Health Media in the COVID-19 Era: A mid-wave report – Features – MM&M – Medical Marketing and Media

MM&M first wrote about health medias COVID-19 coverage several thousand news cycles ago on February 3, to be precise. That story concluded with the following paragraph:

So it will continue to fall on health media to alternately inform, educate, soothe and de-escalate. We really need to keep thinking through how we do our jobs in an environment, like this one, where there can be misinformation. If I talk about bat soup, versus be sure to wash your hands, whats going to get more traffic? We need to do more to elevate credible information, even if it sometimes is boring.

That last quote, from WebMD chief medical officer Dr. John Whyte, feels prescient with the benefit of hindsight. Sporadic bursts of overcaution notwithstanding, health media publications and commentators embraced their elevation mission. Drowning out the deniers and grifters wasnt always easy, but nearly every health media organization attacked the task with insight and empathy. In doing so, they elevated the level of understanding and, in all likelihood, prevented people from getting sick, or sicker.

For an insider view of the continuing coverage of COVID-19, we asked leaders from a range of media-adjacent organizations to weigh in on social media follows, coverage blind spots and more. The MM&M media panel included: Jack Barrette, CEO and founder of Wego Health; Amy Conway, editor-in-chief of Health; Alexandra Gilson, director, social media at CMI/Compas; Richelle Horn, senior director, marketing at Wego Health; Craig Mait, president and chief revenue officer of Mesmerize; Andrea Palmer, president of Publicis Health Media; Georgette Pascale, founder and CEO of Pascale Communications; Dr. Judith Simmons, managing director of healthcare at Gather and founder of Lion Head Advisors; Cynthia Spitalny, senior director, integrated marketing at Outcome Health; and Whyte. Responses have been lightly edited for length and clarity.

Simmons: Good curation has been key. COVID updates at The New York Times, Johns Hopkins University of Medicine, STAT, Nature Briefing, Science, The COVID Tracking Project, The New England Journal of Medicine, Kaiser Health News and the CDC have kept up with the rapid pace of important information. Current and former officials such as Dr. Anthony Fauci, Dr. Tom Frieden and Andy Slavitt are experienced and valued voices.

Palmer: Times Up Healthcare (@timesuphc) on Twitter. Only 20% of the decision-makers in healthcare are women, which was an issue before the pandemic and will continue to be an issue if we dont advocate in this space. From a media standpoint, its been fascinating to see how brands are embracing platforms such as TikTok to spread helpful messaging, from P&Gs use of influencers to drive the #DistanceDance phenomenon to fitness and athletic companies creating at-home workout challenges.

Whyte: I focus on Twitter, because I find Instagram doesnt provide the ability to have as much dialogue. @GilBashe curates interesting scientific and policy-type articles. @JeromeAdams, the Surgeon Generals personal account, provides a personal perspective as well as succinct advice on managing the pandemic. @DrJenCaudle is an African-American physician who shares very practical advice.

Conway: On Twitter, Angela Rasmussen (@angie_rasmussen) is a Columbia virologist who shares and demystifies the latest news on COVID-19, calls out others for disinformation and promotes diversity and inclusion and manages to do it all with a dose of humor. Craig Spencer (@Craig_A_Spencer) an ER doctor and Director of Global Health at NewYork-Presbyterian/Columbia University Medical Center, has shared what it was like to be on the front lines back in March and if youre looking for guidance on masks, read his A Soliloquy on Masks. Leah Douglas (@leahjdouglas), a reporter for the Food & Environment Reporting Network, has been mapping COVID-19 outbreaks in the food system. The coverage is impressive, fascinating and terrifying.

Pascale: On Instagram, @humansofny and @wetheurban give a realistic approach to who [are] and what is really being affected.

Gilson: Governor Andrew Cuomo has been a voice of authority in this new normal, with New Yorkers being on the frontlines battling the pandemic in its early stages.

Spitalny: With multiple family members and friends working in healthcare, I am a big champion of frontline essential workers. Mask Match, a nonprofit that helps people with spare masks send them directly to healthcare workers on the front lines or donate to replenish their PPE, was something important to elevate.

Mait: We have relied on the CDC to track cases in the U.S. and for information to protect ourselves and our communities. We have also become more active on LinkedIn than ever before, seeking out leaders of similar-sized organizations to ours to see how they are responding to and dealing with the situation.

Barrette: One of my favorites on Facebook is frontline nurse and immunocompromised patient leader MarlaJan Wexler, who cuts through the politics and BS as only a nurse can do.

Whyte: Laurie McGinley at the Washington Post always provides good analysis of important issues. Shes not trying to get clicks. STAT is terrific for a daily morning update. And living in the Washington, D.C. area, I find Bob Cusack and his team at The Hill helps me understand everything happening in DC that may impact me. Its succinct and timely.

Spitalny: It has been interesting to see how mainstream journalists have been covering the innovative ways companies have addressed their business challenges during the pandemic. I have also been listening to a lot more news through podcasts, like NPRs up first and NY Times The Daily. They help prepare me for the day and keep me apprised of topics that may become important to what we message and pursue as an organization.

Palmer: COVID has shown us just how important it is to create content with a consciencecontent that works in service to the people who consume it. Lets elevate voices in the media who are dedicated to truth and facts, like Pien Huang from the Science Desk at NPR. Since the start of the outbreak, she has consistently shared thought-provoking pieces that aim to educate readers.

Conway: Olga Khazns articles for The Atlantic are engrossing and surprising, answering questions you might not even have thought to ask: Why did it take so long for therapists to start seeing clients remotely? Why does Americas sick leave policy work against its workers? Is a socially distanced pool still fun? STATs no-nonsense news reporting by Sharon Begley, Helen Branswell and Andrew Joseph goes deep into the science of COVID-19 but is always readable, engaging and enlightening.

Barrette: Overall, traditional media has pounded us with the latest hours sound bites from experts who themselves are learning real time about this disease. The result is confusion, fear, complacency and desensitized consumers

Gilson: More important than individual voices has been the collective conversation on COVID, stemming from patients and HCPs trying to navigate chronic diseases and cancer which did not let up despite the pandemic monopolizing health conversations. Those patients and their doctors are still in need of critical information, now more than ever, to keep up to date on treatments and recovery in a post-COVID world. Individual voices such as Governor Cuomo and Dr. Fauci will continue to be important in the evolving climate, but Pharma should continue to pay attention to the masses in understanding trends and sentiment within healthcare.

Pascale: Local papers and online sources are covering the news that is real and relevant to you. Sometimes its most helpful to track how things are influencing you locally, in your own backyard.

Simmons: The New York Times has stood out in providing local, national, and global views, reporting on the science, and publishing beautiful data visualizations that have helped make information clear for readers.

Mait: Unfortunately, many of us are avoiding mainstream media and news cable channels as they appear to be adding to the problem by politicizing COVID-19. Weve relied on Andrew Cuomo and Bill de Blasios daily press briefings on TV for updates on COVID-19s progress in New York. We try to listen to the medical professionals giving proper information, like the CDC, Dr. Anthony Fauci and Dr. Sanjay Gupta.

Spitalny: I am most impressed by 17-year-old Avi Schiffmann, the high school web developer who had the foresight to begin tracking COVID-19 in December when it wasnt really a news topic in the United States. His website demonstrates that ingenuity and talent can come from anywhere. Although he was offered up to $8 million from sponsors and has had numerous job offers, he declined all of it; he is adamant about protecting the integrity of the data and the site.

Simmons: Dr. Craig Smith, chair of the Department of Surgery at NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital/Columbia University Medical Center, started writing a series of daily letters that spanned a 50,000-foot overview to the ground level of his hospital. He shared important information with perspective, warmth, context and occasionally poetry. Each letter was a realistic and human assessment of the moment and collectively they have become a narrative of the pandemic.

Palmer: NPRs What Do Coronavirus Racial Disparities Look Like State By State? should be required reading. Its thorough and outlines through visuals and statistics how and why people of color are so disproportionately affected by COVID-19. We need to put this new data into action, creating points of connection and communication where they are missing or ineffective. Moving America in a healthy direction will be about more than combatting the virus effectively; itll be about advancing our society justly and inclusively.

Conway: Some Coronavirus Guidelines, a New Yorker piece by John Kenney published in March, offers helpful guidelines on how to handle the Coronavirus crisisbeginning with the simple dont panic and wash your hands and progressing to the end of the world. Its funny because it pokes fun at the very real escalation of thoughts and fears we were having at the time (and still are!).

Whyte: The reporting in March around the growing mental health epidemic was prescient. I think some people thought it was just anxiety and would go away. But we are seeing how the pandemic is exacerbating mental health issues in those persons already diagnosed, as well as creating new mental health problems in people who never exhibited problems. I give credit to Arianna Huffington and her Thrive platform, which has been sounding the alarm bell from the beginning. The medical community has only recently come around to recognizing the problem.

Spitalny: The personal impact that this pandemic has taken on HCPs has felt overlooked. My husband is a physicians assistant and works at a major hospital, so seeing his day-to-day activity and knowing that other HCPs are probably going through something similar (burnout, cut wages for longer hours, etc.) suggest there are stories that needed to be told that were grittier than just the headline.

Whyte: We dont have an adequate explanation of the data. We report the number of cases and deaths, but we dont focus enough on local infection rates and what they mean. Early on, many cases occurred in clusters in certain counties. That was relevant to know when we talked about containment. We also didnt acknowledge the uncertainty of data, that we were learning as we went along. So we made different recommendations at different times relating to masks and antibody testing. That caused confusion and eroded trust.

Mait: During the last few months, there has been a lack of leadership from the federal government, a lack of a centralized voice with clear messaging and, of course, a lack of scientific data given the novelty of the disease. This disease is something that so clearly should not be politicized, yet it has been. What we need is a real task force with a centralized voice that everyone has access to and that is not politicized. Coverage should focus on the top doctors and what they are doing and saying about COVID-19 and the reasons why.

Simmons: The unprecedented breadth of achievements in six months related to this virus and pandemic. COVID-19 is a totally new disease and when I look back on what has been accomplished in basic science, therapeutics, clinical management, vaccine development, transmission and adjustments in how people live and work in just months its amazing. It matters because we need to use the growing bank of facts and science that we have learned to guide us as we move ahead. We know a lot more now.

