Big Tech Faces an Overdue Grilling From Congress – TIME

When the heads of four of the biggest tech companies lined up for a WebEx grilling from members of the U.S. House on Wednesday, there was something decidedly retro about the whole affair. Its as if Amazon is this centurys Standard Oil a behemoth that is integral to American life yet posing very real threats incumbent in a monopoly. That risk has been out there for some time, but the coronavirus pandemic has forced lawmakers to pay attention to how quickly these companies are changing Americans day-to-day lives and the inherent threat that carries.

Amazon, Apple, Facebook and Google chiefs were nominally visiting with a House antitrust subcommittee to answer questions about free-market competition and consumer privacy that have been simmering for years. In reality, they were defending their very right to exist as the enormous brokers of how Americans shop for goods and ideas alike. Tech companies critics have argued that they are too large to stay in their current form and need to be broken up so as not to amass too much power. Their defenders say theyre (mostly) free services and compete with each other fiercely to provide the best products and experiences.

Make sense of what matters in Washington. Sign up for the daily D.C. Brief newsletter.

Congress has its own questions to answer in navigating whether these companies should be allowed to continue doing business as usual. Do lawmakers want to shut off the spigot of easy access to goods and ideas? Congress has been wary of stepping in to check these massive companies for good reason. One, theyre economic powerhouses that provide a steady stream of tax revenue. (Amazon, of course, is the exception to this, given its relatively low levels of profit and correspondingly low tax burden.) Two, the giants have armies of lobbyists ready to ding lawmakers who step out of line and to reward those who support their clients. And three, if a 2018 hearing with many of these same faces is any indicator, its clear that many of these lawmakers dont actually understand what these companies do.

But the coronavirus pandemic has laid bare the depth of these companies influence. Amazon now handles half of the entire e-commerce marketplace. The iPhone is ubiquitous and Apples app platform has a choke-hold over downloads, including e-health tracking systems. Facebook has become Americas national newspaper, while lacking any editorial standards. And Google is so common that its company has become a verb for most people. Therein lies a force too powerful to continue to lurk in the shadows unquestioned.

Its easy to treat todays hearing as an academic exercise about how much power is too much. But consider your family members social media feeds. It turns out that a quarter of Americans currently believe, to some degree, the false conspiracy theory that powerful people planned and executed the coronavirus pandemic. Pew Research Center polling out last week shows 20% of Americans think its probably true that powerful interests were behind the outbreak, and 5% who say its definitely true. Among Republicans, a full third buy the conspiracy theory. But Black and Hispanic voters, who are overwhelmingly against President Donald Trump, also buy this theory more than their white or Asian neighbors.

At some point, distrust of respected institutions like the Centers for Disease Control left the fringe and became a real public health threat. This reality exists in large part because social media platforms like Facebook allow disinformation to hum along without a credible antidote. Apple decides what apps you can use to check your own health and information. Amazon decides which products including books and the ideas packed between the covers are available and at what costs to publishers and to consumers. And Google decides what answers appear at the top of your searches. At a moment of twin health and economic crises, Congress had little option but to haul these execs in to justify their existence. A quick remedy, though, is out-of-stock on Amazon.

A version of this article first appeared in The DC Brief, TIMEs politics newsletter. Sign up here to get stories like this sent to your inbox every weekday.

For your security, we've sent a confirmation email to the address you entered. Click the link to confirm your subscription and begin receiving our newsletters. If you don't get the confirmation within 10 minutes, please check your spam folder.

Write to Philip Elliott at philip.elliott@time.com.

Follow this link:

Big Tech Faces an Overdue Grilling From Congress - TIME

Lawmakers grill 4 Big Tech CEOs but don’t land many blows – The Associated Press

WASHINGTON (AP) Congressional lawmakers finally got a chance to grill the CEOs of Big Tech over their dominance and allegations of monopolistic practices that stifle competition. But its unclear how much they advanced their goal of bringing some of the worlds largest companies to heel.

Invective flew Wednesday as legislators questioned Facebooks Mark Zuckerberg, Amazons Jeff Bezos, Googles Sundar Pichai and Apples Tim Cook at a hearing of the House Judiciary subcommittee on antitrust. For the last year, that panel has probed the business practices of the Silicon Valley giants with an eye to determining if they need to be regulated more heavily or even broken up.

In nearly five hours of testimony and questioning, however, there were few startling revelations or striking confrontations. While the executives faced hostile questioning and frequent interruptions from lawmakers of both parties, little seemed to land more than glancing blows.

The CEOs testified via video to lawmakers, at times appearing together on the committee room display as tiny individual figures in a mostly empty array of squares. Most committee members were seated, masks on, in the hearing room in Washington.

The execs provided lots of data purporting to show how much competition they face and how valuable their innovation and essential services are to consumers. But they sometimes struggled to answer pointed questions about their business practices. They also confronted a range of other concerns about alleged political bias, their effect on U.S. democracy and their role in China.

The panels chairman, Rep. David Cicilline, a Rhode Island Democrat, said each platform controlled by Facebook, Amazon, Google and Apple is a bottleneck for a key channel of distribution.

Whether they control access to information or to a marketplace, these platforms have the incentive and ability to exploit this power, he said. They can charge exorbitant fees, impose oppressive contracts, and extract valuable data from the people and businesses that rely on them.

Simply put: They have too much power.

The four CEOs command corporations whose products are woven into the fabric of everyday life, with millions or even billions of customers, and a combined market value greater than the entire German economy. One of them, Bezos, is the worlds richest individual; Zuckerberg is the fourth-ranked billionaire.

And they had a few rough moments. Pichai and Zuckerberg appeared discomfited when pressed about unsavory aspects of their companies businesses but got respites when their inquisitors ran out of time. Bezos also acknowledged that alleged misdeeds at Amazon such as reports that the company has used data generated by independent sellers on its platform to compete against them would be unacceptable if proved to be true.

Outside observers were able to draw radically different conclusions from the event. Richard Hamilton Jr., a former Justice Department antitrust lawyer, said that everyone on the committee seemed to be in agreement on the need for tougher regulation of all four companies an ominous sign, he said. But Stephen Beck, CEO of the management consulting firm cg42, said the tech companies and their brands emerged relatively unscathed.

In particular, he said, Cook was particularly polished and well prepared, enabling the Apple CEO to put on what Beck called a master class in terms of how to handle these situations. Cook drew less attention from lawmakers than did the other CEOs after arguing that Apple isnt dominant in any of its markets.

Among the toughest questions for Google and Amazon involved accusations that they used their dominant platforms to scoop up data about competitors in a way that gave them an unfair advantage.

Bezos, who was appearing before Congress for the first time, said he couldnt guarantee that the company had not accessed seller data to make competing products, an allegation that the company and its executives have previously denied.

We have a policy against using seller specific data to aid our private label business, Bezos said in a response to a question from Rep. Pramila Jayapal, a Washington Democrat. But I cant guarantee to you that that policy hasnt been violated.

Pichai deployed an old Washington trick appealing to the specific interests of legislators. In his opening remarks, he touted Googles value to mom-and-pop businesses in Bristol, Rhode Island, and Pewaukee, Wisconsin, which just happen to be located in the home districts of Cicilline and Rep. James Sensenbrenner of Wisconsin, the panels senior Republican.

But the Google executive struggled as Cicilline accused the company of leveraging its dominant search engine to steal ideas and information from other websites and manipulating its results to drive people to its own digital services to boost its profits.

Pichai repeatedly deflected Cicillines attacks by asserting that Google tries to provide the most helpful and relevant information to the hundreds of millions of people who use its search engine each day in an effort to keep them coming back instead of defecting to a rival service, such as Microsofts Bing.

As Democrats largely focused on market competition, several Republicans aired longstanding grievances, claiming the tech companies are censoring conservative voices and questioning their business activities in China. Big Tech is out to get conservatives, insisted Rep. Jim Jordan of Ohio.

In its bipartisan investigation, the Judiciary subcommittee collected testimony from mid-level executives of the four firms, competitors and legal experts, and pored over more than a million internal documents from the companies. A key question: whether existing competition policies and century-old antitrust laws are adequate for overseeing the tech giants, or if new legislation and enforcement funding are needed.

Cicilline has called the four companies monopolies, although he says breaking them up should be a last resort. While forced breakups may appear unlikely, the wide scrutiny of Big Tech points toward possible new restrictions on its power.

The companies face legal and political offensives on multiplying fronts, from Congress, the Trump administration, federal and state regulators and European watchdogs. The Justice Department and the Federal Trade Commission have been investigating the four companies practices.

___

Liedtke reported from San Ramon, California, and OBrien from Providence, Rhode Island. AP Business Writer Joseph Pisani in New York contributed to this report.

___

Follow Gordon on Twitter at https://www.twitter.com/mgordonap.

Here is the original post:

Lawmakers grill 4 Big Tech CEOs but don't land many blows - The Associated Press

A recap of the Big Tech antitrust hearing – Arab News

DUBAI:On July 29, CEOs from the worlds biggest tech companies appeared before the US House Judiciary Subcommittee on Antitrust, Commercial and Administrative Law. Amazons Jeff Bezos, Facebooks Mark Zuckerberg, Apples Tim Cook and Alphabet Inc.s Sundar Pichai spent hours facing questioning from lawmakers about anti-competitive monopolies.

There have been several concerns regarding the inclusion of all four companies due to their differences in business models, but subcommittee ChairDavid Cicilline addressed these by highlighting the commonalities between the companies: All are a bottleneck for a key channel of distribution; all use data and surveillance of other companies to buy, copy, or cut off potential competition; and all abuse their control over current technologies to extend their power.

Their ability to dictate terms, call the shots, upend entire sectors, and inspire fear represent the powers of a private government, said Cicilline.

Over a span of nearly six hours, lawmakers questioned the four CEOs on topics including Googles search practices, the filtering out of political viewpoints on a platform, Russian election interference, promoting racism and anti-Semitism and practices that could eliminate existing and potential competition.

Though it was Bezos first congressional testimony, he appeared the least fazed by the grilling. Cook drew fewer barbed questions than Bezos but handled them efficiently, while Zuckerberg took the most damage, stumbling a few times when confronted with internal emails. Pichai endured much heat from conservatives, and he looked the worse for it as he repeatedly told lawmakers he would be happy to look into various situations and get back to them.

Unfortunately, the Big Tech hearing was decidedly low-tech. Bezos escaped questioning for about 90 minutes in what may have been a tech issue and was caught reaching for what appeared to be a snack. Poor audio quality, flat-screen televisions switching off, and chief executives appearing together as thumbnails on a large screen all frustrated viewers and led to mockery of the virtual set-up on Twitter.

All of them indicated that they use their massive data advantages to peek into what their competitors or people who rely on their platforms are doing, said Gene Kimmelman, an adviser with the Washington-based nonprofit Public Knowledge. So, while they didnt really want to admit it, they couldnt deny it.

The hearing concluded with Cicilline saying: This hearing has made one fact clear to me: These companies, as they exist today, have monopoly power. Some need to be broken up, all need to be properly regulated and held accountable. We need to ensure the antitrust laws first written more than a century ago work in the digital age.

Read more here:

A recap of the Big Tech antitrust hearing - Arab News

Big tech companies continue to expand in Seattle – KING5.com

Technology companies now make up around 20% of the state's overall economic impact.

SEATTLE As Congress investigates whether big tech companies are too big, Seattle continues to see fast growth as these companies expand.

Currently, tech companies make up 20.2% of Washington state's overall economy, according to a recent study by CompTIA.

In Seattle, the overall footprint among companies like Amazon, Apple, Google, and Facebook is expanding. Amazon's global headquarters is now more than 40 owned and leased buildings in Seattle.

When it comes to jobs, the impact is growing too.

Amazon currently employs around 50,000 people in the region. Apple, which is moving into two 12-story buildings on Dexter Avenue in Seattle, is planning to move in around 2,000 employees.

Google is putting the finishing touches on its new five-building campus along Mercer Street and is expected to provide around 4,500 jobs.

Facebook, which is also now growingwith five buildings in Seattle, has around 5,000 employees in the city.

But many feel that big tech growth can also do more harm than good.

"These four companies represent a private government that can overtake many countries in a way," said Hanson Hosein, co-director of the Communication Leadership master's program at the University of Washington. Hosein has been closely studying tech growth in Seattle for more than a decade.

"We're talking billions of people and trillions of dollars," he said. "That power is disproportionate, and the concern is very anti-democratic because they're not that accountable to us."

Read the rest here:

Big tech companies continue to expand in Seattle - KING5.com

SCOTT GALLOWAY: This may be the beginning of the end of Big Tech we shouldn’t see it as a punishment, but a restoration of balance – Business Insider

Since the age of five I've enjoyed peeing outdoors. Forty years later, peeing has become something I must do several dozen times a day, and I don't like the outdoors. But life mimics math, and the product of two negatives is a positive. More math: Grilled cheese or tomato soup as individuals I find boring. But together, they're my favorite thing at the Crosby Hotel bar. God, I miss eating at bars alone, with strangers around me.

I'm staying alone in Montauk at a friend's house while he's in Portugal (something about taxes and quality of life). After my morning coffee and power shake, it's time to water the plants. Look, it's a bayberry plant, and there's a crape myrtle. I hear something and startle. I just came from Montana, where everyone tells you to be mindful of bears. My fear escalates to DEFCON 2 when I see not a bear, but five men standing in the backyard witnessing my divertissement. Four of them are wearing cargo shorts and could be quadruplets. The fifth is in a suit. The only guy that wears a suit on 92-degree Saturday morning is a real estate broker. Now I remember, the broker is showing the house this morning.

They act like my Vizsla when she's done something wrong: freeze in their tracks and avoid eye contact. Who would blame them.

The smartest and most noble people in the world according to the IRS, DC, and CNBC are really, really rich people who made their money in tech. The Jesus Christs of our generation. More than that innovators. So, taking my cues from our role models, I turn to the five men and say:

"We live in a great country. I was raised by a single mother who lived and died a secretary."

This week, the CEOs of the largest tech firms were all under consensual hallucination that an emotional opening statement absolves you of monopoly abuse. Bezos must have thought he was being filmed for his A&E biography. Pregnant teen mom, immigrant father, we get it, you were once poor.

Jesus (i.e., Elon), make them stop.

Scott Galloway

Struck me right away that the GOP seemed to be more prone to questions about a lack of patriotism when questioning the one brown guy, Pichai. The wordAmerican popped up 15 times in questions to Sundar Pichai, a US citizen born in Madurai, India. To Zuckerberg, whose platform has wreaked considerable damage on American elections, American politics, and American news, the word was only used nine times. Representatives on the panel felt the need to remind the witness what country we live in just once when questioning the guys born in Albuquerque, New Mexico, and Mobile, Alabama.

