2 immunotherapies merged into single, more effective treatment – Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis

Visit the News Hub

Mouse study suggests strategy may work against variety of cancers

Researchers at Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis have combined two types of immunotherapy into a single treatment that may be more effective and possibly safer than current immunotherapies for blood cancers. Shown is a type of immune cell called a memory-like natural killer cell (right) attacking a leukemia cell (left). In the new study, the researchers modified the natural killer cells to help them find the leukemia cells more effectively.

Some of the most promising advances in cancer treatment have centered on immunotherapies that rev up a patients immune system to attack cancer. But immunotherapies dont work in all patients, and researchers have been searching for ways to increase their effectiveness.

Now, researchers at Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis have combined two immunotherapy strategies into a single therapy and found, in studies in human cells and in mice, that the two together are more effective than either alone in treating certain blood cancers, such as leukemia. Evidence also suggests that the new approach could be safer than one of the most recent cellular immunotherapies to be approved by the FDA, called CAR-T cell therapy, in which the immune systems T cells are engineered to target tumor cells. Cell-based immunotherapies are most commonly used against blood cancers but can be harnessed against some solid tumors as well, such as prostate and lung tumors and melanoma.

The study appears online in the journal Blood.

In the new research, the scientists have harnessed the technology used to engineer CAR-T cells and, instead of modifying specialized immune cells called T cells, they have used similar technology to alter different immune cells called natural killer (NK) cells. The resulting immunotherapy combines the benefits of both strategies and may reduce the side effects that are sometimes seen in CAR-T cell therapy. In some patients, for example, CAR-T cell therapy causes a cytokine storm, a life-threatening overreaction of the immune system.

Immunotherapies show great promise for cancer therapy, but we need to make them more effective and more safe for more patients, said co-senior author Todd A. Fehniger, MD, PhD, a professor of medicine. This combined approach builds on the treatment strategy that we developed for leukemia patients using natural killer cells. We can supercharge natural killer cells to enhance their ability to attack cancer cells. And at the same time, we can use the genetic engineering approaches of CAR cell therapy to direct the natural killer cells to a tumor target that would normally be overlooked by NK cells. It fundamentally changes the types of cancer that NK cells could be used to treat, both additional blood cancers and potentially solid tumors as well.

In past work, Fehniger and his colleagues showed that they could collect a patients own NK cells, expose the cells to a specific recipe of chemical signals that prime the cells to attack tumors, and then return the primed cells to patients for therapy. This chemical exposure is a sort of basic training for the cells, according to the investigators, preparing the NK cells to fight the cancer. When the cells are then returned to the body, they remember their training, so to speak, and are more effective at targeting the tumor cells. Because their training has given the NK cells a memory of what to do when they encounter tumor cells, the researchers dubbed them memory-like NK cells.

In small clinical trials conducted at Siteman Cancer Center at Barnes-Jewish Hospital and Washington University School of Medicine, such cells were effective in putting some patients with leukemia into a lasting remission, but they didnt work for everyone. Some tumor cells still evaded the memory-like NK cells, despite the cells basic training. To help the cells find the tumor cells, so their basic training can kick in and kill the correct target, the researchers modified the memory-like NK cells with the same CAR (chimeric antigen receptor) molecule that is typically used to target T cells to tumor cells. The CAR molecule is flexible and can be modified to direct the cells to different tumor types, depending on the proteins on the surfaces of the cancer cells.

The resulting hybrid cells were more effective in treating mice with leukemia than memory-like NK cells alone, leading to longer survival for mice treated with CAR memory-like NK cells. The researchers also found the therapy to be effective despite the fact that the mice were given relatively low doses of the cells.

One aspect of this study I find most exciting is how nicely these hybrid NK cells expand in the mice to respond to their tumors, said co-senior author Melissa Berrien-Elliott, PhD, an instructor in medicine. We can provide a tiny dose and see an incredible amount of tumor control. To me, this highlights the potency of these cells, as well as their potential to expand once in the body, which is critical for translating these findings to the clinic.

Fehniger also pointed out that an advantage of NK cells in general and for biological reasons that the scientists are still working to understand NK cells dont trigger a dangerous immune response or the long-term side effects that T-cell therapy can cause in attacking the patients healthy tissues, a condition called graft-versus-host disease.

In all of the clinical trials exploring any type of NK cells, we dont see the troublesome side effects of cytokine release syndrome or neurotoxicity that we see with CAR-T cells that can profoundly affect patients, Fehniger said. These side effects can be life-threatening and require intensive care. Were still working to understand how NK cells are different. But if you can get the benefits of CAR-T cells with few if any of the side effects, thats a reasonable line of research to pursue. Another benefit of this safer therapy is the potential to give these cells to patients at an earlier stage in their disease, rather than using them as a last resort.

Other groups have developed CAR-NK cells, but a major difference is that other groups NK cells came from donated cord blood or induced stem cells, rather than adult donors or the patients themselves.

The other groups have artificially differentiated stem cells into something that resembles an NK cell, Fehniger said. With that strategy, theres no guarantee that those cells will have all the properties of typical mature NK cells. In contrast, were starting with adult NK cells, so were more confident that they will have all the inherent properties and behavior of adult NK cells, which we have already shown to be effective in certain types of cancer patients, especially those with leukemia. Inducing memory properties adds to their persistence and effectiveness against many cancer types.

Over the next several years, we would like to be able to scale up this process to produce enough cells for a first-in-human clinical trial, and investigate their effectiveness in different types of human blood cancers, he said.

This work was supported by the Howard Hughes Medical Institute; the National Institutes of Health (NIH), grant numbers F32CA200253, T32HL00708843, K12CA167540 and R01CA205239; and a NIH SPORE in Leukemia, grant number P50CA171063. Additional funding was provided by the Siteman Cancer Center through NIH grant number P30CA091842; the Leukemia and Lymphoma Society; the V Foundation for Cancer Research; the Childrens Discovery Institute at Washington University School of Medicine; the Jamie Erin Follicular Lymphoma Research Fund; and the Steinback Fund.

Berrien-Elliott and Fehniger are inventors on patents related to this study that have been filed by Washington University. Fehniger has received research support from ImmunityBio, Compass Therapeutics, and HCW Biologics, and advises Kiadis, Nkarta, Indapta, and Orca Biosystems. Other authors report serving as a consultant for Kiowa Hakka Kirin and C4 Therapeutics; receiving research funding from Bristol Myers-Squibb, Verastem Pharmaceuticals, Innate Pharmaceuticals, Genentech/Roche, Celgene, and Corvus Pharmaceuticals; having direct ownership of equity in and a consultancy with Wugen; serving on the consulting/advisory committee for Rivervest, Bioline, Amphivena and Bluebird, Celegene, Incyte, NeoImuneTech, and Macrogenics and ownership investment in Magenta and WUGEN.

Gang M, Marin ND, Wong P, Neal CC, Marsala L, Foster M, Schappe T, Meng W, Tran J, Schaettler M, Davila M, Gao F, Cashen AF, Bartlett NL, Mehta-Shah N, Kahl BS, Kim MY, Cooper ML, DiPersio JF, Berrien-Elliott MM, Fehniger TA. CAR-modified memory-like NK cells exhibit potent responses to NK-resistant lymphomas. Blood. July 2, 2020.

Washington University School of Medicines 1,500 faculty physicians also are the medical staff of Barnes-Jewish and St. Louis Childrens hospitals. The School of Medicine is a leader in medical research, teaching and patient care, ranking among the top 10 medical schools in the nation by U.S. News & World Report. Through its affiliations with Barnes-Jewish and St. Louis Childrens hospitals, the School of Medicine is linked to BJC HealthCare.

Read this article:

2 immunotherapies merged into single, more effective treatment - Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis

LIttered with progress – Fence Post

The other day on the internet, I saw an old commercial of a semi truck that had these words painted on the side: JONNY KAT, KITTY LITTER. For some reason that had a profound affect on me. Imagine a semi full of kitty litter! 40,000 pounds of scented, colored, and packaged cat box contents!

That has to say something about our affluent society, about the shape of our civilization. Some of our past inventions are quite practical and ingenious. The self-sealing, puncture proof tire, mercury lights, insecticide ear tags, microwave ovens, the Salk vaccine, four wheel drive, frozen orange juice and boxed beef. Pistachio tree roots are susceptible to certain kinds of root rot. But peach tree roots are more resistant. So the pistachio growers graft pistachio trunks onto peach tree roots. Clever.

Consider how much artificial insemination has done to improve the quality of our livestock production. Genetic engineering is space age technology.

But sometimes when we strive to achieve we go off the deep end. Take the cell phone. When they first appeared on the scene they were expensive, heavy and required two hands to operate. Now you can get a disposable one with a camera that adds, subtracts, calculates square roots, tells you the time in Singapore, wakes you up, plays you a tune, gives you the weather and news, takes your pulse, calendars all your events and reminds you of them all, and controls all appliances in your house! What Id like to find is a cell phone that gives me more hours in a day!

And speaking of rotting edges affluence, how about aerosol cheese spread? I thought plastic wrapped, individual cheese slices were pretty decadent but you can also foam it onto your crackers like shaving cream.

Yep, weve surrounded ourselves with creations that have gone a step beyond their original purpose; fender skirts, square headlights and veterinarians with PhDs. Some might even include Pekingese, Chihuahua or Appaloosa in that group but I know how sensitive animal breeders are so I certainly wouldnt include them. Obviously our adventures into the extreme or entertaining are useful. We learn and perfect by doing.

Well, my digital ballpoint pen is playing Mammas Dont Let Your Babies Grow Up To Be Cowboys, so I guess its time to brush my teeth and hit the sack. I hope the batteries are still charged in my computerized flosser.

Read more:

LIttered with progress - Fence Post

Oregon sues US agencies over protest arrests; what gave feds authority to intervene? – ABA Journal

Constitutional Law

By Debra Cassens Weiss

July 20, 2020, 11:00 am CDT

Image from Shutterstock.com.

Oregon Attorney General Ellen Rosenblum alleged in a lawsuit Friday that federal agencies dispatched to Portland, Oregon, demonstrations are violating protesters constitutional rights.

The lawsuit says federal officers are driving in unmarked vehicles, wearing military fatigues with patches marked police and detaining protesters without stating a reason.

The Washington Post, the Oregonian and Oregon Public Broadcasting have stories; a press release is here.