Horn: Having had cancer and working so closely with patient leaders, I would like to see more coverage on how people living with chronic health conditions (immunocompromised, genetic disorders, metabolic disorders) should safely, if at all, re-enter society as things begin to open up.

Pascale: People have mistakenly thought this was going to be over by now. We need to continue to put emphasis on what we are doing as we move forward. For example, with my sons basketball camp canceled, we made do by involving him with a mini-camp in the neighborhood. These kinds of things are important to talk about, as they show how people are functioning during this time. Hyperlocal pieces can be helpful, witty and smart, and get people to a better place of understanding.

Conway: The reporting is starting to catch up, but it took a while before there was substantial coverage about how discrimination and disparity play into the pandemic. Because of long-standing inequities, African-Americans, Hispanics and Latinos and American Indians/Alaskan Natives are at increased risk for getting or becoming seriously ill with COVID-19. The LGBTQ+ community already faces discrimination when seeking healthcare and may avoid getting care. Socioeconomic disparity means that children without computers or reliable Wi-Fi are not able to learn online. Workers without paid sick leave or other benefits may put themselves or others into vulnerable situations. The list goes on.

Palmer: We need to make sure that science-based solutions are not being politicized in the news. With the rise of Black Lives Matter, we are now more aware of the social determinants that have led to disproportionate COVID-19 cases in the Black community but we havent heard enough about solutions. Black Americans are 3.5 times more likely to die of COVID-19 than White Americans. That statistic should send shock waves through everyone, and inspire wide-scale behavior change. If individuals arent doing it themselves, its worth asking in our industry how media and marketing can create the impetus for broader institutional change to take place.

Whyte: 1. Data needs to be presented in terms of local infection rates. Everyone isnt a NYC or small town in Wyoming. You need to put the data in context. 2. Stop all the talk about the vaccine, because its just not realistic. Lets have a real discussion around risk and help people understand how to live with the virus. 3. Acknowledge the role of innovation. Despite some problems with testing and mixed results from therapeutics, we had nothing five months ago. The perfect cannot be the enemy of the good.

Simmons: We havent communicated a clear understanding of how the virus is transmitted, how pandemics grow and how one persons actions may affect others. Mask wearing has become politicized, rather than normalized, and that must change. Weve got to keep refreshing peoples knowledge and presenting essential information in all ways across all platforms. This virus is not going away and we will have to adapt to it.

Conway: 1. The importance of improving diversity in the fields of science and medical care. In 2018, just 5% of active doctors in the United States identified as Black or African-American, according to the Association of American Medical Colleges. According to the American Psychological Association and American Psychiatric Association, just 4% of psychologists in the U.S. and 2% of psychiatrists are Black. Having different viewpoints and voices can improve care for all. 2. What are the long-term ramifications for children in terms of socialization, education and overall health and well-being? What services have special-needs children been gettingor more importantly, not gettingduring the pandemic?

Barrette: 1. Share concrete steps that every consumer can take, and specifically how those steps will lessen the suffering caused by the virus *in their area*. For example, if 80% of Bostonians wore masks starting now, you could watch the Red Sox in August. If its just 50%, the season is canceled. 2. Check the facts before publishing anything. If theyre wrong, either dont put them out or correct them. 3. Share more stories of how [US geography here] truly flattened the curve and back it up with data.

Spitalny: Id like to see coverage of how content providers are creating compelling, unbiased information about the benefits of wearing a mask. Id also like to see a full 360-degree look at whats happening in healthcare beyond the explosion of telehealth. Id like to see journalists tackle touchy topics like, for example, if hospitals are losing money because of electives being pushed or on the personal impact of the coronavirus crisis on HCPs in terms of mental health and loan burden. Are these crises within a crisis?

Pascale: 1. Focusing on the positives a bit more would be nice. There has been some good news that hasnt received enough recognition. 2. Reiterating that we still need to be responsible. We need to find a balance in coverage about continuing to take precautions, and how to do so. Repetition builds retention! 3. Collaborating and working together to make things happen quicker, especially scientifically. With more people sharing data when developing drugs, the endpoint can be sped up safely and effectively.

Horn: I would like to see more of an emphasis on preventative care. What are the effects of skipping or delaying appointments, or discontinuing medications? As someone who had her thyroid cancer detected during a normal well visit, I want the media to encourage people to continue to seek care during this time.

Palmer: Talk about a moving target. A little while ago, we were excited about gradual reopening and outdoor dining. By late June, we were seeing around 40,000 new cases a day, with Dr. Fauci warning the sum could rise to 100,000 new cases a day. That said, the media needs to continue focusing on prevention and caution. When this started, we saw a lot of coverage around quick fixes for our stress levels and overall quarantine wellness, such as virtual fitness classes. Now, we know we are in this for the long run, and people need endurance. They need long-term solutions to the mental health challenges were mired in. Coming off COVID-19, we need the media to look at mental health with fresh eyes and future-facing insights.

From the August 01, 2020 Issue of MM&M - Medical Marketing and Media

Read more:

Health Media in the COVID-19 Era: A mid-wave report - Features - MM&M - Medical Marketing and Media

Thousands March in Berlin to Protest Coronavirus Curbs – The New York Times

BERLIN Thousands marched in Berlin on Saturday to protest against measures imposed in Germany to stem the coronavirus pandemic, saying they violated people's rights and freedoms.

The gathering, estimated by police at 17,000, included libertarians, constitutional loyalists and anti-vaccination activists. There was also a small far-right presence with some marchers carrying Germany's black, white and red imperial flag.

Protesters danced and sang "We are free people!" to the tune of rock band Queen's "We Will Rock You". Others marched with placards saying "We are making a noise because you are stealing our freedom!" and "Do think! Don't wear a mask!".

"Our demand is to return to democracy," said one protester who declined to give his name. "The mask that enslaves us must go."

The protests followed a rallying call from Michael Ballweg, an entrepreneur and political outsider who has organised similar rallies in Stuttgart and is running to become mayor of the southwestern city.

Police filed a complaint against the organiser for failing to ensure marchers wore masks and kept their distance. Mainstream politicians criticised the protesters, with Social Democrat co-leader Saskia Esken calling them "covidiots".

"They not only endanger our health, they endanger our successes against the pandemic," tweeted Esken, whose party is Chancellor Angela Merkel's coalition partner.

After Germany's initial success in curbing the pandemic, infections are rising again. More than 200,000 people have caught COVID-19 and more than 9,000 have died from it.

Most people in Germany have respected measures that include wearing face masks in shops, while the government has just imposed mandatory tests for holidaymakers returning from high-risk areas.

But a vocal minority is chafing against the restrictions.

"Only a few scientists around the world who follow the government's lead are heard," said protester Peter Konz. Those who hold different views "are silenced, censored or discredited as defenders of conspiracy theories".

(Reporting by Reuters TV, Writing by Douglas Busvine; Editing by Giles Elgood)

View post:

Thousands March in Berlin to Protest Coronavirus Curbs - The New York Times

Reign of the Nerds – Splice Today

The high schoolers on your street who load up on Mountain Dew and play D&D (Dungeons & Dragons) all night may know more about the political spectrum than their parents.

Gary Gygax and David Armisen created D&D in 1974, the same year Richard Nixon resigned from office. It was a timelike nowwhen questions about the uses and abuses of legal and political power cast shadows over everyday conversations. In a stroke of genius, about which we know very little, Gygax and Armisen organized their fantasy world according to alignments: good, neutral, and evil, respectively. Each alignment was sub-divided further into another three sections: lawful, neutral, and chaotic. Any character (created and impersonated by a human player), and any non-player character (handled by the Dungeon Master or DM), had a designated alignment. This helped the DM and the players figure out how their characters would behave, how theyd interpret the events in each adventure, and how theyd react to each other.

Good and evil are as nebulous in the world of D&D as they are in the real world. In theory, certain characters are always good (soft-spoken healers), others predictably evil (undead sorcerers bent on world domination); in practice, the players usually perceive themselves as good, unless theyre weird. They also tend to believe that anything they want to stab is evil. Neutral, a bizarre category that borrowed heavily from J. R. R. Tolkiens charmingly indifferent minor characters, continues to baffle players ages 11+ to this day. All we can say for sure is that it has something to do with caring more about nature than people. D&D came out just two years after Arne Naess and George Sessions coined the term deep ecology. Apparently, Gygax and Armisen were listening. (That said, its too bad that Naess and Sessions didnt invent a role-playing game of their own, set on a planet imperiled by climate change and industrial pollution.)

Lets table good and evil, for the time being, and replace them with right and left. Im sure those strike you as slippery categories. Sometimes they get cleared up by the stands people take on individual issues, like abortion rights. Other times, theres a historical precedent: calling Communism leftism, for example, or assigning libertarianism to the Right. Youve probably heard someone say that the Left and Right meet at the extremes, which sounds counterintuitive and profound, but actually just muddies the waters. Former leftists sometimes veer to the right. Thats what happened to Benito Mussolini, William Wordsworth, and many former Communists in America. By the same token, I can give you countless examples of religious conversions. But the fact that a Lutheran in Minnesota has recently become Muslim doesnt mean Christianity and Islam meet at the extremes. People are fickle. Nonetheless our idea of a political Left and a political Right endure.

Contra Crispin Sartwell, who writes (both here and elsewhere) about this issue quite frequently, I have no trouble defining these opposing sides. People on the left are, as we say, progressives. They believe in the unfinished project of making society better in unprecedented ways. Their opponents on the right are conservative; they uphold the claims of tradition and existing social structures. Neither side is inherently more committed to individual rights. Conservatives believe in all the individual rights they perceive as vital within the traditions they cherish most. Progressives tend to want to extend individual rights, but not at the expense of the common good. For example, theyll happily defend the Endangered Species Act against challenges from individual property-holders, because they believe environmental protections promote the general welfare.

These are not vague distinctions, or prone to sudden eclipses, once you separate each concept from its shifting constituency. They are, instead, fundamental questions of political emphasis. Everyone believes somewhat in tradition, and somewhat in tinkering with the status quo, but individuals path-commit to one or the other in ways that snowball into lasting affiliations. How do we make sense of the way people on both sides of the spectrum disagree amongst themselves? Is everyone on the Right bound to support Donald Trump? Is everyone on the Left secretly hoping the nanny state will intervene and solve all their problems? This is where politics needs to borrow from D&D.

