Orca Bio Surfaces With $192M and Recipes for Custom Cell Therapies – Xconomy

XconomySan Francisco

The cancer cell therapies available today are made by tweaking a patients own immune cells to better recognize and fight the disease. Orca Bio is developing what it says is the next generation of cell therapy: custom preparations made without modifying cells or genes.

Orca is already testing its technology in humans, though it has kept that research mostly under wraps. As the startup prepares to reveal its preliminary findings and ramp up its manufacturing capability, the Menlo Park, CA-based biotechannounced on Wednesday the close of $192 million in financing.

The immune system is comprised of many cells that work in concert, says CEO Ivan Dimov. Some cells stimulate activity while other cells block it. But the effects of these immune cells can be dampened by the other cells around them. Orcas therapies are allogeneictheyre made by taking stem and immune cells from healthy donors rather than from the patients themselves, as is the case with autologous treatments. But rather than just taking those healthy cells and putting them into a patient, Orca chooses certain cells from the donor sample and combines them in specific ways. Dimov says each mixture, created from certain cell types that it has assembled in the proper ratio, forms a custom immune army that seeks out cancer cells and leaves healthy tissue alone.

Weve created a novel class of precision therapiesprecise, optimal therapeutic mixtures, he says.

Orcas first disease targets are aggressive blood cancers that require bone marrow transplants as a treatment of last resort. These procedures offer patients a potential cure, but they also come with risks, such as rejection by the immune system.

In recent years, cell therapy has emerged as a new option for aggressive blood cancers that havent responded to treatment. Chimeric antigen receptor T cell therapies, or CAR-Ts, are made by engineering a patients own T cells, multiplying them in a lab, and then infusing them back into the patient to target and fight the cancer. The first CAR-Ts that reached the market were developed by Novartis (NYSE: NVS) and Gilead Sciences (NASDAQ: GILD). These therapies pose the risk of a potentially fatal immune system reaction.

There are other biotechs that are trying to advance CAR-T therapy by making it safer and more scalable. Some of them, like Orca, are developing allogeneic cell therapies. Two such companies, Allogene Therapeutics (NASDAQ: ALLO) and Precision Biosciences (NASDAQ: DTIL), use gene editing to eliminate parts of an immune cell that could prompt an adverse response. Those companies are testing their respective therapies in clinical trials.

Dimov says Orcas custom therapies are meant to allow patients to avoid the complications associated with bone marrow transplants and CAR-T drugs. The descriptor custom needs a bit of clarification: An Orca therapy is not tailored to each patient, but rather customized to generate a particular therapeutic effect, Dimov says. If it works, the right mix not only provides the optimal treatment, it also avoids any adverse immune response. This approach offers a new way to reset and rebuild the immune system, Dimov says.

Orca has two programs in clinical trials. TRGFT-201 is a formulation of T cells and regulatory T cells (a type of cell that tamps down an immune response) that is in Phase 1/2 testing in patients with certain blood cancers. A second program, OGFT-0001, is a formulation of T cells that is in Phase 1, also in blood cancers. The new cash is expected to be enough for Orca to complete Phase 1 tests of the lead program, as well as build the startups manufacturing capacity.

Preliminary data from the studies have not yet been reported but Dimov says a terminally ill cancer patient who received one of the Orca therapies got well enough to leave the hospital. Anecdote aside, while full data are expected in 2022, some early findings are being prepared for peer review.

Orca traces its origins to the laboratory of Irv Weissman, director of the Stanford Institute for Stem Cell Biology and Regenerative Medicine. Dimov joined Weissmans group in 2010 as the field of cell therapy was heating up. At that time, a central obstacle to its progress was figuring out how to make cell therapy manufacturing scalable. Meanwhile, the scientific communitys understanding of immune cells continued to advance. Orcas intellectual property covers both the cell therapy manufacturing technology, which offers the capability to sort stem and immune cells, and the therapeutic mixtures of cells. The startup spun out of Stanford in 2016 and started its first clinical trial about two years later, Dimov says.

Though cancer is Orcas focus for now, Dimov says the companys technology has potential applications in other diseases. Rare inherited disorders such as beta thalassemia and severe combined immunodeficiency are possible targets. Autoimmune diseases represent another opportunity. For each one, Orca would develop an appropriate mixture of immune and stem cells to treat the condition and restore immune system function, Dimov says.

Including the latest financing, Dimov says Orca has raised nearly $300 million. The new capital, a Series D round of funding, was co-led by Lightspeed Venture Partners and an unnamed investor. The other investors Orca has disclosed are 8VC, DCVC Bio, ND Capital, Abu Dhabi sovereign wealth fund Mubadala Investment Company, Kaiser Permanente, and the Illinois Municipal Retirement Fund.

Image: iStock/jonmccormackphoto

Frank Vinluan is an Xconomy editor based in Research Triangle Park. You can reach him at fvinluan@xconomy.com.

Original post:

Orca Bio Surfaces With $192M and Recipes for Custom Cell Therapies - Xconomy

Coronavirus: inside the UAE stem cell centre working to treat Covid-19 – The National

When Dr Yendry Ventura began work to set up the Abu Dhabi Stem Cell Centre in late 2018, there was, he says, nothing else "related to stem cell therapy in the emirate.

Fast forward to today and the situation has changed dramatically. After opening in December last year, the centre has already received international press coverage over to its research into a treatment for Covid-19.

Their groundbreaking work has involved taking stem cells from a patients blood and returning them, via a nebuliser, as a fine mist to the lungs.

There they help regenerate lung cells and improve the body's immune response by preventing an overreaction to the infection that can damage healthy cells.

What characterises the method, says Dr Ventura, is that very little manipulation of the cells is needed for the treatment to be effective.

The future for the stem cells lies in regenerative medicine, in which you can treat almost all the degenerative conditions.

Dr Yendry Ventura

We separate a specific layer of cells from the blood, Dr Ventura told The National. Were the first one to use these cells with this route with this method.

We believe this way the cells can be aimed much better to the affected organs - the upper and lower respiratory tract.

In April, the centres efforts to develop a Covid-19 treatment led to the recovery of all 73 patients the treatment was initially trialled on. A quarter had been in intensive care.

The results appeared so promising that this month the centre secured intellectual property rights to the technique, allowing the treatment to be widely licensed, including to facilities abroad.

The ongoing work exemplifies how the centres specialists have been able to apply their expertise to help in a time of crisis, Dr Ventura said.

But the new research is a departure from the facilitys usual purpose, which involves developing cutting-edge stem cell treatments for conditions such as cancer and heart disease.

Stem cells were first extracted from humans and grown in laboratories less than a quarter of a century ago.

The human body is mostly made of specialised cell types, such as heart muscle cells, kidney cells or nerve cells, all of which have a particular form related to their function.

Stem cells, however, have not yet undergone the process of developing into a specialised cell type, and are able to be manipulated to perform a specific function.

In adults, stem cells are found in tissues including fat and bone marrow, and these can be turned into cell types.

One technique that the Abu Dhabi Stem Cell Centre plans to implement is haematopoietic stem cell transplantation, which involves stem cells being removed from an individual who is due to have cancer treatment.

The cells are then processed in a laboratory and injected into the patient after they have undergone chemotherapy or radiotherapy.

In this way, they can replace stem cells destroyed by the treatment, allowing a patient to tolerate a higher dose of therapy.

Dr Ventura says that similar treatments were applicable to most cancers of the blood as well as cancers that produce solid tumours.

There are many of these therapies still in research stage, but if you conquer this research, you can have a programme in which you can ... treat many kinds of cancers at the same time in one centre, he said.

The reality is that cell therapy is curing cancer We need to improve this therapy and make it available for many other people.

The future for the stem cells lies in regenerative medicine, in which you can treat almost all the degenerative conditions.

You can create in the future, if you have the right technologies, even artificial organs.

Set up with private sector funding in collaboration with the UAE authorities, the Abu Dhabi Stem Cell Centre works closely with experts at Sheikh Khalifa Medical City.

But the institution is keen to forge further partnerships with both public and private sector medical institutions.

Currently, it operates seven days a week and has more than 100 staff, including nurses, technicians and doctors who specialise in immunology, haematology, pathology, orthopaedics, urology and radiology.

In another initiative, the facility has recently begun running Minimal Residual Disease tests, which look at how many malignant cells remain in a patients blood or bone marrow.

These tests are useful for people with a variety of blood cancers, including lymphoma, leukaemia and myeloma. But they require fresh samples from the patient, so the lack of UAE testing facilities has, until now, required patients to travel abroad.

We try to implement the tests here in the Abu Dhabi Stem Cell Centre so that the patient does not need to travel anymore, said Dr Ventura.

Updated: June 17, 2020 04:31 PM

Read more:

Coronavirus: inside the UAE stem cell centre working to treat Covid-19 - The National

Efforts at coronavirus vaccines and treatments abound in the Bay Area – San Francisco Chronicle

The frenetic search for the miracle that will rid the world of COVID-19 is branching out in a thousand directions, and a large part of the microbial treasure hunt is going on in the Bay Area, where major progress has been made in the 100 days since residents were ordered to shelter in place.

Scientists at universities, laboratories, biotechnology companies and drug manufacturers are combing through blood plasma taken from infected patients for secrets that will help them fight the disease.

The key is likely a super-strength antibody found in some patients. But researchers must first figure out how those antibodies work and how they can be harnessed and used to stop the many health problems associated with COVID-19, particularly acute respiratory distress syndrome, or ARDS, which has killed more people than any other complication connected to the disease.

Other developments showing promise include injections of mesenchymal stem cells, found in bone marrow and umbilical cords, that doctors are studying to battle inflammation caused by ARDS. And a steroid called dexamethasone reduced the number of deaths by halting the overreactive immune responses in seriously ill patients in the United Kingdom.

In all, more than 130 vaccines and 220 treatments are being tested worldwide.

What follows is a list of some of the most promising elixirs, medications and vaccines with ties to the Bay Area:

Monoclonal antibodies / Vir Biotechnology, San Francisco: Scientists at Vir and several institutions, including Stanford and UCSF, are studying monoclonal antibodies, which are clones of coronavirus-fighting antibodies produced by COVID-19 patients.

The idea is to utilize these neutralizing antibodies which bind to the virus crown-like spikes and prevent them from entering and hijacking human cells.

Only about 5% of coronavirus patients have these super-strength antibodies, and those people are believed to be immune to a second attack.

The trick for scientists at Vir is to identify these neutralizing antibodies, harvest, purify and clone them. If they succeed, the resulting monoclones could then be used to inoculate people and it is hoped give them long-term immunity against the coronavirus. The company recently signed a deal with Samsung Biologics, in South Korea, to scale up production of a temporary vaccine in the fall after clinical trials are complete.

Another monoclonal antibody, leronlimab, is being studied in coronavirus clinical trials by its Washington state drugmaker, CytoDyn. The companys chief medical officer is in San Francisco, and the company that does laboratory tests of leronlimab is in San Carlos.

Interferon-lambda / Stanford University: Doctors at Stanford are running a trial to see if interferon-lambda, which is administered by injection, helps patients in the early stages of COVID-19. Interferon-lambda is a manufactured version of a naturally occurring protein that has been used to treat hepatitis. Stanford doctors hope it will boost the immune system response to coronavirus infections.

Dr. Upinder Singh, a Stanford infectious-disease expert, said the trial has enrolled more than 50 patients and is halfway finished. We have noted that patients tolerate the drug very well, she said.

Mesenchymal stem cells / UCSF and UC Davis Medical Center: UCSF Dr. Michael Matthay is leading a study about whether a kind of stem cell found in bone marrow can help patients with ARDS. Matthay hopes that the stem cells can help reduce the inflammation associated with some of ARDS most dire respiratory symptoms, and help patients lungs to recover.

Matthay is aiming to enroll 120 patients in San Francisco, the UC Davis Medical Center in Sacramento and hospitals in a handful of other states. He said the trial, which includes a small number ARDS patients who dont have COVID-19, should have results within a year. So far 17 patients are enrolled in the trial, most of them in San Francisco.

Remdesivir / Gilead Sciences (Foster City): Remdesivir, once conceived as a potential treatment for ebola, was the first drug to show some promise in treating COVID-19 patients. The drug interferes with the process through which the virus replicates itself. A large study led by the federal government generated excitement in late April when officials said hospitalized patients who received remdesivir intravenously recovered faster than those who received a placebo.

A later study looking at dosage showed some benefit for moderately ill COVID-19 patients who received remdesivir for five days, but improvement among those who got it for 10 days was not statistically significant. Gilead, a drug company, recently announced that it will soon launch another clinical trial to see how remdesivir works on 50 pediatric patients, from newborns to teenagers, with moderate to severe COVID-19 symptoms. More than 30 locations in the U.S. and Europe will be involved in the trial, the company said.

Coronavirus crisis: 100 days

Editors note: Its been 100 days since the Bay Area sheltered in place, protecting itself from the coronavirus pandemic. What have we learned in that time? And what does the future hold for the region and its fight against COVID-19? The Chronicle explores the past 100 days and looks to the future in this exclusive report.

Favipiravir / Fujifilm Toyama Chemical (Stanford University): This antiviral drug, developed in 2014 by a subsidiary of the Japanese film company to treat influenza, is undergoing numerous clinical studies worldwide, including a Stanford University trial that began this month. Unlike remdesivir, it can be administered orally, so it can be used to treat patients early in the disease, before hospitalization is necessary.

Stanford epidemiologists want to see if favipiravir, which has shown promising results in other trials, prevents the coronavirus from replicating in human cells, halts the shedding of the virus and reduces the severity of infection. The Stanford study, the only outpatient trial for this drug in the nation, is enrolling 120 people who have been diagnosed with COVID-19 within the past 72 hours. Half of them will get a placebo. People can enroll by emailing treatcovid@stanford.edu.

Colchicine / UCSF (San Francisco and New York): The anti-inflammatory drug commonly used to treat gout flare-ups is being studied in the U.S. by scientists at UCSF and New York University. The drug short-circuits inflammation by decreasing the bodys production of certain proteins, and researchers hope that it will reduce lung complications and prevent deaths from COVID-19. About 6,000 patients are receiving colchicine or a placebo during the clinical trial, dubbed Colcorona, which began in March and is expected to be completed in September.