Defendants are injuring the occupants of Portland by taking away citizens ability to determine whether they are being kidnapped by militia or other malfeasants dressed in paramilitary gear (such that they may engage in self-defense to the fullest extent permitted by law) or are being arrested (such that resisting might amount to a crime), the suit says.

The suit cites the July 15 detention of Mark Pettibone, who says he was confronted by armed men dressed in camouflage, pushed into a van, placed in a cell and read his Miranda rights. He was released without any paperwork or record of his arrest, the suit says.

The suit alleges violations of the First Amendment right to protest racial inequality, the Fourth Amendment right against unreasonable seizures and the Fifth Amendment right to due process.

Defendants in the suit are the U.S. Department of Homeland Security, the U.S. Marshals Service, U.S. Customs and Border Protection and the Federal Protective Service.

The agents were sent to Portland to protect federal property as a result of an executive order signed by President Donald Trump, the New York Times reports. Officials cited the Homeland Security Act of 2002, which gives Customs and Border Protection the authority to deputize federal agents to help the Federal Protective Service protect federal property.

Other federal laws allow arrests away from federal property if a federal crime is committed, Peter Vincent, former principal legal adviser for U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, told the New York Times.

Homeland Securitys authorities are so extraordinarily broad that they can find federal laws that they are authorized to enforce across the spectrum, so long as it has some national security, public safety, human trafficking, criminal street gang conspiracy, Vincent said.

Usually, federal agents are sent to a local jurisdiction in response to a request by officials there; Portlands mayor and Oregons governor oppose federal intervention.

The suit seeks an injunction requiring federal agents to identify themselves and their agency before detaining or arresting any protester, to explain the reason for the detention or arrest, and to stop making arrests without probable cause or a warrant.

The American Civil Liberties Union Foundation of Oregon also took legal action Friday by adding federal agencies as defendants to a suit filed against local law enforcement on behalf of journalists and legal observers, according to a press release.

A federal judge has already blocked local law enforcement from dispersing, arresting, threatening to arrest or using physical force against journalists or legal observers at protests. The suit asks the judge to expand the order to block those actions by federal agents.

The rest is here:

Oregon sues US agencies over protest arrests; what gave feds authority to intervene? - ABA Journal

Can use of force restrictions change police behavior? Heres what we know – PBS NewsHour

The phrase I cant breathe used by both Eric Garner and George Floyd in their fatal encounters with police has become a rallying cry for a nationwide movement demanding an end to excessive use of force by police.

In the wake of Floyds death, there has been a renewed call from reform advocates to restrict police use of force. But measuring the impact of different restrictions can be complicated, making it hard to get a clear picture of whether they are effective. Some officers have also expressed concern that significant limitations may jeopardize their safety or prevent them from doing their jobs effectively.

Some cities are proposing additional regulations to their use of force policies. Others are implementing trainings on bias or de-escalation. President Donald Trump issued an executive order on policing last month that calls for a federal database to track incidents of excessive use of force. Two pieces of legislation introduced in Congress, also in June one by House Democrats and another by Senate Republicans sought to limit chokeholds and encourage different training and alternatives to force.

Researchers said that what the country knows about how police use force, as well as the success of proposals to reduce it, is limited. What is considered an unnecessary use of force can be different from department to department. Federal and state data tracking use of force is lacking, and the quality of policies and training what skills or techniques they emphasize also varies.

The U.S. has more than 12,000 local law enforcement agencies, and none are required to report use of force incidents to the Justice Department.

In recent years, the federal government has made efforts to collect more data on police use of force, but participation is voluntary. The FBIs National Use-of-Force Data Collection project, launched in 2019, received submissions from 40 percent of police agencies. The findings of the information gathered so far have not yet been published.

Most states do not have a standardized system for police departments to report use of force, said Seth Stoughton, an associate professor of law at the University of South Carolina who worked as a police officer in Florida for five years.

We really dont have any comprehensive data federally or at a state level, Stoughton said, adding that the available federal data is wildly inaccurate. The most comprehensive tracking of police use of force or fatal encounters do not come from the federal government, he said, but rather from journalists.

In 2015, the Washington Post began tracking fatal shootings by on-duty police officers across the country. Between 2015 and 2020, the Post found more than 5,000 fatal officer-involved shootings. But not every fatal encounter involves a shooting, as exhibited in the cases of Garner and Floyd.

MORE: Why police unions are so powerful and what that means for reform

A report from the Guardian found that police killed 1,093 people in 2016, of whom 1,011 died of gunshot wounds. Another comprehensive database, by NJ Advance Media, tracked five years worth of use-of-force reports 72,677 in total from every local police department in New Jersey. Among the projects findings: Ten percent of police officers accounted for 38 percent of all instances of use of force.

These three investigations do not assess whether force was justified in any of the cases.

Research indicates that of the roughly 60 million police-civilian encounters in the U.S. each year, about 1.8 percent may involve use of force, Stoughton said, but states and departments do not have uniform definitions of force and what interactions officers are required to report. Lower level uses of force like a shove or tackle to the ground are more likely to go unreported, Stoughton said.

The variation between police jurisdictions underscores the need for a national database to provide a centralized way to identify and compare trends, said Kami Chavis, a professor and director of the criminal justice program at Wake Forest University School of Law.

Demonstrators walk towards the White House and away from the U.S. Capitol Building during a protest against the death in Minneapolis police custody of George Floyd, in Washington, U.S., June 6, 2020. Picture taken June 6, 2020. Photo by Lucas Jackson/Reuters.

Researchers who spoke with the NewsHour said disparities exist in how police use force against people from different racial groups, but measuring these differences is complicated. Many studies analyze police killings against nationwide Census data, while some try to account for crime rates in a particular area.

The Washington Post report found that fatal police shooting rates were twice as high among Black Americans as they were among white Americans, and Hispanic Americans had the second highest rate of fatal police encounters. An analysis from The Guardian found that in 2016 police killed Native Americans at the highest rates (10.13 per million people), followed by Black people (6.66 per million). The rate for Latino people was 3.23 per million, and 2.9 per million for white people. The NJ Advance Media investigation concluded that statewide in New Jersey, a Black person was more than three times more likely to face police use of force. And a 2019 national study from university researchers found that Black people are 2.5 times more likely than white people to be killed by police.

One Bureau of Justice Statistics survey determined that in 2015, reported rates of nonfatal threats or uses of force were also higher for Black and Hispanic people 3.3 percent and 3.0 percent, respectively compared to 1.3 percent for white people.

But its hard to measure racial disparities, in part because every case has a unique set of circumstances, said Robin Engel, director of the International Association of Chiefs of Police/University of Cincinnati Center for Police Research and Policy. Simply taking the total number of Black people killed by police and comparing it to their overall population size is not a good comparison because it removes the situational factors that may play a role in the use of force, Engel said.

Im not claiming that [racial disparities] are not real. They are. Its very clear there are racial and ethnic disparities, Engel said. But the reasons for those disparities is what we really need to better understand as social scientists so that we can better inform the solutions.

One of the strongest predictors of whether police use force is civilian resistance, she said. Use of force is also more likely when officers are engaged in enforcement activities like making an arrest, Stoughton said. However, these predictors do not speak to different reasons people of color might be more likely to encounter an officer in the first place.

Its very clear there are racial and ethnic disparities, but the reasons for those disparities is what we really need to better understand as social scientists.

These reasons can include disparate decision making in how police are assigned to different neighborhoods, as well as whether and why people choose to call the police, Stoughton said. Incidents of Black people having the police called on them while sleeping on their university campuses, barbecuing and birdwatching, among other activities, have gained national attention. Numerous high-profile cases of police killings also involve Black people who were unarmed and engaged in nonviolent, low-level offenses.

Some of this behavior can be explained by racial bias, said Jennifer Eberhardt, a Stanford University psychologist and leading researcher on the science of bias. In a series of studies, she found that a group of police officers and a group of graduate students were each more likely to associate Black faces rather than white faces with images and words related to crime, such as knives or guns.

One California police chief told the NewsHour he believes racial disparities can be a problem in policing, but added that officers face a difficult task when making split second decisions about whether to investigate a potential crime or to walk away.

Ultimately its about communicating the role the police have and the job of trying to maintain public safety, said John Perez, chief of the Pasadena Police Department and research fellow with the National Police Foundation.

To assist with this goal, Perezs department began working with a nonprofit in 2018 called Whyd You Stop Me, which seeks to foster positive civilian-police interactions by dispelling misconceptions about police to the community and training officers to understand community issues.

A memorial to George Floyd, who died after a white Minneapolis police officer pressed his knee into his neck on May 25, is lit by morning light one month later in Minneapolis, Minnesota, U.S. June 25, 2020. Photo by REUTERS/Nicholas Pfosi

Currently, 36 states have laws regulating lethal and non-lethal force, Stoughton and other researchers wrote in a piece for The Atlantic. More than three-quarters of those statutes were adopted in the 1970s, and most have not been amended recently, according to their findings.

For states without statutes, courts have the discretion to interpret use of force cases. Courts often evaluate use of force by referring to the Fourth Amendment, which is meant to regulate seizures, Stoughton said.

In recent years, some police departments and states have moved to limit officers use of force. One notable example is Cincinnati, which entered into an agreement with the Justice Department in 2002 that mandated sweeping changes to the citys police department, including restrictions on use of force. Engels research found that between 1999 and 2014, Cincinnati saw a 69 percent decline in police use-of-force incidents, a 56 percent reduction in citizen injuries during police encounters and a 42 percent decrease in citizen complaints

The city of Camden, New Jersey, dissolved and rebuilt its police force in 2014. In 2019, Camden police adopted an 18-page policy that emphasized de-escalation and authorized deadly force only as a last resort.

It started with two real principles that were laid as the cornerstones for how we would use force. One is that the sanctity of human life underpins everything that we do, Scott Thomson, the citys police chief until 2019, told the PBS NewsHour Weekends Hari Sreenivasan. We review every incident of force thats used with multiple layers of review from first line supervisor to the commander, to an internal affair review to the training unit review.

Camden found that civilian excessive force complaints declined by 95 percent from a peak of 65 complaints in 2014 to three complaints in 2019.

After the 2018 police shooting death of Stephon Clark, a 22-year-old Black man, California enacted one of the countrys strictest use-of-force laws, which only allows police to use deadly force in the necessary defense of the officers or another persons life. That same year, Pasadena police chief Perez implemented a 30-day review requirement for all use of force incidents in his department, which he said allows them to more quickly identify and discuss potentially unnecessary use of force incidents. Between 2018 and 2020, Perez said the number of use of force incidents decreased by 50 percent.

