COS Systems Ready to Automate Open Access Networks as a Nokia Connected Partner – Broadband Communities

UMEA, SWEDEN COS Systems is specializing in software to operate broadband networks open for multiple providers delivering services on a shared infrastructure. Nokia is a global leader in fixed and wireless networks and networking technologies for open network architectures, software defined networking and network slicing. After recent integration work the cooperation between the companies is now formalized as COS Systems becomes a Nokia Fixed Networks OSS Connected Partner.

With new types of services emerging, such as telehealth, internet of things and smart services, it is becoming increasingly important to have a network open for multiple providers. Instead of building a proprietary network and trying to produce all the services current and future customers will need, it is attractive to provide a robust infrastructure and then open it up to multiple specialized providers on a wholesale basis.

In 2014 when we established COS Systems in the United States, Open Access was almost unheard of, but in just a few years this has changed dramatically. Especially municipalities are realizing that their best choice is not to become a provider of telecommunications services, but to ensure that this critical infrastructure is in place, just as with other utilities such as roads, water and electricity, says Bjorn Wannman, sales manager at COS Systems.

True Open Access Networks

With COS Systems heritage from Sweden, where their BSS/OSS platform COS Business Engine is used to operate more than a hundred municipal and utility fiber networks, this is not something new. For over a decade COS has enabled True Open Access Networks, where subscribers can access an online marketplace and choose freely between any type of services provided by many competing service providers. The competitive nature of the marketplace brings service innovation, increased quality, and lower prices. This is also where the partnership with Nokia comes into play. For a network deployed using Nokia Fixed Access equipment COS will be able to fully automate the subscribers interaction with the marketplace. As subscribers are managing their services on the marketplace, COS Business Engine will instruct Nokias management and control platform to instantly perform desired changes in the network.

With the tools to simplify business and network operations, COS Systems is able to uniquely meet operator needs for network automation. With this cooperation, operators - regardless of whether they are new or existing players in the market - can easily automate the delivery of high-speed broadband services to their residential and enterprise customers, says Bassam El-Zakhem, vice president, Fixed Networks Americas at Nokia.

Nokias OSS Connected Partner Program

Were excited to be part of Nokias OSS Connected Partner Program. They share our visions about open networks and what we see today is just the beginnings of what will come. Working together with a global leader such as Nokia on current and emerging Software Defined Networking and network slicing technology is thrilling. Network owners and operators working with us will know they are choosing an open and future proof solution, says Isak Finer, CMO and VP North America at COS Systems.

COS Systems has unique understanding and experience in the open type of networks that are becoming increasingly important. By combining the Nokia AMS and Altiplano management and control platforms with the COS Business Engine, operators can more effectively keep up with rapidly changing customer demands. Were happy to welcome COS Systems as OSS Connected Partners, says Bassam El-Zakhem, vice president, Fixed Networks Americas at Nokia.

Read this article:

COS Systems Ready to Automate Open Access Networks as a Nokia Connected Partner - Broadband Communities

Global Sales of Oil and Gas Terminal Automation Market to Follow a Downward Trend Post 2026, with Co – PharmiWeb.com

VALLEY COTTAGE, N.Y. The report Oil and Gas Terminal Automation Market: Global Industry Analysis and Opportunity Assessment, 20162026 offers a 10-year forecast for the global oil and gas terminal automation market for the period of 20162026. The report studies the oil and gas terminal automation market across six key regions of the globe, including North America, Latin America, Asia Pacific excl. Japan, Middle East & Africa, Europe and Japan. The report covers key factors driving the growth of the market, trends and developments shaping the dynamics of the market and other insights across key segments.

Report description

This Future Market Insights report examines the global oil and gas terminal automation market for the period 20162026 in terms of value. The primary objective of the report is to offer updates on developments in the oil & gas terminal automation market and quantification of revenue generation from oil and gas terminal automation across various categories and country/ regional market segments.

For more insights into the market, request a Sample of this Report @ https://www.futuremarketinsights.com/reports/sample/rep-gb-197

On the basis of categories, the global oil and gas terminal automation market is segmented into:

The report starts with the oil and gas terminal automation market overview and provides market definition and overview of category based segments for global oil and gas terminal automation market. The sections that follow include market analysis and forecast, by category and by region, country level. All the above sections evaluate the market on the basis of various factors affecting the market, covering present scenario and future prospects. For market data analysis, the report considers 2015 as the base year, with market numbers estimated for 2016 and the forecast made for 20162024.

In the final section of the report, a competitive landscape has been included to provide a dashboard view of key companies operating in the global oil and gas terminal automation market. This section is primarily designed to provide clients with an objective and comparative assessment of key providers specific to a market segment in the global oil and gas terminal automation market. The section also includes market strategies and SWOT analysis of the main players operational in the global oil and gas terminal automation market.

Research methodology

To quantify the market size, an elaborate research methodology comprising in-depth secondary research and number of primary interviews have been done followed by triangulation of the data thus gathered. Further, data inputs such as market split by categories, and qualitative inputs from industry experts have been taken into consideration before concluding the market estimates. Each region based section highlights the oil and gas terminal automation market based on different categories in that region. To give a brief idea about revenue opportunities from various services and region/ country, the report also provides absolute $ opportunity and total incremental opportunity for each segment over the forecast period.

Request for covid19 Impact Analysis @ https://www.futuremarketinsights.com/covid19/rep-gb-197

The market size estimation is carried out through multiple top-down and bottom-up approaches. Crude oil production data historical and forecast, is benchmarked to identify relative shares in the market and the market data range, thus received, has been validated by primary resources. Moreover, Infrastructure investments, indicative share of automation in overall investment and upcoming terminals related data has been considered to determine the respective market share and corresponding growth rates.

In the final section of the report, a competitive landscape has been included to provide report audiences with a dashboard view. Detailed profiles of oil and gas terminal automation solution providers are also included within the scope of the report in order to help evaluate strategies, key recent developments in the global market.

Original post:

Global Sales of Oil and Gas Terminal Automation Market to Follow a Downward Trend Post 2026, with Co - PharmiWeb.com

Bogot returns to strict quarantine based on rotating localities as of July 13 – The City Paper Bogot

Bogot Mayor Claudia Lpez placed the Colombian capital under Orange Alert given the spread of coronavirus and announced that the citys 10 million inhabitants will return to strict quarantine based on localities, divided in 3 groups. The strict quarantine will be enforced by an additional 850 members of the National Police. A liquor sale ban is in effect in all localities during the strict quarantine.

Lockdown starts Monday, July 13, and ends August 23.

Group 1: Starts July 13 and ends July 26. Localities: Ciudad Bolvar, San Cristbal, Rafael Uribe Uribe, Chapinero, Santafe, Usme, Los Mrtires and Tunjuelito.

Group 2: Starts July 27 and ends August 9. Localities: Bosa, Kennedy, Puente Aranda and Fontibn.

Group 3: Starts August 10 and ends August 23. Localities: Suba, Engativ and Barrios Unidos.

During each of the respective 14 days, localities will have total restriction on mobility and all shops must close, except supermarkets and pharmacies for basic necessities.

All residents must be inside their homes from 8 pm to 5 am.

Essential errands can only be done by one member of the household from 5 am to 7 pm.

Those exempt from mobility restrictions are health workers and elderly care personnel.

The strict quarantine was presented to the government of President Ivn Duque and approved for the district capital. Mayor Lpez also announced during a virtual press conference that 550,000 poor and vulnerable families will receive money from Bogot Solidaria en Casa in order to guarantee a basic income during the peak of the pandemic. Families in need will receive $240,000 pesos and resources that will be covered jointly between Bogot and Nation. The district will also deliver 150,000 food markets. Families in these localities who need to access these benefits and are not registered in the database can apply with the Bogot Caregiver App.

Together we are going to take care of ourselves to pass the peak of contagion. We are no longer going to postpone it, we are going to face it and we are going to achieve it, it is at this moment that we need the unity of all citizens, said Lpez.

Read more:

Bogot returns to strict quarantine based on rotating localities as of July 13 - The City Paper Bogot

3D Printed Medicine Uses Fish Gelatin to Deliver Cancer Treatment – 3DPrint.com

Japanese researchers Jin Liu, Tatsuaki Tagami, and Tetsuya Ozeki have completed a recent study in nanomedicine, releasing their findings in Fabrication of 3D Printed Fish-Gelatin-Based Polymer Hydrogel Patches for Local Delivery of PEGylated Liposomal Doxorubicin. Experimenting with a new drug delivery system, the authors report on new potential for patient-specific cancer treatment.

The study of materials science continues to expand in a wide range of applications; however, bioprinting is one of the most exciting techniques as tissue engineering is expected to lead to the fabrication of human organs in the next decade or so. Such research has also proven that bioprinting may yield much more powerful drug delivery whether in using hybrid systems, multi-drug delivery systems, or improved scaffolds.

Here, the materials chosen for drug delivery are more unique as the researchers combined printer ink with semi-synthesized fish gelatin methacryloyl (F-GelMA)a cold fish gelatin derivative.

In providing aggressive cancer treatment to patients, the use of doxorubicin (DOX) is common as an anti-carcinogen for the treatment of the following diseases:

DOX may also cause serious cardiotoxicity, however, despite its use as a broad-spectrum drug. As a solution, PEGylated liposomal DOX, Doxilhas been in use for treatment of cancer with much lower cardiotoxity. The nanomedicine has also been approved by the FDA, and is used for targeting local tumors; for instance, this type of drug delivery system could be suitable for treating a brain tumor.

PEGylating liposomes can prolong their circulation time in blood, resulting in their passive accumulation in cancer tissue, called the enhanced permeability and retention effect, state the authors.

