Debbie Kilroy: Why we must abolish the prison system – Green Left Weekly

Debbie Kilroy is a long-term prison rights campaigner, particularly focused on protecting the rights of women and children. She helped establish Sisters Inside and is its CEO. She is a strong supporter of decarceration to end the use of prisons and other systems of social control in response to crime and social issues. Below is an abridged transcript of Kilroys presentation to an online Green Left forum on June 28 where she spoke alongside Gumbaynggirr Dunghutti Bundjalung woman Elizabeth Jarrett and Mervyn Eades, a Menang/Wilaman man from the Noongar nation.

* * *

First, the abolition of the prison industrial complex is our destination and decarceration is our journey. Its not something Im going to see in my life. But, right now, with a new movement on the streets there is a conversation around abolishing the prison industrial complex and decarceration strategies.

Its really important to imagine a world without prisons and police and punishment. The models we know of now are killing First Nations people, black and brown people. I hope you all demand we defund police and abolish prisons: its now a global movement.

In Australia, we must demand divestment from police and punishment and prisons. This must include every entity that uses carceral mechanisms. By this, I include corporations and non-government organisations that are funded with taxpayers money and use carceral mechanisms to control people that they are funded to support. They must be defunded.

We cannot continue to use carceral responses and think we are going to get something different than what we have today: the killings of First Nations people, black and brown people by police, prisons and other institutions. And, as Lizzie Jarrett said, the removal, the kidnapping of Aboriginal children is still a huge issue.

Until recently, society has not questioned whether policing and punishment and prisons should exist. Its only now, that a new generation of young people are thinking about the world and wanting a different one to this racial capitalist society.

Prisons have become part of the subconscious landscape in our mind. When we think of behaviour we dont like, we think of calling cops and engaging courts and prisons to respond. This must end.

We cant rely on the same structures to deal with cops within a system that doesnt deal justice to anybody. We have to come up with other models of public safety and security.

Its time. There are groups in our community that are working on these strategies. We know Aboriginal women will not go to the police for help around domestic and family violence because theyll be arrested. We know that black trans women wont call the police to deal with a violent interaction, whether its interpersonal or with the state, because they will also get violated and may be killed. Non-binary communities have other strategies to deal with the violence in their lives. We must start talking to these communities because theyre already doing it.

Women in prison today dont rely on screws to deal with the violence in the prison system. They know that they will be violated even further. We take it into our own hands.

To say that we need prisons because of certain people that are violent just means that the violence will continue, because prisons are violent. To end violence, we need ways to deal with people in a way thats respectful and dignified.

But, if someone is violating someone else, causing harm, how do we address that? It cant be with police and punishment and prisons. Weve got to stop thinking about punishment models. Weve got to start thinking outside the bars. My sister in the United States Angela Davis says: Its as if prisons were an inevitable part or fact of life, like death and birth. We cant rely on prisons to be part of our lives, like life and death. They do not give us life. They kill us and we know more so for Aboriginal people, Torres Strait Islander peoples and black and brown people around the world.

An important question today is about how to prevent the net widening? How do we prevent the further criminalisation and imprisonment of First Nations peoples and other disadvantaged peoples in our community here and around the world?

In Australia, were now having the conversation about defunding police and the abolition of prisons. We need to keep this conversation going. We cannot bolster the expansion of the prison industrial complex.

I dont support justice reinvestment, because I dont see any justice in the first instance. The reinvestment thats usually made in those type of models are Back to white academia, universities or researchers. The money is not given back to elders or to communities to distribute how they want.

Money saved in the government-funded justice reinvestment models is removed from the community and spent elsewhere. In New South Wales, a new 1700-cell prison, run by Serco, has just opened, something weve been fighting against for years. Justice reinvestment is only on the agenda because new prisons are opening their doors.

We must imagine and creatively explore new ideas of justice, new models of community safety and security. We can no longer rely on the racial, capitalist, punishment models and those institutions that it calls justice.

People call it the criminal justice system. I call it the criminal punishment system. That is the reality. There is no justice. Weve got to take justice back and develop the models ourselves.

We must continue to expose racial capitalism and its punishment institutions.

We must declare, now, a moratorium on building any more prison cells in whatever form. No more. Not even if the reform is to say, well, the children are cramped together or the prison is overcrowded. Well, release them!

During the coronavirus pandemic in Queensland, the watchhouse was not locking up women and more women were being released from prison; the numbers were coming down and more lawyers were taking action for women and girls and men.

The numbers came down because the watchhouse didnt want people coming in under arrest in case they had the virus. Instead, they would give them a notice to appear in court on a certain date. So the watchhouses were cleaned out. Sisters Inside was going into the biggest watchhouse in this state, where usually about 30 women or more were being held and processed in a week, and it went down to four or five.

Its only now that were seeing the restrictions ease that watchhouses have become active again.

We knew that the cops could do things differently. But now, because the watchhouse is open again, were seeing the numbers of people go up.

The time has come to push back on the cops.

Pam Palmater, my Indigenous activist sister from Canada said it so beautifully: we can and must stop taxpayers dollars yours and mine from continuing the oppression of First Nations peoples. The time has come to defund the police, take the resources from them. The time has come to move funding from those organisations, whether they are non-government organisations or corporations or companies, she said.

Funding must be removed from carceral mechanisms to control people, that carceral institutions are funded to support. Whether its housing, for example, and they want someone to move out, rather than call the cops and criminalise someone, they need to talk to the person to work out the issues.

The same goes for when they take a baby from mum, and mum's upset. They call the cops to come with the child protection workers to kidnap that Black baby. The baby is never returned home to its mother, its family and its community. This is the ongoing genocide happening to First Nations peoples in this country.

What Palmater says must happen for Canadian Aboriginal people is also what we must call for here: weve got to stop using taxpayers money to fund the oppression of First Nations peoples.

We must decarcerate and create a national plan about how are we going to do this together. We also need to stop criminalising people. Weve got to repeal the laws that criminalise people.

Ruthie Wilson Gilmore, an activist, academic and prison abolitionist in the US, says three words, twice. I want to end by saying them too, because I really believe this: Life is precious. Life is precious.

Read the original here:

Debbie Kilroy: Why we must abolish the prison system - Green Left Weekly

Why lawyers were as culpable as any slaver – Prospect Magazine

Attorney general Philip Yorke, of the 18th-century YorkeTalbot slavery opinion. Photo: Wikimedia Commons

Aslave is a human being who is the property of someone else: a human being who can be owned, bought and sold just like other forms of property. Property rights, in turn, depend on being recognised and enforceable by a system of law.

Of course, a person can be kept captive by brute force and forced to work on pain of violence, and this too perhaps can be called slavery. But for slavery to be sustainable in any organised society, the complicity of laws and lawyers is required. A system of slavery needs to have laws and lawyers to make it work.

Slave owners and traders such as Edward Colston, whose statue was recently toppled in Bristol, were not on some frolic of their own. They were part of a wider enterprise in which many others in British society were complicit. They were practical businesspeople supported by specialist banks and insurers, supplied by expert chain and weapon makers, and advised by attorneys and barristers on how to avoid and minimise risk in their commerce in human flesh.

Few at the time thought any of this exceptional. Slaves were regarded as chattels or even as investment opportunities. Ownership of a slave in the faraway plantations was as normal then as, say, owning a timeshare in Spain would be now. Slave ownership was prevalent throughout society, and not just the preserve of a few wealthy merchants in Liverpool and Bristol.

There is a comforting national myth promoted by some commentators and politicians that slavery was not known to English law. Certain 18th-century cases are pointed to as deciding that slavery was always repugnant to the common law. But this is not correct: English law was quite at ease with slavery until its abolition across the Empire in 1834. This is demonstrated by the immense compensation arrangements that were required for the abolition to happen. If slavery was already unlawful, then what were the slave owners being compensated for losing?

The celebrated cases of the 1700s touched on what rights a slave owner could assert if their slave happened to be on British soil. The sordid practice was fine, as long as owners exercised their property rights from afar.

Other legal cases reveal how the horrors of slavery were normalised. In the Zong shipping case of 1784, the court heard how in order to protect a ship and its crew with depleted onboard supplies, slaves had been thrown overboard to drown. The commercial law issue for the court to rule on was whether the cargo owners could make a claim on the insurance policy. The judges took their decisions on a technical point of evidence, and nobody concerned in the case made any objection to slavery as a matter of principle. The insurer defendants certainly did not object, even if they disputed this case, as they were as much a part of the overall slavery system as the cargo owners who brought the case.

Any doubts that human beings could be property had much earlier been waived aside with a formal legal statement of 1729 by the two law officers of the Crownthe attorney general and solicitor general. The so-called Yorke-Talbot Opinion was, in substance, little more than an assertion that the practice was acceptable with no authorities cited. But with this endorsement by the British state, practical people saw no need to give the matter a second thought.

And once you know about how deep and wide slave ownership was before 1834, many familiar things become disconcerting. Fine Georgian squares, great public schools, handsome Oxbridge colleges and the Inns of Court: many of these things have hidden foundations at least in part in slave ownership. The social satires of Jane Austen are more sharply excruciating when you realise what many of the estates of her characters were ultimately based on.

Even after the abolition of 1834, British economic development depended in part on the slaves held elsewhere and then, later in the 19th and early 20th century, on the annexation of properties belonging to others, the very essence of imperialism. And at each step, lawyers and others were there to counsel those who were seeking to commercially exploit such misery.

No doubt many of those involved considered themselves then just as kind as we consider ourselves now. One could own, buy and sell slaves, and profit from their exertions, without ever encountering anyone actually enslaved, as they were far away in the Indies and out of mind as well as sight.

Understanding the complicity and connivance of law and lawyers (and of society generally) is essential to filling out the picture of the past. The archives show how central the miseries of slavery and imperialism were to our national history: the evidence is there in the detailed legal instruments, inventories and other business records that were needed to sustain them. There are shelves of volumes of ledgers of everyday bookkeeping and due diligence. They constitute our own version of the banality of evil, as Hannah Arendt described a later bureaucratic system ofmethodical horror.

The current focus on individual traders, like Colston, means that those who facilitated and enabled the trade, such as lawyers and other advisers, are out of sight. Systems make the difference. In more modern times, the police officer who abuses their power does so because he or she knows that they will probably get away with it: the system is rigged against anybody facing real accountability.

The wider legal system means that bad things can easily happen. Laws and due process are never neutral in their application, even if legal equality is the ideal.

Slaves could be thrown overboard just as a police officer can now kneel on a black mans neck, because the legal system will operate so as to protect those inflicting the harm. The system of law is better at protecting those abusing power more than those they are dealing with. Some lives, and livelihoods, matterand some do not.

See the article here:

Why lawyers were as culpable as any slaver - Prospect Magazine

On Goodwill Versus History and the Potential Renaming of Franklin Pierce Law School – IPWatchdog.com

It was trademark malpractice to remove the name Franklin Pierce which had become synonymous with excellence in IP in the first place. It would be negligent to rush to judgment, caught up in a whirlwind, and remove it a second time.

