155 Years of Black Freedom – Columbia Business Times

Bringing awareness and a culture of inclusion to Columbia.

On June 19, 1865, Union Army General Gordon Granger arrived on the island of Galveston, Texas, with over 2,000 federal troops and announced a federal proclamation that declared all enslaved Black people free. This day became commonly known as Juneteenth, and would be celebrated to commemorate the liberation of the last enslaved Black people in America and the nascence of recognizing Black individuals as full human beings with hopes, fears, dreams, and most importantly, human rights.

Today, Juneteenth maintains the same spirit, but it has also taken on a new meaning.

Between March and May, the nation witnessed the murders of Breonna Taylor, Nina Pop, Tony McDade, and George Floyd, among many others, all at the hands of racism. Consequently, many Black individuals and allies rallied in the streets for the Black Lives Matter movement to protest the loss of these innocent lives, demand radical change in law enforcement systems, and initiate discourse on Black liberation and granting Black people authentic, unequivocal human rights.

Given this context, Juneteenth has taken on new meaning it has now morphed into a holiday that is not just a fte, but also a form of protest in defense of Black lives.

In Columbia, there were a number of events that celebrated Juneteenth and also educated the community on the history of the event and the general plight of Black people in the community. One of these events, CoMo Celebrates Juneteenth, was hosted at Karis Church.

The event was three parts. It began with a walk through Heritage Trail. This was followed by an in-person drive-through portion in Karis Churchs parking lot. The scene was vibrant, featuring people enjoying soul food made by local vendors. Families, with their enthusiastic children, contorted their bodies to the sound of Cupid Shuffle.

Thereafter, there were a series of speeches given by Adonica Coleman and Nikki McGruder, co-organizers of the event, and Mary Ratliff, president of Columbias NAACP chapter. All three speakers addressed the importance of celebrating Black liberation and harkening to voices in the community that are demanding change and demanding that Black lives to be acknowledged and respected. The drive-through segment ended with a recitation of Frederick Douglass famous speech, What to the Slave is the Fourth of July?

The final portion of the event was a series of online content and included an in-depth panel discussion with local pastors, moderated by Adonica, that discussed the history and meaning of Juneteenth.

The idea to host a major Juneteenth event began with CoMo Small Great Things, a book club of diverse women, and of which Adonica and Nikki are members. The book club dwells on literature about racial issues, so naturally, the conversation about Juneteenth and what the community could do to celebrate the event became a point of discussion.

We have a book club that has been meeting for three years . . . We were having a conversation about the latest book wed read, and one of the white ladies said, Why is the onus always on Black people in town to actually get things going? If were trying to seek racial reconciliation, we should be the ones doing the work, Adonica says. Thats when Juneteenth came up in the conversation, and they offered to take some of the responsibility of planning the event, offering to get more community members involved, including local churches.

While celebration was the central phenomenon, the event made it a priority to also educate the community and bring awareness to the context of Juneteenth.

Nikki says: I think its important to know that the group Im in has been having conversations around race for a long time. So, we wanted to make sure that we provided a celebratory aspect along with education.

She adds, We talked about the importance of working with our allies and wanted to make sure that it was a celebration where we could also show why it is important that those positioning themselves to be allies celebrate [Juneteenth] too.

Education was also a priority because, after taking stock of general sentiments regarding the holiday, organizers realized that the public especially the non-Black public doesnt know much about Juneteenth.

Adonica says: For Nikki and I, we didnt know about Juneteenth until we were fully-grown women, and were both Black women in our forties. So, we wanted to involve different people and have several voices and make the event interactive.

The process of planning CoMo Celebrates Juneteenth was not without its challenges. With the COVID-19 pandemic upending event planning, the organizing team had to adapt to the times and create an event that would celebrate and educate people about Juneteenth while keeping their health and safety a priority.

We submitted our plans to the health department and had consistent communication with them about what things to consider to make sure everyone was safe, Adonica says.

The team drew inspiration from Karis Churchs Easter service, which was a drive-through gathering that encouraged social distancing. In addition, there were also masks sold at the concessions table at the events entrance.

We talked about the importance of working with our allies and wanted to make sure that it was a celebration where we could also show why it is important that those positioning themselves to be allies celebrate [Juneteenth] too.

Reflecting on CoMo Celebrates Juneteenth, it is evident that the event was a success it was able to bring together Columbias community in solidarity, maintain health and safety regulations, and also give people invaluable knowledge about the importance of Juneteenth and advocacy for Black lives. As of June 19, 2020, Mayor Brian Treece proclaimed Juneteenth Celebration Day an officially recognized holiday in Columbia.

I think one of the greatest feats for that day was coming together to do the in-person aspect and keep it according to the plan that we put together for the health department. So people started off their day the right way, and then they were able to go to their respective places to enjoy the rest of the content virtually, Nikki says.

With regards to next year, the goal is to enlarge the Juneteenth celebrations by collaborating with more community entities, including the city council. The educational content will still harken to the history and relevance of Juneteenth, and it will extend to include the contributions and success of Black people within Columbia and the nation at large.

Original post:

155 Years of Black Freedom - Columbia Business Times

Voter guide: What you should know for the Aug. 11 primary elections in Wisconsin – Milwaukee Journal Sentinel

Buy Photo

Volunteer Anne DeLeo organizes ballots and documentation that goes with them for the April 7, 2020 election.(Photo: MIKE DE SISTI / MILWAUKEE JOURNAL SENTINEL)

The Aug. 11 partisan primaries will determine who of each party's candidates will be on the ballot in the Nov. 3general election andcome months after Wisconsin's contentious April 7elections, which were plagued by long lines and often a lack of social distancing.

A full statewidelist of the candidates on the primary ballot, including candidates for state Assembly and county district attorney, is available from the Wisconsin Elections Commission.

District 1:In the district once represented by former U.S. House Speaker Paul Ryan, attorney and businessman Josh Pade of Kenosha is facing national security expert Roger Polack of Racine in the Democratic primary.

The winner will take on Republican incumbent Bryan Steil of Janesville in the general election.

The district encompasses Kenosha and Racine counties and portions of Rock, Walworth, Waukesha and Milwaukee counties.

READ MORE: 1st Congressional District primary: Pade, Polack hope to flip Paul Ryan's old district

District 3:Democratic incumbent Ron Kind of La Crosse, who has represented the district since 1997, is facing primary challenger Mark Neumann, a former physician from La Crosse.

Neumann is not the same Mark Neumann who served as the 1st District's representative in the 1990s.

Two political newcomers are running in the Republican primary in the hope of delivering the seat to the GOP in November: health care publicist Jessi Ebben of Eau Clare and former Navy SEAL Derrick Van Orden.

The western Wisconsin district stretches from Grant County in the far southwestern corner of Wisconsin north to the River Falls, Menomonie and Eau Claire areas. The district also includes parts of central Wisconsin, including Stevens Point.

READ MORE: 3rd Congressional District primary: Kind has challenge on left; GOP wants to flip district

District 4: Republicans Tim Rogers and businesswomanCindy Werner, both Milwaukee residents, are on the primary ballot, vying to take onDemocratic incumbent Gwen Moore in the district containing the city of Milwaukee.

Both Werner and Rogers previously ran in the 2018 Congressional primary. Moore defeated Rogers in the general election with about 75% of the vote.

District 5:Republican incumbent Jim Sensenbrenner announced in September that he would not be seeking reelection.

Navy veteran and businessman Tom Palzewicz of Brookfield is the only Democrat running to replace him.

But the Republican primary is contested between Scott Fitzgerald of Juneau, currently the majority leader in the Wisconsin state Senate, and Coast Guard Reserve commander and businessmanCliff DeTemple of Jackson.

The district includes Jefferson and Washington counties and parts of Dodge, Milwaukee, Walworthand Waukesha counties.

District 6:The three Democrats running in the primary, in the hope of unseating Republican incumbent Glenn Grothman ofGlenbeulah, arebusiness development executive MatthewBoor of Cleveland, IT consultant Michael Beardsley of Oshkosh, and lawyerJessica King of Oshkosh.

The district north of Milwaukee includes areas of Ozaukee, Milwaukee, Sheboygan, Manitowoc,Columbia, Fond du Lac, Dodge, Green Lake, Marquette, Waushara and Winnebago counties.

READ MORE: Meet the Democrats vying to challenge Glenn Grothman in the 6th Congressional District

A poll worker wears a sign asking voters to observe social distancing outside the Schuetze Recreation Center on April 7 in Waukesha, Wis.(Photo: Scott Ash/Now News Group)

In addition to other primary races throughout the state, the following legislative seats are holding partisan primaries in the Milwaukee area:

Senate District 6:Democratic incumbent LaTonya Johnson faces a challenge from Michelle Bryant, the chief of staff for state Sen. LenaTaylor.

The winner will face Republican candidate Alciro Deacon in the fall. The district covers parts of Milwaukee's north and west sides.

Senate District 28: Five Republicans are running to succeed incumbent Dave Craig, who is not running for reelection.The GOP challengers are leadership trainer Steve Bobowski, attorney Dan Griffin, Army veteran and businessman Jim Engstrand, businessman andformer La Crosse County Republican Party Chairman Julian Bradleyand attorney Marina Croft.

The Aug. 11 winner will face Democratic candidate and businessman Adam Murphy in the general election. The district includes parts of southern Waukesha and Milwaukee counties.

AssemblyDistrict 8:Both parties are running primaries to see who will vie to replace outgoing Democratic incumbent JoCasta Zamarripa on the near south side district.Zamarripa was elected to the Milwaukee Common Council in April.

In the Democratic primary, Milwaukee County Supervisor Sylvia Ortiz-Velez is running against community organizer Joanna Bautch. In the Republican race, Marine veteran and nonprofit founder Ruben Velez will face businessmanAngel Sanchez.

Assembly District 9:Democratic incumbent Marissa Cabarera is facingChristian Saldivar in the primary; the winner face Republican candidate and medical interpreter Veronica Diaz in the fall in the south side district.

Assembly District 11:Democratic incumbent Jason Fields, who was elected Milwaukee city comptroller in April, is not running for reelectionand there is a four-wayprimary to replace him. The candidates are community advocate Curtis Cook II, nonprofit member services coordinatorDora Drake, Glendale Ald. Tomika Vukovicand businessman Carl Gates. They are vying to face Republican candidate Orlando Owens in the general election. The district includes parts of northern Milwaukee County.

Assembly District 14: Republicans have a three-way primary to pick achallenger to Democratic incumbent Robyn Vining. The candidates arechurch outreach directorBonnie Lee, electrician Steven Sheveyand former special education teacher Linda Boucher.

The districtspans parts of Waukesha and Milwaukee countiesand includes Brookfield and Wauwatosa

READ MORE: Meet the candidates for the Republican primary for Wisconsin State Assembly District 14

READ MORE: A battleground district in a battleground state: How the Democrats aim to claim Scott Walker's home turf

Assembly District 17:Three Democrats teacher and veteran Mike Brox, Milwaukee County Supervisor Supreme Moore Omokundeand Democratic Party of Milwaukee County Chair Chris Walton are running in the primary to face Republican candidate Abbie Eisenbach. The seat, representing parts of Milwaukee's west sidewas held byDavid Crowley, who was elected Milwaukee County executive in April.