Using a 3D bioprinter, the authors developed liposomal patches to be directly implanted into cancerous cells.

(a) Synthesis of fish gelatin methacryloyl (F-GelMA). (b) Hybrid gel of cross-linked F-GelMA and carboxymethyl cellulose sodium (CMC) containing PEGylated liposome. The reaction scheme was prepared in previous studies

We used a hydrogel containing semi-synthetic fish-gelatin polymer (fish gelatin methacryloyl, F-GelMA) to entrap DOX-loaded PEGylated liposomes. Fish gelatin is inexpensive and faces few personal or religious restrictions, stated the authors.

Fish gelatin has not been used widely in bioprinting, however, due to low viscosity and rapid polymerization. To solve that problem, the authors created a bioink composite with elevated viscosity.

Viscous properties of drug formulations used as printer inks. (a) The appearance of F-GelMA hydrogels containing different concentrations of CMC. (b) The viscosity profiles of F-GelMA hydrogels containing different concentrations of CMC. The data represent the mean SD (n = 3).

And while hydrogels are generally attractive for use due to their ability to swell, for this study, the researchers fabricated a variety of different materialswith the combination of 10% F-GelMA and 7% carboxymethyl cellulose sodium (a thickening agent) showing the highest swelling ratio.

Swelling properties of hydrogels after photopolymerization. (a) Swelling ratio of different concentrations of F-GelMA. (b) Swelling ratio of mixed hydrogel (10% F-GelMA with different concentrations of CMC). The data represent the mean SD (n = 3).

Design of the different 3D geometries: (a) cylinder, (b) torus, and (c) gridlines.

Patches were printed in three different sample shapes, using a CELLINK bioprinter syringe as the authors tested drug release potential in vivo. Realizing that surface area, crosslinks density, temperature, and shaker speed would play a role, the team relied on a larger surface volume for more rapid release of drugs.

Printing conditions of patches.

While experimenting with the torus, gridline, and cylindrical sample patches, the researchers observed gridline-style patches as offering the greatest potential for sustained release.

Drug release profiles of liposomal doxorubicin (DOX). (a) Influence of shape on drug release. The UV exposure time was set to 1 min. (b) Influence of UV exposure time on drug release. The gridline object was used for this experiment. The data represent the mean SD (n = 3).

These results indicate that CMC is useful for adjusting the properties of printer ink and is a useful and safe pharmaceutical excipient in drug formulations. We also showed that drug release from 3D-printed patches was dependent on the patch shapes and UV exposure time, and that drug release can be controlled. Taken together, the present results provide useful information for the preparation of 3D printed objects containing liposomes and other nanoparticle-based nanomedicines, concluded the authors.

Continued here:

3D Printed Medicine Uses Fish Gelatin to Deliver Cancer Treatment - 3DPrint.com

Class of 2017’s Dr. Jawan Gorgis is Family Medicine Resident of the Year – The South End

Wayne State University School of Medicine alumna Jawan Gorgis, M.D., was named by the Michigan Academy of Family Physicians as one of only two Michigan Family Medicine Residents of the Year.

Dr. Gorgis who graduated from the School of Medicine in 2017, is a resident in Beaumont Health of Troys Family Medicine residency program.

Associate Dean of Student Affairs and Career Development Margit Chadwell, M.D., wrote Dr. Gorgiss recommendation letter for the Beaumont residency program.

I (had) the pleasure of getting to know Jawan through her engagement with our Family Medicine Interest Group, where I serve as the faculty advisor. Jawan is inquisitive and resourceful, and has actively explored family medicine as a specialty choice. I have been impressed by her professional and pleasant demeanor, and her enthusiasm, Dr. Chadwell wrote.

Dr. Gorgis will receive the award during the virtual Academy Awards celebration Aug. 8, immediately following thevirtual MAFP Annual Meeting.

The Michigan Family Medicine Resident of the Yearaward recognizes a Family Medicine resident (PGY-1, PGY-2 or PGY-3) who exhibits qualities of exemplary patient care, demonstrates leadership among colleagues, displays a commitment to the community at large and is dedicated to the specialty through involvement in the MAFP and AAFP, service to the residency program, and/or other Family Medicine organizations.

As a student, Dr. Gorgis served as the education and training director for Street Medicine Detroit, coordinating and providing medical assistance to the citys most disadvantaged population. She was elected the schools national representative to the American Medical Association, and participated in the comprehensive Fabric of Society and Medical Political Action Committee Co-Curricular program, volunteering 150 hours in multiple community organizations, clinics and lobbying efforts. She obtained certification as an HIV counselor. She also was involved with multiple research studies resulting in a publication on her diabetes project. Her work with Street Medicine Detroit resulted in two posters she presented at national conferences.

Visit link:

Class of 2017's Dr. Jawan Gorgis is Family Medicine Resident of the Year - The South End

Explained: What works in Covid-19 treatment – The Indian Express

Written by Dr Satchit Balsari, Dr Zarir Udwadia | New Delhi | Updated: July 11, 2020 11:09:48 am

Like a wedding guest piling food from a buffet onto their plate until there is no place left, doctors have been prescribing fistfuls of drugs when attempting to manage patients with Covid-19. We summarise based on current evidence from around the world, what scientists say works and does not, from among the treatments currently in vogue in India.

Azithromycin: This must be the most widely prescribed and misused antibiotic in this pandemic. Azithromycin, as with all other antibiotics, does not work in viral infections. Antibiotics are only warranted in patients who have evidence of a secondary bacterial infection as some hospitalised patients will have in the later stages of their disease. Indiscriminate use (as was the case even before the pandemic) in the hope that they will prevent bacterial infection only worsens antibiotic resistance, to which India is a frequent contributor.

Blood Thinners: Hospitalised Covid-19 patients have been observed to have a very high incidence of blood clots. There is current global consensus that all hospitalised Covid-19 patients will benefit from blood thinners injected daily just under their skin (like insulin injections). Though there is sound mechanistic reasoning, randomised controlled trials are awaited.

BCG & other existing vaccines: While the world eagerly awaits a new and SARS-CoV-2-specific vaccine, the use of existing vaccines (BCG, Polio, MMR vaccines) in the hope they will work is inappropriate. Trials are under way to see if they will boost innate immunity. We know that BCG has already been given at birth to all Indians, and it does not seem to have helped keep our case numbers low.

Vitamin C: More vitamin C may have been consumed than oranges since Covid-19 began! It doesnt work.

Vitamin D: A large meta-analysis just released shows that Vitamin D does not protect against Covid-19.

Favipiravir: This is an oral antiviral drug which was fast tracked by the Indian Drug Controller but is not yet approved in the EU or US. Its use should be restricted to mild or moderate infections only. Available data to support its use is sparse but Indian trials have just been completed and the results are awaited.

Hydroxychloroquine sulphate (HCQS): We now have compelling data from multiple large clinical trials including WHOs SOLIDARITY and the UKs RECOVERY trials to categorically say: HCQS does not work. Even Donald Trump may have stopped taking it by now and so should you.

Ivermectin: This is an anti-parasitic drug widely prescribed in India and parts of South America to treat infections from worms. There is no evidence it has any role in Covid-19. It should not be used.

Miscellaneous cures: The state machinery has been used to distribute unproven herbal and Ayurvedic potions (Ukalo), homeopathic drops (Arsenicum album), and treatments peddled by god-men. Anecdotes and observations do not constitute scientific evidence. In the absence of evidence generated from rigorously vetted clinical trials, the distribution of these substances must be condemned. Pushing unproven and supposedly harmless treatments and distributing them to hundreds of thousands is not only disingenuous, but provides people false hope, and risks them lowering their guard. There are no magic pills to boost immunity to fix years of malnutrition, stunting, obesity, and chronically inflamed lungs.

Oseltamivir: This is an antiviral agent prescribed for tempering symptoms from the virus that causes influenza. It has no role in treating Covid-19 infection which is caused by a coronavirus.

Plasma: Our blood is composed of cells and plasma. Plasma from those who have recovered from Covid-19 carries naturally acquired antibodies, and, when transfused to critically ill patients with Covid-19, may help improve outcomes. This form of therapy is being used across the globe and trials to access its efficacy are under way.

Remdesivir: An intravenously administered antiviral medication, it has been shown to be effective in well-designed studies. It seems to shorten recovery time and hospital stay but does not reduce the chance of death. It is currently to be used only in hospitalised patients with severe disease.

Steroids: The only drug so far shown to have a striking impact on mortality is an old and inexpensive one. Current evidence shows that dexamethasone can reduce deaths by one-third in patients with severe Covid-19 infection who need oxygen therapy or ventilators. Their use should, however, be restricted to hospitalised patients. If they are given too soon in the course of an infection, or given to someone with only a mild infection, they could prevent the bodys own immune system from fighting the virus effectively.

Express Explainedis now onTelegram. Clickhere to join our channel (@ieexplained)and stay updated with the latest

Tocilizumab: This drug is an injection originally used in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. It is being widely used to counter the severe inflammation (cytokine storm) that occurs in some Covid-19 patients. Its use can increase the risk of bacterial infections, and it must therefore be used with caution, if at all, in carefully selected patients.

Zinc: This mineral is also commonly prescribed, despite there being no evidence that it is effective.

In conclusion, six months into the pandemic, we must therefore acknowledge four facts:

(Dr Zarir Udwadia is Consultant Chest Physician, PD Hinduja Hospital & Medical Research Centre, Mumbai. Dr Satchit Balsari is assistant professor in Emergency Medicine and in Global Health at Harvard Universitys medical and public health schools. )

The Indian Express is now on Telegram. Click here to join our channel (@indianexpress) and stay updated with the latest headlines

For all the latest Explained News, download Indian Express App.

