

For a longer news piece related to ETH thats been generating discussion, check out:

Ethereum Unique Addresses Surpasses 100 Million, Investors Are Holding More ETH than BTC Now

Besides the gains, the total number of addresses holding ETH at 39.96 million now surpasses those holding bitcoin at 30.1 million, as per IntoTheBlock.This growth is seen as Ethereum makes strides towards launching Ethereum 2.0 which is evident from the number of wallets holding more than 32 ETH, the threshold to stake, which has been increasing over the last year.As of June 3rd, 22.39 million addresses have been holding 61.22 million ETH for over a year now.

Read the original post:

Ethereum (ETH) Down $3.22 in Last 4 Hours, Outperforms All Top Cryptos to Start the Day; Started Today Up 0.7% - CFDTrading

Ethereum-Based Tether Better Distributed Than Other Stablecoins – Report – Cryptonews

Source: Adobe/dennizn

Among the explored stablecoins, Tether (USDT)'s ERC20 version is "particularly well-distributed," crypto market analysis firm Coin Metrics said, stressing that only a few accounts own a large majority of five other stablecoins' supply.

Since its creation six years ago, the dollar-pegged Tether expanded to other networks from the Omni protocol (itself built on top of the Bitcoin blockchain) on which it was originally built. Tether now has Omni, Ethereum, Tron, and EOS versions. But even when issued by the same entity, "stablecoins on different networks have varying outcomes in supply and activity distribution," said Coin Metrics.

We can understand how a stabecoin is used by exploring its distribution, according to the firm.

If a stablecoin is used on few exchanges only, and lacks other activity, it means its distribution is not broad but concentrated in few addresses, and vice versa. "The ERC20 variant of Tether shines as being particularly well distributed amongst its holders," wrote the firm. On the other hand, just six accounts or less than that own more than 80% of the supply for Tether (Tron), Gemini Dollar (GUSD), Binance USD (BUSD), USDK, and HUSD.

One can look at how many accounts are responsible for the majority of the on-chain activity - a small number suggests not much use outside of a few exchanges. Ranked from the highest down, USDT takes the 3rd place, the ERC20 variant the 7th, and the TRC20 variant the 9th place out of ten. The most active Tether on Tron accounts, says the report, are connected to "dividend" payouts, being occasionally responsible for more than 90% of Tether on Tron transfers.

Meanwhile, while Paxos (PAX) appears to have a broad active user base, said Coin Metrics, the two most active accounts are linked to ponzi scheme MMM BSC, with more than 40% of all PAX transfers directly related to it.

Whether stablecoin is used as a means of payment for retail users or as liquidity rails for traders, can be determined by the height of payment value. There are many retail-like transactions (those below USD 100) with USDT on Tron and PAB, "probably due to the presence of MMM and other dividend schemes on these assets." Others, like HUSD and BUSD, have a large share of payments above USD 100,000.

Ranked number 3, Tether's current total market capitalization is USD 9.4 billion. ___

Learn more: Mysterious Stablecoin Rally Marked With Regional Differences

View post:

Ethereum-Based Tether Better Distributed Than Other Stablecoins - Report - Cryptonews

Ethereum, XRP, and Litecoin Outperform Amidst Market-Wide Crash – Crypto Briefing

The cryptocurrency market is going through a period of high volatility, but there are critical support levels preventing Ethereum, XRP, and Litecoin from a steeper decline. Key Takeaways

Ethereum, XRP, and Litecoin continue to hold steady despite the recent market-wide crash. A new series of developments around these altcoins are making the headlines, which could set them up for major price movement.

Grayscale Ethereum Trust, a financial product that enables investors to gain exposure to the price movement of ETH, has been on a tear over the last two weeks. The FINRA-approved investment vehicle rose from a low of $96 to recently reach a new yearly high of $217.

Such a powerful bullish impulse represents a 127% price increase. This impulse may indicate that institutional demand for Ethereum is skyrocketing. But large investors are not the only ones trying to get a piece of the smart contracts giant.

Bitfinex, a retail-oriented cryptocurrency exchange, reported that the number of long Ether positions on its platform has been pilling up. Since the beginning of the year, they have risen by more than 580%. The Hong Kong-based trading firm recently recorded a new all-time high of nearly half a billion dollars worth of long ETH positions.

While demand for Ethereum goes through the roof, its price has been contained within an ascending parallel channel since mid-March. The recent rebound from the lower boundary of the channel sent Ether towards the middle line of this technical pattern. This resistance barrier is now key to Ethers trend.

By breaking above it, the smart contracts giant would likely rise towards the top of the channel as it has done it in the past three months. But if this supply wall can reject the price of ETH, it is reasonable to expect a downswing to the bottom of this technical formation.

The Fibonacci retracement indicator adds credence to this ambiguous outlook. A spike in volume that allows Ethereum to turn the 78.6% Fib level into support could lead to a further advance to mid-Februarys high of $287. Failing to do so, however, may see this altcoin drop towards the 61.8% Fib level.