For the first two hours the witness who was subjected to the toughest grilling was Jack Dorsey. Of course, Mr. Dorsey wasn't there. Any problem regarding the rage machine that is Twitter has nothing to do with antitrust. Forcing the microblogging platform to divest Kanye's account, and let it trade on the NASDAQ, doesn't make much sense.

Or does it?

Many of the GOP panelists came to the wrong hearing. Twitter is worth $29 billion; the others are worth an average $1.23 trillion. I know, market cap isn't a signal of monopoly behavior that warrants antitrust. But here's the thing it is. To be fair, if Jack had testified, we'd only really understand the respective scale of the problem if Jack were 2 inches tall and weighed 4 pounds. Pretty sure the last sentence is a hate crime.

Rep. Jayapal stood out as the most effective examiner on the committee. Her questioning of Bezos around third-party seller data was pointed and effective, as well as her grilling Zuckerberg over copying apps. Politicians are sometimes overmatched in these hearings, but Rep. Jayapal demonstrated she was more than talented enough to have been in the opposite seat, testifying in front of Congress about the anticompetitive practices of her firm but instead decided to serve her country.

The Samurais of the world's greatest deliberative bodies increasingly have one thing in common: pantsuits. Reps Jayapal, Porter, Ocasio-Cortez, and Senator Warren have created a super-featherweight class whose fists of preparation and faculty make Floyd Mayweather uneasy. They will likely play a central role in the breakup of the world's most powerful firms. However, this pales in comparison to another contribution there are likely millions of young women who watch them and think, "Why not me?"

When they weren't questioning Pichai's patriotism, most of the Republicans on the committee spent their time complaining about alleged bias against conservatives, rather than addressing the actual subject of the hearing: antitrust. Were they just playing to the millions who watch Fox News? That's half right. They are playing to one person who watches Fox News. It's clear most Republicans still fear Trump and are desperate to please him. The persecution complex plays well, especially on Fox.

Scott Galloway

There is no conservative bias on Facebook. There is a "bias" (open community guidelines) against spreading dangerous health information. It's just that the two (conservative sources and misinformation) are often one and the same. But a "conservative bias" might as well mean, "the best place to get your conservative news, conservative opinion, and conservative conspiracy theories fed to you in a constant drip feed of enragement." In May, a study found that most of the top news publishers by interactions lean right (as they have for years). The top ten political publishers with highest engagement are: Ben Shapiro, Breitbart, NowThis, The Hill, The Western Journal, The Young Turks, The Blaze, IJR, Washington Examiner, and CNN Politics.

Scott Galloway

Two "oops I f----d up and told the truth, corrections coming":

David Cicilline, chairman of the committee, claims he's from the first district of Rhode Island. He's not fooling us. He's clearly from Ronkonkoma and he's a Michael, not a David. Anyway, Chairman Cicilline comes across both very smart and as someone who, when you order a frozen mai tai from a lobster stand in Westhampton, would lean over and recommend an extra rum floater. And he'd be right.

Rep. Cicilline's opening statement gave me hope: "This investigation has been bipartisan from the start As my colleague Congressman Ken Buck recently commented, and I quote, 'This is the most bipartisan effort that I've been involved with in five and a half years of Congress.'" His rhetoric was also powerful: "Our founders did not bow before a king, and we should not bow before the emperors of the online economy."

We should also stop thinking of the breakup of big tech as punishment for doing something wrong, or that they're bad people. We break companies up to restore competition to markets, which is the gangster app for a growing economy that demands better behavior. As a result, there are more options from other players who must then behave better.

So, I've decided to run for the Democratic nomination to challenge Senator Rubio in 2022. I've already drafted my closing remarks for a similar upcoming Senate panel:

"Mr. Cook, you are an inspiration and reek of grace. Mr. Pichai, you are the best of America, an exceptional young immigrant who creates greatness in the agency of others. Mr. Bezos, you are just so damn rich, and even more jacked we should roll. And Mr. Zuckerberg, you are an awful person, but a brilliant business mind. Your successes are nothing short of remarkable. It must be tremendously rewarding to know your grit, intellect, and vision took your firms to heights that made it difficult not to abuse your positions of power. Our separation of your assets will unlock tremendous value for tens, if not hundreds, of millions of people. Well done, and thank you."

This may be (and I've said this before) the beginning of the end of big tech. However, it could also be a new beginning for the country, entrepreneurs, and markets. I find it all quite exciting. It makes me want to venture outside.

READ MORE:Popular NYU professor Scott Galloway has a new course on business strategy anyone can sign up to take I took away MBA-like insights for way less money than going to business school

Read more from the original source:

SCOTT GALLOWAY: This may be the beginning of the end of Big Tech we shouldn't see it as a punishment, but a restoration of balance - Business Insider

Law Decoded: Big Tech, Central Banks and the Hunt for Monopolies, July 24-31 – Cointelegraph

Every Friday, Law Decoded delivers analysis on the weeks critical stories in the realms of policy, regulation and law.

The concept of monopoly will reign in todays Law Decoded. As a fundamental principle, blockchain technology is about distributing both inputs and outputs of information securely. In its still very young lifecycle, the technology has proven to have boundless applications on the basis of this fairly simple principle.

A secondary principle is decentralization, and in this way, blockchain technology seems inherently opposed to monopolies. The big challenge of Bitcoins white paper was finding a way to move value across parties without getting lost in either that proverbial valley between two Byzantine generals OR the trap of a third party. Thats not to say that every firm working in blockchain is morally so grounded as to turn down the opportunity to monopolize its market. But the tech is promising for addressing a huge range of concentrated power especially in a digitizing world.

This week saw antitrust conflict between paeons of big tech and government. While those encounters were hostile, they will likely not result in any major damage to anyones bottom line. It also saw some new consequences for misuse of monopolized monetary power, which is a system that is also unlikely to change soon. The great thing about a monopoly, once you have it, is that its really hard for someone else to take it from you. But these are clusters of power that seem pretty obvious as places youd look to decentralize.

Kollen Post, Policy Editor, @the_postman_

CEOs for the four horsemen of U.S. tech Apple, Amazon, Google and Facebook appeared virtually before Congress on Wednesday to face accusations of functionally acting as monopolies.

The Thursday release of Q2 earnings reports showing rising revenues for each of the firms except Google did nothing to gain these firms sympathy. This was despite efforts during the hearings by the CEOs to depict their companies and their individual biographies as the American dream come true.

The past half-decade has ravaged the public image of tech in the United States. Increasingly dystopian revelations of data-gathering practices and brutal campaigns to squash competition have led to a widespread backlash against Silicon Valley. The role of social media in the 2016 election and subsequent waves of disinformation (including COVID-19) has also ended whatever honeymoon period firms like Facebook and Twitter had enjoyed.

Meanwhile, China, whose digital payments providers are widely praised as ahead of those in use in the U.S., looks set to crack down on those providers based on similar antitrust principles. For China, however, that might be at least in part to clear the way for a broad launch of a digital yuan.

Many of these tech giants are entrenched enough that they may be getting too big to fail. It is undeniable that they provide services that have changed our way of life. As Mark Zuckerberg pointed out during Facebooks investor call last night, had the COVID-19 pandemic happened two decades ago, this shift to working remotely wouldnt have been possible, and many more people would be dying. However, recent events should be getting a lot of people thinking about whether these giant firms are the best we can do and whether we might be better served looking at decentralized alternatives.

Also in the U.S., the Federal Reserves printer continues to go brrr, beating out the countrys total money printing over the first two centuries of its existence in the space of a month. The dollar is, for the first time during this pandemic, looking to be on the ropes.

Quantitative easing the formal term for the Feds use of inflation as a source of funds at the expense of all dollars already out there is a recurring villain in Bitcoin narratives. The idea is that it has to result in a monetary collapse eventually.

The extraordinary expenditures in the U.S. over recent months have seen the dollar stubbornly resisting this narrative, but according to recent analysis, thats changing. Early in the pandemic, global financial institutions and governments scrambled to stock up on dollars, buoying demand and value despite outlays. But this week, as Congress considers another huge stimulus bill, the dollar dipped to its lowest level since May 2018.

Were not witnessing a collapse in the monetary system, but certainly, a strain that, if it continues, will call into question whether the Fed really knows what its doing. At the same time, the head of the countrys major banking regulator is calling for blockchain-based challengers to the Feds central role in payments.

As China and the U.S. dominate headlines focusing on potential central bank digital currencies, and different European Union banks are launching their own trials, the remaining two of the five major currencies in the world have taken major steps indicating the same interest.

The Bank of Japan announced that it had appointed its top economist to a team doing research on the digital yen. The Bank of England, meanwhile, tapped Accenture to update technology for the U.K.s payments system not explicitly referring to a CBDC, but Accenture is deeply involved in the development of CBDCs around the world, including the digital dollar.

The dollar, the euro, the yen, the pound sterling and, as of 2016, the yuan form the basis for the International Monetary Funds Special Drawing Rights and form the backbone of global reserves. None of the five are transacting as CBDCs yet, but its clear that they are all worried about being left out. CBDC technology is not yet standard, but at the very least, research into it has become necessary to those currencies looking to maintain their prestige.

The American Enterprise Institutes visiting crypto expert, Jim Harper, talks digital dollars and new payments systems.

Coin Center, a leader in lobbying and research on decentralized networks, has updated its educational resources.

Kelman Law runs down the basics of paying taxes on both earnings in cryptocurrencies and capital gains on trading in the United States.

View post:

Law Decoded: Big Tech, Central Banks and the Hunt for Monopolies, July 24-31 - Cointelegraph

When it comes to big tech, US government official incompetence is embarrassing and horrifying – AppleInsider

The hearing on big tech antitrust matters on Wednesday was an embarrassment, and not a single governmental official there had the ability, will, or both, to bring any of the CEOs on hand to task.

The very best you can say about Wednesday's hearing is that it was bipartisan. But you can only say that because Democrats and Republicans alike displayed equal ignorance, and favored their own political careers instead of doing the job they said they were there for.

Whether you think Apple, Google, Facebook, and Amazon are shiny-clean saints, slightly murky figures, or outright criminal, it doesn't matter. If there's anything to get away with, they got away with it and that was it, that latest round was over with nobody but the tech CEOs scoring any points.

America originally took the basics of its legal system and its hearing procedures from the UK, where one of the authors of this editorial is from. In the UK, there is a weekly Prime Minister's Questions session, the PMQs, and it is lauded as among the greatest examples of democracy in action but only by the people involved. To the people, it is an embarrassment. Highly paid and in theory highly educated people act in it the same way schoolboys do in the yard.

And for the Americans on the staff, this was more of the same ignorance and posturing on the irrelevant that we've seen for the last 20 years. It was elected officials wrapping themselves in the flag, trying to score points for re-election campaigns. Instead of listening to answers, they'd cut off the answers, and keep reading what were pre-prepared statements in the form of the worst Jeopardy game show-like presentation possible.

Not one single person facing off against Tim Cook and the rest, did a good job and got a good answer. There was Rep. Mary Gay Scanlon who had specific questions about Amazon's alleged destruction of rival Diapers.com, but she was only able to make Jeff Bezos squirm until her time was up. And, that diapers.com example was from more than a decade ago.

But, at least Scanlon came armed with specifics and research. This hearing purportedly followed an investigation begun back in 2019 but most appeared to have been briefed for the first time on their way into the room.

More platform confusion on display belies bigger knowledge problems

As an AppleInsider reader, the difference between Twitter and Facebook is so obvious to you that it seems impossible anyone could get them mixed up. If you're not a user, though, it's all one big social media monolith and it's not your job to find out which is which.

But, knowing what the differences are in a hearing ostensibly about big tech power, it literally was the job of the committee to know the difference. You might hope that they would already know the difference between Twitter and Facebook, and that they would know what an app is. The fact that they didn't isn't shocking at this point, and the fact that they were incapable of finding out during this entire investigation is shameful.

At first, this seemed like it might be similar to the decision then-senator Steve King made when he tried to grill Google's Sundar Pichai about an iPhone issue. It might or might not have been technological ignorance, but it was certainly political maneuvering and it was playing to the crowd instead of trying to find the truth.

The representatives in this hearing did not know what they were asking either, and that is a clear abdication of responsibility. You and I can't pin Mark Zuckerberg up against the wall and get him to answer for years of Facebook's issues. This august body could, and have the power to do so and they just didn't.

Five minutes in government meetings is meaningless, no matter how many laps you take

After significant wrangling by both the committee and the tech CEOs, each committee member was granted what turned out to be three five-minute slots in round-robin and parliamentary fashion in which to ask questions. Obviously, that's inadequate. But, apparently if you give a politicians five minutes, they will take the five minutes. We counted about four minutes and ten seconds on the average per five-minute allocation, for the representatives themselves and their political agenda.

Even the ones who actually did ask questions instead of proselytizing, they tended to interrupt the answers in a handful of seconds. Sometimes that was right and necessary these four big tech people are not dumb and they know five minutes can be eaten up very quickly with some padding.

But most of the time, the interruptions were not to get back on topic or to delve or to pull a CEO up for talking nonsense and there was a fair amount of that nonsense, but discussions of all the CEOs portraying their companies as scrappy underdogs under constant threat is a topic for another day. Most of the time, a representative would interrupt an answer in order to ask their next pre-prepared question with no regard to the answer just given. Answers don't matter to them, being seen to ask your questions does.

Repeatedly, too, we had the outright offensive demand that the CEOs answer complex issues with just a yes or no. If you're allowed a complex answer, you can hide in the details but there's a chance you'll reveal the truth. With a yes or no, there isn't.

The only people who ever demand a yes or no, are ones who have no interest in the answer, or in the truth. They solely and exclusively care about how they look to their voters back home.

There used to be an office in the US designed to help with this, but it is long gone

In 1972, The United States Congress established the bipartisan Office of Technology Assessment (OTA). It was specifically established to educate and brief the House and Senate on complex scientific and technical issues of the day, and was instrumental in the early digital distribution of governmental documents to not just the feds, but to the public as well. It was governed by 12 members of Congress six Republicans and six Democrats and had a staff of 143 people, mostly scientists, with a smattering of support people.

It cost the federal government about $22 million per year in the early '90s. That's millions, not billions. It was dissolved as unnecessary and "wasteful" in 1995, with arguments saying that governmental officials were more than capable enough to understand and govern fairly on the issues and technologies of the day.

They weren't capable of doing that without the OTA then, and as the years have passed, this has only gotten worse, and the skeleton crew of mostly non-scientists doing this kind of work at the Government Accountability Office is underfunded and understaffed for the increasingly complex matters at hand. What isn't clear, is if this inability to govern on these matters without education is willful, or just incompetent.

