On the West we rely – New Eastern Europe

Posted on by

The Georgian parliament has adopted constitutional changes that have been applauded by their international partners. As a result, the Georgian Dream government might struggle with an even more alienated opposition.

July 31, 2020 - Archil Sikharulidze- Articles and Commentary

Parliament of Georgia. Photo: DDohler flickr.com

On June 29th 2020 the Georgian parliament finally adopted constitutional amendments that have been praised by an absolute majority of local and international actors as historic. The new electoral system, which introduces a mixed model consisting of 120 members of Parliament proportionally elected and 30 majoritarian MPs, is seen as an opportunity for Georgian democracy to build a culture of collaboration and coalition governments. And while this statement maybe seriously challenged, there are issues that are more relevant and important in Georgian society.

Particularly, members of the political opposition, Irakli Okruashvili and Gigi Ugulava, had been previously pardoned by president Salome Zurabishvili. These individuals, arguably perceived as criminals by the majority of Georgians, were released as a result of international pressure from some representatives of European Parliament and American Congress. Local oppositional parties praised the decision, calling it a step towards less political turbulence; more justice and peace is expected in buildup to the upcoming parliamentary elections set for October 2020.

Meanwhile, the majority of the electorate of Georgian Dream is most likely shocked and astonished asthey simply cannot understand how former members of the ruling government who directly participated in building a semi-authoritarian regime while oppressing media and human rights can be protected and lobbied by the states strategic partners in the EU and USA. This is especially relevant as it relieson judgements by the ECHR and International arbitrage in The Hague. Moreover, there is an apparentembarrassment due to the behavior of Georgias allies who directly intervened in internal affairs and pressured the government, or even threatened it.

Terrorists or freedom fighters

It goes without saying that the biggest issue here is an alleged existence of political prisoners in Georgia. Some members of European Parliament as well as American Senators and Congressmen are extremely keen to refer to almost all the members of political opposition who went to jail as political prisoners. Of courselocal judiciary and prosecutor offices are far from Western standards and need to be further strengthened and distanced from the states grip. At the same time, all statistical data shows that these institutions are freer and more independent than ever before. Thus, Georgians can be sure that their rights will be better protected than in the past. This fact issometimes even challenged despite clear evidence.

Secondly,it is up to local and international legal institutions to give final judgement on whether a person has been persecuted due to political views and activities or not. But what bothers regular citizens of Georgia is that there are activeattempts by some Western officials to whitewash members of Saakashvilis government; although it is a government prominent for its brutal dispersal of peaceful protests, massive oppression of political opponents, seizure of oppositional media outlets and total disregardof human rights. And these outcomes frequently comethrough direct misrepresentation of data and even ECHR judgements. For example, Magorzata Maria Gosiewska, Deputy Marshal of the Sejm of the Republic of Poland, represented former Minister of Internal Affairs Ivane Merabishvili as a political prisoner and citedan ECHR judgement as a legal document. Ms. Gosiewska blatantly misled listeners as the court ruled that the state hadnt violated Mr. Merabishvilis right to a fair and public trial and his sentence was given in accordance to international practice. Generally speaking, there are serious hesitations and doubts about fairness of conclusions made by some politicians, especially Europeans. This is especially relevant in wake of a call by Marketa Gregorova, Czech activist, member of the Czech Pirate Party, and elected MEP, to investigate dispersal of a questionably peaceful political protest on June 20th 2019. If this issue is so urgent and relevant for some members of EU parliament then why do they continue to whitewash Ivane Merabishvili, who brutally stamped out dozens of peaceful protests which resulted in hundreds, if not thousands, of people being injured and three people being killed?!

Generally, an extremely large gap in perceptions exists between regular Georgian citizens on the one hand and some political actors on the ground and abroad on the other hand. This challenge can described within the framework given by a character from the movie Die Another Day, in which he stated one mans terrorist is another mans freedom fighter. For the larger Georgian society, Gigi Ugulava and other former top officials arecriminals mentioned in judgements by the ECHR in cases such as Sulkhan Molashvili v. Georgia (political persecution and torture), Enukidze and Gvirgvliani v. Georgia (torture of civilian and concealment of evidences), Batiashvili v. Georgia (intentional fabrication of evidences), Rustavi 2 Broadcasting Company Ltd and Others v. Georgia (unlawful expropriation of private media property) and so on.

Politics above the law

The lions share of allegations against Georgian Dreamfrom its American allies is arguably mostly politically motivated. At the very least, the allegations made by American Senators and Congressmen are definitely political rather than legal. Arguably the best example of this is the claimed oppression of American business, as in the Frontera Resources case. This Texas company has operated in Georgia since 1997 and continues promising to find natural resources, such as gas and oil. The Georgian Dream government argued that the company violated an agreement, resulting in approximately one hundred Georgian citizens not being paid salaries for more than year. The company, however, was and still is arguing that it has found the largest oil and gas deposits, which have been false claims for the last two decades. Therefore, the government of Georgia decided to break the contract. This situation was addressed by American Republican Congressman Pete Olson, who directly called Bidzina Ivanishvili and the current government pro-Russian puppets; additionally, Mr. Olson argued that Frontera Resources has been pushed away in order to give Georgian gas to the president of the Russian Federation, Vladimir Putin, and the Kremlin in general. This narrative was picked up by members of the political opposition despite the fact that one of its own leaders from the United National Movement, MP Roman Gotsiridze, was personally calling Frontera Resources a charlatan company and urging the government to defend Georgian citizens. These allegations did not disappear even after a judgement by an international arbitrage, located in The Hague, ruled in favor of the Georgian government and gave the state permission to break cooperation with the American company due to a breach of contract. But what is especially disturbing is that some representatives of leading international and local NGOs, such as Transparency International, including Georgias Executive Director Eka Gigauri, are still using this case to express concerns and contribute to the legally false claims of Congressman Olson and the local political opposition.

It seems that these organisations, at least some of their members, have their own ideological and political rivalry or confrontation with the ruling Georgian Dream, which pushes them to turn a blind eye to the legal aspects and focus more on a political agenda. The same scenario happened during the private Rustavi 2 channel dispute when NGOs argued that Bidzina Ivanishvili and Georgian Dream controlled local courts, pushing the institution to transfer property rights to pro-governmental businessman Kibar Khalvashi. This narrative is still proliferated by these same organisations and people despite an ECHR judgement that ruled in favor of the decision made previously by a Georgian court. Moreover, none of the claims made by NGO representatives had been publicly shared. By the end of this ruling. members of the political opposition called the judgement pro-Russian and claimed the ECHR was bribed by Bidzina Ivanishvili and influenced by the Kremlin.

Behind the back politics

The biggest concerns among regular citizens are raised most often due to political negotiations and agreements facilitated by European and American diplomats between the Georgian Dream government and political opposition. The most important achievement of this process was the]March 8th agreement that, in theory, should have depolarised the environment in the country and ensured more transparent and democratic parliamentary elections, which are set for October 2020. But as soon as the ruling party and political opposition started disputing the agreement itself, Georgian citizens realised that they had no clue what was happening at all. It took place behind closed doors and agreements were made in secret. Thus far, local voters are in a frustrating situation as political actors are representing things in a completely contradictory manner while European and American diplomats keep silent. Georgias strategic partners have often negotiated democracy with local political elites behind the back of Georgian society. Thus, the above concerns are obviously not baseless. In a country where shadow politics is taking place on a regular basis, it is highly questionable whether yet another example of international shadow politics can strengthen democracy or increase trust in the political process. Moreover, this can easily be perceived as aintervention into domestic affairs and an attempt to defend interests of political elites on the one hand and national (political, geopolitical and economic) interests of the EU and USA on the other hand, without asking for an opinion from Georgian voters.

By and large, the substantial astonishment among a significant portion of Georgian society, namely those who sent Mikhail Saakashvilis government to the political bench, stems from them simply being unable to understand how the former officials, involved in corruption and other legal cases, can be lobbied by the West and even called freedom fighters?! Furthermore, why do some European and American officials think that Georgian democracy will be strengthened by keeping these perceivably corrupt individuals active in politics and even appointing them to high political positions again?! The usual pro-Western actors in the country, as well as their allies abroad, should be ready for increased anti-Western criticism and skepticism among regular citizens of Georgia who see lobbyist attempts as a glaring intervention in domestic affairs and a politically-motivated liberation of alleged criminals. Most importantly, however, are the concerns raised about whether the European and American actors involved in the process promote principles of equality before the law or an old quote known as all are equal but some are more equal. And it seems that in this case Gigi Ugulava and Irakli Okruashvili fall into the second basket, because there is no doubt that no one can be bothered to save individuals who lack political labels and/or political protection.

Archil Sikharulidzeis a PhD candidate in Social Sciences at the Georgian Institute of Public Affairs and the founder of SIKHA Foundation Initiative.

Dear Readers -New Eastern Europe is a not-for-profit publication that has been publishing online and in print since 2011. Our mission is to shape the debate, enhance understanding, and further the dialogue surrounding issues facing the states that were once a part of the Soviet Union or under its influence.But we can only achieve this mission with the support of our donors.If you appreciate our work please consider making a donation.

democracy, Georgia, Georgian election

Read more:

On the West we rely - New Eastern Europe

End the Marxism love affair | News, Sports, Jobs – Gloversville Leader-Herald

Posted on by

By LAURA HOLLIS

I watched director Agnieszka Hollands award-winning film Mr. Jones this week. Its truly outstanding, a quiet masterpiece about the young Welsh journalist Gareth Jones who risked his life to expose what is now called the Holomodor, the 1932-33 famine in Ukraine caused by the collectivist policies of Soviet dictator Josef Stalin.

Aware of troubling rumors, Jones used his political connections as foreign policy advisor to English Prime Minister Lloyd George to get a visa into the Soviet Union very difficult to do at the time and, from Moscow, finagled his way onto a train into Ukraine, where he slipped past his handlers and spent two or three weeks traipsing from village to village. What he saw there seared his soul, and he recorded his observations in diaries that survived his untimely death (Jones was murdered in China on the eve of his 30th birthday).

Stalins collectivization of farming and food production in Ukraine the Soviet Unions breadbasket resulted in widespread famine and deaths of anywhere from 4 to 10 million people from starvation. Many of the villages Jones came across were devoid of people; most of the livestock were dead; frozen corpses lay in the streets or uncollected in their homes. Hollow-eyed children begged for food. People told Jones stories of those who had gone mad from hunger and resorted to cannibalism (one of the starkest scenes in the film).