Selinexor / Kaiser Permanente: Kaiser hospitals in San Francisco, Oakland and Sacramento are studying selinexor, an anticancer drug that blocks a key protein in the cellular machinery for DNA processing, as a potential COVID-19 treatment. The drug has both antiviral and anti-inflammatory properties, and its administered orally, according to Kaisers Dr. Jacek Skarbinski. The trial aims to enroll 250 patients with severe symptoms at Kaiser and other hospitals that are participating nationwide.

VXA-COV2-1 / Vaxart, South San Francisco: The biotechnology company Vaxart is testing this drug to see if it is as effective at controlling COVID-19 as trials have shown it to be against influenza. VXA-COV2-1, the only potential vaccine in pill form, uses the genetic code of the coronavirus to trigger a defensive response in mucous membranes. The hope is that the newly fortified membranes will prevent the virus from entering the body.

Its the only vaccine (candidate) that activates the first line of defense, which is the mucosa, said Andrei Floroiu, Vaxarts chief executive, noting that intravenous vaccines kill the virus after it is inside the body. Our vaccine may prevent you from getting infected at all.

The drug was effective against influenza and norovirus in trials and appears to work on laboratory animals, Floroiu said. He expects trials of VXA-COV2-1 on humans to begin later this summer.

VaxiPatch / Verndari (Napa and UC Davis Medical Center): Napa vaccine company Verndari makes a patented adhesive patch that can deliver a vaccine instead of a shot. Now, the company is trying to make a vaccine for COVID-19 that they can administer through that patch. At UC Davis Medical Center in Sacramento, Verndari researchers are developing a potential vaccine that relies on the coronavirus spike-shaped protein. When injected into a person, the substance would ideally train their body to recognize the virus and fight it off without becoming ill.

A spokeswoman told The Chronicle that the companys preclinical tests have shown early, positive data in developing an immune response. Verndari hopes to move into the next phase of testing in the coming weeks and start clinical trials in humans this year.

If the vaccine is proved effective and safe, patients could receive it through the mail, according to company CEO Dr. Daniel Henderson. The patch would leave a temporary mark on the skin that patients could photograph and send to their doctor as proof they have taken the vaccine, Henderson has said.

Peter Fimrite and J.D. Morris are San Francisco Chronicle staff writers. Email: pfimrite@sfchronicle.com, jd.morris@sfchronicle.com Twitter: @pfimrite, @thejdmorris

Excerpt from:

Efforts at coronavirus vaccines and treatments abound in the Bay Area - San Francisco Chronicle

Cell Therapy Manufacturing Market: Factory Price and Marginal Revenue Analysis by 2026 – Surfacing Magazine

Cell Therapy Manufacturing Market 2020 Global Industry Research report presents an in-depth analysis of the Cell Therapy Manufacturing market size, growth, share, segments, manufacturers, and technologies, key trends, market drivers, challenges, standardization, deployment models, opportunities, future roadmap and 2027 forecast.

Global Cell Therapy Manufacturing Market 2020 Industry Research Report is an expert and inside and out examination on the flow condition of the Global Cell Therapy Manufacturing industry. In addition, investigate report sorts the worldwide Cell Therapy Manufacturing market by top players/brands, area, type and the end client. This report likewise examines the different Factors impacting the market development and drivers, further reveals insight into market review, key makers, key received by them, size, most recent patterns and types, income, net edge with provincial examination and figure.

Read Summary Of Cell Therapy Manufacturing Market Report @Cell Therapy Manufacturing Market

List Of TOP KEY PLAYERS in Cell Therapy Manufacturing Market are: Pharmicell, Merck Group, Dickinson and Company, Thermo Fisher, Lonza Group, Miltenyi Biotec GmBH, Takara Bio Group, STEMCELL Technologies, Cellular Dynamics International, Becton, Osiris Therapeutics, Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc., Anterogen, MEDIPOST, Holostem Terapie Avanazate, Pluristem Therapeutics, Brammer Bio, CELLforCURE, Gene Therapy Catapult EUFETS, MaSTherCell, PharmaCell, Cognate BioServices and WuXi AppTec.

Scope of Report:

The global Cell Therapy Manufacturing market is anticipated to rise at a considerable rate during the forecast period, between 2020 and 2027. In 2020, the market was growing at a steady rate and with the rising adoption of strategies by key players, the market is expected to rise over the projected horizon.

This report covers present status and future prospects for the Cell Therapy Manufacturing Market forecast till 2027. Market Overview, Development, and Segment by Type, Application and Region. Global Market by company, Type, Application and Geography. The report begins with an overview of the industry chain structure and describes the upstream. Besides, the report analyses Cell Therapy Manufacturing market trends, size and forecast in different geographies, type and end-use segment, in addition, the report introduces market competition overview among the major companies and companies profiles, besides, market price and channel features are covered in the report.

Cell Therapy Manufacturing Market Research Report provides exclusive vital statistics, data, information, trends and competitive landscape details in this niche sector.

We do offer sample of this report. Kindly go through the follow information in order to access sample copy.

Get Sample Copy Of This Report @ https://www.coherentmarketinsights.com/insight/request-sample/1728

This report sample includes

Brief Introduction to the research report.Table of Contents (Scope covered as a part of the study)Top players in the marketResearch framework (presentation)Research methodology adopted by Coherent Market Insights

Cell Therapy Manufacturing Market global industry research report is a professional and in-depth study on the market size, growth, share, trends, as well as industry analysis. According to the details of the consumption figures, the global Cell Therapy Manufacturing market forecast 2027.

Market by Region:

North America (U.S., Canada, Mexico)Europe (Germany, U.K., France, Italy, Russia, Spain etc.)Asia-Pacific (China, India, Japan, Southeast Asia etc.)South America (Brazil, Argentina etc.)The Middle East and Africa (Saudi Arabia, South Africa etc.)

Key Benefits For Stakeholders

Cell Therapy Manufacturing Market Taxonomy

On the basis of therapy type, the global cell therapy manufacturing market is segmented into:

On the basis of technology, the global cell therapy manufacturing market is segmented into:

On the basis of source, the global cell therapy manufacturing market is segmented into:

On the basis of application, the global cell therapy manufacturing market is segmented into:

On the basis of region, the global cell therapy manufacturing market is segmented into:

Main Aspects Covered In The Report:

Overview of the Cell Therapy Manufacturing market including production, consumption, status and forecast and market growth.Geographical analysis including major countries.Overview of the product type market including development.Overview of the end-user market including development.

Research Objectives:

To understand the structure of Cell Therapy Manufacturing market by identifying its various sub-segments.Focuses on the key global Cell Therapy Manufacturing manufacturers, to define, describe and analyze the sales volume, value, market share, market competition landscape, SWOT analysis and development plans in next few years. To analyze the Cell Therapy Manufacturing with respect to individual growth trends, future prospects, and their contribution to the total market. To share detailed information about the key factors influencing the growth of the market (growth potential, opportunities, drivers, industry-specific challenges and risks). To project the consumption of Cell Therapy Manufacturing submarkets, with respect to key regions (along with their respective key countries). To analyze competitive developments such as expansions, agreements, new product launches, and acquisitions in the market.To strategically profile the key players and comprehensively analyze their growth strategies.

Request Discount option enables you to get discounts on the actual price of the report. Kindly fill the form, and one of our consultants would get in touch with you to discuss your allocated budget and would provide discounts.

Use QUARANTINEDAYS Code In Precise Requirement And Get FLAT $1,000 OFF On This Reports

Ask Discount Before Purchasing @ https://www.coherentmarketinsights.com/insight/request-discount/1728

At last, the report gives the inside and out examination of Cell Therapy Manufacturing Market took after by the above components, which are useful for organizations or individuals for the development of their present business or the individuals who are hoping to enter in Cell Therapy Manufacturing industry.

About Coherent Market Insights

Coherent Market Insights is a prominent market research and consulting firm offering action-ready syndicated research reports, custom market analysis, consulting services, and competitive analysis through various recommendations related to emerging market trends, technologies, and potential absolute dollar opportunity.

Follow this link:

Cell Therapy Manufacturing Market: Factory Price and Marginal Revenue Analysis by 2026 - Surfacing Magazine

Cell Therapy Market 2020 by Product-Types, Market Dynamics, Application, Growth Prospects, Top Players Analysis and Demand Insights 2025 – Owned

Global Cell Therapy Market report shows the Industry Chain Structure as well as Macroeconomic Environment Analysis and Development Trend. The Cell Therapy Market report also provides the market impact and new opportunities created due to the COVID19/CORONA Virus catastrophe. The total market is further divided by company, by country, and by application/types for the competitive landscape analysis. The report then estimates 2020-2025 market development trends of Cell Therapy Industry.

Top Leading Key Players are:

JCR Pharmaceuticals Co., Ltd., Kolon TissueGene, Inc.; and Medipost and many more.

Get Sample PDF (including COVID19 Impact Analysis, full TOC, Tables and Figures) of Cell Therapy Market @ https://www.adroitmarketresearch.com/contacts/request-sample/611

Initially, the report provides a basic overview of the industry including definitions, classifications, applications, and industry chain structure. The Cell Therapy market analysis is provided for the international markets including development trends, competitive landscape analysis, and key regions development status.

The report introduces Cell Therapy basic information including definition, classification, application, industry chain structure, industry overview, policy analysis, and news analysis. Insightful predictions for the Cell Therapy market for the coming few years have also been included in the report.

Browse the complete report Along with TOC @ https://www.adroitmarketresearch.com/industry-reports/cell-therapy-market

Global Cell Therapy market is segmented based by type, application and region.

Based on Type, the market has been segmented into:

By Use & Type Outlook, (Clinical-use,By Cell Therapy Type,,Non-stem Cell Therapies,Stem Cell Therapies,BM, Blood, & Umbilical Cord-derived Stem Cells,Adipose derived cells,Others), By Therapeutic Area, (Malignancies,Muscoskeletal Disorders,Autoimmune Disorders,Dermatology,Others,Research-use), By Therapy Type, (Allogenic Therapies,Autologous Therapies)

The report focuses on global major leading Cell Therapy Market players providing information such as company profiles, product picture and specification, capacity, production, price, cost, revenue and contact information. Upstream raw materials and equipment and downstream demand analysis is also carried out.

The Cell Therapy industry development trends and marketing channels are analyzed. Finally, the feasibility of new investment projects is assessed, and overall research conclusions offered.

For Any Query on the Cell Therapy Market: https://www.adroitmarketresearch.com/contacts/enquiry-before-buying/611

About Us :

Adroit Market Research is an India-based business analytics and consulting company. Our target audience is a wide range of corporations, manufacturing companies, product/technology development institutions and industry associations that require understanding of a markets size, key trends, participants and future outlook of an industry. We intend to become our clients knowledge partner and provide them with valuable market insights to help create opportunities that increase their revenues. We follow a code Explore, Learn and Transform. At our core, we are curious people who love to identify and understand industry patterns, create an insightful study around our findings and churn out money-making roadmaps.

Contact Us :

Ryan JohnsonAccount Manager Global3131 McKinney Ave Ste 600, Dallas,TX 75204, U.S.APhone No.: USA: +1 972-362 -8199 / +91 9665341414

Link:

Cell Therapy Market 2020 by Product-Types, Market Dynamics, Application, Growth Prospects, Top Players Analysis and Demand Insights 2025 - Owned

Global Animal Stem Cell Therapy Market Report 2020 Cole Reports – Cole of Duty

The report delivers the driving factors, challenges, restraints, opportunities, acquisition & merger, revenue structure, business models, market players, segmentation, regional analysis, production price, manufacturing process, operations, methodology, market share, market size, CAGR, and investments.

Request a sample of this report @ https://www.orbisresearch.com/contacts/request-sample/4197303

Manufacturer Detail

Manufacturer DetailMedivet Biologics LLCVETSTEM BIOPHARMAJ-ARMU.S. Stem Cell, IncVetCell TherapeuticsCelavet Inc.Magellan Stem CellsKintaro Cells PowerAnimal Stem CareAnimal Cell TherapiesCell Therapy SciencesAnimacel

BIS reports covers key roles in analyzing the industry outlook and let understand the prominent vendors about their strategies and future plans for the betterment of the market in the near future. Furthermore, the report also covers an ultimate goal of market target gained on the basis of product or services. In this Animal Stem Cell Therapy market report, viewers can also experience detailed study of business introduction including benefits, restraints, opportunities, challenges, drivers, and more. The report smartly takes you to productive methodology in organizing, collection, and analyzing data. The report covers key aspects including production, market share, CAGR, key regions, leading vendors, and revenue rates. This keyword report also provides viewers with relevant figures at which the Animal Stem Cell Therapy market was valued in the base year and estimated to project the revenue in the forecasted period. The Animal Stem Cell Therapy market is categorizes several segmentations including type, application, end user industry, and region. This effective set of information delivers an in-depth analysis about the drivers, challenges, market share, market dynamics, emerging countries, pricing, investment activity, industry performance, revenue generation and CAGR.

Region Segmentation

North America Country (United States, Canada)South AmericaAsia Country (China, Japan, India, Korea)Europe Country (Germany, UK, France, Italy)Other Country (Middle East, Africa, GCC)

Product Type SegmentationAlN-170 AlN Ceramic SubstratesAlN-200 AlN Ceramic SubstratesOthers, like AlN-180 and AlN-230 etc.Industry SegmentationIGBTLED

Browse the complete report @ https://www.orbisresearch.com/reports/index/global-animal-stem-cell-therapy-market-report-2020

Channel (Direct Sales, Distributor) Segmentation

Section 8: 400 USDTrend (2019-2024)

Section 9: 300 USDProduct Type Detail

Section 10: 700 USDDownstream Consumer

Section 11: 200 USDCost Structure

Section 12: 500 USDConclusion

The research report is an overall draft when it comes to understand the investment structure and future analysis of the Animal Stem Cell Therapy market. BIS Report manages to convey detailed information regarding prominent vendors of the Animal Stem Cell Therapy market including recent innovations, advancements, improvements, business estimation, revenue margin, and sales graph.

Consumer-wise, the report studies about the demand coming from particular region and category of consumers taking interest in the product or services of the Animal Stem Cell Therapy market. The global keyword market is majorly driven by key factors and offers an in-depth insight about the keyword market.