Of course, it isn't clear how much the concept manned by a skeleton crew helps with the problem if that inability to deal with complex scientific or technological matters is willful. The European Parliamentary Technology Assessment (EPTA) performs roughly the same tasks, with roughly the same manning, and it doesn't seem to help decisions there either.

Not the first time, and it won't be the last

At first glance, this seems like more of the same that we've come to expect from the US government when it comes to technology. But, this time they went too far. Wednesday's hearing was the least productive federal hearing we've had the misfortune to have to sit through in two full decades. And yes, this includes the supreme court case discussing live video streaming service Aereo that likened the service to a parking lot and a dry cleaner's shop, somehow.

You know that each of the four CEOs had a debriefing with their executive board after the hearing. You can bet that each one of them had a stiff drink and counted their lucky stars that it went the way it did.

As CEOs, they should be relieved. As Americans, they should be scared. The House of Judiciary correctly and properly identified a huge issue, and it spoke correctly of the importance of this hearing. But then, it destroyed its authority by presenting a circus of schoolyard children. And, that comparison probably isn't fair to the children.

Maybe the next hearing, or the one after that will be better. We're not expecting it, though.

More here:

When it comes to big tech, US government official incompetence is embarrassing and horrifying - AppleInsider

From Sealand Road to the San Siro – Colin Woodthorpe on tragedy and a remarkable football journey – Cheshire Live

For Colin Woodthorpe football still matters, it's just that life has that way of putting things in perspective.

The former Chester City defender, who made 155 Football League appearances for the Blues between 1985 and 1990, is back in the game after a brief hiatus since leaving AFC Fylde back in October.

The surroundings may be slightly more humble, the challenge very different, but taking the assistant manager job at Northern Premier League Division One North West side Runcorn Linnets gives the 51-year-old the balance he needs in his life right now, working alongside Chester FC academy coach Calum McIntyre as he takes his first post in senior men's football.

A professional career that has seen him up sticks and move to some of the most remote places in the UK - Norwich and Aberdeen - means that a commute from his Northwich home to Runcorn for a part time post aligns with what really matters.

For Woodthorpe and his three sons, Nathan, Elliott and Ashley, the past 21 months have been unimaginably difficult following the death of his wife, Karole, from breast cancer in 2018.

"From October 2018 to now it has been a difficult journey," admitted Woodthorpe.

"I lost my wife and the boys lost their mother and life completely changes.

"You don't realise how much how much your wife being organised allows you to be organised in your own life and to thrive and achieve what you strive for. I used to be able to get out the door as and when I needed to but now there are a whole set of different challenges that you don't expect and where there is only you to deal with them.

"Christmas I found difficult as she used to take care of that. After she died I was petrified that first Christmas because I didn't want to drop the ball, I didn't want to forget people and I wanted to be able to do all that stuff that I used to take for granted because Karole did it. I know people were understanding but you want to do it for yourself, you want to show you can step up, but sometimes the little things can be so hard."

McIntyre was already friends with Woodthorpe having got to know him and Dave Challinor, who Woodthorpe worked under as assistant, successfully, at both Colwyn Bay and AFC Fylde. He wasn't expecting any interest from the former Norwich City, Aberdeen, Stockport County and Bury man in the role.

"Cal didn't think I'd be interested at all but he asked anyway," said Woodthorpe, whose youngest son Ashley has a rare genetic condition called Koolen De Vries which means he needs 24/7 care.

"I was happy to. It fits what I need right now and where I am at.

"My youngest, Ash, has special needs and is in his last year of high school so it all fits in geographically so I can be around and be a support to him, Nathan and Elliott.

"I can't tell you how proud of my lads I am.

"From when Karole was diagnosed through to her death and all the pain that comes after that they have been through A-Levels, GCSEs and Nathan has just been awarded his first professional deal at Crewe Alexandra, he's a left back like I was.

"For those lads to go through what they have done and still achieve just fills me with pride. I want to be around as much as possible to provide that support and right now this Runcorn role allows me to do that and I'm excited about it."

It's 35 years this year since Woodthorpe made his breakthrough in the professional game, emerging through the youth team ranks at Chester before being handed his debut by the legendary Blues boss Harry McNally.

What had been a tough decision whether to take on an apprenticeship with the Blues turned into a 23-year playing career that saw him clock up over 600 appearances, play in the Premier League and play in the UEFA Cup - including away at Inter Milan.

"I decided against an apprenticeship at Chester first off and went to the local college to study A-Level economics," recalled Woodthorpe.

"After a few days I thought 'no, not for me' so I went back and signed my YTS forms at Chester and started from there.

"It's quite something when your first manager is someone like Harry McNally. You don't know any different as a kid at that age, you think that all the things that went on there were normal, that it happened at every club up and down the country.

"It wasn't until I went to Norwich that I realised how mad Chester was.

"I loved it. The people were fantastic and people like Barrie and Pam Hipkiss, to see diamonds like those two still involved at the club is wonderful. It was a really friendly club with some superb people around it.

"As players we had that kind of Crazy Gang mentality, a bit like Wimbledon did. Harry helped forge all that and it was what was needed at the time as we weren't flush with cash and we had to make the most of the tools we had.

"We had tough lads like Graham Barrow and we did things our own way because that's what we had to do to make sure we gave ourselves the best chance."

Some of McNally's antics at Chester are the stuff of legend.

From being arrested in his underpants climbing a chimney in the Faroe Islands to breaking his leg on a friendly tour of Scotland because he didn't pull out of a tackle 'because it would have sent the wrong message', there will never be another like McNally.

Woodthorpe himself was at the centre of one of McNally's famous moments, when the Chester manager literally threw him back on to the pitch in a Freight Rover Trophy match at Wrexham when he was injured, following up the flash-point after the match with the declaration to the media that 'with minutes to go in a cup tie at Wrexham you must be prepared to die for the cause'.

"God, yeah, I remember that," recalled Woodthorpe.

"I'd been on the end of this heavy challenge and I was winded and felt like I'd cracked my ribs. I was ready to get up and get back playing but needed some time to compose myself.

"Out of the corner of my eye I see Harry storming up the touchline with a face like thunder and think he's going to give the ref some or have a go at their lad. He then throws me onto the pitch and screams at me.

"My mum was watching in the stands and started to make her way down as she wanted to hit him with her umbrella. She was furious.

"That's what it was like, though. You expected the unexpected.

"I remember when we were winning 4-1 against Bury, I think it was in 1987. We ended up drawing 4-4 and he comes back in the changing room at the end of the game and he is absolutely furious. I mean he is literally frothing at the mouth.

"While he's frothing at the mouth he's getting undressed and shouting and screaming at everyone. By this time he'd told everyone who wasn't a player to get out, including the lad who was running the bath.

"He jumps in this bath that is just scolding hot and lets out this blood curdling scream. He then storms around the tunnel looking for the volunteer who ran the bath to get him sacked, even though he told him to clear off and the poor fella had tried to tell him he hadn't finished running the bath and put any cold water in yet!"

As well as the pre-season tour to the Faroe Islands being full of tales to tell, the annual trip away would often elicit much of the same.

"We went to Ireland for one tour," said Woodthorpe.

"We played a couple of games, Cork and Waterford, but the thing was a massive booze up. But it was very much of its time back then, that's what it was.

"Anyway we have a night out in Dublin, all we do is drink Guinness. We can't find Harry and it ends up he's holding up traffic in Dublin city centre doing the dying fly on the floor. You're thinking 'that's my manager, that'.

"He'd tried to make us do this challenge to show how brave we were which involved eating the plate of food and then the paper plate and paper napkin. Nobody was going to do it, it was nonsense. But Harry's there, finishing his food and then starts chomping down on this paper plate and eats the lot, red napkin and all. It made him pretty poorly.

"We get the ferry back to Holyhead the next day and everyone is rough. Harry has a horrific hangover and he is just lying down on the floor of this ferry and all these kids who are on a school trip are just prodding him and he's there fast asleep, flat out. You're thinking 'what is going on here?'

"But that was Harry, I suppose. When it came to football he was dead serious and I found that he helped me in a big way and prepared me well.

"Was he demanding? Yes, very. But surely people would say that Sir Alex Ferguson was demanding or that Marcelo Bielsa was demanding. Now I'm not putting him in that bracket but managers who succeed and get the best out of players are demanding."

By the summer of 1990 Woodthorpe had attracted considerable interest from big clubs.

It was Norwich City who would be the ones to show their hand as they paid 225,000 for the services of the talented left back.

Still just 21, Woodthorpe headed to Norfolk to begin a new chapter with the Canaries.

"It was tough to start with and I had some pretty miserable nights and didn't know if I'd made the right choice," said Woodthorpe.

"I was staying at the Landsdowne Hotel for a few weeks but I ended up getting my first house that August and then things became easier.

"I mean it in the best way but I always felt that it was like the land that time forgot, Norwich.

"I got there and they had punks! I hadn't seen punks for about five years!

"It was horrific to get to but once I settled I just didn't want to leave. The people were brilliant, the lifestyle was brilliant and I was enjoying playing for a big club on the big stage.

"I'd gone from not knowing if I'd take up my YTS at Chester to playing Inter Milan at the San Siro. When you are a kid growing up you dream of things like that, to play on that kind of stage in games like that and that is something I'll always have.

"We had good lads at Norwich, too.

"David Smith ended up being my best man, then you had lads like Mark Bowen, Jeremy Goss and Ian Crook - the most gifted footballer I have ever seen. He was an absolute magician with the ball.

"It was a great time in my life and me and Karole were happy down there."

The idyllic life in Norwich that Woodthorpe and Karole had built for themselves would be turned on its head in 1994 as the Canaries accepted a bid from Aberdeen for his services.

It was a move that Woodthorpe didn't want to make.

"It's not like nowadays, if you move clubs you move your life there too," he said.

"I was in Norwich and of all the places to go it was somewhere even more remote. I had to flick through seven pages of the atlas to find Aberdeen.

"I'd heard there was interest but I used to avoid the phone. If I thought someone might come in I'd go for a walk or something so that nobody could get hold of me, I didn't have a mobile then. I thought if I don't speak to anybody then I don't have to move. It doesn't work like that, though.

"So we moved to Aberdeen and, again, the people were great.

"To drive up there took forever so we still had roots in Chester and whenever we would come back I would get this little propeller plane from Manchester.

"It would take in a few stops as you'd pick up riggers heading up to Aberdeen from Newcastle and Humberside.

"I remember Ricky Tomlinson being on board with us, he had his banjo with him and we had a right good time. I think we ended up drinking our fare."

Woodthorpe stopped in Aberdeen for three seasons, taking in another UEFA Cup adventure during that time, before deciding to head back closer to his North West roots, a move to Stockport County following before a switch to Bury, both of which would see him clock up over 300 Football League appearances between the pair.

Woodthorpe's final game as a professional arrived in 2008 at Bury, a club where he did link up with Barrow once more after the former Chester boss took the reins at Gigg Lane from 2003 to 2005.

Coaching and management wasn't always at the forefront of his mind but when his old teammate from Bury, Challinor, asked him if he wanted to join him as number two at Colwyn Bay following the departure of Neil Young to take up the role of Chester FC's first boss in 2010 he couldn't say no.

"We had a great run together and we were gutted with how it ended at Fylde," said Woodthorpe.

"We'd been at Wembley twice in a week just a few months before we left, losing in the play-offs and winning the FA Trophy. For me personally it was a year of a rollercoaster of emotions.

"I'd took a bit of time away but I happy with where I am right now, to be there for the lads, and happy that I'm able to get back into football and have it as part of my life again."

Original post:

From Sealand Road to the San Siro - Colin Woodthorpe on tragedy and a remarkable football journey - Cheshire Live

Fight breaks out and spills onto the street at family pub in Ingoldmells – Lincolnshire Live

Video footage shows a fight which broke out and spilled onto the street at a family pub in Ingoldmells.

The incident took place at Sealands Pub in Roman Bank, Ingoldmells on Tuesday, July 28.

Video footage shows a family being ushered out of the pub by bouncers, before a fight breaks out in the street and punches are thrown.

Another family then become involved in the argument, before a man takes his top off and another fight breaks out.

One man tells a security guard: "I want him on his own," before warning him 'touch her and I will leather you' when he begins arguing with another woman.

Small children, one in a pushchair, begin crying as the incident takes place.

One small boy shouts at the security guards: "Get the f*** off my dad!"

The video, which has been viewed nearly 350,000 times on Facebook, has also been shared more than 5,500 times since it was posted two days ago.

Other customers at the pub watch on as the argument escalates, with some calling it "disgusting" and "shocking".

The video also shows traffic on Roman Bank being held up as the incident unfolds in the middle of the street.

Lincolnshire Police have been approached for comment.

Lincolnshire Live has attempted to contact Sealands Family Bar about the incident.

Read more here:

Fight breaks out and spills onto the street at family pub in Ingoldmells - Lincolnshire Live

MA Senate to Revise or Redesign Massachusetts Seal and Motto, Passes Bill to Increase Higher Education Opportunities for People with Disabilities and…

Senate Approves Commission to Revise or Redesign Massachusetts Seal and Motto

The Massachusetts State Senate on Tuesday passed legislation that would establish a commission to study and redesign the Massachusetts state seal and motto in an effort to make it more inclusive and historically representational.

The legislation, Resolve establishing a special commission relative to the seal and motto of the commonwealth (S.1877), will create a commission to study the state seal. Many people, particularly members of Native American communities, find the seal offensive and unwittingly harmful, and others feel it perpetuates a misunderstanding of indigenous culture and history. The commission will be tasked with making recommendations for a revised or new seal and motto for the state. The state seal and motto are featured on the Massachusetts flag and other official insignia.

This bill provides a chance to begin a conversation about our history and reimagine what a truly inclusive state seal and motto can look like, stated Senate President Karen E. Spilka (D-Ashland). The Senate will never waiver on its commitment to making our Commonwealth welcoming for all, and so I am proud to see this proposal for a commission to study our seal and motto move forward. I would like to extend my gratitude to the many advocates who have continued to raise this issue, and to Senators Lewis and Comerford for their work and collaboration on this issue.

COVID-19 and Black Lives Matter demonstrate that the social issues of Black, Indigenous, and People of Color are entwined as the collective challenge to social structures solidifies, said Jean-Luc Pierite, President of the North American Indian Center of Boston and a member of the Tunica-Biloxi Tribe of Louisiana. Today's vote in the Massachusetts Senate affirms that we can reconcile the identity of social systems while advocating and establishing needed change.

Our collective symbols of identity matter, and if they marginalize some of our fellow residents and perpetuate harmful stereotypes, they should be replaced, said Senator Jason Lewis (D-Winchester), Senate chair of the Joint Committee on Education and lead sponsor of the resolve. I want to thank former Representative Byron Rushing, former Executive Director of the Massachusetts Commission on Indian Affairs John Slow Turtle Peters, and many other Native advocates and allies for championing this legislation for many years.

