Can the Turkish Military’s Fight Against the Pandemic Set an Example for NATO? – The Jamestown Foundation

In March 2020, eight personnel in the German-led, multinational North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) battalion in Lithuania tested positive for the novel coronavirus (The Baltic Times, March 24). From a defense-planning standpoint, the spread of COVID-19 to the Enhanced Forward Presence (eFP) units stationed along the Alliances eastern flank marked a critical challenge. Worse, several military exercises, most notably Defender Europe 2020, had to be canceled or dramatically scaled back, raising concerns about whether NATO countries would be able to maintain combat readiness at adequate levels in the midst of the global health crisis. But at the same time, the Turkish Armed Forces have remained busy pursuing a heavy agenda beyond the countrys borders, even though NATOs southeastern-most member was hit fairly hard by the coronavirus outbreak.

Despite the pandemic and growing bio-security threat, the Turkish Armed Forces actually stepped up their combat operations. The Turkish Naval Forces have been pursuing a robust buildup in the Mediterranean Sea and recently intensified their deterrent presence off the Libyan coast (Yeni afak, July 7). The Turkish Land Forces have also been quite active. In Northern Iraq, Operation Claw-Tiger (Pene Kartal Operasyonu) targets the Kurdistan Workers Partys (PKK) logistical infrastructure, arsenal and militants (Msb.gov.tr, June 30). In tandem, the Air Force continues to strike at PKK positions in northern Iraq (Sabah, June 25).

In June 2020, the Turkish navy once more assumed command of Combined Task Force 151 to tackle piracy in the Gulf of Aden and off Somalias coast. In early July, Turkeys Defense Minister Hulusi Akar paid a visit to Libya, where Ankara has forward-deployed contingents in support of the United Nationsrecognized Tripoli government (Msb.gov.tr, July 7, 18).

Three important factors regarding the Turkish Armed Forces deserve mention before going into the details of how Ankara has managed the situation. First, Turkey is one of the few NATO member states that still employ conscription. This fact looms large as the biggest hardship and risk amidst the quickly and readily spreading coronavirus pandemic. Second, the Turkish military has an expeditionary posture. It has forward-deployed units and overseas bases in many countries and regions, such as Libya, Syria, Cyprus, Iraq, Somalia and Qatar (TRT Haber, January 3). Likewise, the Naval Forces sail beyond coastal waters regularly. At present, for example, one-quarter to one-third of the frigate arsenal operates in and near Libyan waters (Yeni afak, January 25). Third, the Turkish military is not a ceremonial or parading force. It fights, and it fights hard. Over recent years, Turkish generals planned and executed fierce campaigns against the PKK, Islamic State, the Syrian Arab Army and accompanying Iranian-backed Shiite militias at Turkeys doorstep. Overall, the Turkish Armed Forces cannot risk being pinned down by bio-security threats. The wars go on.

To weather the storm, at the outset of the pandemic, Turkeys Ministry of Defense established the Center for Countering the Coronavirus (Koronavirus ile Mcadele MerkeziKOMMER) to tackle the outbreak within the militarys ranks. In a joint-force planning fashion, the KOMMER incorporated the General Staff, all military branches, Turkeys four field armies, the naval fleet as well as each of the airbase commands (Anadolu Agency, June 7). By doing so, the defense ministry centralized its health-tracking databases and necessary countermeasures.

Dronization has been another factor that helped the Armed Forces. In many frontiers, Turkeys generals were able to rely on unmanned aerial vehicles (UAV) to achieve mission objectives with a limited troop footprint (TRT World, May 22; Al Jazeera, May 28; Mei.edu, March 26).

Apart from establishing the KOMMER and using UAVs extensively, the Turkish military closed its facilities, units and headquarters to outsiders. The navy, meanwhile, sailed its ships away from the homeports and kept the critical personnel away from the rest of the Armed Forces and society. The 2nd Field Army, which is responsible for the Middle Eastern frontier, did its best to isolate the forward-deployed elements in Syria and northern Iraq. Additionally, the defense ministry assigned Chemical, Biological, Radiological and Nuclear (CBRN) defense teams to combat formations in high-risk areas to provide additional protection (TRT Haber, June 7). As a result, Turkeys military operations were not plagued by the coronavirus.

One thing the coronavirus pandemic reminded war planners of is the bio-security aspect of military campaigns. Since ancient times, wars have centered on the soldier, for most of human history accompanied by other animals, such as horses, oxen and elephants. All living things are, of course, to one degree or another, vulnerable to microscopic pathogens and environmental conditions. With the Second World War, the mechanization of warfighting inevitably replaced the non-human part of traditional warrior packs. However, people must still man main battle tanks and fly fighter aircraft.

In terms of temporary strategies to weather, or mitigate the effects of the pandemic, the Turkish military did well, and it was able to continue fighting effectively in multiple fronts beyond Turkeys borders. However, over the longer term, Turkey and other NATO countries will need to find and adopt more sustainable solutions to ensure uninterrupted high-readiness levels. The progressive introduction of ever-larger numbers of robotic systems to battlegrounds and exercises may offer some relief. Likewise, AI-assisted multi-national exercise simulations could replace some, albeit not all, military drills. Overall, the COVID-19 pandemic has laid bare the limits of human planning and operations in the midst of a crisis. As the classic Latin adage goes, Si vis pacem, para bellumif you want peace, prepare for war. Turkey and its NATO allies will, thus, need to spend the next several years preparing to do so under more daunting bio-security conditions.