The Indian Express (P) Ltd

Here is the original post:

Explained: What works in Covid-19 treatment - The Indian Express

American College of Lifestyle Medicine Launches Campaign to Promote Treatment and Reversal of Chronic Disease with Lifestyle Medicine – PRNewswire

The convergence of the COVID-19 pandemic and racial unrest has been a wake-up call on the state of our individual and collective health, highlighting health disparities and faults in our health care system and medical schools.Our nation's lack of health has left us blindsided and vulnerable to the ravages of COVID-19, particularly in minority and underservedcommunities.

Chronic disease is the leading cause of death and disability in the U.S., having reached epidemic proportions. Sixty percent of American adults now live with at least one chronic condition, while 42 percent have more than one. African American adults in particular are more likely to have high blood pressure and diabetes, in part due to the chronic, toxic stress associated with racism. Chronic disease now accounts for as much as 86 percent of all health care expenditures. Yet our health care and medical education systems focus on chronic disease management rather than the health restoration provided by addressing its root-causes. Despite most chronic diseases being caused by unhealthy lifestyle behaviors, training in the pillars of Lifestyle Medicine has been virtually non-existent in medical schools.

Lifestyle Medicine is the use of a whole food, plant-predominant dietary lifestyle, regular physical activity, restorative sleep, stress management, avoidance of risky substances and positive social connection as a primary therapeutic modality for treatment and reversal of chronic disease.

ACLM President Dr. Dexter Shurney and other Lifestyle Medicine experts are available for media interviews and background. See our media kit: https://bit.ly/2O7loms.

Topics ACLM experts can be resources for include:

ACLM provides live and online CME-accredited events and courses for physicians and allied health professionals across the continuum of medical education, as well as certification, clinical practice tools, patient education resources, economic research, networking opportunities and advocacy. Board certification has been available since 2017.

SOURCE American College of Lifestyle Medicine

http://www.lifestylemedicine.org

Read more from the original source:

American College of Lifestyle Medicine Launches Campaign to Promote Treatment and Reversal of Chronic Disease with Lifestyle Medicine - PRNewswire

WHO: access to HIV medicines severely impacted by COVID-19 as AIDS response stalls – World Health Organization

Seventy-three countries have warned that they are at risk of stock-outs of antiretroviral (ARV) medicines as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, according to a new WHO survey conducted ahead of the International AIDS Societys biannual conference. Twenty-four countries reported having either a critically low stock of ARVs or disruptions in the supply of these life-saving medicines.

The survey follows a modelling exercise convened by WHO and UNAIDS in May which forecasted that a six-month disruption in access to ARVs could lead to a doubling in AIDS-related deaths in sub-Saharan Africa in 2020 alone.

In 2019, an estimated 8.3 million people were benefiting from ARVs in the 24 countries now experiencing supply shortages. This represents about one third (33%) of all people taking HIV treatment globally. While there is no cure for HIV, ARVs can control the virus and prevent onward sexual transmission to other people.

A failure of suppliers to deliver ARVs on time and a shut-down of land and air transport services, coupled with limited access to health services within countries as a result of the pandemic, were among the causes cited for the disruptions in the survey.

The findings of this survey are deeply concerning, said Dr Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, WHO Director-General. Countries and their development partners must do all they can to ensure that people who need HIV treatment continue to access it. We cannot let the COVID-19 pandemic undo the hard-won gains in the global response to this disease.

According to data released today from UNAIDS and WHO, new HIV infections fell by 39% between 2000 and 2019. HIV-related deaths fell by 51% over the same time period, and some 15 million lives were saved through the use of antiretroviral therapy.

However, progresstowards global targets is stalling. Over the last two years, the annual number of new HIV infections has plateaued at 1.7 million and there was only a modest reduction in HIV-related death, from 730 000 in 2018 to 690 000 in 2019. Despite steady advances in scaling up treatment coverage with more than 25 million people in need of ARVs receiving them in 2019 key 2020 global targets will be missed.

HIV prevention and testing services are not reaching the groups that need them most. Improved targeting of proven prevention and testing services will be critical to reinvigorate theglobal response to HIV.

COVID-19 risks exacerbating the situation. WHO recently developed guidance for countries on how to safely maintain access to essential health services during the pandemic, including forall people living with or affected by HIV. The guidance encourages countries to limit disruptions in access to HIV treatment through multi-month dispensing, a policy whereby medicines are prescribed for longer periods of time up to six months. To date, 129 countries have adopted this policy.

Countries are also mitigating the impact of the disruptions by working to maintain flights and supply chains, engaging communities in the delivery of HIV medicines, and working with manufacturers to overcome logistics challenges.

At the IAS conference, WHO will highlight how global progress in reducing HIV-related deaths can be accelerated by stepping up support and services for populations disproportionately impacted by the epidemic, including young children. In 2019, there were an estimated 95 000 HIV-related deaths and 150 000 new infections among children. Only about half (53%) of children in need of antiretroviral therapy were receiving it. A lack of optimal medicines with suitable pediatric formulations has been a longstanding barrier to improving health outcomes for children living with HIV.

Last month, WHO welcomed a decision by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration to approve a new 5mg formulation of dolutegravir (DTG) for infants and children older than 4 weeks and weighing more than 3 kg. This decision will ensure that all children have rapid access to an optimal drug that, to date, has only been available for adults, adolescents and older children. WHO is committed to fast-tracking the prequalification of DTG as a generic drug so that it can be used as soon as possible by countries to save lives.

Through a collaboration of multiple partners, we are likely to see generic versions of dolutegravir for children by early 2021, allowing for a rapid reduction in the cost of this medicine, said Dr Meg Doherty, Director of the Department of Global HIV, Hepatitis and STI Programmes at WHO. This will give us another new tool to reach children living with HIV and keep them alive and healthy.

Many HIV-related deaths result from infections that take advantage of an individuals weakened immune system. These include bacterial infections, such as tuberculosis, viral infections likehepatitis and COVID-19, parasitic infections such as toxoplasmosis and fungal infections, including histoplasmosis.

Today, WHO is releasing new guidelines for the diagnosis and management of histoplasmosis, among people living with HIV. Histoplasmosis is highly prevalent in the WHO Region of theAmericas, where as many as 15 600 new cases and 4500 deaths are reported each year among people living with HIV. Many of these deaths could be prevented through timely diagnosis and treatment of the disease.

In recent years, the development of highly sensitive diagnostic tests has allowed for a rapid and accurate confirmation of histoplasmosis and earlier initiation of treatment. However, innovative diagnostics and optimal treatments for this disease are not yet widely available in resource-limited settings.

See the original post here:

WHO: access to HIV medicines severely impacted by COVID-19 as AIDS response stalls - World Health Organization

Laughter Really Is the Best Medicine: 6 Easy Ways to Add More Humor to Your Day – KCTV Kansas City

'); $("#expandable-weather-block .modal-body #mrd-alert"+ alertCount).append(""+val.title+""); // if (window.location.hostname == "www.kmov.com" || window.location.hostname == "www.kctv5.com" || window.location.hostname == "www.azfamily.com" || window.location.hostname == "www.kptv.com" || window.location.hostname == "www.fox5vegas.com" || window.location.hostname == "www.wfsb.com") { if (val.poly != "" && val.polyimg != "") { $("#expandable-weather-block .modal-body #mrd-alert"+ alertCount).append('"+val.ihtml+""); $("#expandable-weather-block .weather-index-alerts").show(); $("#expandable-weather-block .modal-body h2").css({"font-family":"'Fira Sans', sans-serif", "font-weight":"500", "padding-bottom":"10px"}); $("#expandable-weather-block .modal-body p").css({"font-size":"14px", "line-height":"24px"}); $("#expandable-weather-block .modal-body span.wxalertnum").css({"float":"left", "width":"40px", "height":"40px", "color":"#ffffff", "line-height":"40px", "background-color":"#888888", "border-radius":"40px", "text-align":"center", "margin-right":"12px"}); $("#expandable-weather-block .modal-body b").css("font-size", "18px"); $("#expandable-weather-block .modal-body li").css({"font-size":"14px", "line-height":"18px", "margin-bottom":"10px"}); $("#expandable-weather-block .modal-body ul").css({"margin-bottom":"24px"}); $("#expandable-weather-block .modal-body pre").css({"margin-bottom":"24px"}); $("#expandable-weather-block .modal-body img").css({"width":"100%", "margin-bottom":"20px", "borderWidth":"1px", "border-style":"solid", "border-color":"#aaaaaa"}); $("#expandable-weather-block .modal-body #mrd-alert"+ alertCount).css({"borderWidth":"0", "border-bottom-width":"1px", "border-style":"dashed", "border-color":"#aaaaaa", "padding-bottom":"10px", "margin-bottom":"40px"}); }); } function parseAlertJSON(json) { console.log(json); alertCount = 0; if (Object.keys(json.alerts).length > 0) { $("#mrd-wx-alerts .modal-body ").empty(); } $.each(json.alerts, function(key, val) { alertCount++; $("#mrd-wx-alerts .alert_count").text(alertCount); $("#mrd-wx-alerts .modal-body ").append(''); $("#mrd-wx-alerts .modal-body #mrd-alert"+ alertCount).append(""+val.title+""); // if (window.location.hostname == "www.kmov.com" || window.location.hostname == "www.kctv5.com" || window.location.hostname == "www.azfamily.com" || window.location.hostname == "www.kptv.com" || window.location.hostname == "www.fox5vegas.com" || window.location.hostname == "www.wfsb.com") { if (val.poly != "" && val.polyimg != "") { $("#mrd-wx-alerts .modal-body #mrd-alert"+ alertCount).append(''); } else if (val.fips != "" && val.fipsimg != "") { // $("#mrd-wx-alerts .modal-body #mrd-alert"+ alertCount).append(''); } // } //val.instr = val.instr.replace(/[W_]+/g," "); $("#mrd-wx-alerts .modal-body #mrd-alert"+ alertCount).append(val.dhtml+"

Instruction

Read more:

Laughter Really Is the Best Medicine: 6 Easy Ways to Add More Humor to Your Day - KCTV Kansas City

Impact Assessment of COVID-19 Outbreak on Nuclear Medicine & Radio Pharmaceuticals Market 2020 Global Industry Trends, Manufacturers, Growth,…

Global Nuclear Medicine & Radio Pharmaceuticals Market presents insights into the present and upcoming industry trends, enabling the readers to identify the products and services, hence driving the enlargement and effectiveness. The research report provides a comprehensive breakdown of all the major factors impacting the market on a global and regional scale, including drivers, constraints, intimidation, challenges, opportunities, and industry-specific trends. Further, the report cites global certainties and endorsements along with downstream and upstream analysis of leading players.