Assembly District 60:Republican incumbent Robert Brooks faces a primary challenge from health care consultant and former Cedarburg City Council member Chris Reimer. There are no Democrats on the ballot. The district includes parts of Ozaukee and Washington counties.

Assembly District 82:Republican incumbent Ken Skowronski faces a primary challenge from attorney Theodore Kafkas in the district covering parts of southwestern Milwaukee County including Greendale and Franklin.

The Democratic primary in the district pits recent Yale graduate Jacob Malinowski and businessman Paul McCreary.

In Milwaukee County, there is a contested Democratic primary for the office of Register of Deeds. Incumbent Israel Ramn faces a challenge from County Supervisor John Weishan Jr.

Registering to vote by mail or online in time for the primary ended on July 22, but it is still possible to register in person at the polls;to do so, you must bring a Wisconsin driver's license orstate IDor the last four digits of your Social Security numberas well as a document providing proof that you live in Wisconsin.

Wisconsinites who are already registered to votecan vote in person at their local polling place, at an early voting siteor by mail.

In-person early voting started on July 28 and ends Aug. 9.

To find your local polling place, visit myvote.wi.gov.Polls will be open 7 a.m. to 8 p.m. Aug. 11.

More than 785,000 voters have requested absentee ballots for the primary so far, and due to the pandemic, groups such as the bipartisan VoteSafeWI organization are trying to expand access to absentee voting. Anyone registered to vote can request an absentee ballot in person, by mailor online at myvote.wi.gov.

To request a ballot in person or by mail, visit or contact your municipal clerk; a directory of clerks is available at https://elections.wi.gov/clerks/directory.

If you are voting in person, you will need to bringa photo ID. Some of the accepted IDs include a driver's license from the Wisconsin Department of Transportation; an identification card from the DOT; a military ID card; a U.S. passport; an ID card from an indigenous tribe in Wisconsin; or a photo ID from a "Wisconsin accredited university or college that contains date of issuance, signature of studentand an expiration date no later than two years after date of issuance.Also, the university or college ID must be accompanied by a separate document that proves enrollment,according to the Wisconsin Elections Commission's ID website.

It is also possible to apply for a state photo ID through the Division of Motor Vehicles.

More details and forms of eligible ID can be found athttps://bringit.wi.gov/.

Our subscribers make this reporting possible. Please consider supporting local journalism by subscribing to the Journal Sentinel at jsonline.com/deal.

Read or Share this story: https://www.jsonline.com/story/news/politics/elections/2020/07/30/wisconsin-primary-what-know-august-11-elections/5518864002/

Excerpt from:

Voter guide: What you should know for the Aug. 11 primary elections in Wisconsin - Milwaukee Journal Sentinel

LNP Scoreboard: Youth and recreational sports results from July 30 – LancasterOnline

Here is a listing of youth and recreational sports results reported to LNP on July 30.

Please note that because of the COVID-19 pandemic, the LNP sports department is not working in the newsroom. If you call in a score to 717-291-8666, you will only be able to leave a voice mail. We retrieve voice mails remotely each night; but if you do call, be sure to leave your name and phone number so we may contact you if there is a problem. Results may also be emailed to sports@lnpnews.com. They appear in the print edition of LNP as space permits each day. Also, because LNP has begun running on a new press as of July 27, print deadlines will be much earlier for the next several weeks during the shakedown process. The nightly cutoff for print will be between 8:30 and 9 p.m., depending on shifting deadlines.

14U

Section Two

Elizabethtown Black 11, Manheim Township Lightning 1

Dakota Petrosky went 2 for 3 with an RBI, and Brady Moran went 3 for 3 with an RBI.

Mountville Red Sox 16, Lititz VFW 9

Bowmansville Red Sox 14, Lampeter-Strasburg Blue 4

Section Three

Donegal Indians 15, Cocalico Eagles 1

Peighton Derr pitched a complete-game one-hitter for the win.

12U

Section One

Lampeter-StrasburgCardinals 5, Solanco Gold 3

Section Two

Cocalico White 6,Manheim Township Lightning 3

Mountville Phillies 15, Garden Spot Blue Sox 1

Section Three

Donegal Black 18, Hempfield 1

Manheim TownshipChargers 12, Manheim VFW 8

10U

Section One

Donegal Indians 10, Penn Manor 8

Section Two

Lancaster SALSA 15, Hempfield Red 2

Mountville Giants 14, Penn Manor White 6

14U

Section Two

Manheim Tigers 17,Lampeter-StrasburgBlue 4

10U

Section One

Mountville Cubs 9,Manheim Township Streaks 3

12U

Section Three

Mount Joy 18, Manheim VFW 17

At Lancaster Country Club

Friday, July 31

8 a.m. Austin Bortz, Zachary Lessley, Nathan Williams, Joseph McGinty (Boys Silver)

8:10 a.m. Isaiah Hansen, Ian Stefanchik, Jesse Shue, Jamesson Radwanski (Boys Silver)

8:20 a.m. Kayla Maletto, Elle Overly, Tristan Groff, Hannah Barrett (Girls Gold)

8:30 a.m. Tyler Swartz, Reagan Flynn, Luke Barbour (Boys Gold)

8:40 a.m. Grant Novinger, Brant Bomberger, Alex Williams, Brady Wiggins (Boys Gold)

8:50 a.m. Sawyer Marten, Brock Smith, Trey Rios, Matthew Wilson (Boys Gold)

9 a.m. Logan Wagner, Ben Wilson, Sean Cliff, Dante Billoni (Boys Gold)

9:10 a.m. Ben Feeman, Tyson Mitchell, Tanner Fackler, Simon Domencic (Boys Gold)

9:20 a.m. Colton Yenser, Evan Jozwiak, Michael Fioravante, Trevor Snyder (Boys Gold)

9:30 a.m. Garrett Engle, Derek McGlaughlin, Jonathan Glick, Connor Strine (Boys Gold)

Success! An email has been sent with a link to confirm list signup.

Error! There was an error processing your request.

Good Food Inc. 16, G.E. Richards 1

JUNIOR DOUBLES

Drew Jaquith, 226-212-277715

Aliza Shirk, 227-236-246709

Trevor Courtney, 210-270-207687

Robbie Jack, 192-207-280679

Morgan Kline, 226-177-213616

Bethany Jaquith, 192-215-197604

MENS GUEST DAY Better Ball of Partners, July 30.

Gross: First, Bob Ford and Alex Blickle, 68; second, Dave Knox and Andy Wallover, 69; third (tie), Dave Knox and Conor Gilbert, Shane Clayton and Pete Bulat, 70.

Net: First (tie), Hank Popplewell and Kevin Popplewell, Jody Shelby and Ed Kocher, Jim Fucci and Doug Layaw, Pahn Sisay and Paul Kamay, 61; fifth (tie), Jim Fucci and Ron Battaglia, Jim Fucci and Jake Daggett, 62.

PURPLE GANG STABLEFORD July 30. The team of Brian Eidemiller, Lee Tannehill and Mike Cohen won the front with +12, the back with + 7, and total with +19.

THURSDAY MORNING WOMENS LEAGUE July 20. FIrst, Becky Wilson, +9; second, Paula Levandowski, +7; third, Connie Archey, +6.

WEDNESDAY WOMENS LEAGUE Crier, July 29. First Gross: Billie Besser, 93. First Flight (Net): First, Fern Clemmer, 62; second, Donna Beck, 66) Second Flight (Net): First, Barb Landis, 70.

SENIOR LEAGUE July 30.

A Flight: First, Ron Hunt, 64; second, Mike ODay, 66; third (tie), Dan Miller, Karl Gochnauer, 68; fifth, Bob Kayden, 69.

B Flight: First (tie), Jack Janowicz, Dave Scott, 64; third (tie), Dennis Michael, Howard Pryor, 65; fifth, Jamie Roak, 67.

C Flight: First, Larry Booz, 62; second, Leon Brisson, 67; third, Don Denlinger, 68; fourth, Steve Brickner, 69; fifth (tie), Wayne Hoffman, Carl Smith, 71.

D Flight: First, Ed Rowlands, 64; second (tie), Carl Frey, Richard Drennen, Gene Wise, Bill Bitterman, 67.

E Flight: First, Frank Sahd, 62; second, Bill Arms, 63; third (tie), Ron Ross, Bill Renninger, 67; fifth, George Lower, 68.

Closest to the Pin: No. 6, Mike ODay, 8 feet, 2 inches; No. 17, Steve Parmer, 3 feet.

WOMENS NINE-HOLE LEAGUE Medal Play, July 30. Flight A: Linda Goodhart, 30. Flight B: Kristie Arment, 28. Flight C: Linda Wilson, 26. Flight D: Judy Gingerich, 36.

SENIOR LEAGUE Points System, July 30, 37 players. First: Mike MacKinnon and Dwight Evans, +21. Second: Carl Anderson, Herman Arters and Scott Herber, +20. Third: Greg Strunk and Jim Axe, +18. Fourth (tie), Ted Kuznier and Carl Sabal, Jeff Bohler and Joe Pieja, +13.

Greenies: No. 2, Joe Pieja; No. 8, Jere Stick; No. 11, Charlie Miles; No. 17, Ken Martin.

MONDAY SENIOR LEAGUE July 27.

A Flight (Handicap 17 and below): First, Frank Telenko Jr., 60; second (tie), Ed Binder, Guy Gillespie, Joe McDonough, 68; fifth (tie), Greg Smith, Keith Branum, 69; seventh, Jim Terry, 71.

B Flight (Handicap 18 and above): First, Pat Moran, 59; second, Gene Newcomer, 60; third, John Schnee, 65; fourth, Erick Kershner, 66.

Closest to the Pin: No. 12, Ed Binder.

WEDNESDAY SENIOR LEAGUE July 29.

A Flight (Handicap 17 and below): First, Tom Snyder, 65; second, Kevin Ahern, 66; third, Doug Bitner, 67; fourth (tie), Barry Mowrer, Ed Binder, Tom Shaub, 68.

B Flight (Handicap 18 and above): First (tie), Pat Moran, Phil Sinegar, 65; third (tie), Gene Newcomer, Robert Scharf, 66; fifth (tie), Carl King, Charlie Brecht, 67; seventh, Bob Culp, 68.

Closest to the Pin: No. 12, Keith Branum.

SHOT HIS AGE John Hershey, age 74, shot a round of 73 on July 30.

HOFFA TEAM MATCHES July 30. Front (plus-10) and total (plus-14): Roy Hoffa, Tom Perlaki, Dave Guiles and Ed Lilly. Back (plus-8): Irv Fox, Don Gehman, Jim Lloys and Dave Seibold.

SHOT HIS AGE Roy Hoffa, age 84, shot a round of 80 on July 30.

SHOT HIS AGE Irv Fox, age 77, shot a round of 74 on July 30.

SHOT HIS AGE Dave Seibold, age 77, shot a round of 77 on July 30.

SHOT HIS AGE Spence Henry, age 79, shot a round of 76 on July 30.

SHOT HIS AGE Jim Lloyd, age 89, shot a round of 89 on July 30.

WOMENS 18-HOLE LEAGUE Team Quota, July 29. First: Janice Leakway, Liz Martin, Ann Schein and Nancy Cummings, +11.