Go here to see the original:

Can the Turkish Military's Fight Against the Pandemic Set an Example for NATO? - The Jamestown Foundation

In the North Atlantic, NATO navies are practicing to take on a wave of Russian submarines – Business Insider – Business Insider

NATO navies converged in the North Sea in late June for this year's Dynamic Mongoose anti-submarine-warfare exercise, reflecting a growing focus on countering enemy submarines amid "great-power competition" with Russia and China.

During the exercise, US Navy destroyer USS Roosevelt and four other surface ships took turns hunting and being hunted by Navy fast-attack sub USS Indiana and four other subs in the waters off Iceland.

"It was fantastic because we would have such a small, confined area that it forced interaction between the submarine and the surface ships," Cmdr. Ryan Kendall, commanding officer of the Roosevelt, said in an interview.

Royal Navy frigate HMS Kent with Allied warships, including USS Roosevelt, left, at the end of Dynamic Mongoose, July 9, 2020. British Royal Navy/LPhot Dan Rosenbaum

Roosevelt and its counterparts brought helicopters with dipping sonar and torpedoes. Five maritime patrol aircraft, including a US Navy P-8 Poseidon, also took part.

"We'd all take turns controlling the aircraft and controlling the helicopters in the air. So we would have the P-8 come out, drop some sonobuoys, and help us localize" the sub, Kendall said. "Surface ships would come in to get closer to see if we could get our towed array or our whole active sonar on the submarines."

The Roosevelt's AN/SQQ 89A(V) 15 sonar "is one of the most advanced in the Navy," Kendall said. "We have an MH-60R helicopter with an active dipper, so we're able to use the tag team of Roosevelt and our active sonar and passive sonar, as well as our multifunctional towed array, to localize the submarine and then use our helicopter to pounce."

Subs like Indiana "mesh with the other parts of the team who can provide fast response and broad area coverage," said Cmdr. David Grogan, commanding officer of USS Indiana.

"We represent the persistent, in-stratum asset who can effectively use the underwater environment to maximize detection and engagement possibilities of an adversary submarine," Grogan added.

NATO ships and subs during exercise Dynamic Mongoose, July 2020. British Royal Navy/LPhot Dan Rosenbaum

Dynamic Mongoose allows ships and subs to exercise in real-world conditions for an extended period, Kendall said.

US and French aircraft operated out of Iceland while British planes flew from Scotland. Ships dealt with rough seas, and helicopters practiced staying aloft for extended periods.

"Normally when they execute a training scenario, it could be anywhere from two to three hours," Kendall said. "In this case, we were doing it for 12 or 22 hours straight, and you'd have watch-team turnovers."

Coordinating with aircraft and ships "can be complicated for a number of reasons," Grogan said. "Exposing my team to that, as well as learning to best employ each submarine, surface, and air asset ... was vital to expanding my team's ability within the greater ASW effort."

Canadian frigate HMCS Fredericton, left, British frigate HMS Kent, right and a German diesel submarine, center, during Dynamic Mongoose, July 2020. British Royal Navy/LPhot Dan Rosenbaum

Subs were also able to use "the environment and ... water temperature, salinity, depth, [and] bottom contours to evade us or to hide so that they can into an advantageous position to attack us," Kendall added.

Roosevelt analyzed the water "hour by hour, day by day," Kendall said, because changes in it mean "we'll get different ranges on our sonar" though Grogan said the "only tangible difference onboard in colder water is the presence of an extra sweater here or there."

"You can't do synthetic training pier-side with a computer-generated model for ... tracking real-world submarines," Kendall added. "You have real people making real decisions, and you have consequences for those decisions."

NATO ships during Dynamic Mongoose, July 2020. British Royal Navy/LPhot Dan Rosenbaum

Russian and Chinese submarine fleets have gotten bigger and better, and the US Navy has dedicated more time and resources to ASW.

"They finished fielding the P-8, they're putting the new AN/SQQ 89 sonar system onto all the destroyers, and they've been investing in some unmanned systems for anti-submarine warfare," said Bryan Clark, a senior fellow at the Hudson Institute and former special assistant to the Navy's chief of naval operations.

They're also practicing more. "Dynamic Mongoose is one example," Clark said, citing recent exercises above the Arctic Circle.

"The most important mission for those deployments was anti-submarine warfare basically looking for Russian submarines deploying out of their bases in the Kola Peninsula," where the powerful Northern Fleet is based, Clark added.

Sailors man the rails on the flight deck of USS Roosevelt at the end of Dynamic Mongoose 2020, July 9, 2020. US Navy/MCS Seaman Austin G. Collins

During the Cold War, the Greenland-Iceland-UK Gap was an important chokepoint between that Russian fleet and the Atlantic. "We still rely on these chokepoints as kind of the line in the sand," Clark said.

Russia subs passing through that gap could threaten Europe's links to North America in a war. (A Russian ship monitored Dynamic Mongoose but "didn't affect the exercise at all," Kendall said.)

"There's a big concern on the US part about even a couple Russian nuclear submarines making it past the GIUK gap, because they can then just drift around in the Atlantic until they can track down a US [ballistic missile sub] or threaten the US coast," Clark added.

Subs and aircraft assumed much of the ASW mission after the Cold War, but the Navy has invested in more surface-ship ASW because that sub fleet which will shrink in coming decades as older Los Angeles-class subs retire now has many other missions.