Get more information on Global Nuclear Medicine & Radio Pharmaceuticals Market Research Report by requesting FREE Sample Copy @ https://www.globalmarketers.biz/report/life-sciences/2015-2027-global-nuclear-medicine-&-radio-pharmaceuticals-industry-market-research-report,-segment-by-player,-type,-application,-marketing-channel,-and-region/147448#request_sample

Major Players:

GE HealthcareTriFoil ImagingBiosensors International Group, Ltd.EsaotePhilips HealthcareHitachiSiemens HealthcareCarestreamToshibaShimadzu

Global Nuclear Medicine & Radio Pharmaceuticals Market research reports enlargement rates and the market value based on market dynamics, growth factors. Complete knowledge is based on the newest innovation in business, opportunities, and trends. In addition to SWOT examination by key suppliers, the report contains an all-inclusive market analysis and major players landscape.

The regional segmentation covers:

Segmentation by Type:

Diagnostic Medicine: SPECT Radiopharmaceuticals, PET Radiopharmaceuticals.Therapeutic Medicine: Beta Emitters, Alpha Emitters, Brachytherapy Isotopes.

Segmentation by Application:

Diagnostic Applications: SPECT, PET.Therapeutic Applications: Thyroid, Bone Metastasis, Lymphoma, Endocrine Tumors, Other Therapeutic Applications.

Do Inquiry Before Purchasing Report Here and Ask For Discount @: https://www.globalmarketers.biz/discount_inquiry/discount/147448

Report Objectives

Enquire Before Buying : https://www.globalmarketers.biz/report/life-sciences/2015-2027-global-nuclear-medicine-&-radio-pharmaceuticals-industry-market-research-report,-segment-by-player,-type,-application,-marketing-channel,-and-region/147448#inquiry_before_buying

Table of Content:

The Global Nuclear Medicine & Radio Pharmaceuticals Market

Chapter 1: Nuclear Medicine & Radio Pharmaceuticals Market Overview, Drivers, Restraints and Opportunities

Chapter 2: Nuclear Medicine & Radio Pharmaceuticals Market Competition by Manufacturers

Chapter 3: Nuclear Medicine & Radio Pharmaceuticals Production by Regions

Chapter 4: Production, By Types, Market share by Types

Chapter 5: Consumption, By Applications

Chapter 6: Comprehensive profiling and analysis of Manufacturers

Chapter 7: Manufacturing cost analysis

Chapter 8: Industrial Chain, Sourcing Strategy and Downstream Buyers

Chapter 9: Marketing Strategy Analysis, Distributors/Traders

Chapter 10: Nuclear Medicine & Radio Pharmaceuticals Market Effect Factors Analysis

Chapter 11: Nuclear Medicine & Radio Pharmaceuticals Market Forecast

Chapter 12: Conclusion of Nuclear Medicine & Radio Pharmaceuticals Market

The Report has Tables and Figures Browse The Report Description and TOC @ https://www.globalmarketers.biz/report/life-sciences/2015-2027-global-nuclear-medicine-&-radio-pharmaceuticals-industry-market-research-report,-segment-by-player,-type,-application,-marketing-channel,-and-region/147448#table_of_contents

Read this article:

Impact Assessment of COVID-19 Outbreak on Nuclear Medicine & Radio Pharmaceuticals Market 2020 Global Industry Trends, Manufacturers, Growth,...

Massive Demand in Artificial Intelligence in Medicine Market | Scope and Price Analysis of Top Manufacturers Profiles by 2027| Welltok, Inc., Intel…

HealthCare Intelligence Markets unravels its new study titled Artificial Intelligence in Medicine Market. Effective exploratory techniques such as qualitative and quantitative analysis have been used to discover accurate data. For an effective business outlook, it studies North America, Latin America, Asia-Pacific, Japan, and India by considering different aspects such as type, size, as well as applications. SWOT and Porters five analysis have been used to analyse cost, prices, revenue, and end-users. Various aspects of businesses such as primary application areas, financial overview, and requirement of the industries have been mentioned to give a brief to the readers. This research study further offers mergers, acquisitions and product portfolio of the businesses.

Ask for sample copy of this [emailprotected]https://www.healthcareintelligencemarkets.com/request_sample.php?id=135746

Profiling Key players: Welltok, Inc., Intel Corporation, Nvidia Corporation, Google Inc., IBM Corporation, Microsoft Corporation, General Vision, Inc., Enlitic, Inc., BioXcel Corporation, and Berg Health.

Global Artificial Intelligence in Medicine Market Report Illuminates:

Ask for a discount on this [emailprotected]https://www.healthcareintelligencemarkets.com/ask_for_discount.php?id=135746

Table of Contents:

For more information ask our experts @https://www.healthcareintelligencemarkets.com/enquiry_before_buying.php?id=135746

If you have any special requirements, please let us know and we will offer you the report as per your requirements.

About Us:

HealthCare Intelligence Markets Reports provides market intelligence & consulting services to a global clientele spread over 145 countries. Being a B2B firm, we help businesses to meet the challenges of an ever-evolving market with unbridled confidence. We craft customized and syndicated market research reports that help market players to build game-changing strategies. Besides, we also provide upcoming trends & future market prospects in our reports pertaining to Drug development, Clinical & healthcare IT industries. Our intelligence enables our clients to make decisions with which in turn proves a game-changer for them. We constantly strive to serve our clients better by directly allowing them sessions with our research analysts so the report is at par with their expectations.

Contact Us:Address: 90, State Office Center,90, State Street Suite 700,Albany, NY 12207Email:[emailprotected]Website:www.healthcareintelligencemarkets.comPhone:+1 (888) 616-2766

Originally posted here:

Massive Demand in Artificial Intelligence in Medicine Market | Scope and Price Analysis of Top Manufacturers Profiles by 2027| Welltok, Inc., Intel...

The wild economy: Changing the way we see and use wildlife and natural resources – Daily Maverick

This article was first published on Roving Reporters.

Young black South Africans are challenging the way we look at our planet and how best to use its natural resources. A new generation on the continent and elsewhere are questioning the way we do things, including deeply ingrained racial bias.

Merlyn Nomsa Nkomo, an aspirant ornithologist and Conservation Biology Masters student at UCT, reminds us of a prevailing stereotype that black people in South Africa believe that the love of nature and wildlife is a white thing.

In a recent article in the student publication iLizwi, Nkomo makes the point that conservationists are frequently detached from social realities. They are, she says, focused on being published in academic journals and travelling and working in remote and picturesque places at the expense of grappling with real problems which threaten the entire conservation project.

These include poverty, social inequality and a prevailing system dating back to the colonial era when parks were fortresses to protect nature from black communities that had lived with it in harmony for centuries before.

This is indeed a tragedy which only a few seem committed to addressing.

With the multiple threats of the Covid-19 pandemic, drought, human population growth, habitat loss and increasing human/wildlife conflict, what we require now, more than ever are African solutions for Africas problems, by African people.

The new generation of youth and leaders in Africa understand and value a growing wild economy that drives rural development through the sustainable use of wildlife, the socioeconomic benefits of ecotourism and co-managed conservation areas.

It creates more jobs than any other sector and is growing at a higher rate than any other. It now needs to become an all-encompassing economy that is generational, responsible and sustainable.

Many of us see this value, but empty stomachs have no ears. We have real pressing issues of poverty, unemployment and hunger to address. Yet, we are blessed with the last remaining megafauna and vast open spaces that exist only in many peoples wildest imagination or on Nat Geo channels.

Yet, for most, the debate on sustainable use and, in fact, the wildlife economy, pivots around hunting, tourism and trade. You are either for hunting or against it. You are either for trade or against it. Why not responsible use? If it is not ethical, equitable, ecologically and economically sound, it shouldnt be permitted. Its as simple as that. In my eyes, a high-end, luxury photographic safari, using thousands of litres of water per person per night, creating only a few jobs falls into the same category as captive lion breeding.

The wildlife economy is not only about hunting, tourism and bioprospecting the use of plants and animal species for medicinal drugs and other commercially valuable products. It is far broader than that diverse, domestic, and demand driven.

And pangolin, rhino, and elephant poaching and foreign vessels raping our shorelines are all symptomatic of a deeper ill that includes poor service delivery and corruption.