WEDNESDAY MENS LEAGUE Team Quota, July 29. First: Bob Stauffer, Mark Gast and Brian Cline, +3. Second (tie), Richard Frey, Roger Harvey Jr., Andrew Enck and Bob Rose; Blaise Holzbauer, Tom Holzbauer, Roger Harvey Sr. and Frank Dano, -2.

Subscribe today for only $2

' + submsgtxthtml + '

Get unlimited access to breaking news, ancestry archives, our daily E-newspaper, games and more.

Subscribe today for only $2

' + submsgtxthtml + '

Get unlimited access to breaking news, ancestry archives, our daily E-newspaper, games and more.

Subscribe today for only $2

' + submsgtxthtml + '

Get unlimited access to breaking news, ancestry archives, our daily E-newspaper, games and more.

Subscribe today for only $2

Continue reading here:

LNP Scoreboard: Youth and recreational sports results from July 30 - LancasterOnline

Fear of speech is replacing freedom of speech – The Boston Globe

Freedom of Speech, the famous Norman Rockwell painting that depicts a young man addressing a local gathering, was inspired by a real event. One evening in 1942, Rockwell attended the town meeting in Arlington, Vt., where he lived for many years. On the agenda was the construction of a new school. It was a popular proposal, supported by everyone in attendance except for one resident, who got up to express his dissenting view. He was evidently a blue-collar worker, whose battered jacket and stained fingernails set him apart from the other men in the audience, all dressed in white shirts and ties. In Rockwells scene, the man speaks his mind, unafraid to express a minority opinion and not intimidated by the status of those hes challenging. He has no reason not to speak plainly: His words are being attended to with respectful attention. His neighbors may disagree with him, but theyre willing to hear what he has to say.

What brings Rockwells painting to mind is a new national poll by the Cato Institute. The survey found that self-censorship has become extremely widespread in American society, with 62 percent of adults saying that, given the current political climate, they are afraid to honestly express their views.

These fears cross partisan lines, writes Emily Ekins, Catos director of polling. Majorities of Democrats (52 percent), independents (59 percent), and Republicans (77 percent) all agree they have political opinions they are afraid to share. The surveys 2,000 respondents sorted themselves ideologically as very liberal, liberal, moderate, conservative, or very conservative. In every category except very liberal, a majority of respondents feel pressured to keep their views to themselves. Roughly one-third of American adults 32 percent fear they could be fired or otherwise penalized at work if their political beliefs became known.

Freedom of speech has often been threatened in America, but the suppression of wrong opinions in the past has tended to come from the top down. It was the government that arrested editors for criticizing Woodrow Wilsons foreign policy, made it a crime to burn the flag, turned the dogs on civil rights marchers, and jailed communists under the Smith Act. Today, by contrast, dissent is rarely prosecuted. Thanks to the Supreme Courts First Amendment jurisprudence, freedom of expression has never been more strongly protected legally.

But culturally, the freedom to express unpopular views has never been more endangered.

On college campuses, in workplaces, in the media, there are ever-widening no-go zones of viewpoints and arguments that cannot be safely expressed. Voice an opinion that self-anointed social-justice warriors regard as heretical, and the consequences can be career-destroying. The dean of the nursing school at UMass-Lowell lost her job after writing in an email that everyones life matters. An art curator was accused of being a racist and forced to quit for saying that his museum would continue to collect white artists. The director of communications for Boeing apologized and resigned after an employee complained that 33 years ago he was opposed to women serving in combat.

Virtually everyone would agree that some views are indisputably beyond the pale. If there are supporters of slavery or advocates of genocide who feel inhibited from sharing their beliefs, no one much cares. But the range of opinions deemed unsayable by todays thought police extends well into the mainstream. And in many cases, the most enthusiastic suppressors of debate are students, journalists, artists, intellectuals those who in former times were the greatest champions of uninhibited speech and the greatest foes of ideological conformity.

It isnt only on the left that this totalitarian impulse to silence dissent exists. President Trump, always infuriated by criticism, has called for columnists who disparage him to be fired, hecklers at his rallies to be beaten up, and TV stations to lose their licenses if they run ads vilifying his handling of the pandemic calls routinely amplified on social media by tens of thousands of his followers. When a Babson College professor joked that Iran ought to bomb sites of beloved American cultural heritage like the Mall of America and the Kardashian residence, a right-wing website launched a campaign that got him fired.

The new Cato survey found that more than one in five Americans (22 percent) would support firing a business executive who donated money to Democrat Joe Bidens presidential campaign, while 31 percent would be OK with firing someone who gave money to Trumps reelection campaign. The urge to ostracize or penalize unwelcome views isnt restricted to just one end of the spectrum.

Americans right to free speech is shielded by the Constitution to a degree unmatched anywhere else. But our First Amendment guarantees will prove impotent if the habit of free speech is lost. For generations, Americans were raised to see debate as legitimate, desirable, and essential to democratic health. They quoted Voltaires (apocryphal) aphorism: I disapprove of what you say, but will defend to the death your right to say it. Editors, publishers, satirists, and civil libertarians took to heart the dictum of Supreme Court Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes Jr., who wrote that the principle of free thought is meant to enshrine not free thought for those who agree with us but freedom for the thought that we hate.

But that principle has been turned on its head. The thought that we hate is not tolerated but stifled. It is reviled as taboo, forbidden to be uttered. Anyone expressing it may be accused not just of giving offense, but of literally endangering those who disagree. And even if only some people lose their careers or reputations for saying something wrong, countless others get the chilling message.

And so dread settles in, writes journalist Emily Yoffe. Challenging books go untaught. Deep conversations are not had. Friendships are not formed. Classmates and colleagues eye each other with suspicion.

And 62 percent of Americans fear to express what they think.

The speaker in Norman Rockwells painting may have had something unpopular to say, but neither he nor his neighbors had any doubt that it was appropriate for him to say it. Now, such doubt is everywhere, and freedom of speech has never been more threatened.

Jeff Jacoby can be reached at jeff.jacoby@globe.com. Follow him on Twitter @jeff_jacoby. To subscribe to Arguable, his weekly newsletter, visit bitly.com/Arguable.

Original post:

Fear of speech is replacing freedom of speech - The Boston Globe

"Freedom Festival" is planned this weekend – The Ellsworth American

ELLSWORTH Former State Senate candidate John Linnehan will host a Freedom Festival on Aug. 1 and 2 in the parking lot of the Maine Coast Mall behind Governors Restaurant.

This is the first one Ive ever done, said Linnehan. Im trying to make it a staycation vacation.

Linnehan, who is president of Linnehan Homes and has run Christian ministries in the area, was a conservative candidate in the July 14 Republican primary for Maine Senate District 7. He lost to fellow Republican Brian Langley of Ellsworth.

Linnehan said he is not selling tickets to this weekends event and will not be counting visitors. The state is still under orders to limit indoor gatherings to 50 people or less to prevent the spread of COVID-19. Seated outdoor events, such as concerts, may divide seating into up to four separate areas with up to 50 people each as long as the layout meets several criteria. Those include at least 14 feet of separation between sections, with physical barriers to prevent intermingling; separate restrooms, concessions and services for each section and enough space for 6 feet of separation between household groups.

Linnehan said that hes not sure how many people will be attending the festival but that he doesnt expect people to camp out but stay for an event and move on.

We will have masks available but Im not going to enforce it, he said. People are more than welcome to put it on. I believe its an individual choice.

The festival includes a Spin-tacular basketball show with the Crevier family, gospel singers and a salute to law enforcement. The festival will span two days, with the same agenda both days beginning at 1 p.m. and ending at 7 p.m.

We strongly believe in our biblical Christian values and our United States and Maine constitutional rights and freedoms, reads a statement on the Freedom Festival website. We believe that all citizens have their individual freedom of choice to wear a mask or not wear a mask. We will have masks available. Please respect all people attending whether you agree personally with their position on this issue or not.

Linnehan said that he wants everyone to respect everybodys individual constitutional rights, and that those who are uncomfortable with being in a large group are welcome to watch the event online or not attend.

Im very sorry the way this has been a divisive issue around the country, he said. Linnehan compared coronavirus with the flu and said he believes the risk from COVID-19 is very, very minimal. He said that the effects of lockdowns are worse.

Were meant to be social people. We hug people, we shake hands. Those things to me are being more effectively damaged.

Although respiratory diseases linked to the seasonal flu can be deadly, killing between 290,000 to 650,000 people every year according to the World Health Organization, COVID-19 has already surpassed that figure, killing at least 650,157 people worldwide since late December, according to Johns Hopkins University. That has been the case even with strict prevention and lockdown measures in place across the globe. Cases show no sign of abating in the United States.

The city did issue a mass gathering permit for the Freedom Festival, said Code Enforcement Officer Dwight Tilton, as it has done for other gatherings in recent weeks, including those associated with the Black Lives Matter movement.

This event differs from other rallies in recent weeks, said Tilton, because it is on private property.

The purpose of the permit is to have a diagram of the event area in case of a police or fire emergency, Tilton said in an email. The permit is not issued for the event but for the location.

The code enforcement officer would not be enforcing possible violations of the Governors executive order, which Tilton said would be the responsibility of the property owner and event coordinator.

Tilton said Police Chief Glenn Moshier did send letters reminding the property owner and event coordinator that they are required to follow the Governors executive order, and included copies of the order in the letter.

The American was unable to reach the owner of the Maine Coast Mall or state officials who would be tasked with enforcing the Governors executive order.

The rest is here:

"Freedom Festival" is planned this weekend - The Ellsworth American

Freedom worth fighting for right here in America – Times Union

There's a Far Side cartoon by Gary Larson that has always been a favorite. In it, two deer are standing in a field and they are chatting, as deer often do in Larson's cartoons. One of the deer has a black and white bull's-eye painted in the center of his chest. The other deer comments sympathetically, "Bummer of a birthmark, Hal."

Right now, Americans feel a little bit like Hal. We're getting used to the United States being challenged and accused by allies and enemies alike. We feel the danger that has accrued to our role in the world. We're reminded daily that our war is now about civilian targets. Shootings and bombings and police militarization are about civilian loss and injuries. It is civilians now people of color, young and old protesters who are in danger. We live in a military state and it crept up on us. We taught our kids, "If you ever feel scared, look for a policeman." And now none of us can safely say that.

This is where it gets hard to be an American liberal or conservative. We advocate for democracy in other countries, but we feel so aware of the personal danger that it's tempting to throw away what's important.

It's excruciating to watch a president and many leaders toss out our rights like a newcomer cleaning someone else's house. In the guise of security, what we look up online, or share on social media and even our medical records might not be private. We could end up running after a truck saying, "Whoa, those are my baseball cards and my civil liberties, and hey, that's the Bill of Rights, I'm not done with that yet."

People say they are willing to trade a few freedoms for safety, but do they mean that? I don't want to be blithe about the dangers. But can we keep for ourselves what we have fought for elsewhere: fair elections, freedom of speech, rule of law and an open political process? We can't paint a bull's-eye on our civil rights.

We also have to find ways to partner with the rest of the world. Years ago, Canada's then-prime minister, Pierre Trudeau, called the United States "the elephant next door." So, as the world's elephant, could we learn to move more gracefully? Or use our might for the common good?