Make an enquiry of this report @ https://www.orbisresearch.com/contacts/enquiry-before-buying/4197303

The Animal Stem Cell Therapy market reports delivers the information about market competition between vendors through regional segmentation of markets in terms of business opportunities, demand & supply, and revenue generation potential.

BIS report envision clear view about Animal Stem Cell Therapy market including regional growth and falls down mentioning about particular forecast period along with appropriate reasoning about the market.

The Animal Stem Cell Therapy market also delivers the market size, market appearances, segmentation, provincial collapses, tendencies, competitive background to gain the appropriate insights. Moreover, the report also covers about the acquisitions and mergers taken in the recent past.

About Us:

Orbis Research (orbisresearch.com) is a single point aid for all your market research requirements. We have vast database of reports from the leading publishers and authors across the globe. We specialize in delivering customized reports as per the requirements of our clients. We have complete information about our publishers and hence are sure about the accuracy of the industries and verticals of their specialization. This helps our clients to map their needs and we produce the perfect required market research study for our clients.

Contact Us: Hector CostelloSenior Manager Client Engagements4144N Central Expressway,Suite 600, Dallas,Texas 75204, U.S.A.Phone No.: USA: +1 (972)-362-8199 | IND: +91 895 659 5155Email ID: [emailprotected]

See the rest here:

Global Animal Stem Cell Therapy Market Report 2020 Cole Reports - Cole of Duty

NIH announces new Transformative Research Award program for ALS – National Institutes of Health

News Release

Wednesday, June 17, 2020

New initiative encourages innovative research on devastating neurological disease.

The National Institutes of Health plans to invest $25 million over five years in a new program to spur innovative research on amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), a progressive and fatal neurological disease that weakens and eventually paralyzes voluntary muscles. Accelerating Leading-edge Science in ALS (ALS2) aims to answer critical questions about this disease.

Over the past few decades, there has been significant progress in our understanding of ALS, but we still do not have any breakthrough treatments for this terrible disease, said NIH Director Francis S. Collins, M.D., Ph.D. We hope this program will inject new ideas to the field to push us rapidly toward effective therapies.

Sometimes known as Lou Gehrigs disease, ALS is a neurodegenerative disease that affects motor neurons in the spinal cord that control voluntary muscles. For reasons that are currently unknown, the motor neurons die off, resulting in progressive muscle weakness that usually leads to respiratory failure. ALS is virtually always fatal, and many people die within three to five years of developing symptoms.

There is no cure for ALS. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration-approved drugs riluzole and edaravone can prolong life by a few months but do not improve symptoms. Ongoing clinical trials are looking at a range of therapeutic strategies including new drug candidates, devices to improve quality of life, and stem cell therapies. Genetic research has recently provided clues to understanding the disease, but it will take a focused investment in research from a range of scientific disciplines in order to capitalize on these insights.

ALS2 will be part of the NIH Common Funds High-Risk, High-Reward (HRHR) research program. The four initiatives of the HRHR program are a time-tested, powerful approach to sparking innovation. They support exceptionally creative research, which is inherently riskier, but has the potential to transform biomedical science. NIH will apply this potential to ALS2 through the HRHR programs Transformative Research Award initiative. The Transformative Research Award is particularly well-suited to interdisciplinary teams of scientists looking to combine their expertise and pursue new ideas with the potential to transform ALS research.

ALS2 will take a three-pronged approach to improve understanding of ALS:

Information on a Notice of Special Interest to accompany the Transformative Research Award funding opportunity will be posted here: https://commonfund.nih.gov/tra/grants.

This initiative is managed collaboratively by the NIH Common Fund, the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, the National Institute on Aging, the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, and the National Institute of General Medical Sciences.

About the National Institutes of Health (NIH):NIH, the nation's medical research agency, includes 27 Institutes and Centers and is a component of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. NIH is the primary federal agency conducting and supporting basic, clinical, and translational medical research, and is investigating the causes, treatments, and cures for both common and rare diseases. For more information about NIH and its programs, visit http://www.nih.gov.

NIHTurning Discovery Into Health

###

See the rest here:

NIH announces new Transformative Research Award program for ALS - National Institutes of Health

FTC Sends Letters Warning Marketers to Stop Making Unsupported Claims That Their Products and Therapies Can Effectively Prevent or Treat COVID-19 …

June 22, 2020 - The Federal Trade Commission announced it has sent letters warning 30 more marketers nationwide to stop making unsubstantiated claims that their products and therapies can treat or prevent COVID-19, the disease caused by the novel coronavirus. This is the seventh set of warning letters the FTC has announced as part of its ongoing efforts to protect consumers from health-related COVID-19 scams. In all, the Commission has sentsimilar letters to 250 companies and individuals.

Most of the letters announced today target treatments the FTC has warned companies about previously, including intravenous (IV) Vitamin C and D infusions, supposed stem cell therapy, vitamin injections, essential oils, and CBD products. Other letters sent recently challenged claims that infrared heat, oral peroxide gel, and oxygen therapy can treat or cure COVD-19. However, currently there is no scientific evidence that these, or any, products or services can treat or cure the disease.

The FTC sent the letters announced today to the companies and individuals listed below. The recipients are grouped based on the type of therapy, product, or service they pitched as preventing or treating COVID-19.

CBD:

Essential Oils:

Infrared Heat:

Intravenous (IV) Vitamin and Ozone/Oxygen Therapies:

Oral Peroxide Gel:

Pulsed Electromagnetic Field Therapy:

Stem Cell Treatments:

Supplements, Vitamins, and Colloidal Silver:

In the letters, the FTC states that one or more of the efficacy claims made by the marketers are unsubstantiated because they are not supported by scientific evidence, and therefore violate the FTC Act. The letters advise the recipients to immediately stop making all claims that their products can treat or cure COVID-19, and to notify the Commission within 48 hours about the specific actions they have taken to address the agencys concerns.

The letters also note that if the false claims do not cease, the Commission may seek a federal court injunction and an order requiring money to be refunded to consumers. In April, the FTC announced itsfirst case against a marketer of such products, Marc Ching, doing business as Whole Leaf Organics.

The FTC worked in coordination with the Office of the Attorney General of Louisiana, on the warning letter to The Remedy Room, and appreciates its assistance.

See the rest here:

FTC Sends Letters Warning Marketers to Stop Making Unsupported Claims That Their Products and Therapies Can Effectively Prevent or Treat COVID-19 ...

COVID 19 to Lead the Sales of Non-Union Fractures to Register Stellar Growth in the Next 10 Years – Cole of Duty

Nonunion bone fracture is changeless disappointment of recuperating following a broken bone unless intercession, (for example, surgery) is performed. Nonunion fractures can be categorized into hypertrophic (generally due to mechanical failure/ callus formation) and atrophic (generally due to organic failure/ no callus and bone resorption). A delayed or with nonunion fracture forms a structural resemblance to a fibrous joint, and is therefore often called pseudoarthrosis. Nonunion fracture is a genuine complexity of a bone fracture and may happen when the bone moves excessively, has a poor blood supply or gets infected. Patients who smoke have a higher occurrence of nonunion fractures. The ordinary procedure of bone recuperating is hindered or slowed down. A nonunion or delayed fracture may go ahead to recuperate without mediation in many cases. In normal, if a nonunion is as yet obvious at a half year post damage it will stay unhealed without particular treatment, generally orthopedic surgery. The revision surgical intervention is the common methodology utilized, treatment via stem cell therapies is also on a rise, such as, Regenexx stem cell procedure. The explanations for a non-union fracture may comprise: complicated, multisegmental fractures (severe comminution), open fractures, fractures associated with tumors (pathologic fractures), infection, inadequate fracture immobilization (fixation), inadequate blood supply, poor nutrition, and chronic disease states (diabetes, renal failure, metabolic bone disease).

Get Free Sample Copy With Impact Analysis Of COVID-19 Of Market Report @https://www.persistencemarketresearch.com/samples/23059

Factors Driving Non-union fractures

Increasing sports related injuries and mechanical injuries, diabetic population, obesity, bone infection, poor nutrition and rising pathologic fractures among geriatric individuals is going to spur revenue growth for global non-union fractures market. In the US, there are roughly seven million new fractures which occur every year, with around 300,000 growing gradually. Appraisals for the normal non-union fracture associated treatment cost shift from almost $25,000 to $45,000. Non-unions are assessed to cost the healthcare services in the US $9.2 billion/year. This prohibits losses in profitability to the economy.

Rising Associated Cost for Non-union fractures Treatment

In the UK, there are around 850,000 new bone fractures seen every year. While it has been recommended that roughly 5-10% of such fractures are fractures in which the broken bone neglects to recuperate, medicinally alluded to as nonunion bone fractures. The cost to the National Health Service of treating non-union bone fractures has been accounted for to go amongst 18,000 and 79,000 per individual. The evaluated addressable market for nonunion and improved recuperating of bone fractures for the EU is around 0.7 to 2 Bn Euros for each year, expecting a cost of roughly 2,000 to 2,500 Euro for every treatment regimen. Normal direct expenses of treatment for a built up long bone non-union have been accounted for: Canada, $11,800; the USA $11,333; the UK 29,204.

Market Segmentation:

By Treatment Type

By Indication

Competition Outlook

Examples of some of the key participants in the non-union fractures market are Daniel C. Allison, Regenexx, Kalytera Therapeutics, Inc., ASA srl, Mesentech, EnteraBio Ltd. and others.

Regional Market Outlook

Globally, around 50 Mn bone fractures occur worldwide consistently. Osteoporosis is the most widely recognized reason for bone fractures and the commonness of osteoporosis and low bone mass is required to increment in coming a very long time due basically to the geriatric and matured population. Roughly 33% of all tibia and femoral shaft bone fractures have deferred rates of recuperating or non-healing. Patients with postponed union or non-union can expect poorer results, including expanded pain, loss of overall functionality, loss of personal satisfaction, and deferral consequently to work. There are as of now restricted treatment alternatives accessible for enhancing the rate of bone healing and bone fracture repair.

You Can Buy This PMR Healthcare Report From Here @https://www.persistencemarketresearch.com/checkout/23059

Anabolic specialists and bone morphogenetic proteins, including teriparatide, are exorbitant and may need wanted viability; enhanced therapeutic or remedial choices are desired. On the basis of geography, the global non-union fractures market can be segmented into five key regions viz. North America, Latin America, Europe, Asia Pacific, and the Middle East & Africa. North America and Europe collectively are expected to dominate the global non-union fractures market due to increasing awareness and inclination of treatment options coupled with stem cell therapy management. However, APAC is expected to grow at a sluggish rate in the global market due to their low adoption, though with large patient pool. The Middle East & Africa to adopt this advanced technology lately due to less awareness and less reach of the product due to less geographical presence of the players.

Read more from the original source:

COVID 19 to Lead the Sales of Non-Union Fractures to Register Stellar Growth in the Next 10 Years - Cole of Duty

COVID-19: Potential impact on Musculoskeletal Disorder Stem Cell Therapy Market Estimated to Record Highest CAGR by 2019-2025 – Personal Injury Bureau…

The global Musculoskeletal Disorder Stem Cell Therapy market study presents an all in all compilation of the historical, current and future outlook of the market as well as the factors responsible for such a growth. With SWOT analysis, the business study highlights the strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats of each Musculoskeletal Disorder Stem Cell Therapy market player in a comprehensive way. Further, the Musculoskeletal Disorder Stem Cell Therapy market report emphasizes the adoption pattern of the Musculoskeletal Disorder Stem Cell Therapy across various industries.

The Musculoskeletal Disorder Stem Cell Therapy market report examines the operating pattern of each player new product launches, partnerships, and acquisitions has been examined in detail.

The report on the Musculoskeletal Disorder Stem Cell Therapy market provides a birds eye view of the current proceeding within the Musculoskeletal Disorder Stem Cell Therapy market. Further, the report also takes into account the impact of the novel COVID-19 pandemic on the Musculoskeletal Disorder Stem Cell Therapy market and offers a clear assessment of the projected market fluctuations during the forecast period.

Get Free Sample PDF (including COVID19 Impact Analysis, full TOC, Tables and Figures) of Market Report @ https://www.researchmoz.com/enquiry.php?type=S&repid=2692084&source=atm

segment by Type, the product can be split intoAllogeneicAutologousMarket segment by Application, split intoMuscle diseaseSkeletal disease

Market segment by Regions/Countries, this report coversNorth AmericaEuropeChinaJapanSoutheast AsiaIndiaCentral & South America

The study objectives of this report are:To analyze global Musculoskeletal Disorder Stem Cell Therapy status, future forecast, growth opportunity, key market and key players.To present the Musculoskeletal Disorder Stem Cell Therapy development in North America, Europe, China, Japan, Southeast Asia, India and Central & South America.To strategically profile the key players and comprehensively analyze their development plan and strategies.To define, describe and forecast the market by type, market and key regions.

In this study, the years considered to estimate the market size of Musculoskeletal Disorder Stem Cell Therapy are as follows:History Year: 2015-2019Base Year: 2019Estimated Year: 2020Forecast Year 2020 to 2026For the data information by region, company, type and application, 2019 is considered as the base year. Whenever data information was unavailable for the base year, the prior year has been considered.

Do You Have Any Query Or Specific Requirement? Ask to Our Industry [emailprotected] https://www.researchmoz.com/enquiry.php?type=E&repid=2692084&source=atm

The Musculoskeletal Disorder Stem Cell Therapy market report offers a plethora of insights which include:

The Musculoskeletal Disorder Stem Cell Therapy market report answers important questions which include:

The Musculoskeletal Disorder Stem Cell Therapy market report considers the following years to predict the market growth:

You can Buy This Report from Here @ https://www.researchmoz.com/checkout?rep_id=2692084&licType=S&source=atm

Why Choose Musculoskeletal Disorder Stem Cell Therapy Market Report?

Musculoskeletal Disorder Stem Cell Therapy Market Reportfollows a multi- disciplinary approach to extract information about various industries. Our analysts perform thorough primary and secondary research to gather data associated with the market. With modern industrial and digitalization tools, we provide avant-garde business ideas to our clients. We address clients living in across parts of the world with our 24/7 service availability.

More:

COVID-19: Potential impact on Musculoskeletal Disorder Stem Cell Therapy Market Estimated to Record Highest CAGR by 2019-2025 - Personal Injury Bureau...