People starve while cash-fat tourists photograph or hunt game that indigenous communities rightly have a stake in. Nkomo is on the money when she fingers our colonial history and exclusivity of our parks. Our new wildlife economy needs to start with basic needs.

Why are we not farming diversity? Well-managed rangelands supported many people in the past and ecological agriculture or wild management could well prove the provider. Game meat has massive potential to create hundreds of thousands of jobs alongside a vibrant red meat industry and a self-sustaining ecological approach to landscape management.

And, most importantly, how do we make the wild economy attractive to our next generation, our youth?

What if we really invested in this wild economy? Created roads and infrastructure, and bursaries and discounted tertiary education to support it? Cleaned up our act, removed aliens and cleaned water courses because it makes economic and ecological sense?

We need interventions as simple as homestead gardens, collaborative and large-scaled beekeeping enterprises, job creation through guiding, hunting, tourism development and maintenance. And we need to embrace age-old traditional income generation and practices in iconic locations.

What if we created a 50-year vision to grow our entire economy on the back of a wild economy? Link it to renewables, to clean water, air and soil, to carbon sequestration, to the red meat industry, grazing on open grasslands, not factory farmed via feedlots, but responsible, ethical, equitable, economic and ecologically sound use a natural resource-based economy.

If you had to make a choice between oil, gas and coal or clean air, clean water and clean soil what would you choose? The answer is obvious. It is our constitutional responsibility to look after this for future generations. Lets start talking about responsibility rather than rights.

Too often we turn to international experts for answers. We tend to forget that local is lekker. While international tourists generate fantastic local benefits, jobs and income, the pandemic has taught us just how vulnerable we are. We need to become more self-sufficient. We need to feed ourselves first.

Amid this, our new wild economy must compete with vested commercial economic interests and extractive industries that have decimated landscapes, wetlands and forests in the name of progress.

Our goal should be to foster resilient, empowered, enterprising communities who understand, cherish, own, manage and protect the wild economy, reducing the need for donor and government support, enabling strong, responsible and sustainable communities.

That is what we should aim for, not cheap political points, or short-term economic gain. When the value on the inside of our wildlife reserves is appreciated and benefits realised (economically and socially), then we reduce conflict and begin to move in the right direction.

We need interventions as simple as homestead gardens, collaborative and large-scaled beekeeping enterprises, job creation through guiding, hunting, tourism development and maintenance. And we need to embrace age-old traditional income generation and practices in iconic locations.

In her article, Nkomo quoted Zimbabwean writer, author and publisher Pathisa Nyathi: Keep frowning on African culture and your birds will be driven extinct by what you call myths and superstitions. Beliefs are as real as their consequences.

Last time I checked, we only have one Earth, one Africa, one South Africa. Isnt it time we started looking after it and investing in it, instead of blaming each other for destroying it or worse, tearing it apart for personal gain? DM

Francois du Toit is the CEO of African Conservation Trust, an organisation that envisages a world that is able to sustain human life with abundant natural resources, which people can use not only to survive, but to flourish.

Please note you must be a Maverick Insider to comment. Sign up here or if you are already an Insider.

Read this article:

The wild economy: Changing the way we see and use wildlife and natural resources - Daily Maverick

Guest View: The show, and all other arts and culture, must go on – Seacoastonline.com

While many of our businesses have been able to adapt to reopening protocols in a joint effort to protect the health and safety of both employees and consumers, currently it is an entirely different story for New Hampshires arts and culture economy. At best, its journey to recovery is going to be slow and extremely challenging. At worst, without additional support, many are at of risk of having to close despite the creativity and innovation they have shown throughout this pandemic.

In an industry that relies almost completely on bringing people together, the impacts of COVID-19 have been catastrophic. In the latest numbers pulled together by the Granite Stage, a Facebook based resource for New Hampshire theater, over 40 performing arts companies and festivals have either canceled their summer season or canceled the rest of their 2020 season altogether. In a recent presentation to stakeholders, we heard how 71% of arts-based nonprofits have had to lay off staff in order to keep afloat.

In New Hampshire, the creative economy is a $2.6 billion industry, employing over 2,200 full time staff. The ripple effect on our main streets and surrounding businesses is significant. In Portsmouth, for example, The Music Hall brings in 130,000 patrons every year who go on to spend an average of $27 to $37 per person in event-related expenditures including dinner, drinks, and parking. In Concord, at the Capitol Center for the Arts that number is $18 for locals and up to $49 per person for patrons coming in from out of town.

Closure of a theatre, concert hall or museum means more than the loss of a show or a gallery opening. It is the loss of jobs, contracts, and an economic driver that has revitalized downtowns across the Granite State and brings visitors to New Hampshire.

The arts sector is particularly resilient. It has been common practice among professional artists to not only create, but defend the very act of creation and its impact. In the case of New Hampshire, that impact equals $57 million in direct expenditures, local and state government revenues of $6 million, and $60 million in arts-related spending annually.

In response to this crisis our arts organizations have been extremely innovative in reaching out to their clientele, but often with little or no remuneration. Artists have converted their front lawns into drive-by art galleries. Theaters have quarantined together in order to continue the art of live performances which are showcased online. Musicians, who have lost half a years salary in canceled performances, continue to host online free concerts for their audiences. Music teachers have also brought their students online. Dance teachers are sending their students new choreography and checking in to make sure that the years of progress made in training and discipline are not lost in the time they are apart. In short, our arts and culture sector has been bringing us the very thing that we all have been missing, human connection.

As we begin to emerge as a state from the COVID-19 crisis, it will be the role of our arts and culture organizations to continue to help combat the long-term effects of social distancing and isolation. It will be the job of our artists to bring people back together and allow us to share our stories in a meaningful way as well as displacing feelings of loneliness that have become more prevalent, particularly among our most vulnerable populations.

While the stories of perseverance by this vital sector of our economy are inspiring, the loss of actual participation and engagement by attendees, performers and artists cannot be ignored. When someone watches a video online or attends a virtual class, concert, play, exhibition or arts event, the revenue is a fraction of what could be made through in-person attendance. Upon reopening, reduced seating capacity going forward will significantly minimize a venues main revenue stream. Most arts and cultural organizations rely on a combination of direct event revenue, grant funding, and private donations to stay afloat. As the economy as a whole takes a hit, major fundraisers for these organizations have been canceled or postponed and personal liquidity has been put in danger, dramatically decreasing the number of individuals able to make personal donations.

So what do we do? We must continue to support all our arts and cultural organizations by buying virtual tickets, gift cards for our family members and friends, and safely attending their events and programs as they slowly begin to re-open. Arts organizations have worked closely with public health to create guidelines to protect both patrons and artists and their work is to be commended. If you are not already a member, become a member and support the mission of your preferred arts and cultural organizations as they have supported us throughout this pandemic. If you are able, donate in order to keep the impact of fixed overhead costs at bay. We must reach out to local government, state elected officials and our federal delegation to find additional financial support. We must do everything we can to allow these organizations to survive, thrive and do what they do best keep us connected.

Sen. Shannon Chandley represents District 11, Sen. Martha Fuller Clark represents District 21, and Sen. Jon Morgan represents District 23. The views expressed are those of the writers.

See the original post:

Guest View: The show, and all other arts and culture, must go on - Seacoastonline.com

Keep the geeks in charge of the internet – The Japan Times

Los Angeles The coronavirus pandemic has rapidly transformed the internet into the most critical infrastructure on Earth.

By enabling people and businesses to remain connected while under lockdown, the internet has helped to prevent the global economy from collapsing entirely. Indeed, with fear and social distancing continuing to separate many of us, it has become the connective tissue for much human interaction and economic activity around the world.

But few appreciate how this critical global resource has remained stable and resilient since its inception, even as its scope and scale have undergone uninterrupted explosive growth. In an age of widening political, economic, and social divisions, how has the one internet connecting the entire world been sustained? And how can we best continue to protect it?

The answers to both questions start with understanding what makes the Internet which consists of tens of thousands of disparate networks look like and function as one network for all. These components, or unique internet identifiers, include Internet Protocol (IP) addresses, which are associated with every device connected to the internet, and internet domain names (like ft.com, harvard.edu or apple.news), which we use to search for and connect to computers easily.

These unique identifiers ensure that, no matter where you are or which network you are connected to, you will always get in touch with the right computer with the desired domain name, or reach the right target device with an embedded IP number (such as a smart thermostat, for example). This simple, elegant architecture reflects the genius of a handful of brilliant engineers who created the internet a half-century ago. Since then, it has never failed to help us locate the billions of devices that have been added to the thousands of networks that make up todays cyber economy. Should the identifiers fail, we would experience immediate digital chaos.

Given the identifiers critical role, it is imperative that they not be compromised or controlled by any authority that is not committed to maintaining the internet as an open, global, common good. In the wrong hands, they could be used to fragment the Internet and enable top-down control of usage and users by governments with malign intentions. And such fears are real, given authoritarian governments online meddling in elections, national security networks and digital commercial transactions in the last few years.

So, the key question is who should be entrusted today to maintain the security and reliability of internet identifiers. The answer is simple: geeks, not governments.

The same engineers who built the internet established nonprofit institutions, such as the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) and the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF), to take responsibility for the unique identifiers and maintain the internets original ethos of openness. These and other institutions coordinate global efforts to manage the protocols necessary for the Internets stable and reliable operation, and the engineers who run them today do so with remarkable independence, precision, dedication, and humility.

The last major assault on these institutions independence came in December 2012, when a group of governments at the United Nations World Conference on International Telecommunications (WCIT) attempted to take control of the unique identifiers. This effort was thwarted thanks to the vigilance of democratic governments that valued the power of a single global internet to foster innovation, commerce, and international cooperation.