According to the Concord Monitor, the University of New Hampshire is being petitioned by several students to drop the name of Franklin Pierce from the law school. And although the decision will not rest with the faculty of the law school, sources tell IPWatchdog that 12 of the 25 full-time law school faculty support the petition.

With the movement that were currently in, it felt like an opportune time to take the name off there, Adrin Coss, a rising third-year law student at the law school who is involved with the petition told the Concord Monitor. Its wrong to begin with. This is racially insensitive.

Why is the name Franklin Pierce racially insensitive? In a nutshell, Pierce, who did not himself own any slaves and abhorred slavery, did not do enough to put an end to the practice of slavery during his turbulent one term as President of the United States.

I consider slavery a social and political evil, Pierce said, and most sincerely wish that it had no existence upon the face of the earth. See Franklin Pierce. Unfortunately for the legacy of Pierce, he saw as his primary responsibility the preservation of the Union, and made several compromises to keep the Union together, which ultimately failed and pleased no one. History teaches that Pierce did not live up to his own convictions because he did not think the Union could survive the abolition of slavery, see Id., a prophecy that unfortunately turned out to be true.

This story matters to me because I graduated from Franklin Pierce Law Center more than a generation ago. This matters to many within the intellectual property community in the United States and all across the world because Franklin Pierce Law Center, which was subsequently acquired by the University of New Hampshire, was one of the top intellectual property institutions in the world. A tradition carried on by Franklin Pierce Law School, the school has never been outside the top 10 rankings for intellectual property law schools since the rankings began. In the early years while I was walking the halls, FPLC enjoyed the status of the top school in the nation three years in a row. In recent years, the school has been again rising.

Once upon a time, many hundreds of international students would descend upon FPLC in Concord every summer to learn about intellectual property at the Intellectual Property Summer Institute (IPSI), which the school just relaunched this summer in virtual form due to COVID-19. Some 50 to 100 students from abroad would stay throughout the academic year. Indeed, a more diverse institution would be hard to find, with students from America, Asia, South America, Europe and Africa. That is what Franklin Pierce means to me and so many others. These international students would take turns each week sharing their stories, their culture and food from home with the school community. It was a most inclusive place.

Over time, Franklin Pierce Law Center and then the University of New Hampshire lost its focus on intellectual propertyand even lost the name Franklin Pierce for nine years, when it was acquired by UNH in 2010but somehow still managed to maintain a top 10 ranking. This lost focus caused many alums to distance from the school. With the recent hire of Dean Megan Carpenter, the school has become rededicated to intellectual property, has restored the name Franklin Pierce, and many alumni are cautiously reengaging with the school in hopes that the diverse law school that focused on intellectual property in New Hampshire named after the only President in the States history might regain its mojo.

And therein lies the issue. Robert Rines was the founder of Franklin Pierce Law Center. He was a patent attorney, Hall of Fame Inventor with more than 60 patents to his name, and a composer of both Broadway and off-Broadway productions. Rines chose the name Franklin Pierce precisely because he was the only President from the state of New Hampshire. Are we at the point in American history where institutions cannot be named after former Presidents? Perhaps we are. Princeton University made the decision to remove the name of Woodrow Wilson from its School of Public and International Affairs, a decision supported by some, and questioned by others as setting a bad example.

If we are going to judge who can have a school named after them based on the worst, most difficult or most complicated decisions the individual ever made, will we ever be able to name anything after anyone anymore?

When it comes to names, there is so much good will that attaches over time that has nothing to do with whether the name is, was or should be defined in totality by one, a few, or a series of decisions or actions devoid of consideration of the complete picture. When the University of New Hampshire removed Franklin Pierce from the name of the law school in the first instance, it severed ties with a past that had nothing to do with slavery, or racism, or even Franklin Pierce the individual. Instead, UNH severed ties with what Franklin Pierce had come to mean to those who attended a quirky and shockingly diverse institution that just happened to be named after the only President in the states history.

When UNH removed the name Franklin Pierce it severed itself from the memories many alums had of a genuinely good place, with genuinely good people who genuinely cared, and signaled it was something different. It lost the good will it had accumulated. Alumni openly and mockingly joked that they attended the school formerly known as Franklin Pierce, and student resumes made obvious notations to make sure employers knew that the University of New Hampshire was really the old Franklin Pierce Law Center. Why? Because the name Franklin Pierce had become synonymous with excellence in the field of intellectual property, wholly devoid of any association with the man who was President during the most difficult period of time in U.S. history.

It was trademark malpractice to remove the name Franklin Piercewhich had become synonymous with excellence in IP in the first place. It would be negligent to rush to judgment, caught up in a whirlwind, and remove it a second time in order to appease what appear to be a small group of petitioners that in the words of Mr. Coss admit their actions are purely opportunistic (i.e., it felt like an opportune time, he told the Concord Monitor).

In the heat of the moment it is impossible to reflect with the proper perspective. Franklin Pierces name was on the school for over 35 years, it was removed for a handful of years, and now it has been reinstated after great deliberation and much celebration by alums because it has always been synonymous with excellence in IP education.

As the U.S. Senate was created as a cooling saucer for the hot passions of the House of Representatives, greater perspective ought to be brought to bear and alumni consulted before another change is made. The reputation for excellence the school rightfully deserves was built by the hard work of alums all over the world. Shouldnt they be at least consulted?

Gene Quinn is a Patent Attorney and Editor and President & CEO ofIPWatchdog, Inc.. Gene founded IPWatchdog.com in 1999. Gene is also a principal lecturer in the PLI Patent Bar Review Course and Of Counsel to the law firm of Berenato & White, LLC. Genes specialty is in the area of strategic patent consulting, patent application drafting and patent prosecution. He consults with attorneys facing peculiar procedural issues at the Patent Office, advises investors and executives on patent law changes and pending litigation matters, and works with start-up businesses throughout the United States and around the world, primarily dealing with software and computer related innovations. Gene is admitted to practice law in New Hampshire, is a Registered Patent Attorney and is also admitted to practice before the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. CLICK HERE to send Gene a message.

Follow this link:

On Goodwill Versus History and the Potential Renaming of Franklin Pierce Law School - IPWatchdog.com

Investigation into Springfield Police Departments Narcotics Unit finds pattern of excessive force – WWLP.com

SPRINGFIELD, Mass. (WWLP) A years-long investigation into the Narcotics Bureauof the Springfield Police Department by the U.S. Department of Justice has revealed a pattern or practice of using excessive force in violation of the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution.

The Office of U.S. Attorney AndrewLellingannounced that the investigation found the Narcotics Bureaus pattern or practice of excessive force is directly attributable to systemic deficiencies in policies, which fail to require detailed and consistent use-of-force reporting, and accountability systems that do not provide meaningful reviews of uses of force.

As demonstrated by recent events, it is crucial that our urban police departments keep the trust of their communities and ensure accountability for officer misconduct. Our investigation of the Springfield Police Department over the last year revealed chronic issues with the use of force, poor record keeping on that subject, and repeated failures to impose discipline for officer misconduct. That said, the Police Department and the City of Springfield have fully cooperated with this investigation and have made clear their commitment to genuine reform. We look forward to working with them to make Springfield a safer place.

The investigation was conducted pursuant to the Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act of 1994 and was announced on April 13, 2018.Its findings, a 28-page report, comes as a petition demanding the removal of the current police commissioner, Cheryl Clapprood, has been created with over 600 signatures.

Clapprood, a 40 year veteran of the department, was appointed police commissioner in September 2019, after serving as acting commissioner for six months following the sudden retirement of then-Commissioner John Barbieri. Barbieri was with the department for 31-years.

At a news conference announcing his retirement, Mayor Domenic Sarno told 22News it was a mutually accepted decision. The mayor then named Clapprood, who was deputy police chief at the time, to acting commissioner. She was officially sworn in on October 8, 2019.

The DOJ said investigators conducted an in-depth review of the police departments documents, including over 100,000 pages of written policies and procedures, training materials, and internal reports, data, video footage, and investigative files.

DOJattorneys and investigators also conducted interviews withSpringfield Policeofficers, supervisors and command staff, andcity officials, and met with community members and local advocates.

Ive said many times that being a police officer is the toughest job in America. We owe these public servants our respect and our support. But with this high calling comes a tremendous responsibility to uphold the public trust. The Department of Justice is committed to supporting our law enforcement while holding departments accountable that violate this sacred trust. The Department will work with the City of Springfield and the Police Department to ensure that the police officers and people of Springfield get the law enforcement agency they deserve, one that effectively and constitutionally stops violent crime and narcotics trafficking.

The Justice Department said Springfield Policecooperated with theirinvestigationand has already begun to implement a number of remedial measures.

Springfield Police spokesperson Ryan Walsh confirmed to 22News that Springfield Police received the DOJ report Wednesday evening as well. He said they are reviewing the findings before making a formal statement.

See the rest here:

Investigation into Springfield Police Departments Narcotics Unit finds pattern of excessive force - WWLP.com

The Night That Lasted A Lifetime: How Psychology Was Misused In Teen’s Murder Case : Hidden Brain – NPR

At seventeen years old, Fred Clay was sentenced to prison for a crime he did not commit. Various flawed ideas in psychology were used to determine his guilt. Ken Richardson/Ken Richardson hide caption

At seventeen years old, Fred Clay was sentenced to prison for a crime he did not commit. Various flawed ideas in psychology were used to determine his guilt.

On an autumn night in 1979, a young cab driver named Jeffrey Boyajian was sitting in his taxi, waiting for his next fare. It was around 4 a.m., and he was parked in downtown Boston's red-light district, known then as the 'Combat Zone.'

Three men approached the curb and got into Jeffrey's cab. He drove them across the city to a public housing complex called the Archdale Housing Development.

When Jeffrey stopped the cab, the three passengers made their real intentions clear. They pulled Jeffrey out of the car to rob him. After he begged for his life, one of the men raised his left arm and fired several shots into Jeffrey's head.

Minutes later, the police arrived to find Jeffrey lying in a pool of his own blood near a dumpster. The robbers had fled.

Over the next few days, police used now-discredited psychological techniques including hypnosis to get two eyewitnesses to identify the shooters. One of them, they claimed, was sixteen-year-old Fred Clay.

Fred Clay's image was part of a twelve-photo array shown to two eyewitnesses in Jeffrey Boyajian's murder case. Both witnesses identified Fred but only after police used flawed psychological techniques to elicit their testimonies. Lisa Kavanaugh / CPCS Innocence Program hide caption

Fred Clay's image was part of a twelve-photo array shown to two eyewitnesses in Jeffrey Boyajian's murder case. Both witnesses identified Fred but only after police used flawed psychological techniques to elicit their testimonies.

Fred remembers the day the police came to arrest him.

"They told me that I was being arrested for [the] murder of a cab driver," said Fred. "And I said, 'Excuse me, you got the wrong person.'"

The night of the murder, Fred had been asleep in bed at his foster home. His foster mother had seen him, and could have backed up his alibi.

But the police were sure they had the right person.

"People say they want to know the truth," said Fred. "But when you tell them the truth, they don't respect the truth."

Eventually, Fred was tried in court for the murder. The state relied on questionable psychological practices and ideas about human behavior as it argued for Fred's guilt, and determined that he should be sentenced as an adult.

