Post-COVID-19 thoughts: Sustainable development and Buddhism – ft.lk

One of the important teachings of the Lord Buddha, the notion of cause and consequence (Karma) alone is adequate to emphasise the importance of being concerned about the future Pic by Shehan Gunasekara

The coronavirus outbreak which shattered the lives of many people and sent ripples throughout the world at an unprecedented rate, has made us think about the present lifestyle of us as humans, environmental degradation and overall sustainability of the planet.

Religion is undoubtedly one of the important sources that has the potential to influence human behaviour. Because the present crisis in the ecology can be attributed to a spiritual issue (human greed) which calls for a spiritual answer.

The Assisi Declaration

Several multi-religious conferences have been conducted during past few decades focusing on religious values on environmental conservation. However, the Assisi Declaration can be considered as a pioneering effort to explain the importance of environmental protection from a religious perspective.

In 1986, with the intervention of WWF (World Wide Fund for Nature) and leaders of five major religions of the world representing Christianity, Buddhism, Hinduism, Islam and Judaism, gathered at Assisi, Italy and issued a declaration explaining as to how the teachings of each religion can contribute to the conservation of nature.

Buddhism and sustainable development

The World Commission on Environment and Development also known as Brundtland Commission defines sustainable development as, development that meets the needs of the present without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs. The present lifestyle is driven by high levels of consumerism, with scant respect towards the environment and future generations.

However, Buddhism is replete with future perspectives. One of the important teachings of the Lord Buddha, the notion of cause and consequence (Karma) alone is adequate to emphasise the importance of being concerned about the future. The aforesaid cause and consequence (Karma), speaks of people having to face the consequences of their actions in the future. Accordingly, if humans continue the present lifestyle of over-consumerism with little consideration towards the environment, adverse consequences such as the depletion of natural resources, increase of global warming are inevitable.

Recent estimates indicate that deforestation has increased to a level that every second we are losing rainforest equivalent to a football ground. In the present, amidst the coronavirus pandemic, it has been reported that air pollution has decreased nearly 50% and the ozone layer is repairing itself. One of the reasons for present lifestyle of over-consumerism is human greed. Buddhism explains greed is the root cause of human suffering.

The Four Noble Truths in Buddhism explains that suffering exists, cause of suffering, there can be an end of suffering and there is a way to emancipate from the suffering. The notion of suffering is not intended to portray negative view on the human lives or the world yet it emphasises the importance of acknowledging fleeting nature of all things. Developing an understanding about the fleeting nature of all things which is an essential part of Buddhism, enables the human to control the greed for material wealth.

There are examples from the life of Lord Buddha that indicate the benefits of leading a life in harmony with the environment and appreciating the contribution of the environment. For example, The Lord Buddha upon achieving enlightenment stood gazing at a Bodhi tree with motionless eyes (Animisalochana) as a mark of gratitude to the tree that sheltered him during his struggle to achieve the enlightenment.

In Vanaropa Sutta, the Lord Buddha said: They who plant orchards and gardens, who plant groves, who build bridges, who set up sheds by the roadside with drinking water for the travellers, who sink wells or build reservoirs, who put up various forms of shelter for the public, are those in whom merit grows by day and by night. The Cakkavatti Sihanada Sutta indicate duties of a righteous king include not only protecting humans but also beasts and birds. The Metta sutta says people should be mindful with love and kindness not only to other humans but also to animals including all living beings. Buddhism is not against having material wealth, yet it emphasises the importance of following the middle path (Majjhima Patipada) without going to the extremes.

As per the teachings of Buddhism, the Noble Eightfold Path (Ariya Astaangika Magga) is as follows:

Right Understanding

Right Thought

Right Speech

Right Action

Right Livelihood

Right Effort

Right Mindfulness

Right Concentration

If a person can follow the above mentioned eightfold path it will pave the way for spiritual progress. In context of sustainable development, right understanding would mean one should understand that everybody is dependent on the environment for their survival. Accordingly, any environmental damage would pose a threat for the very survival of the human race. In relation to the sustainable development any livelihood that creates negative impact on the environment cannot be considered as a right livelihood which also excludes some of the immoral income earning activities.

As a bee without harming the blossom its colour, its fragrance takes its nectar and flies away, so should the sage go through a village. (Dhammapada, Pupphavagga)

Similar to the bee extracting the honey from flowers without damaging the colour or the fragrance of the flower, humans should interact with the environment without causing any damage.

(The writer is a postgraduate qualified economic policy researcher, and can be contacted via eranda1700@gmail.com.)

See more here:

Post-COVID-19 thoughts: Sustainable development and Buddhism - ft.lk

MIT to Launch Research Centre at AUC as Part of Ongoing Work to Fight Poverty in the Middle East – CairoScene

When many of us hear the acronym MIT (Massachusetts Institute of Technology), we think of top-level scientists working on something diabolical you know, like in the movies. Naturally, a billionaire villain of vague origins is trying to get his hands on it, but then Tom Cruise swoops in and saves the day. Now, were not saying that MIT arent dangerously exploring technological singularity, robot astronauts or whatever the next step in technology might be, but the truth is that the American research universitys work extends well beyond what Hollywood has fed us including eradicating poverty.

This has been the goal of MITs Abdul Latif Jameel Poverty Action Lab (J-PAL) since its launch in 2003. As part of that goal, J-PAL is set to launch a new research centre at the American University in Cairo as an entry point to the Middle East. What the centre aims to do is innovate research and policy engagement, with the ultimate goal of reducing poverty in the region. The centre intends to do this by focusing on three areas: research designed to inform high-level decision-making; policy engagement with governments, NGOs and other organisations to bridge the gap between research and policy decisions; and professional training to build evidence-informed policymaking across the region. It all sounds pretty lofty, but when you break it down, it all comes down to a sort-of greasing of the wheels in a field that is forever complicated by its very nature a filler and connector of gaps in the fight against poverty in the region.

J-PAL have worked in collaboration with AUC before, but what a dedicated centre in the heart of the region does is dial up the urgency and trigger change from within.

For 15 years, our offices have forged close partnerships with governments, NGOs and foundations, Iqbal Dhaliwal, Global Executive Director of J-PAL, said. With the launch of J-PAL MENA, I am thrilled that we will have a permanent home in the region and deepen our work with partners in Egypt and MENA.

Originally posted here:

MIT to Launch Research Centre at AUC as Part of Ongoing Work to Fight Poverty in the Middle East - CairoScene

This Robotic Chemist Does Over 600 Experiments a Week and Learns From Its Own Work – Singularity Hub

AI is being widely applied to speed up the search for new drugs and new materials that could dramatically improve critical technologies like batteries and solar panels. Most of this work is done in simulation or by trawling through databases, though, and a lot of science still requires work in the lab.

Robots are helping on that front as laboratory automation becomes increasingly prevalent, making high-throughput experiments possible in many different domains. But equipment tends to be tailored to very specific kinds of experiments and still requires considerable oversight by humans.

Now though, researchers at the University of Liverpool in the UK have created a mobile robot that can carry out experiments using standard lab equipment designed for humans and can make decisions on the fly about what experiments it should do next based on its previous results.

Our strategy here was to automate the researcher, rather than the instruments, project leader Andrew Cooper said in a press release. This creates a level of flexibility that will change both the way we work and the problems we can tackle.

The 400 kilogram wheeled system moves about the lab guided by LIDAR laser scanners and has an industrial robotic arm made by German firm Kuka that it uses to carry out tasks like weighing out solids, dispensing liquids, removing air from the vessel, and interacting with other pieces of equipment.

In a paper in Nature, the team describes how they put the device to work trying to find catalysts that speed up reactions that use light to split water into hydrogen and oxygen. To do this, the robot used a search algorithm to decide how to combine a variety of different chemicals and updated its plans based on the results of previous experiments.

The robot carried out 688 experiments over 8 days, working for 172 out of 192 hours, and at the end it had found a catalyst that produced hydrogen 6 times faster than the one it started out with.

Cooper points out to The Verge that this kind of research would normally not get done because its simply too time-consuming for a human to do. But by working around the clock the team predicts the robot can carry out the research roughly 1,000 times faster, opening up new avenues of research previously out of reach.

This isnt the first time researchers have automated the scientific process. A group at MIT built a robot that drags objects through water, observes the flows and vortexes this produces, and then intelligently analyzes the results to decide alterations to the setup to fine-tune the experiment.

Another at the University of British Columbia is using a robotic arm combined with AI to create and test thin films for use in solar panels.

The big difference with this new robot scientist is its generality. Almost all efforts to automate lab work involve static implementations and are hardwired into specific bits of equipment, Cooper told Chemistry World. In contrast, the new system is able to interact with equipment the same way a human would, and it can move around the lab, which should make it possible to adapt for all kinds of applications.

Its creators have launched a startup call Mobotix, which Cooper told The Verge will provide a range of different robots of varying capabilities within 18 months. He also told Chemistry World he envisages the robots eventually being able to analyze the scientific literature to better guide their experiments.

If everything goes to plan it may not be long before an army of robot scientists catapults us into a new age of exponential progress.

Image Credit: Cooper Group, University of Liverpool

Excerpt from:

This Robotic Chemist Does Over 600 Experiments a Week and Learns From Its Own Work - Singularity Hub

Beyond the kingdom of the sick: What literature teaches us about illness – Prospect Magazine

Purely personal accounts give languagewhatever Woolf might sayto the weird, woozy semi-reality of fevers, pain, exhaustion, nausea, and more. Image: By a sickbed, Michael Ancher

Illness has often been described as a landscape of sorts. In Virginia Woolfs essay On Being Ill she writes of undiscovered countries and the terrible wastes and deserts of the soul brought to light by a slight attack of influenza. Charles Lambs The Convalescent and William Hazlitts The Sick-Chamber respectively (and gloomily) deem illness a prison and a dull place where the folding-doors of the imagination remain closed. In Hilary Mantels Meeting the Devil, a mesmerizing description of the authors hallucinatory time recovering in hospital from major surgery, she recounts her first night flighted by morphine [thinking] that my bed had grown as wide as the world.

Meanwhile, Alan Garners powerful essay The Edge of the Ceiling dwells on his touch-and-go experience of three serious illnesses as a young child. Confined to his bed during each bout of illness, the younger Garner escapes his own painful physical limits by willing himself out of his body and floating up into the childhood bedroom ceiling above him. To him, it is a fully realized terrain containing a forest with hills, and clouds, and a road to the horizon. Garners imagined landscaperemembered vividly by the adult writeroffers temporary reprieve to a boy with endless time and nothing to do but endure his own sickness. Memories exist of another geography too: that of the plaster in his parents ceiling, forming itself into the ominous shape of a plump little old woman with a circular face. Each time the young Garner witnesses this face he becomes keenly aware of his mortality, his illness taking him close to the edge. Each time though, he rallied. I was too angry to die, Garner remembers uneasily.