Lets say your alignment is Lawful Conservative. That means you believe in the rule of law pretty unconditionally. You may believe in the democratic process, and the right of a people to change the laws that govern thembut that doesnt mean you support tossing laws aside when they become inconvenient. Youre a consistent voter. You support laws that defend traditional institutionslike tax exemptions for religious organizationsand oppose laws you perceive as disruptive to the normal functioning of society. The American evangelical movement is lawful and conservative. So are Wall Street and most police officers. J. R. R. Tolkien is extremely biased in favor of legal precedents and comfortable observances; youll notice, in his novels, that every rebellious act of good is based on restoring lost traditions, reinstating monarchs, and upholding the placid, cyclical existence of the Hobbits. It isnt bizarre to range fascism among right-wing movements, either; fascists are nationalistic (conservative), nostalgic (conservative), and pro-industry (which, at this point, is conservative too). The Nazi state didnt cause trouble for loyal German families who believed in Jesus Christ. On the contrary: it did everything possible to empower their success.

The biggest difference between a lawful conservative and a lawful progressive is the way they talk and vote. Their actual lifestyles tend to converge, which is why interns from both parties love to hang out together in Washington bars. Extreme political thinkers, who want to overthrow the government, are still either right-wing or left-wing: theyre either trying something altogether new, or theyre trying to restore a tarnished Golden Age. Though a few decaying remnants of pastoral fictionsparticularly natural law and natural rightsstill carry some weight with the Left, most thoughtful leftists reject the notion of a pre-existing Golden Age. Most progressives with a college education can tell you that Jefferson owned slaves, and that the Greeks oppressed their women, and may well continue talking in this vein for a long time if you make the mistake of buying them a drink.

The sunset gleam of the pastoral is particularly discernible in the fantasies of anarchists, our apostles of chaotic leftism. Anarchists arent libertarians; they arent close to libertarians, although the two ideologies sometimes become bedfellows. Anarchists believe in voluntary associations among people: cooperative businesses, direct local democracy, and protecting individual rights through a moral consensus. This is pretty much a distant horizon, in terms of whats even been tried among human beings. Anarchists dont mind that; they rightfully consider themselves idealistic. Libertarians, on the other hand, are chaos-loving conservatives who simply dont trust the law. Theyd rather allow people to do all kinds of damn foolishness than try to restrain them. Libertarians dont think about corporate power often, although they deplore most legislation that increases it; to anarchists, meanwhile, corporations and governments are part of one interdependent, oppressive system of hierarchies. At its base, this speaks to a fundamental difference between two incompatible political visions: doing away with corporate hierarchies, in the name of progress, or assigning them a placeas limited, private institutionswithin a natural and timeless order.

Neutrality, on the Right and Left, is harder to pin down but no less important. Here are two very different misdemeanors: smoking marijuana, and driving faster than the speed limit. Intuitively, you probably see the first as vaguely progressive, the second as conservative. Thats truebut why? Because of the way people justify their acts. Marijuana, thanks to the Beats and the hippies and the Rastafarians, has a certain reformist cachet. It will expand your mind. Its an experiment. Its a spiritual practice. Its an analgesic, relieves anxiety, and could be used to treat other disorders as wellif the government would just stop making it so illegal. The marijuana lobby is basically neutral in disposition: legalize it if you can, hide it if you cant. Theyll take the laws cooperation, when they can get it, but they wont take the systems no for an answer. Either way, their ideological justifications are usually based on claims that pot makes people, and society, somehow better off. Thats progressive.

Speeding, on the other hand, isnt a religious experience, except in certain novels by J. G. Ballard and Jack Kerouac. Its personally motivated and privately justified: why is this road 30 mph? I want to drive it faster. We think to ourselves, I know how fast you can go on this roadknow it better than the bureaucrats in the government. Is that libertarian thinking? Almost. But then the person behind you, in the vintage convertible, comes alongside to pass. On a double-laned road. When you were already going as fast as anyone should go. I hope they get nabbed, you mutter. So much for libertarianism, eh? Taking a neutral stance towards the law implies that the ends always justify the means. Protest, if you can get the police to listen; riot, if you cant. Lobby for loopholes in your taxes and emissions; meanwhile, dump what you mustright into the river. In the long run, playing the law for a sucker isnt really politics at all; as Immanual Kant first argued, its a small (but significant) tearing of the social contract. But its also something we all do, in bigger or smaller ways, from time to timeand such sabotage becomes a sunk cost for any institution we depend on.

Incidentally, if you want to see the conservative version of this, watch the Fast and the Furious movies. Every film is another assembly line for convenient, nostalgic, made-to-fit neutrality, usually in the name of family. A cop goes undercover to bust an illegal drag racing ring. Then the cop becomes an illegal drag racer. Then he and his buddies protect their families against gangsters. Which means joining forces with the cops. Until theyre forced to go rogue. But not really. The reversals get dizzying, and its a goofy undertaking from the first five minutes on, but the series acrobatic, blas agnosticism towards the law ought to win some kind of prize: an award for cognitive dissonance turned all the way to 11.

As noted at the beginning, the kids who play D&D learn this stuff by heart. They know all about the chaotic goblin who resents his chieftain, and the lawful sheriff who takes our heroes into custody because the king hadnt signed off on their escapade. (He also thanks them, surreptitiously, for saving the townsfolk.) They know about the neutral druids who currently baffle Winterfrosts poachers and its licensed hunters, and wouldnt let a poor woodsman take one small wyvern home to eat. But something happens to these prodigies of political understanding. They put away childish things and unlearn the truth about alignments. They start insisting that all left-wing scholars are authoritarians at heart, or claiming that Republicans are corrupt by nature. They accuse libertarians of anarchism, anarchists of Communism, and socialism... well, they accuse socialism of making them wear a mask when they go outside. The political spectrum is more like a circle, really, they declare. Thats why Im an Independent. And the clarity we were granted, thanks to a lucky, lucid moment on the part of Gygax and Armisen, goes back on the shelf. Maybe those handbooks are still there, waiting to be recognized for unriddling our politics vis--vis the lawalongside the experiments that made us a better nation, and the traditions we try to keep from wobbling; things which, taken together, comprise our rightful vocation as Americans.

Read the rest here:

Reign of the Nerds - Splice Today

Comet of the Week: 67P/Churyomov-Gerasimenko – RocketSTEM

A sketch I made of Comet 67Ps visual appearance through a 20-cm telescope on December 24, 1982.Perihelion: 2015 August 13.08, q = 1.243 AU

There have been a handful of occasions throughout recent history when someone has discovered a comet while looking for, or examining, another one. Such an incident happened in late 1969 in the former Soviet Union, when on September 11 Svetlana Gerasimenko with the Alma Ata Observatory (in what is present-day Kazakhstan) took photographs of Comet 32P/Comas Sola. Klim Churyumov, then with the Kiev Observatory, performed the astrometric measurements of what he believed was that comet, but a month later realized that the positions were far off. Upon re-examining the photographs he found that he had in fact measured a previously-unknown comet that was some two magnitudes brighter than Comet Comas Sola (that was also on the photographs).

The newly-discovered Comet Churyumov-Gerasimenko was found to have an approximate orbital period of 6.6 years. It has been recovered on every return since then, and during the 1982 return, which took place under very favorable viewing geometry, it reached 9th magnitude and I was able to detect it with binoculars. It also exhibited a distinct dust tail which on one occasion I measured as being 20 arcminutes long visually.

Comet 67P achieved fame in the mid-2000s when it was selected as the destination for ESAs ambitious Rosetta mission. Rosetta had originally been scheduled for launch in January 2003 with its destination being Comet 46P/Wirtanen, however a failure of the Ariane 5 launch rocket a month earlier grounded all flights of that vehicle until the necessary failure analysis could be conducted. Comet 67P was accordingly chosen as the new destination.

Rosetta was successfully launched from Kourou, French Guiana on March 2, 2004. Over the next 5 years it performed three gravity-assist flybys of Earth as well as a very close gravity-assist flyby of Mars, and as discussed in a previous Special Topics presentation it also performed flybys of the main-belt asteroid (2867) Steins in September 2008 and the larger main-belt asteroid (21) Lutetia in July 2010. Not too long after the Lutetia encounter Rosetta was placed in a state of hibernation, from which it was awoken in January 2014. From there it made its final approach to Comet 67P, arriving there on August 6 of that year, and after various maneuvers, it successfully entered orbit around the comets nucleus a month later.

The approach photographs showed that the comets nucleus is made up of two discrete hemispheres, one distinctly larger than the other, making it a contact binary similar to several of the near-Earth asteroids that have been successfully radar-imaged (and also the Kuiper Belt object (486958) Arrokoth that was visited by the New Horizons mission at the beginning of 2019). The evidence that has been collected suggests that the two hemispheres were at one time two separate objects that collided and stuck together a long time ago and based upon the various other objects that exhibit such a structure it would appear that this is a relatively common occurrence amongst the small bodies of our solar system.

At the time of Rosettas arrival, Comet 67P was a full year away from perihelion passage, and the overall rationale for the mission was to examine the comet as it approached perihelion and became active, and then as it began to shut down as it receded from perihelion. With an onboard complement of eleven scientific instruments Rosetta was able to conduct numerous scientific studies throughout that time, and among its findings were numerous organic compounds, including four for the first time (one of these being acetone), a deuterium-to-hydrogen ratio in its water that is three times higher than that in Earths seawater the significance of these findings being part of the subject of a future Special Topics presentation large amounts of free oxygen (which was quite unexpected), a lack of a magnetic field, and the appearances of numerous sinkholes and the crumbling of cliffs as the comets activity proceeded.