I think about how, as a child, I learned about the United States from one of those wall-sized maps common in elementary classrooms, the ones that show each state as a different color. I remember the first time we went on a family vacation to another state and how disappointed I was that all that distinguished the next state was a sign saying, "Welcome to Ohio" but Ohio wasn't blue as my classroom map had shown it. Now, we are similarly challenged to accept that countries are permeable, and that we have to see the world as a whole.

In 1941, President Franklin Roosevelt described the four freedoms that he wished for our future: Freedom of speech and expression; Freedom for everyone to worship God his own way; Freedom from want; and Freedom from fear.

We've seen these freedoms depicted in Norman Rockwell paintings, which might make us think these were only for the American people, but that's not true. FDR called them a "human birthright," and the tagline on each painting was: for everyone, everywhere in the world.

That's the challenge. It's simple but not easy. But it's a birthmark worth wearing and fighting for abroad and at home.

Diane Cameron is a Capital Region writer. DianeOCameron@gmail.com.

Read more from the original source:

Freedom worth fighting for right here in America - Times Union

TCW’s Brexit Watch: Are we heading for a fake freedom? – The Conservative Woman

BREXIT Watchers received a nasty shock with the news that David Frost recently told senior Tory MPs that we will only get 60 per cent of what we want. Michel Barnier has continued with the intransigent EU demand for permanent rights over UK sovereign fishing grounds and insistence on the EU regulation of UK trade and state aid so as to prevent the UK gaining any economic advantage.

Could the UK be giving way on these demands? TheExpressreports that Cummings is fighting off Whitehall mandarins on state aid regulation, demanding UK freedomand also that the fisheries issue is to remain a matter of UK sovereignty, not a trading bargaining chip.Joe Barnes in theExpresshas also suggested that Frost is dropping several trade demands in the post-Brexit talks with Brussels in the hope of increasing the chances of a deal:

Boris Johnsons chief negotiator with the European Union hopes that asking for a less ambitious free-trade agreement will unlock the negotiations. David Frost has told EU counterpart Michel Barnier that the UK is willing to accept less favourable terms for manufacturers and professionals as part of the final agreement. The Taskforce Europe chief believes lowering the complexity of the pact, in areas such as rules of origin and mutual recognition of qualifications, would mean Brussels dropping its complaints about easy access to its single market.

That could possibly be good news as regards a clean Brexit, as long as the Germans and French are given the same treatment as the UK exporters.However Matthew Parris (always worth reading despite his belief we should stay in the EU) says in hisTimescolumnthat the UK is well on the way to becoming a trade colony and, like sheep, we are slowly but inexorably being herded into the truck.Following his colleague Bruno Waterfields briefing from Brussels, Parrisanticipates a trade deal will be done soon with the UK submitting to regulation as the price for tariff-free trade: the very bad deal that has always been feared by Brexiteers.

PM Johnson will, no doubt, praise the deal and pronounceit a victory but the truth is that it will amount to the UK beingallowedto check out legally, but agreeing not to,voluntarily a fake freedom, a Brino.

It is worth quoting from Parriss analysis as the article is behind a paywall. In his words:

Such an FTA would leave us still able to enjoy relatively frictionless trade with our formerEUpartners, so long as we essentially copy theEUs level playing field rules; but doing so voluntarily as a sovereign nation.Boris Johnsoncould burble more or less truthfully that we are no longer bound by Brusselss rules because we could always walk away (or diverge or regress) and take the consequences. Destiny, that sheepdog of our doings, knows already that since we realise which side our bread is buttered on, we shall not in fact diverge. But, hey, we could.

As he says, this is the puncturing of the Brexit dream of a clean break, that will be covered up by PM Johnsons burbling about a victory.He sets out the four ideas that he understands to be at the core of the case for Brexit:

The first was thatEUred tape was strangling the British economy (indeed, according to some, the British way of life). Straight bananas, threats to the British sausage, lawnmower-noise directives, that sort of stuff.

The second idea was that Europe would be so desperate to keep British trade that wed easily secure a frictionless trade agreement with theEU. We could deploy Project Fear against them. They would buckle.

The third was that we could keepEUimmigrants out.

The fourth was that there existed a world out there beyond theEU, waiting to do more business with us once wed untangled ourselves from European regulation and struck new, bilateral trade deals with other countries.

Parris thinks that some success has happened as regards the first point, but otherwise the failure of the UK to gain lots of trade deals with other nations has punctured the bid for freedom. He says:

But its the failure of the new global deals idea that has brought the whole project down. The deals are simply not there. America was the great hope, the linchpin of this hoped-for opening-up. You can forget Australia and New Zealand: antipodean trade was falling as a share of the total even before we entered theEU; their share now is tiny. The United States, though, is different: our second-biggest trading partner (15 per cent) after theEU(49 per cent). It has emerged this week that hopes of reaching any trade deal this year have all but vanished. The sticking points (food standards being notorious) are well known, and have not unstuck.

His view is that the Department of Trade has failed and that the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Defra) lobby has managed to stall a quick deal with the USA, deploying its famous chlorine-washed chicken successfully as I discussed in my last post. This analysismight explain Frosts 60 per cent prediction, and is depressing. It is worth stressing that the farming issue remains contested and unclear. Whats more, it could be solved easily with big subsidies but as theFTtells us:The National Audit Office warned last year that Defra has not allowed enough time to fully develop the payments system.The dead hand of remainer Whitehall is impossible to escape.

Defence remains the one oven-ready deal, a pure gift to the EU, again disguised from the public and democratic accountability as I discussedhere.

On the SNPs war against Brexit, theTelegraphs Roger Bootlepoints out that the economic case for Scottish independence shrivels away after Brexit because it would be so disadvantageous.What is the point of trying to rejoin theEU for that is what would be entailed if that meant leaving the UKs single market, which is much more significant for Scotland than the bloc? he asks.

Finally, some good news. The UK has dodged an immense EU bullet of at least50billion that we would have had to pay to theEuropean Central BankCovid recovery fund. And poor Ireland is now on the hook to be a net contributor to the EU budget. The bloc is on its way to being a single dysfunctional state, ruled from Berlin. Leaving was surely a great decision, and remainers look more and more like fundamentalist swivel-eyed lunatics, as Matthew Parris and David Cameron used to call them.

- Advertisement -

Read more from the original source:

TCW's Brexit Watch: Are we heading for a fake freedom? - The Conservative Woman

The Hard Right is a Far Greater Threat to Freedom of Speech than ‘Cancel Culture’ – Byline Times

From his experience with the far-right, Caolan Robertson argues their reaction to that assault on commentator Owen Jones proves they are happy to silence opponents when it suits them

When Owen Jones was violently attacked outside a London pub last year by three football hooligans, one of whom karate kicked him in the back without warning, the response was disturbingly mixed. While many on the political left and the centre were justly horrified, there was a particularly disturbing and predictable response from much of the right.

On Telegram, the Russian app to which many far-right e-celebs have been exiled, comments and posts claiming Jones had it coming or outright denying the attack happened were rife. Even now on Twitter, responses to a BBC tweet linking an article about the attackers sentencing include users calling him a puff, claiming that he brought it upon himself and that he should have been hit harder.

James Healy, the man who led the attack was found to have been a member of a football hooligan firm and to have kept neo-nazi group Combat 18 memorabilia at home. While this attack was clearly politically motivated, its also worth noting that one of Combat 18s key tenets is Kill all Queers. Perhaps most concerning though, is not the actual violence from avowed neo-nazis, but rather the committed support for it from the much less radical sections of the right.

The right simply does not care about freedom of speech, or freedom of the press, or freedom of association or assembly or any other freedom that forms the basis of the Western democracy they profess to love so deeply.

On Telegram, the idols of the far-right such as Milo Yiannopoulos, Tommy Robinson and Gavin McInnes are vociferous in their insistence that free speech must be protected at all costs. But there is no clearer example of an attack on free speech than the brutal and frenzied attack on Jones simply for his advocating left-wing ideals.

So why are so many on the right, even the centre-right dismissing or even lauding what is essentially a shocking, appalling, affront to the very idea of free speech? Not since the murder of Jo Cox, a sitting MP, has such a blatant and frankly shameless act of political violence been met with such disregard from those who profess to nail their colours to the mast of Western Values.

News of Healy and his accomplices sentencing (two years and a suspended sentence of eight months respectively) comes at a time when the culture wars topic du jour is cancel culture. The timing could not be more pertinent. At this point, we must stop and ask ourselves which is the greater affront to freedom of speech and Western democratic ideals?

Certainly, the use of physical violence, of any kind, against a political opponent is a far greater threat to the ability of any person to speak freely than the possibility of losing a job, a book deal or some other professional commodity. We can debate whether cancel culture exists or not but all of its supposed impacts pale in comparison to actual violence. Yet the most outspoken advocates of free speech are not up in arms over this attack but at worst celebrated it and at best dismissed it completely.

Thus their hypocrisy is laid bare for all but themselves to see. This is because they patently do not care about freedom of speech or Western democracy. Milo Yiannopoulos, the right-wing provocateur who artificially inflated his book sales, posted on the right-wing app Parler as recently as this week, declaring he doesnt want to see less cancel culture but more of it, as long as it is those he disagrees with being cancelled.

Once upon a time, when I was much younger and vastly more stupid than I am now, I worked with Milo and this was very much his stance on politics. I also worked with Tommy Robinson and many other content creators on the online right and can assure you that this attitude is not limited to Yiannopoulos. As the outtake from 2018 below reveals, Robinsons latching onto the notion of free speech was very much opportunistic and insincere.

In @CaolanRob's upcoming piece on why the Far Right are a far greater threat than Cancel Culture to free speech, a previously unseen outtake from Yaxley Lennon in 2018, where he describes how he'll use the 'free speech' theme for his own ends. pic.twitter.com/iqic2k6KZ6

The trouble is that in recent years the line that separated the far right from the mainstream conservative movement is eroding fast.

Last year Prime Minister Boris Johnson appointed Chloe Westley as head of social media for Downing Street. Westley openly referred to the co-leader of Tommy Robinsons Pegida UK (a branch of a German alt-right ethnonationalist group) as a hero. Anne Marie Waters, the far-right activist in question, was caught on camera by ITV claiming the EU wanted to turn Europe into an Islamic State.

I even met with the CEO of Westminster Digital, a production company responsible for much of the Conservative Partys campaign content to discuss working on their content while I was working with Tommy Robinson and other hard-right ideologues.

One of the reasons I began working with these people was because I believed that freedom of speech was under attack, I heard the figures about Sadiq Khans online hate crime hub and the increasing number of arrests made over Twitter posts in 2016 and 2017. Like many, I had a knee jerk reaction to it, and this was part of the reason I drifted into hardcore right-wing politics.

One of the reasons I began to question my involvement was a violent attack on Muslim Youtuber Ali Dawah at the Day for Freedom rally in 2018. We had planned for the event to be the largest pro-free speech rally in recent memory and the lineup was a whos who of the online right at the time. The day before the event, Ali Dawah had been making a lot of noise on Twitter claiming that if the rally was really about free speech we would let him speak too.

What a coup it would be, we thought, if Ali Dawah, who had a history of online spats with Robinson would crop up on stage and speak. We thought we could prove the naysayers wrong, prove that it was ultimately all about the freedom of speech, about democracy and Western values of freedom.