It is worth noting that in the event of a correction, the 61.8% Fib level must hold for the uptrend to remain intact. Otherwise, Ethereum could plummet to the 38.2% Fib level that sits around $165.

Network validators seem ready to introduce a new feature to the XRP ledger (XRPL) dubbed Checks. The idea behind it is to implement a system similar to paper checks that allow network users to transfer funds intermittently.

Checks work similarly to personal paper checks. The sender signs a transaction to create a Check for a specific maximum amount and destination. Later, the destination can cash the Check to receive up to the specified amount, reads the amendment.

Although this attribute was first proposed in 2018, a UNL validator recently brought it back to life, and it is only one vote away from being approved.

This shows that Ripple has been staying true to its long-term roadmap, which is consistent with the spikes in development activity seen over the past few months, based on data from Santiment.

From a technical perspective, the cross-border remittances token is currently sitting in a no-trade zone. The area is defined by the 50 and 200-day moving averages. These support and resistance levels are hovering around $0.20 and $0.215, respectively.

Breaking above this no-trade zone may see XRP rise towards early Mays high of $0.236 or even higher. If this were to happen, the next significant resistance levels to watch out are the 127.2% and 141.4% Fib levels.

On the reverse, an increase in the selling pressure behind this cryptocurrency could push itbelow the 50-day moving average. Moving past this supply barrier may see it drop to the 61.8% or the 50% Fib levels.

Litecoins Mimblewimble-based privacy efforts finally have a testnet launch date. David Burkett, the developer behind the subproject, announced that he had completed the implementation of blocks logic.

This means that when a MimbleWimble block is received, it will be fully validated, added to the chain, and the UTXO set will be updated, said Burkett.

Now, the evangelist of the privacy protocol is going to start working on the mempool to speed up the process of mining MimbleWimble blocks. He also shared a roadmap to launch the testnet by the end of the summer.

This is all subject to change, he said, but in June, he plans to start mining valid chains with MW extension blocks. By July, Burkett wants to find a way to make different syncing approaches work smoothly together. By the end of August the testnet should go live.

Despite the significance of the announcement, Litecoin continues consolidating within a narrow trading range. The price action of this altcoin has been contained between the $42 support level and the $49 resistance since late April.

Throughout this stagnation phase, the Bollinger bands were forced to squeeze on LTCs 1-day chart. Wild price movements typically succeed squeezes. The longer the squeeze, the higher the probability of a strong breakout.

Since this technical index does not provide a clear path of where Litecoin could be headed next, the area between the support mentioned earlier and resistance levels is a reasonable no-trade zone. A decisive impulse outside of this area will determine the direction of the trend.

Upon the break of the overhead resistance, the next major hurdle is the 50% Fib level that sits at $54.5. Conversely, a spike in the selling pressure behind Litecoin that allows it to break below support could send it to the 78.6% Fib level at $37.5.

The last few days have been quite dramatic in the cryptocurrency industry. Bitcoin broke through the infamous $10,000 resistance level sending investors and market participants alike into greed, according to the Crypto Fear and Greed Index. But only a few hours after that happened, the bellwether cryptocurrency took a brutal $1,000 nosedive that erased these gains in a matter of five minutes.

Data from Skew reveals that this price action caused the liquidation of over $200 million worth of long and short Bitcoin positions on the crypto derivatives exchange BitMEX.

Regardless of the recent levels of volatility, the altcoins described in this analysis continue to hold above critical levels of support. If they continue to hold, these coins could lead the next bull cycle.

The information on or accessed through this website is obtained from independent sources we believe to be accurate and reliable, but Decentral Media, Inc. makes no representation or warranty as to the timeliness, completeness, or accuracy of any information on or accessed through this website. Decentral Media, Inc. is not an investment advisor. We do not give personalized investment advice or other financial advice. The information on this website is subject to change without notice. Some or all of the information on this website may become outdated, or it may be or become incomplete or inaccurate. We may, but are not obligated to, update any outdated, incomplete, or inaccurate information.

You should never make an investment decision on an ICO, IEO, or other investment based on the information on this website, and you should never interpret or otherwise rely on any of the information on this website as investment advice. We strongly recommend that you consult a licensed investment advisor or other qualified financial professional if you are seeking investment advice on an ICO, IEO, or other investment. We do not accept compensation in any form for analyzing or reporting on any ICO, IEO, cryptocurrency, currency, tokenized sales, securities, or commodities.

See full terms and conditions.

Litecoin's $70,000 Mimblewimble Development Plan Has Begun

Bitcoin Halving Readies Ethereum, XRP, and Litecoin for Bullish Breako...