Surface ships are also now the primary missile-defense platform and are responsible for maritime security operations, meaning ASW "is another mission on top of all the other missions they've got to do," Clark said.

A US Navy MH-60R Seahawk helicopter prepares to land on the guided-missile destroyer USS Roosevelt in the Atlantic Ocean, August 4, 2013. US Navy/MCS2 Samantha Thorpe

Dynamic Mongoose illustrates the mismatch, Clark said. "Every time the Russians deploy a ... nuclear submarine down through the GIUK gap, we deploy a dozen airplanes or ships to go up there and track it. So the Navy just isn't set up to be able to do ASW at any scale."

Dynamic Mongoose involved five submarines, but Russia can muster more.In October, Russia's Northern Fleet reportedly sent 10 subs toward the Atlantic to test NATO's detection abilities and show it could threaten the US.

"These submarines are really hard to track unless you want to put one of our submarines on it," Clark said, "and we don't have enough submarines to do that."

Clark argues more unmanned vehicles should be acquired and used to suppress some subs while manned assets to pursue the subs that need to be eliminated.

"You have to decide which submarines are ... ones you have to sink and which ones can you accept just harassing and suppressing, because you don't have enough submarines to go try and kill every opponent submarine," Clark said.

Original post:

In the North Atlantic, NATO navies are practicing to take on a wave of Russian submarines - Business Insider - Business Insider

Romania Ready to Welcome US Troops Removed From Germany – Balkan Insight

Romanias President Klaus Iohannis (2-R) visits the Mihail Kogalniceanu military airport, 250 east of Bucharest, June 13, 2017. Archive photo: EPA/Bogdan Cristel

Hours after Washington announced on Wednesday that 11,900 US troops in Germany would be redeployed to reinforce NATOs southeastern flank, Romanian President Klaus Iohannis expressed appreciation for the move and reaffirmed that US troops are always welcome in Romania.

Speaking on Wednesday, Iohannis deemed the US decision very important for Romania, and recalled that he and the Bucharest government had long been stressing the need of [deploying] more troops in the Black Sea zone.

If this happens, we are very satisfied, said Iohannis, who added that the details of a potential redeployment to US troops to Romania would be discussed at NATO level.

Romania is one of the staunchest allies of the US in Europe. Bucharest already hosts a military NATO airbase with an American presence by the Black Sea as well as a missile shield base.

Particularly after the Russian annexation of the Crimea in 2014, the Black Sea region has become a place of mounting tension between Russia, which has deployed more military capabilities in the area, and the US and NATO.

As a firmly pro-Western country and NATO member since 2004, Romania is a cornerstone of the US architecture of deterrence of Russia in the region. In response to Moscows growing activity and presence in the Black Sea, Bucharest has boosted its own military investment in recent years.

Romanias National Defence Strategy for 2020-2024 mentions Russias aggressive behaviour in the region as one of the major strategic threats facing the country.

The new strategy was adopted last month by the Romanian parliament. In a clear reference to the US, Russia has accused Bucharest of being subservient to third parties and their agendas at the expense of its own interest.

The US restructuring of its presence in Europe was outlined on Wednesday by Washingtons Secretary of Defence, Mark Esper.

Approximately 11,900 military personnel will be repositioned from Germany, with nearly 5,600 repositioned within other NATO countries and 6,400 returning to the United States to address readiness and prepare for rotational deployments, the US Department of Defense explained.

The plan will consolidate headquarters to strengthen operational efficiency to focus on readiness, and place rotational forces in the Black Sea region on NATOs southeastern flank, it added.

This makes Romania a prime candidate to host, on a permanent or rotational basis, part of the US troops being moved from Germany.

The reshaping of US defence architecture in Europe serves the purpose of enhancing deterrence of Russia as its first priority, Esper highlighted.

By strengthening military capabilities in the Black Sea, the US seeks to prevent further Russian aggression against NATO allies in the region.

The US plans to invest 130 million dollars in turning the old airbase of Campia Turzii, in central Romania, into a hub of the US Airforce operations in southeastern Europe from which more fighter planes rotations can be conducted.

Read more:

Romania Ready to Welcome US Troops Removed From Germany - Balkan Insight

Poland Agrees To Pay Almost All Costs of US Troop Presence – Breaking Defense

American and Polish soldiers during an exercise at a Polish base.

WASHINGTON: The Polish government will pay the majority of costs associated with stationing 5,500 US troops at bases within its borders as part of a new security cooperation pact, the Pentagon has confirmed to Breaking Defense.

The deal comes as the Trump administration keeps prodding longtime allies like South Korea and Japan to pay more of the costs of tens of thousands of US troops within their borders, while President Trump has complained that countries like Germany dont meet defense spending goals outlined by NATO.

But Poland, which already meets the NATO-mandated goal of spending 2 percent of GDP on national defense by 2024, has agreed to take more US forces, aircraft and drones while footing what is likely to be a hefty bill to build infrastructure for those forces as they flow in and out of the country on a rotational basis.

Warsaw has agreed to fund infrastructure and logistical support to U.S. forces in Poland, including the current 4,500 rotational forces and the planned increase of 1,000 additional rotational forces, Lt. Col. Thomas Campbell, a Pentagon spokesperson said.