All of these writers delineate their own version of what Susan Sontag refers to in Illness as Metaphor as the division between kingdom of the well and the kingdom of the sick. The latter, the night-side of life, is one, Sontag writes, that all of us are obliged, at least for a spell, to identify ourselves as citizens of. In the kingdom of the sick, illness is experienced as a wide and unpredictable vista: both expanding far beyond and hemmed in by the edges of a bed, forming a space in which time, reality, and sensation all waver. It is a kingdom, however, that requires careful consideration. Sontags book is primarily concerned with how clichs and metaphoric thinking cloud our understanding of illness as it actually is.

***

I have thought a lot about these essays in recent months, compelled by their various attempts to relate the odd, horizontal experience of sickness. For as long as people have been getting ill, they have been trying to put the experience of illness into words. Woolf mawkishly complains of a paucity of language in which to do so; Mantel, in direct riposte, lists a vocabulary of singing aches, of spasms, of strictures, and aches, tartly concluding that no ones pain is so special that the devils dictionary of anguish has not anticipated it. At a time when illness feels acutely present in all our lives, there may be solace found in reading accounts of those who have previously risen to the tricky business of articulating serious pain and discomfort.

In a way, there is some consolation in reading these accountsif only to appreciate the vivid singularity of each experience. Perspectives change. Bodies become alien. Death and other forms of uncertainty linger close at hand.

But something in them feels strangely distant too. Many of these essays read as definitive journeys with return tickets. In them the author ventures into the kingdom of the sick, is stuck there for a while, and then leaves again, perhaps bearing a new memento or two: insight; a scar; fresh gratitude for being able to stand upright. This journey requires the fixed certainty of a normal world to return to. It is this well world that stands ready to welcome these adventurers back when they recover. Even for those like Mantel, who concludes that needing more surgery, I am not sure what kind of story Im in, the story is still one in which that well world continues to whir as usual outside the sick room, waiting for her.

It is difficult to find present parallels with these narratives. Right now, illness is not just an individualized experience but a mass occurrence. One that makes it so much harder to draw any clear divisions between the well and sick. Some of the sick are symptomless, carrying around a virus that leaves them unharmed but can potentially kill others who cross their path. Various symptoms are still unclear or have only recently been added to official guidance. Over the past few months, fear and grief have become entwined with so many aspects of daily life: fear of becoming ill or watching loved ones become ill; grief at what has happened, and continues to happen, to countless individuals and families, perhaps including our own.

Theres no real normality awaiting the recovered either. Despite the move towards easing out of lockdown, much of what we previously took for granted remains just as uncertain. With so many usual aspects of life still currently turned upside downtouch, crowds, workplaces, education, restaurants, travel, forward planning, proximity to strangers, groups gathering for parties, weddings, funerals, festivalsits not just the terrain of illness that has transformed, but everything else beyond it.

None of this is necessarily unique to coronavirus, even if this pandemic feels uniquely bewildering in scale. Nor is it entirely unexplored territory for writers. For every description of illness with a beginning, middle and ending, there is another that refuses narrative closure. In recent years a spate of medical memoirsPorochista Khakpours Sick, Sinad Gleesons Constellations, and Anne Boyers The Undying among themhave signalled a shift towards approaching illness not from the safe, removed vantage point of the well, but as something more complicated, that extends into quotidian life.

Khakpours memoir, which dwells on her diagnosis of late-stage Lyme disease, traces the ongoing challenges of chronic illness. In the epilogue she pithily compares The Book I Sold a narrative promised to her publishers about the personal triumph of a woman who got herself betterwith the actuality of accepting that illness will be with you as long as life is with you. Gleesons essay collection, too, focuses on the lifelong ramifications of ill health, including a major hip operation in her teens and a diagnosis of leukemia at the age of 28. Early on she describes herself as an accumulation of sleepless nights and hospital days, writing about these experiences not as a wholly distant vista but something that continues to inform numerous aspects of who she is now.

Boyers The Undying is especially bracing. At once sprawling and tightly focused, her book ostensibly figures as an account of her diagnosis and treatment of triple-negative breast cancer. But Boyer is not interested in standardor solitarynarrative paths. Instead she writes of her illness not just an individually experienced phenomena, but as something located within a specific nexus of capitalism, gender, language, medical history, the US healthcare system, and the lineage of those who have died before her. Echoing Sontags desire to investigate the punitive or sentimental fantasies surrounding sickness, Boyer rails against a culture in which the narrative spoils go to victors: she writes critically about our celebrations of those who have beaten breast cancer and can tell a story of surviving via individual self-managementthe narrative [one] of the atomized individual done right.

Boyer argues instead for sickness as something that exists in the social body, collectively produced and widely experienced with our ability to treat and respond to it mediated largely by money. Here the world does not ebb away during illness but remains firmly present, dictating difficult decisions over work, and access to treatment; who lives and dies, and to whom who care falls. The echoes found in current conversations are stark, especially when she lists some of the main systems medicine interlocks with: family race work gender education.

***

Relentlessly probing and politically excoriating, Boyer still offers something hopeful among her fragmented reflections: a practical kind of solidarity. Everyone who is not sick now has been sick or will be sick soon, Boyer writes: This is why I tried to write down pains leaky democracies, the shared vistas of the terribly felt. In illuminating those vistas she connects her experience to a constellation of others, creating what Lauren Berlant deems a commons of suffering: attentive to the singularity of each unwell experience, but also refusing the idea of illness as something wholly lonely, or held solely in any one individual body.

Perhaps both types of writing have their uses right now. Purely personal accounts give languagewhatever Woolf might sayto the weird, woozy semi-reality of fevers, pain, exhaustion, nausea, and more. They accurately and sometimes startlingly capture passage into the realm of the unwell, and reflect on their findings.

But one needs those like Boyer too, reminding us not just of the precariousness of these passages, but the way illness has always existed both individually and collectively: intensely personal, expansively wide-ranging, existing within the context of numerous communities and systems. At a point when all usual definitions of normality and sickness are still up in the air, this recognition doesnt provide much concrete comfortbut it perhaps offers another way of approaching the uncertain landscape we now find ourselves living in.

Read more:

Beyond the kingdom of the sick: What literature teaches us about illness - Prospect Magazine

‘Big Tech’ Pullback Explains Why Bitcoin Rally Has Paused in Q3 | NewsBTC – newsBTC

Bitcoin and Big Tech do not concern each other historically, but that is about to change during the Julys earnings session.

The benchmark cryptocurrency is moving at a snail-like speed as it remains stuck inside a $300 trading range. The parameters are pretty low for an asset that typically moves wildly on a day-to-day basis. Its impatient daytraders are therefore jumping the ship to seek opportunities in parabolic crypto assets like LINK, XLM, and others.

Despite blanketed by a long-term bullish narrative that envisions its price at $100,000, Bitcoin is not showing any enthusiasm to make that happen.

The last three months, instead, has seen the cryptocurrency tuning itself to a string of macro narratives, including an escalating COVID pandemic, the central banks stimulus policies, and fears of an economic slowdown. That has brought Bitcoin close to acting like a stock market.

And it is, indeed. The cryptocurrencys short-term correlation with the S&P 500 reached an all-time high last week. Barring few exceptions, it moved hand-in-hand with the US benchmark index, suggesting that its interim market outlook entirely depends on how the US equities will perform.

That is what brings Bitcoin in the proximity of the Big Tech a make-believe index of technology stocks belonging to top companies like Apple, Alphabet, Facebook, Netflix, and Amazon.

Big Tech shares at a $7 trillion valuation cover 23 percent of the S&P 500. Meanwhile, they are also 40 percent of the Nasdaq Composite index. On the whole, the so-called FAANG stocks are 18 percent of the entire US stock market.

A recent Bank of America survey found that US tech and growth stocks received more positive bets than any other sector during the Q2, be it Bitcoin or the lower-risk US government bonds. As a result, their stock rates hit record highs in recent days as investors treated them as a haven during the coronavirus-induced lockdown.

That explains why a tech-heavy Nasdaq Composite outperformed its benchmark S&P 500.

But it appears the tech party is coming to an end as investors grapple with a rising number of infections in the US, followed by another lockdown. The BofA survey pointed the same after the first US states started reversing their reopening plans in the face of COVID threats.

Jefferies Global Equity Strategist Sean Darby earlier this week switched his position on Big Tech from modestly bullish to modestly bearish. The analyst said that he sees a minor stock pullback as the S&P 500 and the Nasdaq Composite trades based on an old fractal.

Calling the tech stocks overvalued, Mr. Darby cited the Four Horsemen scenario of the 1990s. In it, four stocks Microsoft, Oracle, Dell, and Cisco Systems were dominating the stock market, adding that FAANG is making a similar trajectory as previous bubbles.

The BofA survey also stated that Big Tech is now the most overcrowded trade, something that is running ahead of its true valuations as investors seek haven against low-yielding bonds. That amounts to a correction big or small.

That brings attention back to Bitcoin. The cryptocurrency is practically trading cluelessly without a strong narrative. But as the Big Tech slumps during the earnings session next week just as Netflix plunged on Thursday after releasing its financial results it will bring the S&P 500 and Nasdaq down in unison.

Bitcoin, like a mute follower, risks falling downwards under the same setup.

Original post:

'Big Tech' Pullback Explains Why Bitcoin Rally Has Paused in Q3 | NewsBTC - newsBTC

How Palantir and Peter Thiel might lead the biggest tech IPO of the year – Vox.com

In the earlier days of the Covid-19 pandemic, many of the countrys public health departments, still reliant on fax machines, were woefully unprepared for the massive amounts of data they needed to process. Looking for a tidy private sector solution to a messy government problem, the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) paid a shadowy Silicon Valley company with ties to the Trump administration to build something new. That company is called Palantir Technologies, and if you dont know much about it, thats by design.

Palantir specializes in data-gathering and analysis, most of which it does for government agencies. It has about $1.5 billion in federal government contracts alone, including, recently, with the Space Force and the Navy. Now, as new Covid-19 case numbers break records daily, Palantir is trying to help organize the information with a new platform called HHS Protect, which will be run by another private company called TeleTracking. This partnership has effectively replaced the Centers for Disease Control and Preventions (CDC) National Healthcare Safety Network, per the Trump administrations orders to hospitals to stop reporting their information to it. HHS Protect, which is not accessible to the general public, is now the only source for this information.

Today, the CDC still has at least a week lag in reporting hospital data, Michael Caputo, assistant secretary of the HHS for public affairs, told the New York Times. America requires it in real time. The new, faster, and complete data system is what our nation needs to defeat the coronavirus.

Palantir, the architect of this complete data system, isnt a household name like its Palo Alto peers, but the 17-year-old company founded by Peter Thiel is one of the most valuable private companies in Silicon Valley. That anonymity is a feature, not a bug: Palantir does most of its work for the government, including national security and intelligence operations. In recent years, headlines about the company have stressed its access to everything about all of us, which privacy advocates have long criticized. Palantirs data-mining software has been credited with killing Osama bin Laden (a claim that has never been confirmed) and blamed for tearing unauthorized immigrant families apart.

Now the notoriously secretive surveillance startup that the White House is entrusting with the nations coronavirus data is about to go public.