Tennessee, Delaware and Iowa also have laws that require officers to exhaust other reasonable means before using deadly force. And in the weeks since George Floyds death, several states and cities have moved to make changes such as banning chokeholds or no-knock warrants, Chavis of Wake Forest said.

Now is the time for a meaningful change so that no one, especially black men and women, has to ever again think that could have been me, Isaiah McKinnon, a retired chief of the Detroit Police Department, wrote in a USA Today piece that recounted his experience being stopped by one of his own officers.

READ MORE: Body cameras are seen as key to police reform. But do they increase accountability?

But a policy change is one of many things that may affect officer behavior, and may not change the rate of fatal encounters, Stoughton said. For example, he pointed out that the available data between 2015 and 2018 suggests officers killed more people per capita in Tennessee (about 3.6 per million people) than in Florida (2.9 per million), a state that gives broad authorization for officers to use deadly force.

Evidence indicates that in order for administrative policies to change officer behavior, the policy must clearly dictate what officers can and cannot do, must be widely communicated, and must be enforced, said Michael White, a professor at Arizona State Universitys School of Criminology and Criminal Justice.

Police disperse protesters rallying against the death in Minneapolis police custody of George Floyd, in Portland, Oregon, U.S. June 13, 2020. Picture taken June 13. REUTERS/Terray Sylvester

A 2016 report by the Use of Force Project looked at 91 police departments and assessed eight different force-related policies various departments had in place. Among these, the report found the policies most effective at reducing police-involved killings were those that require comprehensive reporting of when officers use force (25 percent reduction), those that require officers to exhaust all other reasonable means before using a firearm (25 percent reduction), and those that ban chokeholds and strangleholds (22 percent reduction).

The report found that police departments that had implemented four or more of the eight policies had 37 percent fewer police-involved killings than those with zero or one policy in place, and that departments with all eight policies in place would kill 72 percent fewer people, on average, between 2015 and 2016.

When it comes to bias or de-escalation training, research on their efficacy is virtually non-existent. Over the last decade police departments have shown a growing interest in both styles of training to mitigate use of force or address racial disparities. As of 2017, 16 states required officers to have de-escalation training, according to American Public Media, eight of which enacted the policies after the 2014 shooting of Michael Brown in Ferguson, Missouri. A CBS News report found that 57 percent of 155 police departments it contacted had implemented racial bias training in the five years since Browns death.

In January of this year, Engel and other researchers published a systematic review of studies that look at the effectiveness of de-escalation training. And do you know how many we found for policing? None, Engel said. Not one study had been conducted to examine the impact of de-escalation training on officer attitudes or behavior.

Of the 64 studies examining de-escalation training for other industries like nursing and psychiatry, Engel said the quality of the methodology was not strong, but the findings showed slight-to-moderate individual and organizational improvements as a result of the training. Based on this and anecdotal evidence, theres reason to be optimistic about de-escalation training, Engel said.

READ MORE: How a VP with law enforcement experience could help Biden win over moderate voters

On bias, theres hardly any study on the effectiveness of training, Eberhardt said. Furthermore, she said, evidence indicates that simply becoming aware of a bias does not change behavior.

The composition and quality of the training varies, said Lorie Fridell, CEO of Fair and Impartial Policing, a company that has provided bias training to officers in New York City, Baton Rouge, Louisiana, Arlington, Texas and others. For Eberhardt, the most effective programs look to disrupt circumstances that may trigger bias. Fridell said her focus isnt about eliminating bias but instead managing bias. Both strategies may involve prompting police to ask certain questions of themselves to figure out why they are engaging a particular civilian.

Rather than simply informing people about the conditions under which bias is most likely to occur, we should be actually working to change those conditions, Eberhardt said.

Fridell said the attitudes of officers in her companys bias training range somewhere between defensive and outright hostile. But when she approaches bias as a human and societal problem rather than just a police problem, they become much more receptive, she said.

Bias and de-escalation training has received more broad support from law enforcement and lawmakers, but officers have voiced frustration over use-of-force restrictions and disciplinary action taken against them for using force. In 2019, the Crime and Justice Institute released a report on focus groups conducted with police officers in Baltimore. The summary said officers fear and believe that too many documented uses of force will be used as evidence against them and result in disciplinary action, a criminal investigation, or restrict reassignment and advancement within the department. It added that the officers said they felt less safe on the job and apprehensive about when to use force.

Perez of the Pasadena Police Department said he respects the Black Lives Matter movements calls for reform but he also understands some of the anxieties officers may have regarding strict limitations. Rigid policies that dont take into account the challenges of policing could make officers hesitate to take actions to protect themselves during a confrontation, Perez said. It could go too far, Perez said. It requires so much more discussion to make the changes that we need. We have to get the empirical evidence and look at it to protect the young officers who are working in the streets.

Advocates, however, continue to push forward with proposals for sweeping systemic changes. As conversations about policing continue, Eberhardt said, it will take more than training or restrictions on excessive use of force, but they are an important start, she said. Its about addressing the entire context under which these police-civilian interactions occur.

See original here:

Can use of force restrictions change police behavior? Heres what we know - PBS NewsHour

5 Best Online Poker Sites for Real Money (2020)

The US online poker for real money scene continues to grow, and a number of fantastic poker sites for real money games are now available to play here. There are many to choose from, but this article will focus on only a few of the best US friendly poker sites available right now.

One of the best poker sites for US players is BetOnline (click for a $1,000 bonus). Since this sites creation in 2009, BetOnline has grown to become one of the most popular internet poker websites in the world with a huge user base and some of the best tournaments available.

Players here have the option to play instantly online or download the software for a bigger selection of games. Their design is simple and offers a live chat feature that helps customers with any questions they might have.

You cant make a list of the top US poker sites without mentioning the highly popular Ignition Casino (click here for a $2000 bonus). It was formed as a replacement for Bovada and strives to offer members the same high-quality gaming experience that its predecessor did.

Many members of Ignition praise the website for their highly functioning mobile platform. Despite the huge number of mobile poker fans, many of the best poker sites in the USA still do not offer a great way to play through a phone. Ignition Casino took notice of this and now offer all of their games on both iOS and Android devices.

Intertops is known as one of the most popular internet sportsbooks in the world, and in more recent years has become one of the best online poker sites for US players. Much like their sports betting platform, Intertops poker (click for $1000 bonus) games for real money offers players a simple and safe way to play a wide range of different poker games for real money.

What makes Intertops one of the best US poker sites for real money is their huge list of amazing offers for both new and existing customers. One of the most popular bonuses right now is the refer-a-friend bonus, which offers a $50 cash reward to any member that helps a friend sign up. There is also an incredible 200% welcome bonus up to $1,000 for new members with a minimum sign-up deposit of $25.

The welcome bonus at Bovada might be enough to list them as one of the best online poker sites US players can access, but in reality, its their massive list of different games and fantastic tournaments that put them at the top of the list.

New players are eligible for a 100% bonus up to $2,500 on their first deposit. Additionally, this amazing site offers a huge number of games including the Bad Beat Jackpot tables, offering some of the biggest jackpots you can find today.

Each of these sites is available to US players right now and are special for a number of different reasons. If youre looking for some great bonuses and a massive list of different games, check them out today and find out for yourself why they have become so popular with US poker for real money fans.

See the original post:

5 Best Online Poker Sites for Real Money (2020)

Best 7 Online Poker Sites (2020) for Real Money

If youre a poker player and you want to make money, then you need to find the fish. Most players randomly play poker online, not even thinking about what kind of competition theyre going to be up against. This is a real error.

Half of todays game is to seek and destroy. If you want to play online poker for real money, then you need to go to the sites that have the most traffic. By doing so, youre going to find the largest pool of players. When you find the largest pool of players, you will find the most fish or the softest poker game. Lets take a look at where to find the most fish.

The best places to play poker online for real money are Ignition, Bovada, and Intertops.

Ignition attracts a lot of players because you can win 1,000 times your buy-in in a short period of time in a tournament. They will also run a tournament series from time to time in order to attract new players. These new players are often recreational. If you want to take advantage of someone who will be willing to call your all-in with AJ-off while youre holding AA, then you might want to play poker for real money on Ignition. It is considered one of the best online sites because of all the fish swimming around.

Ignition might be one of the best online poker sites for US players, but Bovada can sure give it a run for its money. Bovada has an advantage because it has been around since 2004. Therefore, it has the most US players of all poker online sites. Bovada is also known for having the fastest payouts, which might make it the best online poker sites US players. Americans love money, and they want their money fast. They can find that at Bovada.

If you love Monster Stack tournaments and youre seeking online poker real money, this is the place to go. You will find the game you want at 7 a.m., 7:00 p.m., and 7:30 p.m. All of those are Daily Monster Stack tournaments. This is a limited-time event, but you can safely bet that something similar will launch right around the corner on this poker online site. Bovada likes to take care of its players. Therefore, if the Daily Monster Stack tournaments are a success, they will bring it back or do something similar in the near future.

Intertops is a bit different. If youre seeking a cash game, otherwise known as a ring game, then this is where you want to go. Cash game players tend to play online all day and/or night. Its difficult not to do so if you know what youre doing and your opponents dont. When it comes to ring games, this is one of the top sites out there. Intertops also offers freerolls and sit & go tournaments.

The online game is a bit different than the live game. You see a lot more hands per hour online and people tend to be more aggressive. They also tend to make looser calls. This is because theyre hidden behind a screen and wont be embarrassed like they would in a live setting. This is a tremendous advantage for a patient player. You dont even need to bluff. With the online game, you can be the biggest NIT in the world and still make money. Just sit back and wait for an opponent to make an error. Then start counting your money.

See original here:

Best 7 Online Poker Sites (2020) for Real Money

Josh & Heather Altman Threw Son Ace an Adorable Poker-Themed 1st Birthday Bash – Bravo

Exclusive

Josh and Heather Altman Give a Tour of "Lexi's Backyard"

With a name like Ace, a poker-themed party seems to be... well, in the cards. So when their son turned 1year old, Heather and Josh Altman seized upon the milestoneto host a festive barbecuethat was filled with Vegas-style flair.

Both Million Dollar Listing Los Angelesparents shared photos from the bash on Instagram. "We celebrated Aces 1st Birthday this weekend with our family having a good ol fashion BBQ and pool party with the cousins," mama Heather wrote. "Of course, we themed it up as a poker theme in honor of Aces name inspiration and my Vegas roots."