Jones was arrested and deported, and the Soviet government threatened retribution if any word of the troubles in Ukraine got out. In the film, Jones is asked before he leaves Moscow to clearly repeat the propaganda There is no famine in Ukraine.

But Jones refused to be silenced. Upon his return to Europe, he wrote and spoke out about what he had seen and the disastrous policies of the communists in the Soviet Union.

As it turned out, Jones most powerful adversaries were not members of the Soviet government but of the European and American press corps, led by The New York Times man in Moscow, Walter Duranty. Duranty was the pride of the press corps and the toast of Moscow. He had won a Pulitzer Prize for his reporting which, it turned out, largely consisted of pro-Soviet propaganda, per an agreement between the Soviet government and The New York Times. In exchange, Duranty enjoyed a life of relative luxury (and decadent excess) and access to the highest men in government, including Stalin himself.

Eager to promote the U.S. governments official recognition of the communist regime, Duranty and the rest of the press corps denounced Jones writing as false, hysterical and exaggerated.

The scenes where Jones confronts pro-Bolshevik westerners, including Duranty and fledgling writer Eric Blair (later better known as George Orwell) are some of the most powerful in the film. Duranty is blase and nonchalant about the excesses of the communist regime. (He said, infamously, To put it brutally, you cant make an omelet without breaking eggs.) But Blairs/Orwells disappointment is palpable. If the Soviet experiment is a failure, he asks Jones, then there is no hope?

In that comment, one can see the next 100 years of wishful thinking and deplorable denial by socialists and communist sympathizers across the globe.

Ignorance in the 1930s was perhaps understandable. But ignorance in the 21st century is unfathomable. It isnt just the scale of suffering, privation and death from the Holomodor and events like it (Cambodias Year Zero, Maos Great Leap Forward) that staggers the imagination; it is the pitiless promotion of these Marxist, dictatorial regimes by western intellectuals, including and especially academics and the American press.

The New York Times is among the worst. Duranty was the apologist for Marxism in the 1930s. In the 1970s, Times writer Sydney Schanberg vocally supported the Khmer Rouge communist revolutionaries in Cambodia at least until Phnom Penh fell and yet another communist genocide took place. In 2009, New York Times writer Thomas Friedman described Chinas communist government as reasonably enlightened and praised its efficiency and effectiveness relative to the clumsy efforts of Americas representative republic. (No doubt the Muslim Uighur population in China understands Chinese efficiency all too well.) In 2017, The Times published Red Century, an embarrassingly sycophantic series of glowing paeans to global communism since the 1917 communist revolution in Russia.

How much suffering do we need to see to understand the utter failure of these philosophies? I wonder whether we have become inured to wholesale slaughter of millions of innocent people by governments that promise utopia. (As the quote attributed to Stalin himself goes, The death of one man is a tragedy; the death of millions is a statistic.) In addition to the Soviet Union, Cambodia and China, the world has witnessed appalling oppression, imprisonment, starvation, torture and death in the former East Germany, Cuba, Vietnam, North Korea, Angola, Nicaragua and Peru. We have watched as socialist policies in Venezuela have destroyed what was once the most prosperous country in South America, reducing it to abject poverty before our very eyes.

And still the levers of the left sing collectivisms praises. With 100 million corpses in its wake, support for Marxism is no longer understandable and claims of ignorance no longer credible. It is inexcusable. And those of us who oppose Marxism in any form do so not because we do not support equality, freedom and a chance at prosperity for all but because we do.

It is past time for the American press to end its love affair with Marxism. Equality of poverty, equality of misery and equality of oppression are not progress.

Today's breaking news and more in your inbox

Excerpt from:

End the Marxism love affair | News, Sports, Jobs - Gloversville Leader-Herald

History of Dalit movements in Nepal: Much has been achieved, but discrimination still exists – Online Khabar (English)

Posted on by

Dalits are those communities that have been oppressed, and marginalised in the worst forms for millenniums in the name of caste, the major practice of social stratification in the Hindu society in South Asia. Also termed Achhoots (meaning untouchables) by the radical enforcers of the extremely rigid caste system, the Dalits are not included even in the traditional four Varnas and are referred to as Panchamas.

Dalits in South Asia

In an orientalist historical explanations, untouchability originated when Indo-Aryan community migrated to the Indian subcontinent in around 1,500 BCE and deemed the indigenous community inferior in terms of cultural and racial aspects. Manusmriti, an ancient Hindu legal text written around 1,250-1,000 BCE, incorporated the caste system as the basis of order and regularity to preserve the purity of race and blood, ostracising the indigenous community into Achhoots.

IndiasBR Ambedkar, however, declines to accept this multiracial notion of Aryans and non-Aryans and the purity. He defines caste as an artificial stratification of people into fixed and definite units. He presents the caste system not as a racial division but as a social division of people of the same race.

Dalits in Nepal

In Nepal, the earliest caste system is said to have come to practice in Khas Rajya (modern-day western Nepal) in the 12th century when Brahmins from the then independent states in India came to the Sinja valley. Dor Bahadur Bistas Fatalism and Development details how the caste system was introduced in Khas Rajya during the early medieval period. Likewise, the caste system was introduced in Kathmandu Valley by King Jayasthiti Malla with the assistance of his five pandits in the 14th century by introducing four Varnas and 64 Jaats.

In modern times, Prithvi Narayan Shah declared his unified territory as the country of four Varnas and 36 Jaats. Jung Bahadur Rana legitimised the caste system through the countrys first documented law, Muluki Ain (Civil Code) 1854, and also included non-Hindu groups in the caste system. The legal code documented the castes into four types:

The word Dalit

The root of the word Dalit is Dalan, which translates to oppression in Sanskrit, Nepali and Hindi languages. Hence, Dalit means oppressed. Perhaps, the word was first used by the Indian reformer Jyotirao Phule. Although Mahatma Gandhi proposed and used the term Harijan or children of god in 1932, Ambedkar used and popularized the word Dalit as a quasi-class term, referring to a class of people at the rock-bottom of the Hindu caste hierarchy.

Social history of Dalits in Nepal

Whether one believes the colonial orientalist view or the countering view of Ambedkar, it is undeniable that the Dalits have been ostracised and oppressed for more than three millenniums since the Vedic age. When the caste system was introduced in Khas Rajya, it created a hierarchical and social difference among the people of the state. Similarly, while many historians see the division of the caste system based on peoples occupation as a reform, it also led to segregation and oppression. For example, people from the lowest caste in the Kathmandu valley in the medieval period were not allowed to have tiles on their roofs and had to show respect to the people of the higher caste.

Practising the caste system inflicted discrimination so much so that it would deny even the basic rights to the people from the lowest castes. Jung Bahadur Rana encouraged discrimination based on castes through the Muluki Ain, which was already in practice in the Nepali society. The punishments were set based on caste as the Brahmins were not given capital punishments while the people from the lowest castes would get severe ones. Similarly, marriage was made endogamic, i.e., within the same caste for the sake of purity.

The people labelled as impure were denied even the basic social, economic, cultural, intellectual, and political rights. They were not allowed to touch tap water used by people of a higher caste, could not enter temples, would be punished if they married from a higher caste. They had no participation in politics and education and were even prohibited to touch people and their belongings.

Dalit movements in Nepal

The history of Dalit movements in Nepal can be traced parallel to the countrys political history.

The first wave of Dalit assertion in Nepal began in 1947 in a village called Thadaswara in Baglung district when Sarvajit Bishwakarma established an organisation called Vishwa Sarvajan Sangh to challenge the existing caste system and wore a janai (the sacred thread) against the oppression. In the Kathmandu valley, the successful movement of the Pashupati Temple Entrance Campaign in 1954 is considered one of the first movements.

Many other organisations such as Tailors Union (1947), Nepal Samaj Sudhar Sangh (2947), Nepal Harijan Sangh (1947) were established before the democratic struggle against the Rana regime in 1951, while many other organisations were established for Dalit movements and upliftment during Nepals first tenure of democracy in 1950-60.

The Interim Government of Nepal Act (1951) was the first legal document to recognise people, including Dalits, as citizens with civil and political rights. The autocratic Panchayat regime formulated the New Muluki Ain in 1963 and tried to abolish untouchability in the legal and social systems. During the Panchayat era, nine more organisations were established for the upliftment of Dalits.

As the country adopted the free market policy after the restoration of democracy in 1990, it also sought to provide welfare through private development partners such as national and international non-government organisations (I/NGOs). Many organisations emerged with slogans of Dalit emancipation. As the Dalit movement rose, the government formed the Dalit Commission in 2002 and brought many programmes such as scholarships and reservations. And, although such steps were not adequate to abolish caste-based discrimination, it certainly boosted the morale of Dalit rights activism. Dalits had an important role during the decade-long Maoist Insurgency (1996-2006) as thousands of Dalit men and women participated in the armed conflict while around 200 were killed.

The country headed to a more participatory federal system post the second Peoples Movement in 2006. The issues of Dalits have been covered on the national agenda and the Dalit movement has gradually progressed although it is yet to be institutionalised.

The major achievement during the last decade has been the criminalisation of caste-based discrimination through the Caste-based Discrimination and Untouchability Crime Elimination and Punishment Act in 2011, and the Constitution of Nepal (2015) endorsing the rights and opportunities for the Dalits for their upliftment. Moreover, the constitution recognised the National Dalit Commission as a constitutional body, and the National Dalit Commission Act 2017 was enacted to ensure opportunities for Dalits.

Similarly, the Nepali Parliament has reserved certain seats for Dalits and other excluded communities in the proportional representation system to ensure participation in the political spheres. As per the election laws, 13.8% of the PR seats in the House of Representatives, as well as the provincial assemblies, are allocated for Dalits while the seven provinces must select at least one Dalit representative each among eight seats allocated to them for the National Assembly. Moreover, at least one woman between two women members in each ward of a local government must be from the Dalit community to ensure participation.

The discrimination against Dalits is still a prevailing issue in Nepal as reports of discrimination, prejudice and even hate crimes emerge from time to time. In recent times, the news broke out about the killing of six people from the Dalit community in Rukum (West) as one of the victim tried to elope with a girl from a higher caste. The devastating news did not only shake the nation but brought out again the discourse on discrimination and oppression on the Dalits.

Published on August 1st, Saturday, 2020 4:19 AM

Download Onlinekhabar App. Android click here & IOS click here . Keep in touch with us on Facebook, Twitter & YouTube.