This week on Hidden Brain, we go back four decades to retrace the steps of Fred's arrest and prosecution. We'll uncover the harm that arose when flawed ideas from psychology ideas that continue to pervade some courtrooms today were used to put a teenager behind bars for life.

Additional Resources:

"Wrongfully Jailed For 38 Years, Fred Clay Rebuilds His Life In Lowell," by Chris Burrell, WGBH, 2018.

"Eyewitness testimony," by Gary Wells, Encyclopedia of Crime and Punishment, 2002.

"False witness: why is the US still using hypnosis to convict criminals?" by Ariel Ramchandani, The Guardian, 2019.

"Invisible Ink? What Rorschach Tests Really Tell Us," Association for Psychological Science, 2009.

"The Reasonable Black Child: Race, Adolescence, and the Fourth Amendment," by Kristin Henning, American University Law Review, 2018.

"The Essence of Innocence: Consequences of Dehumanizing Black Children," Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2014.

Read more here:

The Night That Lasted A Lifetime: How Psychology Was Misused In Teen's Murder Case : Hidden Brain - NPR

FTP Fix The Police: A Series On Police Reform – The Organization for World Peace

After a Fourth of July weekend that left many to ponder the real legacy of our country in a time of crisis, many Americans have called for a restructured policing system that better reflects the ideals of its citizenry. This not only includes defunding the police, but trimming budgets, solving legal problems, and limiting access to military-grade weaponry, a practice that has spun out of control over the past decade. Each of these reforms would save the department money, and could allow local governments to reallocate funding away from the police department to other government agencies or resources. After firing officers or decreasing expenditures on equipment, local governments could use funds to sponsor community programs, mental health clinics in high risk neighbourhoods, or other expenditures that would not only benefit the community, but would diminish crime. Most crime doesnt simply materialize in impoverished communities because people get up one morning and decide to break the law, but is instead caused by structural inequalities that prevent economic mobility, promote structural racism, and create generational cycles of trauma. Defunding the police would aim to solve these problems not through the long arm of the law, but smarter and more compassionate community reform that may take a lot of work and investment, but will lay the groundwork for a better society.

Defunding the police has two basic parts: what to cut, and how to spend the newly acquired funds. Beginning with what to cut, we can separate this into two basic categories, by material and human resources. In Chicago, the city allocated over $1.8 billion towards their police force, a whopping sum in a city where the publics trust towards its police force has been abysmal, particularly after the shooting of a black teenager Laquan McDonald. In the McDonald case, the city paid over $5 million to the family of the victim before the video came out, and has paid over $757 million since 2004 in settlements, legal fees, and other costs related to police misconduct. Chicago and other larger cities often prefer to settle with victims and their families, but the costs of the bonds often fall on the taxpayer and force the city to take out bonds.

According to Bloomberg News, Chicago also took out over $225 million in general obligation bonds to pay off police settlement debts [in 2017], according to a letter to one of the bondholders from the Action Center on Race & the Economy [ACRE].

ACRE also describes the loans as police brutality bonds, and argues that they transfer resources and extract wealth from black and poor communities to Wall St., through the fees banks charge cities for the bonds. These bonds are mostly used when a city is already suffering from revenue shortages [ but] leave the root causes of the revenue shortage unaddressed.

While this may seem unrelated to police conduct, it rates the interaction of problematic government policies at the local level, and is yet another burden that police put on their citizenry through their own misconduct. A defunded police department would not only be better trained to deal with such issues, but would also cost the department less money. Saving money and better conduct go hand in hand, and even a defunded department requires better training, especially in larger cities.

Some other reforms in this area include mandatory liability insurance, a policy that not only increases costs for officers who continually engage in risky and illicit behaviours, but brings an end to the predominant policy of absolving officers of responsibility for their actions. It would also shift a social problem to an economic one, and allow the risk of improper conduct to be reflected by ones premiums, while also encouraging governments to collect more data on their officers to paint a clearer picture of their behavior.

Increasing officer accountability could also be implemented by ending qualified immunity. Qualified immunity grants government officials (namely police officers) immunity from civil suits unless the plaintiff shows that the official violated clearly established statutory or constitutional rights of which a reasonable person would have known. The rationale was originally introduced in a 1967 Supreme Court case Pierson vs. Ray in order to protect officers from frivolous lawsuits and financial liability, but created a Catch-22 that limits our ability to hold officers accountable. In order to prove that someones statutory rights were violated, there needs to be a legal precedent of that occurring, but because qualified immunity limits our ability to convict cops for an abuse of force or murder, its impossible to build a precedent.

The more we examine our justice system, the easier it is to see that much like in politics, our police forces are the product of an interconnected web of institutional, legal, and monetary decisions. Cops are prosecuted by district attorneys, which at best leaves the perception of bias and at worst becomes a conflict of interest, simply because prosecutors rely on officers for sworn testimony and cooperation with their cases. Because of this interdependent relationship, many have suggested that either federal prosecutors or the office of the state attorney general prosecute the case instead of the local D.A, a solution that would remedy potential conflicts of interest.

But legal tangent aside, why are we spending so much money on our justice system, and how can we make it cheaper? One solution may be to reform a cops overtime pay. A government watchdog found that the Chicago Police Department spent over $575 million on overtime pay from 2011-2017, or an average of $7,657 extra per 12,000 officers in the city. Some noticeable cases included an officer who accrued more than $336,000 in overtime pay over a two and a half year period while four officers took in over $250,000, excluding their yearly salary. It was also found that in 99% of overtime cases, the department gave no reason for paying overtime, not only illustrating corruption among the rank and file, but inaction among the local administration. Real change begins with solving corruption, and corruption can only be rooted out with more regulation and attention given to systems ripe for abuse, like overtime pay.

Yet another problem entails the militarization of police. In 1990, the National Defense Authorization Act permitted local and state police departments to access military hardware from the Department of Defense, ostensibly for use in counter-drug activities. Without this law in place, we wouldnt be seeing police with armoured vehicles, riot gear, or advanced surveillance equipment that can easily lead to an infringement on fourth amendment protections. A 2017 study even found that the number of civilian casualties; the change in the number of civilian casualties; and the number of dogs killed by police [had] a positive and statistically significant relationship between [military equipment] transfers and fatalities from officer-involved shootings across all models. Simply put, bigger guns lead to a greater risk for civilians and the officers who wield them.

Whats particularly important is that material militarization, namely the polices growing use of advanced weaponry, can lead to other forms of militarization. Anthropologist Peter Kraska defines militarization along four categories, namely material, cultural, organizational, and operational. The National Defense Authorization Act obviously encourages material militarization, but cultural militarization as well. This can clearly be seen from the June 2020 protests where officers across the country beat down peaceful protesters without any visible cause, including the assault on an elderly gentleman in Buffalo, New York. Many psychological elements are also at play here, namely the pack mentality, an enhanced view of ones own power when given equipment meant for a warzone, and even toxic masculinity. The Washington Post sums up cultural militarization by describing an officer that shot a high schooler exiting a party, stating that militarization makes every problem even a car of teenagers driving away from a party look like a nail that should be hit with an AR-15 hammer.

There are so many simple reforms we could conduct to solve the problems Ive outlined above, and countless others that Ive neglected to mention. Collecting data on deaths caused by a police department or uses of force would likely paint an unsavoury picture across America, which is why departments dont want to report on how violent their officers are. Enhanced psychological screenings for officers could also weed out the kinds of bad apples we keep hearing about, but real change wont come unless we change the culture in a police department, or disband the blue line of fraternity that can stand in the way of progress. No one wants a society where an emergency 911 call goes unanswered, but the system we have needs a massive overhaul and systemic change. The implicit and explicit racism that has built our police force is too ugly to hide as we discuss how to reform a law enforcement entity that evolved from slave patrols designed to return property to its owner. Remnants of this mindset come to the forefront of our national consciousness when officers are caught flashing the white power symbol, a disgusting trend of bigotry within the ranks. America needs to get with the program and defund the police. Were smart enough to use our money more efficiently, so why dont we? Why dont we rise to the occasion, vote out leaders who refuse to heed our calls to action, and vote in ones who will? Why dont we focus on fixing our communities instead of failing them, letting our officers drive by communities filled with underpaid workers and a lack of affordable child- and healthcare? Why dont we give a damn?

If youd like to help, you can call your local city council and demand change, and donate to the Critical Resistance, an organization that supports defunding the police: http://criticalresistance.org/. Please also consider signing this petition from Black Lives Matter, calling for a defunded police force: https://blacklivesmatter.com/defundthepolice/.

Read more:

FTP Fix The Police: A Series On Police Reform - The Organization for World Peace

It seems black lives don’t matter quite so much, now that we’ve got to the hard bit – The Guardian

It didnt take long. The wheels of the Black Lives Matter movement are already starting to get stuck in the mire of doubt and suspicion. A few short weeks ago, politicians were eager to be photographed taking the knee in solidarity with the movement; now theyre desperate to distance themselves from what the movement demands such as moving funds away from policing and into mental health services and youth work to prevent crime occurring in the first place. After a respectful period during which it would have been tone deaf to object to public support of the cause of the day, the BBC banned its hosts and presenters from wearing Black Lives Matter badges because it is seen as an expression of some sort of political opinion.

Everyone applauds a movement for social justice until it goes too far when it starts making unreasonable demands in the service of its political agenda. This moment, where sympathetic onlookers start shimmying away from their earlier expressions of solidarity, was always inevitable. It is easy to agree that black lives should matter. But it is hard to contemplate all the ways the world needs to change to make them matter and for most people, its simpler to say that the goal is admirable, of course, but that these particular demands from these particular protests at this particular moment are just going too far. We project our failures of imagination on to the movement, and we decamp from the cheerleading stands into the peanut gallery. Defund the police? How about we come up with a less provocative slogan, for a start? These Black Lives Matter protesters, they dont make things easy for themselves, do they?

We tend to think that protest is confrontational, and change is consensual first, a painful moment with marches in the streets and impassioned orations, followed by something less dramatic, a softer path of negotiation and adaptation. But the opposite is true. Protest is the easy bit. More specifically, protest is a smooth part sandwiched between two very rough ones.

Before protest there is a oppression, lack of popular support, and the hard work of awareness-raising. After that comes the high-octane action, the moral clarity and allies hop on board. But once the first blood rush of protest subsides, the people who are still on the streets are mocked by their erstwhile allies, impatient to find fault with the movement and get back to their lives without any further disruption. What was universally celebrated a few weeks ago is now faintly embarrassing: too radical, too combative, almost comically unrealistic. You might think of the trajectory of the Black Lives Matter protests so far as like that famous quote misattributed to Gandhi, but this time in reverse: first you win, then they fight you, then they laugh at you, then they ignore you.

We have a great knack for supporting victims once the injustices are out in the open when David and Goliath have been clearly identified, and a particularly British sensibility of fair play has been assailed. In the Windrush scandal, popular anger and support for the victims of the Home Office is what put a stop to their deportations and led to the resignation of Amber Rudd. National fury, at the peak of the coronavirus pandemic, managed to pressure an obstinate, bunkered government into scrapping the outrageous NHS surcharge for NHS staff, and extending residency rights to all the bereaved families of NHS victims of coronavirus. If it hadnt been for Boris Johnsons terror of losing him, the countrys disgust at Dominic Cummings would have turfed him out too, so mortally had he wounded the nations sense of justice.