In her photos, the Nevada nativeoffered a glimpse of the decor. There were black, red, and gold balloons from Sky Balloon Bar, as well as oversized dice and playing cards. Ace's big sister Lexi helped him blow out the candle on his first-ever cake, which had two tiers covered with edible poker chips, cards, and spades.

That cake was too elaborate to smash but Ace's parents also brought in the cutest, powder-blue confectionfor him to dig his little fists into. "The cake smash was epic and definitely Lexis favorite part," Josh wrote on his feed. "Best of all [was] celebrating health and happiness with family Altman BBQ style."

Get a taste of that BBQ swagger, below:

To seemore of the family's kid-friendly backyard, watch the clip above.

Bravos Style & Living is your window to the fabulous lifestyles of Bravolebrities. Be the first to know about all the best fashion and beauty looks, the breathtaking homes Bravo stars live in, everything theyre eating and drinking, and so much more. Sign up to become a Bravo Insider and get exclusive extras.

Read more:

Josh & Heather Altman Threw Son Ace an Adorable Poker-Themed 1st Birthday Bash - Bravo

Best 9 Online Poker Sites for Real Money 2020 – Bonus to …

If youre looking for online poker real money, there are a few options you can try out. These sites for online poker for real money range in variety, but one thing they all have in common is that they let you play poker for real money. Heres some information on these sites.

This online poker casino lets you play poker online for real money. Its consistently rated as one of the best online poker sites for US players. The reason why its rated as one of the best online poker sites US players is due to its various features. Some of the features it has included a 100% casino match bonus that goes up to $1000. This means that for every dollar you deposit, you get $1 in return from the site.

Its also known for having some strong developer companies behind the slot games. Realtime Gaming and Rival are considered by many to be among some of the best developers for slots in the business. Plus, you also have the option for adding Bitcoin to your deposit account, which is attractive to many people due to the fact that theres some anonymity to it and many people are happy with the security.

Bovada is a popular poker online location for people from the U.S. It has a lot of opportunities for real online poker options for making money. It started out in 2011, and it has a real email and phone contact info so that you know its legit. People love the racebook and sportsbook options along with casino options, all from the same account. Bovada actually appeals directly to US players and focuses exclusively on them. It gets excellent ratings online and has built up a reputation as a trusted organization.

You can deposit and withdraw funds easily from the site, minus a lot of the hassle that you may get with other sites. The Welcome Bonus is good up to $3750. Among the community for casinos on the Internet, it has a reputation for actually paying players who win quickly. This is critically important among an industry that often doesnt meet these high standards.

They have a huge number of games with over 150 casino games. You can cash out of the site in just 4 days, and it should never take longer than a week. They take a number of different credit cards, as well as Bitcoin and Bitcoin Cash.

Intertops also gets some strong reviews, especially in the area of sports betting. They are one of the longest-lasting games in town. They receive 4.5 out of 5 on many review sites, and many places indicate they have a strong performance when it comes to payments. There are apparently virtually no reports of them having a problem with not paying the people who won on their site.

They are also known as being a place that pays players quickly. On Intertops, you get up to a $200 sign up bonus. They have been running since 1996. They can handle just about everything from basketball to NFL, MLB and other types of bets. They also offer poker or casino bets.

The place has a lot of support for customers, and you can contact them on a variety of different platforms including through Skype, through live chat, email or on the phone. They take bitcoin, and the estimated payout time through Bitcoin is just 48 hours.Plus, if you dont speak English, they still have you covered. You can instead get support in Spanish, Danish, Chinese, Portuguese, and many other languages besides. Its all included.

This is an excellent chance to play poker online, and pick any online poker game you want. You can play poker online whenever you want here.

The rest is here:

Best 9 Online Poker Sites for Real Money 2020 - Bonus to ...

Inside the world of Daniel Negreanu: The life and making of poker’s biggest superstar – Mirror Online

As a teenager, Daniel Negreanu would visit the mall in his hometown of Toronto - but he wasnt there to buy clothes.

Instead, he was there simply to watch people walk by.

It was, in part, the making of a genius. He wouldnt realise it at the time, but by studying anyone and everyone who happened to enter his vision, Negreanu was mastering his craft.

When he took to the poker tables, it became his forte. He developed an almost subhuman ability to call his opponents hand, as he assessed his opponents body language on top of their betting patterns.

It would win him championships - six World Series of Poker bracelets, two World Poker Tour titles and over 32million in tournament winnings - and coupled with his quirky and bubbly personality which perfectly lent itself to the televised game, he soon became a true superstar of the felt.

When I was learning the game as a teenager, I just noticed patterns, Negreanu said.

To some people, it may sound a bit silly. Id sit on a bench for like an hour and I wouldnt say anything, and Id watch people walk by.

I would make up stories in my head about who they are. What they were like in high school, whether I liked them, whether I could trust them, would they be honest.

It wouldnt matter if I was wrong, it was just the case of seeing what I could pick up.

Negreanu ended up becoming a blockbuster star of the game he was introduced to by friends at his local snooker centre. He soon got the poker bug and would host private games in his basement, or even play in the cafeteria at school.

Those games were funded by a modest early working life: he was a telemarketer, but didnt like people hanging up on him so quit after one day, and had spells working in Subway sandwiches, as a dishwasher and as a bus boy.

I did a lot of those things in high school, just so I could have enough money to gamble at pool, or go to the pool hall, and eat and have a life, he said.

Those were the only jobs that I had but then as soon as poker took off for me, no more jobs existed.

Ultimately, Negreanu knew he was destined for the big time when he made his debut at the World Series of Poker in 1998. In his very first event, he took home over 130,000 and won a coveted bracelet, which remains the holy grail for players learning the game today.

While it was confirmation that he could compete at the very highest level, it would also prove to be a steep learning curve.

I was like woah, I have so much money, I could never lose this money ever and the two months later, it disappeared, he said.

I think the first one was when I won my bracelet in my first-ever event at the World Series of Poker in 1998. My bankroll went from like $2,000 to $150,000.

But then I started to stake the wrong people, I lent the wrong people money, a few of those things and then it was all gone.

So that was a life lesson of understanding that I had to treat this more like a business, I cant just do this loosey-goosey.

Fast forward 22 years and Negreanu is now content that he has achieved all of his early lifes goals. Primarily, he wanted enough money so he would never have to work by the time he was 30.

He lives with his wife, Amanda, on the outskirts of Las Vegas, in a house built to his dream specifications. He has a pool, a golf simulator, a state-of-the-art TV multi-screen system, video games, everything he needs.

He actively avoids going on lavish holidays and visiting the worlds flashiest places in favour of kicking back on the sofa.

And despite appearing to be a natural showman on the televised poker tables, Negreanu says that he prefers playing online poker in the comfort of his own company - and is currently playing this years World Series of Poker, which is being hosted online on GGPoker.

Contrary to popular belief, people make the assumption about me that I am an extrovert, he explained. I would say its the opposite. Im very introverted and so is my wife.

Introvert doesnt mean that you cant have fun and be socially engaging when you are out, it just means that when you are doing that, you are spending energy and it drains you.

When I am home and relaxed, that is my favourite thing in the world, I feel energised.

I find that a lot of people judge if you dont go out hiking and seeing nature, travel and all that stuff, people think youre not living, he said. If thats what you like to do, more power to you, go out on a hike, go travel.

Me and my wife love staying home. We love watching TV together, we love reading. What are you judging me for, because I am not living my life how you would do if you had money?

Were living a life as we designed it and as we want. Guess what, if we wanted to go out and go hiking, I can do that!

Throughout my career, I travelled so much for poker. I would travel to Atlantic City, LA, whatever for months at a time.

I would go to Europe for two straight months and I would see all these beautiful places, but they were always related to work. They were work trips.

I remember I would go to say, Barcelona, and people would ask me what it is like there and I would say I dont know, the hotel was nice and the room service was good because I didnt really experience it.

The truth is that the only two vacations Ive taken that were not poker related were my first honeymoon and my second honeymoon!

I am not a traveller. I much prefer staying at home. I feel that when Im at home, Im on a regular routine. I thoroughly enjoy that.

Vegas has proven the ideal base for Negreanu, because while the outskirts of the city overlooking the desert provide him the peace and quiet he craves, he does remain just a 15 minute drive from the strip.

It is down the famous Las Vegas Boulevard in the world famous Bellagio where you might be most likely to spot him.

The Bellagio is the venue of pokers most iconic high stakes environment: Bobbys Room. And thats the place where Negreanus world renowned status counts for nothing.

When you enter Bobbys Room, they dont care if you are Michael Jordan, Oprah Winfrey, Barack Obama. Youre just a person with money. So lets sit down, put your money down on the table and lets shoot the s*** as they would say!

There is no sense of awe with these guys. They are all killers themselves.

Negreanu came through a generation of iconic poker players. He would often brush shoulders with legends such as Phil Hellmuth, Tony G, Sammy Farha, Scotty Nguyen and Doyle Brunson.

But over the years, those names began to disappear from the limelight as they couldnt keep pace with the younger, online-centred generation who were rapidly evolving the game.

Except Negreanu.

The secret to success? Mindset.

If you get to the point where you think youre the best, and youve stopped learning and youve stopped working on your game - everyone else is still working really hard.

I have watched the Rocky movies a lot and there is this montage where Rocky Balboa is doing commercials, doing ads, but Clubber Lang is in the gym, hes working hard, sweat, blood and tears. What happens when Rocky fights him? Clubber Lang knocks him cold - because he was not prepared and not ready.

I always look at these young and up-and-comers and rather than think these kids have got nothing on me, I think what are these kids doing well? Is he better than me? And if he is, what is he doing so I can learn and be better?

I am constantly looking at my game, every six months to a year, looking if I am good enough and what do I need to be doing differently.

I think a lot of my generation has fallen off, because of an unwillingness to learn from them and they just chastise themselves.

So, what next for Negreanu? He actively admits that until this year's World Series of Poker, hes playing less than ever before - and his goal is now to create a version of himself that he is happier with.

I have done everything in my life and now I want to look the part, he explained as he talked through his decision to go through an extreme body transformation.

I have tried different things at different times, with varying degrees of success, but I found a really good coach, who is vegan and he put me on a good meal plan, a good workout plan, with a good mindset.

We went from 176lbs to 138lbs, which is a huge swing for someone of my size, but I feel great. Right now Im at 140 and the plan is to gain muscle over the next year.

I have always been someone who has been about self-improvement. I have always enjoyed working out, being on a plan, so it goes well with my way of thinking in life.