Read more:

History of Dalit movements in Nepal: Much has been achieved, but discrimination still exists - Online Khabar (English)

Solidarity, the best antitoxin – Workers World

Posted on by

Sign in the window of a Manchester, CT hair salon.

As the coronavirus spreads around the globe, the United States continues to report by far the largest number of cases and deaths. As of July 27, the figures show nearly 4.5 million cases in this country and over 150,000 deaths. That comes to 454 deaths per million people.

By contrast, China has had 3 deaths per million, even though it was the first country to discover the virus and had to start from scratch in figuring out how to deal with the epidemic. Vietnam has had no deaths. Cuba has had 8 deaths per million.

Weve made this point before, but with each passing day the contrast between the two social systems capitalism and socialism becomes more glaring.

Even the U.S. government admits that poverty and racism are factors determining who in this capitalist country gets the disease and who dies from it. The CDC Centers for Disease Control and Prevention on July 24 released an updated version of the report, Health Equity Considerations and Racial and Ethnic Minority Groups. It shows that racial discrimination by itself is a risk factor, in addition to its damaging effects on health care access and utilization.

People targeted by racism are more likely to work in areas of the economy most exposed to the virus. They suffer from subpar education, low income and wealth gaps, as well as less access to housing, all of which make them more vulnerable in the pandemic.

The spread of COVID-19 in the U.S. has shone a glaring light on the great social inequalities here. At the same time, many people are literally risking their lives to go to work and to take part in demonstrations against the system.

The risk comes not only from being exposed to the virus in a crowd. One marcher, Garrett Foster, was shot and killed by a right-winger on July 25 while at a Black Lives Matter protest against police brutality in Austin, Texas. Foster was white; his fiancee is Black and a quadruple amputee.

Hatred the opposite of solidarity is what drives the far right.

The anthem of the labor movement in the 1930s was Solidarity Forever. Today we see courageous people in the streets demonstrating against racism and oppression of all kinds who are reviving the meaning of solidarity.

And solidarity is what is needed to get through this crisis. Solidarity is how China, Cuba and Vietnam have stamped out the virus before it could spread. It takes the active trust of the population in the government and in your fellow workers, neighbors and acquaintances to carry out an effective campaign against this disease.

On a governmental level in the U.S., there is certainly no solidarity. It is a snake pit of rivalry, backstabbing, lying, cheating and accusations. All of it is driven by the viciously competitive character of capitalism. The victor takes the spoils. Whoever takes over the levers of political power Republican or Democrat gets to distribute the lucrative government contracts.

But the struggle against this rotten, racist system is building solidarity in the grassroots. We are seeing it in the streets of Portland, Ore., and in all the places where workers come together and risk their lives each day.

(Kitty Stapp)

(Kitty Stapp)

View original post here:

Solidarity, the best antitoxin - Workers World

Pandemic as the Learning Lab and Government Reloaded – Modern Diplomacy

Posted on by

The winds of change have, unlike ever before, cast reservations over the international order of reverence. As each nation scrambles to keep its citizens out of harms way, multilateralism, or in simpler terms, unity of nations is neglected. Nations, in such times of uncertainty, must unite. Unite, not for personal enrichment but global welfare. The beacon of hope and the long-standing guardian of united world order, the United Nations must, as it has in the past, act to unite. In this regard, history postures itself as a potent catalyst illustrating the virtues of multilateralism. 1960, like 2020 was marred with political turmoil, unprecedented world events, and an increasingly divided society. On the 3rd day of February in 1960, Prime Minister Harold Macmillans, an evangelist in hopes of reviving multilateralism, addressed the Parliament of South Africa in Cape Town. His speech was titled, the Winds of Change and coincided with the British empires decline in comparison to the rise of independence movements within the British colonies.

Before addressing the Parliament, the British Prime Minister traveled around the Union and found a deep preoccupation with what was happening in the rest of the African continent. He said, I understand and sympathize with your interests in these events and your anxiety about them. Ever since the breakup of the Roman Empire, one of the constant facts of political life in Europe has been the emergence of independent nations. They have come into existence over the centuries in different forms and kinds of Governments. But all have been inspired by a deep keen feeling of nationalism. In the 20th Century and especially since the end of the wars, the processes which gave birth to the nation-states of Europe have been repeated all over the world.

We have seen the awakening of national consciousness in peoples who have, for centuries, lived in dependence upon some other power. Fifteen years ago this movement (de-colonisation) spread through Asia. Many countries, of different races and civilizations, pressed their claim to an independent nation. Today, the same is happening in Africa. The wind of change is blowing through this continent and whether we like it or not this the growth of national consciousness is a political fact. We must all accept it as fact and our national policies must take account of it. I sincerely believe that if we cannot do so, we may peril the precarious balance between East and West on which the peace of the world depends. The struggle is joined and it is a struggle for the minds of men. This is much more than our military strength or our diplomatic and administrative skill. It is, of our way of life at the same time we must recognize that in this shrinking world in which we live today, the internal policies of one nation may have effects outside it. So we may sometimes be tempted to say mind your own business. These days, I would expand the old saying so that it says, mind your own business but mind how it affects my business too.

The population of America like Africas is a blend of many different strains. Over the years most of those whove gone to North America have gone there to escape conditions in Europe. The Pilgrim Fathers were escaping from persecution, as Puritans were escaping the Marylanders. Roman Catholics, throughout the 19th century witnessed a stream of immigrants across the Atlantic from the Old World to the New to escape. From the poverty in their homelands and now in the 20th Century, the United States have provided asylum for the victims of political oppression in Europe. Thus, for the majority, America has been a place of refuge. Therefore, for many years the main objective of American statesmen, supported by the American public, was to isolate themselves from Europe. Americans, with their great material strength and the vast resources which were open to them saw this as an attractive and practicable course. Nevertheless, twice in my lifetime in the two Great Wars of these 50 years, they have been unable to stand aside. Twice, their manpower and arms have streamed back across the Atlantic to shed its blood in those European struggles from which their ancestors thought they could escape by immigrating to the New World. When the Second War was over, they were forced to recognize that in the small world of today, isolationism is out of date and more than that, it offers no assurance of security. The fact is that, in this modern world no country, not even the greatest can live for itself alone.

What Dr. John Donne said of individual men 300 years ago is true today of my country, of your country, and all the countries, any mans death diminishes me because I am involved in mankind and therefore never send to know for whom the bell tolls it tolls for thee. All nations are now interdependent. Yet, they are, one upon another, and this is generally realized throughout the Western world. Russia has been isolationist in her time and still has tendencies that way but the fact remains that we must live in the same world. With Russia, we must find a way of doing. Similarly, the independent members of the Commonwealth do not always agree on every subject. It is not a condition of their association that they should do so.

On the contrary, the strength of our Commonwealth lies largely on the fact that it is a free association. Free, independent and responsible for ordering its affairs. But, bearing in mind that, cooperation, in the pursuit of common aims and purposes in world affairs. Moreover, these differences may be transitory in time. They may be resolved. We must see them in this perspective, in a perspective against the background of our long association. If this, at any rate, I am certain those of us, who by the grace or favor of the electors are temporarily in charge of affairs in your country and mine, we, fleeting transient phantoms of the great stage of history have no right to sweep aside on this account the friendship that exists between our countries. That is the legacy of history. It is not ours alone to deal with. To adapt to a famous phrase, it belongs to those who are living, it belongs to those who are dead, and to those who are unborn. We must face the differences but let us try to see a little beyond them. Down the long Vista of the future but as time passes and as one generation yields to another, human problems change and fade. Let us, therefore, resolve to build and not to destroy. Let us also remember, weakness comes from division and in words, familiar to you, strength from unity.

As pervasive viruses infiltrate lives on racial, health, gender and sexual orientations. The virus of stigmatization and isolationism personifies the 21st Century and the myriad of global complications. Life, as it was known, is on trial. The inequalities have perpetuated and have fundamentally shifted the world in a stagnant state of paralysis. But, it is worth remembering that only after the Dark Ages was there an Age of Renaissance and only after a crisis would one value the values it espoused. As the turbulent winds of change are blowing throughout the world and the global human consciousness must rise. Otherwise, the ultimate tragedy of humanity will prevail. Thus, to survive, we must unite and hope we can live to fight another day.

Related

See more here:

Pandemic as the Learning Lab and Government Reloaded - Modern Diplomacy

The Lies That Bind South Sudanese – gurtong

Posted on by

By Jok Madut Jok*

I have twice accidentally driven into driveways that no man in his right mind would. One was the main entrance to State House in Nairobi and the other was near the back fence of State House on Nakesero Hill in Kampala, Uganda and nearly got shot on both occasions.

Luckily, I was able to persuade the guards to allow me to reverse and be on my way. Dont ever make that mistake in Juba. It would not end well for you. South Sudans State House, known locally as J1, is a rather intriguing place, just as it is unnecessarily unfriendly.

Over the years, it has puzzled many curious citizens who want to know what lies inside this tightly guarded compound. After all, anyone passing by it, walking right in front of it or behind it or on the side road next to it, will not fail to notice the tight security, a plethora of armed men congregating at the entrance, supposedly watching out for anyone with ill intentions for the hatted man seated inside.

And yet, as the passers by also see a traffic of pedestrians entering and exiting, some in uniform, some in suits, some women in flip-flops and others in rags or clutching children in their arms and seeking to enter the coveted J1, they may be fooled to think that they too have their citizenship right to enter. Some of them, mostly women, congregate across the road, hoping to see one of the gatekeepers to power. But through all the beehive of people, someone could get attacked, injured or killed for seeking access.

POWER IS CRUELPower is a cruel thing. A man can mingle, eat with and laugh with every mortal when seeking power but quickly isolates himself the moment that ultimate goal is achieved.

No citizen is too nave to realize that this is the republican palace, the symbol of power hierarchy, of male power, the pinnacle of class structure, the abode of those who eat on our behalf.

As such, for those wanting to look inside J1 or those seeking financial assistance in times of distress such as during the Covid-19 pandemic, as millions of citizens down on their luck are wont to do, looking around J1 or hanging out near it is tantamount to asking for a bloody nose.

But that is us, South Sudanese. We are new to the fault lines that divide wealth, power, big man syndrome, stars on the shoulders and class snobbery from poverty, from our carefree attitude, our natural born conviction that anyone of us can be president. For were we not just on the same level as recent as 15 years ago when we were all faced with the realities of liberation? And so, J1 and any other temple to the god of power, are not out of reach for any mortal.