But when it comes to the underlying injustice to making the links between the deportation and death of a Windrush citizen, the NHS worker impoverished by Home Office fees and unsettled by cruel hostile environment policies, the unelected special adviser breaking lockdown rules, and the political party we keep voting in were not so good.

The same is now happening with the Black Lives Matter movement. Everyone is on board with the principle, but when it comes to the change that is required, the idealistic passengers the movement picked up along the way suddenly come down with a case of extreme pragmatism.

Part of the reason for their belated reluctance is that the course of actual change is unflashy. After the first moment passes, the supportive ally has nothing to show for their continued backing for the cause: there are no public high-fives for your continuing solidarity. You cant post it, you cant hashtag it; most of the time you cant even do it without jeopardising something, whether thats your income, status, job prospects or even friendships.

But the main reason for the ebbing support is that change is just hard. If it wasnt, the long arc of history that allegedly bends towards justice would be a very short one. And change is supposed to be hard. It is supposed to be political.

Movements such as Black Lives Matter arent hobbies or social clubs or edgy pop culture moments to be accessorised with. Change is supposed to have an agenda, otherwise its just a trend. When we hear that liberal politicians think the goals of the Black Lives Matter movement are nonsense, or that wearing a badge is political, or that support needs to be scaled back because it looks like there might be other, more nefarious forces at play, what we are really being told is: this is hard and we are retreating to our comfort zones.

Nesrine Malik is a Guardian columnist

Original post:

It seems black lives don't matter quite so much, now that we've got to the hard bit - The Guardian

New York AG says Black Lives Matter Foundation ‘not affiliated with the movement’ and orders it to stop collecting donations – CNN

"I ordered the Black Lives Matter Foundation to stop illegally accepting donations that were intended for the #BlackLivesMatter movement. This foundation is not affiliated with the movement, yet it accepted countless donations and deceived goodwill," James tweeted. The Black Lives Matter Foundation is based in California and, according to a 2017 tax filing, seeks to "help bring the police and the community closer together." The organization recently came under scrutiny after news reports that it had solicited donations from people who were given the impression that their money would go to the Black Lives Matter movement.

Ray Barnes, the president and CEO of the foundation, told CNN on Monday night that he has never solicited donations in New York.

"I have never been to New York in the matter of the Black Lives Matter Foundation. We have never solicited any funds from New York. Now, donations have come through charitable organizations. They may have sent us funds that the donor may have been from New York, but it is not because we solicited from New York," Barnes said.

"The funds come to us and they may be from people from New York. I don't know. But we have never solicited any funds from New York," Barnes continued.

In her order, James cited the organization's failure to register and file the appropriate financial documents as the reasons for her action.

"Every organization that seeks to solicit donations from New Yorkers must follow state laws," James said in a news release.

"We will also fight for transparency so that donors' goodwill isn't preyed upon by opportunists. The Black Lives Matter Foundation failed to register or file any financial documents with the state, and therefore has failed to provide New Yorkers with information on how their donations will be used.That's why we are taking action by demanding that the foundation stop soliciting contributions from New Yorkers. I encourage all donors to practice due diligence when giving to charities."

Excerpt from:

New York AG says Black Lives Matter Foundation 'not affiliated with the movement' and orders it to stop collecting donations - CNN

LeBron James will not wear Black Lives Matter message on back of jersey, will instead wear traditional James – MassLive.com

Los Angeles Lakers star LeBron James has opted not to wear one of the league-approved messages on the back of his jersey as the NBA resumes its season in the Disney World bubble.

Players reportedly will be allowed to change the name on the back of their jersey to direct attention to the Black Lives Matter movement -- a concession the league made to the NBA players association to assuage concerns that the leagues restart from the coronavirus shutdown would distract from the movement against racial inequality that has swept the nation since the death of George Floyd in May. The league and players association agreed on several messages.

James, however, told reporters via Zoom he will not participate in that particular aspect of protests.

It was no disrespect to the list that was handed out to all the players, James said, per ESPN. I commend anyone that decides to put something on the back of their jersey. Its just something that didnt really seriously resonate with my mission, with my goal.

I would have loved to have a say-so on what would have went on the back of my jersey. I had a couple things in mind, but I wasnt part of that process, which is OK. Im absolutely OK with that. ... I dont need to have something on the back of my jersey for people to understand my mission or know what Im about and what Im here to do.

James added that he never felt pressure not to play to keep attention on the protests.

"It never crossed my mind that we did not need to play this beautiful game of basketball that brings so many people together, that brings happiness, that brings joy," James said. "I'm happy to have a platform where not only people will gain joy by the way I play the game, by the way our team plays the game, but for also for what I'm able to do off the court, as well.

Being able to use my platform, use the NBAs platform, to continue to talk about whats going on. Because I will not stop until I see real change for us in Black America, for African Americans, for people of color. And I also believe I can do both, though.

Boston Celtics wing Jaylen Brown, who participated in protests in his hometown of Atlanta following Floyds death, said he initially had concerns that NBA games would take attention away from the protests.

Eventually, he said, he decided the attention could be a good thing for the movement.

I think everybody wants to watch basketball and the NBA, and we have voices of influence in our communities and we have obligations to our communities, not just obligations to our organizations, Brown said. The more the NBA understands that, the better everybody will feel about it, especially players. So I feel that us going down there and making sure nobody gets distracted is part of the initial correspondence. We have to go down there and make sure that people dont forget about GerogeFloyd or Breonna Taylor or Philando Castile or Ahmaud Arbery or Trayvon Martin, which is in the Orlando area. And the list goes on, and the countless other people who were not caught on video who experienced something similar. The bottom line is theres improvements that need to be made, and the NBA has a great voice and a lot of resources and a lot of influence and we are appreciative they are helping in aiding in a lot of the things we care about. So thats really important.

Related content

Boston Celtics assistant Kara Lawson officially named Duke womens basketball head coach

Jayson Tatum believes Boston Celtics have a realistic chance of winning a title in Orlando

Boston Celtics Jayson Tatum adds muscle, take game up another level, I can get better at everything

Read more:

LeBron James will not wear Black Lives Matter message on back of jersey, will instead wear traditional James - MassLive.com

THINK – A Call for Philosophers with Dr. Stephen Law – News Intervention

Scott Douglas Jacobsen: How did you become the editor of THINK?

Dr. Stephen Law: The Royal Institute of Philosophy decided it wanted a journal that would be aimed at laypeople some time ago and advertised for an editor. I was appointed. There were early difficulties, though Cambridge University Press didnt want to publish it (they publish the RIPs other journal Philosophy) and so it looked like it might have to be online only but thenThe Philosophers Magazine very kindly offered to publish it, which they did, very successfully. Some wanted to call it a journal; for schools which would have been the kiss of death, I think. I asked Simon Blackburn if hed mind us using THINK as the title (he has a book of that name) and he agreed so we went with that. The Strapline is Philosophy for Everyone.

Jacobsen: You are searching for philosophers with an emphasis on women philosophers. Why the search for women philosophers in particular?

Law:Unfortunately we dont get nearly enough unsolicited submissions from women to achieve a decent gender balance. So I specifically approach women philosophers. This has had some effect, but still not enough so I am really pushing very hard on trying to achieve a healthy gender balance now. Theres a forthcoming themed issue on women and philosophy too.

Jacobsen: How will these submitted pieces be used by RS teachers and students?

Law:The idea is that they will be useful resources helping teachers of RS better understand the material;, and they will be accessible enough to be read by pupils. However, I want to stress that these are all fascinating topics anyway, and will be of interest to a lot of people. I recently put together a themed issue on naturalism and theism which, while of interest to schools, has proved extremely popular with all sorts of people theists, philosophers, skeptics, etc.

Jacobsen: You have proposed a number of possible topics including the application of virtue ethics to embryo research and designer babies, abortion, euthanasia and assisted suicide, capital punishment, lying, theft, use of animals as food and intensive farming, xenotransplantation, vivisection, and blood sports, and more. If any, what are the guiding themes behind the topics?

Law:In that case, the RS syllabi. However, theyre also fun topics. I am really looking forward to reading the pieces.

Jacobsen: Have any of these topics been particularly overdone or underdone?

Law:I dont think so.

Jacobsen: How can people submit pieces or submit proposals for consideration of articles?

Law:They just email them to me:[emailprotected]

Jacobsen: What are you hoping will be the big takeaway from this issue ofTHINK?

Law:Well, these pieces wont all be in the same issue I will spread them out. But I think they will help make it clear how relevant philosophy is to a lot of practical questions about our treatment of animals, assisted suicide, etc.

Photo by Tachina Lee on Unsplash

Assistant Editor, News Intervention,Human Rights Activist.

Scott Douglas Jacobsen is the Founder of In-Sight: Independent Interview-Based Journal and In-Sight Publishing. He focuses on North America for News Intervention. Jacobsen works for science and human rights, especially womens and childrens rights. He considers the modern scientific and technological world the foundation for the provision of the basics of human life throughout the world and advancement of human rights as the universal movement among peoples everywhere. You can contact Scott via email.

Read more:

THINK - A Call for Philosophers with Dr. Stephen Law - News Intervention

Conservationists raise concerns over state of care for grizzly cubs transferred to BC zoo – Maple Ridge News

Three orphaned grizzly cubs now on display at the privately-owned Greater Vancouver Zoo represent a disappearing opportunity for survival of a threatened species, says conservationists.

General manager of the zoo, Serge Lussier, said Wednesday, Theres two options for bears so young when the mother dies is euthanasia, or find an approved zoo.

The trio were found by Alberta Fish and Wildlife officers in Crowsnest Pass in April after their mother was killed by hunters.

They were sent for care at the Calgary Zoo, who ended up passing the responsibility to the Aldergrove zoo.

During that time, 104 signatories many B.C. and Alberta scientists or conservationists wrote a letter to the Alberta government, urging the rehabilitation and release of the cubs back into the wild, given that grizzly bears are a threatened species in Alberta, the letter reads.

More specifically, the age and health of these three cubs make them ideal candidates for the only grizzly cub rehabilitation program in North America, namely the Northern Lights Wildlife Shelter in Smithers, B.C.

The Ministry of Forest, Lands and Natural Resources sent an email statement to the Star, confirming the Smithers rehabilitation program was ruled out because it is a pilot, and not considered operational.

Formal best management practices for the facility are in the process of being developed. These are critical to standardize facility construction, humane care and handling and proof of concept, the statement continued.

Co-founder of the shelter, rehabilitationist Angelika Langen, has successfully released 22 bears into the wild during the 13 years the program has been in operation.

Everyone says we are still in a pilot project and they are awaiting results, yet they dont give us the cubs to prove it, she remarked.

Of the three six-month-old grizzly cubs at Greater Vancouver Zoo two of them are female.

Our efforts to prove long-term [grizzly bear] survival and re-integration into the wild population would have made a big step forward with the females, said Langen, noting their reproduction capabilities.