Regenerative Medicine Market Key Trends, Growth, Share, Size, Analysis and Forecast to 2023 – 3rd Watch News

Premium market insights delivers well-researched industry-wide information on the Regenerative Medicine market. It studies the markets essential aspects such as top participants, expansion strategies, business models, and other market features to gain improved market insights. Additionally, it focuses on the latest advancements in the sector and technological development, executive tools, and tactics that can enhance the performance of the sectors.

Request Sample Copy of Regenerative Medicine Market at: https://www.premiummarketinsights.com/sample/AMR00013825

Scope of the Report

The global regenerative medicine market was valued at $5,444 million in 2016, and is estimated to reach $39,325 million by 2023, registering a CAGR of 32.2% from 2017 to 2023. Regenerative medicines repair, replace, and regenerate tissues and organs affected due to injury, disease, or natural ageing process. These medicines help restore the functionality of cells & tissues and are applicable in numerous degenerative disorders such as dermatology, neurodegenerative diseases, cardiovascular, and orthopedic applications. Researchers focus on developing technologies based on biologics, genes, somatic as well as stem cells. Stem cells are capable of proliferation and differentiation and hence, are critical in this field.

The major factors that boost the market growth include technological advancements in tissue and organ regeneration, increase in prevalence of chronic diseases and trauma emergencies, prominent potential of nanotechnology, and emergence of stem cell technology. In addition, rise in degenerative diseases and shortage of organs for transplantation are expected to fuel the growth of the market. Moreover, utilization of nanomaterials in wound care, drug delivery, and immunomodulation has opened numerous growth avenues for the regenerative medicines market. However, stringent regulatory barriers and high cost of the treatment are likely to hinder the market growth.

!!! Limited Time DISCOUNT Available!!! Get Your Copy at Discounted [emailprotected] https://www.premiummarketinsights.com/discount/AMR00013825

Top Key Players:

KEY MARKET BENEFITS FOR STAKEHOLDERS

This report offers a detailed quantitative analysis of the market trends from 2016 to 2023 to identify the prevailing opportunities.

The market estimations provided in this report are based on a comprehensive analysis of the key developments in the industry.

An in-depth analysis based on geography facilitates the study of the regional market to assist in strategic business planning.

The development strategies adopted by the key manufacturers are enlisted in the report to understand the competitive scenario of the market.

KEY MARKET SEGMENTS

By Product Type

Cell Therapy

Gene Therapy

Tissue Engineering

Small Molecule & Biologic

By Material

Synthetic Material

Biodegradable Synthetic Polymer

Scaffold

Artificial Vascular Graft Material

Hydrogel Material

Biologically Derived Material

Interested in purchasing this Report? Click here @ https://www.premiummarketinsights.com/inquiry/AMR00013825

Geographically, this report focuses on product sales, value, market share, and growth opportunity in key regions such as United States, Europe, China, Japan, Southeast Asia, and India.

About Premium market insights:

Premiummarketinsights.comis a one stop shop of market research reports and solutions to various companies across the globe. We help our clients in their decision support system by helping them choose most relevant and cost effective research reports and solutions from various publishers. We provide best in class customer service and our customer support team is always available to help you on your research queries.

Contact US:

Sameer Joshi Call: US: +1-646-491-9876, Apac: +912067274191Email: [emailprotected]

See original here:

Regenerative Medicine Market Key Trends, Growth, Share, Size, Analysis and Forecast to 2023 - 3rd Watch News

CRISPR trial shows promising results for sickle cell and thalassaemia – BioNews

22 June 2020

CRISPRgenome editing has been successfully used to treat three patients with blood disorders in a clinical trial.

Two US patients with beta-thalassaemia and one with sickle cell disease had their bone marrow stem cells edited to produce a different form of haemoglobin, which is normally only found in fetuses and newborns.

'The results [demonstrate] that CRISPR/Cas9 gene editing has the potential to be a curative therapy for severe genetic diseases like sickle cell and beta-thalassaemia,' said Dr Reshma Kewalrami, CEO and President of Vertex, which is running the study jointly with another US pharmaceutical company, CRISPR Therapeutics.

Both sickle cell and beta-thalassaemia are caused by mutations in a gene that produces haemoglobin, the protein in red blood cells that carries oxygen throughout the body. With limited treatment options, patients are often dependent on blood transfusions.

However, the human body is able to make another form of haemoglobin, encoded in a completely separate gene, which is normally only expressed during fetal development and is switched off soon after birth.

In the clinical trial, blood stem cells were removed from the patients and a control gene that turns off the production of fetal haemoglobin was inactivated. Patients were given chemotherapy to remove remaining bone marrow stem cellsbefore they were replaced by the editedcells. The patients were then able to make fetal haemoglobin as adults.

The results of the ongoing trial, presented at the virtual Annual European Hematology Association Congress, reported that two beta-thalassaemia patients were transfusion independent at five and fifteen months after treatment, and the sickle cell patient was free from painful crises at nine months after treatment.

All three patients suffered significant side effects (from which they all recovered), but these were thought to be as a result of the chemotherapy rather than genome editing. Chemotherapy can also have long-term effects including infertility.

It is hoped that this treatment will have long-lasting and durable effects in patients with inherited blood diseases, and early clinical data appear promising. However, patients will need to be followed up throughout their lives to record any changes.

'These highly encouraging early data represent one more step toward delivering on the promise and potential of CRISPR/Cas9 therapies as a new class of potentially transformative medicines to treat serious diseases,' said Dr Samarth Kulkarni, CEO of CRISPR Therapeutics.

Excerpt from:

CRISPR trial shows promising results for sickle cell and thalassaemia - BioNews

Will Self on the paradox of multiculturalism – The New European

PUBLISHED: 17:00 19 June 2020

Will Self

Following a social media post by the far-right activist known as Tommy Robinson, members of far-right linked groups have gathered around statues in London. Here, one argues with a police officer. Photo: Getty Images

2020 Anadolu Agency

WILL SELF on the paradoxes and contradictions which make up multiculturalism

Email this article to a friend

To send a link to this page you must be logged in.

Become a Supporter

Almost four years after its creation The New European goes from strength to strength across print and online, offering a pro-European perspective on Brexit and reporting on the political response to the coronavirus outbreak, climate change and international politics. But we can only continue to grow with your support.

Years ago I had the misfortune to be seated at a fancy dinner next to Conrad Black, who at that time was a controversial if ennobled media tycoon. Throughout the meal we argued about everything, such was the divergence in our opinions, our beliefs, and our very weltanschauung. Then, at the end, as we rose to leave, he grasped my hand firmly in his and said: Good! Thats settled then we agree, turned on his handmade heel and left.

At the time I understood Blacks besetting character defect to be a need to be always in the right and little thats happened since, including his imprisonment for fraud and obstruction of justice, has changed my view. There are some people who will do anything they can to maintain a sense of self-righteousness including arbitrarily enlarging it to include another whose views dont accord with theirs whatsoever. And this leads me, fairly logically, to the culture wars currently consuming the British body politic.

As the two sides of the argument concerning Britains culture square off in one corner conservative traditionalists, in the other post-colonial revisionists so levels of self-righteousness are rising throughout the body politic, inducing a feverish state within which the greatest crime of all is to be neutral. Yes: you can tell when things really are falling apart because the centre not only cannot hold but is actively under attack by partisans who claim that if youre not with them, youre necessarily opposed.

For the record: any essentialist judgement made about anyone by virtue of their race or ethnicity disgusts me, and I believe we should do everything we can individually and collectively to foster a society in which such judgements are entirely otiose. This being noted, a culture as Ive had cause to remark numerous times in this space is a vector that carries through time (and space) commonly held values, together with their associated practices, including aesthetics in the form of taste and the cultural objects (artworks and artefacts) born out of that taste and those values. The problem for multiculturalists is that they are caught up in a colossal paradox: in order for a culture to enshrine multiple value-systems it would have to cease being a culture, since its manifestly impossible to educate young people to, for example, believe in God and not believe in God at the same time.

The suppressed premise that lies behind both multiculturalism and liberal humanism more generally is that of world-governance: human rights were a sequel to the establishment of the United Nations following the Second World War, and unless you believe in an omnipotent and omniscient God capable of enforcing divine justice, you must aspire towards a mundane authority thats capable of doing the same for secular justice. Because no one has any rights purely by virtue of being human as any of the chattel slaves currently owned in Eritrea and Mauritania could tell you, or the indentured workers in the UAE and China for that matter. There arent even equal rights in this country something made abundantly clear by the disparity in death rates between the haves and the have-nots during the current pandemic.

Even if we did have an effective world government, able to ensure equal dibs for all groups everywhere, what could that possibly look like? Surely, in order to ensure that the God-believers could pursue their cultural agenda unfettered including proscriptions and practices that liberal humanists find deeply offensive their cultural space would need to be demarcated. So, this great progressive development would mirror the Biblical homily of the Tower of Babel: we would have built a great edifice exemplifying our commonality, only by that act alone to bring about still further fissiparousness.

Another way of grasping the paradox is that some people are currently passionately insisting on the absolute significance of cultural identities that they wish to be totally ignored when it comes to others forming judgements about them whether this is their ethnicity, their religion, their sexual orientation or gender. Meanwhile, others of the formerly dominant culture are reduced to a literal rump: obese thugs, p***ing in public and beating up on the police. Both sides are intent on colonising the past (which is, indeed, another country), because neither party is capable of envisioning a viable future. The British culture which was based, entirely hypocritically, on the manifest destiny of white Europeans has foundered on brute geopolitical and environmental reality; the multi-culture that aspires to succeed it will founder on its own internal contradiction.

Of course, neither moiety will thank me for pointing this out let alone indulge in the sort of radical critique of their own views that might lead to genuine clarity. For my part, I wont commit the Conrad Black solecism and insist on an agreement where none actually obtains. As it is with Brexit, for me, so it is with this: a plague on both your houses. Metaphorically speaking, that is.

Almost four years after its creation The New European goes from strength to strength across print and online, offering a pro-European perspective on Brexit and reporting on the political response to the coronavirus outbreak, climate change and international politics. But we can only rebalance the right wing extremes of much of the UK national press with your support. If you value what we are doing, you can help us by making a contribution to the cost of our journalism.

See original here:

Will Self on the paradox of multiculturalism - The New European

Wake up, globalization fans: In a pandemic, nation-states are at their best – Haaretz

When the gravity of the COVID-19 pandemic crisis began to come into focus, casting a shadow on global horizons, world-famous Israeli historian Yuval Noah Harari rushed to print a series of articles in an effort to steady our resolve. We need to be careful, Harari warned, not to draw the wrong conclusion from the outbreak of the pandemic.

While there are borders that need to be strengthened, he said, such as those between viruses and humans, it would be a mistake to reinforce borders between nations. The answer to the coronavirus, in Prof. Harari's opinion, lies in greater global cooperation, especially in the joint efforts of the international scientific community not in a return to atavistic divisions.

Harari, a worldwide best-selling author is, perhaps, the most widely known ideologue of the new, progressive neoliberal globalism. And he was right to be worried. Because the dream of a "global village" on which internationalist elites have staked their political and economic fortunes is now in jeopardy. But his eloquent defense of globalism, with all the beautiful ringing phrases we have come to expect from him, published just as the world was turning its attention to China and Italy, seemed strangely out of step.

The growing crisis had not only shown that epidemics have been globalized along with almost everything else, it also offered a ready metaphor for other dangers globalism had brought into its fold: China is clearly not becoming a responsible partner in a liberal global village, based on universal human rights. Rather the Chinese Communist Party, the most murderous regime in the history of mankind, has been using the post-Cold War international order in order to steal technology, oppress minorities, bully smaller nations, pollute the environment and run roughshod over anything that stands in its way to global hegemony. The coronavirus and the web of lies around it have reminded us whom we are dealing with.

Italy, meanwhile, seemed to offer a complementary metaphor about international institutions: They can't be trusted to help the afflicted. As the pandemic ravaged the country, the world press was full of stories about how its fellow European Union member states turned their backs on Italy and scrambled to hide their own medical supplies, contrary to their EU obligations.

Harari had little to say about the conduct and future of the EU, or about how the Chinese totalitarian regime had deceived the world by, among other things, leveraging its influence on the World Health Organization, and by withholding information until it was too late: Flights departed Wuhan for the rest of the world after domestic flights from the city were stopped. Instead the historian focused his wrath on Donald Trump, the first American leader to seriously challenge China since 1972.

Trump's America First policy, said Harari, exemplified the bad old idea of national egotism. In response to Trump's halting U.S. support to the WHO, Harari announced he personally would donate $1 million to the organization. The proper response to the pandemic, his Twitter account announced, is a show of "global solidarity and generosity."

In articles in the Hebrew press, he also berated Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, who was using the pandemic, Harari claimed wrongly, it turned out to turn Israel into a dictatorship. It turns out that China's dictatorship bothered Harari less.

This is not the first time that he has chosen to accommodate dictatorships. He infamously replaced his criticism of Vladimir Putin with criticism of Trump in the Russian edition of his blockbuster book "21 Lessons for the 21st Century."

But this time not only Harari's moral credentials were on the line. This time his views of politics and history were also put to the test, and it can be said they have stood it very well. If you want to defend globalism from the coronavirus pandemic, though, you have to do better than that. It is not enough to conflate Western nationalism with egotism while ignoring the bullies that are taking advantage of the neoliberal global order.

If you're serious you would need to explain why international institutions have failed us so badly in stopping China's egotism, and why so many people turned instinctively to rely on to the nation-state, which the internationalists have been casting in the role of villain since the end of World War II.

Loyalty and altruism

It turns out that people have good reasons for turning to the nation-state in such a crisis. The first is solidarity. National societies are able to evoke altruism and self-sacrifice among their citizens. Sadly, larger collectives, such as "humanity" or "Europe," have so far not been able to do the same. For nations are, as Israeli scholar Yoram Hazony's "The Virtue of Nationalism" has recently reminded us, like extended families: They are bound by ties of "mutual loyalty."

The second reason to turn to nation-states, one that is even harder for neoliberal internationalists to acknowledge, is democracy. So far nation-states have proven to be the most effective vehicle for people and peoples to exercise control over their common fate. Self-determination perhaps better described as self-sovereignty is not a singular act of creation at the birth of independence; it is a continuous form of collective action. Democracy is nothing if not the framework for exercising self-sovereignty.