Palantir was founded in 2003 by venture capitalist and Paypal co-founder Peter Thiel along with Joe Lonsdale, Stephen Cohen, Nathan Gettings, and Alex Karp, its eccentric CEO who has a law degree and a PhD in neoclassical social theory and keeps 20 identical pairs of swimming goggles in his office. The companys name comes from J.R.R. Tolkiens palantri, which are magical orbs that let their possessors see anything happening in the world at any time. The name fits, too, as Palantirs vision has always been to create software that can mine and analyze large and disparate data sets, putting them all in one place and finding connections between them.

The company came together not long after 9/11, when Palantir was pitched as a tool that could have identified and stopped the hijackers and would prevent similar attacks from happening in the future. Sure enough, by 2011, Bloomberg Businessweek was calling Palantir an indispensable tool employed by the US intelligence community in the war on terrorism. The magazine added, Palantir technology essentially solves the Sept. 11 intelligence problem.

Indeed, the CIA was one of Palantirs earliest investors through its venture capital arm, In-Q-Tel (yes, the CIA has a venture capital arm). It was Palantirs only customer for years as the company refined and improved its technology, according to Forbes. By 2010, Palantirs customers were mostly government agencies, though there were some private companies in the mix. Having managed to quietly work its way toward a $1 billion valuation, it was then one of the most valuable startups in Silicon Valley. By 2015, Palantir was valued at $20 billion.

I think its worth keeping in mind that Palantir sees itself not alongside Uber, Twitter, and Netflix, but alongside Raytheon, Lockheed Martin, and Booz Allen, said the Intercepts Sam Biddle, who has covered Palantir for years. Palantir wants to be a defense contractor, not a Silicon Valley unicorn.

Palantir has grown into a company with roughly 2,500 employees, most of them engineers who write the software that collects data, and embedded analysts who work on site with Palantirs customers to make sense of it. Company culture has been described as cult-like, big on T-shirts and Care Bears, and more Google than Lockheed. Employees are called Palantirians.

One of Palantirs product demonstrations, as described in Bloomberg Businessweeks 2011 article, presents a fictional example of the softwares capabilities: A terrorist leaves a trail of data across Florida, including one-way plane tickets, condo rentals, bank withdrawals, phone calls to Syria, and security camera footage from Walt Disney World. Taken separately, these details dont add up to much, but Palantirs software ties together thousands of databases across various agencies and helps clients see connections across them. In this case, actions that are innocuous on their own are much more suspicious when combined, and the CIA could identify and stop a terrorists plan to attack a theme park.

Again, that was a hypothetical product demonstration, but Palantirs technology has been credited with saving its financial institution customers hundreds of millions of dollars, being used to detect Chinese spyware on the Dalai Lamas computer, thwarting Pakistani suicide bombers, and unraveling Bernie Madoffs Ponzi scheme. Its customers have included the CDC, police departments in America and abroad, and large corporations like JPMorgan and Home Depot. Palantir even sued the US Army in 2016 to force it to consider using its intelligence software after the Army chose to go with its own. Palantir won the suit, and then it won an $800 million contract.

Despite its high valuation and lucrative contracts, however, Palantir has yet to make a profit.

Palantirs work, the government agencies that contract it, and the relative lack of details about the companys inner workings mean its often seen as secretive, all-knowing, and even malevolent. Seven years after touting Palantirs terrorism-fighting abilities, Bloomberg Businessweek ran a feature on the company with the headline Palantir Knows Everything About You. In a book with the phrase destroying democracy in the title, Robert Scheer called Palantir a monstrous government snoop, mining our most intimate data. The companys software has been criticized for its dragnet ways, pulling in records about millions of innocent people so it can catch a few possible criminals.

Palantirs data-mining software is used to analyze vast amounts of personal data held by the federal government to make determinations that affect peoples lives with little to no oversight, said Jeramie D. Scott, senior counsel for the Electronic Privacy Information Center (EPIC), which successfully sued Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) to get records on its work with Palantir. Palantir analyzes databases containing telephone numbers, email addresses, financial data, call transaction records, and social media information. ... The documents EPIC obtained showed that ICEs Palantir-based databases could analyze call records and GPS data as well as conduct social network analysis of the information linking different individuals.

The company suffered one of its first rounds of bad press in 2011 when a hacker discovered it was part of a proposal to Bank of America to sabotage Wikileaks. In response, Palantir issued a public apology, created a Council of Advisors on Privacy and Civil Liberties, and suspended but did not fire the engineer responsible.

The post-9/11 world that Palantir was born into in 2003 then changed considerably in 2013 when leaks from Edward Snowden revealed that the National Security Agency used the directive of protecting the country at all costs in order to mass-collect the phone records of millions of Americans, leading to widespread outcry and some reforms. Palantir denied working with the NSA on that particular project but has worked with the agency on others, according to an internal video that was leaked to BuzzFeed News.

Palantirs work with various police departments across the country has also brought renewed scrutiny to the company, especially in light of recent protests against police brutality. Palantirs software powers the Los Angeles Police Departments predictive crime program, called Operation LASER, which tries to identify and target potential criminals for increased surveillance. The program ended in 2019 amid doubts that predictive policing was an effective crime deterrent, as well as criticism from civil rights organizations that it unfairly targeted minority communities. Its hard to get exact numbers on how many police departments Palantir has contracts with, but New Orleanss and New Yorks police departments are known customers, and Palantir boasts on its website of its work with the Salt Lake City Police Department.

Palantir declined Recodes request for comment, but the company has said its technology is built with protections for privacy and civil liberties. While the companys software obviously collects and works with data for its clients, the company says it doesnt collect or use any of that data for itself.

Palantirs less-than-great public image has come with some consequences. In the past few years, nonprofits have dropped Palantir as a corporate sponsor, and students regularly protest Palantir-related campus events and recruiting sessions. In an op-ed for the Washington Post, Karp noted that a small group of protesters regularly assembles outside Palantirs offices, and hes said that his own home is the site of near-daily protests. He has a personal security guard at all times. The Investor Alliance for Human Rights criticized Palantirs work with the government and ICE, saying it was failing to fulfill its human rights responsibilities and noting that its use of personal data came with legal risks and could be in violation of state laws.

That reputation has followed Palantir even as its technology seems to be doing some good during the Covid-19 pandemic. The company is providing its services at almost no cost to the United Kingdoms National Health Service (NHS), but headlines focused on how much patient data the company was getting access to in order to do that work and what it would do with it. The NHS has also provided patient data to other companies, including Microsoft and Amazon.

Stateside, theres HHS Protect another example of Palantirs expansion into how the government collects and manages data and whom it trusts to do it (and, it seems, whom it does not). A spokesperson for HHS told NBC News last month that ICE would not have access to HHS Protect and that all information in it was de-identified anyway. But some politicians have still expressed their concerns about if and how patients personal health information will be protected, and that it wont be shared with other federal agencies. Theyve specifically cited Palantirs work on the project as one of their issues.

Our concerns that HHS Protect could be misused in this way are compounded by the fact that Palantir has a history of contracting with ICE, including two active awards worth over $38 million in total, they said in a June letter to HHS Secretary Alex Azar.

Palantir is also controversial because its co-founder and board chair, Peter Thiel, is controversial. Thiel, who was one of Facebooks first outside investors and maintains a position on its board of directors, has seen his share of criticism over the years, but the libertarian billionaire really came into the public eye in 2016 when he revealed himself as the money behind Hulk Hogans privacy lawsuit against Gawker (which would ultimately kill the site) and an early Trump supporter.

As most of liberal Silicon Valleys big names publicly came out against Trump, Thiel was one of relatively few public figures who supported his candidacy. After speaking at the Republican National Convention, he gave the Trump campaign $1.25 million, and when Trump won the election, New York magazine said he was poised to become a national villain. Thiel has been rewarded for his support: He was chosen to be a member of the presidents transition team; in the early days of the Trump presidency, Politico dubbed Thiel Donald Trumps shadow president in Silicon Valley; and Thiels chief of staff and protg, Michael Kratsios, served as the White Houses chief technology officer from 2017 until this month, when he was named acting undersecretary for research and engineering at the Department of Defense. Thiels Trump support is said to have changed going into the 2020 election, however, and he hasnt donated to Trumps campaign since October 2018.

Due, in part, to Thiels Trump links, the company has faced a new round of scrutiny. Its contract with ICE caused numerous civil rights organizations to blame Palantir for helping the agency find and deport unauthorized immigrants. While other companies were ending their relationships with certain government agencies over purported ethical concerns, Palantir renewed its ICE contract in 2019 despite reported opposition even from its own employees, some of whom left the company over it. Palantirs CEO, on the other hand, has said its not his companys place to decide how its software is used.

For a while, it suited Palantir to paint itself as this lean and mean secretive startup, said Biddle, who used to work at Gawker. Now that theyre established and have clearly weathered popular outrage over their work with ICE and a lifetime association with Peter Thiel, its time to cash in.

Karp famously and repeatedly said that he would never take his company public, believing that staying private gave Palantir an edge its public company competitors didnt have.

The minute companies go public, they are less competitive, Karp said in 2014. You need a lot of creative, wacky people that maybe Wall Street wont understand. They might say the wrong thing all the way through an interview. You really want your people to be focused on solving the problem.

But Karp has seemed more amenable to the idea in the last few years. When Palantir added its first female board member in June, a public filing seemed all but certain according to California law, public companies must have at least one female board member. Palantir filed its initial paperwork with the SEC on July 6 in a confidential filing that allowed it to avoid revealing much about its inner workings to the public. Twitter, Uber, and Spotify, among other startup giants, have done the same thing. Theres no timeline for when the company might actually go public.

Despite Palantirs enormous valuation, the company has reportedly never made a profit and struggled to live up to its hot startup image, as the Wall Street Journal said in 2018. Bloomberg reported last year that Palantirs valuation had plummeted to half, maybe even a quarter, of its 2015 peak, as investors wrote down the value of their holdings and the company offered discounted shares to employees to boost morale. Big corporate clients such as Coca-Cola, American Express, Hershey, Nasdaq, Home Depot, and JPMorgan have dropped the service, as has the NSA, according to BuzzFeed News.

But 2020 has been mostly good to Palantir, if to no one else. The company says its on track to make $1 billion in 2020 and turn a profit for the first time. It has that $800 million contract with the Army and is said to be increasing its corporate customer base with its Foundry product, which requires significantly less time, money, and employees to set up than the companys custom-built solutions. Meanwhile, as evidenced by its recent work with HHS, the pandemic has increased worldwide demand for its software. Investors and employees alike have been itching for a return on their investment for years, and now might be the best time to make their wishes come true.

The market right now is crazy, Ashu Garg, a partner at venture capital firm Foundation Capital, told Recode. Theres a junk rally for tech stocks in the public markets, and most tech stocks are very richly valued without a lot of discrimination around quality.

Going public will mean Palantirs opaque business practices will have to be more transparent, and the company may not be able to simply wave off public outcry over its work as it has in the past. But experts and advocates seem to doubt much will really change on either of those fronts.