Bitcoin Crashes to $9,000, Indicators Point to a Rebound

Read more:

Ethereum, XRP, and Litecoin Outperform Amidst Market-Wide Crash - Crypto Briefing

Top 3 Price Prediction Bitcoin, Ethereum, Ripple: Crypto bulls treading water ahead of a new week – FXStreet

The most dominantly traded crypto coin, Bitcoin, is side-lined below 9700 heading into the weekly closing. Ethereum and Ripple follow suit amid a lackluster trading activity seen across the crypto space on Sunday. Ethereum, however, outperforms the rest two on a weekly basis, as it remains on track for 2% weekly gains. The total market capitalization of the top 20 cryptocurrencies now stands at $274.88 billion, as cited by CoinMarketCap.

The top three coins are awaiting fresh impetus/ catalyst, with FXStreets Confluence Detector indicating key support and resistance levels to consider ahead of a new trading week.

Amid broader market indecision, Bitcoinis likely to face stiff resistance at 9708, the confluence of Fib 61.8% 1D, Fib 23.6% 1M and SMA 200 1H, on a convincing upside break.

The immediate hurdle above the latter is aligned at 9758, where SMA 10 1D, SMA 100 1H and Bollinger Band 1H Middle intersect. Next up, the bulls aim for 9808 (Fib 38.2% 1W and Previous Day High).

To the downside, the immediate downside should find minor support at 9558, Fib 23.6% 1W and Previous Day Low.

Should the bulls fail to defend the aforesaid support, the selling pressure will likely accelerate towards 9500 amid a lack of significant supports.

According to Ethereums near-term technical view, the ETH bulls are struggling to extend the recent recovery mode, as the 243.07 level remains a tough nut to crack. That level is the confluence of Fib 38.2% 1D, SMA50 1H and SMA5 4H.

The bullish pressure will likely intensify above that level, triggering an extensive rally towards 255.64 (Previous Week High and Pivot Point 1W R1), in absence of strong resistance levels.

Alternatively, a cluster of supports is seen around 240-238, which could likely limit the losses. A breach of the latter could open floors towards the next relevant support at 225.46, the Previous Week Low and Pivot Point 1W S1.

Rippleis trapped in an extremely tight range just above the 0.20 handle, with the immediate upside capped around 0.2050, the major confluence zone of Fib 38.2% 1D, SMA200 4H and SMA5 1D.

A sustained breakthrough above the last could test the 0.2063 level (Previous Day High). A bullish break to the upside is likely to fuel a rally in the spot towards the next significant resistance, now located at 0.2274 Previous Month High and Pivot Point 1M R1.

The coin lacks a clear directional bias, at the moment, as the bears challenge the 0.2020 support, the intersection of Fib 61.8% 1D and SMA50 1D.

A break below the last would call for a test of the psychological 0.2000 level, which is critical to hold the near-term recovery momentum.

See all thecryptocurrency technical levels.

More:

Top 3 Price Prediction Bitcoin, Ethereum, Ripple: Crypto bulls treading water ahead of a new week - FXStreet

On "Darwinism" – Scientific American Blog Network

He could have just said he didnt believe in evolution, or that evolution had flaws. Or, he could have said that a book with a whole unit on evolution was just too much. But William Buckingham, of the Dover Area School Board in Pennsylvania, didnt use the E word when he explained his objections to the biology textbook selected by the science teachers at Dover High School. Instead, he invoked a term that didnt even appear in that textbook. Prentice Halls Biology: The Living Science, he claimed, was laced with Darwinism from beginning to end. Surely, he must have thought, Darwinism was a disqualifying slander that everyone could understand.

As he explained his remarks to a reporter, Buckingham expanded on that theme, once again invoking the name of Darwin rather than the name of the field itself. Its okay to teach Darwin, said Buckingham, but you have to balance it with something else, such as creationism. Later that year, the school board attempted to do exactly that, pairing Darwinism with Intelligent Design, and leading to the landmark Kitzmiller v. Dover trial in 2005. The defenders of evolution won a resounding victory in that trial, but afterwards I was left to wonder how Darwins own name had come to be used as a slur against science.

To find the intellectual roots of that transformation, one need look no further than a 1998 essay by one of Americas greatest living writers, Marilynne Robinson. Author of novels such as Housekeeping, Home and Gilead, for which she won the Pulitzer Prize in 2005, Robinson is also the author of Darwinism, a provocative essay that forms the cornerstone of her 1998 collection of essays, The Death of Adam. Robinson is no creationist. In fact, she writes that creationism, a caricature of religion, is the best thing that could have happened to Darwinism, since it justifies Darwinist contempt for the whole of religion. What, then, is her objection to evolution?

Surprisingly, she does not seem to have one, at least not a scientific objection. In fact, she regards Darwins work as impressive, and makes no argument for a young Earth, the fixity of species or any of the other usual creationist canards. But to her mind, Darwinism is something else again. She writes that Charles Darwin had a cheerful interest in the extermination of races, that Darwinism is harsh and crude, and that Darwinists regard the human animal as a creature who shares essential attributes with whatever beast has recently been observed behaving shabbily in the state of nature.

Robinson makes no case for the existence of a historical Adam or the Garden of Eden, but she clearly laments the way in which evolution, or Darwinism, has dispelled the civilizing myth of Adam, and the key assumptions that once formed the bedrock of Western culture, even the culture of science itself. If one were to seek an intellectual founding mother for the use of Darwinism as a slander against evolution, Robinson would surely get that honor.