It was agreed that he would be put on stage and the update was announced via Robinsons assistant on Twitter. The backlash was instant and Robinson publicly revoked the invite and denied any participation in making the decision, wasting no time in throwing his assistant under the bus.

Privately, however, Dawah was still slated to speak until the last minute when he had already arrived. A handful of supporters broke loose and violently confronted Dawah and his cameraman, assaulting him mid livestream in an attack that terrified me even then. My relationship with Robinson began to break down when that afternoon he reprimanded me, his assistant and my partner George Llewelyn-John for sharing tweets condemning the attack and appealing for witnesses to identify the men responsible.

At the Day for Freedom, Ali Dawah wasnt just literally cancelled but he was made the victim of all too common far-right violence, violence that is implicitly supported by people like Robinson and Yiannopolous.

But Ali Dawah and Owen Jones are far from the only victims, a labour activist in her 70s was attacked by right wing thugs and suffered cracked ribs as recently as November last year. In March that same year the DFLA, a loose union of football hooligan firms stormed into the Guardian offices demanding a letter they wrote be published and threatened to return in greater numbers if their demands werent met. There are countless examples of threats and actual violence from the far-right and yet none of the doxxing, assaults, threats or harassment are on the table for discussion when the right want to talk about cancel culture and its danger to freedom of speech.

It is time we all woke up. The right simply does not care about freedom of speech, or freedom of the press, or freedom of association or assembly or any other freedom that forms the basis of the Western democracy they profess to love so deeply. Nor do they care about democracy itself. They care only about winning, about spewing hate or perpetrating acts of violence with impunity.

If we are to stand any chance of slowing or reversing the tide of right-wing populism, if we are to protect freedom of speech and the right to dissenting opinions, we must stop meeting them where they are. We must stop taking their arguments at face value; false, disingenuous arguments meant only to subvert our democracy, to divert our attention while they conjure up something much worse.

We have to stop falling for it every time, arguing with them over a cancel culture that they dont even believe exists. It is all just a vehicle for them to achieve their reactionary goals, and while we are getting down in the mud with them from behind our computer screens, they are on the streets putting journalists in hospital and convincing a large proportion of the population that it didnt even happen.

I used to laugh about the idea of fascism in the UK. I used to joke about it because I thought it wasnt even a remote possibility.

How wrong how naive I was.

See original here:

The Hard Right is a Far Greater Threat to Freedom of Speech than 'Cancel Culture' - Byline Times

John Lewis: ‘Now it is your turn to let freedom ring’ | TheHill – The Hill

The late Rep. John LewisJohn LewisHouse approves amendments to rein in federal forces in cities Sanders calls for the end of the filibuster following Obama's remarks The Hill's Campaign Report: Trump faces pushback after suggesting election could be delayed MORE (D-Ga.) said in a posthumous op-ed that he had been inspired shortly before his death by nationwide demonstrations against systemic racism and police brutality sparked by the death of George Floyd in May.

In a piece publishedin The New York Times on the day of his funeral, the civil rights titan recounted his own fears after the lynching of Emmett Till in 1955 and his own path to the civil rights movement led by Martin Luther King Jr.

Lewis called on the next generation to carry on the mantle of civil rights and continue getting into good trouble, necessary trouble.

While my time here has now come to an end, I want you to know that in the last days and hours of my life you inspired me. You filled me with hope about the next chapter of the great American story when you used your power to make a difference in our society, Lewis wrote.

Though I may not be here with you, I urge you to answer the highest calling of your heart and stand up for what you truly believe. In my life I have done all I can to demonstrate that the way of peace, the way of love and nonviolence is the more excellent way, he added. Now it is your turn to let freedom ring.

Lewis wrote that he had to visit the site of demonstrations in Washington, D.C., in the newly established Black Lives Matter Plaza outside the White House in June to see the latest manifestation of the civil rights movement. Lewis was hospitalized the next day.

I just had to see and feel it for myself that, after many years of silent witness, the truth is still marching on, he wrote.

Lewis, who after a prominent role in the civil rights movement represented an Atlanta-area district in the House for more than 30 years, died on July 17 at the age of 80. He had been diagnosed with pancreatic cancer in December.

Lewis was given the rare honor of lying in state at the U.S. Capitol two days earlier this week, and a funeral will be held for him Thursday at Atlantas Ebenezer Baptist Church, the site of Kings funeral in 1968. Former President Obama will be one of the attendees to deliver a eulogy.

Read more here:

John Lewis: 'Now it is your turn to let freedom ring' | TheHill - The Hill

On the internet, freedom for some never means freedom for all – The Spinoff

Kathy Errington introduces a conversation with Anjum Rahman on online harm, an extract from the upcoming BWB text Shouting Zeroes and Ones, edited by Andrew Chen.

Articulating what matters when we look to reduce online harm is becoming ever more important in a context where states are increasingly turning to regulation to address harms caused by social media platforms which grew too big, too fast while accepting too little responsibility.

Unfortunately, many of us have concluded that we cant trust social media companies to properly regulate themselves. They are, after all, largely reliant on a huge volume of user-generated content, and are often unwilling to make the necessary investment into human moderators to effectively review what or whom they give a platform to. Algorithms designed to ensure users stay on the platform can create dark echo chambers in which harmful content is continually reinforced, but social media companies have become reliant on this business model and are resistant to change.

Kathy Errington: You have said that in regard to freedom of expression, freedom for some takes away freedom from others. Can you expand on that?

Anjum Rahman: What we know about hate speech is when people are really aggressive with hate, particularly when language is threatening and abusive, it silences other people. Often with hate language, not only is it belittling the targeted group, it is spreading misinformation and ascribing false motives. The aim is to enhance the negativity of one group over another, thereby undermining the authority and validity of the speaker by associating them with a group or community delineated as evil.

The second dynamic is the sheer numbers. Those who are involved in hate will often attack groups that they perceive to have little ability to respond. In other words, the targets have little positional power within society, and they may already be viewed negatively by a significant number of people. So, the hater is in a position of feeling secure in being able to target that group safe in the knowledge that they have numbers on their side to overwhelm existing systems which attempt to provide balance.

For example, back in the day when letters to the editor were more of a thing than social media, I could write one letter trying to defend a position, and then have to deal with 20 to 30 letters in response. And the way it worked was that I only got 200 words, I only got to publish a letter once every 10 days or so, and therefore my ability to respond back, just with the sheer numbers, was so limited.

In the online world, an additional factor is the high number of bots and paid trolls, with a lot of resourcing going into campaigns targeting particular communities. As a person being targeted, when people are threatening you with rape, or death, or harm, when they are being really abusive in their language, and when they are spreading a lot of misinformation or one-sided information, when there are literally hundreds of accounts going at you, it restricts your freedom.

The response is to just shut down your social media accounts, to get offline, which means youve lost your freedom to speak. Weve seen it with celebrities, weve seen it with all sorts of people. The result is that the dominant groups freedoms are protected and advanced, while the marginalised groups lose their freedom. Theyre silent because they dont have the capacity to withstand the harassment and abuse, and they dont have the ability to respond to all those accounts. Countering the hate is not viable, so the response is to hunker down and to be silent, which is what the haters were wanting in the first place; they want to silence the voices of people they dont like.

That is a long answer to how freedom for some takes away the freedom of others. If you dont balance different types of freedoms from discrimination, from harm then youre actually only promoting the freedoms of dominant groups. Youre not promoting freedom for all people.

KE: How do we get regulation right? We seem caught in a conversation where any efforts to improve life online become immediately attacked for government overreach. And governments, even democratic ones, can respond in heavy-handed ways.

AR: I am not opposed to regulation, but we do need to be really careful. What we are hearing from an organisation in the United States is that, in their experience, regulation sought by marginalised groups can be used against them by a subsequent administration. Putting in regulation without also dealing with power and the way society is structured will not achieve anything. I think that we have to be really careful around legislation and we have to design the systems that administer those regulations knowing that, at some point, a hostile government will be enforcing them. What will protect marginalised groups in that situation? That has to be really seriously tested and factored into the way we regulate.

Another problem raised by civil society organisations overseas is that a lot of videos depicting violence which were taken down by YouTube were evidence of crimes by regimes, or evidence that could be used in court cases. So simply removing content has consequences that will be harmful to those that are suffering abuse. We need to think about how that content is archived. Who can have access to it? How can it be protected so that it can be accessed when its needed? All of this has to be factored into regulation, which is again to say, I do believe that we should have regulation. I think there are things we can do, but when it comes to implementation and enforcement, you really have to be careful.

Shouting Zeroes and Ones will be available at Unity Books from August 10.

David Hall, Curtis Barnes, Anjum Rahman, Kathy Errington, and Donna Cormack discuss the spread of disinformation, reducing online harm, and Mori data sovereignty as part of Techweek on Wednesday, July 29. Streaming details here.

The Bulletin is The Spinoffs acclaimed daily digest of New Zealands most important stories, delivered directly to your inbox each morning.

Here is the original post:

On the internet, freedom for some never means freedom for all - The Spinoff

The Cold War Bunker That Became Home to a Dark-Web Empire – The New Yorker

By various methods, the police came to believe that CyberBunker was the biggest hoster of illegal Web sites in Germany, and perhaps anywhere in the world. In 2014, it hosted Cannabis Road, the dark-Web marketplace. Between March, 2016, and February, 2018, it hosted the forum Fraudsters, through which counterfeit money, fake I.D.s, and prescription and illicit drugs were traded. Between 2015 and 2018, CyberBunker hosted Flugsvamp, a dark-Web market that accounted for roughly ninety per cent of the online illicit drug trade in Sweden. Xennts most significant dark-Web client was a site called Wall Street Market. Between 2016 and 2019, it sold more than thirty-six million euros worth of drugs. The sites administrators took a commission of three per cent on each transaction.

While the Mainz cybercrime unit was building its case against Xennt, a separate international investigationled by federal police in the United States, Germany, and the Netherlandstargeted Wall Street Market. Jrg Angerer, the Koblenz prosecutor, told me it was vital that the prosecution of Wall Street Market proceed before the German police moved against CyberBunker. There is a chain, Angerer said. The hosters are facilitating the real criminals.... But first you have to process the real criminals.

In April, 2019, the police arrested three German men accused of being Wall Street Markets administrators. On the dark Web, the defendants were known by pseudonyms: Tibo Lousee was coder420; Jonathan Kalla was Kronos; Klaus-Martin Frost was TheOne. Led by officers from Germanys federal cybercrime unit, which is based in Frankfurt, the police in the three countries worked together to decipher the identities of the administrators, through undercover chats and through clues left by the men online. In a complaint filed in the Central District of California, the three principals were charged not only with running the site but also with planning an exit scam, in which they intended to abscond with some eleven million dollars being held in users accounts. All three men are awaiting trial.

A week after Wall Street Market was broken up and its leaders arrested, several officers from the B.K.A., Germanys federal police force, arrived at the Traben-Trarbach bunker to seize evidence relating to the case. A manager at the bunker expressed surprise and readily complied, escorting the officers to the server bank on the third floor. The officers took away the servers used by Wall Street Market, and left the rest.

After Wall Street Market was taken down, Angerer fixed CyberBunker itself in his sights.