Going public might make some additional information public, but it does not guarantee oversight or accountability, Scott said.

Garg doesnt think Palantirs work with agencies like ICE and the resulting bad publicity will be too much of a detriment in the market, given how interwoven that work is and has always been with the companys business model not the case for, say, the Facebooks and Ubers and Zooms of the world.

Palantirs core business, and probably its most profitable business, is its government business especially work for three-letter agencies and the Department of Defense, Garg said. I dont think thats going to change.

What remains to be seen, then, is if Palantirs ability to marry 21st-century Silicon Valley disruption to 20th-century defense contracting will live up to its valuation when it hits the stock market. At a time when Big Tech companies are trying to make their data collection practices more transparent and say theyll give consumers more control over them (and are facing increased pressure from lawmakers to do so), Palantir has been able to keep much of its work with our data secret. A successful IPO will only give it more reasons and opportunities to do so.

Open Sourced is made possible by Omidyar Network. All Open Sourced content is editorially independent and produced by our journalists.

Support Voxs explanatory journalism

Every day at Vox, we aim to answer your most important questions and provide you, and our audience around the world, with information that has the power to save lives. Our mission has never been more vital than it is in this moment: to empower you through understanding. Voxs work is reaching more people than ever, but our distinctive brand of explanatory journalism takes resources particularly during a pandemic and an economic downturn. Your financial contribution will not constitute a donation, but it will enable our staff to continue to offer free articles, videos, and podcasts at the quality and volume that this moment requires. Please consider making a contribution to Vox today.

Read the original:

How Palantir and Peter Thiel might lead the biggest tech IPO of the year - Vox.com

Here’s what happened to the stock market on Monday – CNBC

Dow Jones Industrial Average rises 10 points

The Dow climbed 10.50 points, or 0.04%, to 26,085.80. The S&P 500 slid 0.94% to 3,155.22. The Nasdaq Compositefell 2.13% to 10,390.84. Stocks reversed course as a rally in major tech names which briefly pushedthe S&P 500 into positive territory for the year fizzled out.

Shares of Microsoft ended the day down 3.09% while Facebook, Netflix Alphabetand Apple also closed lower.Big Tech started rolling over after the S&P 500 briefly turned positive for 2020. "No sentient human could look at some of the super-cap tech stocks and say the latest move wasn't anything other than a momentum-driven melt-up rally," says one trader. Wall Street also lost its footing after California Gov. Gavin Newsom ordered indoor operations for fitness centers, malls and places of worship, among others, to shut down amid rising Covid cases.

Pfizer and German biotech BioNTechSEwere granted fast track designation by the FDA for two of the companies' four vaccine candidates against the coronavirus. Pfizer and BioNTech said they expect to start the next phase of the vaccine trial later this month with 30,000 subjects.

JPMorgan Chase and Citigroup are among the companies set to report earnings on Tuesday.

Subscribe to CNBC PRO for exclusive insights and analysis, and live business day programming from around the world.

Read the original:

Here's what happened to the stock market on Monday - CNBC

The Biggest Problem With Investing in Teladoc – The Motley Fool

As the COVID-19 pandemic keeps people home, the demand for virtual care services appears to be on the rise. And one company that's benefited from that is TeladocHealth(NYSE:TDOC). The New York-based healthcare company's been a hot investment this year, with its share price surging 160% so far in 2020 -- well above the near-flat returns the S&P 500has produced thus far.

While it's tempting to jump aboard the bandwagon, there's one big reason long-term investors should think twice before buying in, and it has nothing to do with valuation. It's the company's lack of moat.

Moat is something Warren Buffett fans are familiar with: It refers to a company's ability to hold a competitive advantage over its peers. The billionaire investor values companies that enjoy a large moat, because it means they'll be able to ward off competitors.

Image source: Getty Images.

In Teladoc's case, there's not much moat there -- and that could make competition a worry for investors in the years ahead, especially as telehealth and virtual care services grow in popularity. Connecting physicians to patients remotely can be as easy as using Skype or Zoom.

Teladoc's low-cost Everyday Care costs $75 for people without insurance to access a doctor and even less if an insurance provider picks up a portion of the tab. One of the company's main competitors, Amwell, offers urgent care visits for $79.And patients who want a yearly subscription can sign up with One Medical (NASDAQ:ONEM), which for $199 annually offers access to physicians via video and the ability to book in-person appointments at more than 85 locations across the country.

Every industry has competitors, but as telehealth and virtual care services become more popular amid the COVID-19 pandemic, even more could join in. Right now, Teladoc remains on the rise; on April 29, Teladoc reported year-over-year sales growth of 41%. There was also a 92% increase in visits, and memberships rose by 61%. High growth numbers like that could raise eyebrows and attract companies from other industries like the tech sector.

Tech giantAmazon (NASDAQ:AMZN) announced this month that some of its fulfillment centers would be getting healthcare centers as it partners with Crossover Health. It's a pilot program that will involve setting up 20 centers in five states, and more could be on the way if it's successful. With the company's technical resources and capabilities, enabling these offices to offer virtual care wouldn't be too much of a stretch. And while the service is currently only for Amazon employees, it's just the latest sign of big tech showing an interest in the industry.

Google parent Alphabet (NASDAQ:GOOG)(NASDAQ:GOOGL), for example, has invested in One Medical, and its employees also use the company's services.

If a company lacks a moat, it'll likely need to compete on price. That should be a big concern for Teladoc investors, given that the company's been in the red every year. With more competition, its sales growth could taper off quickly, and the company may need to invest more in generating revenue. That means that not only would its top line slow down, but its expenses would accelerate, leading to a net negative impact on the bottom line that could put Teladoc even deeper in the red.

And without strong sales numbers, investors will be left looking at profits -- which could quickly make Teladoc an undesirable investment to hold.

A lack of moat is one reason to sell Teladoc, and the company's astronomical valuation is another. With no profits and shares trading at 25 times revenue, the company carries a hefty premium for investors who buy the stock today. Even though Teladoc is likely to continue growing at a good rate for the foreseeable future, long-term investors need to be aware of the risk of holding on to the healthcare stock for too long.

Things can change quickly in the world of tech, and five years from now the company may be battling for market share with tech giants like Alphabet and Amazon. Tougher times may be in store, and that's why I'd avoid investing in Teladoc today.

More:

The Biggest Problem With Investing in Teladoc - The Motley Fool

Big Tech is Poised to Pounce on Banking – Global Banking And Finance Review

By Simon Axon, EMEA Financial Services Industry Consulting Director at Teradata.

COVID-19 has changed banking, possibly forever. But as banks wrestle with the pandemic and its after-effects they must also focus on a bigger imminent threat to their existence and its not from FinTechs.

Among the many impacts of the global pandemic has been a significant shift in the way consumers and businesses go about their banking. Mothballed branches and social distancing have accelerated the use of online and mobile banking driving what McKinsey has found to be a20% increase in digital engagementand a 50% decline in the use of cash.

Many may be surprised that these moves have not benefitted Fintechs, but, according todata from Finbold, downloads of fintech apps have actually fallen during the crisis with leading challenger banks Monzo and Revolut both seeing slides of around 20% in March. This confirms what I have suspected: the FinTech threat has always been a distraction from the real challengers to todays banks.

That threat comes from Big Tech; Google, Amazon, Apple, Baidu and Tencent among others. These huge and wealthy businesses are already deeply integrated into the lives of consumers and businesses. The top 20 tech firms are valued at almost $6 trillion, getting on for double that of the top 20 financial services firms at$3.3 trillion. They have the money, the ambition and the technology to completely change the face of banking in ways that fintech could not. They can do it almost overnight, and they are preparing to do so now.

The power and wealth of Big Tech is virtually unlimited. They can disrupt and dominate whole economies with digital platforms that touch every aspect of our lives. Data fuels their business models as they seek to understand and monetise every aspect of individuals behaviour. Collecting, acquiring, owning and processing data is the modus operandi of Big Tech. The list of industries up-ended by these behemoths grows daily; music, publishing, retail, gaming, film, communications already with transport, healthcare, education and even government now feeling their impact.

There is no doubt that banking and financial services are next on the list. Chinese technology firms are already deeply engaged in financial services. Social Media leader Tencent already derives28% of its revenues from payments. US firms are beginning to see the benefits and to provide their users with payment services. Google, Apple, Microsoft and Amazon are looking beyond on-site digital payments to take definitive steps into financial services. Apple has launched a credit card which can be opened within 30 seconds;Google is launching a current accountand Facebook is trying to develop its own digital currency.

The threat from big tech is not new, but it is rapidly sharpening, driven by both by investor demands and by the fallout of the COVID crisis.

Traditional banks room to maneuver is severely constrained by the increased risk and responsibilities deriving from their role in restarting economies post-COVID. Concerns about the risk attached to government-mandated business loans are widely voiced. Business risk stems not only from defaults, but the resource intensive, logistically challenging and expensive efforts to secure repayments. COVID-19 loans threatens to become aPR disasteras they erode trust and reputation of banks forced to chase small businesses for repayments they cannot afford.

Big Tech, by contrast has had a good COVID crisis. As millions have suffered lockdowns and been forced to work, shop, socialise and entertain themselves from home, not only have tech firms seen revenues rise, but they have cast themselves as consumer champions. The tech-lash which saw trust in tech erode towards the end of the last decade, seems to have evaporated.

There is a clear and present danger to banks and the shape, ownership and purpose of the Bank of the Future hangs in the balance. The combination of the growth in influence, spending power and ambition of Big Tech, with the dislocation of the economy caused by the coronavirus pandemic, creates a dangerous scenario for banks. The window of opportunity to transform and meet the evolving demands of customers has all but closed. Bold thinking and decisive execution are needed now if banks are to survive in positions where they can shape their own future.

The coming battle will be about data. Banks have it, Big Tech covets it. The side that is best able to protect, understand and utilise it as an asset will prevail. Data is both the prize and the key to success in this battle, and my next article will outline how banks can value and leverage the data advantages they have to win this war.

Read the original:

Big Tech is Poised to Pounce on Banking - Global Banking And Finance Review

As the Revolving Door Swings – The American Prospect

In early 2019, I had the privilege of presenting my ideas on regulating tech platforms to several staff members on the Senate Judiciary Antitrust Subcommittee. I told the staffers that I was worried about whether antitrust, which can address certain anti-competitive conduct by the platforms, could be counted on to police the misappropriation of data from third-party content providers, or the self-preferencing of their own brands or applications to their hundreds of millions of users. I recommended sector-specific regulation to address this conduct, as have other important voices, from Public Knowledge to the Stigler Center.

I also presented my ideas at the Federal Trade Commissions platform competition hearings in October 2018. Both there and at the Antitrust Subcommittee, I was called back for private briefings with staffers.

Nothing ever came of my ideas. I figured getting legislation passed would be a long shot, but I also thought my ideas were good and necessary, given the way the platforms exploit gaps in our consumer-oriented and price-fixated antitrust laws.