A number of purposes are served by reducing an entire scientific field to an ism based on the name of its founder. The first is obvious. Evolution then becomes an ideology, not a field of science. This view is on full display at the lavishly appointed Creation Museum in Petersburg, Kentucky, where visitors are assured that scientific data can be interpreted in two waysfrom a Darwinist perspective, or from a creationist point of view. Because both depend only upon ones preconceptions, the creationist viewpoint is just as valid as any other.

Like any supposed ism, Darwinism has an agenda, and its not just a scientific one. It dismisses moral values as the epiphenomena of natural selection, it promotes homosexuality, ruthless competition, selfishness and racism, and it seeks to explain the gems of western civilization, its art, music and literature, as nothing more than individual gambits that advance the artists own interests in sex and reproduction. These supposed evils derive from the way in which it advances a strictly materialistic view of nature, one that, in Robinsons words, denies the mind/soul as spirit, and regards the brain as nothing more than a lump of meat. Darwinism requires the disengagement of conscience, and the grand scale disparagement of the traits that distinguish us from animals. And Darwinists, she notes, take the darkest possible view of the animals.

The overuse of Darwins own name facilitates another line of attack, by pretending that the field relies entirely on Darwins own work, fashioned in an age before the modern sciences of genetics, biochemistry and molecular biology emerged to confirm and expand his ideas. This allows the pretense that evolution is a stolid, unchanging field, with few new ideas that might refresh its 19th century heritage. Any scientist would scoff at this, of course, knowing the vigor that new discoveries constantly infuse into evolutionary biology. But to laypeople, unfamiliar with the rapid pace of scientific discovery, this can be a persuasive argument.

Finally, by constantly railing against pernicious Darwinism, the advocate can map the many personal faults and flaws of Charles Darwin and his like-minded contemporaries onto evolution itself. Darwins racism is thereby presumed to be inherent to the field, as is the imperial condescension that might be found in any upper-class Briton of the period. Closer to the present day, the eugenics movement can be linked to Darwinism as well, misrepresenting the science of evolution as justification for the horrors inflicted in its name.

What, then, is to be done? Should we abstain from the use of Darwins name, stop reading The Origin of Species or co-opt the term by applying it broadly to evolutionary science? While I dont think thats necessary, we should keep in mind that many of our professional colleagues have indeed attached the authority of evolution to assertions that are more political and cultural than biological. One such field is evolutionary psychology, a discipline in which evolutionary principles can indeed be used to great effect. But it is also a field in which Darwinian just-so arguments have been used to explain everything from male and female shopping behavior to music and to tell us that the impulse to rape was favored by natural selectionso all males are potential rapists. A gentler example of this cultural overreach is proudly advanced by David Sloan Wilson, president of the Evolution Institute, who proclaims that in this century the theory of evolution will expand to include all human-related knowledge, including anthropology, art, culture, economics, history, politics, psychology, religion, and sociology. In short, step aside, humanists and social scientists, were taking over.

Maybe so. But Im still waiting for an evolutionary explanation of the thrilling beauty of a Mozart symphony or a James Joyce short story, to say nothing of a truly biological explanation for the particular political situations in the U.S., Venezuela or Germany. In advocating for greater public understanding of evolution, we might do well to keep in mind that it is a theory for the origin of species, not the explanation of all things human, great and small.

But there is a deeper, more powerful strategy that can get to the very heart of the fundamental concerns of intellectuals like Robinson and laypeople who share her concern that evolution diminishes the status of the human person. That is to use evolution itself to highlight the exceptional nature of our species. Yes, there was an element of truth in Henry Gees admonition that There is nothing special about being human, any more than there is anything special about being a guinea pig or a geranium. Frans de Waal made a similar point regarding the human intellect. We are, he asserted, animals not only in body but also in mind. Science blogger P. Z. Myers was even more explicit in his efforts to take us down a notch: we [humans] arent any more special to the universe than a sea slug. While all of these statements emphasize our full-fledged membership in the animal kingdom, they miss somethingsomething essential to a genuine understanding of the place our species holds in the evolutionary narrative.

Referring to the work of two great pioneers of animal behavior, the late Jacob Bronowski wryly pointed out that their studies of birds and rodents fell somewhat short of accounting for the most important details of human behavior: There must be something unique about man because otherwise, evidently, the ducks would be lecturing about Konrad Lorenz, and the rats would be writing papers about B. F. Skinner. That is exactly the point.

We are the children of evolution in every sense, part of Darwins fabled tangled bank. We must never forget that. But we must also remember that we are the only creatures to emerge from that thicket and make sense of it all. Darwinism does not diminish us. Rather, it puts the human experiment into a truly scientific perspective. We are not just hairless bipedal primates. We are creatures capable of the fugues of Bach, the verses of Yeats, the stories of Twain, the creations of Dal and, for that matter, the mathematics of Gdel, Ramanujan and Turing.