READ MORE: Red Panda dies at Greater Vancouver Zoo

As it stands, in Alberta there are only 700 surviving grizzly bears, according to the Alberta Wilderness Association. This, compared to 15,000 most recently recorded in B.C. by the Ministry of Forests, Lands and Natural Resource Operations.

Of 25 cubs government approved for the Northern Lights Wildlife project, only three were female, Langen emphasized.

Alberta conservation biologist and letter signatory, Lisa Dahlseide, said the zoos one-acre enclosure is not nearly large enough to house the cubs for the rest of their lives.

B.C. conservationist, Barb Murray, director of Bears Matter, corroborated Dahlseides concerns about enclosure space for the cubs, them being fed dog food, and kept in captivity.

The cubs will outgrow that one acre so quickly, Murray said, also addressing claims made by the zoo that the cubs are not suitable for re-entry to the wild since they are human imprinted.

READ MORE: Greater Vancouver Zoo animals suffer boredom and frustration, humane society says

Murray along with other signatories of the letter in a race against time to have a bear biologist or rehabilitationist examine the Greater Vancouver Zoos newest cubs and see if they are still candidates for the Smithers rehabilitation program.

We are prepared to pay the expert to fly in, Murray said. Six months isnt that old, only bear experts will know if the cubs are still viable for rehabilitation.

Until we have a definitive answer from a bear expert it is a question mark we just cant answer. Let them be assessed now before their fate is sealed, shes pleading.

The Greater Vancouver Zoo, in Aldergrove, has previously been criticized for how it cares for its animals, particularly large species which have died in its care.

Lussier, the zoos general manager, insisted: We have the habitats, we have the experts, and were so proud to be a part of this.

READ MORE: Giraffes death shocks Greater Vancouver Zoo in Aldergrove

AldergroveConservation

Read more:

Conservationists raise concerns over state of care for grizzly cubs transferred to BC zoo - Maple Ridge News

Allies and antis – manilastandard.net

postedJuly 13, 2020 at 12:00 amby Jude Acidre "Democracy is not about us being right, and others being wrong."When I was younger and none the wiser, I used to simplistically draw an imaginary line separating two types of people in the political sphere: the allies and the antis. In my mind, the line that divided my black-and-white view where there are only winners and losers was definite and sacrosanct. In fact, for me, it was unthinkable, even reprehensible, to think of crossing that line.For example, I was and still am a staunch believer in a consistent ethic of life. My personal and political stand on divorce, marriage, euthanasia, and abortion all reflect an underlying conviction that all life is sacred and marriage is an inviolable social institution. Not only was I strongly against the Reproductive Health Act, I actually believed it was impossible for me to work with people who believed otherwise so much so that I declined an opportunity to be a youth advisor to an UN agency working on adolescent reproductive health. For me, it was a matter of personal integrity, strongly believing that I was right, and shamelessly concluding that those who disagreed with me were wrong.Late last year, however, I started to work closely with non-government organizations whose advocacies on reproductive health issues ran counter to my own personal convictions. While it was difficult at first for me to put off my own biases, I was candid enough to respectfully ask them that we focus on issues that we agree on, and just leave to the side those on which we differed. Turned out, there were more issues that we were in agreement, much more than what we disagreed about, allowing me to discover a newfound respect for people that I would have once labelled as antis those from the other side.Recent events in our country have reinforced this imaginary wall that divide our people into allies and antis and the rhetoric between them is divisive, sharp, and cruel. So we ended up with the Duterte supporters and the anti-Duterte Yellows, those who supported the recently passed Anti-Terrorism Act and those who rejected it as an affront to our freedoms and liberties and just last week, those who are in favor of the renewal of ABS-CBNs franchise and those who support denying another lease on the media giants broadcast rights.Each side believes itself to be right, and the other to be absolutely wrong, recklessly simplifying politics to a question of picking sides. Common sense and reason are among the first casualties, resulting in both sides stubborn inability to compromise and to resist trying to discredit the other.Take for example the passage of the Anti-Terrorism Act. Those who disagreed with the measure believe that is a threat to our rights and freedom, notwithstanding the fact that the law itself is a product of our countrys constitutional process. In fact, the lower House simply adopted a version of the bill that already had broad support from the Senate, including from members of the opposition.Paradoxically, democracy as we ideally believe it to be is far from how imperfect it has become as a way to govern society and believing that for one political side to succeed, the other side has to fail is actually like pushing the system to its breaking point. If we were to persistently divide society into allies and antis, leaving no forgiveness for moderation and compromise, democracy itself is in danger of collapse, and a darker intolerant extremism may take its place. The truth about people is that if five persons will at times find it difficult to agree on what to order for dinner it will be impossible to get a nation of one hundred million to agree on abortion, divorce, death penalty and even on timely issues such as the anti-terrorism measure and the renewal of the ABS-CBN franchise.This see-saw view of our society is exactly what has dragged our nations path to progress, when for every step forward, we had to push back one step, taking away collaboration and compromise out of the question, and replacing it with one complicated gridlock after gridlock. In the end, our democratic idealism begin to serve no longer the people but our own individual biases and ideological tendencies.It would be best to be reminded that democracy is not about us being right, and others being wrong. In fact, a government of laws, rather than of men mean that our political institutions such as Congress are larger than those who for a time carry the burden, or enjoy the comforts of political office. That is why as citizens, it is our duty that no matter what, we must hold these institutions in trust, that instead of simply unfairly criticizing politicians for their political decisions, we must work to preserve and strengthen these institutions so that despite the imperfections of todays leaders, the next generation will know how to choose better. Too often do we forget that our political institutions will outlive our politicians and that we cannot allow the worst of times to take away the better of us and those who will come after us.This brings us to the second point, that our political leaders, despite our lofty democratic ideals, are human beings who fail, make mistakes and at times fall short of their own better nature. Their mistakes, however, are theirs alone, and we should not confuse or impute their failings with the government office that they hold. There is no one among us who has not failed at something in his or her own life, or at one point tread the wrong path. While there are and there must be consequences for ones political decisions, it is unfair to measure a politicians worthiness by simply marking out their failings. More so, should we remember that we cannot appraise the usefulness of our political institutions with the performance of people in politics. Our institutions will survive, as elections will periodically afford us with the chance to make a wiser choice moving forward.Reflecting on recent events on our country, it is good to be reminded that as a society, we are not doomed simply by the actions of one or even a few individuals but by the incalcitrant refusal to believe in the capability of others to be good and to do better. Blindly asserting that others have failed, our politicians included, will not make us any stronger. Our political institutions are weakened not by the flawed individuals that inhabit them, but by our corrupted insistence to see things other than what suits us. Our democratic way of life is not served by insisting on a hegemony of ideas but in our ability to respect diversity of beliefs and opinions.Needless to say, conflict and disagreements in politics are unavoidable. If we could simply wish them away, we wouldnt need politics at all. Limiting our political society to where I win and you lose blind us from the real solutions that our differing perspectives require, and these even turn our anger and conflict into another problem. Consequently, instead of condemning political excesses, our collective rage will continue to fuel them and in the process, destroy us.In the end, politics is no different from the mundane realities of human relationships. People can reasonably disagree and they often do. Oftentimes these disagreements do not necessarily have to end with a conclusion that one is right, and the other is wrong but they can provide us with the opportunity to process our own preferences and perceptions, as a result, generating even better solutions to the problems ahead of us. Sadly, what we see on television, hear on radio and read online is that the message is lost through all attacks on the messenger. But when both sides begin to blame, criticize and ridicule the other, when they begin to lie and use half-truths and fake news to push their agenda, the end becomes nothing less than mutually assured destruction.Mistakes are not corrected if assigning blame is the only action you take. It may sound nave, but disagreements should be an opportunity for us to listen and to ask ourselves to be more honest not only about the wrong that needs correcting but more importantly about the right-left undone and the lessons that we may have learned. Having competing views of the same issues have helped shape democracy in the past, and the more respectful we are of divergent perspectives, as well as, differing decisions by our leaders, the closer we are towards becoming a more democratically inclusive society.

COMMENT DISCLAIMER: Reader comments posted on this Web site are not in any way endorsed by Manila Standard. Comments are views by manilastandard.net readers who exercise their right to free expression and they do not necessarily represent or reflect the position or viewpoint of manilastandard.net. While reserving this publications right to delete comments that are deemed offensive, indecent or inconsistent with Manila Standard editorial standards, Manila Standard may not be held liable for any false information posted by readers in this comments section.

Read this article:

Allies and antis - manilastandard.net

Hacking the Apocalypse: Your new guide to surviving the end of the world – CNET

CNET's new video series looks at how to survive the end of the world.

Can a missile bunker protect you from a nuclear blast? Can an escape pod save you from a megatsunami? Could we put our bodies into cryosleep to avoid the apocalypse altogether?

From July 6, CNET is bringing you Hacking the Apocalypse, a new six-part series looking at high-tech solutions to escape the end of the world.

In each episode, I take you to meet everyone from preppers to pandemic experts, and I'll road test some fascinating tech that could save the world. Plus, you can check out the accompanying stories, covering what you need to know about the end of the world.

The six-part series launches onCNET's YouTube Channelon Monday, July 6, with a new episode every day.

You can also watch the full series on CNET from July 6. Check out ourHacking the Apocalypselanding page to see all the episodes and take a deep dive into each ep with stories and behind-the-scenes galleries. And read on to see the full series rundown below.

You can also watch Hacking the Apocalypse on the CNET channel onPluto TV, channel 684.

From the lab to your inbox. Get the latest science stories from CNET every week.

Hacking the Apocalypse host Claire Reilly at the Mutter Museum in Philadelphia.

When we first started filming Hacking the Apocalypse, long before the coronavirus pandemic, I asked one of the world's top health experts whether a "mutant bat influenza" could catch us off-guard. Little did we know how prophetic that moment would be. The experts warned us, and they were right. In 2020, we've faced a once-in-a-century pandemic and seen what happens when a global health emergency plays out in real time.

For our first episode in this series, we visit the Mutter Museum in Philadelphia to learn about the last major pandemic we faced (it wasn't pretty) and speak to the leading public health experts at the Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security about how we battle a pandemic in the 21st century.

But the big innovation? We speak to scientists in Tennessee who are researching human immunity to help us fight the coronavirus, and to a team of researchers finding life-saving drugs using the world's most powerful supercomputer.

Watch Hacking the Apocalypse: Pandemic on July 6.

How long would we survive if the whole planet went into a full-scale nuclear winter? We travel to Boulder, Colorado, to learn the science behind nuclear winter with an atmospheric scientist and nuclear expert, professor Brian Toon.

Then we head into the heartland of Kansas (we can't tell you where) to visit a real-life nuclear bunker, made for the world's richest preppers. Turns out avoiding nuclear winter doesn't mean sacrificing luxury.

Watch Hacking the Apocalypse: Nuclear Winter on July 6.

Droughts in California, catastrophic fires in Australia -- the impacts of climate change are only going to get worse. In this episode, we learn about the real threat of global drought, before visiting a lab in New York to learn how scientists could turn toxic waste into drinking water.

Then it's off to New Jersey to visit Bowery Farming, a company that's created a space-age vertical farm, inside a warehouse, to grow food with 90% less water.