Many of these mortals wish to know if the place is open and accessible to ordinary citizens and what it takes for such access to be attained. Some wonder if this is the place where all their wants and needs would be answered if they got an opportunity to set foot inside.

Some wish to see the inside just so they can find out what the place that they think consumes all their money looks like on the inside. Others wonder if the President sleeps in J1, how his children and his entire family live. Are they modest, lavish, hardworking or spoon-fed?

In any case, the amount of curiosity on the outside of the J1 fence is limitless. In this war-torn, impoverished, politically in disarray, ethnically divided and supposedly oil rich country, how can we not be curious to look?

People want to know what has become of the country that was born of war, made possible by the death of 2.5 million people and which was celebrated by the whole world when it finally became independent.

Before it became South Sudan, it was one of the most oppressed and destroyed territories on earth, perhaps only second to Europe during the Nazi onslaught.

Before it became a country, this territory had gone through a long history of slavery, Arab racism, Islamist oppression and suffered homegrown and in-ward violence, triggered by competition between liberators, over power they did not yet have. Some liberators attacked their own and then ran to Khartoum, into the arms of the government they had fought to replace.

FEUDSMore violence was brought on by feuds over resources along ethnic lines and some was brought on by the stresses of life under oppression. Some was brought on by militarist ethos of liberation of the past 40 years, where women were expected to contribute to the liberation, if not by combat then by their wombs, to birth the nation that was being decimated by the liberation effort.

But compelling women to be revolutionaries through reproduction became a licence for violence against them. Such prolonged violence leaves a taxing legacy that is not easy to shake off.

It is this history of violence that had deprived so many of resources, of decent living, such that when a new dawn, independence, was only just on the horizon, the politically and militarily powerful but weak at heart trembled at the sight of the plum.

The State was automatically up for grabs and its public resources viewed by the unscrupulous as private.

Such were the makings of the mess that is now South Sudan, and the private citizen has her eyes fixed on State House, for where else is the conductor of this train wreck seated?

One person asked me once if I knew whether the man with the black cowboy hat, gifted to him by President George W Bush of the United States, ever takes a moment to look outside his fortress. Just to remind himself what it was that took him to war all the years of his youth, the idea that he was liberating masses of oppressed South Sudanese, liberating them from entrenched slavery and systemic racism by northern Sudanese, impact of colonialism, from hunger, disease and lack of education.

It would seem that the man with the black cowboy hat would be very keen and interested to know how the people he helped liberate were now living, what his soldiers now ate, how their kids were fairing in terms of nutrition, vaccination, education, how the ordinary men and women who essentially paid the cost of liberation war were now enjoying the independent status of their country.

SIGNIFICANT DAYIt is July 30, 2020 as I write, a very significant day in South Sudans struggles to be free. It is the day the founding leader of the liberation movement, John Garang de Mabior, died in plane crash exactly 30 days after he had just started to implement the peace agreement that brought the freedom war to a close.

It is exactly 15 years ago to date when he died in mysterious circumstances that have left the South Sudanese mourning and with no answers as to what took their beloved leader.

It is now the day all the martyrs are remembered. But the children, the widows of these martyrs can only look with longing eyes into J1 from outside its fence.The seat of power seems to have forgotten them entirely.

Now, the current leadership of South Sudan avoids to face the millions of families that offered their young recruits, offered their resources to feed fighters, sacrificed their own well-being just so that South Sudan is realized. But to what end?

*The author is a professor of anthropology at Maxwell School of Citizenship and Public Affairs, Syracuse University.

This opinion was first published by the Nairobi-based Daily Nation on July 31, 2020.

Here is the original post:

The Lies That Bind South Sudanese - gurtong

Dear Larry Fink: it’s time to stop lavishing your wealth on the police – The Guardian

Posted on by

This summer, as millions of Americans marched and put their lives on the line for racial justice and an end to police brutality, too many wealthy Americans have done nothing more than offer their solidarity and moral support. Our countrys most fortunate have gotten rich thanks to a system that has for centuries excluded fellow Americans from the nations prosperity. They can, and should, go beyond statements in support of racial justice and Black Lives Matter and put their money where their mouth is.

If Americas millionaires tried even one-tenth as hard to end police brutality as theyve tried to cut their own taxes, we would be looking at a completely different world.

Larry Fink, the CEO of BlackRock, one of the largest financial management firms in the world and my former employer, is a perfect example of the problem with the way rich people approach these issues.

Mr Fink has voiced a commitment to racial equity and said all the right things in the last few weeks, but he has not actually done what he professes to believe in. As a firm committed to racial equality, we must also consider where racial disparity exists in our own organizations and not tolerate our shortcomings, he said, in a statement published on 30 May.

Yet, at the same time as Mr Fink is sympathizing with a movement against anti-Blackness, he has remained a donor to the New York Police Foundation (NYPF), which pays for equipment and training and provides incentives for anonymous tips that lead to arrests. For the last three years, Mr Fink has served as co-chair of the NYPFs annual gala.

Funding and publicly supporting the NYPF means that despite his stated commitment to racial equity, Mr Fink has chosen to stand with a group of people who have murdered some of our fellow citizens. The police are clients of BlackRock, but Mr Fink can take a powerful stand for racial justice by making sure his personal contributions reflect his stated commitments. His dollars dont have to reflect BlackRocks client list.

Of course, Mr Fink might see no problem with his financial support of the New York Police Foundation because he, like me and other wealthy, white men, has had generally positive interactions with police. But part of committing to racial justice is understanding the world outside your own narrow scope and its impossible to ignore the damage that the NYPD has done to Black communities and other communities of color in our city.

We know what it looks like when rich people in America really want the government to do something: they spend money to make sure it gets done. From financially supporting public advocacy efforts to hiring lobbyists to contributing to sympathetic elected officials, when rich people in America want something passed, they do a lot more than releasing a statement.

We are in yet another crisis moment. Many wealthy people give generously to philanthropic causes, but most of their giving tends to be aligned with their own vision of how the world should work. This cannot continue. The rich and powerful need to step back and recognize the role we play in systems of oppression even when were not actively contributing to them, and then use our wealth and our power to fix whats broken.

I will even make Mr Fink a deal. If he drops his support of the New York Police Foundation as the racial justice organization Color Of Change has called for and skips the annual police foundation gala, I will go 50-50 on donations to racial justice and workers rights organizations.

If Mr Fink and other wealthy people are going to decry racial inequality, then the least they can do is use their dollars to disrupt the status quo, rather than support an organization that continuously harms low-income and marginalized communities in New York City.

Morris Pearl is chair of Patriotic Millionaires, which focuses on promoting public policy solutions that encourage political equality, guarantee a sustaining wage for working Americans, and ensure that wealthy individuals and corporations pay their fair share of taxes. He previously was a managing director at BlackRock, one of the worlds largest investment firms

Read more here:

Dear Larry Fink: it's time to stop lavishing your wealth on the police - The Guardian

15 lessons from 15 years of BDS – The Electronic Intifada

Posted on by

The movement for Palestinian rights continues to grow across the world. (Alisdare Hickson/Flickr)

July marked the 15th anniversary of the launch of the boycott, divestment and sanctions (BDS) movement.

Much has happened over those years. Here are 15 lessons Ive learned on the journey to dismantle Israeli apartheid.

Anyone who adheres to the BDS principles can join the movement. This empowers and enables everyone to effect extraordinary changes.

The BDS movement speaks directly to people of conscience who understand that by not acting they are allowing states, companies, artists, institutions, universities and businesses to remain complicit and fuel Israeli apartheid.

Joining and taking action allows each one of us to take responsibility and make sure we are at the very least not contributing to harming the Palestinian people. It allows us to speak out and mobilize others to take action too.

The power of the equality that grassroots mobilization brings to politics and the community is instrumental in making every single member give their best and take ownership. No single person in the movement is more important than anyone else. This powers collective leadership.

Unfortunately there are still those who stand up for freedom for the Palestinian people but do not care about the rights and dignity of other discriminated and oppressed groups.

Our deep commitment to anti-racism and intersectionality means we do not liaise with just anyone who agrees on Palestinian rights unless they also respect and support rights and dignity for all. We cannot build and fight for a new world while agreeing to oppress others.

Every little success matters. Small victories can help in reaching a much larger aim.

Getting a small pension fund to divest from the weapons firm Elbit Systems can contribute to discussion of the need for a military embargo against Israel. This small pension fund can encourage others to follow suit.

As we tackle local issues, we must remember the global picture and how being part of a global movement means that what happens somewhere can affect the movement as a whole, positively and negatively.

The BDS movement has already contributed to mainstreaming awareness of the fact that Israel is an apartheid regime.

Why is this so important? In a world with such biased media and even schoolbooks that are still deeply embedded in a colonial narrative, it is essential we take time to clarify reality.

When calling for a boycott or organizing a campaign, we must always remember how doing so helps to clearly explain what Palestinians are facing and how injustice is taking place. Even campaigns that may not reach their objective can contribute to explaining what is happening on the ground and what the Palestinian people are calling for, and to raising awareness about Israels regime of disposession and colonization.

The fact that we support Palestinian rights does not mean that we know best what Palestinians should do, and it does not give us a free pass to say whatever we want. Moreover, when facing attacks, we must defend our right to freedom of expression in a manner that centers Palestinians and keeps the focus on the crimes perpetrated by Israel against them.

We must remember that, by defending the right to freedom of expression, we are defending the right of Palestinians to make their experience and views heard directly or through us by the public and decision makers in our country.

Earlier this month, Rafeef Ziadah and Riya Alsanah wrote how it is worth reflecting on why Palestinians are treated as mere spectators in debates concerning our daily lives.

While the BDS movement calls on allies around the world to take action, Palestinians have a clear, pivotal role. When this isnt happening, it means we are doing something wrong.

We must keep on decolonizing our actions and make sure Palestinians are being heard and that we take guidance from them while organizing in the BDS movement.

Our oppressors are more connected than ever.

At a time when the right and the far-right are gaining power in many institutions worldwide, the left and progressive groups and movements have the opportunity and duty to rethink themselves and to create stronger, more solid and inclusive movements. We must make sure Palestine is a part of that.

We also must be more connected than ever.

We have often been surprised to find allies where we wouldnt expect them. We usually have more allies than we think.

To connect to them we must consider different approaches, language and context-sensitivity. We must ask ourselves, are we helping the movement grow? Are we empowering others to join?