The final amount isnt clear. The Enhanced Defense Cooperation Agreement has been agreed to, but will not be signed for several weeks yet, and no infrastructure improvements that might be needed have not been started. Iin broad terms, Poland has agreed to fully fund infrastructure for:

In a Monday morning statement, Esper said the new deal will enhance deterrence against Russia, strengthen NATO, reassure our Allies, and our forward presence in Poland on NATOs eastern flank will improve our strategic and operational flexibility.

The Polish deal comes as the US is in the early stages of planning to pull 12,000 troops from Germany and remains locked in a spending dispute with South Korea over Trumps demand Seoul pay more to keep the 28,500 American forces in the country.

During a Pentagon briefing last week, Defense Secretary Mark Esper and Vice Chairman of the Joint Chiefs John Hyten repeatedly made the case that moving the Germany-based troops back to the US, Belgium and Italy, is a strategic decision that will benefit the US and NATO. Within minutes of that press conference however, Trump contradicted his military leaders from the White House lawn, saying he ordered the pullout so the US wont be suckersso were reducing the force because theyre not paying their bills. Its very simple, theyre delinquent.

Trump again conflated the 2 percent NATO pledge with payments to the alliance itself. Germany, despite being the wealthiest nation in Europe, continues to fall well below that mark.

Relying on Polish construction efforts has recently cost the Pentagon about $100 million in cost overruns however.

Europes second Aegis Ashore site based in Redzikowo, Poland, was supposed to be up and running in 2018, but problems with local contractors have pushed that back to 2022 and will cost the US an additional $96 million in 2021, according to budget documents. The Missile Defense Agency stopped paying the contractor in the spring due to the schedule slippages; work has since resumed.

Stepping in to foot the bill while fulfilling its NATO pledge Warsaw is ticking off all the boxes demanded by the White House to maintain and improve its relationship with Washington.

Esper has recently acknowledged he is considering adjustments to the American military presence in South Korea, but clarified that he has issued no order to withdraw troops, despite reports suggesting a drawdown is being considered by Pentagon leadership.

Under the previous agreement between the US and South Korea, which ended in December, South Korea agreed to pay $870 million for 2019. The Trump administration originally demanded $5 billion in 2020 to keep the US footprint as is. That was rejected by the South Korean government, who then agreed to pay the salaries of thousands of Koreans who had been furloughed from their jobs on American bases. Since that tweak, talks between the two sides have stalled.

Read the original:

Poland Agrees To Pay Almost All Costs of US Troop Presence - Breaking Defense

China Has Become More Powerful, Wealthier & Dangerous Than USSR Ever Was! – EurAsian Times

As China continues to challenge India up in the Himalayas and provoking neighbours in the South China Sea, a paper written by top defence leaders including a former secretary-general of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), says that NATO immediately needs to adjust its response to the threat posed by China.

From Afghanistan To Syria This Is How Rafale Jets Have Dominated Skies Without Ever Being Shot-Down

Experts have predicted that China could become more powerful than the USSR ever was, if the current pattern continues.This is in reference to Chinas increasing aggressiveness with several countries including India, Japan and its actions in Hong Kong and Taiwan.

It is clear that President Xi Jinping remains committed to the modernisation of the Peoples Liberation Army by 2035 and its transformation into a world-class military by 2049, stated the paper. Recent events demonstrate the determination China has to bring Hong Kong under its firm grip, raising grave concerns for its future as well as that of Taiwan, it added.

In a report accessed byExpress, the paper is published by the Policy Institute and authored by George Robertson, who was the secretary-general of NATO 1999-2004. It has been co-authored by Michael Fallon, UK secretary of state for defence, 2014-17; Catherine Ashton, the EUs first high representative for foreign affairs and security policy, 2009-14; Peter Ricketts, UK permanent representative to NATO, 2003-06, and UK national security advisor, 2010-12; Menzies Campbell, leader of the Liberal Democrats, 2006-07, and the partys former spokesperson for foreign affairs and defence; and Benedict Wilkinson, Director of Research at the Policy Institute, Kings College London.

The paper talked about the ongoing border dispute with India where Indian and Chinese troops got into a violent clash in the Galwan valley of Eastern Ladakh. The clash resulted in 20 Indian casualties and an unconfirmed number on the Chinese side.

Chinas argument with India, and ongoing disputes with Japan, demonstrate preparedness to press territorial claims from the Himalayas to the South China Seas, asserted the paper.

In 2019, NATO leaders acknowledged that the alliance needs to address Chinas growing influence that presents both opportunities and challenges. NATO needs to develop a coherent policy towards China that includes conflict-avoidance and de-escalation.

Chinas actions are pushing NATO to look at Asia, a new change thats bothering an alliance which was created to protect Europe against the Soviet Union and then Russia. With US President Donald Trump pushing European nations to ramp up its military capabilities and to persuade them to join it in confronting an increasingly assertive China, NATO has clearly been facing a dilemma. European nations still see China as an economic partner. However, in December last year, alliance members specifically mentioned China for the first time in their declaration after the NATO Summit.

NATO has been long worried about Russia and has largely been silent on China. However, that is now changing. NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenbergcalled onthe alliance to stand up to Beijings bullying and coercion, emphasising how Chinas rise is radically shifting the global balance of power.

It is clear that NATO can no longer ignore the threat. If the alliance hopes to remain competitive, it will have to develop a new strategy for dealing with Beijing.