Rosetta also carried a separate probe, Philae, that was designed to soft-land upon the comets nucleus. Rosetta released Philae on November 12, 2014, for a seven-hour descent to the comets surface, but unfortunately, the planned anchoring system failed and Philae bounced twice before coming to rest, apparently on its side in a hole next to some high cliffs. It was nevertheless able to carry out various scientific observations during the 60 hours before its battery power ran out, and while the cliffs were apparently made of a rather porous material, Philaes drilling hammer broke after a few minutes, indicating that the ground underneath it was very hard, either rock or solid ice. After its batteries ran out contact with Philae was lost; meanwhile, there was hope that a better sun angle later in the mission might allow for the batteries to be recharged to an extent, and in fact, contact was briefly restored on a couple of occasions in June and July 2015 but unfortunately not long enough for any significant data transmission.

Rosettas mission was formally scheduled to end at the end of 2015, however, before that time the mission was extended until the end of September 2016, i.e., a full year after the comets perihelion passage and two full years after the spacecrafts arrival. As that time approached Rosetta was placed into progressively lower orbits, and on September 2 it successfully photographed Philae, on its side, and wedged against a large overhanging cliff. On September 30 Rosetta touched down upon the comets surface, and contact was terminated.

The large collection of data collected by Rosetta during the two years it spent orbiting Comet Churyumov-Gerasimenko is still being analyzed and will continue to be for some time yet to come. Just last year, for example, a Spanish amateur astronomer, Jacint Roger, was examining Rosetta images when he found a four-meter-wide moon in images that had been taken on October 21, 2015. This Churyumoon, as it was dubbed, was not a permanent feature, but did orbit the nucleus at a distance of 2 to 3 km for the next two days before disappearing.

The viewing geometry during Comet 67Ps 2015 return to perihelion was not especially favorable, with the comet for the most part remaining at a moderately low elongation in the morning sky and reaching a peak brightness of about 12th magnitude. Meanwhile, although it wont have the fanfare that accompanied this recent return, the comets next return, in 2021, is a very favorable one, similar to that of 1982. It passes through perihelion on November 2 and is closest to Earth (0.42 AU) less than two weeks later, and once again should reach a peak brightness around 9th magnitude.

This Week in History Special Topic Free PDF Download Glossary

See the original post:

Comet of the Week: 67P/Churyomov-Gerasimenko - RocketSTEM

How to spot Comet NEOWISE before it disappears for thousands of years – PBS NewsHour

Theres still a little bit of time to catch a glimpse of a newly discovered comet as it blazes across the night sky, especially if you have binoculars or a telescope handy.

C/2020 F3 NEOWISE, also called Comet NEOWISE, was first spotted in late March of this year by NASAs Near-Earth Object Wide-field Infrared Survey Explorer (NEOWISE) mission. According to NASA, the comets nucleus is about 3 miles in diameter and composed of dust, rock and frozen gases left over from the birth of our solar system around 4.6 billion years ago.

When comets near our sun, the increasing heat creates a coma, or a kind of atmosphere composed of particles and gases that surrounds the nucleus. A combination of solar wind and the pressure of sunlight can blow some of that atmosphere away from the comet, forming two tails one made of ions, and another made of dust that can extend in the opposite direction of the sun for millions of miles. Imaging suggests that Comet NEOWISE could potentially have two ion tails, as well as its dust tail.

Graphic courtesy of NASASpacePlace via Wikimedia Commons.

Joseph Masiero, who serves as NEOWISE deputy principal investigator at NASAs Jet Propulsion Laboratory, said that spotting Comet NEOWISE was exhilarating, particularly given how rare it is for comets that are visible to the naked eye to pass by our planet.

These kinds of celestial events really help remind me how big and wonderful the universe is, and how fortunate I am to get to explore it in these difficult times.

Im pretty sure every astronomer surveying the sky has a secret hope to find the next naked-eye comet, so I feel like our team won the lottery on this, Masiero said. These kinds of celestial events really help remind me how big and wonderful the universe is, and how fortunate I am to get to explore it in these difficult times.

Comet NEOWISE made its closest approach to Earth on July 22 and has grown dimmer and dimmer as it heads back toward the outer reaches of our solar system. But if you want to try your luck over the next few days, find a patch of sky with a minimal amount of light pollution where your view wont be obstructed by trees or buildings.

This graphic marks Comet NEOWISEs trajectory over the next few nights from the perspective of someone stargazing in the Northern Hemisphere. Megan McGrew/PBS NewsHour

Then look to the northwestern sky below and just a bit west of the Big Dipper the comet will be climbing higher above the horizon as the nights wear on. You can also use the Comet NEOWISE app to help you figure out exactly where to look for the comet from your location.

Although you may still be able to spot Comet NEOWISE with your naked eye, a pair of binoculars or a telescope should give you a clearer view. The publication EarthSky also recommends using a high quality camera that can capture the comet with an extended exposure.

If you miss the show this time around, youll just have to wait another 6,800 years or so for Comet NEOWISE to make its way back to Earth.

Comet NEOWISE, also known as C/2020 F3, is seen on July 18, 2020 in Joshua Tree, California. Photo by Daniel Knighton/Getty Images

Read more from the original source:

How to spot Comet NEOWISE before it disappears for thousands of years - PBS NewsHour

Turmeric, apple cider vinegar and other home remedies for psoriasis – TheHealthSite

Psoriasis is an autoimmune condition that causes the immune system to over-produce skin cells. For people suffering from this condition, thick, red, scaly, itchy plaques are a common occurrence. This condition can take a toll on a persons overall quality of life. According to researchers of the Psoriasis Research Unit at Baylor Research Institute in Dallas, there is a need for psoriasis to be viewed as a serious disease affecting the whole body with significant quality of life issues. They say that, in the past, psoriasis was viewed primarily as a cosmetic nuisance that was not thought to extend beyond the obvious plaques apparent on the skin. But with the discovery of multiple genes related to this condition, a better understanding of the immune system responses involved in this disease, and the frequent associations with other serious diseases, it is now clear that psoriasis is a much more complex disease that demands continual monitoring and evaluation by a dermatologist. Also Read - Avoid these foods and drinks if you have psoriasis

This is a debilitating condition, no doubt. But you can deal with the symptoms on your own with a few home remedies. Also Read - 5 effective home remedies to treat psoriasis

This is one of the best natural remedies against psoriasis inflammation. Many experts have conducted research on this subject. Scientists say that application of aloe vera gel can reduce the redness and scaling that comes with psoriasis. You can buy this gel from the market or you can take a fresh aloe vera leaf and take out the get. Just slice the leave and scrap the gel off. Apply this to the affected area daily. Also Read - People with psoriasis can also get joint disease: The connection explained

This can help you get relief from scalp itch, which is so common in people suffering from psoriasis. Go for the organic variety and apply it to your scalp daily. You may dilute the apple cider vinegar with a little water in case it stings. But if your scalp is cracked or bleeding, avoid this treatment as it can make matters worse.

Capsaicin is a substance present in chili peppers. This gives chillies their favour and makes them spicy. If you add this to ointments, it can block nerve endings that transmit pain. It can also help reduce inflammation, redness and scaling. But be careful. It can burn people who have sensitive skin. It is best to consult a doctor before using this.

This can help you get rid of scales and reduce the itching that comes with psoriasis. Just add some to warm water and soaking in it for 15 minutes or so. But sometimes, this can cause dry skin. So be sure to apply a moisturizer after your bath.

This has antiseptic properties that can heal skin related issues. You can use a shampoo that contains tea tree oil to get relief from scalp psoriasis. You can also add a few drops to your bath water. But do an allergic test first. Some people are sensitive to this oil.

This spice has potent anti-inflammatory and antioxidant properties. Curcumin in turmeric is known to alter gene expression. This can reduce flare-ups. Just add it to your daily food. You can also have a one-inch piece of raw turmeric every morning.

Published : July 30, 2020 5:03 pm | Updated:July 31, 2020 10:14 am

Read the original post:

Turmeric, apple cider vinegar and other home remedies for psoriasis - TheHealthSite

Plaque Psoriasis Treatment Market Slated to Grow at an Impressive CAGR of XX% During the Forecast Period 2017 – 2025 – Market Research Correspondent

Evaluation of the Global Plaque Psoriasis Treatment Market

The presented study maps the growth trajectory of the global Plaque Psoriasis Treatment market by thoroughly assessing the various factors that are expected to influence the future prospects of the Plaque Psoriasis Treatment market. According to the report published by PMR, the Plaque Psoriasis Treatment market is poised to attain a value of ~US$ XX Mn/Bn by the end of 2029 with a CAGR growth of ~XX% during the forecast period (2019-2029).

A complete evaluation of the trends, market drivers, opportunities, and challenges faced by market players operating in the Plaque Psoriasis Treatment market is provided in the report. Further, an overview and introduction of the Plaque Psoriasis Treatment market is included to ensure that the readers have a seamless experience while going through the contents of the report.

Request Sample Report @ https://www.persistencemarketresearch.co/samples/16069

Critical insights included in the report:

Competitive Outlook

The competitive outlook assessment provides an in-depth understanding related to the business proceeding of top-tier market players in the global Plaque Psoriasis Treatment market. The product portfolio, sales strategy, marketing & promotional strategy, and sales footprint of each market player is scrutinized thoroughly in the report. Some of the leading players evaluated in the report include:

The report segments the global Plaque Psoriasis Treatment market on the basis of region, product type, and end use.

market players are also exploring the developing market. Novartis launched its Cosentyx in Japan for the treatment of psoriasis arthritis in adults who are not adequately responding to systemic therapy.

Plaque Psoriasis Treatment Market: Market Players

Company manufacturer is converting innovative research into a new therapy by constantly investing in research activities. The number of drugs approved for plaque psoriasis is constantly increasing the number of treatment options for the physician and patients. Eli Lillys interleukin inhibitor was approved by the FDA, second molecule to be approved after Novartis Cosentyx.

Some of the plaque psoriasis treatment market contributors are Allergan, Johnson and Johnson, Amgen, Abbvie, Eli Lilly, Dermira Inc., Novartis, Galectin Therapeutics, Cellceutix Corporation and Biogen Inc., Bayer.

Request Report Methodology @ https://www.persistencemarketresearch.co/methodology/16069

Regional Analysis

The market scenario in each region along with a comprehensive assessment of the micro and macro-economic factors that are forecasted to impact the market growth in these regions is included in the report.

End Use Assessment

The market study offers accurate and in-depth analysis of the various end uses of the Plaque Psoriasis Treatment along with a yearly comparison of the market share and revenue growth of each end use.