The BDS movement has shown itself to be highly adept at pivoting to new strategies and building influential alliances. There continue to be numerous arenas in which it faces little effective resistance. These are the words of Asher Fredman, who used to work with Israels strategic affairs ministry.

We must learn from other liberation struggles, while bearing in mind that times and political relations change.

While the BDS movement is highly inspired by the anti-apartheid movement in South Africa, the world is very different from how it looked 30 years ago.

We should not look for patterns to copy, but politically analyze the present and adapt to new times. This means continuing to learn, grow and use the best opportunities in a changing context.

Like all social movements, the BDS movement is facing severe and sustained attacks. Israels government and its lobby groups are regularly attacking and smearing us in an attempt to delegitimize our struggle.

We must not let their attacks shape our plans; strategizing and sticking to our anti-discrimination principles and our proactive and effective campaigning are what protect us the most.

While they seek to distract us from our target, the most powerful thing we can do is to keep on working for Palestinian rights. The best way to defend our right to boycott is to keep on boycotting while mobilizing mass support for our right to freedom of expression.

Solidarity is not unidirectional. At all times we must take responsibility and reject any form of racism, sexism, LGTB-phobia, and any other form of discrimination or bigotry within the movement.

While we call on others to support Palestinian rights, we must show support for other struggles too. Palestine is an Indigenous, anti-racist, feminist, LGTBQAI+, anti-fascist and climate justice issue, and this makes all these struggles crucial to ensuring Palestinian self-determination.

The Israeli government and its supporters spend hundreds of millions of dollars on criminalizing and persecuting the BDS movement and groups in solidarity with Palestine.

But this cannot be understood as something unique or isolated. Social movements have always been repressed by those seeking to maintain injustice and oppression.

Activists everywhere have been imprisoned for criticizing governments, and many calls for justice are being repressed in the streets and online. Let us not forget that those most oppressed by the Israeli government are always the Palestinians.

Using different tactics helps us reach a broader audience. As racism, sexism and disaster capitalism adapt and reconfigure, finding different ways to keep on oppressing, we must also keep on finding creative new ways to engage with others and accomplish our goals.

Political resistance can be beautiful too.

Holding events, lectures, protests and public activities are crucial to show and visualize support for Palestinian rights. But talking to people, organizing, doing research, building alliances and strengthening relations all happen behind closed doors and are what enable us to then go public.

We should never forget how important it is to plan, foster relationships and carefully organize to then build our campaigns.

It is incredible how many cities and cultural spaces have declared themselves apartheid free zones, how many companies have divested from Israeli apartheid, how many artists have decided not to play in Israel and how many academics have ended relationships with Israeli institutions as a result of BDS campaigns.

Yet it is often difficult to keep our hopes up while knowing that Israeli apartheid is the cruelest it has ever been, knowing ongoing Palestinian pain and suffering, and seeing Israel maintain its impunity despite its televised crimes. But we keep on struggling and growing because we know that justice can and will prevail.

Fifteen years on, and during a time of global uprising against an entire system of racist exploitation and oppression, the BDS movement continues learning, adapting and growing, making connections, and exposing and challenging Israeli apartheid.

Alys Samson Estap is the Europe campaigns coordinator of the Palestinian BDS National Committee

Go here to see the original:

15 lessons from 15 years of BDS - The Electronic Intifada

Where Is Robotics Heading? Perspectives From iRobot (Colin Angle), Stanley Black & Decker, And Robots In Service Of The Environment – Forbes

Posted on by

The dream of robots and intelligent machines that can perform a wide array of tasks has been around in the common visions and fantasies of people for centuries. Machines that can do the work of people without having the failings of people is one of those long-sought visions of the future. Originally envisioned as physical systems, the term robot is now used to describe any sort of software or hardware-based automation, whether intelligent or not, that can perform a task that would otherwise require human labor or brainpower.

Colin Angle, Chairman, CEO and Founder of iRobot

Since the term robot was first coined in 1920, robots have become an increasing part of our lives. Companies looking to increasingly automate and enable greater portions of their business that require physical human labor currently look to robots to help or fully replace humans with many tasks. Additionally, robotics companies are also building robots for the consumer market as well. With robots increasingly being used in both professional and personal settings, where are we in the current state of robotics and where is the robotics industry heading?

Many forward thinking companies are using robotics

Increasingly, a number of companies are turning to robotics to help with many human centered tasks. These robots either are there to augment their human counterparts or fully replace them at certain tasks. Physical robots are highly desired in many industries, especially to perform tasks often referred to as the four Ds: Dirty, Dangerous, Dear (or Expensive), and Dull (or Demeaning). These robots operate every day in manufacturing, warehouse, health care, and other situations to perform the tasks that would otherwise be performed by humans with not always positive outcomes.

Stanley Black & Decker is well-known for their innovative tools for construction and building, but you may not be aware that the company also has a future-looking innovation lab that focuses in other areas of development. The company has primarily been known for things such as knives, drill bits, tape measures and other hardware and tools. However over the last several years the companys focus has been on how it can use AI to improve their software, the types of products that they are developing for their customers, and how to make those things work smarter and more efficiently.

For Stanley Black & Decker, AI and robots and other developmental technologies are increasingly being used and incorporated into various design, manufacturing, and related functions at the company. Just like with other industries the company is finding these robots are not replacing jobs, but they are helping workers to use their time more wisely. By having robots perform some of the menial labor, human workers are freed up to perform higher level tasks and add value to the products they're creating.

For forward thinking organizations like Stanley Black & Decker the use of robotics can be seen as a strategic advantage. By identifying opportunities where robotics can be applied, operational efficiencies, benefits, and ROI will be achieved. Robots will help decrease costs, improve safety, and overall enhance operations. Embracing robotics and disruptive technologies will help improve and enhance manufacturing as well as shift the way the company designs and validates. From the Stanley Black & Decker perspective, at least, robotics is core to their long term strategy, and well be seeing more robotics in our day-to-day lives.

Robots going underwater

While many focus on robots above ground, some companies, organizations, and non-profits are bringing robots to the seas. Robots in Service of the Environment (RSE) is developing robots that are able to operate in water to help safely capture invasive species. By bringing augmented intelligence systems and robotics to harsh environments, such as those underwater, we can gain capabilities that would otherwise be too dangerous for humans.

In one particular application, RSE is focused on the challenge of invasive Lionfish. Lionfish are known to be a very invasive fish that quickly eat young reef fish and have no natural predators in waters where they are not indeginous. Although divers could easily kill these invasive fish with spear guns at less than 100ft down, RSE wanted to see if robotics solutions that could operate underwater would be a better solution. Creating scalable and affordable robots is a key driver for RSE. The company has already had a few iterations of their underwater robots, iterating and improving with each new robot. Right now, the process for capturing lionfish is very much human centric, with humans above water controlling and operating the robot. However, the plan is for future versions to self-identify the lionfish to limit the need for human interaction.

RSEs mission is to apply robotic technology to solve large-scale environmental challenges and to inspire the next generation of scientists and engineers through these efforts. While the underwater robot is their first robot in deployment, RSE is also focused on developing robots to solve todays environmental problems as well as inspire the next generation of scientists and engineers. For them, the future looks promising and by getting folks involved in this process and raising awareness of environmental issues, they hope to inspire the next generation. From the RSE perspective, well be seeing robotics applied increasingly to more challenging environments and providing more value where humans are just not capable or equipped to go. If we can put rovers on Mars, then we can put robots to work under the sea.

Moving into the Golden Age of Robotics

For the past few decades, robots and autonomous machines have been making their way into our homes. The idea of Rosie from the Jetsons TV show, a robot that can talk, cook, clean, and interact with humans is still not realized. However robots and autonomous machines that can perform certain narrow tasks are a reality. We now have vacuums that can self navigate through rooms, lawn mowers that can automatically navigate your yard and cut your grass, cars that are getting ever closer to fully autonomous driving, and other machines that can perform certain functions.

Colin Angle, Chairman, CEO and Founder of iRobot believes we are on the cusp of the golden age of robotics. In order to move into this golden age and move past automation to robots and machines that are truly intelligent, three steps need to be achieved. First, robots need to become more responsive. Instead of robots being programmed to simply perform a task, robots need to actually understand their environment and respond accordingly. Second, robots must be more collaborative. To accomplish this we must broaden the awareness and understanding of the robot beyond its immediate environment. It needs to also collaborate with people and other robots as well. While we have collaborative robots already, the vast majority of robots would not be considered to fall into this category. Third, is that in order to have robots be truly intelligent, they must act as part of a larger system. For example, when robots can understand their surroundings and environment they can interact and operate with other robots and devices in your house to create a true ecosystem rather than a bunch of disparate systems.

While many companies are increasing building and adopting robotics into various parts of their workflows, and consumers have welcomed robots into their homes to help with various chores and tasks, the need for intelligent robots continues. Creating robots can be a very costly venture, and unfortunately some robotics companies have not been able to stay in business. However there is much innovation still to be had and the robotics industry isnt going away anytime soon. Many companies and non-profits are finding increasing value from bringing robots into their various operations. As the ROI continues to be shown, companies will continue to invest in robots. At some point, hopefully in the near future, intelligent robots will become mainstream and a true robotics revolution will emerge.

Read more from the original source:

Where Is Robotics Heading? Perspectives From iRobot (Colin Angle), Stanley Black & Decker, And Robots In Service Of The Environment - Forbes

Robotics Special Report: Big Data is the New Currency – Automation World

Posted on by

Kawasaki Robotics Trend Manager failure prediction software is designed to help companies avoid unexpected downtime by allowing them to predict failures and fix issues before loss of production.

A 2019 business intelligence report, Robotics, Innovation 2 Implementation, from PMMI, the Association for Packaging and Processing Technologies, noted, The future of robotics in the manufacturing space will be defined by big data and the ability of AI systems to analyze and act on production information. It adds that, Future factories will utilize big data collection and analyzation to empower robots to make on-the-fly decisions in the middle of production, even when presented with unfamiliar scenarios.

Gerhard Schubert GmbH is among those companies that have embraced big data by developing a solution for its modular, robotic packaging systems that it says provides meaningful analysis of the key figures and 100% protection against Internet attacks. Now integrated into every new robot-based TLM packaging systemwhich offers both primary and secondary packaging capabilitiesis Schuberts industrial gateway, GS.Gate. GS.Gate allows detailed evaluations of system productivity to be called up, and the results can be viewed either on the GRIPS.world customer platform or on the machine operating terminal. From this analysis, Schubert says, potentials and possibilities can then be derived as to how the OEE [Overall Equipment Effectiveness] ratio of the line and therefore the added value can be improved.