Symbols have weight. They have meaning. It's been encouraging to see Confederate symbols coming down across the nation, and yet we in Massachusetts continue to display a symbol that for many expresses the subjugation of Native Americans through violence, said Senator Jo Comerford (D-Northampton), a lead sponsor of the legislation. By passing this legislation, the State Senate is now on the right side of history. Thank you to Senator Jason Lewis, the Senate President, and all of the organizers and towns that have held us accountable. Today, 400 years since the first European Settlement, we have joined together to reject racism, discrimination, and injustice, and in doing so, opened the door to a transformative path forward.

The current state seal, adopted in 1898, prominently features a Native American figure. Historical records show that figure is a composite based on a portrait of a Native American chief from the Chippewa tribe which is primarily located in Montana and the Dakotas, not Massachusetts. Above his head is an arm holding a colonial-era broadsword believed to be the sword of Myles Standish, a Plymouth Colony military commander known in part for killing Native Americans. The Native American holds a downward pointed arrow that has been interpreted as signifying the pacification of the native population.

Indigenous activists in Massachusetts have advocated for decades for a change to the Massachusetts seal, which is viewed by many as racist and over-generalizing. The original version of this bill was filed in 1985 by former State Representative Byron Rushing, a prominent Boston civil rights leader, and has been filed in some form in every session of the Massachusetts Legislature since then.

The commission will include:

Five members appointed by the Commission on Indian Affairs who are descendants of tribes with a historical presence in the commonwealth;Four members appointed by the governor with relevant cultural and historical expertise;The executive director of the Massachusetts Commission on Indian Affairs or a designee;The executive director of the Massachusetts Historical Commission or a designee;The executive director of the Massachusetts Foundation for the Humanities or a designee;The executive director of the Massachusetts Cultural Council or a designee; andThe House and Senate chairs of the Joint Committee on State Administration and Regulatory; Oversight.The commissioners will be appointed within 60 days of the bill becoming law and will make a final report by October 1, 2021.

The legislation now moves to the Massachusetts House of Representatives for consideration.

Senate Passes Bill to Increase Higher Education Opportunities for People with Disabilities, Honoring the 30th Anniversary of the Americans with Disabilities Act

Today, the Massachusetts State Senate passed legislation which removes existing barriers for students with intellectual disabilities, autism spectrum disorders or other developmental disabilities so they can attend public institutions of higher education. The bill, which passed with bipartisan support, honors the spirit of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), which was signed into law 30 years ago this week by President George H.W. Bush.

Under An Act Creating Higher Education Opportunities for Students with Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, students would not be required to pass the MCAS, have a high school diploma, meet minimum requirements for academic courses, or take college entrance exams in order to access inclusive academic, social, and career development opportunities on college campuses with their peers. In addition, the bill also makes clear that strengthening access to higher education for students with disabilities is a goal of the Commonwealth's higher education system.

We have made great strides in Massachusetts to provide inclusive opportunities for persons with disabilities, but there is always more work to be done, said Senate President Karen E. Spilka (D-Ashland). I appreciate the overwhelming support for advancing this bill and look forward to seeing it make its way through the legislative process. I would like to thank Senators Rodrigues, Lovely and Gobi for their attention to this important issue.

As we honor the 30th anniversary of the Americans with Disabilities Act, the Senates passage of this bill today marks another important step towards removing barriers, creating access and opening doors of opportunity and possibility for individuals with disabilities, said Senator Michael J. Rodrigues (D- Westport) Chair, Senate Committee on Ways and Means. I applaud Senator President Spilka for her support and leadership, Senator Lovely for her commitment to this critical issue, and our partnersschool districts and public higher education institutionsfor their collaborative efforts to ensure full inclusion of individuals with disabilities within our Commonwealth.

A little more than thirty years after the Americans with Disabilities Act became U.S. law, I am proud that the Senate has expanded this legacy by passing An Act Creating Higher Education Opportunities for Students with Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, said Senator Joan B. Lovely (D-Salem). Breaking down barriers to higher education for persons with developmental and intellectual disabilities so they can enroll in college courses and participate in extracurricular activities represents a right and long overdue step for young people of all abilities. I am excited to see all of the great changes that will result if this bill becomes law, and am deeply appreciative to Senate President Spilka and Ways & Means Chair Rodrigues for their visionary leadership.

The opportunity to attend one of our many state community colleges, colleges and universities and the further opportunities that creates in life is something that many people strive for. All students deserve that regardless of their abilities, said Senator Anne Gobi (D-Spencer), co-chair of the Joint Committee on Higher Education.

As we celebrate the 30th anniversary of the groundbreaking Americans With Disabilities Act, I commend Senate President Spilka, Chairman Rodrigues, Speaker DeLeo, House Speaker Pro Tempore Haddad and their colleagues in the Legislature for creating opportunities in higher education for students with intellectual and developmental disabilities, said University of Massachusetts President Marty Meehan. This legislation builds on the universitys ongoing efforts to expand access to higher education through innovative programming.

Now, on the 30th anniversary of the ADA, the strongest civil rights law in the nation for people with disabilities, we at the MDSC applaud Senate President Spilka, Chair Rodrigues, Senator Lovely and members of the Massachusetts State Senate for passing Senate Bill S. 2844, which will open doors of opportunity for students with intellectual disabilities to gain access to higher education opportunities in an inclusive college setting, said Maureen Gallagher, Executive Director of the Massachusetts Down Syndrome Congress. For too long, public school options for students with intellectual disabilities transitioning to adulthood have been limited and the passage of this bill removes those existing barriers and ensures that people with intellectual disabilities have access to higher education that will lead to more opportunities for meaningful integrated employment and a fulfilling life in the community.

We are proud that many community colleges are already experienced with inclusive concurrent enrollment programs, and know first-hand that participating students gain life skills and education that increase their ability to live more empowered, independent, and inclusive lives, said Tom Sannicandro, Director of the Massachusetts Association of Community Colleges. This bill creates a life changing opportunity by breaking down barriers to higher education for students with disabilities. We are happy to see the bill move forward to expand this critical program to more students in Massachusetts.

MAC applauds the Senate, our public higher education institutions, and school districts for working together to enact legislation that will remove barriers and provide access, said Julia Landau, Senior Project Director of Mass Advocates for Children. With this bill, persons with intellectual disabilities and autism will be able to participate in college and gain the skills necessary to successfully live and work in the community.

Advocates for Autism of Massachusetts strongly supports Senate passage of S. 2844, to provide college access for individuals with disabilities, said Michael J. Borr, President and Chair of AFAM. This higher education initiative can significantly change the trajectory of life for a young adult with autism. Participating in college courses alongside their peers, provides people with autism needed opportunities for growth and community inclusion. The CDC estimates that 2.21% of adults are diagnosed with autism and approximately 80% are unemployed. Many of these individuals would benefit greatly from the skill sets and much improved employment outcomes that this legislation provides.

Building on the success of the Massachusetts Inclusive Concurrent Enrollment Initiative (MAICEI) grant program, the bill codifies that program, which enables school districts and public institutions of higher education to partner together to offer inclusive concurrent enrollment initiative options for students with disabilities ages 18 to 22. Since 2007, over 1,200 students with disabilities have taken advantage of the opportunity to participate academically and socially in the life of participating colleges in Massachusetts through the MAICEI program.

In response to the challenges facing school districts and public higher education institutions during the COVID-19 pandemic, the Senate bill ensures no additional costs are placed on a school district beyond the existing obligations already required under state and federal special education law.

Furthermore, the bill also ensures that colleges are not required to bear any additional costs of providing individual supports and services for students with severe intellectual disabilities, severe autism spectrum disorders, or other severe developmental disabilities who attend the college through the MACEI initiative.

Finally, the bill delays the implementation of the requirements placed on our school districts and higher education institutions within the bill until the 20212022 school year.

The bill now heads to the Massachusetts House of Representatives.

Statement from Senate President Karen E. Spilka on Extending Session

"The Senate is pleased that the House has agreed with us to extend the session to complete vital legislation and stand ready to act as required by the COVID-19 crisis. This session extension does not affect the urgency of enacting the Reform, Shift + Build Act; I am confident that our colleagues in the House share our commitment to acting on this matter by the end of the week. Senate President Karen E. Spilka (D-Ashland)"

See the original post:

MA Senate to Revise or Redesign Massachusetts Seal and Motto, Passes Bill to Increase Higher Education Opportunities for People with Disabilities and...

Fresh and Naturally Fermented Birch Juice Market Manufacturers Overview 2020-2027 over the Worldwide Regional Analysis of Industry Trends and…

COVID-19 Impact on Global Fresh and Naturally Fermented Birch Juice Market Insights, Forecast to 2027

The Global Fresh and Naturally Fermented Birch Juice Market Research Report Forecast 2020-2027 is a valuable source of insightful data for business strategists. It provides the Fresh and Naturally Fermented Birch Juice industry overview with growth analysis and historical & futuristic cost, revenue, demand and supply data (as applicable). The research analysts provide an elaborate description of the value chain and its distributor analysis. This Fresh and Naturally Fermented Birch Juice market study provides comprehensive data which enhances the understanding, scope and application of this report.

The report also explores the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the segments of the Fresh and Naturally Fermented Birch Juice market and its global scenario. The report analyzes the changing dynamics of the market owing to the pandemic and subsequent regulatory policies and social restrictions. The report also analyses the present and future impact of the pandemic and provides an insight into the post-COVID-19 scenario of the market.

Get Sample Copy of This Report @ https://www.reportsandmarkets.com/sample-request/global-fresh-and-naturally-fermented-birch-juice-market-2020-by-manufacturers-regions-type-and-application-forecast-to-2025?utm_source=primefeed&utm_medium=6

The report further studies potential alliances such as mergers, acquisitions, joint ventures, product launches, collaborations, and partnerships of the key players and new entrants. The report also studies any development in products, R&D advancements, manufacturing updates, and product research undertaken by the companies.

Competitive Landscape:

Fresh and Naturally Fermented Birch Juice market report highlights key players included in the market in order to render a comprehensive view of the competing players existing in the market. Company details, strategies, aptitude, history, cost analysis, and prevalent strategies

The major players covered in Fresh and Naturally Fermented Birch Juice Market @ BelSeva (Belgium),TreeVitalise (UK),Sibberi (UK),Sealand Birk (UK),Treo Brands (USA)

The final report will add the analysis of the Impact of Covid-19 in this report Fresh and Naturally Fermented Birch Juice industry.

Global Fresh and Naturally Fermented Birch Juice Market Research Report 2020 carries in-depth case studies on the various countries which are involved in the Fresh and Naturally Fermented Birch Juice market. The report is segmented according to usage wherever applicable and the report offers all this information for all major countries and associations. It offers an analysis of the technical barriers, other issues, and cost-effectiveness affecting the market. Important contents analyzed and discussed in the report include market size, operation situation, and current & future development trends of the market, market segments, business development, and consumption tendencies. Moreover, the report includes the list of major companies/competitors and their competition data that helps the user to determine their current position in the market and take corrective measures to maintain or increase their share holds.

The report scrutinizes different business approaches and frameworks that pave the way for success in businesses. The report used Porters five techniques for analyzing the Fresh and Naturally Fermented Birch Juice Market; it also offers the examination of the global market. To make the report more potent and easy to understand, it consists of info graphics and diagrams. Furthermore, it has different policies and development plans which are presented in summary. It analyzes the technical barriers, other issues, and cost-effectiveness affecting the market.

The Fresh and Naturally Fermented Birch Juice market research report completely covers the vital statistics of the capacity, production, value, cost/profit, supply/demand import/export, further divided by company and country, and by application/type for best possible updated data representation in the figures, tables, pie chart, and graphs. These data representations provide predictive data regarding the future estimations for convincing market growth. The detailed and comprehensive knowledge about our publishers makes us out of the box in case of market analysis.

The study objectives of this report are:

To study and forecast the market size of Fresh and Naturally Fermented Birch Juice in global market.

To analyze the global key players, SWOT analysis, value and global market share for top players.

To define, describe and forecast the market by type, end use and region.

To analyze and compare the market status and forecast among global major regions.

To analyze the global key regions market potential and advantage, opportunity and challenge, restraints and risks.

To identify significant trends and factors driving or inhibiting the market growth.

To analyze the opportunities in the market for stakeholders by identifying the high growth segments.

To strategically analyze each submarket with respect to individual growth trend and their contribution to the market

To analyze competitive developments such as expansions, agreements, new product launches, and acquisitions in the market.

To strategically profile the key players and comprehensively analyze their growth strategies.

Highlights of the report:

A complete backdrop analysis, which includes an assessment of the parent market

Important changes in market dynamics

Market segmentation up to the second or third level

Historical, current, and projected size of the market from the standpoint of both value and volume

Reporting and evaluation of recent industry developments

Market shares and strategies of key players

Emerging niche segments and regional markets

An objective assessment of the trajectory of the market

Recommendations to companies for strengthening their foothold in the market

Key questions answered in this report

What will the market size be in 2026 and what will the growth rate be?

What are the key market trends?

What is driving this market?

What are the challenges to market growth?

Who are the key vendors in this market space?

What are the market opportunities and threats faced by the key vendors?

What are the strengths and weaknesses of the key vendors?

Make an enquiry @ https://www.reportsandmarkets.com/enquiry/global-fresh-and-naturally-fermented-birch-juice-market-2020-by-manufacturers-regions-type-and-application-forecast-to-2025?utm_source=primefeed&utm_medium=6

Table of Contents

Chapter 1: Global Fresh and Naturally Fermented Birch Juice Market Overview

Chapter 2: Fresh and Naturally Fermented Birch Juice Market Data Analysis

Chapter 3: Fresh and Naturally Fermented Birch Juice Technical Data Analysis

Chapter 4: Fresh and Naturally Fermented Birch Juice Government Policy and News

Chapter 5: Global Fresh and Naturally Fermented Birch Juice Market Manufacturing Process and Cost Structure

Chapter 6: Fresh and Naturally Fermented Birch Juice Productions Supply Sales Demand Market Status and Forecast

Chapter 7: Fresh and Naturally Fermented Birch Juice Key Manufacturers

Chapter 8: Up and Down Stream Industry Analysis

Chapter 9: Marketing Strategy Fresh and Naturally Fermented Birch Juice Analysis

Chapter 10: Fresh and Naturally Fermented Birch Juice Development Trend Analysis

Chapter 11: Global Fresh and Naturally Fermented Birch Juice Market New Project Investment Feasibility Analysis

About Us:

Reports and Markets is not just another company in this domain but is a part of a veteran group called Algoro Research Consultants Pvt. Ltd. It offers premium progressive statistical surveying, market research reports, analysis & forecast data for a wide range of sectors both for the government and private agencies all across the world. The database of the company is updated on a daily basis. Our database contains a variety of industry verticals that include: Food Beverage, Automotive, Chemicals and Energy, IT & Telecom, Consumer, Healthcare, and many more. Each and every report goes through the appropriate research methodology, Checked from the professionals and analysts.