But today, in the midst of the chaos caused by the COVID-19 pandemic, authoritarian governments are once again using the United Nations to try to seize control of critical internet resources from engineers. During a recent International Telecommunication Union meeting, a proposal for a new standard for core network technology was submitted.

Regrettably, and more worryingly, extreme activist groups and democratic governments also are carelessly intruding on the work of these independent institutions, to police free expression on social media among other things. For example, after Twitter attached a fact-check warning to two of U.S. President Donald Trumps recent tweets, he threatened that his administration would strongly regulate or close down social media platforms that he believes silence conservative voices.

Organizations such as ICANN and IETF have spent decades developing and refining consensus-based decision-making processes, involving inclusive and transparent bottom-up participation by engineers, businesses, civil-society organizations, and governments. The danger is that by subverting these institutions established procedures, official interference and lobbying will make them easy prey for authoritarian regimes.

Attempting to reshape from outside the decisions of bodies like ICANN, or to fuel the efforts of authoritarian regimes to shift control of the internet to governments within the UN framework, contradicts the internets original ethos and could be devastating for us all.

We must commit to safeguarding the resilient system that enables the internet to function free of political interference or control. At a time when our physical and economic health are faltering in the face of a potent virus, protecting the independent, democratic, and transparent institutions that have dependably governed the internet infrastructure since its inception has never been more important.

Fadi Chehade was President and CEO of the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) from 2012 to 2016. Project Syndicate, 19952020

See the rest here:

Keep the geeks in charge of the internet - The Japan Times

Room For More Fiscal Support In India In Near Term Given Severity Of Economic Situation: IMF – Inventiva

A top IMF official has said that there is room for more fiscal support in India in the near term, particularly for vulnerable households and SMEs, given the severity of the countrys economic situation due to the COVID-19 pandemic.

Vitor Gaspar, Director of the International Monetary Funds Fiscal Affairs Department, told PTI that a complete and successful implementation of the existing support measures (in particular, food provision to households) is of paramount importance.

Given the severity of the economic situation, in the near-term there is room for more fiscal support, particularly for vulnerable households and SMEs (Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises), he said.

Over the medium-term, India will continue to have a very limited fiscal space, and a credible and well-communicated consolidation plan will be urgently needed once the coronavirus pandemic subsides, Gasper said.

The economic impact of the COVID-19 in India has been substantial and broad-based, he said, adding that high frequency indicators point to a sharp decline in economic activity, as reflected in the industrial production, business sentiment (in the purchasing managers index), vehicle sales and trade.

In the June World Economic Outlook (WEO), growth in fiscal year 20/21 was revised down to -4.5 per cent, he said.

The downward revision compared with the April WEO was driven primarily by the continued rise in the number of COVID-19 cases in India.

This led the International Monetary Fund to make specific two adjustments. First, the assumed length of the partial lockdown was extended somewhat. Second, and more important, we made more conservative assumptions about the speed of recovery given that the health crisis has not yet been contained, Gasper said in response to a question.

He said that the near-term growth outlook in India continues to be clouded by the global and domestic slowdown and uncertainties relating to the evolution of the coronavirus pandemic.

According to the senior IMF official, Indias general government fiscal deficit is projected to reach 12.1 per cent of the GDP in fiscal year 20/21, primarily due to weak tax revenues, as well as a denominator effect associated with the negative projected nominal GDP growth as with all other macro variables, estimates are highly uncertain.

Consistent with this, and the deterioration in economic activity, Indias public debt-to-GDP ratio is projected to reach about 84 per cent this fiscal year, Gasper added.

According to Johns Hopkins Coronavirus Resource Center, the contagion has infected over 12 million people and killed more than 554,000 across the world.

The US is the worst affected country with over 3.1 million cases and more than 1,33,000 deaths. Indias COVID-19 caseload stands at 7,93,802 with 21,604 deaths.

The COVID-19, which originated in Chinas Wuhan city in December last year, has also battered the world economy with the International Monetary Fund saying that the global economy is bound to suffer a severe recession.

Scientists are racing against time to find a vaccine or medicine for its treatment.

Like Loading...

Related

Read the original here:

Room For More Fiscal Support In India In Near Term Given Severity Of Economic Situation: IMF - Inventiva

CT forum to address public-owned banks, which offer low-interest loans – Middletown Press

Ellen Brown is a world-renowned author and founding director of the Public Banking Institute, which will sponsor an online forum Wednesday evening.

Ellen Brown is a world-renowned author and founding director of the Public Banking Institute, which will sponsor an online forum Wednesday evening.

Photo: Photo Contributed By Cimbria Badenhausen

Ellen Brown is a world-renowned author and founding director of the Public Banking Institute, which will sponsor an online forum Wednesday evening.

Ellen Brown is a world-renowned author and founding director of the Public Banking Institute, which will sponsor an online forum Wednesday evening.

CT forum to address public-owned banks, which offer low-interest loans

MIDDLETOWN Local stakeholders are hoping to enlighten people about the possibility of creating a public banking system which potentially could become a financial lifeline to struggling communities.

An upcoming Zoom meeting sponsored by Public Bank Connecticut will be conducted in partnership with the East Haddam-based Sanctuary at Shepardfields, a management services company led by the citys energy coordinator, Michael Harris, who owns Harris Management Services, and administrators with the Public Banking Institute.

These lending entities have been shown to respond more rapidly, effectively and equitably to crises than privately-owned banks, according to California-based PBI, led by Ellen Brown, a world-renowned author and founding director.

These things can really benefit Main Street, and communities and municipalities in Connecticut, which is what were trying to spread awareness, Harris said. I want to get Middletowns attention on this topic.

This is an attractive option both to conservative and more progressive people. The money thats produced in the state stays in the state, according to Cimbria Badenhausen, who runs PBIs engagement and support efforts.

The only such bank in the continental United States was established in North Dakota, and made possible after a Supreme Court ruling, she said.

As a bank, its more successful than Goldman Sachs, Badenhausen said.

Wall Streets interests have prohibited the model from being replicated in other states, she said. They fund the big stuff. We can fund the small stuff through community banks.

It can be an incredibly valuable tool for managing life going forward amid the convergence of crises known as climate disruption and COVID-19, and equity, social and economic justice issues that are all inter sectional, Harris said.

Brown will be the guest speaker at Wednesdays 6 p.m. Zoom session.

Expected to attend are veteran public bank advocate state Rep. Susan Johnson, D-Willimantic, along with Reps. Josh Elliot, D-Hamden, and Christine Palm, D-Chester; Chester Selectwoman Lauren Gister; and East Haddam Selectwoman Theresa Govert, as well as other influencers.

New Haven community organizer Jayuan Carter owns a landscaping company. I love economics. Economics to me is a team sport, he said.

Hes keen on offering additional options to people looking to borrow funds. That way, they can have more access to capital so we can have a better quality of life. The system is not quite working for everyone, said Carter, who called the subject a passion of his.

Johnson proposed legislation five years ago, which is now gaining more interest, Badenhausen said.

Currently, there is some opposition to the plan, including consultants who work to steer people toward private loans, Carter said.

Setting up these public financial institutions at the state and municipal levels is a matter of economy of scale, Harris said. Larger cities are more conducive to the concept.

There are two ways these public banks could be set up in Connecticut, he said. The quickest would be for the governor to make an emergency declaration. An alternative, which would take longer, is legislative action.

Privately held banks have capital resources they leverage by creating credit, Harris said. They can create money out of thin air at a ratio of $10 to every $1 of capital resources they have.

These companies have access to extremely low-cost money through federal emergency measures caused by the economic downturn due to COVID, he added.

All that leverage and profits derived from the way banking takes place today in the world accrue to the capital owners, to private investors through a profit modem, Harris said.

Justin Good, co-executive director of the Sanctuary, which is dedicated to community development, sustainability and other missions, said the Connecticut Bankers Association has come out in opposition to the legislation, saying such banks would mean more competition.

Thats absolutely false. It does just the opposite, Good said. Bank of North Dakota has the highest number of community banks per capita in the states. It increases their lending capacities.

For instance, if Hartford needed $4 billion for infrastructure issues, the city, doing business as the Hartford Bank, could lend itself $4 billion at 1 percent interest. It would be paying 101 percent of the loan rather than traditional, much higher interest levels, Badenhausen said.

Banks are not intermediaries, they actually create money when they create loans, Good said.

Carter gives an example of banks whose policy is to keeping deposited checks for two days, which he considers a questioning of his ability to cover that amount in his own account. In holding that check, theyre depositing and making money in the process.

A car dealer cant sell more than they actually have, but a bank can make more money than it actually has, Good said.

A study in Chicago showed banks there loaned more money to those in white neighborhoods than all others combined, he said. Individual banks loaned 20 to 40 times more funds to white families than to those of color, Good said.

The deepest level of social injustice is in the banking industry. They didnt find explicit racial discrimination because of how they factor risk. This is a problem that, even though redlining is illegal, it still continues with a vengeance. A public bank could address that at the deepest level, he said.

If it were to deposit those revenues into its own public bank, they could leverage that capital resource 10:1 and lend the communitys money at extremely low interest rates, Harris said. The articulated mission is for the communitys good instead of for-profit investors and private owners of capital.

To register for the Zoom meeting, go to CTPublicBank. The event will also be livestreamed on Facebook. For information, visit the Public Banking Institute website and its Facebook page.