Read related articles from Packaging World:

Cobots Automate Assembly & Bagging of PopSockets

Wet Wipes Case Packed via Robots at 160/min

Tomato Grower Automates Palletizer to Stack Higher, Faster

Global CPGs embrace robotics

Packagers realize ROI with robotics

Also operating in the new currency of big data is Kawasaki Robotics failure prediction software, Trend Manager, designed to help companies avoid unexpected downtime by allowing them to predict failures and fix issues before loss of production. The software, which allows users to maintain control of their information, monitors motor current and robot condition during operation and generates a failure prediction date using the data. When Trend Manager detects an abnormality, a warning alarm is sent to the user via email, saves the data, and logs it for reference.

Original post:

Robotics Special Report: Big Data is the New Currency - Automation World

Future Prospects of Rehabilitation Robotics Market 2020 | Size, Growth, Demand, Opportunities & Forecast To 2026 | AlterG, Bionik, Ekso Bionics,…

Posted on by

Rehabilitation Robotics Market research is an intelligence report with meticulous efforts undertaken to study the right and valuable information. The data which has been looked upon is done considering both, the existing top players and the upcoming competitors. Business strategies of the key players and the new entering market industries are studied in detail. Well explained SWOT analysis, revenue share and contact information are shared in this report analysis.

Rehabilitation Robotics Market is growing at a High CAGR during the forecast period 2020-2026. The increasing interest of the individuals in this industry is that the major reason for the expansion of this market.

Get Free Sample Copy of This Report @:

https://www.theresearchinsights.com/request_sample.php?id=64290

Top Key Players Profiled in This Report:

AlterG, Bionik, Ekso Bionics, Myomo, Hocoma, Biodex, Focal Meditech, Honda Motor, Instead Technologies, Aretech. LLC, Kinova, MRISAR, Robotdalen, RU Robots, Woodway, Tyromotion

The key questions answered in this report:

Various factors are responsible for the markets growth trajectory, which are studied at length in the report. In addition, the report lists down the restraints that are posing threat to the global Rehabilitation Robotics market. It also gauges the bargaining power of suppliers and buyers, threat from new entrants and product substitute, and the degree of competition prevailing in the market. The influence of the latest government guidelines is also analyzed in detail in the report. It studies the Rehabilitation Robotics markets trajectory between forecast periods.

Get Discount on this Report at:

https://www.theresearchinsights.com/ask_for_discount.php?id=64290

Reasons for buying this report:

Table of Contents:

Global Rehabilitation Robotics Market Research Report

Chapter 1 Rehabilitation Robotics Market Overview

Chapter 2 Global Economic Impact on Industry

Chapter 3 Global Market Competition by Manufacturers

Chapter 4 Global Production, Revenue (Value) by Region

Chapter 5 Global Supply (Production), Consumption, Export, Import by Regions

Chapter 6 Global Production, Revenue (Value), Price Trend by Type

Chapter 7 Global Market Analysis by Application

Chapter 8 Manufacturing Cost Analysis

Chapter 9 Industrial Chain, Sourcing Strategy and Downstream Buyers

Chapter 10 Marketing Strategy Analysis, Distributors/Traders

Chapter 11 Market Effect Factors Analysis

Chapter 12 Global Rehabilitation Robotics Market Forecast

For More Information:

https://www.theresearchinsights.com/enquiry_before_buying.php?id=64290

Link:

Future Prospects of Rehabilitation Robotics Market 2020 | Size, Growth, Demand, Opportunities & Forecast To 2026 | AlterG, Bionik, Ekso Bionics,...

Robotics and automation in a post-pandemic food system – AGDAILY

Posted on by

Robots working in abattoirs, sky-high vertical farms, more gene-edited foods in our supermarkets, and automated farming systems could all help guarantee food supply in the next pandemic.

University of Queensland Professor Robert Henry said the technologies had all been in various stages of planning prior to COVID-19, but food producers would now be moving much faster to prepare for the next pandemic.

Food processing facilities like meat works have had to close due to a staff member being infected with the coronavirus, and all food processing industries where you have workers in small confined spaces are similarly at risk, Henry said.

Henry, who is the director of the Queensland Alliance for Agriculture and Food Innovation (QAAFI), said roboticised abattoirs and automated harvesting and production facilities would also reduce the risk of transmission of pathogens among workers but also the spread of viruses via the food itself.

COVID does not seem to be transmissible from an infected human touching food but a future pandemic virus might be transmitted this way, so automating the food supply chain reduces this risk.

It also minimises reliance on human workers that are not available due to migration restrictions and border closures.

Henry said protected cropping, including vertical farms or growing food in vertically stacked layers similar to a skyscraper building would optimise plant growth and enable control over climate variations, chemical inputs and water resources.

There will have to be policies that drive consumer acceptance of gene edited foods, which some consumers consider as GMOs. Advanced technologies need to be adopted globally, in each region, to deliver local food production capability that could provide secure sources of food in future pandemics, he said. We will need to design crops to suit automated systems for example for fruit to grow in places where it can be harvested robotically.

Henry said the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic made it difficult to fully assess the impact on agriculture and food supply.

He said despite growing stocks of foods such as cereals, it was estimated the number of people facing a food crisis will grow from 135 million to 265 million by the end of 2020.

It may seem to those of us in Western countries that the only impact on food supply has been a rush on pasta and rice in the supermarket and home-baking but the loss of income caused by the pandemic has hit some countries in Africa hard.

We are in a situation where we have food surpluses while there has been a doubling in the number of people who cant afford to eat and the situation is likely to get worse. Henry said increased investment in agricultural research and development would support enhanced food security.

Read the rest here:

Robotics and automation in a post-pandemic food system - AGDAILY

ABB India opens a new robotics facility to support the digital transformation of manufacturing in India – ELE Times

Posted on by

Spread over 3,600 sq.m at the ABB Nelamangala factory premises in Bengaluru, the new facility will enable ABB India to deliver robotic applications and digital solutions for a variety of Indian industries, including automotive, food & beverage, electronics and other upcoming sectors. The facility houses a state-of-the-art shop floor that can run proof of concepts and factory acceptance tests for 1000 ABB robots every year, which doubles the companys capacity. This enables rapid innovation, adaption, optimisation and agile delivery of made-to-order robotics applications for Indian customers.

The new facility harnesses the powers of ABBs deep global expertise and knowledge of the Indian industrial landscape to support our customer base, said Sanjeev Sharma, Managing Director of ABB India. Even with increased demand for automation, the penetration of robotics, especially in small and medium enterprises is still low in India compared to the global average. With the help of the new and improved robotics facility, we will be able to share our knowledge and encourage Indian manufacturers to embrace our game changing technologies and become best-in-class manufacturers for local and global markets.

The facility includes a demonstration center where the latest technologies in robotic welding, gluing and material handling will be showcased and can be used to carry out joint prove-out sessions with customers. ABB will also integrate an ABB AbilityTM Connected Services team that can remotely monitor an installed base of ABB robots to conduct predictive maintenance and high uptime.

A new Customer Experience Center is being set up for customers to learn about the latest in robotics technology and applications, including ABBs dedicated robot simulation and programming software, RobotStudio. Additionally, the facility will host a paint lab where customers can run simulations of a broad range of industrial painting applications.

ABB is one the leading suppliers of robot, robot systems and machine & factory automation solutions, having shipped over 400,000 robot solutions across the globe. Designed as a complete digital ecosystem, ABBs factory of the future concept will cater to the growing demand of collaborative automation solutions, by enabling innovation of new robot applications tailormade to the Indian market.

For more information,www.abb.com

Visit link:

ABB India opens a new robotics facility to support the digital transformation of manufacturing in India - ELE Times

Corona Impact: Is Industrial Robotics Market will Propel with its Advanced Approaches in 2020 – Market Research Posts

Posted on by

The emergence of COVID-19 across the world has impacted the global industrial robotics market in a negative way. The decline in the market growth is majorly owing to the high investment costs of industrial robots. Nonetheless, the market is likely to recover by the second & third quarter of 2022. The continuous advancements in quality of products and in its costs is expected to impel the market growth of industrial robotics market post-COVID-19 pandemic.

Connect with Our Analyst to Contextualize Our Insights for Your Business: https://www.researchdive.com/connect-to-analyst/309

The global industrial robotics market is likely to witness a decrease in growth rate due to the COVID-19 pandemic. According to a new report published by Research Dive, the global industrial robotics market accounted for $43.2 million in 2018 and is projected to surpass $85.2 million by 2026. Comprehensive analysis of drivers, restraints, growth opportunities and strategies executed by various governments & major market players to sustain in the COVID-19 pandemic are further provided in the report.

The global industrial robotics market was estimated to grow at a CAGR of 9.5% by 2026 prior to the COVID-19 crisis. Although, due to the COVID-19 pandemic, now the market is projected to exhibit a CAGR of 8.8% during the forecast period. Industrial robots are very costly to build. In addition, daily maintenance of high power and high electricity usage is cost prohibitive for end-uses; the industrial robotics industry would be impeded by these factors in the forecast era.

For More Detail Insights, Download Sample Copy of the Report at: https://www.researchdive.com/download-sample/309

The predicted pre-COVID-19 market size for the industrial robotics industry was $51.4 million in 2020 and is expected to witness a drastic downfall and reach up to $33.4 million due to COVID-19 pandemic. Thus, the global industry players are looking towards the government for financial support to sustain this crisis.

The global market is anticipated to observe a significant growth post-COVID-19 pandemic and recover by the second or third quarter of 2022. Implementation of self-programmed robotics based on artificial intelligence and machine learning is expected to generate increased investment opportunities over the forecasted period. For instance, Huawei, CISCO, and Microsoft are now focused on maintaining collaborations with other IoT firms to build new robots so that their production project starts as soon as possible. Therefore, increasing production line efficiency in the projected timeframe is expected to propel the demand for industrial robots.