This seems to be lost on contemporary liberals. In the false dichotomy neoliberalism has imposed on our political discourse there are two opposing poles: On the left there are abstract, universal individual human rights, and opposite them, on the right, there is jingoistic blood-and-soil nationalism, which is all but synonymous with fascism.

This misleading picture is habitually found in Israeli discourse too, in every second op-ed by Profs. Zeev Sternhell and Mordechai Kremnitzer as well as among their many allies. The dichotomy falsely implies that democracy is somehow automatically on the side of individual human rights. We rarely pause to notice, however, that the more human rights have wedded themselves to internationalism, in the admirable cause of promoting universal humanism, the less they have been able to explain how people could hold their leaders to account, or control their own political fortunes.

It turns out that transcending nationalism also means transcending democracy. The EU , for example, though liberal, exercises much power over the lives of people who do not feel it takes their political will into account. Or consider the International Criminal Court in The Hague: Clearly intended to embody liberal values and uphold the universality of human rights, it nevertheless defies the first principle of democracy: government with the consent of the governed.

This trend had also shrunk our concept of liberty. On this view, it seems to mean something like Isaiah Berlin's "negative liberty": freedom from external coercion. But when left alone humans are not free. Alone we are helpless and defenseless. We can be free only within a society and we are the freest when we can take part in charting the course of the collective of which we are a part. This is why democracy, rooted in national solidarity, has been able to turn us from subject into citizen, anchoring liberty in sovereignty. And what this means, to the chagrin of internationalists, is that, through the medium of democracy, solidarity is the precondition of liberty.

The coronavirus crisis has reminded us why in times of distress we cling to the nation-state, its government and its borders to protect us. Because nations are bound by solidarity and can demand that their citizens exercise caution not just to protect themselves, but also to protect others. In the context of solidarity moral behavior is derived from something more than enlightened self-interest. And thus such societies can expect genuine altruism of their citizens.

The EU, it now seems abundantly clear, has failed to produce such bonds of mutual loyalty. And this is why it didn't take its various member states long to revert to shutting down their national borders: In a crisis that demands sacrifice for the sake of others, everyone seemed to know what political frameworks can be expected to deliver.

By contrast, globalist neoliberalism whose purveyors today call themselves the progressive left is not just unable to offer a framework for solidarity. It has in fact mutated into a form of individualism so extreme as to reject the very idea of solidarity. Pivoting around 1968, or thereabouts, the left, all across the West, has taken a momentous turn from class solidarity (which failed) to personal self-realization from Marx to Nietzsche, from communism to existentialism.

America first

Not surprisingly America took the lead, because the turn was seemingly the most natural there: In America socialism never found a comfortable home among the working class, and individualism was its homegrown creed. It is therefore no surprise that Reaganism eventually replaced the framework of the New Deal, in 1980. What we tend to forget is that the individualist revolution had already taken place on the other side of the spectrum when the 1960s New Left replaced the Old Left's quest for class solidarity with a quest for personal authenticity. So that when Reagan stepped into the ring, he found no serious opponent.

If anything, the left's individualism was more extreme than the right's. The American right, though strongly wedded to the free market, as well as to the old Emersonian ideal of the self-made man, still had the traditional checks of conservatism to circumscribe its rugged individualism: the trinity of God, Country and Family. The left rejected all three. We may therefore say that what we now call leftism is not an attack on individualism but the very opposite: an attack on the remaining checks the right has to restrain it. It has therefore become a rejection of solidarity.

One may of course object and say that the contemporary left has enlarged the circles of solidarity to include, beyond class, race, gender, ethnicity and sexual orientation. But in practice the whole trend not only balkanizes class solidarity, it also produces an emphasis on the symbolic at the expense of the political. It offers symbolic quotas in elite jobs and institutions, and individualistic experimentation in self-styled transgressions of gender boundaries. This is not something we should expect to appeal to workers who have lost their jobs to China and are now constantly berated by their would-be betters for their backwardness. "Clingers," Barack Obama called them. "Deplorables," his anointed successor, Hillary Clinton, echoed.

But despite constant attempts to delegitimize them as xenophobes, homophobes, Islamophobes and, of course racists, a growing number of citizens have come to understand what is at stake in the struggle over globalism: their civil rights, their citizenship, which is to say, democracy itself. Elites who seek to dismantle the nation-state under the guise of curing us from atavistic nationalism are really dismantling democracy's political apparatus, which is all that stands between the mass of citizens and the reversion to the status of subjects.

But the masses stubbornly see themselves not as enemies of democracy but as the only force that can save it from the globalist dreams of elites. Indeed, the dream of a single global village has always looked better from airport business lounges than from working-class neighborhoods ravaged by unemployment, and transformed into foreign countries for their indigenous inhabitants by illegal immigration (which has also depressed wages in local markets). The globalist dream seems to them more like a nightmare. The very rich may become "citizens of the world" but the rest of us would become subject of nowhere, under international managerial elites.

Harari's internationalism is not an alternative form of solidarity. It is the alliance between bureaucratic elites over the heads of their various national publics the same alliance which has failed to face the current crisis, and proved impotent in holding China to account. Of course, no one in their right mind, except in totalitarian states, would be against sharing scientific knowledge. No Western nation has done that in the face of the pandemic.

But when actual international solidarity is called for, it cannot be achieved by first suppressing solidarity within states. An international order is probably best suited to preserve liberty when it seeks to become a family of free independent nations not a uniform humanity under a single bureaucratic managerial elite.

The internationalist elite, with its frequent traveling, would probably recognize a handy metaphor for this in flight-safety videos, rendered perhaps even more evocative in a world scrambling for ventilators: When traveling with a person in need of assistance, first put on your own oxygen mask. It is clear why: otherwise you would impair your ability to assist them.

If we are to subdue this disease and emerge from the crisis in reasonable shape we had better hope that Donald Trump, to return to Harari's example, takes care of the America economy first. Unless, of course, Europe will be content to see the next Marshall Plan come from China.

Continue reading here:

Wake up, globalization fans: In a pandemic, nation-states are at their best - Haaretz

End of reason: Why statue vandalism, thought policing and rise of a ‘woke’ religion signal decline of liberalism – Firstpost

The West is in the grip of a violent culture war. It started with the brutal murder of George Floyd in the US, rode on the wings of anti-racism fueled by fury against police brutality, appropriated across the Atlantic and now has become a fierce explosion of rage, outrage, looting, violence, vandalism of statues, cynicism and self-hatred.

To a certain extent, this upheaval was due because the US never really got down to confront its racist past the way Germans did. But the protests, triggered by systemic racism in the US, are also hastening the mutation of western liberalism into a virulent strain. Driven by the reactionary Left, among the many manifestations of this culture war is an all-out assault on history and a reinforcing of the cancel culture that seeks to boycott everything that fails the ideological purity test.

This churn in western liberal democracies throws up some questions that need to be engaged with. What is driving this culture war? Why are statues being attacked? Why is there a movement to amend the past? Why are universities and liberal institutions de-platforming dissent and cultivating a form of extreme censorship instead of serving as a marketplace of vibrant, even competing ideas? Why are revivalism and violent upheaval upstaging the political process in the West? Why is liberalism ceding space to an intolerant version of itself that looks, talks and behaves like a religion demanding unquestioning faith from its followers?

This new, dogmatic ideology lends itself to various semantical expressions such as intersectionality, cultural Marxism, neo-Maoism, identity politics or even the more pejorative call-out culture, virtue-signaling or wokeness but its core beliefs run contrary to and are even antithetical to liberalism.

This dogmatism, that now dominates western (also Indian) campus, media and institutional spaces and defenestrates anyone that its pious practitioners deem as not deferential enough to their cause, has been called successor ideology by cultural critic Wesley Yang that succeeds liberalism but is more of an authoritarian Utopianismmasquerading as liberal humanism while usurping it from within.

This successor ideology is amorphous, frequently changes its goalposts and draws tighter and tighter its chastity circle. Writer JK Rowling may testify. She has apparently been cancelled by her own charactersin the transphobia row.

This radicalism germinates from liberalism and shares some of the liberal goals, but it operates within a faith-based disciplinary superstructure that brooks no questions, imposes a stricter value system, demands total ideological conformity and installs an evangelist doctrine that carries punishment for slip-ups. The successor ideology of social justice warriors, in effect, militates against the very notions of liberalism.

For instance, the #MeToo movement arguesNew York Timescolumnist Ross Douthat after achieving admirable and long-cherished liberal goals has delivered a post-liberal order where intimate life is subject to bureaucratic supervision. Presumption of male guilt has replaced due process. The line between sexual and political is blurred. The tension between liberal values and tenets of successor ideology is now stark.

This tension is visible in the recent controversy around gay and transgender rights where author Rowling has been called a transphobe and hauled over coals for disagreeing with trans-rights activists view that gender identity is separate from biological sex.

Rowlings focus on thereality of biological sexas a way of reinforcing the rights won by women through a long struggle has been called transphobic, and she has been called out for insensitivity.

This is an interesting paradox, and it takes us right into the heart of the debate. Rowling, a radical feminist, and trans rights activists have taken competing political positions.

However, the writers nuanced position and unwillingness to dismiss her own lived reality have been eclipsed by the totalitarian views of the other side that negates her experiences because she is seemingly betraying the cause and her fellow travellers. We know from scholarNassim Nicholas Talebthat the most intolerant winsbut theres more going on here.

Successor ideology may propagate some liberal ideas, but the curve of the movement takes it away from liberalism. To quote from Douthat in NYT, In their liberal form, these causes seek an individual right to live ones life without facing unjust discrimination. But when other constitutional rights long considered essential to liberalism freedom of speech, freedom of religion come into conflict with the movement, its assumed that the old rights must inevitably give way. And the movements vanguard increasingly rejects debate entirelyApplied to this context, it looks thus: author Rowling was exercising her freedom of speech but the moment it came into conflict with the scriptures of the successor ideology, her views were cancelled and she was called out by the torchbearers of neo liberalism. In the sanctified world of Leftist identity politics, wordsare actions.

This semantic twist turns the rules of our world upside down. As James Lindsay writes in the essay How the Left Turned Words Into Violence, and Violence Into Justice: under a prevalent view that has emerged from universities in recent years, a wrong opinion is seen as tantamount to a thrown punch or even an indication of a willingness to genocidewhich invites the idea that an offended party who throws a real punch (or worse) is simply acting in self-defense.

Through her opinion regardless of whether it was nuanced and despite her protestations that she is empathetic to the cause of trans rights Rowling had committed acardinal sinand must be punished. She apparently hasfeet of clay.

When neo-liberalism (or successor ideology) has decided that words are actions, it can leave no space for dissenting views. In a paradigm where non-conformity invites charges of moral transgression and may result in expulsion from the circle, holding a contrary opinion is tantamount to issuing a threat to life. This is the precise scenario that played out at theNew York Timeswhere opinion editor James Bennet was forced to resign for well publishing opinions.'

Through his act of publishing on the NYT Op-Ed page the opinion of Tom Cotton US Senator who advocated calling troops to quell rioters on American streets if local law enforcement fails Bennet had committed such an unpardonable sin that he had to be sacked to redeem the newspaper.

This act of redemption complete with a sincere apology from the NYT apparentlyfollowed a revolt by the newsroomas staffers saw in Senator Tom Cottons words a threat to lives. In the ensuing battle between free speech advocates and social justice progressives, Bennets head had to roll to placate the offended newsroom. It ought to tell us something about a liberal newspaper which had to grovel for publishing a dissenting opinion, sack the commissioning editor and withdraw the article to atone for its sin.

Senator Cottons views could have been wrong, even provocative though he did make a distinction between peaceful protestors and looters and rioters who had taken the law into their hands but if journalists start behaving like thought police and carry an eraser to wipe out opinions that run contrary to their ideology then it speaks of a mediascape that has dropped all pretensions of objectivity.

It indicates that journalists see themselves as crusaders in the battle between good and evil, reserve for themselves the exclusive right to determine good and evil and perceive neutrality as a form of complicity with the devil. Once this Rubicon is crossed, the journalists moral compunction to be objective is gone, what remains is a crusade for the truth as designated by secular ideology. Any dissenting opinion is to be de-platformed, every contrarian voice is to be stifled.

As an author and former editor ofNew RepublicAndrew Sullivan writes, the situation is very reminiscent of totalitarian states where you have to compete to broadcast your fealty to the cause. In these past two weeks, if you didnt put up on Instagram or Facebook some kind of slogan or symbol displaying your wokeness, you were instantly suspect.

This phenomenon is being replicated across media, campuses, institutions to a wide array of cultural symbols. Paw Patrol, a childrens cartoon on canine characters has been de-platformed. Gone With The Wind was sought to be cancelled, but instead of going away with the wind it came back with a vengeance in pop culture.

The editor of a top US academic publication, University of Chicago economist Harald Uhlig, was sought to be de-platformed and dislodged for not being supportive enough to the Black Lives Matter cause and for criticising the movements demand of defunding the police.

Top editor atPhiladelphia InquirerStan Wischnowski was booted out for carrying the headline Buildings Matter, Too, in context of rioters destroying buildings;Bon Apptiteditor-in-chief Adam Rapoport was forced to resign reportedly for not being sufficiently deferential to the cause; a radio jockey was suspended for questioning the orthodoxy of white privilege; an LA Galaxy footballer was fired due to his partners post on BLM, a UCLA lecturer was suspended for refusing to cancel his exam for black students, and a Cornell Law School faculty member faced termination for censuring Black Lives Matter, according to reports.

Bear in mind that some of these de-platformings were done not only because some were guilty of holding incorrect views, but in some cases, the actors supporting the secular ideology were considered not committed enough, reminiscent of life in a totalitarian state where insufficient zeal towards the ideology is a severe crime. Heaven help you if you were the first person to stop applauding after comrade Stalins speech.

What this successor ideology seeks is absolute moral clarity, and it rejects all manner of complexity. It refuses to see humans as complex beings and human societies as complex structures that cannot be straitjacketed into an absolutist doctrinaire. Cancel culture, that remains a prominent symptom of this neo-liberalism, functions on the notion that every perceived deviation is a microaggression and a betrayal of the cause, whose purity must be upheld at all times.