In contemplating the lessons of evolution for our species and our culture, this is how we should overcome the mindless use of Darwinism as a slur. Some may feel demeaned by our evolutionary heritage, but I would argue that the more appropriate emotions are joy and delight. Joy that we are approaching a genuine understanding of the world in which we live, and delight at being the very first stirrings of true consciousness in the vastness of the cosmos. Far from diminishing us, knowing the details of Adams journey ennobles each of us as a carrier of something truly preciousthe genetic, biological, and cultural heritage of life itself. Evolution describes not the death of Adam, but his triumph. That is the great truth of our story.

Go here to read the rest:

On "Darwinism" - Scientific American Blog Network

Darwinism Quotes (148 quotes) – Goodreads

[Said during a debate when his opponent asserted that atheism and belief in evolution lead to Nazism:]

Atheism by itself is, of course, not a moral position or a political one of any kind; it simply is the refusal to believe in a supernatural dimension. For you to say of Nazism that it was the implementation of the work of Charles Darwin is a filthy slander, undeserving of you and an insult to this audience. Darwins thought was not taught in Germany; Darwinism was so derided in Germany along with every other form of unbelief that all the great modern atheists, Darwin, Einstein and Freud were alike despised by the National Socialist regime.

Now, just to take the most notorious of the 20th century totalitarianisms the most finished example, the most perfected one, the most ruthless and refined one: that of National Socialism, the one that fortunately allowed the escape of all these great atheists, thinkers and many others, to the United States, a country of separation of church and state, that gave them welcome if its an atheistic regime, then how come that in the first chapter of Mein Kampf, that Hitler says that hes doing Gods work and executing Gods will in destroying the Jewish people? How come the fuhrer oath that every officer of the Party and the Army had to take, making Hitler into a minor god, begins, I swear in the name of almighty God, my loyalty to the Fuhrer? How come that on the belt buckle of every Nazi soldier it says Gott mit uns, God on our side? How come that the first treaty made by the Nationalist Socialist dictatorship, the very first is with the Vatican? Its exchanging political control of Germany for Catholic control of German education. How come that the church has celebrated the birthday of the Fuhrer every year, on that day until democracy put an end to this filthy, quasi-religious, superstitious, barbarous, reactionary system?

Again, this is not a difference of emphasis between us. To suggest that theres something fascistic about me and about my beliefs is something I won't hear said and you shouldn't believe. Christopher Hitchens

Read this article:

Darwinism Quotes (148 quotes) - Goodreads

Darwinism in full play as the pandemic rages – Deccan Herald

If you are, like most people, anxiously awaiting the good news that the lockdown has finally been lifted, in all likelihood you missed out on all the other news that have been making the headlines recently. Here is a sample of those headlines: How data can aid the fight against COVID-19; Facebook invests $5.7 billion in Indian internet giant Jio; Chile will issue immunity cards to people who have recovered from the virus; Why the wealthy fear pandemics; Miamis rich-poor divide is exposed by flawed Covid-19 testing; With selective coronavirus coverage, China builds a culture of hate; In India, a pandemic of prejudice and repression.

I find the above disconcerting because the overall theme of the articles contents reflects social Darwinism or survival of the fittest. It is hard not to miss the pivotal roles played by social media, e-commerce and money in setting the parameters of coronavirus testing, which is crucial to containing the pandemic.

Now that Facebook has acquired a 9.9% stake in Reliance Jio, it is only a matter of time before FB ends up owning Jio, whose assets of $26 billion pale in comparison to FBs $133 billion. If you think it wont happen, think again. Walmarts attempt to enter the Indian market in a big way was initially rebuffed, but it found a backdoor by buying up Flipkart, Indias e-commerce giant. At the time of the takeover, Flipkart had assets worth $2 billion versus Walmarts $236 billion. FBs first attempt to enter the India market by offering Free Basics was strongly rebuffed. It has since found a backdoor by zeroing in on Jio. All of this does not bode well for the public.

In an incredibly self-serving op-ed piece in the Washington Post, Facebooks CEO Mark Zuckerberg opined that Facebook was in a unique position to help researchers and health authorities get the information they would need to respond to the pandemic since it knew the identities of large numbers of people. Quoting from the op-ed piece, The world has faced pandemics before, but this time we have a new superpower: the ability to gather and share data for good. Note the use of the words we and superpower.

While we lost the war on privacy a long time ago, I think there is still time to contain its fallout.

When a successful vaccine is developed, I presume FB will be in a unique position to identify aggrieved communities to whom the vaccine should be made available. Just as effectively as it did in the Cambridge Analytica scandal?

In two recent coronavirus testing studies done in California, one set of volunteer participants was drawn from a random sample of email addresses and telephone. The second set of participants was obtained through advertising on Facebook. The first people to volunteer came from wealthy neighbourhoods.