Contact Us:

Sanjay Jain

Manager Partner Relations & International Marketing

http://www.reportsandmarkets.com

Ph: +1-352-353-0818 (US)

See the article here:

Fresh and Naturally Fermented Birch Juice Market Manufacturers Overview 2020-2027 over the Worldwide Regional Analysis of Industry Trends and...

Nutrition Break: Preserve tomatoes for a continuing taste of summer – Grand Island Independent

When those big, plump tomatoes turn from blushing pink to red, its time to think about preserving their goodness for year-round use.

Tomatoes are without a doubt the most widely home-canned product in the United States. To avoid spoilage and the risk of foodborne illness, follow these suggestions:

Canning tomatoes: The natural acidity in tomatoes varies widely because of differences in ripeness, growing conditions, injury or disease on the fruit, and vine conditions. Because of these factors, acid should be added in the form of lemon juice or citric acid to all home canned tomato products. Add 2 tablespoons bottled lemon juice or 1/2 teaspoon pure citric acid per quart of tomatoes. Add 1 tablespoon lemon juice or 1/4 teaspoon citric acid per pint.

Salsa: Most salsa recipes contain a mixture of low-acid foods, such as onions and peppers. Acid, like vinegar or lemon juice must be added to prevent the bacteria from growing. Use only salsa recipes that have been research tested to ensure that they contain enough acid and follow the directions closely.

Freezing tomatoes: Tomatoes are fairly simple to freeze. Wash and dip in boiling water for 30 seconds to loosen skins. Core, peel and freeze whole or in pieces. Pack into containers, leaving 1-inch headspace. Seal and freeze. Use only for cooking or seasoning as tomatoes will not be solid when thawed. Tomato products, such as sauce, puree, ketchup and chili sauce, can also be frozen. Prepare as usual, cool rapidly, pack into rigid containers leaving headspace, and freeze.

Pickling tomatoes: The safety concerns of pickled tomatoes are the same as those for canning tomatoes. When pickling, vinegar is typically added to achieve the necessary acidity. Do not alter vinegar, food or water proportions in a recipe or use vinegar with unknown acidity. Use only recipes with tested proportions of ingredients.

Think safety: Think creatively when planning to preserve tomatoes, but also think safety. There are many tested procedures and recipes available to preserve your tomatoes. Creating your own procedures and recipes could result in a hazardous product.

Here is a safe, tested recipe for salsa.

Wash and rinse pint or half-pint canning jars; keep hot until ready to fill. Prepare lids and ring bands according to manufacturers directions.

To prepare tomatoes: Dip washed tomatoes in boiling water for 30 to 60 seconds or until the skins split. Submerge immediately in cold water. Peel off loosened skins and remove cores. Remove seeds and chop (1/4- to 1/2-inch pieces).

To prepare onions: Peel, wash, core and dice onions (1/4-inch pieces). To prepare bell peppers: Wash and core bell peppers. Remove the seeds and membranes before dicing (1/4-inch pieces).

To prepare hot peppers: Wash and remove stems of hot peppers. Keep or remove as much of the seeds and membranes as you wish, depending on the pepper heat of the salsa that you desire. Dice peppers (1/4-inch pieces).

Combine prepared ingredients in a large pot; add lemon juice and salt. Bring to a boil over medium heat while stirring. Reduce heat and simmer salsa for an additional 3 minutes, stirring as needed to prevent scorching.

Fill the hot salsa into prepared hot jars, leaving 1/2-inch headspace. If needed, remove air bubbles and re-adjust headspace to 1/2-inch. Wipe rims of jars with a clean dampened clean paper towel. Adjust lids and bands.

Process in a boiling water canner for 20 minutes (for an altitude between 1,001 and 6,000 feet).

Let cool, undisturbed, 12 to 24 hours and check for seals.

Recipe from: National Center for Home Food Preservation

Cami Wells is an Extension Educator for Nebraska Extension in Hall County. Contact her at 308-385-5088 or at cwells2@unl.edu. Visit the Hall County website at http://www.hall.unl.edu

Read the original post:

Nutrition Break: Preserve tomatoes for a continuing taste of summer - Grand Island Independent

After J-M, UNC and NFL careers, Siler City’s Eddie Mason gives back through training – The Chatham News + Record

BY CHAPEL FOWLER

News + Record Staff

SILER CITY Eddie Mason was more of a bookworm. But there he was, on the practice field at Jordan-Matthews in the summer of 1986, about to take his first handoff as a high school running back.

And I got my bell rung, Mason said. I mean, seriously. I was like, Dude, I dont want no parts of this.

Dazed from the hit, he looked up and locked eyes with Phil Senter, the Jets head coach.

Just days earlier, Mason, a rising freshman, had been riding his bike around town when Senter saw him and convinced him to try out for the football team. Masons older brother, Bucky, was a star for Jordan-Matthews. But his younger brother had but a year of youth ball experience.

On his first carry, it showed. And Mason felt ready to quit, right then and there, until Senter approached.

Eddie, listen, Senter said. When you get knocked down, get back up. Get back up.

He gave me the next play, a toss to the right, and I took it to the house Mason recalled. It was one of those situations where I didnt look back.

Get knocked down. Get back up. Mason found that to be a common theme as his football career progressed from Jordan-Matthews to the University of North Carolina to the NFL, where he played five years and 80 games as a linebacker, primarily on special teams.

He wouldnt change his path, though, because it brought him to where he is today: happily married with three children, strong in his Christian faith and the owner of MASE Training, a gym in northern Virginia that works out professionals, high schoolers and everyone in between.

You know the saying, he said. You may not win the battle, but you can always win the war if you just keep fighting.

A Siler City native, Mason grew up baling hay, chopping wood and tilling gardens for his grandfather, Walter Cheek, whom he called his greatest motivation to this day.

The chores were a pain then, but Mason later realized they helped him get a boost on strength training: his arms, legs and back got an unintentional workout almost daily.

Although he swears he could have been a better running back, and he also gave defensive back a try, Mason found his niche playing linebacker at Jordan-Matthews. At a lean yet stocky 6 feet and 220 pounds, he earned a reputation for his big hits and a slew of all-conference and all-state honors.

He also caught the eye of UNC coach Mack Brown and defensive coordinator Carl Torbush. So Mason moved a county north in 1990 to play for the Tar Heels. He enjoyed football, but he didnt see it as the end goal as a sociology major, he strived to serve as a Navy SEAL and later work for the CIA or FBI.

I had no desire to go play pro, Mason said. That was not on my radar.

He kept that plan in mind through his time at UNC, as he redshirted, spent two years as a reserve and started as a junior and senior in a hybrid linebacker/safety position for the Tar Heels. But his final game for UNC the 1994 Sun Bowl gave him a timely boost.

In a 35-31 loss to Texas, Mason finished with eight tackles, an interception and two pass break-ups. Four months later, the Jets drafted him 178th overall in the 1995 NFL Draft.

God did that, man, Mason said. Honestly. How do you go from being a special teams guy to having a pretty good senior campaign and then get drafted in the sixth round? Thats stuff out of a movie.

He logged 25 tackles as a rookie, all on kickoff and punt coverage, and was named the Jets special teams MVP. But a season-ending injury in 1996 training camp sent him on a three-year drought he was teaching fourth graders at Windsor Park Elementary in Charlotte when the Jacksonville Jaguars called in 1998.

Mason spent his last four years, all productive, with the Washington football team, formerly known as the Redskins, in an area he now calls home. He retired in 2003 and established MASE Training in Sterling, Virginia, the same year.

Workdays begin at 6 a.m. Masons always up by 5 a.m., if not earlier and before coronavirus-induced restrictions, he and his staff would work out 20 to 25 people an hour. A guided tour, conducted by Mason over Zoom, reveals saunas and squat racks and high-speed treadmills and weights galore.

This right here is where Id put you through the ringer, he said with a laugh, turning his iPhone camera to 50 yards worth of indoor turf tucked into one of the corners.

MASE Training, which Mason runs with Sonya, his wife of 23 years, is his way to give back to the same the football community that invested so much in good times and bad, as hes quick to note.

Senter, his coach at Jordan-Matthews, didnt give up on Mason through his various high school slip-ups. Brown, his coach at UNC who recently described Mason as like an adopted son, taught him etiquette and relationship tips in the 1990s he still uses today.

And so many others, he said, have helped along the way like former NFL coach Tony Dungy, who spoke with Mason during a very bad time in my life and later endorsed Masons 2015 book, Training for the Tough Game of Life.

As much as so many coaches and people have poured into me, I would be far remiss if I didnt pour into that same community, Mason said. You feel not an obligation but a calling to do it.

Reporter Chapel Fowler can be reached at cfowler@chathamnr.com or on Twitter at @chapelfowler.

More here:

After J-M, UNC and NFL careers, Siler City's Eddie Mason gives back through training - The Chatham News + Record

Pidilite shareholders are paying the price for the real estate slowdown weak pre-monsoon sales to drag reven – Business Insider India

However, it wasnt the same this year. The company owns 70% of the market share in the waterproofing segment, and it saw a huge revenue decline during the nationwide lockdown, as its services are not included under the essential item lists. And, even as states began unlocking in phases, the pessimism around allowing carpenters, painters and plumbers into houses has kept demand under constraint and is expected to impact the companys sales larger than ever before.

With COVID hitting peoples pockets, analysts think home renovation is not going to be on peoples minds anytime soon. And, with high real estate prices, buying a new house is out of the question. That is the reason Pidilites shares have declined nearly 3% since the beginning of the first quarter, till date.

Advertisement

According to various analysts reports, the company is slated to see a revenue decline of almost 64%.

Advertisement

Advertisement

Investors wait for management commentary However, the management is siding more in favour of caution than hope. These low levels of prices are not going to benefit Pidilite for long-time, but in the short term, there will be gains which will accrue to them, the company told analysts.

Reading June sales and extrapolating it could be misleading, as there is pent-up demand which may be coming through. This is especially true for categories like waterproofing where remedial work is happening just before the monsoon season begins, the company told analysts.Advertisement

See the original post:

Pidilite shareholders are paying the price for the real estate slowdown weak pre-monsoon sales to drag reven - Business Insider India

[WATCH]: Tips on creating a sustainable business – Bizcommunity.com

Recent years have seen a rise in sustainable business practices as people become increasingly aware of their impact on the planet. In the past, sustainability was seen as a "nice to have" or providing a competitive edge to a brand. Today it has become an expected part of the way in which businesses are expected to operate.

The Sustainable Design episode discussed sustainability as the new currency of business and a driver of open and transparent business practices. Here the panel, made up of respected experts on the topic, discussed ways to build a successful brand with sustainability in mind.

Their discussions culminated in a number of insights, with four key tips being shared to help businesses build an environmentally and socially responsible brand.

Create something that serves a purpose, he explains. Sustainability should be the base ingredient and interwoven into the brand DNA, however it has to be functional and look good too.

Davis Ndungu, founder of Recycled Flip Flop Sculptures, is a great example of this. Davis started out his career as an artist using wood as a medium. However, when wood became too expensive, he had to seek out alternative low-cost materials. He started gathering old discarded flip flops, turning them into beautiful animal sculptures.

In times of crisis there are always opportunities, explains Davis. Follow your gut and create something that you believe in. Keep the end user in mind, but dont create something just because you think it will sell.

For example, Jasper credits the success of Sealand Gear to the fact that they remained true to their original brand values, which were developed five years earlier. According to him, a successful brand needs to have a strong story to tell. He recommends that businesses should have a thorough understanding of their business identity and core values and not to lose sight of who they are and what defines them,

Alexis Grosskopf, Co-founder of OceanHub Africa, a platform for ocean-conscious entrepreneurs, notes that, because sustainable business practices have become expected as standard, there are no longer grants to assist start-ups based purely on these principles However, he claims that making these principles core to a brands purpose and operations, adds value to its overall story and identity, which will help to draw in private investors.

What the episode:

Link:

[WATCH]: Tips on creating a sustainable business - Bizcommunity.com

Large Cavities Between Glass Panes by Pressure-equalized IGU – Glass on Web

Conventional insulating glass units (IGUs) are made of several sheets of glass separated by spacers and sealed hermetically around the edges. The cavity between panes is usually filled with argon. The seal keeps the ingress of moisture into the cavity low to prevent water condensing on the inside surfaces of the glass panes and to avoid any corrosion of metallic low-e coatings. Further, the seal prevents the fill gas from escaping.

There is a major drawback associated with this design: an exchange of gas or air between the cavity and the atmosphere is impossible. Thus, whenever the temperature in the cavity or the external air pressure changes, the pressure in the cavity changes as well. This causes the panes to bulge inwards or out, inducing flexural stresses in them. The edge seal is subjected to compressive or tensile loads. (Figure 1) Further, moveable solar shading devices integrated in the IGU might get trapped and damaged by panes bulging inwards.

Atmospheric effects as described above increase with format and inter-pane spacing (Figure 2). Thus, the overall depth of conventional IGUs has to be restricted to avoid any damage caused by changes in air pressure or temperature. Such restrictions would not be necessary if pressure equalization betweenthe IGU cavity and the atmosphere could be achieved permanently.

So, the advantages of permanent pressure equalization are:

No restrictions anymore on interpanespacing, and thus, Simplified integration of various components into the IGU, e.g. solar shading systems Implementation of IGUs with more than three panes without substantial restrictions on the inter-pane spacing Larger overall depth, and thus, less thermal bridging at the connection to the supporting structure Reduced heat transfer coefficient compared to conventional double and triple glazing Improved airborne sound insulation (increases with inter-pane spacing) Use of thinner glass panes possible.

The simplest way forward to achieve pressure equalization would be a large enough opening in the edge seal of an IGU. It could provide for complete pressure equalization between the cavity and the atmosphere, however, at the cost of a large volume flow of air between cavity and atmosphere (and vice versa) whenever the cavity temperature or the atmospheric air pressure change.

Fresh air flowing into the cavity transports humidity from the atmosphere into the cavity. The moisture is being absorbed by the desiccant in the spacer until it is saturated. Then, condensation of water on the inner glas surfaces and corrosion of low-e coatings would follow. The durability ofan IGU would be reduced to merely a few years.

A restriction of the air flow is necessary, at the expense of a reduced degree of pressure equalization. A balance between pressure equalization and moisture uptake has to be found.