Read the rest here:

CT forum to address public-owned banks, which offer low-interest loans - Middletown Press

The wild decade: the 1990s laid the foundations for Vladimir Putins Russia – ThePrint

Text Size:A- A+

By securing victory in a national vote on constitutional changes, Vladimir Putin could now remain president of Russia until 2036 if he chooses to stand again. After 20 years in power, the narrative of Russias chaotic 1990s remains core to Putins legitimacy as the leader who restored stability.

Although the decade still divides public opinion, whats not in doubt is that it was a dangerous and exciting period. The ambiguity of the 90s is summed up by the then-popular Russian word, bespredel, the title of a 1989 prison drama meaning anarchic freedom and unaccountable authority.

At the time, Russias turbulent post-Soviet transition was seen as a lurid sideshow to a stable post-cold war west. A generation later, the uncertainties of that period have a wider resonance than they did at the time.

The 1990s began with the Soviet Unions first multiparty elections in March 1990 when Boris Yeltsin emerged as leader of Russia. It ended, punctually, on December 31, 1999, when Yeltsin resigned in favour of Putin, his designated successor.

The decade included two failed coups in 1991 and 1993, and the abolition of both the ruling Communist Party and the USSR. Massive economic dislocation occurred as Soviet economic ties were severed, a market economy was created and shock therapy accompanied by mass privatisation.

The social impact was immense. Life expectancy fell, with up to five million excess adult deaths in Russia in 1991-2001, birth rates collapsed and both of these trends were compounded by widespread crime and trafficking. These negative effects were concentrated in periods of economic crisis in 1991-94 and 1998-99.

Sharply rising inequality and the emergence of a new wealthy class, including some leading reformers, meant that the term democrat had become a term of abuse as early as 1992.

We are deeply grateful to our readers & viewers for their time, trust and subscriptions.

Quality journalism is expensive and needs readers to pay for it. Your support will define our work and ThePrints future.

SUBSCRIBE NOW

Also read: India doesnt have a Russia problem. New Delhi must stop trying to fix it

My own research from that period shows how the concentration of power was a trend right from the beginning of the reforms. It was from part of the reform movement itself that the style of government associated with Putin emerged.

I arrived in St Petersburg in 1991, expecting to study the conflict between democratic and communist ideologies. Instead, I found that the conflict was between two groups of reformers those who supported strong executive rule and those in favour of representative or parliamentary rule. It was a re-match of the 19th century Russian debate between protagonists of state and society. In both cases it was the statists who won.

For advocates of strong executive rule, such as the leading reformer and mayor of St Petersburg, Anatoly Sobchak under whom Putin served as deputy elected councillors were an obstacle to efficient governance.

All reformers united in opposing the attempted coup by hardline Soviets in August 1991, but from then on the split in the reform camp between the advocates of executive and representative powers grew wider. It culminated in October 1993, in a brief armed conflict between president and parliament. The parliamentary forces were mostly anti-liberal nationalists, but they were also supported by councils. Among them was the reformer-led St Petersburg council, then deep in a legal conflict with Sobchak, its former chair, over what councillors saw as his excessive concentration of power.

Yeltsin ordered his forces to fire on the parliament to quell the attempted coup. With parliament defeated, most regional and city councils across the country were dissolved and replaced by assemblies with reduced powers.

The conflict between Sobchak and his former allies continued until his death in 1999. By then his former deputy, Putin had reached the apex of executive power at national level taking many of Sobchaks St Petersburg team to form the core of his Kremlin administration.

Concentration of power at all levels of the hierarchy meant a more intensive zero-sum struggle to win it, rather than the compromises inherent to parliamentary systems. Higher stakes meant aggressive mobilisation of media for an information war became a feature of 1990s electoral politics at regional level, following the pattern of the 1996 presidential election.

By then, the corruption associated with privatisation had made Yeltsin and the reformers unpopular and many feared the communists would return to power. The democrats had to resort to desperate measures. Every possible resource was mobilised to ensure that Yeltsin was re-elected including deals with powerful oligarchs with large media empires. The communists were defeated but the price was endemic cynicism about the democratic process.

Also read: How India lined up US, Russia on its side of LAC and China was forced to return friendless

The Yeltsin presidency remained beholden to Russias regional governors and the oligarchs. It fell to Putin to curtail the powers of these groups, campaigning in 2000 under the slogan of the dictatorship of law. That such a slogan could have popular support shows the degree to which the public had become disillusioned in the late 1990s. However, the direction towards concentration of power had been set almost a decade before Putin was elected president.

Russias reformers of the 90s largely achieved the irreversible economic change they wanted. They were less successful in creating a positive narrative for the new Russia. Reform had seemed to be based on the idea that Russia needed to learn as much as possible from the west. Over time, disillusion with this idealised view of the west grew and public opinion became more nationalistic.

By the late 1990s, nationalism was both a threat and an opportunity. As in the era of Putins reputed role model, Tsar Alexander III in the late 19th century, the policy appeared to be for nationalism to provide the state with an ideology while centralisation would contain it from getting out of hand. The new constitutional changes Putin has now introduced continue this dual path of greater concentration of power and emphasis on national identity and sovereignty and both have their origins in the early 1990s.

Adrian Campbell, Senior Lecturer in International Development, University of Birmingham

This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.

Subscribe to our channels on YouTube & Telegram

News media is in a crisis & only you can fix it

You are reading this because you value good, intelligent and objective journalism. We thank you for your time and your trust.

You also know that the news media is facing an unprecedented crisis. It is likely that you are also hearing of the brutal layoffs and pay-cuts hitting the industry. There are many reasons why the medias economics is broken. But a big one is that good people are not yet paying enough for good journalism.

We have a newsroom filled with talented young reporters. We also have the countrys most robust editing and fact-checking team, finest news photographers and video professionals. We are building Indias most ambitious and energetic news platform. And we arent even three yet.

At ThePrint, we invest in quality journalists. We pay them fairly and on time even in this difficult period. As you may have noticed, we do not flinch from spending whatever it takes to make sure our reporters reach where the story is. Our stellar coronavirus coverage is a good example. You can check some of it here.

This comes with a sizable cost. For us to continue bringing quality journalism, we need readers like you to pay for it. Because the advertising market is broken too.

If you think we deserve your support, do join us in this endeavour to strengthen fair, free, courageous, and questioning journalism, please click on the link below. Your support will define our journalism, and ThePrints future. It will take just a few seconds of your time.

Support Our Journalism

Read more:

The wild decade: the 1990s laid the foundations for Vladimir Putins Russia - ThePrint

Canada joins Global Ocean Alliance: Advocates for protecting 30 per cent of the world’s ocean by 2030 – Canada NewsWire

OTTAWA, ON, July 9, 2020 /CNW/ - Canada is an ocean nation with the longest coastline in the world. Canadians rely on healthy marine ecosystems to sustain our economy, our food supply, and our coastal communities. But the ocean is a shared resource that requires a global effort to ensure marine conservation. That is why the Government of Canada is joining other countries to advocate for international action to increase conservation and protection of our oceans by 2030.

Today, during the Protecting the Ocean's Most Important Places webinar, the Minister of Fisheries, Oceans and the Canadian Coast Guard, the Honourable Bernadette Jordan, announced Canada has joined the United Kingdom and other countries in the Global Ocean Alliance. The Alliance's goal is to advocate with international partners for ambitious ocean action to protect at least 30 per cent of the world's oceans through the establishment of marine protected areas and other effective area-based marine conservation measures by 2030.

Since 2015, the Government of Canada has worked in partnership with provinces and territories, Indigenous peoples, and environmental and industry organizations to increase the protection of our oceans. Canada aimed to conserve 10 per cent of the country's marine and coastal areas by 2020 and has already surpassed this goal, reaching nearly 14 per cent by August 2019. Canada's efforts, including the establishment of new marine protected areas and other effective area-based conservation measures, have also contributed to the international 10 per cent marine conservation target ahead of the 2020 timeline.

The Government of Canada continues to work toward its ambitious target of protecting 25 per cent of marine and coastal areas by 2025, working toward 30 per cent by 2030. Through the Global Ocean Alliance, we join a growing number of like-minded countries that will advocate internationally for 30 per cent conservation by 2030 around the world. We will work with other countries toward the adoption of new ambitious global biodiversity targets under the Convention on Biological Diversity at the 15th Conference of Parties in Kunming, China in 2021.

Canada is joining the Global Ocean Alliance to help galvanize international efforts towards a 30 per cent conservation goal that allows the marine environment and sustainable marine economies to thrive.

Quotes

Our oceans provide a wealth of opportunity when approached from the position of sustainability and environmental stewardship. Canada is proud to join the Global Ocean Alliance, working alongsidelike-minded countries to advocate for our shared visionof sustainable, healthy oceans around the world. We have made exceptional progress on protecting our own waters, and it is time to move the goal post ahead and reach even farther. Canadians expect our government to be a global leader in environmental protection, and this partnership is another way we will use our voice, leadership, and resources to protect our oceans and make a difference around the world.

-The Honourable Bernadette Jordan, Minister of Fisheries, Oceans and the Canadian Coast Guard

Our government is working together with provinces, territories, Indigenous peoples, environmental organizations and industry to advance conservation on Canada's lands and waters. Together we have made great progress and achieved the 10 per cent global target for marine conservation ahead of the 2020 commitment. Recognizing we have a responsibility to Canadians, the world, and future generations we are committed to redoubling our efforts to protect the biodiversity of our ocean and support the sustainability of coastal communities. Focused and coordinated action by countries around the world is the only way to stem the decline in biodiversity and rise to the challenge of climate change. Canada's participation in the Global Ocean Alliance demonstrates our commitment to achieving these goals.