Even though the population of New York State is 19.4 million (55% white, 15% black) and that of the State of Nebraska is 1.93 million (86% white, 4% black), NY received a paltry $12,000 in federal aid per infected case while Nebraska received more than $380,000. Likewise, in Europe, Hungary and Poland (both countries have been actively gutting democratic institutions over the past two years) which have recorded around 1,143 and 545 coronavirus deaths respectively, received 48 million Euros in assistance, whereas Italy and Spain, which have more than 60,000 deaths between them, received 6.5 million Euros.

As an article in the Guardian newspaper nicely put it, Using Big Tech to tackle coronavirus risks swapping one lockdown for another. To which I might add, physical lockdown is only temporary and will end, sooner or later, but the virtual lockdown never will.

See the article here:

Darwinism in full play as the pandemic rages - Deccan Herald

Personalization, Prediction and Prevention Drive the Second Transformation of Medicine – BioSpace

The pandemic is a wake-up call to humanity to understand the perils of not appreciating the importance of health and healthcare, said Ralph Snyderman, once dubbed the father of personalized medicine, and chancellor emeritus, Duke University, said during Demy-Coltons first virtual salon, The Future of Healthcare: Innovation, Change and Urgency. He believes it will usher in the second major transformation of medicine.

We knew the importance of health and healthcare, but it wasnt front of mind, he said. Faced with the possibility of losing it, we have stopped dead in our tracks.

Now, the healthcare system is innovating to address the pain points the pandemic revealed. Specifically, it is becoming more proactive, preventative and personalized.

Genomics is making those innovations possible. With whole genome sequencing, its finally clear that health is determined by a combination of genetics, individual actions and exposure to environmental conditions throughout life. As Snyderman said, The improvement of health is a dynamic continuum. It must have the individual at the helm.

Sweeping changes will come in the next decade.

I anticipate the ability to predict an individuals susceptibility to disease, to determine the factors that enhance or diminish that disease, and to track them over time. That will be the second major transformation of medicine, behind germ theory.

Millions of people have had their genomes sequenced, he noted, and wearables are commonplace.

That makes it easy for individuals and their physicians to monitor and track activity, sleep, electrolytes, glucose levels and many other elements of health. Apps even remind patients when to take their medications, thus improving medical compliance. The ability to accumulate, aggregate and analyze massive quantities of data only adds value to the sequencing.

Machine learning, a subset of artificial intelligence (AI), can tease apart the factors that affect health. As this occurs, he pointed out, The ability to predict an individuals health pathway is becoming more and more vivid. When genome sequencing and the aggregation of information from wearables becomes a global phenomenon, predictive healthcare will become more accurate and more powerful.

Snyderman equates the healthcare system of the future to GPS systems in cars today.

Were far from it now, but in 10 years, there will be meaningful tools (to plot personalized pathways) for individuals to navigate their own health, Snyderman said.

Today, concierge medicine plots such pathways for those who can afford it. In the future, with digital tools, that can expand to the much larger middle ground of people.

The health delivery infrastructure will be transformed, too. Were already seeing that.

Until recently, healthcare was delivered by large groups of physicians from specific locations. But, as the COVID-19 pandemic showed, The existing hospital network isnt sustainable for the future. We need to distribute care. While hospitals will continue to be a hub where severe illnesses are treated, Snyderman advocates moving many of the less critical procedures to community hospitals.

CVS and Walgreens, among others, already are embracing the distributed healthcare model by placing primary care clinics in many of their retail stores. CVS is augmenting that with onsite telemedicine. With health advice available through online symptom checkers and Google searches, healthcare clearly is moving online.

This represents a major transfer of power from the provider to the individual, he said, helping patients navigate their own health. In the future, this trend will be much greater, and also is more cost-effective, he added.

The brave new world of healthcare comes with cautions. Research published May 18 in the Medical Journal of Australia found that online symptom checkers were right only 36% of the time.

There also are privacy concerns.

With your health records a part of a large ecosystem, who owns them? Snyderman asked. The Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) provides clear guidelines and severe penalties for those sharing patient-identified information beyond the care team, but the rapidly evolving climate around medical information makes it essential to ensure the HIPAA protections remain adequate.

Another concern involves the risk of replacing one monolithic structure with another, as commercial players including multiple healthcare systems, third party payers and digital health partners become involved. Privacy and ethics go hand-in-hand, Snyderman said.

Ultimately, Snyderman predicted a hybrid model will emerge. He envisions virtual caregiver visits for some things and personal visits for others. Theres value to human interaction with a caregiver who knows you and can identify your current health status, proximate risks and ways to mitigate them.

Personalization, prediction and prevention are increasingly possible and will form the basis of the transformation of 21st century medicine that began decades ago with genomic sequencing. The traditional healthcare system is changing as researchers learn more about what drives health and disease. We are learning, Snyderman says, that, Regardless what we do, the most important individual in ones health is oneself.