On September 26, 2019, everybody at the bunker complexnine people, including Xennt, his sons, and his girlfriend, Jacquelinewent out for an early dinner at the Historic Mill, leaving the bunker unguarded. It was unusual for all the residents to be gone at the same time, but Xennts gardener, Harry, had unexpectedly come into an inheritance, and wanted to celebrate. The leader of the Mainz cybercrime team told me his unit had gathered intelligence that made them pretty, pretty sure nobody would be in the bunker during the meal.

At the Historic Mill, antiquated cooking utensils and old guitars hang on the walls. Through a glass panel on the floor, diners can look at the stream that once powered the old mill. Xennts group had booked a private area on the mezzanine. It was a Thursday evening at the end of the summer season, and the main dining room, on the ground floor, was nearly full. At around 6 P.M., as the members of Xennts party were starting to eat, several patrons on the ground floor revealed themselves to be armed undercover police officers. The officers went upstairs to arrest Xennt and the others. Several armed units of police massed outside the front door. A helicopter buzzed nearby. A Belgian tourist was almost caught up in the arrest when he tried to visit the bathroom on the mezzanine just before Xennt was placed in handcuffs.

A few minutes later, about a hundred police officersincluding a contingent from Germanys federal paramilitary police unitraided the bunker. They seized four hundred and twelve hard drives, four hundred and three servers, sixty-five USB sticks, sixty-one laptops and computers, fifty-seven phones, piles of paper documents, and about a hundred thousand euros in cash. Some six hundred and fifty officers were involved in the arrests and the raid.

At a press conference the next day, German authorities were jubilant. Jrgen Brauer, the chief prosecutor, declared that it was the first time in German history that arrests were not directed against the operators of marketplaces but against those who make the crime possible. CyberBunker was a haven for the worlds worst dark-Web sites, established to help its clients exclusively for illegal purposes. Moreover, its operators were connected to people involved in organized crime. (Brauer didnt name the Penguinwhose current location remains unknownbut he was clearly in his thoughts.) Xennt had been arrested, alongside his two sons, Jacqueline, two Germans, and a Bulgarian. Six other suspects remained at large.

The prosecutors reported that, in November, 2016, the bunker had also provided the command-and-control servers for an attack against Deutsche Telekom, one of Germanys largest communications companies. The attack had deployed a new weapon called a Mirai-botnet, which harnesses smart appliances and other wireless devices. An attempt to capture the companys routers failed but caused the network to crash. More than a million Deutsche Telekom customers lost their Internet connection in the attack, costing the company at least two million euros. The incident occurred only a few weeks after an even larger Mirai-botnet attack in Europe and the United States, which disabled Amazon, Netflix, and Twitter, among other sites. Brauer, the prosecutor, said that the people from CyberBunker who had been arrested were accused of hundreds of thousands of offenses, ranging from drugs, counterfeit money, and forged documents to being accessories to the distribution of child pornography.

Sven Kamphuis, the Prince of CyberBunker, was not arrested in the raids of September 26th; nor is he one of the six suspects still at large. After the raid, he claimed that the German police had engaged in an act of waryet he had survived with barely a scratch. The police arrested almost everybody with a connection to the bunker. Given the comprehensiveness of the investigation, the prosecutors lack of interest in Kamphuis seemed strange.

Xennt insisted to me that Kamphuis was not involved in the data center in Germany. But Kamphuis told me that he had engineered much of the Traben-Trarbach bunkers infrastructure, and, according to several people, he had also been important in developing the encrypted-phone business for Xennt. Even if Kamphuiss work was not technically illegal, he was deeply knowledgeable about an organization that the German state believed to be criminal. When details of an indictment were published, in April, the mystery of Kamphuiss treatment deepened. In the document, prosecutors noted that a search engine had been hosted on the Traben-Trarbach servers: cb3rob.net/darknet. It listed more than sixty-five hundred dark-Web sites, including marketplaces for narcotics, weapons, counterfeit money, murder orders, and child pornography. I recalled that CB3ROB is Kamphuiss online handle.

When I asked Patrick Fata, a senior police officer who oversaw the CyberBunker investigation, why Kamphuis was not accused in the case, he said that Kamphuiss role in the organization had diminished since 2014, and that the police did not have enough evidence to link him to the administration of Wall Street Market or other illegal sites. I asked Fata if the police had spoken to Kamphuis during the exhaustive six-year investigation. No, Fata said, adding, We dont know where he is.

Read the original here:

The Cold War Bunker That Became Home to a Dark-Web Empire - The New Yorker

Astronomers Say Megaripples Are Moving Across the Surface of Mars – Futurism

Researchers have found evidence of gigantic waves of sand, often referred to as megaripples, slowly moving around on the surface of Mars, as Science reports.

Megaripples arent unique to Mars; they can be found in deserts back here on Earth as well. But the Red Planets colossal sand dunes, believed to have formed hundreds of thousands of years ago, could be a sign that winds on Mars are even stronger than previously believed.

In a paper published last month in the Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets, the team suggests that megaripples may be migrating thanks to small grains of sand knocking into larger grains, dragging them into motion.

The new research goes against current atmospheric models that largely suggest winds couldnt be strong on Mars enough to move these mega sand structures. In other words, a thin atmosphere may allow for surprisingly strong winds.

Using images taken by NASAs Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter, the international team of scientists had a closer look. By focusing on two sites near the Martian equator, they analyzed a total of 1,100 megaripples.

Scientists previously believed that these megaripples on the Red Planet were first formed a long time ago, when a thicker atmosphere allowed for much heavier winds, and were now stationary.

But to their astonishment, they found that the megaripples do in fact appear to move albeit at the slow paceof roughly 10 centimeters per Earth year. According to Science, thats about as fast as megaripples in the Lut Desert in Iran.

The surprising takeaway: Winds could be strong enough after all, despite the thin Martian atmosphere. A past climate with a denser atmosphere is not necessary to explain their accumulation and migration, the team concluded in their paper.

And thats bad news for future astronauts visiting the Red Planet, as windy conditions could end up messing with habitats and solar panels.

Nonetheless, its an astonishing new discovery about our planetary neighbor.

We can now measure processes on the surface of another planet that are just a couple times faster than our hair grows, Ralph Lorenz, a planetary scientist at the Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory, who was not involved in the study, told Science.

READ MORE: Giant waves of sand are moving on Mars [Science]

More on Mars: NASAs Next Rover Will Bring First-Ever Microphone to Mars

Read the rest here:

Astronomers Say Megaripples Are Moving Across the Surface of Mars - Futurism

The Pentagon’s UFO Task Force Is Finally Ready to Report Findings – Futurism

UFO Task Force

The Pentagons Unidentified Aerial Phenomenon (UAP) Task Force, a program dedicated to investigating UFO sightings, is ready to start reporting some of its findings to the public, The New York Times reports.

The news comes after the Senate released a committee report last month outlining spending for the unusual task force.

Determining whether aliens exist is not the main objective, unfortunately. The main goal, as outlined in the report, is to investigate any links [UFOs] have to adversarial foreign governments, and the threat they pose to U.S. military assets and installations.

Just last week, Senator Marco Rubio (R-FL), chairman of the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence, suggested to local news station CBS Miami that another country like China or Russia could have made some technological leap, explaining previous sightings near US military bases.

News about the Pentagons efforts to collect and investigate UAP encounters first broke in a 2017 New York Times investigation, accompanied by several videos of mysterious encounters with still-unexplained flying objects.

The report also found that the Defense Department had been running investigations as part of its Advanced Aerospace Threat Identification Program since 2007.

Over the last few years, the Pentagon has started officially releasing the videos and previously classified reports about the encounters as well.

Congress has also recently turned up the pressure on the task force in an effort to have all data relating to the mysterious encounters released to the public.

It no longer has to hide in the shadows, Luis Elizondo, the former military intelligence official, who was in charge of a preceding program dedicated to UAPs, told the Times. It will have a new transparency.

READ MORE: No Longer in Shadows, Pentagons U.F.O. Unit Will Make Some Findings Public [The New York Times]

More on the program: Congress Is Trying to Force the Military to Release More UFO Info

Continue reading here:

The Pentagon's UFO Task Force Is Finally Ready to Report Findings - Futurism

Thanks to COVID, the Earth’s Surface Is Shaking 50 Percent Less – Futurism

The Big Quiet

The world has been both literally and figuratively standing still during the ongoing pandemic, scientists say. Lockdowns around the globe have drastically reduced human activity, and as a direct result, the ground is shaking far less a silver lining for those studying seismic signals.

In fact, an international team of researchers have found that seismic vibrations generated by humans have fallen by as much as 50 percent globally, according to a new paper published in the journal Science yesterday.

The 2020 seismic noise quiet period is the longest and most prominent global anthropogenic seismic noise reduction on record, the researchers noted in their paper.

Thanks to this quiet period, scientists were able to get an unprecedented listen to seismic signals from natural sources, including small earthquakes and volcanic eruptions.

While the reduction is strongest at surface seismometers in populated areas, this seismic quiescence extends for many kilometers radially and hundreds of meters in depth, the researchers wrote. This provides an opportunity to detect subtle signals from subsurface seismic sources that would have been concealed in noisier times and to benchmark sources of anthropogenic noise.

The researchers collected data from 268 seismic stations in 117 countries, examining frequency ranges normally associated with human activity. The quiet period started in China in late January 2020, coinciding with the spread of the coronavirus and shelter-in-place orders, with Europe and the rest of the world following in March to April 2020.

The noise level we observe during lockdowns lasted longer and was often quieter than the Christmas to New Year period, the researchers noted in their paper, a period that normally is the most seismically quiet.

READ MORE: Coronavirus lockdowns hushed seismic noise around the world [Axios]

More on the research: The Earth is Standing Still During the Pandemic. Literally.

See the rest here:

Thanks to COVID, the Earth's Surface Is Shaking 50 Percent Less - Futurism

The Local Take: Black Futurists Re-Imagine The Police – WCLK

Saturday at 8am on WCLK's The Local Take I talk with Devin Barrington-Ward about what "Defund The Police" actually means. Last month I moderated a panel discussion for the Center for Civil and Human Rights for the non-profit organization Equal Dignity.

The panel was made up of various activist from across the nation around to answer the question What doesDefund The Police Really Mean?One of the panelists was a young activist from right here in Atlanta. Devin Barrington-Ward is the founder and managing director for The Black Futurists Group. His organization is a social justice innovation firm that works on public policy, community organizing, the media and other tools to ensure an equitable and liberated future for Black people.

I asked Barrington-Ward to tell us exactly what his organization does, and why havent we had an organization concerned about our future before now.

He explained how he came to be involved with public policy after working with Stacy Abrams on her 2006 race for the Georgia House of Representatives. He thinks this is the best way to bring out change. In high school he participated on the debate team and while he was great at making his point, this didn't change anything. He began to look for ways to use those skills to make real change.

The Black Futurists Group was focusing on defunding the police even before it became a hashtag. He shared that police department budgets have waste that can be used to help citizens ratheer than locking them up. He suggests using technology to reduce unnecessary police interactions such as traffic stops. Funds from police departments could be used to provide more counselors in public schools. Instead of policing students, help them become better citizens.

Kiplyn Primus talks with Devin Barrington-Ward from The Black Futurists Group on WCLK's The Local Take.