Watch Hacking the Apocalypse: Global Drought on July 7.

The coast off the Pacific Northwest is a hot zone for catastrophic earthquakes, so what better place to test out a tsunami survival pod? In this episode, we speak to one of the world's leading seismological experts to find out just what happens when the Earth shakes, before heading to Seattle to road test (or should that be water test?) a tiny escape pod that could save us from tsunami devastation.

Watch Hacking the Apocalypse: Tsunami on July 8.

If the end of the world is coming, could we cheat death by putting our bodies into stasis? To answer that question, we visit the facilities of the Alcor Life Extension Foundation, a company promising a second life in the future through the power of cryonics. Delving into the murky world of cryonics is fascinating (and a little haunting). While the hope of escaping death might sound promising, the scientific proof leaves a lot to be desired.

Watch Hacking the Apocalypse: Cryonics on July 9.

If the s--- really hits the fan, could we just bypass the apocalypse and escape the planet altogether? In our final episode of Hacking the Apocalypse, we visit NASA and learn about the space agency's bid to get humans back on the moon and on to Mars. And to get a sense of what life will look like once we've become a multi-planetary species, we talk to the team behind Marsha, a 3D-printed Mars habitat that could be our new home on the red planet.

Watch Hacking the Apocalypse: Escape the Planet on July 10.

Now playing: Watch this: Hacking the Apocalypse trailer

1:00

Go here to see the original:

Hacking the Apocalypse: Your new guide to surviving the end of the world - CNET

Student writes that military metaphors could cause more harm when talking about COVID-19 – The South End

War.

Invisible enemy.

Front lines.

Invader.

All of these military terms, and more, have been used by the president, politicians, journalists and even health care experts to frame the ongoing confrontation against COVID-19.

But Tabitha Moses, an M.D./Ph.D., student at the Wayne State University School of Medicine, believes employing military language in the struggle with the pandemic may actually impede efforts.

The Conversation published Mosess column, How Talking About the Coronavirus as an Enemy Combatant Can Backfire,"on July 10.

These military-inspired metaphors serve a purpose. Unlike the dense linguistic landscape of science and medicine, their messages are clear: Danger. Buckle Down. Cooperate. In fact, studies have shown that sometimes military metaphors can help unite people against a common enemy. They can convey a sense of urgency so that people drop what theyre doing and start paying attention, Moses writes. However, as someone who has studied the way language influences behavior, I know that this kind of rhetoric can have long-term effects that are less positive, particularly within health and medicine. In fact, research has shown that these metaphors can cause people to make decisions that go against sound medical advice.

The use of military metaphors, said Moses, has been shown to alter behavior, but not always for the better. People may become more likely to take risks, overtreat themselves and be less likely to engage in preventive activities, she wrote. Such language can also imply to others that those who do become infected may be stigmatized as weak.

Employing militarist lingo can also cause the public to behave illogically, said Moses, 30, who has completed two years of medical training and is entering her third year in graduate school in pursuit of her doctoral degree.

The use of this type of metaphor in a variety of contexts has concerned me for a while, said Moses, who was born in England and moved to the United States at age 18. In college I majored in cognitive science and philosophy with a focus in bioethics, and am acutely aware of the impact of language on behavior. As COVID-19 escalated, it became clear how this type of metaphor could be harming the efforts to flatten the curve. Additionally, in conversations with my peers in health care, I realized that most did not realize the effect of this language on their patients, so I felt it important to provide this background and context.

Moses, who wants to practice and conduct research in psychiatry, with an emphasis on substance abuse, said she hopes the column will make people aware of the way metaphors can impact those around them, and adjust their language and behavior to improve responses to the pandemic.

After obtaining her undergraduate and masters degrees from Johns Hopkins University, Moses worked in public health research in Baltimore. She then moved to Michigan to attend the Wayne State University School of Medicine.

I knew that for medical school I would want to attend a school in an urban environment where there were ample opportunities to be actively involved with the community, she said. WSU was one of the best schools I looked at in terms of having a diverse range of opportunities to work with and help the community, from projects like public school outreach and the communities gardens, to the free clinics. I also wanted to attend an M.D./Ph.D. program, and WSU had researchers who were active in my fields of interest.

The Conversation is a not-for-profit service that provides columns by leading scholars and academic experts to the Associated Press, which distributes the pieces to thousands of newsrooms across the nation. It has published many pieces by Wayne State University faculty members, including David Rosenberg, M.D., chair, and Arash Javanbakht, M.D., associate professor of the Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neurosciences.

The rest is here:

Student writes that military metaphors could cause more harm when talking about COVID-19 - The South End

Doctors in the House: History of Medical Interns and Residents at Michigan Medicine – Michigan Medicine

When U-M opened the nations first university-owned hospital in this converted professor's house in 1869, no physicians actually saw the patients who stayed there. Instead, the Medical School faculty would examine or operate on patients in front of the medical students in the schools main building, across the field now known as the Diag.

A steward named John Carrington was hired to oversee the hospital building, and his wife served as matron. Together they checked patients in, made sure they were fed and had clean linens and well-tended fires in the winter, and charged them room and board. The medical care was free.

But by 1874, the faculty recognized the need for a physician to examine patients as they arrived, and provide care during their stay. The Regents set forth the duties of a new type of employee called a hospital physician as follows:

Examine patients as they arrive, assign them quarters after they have paid the admission fee, and notify the physician to whose department they belong.

See that they receive proper food and that accurate record is kept of the treatment of each case. Dispense all the medicine himself and charge regular drug store prices, and charge for all dressings.

See that the hospital is kept in a comfortable and cleanly condition, shall prevent persons not belonging in the hospital from lounging in the building, and promptly report any irregularities occurring therein.

They authorized the hiring of Robert J. Peare, M.D., an Irish immigrant who had graduated from the Medical School in 1869, as the first Hospital Physician. He oversaw the care of the 185 patients who stayed in the hospital often for weeks at a time when the hospital was open from October to July of his first year.

By 1876, a large addition to the hospital opened, called the Pavilion Hospital, and the first nurses were hired to work with this first resident physician and faculty.

As more and more patients sought care from U-M physicians, the Regents in 1877 authorized the hiring of one of the Medical Schools newest graduates, Alexander Maclean, M.D., as the first Hospital Surgeon.

Maclean even had a role in getting out the word that the hospital had expanded and had room for patients.

Inadvertisements starting in 1878in the Michigan Medical News, a statewide journal, he wrote that great improvements have been made in the equipment and accommodations of the Hospital so that every provision has been secured for the comfort and treatment of the sick and afflicted.

He also explained in the ads that the resident physician would be available at the hospital to examine and treat patients arriving during the nine months of the year that the hospital was open. The exception: those arriving on Wednesday and Saturday mornings were encouraged to go directly to the Medical School building on East University Avenue, to be examined and treated by faculty during their clinic hours.

Maclean especially called for the supervisors of county houses facilities set up for the care of the poor in each Michigan county to send patients to this well equipped public hospital rather than allowing them to languish or die where they were.

Despite their usefulness in this advertising campaign, historical accounts say that house physicians in these early years were essential to the proper conduct of a hospital, (but) for many years they occupied an inferior position and were more or less looked down upon by the hospital chiefs.

By 1890, medical educators became convinced that post-graduation experience and training under the guidance of senior physicians was important for young doctors, before they could enter practice on their own.

At Johns Hopkins University, William Osler established Americas first formal residency program in 1889, as the institutions first hospital opened and became a training ground for the students and recent graduates of the medical school founded a few years before.

In addition to the house staff, U-Ms first young physicians to be called interns were hired in 1899, and were paid $125 a year. They also received room and board in the hospital or nearby houses.

They were typically the top students in each graduating medical class, who competed fiercely to be chosen to stay on for additional training at the brand-new hospitals that had opened in 1891 on Catherine Street.

The Regents voted to keep the hospitals open every summer, starting in 1897, after a decade of being open during occasional summers but often closing for financial reasons. They spent extra funding from the state for summer operations to support staff salaries and operating costs. The start date for each summer was July 1 still the traditional start date for interns to this day.

But Medical School professors soon recognized that some of their graduating students had asked for recommendations from faculty to try to secure internships at more than one hospital. Those faculty physicians even found themselves apologizing to their colleagues when a student took one hospitals offer over another.

To remedy this, the faculty created a committee in 1911 to oversee all requests and recommendations for internships. They even briefly considered making the intern year a fifth year of medical school, devoted solely to clinical care, but this wasnt put into practice.

In 1912, Reuben Peterson, M.D., a professor of obstetrics and gynecology,wrote a reportto the Council on Medical Education of the American Medical Association, about the plight of interns.

He called for a more formalized approach to their training, to make the most of their time and ensure they were well-trained as well as serving patients. Hospitals and medical schools should partner on the selection and oversight of interns.

That approach, adopted at Michigan and eventually hospitals nationwide, persists today through the system of accreditation of academic residency programs at teaching hospitals nationwide.

By 1914, U-M had so many interns on board that it moved a house from another part of Ann Arbor to the grounds of the hospital to accommodate them. It soon needed expanding, and interns even moved in to occupy part of the hospital administration building.

In 1922, a new law required all medical school graduates to serve a year in an accredited hospital before they could enter practice. By 1927, the Medical School had formed a Department of Postgraduate Medicine to offer short courses in various fields to trainees from hospitals across Michigan, and to physicians already in practice.

The number of early-career medical trainees working at U-M hospitals continued to grow. According to the1941 edition of the Encyclopedic History of the University of Michigan, in 1940 thirty-five interns were on the Hospital staff. They rotated among the various clinical services. There were also approximately forty assistant residents, who served for a second year, and thirty resident physicians, who stayed for a third year.

This designation of program year, abbreviated PGY, tracked where a resident was in his or her training, and is still used today.

In order to keep interns and residents from leaving because they were unhappy with their living quarters, in 1939 an entire building called theInterns Residencewas added to the main University Hospital that had opened in the 1920s.

It could house 75 men, in private rooms with private baths. It even had a recreation room, kitchen, dark room for photography, and handball court though these were carefully built to be away from the bedrooms so that noise from interns enjoying their off hours wouldnt disturb those who had just finished a shift and needed sleep.

As new departments formed within the Medical School, they formalized training programs for interns and residents who had chosen to focus on that departments specialty. Competition for spots increased, as the reputation of the programs spread nationwide. The intern year was no longer a separate program from residency, but rather a nickname for the first year.

Fellowships, for those who had completed residency but wanted further sub-specialty training, became more common often funded by National Institutes of Health training grants.

In 1974, exactly 100 years after the hiring of the first U-M house physician, the House Officers Association became the official collective bargaining organization for U-M interns and residents. The origins of the organization are told in itsHouse Officers Association history.

Today, Michigan Medicine has106 post-medical school training programs 26 residency programs and 80 fellowship programs. Theyre coordinated through the academic departments of the Medical School, and theOffice of Graduate Medical Education. Every year, around July 1, about 400 physicians start their internship or residency at Michigan Medicine.