Important queries addressed in the report:

For any queries get in touch with Industry Expert @ https://www.persistencemarketresearch.co/ask-an-expert/16069

Why Opt for PMR?

See the rest here:

Plaque Psoriasis Treatment Market Slated to Grow at an Impressive CAGR of XX% During the Forecast Period 2017 - 2025 - Market Research Correspondent

The secret history of Britain’s universities and eugenics – Prospect

Every so often in Britain,eugenicsis accused of making a comeback. Recently, the Black Lives Matter movement has drawn attention to the harmful lasting impact of Britains colonialist figures, shocking those who assumed that white supremacy had been left firmly in the past.

But for those campaigning against the legacy ofeugenicsin higher education, these revelations about the roots of racism were not as surprising. From their perspective, eugenicist views never really disappearedthey had just found a safe havenin somepartsof British universities.

British universities have strong historical ties witheugenics. Sir Francis Galton, a prolific Victorian scientist known to be one of the pioneers ofeugenics, set up a lab at University College London in 1904 and endowed the institution with his personal collection of work, along with funding for the countrys first Chair ofEugenics(the post was renamed, in the sixties, to Professor of Human Genetics.) Until it was finally renamed after Black Lives Matter protests, students at UCL still attended lectureson bio-medical genetic issuesat the Galton Lecture theatre.

In 2018, it was revealed thatasecreteugenicsconference, the London Conference of Intelligence, had been held in a UCL lecture theatre.The event hosted white supremacist academics closely associated with the American alt-right, wrote the London Student.

A UCL internal report on the conference, since made public, show the conference had been attended by fringe academics to policy-interested individuals.In a press statement, UCL said The conferences were booked and paid for as an external event and without our officials being told of the details. They were therefore not approved or endorsed by UCL. The university reassured that they were committed to vigorously combatting racism and sexism in all forms, but also stated that they had a legal obligation to protect free speech on campus, within the law.

The scandal brought attention to UCLs history, and the university launched an inquiry into the history ofeugenicsat the institution. But just before the universitys report was publishedto the public, nine membersof the 16-strong inquiry team refused to sign it, and even argued that the inquiry did not go far enough in a separate set of recommendations. An anonymous member of the committee said: the big issue is not how a member of staff booked a room, but why someone with his views was a member of staff at all.

***

But its not just about one man, or one university.After the Second World War, academics from Cambridge, Oxford and Glasgow were also part of the EugenicsEducation Society, a popular 20thcentury group thatat timescampaigned for sterilisation and marriage restrictions.Universities still memorialise the legacies of famous scientists who made important discoveries but also expressed viewsthat have attracted controversy such asFrancis Crick, who discovered the structure of DNA, andRonald Fisher, a pioneer of modern day statistics.

The home ofeugenicshasnearlyalways been in universities, says David King, director of an independent watchdog organisation Human Genetics Alert. Someacademics tend to believe that all knowledge is good, even if eugenic ideas influence the research, he says:universities are a protected space for these kind of views. Political power has always operated in Britain this way, quietly and below the democratic radar, through conversations between privileged elites, often academics.

However, others disagree. Steve Jones, who was head of UCLs genetics department and former president of the Galton Institute, says that the historical ties these institutions have witheugenicsare discussed openly and extensively. In some ways, the horrors of theeugenicsmovement are what has made biologists cautious about what they are willing to do today says Jones. In the old days those involved knew almost nothing, and were willing to do almost anything; while today we know far more but are much less confident about how we use that information.

Jones argues that there is a crucial difference betweentheperspectives of medical researchers now, compared to those in the era of Galton. Eugenicists set out to change the fate of future generations, whatever the cruelties that might be visited on the people of the day. In contrast, modern genetics tries, although it sometimes fails, to improve the prospects of those alive today Jones says.

But if genetics today hasonly tenuous links toeugenics, why are people worried? A subsection ofresearch, which looks for genetic explanations for complex traits such as intelligence, mental health or personality, has recently gained traction. This field, called sociogenomics,could pave the wayfor a new era of genetic engineering and social stigma. Since the 1960s, dubious journals such asMankind Quarterlyhave been the homes of articles that appear togive backing toscientific racism, classism and ableism.

But now even more respected institutions are dabbling in it. Work linking a persons genetic code to their intelligence, income and educational attainment has been produced by researchers across UK universities, includingKings College London,University of Edinburgh, andGoldsmiths. These studies,one of whichlinks 7-year old childrens test scores with their DNA, would arguably not be out of place at the London Conference of Intelligence. Even the most prestigious academic journals, such asNature Communications, have published studies linking income with genetics. These studies have been cited in reports inMankind Quarterlyto support arguments that Muslimimmigrants have lower IQs than white western Europeans.

Authors from these studies say resultscould helpminimize social disparities in health and well-being, or they could lead toevidence-based, biologically-informededucation policy. But how can linking genes with how much you earn lead tolessinequality? And how would finding tiny unchangeable differences in the DNA of schoolchildren lead to better educational for all, when the biggest drivers of educational achievement are factors like having a safe home, and a comfortableupbringing?

***

The global rise of alt-right populism is to blame for the resurgence ineugenicsresearch, says Professor David Colquhoun, who has worked at UCL for over 40 years. The alt-right give credence to eugenic ideas, and use pseudoscientific genetic theories to support them, he explains. This is documented in scientist Angelina Sainis bookSuperior: The Return of Race Science, where she describes how racists insistently search for biological evidence that they are more special than everyone else. If skin colour cant explain racial inequality, then maybe the structure of our bodies and brains will. If not anatomy, then genes. When this one, too, throws up nothing of value, theyll move onto the next thing, she writes.

Ben van der Merwe is the investigative journalist whodrew attention tothe London Conference of Intelligence at UCL. He believes that universities have beentoo willing to provide a home for these people too. You have a minority of people who are basically cranks, and these individuals (qualified scientists and amateur bloggers) have managed to position themselves as part of the current moral panic over free speech on campus he says. Universities dont appreciate thateugenicsis not a culture war issue over the right to offend.

Universities are further heavily incentivised to hide their history ofeugenics, because many profit from legacy funding from these figures, says a UCL SU Disabled Students Officer, who prefers to remain anonymous. The legacy ofeugenicsseems to pervade inuniversity policies today, which are hostile to students with disabilities and other marginalised groups, they say. Black alumni at UCL have spoken about feeling they were forced out [of the university], and I have no doubt this happens to other groups historically targeted byeugenics. Universities in this country were built from the work of people with many harmful attitudes, says the SU Officer. Students are blocked from finding out about their institutions histories by a lack of accessible information, and an attitude that everything has been fixed now. But it hasnt.

Profit motives and prejudiced policy are not the only factors leading to a culture where eugenicsresearchseems to thrive.Criticising UCLs handling of theeugenicsinquiry, Joe Cain, professor of history of science at UCL,wrote: Excessive deference to managers is one factor. Excessive amounts of discretionary money is another. Crafty people who know how to work the system is a third. Complacent, homogenous, and soft oversight is a fourth.

What should universities do next?UCL have taken important steps, including considering new names for their buildings named after eugenicists, and plan to fund new scholarships to study racism.

David King, who says he has experienced threats and intimidation for speaking up, believes a more extreme approach is needed, in UCL and other centres. He wants places like the Galton Institute to be shut down, and funding for research into genes and intelligence to be removed.

Big science projects cost a lot of money and do not take place unless they are funded King says. There is never enough money to fund all the research that scientists want to do. Science gets stopped every day. So the real question is which science do we want? And who gets to control it?

Go here to read the rest:

The secret history of Britain's universities and eugenics - Prospect

North Carolina has a bit part in the dark history of genocide – BioEdge

A dark chapter in North Carolinas history is its 20thcentury eugenics program. Apart from denying the human rights of many disabled people, it had a disproportionate effect on black citizens. According to a study from Duke University, it was designed to breed out non-working black residents.

This suggests that for Blacks, eugenic sterilizations were authorized and administered with the aim of reducing their numbers in the future population -- genocide by any other name, the authors state.

The article in the American Review Of Political Economysurveyed reports from the North Carolina Eugenics Board about 2,100 authorized sterilizations between 1958 and 1968.

Sterilization rates were much higher in counties with higher numbers of non-working black residents. This was not the case with other racial groups, suggesting, the authors say, that blacks were deemed to be inferior.

The United Nations official definition of genocide includes imposing measures to prevent births within a (national, ethnically, racial or religious) group, says co-author William A. Darity Jr., a professor of public policy, African and African American Studies and economics at Duke University. North Carolinas disproportionate use of eugenic sterilization on its Black citizens was an act of genocide.

Controlling Black bodies and their reproductivechoices is nothing new, says co-author Rhonda Sharpe. Our studyshows that North Carolinarestricted reproductive freedom, using eugenicsto disenfranchise Black residents.

Bertween 1929 and 1974, the states eugenics programsterilized close to 7,600 men and woman, making it impossible for them to have children, according to the Justice for Sterilization Victims Foundation.The youngest victims were 10 years old; 85% were female; 40% were minorities including African Americans and Native Americans.

The program had strong defenders -- as this paragraph froma 1950 pamphlet by the Winston-Salem-based Human Betterment League of North Carolina shows:

You wouldn't expect a moron to run a train or a feebleminded woman to teach school. You wouldn't want the state to grant driver's licenses to mental defectives. Yet each day the feebleminded and the mentally defective are entrusted with the most important and far reaching job of all the job of PARENTHOOD!

Michael Cook is editor of BioEdge

Originally posted here:

North Carolina has a bit part in the dark history of genocide - BioEdge

Forefathers (and Foremothers) Flaws – The American Prospect

A couple of years ago, when I was researching the 1970s just-transition legislation to protect loggers whod lost their jobs when the Redwood National Park was expanded, I read up on the origins of the park, which dated back to the 1917 founding of the Save the Redwoods League. Turned out that the founder of the league was none other than Madison Grant, who one year earlier had authored The Passing of the Great Race, which argued that America was threatened by non-Nordic immigrants such as Jews and Southern and Eastern European Catholics and Slavs, not to mention African Americans, Asians, and Latinos. Grants book, like D.W. Griffiths landmark 1915 film The Birth of a Nation, reinvigorated both racism and nativism, and laid the foundations for a reborn Klan, which in the 1920s focused much of its hatred on Catholics and Jews as well as Blacks. It provided the pseudo-scientific call for ending immigration from any place but Protestant Northwest Europe, and Congress did just that in 1924, in a law that wasnt repealed until 1965. It also inspired such European anti-Semites as the young Adolf Hitler.