As for poker? When I was young, I had a clear goal in life in my early 20s, so that when Im in my 30s, I dont have to work, I can do whatever I want because I have enough money. And Ive accomplished that goal.

I play when I am inspired to play. I will play the high rollers, I will play the big tournaments, but outside of that, I have a pretty balanced life and it is not a case of burn out, because I still enjoy the game, but its just a case that I dont have to do it to put food on the table.

Visit link:

Inside the world of Daniel Negreanu: The life and making of poker's biggest superstar - Mirror Online

‘It’s time to walk away from Brexit trade talks’ – Readers on this weeks talking points – Telegraph.co.uk

'The EU needs to stick something on the table first'

@Owen Thomas:

"If you ask for the world in a negotiation, and then try and compromise by asking for half of it, it's clearly bonkers to then say because the other side isn't agreeing with that they are inflexible.

"Their demand on fishing is ridiculous. Could I see it negotiated away? Yes, but the EU needs to stick something on the table first, not expect us to give it away for nothing.

"We know how they operate. As soon as we give them a sniff of compromise they'd zero in on it, ignore everything else and then salami slice us. David Frost isn't dumb."

@Jeremy Friend:

"I thought MrFrost put it very well and succinctly. He pointed out that our stance on the ECJ, fisheries and the level playing field are not negotiating positions but the norm which an independent country owns. They cannot therefore be bartered away. They are not up for discussion and unless the EU accepts that, as they have with all other countries with whom they have a free trade agreement, there can be no agreement.

"It is not a 'bill' for the EU to accept or reject. It is a sine qua non of a country's independence and sovereignty."

Following the positive results from the trials at Oxford University, Celia Walden fearedthe influence thatanti-vaxxers have on social media and discussedhow the potential Covid-19 vaccine could be made compulsory if too many people refuse to be vaccinated. While a number of our readers agreed with Ms Walden, others weremore cautious about rushing a vaccine to market.

@Helen King:

Im very pro-vaccine, Ive had all my vaccinations and so have my children. But no, I will not be taking a rushed vaccine and will be advising my children not to either. Id rather take my chances with the virus than a vaccine that because ofits rushed nature, we will have no indications of its long-term effects.

The selfish ones are those who want to force others to have a vaccine. Anyway, the vaccine is still unlikely to happen, so its all a moot point anyway.

@Charles Cole:

That there are even people discussing the idea of a compulsory vaccine shows how far we have sunk. How utterly incredible. If people want to take a vaccine which has been rushed to market with extraordinary haste, let them. The state is here to serve us, not the other way around.

@Derek Smith:

Civilised society is an imperfect system but it's all we have, and depends on both rules and conditions that are deemed reasonable and sensible by the majority. Vaccination has allowed the human race to mostly overcome the mass casualties associated with densely populated towns and cities largely through compliance. Remove this and these dormant mass killing machines such as smallpox, measles, typhoid and ad infinitum will rear up and once again kill and maim, usually innocent children.

Ignoring vaccination protocols is ignorant, dangerous and downright stupid, if you want to ignore your societal responsibility jog off and do so on your own, live in your own bubble but do not use public schools, hospitals or any communal area as you are definitely not welcome.

Tom Welsh argued that many young people feel cut off from colleagues and the wider corporate context by working from home during lockdown. Our readers drew from their own experiences to debate both the advantages and disadvantages of working from home, with many agreeing that businesses should opt for a more flexible approach.

@Peter Jackson:

I used to live 1.5 miles from my office. Having a separate space to work from where I lived allowed me to work without distractions, when needed, and I could talk to people when needed. Gradually everyone else in my group started working from home. The office became a lonely place to be.

Working from home would have meant setting aside space in my flat for working and being alone all day. Even lonelier than the office.

There are advantages and disadvantages to working from home for bothemployeesand employers. It is hard to build a team if people aren't meeting, or to train someone remotely.

Businesses should be able to choose what suits them best. The employees can choose whether or not an employer offers home working as a factor when looking for work.

@Keith Badger:

There is nothing 'woke' about allowing people to work from home. I run a business where many functions that were office-based such as accounts, marketing, customer services and sales are now donefrom home.

People are happier and more productive than before, we have no issues with parking or a lack of office space. It's a win win as far as I'm concerned. I have given people the option of returning to work in the office if they so wish, but so far nobody has taken me up on that offer. Good for them.

@Able Archer:

Before lockdown, I worked from home twodays a week and wentinto the office three days a week. Seeing people at work is good for office camaraderie and meant we could interact informally.

Some of my colleagues chose to WFH permanently, which meant that they seemed detached from the rest of us and were more likely to be left out of the loop on small matters.

It can also be very lonely sitting at home all day. Not everyone has the ideal home, some of us are stuck in small flats with poor sound insulation. We were created as social beings to interact with each other. Talking at someone down a screen with a slight time delay is not proper social interaction.

@Jay Bee:

A 'blended working' solution will become the norm after this something like two days a week in the office, three days at home.

Companies who aim to return to inflexible in-office work routines, will haemorrhage staff and fail. You just need to look at the opinion polls British office workers have had an awakening to the many benefits of a more progressive work/life balance.

Lewis Hamilton won the Hungarian Grand Prix on Sunday for the eighth time after a perfect drive. Luke Slater arguedthat whileHamilton and Mercedes brilliance has ensured their dominance,it is not what the sport needs.

The rest is here:

'It's time to walk away from Brexit trade talks' - Readers on this weeks talking points - Telegraph.co.uk

When it comes to Brexit, British interference got us into this mess – The Independent

The first lesson we can learn from the way the government handled this report about the Russians trying to fiddle with our elections is its fine to have something ready, then wait nine months before letting anyone see it.

We would be so much more relaxed if we all did this. Kids could tell their teachers: Ive finished my geography homework. Ill hand it in next April.

In a cafe, the waiter could tell you the sausage and chips are ready, so theyll bring them out a few weeks after Christmas.

Sharing the full story, not just the headlines

The government seems just as calm about the Russians trying to influence our democracy. The prime minister answered Keir Starmers question about the report by saying, Youve had more flip-flops than Bournemouth beach.

This is an impressively chilled reaction to another country trying to alter your government. Maybe Boris Johnson learned this at a mindfulness class, where he was told, If youre prime minister, and the Russians try to muck about with your election, dont get stressed. Breathe deeply, chant were getting Brexit done 4 million times, and make a funny joke, such as You do more whining than a man who runs an active vineyard, to soothe your spiritual journey.

The report concluded the government had not seen or sought evidence of interference by Russia because they did not want to know. Thats a novel method for investigating a crime, to not want to find any evidence.

There should be a detective series, starring Boris Johnsons cabinet. They turn up to a murder scene, and theyre told, A man was seen shooting the victim. We caught him hiding in this cupboard. Here he is. So Boris Johnson says, Well never work out who did it. Close the case. The whole programme would be over in nine seconds, proving how efficient they are.

Boris Johnson also told us the real reason anyone was concerned about the report was they were an Islingtonian Remainer trying to undermine the referendum result.

This will be how everything works now for a couple of hundred years. The government could be caught setting up a series of brothels in Kuala Lumpur to fund the cabinets crystal meth habit. And when Keir Starmer says: Could the prime minister assure the house he will cease his forays into prostitution and partaking of class A narcotics? Johnson would reply: Ah, aha, what we have, indeed, Mr Speaker, is a flagrant attempt, er attempt, to undermine the historic vote of the British people.

In any case, Boris Johnson knows for a fact the Russians have no interest in winning influence in Britain, because he accepted 160,000 from Russian oligarch Lubov Chernukhin to play her at tennis.

So he must know that Russian business doesnt try to buy favours. She simply wanted to improve her tennis, and rather than do it the complicated way, by paying a tennis coach, she spent the money wisely and played Boris Johnson. She was lucky he could fit her in, between his sessions coaching Roger Federer.

You can understand why the government wouldnt believe the claims, as it seems implausible that Putins people would behave in an underhand or deceitful way. Its true they brought down a plane and lied about it, and poisoned one of our oldest cities and said they were there to admire the cathedral. But they wouldnt try more serious things like invent a Twitter account to say the EU had a negative effect on the British jam industry.

But the biggest revelation from this issue is that for 60 years there has been a misunderstanding between us all. For all that time, Conservative people would say to anyone slightly liberal: If you had your way, youd let the Russians run the country. We thought they were angry about the Russians, but in fact they were upset because we didnt want the Russians to run the country enough.

The Russians would fund the odd political campaign or pamphlet, but now we realise the Conservatives wanted the Russians to run our elections and dictate when our prime ministers play tennis.

There could be another reason the government is so dismissive about the report. It concludes the Russians tried to interfere through using TV programmes and social media. So Boris Johnson must think: My oligarch mates have bought a huge chunk of London and all the riverside apartments and a football club and shares in everything, so why are people in a flap because of some programmes on Russia Today and a bunch of Twitter accounts?

It seems unlikely that Russian social media made a decisive difference in the referendum. Or maybe it did, and Gary from Stoke said: Here mum, Ive just got a message from Anna3628710 on Twitter that says the EU are responsible for stealing 17 per cent of our mackerel. Sod that, Im voting Leave.

And Maureen from Sunderland meant to watch Homes Under the Hammer one day, but accidentally switched on Russia Todays misleading documentary about how EU salad subsidies are unfairly biased against British cucumber farmers.

Another possibility is the Leave Campaign had an effective message and the Remain Campaign had no message. And the stories that had the greatest impact were those about taking back control, and money saved by leaving would be spent on the NHS, and the number of immigrants had reached Breaking Point. These ideas werent spread by Russian Twitter accounts, they were on billboards and Facebook pages and buses, arranged by Dominic Cummings and Nigel Farage.

So the problem with the referendum was British interference. There should be another report, that should conclude wed have been better off only allowing foreigners to campaign in the referendum, and not let the British say anything.

See original here:

When it comes to Brexit, British interference got us into this mess - The Independent

Britain will be constructive with EU in Brexit talks, says PM’s spokesman – Reuters

FILE PHOTO: The Union Jack flags are seen above number 11 Downing street after Britain's prime minister Boris Johnson tested positive for the coronavirus disease (COVID-19), in London, Britain, March 27, 2020. REUTERS/Toby Melville

LONDON (Reuters) - Britain will continue to engage constructively with the European Union in talks on a future relationship, but London is not willing to give up its rights as an independent state, a spokesman for Prime Minister Boris Johnson said on Monday.