Flash forward to the summer of 2020. Through a LinkedIn email, I learned that a recent staffer on the Senate Judiciary Antitrust Subcommittee was recruited by Amazons public-policy arm this month. I took to Twitter to express my dismay, and quickly learned that another staffer on the Senate Judiciary Committee was recruited by Facebooks competition policy arm in May 2020.

These two staffers are now working for the tech platforms, and presumably against my ideas, after having heard my ideas in a private setting.

It is important to note right here that I have no beef with these fine folks. Indeed, given the substantial time I invested twisting their arms in support of platform regulation, I have no reason to think they were acting in bad faith or that their actions (or lack thereof) were affected by these offers. My beef is with the process, and the way the platformsby offering jobs to government officials tasked with regulating the platformsare interfering with democracy.

To understand how, lets start with a clear-cut hypothetical: Would we ever allow a defendant to make a job offer to a member of the jury? If the juror believed that she could curry favor with the defendant by voting to acquit, the job offeror even the prospect of an offercould create a conflict. For the same reason, we wouldnt allow a defendant to threaten a juror, for fear that the threat could taint the outcome of a trial. (The same logic applies to a plaintiff.)

Lets try another thought experiment: Should a target of an ongoing antitrust investigation by the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) or Department of Justices Antitrust Division (ATR) be permitted to hire away key staffers on the investigation team? Or should the target be permitted to fund a position at an academic center that recruits the staffer? These also seem problematic, as the prospect of an offer by the target could induce the staffer to modify his investigation or recommendations in favor of not pursuing an antitrust complaint.

Your donation keeps this site free and open for all to read. Give what you can...

SUPPORT THE PROSPECT

One final experiment: Would we permit the target of a congressional inquiry on monopoly (and monopsony) abuses by dominant platforms to hire away key staffers on congressional committees tasked with investigating the platforms? This is also problematic, as the prospect of a job offer could induce a staffer to refrain from recommending to her representative or senator that the platform should be subjected to new regulations.

The optimal policies here are complicated by the fact that policy staffers have developed specialized skills, about both the industry and antitrust generally as well as the lobbying process, that could be valuable to the platforms under investigation. Denying such mobility into the private sector with a complete ban on recruitment would deprive the staffer of reaping the fruits of his or her labor.

But theres a strong public-interest motive to deny this free exercise of movement from government to the corporate sector if it conflicts with proper corporate regulation. And that appears to be whats happening.

NOTWITHSTANDING ITS dull content, LinkedIn has a nifty tool that allows searches for people who currently work in one place and previously worked somewhere else. For example, type in Department of Justice Antitrust Division Amazon, and you get back 65-odd results. (Results may vary slightly based on who conducts the search and where the search is performed.) Click the all filters drop-down, and choose Amazon as the current company. The results are narrowed to eight employees. A similar search reveals 10 and 11 current employees at Google and Facebook, respectively. The table below reports the number of people currently employed at Amazon, Google, or Facebook based on these queries.

In several instances, the same worker can be represented multiple times in the tablefor example, if she worked at two (or more) government agencies before moving to the platform. It is possible that LinkedIn is generating matches that are close but not equal to the search terms. It bears noting that in many of these cases, the worker held a stint at a different employer before moving on to the platform. The table is meant to be illustrative and hopefully replicable.

When the keyword antitrust, or in the case of DOJ, the keywords antitrust division are removed from the initial query, the results are unsurprisingly larger. To restrict the results for DOJ and FTC, I impose a second filter for prior employer.

According to LinkedIn, 41 current Amazon employees previously worked at DOJ; 54 current Google employees previously worked at DOJ; and 48 current Facebook employees previously worked at DOJ. Without some benchmark or standard, it is hard to judge whether these numbers are intolerably high. But there is no doubt that the two recent episodes of poaching mentioned above are not outliers. Instead, they appear to be part of a larger pattern by the platforms of poaching government officials in the agencies and congressional committees that have jurisdiction over them.

That this stealthy form of influence peddling happens all over governmentread Jessie Eisingers The Chickenshit Club to learn about the corruption in financial servicesdoesnt mean it is not insidious here.

Your donation keeps this site free and open for all to read. Give what you can...

SUPPORT THE PROSPECT

The platforms are in the crosshairs of multiple investigations, including by DOJ, state attorneys general, and the House Judiciary Committee. Amazon, Facebook, and Google picking off staffers charged with overseeing them erodes public trust in these institutions, and potentially undermines the investigations, to the extent it influences the conduct of the staff.

Other costs of permitting such poaching are less obvious. For example, knowing that she could be courted by a platform with deep pockets might encourage a staffer to develop certain skills or seek out positions that maximize the chances of being courted. Shes taking the job in the hopes of getting scooped up to take another job, in other words. Poaching a government official is similar to a killer acquisition: Staffers are acquired precisely to undermine potential oversight.

The revolving door could also affect government procurement, to the detriment of smaller rivals and to the benefit of Big Tech. In November 2016, Amazon hired the former chief acquisition offer of the General Services Administration (GSA) in the Obama administration. During 2017, Amazon reportedly privately advised the GSA on the launch of a new digital portal for government purchasing of commercial items and office supplies. Some rivals complained that as written, the bid would favor Amazon. After maintaining that the project was on hold because of the pandemic, in June GSA abruptly announced that Amazon, alongside Overstock and Fisher Scientific, won the bid. All three winners have their own private labels, which could disadvantage independent sellers.

IN FAIRNESS, the House Subcommittee on Antitrust is holding a hearing on July 27 to examine the dominance of tech platforms, and it plans to issue recommendations soon. And Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-MA) has outlined several policy ideas, including breaking up Big Tech. But nothing today prevents Amazon or Google or Facebook from buying off entire antitrust agencies and congressional committees. I dont begrudge any individual staffer who jumps at the offer. The point is that if we allow such offers without any guardrails, some people will end up taking them. That it happens so frequently is an indicator that we must reform the poaching processbut how?

Theres a strong public-interest motive to deny this free exercise of movement from government to the corporate sector if it conflicts with proper corporate regulation.

Lets begin by paying government officials more, to narrow the income difference between keeping your government job and jumping ship. Additionally, we could offer government officials job security and suitable pensions, so making a career out of public service is not seen as an inferior alternative to the private sector. In The Chickenshit Club, Eisinger explains that SEC officials are reluctant to bring cases because of a challenging legal environment; the same can be said for antitrust. A more radical idea would be to offer bonuses to agency officials (or maybe just division heads) based on judgments or jury awards against a platform, as a means to incentivize them to bring riskier cases.

Sen. Warren has a policy piece on pointof course she doestitled End Washington Corruption, which calls for longer cooling off periods for former government officials. Current law mandates a period of one year before former senior government officials work on projects that they worked on in government. Warrens plan would restrict the ability of corporate lobbyists to enter government jobs for six years, and would ban companies from hiring former senior government officials for at least four years.

Whats not clear is whether the four-year ban pertains only to full-time hiresthat is, whether companies may hire former senior government officials indirectly (by the hour) via law firms or lobbying firms. If thats the case, then an agency head could still deliver huge benefits to former or would-be clients via nonenforcement (or other means) and then be rewarded via future payments as billable hours. And were right back to the underenforcement problem.

Every day that passes in which Congress fails to deliver protections for independent merchants and content creators is a victory for the platforms. Regardless of its potential gaps, Sen. Warrens anti-corruption plan is a good start. We might not get platform regulation until we address the revolving door in Washington.

The views expressed here are those of the author, and do not represent the views of his employers. Singer does not currently work for or against Amazon, Google, or Facebook in any pending litigation or consulting matter.

View post:

As the Revolving Door Swings - The American Prospect

Cloudflare DNS goes down, taking a large piece of the internet with it – TechCrunch

Many major websites and services were unreachable for a period Friday afternoon due to issues at Cloudflares 1.1.1.1 DNS service. The outage seems to have started at about 2:15 Pacific time and lasted for about 25 minutes before connections began to be restored.

Early reports suggested Google DNS may also have been affected, but this turned out not to be the case Google Cloud confirmed it had no outages yesterday.

Update: Cloudflare at 2:46 says the issue has been identified and a fix is being implemented. CEO Matthew Prince explains that it all came down to a bad router in Atlanta:

The company also issued a statement via email emphasizing that this was not an attack on the system.

This afternoon we saw an outage across some parts of our network. It was not as a result of an attack, the company said in a statement. It appears a router on our global backbone announced bad routes and caused some portions of the network to not be available. We believe we have addressed the root cause and monitoring systems for stability now. We will share more shortlywe have a team writing an update as we speak.

Discord, Feedly, Politico, Shopify and League of Legends were all affected, giving an idea of the breadth of the issue. Not only were websites down but also some status pages meant to provide warnings and track outages. In at least one case, even the status page for the status page was down.

A DNS, or Domain Name System, is an integral part of the web, connecting domains (like TechCrunch.com) to their IP addresses (such as 152.195.50.33). If the one you or a site use goes down, it doesnt matter whether a websites own servers are working or not users cant even reach them in the first place. Internet providers usually have their own, but theyre often bad, so alternatives like Googles have existed for many years, and Cloudflare launched its service in late 2018.

Cloudflare wrote in a tweet and an update to its own status page (which thankfully remained available) that it was investigating issues with Cloudflare Resolver and our edge network in certain locations. Customers using Cloudflare services in certain regions are impacted as requests might fail and/or errors may be displayed.

Despite much speculation as to the cause of the outage, there is no evidence that it was caused by a denial-of-service attack or any other form of malicious hackery.

(This story has been updated to reflect new information, such as the Google and Cloudflare statements.)

More here:

Cloudflare DNS goes down, taking a large piece of the internet with it - TechCrunch

How Old Is Your Dog? New Equation Shows How to Calculate Its Age in Human Years – NBC New York

Common wisdom has long held that each dog year is equivalent to seven human years. But a new equation developed to measure how a dog ages finds the family pup may be a lot older than we realize.

Researchers studying chemical changes to canine DNA found that dogs age very quickly during their first five years and much more slowly later on.

The findings, published recently in the journal Cell Systems, calculate that a 5-year-old dog would be pushing 60 in human years.

Puppies age super quickly, said Trey Ideker, the studys senior author and a professor of genetics at the University of California, San Diego, School of Medicine. By the time a dog is a year old, at a molecular level, hes much more like a 30-year-old human. Retrospectively, we did know these things. It didnt make any sense that the equivalent to a 7-year-old human would be able to have puppies.

Read the full story on NBCNews.com

Read the rest here:

How Old Is Your Dog? New Equation Shows How to Calculate Its Age in Human Years - NBC New York

3D Printing in Aerospace and Defense Market Analysis, Industry Growth, Competitive Analysis, Future Prospects and Forecast 2026| Stratasys, 3D…

Los Angeles, United State: The global 3D Printing in Aerospace and Defense market is exhaustively studied in the report while largely concentrating on vital aspects including competitive landscape, market dynamics, costs and prices, sales growth, regional expansion, production, and consumption. The report offers Porters Five Forces, PESTEL, and other market analyses to provide a 360-degree research study on the global 3D Printing in Aerospace and Defense market. It discusses about important market strategies, future plans, market share growth, and product portfolios of leading companies operating in the global 3D Printing in Aerospace and Defense market. It also provides absolute dollar opportunity and qualitative and quantitative analyses to help readers clearly understand the global 3D Printing in Aerospace and Defense market.