There are two ways, in principle, to achieve a restriction of the air flow:

3.1 Principles of the model

Within the framework of a research project [1], ift Rosenheim has developed a calculation model which simulates the behaviour of a permanently pressure-equalized IGU with respect to the degree of pressure equalization and moisture uptake.

Hourly weather data (temperature, solar irradiation, atmospheric pressure, atmospheric humidity) and parameters of the IGU (design, size, absorption characteristics) as well as parameters of the capillary tube or the valves are the input parameters to the model.

The model calculates the deflection of the glass panes, the related flexural stress in the panes and the moisture uptake due to the volume flow of air through the capillary tube or the valves, respectively. Diffusion processes through the edge seal or within a capillary tube are not represented in the model.

An iterative process yields suitable capillary tube parameters (inner diameter, length) or valve parameters (inlet and outlet pressure), in order to reach a balance between pressure equalization and moisture uptake of the IGU.

3.2 Example calculations

Figure 4 illustrates the pressure equalization by capillary tube and valves for the location Rosenheim as determined with the calculation model. The pane deflection is shown as a function of time. The x-axis displays the hours of one year, from 00:00 am on 1 January until 12:00 pm on 31 December. A positive value on the y-axis means outward bulging of the panes while a negative value means inward bulging of the panes.

The blue curve represents a hermetically sealed IGU. The curve follows the average daily temperature throughout the year. So, the panes bulge inwards during winter (because the temperature is lower than during the manufacturing of the IGU), and they bulge outwards during summer (because it is warmer than during the manufacturing). Further, the curve follows the dailytemperature changes. (Normal variations of the atmospheric pressure have only a relatively small effect on IGUs in comparison to daily and seasonal temperature changes.)

The red curve represents an IGU pressureequalized via a capillary tube. The curve does not show any seasonal changes, and the daily amplitude is smaller than that of the blue curve. Both effects are due to the partial pressure relief caused by the volume flow of air through the capillary tube.

A curve for a pressure equalization via valves (green) is only shown in the detail of Figure 4b as it would partly cover up the blue and the red curve in Figure 4a. The valve parameters in this model calculation were set, so that the degree of pressure equalization would be similar to that caused by the chosen capillary tube. Typical for the effect of valves are the plateaus of constant deflection (here at about 2.2mm).

This is when one of the valves is open, and air is flowing freely through it.

The results of model calculations for three locations with different climates are presented Table 1. Capillary tube and valve parameters were chosen so that the degree of pressure equalization was similar in all three cases. The values in the table indicate the moisture uptake due to the volume flow of air through the capillary tube or the valves, respectively. Permeation/diffusion through the edge seal and capillary tube are not considered in the model calculations.

There is a strong effect of the climate on the moisture uptake. For example, in Singapore about three-times as much moisture is getting into the cavity than in Rosenheim.

Further, IGU with valves show a considerably lower moisture uptake than those with a capillary tube. This is because for long periods, while the pressure in the cavity is between the setpoints of the two valves, the cavity is practically sealed. There is no exchange of air with the atmosphere.

EN 1279-3 Gas leakage [2]: Permanently pressure-equalized IGUs cannot be filled with argon or a similar gas as they are basically open to the atmosphere. A gas filling would escape within a few weeks. Therefore, a gas leakage test is not applicable.

EN 1279-2 Water penetration [3]: Conventional (hermetically sealed) IGUs absorb moisture via permeation/diffusion through the edge seal. The water penetration test of EN 1279-2 is designed to provide good conditions for this: a small specimen format to create high loads on the edge seal, a high concentration gradient between the cavity and the test chamber and last but not least a high test temperature. The evaluation of the EN 1279-2 test is based on many years of experience: If an IGU design passes the test, real-life IGUs will usually reach a durability of about 25 years and more.

For permanently pressure-equalized IGUs the situation is completely different. The main mechanism of moisture uptake is the volume flow of air due to changes in temperature or air pressure. If temperature and air pressure are constant, there is no volume flow. And the contribution of diffusion through the edge seal might be reduced as well because, after the pressure has equalized, there is no load on the edge seal which could potentially open up any flaws in the edge seal and favour diffusion through such flaws.

Further, no experience exists concerning the relation between EN 1279-2 test results and the real-life durability of permantly pressureequalized IGUs. So, passing the test does not say anything about real life durability.

Therefore, a water penetration test according to EN 1279-2 is not appicable to pressureequalized IGUs and even meaningless.

Large cavities in IGUs can be realized by applying pressure equalization.

The degree of pressure equalization has to be balanced against the moisture uptake to ensure a sufficient durability of the IGU.

Capillary tubes haven proven theoretically as well as experimentally to be suitable means to achieve pressure equalization.

Valves are theoretically very promising, however, suitable valves could not be found yet. Development work might be necessary.

There is no general solution. Capillary tube parameters and valve parameters have to be chosen depending on IGU format, construction and energetic absorption properties as well as the particular climatic loading.

[1] Rose, A., Sack N.Untersuchungen zur Umsetzbarkeit von druckentspanntem Mehrscheiben-Isolierglas(Pressure-equalized insulating glass units a feasibility study)Research reportift Rosenheim 2015

[2] DIN EN 1279Glas im Bauwesen Mehrscheiben-Isolierglas Glass in building Insulating glass unitsBeuth Verlag GmbH, Berlin

Original post:

Large Cavities Between Glass Panes by Pressure-equalized IGU - Glass on Web

Heres How We Remake the Economy – Common Dreams

It has been several weeks since Valerie suffered a nightmare. After falling asleep, instead of suddenly finding herself at a grocery store checkout counter with no money, as happened so often in the past, or under arrest for crossing state lines to find shelter with her children, she has dreamt simply of flying, traveling, being alone in quiet fields, and reading.

Last month, Valerie caught up on her electric bill. She paid off some debt, tipped generously for grocery delivery and, for the first time in six years, deposited money into a savings account. In June, she gave her son the best birthday of his life, sparing no expense for a dart board, an indoor mini-trampoline, a box of kinetic sand, and Lego Minifigures for him and his brother.

At age 48 and recently divorced, Valerie, who wished to remain anonymous for this article, is raising her two sons alone on a declared income of $19,270 per year in a small city in the Mid-Hudson Valley, one hour north of New York City. She is one of some 39 million people in the United States who lost their livelihoods to the Covid-19 pandemic this spring. She could afford her expenses and the gifts for her children because the federal government did something rare and wonderful: In response to mass unemployment caused by the pandemic, it gave those who lost their jobs an additional $600 in weekly financial support to stay home and help them cover living expenses.

This week, however, the four-month period of Federal Pandemic Unemployment Compensation stipulated in the CARES Act (Coronavirus Aid, Relief and Economic Security) will expire and those payments will stop. Republican lawmakers have publicly considered reducing the benefits to between $200 and $400 per week, and sending another round of $1,200 stimulus checks to taxpayers. But Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell has shown no urgency for people like Valerie, who stand to lose between 50 and 85 percent of their income.

I have no idea what Im going to do, she told me over the phone in mid-July. Im terrified to start cleaning AirBnBs again. I dont really have the energy and Im nervous to be in spaces where people from New York City have been. Im scared to bring the virus home to my children.

Valerie does not have to imagine what it is like to contract COVID-19. Though she was careful to keep her distance from people, to wash her hands and avoid touching her face, she says she caught the virus somehow in April. As she waited to recover, her boys, ages 11 and 12 took care of their mother and each other. Her generosity on her sons birthday was also a thank-you to both of them for stepping up when she could not maintain their home and her future was uncertain.

My 12-year-old cooked and took care of the cleaning as best he could, she said. He kept us afloat. Children shouldnt have to take on that kind of responsibility, but they did. They were terrified and they never let it show until after I was well.

Twelve years ago, Valerie quit her job in IBMs intellectual assets and property division to take care of her first child, who was born with autism and four genetic diseases, three of which are shared by his younger brother. The boys can have allergic reactions to perfume and their own sweat, she says. Valerie homeschools the boys and spends between five and six hours each day preparing food that will not hurt them. She regularly monitors them for reddened lips and other indications that a kind of silent anaphylaxis is underway in their bodies.

The boys know that their circumstances are fragile. Since the pandemic began, they have had nightmares that they did not have before, including about the end of the world.

Theyre the healthiest kids that doctors who treat these disorders have ever seen, so Im doing something right, she beamed proudly. Im constantly looking out, but now I havent worked a proper job since 2007, so Im basically unemployable.

The boys know that their circumstances are fragile. Since the pandemic began, they have had nightmares that they did not have before, Valerie says, including about the end of the world.

My big guys not talking to me as much, Valerie said. He says: There are some things I need to keep just for me and I completely agree with that. My little one has never been terribly articulate verbally, but hes more emotional and needy. Hes requesting to spend a lot more time cuddling and reading, and pretending to fall a lot. Its just not like him to do that.

Valerie lives in one of many places in the United States where people have self-organized in beautiful mutual aid operations to help each other survive through the pandemic. She has called upon the group to get deliveries of prescription medications, medical supplies and health services, but before the pandemic, she rarely sought help from her neighbors.

I dont bother people, she said. I just figure that everyone is going through their own shitshow and I try to get through every day as best I can. When she really needs someone to talk to, she calls her father, an incredibly bright, intuitive and insightful retired blue-collar worker who lives in the Midwest and whom her boys adore. Custody rules prevent her from traveling the distance that would be required to live with him or her sister, hence her recurring nightmares about getting arrested for crossing state lines.

In the absence of a safe way to work and earn money, Valerie and her boys need the weekly $600 federal payments or some large portion of them to be renewed in order to survive.

I dont think theres a hope in hell of it happening, she said. But I do think that they should extend it to at least the end of January 2021. Im not up on all the proposals for what could happen. I skim the news very gently and from very specific sources. I think they should give everyone a universal income; $40,000 is an insane cap that I saw being thrown around randomly, but in New York thats nothing. Especially for single family households. I would like to see our tax money going towards supporting people to be able to make choices about savings, and not having to panic with a calculator at the grocery store. Or to be able to treat their kids to something in these extraordinary times.

I have to think theyre completely out of touch and not actual demons. Because it feels like they might be demons.

The kids should not be going back to school, she continued. I cant even go to the Social Security Administration office and get the name on my Social Security card changed back to my maiden name. I thought, I must be able to do this. The bars are open. But I cant. Theyre not letting us have access to Social Security Administration employees for urgent business because theyre protecting those employees. But theyll send children back to school like sacrificial lambs so the parent worker bees can work again and make the gazillionaires richer. Its appalling.

I have to think that these politicians dont understand the implications of their actions because theyre of such privilege at this point, she concluded. Theyve been making over $100,000 a year and getting kickbacks from everywhere, and they have great jobs lined up for after their time in Congress. I have to think theyre completely out of touch and not actual demons. Because it feels like they might be demons.

In late March, shortly after the pandemic erupted in the United States, my friend Peter Frase published an article in Jacobin warning that the bipartisan ruling elite would sooner sacrifice the lives of working people than allow a government response to the pandemic to diminish their power to profit. Four months later, the Trump administration has not just failed to end the pandemic; rates of COVID-19 infection and deaths are spiking as states and businesses reopen and close again, and frightened, vulnerable people are being forced back to work.

In addition to helping people pay their bills and stay safe by staying home, the $600 weekly Federal Pandemic Unemployment Compensation has been a lifeline for U.S. businesses too. Consumer spending the cash we spend on food, energy, entertainment and tchotchkes, etc. is a key driver of the nations economy. For every three dollars consumers spent before the pandemic erupted, they spent just two dollars under lockdown. Corporations and businesses panicked and the government took action. It passed the CARES Act, which among other things simply put cash into the hands of tens of millions of jobless people. By late June, consumer spending returned to within a few points of pre-pandemic levels. (Predictably, poorer people who must spend their money to stay alive are spending closer to pre-pandemic levels than wealthier people.)

As a general stimulus then, the $600 weekly pandemic unemployment payments were not just a lifeline to people in need. They kept businesses afloat as people spent their benefits into the economy.

With characteristic cruelty, Republicans tried to prevent these benefits from reaching unemployed people. As if the fabric of society were not coming apart, Republican Senator Lindsey Graham complained that modestly high unemployment payments would give people the freedom to refuse to report to life-threatening jobs in exchange for poor wages, and called for the payments to be reduced. Ignoring the fact that unemployment laws prevent people from collecting benefits if they turn down a job because of low pay, Grahamlater rationalized:If you pay someone $23 an hour not to work, theyre going to take you up on it You shouldnt be paid more in unemployment than you do at work.

But Senator Bernie Sanders fought for the unemployed, using his bully pulpit to publicly shame Republicans like Graham and threatening to halt passage of the CARES Act. Business owners and capitalists can thank the socialist for their recovered revenue.

Instead of preserving this vital support, the Trump administration and the conservatives in Congress are ready to pull it out from underneath people and businesses that are barely standing. The economy going back into recession is likely if we cold-turkey cut the extra unemployment insurance benefits, Moodys Analytics Chief Economist Mark Zandi told Fortune in late June. Additionally, conservative politicians and pundits are whining over some kind of imagined unfairness because two-thirds of the 25 million people receiving the $600 weekly payments are getting more money than their employers paid them 34 percent more, on median. (Personal income rose [more than] 9 percent in April and May from a year earlier, wrote the economics analyst Doug Henwood.)

These politicians are pissed that the unemployment program is actually helping people in need. And its not just Republicans who are the problem. In Colorado, Democratic Governor Jared Polis justified his decision to allow landlords to evict jobless people during the pandemic by simply asserting that, People should generally be back at work and earning money despite the fact that unemployment is rising in the state.

Conservatives are not just seeking to slash unemployment benefits. They are also working to shield employers from the threat of lawsuitsfiled by workers who get sick with Covid-19. Two Congressional Progressive Caucus staffers warned that the new policy would make it nearly impossible to sue corporations for Covid-19-related legal claims by workers [and] give employers a free pass to flout worker safety laws.

Being unemployed is not simply a vacation, free of onerous requirements, legal hazard and threats of punishment from the state. As the journalist David Sirota wrote recently, jobless workers can be harshly sanctioned for trying to collect benefits if they dare turn down any job, no matter how poorly paid or dangerous. In many cases, unemployment systems are now set up to deny benefits at every opportunity, says Michele Evermore of the National Employment Law Institute with the rate of erroneous benefit denials nearly doubling over the past decade.

According to Michigan Public Radio, Michigans automated computer system falsely accused more than 40,000 people of fraudulently claiming unemployment benefits between 2013 and 2015. After Republicans took control of the state in 2011, people accused of collecting benefits after refusing a job offer can be forced to repay four times the amount of money they received, plus 12 percent interest.