The two sides will resume talks on Tuesday after Britains chief negotiator David Frost hosts his EU counterpart Michel Barnier for dinner later on Monday, but there has been little movement on the significant differences that divide them.

Britain left the EU in January and is in a status quo transition period until the end of the year, when some companies fear disruption if the two fail to secure a free trade deal.

Our position on our sovereignty, laws and fisheries is clear, we will not give up our rights as an independent state, the spokesman told reporters.

We will continue to engage constructively with the EU on these key issues and will work hard to reach the broad outline of an agreement, but as we have been clear all along we are not asking for a special, bespoke or unique deal.

Reporting by Elizabeth Piper; editing by William James and Alistair Smout

View post:

Britain will be constructive with EU in Brexit talks, says PM's spokesman - Reuters

Alister Jack: ‘No threat’ to devolved power in post-Brexit laws – BBC News

Media playback is unsupported on your device

Claims that Holyrood powers are under threat by post-Brexit legislation are "absolute scaremongering", the Scottish Secretary has said.

Alister Jack told BBC Scotland plans for a UK "internal market" amounted to a "power surge" and not a "power grab".

The proposals have been set out in a white paper, with legislation to follow later in the year.

Scottish Constitutional Affairs Secretary Mike Russell said any assurances from the UK were "not true".

Plans for how a UK-wide "internal market" will operate after the country leaves the EU were published earlier in the week.

UK Business Secretary Alok Sharma said the move would see "the biggest transfer of powers in the history of devolution".

But the Scottish government has said the plan would "strip power" from the Scottish Parliament.

Speaking on BBC Scotland's Sunday Politics programme, Mr Jack said the objections raised by Mr Russell were a "confected red herring".

He said there was "absolutely no threat" to Scottish government policies like free university tuition or alcohol minimum pricing.

"There is not a single power being taken away from Holyrood or any of the other devolved administrations and when challenged in parliament this week, they couldn't come up with a single power they're losing," he said.

"This is absolutely a power surge for them, not a power grab."

Much of the debate over powers has focused on food standards and whether chlorinated chicken would ever be sold in the UK.

But Mr Jack said this was "not going to happen".

"Chlorinated chicken can't be sold in the UK. Nor can hormone-induced beef. We're quite clear about that. They are illegal products," he said.

"We're going to bring all the EU food standards into UK domestic law at the end of this year in the Withdrawal Act. And then we intend to increase our food production standards and our animal welfare standards which are already the highest in Europe."

Mr Jack told the BBC that the only future changes would be to improve food standards and not "diminish" them.

He added: "Were it ever to come to pass that a future government did something on food standards that didn't satisfy the other devolved administrations first of all there would be a bill to go through the UK Parliament on that trade deal and then there would be consent motions sought from the other administrations."

However, Mr Russell said he had "no doubt" that under the current proposals chlorinated chicken could be sold in Scotland, even if the Scottish Parliament did not want it.

Speaking earlier on the programme, he said the proposals were there because the UK wanted to be able to do "bad trade deals" with other countries as they were the "only trade deals left to them".

"To do so they want to make sure that neither the Scottish Parliament or the Welsh Parliament or the Northern Irish Parliament can interfere with that," he said.

"That won't just be bad for consumers, it'll be very bad for business. It will put Scottish businesses out of business if they go ahead."

Mr Russell said he had heard many assurances in the past from the UK government but they had "come to nothing".

View post:

Alister Jack: 'No threat' to devolved power in post-Brexit laws - BBC News

Populism and the manufactured crisis of British neoliberalism: the case of Brexit – British Politics and Policy at LSE

Using the case of Britains 2016 vote to leave the European Union, James Wood andValentina Ausserladscheider challenge prevailing accounts explaining populism as political response to neoliberalisms negative impact on voters. Using a descriptive analysis, they explain how the antagonistic people vs. elite relationship at the core of populism has been mobilised by opposing British political actors as a discursive frame to generate voter support for their own policies.

Populism has come to dominate Britains political economy, which culminated in the 2016 vote to leave the political and economic project of the EU. Although there are various conceptions of what populism is, many definitions focus on a core antagonistic relationship between the people and a corrupt or incompetent elite.

Dominant explanations of the rise of populism in Britain argue that populist politicians appealed to a long-standing general will of the people by advocating anti-EU policies to mitigate the negative consequences of globalisation, such as increased immigration and inequality from international trade. Populism has also been considered a response to voter demands for greater state intervention in the British economy to challenge the market-based policies of neoliberalism, which have increased economic insecurity since the 1980s. However, we argue these accounts fail to adequately conceptualise what constitutes as populism in the case of Brexit.

The chart above from The Economist demonstrates that for a decade prior to the 2016 referendum, less than 10% of the British public believed the EU was a pressing political issue; this increased dramatically to over 50% shortly after the referendum announcement. Therefore, leaving the EU cannot be considered a long-standing voter demand that populist politicians adopted to appeal to voters. Rather, the referendum itself may be considered the referential moment where leaving the EU became a significant issue for British voters. Additionally, whilst populist political actors on the left, such as Jeremy Corbyns Labour Party, advocated increased state intervention in the economy to challenge neoliberalism, there were mainstream populist political actors in the Conservative Party supporting policies perfectly congruent with neoliberalism.

Our research provides an alternative explanation as to what constitutes as populism in the case of Brexit. We argue that what these populist political actors have in common is that they both present a challenge to Britains debt-driven neoliberal growth model, which is reliant on continuous house price increases and consumption.

Major shifts in macroeconomic policy paradigms occur rarely, and require the policies associated with the dominant paradigm to be framed negatively by political actors to the voting public. We argue that the elite/people relationship at the core of populism was used as a discursive frame by political actors looking to generate voter support for their own policies. Here, a current policy can be problematised by political actors by framing it as being detrimental to the people whilst benefiting an elite; alternatively, the converse framing can be used to highlight the benefits of their policies to voters as the people at the expense of the elite.

We explore this argument by examining two competing economic policy paradigms looking to challenge Britains debt-driven neoliberal growth model: the Liberal Economic Nationalists and the Democratic Socialists.

Britains modern Liberal Economic Nationalist policy paradigm looks to change Britains neoliberal growth model from being debt-driven to focus on increasing British exports, and is advocated by an influential group of politicians in the Conservative Party, such as Michael Gove, Liz Truss, and Boris Johnson.

The Conservatives used the populist frame to critique the EU for limiting Britains sovereignty and generate support for their own export-oriented trade policies. An example of this can be seen in Michael Goves announcement in support of the Vote Leave campaign:

The EU is built to keep power and control with the elites rather than the people Every single day, every single minister is told: Yes Minister, I understand, but Im afraid thats against EU rules. I know it. My colleagues in government know it. And the British people ought to know it too: your government is not, ultimately, in control in hundreds of areas that matter.

After chastising EU elites for limiting British sovereignty that harms the British people, Gove then redeployed the populist frame in a different speech to show how leaving the EU resolves this problem for the people:

I am not asking the British people to have faith in me, I am asking them to have faith in themselves. I am asking the British people to take back control from those [EU] organisations which are distant and elitist. With trade it is really important that we take back control.

Therefore, for the Conservatives, Brexit provides an opportunity for British neoliberalism to be reoriented around an export-driven growth model supported by non-EU trade.

Rather than focus on the EU, the Democratic Socialists in the Labour Party directly critiqued market-based neoliberal policies for benefiting the few at the expense of the many: a clear transposition of the populist elite/people frame. One example comes from Jeremy Corbyns speech to the 2017 Labour Party Conference:

Ten years after the global financial crash the Tories still believe in the same dogmatic mantra Deregulate, privatise, cut taxes for the wealthy, weaken rights at work, delivering profits for a few, and debt for the many. Nothing has changed.

To rebalance inequalities in favour of the many, they propose a post-Brexit full paradigm shift towards socialism, by nationalising industries and limiting market activity. Corbyn promoted such policies to the public using the populist discursive frame in the 2017 Labour Party manifesto:

the distribution of ownership of the countrys economy means that decisions about our economy are often made by a narrow elite. More democratic ownership structures would help our economy deliver for the many and lead to a fairer distribution of wealth.

These examples demonstrate how these opposing political actors have used the populist discursive frame to construct a challenge to Britains debt-driven neoliberal growth model and generate voter support for their own economic policies. Therefore, rather than focusing on how different political actors adopt incongruent policies to appeal to the public, we argue it is the shared deployment of the elite/people discursive frame that provides a more complete account of constitutes as populism in the case of Brexit. This offers a more compelling generalisable constitutive theory to understand the phenomenon of global populism and how it manifests in specific cases.

__________

Note: the above draws on the authors published work in The Review of International Political Economy. All articles posted on this blog give the views of the author(s), and not the position of LSE British Politics and Policy, nor of the London School of Economics and Political Science. Featured image credit: by Christian Lue on Unsplash.

See the rest here:

Populism and the manufactured crisis of British neoliberalism: the case of Brexit - British Politics and Policy at LSE

Activists step up bid to protect the NHS from Brexit trade deal – The National

CAMPAIGNERS have vowed to step up their fight to protect the NHS after a legal bid to prevent it being on the table in post-Brexit trade deals was voted down by Tory MPs.

A series of amendments to the Trade Bill aimed at protecting the NHS from control from outside the UK and allowing more parliamentary scrutiny of deals were rejected in the House of Commons last week.

More than 230,000 people have now signed a petition urging peers to introduce fresh amendments to the Bill when it goes to the House of Lords in the autumn.

Pascale Robinson, campaigns officer for anti-privatisation pressure group We Own It, said unless specific protections were in place for the NHS, there was the risk of the health service being opened up in trade deals to American healthcare firms and drug prices increasing.

She said the huge response to the petition in the space of just a few days showed how angry people were at the result of the voting down of the amendments.

It has shown that platitudes about protecting our NHS are a barefaced lie and that we will not forgive or forget those MPs who did not stand up for the NHS in that vote, she said.

READ MORE:Majority of Scots regret Brexit and would rejoin EU, eu+me finds

Robinson also pointed that while health was devolved in Scotland, the proposals around the UK internal market meant it would be impacted by any trade deal. She added: They call it levelling the playing field, meaning there is the same access what will happen is Scotland will have to accept goods and services of the same standard as the UK.

The British Medical Association said it was disappointing the amendments were voted down, adding it would have gone some way to protecting the health service and public health in trade agreements.

BMA council deputy chair and trade negotiations lead Dr David Wrigley said: The BMA is clear that the only true protection we have is if our health service and standards are protected by law. As the Bill moves on for consideration by the Lords, it is vital this pivotal point to do so is not lost.