See the original post here:

China Has Become More Powerful, Wealthier & Dangerous Than USSR Ever Was! - EurAsian Times

‘Naming The Tree’ | Circle Round 103 | Circle Round – WBUR

Ever heard the saying, Bigger is better?

Story continues below

Subscribe to the podcast

Well guess what?

Its not necessarily true!

In todays story, well meet a character whos anything but big. But when it comes to patience, focus and creativity shes huge!

Our story is called Naming the Tree. Versions of this tale come from parts of Africa. Our adaptation continues our 2020 summer series with the Boston Symphony Orchestra, and features musical accompaniment by BSO tuba player Mike Roylance.

Voices in this episode include Gabriela Fernandez Coffey, Kevin Corbett, Jessica Rau, Jefferson Russell, Chris Tucci, Craig Wallace, Laura K. Welsh and Chloe Coleman. Kids, you can see Chloe in Timmy Failure: Mistakes Were Made on Disney+. And grown-ups, look for Chloe in Upload on Amazon, Big Little Lies on HBO, as well as the feature film, My Spy.

Coloring Page

ADULTS! PRINT THISso everyone can color while listening. Were also keeping an album so share your picture onFacebook,Twitter,Instagram, and tag it with #CircleRound. We'd love to see it! To access all the coloring pages for past episodes clickHERE.Our resident artist is Sabina Hahn and you can learn more about herHERE.

Things To Think About After Listening

Think about a time you felt strong - in body, or mind, or both.

Find a piece of paper and something to draw with, then create a picture that shows your experience. Once youre done, show it to a grown-up in your life, and tell them all about it. Then ask your grown-up to describe a time they felt strong.

Musical Spotlight: Tuba

Appearing first in the mid-1800s, the tuba is one of the newer instruments in the modern orchestra. Its also the lowest-pitched member of the brass family. Composer Eric Shimelonis chose the tuba to accompany this story because its deep, booming sound echoes the rich, low voice of Elephant - and suggests the slower, steadier pace of Tortoise!

Script:

NARRATOR: Long ago back when animals ruled the earth a great drought came to the land.

Not one drop of rain fell from the sky, so the ground grew scorched, baked and dusty and the long, tall grass shriveled, withered and wilted.

The great drought led to a great famine, and the animals roamed the plains, searching for something anything! to fill their bellies.

But they couldnt find a thing to eat.

Until...

ANIMAL 1: / ANIMAL 2: / ANIMAL 3: / ANIMAL 4: / ANIMAL 5: Wooooowwwwwww!

NARRATOR: Miraculously, sprouting up in the middle of the vast, sunburnt plains was a lofty, leafy tree, with a thick, gnarled trunk. The trees strong, sturdy branches were bursting with ripe, fragrant, juicy fruit all of them different colors of the rainbow!

As the animals gaped at the tree with watering mouths, Elephant used his strong, grey trunk to grasp one of the plump fruits. He gave the fruit a tug but it held fast to the branch.

ELEPHANT: Ahhhh just as I suspected!

NARRATOR: Elephant let go of the fruit and turned to his fellow animals.

ELEPHANT: My friends! Ive heard stories about this tree... Legend has it its a magic tree! And its rainbow-colored fruit will cling to its branches and never come off... unless we can say the trees name.

NARRATOR: The animals were intrigued.

ANIMAL 1: Okay

ANIMAL 2: So, whats the name of the tree, Elephant?

ANIMAL 3: Yes! Whats the name of the tree!?

ANIMAL 4: Tell us what it's called!

ANIMAL 5: Tell us the name!

ANIMAL 1: / ANIMAL 2: / ANIMAL 3: / ANIMAL 4: / ANIMAL 5: (ad-lib excited pleas to hear the trees name, to say the name and get fruit, how hungry they are, etc.)

NARRATOR: Elephant held up his trunk. The animals quieted down.

ELEPHANT: The truth is, my friends... I dont actually know the trees name! The only one who does know is the king of the beasts himself Lion! (beat) So... my question is which one of you will go and ask Lion the name of the tree?

NARRATOR: The animals exchanged a nervous glance. All of them knew that Lion lived far across the plains, over the hills, and deep within the jungle! The great creature rarely emerged from his den, and he was always grouchy, grumbly and grumpy.

ELEPHANT: (encouraging) Oh, come now, friends! Surely one of you can visit Lion and find out the name of the tree...? So that we can enjoy this succulent, sweet-smelling fruit...? (beat) Anyone? (getting discouraged/frustrated) Anyone?

TORTOISE: Ill do it, Elephant!

NARRATOR: The animals all stared at Tortoise.

TORTOISE: Ill go and ask Lion the name of the tree!

NARRATOR: Elephant knelt down, lowered his trunk, and gave Tortoises tiny head a gentle pat.

ELEPHANT: (almost condescending) Oh, Tortoise. I appreciate your offer. But look at you! Youre so small! So slow! By the time you return from Lions den, all of us will have wasted away from hunger!

NARRATOR: Elephant got back to his feet.

ELEPHANT: No. We want to send someone whos swift... and nimble! Someone like

NARRATOR: His eyes darted from animal to animal.

ELEPHANT: like Hare! (beat) Hare, why dont you go across the plains, over the hills and into the jungle to ask Lion the name of the tree?

NARRATOR: Hare wiggled her slender ears and twitched her whiskery nose.