The chief scholarly justification for ending the payments comes from a trio of University of Chicago economists academics who decided that the most important contribution they could make to the general welfare in this time of danger was to scrutinize the amount of money being used to help poor people. Claiming twice in their May paper that they take no stand on how much support the involuntarily jobless should receive, they nonetheless provided anti-worker politicians and pundits with academic cover to lecture the public as if the main problem with the governments pandemic-economic response is that poor people have a little money with which to make their lives tolerable.

By contrast, these servants of the rich are not motivated to quibble with the hundreds of billions of dollars that the CARES Act shoveled toward corporations, millionaires and billionaires; nor do they question the Federal Reserves policy of providing incessant support to Wall Street but not working people and the institutions that benefit them.

To defend the $600 unemployment payments as both morally and economically necessary is not to suggest that the CARES Act is a sufficient solution to our economic problems. Nor, says Pavlina Tcherneva, Associate Professor of Economics at Bard College and a Research Scholar at the Levy Economics Institute and advisor to Bernie Sanderss 2016 presidential campaign, is the Democratic-led HEROES Act, which would extend the payments through January 2021 if Senate Republicans and the Trump administration would support it

What is happening to Valerie and tens of millions of other people fired, laid off or losing benefits, healthcare or housingis not simply natural it is the predictable and preventable consequence of established government policy. Alternatives are known, and working people, organizers, activists and voters must discover them and force them upon politicians and government if society and life are not to further deteriorate under pressure from the pandemic, a rigged economy and worsening, generalized fear.

Dr. Tcherneva studies the impact of unemployment on growth, income inequality and public health, and saving people from the hardship that awaits Valerie is the focus of her work. In The Case for a Job Guarantee, which she published this summer, Tcherneva explains how the federal government could provide a living-wage job to anyone who wants one.

What follows is an edited transcript of our conversation about what the pandemic unemployment payments meant for the economy and how the United States could enact a Job Guarantee.

Everybody is focused on how the unemployment insurance program is providing greater income for a lot of people, and the debate is whether we should retain it or not. But the real problem is not unemployment insurance. The real problem is the low wages in our economy. The fundamental issue is jobs and how poorly paid they are.

SCROLL TO CONTINUE WITH CONTENT

Get our best delivered to your inbox.

Roughly half the workers in the United States earn less than $15 an hour. That is a very, very low level of income generation. The floor is really rock bottom. Unemployment insurance is inadequate and the job losses already caused by the pandemic would cause additional layoffs and other ripple effects. Im talking about bankruptcies, people not being able to pay their bills, storefronts shuttering, etc.

To stop these things from happening the government decided to use this one-time boost of $600 weekly payments, and it was the right thing to do. Its a really good policy. In fact, it tipped the scales toward the least advantaged workers! Thats a benefit, not a shortcoming. You have to appreciate that the market is already so skewed and that we already have such runaway inequality, so using the average workers income to calculate how much we should give to each unemployed worker as a supplement was a tiny rebalancing. I dont want to oversell it. The federal unemployment insurance is really just a Band-Aid, a patch.

Okay. So now we have to decide what to do next. The major proposals are problematic.

First, Democrats want to renew the unemployment insurance boost. Thats all well and good. But they dont really have anything else to offer. Remembering that the real issue is jobs and wages, lets think back to the Great Depression. FDR put a minimum wage in place and a few years later Truman doubled it. This is the sort of thing we have to think about doing now. If our federal minimum wage is $7.25 per hour, we have to at least double it to $15 per hour. But thats still not going to be enough. Well still have mass unemployment. So we need a policy that creates jobs. Democrats should defend continued unemployment insurance, but they have to offer something else as well.

FDR put a minimum wage in place and a few years later Truman doubled it. This is the sort of thing we have to think about doing now.

Now, Republicans on the other hand insist that we have to remove the unemployment payments because they disincentivize people from working. This, of course, is a cruel way of dealing with mass unemployment. It says: Lets just take away the little support that folks have so that they can go out and look for jobs that arent there. It doesnt matter how many incentives they try to create or how much they attempt to flog people into submission: People wont find jobs that arent there and the jobs that are there wont be well-paid.

Yes. They say the distribution of payments is problematic. They imply that the program is more unequal because lower-income folks are getting a little bit more money. But they dont recognize that income today is already extremely skewed to the top. You cant argue that the program unfairly distributes income without recognizing that the economy has been distributing income unfairly for a very long time.

I think its disingenuous when economists pretend that they dont have a moral position. Several times in that paper the authors claim: We take no stand on how one should weigh these pros and cons. Of course they take a stand! Their stand is the following: These payments create moral hazard, which is economist-speak for they would make people lazy, they would discourage them from working. This is a value judgment. Calling unemployment insurance a disincentive is a moral claim, not an economic claim. These people are fighting for their survival. If you suddenly get $600 more every week and youre able to pay your mortgage and youre not defaulting on your credit card, thats an aid in your fight for survival. These are the kinds of blinders that I think really need to be exposed. Economists pretend to have a neutral way of talking about issues. But moral claims and assumptions underlie every one of our models, and we have to expose them.

Right. But you dont have to be an expert to understand this. A lot of folks are saying that unemployment insurance is bad because it gives people more money. This has become a conventional talking point. You can look at this on the surface and say, Hey! Somebody is getting more money than they got before! It feels unfair on its face, I guess. But if you drill deeper and ask why, well then you can see that an extra $600 per week is not that much money. Just compare that to what rent costs each month in New York City. The $300 average that people normally get from state unemployment programs is not replacement income. Its not nearly adequate. If the $600 per week extra puts some people on top, then that really exposes how poorly some people are getting paid. Like I said before, less than half of American workers make roughly $15 per hour. And a whole lot of them earn even less.

Even if you dont approach the issue of unemployment payments from the cruel perspective, even if you approach it from the desire to help people, we still have to drill deeper. At the individual level, there are real consequences to these programs. For employers, too. And we cant overlook them.

For instance, I have a friend who manages a gym. He told me: I have to reopen the business and need to figure out who to bring back from the furloughed workers. On the one hand, I dont want to bring some workers back who were paid so little because theyll lose the $600 per week. But if I dont bring them back, then theyll become permanently laid off. I cant reopen my business with 100 percent staff capacity.

So, someones going to get cut, and its the low wage-folks. And they will become the long-term unemployed who have the hardest time getting jobs afterwards. There is a Catch-22 here: Low-income folks might not want to go back to work because right now they can have the $600 extra. But if they want to go back to work, say at the end of this yeardepending on when their benefits endthe economy wont bounce back to create enough jobs by then, and they will become the long-term unemployed and face higher barriers to re-enter the workforce.

We want to raise wages, but from the perspective of a business owner, theyre operating on razor-thin margins. Many businesses simply cant afford to pay double wages or match the benefits of the person who doesnt want to come in. On the other hand, there are so many unemployed people that, if employers want to hire, there will be many more people desperate for those few jobs, and firms will not feel the pressure to offer better pay.

What most people probably dont realize is that the government is essentially supporting the economy almost in its entirety. The CARES Act was $2.2 trillion. It was distributed very inequitably, but it was an enormous chunk: 10 percent of our economy. The private sector is on life support because the government is supporting it. The Federal Reserve is providing loans. Congress is appropriating more loans. And theres unemployment insurance. Theres going to be spending on COVID and crisis control. But theyre doing it in a way that props up a very unequal system, a system that is going to endure mass unemployment and mass devastation. When we shake off our phobia about spending, then we can start to ask better questions, starting with the question of what the government should spend its money on.

During the Great Depression, the U.S. rethought the foundations of the economy with the New Deal. We committed to stronger wages, stronger employment, better working conditions and stronger protections for workers. Today, the economy does not provide comparable economic security. We dont have universal healthcare amid a pandemic. In fact, millions of people who had health insurance lost it because it was tied to their jobs!

When we shake off our phobia about spending, then we can start to ask better questions, starting with the question of what the government should spend its money on.

So there is much to do. But we need to keep our eye on the ball abundant and better-paid jobs. I would like to see the government create big and bold investment and employment programs to address all the neglect in our communities, including improving our infrastructure and greening the economy. To me, the Green New Deal is the clearest articulation of what the future society should look like. It rebalances how we produce things. It focuses on local sustainable practices. It has a social component, which means were not going to just allow people to live in weatherized homes, were actually going to ensure that every person has a home; its not going to be a world of homelessness with some solar panels. The government will be spending enormous resources to deal with this crisis. We can choose to use those resources to pursue a green agenda that restructures both our economy and society and provides the employment security and jobs that we need right now.

So, I work on the federal Job Guarantee. For me that is a critical piece of the employment safety net. If youre an unemployed person, you will go into a public employment office and get a public service job. We will help you find work in your community. The Job Guarantee is a critical safety net and a critical component of the Green New Deal, which ensures that if we pursue this new world, everybody will have a place in it. We wont leave behind people in mining communities and towns dependent on fossil fuel extraction. Well clean up and rebuild our communities.

Contrary to what some politicians and private employers say, people want to work. But the private sector doesnt provide adequate jobs. So, the Job Guarantee steps in to fill the void.

Say youve been a stay-at-home parent for a long time now. Your kids are off to college and you want paid work. But where do you start? Your resume is blank. You could do some good community work locally through the Job Guarantee. In reality, people already organize themselves to work. In the mutual aid groups that have emerged in the pandemic, people are already doing work on the ground to address their communitys needs. You can make that the engine of job creation for the Job Guarantee. And the nature of work the forces that motivate it are fundamentally different from most of the jobs we have now. In the private sector, the profit motive ensures cost-cutting and leads to precarious pay and working conditions. With the Job Guarantee, the terms on which work is offered is for public purpose and the public good.

Now, lets step back. The Job Guarantee might sound daunting. The obstacles might seem insurmountable given todays politics. We are dealing so poorly with COVID, let alone other crises. But the thing is that nearly 100 years ago, in the midst of really desperate times during the Great Depression, we rethought the purpose of government in radical ways. This took leadership. I dont know if were going to get it now or if well have to wait longer, but this is the kind of moment were living through. It calls for the same kind of re-thinking and bold action.

I dont have a crystal ball to know what will happen, but I keep thinking of the years that led up to the New Deal. This kind of rethinking, activism and work on the ground was thriving for decades before FDR was elected president. From the early 1900s, even the late 1800s, this push for better working conditions was strong, it came from many corners of civil society and the work coalesced. Now, we have environmental problems and its a crisis that will only get worse. I see people once again challenging conventional wisdom.

I thought 2008 might be the moment to transform government policy and remedy the inequities in our economy. But our failure to do that has brought us here, more unprepared to tackle this crisis and the hardships it will bring. Simultaneously, rightwing governments are seizing on the economic pain. We need democratic solutions and hopefully we wont miss this chance.

There are many different versions of the UBI, so we really need to be very careful of what were talking about. I object to the UBI that just gives everybody $30,000 or $35,000 per year, rich or poor. Now, there are people who cannot work and should not work, and they need basic income. Thats different from UBI. In the Green New Deal and the Job Guarantee, there is income support for those who should not be working. If youre a student, for example, tuition-free college is a type of basic income. If we have universal healthcare, thats a kind of basic income.

In my Job Guarantee proposal, I argue that it should be coupled with universal childcare and universal child allowance, along with basic income support for veterans or people with disabilities. The point is that the income is targeted to the specific dimension of insecurity that a person is experiencing.

Silicon Valley advocates of UBI, not to mention rightwing supporters, are pushing it as a replacement for the existing safety net. Andrew Yang explicitly funds his $1,000 per month Freedom Dividend by having recipients opt out of Social Security! This should worry people very, very much. To me, UBI is a Trojan Horse and a false promise. It says, Ill just give you income. Go out and find affordable rent. Go find affordable childcare. People who have decent salaries today already cant find these things!

So UBI does not solve these other problems that we face. It always resonates more with upper middle class individuals. Working folks who are juggling two or three jobs want to work, and they want stable, good work. But the hate mail I get is usually from some college-educated person who tells me: I would like to spend my life gardening. Why are you against universal basic income? And Im thinking, Well, I dont want to lose our hard-fought-for social safety net, and I want an economy that provides jobs for those who want them.

To me, [Universal Basic Income] is a Trojan Horse and a false promise. It says, Ill just give you income. Go out and find affordable rent. Go find affordable childcare. People who have decent salaries today already cant find these things!

I think weve been doing a pretty good job of debunking the myth that the government cant afford these programs. Remember, in response to COVID we passed an enormous budget overnight. We did the same thing during the 2008 financial crisis. In these moments of crisis, the government musters the public resources, the fiscal power, and they pass a budget. I think we should always reject the question of But how we will pay for it? It is quite clear that when a policy is a priority, there is no problem funding it.

So first we must recognize that the federal government is self-funding. It already has the financial resources. It pays for the Job Guarantee or the Green New Deal the way it pays for everything else: by appropriating budgets which the Treasury and the Federal Reserve coordinate to fund. Unlike state governments, the federal government does not depend on tax revenue to spend. It is the issuer of currency. It has a public monopoly, and if you have the monopoly on issuing dollars, how can you possibly run out of them? Most people just dont focus on this very basic fact of life. The government issues the dollar, and every expenditure it appropriates through Congress results in an injection of new dollars into the economy. Tax payments represent the retrieval of those dollars. Taxes are not a funding mechanism.

So think of it like this: Votes fund programs. As long as you can muster up the votes, then the sovereign monetary institutions of the government the Treasury and the Federal Reserve coordinate to make all payments. Again, the government will be paying for the crisis one way or another. The question is: Will it spend and use resources in reaction to mass immiseration and environmental destruction? Or will it spend them for prevention and the rebuilding of our economy?

Yes. Frankly, I find the positions of some people on the left baffling. Look, there are two things that conservatives have no problem doing. One, they never hesitate to use the power of the public purse to pursue their reactionary agenda. Never. And they have been extremely clear, from Reagan to Cheney to Trump: the deficit doesnt matter. We print our own money. But many on the left refuse to acknowledge this basic fact and hide behind a fake respectability. By clinging to sound finance they cripple their own policy agenda. So, what kind of fight are you fighting when you dont have all the tools in the arsenal?

The other issue is jobs. In desperate times, the right will have no trouble launching punitive workfare programs. For the unemployed, these programs will still be considered better than no jobs at all. What is the lefts alternative? In my view, it is the Job Guarantee. That is the alternative to workfare: a voluntary, decent public option for jobs.

But many on the Left cling to universal basic income and some are clearly opposed to the Job Guarantee. They might as well raise the white flag. One cannot strengthen the position of labor by providing income alone when the threat of unemployment is perennial. In fact, in a market economy, income assistance is a wage subsidy for the employer. Why demand living wages from firms when the government has promised checks? And, of course, these checks will come at the cost of other benefits.