One of the reasons why liberalism is ceding space to this totalitarian strain is that the cancel culture makes an easy replacement for activism, providing the same adrenalin rush of feeling good about oneself merely by being judgmental about others. This, as Barack Obama had pointed out last year during a youth convention, isnt real activism.

Like, if I tweet or hashtag about how you didnt do something right or used the wrong verb then I can sit back and feel pretty good about myself, cause, Man, you see how woke I was, I called you out. Thats not activism. Thats not bringing about change If all youre doing is casting stones, youre probably not going to get that far. Thats easy to do.

And yet this totalitarian ideology has gained massive ground among the educated urban youth in democracies because it cuts through the complexities and ambiguities of human nature and offers a clear sense of purpose, moral clarity and a thrill of solidarity, a spiritual horizon for ordinary human life, things that an exhausted liberalism fails to do, points out Douthat in NYT.

And yet it is a false clarity that fails to consider the agency of an individual and dismisses the notion that human beings can be flawed and yet virtuous, and one doesnt cancel the other. Obama had stressed this very point when he said, This idea of purity and youre never compromised and youre always politically woke and all that stuff You should get over that quickly. The world is messy; there are ambiguities People who do really good stuff have flaws

The protestors who had declared a war on the statues and sought to deface or bring down the effigies of Mahatma Gandhi, Winston Churchill, Christopher Columbus, George Washington or even Abraham Lincoln, apply modern standards of morality on historical figures, try to sort them in simplistic boxes of good and evil, and if found inadequate, proceed to cancel them from history.

This act is problematic on multiple counts. First, dismantling of statues is a symbolical act of erasing the past making it difficult for later generations to honestly confront events which they an inescapable part of. Any attempt at editing history makes us rootless, places usin medias reswithout a context and erodes our identity. In this, the totalitarian neo-liberalism ideology takes a leaf out of Chinese playbook. The Communist Party has meticulously erased all links to its violent past when Mao Zedongs permanent revolution destroyed millions of lives.

China has sought to erase that history to the extent that a visitor wandering the streets of any Chinese city today will find no plaques consecrating the sites of mass arrests, no statues dedicated to the victims of persecution, no monuments erected to honor those who perished after being designated class enemies.

The Communist Party did that because any acknowledgement of guilt, it fears, may delegitimize the party. It speaks of insecurity that successor ideology seeks to emulate.

Second, the secular ideology driving this statue activism isnt that different from the Talibans act of destroying the Bamiyan Buddhas to underline the threat cultural motifs of the past pose to dominant ideologies of the present. The Taliban sought to establish its power structure by destroying the past, the woke Taliban seeks to amend the future by doing a surgical procedure on history.

Gandhi may have held problematic views on racism at an early stage in his career but to cherry-pick that flaw, amplify it, define him solely through that prism and invalidate one of the 20th centurys greatest political leaders is a perfectly woke and pointless thing to do. The call to cancel Cromwell, Churchill, Columbus, or even Edward Colston, a 17th-century philanthropist who made his money in the slave trade, arises from the same infantile impulse rid the public sphere of characters who fail the modern purity test. No allowance is given for context, human agency, flaws and complexity of characters.

As Sahil Mahtani writes inSpectator, The Taliban drew strength from cultish beliefs taught in schools - and so, too, are we now seeing the maturing of a moral system developed on campuses. The Taliban were anti-Shia, seeing their revivalist Sunnism as the only acceptable version of Islam. The statue campaigners think they are the only acceptable heirs of liberalism

India, too, has witnessed the removal of cultural motifs of the colonial past but that process be it renaming of roads or cities has largely been a slow, evolutionary and political process unlike the violent upheaval of a beheaded Columbus. There have been instances of vandalism, for sure, but those were borne more out of political opportunism than any grand and coordinated ideological purge.

As Swapan Dasgupta writes in Times of India, Indians, it is often said, have a feeble sense of history. Yet, in todays world, we seem remarkably at ease with it.

Western liberalism, though, is facing a crisis of confidence, upstaged by a transmogrified version of itself that demands obeisance, genuflection, unquestioning faith and gives the thrill of moral upliftment and cohesion in return. It represents the end of reason and Americas irreversible ideological decline.

See more here:

End of reason: Why statue vandalism, thought policing and rise of a 'woke' religion signal decline of liberalism - Firstpost

The Vocoder’s Cyborg Flights in Electronic Music and Hip-Hop – Reverb News

The first time the legendary jazz bandleader Herbie Hancock streaked his voice across one of his albums, he threaded it through a vocoder first. Hancock's 1978 album Sunlight prominently features the Sennheiser Vocoder VSM201, a newly manufactured device that thinned and buffed his voice to a futuristic shine on the album's disco-inflected A-side. On songs like "I Thought It Was You" and "Come Running To Me," Hancock's heavily processed voice pitches higher than its natural range, its guttural qualities swapped out for an airy computerized whine. It's a voice that matches its partly synthesized, partly acoustic instrumentation, a tone caught between worldsnot quite human and not quite machine, but a third, cyborgian presence.

First developed in the early 20th century and used during World War II to encrypt telephone conversations between world leaders, the vocoder sneaked its way into popular music in the early '70s by way of the soundtrack to Stanley Kubrick's 1971 science fiction movie, A Clockwork Orange. (The generic term "vocoder," a portmanteau of "voice" and "encoder," has since been applied to many different vocal-manipulation devices.) Wendy Carlos, whose 1968 album, Switched-On Bach, was largely responsible for popularizing the Moog synthesizer, signed on to write and perform a score fitting the movie's dystopian ambiance. The film's protagonist loves Beethoven, and Carlos and her primary collaborator Rachel Elkind had already begun work on a synth adaptation of the Ninth Symphony with its famous choral setting "Ode to Joy."

Hancock introduces the vocoder to a live audience in this 1979 performance of "I Thought It Was You."

They had tried before, with little success, to get the Moog to "sing," but found it could not convincingly enunciate consonants. Rather than conjure up a voice fully from inside the machine, Carlos opted to filter Elkind's singing voice through a vocoder, a technology she had first encountered at the Bell Labs Pavilion during the New York World's Fair of 196465. The result fit the sound of the Moog perfectly: This cyborg voice retained enough human qualities to be decipherable, even as it was plated over with pristine computer tones. Early listeners were skeptical of the new sound. "The first reactions were unanimous: Everyone hated it!" Carlos wrote on her website decades later. "A playing synth was bad enough, but a 'singing' synth? Too much, turn it off!"

Not long after Carlos and Elkind first applied the vocoder to music, it began reverberating across national borders, from the United States to Germany and Japan and back again. With each iteration, it accumulated new meaning and potential. In the soundtrack to A Clockwork Orange, the vocoder's cyborg presence deepened the movie's considerations of what it might mean to "program" a person against his willto empty him of self-determination and turn him into something more like a computer. Across the Atlantic in Dsseldorf a few years later, the groundbreaking electronic band Kraftwerk began deploying the vocoder in their own explorations of personhood and technology.

Not long after Carlos and Elkind first applied the vocoder to music, it began reverberating across national borders, from the United States to Germany and Japan and back again. With each iteration, it accumulated new meaning and potential. In the soundtrack to A Clockwork Orange, the vocoder's cyborg presence deepened the movie's considerations of what it might mean to "program" a person against his willto empty him of self-determination and turn him into something more like a computer. Across the Atlantic in Dsseldorf a few years later, the groundbreaking electronic band Kraftwerk began deploying the vocoder in their own explorations of personhood and technology.

On albums like 1977's Trans-Europe Express, 1978's The Man-Machine, and 1981's Computer World, Kraftwerk sought to locate the role of the human in an increasingly surveilled and automated modern world. They declared themselves robots, speak-singing in dry, modulated tones over impossibly tight drum machine beats and synthesized arpeggios. Singing into machines, they professed their love for computers, serenading not the person on the other end of the line but the cold, impartial screens of the connective devices themselves. Though Kraftwerk's music was future-oriented (and certainly prescient), they rarely incubated a sense of cynicism or dystopia in their work. Their melodies slant upwards, more innocent than all-knowing; they sound helpless and in awe of technology rather than terrified of it.

The open ambivalence toward technology that Kraftwerk maintained throughout their seminal work in the '70s and early '80s made their music and its techniques easy to reinterpret. Their use of the vocoder radiated into Herbie Hancock's work (he used the Sennheiser on 1979's Feets Don't Fail Me Now as well as Sunlight), populated Italo-disco producer Giorgio Moroder's 1977 album, From Here to Eternity, and found its way into the albums of the Japanese band Yellow Magic Orchestra. Beginning in the early '80s, the vocoder would begin to make a natural home in the new, Bronx-based genre of hip-hopa form of music that, like Kraftwerk, challenged conventional narratives about the relationships between human beings and novel technology.

If a genre can be said to originate from a single moment in time, then hip-hop's starting point is well-documented. It sprang from a high school party at the end of the summer of 1973, hosted by a teenage DJ Kool Herc and his sister, Cindy Campbell. Herc spun records for his friends on his parents' soundsystem in the rec room of their apartment building, opting for songs with long instrumental breakdowns that inspired the crowd to dance. His friend, Coke La Rock, started shouting out the names of his friends over these vocal-free segments, a musical style derived from Jamaican toasting that would later become rap. Word of the music at the party spread through the Bronx, and as Herc got hired at more and more gigs, he began extending the drum breakdowns of the soul and funk records he played, spinning two copies of the same record simultaneously and resetting the needle so that the break went on indefinitely. He dubbed this technique "the merry-go-round."

In this way, from its beginning, hip-hop consciously reinscribed the potential meaning of the consumer technology on which it depended. A turntable, as a product, came pre-loaded with a specific model of music consumption: It was meant to play a record from beginning to end, to serve as a delivery device for prerecorded music. It was never intended to be an instrument in itself, just an intermediary between record company and listener. Hip-hop, along with its Manhattan cousin disco, positioned the listener as an artist in her own rightsomeone who could take consumer products designed for passive consumption and flip them around into active, dynamic tools.

In an interview with Mark Dery for his 1993 book, Flame Wars, science-fiction author Samuel R. Delany noted the challenge that hip-hop posed to the technological tools in its arsenal. "To look at any of these black cultural youth movements as an easy and happy development blossoming uncritically from the overwhelmingly white world of high-tech production that, yes, makes that culture possible is, I suspect, thoroughly to misread the fiercely oppositional nature of this art: scratch and sampling begin, in particular, as a specific miss-use and conscientious desecration of the artifacts of technology and the entertainment media," he said.

Jonzun Crew play "Pack Jam" on German TV, 1983.

The vocoder, another technology misapplied toward musical purposes, fit neatly into this schema, and by 1982 had found its place in hip-hop.

The subgenre known as electro-boogie bloomed that year, when the Boston-based rap group Jonzun Crew, the Bronx DJ and rapper Afrika Bambaataa, and the Bronx hip-hop group Grandmaster Flash and the Furious Five all released pivotal vocoder-based singles. Jonzun Crew's "Pack Man (Look Out For The OVC)" drew references to Sun Ra's jazz Afrofuturism into a hip-hop context ("OVC" stands for "Outerspace Visual Communicator," a video synthesizer played by its creator, Bill Sebastian, at Sun Ra concerts in the late '70s). Amid detuned arpeggios, sparse percussion, and minor key motifs in the style of Kraftwerk, a deeply corroded voice rasps, chants, and laughs. The song's title can be made out, and the name of the Outerspace Visual Communicator, and little else. The song plays like a garbled transmission from a distant planet; its central voice, engulfed in immeasurable space, holds a certain authority, as if it were calling out from a world more advanced than our own, and unintelligible in its advancement.

"Jonzun Crew broke out of their own constraining present with instruments that gestured toward a post-human landscape, a place where the line between human and machine blurred away."

Jonzun Crew's 1983 debut album, Lost in Space, introduced more concrete pop elements to the group's futuristic sound, all while highlighting the vocoder as a primary tool. It once again pointed to Sun Ra as an ancestor with the song "Space is the Place," a reinterpretation of the Afrofuturist visionary's iconic 1973 track. If Sun Ra deployed the tools of jazz toward an expansive, utopian future, Jonzun Crew broke out of their own constraining present with instruments that gestured toward a post-human landscape, a place where the line between human and machine blurred away. The group readily transformed themselves into cyborgs with the vocoder, but their work's finer details retained a sense of human embodiment.

Toward the end of "Space is the Place," Jonzun Crew stage a call-and-response coda, a technique with deep roots in Black gospel. "You must follow me," speaks one voice, and a chorus of voices answers: "We will follow you." "You must follow me to space," clarifies the first voice, and as the vocals fade out, the sound of heavy breathing replaces them. By its nature, the vocoder irons out non-utterances like breathing. The song concludes not with the sound of robots blasting off into the heavens, but with the sound of a panicked, disoriented human being taking stock of an alien environment.

The year 1982 also saw the release of Grandmaster Flash and the Furious Five's "Scorpio," an electro single from the album The Message that similarly deployed the vocoder toward thinning and granulating the human voice to the point of near-unrecognizability. That same year, Afrika Bambaataa and the Soulsonic Force's landmark single "Planet Rock" interpolated two Kraftwerk songs"Trans Europe Express," from which it gets its beat and synth motif, and "Numbers," from which it takes a vocoder sampletoward its own vision of post-industrial humankind. Bambaataa also processed his own voice on the track, using a vocoder and a Lexicon PCM42 digital delay to lend his raps a gleaming metallic edge. While "Pack Man" and "Scorpio" both carried an air of future menace in their refusal to yield the voice and their insistence on an enigmatic cyborgian presence, "Planet Rock" focused more on how technology could bolster, rather than disappear, the human. Bambaataa's calls and responses sound more as though he's speaking to a real, live crowd, rather than a congregation of robots. His sparing use of voice processing technologies line the song with futuristic potentials without drowning it in them. Technology is the starting point, but people are the end goal.

Grandmaster Flash & The Furious Five - "Scorpio"

In Flame Wars, Mark Dery asks hip-hop scholar Tricia Rose how the use of consumer technology squares with the Black musical tradition. "Can one be funky and mechanical?" he queries. "No question; that's what hip-hop is!" she replies. "If we understand the machine as a product of human creativity whose parameters are always suggesting what's beyond them, then we can read hip-hop as the response of urban people of color to the postindustrial landscape... What Afrika Bambaataa and hip-hoppers like him saw in Kraftwerks use of the robot was an understanding of themselves as already having been robots. Adopting the robot reflected a response to an existing condition: namely, that they were labor for capitalism, that they had very little value as people in this society. By taking on the robotic stance, one is playing with the robot. Its like wearing body armor that identifies you as an alien: if its always on anyway, in some symbolic sense, perhaps you could master the wearing of this guise in order to use it against your interpolation."