See the rest here:

Personalization, Prediction and Prevention Drive the Second Transformation of Medicine - BioSpace

Art and medicine: Looking at the role of portraiture in health care – American Medical Association

There are artistic representations of medicine and illness in anatomical and physiological illustrations of the human body, medical instruction manuals, treatment documentation and aesthetic works. These have facilitated discovery and understanding for different parts of medicine, health, illness and disability.

In particular, the use of portraits can be instrumental in representing and explaining medical pathologies, pathopsychologies and trauma. Portraiture in health care can be used to introduce innovative strategies for perceiving ethical and aesthetic value. Most importantly, it can also motivate deeper and fuller understanding of the experiences of patients, physicians and others in health care.

The June issue ofAMA Journal of Ethics(@JournalofEthics) features numerous perspectives on portraiture in health care and gives you an opportunity to earn CME credit.

Articles include:

In the journals June podcast, expert James Van Arsdall, EdD, social science faculty at Metropolitan Community College in Omaha, Nebraska and an advanced trauma life support educator for the American College of Surgeons, shares his experience of sitting for a portrait after his treatment for oral cancer.

Mark Gilbert, PhD, is an artist and a researcher associated with the Faculty of Medicine at Dalhousie University in Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada. On the podcast, Gilbert discusses how he came to do portraiture in clinical settings.

Listen toor watchprevious episodesof the podcast, Ethics Talk, or subscribe iniTunesor other services.

TheAMAJournal of EthicsCME modules, How Portraiture Can Help Build Therapeutic Capacity in Patient-Clinician Relationshipsand Ethics Talk: Portraiture in Clinical Contexts, areeachdesignated by the AMA for a maximum of 0.5AMA PRA Category 1 Credit.

The offerings are part of theAMA EdHub, an online platform that brings together high-quality CME, maintenance of certification, and educational contentin one placewith relevant learning activities, automated credit tracking and reporting for some states and specialty boards.

Learn more aboutAMA CME accreditation.

The journals editorial focus is on commentaries and articles that offer practical advice and insights for medical students and physicians.Submit a manuscriptfor publication.

The 2020 JohnConley Ethics Essay Contestand theConley Art of Medicine Contestare now open for submission. Read the essay prompt and see visual media requirements on theAMA Journal of Ethicswebsite.

Apply to become a theme issue editorto help the journal develop theme issues on interested and neglected topics.

Visit the journalsCOVID-19 Ethics Resource Centerfor articles, podcasts, and videos relevant to the ethical challenges of the current pandemic.

Upcoming issues of theAMA Journal of Ethicswill focus on humor in health care as well as opioids and public health.Sign upto receive email alerts when new issues are published.

View original post here:

Art and medicine: Looking at the role of portraiture in health care - American Medical Association

Sustained Acoustic Medicine Device sam Offers an Alternative Solution to Pain Medication and Surgery – Yahoo Finance

TRUMBULL, Conn., June 9, 2020 /PRNewswire/ --The advanced sustained acoustic medicine device (sam) from ZetrOZ Systems offers physicians and orthopedic surgeons an alternative solution to pain medication and surgery for their patients. Medical providers can prescribe sam, the only FDA-cleared long-duration ultrasound device, for prescription home-use to treat arthritis and soft tissue injuries.

sam is a non-invasive prescription medical device that is applied over the target injury and delivers a localized treatment. The device is an excellent option for avoiding medication and delaying surgery, as well as improving postoperative healing and surgical outcomes. sam is especially beneficial for patients who struggle with poor healing capability.

In addition to accelerating and improving the healing process, sam is also a very effective treatment for pain arising from conditions such as arthritis, back spasms, disk herniation and tendonitis.

Sixty million people suffer from arthritis and 50 million people struggle with back pain in the United States alone. The leadership team at ZetrOZ Systems set a goal to help 100 million patients who are in pain or facing surgery. sam does not block or mask pain. The device treats the damaged tissue and inflammatory response that causes it, getting to the root of the problem. ZetrOZ Systems believes that not all patients require surgery or medication.

"We want physicians and orthopedic surgeons to know they are not limited in the options they can offer patients. sam gives them a viable, convenient alternative to prescribing drugs or putting patients under the knife," said Dr. George Lewis, chief executive officer of ZetrOZ Systems.

While sam is technologically sophisticated, it is also easy to use and apply, making it the perfect choice for home application by patients. The solution is convenient, as patients can engage in most activities while wearing it. sam ships directly to the patient's home, conserving clinic time and requiring little followup from medical providers.

Medical providers can prescribe sam using a simple Rx form available at samrecover.com. Patients typically undergo treatment for eight to 10 weeks. Each treatment includes the sam device and five to eight packs of ultrasound coupling patches. Those with chronic arthritis pain will continue to use the device beyond 10 weeks to maintain their condition.

About ZetrOZ Systems

ZetrOZ Systems is an FDA cGMP and ISO 13585 medical technology company headquartered in the southern coastal region of Connecticut. The organization also has manufacturing facilities across the United States. ZetrOZ Systems produced UltrOZ, samSport and samPro 2.0 to provide safe and effective treatment options for prevalent conditions such as arthritis. Learn more at zetroz.comand samrecover.com.