At any given time, nearly 1,300 physicians bear the title of house officer at U-M from the interns who start July 1 to senior residents who do research and provide leadership to their junior colleagues. And just as in 1874, Michigan Medicines hospitals and clinics couldnt operate without them.

See original here:

Doctors in the House: History of Medical Interns and Residents at Michigan Medicine - Michigan Medicine

I couldnt do anything: The virus and an ER doctors suicide – Boston.com

NEW YORK On an afternoon in early April, while New York City was in the throes of what would be the deadliest days of the coronavirus pandemic, Dr. Lorna Breen found herself alone in the still of her apartment in Manhattan.

She picked up her phone and dialed her younger sister, Jennifer Feist.

The two were just 22 months apart and had the kind of bond that comes from growing up sharing a bedroom and wearing matching outfits. Feist, 47, a lawyer in Charlottesville, Virginia, was accustomed to hearing from her sister nearly every day.

Lately, their conversations had been bleak.

Breen worked at NewYork-Presbyterian Allen Hospital in Manhattan, where she supervised the emergency department. The unit had become a brutal battleground, with supplies depleting at a distressing rate and doctors and nurses falling ill.

When Breen called this time, she sounded odd. Her voice was distant, as if she was in shock.

I dont know what to do, she said. I cant get out of the chair.

Breen was a consummate overachiever, one who directed her life with assurance.

When she graduated from medical school, she insisted on studying both emergency and internal medicine, although it meant a longer residency. She took up snowboarding, cello and salsa dancing as an adult. Once, after she had difficulty breathing at the beginning of a half-marathon, she finished the race, then headed to a hospital and diagnosed herself with pulmonary emboli blood clots in the lungs that can be fatal.

In addition to managing a busy emergency department, she was in a dual-degree masters program at Cornell University.

Breen was gifted, confident, clever. Unflappable.

But the woman speaking to Feist that day was hesitant and confused.

Feist quickly arranged for her sister to be picked up by two friends who would ferry her to Baltimore, where Feist could meet them to take her to family in Virginia. When Breen finally climbed into Feists car that night, she was nearly catatonic, unable to answer simple questions. Her brain, her sister said, seemed broken.

They drove together for a few hours, heading to the University of Virginia Medical Center. When they arrived, Breen checked into the psychiatric ward.

Breen, 49, had suffered a breakdown when the city was desperate for heroes. And she was certain her career would not survive it.

Her family members tried to convince her otherwise. After all, she had no apparent history of mental health problems, and the past month had been one of extremes for everyone.

Breen was doubtful. An insidious stigma about mental health persisted within the medical community.

Lorna kept saying, I think everybody knows Im struggling, Feist said. She was so embarrassed.

Lorna Breen, an athletic and motivated student, headed off to Cornell University to study microbiology before earning a masters degree in anatomy. After medical school in Virginia, she was determined to study two specialties in her residency because she knew emergency doctors suffered high stress. She wanted to have internal medicine as an option down the road.

In 2004, Breen joined the sprawling NewYork-Presbyterian medical system, working at Columbia University Medical Center and the smaller NewYork-Presbyterian Allen Hospital, called simply the Allen.

As if to ensure relief from her intense job, Breen planned thrilling trips, joined a ski club, played cello in an orchestra, took her salsa classes and attended Redeemer Presbyterian, a church that attracted high-achieving professionals.

In 2011, Breen was promoted to the helm of the emergency department, where colleagues said she tended to solve problems with systematic precision and preferred concrete solutions.

She liked structure, said Dr. James Giglio, who was then her boss. She liked working in an organized world.

That world would later distort and crumple. By early this year, the coronavirus was slipping into New York, undetected and underestimated.

In late February, as elected officials were still assuring the public that the virus did not pose a serious threat, Breen sat down at her computer and updated a contingency plan addressed to her family.

She had created it after the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks and revised it after Hurricane Sandy hit in 2012; it was her methodical response to calamity. The coronavirus, she was convinced, would catch hospitals off guard.

A week later, she went on a planned vacation with Feist, her sister, in Big Sky, Montana. By the time Breen returned from the trip, a state of emergency had been declared in New York.

Breen reported back to work March 14, arriving to questions about the departments stock of personal protective equipment and whether staff members could get Tyvek protective suits.

Four days later, Breen showed symptoms of COVID-19. Feverish and exhausted, she quarantined at home to recover. She slept up to 14 hours in a row, was drained by small tasks, lost 5 pounds. But she still tried to sort out work problems, like a shortage of oxygen tanks.

The last weekend in March, Breen went on a walk and felt wiped out. But she told her work she would be back soon. She knew they needed more hands.

When Breen returned to work April 1, the city was on the verge of a grim bench mark: Deaths would soon peak at more than 800 in a single day. The scene at the Allen prompted a disturbing realization: She and her emergency department were outmatched. She called her sister, Feist, upset about the chaos.

Co-workers noted that she looked frazzled. And she was not exuding her usual confidence. Still, she managed that week to call in to a video meeting with her Bible study group. She also reached out to classmates in her postgraduate program, concerned about a group project. She was anxious she was not doing her part.

She started working long days that bled into one another. On April 4, Breen spent about 15 hours at work, according to a colleague.

The following day, she seemed confused and overwhelmed, said the colleague, who had never before seen Breen in such a state. Breen wrote a message to her Bible study group.

Im drowning right now May be AWOL for a while, she typed.

She soon stopped replying to friends messages altogether.

Despite their often hero status, health care workers experience pressure that can be paralyzing. Emergency doctors are particularly vulnerable to post-traumatic stress while working in a profession that encourages toughing it out. The pandemic intensified both the demands made of doctors and the pressure to endure those demands.

When Breen finally called her sister for help April 9, she sounded so unlike herself that Feist wondered if the virus had somehow altered her sisters brain. Although research is still preliminary when it comes to COVID-19s effects on the brain, there is growing evidence that the disease, or the way the body responds to it, can cause a range of neurological issues.

Feist called Dr. Angela Mills, who, as chief of emergency medicine, was Breens supervisor.

When Mills arrived at Breens apartment, Breen looked strange. She was quiet, only speaking when questioned. Even then she gave only one- or two-word answers.

Mills asked if she felt like she wanted to hurt herself. Breen indicated yes.

A friend of Breens who was a psychiatrist arrived to pick her up. After spending some time in the car with Breen, the friend called Feist and said her sister needed to go to the hospital.

Breen spent about 11 days as an inpatient in the psychiatric ward. While in the hospital, she chatted on the phone with her friend Anna Ochoa. Ochoa felt good after hanging up. Her friend seemed strong.

Breen was soon discharged, and she stayed with her mother in Charlottesville, where she was a bit more herself, even making jokes. She mentioned returning to her MBA studies. She started going for long runs. Family members talked about getting her back to New York.

But on April 26, Breen killed herself.

It is impossible to know for sure why someone takes her own life. And Breen did not leave a note to unravel the why.

Still, when the casualties of the coronavirus are tallied, Breens family believes she should be counted among them that she was destroyed by the sheer number of people she could not save, that she was devastated by the notion that her professional history was permanently marred, and mortified to have cried for help in the first place.

NewYork-Presbyterian said in a statement that Dr. Breen was a heroic, remarkably skilled, compassionate and dedicated clinical leader who cared deeply for her patients and colleagues.

If Breen is lionized along with the legions of other health care workers who gave so much maybe too much of themselves, then her shattered family also wants her to be saluted for exposing something more difficult to acknowledge: the culture within the medical community that makes suffering easy to overlook or hide, the trauma that doctors comfortably diagnose but are reluctant to personally reveal.

If the culture had been different, that thought would have never even occurred to her, which is why I need to change the culture, Feist said.

For Breens friend Ochoa, their last conversation has become especially crushing. Ochoa cannot stop hearing Breen repeat: I couldnt help anyone. I couldnt do anything. I just wanted to help people, and I couldnt do anything.

Sign up and receive coronavirus news and breaking updates, from our newsroom to your inbox.

See original here:

I couldnt do anything: The virus and an ER doctors suicide - Boston.com

Deborah Heart and Lung Center partners with Thomas Jefferson University – GoErie.com

The states only specialty heart, lung, and vascular center announced Thursday a a new partnership with Sidney Kimmel Medical College at Thomas Jefferson University for Deborahs Fellowship Programs.

PEMBERTON TOWNSHIP Deborah Heart and Lung Center has partnered with a top medical school in Philadelphia.

The states only specialty heart, lung, and vascular center announced Thursday a new partnership with Sidney Kimmel Medical College at Thomas Jefferson University for Deborahs Fellowship Programs.

The new partnership could expand more subspecialty training at Deborah, according to Dr. Vincent Pompili, chair of the department of cardiovascular medicine at Deborah.

"Partnership with Jefferson will enhance our resources and help deliver an exceptional educational experience and opportunity," said Pompili in a statement. "The Sidney Kimmel Medical College at Thomas Jefferson University is well-renowned and respected for its progressive medical school education and research, offers a perfect complement to Deborahs specialty training."

Physicians who plan on specializing in general cardiology, electrophysiology, interventional cardiology, advanced heart failure, and vascular surgery apply each year for a coveted spot in Deborahs Fellowship Program, where they receive intensive specialty training.

Fellows at Deborah work side-by-side with physicians at the hospital, training in advanced cardiovascular techniques, and work on cutting-edge clinical trials.

"As a specialty educational training site, we need to partner with a medical college with accredited Internal Medicine core standards and established residency program. Thomas Jefferson University meets those requirements and also brings a connection and synergy to our program," noted Pompili.

"The legacy and commitment at Deborah to its training programs aligns well with Jeffersons mission to educate the physicians of the future with clinical and scientific knowledge, as well as the human skills of empathy and creativity," said David Paskin, MD, vice dean, graduate medical education and affiliates at Thomas Jefferson University.

See the original post:

Deborah Heart and Lung Center partners with Thomas Jefferson University - GoErie.com

Medical group cited by Trump denounces school funding threat – Sumter Item

By COLLIN BINKLEYAP Education Writer

A medical association that the White House has cited in its press to reopen schools is pushing back against President Donald Trump's repeated threats to cut federal funding if schools don't open this fall.

In a joint statement with national education unions and a superintendents group, the American Academy of Pediatrics on Friday said decisions should be made by health experts and local leaders. The groups argued that schools will need more money to reopen safely during the coronavirus pandemic and that cuts could ultimately harm students.

The statement comes at a time when schools across the nation are weighing decisions for the fall as Trump pushes them to reopen. Millions of parents are still waiting to hear if their children will be returning to school, but some of the nation's largest districts have said students will be in the classroom only a few days a week.

"Public health agencies must make recommendations based on evidence, not politics," the groups wrote in the statement. "Withholding funding from schools that do not open in person full-time would be a misguided approach, putting already financially strapped schools in an impossible position that would threaten the health of students and teachers."

Trump, however, repeated his threat on Friday, saying on Twitter that virtual learning has been "terrible" compared with in-person classes.

"Not even close! Schools must be open in the Fall. If not open, why would the Federal Government give Funding? It won't!!!" he wrote. Trump issued a similar warning on Twitter on Wednesday, saying other nations had successfully opened schools and that a fall reopening is "important for the children and families. May cut off funding if not open!"