Green MP Caroline Lucas had put forward an amendment to stop the health service being a part of trade deals, saying red lines were needed in the negotiations. The bid to give MPs and peers a say on any new trade deals signed by UK ministers was a rebellion led by Conservative MP Jonathan Djanogly.

Meanwhile, SNP MPs were among those who submitted an amendment to ensure Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland could give their consent to trade regulations containing matters within their remit, which was also rejected.

All six Scottish Tory MPs voted against these amendments, which were backed by the SNP, Labour and LibDems.

READ MORE:Stephen Gethins's bid to strengthen Scotland-EU post-Brexit ties

Following Mondays vote, West Aberdeenshire and Kincardine MP Andrew Bowie was one of a number of Conservatives who pointed to the partys manifesto commitment which pledged the NHS will not be on the table in any trade negotiations.

Just to be clear no one voted to sell the NHS last night. It is not for sale. It is not on the table, he tweeted.

But Gay Lee, a nurse and member of campaign group Keep Our NHS Public, said: That is the argument of well, we promised, so we dont need to put it in writing and we dont need to put it law.

The Government is not particularly trusted at the moment, so how they think that argument is going to wash with people I dont know.

The UK Government has also insisted that any changes affecting the NHS would have to come before parliament.

However, at present the role of Westminster in approving treaties is based on rules established 100 years ago, which means there is no systematic scrutiny and consent to ratification is given by default, with no debate or vote required.

Dr Brigid Fowler, senior researcher at think tank the Hansard Society, said the view of most constitutional lawyers who had examined the issue is that the current system is not fit for purpose and particularly now the UK is negotiating its own free trade agreements.

She said: This was the first time that a Conservative MP had put his head over the parapet and said we think we should amend this.

It was really significant that there are now clearly some Conservative backbenchers who arent happy but there werent enough of them.

At the moment theres nothing in law to stop a UK minister just signing a free trade agreement without MPs having seen it.

She added: Youre making a form of law when you sign an international treaty like that and youre also making economic policy.

It could have massive implications for different industries and for different parts of the country.

Nick Dearden, director of campaign group Global Justice Now, pointed out peers had successfully passed a democratic scrutiny amendment in the previous Trade Bill. The bill was subsequently dropped by the UK Government when Westminster was prorogued last year.

It is really interesting that this is one of the few areas where there has actually been a Tory rebellion, Dearden said.

The Government is really under the most enormous pressure on this.

Link:

Activists step up bid to protect the NHS from Brexit trade deal - The National

COVID-19 payments can be repurposed to deal with Brexit – Varadkar – Newstalk

The Tnaiste Leo Varadkar has said the emergency COVID-19 payments can be repurposed in the new year to deal with Brexit if needed.

Under the July stimulus plan, the emergency Pandemic Unemployment Payment and the Wage Subsidy Scheme will be extended until April 2021.

However both will be tapered to lower levels during that time - with the unemployment payment eventually being reduced in line with jobseekers benefit.

Speaking to Newstalk's political correspondent Sean Defoe, Mr Varadkar said part of the decision to extend the fund was with Brexit in mind.

"There's extra money from my department in particular to help businesses that trade with the UK to prepare for Brexit."

"But more significantly, if you look at the way this package is structured, it runs through to the end of the first quarter of next year.

"The Pandemic Unemployment Payment, the Wage Subsidy, the VAT cut - all of those things run into February and March of next year, April in some cases.

"Why did we make that decision? Because Brexit's coming: at least in terms of trade Brexit, if you like, political Brexit already happened but trade Brexit will happen on the 31st of December this year.

"So if you look at what's happening for example in Britain, they're ending their wage subsidy in October - same in Northern Ireland - they're ending their VAT cut at the end of December.

"We thought 'no, we actually needed a plan that runs through to the spring of next year' - so that it covers Brexit as well as what's happening as a result of the pandemic".

It comes as the European Union's chief Brexit negotiator Michel Barnier has said a trade deal between the bloc and the UK is now unlikely.

On Thursday, Mr Barnier said while some progress was made, issues around a level playing field and fisheries are still outstanding.

"The EU has always insisted that an economic partnership with the UK must include robust level playing field rules and an equitable agreement on fisheries.

"This means that, by its current refusal to commit to conditions of open and fair competition and to a balanced agreement on fisheries, the UK makes a trade agreement at this point unlikely", he added.

Meanwhile the Government's new staycation tax rebate can also be used to get tax back on meals in local restaurants.

Under the plan people can get up to 125 back on 625 spent on accommodation or food bills.

Mr Varadkar said the scheme can also be used to boost local business.

"I think this is going to benefit all parts of Ireland - essentially it's a 5bn injection into our economy, 7bn if you include loan guarantees.

"And it's all about getting businesses open, helping those that are open to stay open, getting people back to work and for those who won't be able to go back to their old jobs, there'll be about 75,000 opportunities in terms of education, apprenticeships, enterprise set up grants, courses, you name it.

"But I think one thing that'll be particularly beneficial for businesses in rural Ireland is that fact that the minimum restart grant has been increased to 4,000.

"Any business that is re-opening in rural Ireland, or any business that stayed open and saw a significant reduction in their turnover, will have a restart grant of 4,000".

"I think what will also be of particular benefit is that there'll be a commercial rates holiday for six months.

"The big companies will have to pay, but the smaller companies particularity in towns and villages won't have to pay".

He said he hopes people will take advantage of the spend and save initiative while holidaying at home.

"We're hoping that at least two million people will take advantage of it.

"Yes it's for domestic tourism encouraging people to take that weekend away or that night away during the winter.

"But also as well encouraging people to support local businesses in their towns.

"So if you can't afford, or you're not able to go away for the weekend, you can use that money in your local town - and if you do that'll be a good thing as well".

Reporting by Sean Defoe | Additionalreporting: Jack Quann

See the article here:

COVID-19 payments can be repurposed to deal with Brexit - Varadkar - Newstalk

Will Britain’s post-Brexit plan deepen divisions within the Union? – The New European

PUBLISHED: 14:30 24 July 2020 | UPDATED: 12:53 25 July 2020

Nicola McEWEN

Former Prime Minister Theresa May pledged to 'strengthen the precious European Union' when setting out her Brexit objectives in January 2017. Picture: Frank Augstein/PA

PA Wire/PA Images

Recently published plans on how the UKs internal market will work after Brexit hint at further tensions ahead, suggests NICOLA McEWEN.

Email this article to a friend

To send a link to this page you must be logged in.

Become a Supporter

Almost four years after its creation The New European goes from strength to strength across print and online, offering a pro-European perspective on Brexit and reporting on the political response to the coronavirus outbreak, climate change and international politics. But we can only continue to grow with your support.

When Theresa May first set out her Brexit objectives at Lancaster House in January 2017, one of her top priorities was to strengthen the precious union, by ensuring that as we leave the European Union no new barriers to living and doing business within our own Union are created.

The recent publication of a UK government white paper gives the clearest indication yet of how her successor plans to uphold the UK internal market.

Although the details are unusually sketchy for a white paper, the proposals could have a profound effect on devolution.

They could place considerable constraints on the capacity of the devolved institutions to pursue some of the distinctive policy goals they have been able to take up hitherto, including those that were permissible within EU internal market regulations.

Once the transition period ends, the UK and devolved governments will no longer be obliged to conform to EU regulations.

Each will be free to develop new regulations within their areas of competence, subject to any level playing field commitments made in a UK-EU deal.

That opens up the possibility of greater policy divergence that, in principle, might disrupt trade across the UKs internal borders.

To guard against this possibility, the white paper proposes a Market Access Commitment. This will introduce in primary legislation both a principle of mutual recognition and a principle of non-discrimination to guarantee the continued right of all UK companies to trade unhindered in every part of the UK.

Mutual recognition ensures that goods or services that satisfy regulatory standards in one part of the UK are eligible to enter the market anywhere in the UK.

Non-discrimination prevents UK businesses or individuals trading across the UKs internal borders from being treated differently from local traders, either directly on the grounds of residence or geographical origin.

So, if the Scottish parliament decided to pass a law to limit the sugar content of goods produced in Scotland to tackle the problem of obesity, it could not impose those standards on goods coming into Scotland from other parts of the UK, nor could it prevent those goods from entering the Scottish market, provided these satisfy regulations set anywhere in the UK.

Such a law may also be challenged by Scottish producers as an unnecessary barrier to their ability to trade freely across the UK.

There are many uncertainties in the proposals. The devolved governments had been concerned that an independent regulatory body, potentially with little understanding of devolution, could be tasked with enforcing UK internal market rules.

The white paper seems to rule this out. That leaves open the issue as to how the Market Access Commitment will be enforced.

The implication is that businesses and consumers will be empowered to challenge any law or action that is perceived to impede their ability to engage in frictionless trade in any part of the UK.

The legislation could go even further, amending the devolution settlements, either to introduce a constraint that prevents laws from being passed that are incompatible with UK internal market law, or that empower the Secretary of State to prevent actions by the devolved institutions on grounds of incompatibility with the internal market.

Any of these enforcement mechanisms could represent a significant new constraint on devolved competence and would be met with considerable resistance.

In theory, the internal market principles would affect all four administrations. In practice, they will inevitably have an asymmetrical effect.

The paper acknowledges that traders in Northern Ireland, and goods entering that market, will have to comply with EU rules, as required by the Northern Ireland protocol.

Moreover, the principle of parliamentary sovereignty means that the Westminster parliament cannot bind itself, and so its autonomy to make laws will not face the constraints that may be placed on the devolved institutions.

The sheer size of the English economy and population relative to the others is also likely to give English businesses and consumers, and the UK government making policies for England, considerably greater influence in determining regulatory standards across the UK.

No government in any part of the UK would seek to impose unnecessary barriers to trade and mobility. But who gets to determine the necessity, or otherwise, of distinctive regulations?

When the Scottish parliament passed legislation to introduce minimum unit pricing for alcohol, the disruption to trade in alcohol resulting from the policy was defended as a legitimate and proportionate means of tackling adverse health and social effects of alcohol abuse.

After lengthy legal challenges led by the Scotch Whisky Association, the Supreme Court sided with the Scottish government.

But it is not at all clear that public health, environmental or any other policy goals will be justifiable exemptions from UK internal market principles. The white paper seems to place the objective of frictionless trade above all other policy ambitions.