For more information on The Black Futurists Group

To view the National Center for Civil and Human Rights Panel Discussion on Defund The Police

For more information on Devin Barrington-Ward

Read the rest here:

The Local Take: Black Futurists Re-Imagine The Police - WCLK

Bringing Offshore Wind into California’s Future – Natural Resources Defense Council

This is the second part in a two-blog series about offshore wind development in California. In Part 1, we explained why offshore wind might be the missing link in Californias zero-carbon electricity future. In this blog, we describe the barriers offshore wind development faces and trace a path to jump-start the industry in California.

The California Public Utilities Commission estimates that about 7 GW of offshore wind could be part of Californias ideal zero-carbon electricity mix by 2045. This is equal to around 9 % of the total electricity producing capacity in California. Any strategy to develop offshore wind in California needs to solve for offshore winds own three-body problem: avoiding local environmental impacts; figuring out how to meet stakeholder needs which includes state and federal regulatory requirements, the needs of the fishing industry, and the Department of Defense; and building enough offshore wind to make it profitable to developers while being a cost-effective investment for Californians.

To solve this problem in a timely manner, the state and stakeholders need to commit to getting the first 100 MW of offshore development commissioned within the next year. 100 MW is enough to meet the electric demand of approximately twenty five thousand average California homes and more than three times the amount of floating offshore wind that exists worldwide today.

This initial project is big enough to pique the industrys interest. It will also be a valuable source of data to (1) figure out the impacts these wind farms have on the environment, (2) balance stakeholder needs and figure out smooth regulatory processes to permit offshore wind build-outs, and (3) enable the industry to get going in California to bring down the cost of future offshore wind development.

The rest of the blog explains in detail the barriers offshore wind faces and why building the first 100 MW project is the way to go.

We must strive to make sure offshore wind development in California has minimal environmental impacts on its unique and diverse marine ecosystem. To accomplish this, we need to prioritize understanding how offshore wind farms could impact Californias marine ecosystem, and then figure out how to site and maintain these wind farms to minimize any ecological disruption.

Californias Pacific coastline is well known for its scenic beauty and biologically rich ecosystems. Iconic species such as the blue whale, the humpback whale, the fin whale, and the gray whale call its waters home. NRDCs report Harnessing the Wind: How to Advance Wind Power Offshore recommends measures to mitigate construction noise that can be harmful to these species. Solutions such as bubble curtains, ultraviolet lights and ultrasonic noise emitters can protect birds and bats from crashing into the turbines.

Untangling the regulatory complexities of offshore wind isnt an easy task. Offshore wind in California will most likely be built in federal waters beyond three nautical miles or around three and a half miles. This means that the electricity these turbines produce will travel via undersea transmission cables through federal and state waters to reach the electric grid. Federal and state agencies have separate regulatory processes that offshore wind companies must follow to get approval for construction and operation.

In addition to these permitting challenges, there are key stakeholder concerns that must be addressed if offshore wind development is to proceed smoothly.

First, on the Central Coast, offshore wind development needs to overcome the Department of Defenses concerns that offshore wind projects can interfere with long-range radars (air defense and homeland security radars), weather surveillance radars, and military operations. Second, the states commercial fisheries generate millions of dollars of revenue annually, and Californias fishermen are concerned that large scale offshore wind development could strip them of important fishing grounds and habitat. Finally, offshore wind farms would need to be sited so as not to conflict with intensively used shipping routes.

What scale and pace of offshore wind deployment are cost-effective for the states electricity sector, and to Californias economy at large? The California Public Utilities Commission estimates that approximately 7 GW of offshore wind may be needed to get to our 2045 zero-carbon goals. Of that 7 GW, 1.6 GW may be needed by 2030 if we set an aggressive 2030 carbon reduction milestone, and no out of state wind is available.

Creating an offshore wind industry in California will require building infrastructure, custom-built floating turbines, dedicated transmission lines, and port upgrades, to name a few. All this spending will have a positive impact on the state. The National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL), through an unrelated study, estimated that if California builds 10 GW of offshore wind, it could bring in approximately $20 billion to Californias economy and create a total of 14,890 construction jobs by 2050.

Although offshore wind development needs to get started, building small pilot projects isnt attractive for developers or cost-effective for electricity consumers. This is because of the large amount of capital necessary to get these turbines built and to connect them to the grid. But, going too big, too soon, would mean overlooking environmental concerns, the needs of the fishing industry, and the Department of Defense.

Until the first wind farm floats, we wont know the impact these turbines will have on local ecosystems, the fishing industry, or the Department of Defenses activities. Moreover, to provide clean electricity in a timely manner to help California get to its clean electricity goals, environmentally responsible offshore wind deployment needs to start soon. A right sized near-term commitment will open the gate to unleash Californias offshore wind potential. Committing to developing the first 100 MW in the three call areas (Humboldt, Morro Bay, and Diablo Canyon, which combined can easily handle that) within the next year is the way to go.

Industry, environmental organizations, and regulators should work together through the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management and the California Energy Commissions existing processes to determine how to get this first 100 MW built. Then industry and stakeholders can begin collecting the data that we need to figure out how to scale up offshore wind to seventy times that size - 7 GW.

See more here:

Bringing Offshore Wind into California's Future - Natural Resources Defense Council

UK Offshore Production Reaches 80% Efficiency Years Ahead of Expectations – Oil and Gas Facilities

In a new report, the UK Oil & Gas Authority (OGA) highlights that the countrys offshore sector improved its production efficiency for the seventh straight year.

In 2012, fixed-leg platforms and floating facilities in the UK continental shelf operated with a production efficiency rate of only 60%. In 2019, the figure jumped by 5% year-over-year to hit 80%a target the OGA hoped would be reached by 2022.

Based on best practice guidelines established in partnership with the SPE, the OGA calculates production efficiency by comparing actual wellhead production vs. the maximum economic production potentials. Production losses include reservoir degradation, plant shutdowns, and pipeline constraints. Under this equation, actual wellhead production improved by only 1% but factoring in reduction in economic production potential resulted in a 5% increase in efficiency.

The OGA said the recent gains are the result of a concerted effort by the industry to stem production losses and avoid plant shutdowns, which exceeded schedule by only 1% last year compared with a 15% overrun in 2018.

Improvements in operations resulted in higher efficiencies across every major offshore region except for West of Shetland, home to the UKs northernmost frontier exploration areas.

In the central North Sea region, production efficiency mirrored the aggregate with a wellhead output increase of 1% and an efficiency increase of 5%. The most efficient operations in the region were floating production hubs which boasted an 85% efficiency rate compared with 80% on large fixed-leg platforms.

Between operations in the Irish Sea and the southern region of the UKs North Sea, overall efficiency was 75% and 76%, respectively. Among the two regions, unmanned platforms improved efficiency by 14% but overall efficiency remained well below the regional average at 68%. Meanwhile, small manned platforms achieved 80% efficiency. The regions also combined for a planned shutdown overrun rate of 10%.

OGA estimated that the increasing production efficiency rates since 2014 have lowered the emission intensity of each produced barrel by 10%. To learn more, access the full report.

Source: UK Oil & Gas Authority

See the original post:

UK Offshore Production Reaches 80% Efficiency Years Ahead of Expectations - Oil and Gas Facilities

Nanotechnology Enabled Coatings for Aircraft Market Executive Summary, Introduction, Sizing, Analysis and Forecast To 2025 – Bulletin Line

Up Market Research (UMR), one of the worlds prominent market research firms has released a new report on Global Nanotechnology Enabled Coatings for Aircraft Market. The report contains crucial insights on the market which will support the clients to make the right business decisions. This research will help both existing and new aspirants for Nanotechnology Enabled Coatings for Aircraft market to figure out and study market needs, market size, and competition. The report talks about the supply and demand situation, the competitive scenario, and the challenges for market growth, market opportunities, and the threats faced by key players.

The report also includes the impact of ongoing global crisis i.e. COVID-19 on the Nanotechnology Enabled Coatings for Aircraft market and what the future holds for it. The published report is designed using a vigorous and thorough research methodology and Up Market Research (UMR) is also known for its data accuracy and granular market reports.

You can buy the report @ https://www.upmarketresearch.com/buy/nanotechnology-enabled-coatings-for-aircraft-market-2019

A complete analysis of the competitive scenario of the Nanotechnology Enabled Coatings for Aircraft market is depicted by the report. The report has a vast amount of data about the recent product and technological developments in the markets. It has a wide spectrum of analysis regarding the impact of these advancements on the markets future growth, wide-range of analysis of these extensions on the markets future growth.

Nanotechnology Enabled Coatings for Aircraft market report tracks the data since 2015 and is one of the most detailed reports. It also contains data varying according to region and country. The insights in the report are easy to understand and include pictorial representations. These insights are also applicable in real-time scenarios.

Request A Free Sample Report @ https://www.upmarketresearch.com/home/requested_sample/79358

Components such as market drivers, restraints, challenges, and opportunities for Nanotechnology Enabled Coatings for Aircraft are explained in detail. Since the research team is tracking the data for the market from 2015, therefore any additional data requirement can be easily fulfilled.

Some of the prominent companies that are covered in this report:

AnCattApplied Thin FilmsFlightShieldGlonatechTripleCHOOSE NanoTechGeneral NanoHR ToughGuardSurfactis TechnologiesTesla NanoCoatings

*Note: Additional companies can be included on request

The industry looks to be fairly competitive. To analyze any market with simplicity the market is fragmented into segments, such as its product type, application, technology, end-use industry, etc. Segmenting the market into smaller components helps in understanding the dynamics of the market with more clarity. Data is represented with the help of tables and figures that consist of a graphical representation of the numbers in the form of histograms, bar graphs, pie charts, etc. Another key component that is included in the report is the regional analysis to assess the global presence of the Nanotechnology Enabled Coatings for Aircraft market.

Following is the gist of segmentation:

By Application:

Commercial aircraftMilitary aircraft

By Type:

Anti-corrosion abrasion and wear-resistant aircraft nanocoatingThermal barrier and flame retardant aircraft nanocoatingAnti-icing aircraft nanocoating

By Geographical Regions

Asia Pacific: China, Japan, India, and Rest of Asia PacificEurope: Germany, the UK, France, and Rest of EuropeNorth America: The US, Mexico, and CanadaLatin America: Brazil and Rest of Latin AmericaMiddle East & Africa: GCC Countries and Rest of Middle East & Africa

You can also go for a yearly subscription of all the updates on the Nanotechnology Enabled Coatings for Aircraft market.

Reasons you should buy this report:

Below is the TOC of the report:

Executive Summary

Assumptions and Acronyms Used

Research Methodology

Nanotechnology Enabled Coatings for Aircraft Market Overview

Nanotechnology Enabled Coatings for Aircraft Supply Chain Analysis

Nanotechnology Enabled Coatings for Aircraft Pricing Analysis

Global Nanotechnology Enabled Coatings for Aircraft Market Analysis and Forecast by Type

Global Nanotechnology Enabled Coatings for Aircraft Market Analysis and Forecast by Application

Global Nanotechnology Enabled Coatings for Aircraft Market Analysis and Forecast by Sales Channel

Global Nanotechnology Enabled Coatings for Aircraft Market Analysis and Forecast by Region

North America Nanotechnology Enabled Coatings for Aircraft Market Analysis and Forecast

Latin America Nanotechnology Enabled Coatings for Aircraft Market Analysis and Forecast

Europe Nanotechnology Enabled Coatings for Aircraft Market Analysis and Forecast

Asia Pacific Nanotechnology Enabled Coatings for Aircraft Market Analysis and Forecast

Middle East & Africa Nanotechnology Enabled Coatings for Aircraft Market Analysis and Forecast

Competition Landscape

If you have any questions on this report, please reach out to us @ https://www.upmarketresearch.com/home/enquiry_before_buying/79358

About Up Market Research (UMR):

Up Market Research (UMR) has a vast experience in designing tailored market research reports in various industry verticals. We also have an urge to provide complete client satisfaction. We cover in-depth market analysis, which consists of producing lucrative business strategies for the new entrants and the emerging players of the market. We make sure that each report goes through intensive primary, secondary research, interviews, and consumer surveys before final dispatch. Our company provides market threat analysis, market opportunity analysis, and deep insights into the current market scenario.