Get Full PDF Sample Copy of Report: (Including Full TOC, List of Tables & Figures, Chart)https://www.qyresearch.com/sample-form/form/1776151/1940943/global-3d-printing-in-aerospace-and-defense-market

The authors of the report have covered almost all key players of the global 3D Printing in Aerospace and Defense market. The research study comes out as a brilliant compilation of several important studies on the competitive landscape of the global 3D Printing in Aerospace and Defense market. It shows how top players are maintaining their supremacy in the global 3D Printing in Aerospace and Defense market using powerful business tactics, price strategies, and other strategic moves. It digs deep into the nature and characteristics of the vendor landscape and includes accurate predictions of key changes in market competition.

Key Players Mentioned in the Global 3D Printing in Aerospace and Defense Market Research Report: Stratasys, 3D Systems, Arcam Group, Renishaw, ExOne, Optomec, SLM Solutions, EnvisionTEC, VoxelJet AG, Sciaky Inc, EOS e-Manufacturing Solutions, GE

Global 3D Printing in Aerospace and Defense Market by Type: Metal, Polymer, Ceramic, Others

Global 3D Printing in Aerospace and Defense Market by Application: Civil Aviation, Military Aviation, Spacecraft, Other

The comprehensive segmental study provided in the report gives industry-best intelligence on the current and future market positions of all segments of the global 3D Printing in Aerospace and Defense market. It helps players to become aware of upcoming segments and key growth pockets so that they could cash in on some rewarding opportunities available in the global 3D Printing in Aerospace and Defense market. Each segment is analyzed with a broad focus on its market share, growth journey during the forecast period, and future growth prospects. The analysts have mainly segmented the global 3D Printing in Aerospace and Defense market into product type and application segments.

The researchers have shed light on important regional markets and their recent as well as future progress in terms of CAGR, revenue and volume growth, production, consumption, and other significant factors. The regional segmentation study offers players with great insights into the regional growth of the market, which could be used to build effective strategies to expand their geographical reach.

Questions Answered by the Report:

Which are the dominant players of the global 3D Printing in Aerospace and Defense market?

What will be the size of the global 3D Printing in Aerospace and Defense market in the coming years?

Which segment will lead the global 3D Printing in Aerospace and Defense market?

How will the market development trends change in the next five years?

What is the nature of the competitive landscape of the global 3D Printing in Aerospace and Defense market?

What are the go-to strategies adopted in the global 3D Printing in Aerospace and Defense market?

Request for customization in Report:https://www.qyresearch.com/customize-request/form/1940943/global-3d-printing-in-aerospace-and-defense-market

Table of Contents

About Us:

QY Research established in 2007, focus on custom research, management consulting, IPO consulting, industry chain research, data base and seminar services. The company owned a large basic data base (such as National Bureau of statistics database, Customs import and export database, Industry Association Database etc), experts resources (included energy automotive chemical medical ICT consumer goods etc.

The rest is here:

3D Printing in Aerospace and Defense Market Analysis, Industry Growth, Competitive Analysis, Future Prospects and Forecast 2026| Stratasys, 3D...

Aerospace Fabrics size and Key Trends in terms of volume and value 2019-2020 – Jewish Life News

Global Aerospace Fabrics market- Report defines the vital growth factors, opportunities and market segment of top players during the forecast period from 2019 to 2025. The report Aerospace Fabrics offers a complete market outlook and development rate during the past, present, and the forecast period, with concise study, Aerospace Fabrics market effectively defines the market value, volume, price trend, and development opportunities. The comprehensive, versatile and up-to-date information on Aerospace Fabrics market is provided in this report.

The latest research report on Aerospace Fabrics market encompasses a detailed compilation of this industry, and a creditable overview of its segmentation. In short, the study incorporates a generic overview of the Aerospace Fabrics market based on its current status and market size, in terms of volume and returns. The study also comprises a summary of important data considering the geographical terrain of the industry as well as the industry players that seem to have achieved a powerful status across the Aerospace Fabrics market.

Get PDF Sample Copy of this Report to understand the structure of the complete report: (Including Full TOC, List of Tables & Figures, Chart) @ https://www.marketresearchhub.com/enquiry.php?type=S&repid=2701249&source=atm

Segment by Type, the Aerospace Fabrics market is segmented intoAramid FibersCarbon FibersGlass FibersKevlar FibersNylon FiberOther

Segment by Application, the Aerospace Fabrics market is segmented intoEvacuation SlidesAirplane InteriorsUpholstery FabricsSpace Suit Costume & Pilot UniformsPilot ParachutesOther

Regional and Country-level AnalysisThe Aerospace Fabrics market is analysed and market size information is provided by regions (countries).The key regions covered in the Aerospace Fabrics market report are North America, Europe, Asia Pacific, Latin America, Middle East and Africa. It also covers key regions (countries), viz, U.S., Canada, Germany, France, U.K., Italy, Russia, China, Japan, South Korea, India, Australia, Taiwan, Indonesia, Thailand, Malaysia, Philippines, Vietnam, Mexico, Brazil, Turkey, Saudi Arabia, U.A.E, etc.The report includes country-wise and region-wise market size for the period 2015-2026. It also includes market size and forecast by Type, and by Application segment in terms of sales and revenue for the period 2015-2026.Competitive Landscape and Aerospace Fabrics Market Share AnalysisAerospace Fabrics market competitive landscape provides details and data information by players. The report offers comprehensive analysis and accurate statistics on revenue by the player for the period 2015-2020. It also offers detailed analysis supported by reliable statistics on revenue (global and regional level) by players for the period 2015-2020. Details included are company description, major business, company total revenue and the sales, revenue generated in Aerospace Fabrics business, the date to enter into the Aerospace Fabrics market, Aerospace Fabrics product introduction, recent developments, etc.The major vendors covered:Porcher SportBGF IndustriesGelvenor TextilesSigmatexOriental MillsHighland IndustriesSafety Components

Do You Have Any Query Or Specific Requirement? Ask to Our Industry [emailprotected] https://www.marketresearchhub.com/enquiry.php?type=E&repid=2701249&source=atm

Complete Analysis of the Aerospace Fabrics Market:

Comprehensive assessable analysis of the industry is provided for the period of 2019-2025 to help investors to capitalize on the essential market opportunities.

The key findings and recommendations highlight vital progressive industry trends in the global Aerospace Fabrics market, thereby allowing players to improve effective long term policies

A complete analysis of the factors that drive market evolution is provided in the report.

To analyze opportunities in the market for stakeholders by categorizing the high-growth segments of the market

The numerous opportunities in the Aerospace Fabrics market are also given.

You can Buy This Report from Here @ https://www.marketresearchhub.com/checkout?rep_id=2701249&licType=S&source=atm

Furthermore, Global Aerospace Fabrics Market following points are involved along with a detailed study of each point:

Generation of this Global Aerospace Fabrics Industry is tested about applications, types, and regions with price analysis of players that are covered.

Revenue, sales are planned for this Aerospace Fabrics market, including with various essentials along yet another facet is assessed in this section for foremost regions.

In continuation using earnings, this section studies consumption, and global Aerospace Fabrics market. This area also sheds light on the variance between ingestion and distribution. Export and Aerospace Fabrics significance data are provided in this part.

In this section, key players have been studied depending on product portfolio, their Aerospace Fabrics market company profile, volume, price, price, and earnings.

Aerospace Fabrics market analysis aside from business, the information, and supply, contact information from manufacturers, consumers and providers can also be presented. Additionally, a feasibility study to asset and SWOT analysis for endeavors have been contained.

Read more:

Aerospace Fabrics size and Key Trends in terms of volume and value 2019-2020 - Jewish Life News

Composites in the Global Aerospace Market, 2014-2019 & 2020-2025 – ResearchAndMarkets.com – Business Wire

DUBLIN--(BUSINESS WIRE)--The "Composites in the Aerospace Market Report: Trends, Forecast and Competitive Analysis" report has been added to ResearchAndMarkets.com's offering.

The future of the global aerospace composite materials market looks promising with opportunities in commercial aircraft, regional aircraft, general aviation, helicopter, and military aircraft markets.

The global aerospace composites materials market is expected to decline in 2020 due to global economic recession led by COVID-19. However, market will witness recovery in the year 2021 and it is expected to reach an estimated $3.3 billion by 2025 with a CAGR of 5% to 7% from 2020 to 2025. The major drivers for this market are growing demand for lightweight materials to increase fuel efficiency and growth of aircraft with high composites penetration such B787 and A350WXB.

An emerging trend, which has a direct impact on the dynamics of the industry, includes the recycling of advanced composites. Some of the aerospace composite materials companies profiled in this report include Hexcel, Cytec Solvay Group, Toray, Gurit, and Teijin.

The study includes a forecast of the growth opportunities for the composites in the global aerospace market by aircraft type, reinforcement type, manufacturing process, type of structure, component and region.

In this market, carbon fiber, glass fiber, and aramid fiber are used to fabricate various aircraft components. On the basis of comprehensive research, it is forecast that carbon fiber based composites will remain the largest market during the forecast period. Increasing penetration of carbon composites in commercial aircraft, such as B787 and A350XWB is expected to drive the demand for this segment over the forecast period from 2020 to 2025.

Within the aerospace composites market, commercial aircraft will remain the largest market by value and volume consumption followed by military aircraft.

By type of structure, primary structure will remain the largest market by value and volume due to higher composite consumption.

North America will remain the largest region during the forecast period due to a higher demand for newer aircraft and the ongoing replacement of an aging fleet.

Features of the report include:

This report answers following 11 key questions

Q. 1. How big are the opportunities for composites in the global aerospace market by aircraft type (commercial aircraft, regional aircraft, general aviation, helicopter, military aircraft, others), by reinforcement type (carbon composites, glass composites, aramid composites, others), manufacturing process (hand lay-up, AFP/ATL, RTM, injection molding, compression molding, others), type of structure (primary structure interior, engine, others), component (wing, fuselage, empennage, engine, interior, rotor blade, radome, landing gear, others), and region (North America, Europe, Asia Pacific, and the Rest of the World)?

Q. 2. Which product segments will grow at a faster pace and why?

Q. 3. Which region will grow at a faster pace and why?

Q.4. What are the key factors affecting market dynamics? What are the drivers, challenges, and business risks in this market?

Q.5. What are the business risks and competitive threats in this market?

Q.6. What are the emerging trends in this market and the reasons behind them?

Q.7. What are some of the changing demands of customers in the market?

Q.8. What are the new developments in the market and which companies are leading these developments?

Q.9. Who are the major players in this market? What strategic initiatives are being taken by key companies for business growth?

Q.10. What are some of the competing products in this market and how big of a threat do they pose for loss of market share by product substitution?