I was reminded of Grants bifurcated legacy over the past week by the Sierra Clubs acknowledgment and repudiation of its founders, John Muirs, racism, and by Planned Parenthoods acknowledgment and repudiation of the racist eugenics of the great birth control advocate Margaret Sanger. What the stories of all three of these deeply flawed pioneers illustrate is how pervasive bigotry was among Americans of their eras, and not just among the general public but particularly among educated elites, among whom the nonsense of eugenics was believed to provide a scientific confirmation of racial bias. The burning crosses that popped up in nearly every city visited by Democratic presidential nominee Al Smitha Catholicduring his 1928 campaign had their elite equivalent in Ivy League universities opposition to admitting Jews and people of color andoh yes, themwomen.

If theres a lesson here, its that even the signal advances this nation has made in progressive causes have often owed their success to individuals who also partook in, and sometimes championed, their times prevailing biases. That was no less true in 1917 than it was in 1776; its almost surely, and sadly, a constant of human existence. The broader a legacys scope, the more imperfect, and in some instances appalling, its history is likely to be. Columbus may have been a flop, as Saul Bellow wrote in the closing passage of The Adventures of Augie March, but that didnt prove there was no America.

Read the rest here:

Forefathers (and Foremothers) Flaws - The American Prospect

Their View: Trinkle condemned for things that didn’t make the first draft of history – Bristol Herald Courier

Hear ye! Hear ye! The Court of Public Opinion is now in session, the Honorable Judge Vox Populi presiding.

Our first case today: The People versus E. Lee Trinkle, former governor of Virginia.

Governor Trinkle, you stand accused of racism and support for eugenics. How do you plead?

Well, since Trinkle has been dead since 1939, he cant very well testify, but he has been the latest historical figure put on trial, so to speak. Last week, the University of Mary Washington renamed its Trinkle Hall, finding the name so offensive that it expedited the renaming ahead of other nomenclature concerns.

This is of interest to us for several reasons, beyond our interest in Virginia history. Trinkle was the rare governor from Southwest Virginia he grew up in Wytheville. His name also adorns buildings at Radford University as well as the College of William and Mary. If his name causes such consternation at Mary Washington, should it not also provoke the same concerns at those other schools? And just what was Trinkles record anyway? The specific charges are contained in a report prepared last year for the Mary Washington Board of Visitors which found that students are uncomfortable walking by Trinkle Hall. It said that Trinkle is perhaps best known by three pieces of legislation either passed or presented during this time as Governor. These included the Racial Integrity Act of 1924, the Forced Sterilization Act of 1924, and the Racial Segregation Act of 1926.

Read the original:

Their View: Trinkle condemned for things that didn't make the first draft of history - Bristol Herald Courier

This Air Jordan 5 Release Pays Tribute to the Fresh Prince of Bel-Air – Footwear News

With its bold 1990s-inspired color scheme, the upcoming Air Jordan 5 Ghost Green appears to pay homage to famed actor Will Smiths character in the beloved TV show The Fresh Prince of Bel-Air.

Nike revealed that NBA icon Michael Jordans fifth signature sneaker will be releasing in a new Ghost Green colorway this weekend. With both the classic 90s sitcom and the Air Jordan 5 celebrating their 30th anniversaries, its fitting that the shoe will release with a look Smith would undoubtedly have worn.

The shoe features a white leather upper thats combined with neon accents, while geometric patterns on the liner resemble some of Smiths outfits worn on the sitcom. The shoes standout details are the mismatched green and pink Jumpman logos on the tongue and heel, while purple midsoles and translucent outsoles complete the look.

The Air Jordan 5 Retro Ghost Green.

CREDIT: Nike

The lateral side of the Air Jordan 5 Retro Ghost Green.

CREDIT: Nike

The medial side of the Air Jordan 5 Retro Ghost Green.

CREDIT: Nike

The brand also referenced Smiths character in 2018 by releasing a variation of the classic Air Jordan 5 Grape without laces a nod to how he would wear the model on-screen. Smith also celebrated the shows 30th birthday by releasing a limited-edition Fresh Prince/ Summertime apparel collection in May.

The Air Jordan 5 Retro Ghost Green will be available on the Nike SNKRS app and at select Jordan Brand retailers on Aug. 9 for a retail price of $190.

A top view of the Air Jordan 5 Retro Ghost Green.

CREDIT: Nike

The outsole of the Air Jordan 5 Retro Ghost Green.

CREDIT: Nike

Go here to see the original:

This Air Jordan 5 Release Pays Tribute to the Fresh Prince of Bel-Air - Footwear News

Michael B. Jordan And More React To Record Number Of Black Actors Nominated For Emmys – Forbes

PASADENA, CALIFORNIA - FEBRUARY 22: Michael B. Jordan attends the 51st NAACP Image Awards at the ... [+] Pasadena Civic Auditorium on February 22, 2020 in Pasadena, California. (Photo by Aaron J. Thornton/FilmMagic)

BIG BLACK EMMYS ENERGY was the first line of an email I received on June 28th 2020.It was a response in a list-serve started by my acting teacher, actor Andrew Stewart Jones with the subject line Us. The beautiful Us.

Started as a safe space for black artist to share, vent and process, following the murder of George Floyd and the subsequent social unrest; the exchange has grown into a beautiful celebration of blackness in its various representations.So its no wonder that on Tuesday July 28, 2020 the list was buzzing with celebration considering the Television Academy nominated a record number of Black actors forEMMYSwith a whopping 34.3% of the acting nominees being Black. Thats a considerable increase from last year, when Black actors made up 19.8% of the nominee pool.

Along with that single line Big Black Emmys energy there was also a video from actor Michael B. Jordans Instagram.In the video that has now been viewed over 1 million times and shared exponentially more, actor Michael B. Jordan celebrates the nominations in distinguishably unique yet magnificent style.

The video begins with the now iconic Variety Interview where Issa Rae is asked who shes rooting for tonight? She of course responds, Im rooting for everybody black.Next Wales Sue Me drops. Then the catalog of images of many black Emmy nominees from Issa Rae to Jeffrey Wright begin to flash on the screen. In the last moments of the video Jordan appears and offers a head nod, a smile, and a congratulations everybody! His caption, PROUD in all capital letters #EMMYS. Its short, beautiful, and powerful.

Issa Rae featured in Rooting For Everybody Black Emmy edition

Nominees in top acting categories included Billy Porter, Maya Rudolph, Sterling K. Brown, Zendaya, Anthony Anderson, Don Cheadle, Tracee Ellis Ross, Regina King, Jeremy Pope, Octavia Spencer and Kerry Washington to name a few.

After being shut out last year, Issa Rae is back with a nomination for her role in HBOsInsecure in the category for Outstanding Lead Actress in a Comedy. While Maya Rudolph led performers overall with three nominations. Rudolph was nominated twice for Best Comedy Guest Actress this year, making her the first actor in Emmy history to be nominated twice in the same guest category in the same year. Giancarlo Esposito also received multiple nominations for the Supporting Actor In a Drama Series category for playing Gus Fring AMCsBetter Call Saul, and Guest Actor In a Drama Series nomination for playing Moff Gideon on Disney+sThe Mandalorian.

This Is Usstar Sterling K. Brown, also received double nominations with a nod for actor in a drama series field, in addition to his fourth consecutive Lead Actor in a Drama Series nom for playing Randall Pearce on NBCsThis Is UsBrown is also nominated in the Supporting Actor in a Comedy Series category for his arc as Reggie on Season 3 of AmazonsThe Marvelous Mrs. Maisel.

In total there were 36 actors of color nominated, while actors who have openly identified as members of the LGBTQ+ community received 11 nominations. Six people of color were nominated for hosting, while seven people who identified as LGBTQ+ also received nods.

Still with a record number of nods in acting categories and some in hosting, many feel it isnt enough. And many fear it could be a performative gesture. As the fight for fair representation in Hollywood continues, many arent satisfied with this limited progress since other non acting categories didnt see the same sort of parity. 2020 Writing and directing categories didn't go quite the same. Thats why the increase in the nominations of black actors feels somewhat bittersweet for some. While there is certainly a reason to celebrate, there is also a lot of work still to be done.

Read more from the original source:

Michael B. Jordan And More React To Record Number Of Black Actors Nominated For Emmys - Forbes

Jordanian Police Beat and Arrest Protesting Teachers – The New York Times

AMMAN, Jordan Jordanian anti-riot police clashed with protesting teachers in the capital Amman on Wednesday, with several demonstrators being beaten with clubs and arrested.

Hundreds of protesters headed toward the prime minister's office were met by hundreds of riot police who pushed the crowd back as they chanted peaceful, peaceful, and called for the prime ministers resignation.

Clad with clubs, police beat some of the protesters, several of whom fell to the ground after the clash. Dozens were arrested, according to an Associated Press video journalist at the scene.

The journalist, Omar Akour, was also beaten on the head with a club, despite telling police he was a journalist, a declaration that was ignored. Akour fell to the ground after being struck, where another policeman kicked him. Police smashed his cellphone, destroying the footage he filmed of the clashes.

Police had blocked off the area leading to the prime ministers office and authorities had warned before the protest that any gatherings of over 20 people, in violation of coronavirus restrictions, would draw a stern response.

The protesters turned out to oppose the arrest of 13 members of their syndicate. The arrests came after Ammans deputy attorney general suspended the members of the Jordan Teachers Association council from service and ordered the closure of the syndicate and its branches for two years over criminal and corruption charges.

The members were arrested after threatening to stage protests over a salary dispute.

The Jordanian government had agreed to increase teachers salaries by 50% after a month-long strike in September of last year. But after restrictions related to the coronavirus outbreak hit the economy, the government postponed the salary hikes, drawing scorn from the teachers. They accused the government of failing to honor the agreement.