Contact Us:

Mr. Abhishek PaliwalResearch Dive30 Wall St. 8th Floor, New YorkNY 10005 (P)+ 91 (788) 802-9103 (India)+1 (917) 444-1262 (US) TollFree : +1 -888-961-4454Email:[emailprotected]LinkedIn:https://www.linkedin.com/company/research-diveTwitter:https://twitter.com/ResearchDiveFacebook:https://www.facebook.com/Research-DiveBlog:https://www.researchdive.com/blogFollow us on:https://covid-19-market-insights.blogspot.com

Go here to see the original:

Corona Impact: Is Industrial Robotics Market will Propel with its Advanced Approaches in 2020 - Market Research Posts

Locus Robotics Expands UK Presence with Strategic Partnership with Balloon One – PRNewswire

Posted on by

WILMINGTON, Mass., July 29, 2020 /PRNewswire/ -- Locus Robotics, the market leader in autonomous mobile robots (AMR) for fulfillment warehouses, today announced a strategic partnership with Balloon One, a London-based provider of software and supply chain applications for distribution, manufacturing and e-commerce companies. Together, Balloon One and Locus Robotics will provide customers with a more efficient, cost-effective solution to meet the dramatically increasing demand for e-commerce fulfillment, further driving the adoption of the innovative warehouse technologies offered by both companies.

"As e-commerce continues to explode across all channels, warehouse fulfillment has become a critical part of the economy," said Rick Faulk, CEO of Locus Robotics. "Our partnership will deliver cutting-edge robotics technology to Balloon One customers and drive significant operational efficiency and productivity gains, and a faster time to value."

Through the partnership, Balloon One will offer Locus Robotics' award-winning, multi-bot solutionfor warehouse fulfillment alongside Krber/HighJump WMS, enabling customers to achieve consistent efficiency gains of 200-300% without the need for expensive or time-consuming infrastructure changes. In addition, the Locus Robotics-as-a-Service (RaaS) model ensures that Balloon One customers can address the challenges of the labor market at a very low start-up cost.

"Balloon One is pleased to announce an exciting new partnership with the industry's most technologically advanced autonomous mobile robot (AMR) provider, Locus Robotics," said Craig Powell, Managing Director, Balloon One. "The Locus system can be deployed in as little as four (4) weeks and provides two to three (2X-3X) times picker productivity gains. Based on our internal assessment, we believe this technology will become an essential part of our warehouse operations and will provide our customers with a unique and significant advantage in today's increasingly demanding e-commerce landscape."

The COVID-19 pandemic has quickly transformed the retail industry, making online and omnichannel purchasing the new normal across the globe. Locus Robotics' industry-leading robotics fulfillment solution enables brands, retailers, and third-party logistics (3PL) operators to easily meet higher order volumes and increasing consumer demand for e-commerce, retail, omnichannel, and manufacturing order fulfillment. Locus's proven, multi-bot solution for fulfillment incorporates collaborative, autonomous robots that workclosely with human employees to improve fulfillment productivity and efficiency consistently doubling or tripling fulfillment productivity, lowers labor costs, with near-100% accuracy, while also enabling users to save 30% or more in operating expenses.

Balloon One will be offering live, in-person demonstrations of the Locus Solution to prospective customers at their new demonstration suite in West London. Demos will provide a hands-on experience to showcase the value of the fully integrated Locus and Krber/HighJump solutions.

About Locus RoboticsLocus Robotics' revolutionary, multi-bot solution incorporates powerful and intelligent autonomous mobile robots that operate collaboratively with human workers to dramatically improve piece-handling productivity 2X-3X, with less labor compared to traditional picking systems. This award-winning solution helps retailers, 3PLs, and specialty warehouses efficiently meet and exceed the increasingly complex and demanding requirements of fulfillment environments, easily integrating into existing warehouse infrastructures without disrupting workflows, instantly transforming productivity without transforming the warehouse. For more information, visit http://www.locusrobotics.com.

About Balloon OneFounded in 2003 and based in West London, Balloon One is an End-to-End Supply Chain Systems provider with a focus to deliver agile solutions through a pragmatic approach to their customer's distribution operation, large or small, every time. Balloon One provides WMS, ERP, TMS & Automation, to enable greater interoperability between processes throughout the supply chain. With a value driven and fact-based strategy, Balloon works with clients to not only identify and resolve their pain points but to facilitate the growth of their businesses. For more information, visit. http://balloonone.com.

SOURCE Locus Robotics

Home

Read more from the original source:

Locus Robotics Expands UK Presence with Strategic Partnership with Balloon One - PRNewswire

Duke Robotics Presents TIKAD Combat Drone Equipped with Innovative Stabilization Technology – sUAS News

Posted on by

Duke Robotics, a leader in robotics technology and drone solutions, introduces TIKAD, an innovative military UAS octocopter drone with a mounted lightweight firearm and advanced stabilization technology. TIKAD features a lightweight robotic gimbal with the unparalleled ability to carry and stabilize payload recoil up to three times its weight. In addition, TIKADs gimbal offers real-time, 6 DOF (degrees of freedom), a capability that provides an advantage to U.S. and allied forces in combat.

TIKADadvances military strategy by integrating an aerial support system into combat missions. The UAS drone can engage with troops or lead precision strikes without the need for intrusive action. TIKAD can be used in various military applications including border patrol law enforcement, drone on drone warfare and counter terrorism.

According to a recent report,Fortune Businessprojects the military drone market to reach$21.76 billionby 2026, at a CAGR of 12.4% during the forecast period. The report says, Advanced defense technologies, such as artificial intelligence, 3D printing, multi-sensor data fusion for UAV navigation, cloud computing-based services for military UAVs, and technological advancements in drone payloads are expected to support the market growth during the forecast period. mid-air refueling of drone, and anti-UAV defense system are the major upcoming trends in the military drone market.

More:

Duke Robotics Presents TIKAD Combat Drone Equipped with Innovative Stabilization Technology - sUAS News

ROBUST GROWTH OF THE Service Robotics Market MARKET PREDICTED OVER THE FORECAST PERIOD 2015 2021 – Research Newspaper

Posted on by

The Service Robotics Market market report provides a detailed analysis of global market size, regional and country-level market size, segmentation market growth, market share, competitive Landscape, sales analysis, impact of domestic and global market players, value chain optimization, trade regulations, recent developments, opportunities analysis, strategic market growth analysis, product launches, area marketplace expanding, and technological innovations.

It incorporates Service Robotics Market market evolution study, involving the current scenario, growth rate (CAGR), and SWOT analysis. Important the study on Service Robotics Market market takes a closer look at the top market performers and monitors the strategies that have enabled them to occupy a strong foothold in the market. Apart from this, the research brings to light real-time data about opportunities that will completely transform the trajectory of the business environment in the coming years to 2025. Some of the key players in the global Service Robotics Market market is Adept Technology Inc, Aethon Inc, Bluefin Robotics, DJI, Delaval International AB, ECA Group, GeckoSystems Intl. Corp, IRobot Corporation, Kuka AG, Intuitive Surgical Inc, Parrot S.A. ,

Download Sample Copy of the Report to understand the structure of the complete report (Including Full TOC, Table & Figures) @ https://brandessenceresearch.biz/Request/Sample?ResearchPostId=128&RequestType=Sample

Service Robotics Market Market: Competitive Landscape:

The competitive landscape further includes details about different players and their position on a global and a local level is also explained in detail in this compiled study. These insights were prepared through mapping business strategies and products that offer high revenue generation capacities. An overview of the Service Robotics Market market Comprehensive analysis of the market Analyses of recent developments in the market Events in the market scenario of the past few years Emerging market segments and regional Service Robotics Market markets Segmentations up to the second and/or third level Historical, current, and estimated market size in terms of value and volume Competitive analysis, with company overview, products, revenue, and strategies. An impartial assessment of the market Strategic recommendations to help companies increase their Service Robotics Market market presence.

The Key Manufacturers covered in this Report:- Adept Technology Inc, Aethon Inc, Bluefin Robotics, DJI, Delaval International AB, ECA Group, GeckoSystems Intl. Corp, IRobot Corporation, Kuka AG, Intuitive Surgical Inc, Parrot S.A. ,

By Power Rating:Defense, Security & Rescue Service RoboticsField Robots Service RoboticsMedical Service RoboticsMarine Service RoboticsLogistics Service RoboticsTelepresence Service RoboticsInspection & Maintenance ServiceEntertainment Service Robotics SystemEducation & Research Service RoboticsBy Operating Environment:

AerialGround-BasedMarine

The key regions covered in the Service Robotics Market market report are:

North America (U.S., Canada, Mexico)

South America (Cuba, Brazil, Argentina, and many others.)

Europe (Germany, U.K., France, Italy, Russia, Spain, etc.)

Asia (China, India, Russia, and many other Asian nations.)

Pacific region (Indonesia, Japan, and many other Pacific nations.)

Middle East & Africa (Saudi Arabia, South Africa, and many others.)

Request Customization of the Report: https://brandessenceresearch.biz/Request/Sample?ResearchPostId=128&RequestType=Sample

Table of Contents

Report Overview: It includes major players of the global Service Robotics Market Market covered in the research study, research scope, and Market segments by type, market segments by application, years considered for the research study, and objectives of the report.

Global Growth Trends: This section focuses on industry trends where market drivers and top market trends are shed light upon. It also provides growth rates of key producers operating in the global Service Robotics Market Market. Furthermore, it offers production and capacity analysis where marketing pricing trends, capacity, production, and production value of the global Service Robotics Market Market are discussed.

Market Share by Manufacturers: Here, the report provides details about revenue by manufacturers, production and capacity by manufacturers, price by manufacturers, expansion plans, mergers and acquisitions, and products, market entry dates, distribution, and market areas of key manufacturers.

Market Size by Type: This section concentrates on product type segments where production value market share, price, and production market share by product type are discussed.

Market Size by Application: Besides an overview of the global Service Robotics Market Market by application, it gives a study on the consumption in the global Service Robotics Market Market by application.

Production by Region: Here, the production value growth rate, production growth rate, import and export, and key players of each regional market are provided.

Consumption by Region:This section provides information on the consumption in each regional market studied in the report. The consumption is discussed on the basis of country, application, and product type.

Company Profiles:Almost all leading players of the global Service Robotics Market Market are profiled in this section. The analysts have provided information about their recent developments in the global Service Robotics Market Market, products, revenue, production, business, and company.

Market Forecast by Production:The production and production value forecasts included in this section are for the global Service Robotics Market Market as well as for key regional markets.

Market Forecast by Consumption:The consumption and consumption value forecasts included in this section are for the global Service Robotics Market Market as well as for key regional markets.

Value Chain and Sales Analysis:It deeply analyzes customers, distributors, sales channels, and value chain of the global Service Robotics Market Market.