HARE: (flattered, becoming more confident) Well I am swift and nimble! The swiftest and nimblest, in fact! (beat) You know what? Ill do it!

NARRATOR: So swift, nimble Hare jumped across the plains, hopped over the hills, and leaped through the jungle, all the way to Lions den.

HARE: (cheery, chirpy) Hi there, Lion! Do you have a minute?

NARRATOR: Unbeknownst to Hare, Lion was about to settle down for a nap. The great beast lifted his shaggy, golden head and rolled his big, amber eyes.

LION: (tired, grumpy) I suppose I have a minute - but thats all! (beat) (grudging) What is it, Hare?

HARE: Well, Lion It hasnt rained in ages, and the animals are very hungry. But we found the magic tree in the middle of the plains! The one that grows juicy, rainbow-colored fruits! So I wonder, could you please tell me the trees name...?

NARRATOR: Lion opened his mighty jaws and let out a yawn.

LION: (yawn) So you wish to know the name of the magic tree in the middle of the plains that grows juicy, rainbow-colored fruits...? (beat) The name of the tree is (slowly) UWUNGELEMA [uh-WOONG-uh-LAY-muh]. [note: the oo is like spoon or moon.]

HARE: (slowly repeating) Uwungelema? [uh-WOONG-uh-LAY-muh] [note: the oo is like spoon or moon.]

LION: Thats right! Say that name and you and the other animals can eat as many juicy, rainbow-colored fruits as you want. (beat) Now beat it, Hare. I have a cat nap to take.

NARRATOR: Hares heart and legs were racing as she scurried away from Lions den.

HARE: (as she runs, super-excited) Oh boy oh boy oh boy! Well be stuffing ourselves on juicy, rainbow-colored fruit in no time thanks to my swift, nimble feet! (beat) Lets see how fast these babies can go!

NARRATOR: Hare began sprinting faster...

HARE: Woo-hoo-hoo!

NARRATOR: ...and faster

HARE: Look at me!!!

NARRATOR: ...and soon she was going so fast that as she burst out of the jungle and headed toward the hills...

HARE: (gasp)

NARRATOR: ...her paw got snagged in a vine hanging from a baobab tree!

HARE: Oh no!

NARRATOR: Hare wriggled this way and that as she scrambled to untangle herself from the creeper.

HARE: (fighting to untangle) Oh, come on! Come on!

NARRATOR: And when she finally broke free

HARE: Whew!

NARRATOR: ...she sped back over the hills and across the plains at such a breakneck pace, her slender body looked like a blur.

When Hare returned to the magic tree, Elephant and the other animals leaned in with hopeful eyes and bated breath.

ELEPHANT: Well, Hare? Tell us! Whats the name of the tree?

NARRATOR: Hare grinned.

HARE: (proudly) Okay, everybody. The name of the tree is (realizing shes unable to remember)... is ummmm

NARRATOR: Hare wracked her brain, trying to remember what Lion told her. But her unexpected tango with the vine had knocked the trees name right out of her head!

HARE: The name is... uhhhh ummmm (beat) (defeated, sheepish) I forgot!!!

NARRATOR: The animals faces dropped. Elephant shrugged.

ELEPHANT: Thats okay, Hare, thats okay. Well just have to send someone else.

TORTOISE: Well...? What about me?

NARRATOR: Once again, all eyes turned to Tortoise.

TORTOISE: I told you, Elephant! Ill do it! Ill go ask Lion the name of the tree!

NARRATOR: Elephant shook his head.

ELEPHANT: Thats very sweet of you, Tortoise. But like I said, youre just too small and slow! And besides, after what happened with Hare, we need someone who will actually remember what Lion tells them... Someone who wont forget... Someone who (beat, a-ha moment) wait a minute!

NARRATOR: His eyes lit up.

ELEPHANT: Thats me! Elephants never forget!

NARRATOR: It was true! Elephant had an excellent memory.

So, with his wrinkly, grey tail swinging behind him, Elephant set off for Lions den, to find out the name of the magic tree.

NARRATOR: What do you think will happen next?

Will Elephant learn the trees name and remember it?

Well find out, after a quick break.

[theme music in]

NARRATOR: Welcome back to Circle Round. Im Rebecca Sheir. Today our story is called Naming the Tree.

NARRATOR: Before the break, during a great drought and famine, the animals found a magical tree that was actually bearing fruit!

But the animals couldnt pick the fruit until they said the name of the tree and the only one who knew the trees name was Lion, who lived across the plains, over the hills, and deep within the jungle.

First, Lion told the name to Hare, but the swift, nimble creature rushed away so quickly that she got caught in a vine! And the name vanished from her head!

So Elephant volunteered.

The massive creature tromped across the plains, tramped over the hills, and trundled through the jungle, all the way to Lions den.

Read more here:

'Naming The Tree' | Circle Round 103 | Circle Round - WBUR

Green and Growing: Plant blindness, a mower, and one unfortunate afternoon – theday.com

I learned a hard lesson recently. It happened when a 3-year-old wet meadow and shrub area Id designed was accidentally mowed by a brush hog operator one afternoon in early July.

Tractor tires wreaked havoc on one-third acre of native warm-season grasses and sedges and flowering plants along the wetland edge. The brush hog chewed up about 40 young native shrubs, which looked like woody upstarts. (No mounds of mulch surrounded them.) The planting was almost three years old.