Once upon a time, the left was steadfast in their belief that decent employment is a basic human right. Today, there is a kind of surrender to the idea that jobs are forever gone, either because of robots or trade. But there is nothing inevitable about unemployment. Of course, we can create jobs. Of course, they can be good and well-paid jobs. Government guarantees all sorts of things in the economy, from bank deposits, to education, to certain types of loans or profits for government contracts. Guaranteeing employment is in fact not a radical proposition at all. The right has no trouble promising jobs. (Much of it is false, of course. Trump wont bring back manufacturing jobs).

But what does the left have to offer a community that has suffered mass unemployment? Subsidies for firms? Training programs for jobs that never come? Why not a Job Guarantee that creates decent, well-paid employment opportunities that are not punitive and dont make existing benefits conditional on working? A program that creates useful projects that serve the public purpose? Democrats need very quickly to develop a very credible message and a plan for jobs, one that instills confidence that the government will take the necessary bold actions to create opportunities in every corner of the nation. We did it in the 1930s. We can certainly do it again.

So, overall, money has to be rethought. Government policies, and specifically employment policies, have to be rethought as well. How will we engage the power of the public purse? How will we use it to rebalance our economy? How will we clean up the environment, provide care, guarantee healthcare and decent employment opportunities for all? All of these issues go hand-in-hand: sovereign spending, public investment and economic security.

Read more:

Heres How We Remake the Economy - Common Dreams

Skoog: Action, ideology and the in-between of speech – Minnesota Daily

After open white nationalist Jeremy Joseph Christian attempted to attack counter-protesters with a bat at a March for Speech rally in April 2017, the police confiscated his bat. Less than a month later, he hurled vehement racial slurs and hate speech at two Muslim teenage girls on a Portland train. Three men stepped in to defend the girls. Christian stabbed two of them to death. He walked into his arraignment shouting: Free speech or die, Portland! You got no safe place. This is America. Get out if you dont like free speech. You call it terrorism, I call it patriotism. One week later, the Patriot Prayer group hosted the Trump Free Speech Rally on federally controlled property across the Portland City Hall.

The States contextualization of action as it pertains to speech typically shifts at their convenience. Christians expression of white nationalism wasnt deemed a threat to State security until he committed double murder. Is that what it takes to connect white supremacy and violence? Are we to pause our concern until theres open fire or a body beneath one of the vehicles driving into Black Lives Matter protests?

The truck driver who drove into a protest on the I-35W bridge was released without charges. Political context was stripped from the story to his advantage. Protesters, demonstrators and activists arent granted that same prerogative. The spate of vehicles driving into Black Lives Matter protests this summer resembles the car attack at the Unite the Right Rally that killed counter-protester Heather Heyer. Media coverage has waned on the phenomenon in proportion to the governments inaction.

Weve seen the video thumbnails. We know the same militant violence thats professedly targeted at violent protesters is exerted against the Black community, with or without provocative conduct. However cautious or refined a protest for racial justice may be is irrelevant to State powers that have a deep history and present of benefitting from the incarceration of Black people.

In my last column, I discussed the fundamental disparities in peoples right to speech in the United States. For this reason, the conjecture that a protest deserves respect while a riot does not is a dangerous myth. Opposing police brutality and authoritarianism in and of itself requires acting outside the barriers of what the government deems acceptable.

Distinguishing between riot and protest shreds the political conditions from acts of insurrection. It is not an arbitrary uprising. No amount of property damage compares to a single human life. If rioting cant be considered a legitimate form of protest, what is the alternative method to extinguishing an increasingly fascistic government?

View post:

Skoog: Action, ideology and the in-between of speech - Minnesota Daily

Tenn. judge gives OK to call candidate ‘literally Hitler’ – The Fulcrum

In a campaign season when civil discourse seems headed to another record low, rhetorical excess has just been given a little extra boost.

For three decades Tennessee has made it a minor crime to put knowingly false statements about a candidate in oppositional campaign literature one of the more explicit restrictions on political speech in the nation's law books. But last week a state judge said it was a bridge way too far over the First Amendment.

A prominent democracy reform group, Tennesseans for Sensible Election Laws, sued and won the right to declare in print something hyperbolic in the extreme: That a Republican state legislator is "literally Hitler," the Nazi fuhrer who died in Germany three-quarters of a century ago.

The point, the group said, was to produce a campaign flyer with obviously false assertions in order to test the law, which it says has been unconstitutionally stifling properly provocative satire and criticism of state officials.

Sign up for The Fulcrum newsletter

"The framers of our Constitution believed that robust public speech and debate would be essential to self-government," it said. "This law tried to put its thumb on the scale, favoring the very people who enacted it Tennessee state lawmakers to the detriment of members of the voting public."

Judge Ellen Hobbs Lyle of Nashville agreed last week, declaring the law a violation of both the state and federal Constitutions. Its main flaw, she said, was that it punished false speech against a candidate but does nothing to rein in lies in support of a politician, "viewpoint dicrimination" not permitted by the First Amendment. She also said government regulators should not be in the business of distinguishing truth from falsity and that the law bans far more speech than Tennessee could ever punish, besides.

"For emphatic and memorable communication in its campaign materials opposing candidates, the plaintiff uses the literary device of knowingly stating a literally false statement about a candidate in the context of satire, parody and hyperbole," the judge said in her nine-page ruling, and that's one of the Sensible Election Laws group's free speech rights.

The organization was taking on state Rep. Bruce Griffey, a Republican whose first term has been marked by proposing a wave of controversial, conservartuive culture war measures, including a ban on refugee resettlement in Tennessee and a requirement that students use school bathrooms that correspond with their sex at birth. And in January, he proposed a bill that would authorize the state to chemically castrate some people convicted of sex offenses against minors a policy in place in at least seven states.

The good government group tweeted it would begin distributing its leaflets, which say "Bruce Griffey is LITERALLY HITLER" at the top and, underneath that, "Bruce Griffey: an agenda the Nazis would love."

The 1989 law makes it a misdemeanor punishable by a $50 fine and 10 days in jail to distribute "campaign literature in opposition to any candidate in an election" if any "statement charge, allegation, or other matter contained therein with respect to such candidate is false." It makes no exceptions for satire, hyperbole or parody.

The state attorney general's office has not announced whether it will appeal.

Griffey is solidly favored to win a second term in November in a rural district west of Nashville.

From Your Site Articles

Related Articles Around the Web

See the original post:

Tenn. judge gives OK to call candidate 'literally Hitler' - The Fulcrum

Mailbag: ‘Choose life and success’ over COVID-19 – Los Angeles Times

In his farewell address to the Israelites, Moses exhorted them to ... choose life and success or death and disaster.

Our nation faces a similar choice as we struggle with the demon virus that continues its killing spree across the landscape. In Moses case the choice was between life and the worship of false gods, in ours between life and a twisted understanding of personal freedom.

In 1941, the imprisoned dwellers in the Warsaw Ghetto 450,000 mostly Jewish souls in an area of just over 2 square miles were also faced with a vicious virus, Europes typhus pandemic. It was less contagious but deadlier than COVID-19 and was spreading rapidly in these cramped quarters.

However, the ghetto was home to a cadre of physicians who set up strict protocols to quell the outbreak, including courses on public hygiene and infectious diseases, and requirements for social distancing and home quarantining. Though 100,000 had died in the beginning from disease and starvation, by July 1942, typhus was largely eradicated. The trapped community had chosen life even in the face of impending genocide by their Nazi captors.

And they chose life again in April 1943, when faced with the knowledge that the 50,000 who remained would soon be shipped to death camps they rose up with their ragtag weaponry and held off the Nazis for six weeks, a period longer than had the Polish army when Germany invaded in 1939.

Perhaps the determination to choose life by every means possible that inspired the Warsaw Ghetto residents might move the people of Orange County and elsewhere to choose life with a similar determination. This is not easy. In fact, it is unsettling, tedious, frustrating and, for many, lonely.

But we have made sacrifices before during the Great Depression, in World War II, in recovering and rebuilding after 9/11 and in so many other little-known but courageous ways. This is our time to choose life and success over this monster in our midst and get closer to the day when we can all breathe free again.

Ben HubbardCosta Mesa

I take some exception to Andrew Turners article on MMA star Tito Ortiz pulling papers for Huntington Beach City Council for being a whitewash (no pun intended).

An avowed vocal Trump supporter who championed the building of a border wall feeling compelled to protect his community from those who would label its residents as a bunch of white supremacists? Helping out the police department after being arrested here on suspicion of felony domestic violence in 2010 against then-girlfriend and adult-movie performer Jenna Jameson? (Ortiz denied the allegations, and the district attorney later dropped the charges.) Helping the police department by being arrested in January 2014 on suspicion of DUI and, after pleading no contest, fined and ordered to undergo alcohol education?

It seems Tito Ortiz and Donald Trump share an affinity for porn stars, and, in fact, Jameson and Trump are pictured at an event congratulating Ortiz on one of his victories.

I found Republican Mayor Lyn Semetas welcoming of Ortizs candidacy while ignoring his troubled past and his divisive politics gratuitous at best. Of course, having no civic credentials or qualifications didnt hurt Trump when he ran for public office using his celebrity status and wealth.

With less than four months until Election Day, isnt it time we start scrutinizing our local candidates more carefully?

Tim GeddesHuntington Beach

No two ways about it, Orange County, Donald Trump is a threat to American democracy.

Why? Because the nonsense he is peddling that the authenticity of mail-in ballots cannot be validated and therefore the results of the November election will not be legitimate goes to the heart of what separates us from most of the world: the right and freedom to vote.

Forget the fact Republicans from Fullerton to San Clemente have promoted the use of mail-in ballots for years. I am troubled by two issues directly tied to what the president is saying.

First, does this mean the results for all O.C. elections from school board to city council, from state office to Congress also will be in jeopardy; and second, will this give Kentuckys Mitch McConnell, Iowas Joni Ernst and Arizonas Martha McSally the ammunition they need not only to question the outcome of their hotly contested races this fall but to maintain the GOP majority in the Senate?

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi says Mr. Trumps attempt to cast doubts on Novembers election is really about voter suppression. True or not, this is hardly new.

What is new about the presidents repeated, unsubstantiated remarks is this: COVID-19 and a sinking economy are wreaking havoc on his bid for reelection. And because neither is likely to change course between now and Nov. 3, the only strategy left is for him to fan the flames of fear.

During his first inauguration address in 1933, President Franklin D. Roosevelt told a weary nation, The only thing we have to fear is fear itself. If only this were true today.

Denny Freidenrich Laguna Beach

I have noticed some letter writers lately have labeled Harley Rouda as a liberal, saying he has been misrepresented as a moderate.

If a liberal is characterized as someone who introduces and gets three bills signed into law his freshman year of Congress, while introducing six additional bills and 59 legislative measures, who wins the Healthy Seniors Award for his work to ensure Medicare coverage for seniors to be treated at home during the COVID-19 crisis and ensuring they continue to have access to medication for chronic diseases, who wrote a bipartisan bill to provide $25,000 to small businesses to update their personal protective equipment (PPE) during the coronavirus pandemic, to bring $554 million back to Orange County to help fight the pandemic and return $2 million directly to his constituents in the 48th Congressional district, and over $40 million to Orange County businesses, then gift us us with such a liberal any day.

Despite the upcoming election, Rouda is ready to introduce his latest bill, the California Coastal Communities Act, to fund research and resiliency measures to protect people on the coast which will address flooding as one of its components.

To his greatest credit, Rouda stopped his campaign when the pandemic hit and asked businesses around Orange County to donate PPE to Orange Coast Medical Center.

Currently he is working on a bill to reduce airplane emissions and improve water quality. If being the most active congressman in his freshman class makes him a liberal, I would have to say that " liberal takes on a very positive connotation.

I will not talk about the contributions or lack thereof of Roudas predecessors, nor argue about semantics regarding conservative, moderate, liberal, democratic-socialist and fascist (words often thrown around indiscriminately), but since the word liberal has been brought up, I will give you these words from President John F. Kennedy:

If by a liberal they mean someone who looks ahead and not behind, someone who welcomes new ideas without rigid reactions, someone who cares about the welfare of the people their health, their housing, their schools, their jobs, their civil rights and their civil liberties someone who believes we can break through the stalemate and suspicions that grip us in our policies abroad, if that is what they mean by a liberal, then Im proud to say Im a liberal.

Lynn LorenzNewport Beach

Gov. Gavin Newsom released his Water Resilience Portfolio during the same week that the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board was conducting hearings on a permit request by Poseidon, a Canadian hedge fund corporation to build a billion-and-a-half-dollar desalination plant in Huntington Beach.

Desalination was not listed as a priority but as an option as part of the blueprint for California water policy, offering a stay-the-course agenda for projects and policies intended to help cope with a warming climate and more violent weather patterns that already effect the states irrigation, environmental and drinking water supplies.

This should be reason enough for the water-quality board to deny the permit so that the ratepayers should not be saddled with expensive and unneeded desalinated water.

Richard ArmendarizHuntington Beach

Although I am a dedicated Democrat, I must take issue with letter-writer Tim Geddes concern about Republican state Sen. John Moorlach.

Yes, Moorlach is a fiscal conservative, but his concern is for all Californians, and he tries to work with his fellow senators in both parties.

In all of my 92 years, I have voted for only two Republicans, former County Supervisor and State Sen. Marion Bergeson and John Moorlach. Both have crossed party lines and have done their hard-working best for all of us.

Martin A. BrowerCorona del Mar

As the theater writer for a community newspaper in Long Beach, I find it spiritually and artistically deadening that theater is no longer live (The state of O.C. theater will only get rockier as the pandemic continues, but many forge on, TimesOC, Aug. 2).

The skill, the commitment, the vitality so evident in a living, breathing theatrical production is a compilation of so many arts and crafts that to behold a live performance is an inspiration, if not an epiphany.

With the challenges facing the multitude of theater artists in this age of pandemic, perhaps its time to transform live performance into a call for political action.

In the years 1935-39 there was the Federal Theatre Project (FTP), which was one of five Federal Project Number One projects sponsored by the Works Progress administration (WPA); it was developed as a relief measure to give employment to artist, writers, directors and other theater workers.

Whats more, luminaries such as Arthur Miller, Orson Wells, John Houseman, Elia Kazan and Burt Lancaster were products of the Federal Theater Project, which as a part of President Franklin Roosevelts New Deal was implemented as an economic stimulus program but also resulted in a cadre of artists and artistic endeavors that changed American culture immeasurably.

Though it may be some time before we are safe from the coronavirus, its not unreasonable, nor is it unprecedented, to seek the support of our U.S. government in sustaining live theater and the artists and craftspeople who are devoted to this ancient art form.

Ben MilesHuntington Beach

Support our coverage by becoming a digital subscriber.

Original post:

Mailbag: 'Choose life and success' over COVID-19 - Los Angeles Times