Key Findings: This section gives a quick look at important findings of the research study.

Get access to full summary @ https://brandessenceresearch.biz/Machinery-and-Equipments/Global-Service-Robotics-Market/Summary

About Us:

We publish market research reports & business insights produced by highly qualified and experienced industry analysts. Our research reports are available in a wide range of industry verticals including aviation, food & beverage, healthcare, ICT, Construction, Chemicals and lot more. Brand Essence Market Research report will be best fit for senior executives, business development managers, marketing managers, consultants, CEOs, CIOs, COOs, and Directors, governments, agencies, organizations and Ph.D. Students.

Top Trending Reports:

https://www.marketwatch.com/press-release/us-diabetes-care-devices-market-research-report-2020-analysis-opportunity-and-forecast-to-2025-covid-19-impact-analysis-2020-05-28

https://www.marketwatch.com/press-release/us-cataract-surgery-devices-market-size-share-current-trends-and-research-development-report-to-2025-2020-05-28

https://www.marketwatch.com/press-release/disposable-medical-devices-sensors-market-size-analysis-emerging-trends-opportunity-future-growth-insights-and-top-key-players-forecast-to-2025-2020-05-28

https://www.marketwatch.com/press-release/us-managed-print-services-market-2020-size-share-business-growth-regional-trends-opportunities-sales-revenue-and-comprehensive-research-study-2025-2020-06-15

https://www.marketwatch.com/press-release/global-pc-based-automation-market-2020-size-industry-research-rapid-growth-trend-price-regional-outlook-to-2025-2020-06-15

See the article here:

ROBUST GROWTH OF THE Service Robotics Market MARKET PREDICTED OVER THE FORECAST PERIOD 2015 2021 - Research Newspaper

ABB India opens new robotics facility to support the digital transformation of manufacturing in India – Express Computer

Posted on by

The new ABB Robotics solutions delivery facility will enable Indian customers to reap the benefits of Industry 4.0 including cutting-edge robotics and digitalization technologies, going at the heart of helping India become a resilient high-tech manufacturing economy in the world.

Spread over 3,600 sq.m at the ABB Nelamangala factory premises in Bengaluru, the new facility will enable ABB India to deliver robotic applications and digital solutions for a variety of Indian industries, including automotive, food & beverage, electronics and other upcoming sectors. The facility houses a state-of-the-art shop floor that can run proof of concepts and factory acceptance tests for 1000 ABB robots every year, which doubles the companys capacity. This enables rapid innovation, adaption, optimisation and agile delivery of made-to-order robotics applications for Indian customers.

The new facility harnesses the powers of ABBs deep global expertise and knowledge of the Indian industrial landscape to support our customer base, said Sanjeev Sharma, Managing Director of ABB India. Even with increased demand for automation, the penetration of robotics, especially in small and medium enterprises is still low in India compared to the global average. With the help of the new and improved robotics facility, we will be able to share our knowledge and encourage Indian manufacturers to embrace our game changing technologies and become best-in-class manufacturers for local and global markets.

The facility includes a demonstration center where the latest technologies in robotic welding, gluing and material handling will be showcased and can be used to carry out joint prove-out sessions with customers. ABB will also integrate an ABB AbilityTM Connected Services team that can remotely monitor an installed base of ABB robots to conduct predictive maintenance and high uptime.

A new Customer Experience Center is being set up for customers to learn about the latest in robotics technology and applications, including ABBs dedicated robot simulation and programming software, RobotStudio. Additionally, the facility will host a paint lab where customers can run simulations of a broad range of industrial painting applications.

ABB is one the leading suppliers of robot, robot systems and machine & factory automation solutions, having shipped over 400,000 robot solutions across the globe. Designed as a complete digital ecosystem, ABBs factory of the future concept will cater to the growing demand of collaborative automation solutions, by enabling innovation of new robot applications tailor-made to the Indian market.

If you have an interesting article / experience / case study to share, please get in touch with us at [emailprotected]

Read more from the original source:

ABB India opens new robotics facility to support the digital transformation of manufacturing in India - Express Computer

Retread Robots Market 2020: By Regional Analysis And New Technology To Forecast 2026 – Market Research Posts

Posted on by

A comprehensive research study on Retread Robots Market available at Big Market Research provides insights into the market size and growth trends of this industry over the forecast timeline. The study evaluates key aspects of Retread Robots market in terms of the demand landscape, driving factors and growth strategies adopted by market players.

The research report on Retread Robots market provides a granular assessment of this business vertical and includes information concerning the market tendencies such as revenue estimations, current remuneration, market valuation, and market size over the estimated timeframe.

Our analysis involves the study of the market taking into consideration the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic. Please get in touch with us to get your hands on an exhaustive coverage of the impact of the current situation on the market. Our expert team of analysts will provide as per report customized to your requirement.

Request a sample of this premium research: https://www.bigmarketresearch.com/request-sample/3905454?utm_source=Nilesh-MRP

Key parameters presented in the Retread Robots market report: ABB, Eurobots, Alliance Robotics, KUKA, Master Robotics LLC, Scott Technology, A J Robotics, Northline Robot world, Antenen Robotics (Fanuc Corp.), Mahajan Automation, KC Robotics.

Global Retread Robots Market: Segmentation

Global Retread Robots Market Segmentation: By Types

ArticulatedCartesianCylindricalPolarSCARADelta

Global Retread Robots Market segmentation: By Applications

Automotive industryElectrical/Electronic industryMetal and Machinery industryChemicalRubber and Plastics industryFood and Beverages industry

Global Retread Robots Market Segmentation: By Region

1) North America (United States, Canada)2) Europe (Germany, France, UK, Italy, Russia, Spain, Netherlands, Switzerland, Belgium)3) Asia Pacific (China, Japan, Korea, India, Australia, Indonesia, Thailand, Philippines, Vietnam)4) Middle East & Africa (Turkey, Saudi Arabia, United Arab Emirates, South Africa, Israel, Egypt, Nigeria)5) Latin America (Brazil, Mexico, Argentina, Colombia, Chile, Peru)

Influence of the Retread Robots Market Report:

This Retread Robots Market Research/analysis Report Contains Answers To Your Following Questions:

In conclusion, the Retread Robots market is examined for Sales, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin. These points are analyzed for companies, types, and regions. In continuation with this data, the sale price is for various types, applications and region is also included. The Retread Robots Market consumption for major regions is given. Additionally, type wise and application wise figures are also provided in this report.

Request a discount on standard prices of this premium research: https://www.bigmarketresearch.com/request-for-discount/3905454?utm_source=Nilesh-MRP

Table of content :

Topic 1 Industry Overview

Topic 2 Global Retread Robots Competition by Types, Applications, and Top Regions and Countries

Topic 3 Production Market Analysis

Topic 4 Global Retread Robots Sales, Consumption, Export, Import by Regions (2015-2020)

Topic 5 North America Retread Robots Market Analysis

Topic 6 East Asia Retread Robots Market Analysis

Topic 7 Europe Retread Robots Market Analysis

Topic 8 South Asia Retread Robots Market Analysis

Topic 9 Southeast Asia Retread Robots Market Analysis

Topic 10 Middle East Retread Robots Market Analysis

Topic 11 Africa Retread Robots Market Analysis

Topic 12 Oceania Retread Robots Market Analysis

Topic 13 South America Retread Robots Market Analysis

Topic 14 Company Profiles and Key Figures in Retread Robots Business

Topic 15 Global Retread Robots Market Forecast (2021-2026)

Topic 16 Conclusions

About Us:Big Market Research has a range of research reports from various publishers across the world. Our database of reports of various market categories and sub-categories would help to find the exact report you may be looking for.

We are instrumental in providing quantitative and qualitative insights on your area of interest by bringing reports from various publishers at one place to save your time and money. A lot of organizations across the world are gaining profits and great benefits from information gained through reports sourced by us.

Contact us:

Mr. Abhishek Paliwal

Big Market Research

5933 NE Win Sivers Drive, #205, Portland,

OR 97220 United States

Direct: +1-971-202-1575

Toll Free: +1-800-910-6452

E-mail: [emailprotected]

Go here to read the rest:

Retread Robots Market 2020: By Regional Analysis And New Technology To Forecast 2026 - Market Research Posts

Local startup keen on tapping into robotics – The New Times

Posted on by

Two local young entrepreneurs are venturing into unmanned technology, starting with a tray robot. The duo hopes to put their autonomous carrier on the market next year.

KwaandaLabs, a local tech startup, is testing its working prototype of a smart tray, an android-powered machine that will be used to transport items indoors without anyone pushing it around.

At its current stage of development, the robot dubbed Kwbot is operated using a specialised smartphone application.

It has the capacity to carry up to 10 kilogrammes and can go at a constant speed of two meters per second.

James Ndekezi, the cofounder of KwaandaLabs, says the bot can be useful in offices, hospitals, coffee shops or restaurants.

One of the unique features of Kwbot is the ability to record commands. With this function, the user drives the smart tray once and it can carry out similar tasks later on its own using the recorded instructions.

Kwbot chest is surrounded by four laser sensors. Ndekezi explained that the sensors will be used to add computer vision features which will enable the robot to detect and differentiate objects.

That way, he added, it will be easy to avoid unnecessary accidents.

The duo also wants to add a voice assistant which will allow users to operate the machine by talking to it.

This robot is coming to change. We are in time for change, for innovating, for solving social issues, says Israel Nishimwe, also a cofounder.

With the robot project, KwaandaLabs is currently under the Inclusive Business Solution (IBS) Rwanda programme a technology startup incubator established by Korea International Cooperation Agency (KOICA).

Nishimwe and Ndekezi have previously worked on high-tech projects, including a wireless charging system and smart tables.

While some of the projects won innovation prizes, the team called on investors to support the technology.

In recent years, autonomous machines are gaining worldwide attention. During the Covid-19 pandemic, the use of unmanned vehicles picked momentum as it minimizes human contact and thus limits the transmission of the virus

Rwanda particularly has deployed robots on the frontline to combat the Covid-19 outbreak. Five humanoids are being used in hospitals and at Kigali International Airport for mass coronavirus screening, delivering medication, and detecting people who are not wearing protective masks.

Outdoors, drones are used to deliver blood samples and medication, as well as to raise public awareness on the pandemic by playing pre-recorded messages loud from above.

editor@newtimesrwanda.com

Excerpt from:

Local startup keen on tapping into robotics - The New Times