See more here:

Jordanian Police Beat and Arrest Protesting Teachers - The New York Times

Randy Jordan wants the ‘whole thing’ from Derrius Guice in 2020 – NBC Sports Washington

There were a handful of moments in 2019 where Washington running back Derrius Guice made everyone go, 'Man, that guy is special.' Just watch his highlights against the Carolina Panthers if you don't believe me.

However, the problem with Guice a season ago was that there wereonlya handful of moments where the running back displayed his incredible talent.

For the second straight season, Guice was hampered by multiple leg injuries. The running back tore his meniscus in Week 1, causing him to miss Washington's next eight games. In Week 14, Guice suffered another injury to his other knee, the same one he tore the ACL in during the 2018 preseason. The latter injury wasn't nearly as serious, but it did end the running back's sophomore campaign.

Running backs coach Randy Jordan is one of two coaches that have been with Washington since Guice's arrival. And Jordan, like everyone else, is eager to see what Guice can do in a full 16-game season.

"I always tell him this," Jordan said. "'The only thing you did this past year is you were an appetizer, I want the whole steak, I want the whole lobster, I want the whole thing.'"

CLICK HERE TO SUBSCRIBE TO THE WASHINGTON FOOTBALL TALK PODCAST

Guice, too, is eager to show that he can put together a full campaign. He's admitted he's tired of the "soft" label that critics have given him. Last week, he took to Twitter to say he's not messing around anymore in 2020 (and that's putting it lightly).

There's no question the running back is tired of hearing about his injuries. No player likes talking about being hurt.

So, they don't talk about it. Jordan said that the two never focus on Guice's injuries when they speak, rather, they talk about how to keep his body fresh and the best shape possible.

"When you talk about injuries, the biggest thing we do is we dont talk about them," Jordan said."But we always talk about, 'Hey, lets be smart football players taking care of our body and making sure were doing all the different things so that when were ready to go and play, weve built our armor up so that we can take the pounding of the season.'"

Guice knows the NFL is unforgiving about injuries. The NFL is a 'what have you done for me lately?' league. This offseason, the running back has done everything he can to arrive at training camp with his body in the best possible condition.

"The biggest thing I tell him, 'Your best ability is your reliability and your dependability,'" Jordan said."Thats something that hes shown through the offseason. He has worked his butt off and changed his body. So far in terms of what Ive seen, hes done a great job of getting himself prepared for this upcoming season."

And when Guice is on the field, he's shown plenty of promise. He's likely only scratched the surface of his potential.

"Derrius has a whole set of tools that a lot of players dont have," Jordan said."He can catch it, he can run it, he can block. All those things you ask a running back to do and also get the tough yards in the short-yardage situations and make those explosive plays."

Stay connected to the team with the MyTeams app.Click hereto download for comprehensive coverage of your teams.

MORE WASHINGTON FOOTBALL NEWS:

Here is the original post:

Randy Jordan wants the 'whole thing' from Derrius Guice in 2020 - NBC Sports Washington

5 Universities in Jordan That are Considered The Best – CEOWORLD magazine

Jordan is many things for the world. To me, it is one of the most historically rich nations in existence. Offering excellent connectivity with Africa, Europe, and the Middle East, it has great geopolitical importance on regional and international planes. It is a modern nation that has embraced a culture featuring an amalgamation of the new and the old without jeopardizing with either. Overall, Jordan is among the best in the Arab world, and there are enough reasons why it is so.

One aspect of Jordan that has amassed appreciation is Higher Education. Many of its universities are considered to be top-tier in the Arab world and have found places in international rankings as well. In case you are eyeing for a seat in an Arab university, then I suggest that you survey a few Jordanian universities. You can start with the ones mentioned in this article.

Here are 5 universities in Jordan that are crowned as among the best in the region.

Have you read?Worlds Most Powerful Passports.Worlds Top Global Wealth Management And Advisory Firms.Worlds Most Powerful Women.Worlds Most Powerful People.

See the article here:

5 Universities in Jordan That are Considered The Best - CEOWORLD magazine

Jordan Spieth shoots 1-over 71 in round four of the World Golf Championships-FedEx St. Jude Invitational – pgatour.com

Jordan Spieth hit 13 of 18 greens in regulation during his final round at the World Golf Championships-FedEx St. Jude Invitational, finishing at 4 under for the tournament. Spieth finished his day tied for 30th at 4 under; Justin Thomas is in 1st at 13 under; Daniel Berger, Brooks Koepka, Tom Lewis, and Phil Mickelson are tied for 2nd at 10 under; and Jason Day, Matthew Fitzpatrick, Louis Oosthuizen, Chez Reavie, Xander Schauffele, and Shane Lowry are tied for 6th at 9 under.

After a drive to the left side of the fairway on the 401-yard par-4 second hole, Spieth had a 108 yard approach shot, setting himself up for the birdie. This moved Spieth to 1 under for the round.

On the 579-yard par-5 third hole, Spieth reached the green in 3 and sunk a 6-foot putt for birdie. This moved Spieth to 2 under for the round.

After a tee shot at the green on the 171-yard par-3 eighth, Spieth missed a birdie attempt from 6-feet taking a par. This left Spieth to even for the round.

On the par-4 10th, Spieth's 218 yard approach to 7 feet set himself up for the birdie on the hole. This moved Spieth to 1 under for the round.

After hitting his tee shot into the native area, Spieth hit his next to the right rough and reached the green on his third shot, rolling a two-putt bogey on the 406-yard par-4 12th. This moved Spieth to even-par for the round.

On the 472-yard par-4 13th hole, Spieth reached the green in 2 and sunk a 21-foot putt for birdie. This moved Spieth to 1 under for the round.

On the 395-yard par-4 15th, Spieth had a double bogey after hitting the green in 4 and two putting, moving Spieth to 1 over for the round.

On the 530-yard par-5 16th hole, Spieth reached the green in 3 and sunk a 5-foot putt for birdie. This moved Spieth to even for the round.

Link:

Jordan Spieth shoots 1-over 71 in round four of the World Golf Championships-FedEx St. Jude Invitational - pgatour.com

Rethinking Manhattan Project spies and the Cold War, MADand the 75 years of no nuclear warthat their efforts gifted us – NationofChange

Seventy-five years ago before dawn on July 16, 1945, a cataclysmic explosion shook the New Mexico desert as scientists from the top-secret Manhattan Project tested their nightmarish creation: the first atom bomb, called the Gadget.

This birth of the Nuclear Age, was quickly followed a few weeks later, first on August 6 by the dropping of a U-235 atom bomb on Hiroshima, a non-military city of 225,000, and then, three days after that on Aug. 9, by the dropping of a somewhat more powerful Plutonium atom bomb on Nagasaki, another non-military city of 195,000. The resulting slaughter of some 200,000 mostly civilian Japanese men, women and children naturally leads to talk of the horrors of those weapons and to discussions about whether they should have been used on Japan instead of being demonstrated on an uninhabited target.

What goes unmentioned, however, as we mark each important anniversary of these horrific events the initial Trinity test in Alamogordo, the Little Boy bombing of Hiroshima and the Fat Man plutonium bombing of Nagasaki is that, incredibly, in a world where nine nations possess a total of nearly 14,000 nuclear weapons, not one has been used in war to kill human beings since the bombing of Nagasaki on August 9, 1945.

And thats not all. Over those same 75 years, despite seven and a half decades of intense hostility and rivalry, as well as some major proxy wars, between great powers like the U.S. and USSR, and the U.S. and China, no two superpower nations have gone to war against each other.

The reason for this phenomenal and almost incomprehensible absence of catastrophic conflict of the type so common throughout human history is the same in both cases: No country dares to risk the use a nuclear weapon because of the fear it could lead other nuclear nations use theirs, and no major power dares to go to war against another major power because it is obvious that any war between two such nations would very quickly go nuclear.

Things could have gone very differently, however, with the dawn of the nuclear age.

At the end of WWII, the U.S. was the worlds unchallenged superpower. It had emerged from war with its industrial base undamaged while Europe, the Soviet Union, Japan and much of China and were all smoking ruins, their dead numbering in the tens of millions. The U.S. also had a monopoly on a new super weapon the atom bomb a weapon capable of vaporizing a city. And the this country had demonstrated that it had no moral compunction about using its terrible new weapon of mass destruction.

Some important scientists involved in the creation of the bomb urged the sharing of its construction secrets with Americas ally in the war against the Axis powers, the Soviet Union. These scientists, many of them Nobel-winning physicists, said negotiations should begin immediately at that point to eliminate nuclear weapons for all time, just as germ and chemical weapons had already been banned (successfully as the history of WWII showed).

But military and civilian leaders in Washington balked at the idea of sharing the bombs secrets. In fact, after Bohrs visit, President Roosevelt reportedly had the FBI monitor Nobelist Nils Bohr, one of the Los Alamos scientists who directly pleaded with him to bring the Russians into the bomb project, and even considered barring him from leaving the U.S. The Truman administration considered deporting Leo Szilard, and after Robert Oppenheimer proposed to Truman the sharing of the bomb with the Russians, his top-secret security clearance was revoked.

Instead of sharing the bomb with the USSR, which, remember, was Americas ally in World War II, and then working for its being banned, the U.S. began producing dozens and eventually hundreds of Nagasaki-sized atom bombs, moving quickly from hand-made devices to mass produced ones. The U.S. also quickly started pursuing the development of a vastly more powerful bomb the thermonuclear Hydrogen bomb a weapon that theoretically has no limits to how great its destructive power could be. (A one-megaton bomb typical of some of the larger warheads in the U.S. arsenal today is 30 times as powerful as the bomb dropped on Nagasaki.)

Why this obsession with creating a stockpile of atomic bombs big enough to destroy not just a country but the whole earth at such a time as the end of WWII? The war was over and American scientists and intelligence analysts were predicting that the war-ravaged Soviet Union would need years and perhaps a decade to produce its own bomb, yet the U.S. was going full tilt building an explosive arsenal that quickly dwarfed all the explosives used in the last two world wars combined.