The operators explanation was simple and almost predictable: He saw a tall field, he had some time left after his primary mowing job on the same property. The operator thought hed do the owner a favor.

To his eye, he said, it looked like a bunch of weeds. No matter that to the birds, butterflies, bees, reptiles, and amphibians, it looked like a grocery store and a nursery for the next generation. That wasnt on his mind.

We could label the loss the result of incompetence, carelessness, a terrible mistake, or worse. Nothing could undo the damage, especially the years it had taken for the plants to mature.

Yet we all know that the tractor operator made a common assumption that earns him and thousands of others a paycheck: Tall vegetation is supposed to be mowed. It blocks peoples views. It triggers complaints about messiness. Mow it. Its always been that way.

But the mowers attitude may also be a result of a broader cultural problem, one that some in the horticulture world called plant blindness.

The phrase appeared for the first time in a 1998 guest editorial paper by science educators James Wandersee and Elisabeth Schussler. They defined plant blindness as the inability to see or notice the plants in ones own environment.

They observed multiple consequences from this bias, such as the inability to recognize the importance of plants in human affairs and natural processes, and the misguided, anthropocentric ranking of plants as inferior to animals, leading to the erroneous conclusion that they are unworthy of human consideration.

(Read more in their guest editorial in The American Biology Teacher Volume 61, Issue 2, available at online.ucpress.edu/abt.)

This perspective is nothing new in the 21st century, of course. It dates at least to the beginning of the 20th century when our recent ancestors abandoned farms in droves. Or, perhaps it dates from the more distant times when we no longer needed to be able to distinguish edible from poisonous plants or find fibers for homespun clothing or find medicine. We lost our need to see plants.

Unfortunately, our mental wiring may be part of the problem as well. Plants seem to be inanimate and easy to control. Wandersee observed that the primary problem might be due to the inherent constraints of [our] visual information processing systems. Animals are more noticeable. Were more likely to understand the consequences of animal encounters, both positive and negative.

This inability to see plants may have tragic future consequences, however.

Paradoxically, plants form the basis of most animal habitats and all life on earth, observed Wandersee and Schussler in 1999. More recently, Douglas Tallamy, author of Natures Best Hope and other works that alerts us to the insect apocalypse, summarized the profound role of plants in eight words: Plants, in essence, enable animals to eat sunlight, he says. Insects are the animals that are best at transferring energy from plants to other animals.

Can we afford to be plant-blind any longer?

Taking off the blinders

It would be nice to imagine the tractor operator, given the same encounter with a wet meadow, might pause and think: Thats a bird and pollinator habitat that doubles as wetland protection. Id better check with someone before I mow. This change of perspective is unlikely, however, without some new intentions on his part and a bit of education.

Here are a few ideas to help you and those you know overcome plant blindness.

First, check out this entertaining video essay by U.K.-based YouTuber Benedict Furness: bit.ly/plant-blindness.

For more fun, download an app called Picture This, available at picturethisai.com. Heres how it works: I was walking in a grassy field recently when I encountered an unusual plant. I snapped a picture with Picture This. The app, which is based on artificial intelligence, identified a green-fringed bog orchid in about two seconds. I have found it to be about 80 percent accurate, far more than other plant identification apps Ive tried.

If you enjoy crowd-sourced information, one of the most reliable and most popular sites is iNaturalist, available at inaturalist.org. Upload your photos and receive help from scientists, citizen-scientists, students of all ages, and the rest of us.

iNaturalist offers both plant and animal identification. It is a joint initiative by theCalifornia Academy of Sciencesand theNational Geographic Society.

If youre a Facebook user, the Plant Identification group (bit.ly/Facebook-plant-ID) helps with all sorts of plants, including houseplants and edibles.

If you want to know more about plant blindness, the Native Plant Conservation Campaign has more information at bit.ly/plant-blindness-page.

Above all, the next time you see a grassy meadow, chalk one up for pollinator and bird habitat. Make sure the mower stays in the shed.

Kathy Connolly is a landscape designer from Old Saybrook who writes and speaks about horticulture and ecology. Reach her through her website, speakingoflandscapes.com.

Continue reading here:

Green and Growing: Plant blindness, a mower, and one unfortunate afternoon - theday.com

Find the Original Source Image of your Favorite Movie – News Lagoon

(Photo by A24)

Continuing our series of Ridiculously Early Oscar Predictions, we now move on to the gentlemen. As noted when we released our Ridiculously Early Best Actress predictions, it might seem ludicrous to start guesstimating contenders so soon, but the Oscar movie calendar is starting earlier and earlier as is awards season itself and the very notion of an Oscar movie is changing.

Our early Best Actor predictions list is supersized because we might be facing the most competitive race in the category in decades. The upcoming seasoncould evendethrone 1993, which is considered by many to be the most competitive year ever when it comes to Best Actor: Al Pacino(Scent of Woman) wonthe award over Robert Downey Jr. (Chaplin), Clint Eastwood (Unforgiven), Stephen Rea (The Crying Game), and Denzel Washington (Malcolm X).

The same storm of fierce competition is a-brewing for 2020. How do we know?Anumberof the filmslikely to be in the conversation have already screened at festivals and earned Tomatometer scores, and pundits are already singling out the major standout performances in them. There are also othersthat nobody has yet seen, but for which early pre-release buzzand expectations are high. With that said, some on this list may end up in the Supporting Actorcategory, and weve omitted names like Tom Hanks, who plays Mr Rogers inA Beautiful Day in the Neighborhood,becausewebelieve hell be in that Supporting race.