-The Honourable Jonathan Wilkinson, Minister of Environment and Climate Change and Minister Responsible for Parks Canada

Quick Facts

Associated Links

Stay Connected

SOURCE Fisheries and Oceans (DFO) Canada

For further information: Jane Deeks, Press Secretary, Office of the Minister of Fisheries, Oceans and the Canadian Coast Guard, 343-550-9594, [emailprotected]; Media Relations, Fisheries and Oceans Canada, 613-990-7537, [emailprotected]

http://www.dfo-mpo.gc.ca

See the rest here:

Canada joins Global Ocean Alliance: Advocates for protecting 30 per cent of the world's ocean by 2030 - Canada NewsWire

US Senate Finance Subcommittee hearing highlights need to review on China’s censorship – Tibet Post International

Washington, D.C. The Senate Finance Subcommittee hearing of June 30, 2020, highlighted the need for American policymakers to review their approach toward Chinas censorship, as well as the self-censorship practiced by American entities trading with China.

International Campaign for Tibet Chairman Richard Gere was one of the panelists who testified.

The hearing focused on Censorship as a Non-Tariff Barrier to Trade and made a direct connection between the oppressive policies the Chinese government imposes on its citizens and the negative impact those policies have on foreign companies that are prohibited to censor freedom of expression in democratic countries but banned from the Chinese market for that very reason.

As noted during the hearing, Chinese companies, including state-owned enterprises, are not subject to censorship while operating in the United States, in clear violation of the principle of reciprocity.

Bipartisan concerns

As subcommittee Chairman Sen. John Cornyn, R-Texas, said in his opening remarks, the hearing was an opportunity for Congress to see if such censorship by China constitutes a trade barrier in violation of [World Trade Organization], multilateral and bilateral agreements and practices.

The focus on censorship was bipartisan, with subcommittee Ranking Member Sen. Robert P. Casey, Jr., D-Pa., making this case in his opening remarks. The actions undertaken by the Chinese government include direct barriers, such as blocking movies from entering their market or restricting content, Casey said, to blocking internet firms, to dictating content related to Chinas territorial and economic claims, to demanding action or inaction by businesses related to Taiwan, Hong Kong, Tibet, and the ongoing human rights abuses in Xinjian[g].

Chinese interference in Hollywood

Among areas touched upon at the hearing was the influence China has over Hollywood and how that affects American creative freedom. Gere recalled his experience on the issue and what it means. He said: His speaking out for human rights in China and Tibet hasnt directly affected his career, but, Im probably an unusual case.

Self-censorship has become an issue in Hollywood. Theres no doubt that the combination of Chinese censorship, coupled with American film studios desire to access Chinas market, can lead to self-censorship and to avoiding social issues that great American films once addressed, he said.

The atmosphere in Hollywood has changed since the 1990s when major studios released several films showing the brutality of the Chinese Communist Party. Imagine Marty Scorseses Kundun, about the life of the Dalai Lama, or my own film Red Corner, which is highly critical of the Chinese legal system, he said. Imagine them being made today. It wouldnt happen.

Chinese actresses and directors have told him they cant work with him because it would end their careers. One Chinese director was in tears with me having to call me up and say that he couldnt work with me, Gere said. That his career would be over, and his family could not travel.

The way China pressures American studios to do such things as remove the Taiwanese flag from movies doesnt merely show the power of the Chinese government. Its also very illustrative of their weakness, Gere said. Its the way that theyre hypersensitive about the Dalai Lama, the kindest, most generous man on the planet, whos consumed and saturated with love and compassion and forgiveness. The mere mention of his name makes them crazy.

Other panelists

Beth Baltzan from the Open Markets Institute, which uses journalism to promote greater awareness of the political and economic dangers of monopolization, had this analysis of Chinese censorship in her testimony at the hearing: The CCPs leverage over the speech of American citizens comes in large part from its economic leverage over the United States. Abating the Chinese governments economic leverage over us, in turn, abates its leverage over the exercise of our constitutional rights. There are different approaches that can be adopted to diminish that leverage.

Nigel Cory, associate director, trade policy, at the Information Technology and Innovation Foundation, in his testimony, highlighted the impact of Chinas censorship on American business interests. He said, US firms have lost significant revenue by being blocked or inhibited from accessing and operating in the Chinese market.

The impact has been especially damaging given that for many companies, their market access has been denied during a critical, formative period of economic growth in China. This has not only reduced US company global market share but provided Chinese competitors with a protected market from which to launch competitive challenges in other regions, such as South America, the rest of Asia, and Africa.

Self-censorship

Cory also focused on the self-censorship aspect of the issue when he said, Censorship in China is a broad, complicated, and opaque system involving a range of actors, laws, and regulations, and social, economic, and political interests. At the individual level, these come together and result in considerable self-censorship given people realize the potential negative consequences of crossing the many unclear lines on what may or may not be allowed. In this way, Chinas pursuit of censorship has resulted in significant societal changes.

His perspective about self-censorship in China also applies to the American society where corporations and even educational institutions have taken recourse to self-censorship as a way of protecting their economic ties with China.

When asked about recommendations to address this challenge posed by China, the issue of using reciprocity was foremost among the panelists suggestions. Gere talked about it by referring to the Reciprocal Access to Tibet Act and its smart approach to responding to Chinas unfair practices.

This is a good, very rational, and systematic response, and we hope the State Department will implement it soon, as required by law now, Gere said.

Need for new tools

Overall, the discussion that followed the panelists opening statements focused on the need to identify new tools for the US government to use to push back against Chinas censorship, reduce reliance on Chinas manufacturingincluding in the pharmaceutical industryand, at the same time, protect the economic interest of US companies that are shut down or severely restricted from accessing the Chinese market in critical industries like the internet and the media.

Questions and comments from Sen. Bill Cassidy, R-La., Robert Menendez, D-N.J., and Catherine Cortez Masto, D-Nev., highlighted the challenges posed by the interconnectedness of the US and Chinese economies, but also the need for the US to start thinking outside the box to craft policies and remedies that effectively protect both its interests and values.

Continued here:

US Senate Finance Subcommittee hearing highlights need to review on China's censorship - Tibet Post International

Black TikTok creators have long accused the platform of censorship – Reclaim The Net

TikTok, the wildly popular Chinese video-sharing app has long been accused of having a race problem.

While the company is also under fire for privacy problems, with countries such as India banning it already and the US being concerned about user privacy, there have also been accusations of racial bias against the company.

Marc Faddoul, an artificial intelligence researcher, first brought more solid evidence to this idea at the start of the year and stated that there may be a potential glitch in TikTok that may end up fostering racial bias in its algorithm that causes it to censor black people. Faddoul, in a series of tweets, further revealed his findings.

Follow a random profile and TikTok will only recommend people who look almost the same, read a part of Faddouls announcement.

Double your web browsing speed with today's sponsor. Get Brave.

While what he said may sound pretty normal, going deeper would certainly reveal that users hitting follow on a white persons profile are now more likely to see more white people on the platform over and again and that the appearance of those who users were seeing would determine who theyre shown next.

This would inevitably lead them to follow another random white individual from the recommendations, which not only eliminates the scope for black people and other minorities from gaining traction on the platform, but also ends up creating a ripple effect with individuals of a certain race or other physical attribute being recommended more to a certain user. And it works both ways black people would see more black people and white people would see more white people but those in the majority would have a bigger advantage on the platform and access to a larger audience.

The algorithm censorship accusations were wild but also seemed to be backed up with anecdotal stories.

Cat Zhang from Pitchfork commented on this in a recent podcast, saying that it was hard to prove but, but there definitely have been a lot of black creators, LGBTQ creators who have talked about their posts getting taken down, or censored or something to that effect. They feel like its been ongoing to the point where its not just arbitrary. Like they actually feel like theyre being targeted.

Zhang continues, I interviewed Iman, shes a big activist whos been disseminating a lot of protest info. She says that basically, every black creator she knows has another TikTok account just in case their primary one gets banned or deactivated.

And so black creators have long suspected that they have been primarily targeted for shadow banning, especially for posting about activist-related causes.

In China, TikTok is known as Douyin and implements untold levels of censorship for all different reasons even as far as banning people for speaking Cantonese instead of Mandarin.

In the West, TikTok says that it doesnt censor. But its been caught doing that numerous times, mostly commonly censoring content that would irritate Beijing, such as references to Tiananmen Square, Tibet, and Hong Kong.

And there has also been studies into how it shadowbans and suppresses content using various ranking factors.

Basically, TikTok doesnt tell you that anything is happening, but they just dont promote your video, or maybe your followers dont see it, Zhang says. So the view count is really low and its almost like the content really didnt exist in the first place. Like youre just kind of being siloed into your own world.

And while TikTok has been found censoring anti-China content, its also been accused of censoring content based on the user. For example, it was this year that TikTok faced backlash for censoring content from transgender users and a same-sex couple in India found that TikTok deleted a video of them dancing with no explanation.

The stories are numerous and add weight to the idea that TikToks algorithms do censor based on the user, especially after a report found that TikTok moderators were told to suppress content from obese and disabled people and was weirdly based on the idea that if no one could see their content then they couldnt be bullied.

In other words, it was supposed to be censorship for their own good.

The aforementioned phenomenon is known as collaborative filtering. With visibility being the number one factor that determines a creators success on any social media platform, the so-called collaborative filtering can end up becoming a huge hurdle to a number of creators on the platform, if they arent similar to the majority.

Although, that being said, recent rumors suggest that TikTok isnt long for the US market anyway, and could soon be kicked out of the country for privacy and national security concerns before it even has a chance to add more transparency to its algorithms and correct accusations of censorship.

Read more:

Black TikTok creators have long accused the platform of censorship - Reclaim The Net