We invest in our analysts to ensure that we have a full roster of experience and expertise in any field we cover. Our team members are selected for stellar academic records, specializations in technical fields, and exceptional analytical and communication skills. We also offer ongoing training and knowledge sharing to keep our analysts tapped into industry best practices and loaded with information.

Contact Info UpMarketResearchName Alex MathewsEmail [emailprotected]Website https://www.upmarketresearch.comAddress 500 East E Street, Ontario, CA 91764, United States.

Read the original:

Nanotechnology Enabled Coatings for Aircraft Market Executive Summary, Introduction, Sizing, Analysis and Forecast To 2025 - Bulletin Line

Japan’s influence in European offshore wind starts to bear fruit back home – S&P Global

Japanese investors have played a significant role in Europe's 22-GW offshore wind industry and now the experience accrued over the course of a decade in European projects is starting to pay off in their home market.

It has been nine years since Marubeni Corp., one of Japan's largest trading houses, became the first Japanese company to invest in offshore wind, acquiring a 49.9% stake in rsted A/S's Gunfleet Sands project in the U.K.

That deal paved the way for rivals like Sumitomo Corp. and Mitsubishi Corp. to make their own entries into offshore wind buying into projects led by experienced utilities like Engie SA and innogy SE, or independent developers like Parkwind NV and later opened the door for other kinds of Japanese companies, along with investors from elsewhere in Asia, to make their way to Europe.

At the time of Marubeni's entrance, Europe had about one-third of the offshore wind capacity it has now. And during the early 2010s, the cost of installing a turbine offshore was many times higher than it is today.

"In hindsight, it was a really astute decision for some of these Japanese trading houses to get involved [in offshore wind] so early on," said Ross Schloeffel, a partner at London-based law firm Linklaters, given the construction and technology risk involved in some of the early projects.

Fallout from Fukushima

Nearly a decade on from that first investment, construction of Japan's first large-scale offshore wind farms is underway in Akita prefecture, led, in an act of symmetry, by Marubeni. But the story could have been very different if not for the Fukushima nuclear disaster, which occurred just six months before Marubeni's Gunfleet Sands deal was announced.

The events of March 2011 had huge social and political ramifications for the country. "The Fukushima disaster was absolutely a wake-up call for the Japanese government ... It changed the political thinking about their future energy plan," said Feng Zhao, strategy director at the Global Wind Energy Council, or GWEC.

Most notably, it led to the decommissioning of most of the country's nuclear fleet and a search for alternative sources of power generation, including a rush for solar and a refocusing toward gas and coal. Offshore wind came into play more recently, with the government now aiming for 10 GW of capacity by 2030.

"If it wasn't for Fukushima, you may not have had offshore wind in Japan," said Marc Fevre, partner at law firm Baker McKenzie.

Gathering experience

Beginning with Marubeni, several of Japan's largest general trading houses sprawling conglomerates with interests in multiple business lines globally were among the earliest strategic investors in Europe's offshore wind market, which now attracts a broad range of capital, from oil majors to pension funds.

The first few transactions saw them buy stakes in operating projects. More recently, they have become comfortable with construction risk a microcosm of a wider market trend.

Against the backdrop of Fukushima, Japanese companies invested early in European offshore wind to eventually help build a market back home. "Generally speaking, the Japanese investors invest in these projects to learn about the contracting. That's the main reason: getting some operational experience," said Michael van der Heijden, managing director at Amsterdam Capital Partners, a financial advisory firm.

The Japanese corporation most active in offshore wind projects is Sumitomo, which in 2014 acquired a stake in the Belwind and Northwind wind farms in Belgium from developer Parkwind.

"[Offshore wind] was a new sector to many [investors at that time], and obviously for a big Japanese trading house to enter at an early stage and to have quite some ambition in the market ... We had not immediately predicted that. They were really very motivated," said Pieter Marinus, Parkwind's general counsel and investment relations director.

Sumitomo went on to invest in two other Parkwind projects this time taking on construction risk as well as projects in the U.K. and France with other partners. While its primary rationale for doing so may be to export the knowhow back to Japan, the company has a broader objective to invest in renewable energy globally, Marinus said: "[Sumitomo's intention was] not just to learn. They just saw it as an interesting investment opportunity."

"Trading houses invest because it's good business to be had," added Baker McKenzie's Fevre. "That's been their model in the power sector globally and they've become more sophisticated in their approach."

The trading houses, which did not respond to requests for interviews, have also invested across the energy value chain. Marubeni, for instance, is a shareholder in Seajacks International Ltd., which supplies offshore installation and maintenance vessels for wind farms and the oil and gas sector.

Meanwhile, Mitsubishi has an offshore wind turbine manufacturing joint venture, MHI Vestas Offshore Wind A/S, with Denmark's Vestas Wind Systems A/S, and also in March joined forces with Chubu Electric Power Co. Inc. to acquire Dutch energy company Eneco Groep NV with a view to expanding into offshore wind markets in the U.S. and Japan.

Crowding in capital

The presence of the trading houses in Europe's offshore wind sector has spurred multiple waves of capital from Japan. "The trading houses really paved the way for other Japanese capital to flow into Europe," said Marinus.

Marubeni has helped attract compatriots, selling its stake in Gunfleet Sands to the Development Bank of Japan Inc. and Japan's largest utility, JERA Co. Inc. a joint venture between Chubu Electric Power and Tokyo Electric Power Co. Holdings Inc., or TEPCO. Meanwhile, Germany's innogy offloaded an interest in its Triton Knoll project in the U.K. to utilities Electric Power Development Co. Ltd., also known as J-Power, and The Kansai Electric Power Company Inc.

Floating wind, which has recently emerged as the next frontier for offshore renewables, is also attracting the attention of Japanese investors: Tokyo Gas Co. Ltd. invested in floating developer Principle Power Inc., while JERA formed a joint venture with France's Ideol SA to develop 2 GW of floating projects globally. The companies will be hoping to repeat the pioneering role that Japanese companies have played in Europe's fixed-bottom offshore wind market, and also perhaps have one eye on their home market, whose deep waters make it better suited to floating turbines.

Japan has about 66 MW of offshore wind in operation today but its nearly 30,000 kilometers of coastline make it ripe for development, according to GWEC. While floating turbines might be the end game, fixed turbines will account for most of the government's 10-GW capacity target by 2030. "We think Japan will predominantly be a bottom-fixed market over the next decade," Imogen Brown, wind energy analyst at BloombergNEF, said on a July 14 webinar hosted by Reuters Events.

Investment in European offshore wind projects comes from other parts of Asia, too. Chinese state-owned companies like China Three Gorges Corp., State Development & Investment Corp. Ltd. and China Resources (Holdings) Co. Ltd. have invested in European projects in recent years. Unlike Japan, China already has an established offshore wind market, with nearly 7 GW installed, according to GWEC.

"As many Asian governments continue to promote international investment in key strategic sectors, debt and equity providers and equipment manufacturers from Asian countries will likely be increasingly active in the European renewables and power sectors in the months and years ahead," Paul Doris, a partner at multinational law firm Dentons, said in an email.

With Asia set to overtake Europe as the world's largest offshore wind market, with as much as 613 GW of capacity by 2050, according to projections by the International Renewable Energy Agency, the cooperation between the two continents is working in the opposite direction, too.

rsted and Germany's wpd AG are already active in the nascent Taiwanese market, and rsted has a joint venture with TEPCO to work on offshore wind in Japan, whose power sector, like Taiwan's, is seen as open to foreign investors.

Read more here:

Japan's influence in European offshore wind starts to bear fruit back home - S&P Global

New York Offshore Wind and Onshore Renewable Energy – The National Law Review

On July 21, 2020, New York Governor Andrew Cuomo announced the largest combined clean energy solicitation ever issued in the United States, seeking up to 4 GW of renewable capacity. This capacity is broken up into 2500 MW of offshore wind and 1500 MW of onshore large-scale renewable energy projects.

The United States remains one of the most attractive jurisdictions for renewable energy investments. It is the worlds biggest consumer of electricity and is now increasingly transitioning to renewable energy sources. It is a growing market with a stable regulatory environment and a transparent legal system and access to low cost of capital. The size and diversity of the United States also create numerous opportunities for various types of renewable energy projects.

The United States is ranked first in theEYs 2020 Renewable Energy Country Attractiveness Index. According to Bloomberg New Energy Finance, a total of$55.5 billionwas spent in the US renewables sector in 2019 alone (setting new investment records), an increase of 28%, second only to China and beating Europe.

This is New Yorks second offshore wind solicitation; last years solicitation resulted in awards for projects of nearly 1700 MW in total capacity. The solicitation this year requires offshore wind generators to partner with any of the 11 prequalified New York ports to stage, construct key components, manufacture and coordinate operations and maintenance activities. New York is seeking at least 1000 MW of offshore capacity and will be accepting bids of between 400 MW and 2500 MW. New York will be providing $400 million in private and public funding to upgrade the states port infrastructure.

The timeline for the latest round of solicitations includes an online conference for bidders on August 12, 2020, followed by a September 23, 2020, deadline for notices of intent to propose and an October 20, 2020, deadline for the submission of proposals.

See more about the Offshore Wind solicitationhere.

Governor Cuomo also announced that the New York State Energy Research and Development Authority (NYSERDA) and the Power Authority of the State of New York (NYPA) will be running a coordinated solicitation to procure over 1500 MW of renewable energy. Projects selected in these solicitations will be fast-tracked to construction by seeking permitting through the new Office of Renewable Energy Siting.

NYSERDA is seeking Tier 1 renewable energy projects with combined generation of 1.6 million MWh annually. Eligible projects must have entered operation after January 1, 2015, and must enter commercial operation by November 30, 2022 (or November 30, 2025 with extensions). NYSERDA will also allow proposers to leverage renewable energy credits (REC) via the Index REC contract structure for the first time.

NYSERDA will open the Step One Eligibility Application on August 5, 2020.

See more about the NYSERDA solicitationhere.

NYPA is seeking solar photovoltaic and wind projects (with an option to combine with energy storage) with combined generation of 2 million MWh annually. Eligible projects will be required to interconnect into New York state and have generation capacities of between 20 and 25 MW or 100 MW or larger. NYPA will be purchasing energy, capacity and RECs from the selected projects, which are expected to come online between 2021 and 2024. Winning bidders are expected to be notified in late 2020.

See more about the NYPA solicitationhere.

Continue reading here:

New York Offshore Wind and Onshore Renewable Energy - The National Law Review