Related Images

image1.jpg

View original content to download multimedia:http://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/sustained-acoustic-medicine-device-sam-offers-an-alternative-solution-to-pain-medication-and-surgery-301072558.html

SOURCE ZetrOZ Systems

Read the rest here:

Sustained Acoustic Medicine Device sam Offers an Alternative Solution to Pain Medication and Surgery - Yahoo Finance

BIO 2020: Cell and Gene Therapies Will Dominate Medicine in 30 Years – BioSpace

One day, cell and gene therapies will be as common as small molecules and antibody-based therapies are today, according to panelists at BIOs June 8 virtual session, The Next Generation of Medicine: Cell Therapies, Gene Therapies and Beyond.

Because cell and gene therapies have the potential to address complex biological issues such as dysregulation, translocation and mutations, they can use that power to change what the body is doing.

So, while small molecules and antibody therapies will still be around 30 years from now, they will be less important. Cell and gene therapies will dominate, James Sabry, global head of pharma partnering at Roche, said.

In focusing on the future of healthcare, Roche is investing in small company innovation. Its deals with Spark Therapeutics and Adaptive Biotechnologies are prime examples of what it seeks to achieve 10, 20 or even 30 years from now.

Were interested not just in the incremental improvements of antibody therapies or small molecules, but in identifying what could be the therapeutic modalities that will dominate the landscape, Sabry said.

That means cell and gene therapies. Already several gene therapies are approved and others are various companies pipelines.

Spark Therapeutics is working extensively in gene therapies for monogenetic disorders, including hemophilia, said Federico Mingozzi, CSO of Spark.

Spark is validating its gene therapy platform approach with the goal of using it against many more complex diseases.

Assuming a long time frame, one could even imagine using the body as a factory for making antibodies, Sabry said. Essentially, it could be possible to one day turn tissues into biofactories.

Adaptive Biotechnologies has taken its approach to immune-drive medicine from diagnostics into therapeutics.

The immune system doesnt make the distinction between therapeutics and diagnostics the way we do, said Harlan Robins, CSO and co-founder, Adaptive Biotechnologies.

His company focuses on T and B cell receptors, which bind to either pathogens or parts of pathogens, or, in the case of cancer, to mutated pieces of genes.

That binding is how the immune system discovers theres a problem, and its also is how it initiates an immune response, Robins said. Therefore, the same molecule is the diagnostic and targeting molecule. Whats distinct, he said, is the horsepower needed to move a therapeutic along in terms of development. Development for therapeutics is much more intense than for diagnostics. In this case, its partner Roche is providing the horsepower.

Next generation vectors are another hurdle to surmount in advancing cell and gene therapies to the next level, where they may tackle more complex diseases.

There are still enormous opportunities to use (our viral capsid) delivery vehicle for nucleic acids to make them more specific, Mingozzi said. There are a lot of ways to make AAVs more potent and drive expression of the therapeutic gene and then make it more controllable.

Improving the delivery platform will open it to new indications.

Eventually, adenoviral vectors (AVVs) likely will be replaced with more efficient (but not yet determined) delivery systems.

If you think about vectors as a delivery system and a genetic payload, you begin to think that are other ways to getting genetic material into a body, Sabry added.

Exosomes are one possibility, but the future may offer a library of different delivery mechanisms.

Sabry envisions a future in which genetic surgery is performed as routinely as anatomic surgery is performed today.

Imagine going in and removing a disease gene and replacing it with a normal gene, he said. Tight targeting could integrate it at the specific location of the disorder gene. Its not out of the realm of the possible.

The limitations of how to soup-up the genetic manipulations, have not yet been reached, panelists agreed. But there are a lot of barriers. Targeting, especially in cancer, remains a hurdle. To overcome that, Robins suggested making the cells themselves more powerful, but acknowledged safety concerns.

Another approach is to tailor cell therapies specifically to each patient, essentially redefining the meaning of personalized medicine by making therapies for individuals in real time. This necessitates considering not just the cells and the targeting mechanisms, but the integrated and interrelated networks the cells form.

Sabry suggested that Once we start to reestablish normal immune regulation, some of the concerns we have now about having cell therapy either too powerful or not powerful enough will go away. The reason, he said, is that you will be using the regular, nuanced regulatory systems that exist within the immune system to regulate its power and amplitude.

Achieving the future these panelists envision for cell and gene therapies requires companies to take risks. Currently, big pharma does that largely by partnering with or acquiring smaller, innovative companies. In acquisition, though, there is another risk: that the smaller company will be subsumed and lose its innovative drive and, thus, the very reason it was acquired. Therefore its important, Sabry insisted, that innovative companies operate independently, like Genentech and Spark, which both were acquired by Roche.

Its a matter of balance, Mingozzi said. You cant do everything yourself.

Read this article:

BIO 2020: Cell and Gene Therapies Will Dominate Medicine in 30 Years - BioSpace