Q. 11. What M&A activity has occurred in the last have years and what has its impact been on the industry?"

Key Topics Covered

1. Executive Summary

2. Aerospace Market Analysis

2.1. Macro-Level Comparative Economic Analysis

2.2. Supply Chain

2.3. Global Aerospace Market Overview

2.4. Regional Analysis

2.5. Recent Trends in the Global Aerospace Market

2.6. Forecast for the Global Aerospace Market

3. Commercial Aerospace Market Analysis

3.1. Overview of the Commercial Aerospace Market

3.2. Commercial Aerospace Market Size

3.2.1. Narrow-Body Aircraft

3.2.2. Wide-Body Aircraft

3.3. Market Leaders and Market Share

3.4. Commercial Aerospace Market Trends

3.4.1. Narrow-Body Aircraft

3.4.2. Wide-Body Aircraft

3.5. Commercial Aerospace Market Forecast

4. Regional Aircraft Market Analysis

4.1. Overview of the Regional Aircraft Market

4.2. Regional Aircraft Market Size

4.3. Market Leaders and Market Shares

4.4. Regional Aircraft Market Trends

4.5. Regional Aircraft Market Forecast

5. General Aviation Market Analysis

5.1. Overview of the General Aviation Market

5.2. General Aviation Market Size

5.2.1. Piston Aircraft

5.2.2. Turboprop Aircraft

5.2.3. Business Jet Aircraft

5.3. General Aviation Market Trends

5.4. General Aviation Market Forecast

6. Helicopter Market Analysis

6.1. Overview of the Helicopter Market

6.2. Helicopter Market Size

6.3. Market Leaders

6.3.1. Civil Helicopter Market

6.3.2. Military Helicopter Market

6.4. Helicopter Market Trends

6.5. Helicopter Market Forecast

7. Military Aircraft Market Analysis

7.1. Overview of the Military Aircraft Market

7.2. Military Aircraft Market Size

7.3. Military Aircraft Market Trends

7.4. Military Aircraft Market Forecast

8. Manufacturing Process Analysis

8.1. Overview

8.1.1. Hand Lay-Up

8.1.2. ATP and AFP

8.1.3. Filament Winding

8.1.4. Injection Molding

8.1.5. Compression Molding

8.1.6. Resin Transfer Molding (RTM)

8.1.7. Roll Wrapping

8.2. Market Size by Manufacturing Process

8.3. Commercial Aircraft Manufacturing Process

8.4. General Aircraft Manufacturing Process

8.5. Helicopter Manufacturing Process

8.6. Military Aircraft Manufacturing Process

9. Evolution of Composite Applications in the Global Aerospace Market

9.1. Evolution of Composite Applications

10. Composite Applications in the Global Aerospace Market

10.1. Application of Composites in the Commercial Aircraft Market

10.2. Application of Composites in Regional Aircraft

10.3. Application of Composites in General Aviation

10.4. Application of Composites in Helicopters

10.5. Application of Composites in Defense

10.6. Application of Composites in Space

11. Composite Material Market Analysis

11.1. Overview of Composite Materials

11.2. Business Issues with Composite Materials

11.3. Buy and Fly Weight Analysis

11.4. Composite Shipments by Raw Material Type

11.5. Composite Shipments by Market Segment

11.5.1. Composite Materials in the Commercial Aerospace Market

11.5.2. Composite Materials in the Regional Aircraft Market

11.5.3. Composite Materials in the General Aviation Market

Read more from the original source:

Composites in the Global Aerospace Market, 2014-2019 & 2020-2025 - ResearchAndMarkets.com - Business Wire

Tag: Aerospace Industry Report – Cole of Duty

The global Aerospace market report is a full research that focuses on the overall consumption structure, development trends, sales models and sales of top countries in the global Aerospace market. The report focuses on well-known providers in the global Aerospace industry, market segments, competition, and the macro environment.

Market Overview

The global Aerospace market has been studied by a set of researchers for a defined forecast period of 2020 to 2026. This study has provided insights to the stakeholders in the market landscape. It includes an in-depth analysis of various aspects of the market. These aspects include an overview section, with market segmentation, regional analysis, and competitive outlook of the global Aerospace market for the forecast period. All these sections of the report have been analyzed in detail to arrive at accurate and credible conclusion of the future trajectory. This also includes an overview section that mentions the definition, classification, and primary applications of the product/service to provide larger context to the audience to this report.

Get Sample Copy of the Report (After COVID-19 Impact) @ https://www.kandjmarketresearch.com/sample-request/356968

Market Dynamics

The report on the global Aerospace market includes a section that discusses various market dynamics that provide higher insight in the relationship and the impact of change these dynamics hold on the market functioning. These dynamics include the factors that are providing impetus to the market over the forthcoming years for growth and expansion. Alternatively, it also includes factors that are poised to challenge the market growth over the forecast period. These factors are expected to reveal certain hidden trends that aid in the better understanding of the market over the forecast period.

Market Segmentation

The global Aerospace market has been studied for a detailed segmentation that is based on different aspects to provide insight in the functioning of the segmental market. This segmentation has enabled the researchers to study the relationship and impact of the growth chart witnessed by these singular segments on the comprehensive market growth rate. It has also enabled various stakeholders in the global Aerospace market to gain insights and make accurate relevant decisions. A regional analysis of the market has been conducted that is studied for the segments of North America, Asia Pacific, Europe, Latin America, and the Middle East & Africa.

Research Methodology

The global Aerospace market has been analyzed using Porters Five Force Model to gain precise insight in the true potential of the market growth. Further, a SWOT analysis of the market has aided in the revealing of different opportunities for expansion that are inculcated in the market environment.

Enquiry regarding (After COVID-19 Impact) this Premium Report @ https://www.kandjmarketresearch.com/enquiry/356968

Key Players

The global Aerospace market report has provided profiling of significant players that are impacting the trajectory of the market with their strategies for expansion and retaining of market share.

Some of the prominent players operating in the global Aerospace market are

More

For more details, contact at: USA: +1 (661) 636 6162 | IND: +91 9325802062 email: [emailprotected]

Follow this link:

Tag: Aerospace Industry Report - Cole of Duty

Global Aerospace Engine Market with Competitive Analysis, Market Size and Shares Forecasts till 2026 – 3rd Watch News

Aerospace Engine Market is systematic exploration that delivers key statistics on the market status of the development trends, competitive landscape analysis, and key regions development status. The report has included strong players and analyses their limitations and strong points of the well-known players through SWOT analysis. This Report covers growing trends that are linked with major opportunities for the expansion of the Aerospace Engine industry.

Get Free Sample Report(including full TOC, Tables and Figures): @ https://www.globalmarketers.biz/report/chemicals-and-materials/global-aerospace-engine-market-report-2020-by-key-players,-types,-applications,-countries,-market-size,-forecast-to-2026-(based-on-2020-covid-19-worldwide-spread)/154342#request_sample

Honeywell International Inc.KlimovGE AviationHindustan Aeronautics LimitedRolls RoyceMTU Aero EnginesPratt & WhitneyUnited Technologies CorporationITPSafran Aircraft Engines

The Geographical Analysis Covers the Following Regions

The recent outbreak of the COVID-19 (Corona Virus Disease) Provide extra commentary on the newest scenario, an economic slowdown on the overall industry. In addition to this, the report also includes the development of the Aerospace Engine market in the major regions across the world.

Note: Upto 30% Discount: Get this reports in Discounted Price

Ask For Discount: https://www.globalmarketers.biz/discount_inquiry/discount/154342

Global Aerospace Engine Market Segmentation: By Types

Turbine EnginesJet EnginesOthers

Global Aerospace Engine Market Segmentation: By Applications

Commercial AviationMilitary AviationOthers

Do you want any other requirement or customize the report, Do Inquiry Here: https://www.globalmarketers.biz/report/chemicals-and-materials/global-aerospace-engine-market-report-2020-by-key-players,-types,-applications,-countries,-market-size,-forecast-to-2026-(based-on-2020-covid-19-worldwide-spread)/154342#inquiry_before_buying

This research report represents a 360-degree overview of the competitive landscape of the Aerospace Engine Market. Furthermore, it offers enormous statistics relating to current trends, technological advancements, tools, and methodologies.

Global Aerospace Engine Market Research Report 2020

Chapter 1 About the Aerospace Engine Industry

Chapter 2 World Market Competition Landscape

Chapter 3 World Aerospace Engine Market share

Chapter 4 Supply Chain Analysis

Chapter 5 Company Profiles

Chapter 6 Globalization & Trade

Chapter 7 Distributors and Customers

Chapter 8 Import, Export, Consumption and Consumption Value by Major Countries

Chapter 9 World Aerospace Engine Market Forecast through 2026

Chapter 10 Key success factors and Market Overview

It concludes by throwing light on the recent developments that took place in the Aerospace Engine market and their influence on the future growth of this market.

Table of Content & Report Detail @ https://www.globalmarketers.biz/report/chemicals-and-materials/global-aerospace-engine-market-report-2020-by-key-players,-types,-applications,-countries,-market-size,-forecast-to-2026-(based-on-2020-covid-19-worldwide-spread)/154342#table_of_contents

Here is the original post:

Global Aerospace Engine Market with Competitive Analysis, Market Size and Shares Forecasts till 2026 - 3rd Watch News

Maldives is Open to International Travellers – Outlook India

Maldives has reopened its mesmerising beaches, clear waters and posh hotels to international tourists (yes, even for American travellers). However, for the first few weeks, only the private islands and live-aboard stays will be accessible to tourists. From August 1, 2020, they will be able to appreciate the island's picturesque guest houses and hotels too.

And this time, the island will be a tad cheaper than the exorbitantly priced vacation destination it was before. Earlier, tourists needed to book vacations no shorter than 14 days. They also had to apply for a tourist visa, which cost another $100.That's not all. They had to submit either a negative antigen test or a positive antibody test, a week before their arrival. And after arrival, they had to pay another $100 for tests. And they would be quarantined for a maximum of 12 hours.

Now travellers will not have to show a negative COVID-19 test upon arrival. And people who dont have symptoms will not be quarantined. Also,there are no new visa requirements or additional fees to be paid.

Government guidelines say that you can only visit the resort islands and you will need to book your stay in one registered establishment. The only exemption will be for transit arrangements.

Some of the establishments have already opened their doors to travellers, like the Lily Beach Resort and Spa, Velaa Private Island Maldives, Four Seasons Maldives Private Island at Voavah.

Read: Lighthouses Are The New Tourism Destination

View original post here:

Maldives is Open to International Travellers - Outlook India

This summer in Sitka: All the magic, none of the crowds – Anchorage Daily News

Presented by Travel Alaska

This year, travelers everywhere put their plans on hold, presenting Alaskans with a unique opportunity to get out and explore the states incredible destinations while supporting Alaska small businesses. Travel Alaska is encouraging residents to Show Up For Alaska by exploring new places and taking advantage of deals just for locals. Read on to learn about the adventures that await!

Wake up on a private island. Spend the afternoon surfing. Enjoy world-class cuisine. View 18th century art and artifacts. All in a single day -- and all in Alaska?