New governance arrangements are envisaged, building on existing intergovernmental relations (IGR), ensuring a strong basis for political decision-making, oversight, and dialogue in relation to the Internal Market. There is no detail at all about what these intergovernmental processes would entail.

The Joint Review of IGR, initiated by the four administrations in March 2018, has struggled to produce any recommendations to address the evident weaknesses in intergovernmental machinery or agree mechanisms for resolving dispute.

It is difficult to foresee agreement on shared governance arrangements for an internal market if its principles are designed and imposed by the UK government.

UK internal market legislation will affect devolved competences, and so under the Sewel convention, the consent of the devolved legislatures will be sought. That consent is unlikely to be secured. Will that matter? Recent experience suggests not.

In other Brexit-related legislation, the UK government has demonstrated its willingness to press ahead despite devolved institutions withholding consent. Setting aside the Sewel convention again would further undermine one of the core principles of UK devolution.

Without cooperation, consent and co-decision built into the development and governance of a UK internal market, further tensions between the UK and devolved institutions are inevitable. And for what?

The research in the annex to the white paper makes clear that, in comparison to trade between EU member states, between the Nordic states and within European federal states such as Germany, the UK is already highly integrated and the costs associated with cross-border trade are very low.

This suggests that EU regulations have not been the only factor supporting UK market integration. By using a legislative sledgehammer to crack a hypothetical nut, these measures are unlikely restore the trust between the UK and devolved governments that the Brexit process has eroded.

Instead, they may deepen the fractures that threaten the very Union the UK government is seeking to strengthen.

Nicola McEwen is a professor of territorial politics, a co-director of the Centre on Constitutional at the University of Edinburgh, and senior fellow at the UK in a Changing Europe, which originally published this article

Almost four years after its creation The New European goes from strength to strength across print and online, offering a pro-European perspective on Brexit and reporting on the political response to the coronavirus outbreak, climate change and international politics. But we can only rebalance the right wing extremes of much of the UK national press with your support. If you value what we are doing, you can help us by making a contribution to the cost of our journalism.

Read the rest here:

Will Britain's post-Brexit plan deepen divisions within the Union? - The New European

BDI on the conclusion of the Brexit round of talks: "A collapse in the negotiations on a partnership agreement is now all but inevitable" -…

BERLIN, July 24, 2020 /PRNewswire/ --Following the conclusion of the sixth round of Brexit talks, BDI Director General Joachim Lang said: "A collapse in the negotiations on a partnership agreement is now all but inevitable."

"The sixth round of Brexit negotiations was more than a disappointment for the German economy. On key points, such as competition conditions in the future, London has repeatedly diverged from the political declaration. A collapse in the negotiations on a partnership agreement between the EU and the United Kingdom is now all but inevitable. Too many political and technical issues remain unsettled for them to be solved in time.

The imperative of the hour for the German government and the EU is to bundle all their forces and to focus all their attention on the essential emergency measures. Also business on both sides of the Channel must now prepare itself for bilateral trade without an agreement under WTO rules.

German industry does not believe that the United Kingdom will complete the public infrastructure for cross-border goods traffic in time. The latest plans on the part of the British are incomplete. This means that companies are faced with new customs duties, additional bureaucracy and an economic disaster."

The Federation of German Industries (BDI) is the umbrella organisation of German industry and industry-related services. It speaks for 40 trade associations and more than 100,000 enterprises with around 8 million employees. Membership is voluntary.

The Federationof German Industries Member association of BUSINESSEUROPE

Contact numbersT: +49 (0)30 2028 1450 F: +49 (0)30 2028 2450

Website http://www.bdi.eu

Email: bdi-presseteam@bdi.eu

Follow this link:

BDI on the conclusion of the Brexit round of talks: "A collapse in the negotiations on a partnership agreement is now all but inevitable" -...

Remainers must bury the hatchet and work towards a post-Brexit Britain – LBC

25 July 2020, 14:05 | Updated: 25 July 2020, 14:18

Maajid Nawaz pleaded with Remainers to put their egos aside and accept that we need to work together towards a post-Brexit Britain, regardless of your opinion of the result.

Maajid Nawaz was speaking about Brexit as the deadline for a deal edges closer and closer. He was putting forward the argument that Brits have more in common than not, despite the divisive nature of Brexit.

"The human spirit is more binding and more lasting than political debate," said Maajid and used the example of how he was supported in his hunger strike by someone on the other end of the political spectrum to him, Nigel Farage.

"Sometimes it means holding your nose, holding your grudge," to work for the greater good Maajid said, and asked if "on the Brexit debate can we please start doing that."

He warned Remainers that if you don't contribute to the debate and discourse surrounding post-Brexit Britain, Brexiteers "will shape the future of this country without your input."

"Bury the hatchet, bury our egos and start trying to work out which kind of Brexiter we can work with," Maajid said.

He argued that "we need to develop a post-Brexit liberal vision for Britain" and this cannot be achieved if only one side of the debate is addressed.

Maajid went on to imagine "who can our allies be," in post-Brexit Britain and argued that the first place the UK should be looking is to begin "forging closer and closer alliances with the Five Eyes nations" who are the USA, Canada, New Zealand, Australia and the UK.

He argued that if the nations were to move further than just being an intelligence sharing bloc and a socio-economic one too, this would be an ideal place for the UK to start it's life outside of the EU.

Here is the original post:

Remainers must bury the hatchet and work towards a post-Brexit Britain - LBC

Guide to the classics: H.G. Wells’ ‘The War Of The Worlds’ – The Star Online

Spoiler alert: this story details how The War Of The Worlds ends.

The latest screen adaption of H. G. Wells 1898 modern masterwork The War Of The Worlds hit our screens recently. Continuously in print since its first publication, the book is a literary gift that keeps on giving for producers and screenwriters. They recognise the storys unerring capacity to find its mark with each generation.

Wells who also wrote The Time Machine (1895) and The Invisible Man (1897) helped pioneer the science fiction genre when he conceived this astonishing book. With an eyewitness narration that reads grippingly still, it tells of a Martian invasion of Earth.

Shock and awe

Set in London, Wells depicts a complacent world; of men serene in their assurance of their dominion over the planet. But humans get the shock of another reality when suddenly visited upon by blood-feeding and squid-like creatures possessed of intellects vast and cool that are unsympathetic to Earthlings whose planet they had long regarded with envious eyes.

An advance party arrives inside metal cylinders shot from giant cannons stationed on Mars.

From the cylinders come dozens of Martians, each operating a three-legged metal fighting-machine that attacks Londons helpless population by means of a heat ray. From these whatever is combustible flashes into flame, metal liquifies, glass melts and water explodes into steam.

Fleeing like rats from a burning ship, panic spreads like a contagion. The narrator describes a breakdown of law and order, and undergoes something of a breakdown himself.

Upper-class women arm themselves as they cross the country, because traditional deference has gone up in smoke. The social body of organisation police, army, government suffers swift liquefaction.

The Martians, however, had become too intelligent for their own good. They had made the Red Planet disease-free but forgotten about germ theory. And so while laying waste to London, they inhale a bug; a simple bacteria against which their systems were unprepared and so suffered a death that must have seemed to them as incomprehensible as any death could be.

London will rise again. The world has been spared. Humanity gets lucky this time.

A wider war

In the new Anglo-French television series, La Guerre Des Mondes, the action takes place in both London and France. Martian devastation is given wider latitude.

Why does this now-familiar story have such a hold on successive generations? Iterations include the Orson Welles radio broadcast of fake news bulletins about Martian invasion, to the 1978 contemporary music version with Richard Burton narration, to Steven Spielbergs film blockbuster starring Tom Cruise. Last year also saw a BBC production set in Edwardian London.

One response is to consider our attraction to sci-fi. It sees the laws of science upended. Technology seems to make anything possible and to minds already accustomed to real technological transformation, sci-fi literature brings the now-thinkable future into the present.

But therere less obvious elements to think about: themes that were important in 1898 and resonate still.

Invasion and imperialism

Wells book touched something existentially British during their Pax Britannica period of relative peace. Across the Channel, Europe seethed with diplomatic intrigue and tensions culminating in the first world war.

The new sci-fi genre connected to an older invasion literature genre; a long-standing British apprehension of the Continent, especially its renascent German threat. Wells hints at this when he writes that the arrival of the cylinders (before the Martians emerged from them) did not [initially] make the sensation that an ultimatum to Germany would have done.

Then theres the imperialism angle. Was Wells tapping a source of late-Victorian shame at the true source of British wealth and power? Then, a quarter of the world map was coloured British Empire pink. London was the epicentre of modern imperialism the coordination point for the suffering of millions and the plunder of their lands.

Moreover, Belgium, Germany, France, and also the USA, were engaged in the scramble for colonies in Africa and Asia. Under the veneer of sci-fi, Wells describes what its like to be a people facing a powerful invader.

Fear is the contagion

A very different perspective says something about our species and our idealised self-conception. In 1908 the Russian novelist and revolutionary Alexander Bogdanov, drew on WOTW for inspiration. In his novel Red Star protagonist Leonid travels to Mars to learn about communism from Martians who had made their own revolution and now lived in peace. Leonid despairs of the congenitally unstable and fragile nature of human relationships and looks to another planet for guidance.

The Earth-bound communist project of the 20th century ended badly, to say the least. But our human vulnerability to invasion, to tyranny, to economic catastrophe, and even to the bacteriological danger from microbes resistant to antibiotics, continues to haunt us.

The latest adaptation is set in our time with smartphones and the Internet. Here again our 21st-century complacency is shattered, and our vulnerability laid bare.

Fear is a contagion in WOTW, and its Londoners show little heroism in the face of an alien invader.

A new battle

Bacteria did in Wells Martians and might do for us too unless drugs to overcome resistance are developed. Through sci-fi, we can explore our fear of the invisible foe.

Global warming might be our other enemy the red skies of Australias last bushfire season fresh in our memory and reminiscent of Wells novel.

The narrative provides a hugely enjoyable fantasy. But we need to think about what science fiction might be doing to our relationship with science fact, especially if we consume it as a tranquilliser to displace and sublimate our fears of invisible threats.

If we do, then the incomprehensibility felt by Wells Martians may add that little bit more to our discord regarding the sources and solutions to global warming. Humans got lucky in The War Of The Worlds. They didnt need to do anything to survive. We cant count on luck to save us or our planet.

Author Robert Hassan is Professor, School of Culture and Communication, University of Melbourne. This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license.

Read this article:

Guide to the classics: H.G. Wells' 'The War Of The Worlds' - The Star Online