Vocoders on Reverb

The idea of anticapitalist body armor appeared not just in electro-boogie's sound but also its costumes. Afrika Bambaataa and the Soulsonic Force wore flowing lame robes in the Afrofuturist tradition of Sun Ra and Parliament-Funkadelic for the "Planet Rock" video, while Jonzun Crew donned motorcycle helmets and sparkling military jackets for "Pack Jam." These outfits obscured the performers without fully roboticizing them, much as the vocoder did to their voices. If, in the 1980s, white society was content to file Black people away as cheap labor with no further value, Black artists responded by transforming themselves into cyborgs. Shut out from the full sphere of the human, but not content to be machines, either, they employed the vocoder as a mutating tool, an escape hatch from an impossible dichotomy. Bambaataa, Flash, and Jonzun Crew fashioned themselves a third entity, and found a way out.

In the 21st century, following the success of Cher's 1998 single, "Believe," the pitch-correcting software Auto-Tune has largely replaced vocoder as the voice processing method du jour, used to great effect by artists like T-Pain and Charli XCX. One notable holdout from the '90s is Daft Punk, the French duo who siphoned techniques from house and electro-boogie to massive popularity and acclaim. Their robot voices derive from Black American uses of vocoder, in addition to Kraftwerk and Giorgio Moroder, and like many European mimics they have greatly outsold their influences. Singles like "Technologic" and "Harder Better Faster Stronger" loop vocoded phrases that vaguely gesture toward their capitalist environments through breezy, easily digestible pop structures, largely defanging the modes of resistance that have coursed through much of the vocoder's history.

In the 21st century, following the success of Cher's 1998 single, "Believe," the pitch-correcting software Auto-Tune has largely replaced vocoder as the voice processing method du jour, used to great effect by artists like T-Pain and Charli XCX. One notable holdout from the '90s is Daft Punk, the French duo who siphoned techniques from house and electro-boogie to massive popularity and acclaim. Their robot voices derive from Black American uses of vocoder, in addition to Kraftwerk and Giorgio Moroder, and like many European mimics they have greatly outsold their influences. Singles like "Technologic" and "Harder Better Faster Stronger" loop vocoded phrases that vaguely gesture toward their capitalist environments through breezy, easily digestible pop structures, largely defanging the modes of resistance that have coursed through much of the vocoder's history.

The chirpy, French-accented vocals of "Harder Better Faster Stronger" were rerouted into hip-hop in 2007, when Kanye West sampled the song on his single "Stronger." If Daft Punk's original track cheerily gargled words that could have been taken from a manual on worker optimization, West's take funneled the same phrases into a biting tale of survival at any cost. The song's video borrows posthuman imagery from the 1988 anime Akira, casting West as Tetsuo, a biologically engineered teenager who has broken out of his captors' control. He replaces the original's busy house beat with a darker and more pummeling drum pattern that lets its hi-hat linger, and raps seethingly over Daft Punk's vocoder. The phrase he loops the most from "Harder Better Faster Stronger" is the one that dips into a startlingly low register on the last two words: "Our work is never over." Taken into West's hands, the phrase bleeds menace. It's no longer merely a description of capitalism and the place of the human being within it, a source of eternal labor. Instead, it rings defiantly, the cyborg voice clanging against a cyborg beat, seeking escape and beginning the long, hard task of building the world to come.

About the author: Sasha Geffen is the author of Glitter Up the Dark: How Pop Music Broke the Binary, out now from the University of Texas Press. Their writing also appears in Rolling Stone, Artforum, The Nation, Pitchfork, and elsewhere. They live in Colorado.

See more here:

The Vocoder's Cyborg Flights in Electronic Music and Hip-Hop - Reverb News

Jaws Is the Perfect Blockbuster – The Ringer

2020s summer blockbuster season has been put on hold because of the pandemic, but that doesnt mean we cant celebrate the movies from the past that we flocked out of the sun and into air conditioning for. Welcome to The Ringers Return to Summer Blockbuster Season, where well feature different summer classics each week.

Twenty-four hours is like three weeks! Thats the complaint of a local woman (for no reason at all, lets call her Karen) at a town meeting after she learns that the nicely gentrified beach community of Amity will be closed by the mayors office following grisly evidence of a shark attack; its a shrill, high-frequency whine that cuts through the scenes bustling, multitracked sound design like an air-raid siren.

For those of us whove seen Jaws more than a few times, even the films throwaway dialogue has been etched into our cerebral cortexes. For every one of the scripts enduring catchphrasesthink Youre gonna need a bigger boat or Smile, you son of a bitchtheres an exchange beloved by diehards: the idiot, bass-mouthed fisherman unable to comprehend that his friends latest trophy is a tiger shark (A whaaat?); the long-haired hipster searching in vain for his lost (and long since devoured) black Lab (Pippit. Pippit!); the old lady complaining to Roy Scheider that the disenfranchised residents of a local childrens martial arts class have been karate-ing the picket fences. But the line about keeping the beaches closed resonates the most, and not just in our current claustrophobic context. Its a whine that clarifies whats really at stake in Steven Spielbergs industry game changer: the possibility, scarier and more voracious than any great white, of a lost summer.

Summer in Jaws is a character all on its own, even if the bare trees lining the streets betray the films late-fall production dates. (The continuity error was fixed by CGI on DVD, a less obtrusive bit of meddling than turning guns into flashlights in E.T., but revisionist history nevertheless.) There had been iconic movie scenes set on beaches before: Think of the lovers rolling around in the surf in From Here to Eternity, or all the wholesome mid-60s teenyboppers playing Beach Blanket Bingo. But Jaws hunger for exposed, all-American flesh went beyond adolescent titillation or seasonal nostalgia. Spielbergs vision of scantily clad revelers taking their chances in troubled waters was and remains definitive, escapism mixed with anthropology. Jaws is a thriller rather than a coming-of-age fable, but it feels like there are whole, sun-dappled short stories embedded in its recurring images of tanned middle schoolers lounging in dinky sailboats, or parents toweling off their sand-covered kids while standing ankle-deep in the surf. Relaxingbarelyin a beach chair during an off-duty afternoon, police chief Martin Brody observes the panorama from a far, paranoid distance. You dont go in the water at all, do ya? hes admonished by a constituent; his aquaphobia will soon be revealed to be simple common sense, even as it stands in opposition to the bottom line.

Amity is a summer town. ... We need summer dollars, declares Amitys mayor, Larry Vaughn (Murray Hamilton), a comically dishonest figure styled by Jaws and its witty team of screenwriters (Carl Gottlieb, Howard Sackler, and Peter Benchley, the author of the original source novel) after the parade of criminal bureaucrats on display during the Watergate scandal. (Hamilton was a master of playing guys who were slow on the take: Hes the bourgie fool cuckolded by Dustin Hoffman in The Graduate.) In an essay published in March in The New Republic, Alex Shephard analyzed how Jaws barely submerged political allegorya bumbling cover-up designed to save Amitys economy in the face of a new, predatory threatworks both in the context of the movies 1975 release date and in a year where our collective, primal fears have been exploited from all sides, with no reliable protector in sight. Ignored by politicians, [Jaws heroes] face off against an unseen enemy on a much too fragile, much too small boat, writes Shephard. Theyre on their owna feeling that is all too familiar.

Spielbergs trio of shark hunters comprises a cross-section of male types, with Robert Shaws Ahab-ish Quint holding things down for old-school machismo and Richard Dreyfusss monied ichthyologist Matt Hooper embodying well-heeled technocratic geekery (Youve been counting money all your life, Quint says to his new frenemy, and hes not wrong). Somewhere between them resides Brody, a recent big-city transplant whose investment in Amitys survival as a tourist trap is strictly professional. What makes it personal, eventually, is a close encounter between the shark and Brodys preteen son Michael (Chris Rebello), which steeps his hero-cop act in a protective, paternal empathy distinct from dead-eyed 70s supercops like Dirty Harry or Popeye Doyle. (Brodys more like Frank Serpico minus the beard, a straight arrow battling corruption in the system from within.) For Quint and Hooper, the quest into deeper waters aboard the Orca is similarly self-involved: Theyre risking their lives not for civic pride but for a set of private obsessions. Quint survived the shark-infested wreck of the USS Indianapolis, and the hunt is a chance to assuage his survivors guilt and hook his own private Moby Dick; Hooper is in it for scientific progress, but hes also a glib go-getter whose Cassandra act is accuratelyif dismissivelysized up by the mayor as a stab at publicity: Love to prove that, wouldnt you? Get your name into the National Geographic.

As a horror movie released at the apex of the genres studio-subsidized rebirth in the 1970s, Jaws reroutes the trajectories and themes of classics like Psycho and The Texas Chain Saw Massacrecautionary tales in which outsiders venturing into the Old Weird America get whats coming to them via human monsters whod be better left undisturbed. In Spielbergs film, the great white is the outsider, constituting a threat thats at once thoroughly existential and a matter of nickel-and-dime economics. What the shark and Amitys ruling class have in common is the need for a steady food supply: The visitors who swarm into town on ferries, slathered in sunscreen with fanny packs full of disposable income, are just chum in the water.

These are ruthless ideas, but Jaws is, lest we forget, a pretty ruthless movie: Spielbergs filmmaking style on his first big-budget production is carnivorous. By offing a pretty, naked blonde and that aforementioned Labrador retriever in the first 20 minutes, the director definitely establishes that hes not fucking around, PG rating be damned. He also smartly imbues the staging and dialogue with just enough shell-shocked ambivalence to make audiences wonder what, if anything, all that bloody, unsentimental carnage is really about. Is the nubile, guileless hippie chick getting dragged underwater in lieu of a stoned bonfire hookup a symbolic figure, an emblem of the death of the 60s? Did the little boy have it coming as punishment for his moms negligence? Did the dog get it because Steven Spielberg is a cat person?

Combine its not-quite-world-beating heroes with its faux-utopian coastal milieu and putatively metaphorical monsterwhose fakeness when finally glimpsed full-on actually enhances its horrific presence, an accidental Brechtian effect lost to the onset of CGIand Jaws would seem to have plenty going on under the surface. In addition to all the things that it does brilliantlyits efficiency as a scare machine; its effectiveness as a directorial showcase; its evocation of eccentricity filtered through a virtuoso populism closer to The Wizard of Oz; the killer performances of its leads, especially Shaw, who doesnt so much chew the scenery as swallow it wholethe film unfolds as a ripe bicentennial satire, a snapshot of a country at once on guard and susceptible to a semi-hidden enemy. In his new book, Make My Day: Movie Culture in the Age of Reagan, J. Hoberman perceptively pairs Jaws with one of its Best Picture rivals, Robert Altmans Nashville, persuasively painting the two movies as structural and thematic twins, all-American epics in which mass patriotic gatherings are tinged with the threat of bloody violence.

Released in the fall of 1975 and riding a tidal wave of critical adulation via the one-woman hype machine of Pauline Kaelwho watched an early cut and deemed it an epochal masterpieceNashville, for all its down-and-dirty comedy, was a prestige picture. Even if Altman usually managed to be artful and unpretentious at his bestand many consider Nashville to be his masterpiecehe was still the proverbial filmmaker for grown-ups who thrived in a moment when Hollywood was, according to a seductive and still enduring myth, more hospitable to adult cinema. Jaws, by contrast, was seen as embodying the tip of a very dangerous spearthe onset of the high-concept blockbuster, no less potent an emissary of encroaching populism than The Godfather, but even more accessible. Where Altman and Francis Ford Coppola were seen as thoughtfully critiquing American greed and spectacle, Jaws surfaced in the popular consciousness as a pure Hollywood by-producta perfect engine, as Hooper describes its namesake, driven solely by its parent studios motives for profit.

A case can be made that Jaws ostensible single-mindednessits swift, gliding sense of momentum, which renders a two-hour running time almost subliminally quickis still the best expression of its directors skill set: that for all his later forays into history, morality, and future-shock social commentary, Spielbergs best incarnation is as an orchestrator of believably visceral carnage, of the fantastic intruding roughly and entertainingly on the present day. And yet, while its true that Jaws is one lean, mean entertainment machine, it also contains multitudes in a way thats as quintessentially 70s as Nashville, with all those stray, memorable little one-liners and beautifully managed detours into character development, like the game of peekaboo between Brody and his toddler Sean (Jay Mello) that seamlessly embroiders the films reckoning with masculinity. The still-bracing aggressiveness of Spielbergs scare tacticsthose bobbing, mobile underwater perspectives; that lurking, omnipresent John Williams scorebelies how consistently Jaws finds room for exchanges that deepen the psychologies of its protagonists and elevate the supporting characters around them into plausibly weird, funny bystanders. This sense of humanity gives heft to the scripts parable of a town tryingand failing, and trying againto put its best interests over cold hard cash.

The double-edged tension of Jaws plot versus its larger offscreen narrative is fascinating and funny. In the story, the sharks appetite is such that only canceling the Fourth of July will suffice as a public safety measure; in the real world, Jaws ended up drawing crowds to multiplexes in unprecedented numbers. Theres much to say about the sublimated anxieties and (literally) projected fears that drove Jaws popularitythe shark, like George Romeros zombies, can be transformed into a symbol of anything youd likebut blaming the film for the blockbusterization of Hollywood cinema, which happens often enough to be a clich, is unfairly reductive.

The biggest difference between Jaws and Star Wars, which almost instantly toppled Jaws from its all-time box office perch two years later, is not one of style or genre but of ancillary possibilities. Star Wars was aggressively marketed across a variety of products and platforms, creating a template for the high-yield, posthuman studio properties of the 80s. But with Jaws, a nice, cute Bruce plushie was not part of the equation. One way to look at E.T. is as Jaws more benign twin, a film with a big heart as well as myriad opportunities for merchandising and product placement (the only things that gets eaten by its namesake are Reeses Pieces).