What was the purpose of building so many bombs? One hint comes from the fact that the U.S. also, right after the war, began mass producing the B-29 Super Fortress planes like the Enola Gay that delivered the first atomic bomb to Hiroshima and de-mothballing and refurbishing hundreds that had been built and declared surplussed right at the wars end. A B-29 could only carry one plutonium or two uranium bombs for any significant distance. But the U.S. was building several thousand of them in peacetime. Why?

The answer, according to a 1987 book, To Win a Nuclear War authored by nuclear physicists Michio Kaku and Daniel Axelrod, is that the U.S. was planning to launch a devastating nuclear first strike blitz on the Soviet Union as soon as it could build and deliver the 300 nuclear bombs that Pentagon strategists believed would be needed to destroy the Soviet Union as an industrial society and its Red Army as well, eliminating any possibility of the USSR responding by sweeping over war-ravaged western Europe. And the B-29 was at the time the only plane it had which could deliver the bombs.

This genocidal nightmare envisioned by Truman and the Pentagons nuclear madmen never happened because the initial slow pace of constructing the bombs meant that the 300 weapons and the planes to deliver them would not be ready until early 1950. Meanwhile, Russias first bomb, a plutonium device that was a virtual carbon copy of the Fat Man bomb dropped on Nagasaki, was successfully exploded on August 29, 1949, in a test that caught the U.S. by complete surprise. At that point the idea of a deadly first strike was dropped (or at least deferred indefinitely) by Truman and Pentagon strategists.

A new era of Mutual Assured Destruction (MAD) had arrived, and according to Kaku and Axelrod, just in time.

For that bit of good fortune, I suggest, we have to thank the spies who, for whatever their individual motives, successfully obtained and delivered the secrets of the atomic bomb and its construction to the scientists in the Soviet Union who were struggling, with limited success, to quickly come up with their own atomic bomb.

To most Americans, those spies, especially the U.S. citizens among them like Julius Rosenberg and notably Ted Hall, the youngest scientist at the Manhattan Project, hired out of Harvard as a junior physics major at 18, were modern day Benedict Arnolds. The truth is quite different.

Hall, who was never caught, and who was not recruited to be a spy but volunteered plans for the plutonium bomb on his own initiative after searching for and finally locating a Soviet agent, and another spy, the young German Communist physicist, Klaus Fuchs, working independently of each other, both delivering critical plans for the U.S. plutonium bomb to Moscow, clearly prevented the U.S. from launching a nuclear holocaust.

By decisively helping the USSR develop and test its own bomb quickly by mid-1949, half a year before the U.S. could attain a stockpile of 300 bombs, they forced the U.S. to have to consider the unacceptable risk of retaliation. Had the Soviets taken longer to create their own atomic bomb, the US could have gone through with its criminal plans, which would have dwarfed Hitlers slaughter of the six million Jewish and Roma people. (Pentagon experts estimated that over 30-40 million Russians would be killed by a US nuclear blitz.)

Hall, in public statements made in the mid-1990s after de-encrypted Soviet spy codes became public and his name was identified in them, explained that he had acted to share the plans for the plutonium bomb because he felt that the U.S., coming out of WWII with a nuclear monopoly, would have been a danger to not just the Soviet Union, but to the entire world. (The Russian bomb exploded in August, 1949 was a virtual carbon copy of the Nagasaki plutonium bomb Hall had worked on in his two years at Los Alamos.)

Looking back to the US decision to use its first nuclear weapon not as a demonstration on an empty island or military base, but on two undefended civilian cities, and to catastrophic U.S. carpet bombings using non-nuclear bombs, of North Korea and later Vietnam, Laos and Cambodia, its hard disagree with Halls thinking. His concern about U.S. nuclear intentions is further borne out by how close the US came to using its nuclear bombs in crisis after crisis during the late 40s and early 50s against China and North Korea during the Korean War, in support of the French expeditionary force trapped at Dien Bien Phu, by JFK in the 1961 in the Berlin crisis, in the 1962 Cuban Missile Crisis. and later when U.S. Marines were trapped by Vietnamese troops in Khe Sanh. Each time, it was fear of the Soviets responding with their own bomb that saved the day and largely kept American bombs on the ground (actually in the Khe San case in 1968 atom bombs were actually delivered close to the Indochina front, but President Johnson called a halt to the militarys plans).

The truth is, if the Soviets had not had their own bomb during any of the above listed crises, it is hard to imagine that the U.S., with a monopoly on the bomb, would not have used it to full advantage. If were honest, The MAD reality enabled by Russias Los Alamos spies proved to be a lifesaver for tens or perhaps millions of people around the world.

Americans may (and should!) decry the hundreds of billions of dollars (trillions in todays dollars) that have been poured into a massively wasteful arms race with the Soviet Union and later Russia and China money that could have done incalculable good if spent on schools, health care, environmental issues etc. need to consider what the alternative would have been to Cold War and MAD. With MAD (and considerable good luck) we have had no world wars, and no nuclear bombs dropped on human beings. Without it, with the U.S. having a monopoly on the bomb for perhaps as long as a decade following WWII, this country would have nuked cities all over the world, almost certainly destroying the Soviet Union entirely, and the U.S. would today be known today as the ultimate genocidal monster of history, rather than having Germany left holding that eternal badge of shame.

In reconsidering the work of Soviet atomic spies, Americans also need to know the truth about the goal of the Manhattan Project. While the push to develop the bomb began with a letter from Albert Einstein to Roosevelt warning that the Germans might develop such a weapon, by the time the program got underway, it was clear that the real target was Americas Ally in the fight against the Nazis: The USSR.

Of course we must work to ban nuclear weapons and war. Such weapons are incomparably evil and if the world agrees that germ warfare and poison gas weapons should not exist, certainly nuclear weapons a million times worse should not! But we should nonetheless, as we look back at the grim 75th anniversary of those three first nuclear bombs exploded by the U.S., admit a debt of gratitude to those spies at Los Alamos who kept the U.S. from committing an atrocity that humanity would have never forgiven, and for giving us this amazing three-quarters of a century of no nuclear or world war.

FALL FUNDRAISER

If you liked this article, please donate $5 to keep NationofChange online through November.

See the original post here:

Rethinking Manhattan Project spies and the Cold War, MADand the 75 years of no nuclear warthat their efforts gifted us - NationofChange

Letter to the Editor: Seeing is believing when it comes to Covid-19 – Fairfield Daily Republic

When the rabid left lost their battle to impeach our president they went to Plan B, which is the virus attack.

Every morning I wake up to find that my family and friends are still alive. How can that be? The news that was in the paper and on TV said we were destined to die.

I love statistics. If you learn how to properly interpret them you can quickly sift out the baloney.

I wrote to this paper in in the spring and asked them to give you two questions. First, how many individuals do you personally know who have been treated for the virus and second, how many individuals do you personally know who have died from this virus? After five months, how many? Any bells going off? I dont deny the virus existence and I think it behooves us to take reasonable precautions as far as cleanliness goes.

There are those among us who want to take away our freedoms. They want to rule our lives. They almost immediately took our freedom of religion away by closing the churches. Do you really go along with this? And then they try hard to make us wear masks and adhere to social distancing everywhere. Give me a break.

How about our freedom of speech? Whats this, hate speech? It appears to me that if you dont like what I have to say you can label it as such. Once labeled that way, by you, I can never broach the subject again. Just like that.

Patriots, wake up! If you love this wonderful country, it is time to step up. I spent 30 proud years in the military. To stand in harms way was a privilege. I have been on every continent and you wont find any country that comes close to the U.S. or has our freedoms.

Ronald Crews

Rio Vista

Editors note: Solano County Public Health reports 37 deaths thus far in the county that are linked to the novel coronavirus that causes Covid-19. There were 3,611 confirmed cases countywide as of Friday afternoon, 26 of those in Rio Vista.

Related

View original post here:

Letter to the Editor: Seeing is believing when it comes to Covid-19 - Fairfield Daily Republic

A History of Masks From the Black Plague to Coronavirus – The National Interest

Clearly, our discomfort about wearing masksin the midst ofa pandemic has deep roots.

Bad smells and bird beaks

Medical mask-wearing has a long history. In the past few months, pictures of thebeaked masks that doctors wore during the 17th-century plague epidemichave been circulating online. At the time, disease was believed to spread through miasmas bad smells that wafted through the air. The beak was stuffed with herbs, spices and dried flowers to ward off the odors believed to spread the plague.

In North America, before the 1918 influenza epidemic, surgeons wore masks, as did nurses and doctors who were treating contagious patients in a hospital setting. But during the flu epidemic, cities around the world passed mandatory masking orders. Historian Nancy Tomes argues that mask-wearing was embraced by the American public as an emblem of public spiritedness and discipline.

Canadian reluctance and Japanese willingness

The Medical Officer of Health for Edmonton reported that practically no one wore a mask thereafter, except in hospitals. In his view, the rapid spread of the disease after the mask order was put into effect made the order an object of ridicule.

In Japan, by contrast, the public embraced mask-wearing during the Spanish flu. According to sociologistMitsutoshiHorii,mask-wearing symbolized modernity.In the post-war era, Japanese people continued to wear masks to prevent the flu, only stopping in the 1970s when flu vaccines became widely available. In the 1980s and 1990s, mask-wearing increased to prevent allergies,as allergy to cedar pollen became a growing problem. In the late 1980s, the effectiveness of flu vaccinations declined and wearing a mask to avoid influenza resumed.

Mask-wearing skyrocketed in the early years of the 21st century with the outbreak of SARS and avian influenza. The Japanese government recommended that all sick people wear masks to protect others, while they suggested that healthy people could wear them as a preventative measure. Horii argues that mask-wearing was a neoliberal answer to the question of public health policy in that it encouraged people to take individual responsibility for their own health.

A century of Chinese mask-wearing

One of the first cases of COVID-19 in Canada was that of astudent at Western Universitywho had visited her parents in Wuhan over the Christmasbreak.On the flight back to Canada, she wore a mask. She self-isolated upon her arrival in Canada and when she became sick, she showed up at the hospital wearing a mask. She did not infect anyone else.

But support for mask-wearingappears to be growing. In the face of a serious health threat, Canadians are wisely following the lead of Asian countries.

Catherine Carstairs is aProfessor in the University of GuelphsDepartment of History.

See the original post:

A History of Masks From the Black Plague to Coronavirus - The National Interest