Trump has not said what funding he would withhold or under what authority. But White House spokeswoman Kayleigh McEnany has said the president wants to use future coronavirus relief funding as leverage. McEnany said Trump wants to "substantially bump up money for education" in the next relief package but only for schools that reopen.

"He is looking at potentially redirecting that to make sure it goes to the student," McEnany said at a Wednesday press briefing. She added that the funding would be "tied to the student and not to a district where schools are closed."

Trump has been insistent that schools reopen despite growing coronavirus outbreaks in parts of the U.S. The White House hosted a summit on the topic on Tuesday, gathering health and education leaders who said students should return to the classroom this fall to continue their academics and to regain access to meal programs and mental health services.

Among those at the event was Dr. Sally Goza, president of the American Academy of Pediatrics, who called for schools to open.

"Being away from peers, teachers, and school services has lasting effects for children," Goza said at the roundtable. "Although this will not be easy, pediatricians strongly advocate that we start with the goal of having students physically present in school this fall."

Her comments echoed guidelines issued by the group in June, which said time away from school can lead to social isolation and make it harder for schools to identify learning deficits, child abuse, depression and other problems.

Vice President Mike Pence, Education Secretary Betsy DeVos and McEnany have repeatedly, and as recently as Wednesday, cited the American Academy of Pediatrics in defense of Trump's approach.

But Friday's statement acknowledged that it may be best for some schools to stay online. School leaders, health experts, teachers and parents should be at the center of reopening decisions, the groups said, "taking into account the spread of COVID-19 in their communities and the capacities of school districts to adapt safety protocols to make in-person learning safe and feasible."

"For instance, schools in areas with high levels of COVID-19 community spread should not be compelled to reopen against the judgment of local experts," the statement said. "A one-size-fits-all approach is not appropriate for return to school decisions."

New York City's public school district, the nation's largest, said students will be in classrooms two or three times a week and learn remotely in between. DeVos has opposed that kind of approach, saying it fails students and taxpayers.

Read the original here:

Medical group cited by Trump denounces school funding threat - Sumter Item

UND continues to lead the nation in American Indian physicians – Grand Forks Herald

Data collected from the Association of American Medical Colleges shows that from 2018-2020 UNDs medical school ranked in the 100th percentile higher than any other school in the database for the fraction of its graduating medical student class to identify as American Indian. In recent years prior to 2018, the school ranked in the 99th percentile.

In its nearly 50 year history, the INMED program has produced almost 1,000 American Indian health professionals, including more than 250 physicians.

I like to say that an organization like the UND SMHS is characterized by not just what it says, but also by what it does, Joshua Wynne, vice president for Health Affairs at UND and dean of the medical school, said in a statement. The INMED program is a testament to our commitment to deliver on the imperative to move toward more health equity implicit in former President Nixons Special Message on Indian Affairs.

Nixon gave that policy speech 50 years ago this month on July 8, 1970.

Donald Warne, director of the INMED and master of public health programs at the UND medical school, said the policy speech not only paved the way for reversing the federal governments termination policy, which had rescinded the sovereignty of American Indian tribes, but strove to improve American Indian health in several ways.

Warne said people, including his students, are sometimes surprised to hear that Nixon was instrumental in promoting tribal sovereignty. The 1970s was an important decade for indigenous rights, including taking over management of schools from the Bureau of Indian Affairs and improved access to and control over tribes' health care needs. The 1970s also brought the American Indian Religious Freedom Act, which reversed a law that had made indiginous religious practices illegal in the 1880s.

In the 1970s, it was kind of a renaissance of American Indian policy and law, Warne said.

Nixon's policy reversal also played a direct role in creating UNDs Indians Into Medicine program, which was founded in 1973. The program was originally established through federal appropriations. The programs mission is to improve American Indian health and producing more American Indian health care providers, from physicians and physical therapists to occupational therapists and public health researchers.

I think without federal support, this would not be as successful as it is, Warne said, noting there is a long way to go to address disparities in education and health. But at least at UND, we're doing our part.

The medical school is also launching a new doctoral program in indigenous health, the first of its kind.

I think in many ways, the University of North Dakota is well positioned to be the national leader in medical education, and public health education and doctorate level, health professions education really for many years to come, Warne said. Our starting point is really a national leader, but I envision a lot more growth from here as well.

Original post:

UND continues to lead the nation in American Indian physicians - Grand Forks Herald

Inside the walls of St. Agnes Hospital: History of segregated health care in Raleigh – WRAL.com

By Heather Leah, WRAL multiplatform producer

Raleigh, N.C. The stone walls of St. Agnes Hospital are more than a century old. Although the structure is hollowed-out and overgrown with curtains of ivy, the building's remains hold memories from an era of segregation in medical care.

St. Agnes Hospital is viewed by many as a symbol of strength and resilience in the aftermath of slavery. It was hand-built by the students of St. Augustine's College. In fact, students even quarried the stone from the earth themselves.

The hospital was established in 1896, within a single generation of enslaved people being freed from local plantations, to provide much-needed care to Raleigh's Black residents, as well as provide medical training for Black students.

The stone structure that remains today was completed in 1909 and included 75 beds, a nursing college and a nurses' home. St. Agnes provided the highest-quality medical care for the Black community of any hospital between Washington, D.C., and New Orleans.

"It served over 75,000 African-Americans in three states during its existence," said a brief video documentary on the history of the school, produced on behalf of a current fundraiser being held by St. Augustine's University.

The hospital closed in the early 1960s, when WakeMed allowed hospital buildings to become integrated; however, the hallways within were still kept segregated.

The parallels between 2020 and 1918 are astounding, according to Linda Dallas, an artist and assistant professor of visual art at Saint Augustine's University.

When asked what the students who built St. Agnes Hospital in 1909 would think when seeing modern times, she said, laughingly, "I think they'd say in some ways this is just the same as the world they lived in!"

The St. Agnes Hospital building was built in 1909. In 1918, there was the global flu pandemic. Thank goodness St. Agnes was in place the last time we had a pandemic. Can you imagine going through this and while having absolutely no access to a hospital? said Dallas.

In 1919 when Raleigh was going through a pandemic, the political upheaval of that time was comparable to the political upheaval that were going through at this time," she said.

The summer of 1919 was known as the Red Summer, in which the highest number of lynchings in this country were ever recorded.

I think in some ways, they would think, Oh, this is different. But in some ways they would think this is just the same as the world were living in.

In that same period, the country was also trying to adjust to social changes brought on by the Industrial Revolution. Dallas said that on the first day electricity came to St. Augustine's and St. Agnes' campus, students came out and cheered for the electricians who wired the building.

"They didn't turn on the lights right away. They waited until it got dark, and they turned on the lights and cheered," said Dallas.

Dallas compares the changes of the Industrial Revolution, with the social changes modern people are experiencing with the Technological or Informational Revolution.

As bad as the 1918 influenza pandemic was, the Black community would have had even greater losses if St. Agnes had not been here in Raleigh.

St. Agnes almost looks like a castle standing in downtown Raleigh. Many locals have reported driving past the building and wondering about its origins.

Since St. Agnes has been closed around 60 years, decades of growth have begun overtaking the walls. Trees and plants are growing up through the basement floor; ivy is carpeting the stone walls.

Only the basement is accessible, as the floors, doors and windows are long gone. Some locals mistakenly believe the structure was destroyed by fire, but actually the building's innards were actually pulled out intentionally, leaving only the shell behind.

It's a visually stunning place, one-of-a-kind in Raleigh. Some of the building's skeleton reveals where doors and rooms once stood. A secondary section of brick is connected by what looks like a wooden walkway. Tree branches and leaves can be seen waving out upper windows.

Three smaller windows towards the front of the building have a unique shape. According to Michael Palko, who wrote on the history of St. Agnes Hospital, those three windows indicate where the hospital's chapel once sat.

With no floors or modern indications of the hospital's layout, it can be difficult to envision how the hospital appeared during its heyday. Where were babies born? Where did surgeries happen? Where did nurses eat lunch?

By delving into the history, old images and stories, perhaps we can provide a clearer image of how St. Agnes Hospital once functioned and gain a better understanding of its role in Raleigh history.

Many locals have no idea the first four-year medical school was established right here in Raleigh: Leonard Medical School at Shaw University.

In 1882, roughly 14 years prior to the founding of St. Agnes Hospital, Shaw made history as the first institution in the entire country to offer a four-year program for med students. Over the next 36 years, the Medical School in Leonard Hall graduated almost 400 physicians, including Aaron Moore, the first Black doctor in Durham, according to the Raleigh Historic Development Commission.

Over 137 years old, this iconic building can still be seen on Shaws campus.

St. Agnes Hospital and teaching program was founded within the context of Shaw making history with its medical program. Sarah Hunter, the wife of St. Augustine's University's principal, raised the funds to open a small medical facility on campus. As the demand for institutionalized health care grew, the facility grew, eventually leading to building the St. Agnes Hospital in 1909.

The quality of care at St. Agnes was renowned. Because St. Agnes did not have access to as much funding and high tech equipment as local white-only hospitals, doctors at St. Agnes had to rely on exceeding skill and training. Some stories say the local white hospitals would allow doctors from St. Agnes to "moonlight" and come help perform complex procedures.

As history in 2020 parallels circumstances from around a century ago right here in Raleigh, many locals have begun approaching history with a sense of pessimism. However, Dallas said, Theres no place on the surface of the planet earth that doesnt have a history that is a combination of wonderful things and horrible things.

History, she said, is like people: Full of wonderful things and also full of horrible things. You cant blind yourself to either of those things.

Dallas said, "Can you imagine the courage of Sarah Hunter, a white woman who pushed to establish a college for Black Americans in 1896? So it wasnt all horrible, but it wasnt all wonderful either. We have to be willing to see the entire picture."

Art plays a major role helping people see the entire picture, said Dallas.

She said, "Think of all the major art movements that came to be during the turn of the century in the early 1900s: Cubism, expressionism, all the isms!"

Poets, film makers, writers and visual artists from that century could be seen as mentors for living in this time period: Pandemic, racial tensions and new technologies.

One artist even created a rendering of how St. Agnes Hospital may have looked during its years in service.

The date for the exhibit isn't set, but Dallas expects it to take place from early August all the way into November. The art created by Black locals, expressing their feelings during this era, will stand in front of St. Agnes, allowing viewers to reflect on the parallels between history and modern times.

Dallas hopes to open the gates to St. Agnes for a one-day event, allowing visitors to walk close to the building to get a better look at this critically important piece of history.

Take a look at the website for Envision St. Agnes to keep a look out for fundraisers, events and art exhibits on the St. Agnes Hospital campus.

Follow the Envision St. Agnes Facebook page.

Take a look at the history of Oberlin Village, one of Wake County's freedmen's villages formed in the aftermath of the emancipation of slavery.

Or, hear the story of Joseph Holt, Jr., the first black student in Raleigh to challenge segregated schools. At just 13 years old, he faced death threats, hate mail and threats to abduct him, as his family fought for equal education.

Have ideas for more hidden history? Email hleah@wral.com.

Read this article:

Inside the walls of St. Agnes Hospital: History of segregated health care in Raleigh - WRAL.com