But if Jaws is closer to The Godfather than to Star Warsa film that awakened the inner child of an entire society, with arguably catastrophic consequencesits also a more self-contained movie than either. Many would argue that The Godfather: Part II and The Empire Strikes Back represent vitaland superiorextensions of their predecessors, while the desultory Jaws 2, rushed into production without Spielbergs participation, anticipated the mostly diminishing returns of the sequel generation. (Jaws 2 peaks with its taglineJust when you thought it was safe to go back in the waterand is all downhill from there.) Even if you dont think that Jaws has much to say about anything, it says it eloquently enough the first time around that nobody asked for clarification; one reason the films final shot is so beautiful is because it shows Brody and Hooper reaching shore, a foregone conclusion removed of even a sliver of narrative ambiguity. And yet, depending on how you look at it, their safe return can represent either a heartwarming triumph of good over evil or else a cynically capitalist coda: Amity is once again open for business.

Read the original post:

Jaws Is the Perfect Blockbuster - The Ringer

Medical Schools Taken To Task Over Racism, Hazing And Other Abuse : Shots – Health News – NPR

Health workers and others rallied in Seattle during a Doctors For Justice event on June 6, protesting police brutality in the wake of George Floyd's death. Medical training needs a hard look too, doctors say: Students of color and LGBTQ people often bear the brunt of what can be a bullying culture. David Ryder/Getty Images hide caption

Health workers and others rallied in Seattle during a Doctors For Justice event on June 6, protesting police brutality in the wake of George Floyd's death. Medical training needs a hard look too, doctors say: Students of color and LGBTQ people often bear the brunt of what can be a bullying culture.

As doctors and nurses across the United States continue to gather outside hospitals and clinics to protest police brutality and racism as part of the White Coats for Black Lives movement, LaShyra Nolen, a first-year student at Harvard Medical School, says it's time to take medical schools to task over racism, too.

The fight for equality in medical education isn't new, says Nolen, the first black woman to serve as Harvard Medical School's student council president. But she's hopeful that the national conversation around racism in society will force hospitals and medical schools to address racism within their own institutions.

"It wasn't until over a week of riots that people started to pay attention," Nolen says. "We bring black med students to these institutions, and they fill quotas, and they make institutions look good. But we're not protecting them. We need to protect them."

Studies show that students of color and those who are LGBTQ are more likely than other classmates to experience mistreatment during their training. Research published earlier this year in JAMA Internal Medicine, for example, suggests that minority students are more likely to face discriminatory comments, public humiliation and inappropriate sexual advances during their medical education.

Nolen has been heartened by the outpouring of online and in-person activism she's seen, ranging from Twitter testimonials to opinion pieces in major medical journals. She's been involved in efforts at Harvard and nationally to combat racism in medical education.

But there is much work to be done, she says.

The JAMA Internal Medicine study of more than 27,500 medical students in 2016 and 2017 found that 38% of students nationwide from racial and ethnic groups that are under-represented in medicine including students who are black, Latino or Native American reported mistreatment. That's compared to only 24% of white students across the U.S. who said they had been mistreated during medical school.

The results raise questions, the study authors say, about racism in medical education and its implications for the persistently low numbers of people of color who become doctors.

"If these small disadvantages accrue throughout medical school, it could be contributing to keeping certain populations out of medicine," says Katherine Hill, the study's lead author and a medical student at Yale. "Discriminatory comments can have a negative impact both on the people who are targeted, and on bystanders."

Hill and her team used a data set known as the Association of American Medical Colleges Graduation Questionnaire. It's a survey about medical school experiences that almost every medical student completes right before graduation, covering topics ranging from student debt to how prepared they feel they are to practice medicine. The data in Hill's study included responses from about 72 percent of all med school graduates in 2016 and 2017.

Mistreatment during training was a major focus of the survey. Students were asked if they had been publicly humiliated, for example, or been asked to perform sexual favors in exchange for good grades, or been subjected to offensive remarks or names.

More than 35% of the students responding to the survey said they had experienced some kind of mistreatment during medical school.

"It's almost part of the medical school culture that a faculty member may try to embarrass you or humiliate you," says Dr. Dowin Boatright, an assistant professor of emergency medicine at Yale and the study's senior author.

The roots of that bullying culture in medical training are complex, Boatright adds, but he guesses it often occurs in high-stress environments in the hospital, or because it's perceived as an accepted hazing ritual.

Previous research corroborates Boatright's observation that these kinds of experiences are common for students of all races, particularly during clinical training, when students are no longer in the classroom. During that clinical period, students are the least powerful members of a hierarchy, joining teams of medical residents and attending physicians, nurses, and other health care professionals as they care for patients.

What's new in his study, Boatright says, is just how much more likely minority students are to experience this harassment, bullying behavior and abuse.

Women and students who identified as lesbian, gay, bisexual, or transgender were also more likely to experience mistreatment, whatever their race or ethnic group. Above 40% of women reported that they experienced mistreatment, compared to about 25% of men. Similarly, about 43% of LGBTQ students reported an incident of mistreatment, while just over 23% of heterosexual students did.

Boatright and Hill both note that not only are minority students more likely to experience racist or bigoted incidents, they are also more likely to experience mistreatment in general such as being humiliated in front of a team even when the harassment doesn't seem specifically related to race or ethnicity.

Take the experience of Dr. Michael Mensah, who had to listen as one of his professors repeatedly used the N-word at work when Mensah was a medical student in 2015 at the University of California, San Francisco.

Mensah, who is now a psychiatry resident at the University of California, Los Angeles, says he and colleagues were sitting in a hospital workroom at the time, listening to music as they prepared to round on their patients. A song came on that used the expletive. To Mensah's shock and to the shock of everyone else on his team his supervisor casually repeated the expletive multiple times.

"I had a repugnant choice: swallow my lump of anger and sadness to preserve group harmony, or risk my grade and reputation by confronting my superior," he wrote in a 2017 essay in JAMA Internal Medicine about the incident.

More than five years later, the words still sting.

"If that person was willing to speak so frankly to us, and so rudely ... Imagine how that person treats their patients of color," Mensah tells NPR.

While he says he heard from many other students who experienced racism during training physicians mocking non-white patients, peers telling their classmates of color they were accepted to medical school because of their race some other people who read the essay dismissed his experience as a one-time incident.

Instead of questioning whether structural racism might be built into medical training, they dismissed that supervising physician as "only one bad apple," Mensah says.

Evidence from the JAMA Internal Medicine study and others like it confirm that these types of racist incidents are common in health care.

"It really validates my personal experience, which is remarkable because of how isolating these experiences can be," he says. "It makes clear that I wasn't the only one to experience differential, unequal and discriminatory treatment. It helps me feel like what I went through wasn't my fault."

Mensah worries that the prevalence of mistreatment toward students of color, women, and LGBTQ students has another legacy: normalizing discrimination in health care, and ultimately affecting the way future doctors treat their patients.

"There's a direct link between this abuse and how some of our health care disparities play out," he says.

Now, Mensah is focusing much of his energy on addressing racism in health care institutions. He recently wrote, along with several co-authors, an op-ed in Scientific American about how the misuse of medical language in George Floyd's initial autopsy report overemphasized the role of coronary artery disease and hypertension in his death.

Mensah also spoke at a rally this month in Los Angeles sponsored by White Coats for Black Lives. But because there are still such persistently low numbers of black people working in medicine, Mensah found himself addressing a sea of white faces.

"I was the only black male there, unfortunately," he says.

Mara Gordon is a family physician in Camden, N.J., and a contributor to NPR. You can follow her on Twitter: @MaraGordonMD.

See the original post here:

Medical Schools Taken To Task Over Racism, Hazing And Other Abuse : Shots - Health News - NPR

The pandemic has disrupted medical school admissions. I urge you to apply anyway – AAMC

The process of becoming a physician is a journey that starts for each of us at a different point.

For me, it started with a traumatic event a life-threatening injury that I suffered in the sixth grade after a fall through a window, which resulted in substantial blood loss and progressed to hemorrhagic shock. I did not fully understand my proximity to an untimely death until many years later as a surgical intern on the trauma surgery team at Tampa General Hospital at the University of South Florida.

By then, I was far along on my individual journey, one that included catalysts as well as areas of struggle and achievement. Without question, those who are making this journey during the COVID-19 pandemic are facing challenges unlike any in the history of medicine. Many have had disruptions in their undergraduate education or gap year in preparation for medical school. They have had disruption in their ability to take the MCAT exam. And those who are applying to medical school this year will likely face additional disruptions, through virtual rather than in-person interviews.

But I would like you to know that however different the process is this year, it is being shared by premed students all over the United States. One of the advantages to the current way in which most medical schools admit students is the use of a holistic admissions process to decrease emphasis on any specific test (MCAT) or GPA and rather emphasize an individuals journey to becoming a physician and the distance traveled in getting there. Many medical school applicants will have poignant stories related to their respective journeys and, undoubtedly, most will include specifics related to the current pandemic. These stories should be included in applications as a sign of strength and resilience. And while it is true that many applicants will have missed some opportunities for in-person clinical or research experiences during the pandemic, most of the premed students I advise have taken this time to connect and grow in other meaningful ways that will contribute to their career paths and their application processes.

For those of you applying to medical school this year, I would encourage you to think about the application process as a journey that will require perseverance and, for some, perhaps another application cycle. If medicine is your passion, embrace this path forward as well as the experience and always keep learning and growing as you move forward.

In my years as dean of the school of medicine at the Medical College of Wisconsin, I frequently share the following insights, which are even more pertinent during these challenging times:

First, the calling to become a healer and a physician is one of the greatest endeavors that a human can embark upon. It has been this way since the dawn of time and in every culture and every era. That journey is enriched by the special trust and bond that occurs between patient and doctor, and it is strengthened by the expectation of humanism, empathy, and social justice that is at the core of medicine. I would encourage all physicians-to-be, wherever the path takes you, to ensure that social justice is rooted in your outlook for your career and more broadly your communities. As physicians, you will have the ability and opportunity to change not only your patients outcomes but also those of your communities and the broader world.

Second, the path you are choosing will include struggle but also enormous reward. The struggles will include the choices between dedication to patients or time with family. They will include the enormous difficulty around maintaining well-being in the face of many pressures, demands, and illnesses. They will include finding paths to increased health equity when so many disparities occur in our current society and systems of providing care. The rewards will include the ability to put someones arm back together (if you are a surgeon) so that they can live life to its fullest. They will include helping to heal other parts of the human anatomy in different specialties as well as knitting together hearts and souls in a rewarding and lasting way. And, in times when your skills and the current knowledge available are not able to offer a cure, you will be with your patients and their families at an incredibly vulnerable time but also a time when your words, touch, and emotion can provide bridges to healing of another sort.

Finally, the process of becoming a physician is a journey that should never end. It certainly does not end when the medical school dean hands out a diploma bearing the initials MD behind ones name for the first time. It does not end after residency or even when one feels they have mastered the craft of their respective discipline. With changing technology and information medical knowledge now doubles about every 20 to 30 days (a significant increase from approximately every five years when I was in medical school!) physicians can never be complacent. Even in retirement, we will always be doctors, possessing the responsibilities that come with the title and continuing to make those around us, and the world, a better place. For those of you just now beginning your journey, I hope it is successful and I look forward to the day, in the not-too-distant future, when we will be physician-colleagues.

Joseph Kerschner, MD, is dean of the school of medicine at the Medical College of Wisconsin, provost and executive vice president of the Medical College of Wisconsin, and chair of the AAMC Board of Directors.

See more here:

The pandemic has disrupted medical school admissions. I urge you to apply anyway - AAMC

[Special] ‘Korea will be short of doctors even with more medical school admissions’ – Korea Biomedical Review

The nation is likely to be short of physicians until 2067 even if the government increases the annual quota of medical school admissions by 1,500 from 2021, a study showed.

The study assumed that the current supply and demand of physicians remain at a desirable level. The university entrance quota is now set at 3,058 students for medical schools.

Professor Hong Yun-chul of Seoul National University College of Medicine released the Research on the Optimal Level of Physicians Manpower at a round-table meeting, which celebrates the 28th anniversary of The Korean Doctors Weekly on Friday. The meeting was broadcast live on a YouTube channel K-Healthlog, operated by The Korean Doctors Weekly.

Hong led the study, which was commissioned by the Korean Hospital Association.

According to government statistics, Korea had 2.3 clinicians per 1,000 people as of 2017, which was the lowest among OECD members. The OECD average is 3.4 clinicians per 1,000 people.

On the other hand, a Korean patient went to see doctors 16.6 times a year, which was the most among OECD members. The average number of hospitalization was 18.5 days in Korea, the second-longest in OECD.

Korean doctors amount of labor is 3.37 times larger than the OECD average, according to Hong.

Hong predicted the number of outpatients and hospitalizations based on Statistics Korea's population data. He forecasted that the demand for outpatient care would peak in 2043, which will be 1.24 times higher than the current level. The demand for hospitalization is expected to peak in 2059, which will be 2.56 times larger than it is today.

Assuming that the supply and demand of physicians in 2018 were appropriate and increasing the quota for medical school admissions from 2021 will fail to prevent a shortage of doctors until 2067, the study showed.

If doctors retirement age is assumed to be 70 years old and the medical school admission quota is maintained at 3,058, the nation will be short of 55,260 doctors, Hong went on to say.

Even if the government expands the university quota by 1,500 from 2021, Korea will be short of up to 27,755 doctors in 2048.

Pushing up the retirement age at 75 years old and assuming the elderly doctors aged 65 or more have 50 percent productivity, an increase of medical university quota by 1,000 will still fail to prevent a shortage of physicians until 2067. Hong went on to say.

Hong emphasized that the country needs to address the imbalance of physician supplies among regions rather than the shortage of overall doctors.

In 2045, the total number of physicians will fall short of the demand, but those in Seoul will be in oversupply, he said.

In 2020, 15 percent of the total population will be aged 65 or more. In 2030, the proportion goes up to 25 percent, Hong said. This means not only the elderly population but their diseases will increase. It is highly likely that the medical demand will surge.

However, it is still controversial whether Korea is short of doctors because the nation is suffering from a severe imbalance of physician supply among regions, Hong noted.

Without addressing the regional imbalance, it is difficult to relieve the shortage of physicians, he added.

soo331@docdocdoc.co.kr

< Korea Biomedical Review, All rights reserved.>

Read more:

[Special] 'Korea will be short of doctors even with more medical school admissions' - Korea Biomedical Review