Sitkas a unique place, said Rich Kraft, who owns Cascade Creek Inn and Charters. With industries driven by fishing and the outdoors, education and the arts, he said, it has intelligence and diversity and outdoors and fine arts all in one.

Sitka is incredibly popular with Outside travelers, but its location off the road system means it remains a bucket list item for many Alaskans.

You talk to people and theyre like, Wow, Ive never been to Sitka and Ive always wanted to go, said Laurie Booyse, director of Visit Sitka. Well, whats stopping you? Were here!

This summers a poke in the nose, Kraft said. A hard poke.

Kraft and his family got into the visitor industry about five years ago, when they drove by a for-sale sign on a lodge a few miles outside downtown Sitka. Now charters and hospitality are the family business, with their grown children and daughters-in-law involved on the boats, in the kitchen, and around the inn and its 10 oceanfront rooms with views of Mount Edgecumbe.

Many of those rooms will be empty this summer. Sitka was anticipating about 300,000 visitors this year, according to Booyse. With the cruise ship season canceled and most other travelers putting their plans on hold, the streets that would usually be bustling are instead strangely quiet.

While the travel drop-off has been hard on local businesses, for the visitors who do come, its a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity to have the place pretty much to themselves.

Youre definitely going to experience Sitka as though you were here living with us, Booyse said. Some of our best restaurants, you normally cant get a table. Youre actually able to eat like a local. Many of Sitkas eateries are open, either for takeout or for distanced dining, and spots that are impossible to get into during a normal visitor season have plenty of openings. Sitka has a strong food culture, with local ingredients in plentiful supply, vegan and organic options, a farmers market, and even food trucks.

If youre a foodie, youre definitely going to find something excellent for you to experience here, Booyse said.

The benefits of Sitkas slow summer arent limited to the food scene. At the animal sanctuary Fortress of the Bear, tours that are usually delivered over a microphone to groups of 50 have been replaced by private appointments -- long, leisurely visits with the Fortress eight resident black and brown bears, guided by an experienced naturalist.

Everyones getting a personal, private tour experience when they visit, said Bear Manager and Specialist Claire Turner. Having an opportunity to view those bears without being kind of part of a larger group can be really nice.

Even the locals are getting to check out some new experiences; Turner said she recently participated in a behind-the-scenes octopus encounter at the Sitka Sound Science Center that was just the coolest thing ever.

The community here is really doing everything they can to keep everything as safe as possible, Turner said, adding that Fortress of the Bear, the Science Center and the Alaska Raptor Center have been working together to ensure each facility has what it needs to keep guests healthy.

Alaskas scenic melting pot

Located in Southeast Alaska rainforest, Sitkas climate is temperate, lush -- and yes, wet. Wear layers and bring your Xtratufs if youve got them, Booyse advised.

The tradeoff? Its really, spectacularly beautiful.

Because we face the open ocean, we have a constant access to wildlife in a way thats really unique, Booyse said.

Kelp beds foster a large sea otter population; marine birds, crabs and fish flourish in Sitka Sound; and whales, sea lions and seals can all be spotted in and along the water. Old-growth timber still stands on the hillsides, and the dormant Mount Edgecumbe volcano is a scenic reminder of Sitkas location directly along the Ring of Fire.

I fell in love with Sitka instantly, said Turner, who came from the United Kingdom eight years ago for a summer research project and ended up staying. Its a really beautiful place to live. The scenery is beautiful, but the community is beautiful, too.

Even the fast food in Sitka comes with a side of spectacular.

You can go sit in McDonalds, thats on the water, and theres no other McDonalds in the world with a view like that, Kraft said referring to possibly the most scenic McDonalds anywhere, located on the edge of a boat harbor overlooking Mount Edgecumbe. Then youve got just the taste of old Sitka, you know, walking around the small streets and the harbors. Then you put your hiking shoes on, and weve got the best trails of anyplace weve seen.

His personal favorite is the Herring Cove Trail, which twists past waterfalls, meadows and a scenic lake.

I always say, if you were in Hawaii, and you spent $50 to go on this hike and you were butt to butt with people the whole way, when you got down youd still say Thats the best $50 Ive ever spent, Kraft said.

And theres more to Alaskas former capital than plentiful wildlife and sweeping vistas. Visitors to Sitka can experience Alaskas history from pre-contact days to the Russian colonial era to the territorial years to statehood.

Its a real melting pot of histories and cultures and experiences, Booyse said.

There are Russian buildings still standing, with art and icons dating to the 1700s, while the Sitka History Museum displays the document transferring Alaska from Russian to American control. And the areas original Tlingit culture is vibrant and thriving in the community. Sheldon Jackson Museum is offering its artist-in-residence program this summer, giving guests the opportunity to visit and talk to Alaska Native artists at work in the studio. And although the Sitka Music Festival and some other events have gone virtual this year, the communitys creative culture is still on display for visitors to experience.

People make things here, Booyse said. Everything from what you would expect, (like) the Tlingit carving and beadwork, (to) we have two people in town who are chocolatiers, we have two bakeries, we have people who make soap, we have people who make sea salt, we have people who make kelp pickles. If you can figure out a way to make something, people in Sitka are making it.

Sail on a yacht, sleep in a lighthouse

When it comes to accommodations, Sitka again has something for everyone -- hotels, bed and breakfasts, camping, cabins and lodges -- including some truly unique properties, like homes located on private islands and even a lighthouse.

Sitka Travel owner Christine McGraw, who manages about 60 local rental properties, said the vacation home rental market is up and coming in Sitka, with numerous options for visitors who want something remote, something right downtown, or something in between.

Definitely an island is a cool experience for a couple of days, she said. We also have the private charter yachts. We have Dove Island (Lodge), which is a high-end resort -- I have (clients) that will stay out there and come stay at Bart Island for five days after that.

McGraw, who is offering Alaska resident discounts, recommends booking multiple shorter stays at a couple of different properties to get a variety of experiences in a single trip.

Sitka just has it all, she said.

For more ways to experience Sitka like a local, check out VisitSitka.org.

Presented by Travel Alaska, encouraging you to Show Up for Alaska this summer! Whether its a quick trip to your favorite fishing spot or a new adventure in a corner of the state youve never explored, Alaskas small tourism businesses offer something for everyone -- and every budget. Browse summer travel opportunities and specials for Alaska residents at ShowUpForAlaska.com.

This story was produced by the creative services department of the Anchorage Daily News in collaboration with Travel Alaska. The ADN newsroom was not involved in its production.

Excerpt from:

This summer in Sitka: All the magic, none of the crowds - Anchorage Daily News

COVID-19 free? Go on holiday to these countries – The CEO Magazine

Tourists with a COVID-19 negative certificate issued up to 96 hours prior to the flight can now enter Dubai

By Ian Horswill

Posted on July 17, 2020

The thought of a holiday back in April and May seemed non-existent. Now there are luxury holiday destinations that beckon providing you can prove you do not carry the coronavirus.

Dubai

Tourists with a COVID-19 negative certificate issued up to 96 hours prior to the flight can enter Dubai in the United Arab Emirates. There are pristine beaches, amazing shopping experiences, luxurious resorts and the usual warm Arabian hospitality. Face masks are necessary in public spaces.

Aruba

Tourists with a COVID-19 negative certificate issued up to 72 hours prior to the flight can enter the idyllic Aruba, an island of the Netherlands in the southern Caribbean Sea. An online ED card is mandatory for all visitors to Aruba before boarding to fly to the island.

Aruba has a dry climate and an arid desert, with divi-divi trees, palm trees and cacti-strewn across the landscape. This climate has helped tourism as visitors to the island can reliably expect warm, sunny clear skies all year-round. January through to March is the peak season.

Salmon pink flamingos strut along Flamingo Beach on the Renaissance Hotels private island. The island is only a short boat ride away from the capital, Oranjestad, but youll need a day pass to access the island unless youre a paying guest.

Egypt

Almost 10,000 tourists visited Sharm El-Sheikh and Hurghada since the resumption of Egypts tourism at the beginning of July.

Egypts Ministry of Tourism and Antiquities said the two Red Sea cities had received 56 flights from Kiev, Zaporizhia, Lafif, and Kharkiv in Ukraine; Minsk in Belarus; Zurich in Switzerland; and from the Hungarian capital Budapest.

Also, Sharm El-Sheikh and Hurghada received three flights coming from Ukraine and Belarus with 587 tourists on board.

Egypt has also reopened Marsa Matrouh, which overlooks the Mediterranean Sea. Face masks are mandatory in public places in Egypt.

The Bahamas

The Bahamas, with its 700 islands sprinkled over 100,000 square miles of ocean, reopened its international borders on 1 July. It requires all arrivals present a negative COVID-19 test that is less than seven days old. Those without proof will have to pay for a test on arrival or quarantine for two weeks.

The Bahamas is one of the richest countries in the Americas (following the US and Canada), with an economy based on tourism and offshore finance. The best island in the Bahamas where you can spend your holiday really depends on the type of trip you are planning to do.

There are islands and cays which work great for families, others for couples, others for activities. New Providence is the most popular destination and Grand Bahama and the Out Islands are the best options.

Bermuda

Bermuda began welcoming back visitors on July 1, requiring arrivals to test negative for coronavirus at least 48 hours prior to their trip and again upon arrival in order to gain freedom of movement throughout their stay.

Bermuda, an island in the North Atlantic Ocean, consists of 181 islands, with the largest known as Main Island. Unlike other areas designated as subtropical, summers are quite mild, with temperatures not rising in most years above 86F (30C) during the hottest months of July and August.

French Polynesia

French Polynesia is open to international tourists and the first flight arrived in Tahiti from France on Wednesday, with a second from Los Angeles on Thursday. Before embarking on the flight, passengers had to prove they were COVID-19 negative 72 hours before departure and have to self-test for COVID-19 in four days.

An estimated 3,000 visitors are expected in French Polynesia by the end of this month, with a further 7,000 visitors expected in August coinciding with Frances summer holiday.

Saint Lucia

The sovereign island of Saint Lucia in the West Indies, on 9 July, introduced updated travel protocols requiring visitors to obtain a negative COVID-19 test within seven days of travel unless they are traveling from the governments designated travel bubble, which includes the following countries: Antigua, Barbuda, Aruba, Anguilla, Bahamas, Barbados, Bermuda, Bonaire, British Virgin Islands, Curacao, Dominica, Grenada, Guyana, Jamaica, Monsterrat, Saint Barthelemy, Saint Kitts and Nevis, Saint Martin, Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, Trinidad and Tobago and Turks and Caicos.

Upon arrival, all arriving passengers will be screened, with temperature checks at the airport. Any symptomatic passengers will be isolated and tested; they will be required to remain in isolation at their hotel or government-operated quarantine facility until their test results are obtained if positive, they will be transferred to a treatment facility until they receive two negative test results and are clinically stable.

Likely reopening to tourists: Bali, Indonesia, July 31; Hawaii, US, August 1.

Follow this link:

COVID-19 free? Go on holiday to these countries - The CEO Magazine