Whether we like it or not, the campaigns are quietly underway, the conversation has started, and were now ready to join it. Ifhistory and basic math tell us anything, it is that most of these names wont make it to Oscar night, but were pretty confident many of them will be right up there in the awards chatter. So read on as we break down our ridiculously earlypicks for 2020 Best Actor contenders.

Dont agree with our picks? Have at us in the comments.

This fresh take on Bonnie and Clydecame from the mind of Lena Waithe and is based on a story by James Frey. (Yes, its the I lied to Oprah James Frey, but try not tohold that against the film.) In the debut feature film fromMelina Matsoukas (director of Beyonces Formation music video), we follow Queen and Slim, two strangers who end up on the run together and maybe fall in love. RT was lucky enough to screen a few minutes of the film, and whatwe saw was enough to make two bold predictions:Queen and Slimmight be in the awards conversation, and Daniel Kaluuya could very well pull another Oscar nod. WithGet Out andWidows, the Britishactorhas quietly morphed into one of the hottest young talentsworking; what he is able to to do in one conversation with co-star Jodie Turner-Smith is nothing short of spectacular.

Noah Baumbach was at one timeless than thrilled that his 2017 release The Meyerowitz Stories (New and Selected) was picked up by streaming giant Netflix; he had beenvery much hoping for a traditional studio run. However, those ill feelings have seemingly subsided, as he chose to produce his latest film entirely under the Netflix banner. (Hes in good company at the streamer, withAva DuVernay, Martin Scorsese, and Steven Soderbergh all releasing projects there.) We have already singled out Scarlett Johanssons Marriage Story performance as one that couldgo the distance, and her co-star Adam Driver is rumored to be equally impressive. The movie tells the story of a bicoastal breakup and hasbeen described as a modern-day Ordinary People mixed with a dash ofKramer vs. Kramer; its saidto bepoignant, intimate, and like so many otherBaumbach films full of big laughs and tears. Speaking to IndieWirein July, theWhile Were Young director confessed the film defies categorization: [Marriage Story] isa hidden thriller, a procedural, a romantic comedy, a tragic love story. I felt like this was a subject that could handle all those things.

Apost-Fox merger world could provide Walt DisneyStudios with some chances at Best Actor trophies and, more importantly, something theyve never been able to get:a Best Picture Academy Award.You read that correctly: Disney has never won an Academy Award for Best Picture. Just let that sink in. With the Fox merger,Disneynow has a host of titles that will give ita competitive edge for awards, one of the biggest being Ford v. Ferrari. The movie tells the true-life tale of how the Ford Motor Companyworked tirelessly to build a car that could beat racing powerhouse Ferrari at the 24 Hours of Le Mans race in 1966. Starring Matt Damon as famed Ford car designer Carroll Shelby and Christian Bale as racinglegendKen Miles, the films trailer promises a funny, fast-paced adventure. Both lead actors are coming off recent nominations Bale for Vice and Damon for The Martian andwith Logan and Walk the Line director James Mangold behind the camera, the odds are very much in their favor.

When Adam Sandler released his comedy special 100% Fresh earlier this year, everyone here at RT had to crack a smile. Though the comedians filmography,which is featured heavily in our upcoming book Rotten Movies We Love,is beloved by many, he has not been much of critical darling, especially lately. That being said, when Sandler teams up with indie directors, good things happen.The aforementioned The Meyerowitz Stories (New and Selected) earned the former SNL star his best reviews in years, and Paul Thomas Andersons indie darling Punch Drunk Lovescored Sandler hisfirst Golden Globe nomination. In Uncut Gems, the New York native plays a celebrity jeweler from New Yorks famed Diamond District who is suddenly thrust into a race-against-the-clock-thriller to get back his merchandise or pay off his debts when one of his couriers is robbed. Robert Pattinson banged around the indie circuit withsome strongroles during and after his Twilight years, butit was his frantic performance as a bank robber in the Safdie Brothers Good Time that finally resurrectedhim in the minds of many critics. Its no wonder Sandler signed on to take the lead in their follow-up film.

Our new Batman and in this house, we do sayBattinson owes much to the Safdie BrothersGood Time for rehabbing his image in the minds of non-Twilightfans. (OK, and Claire Denis and David Cronenberg and other great indie directors hes been working with.) A supremely talented actor, he hasfought hard to do the kinds of roles that inspire him.Back in 2017 at the SavannahFilm Festival he said, I like finding directors who havent been fully realized by the wider world yet. The Lighthouse, whichwon the Cannes Critics Award, was one of the best-reviewed films of theFrench film festival. Those lucky enough to catch a screening have dubbed the story of two men trapped in an 1800s lighthouse a gothic horror masterpiece. Willem Dafoe, who last year pulled a nomination forthe Vincent van Gogh biopic At Eternitys Gate,is an Academy favorite with five career nominations, and as of today both he and R. Patz areright in the mix to score a nomination. Firstreviews out of the Cannes Film Festival predicted as much, and nothing has changed since then to slow down eithers momentum.

Last year, during the Oscars ceremony, as Netflix was racking up multiple wins from its15 nominations, the studio opted to play a teaserfor Martin Scorseses upcoming and long-awaited film The Irishman. It was a mic drop moment to be sure, and while the trailershowedno footage or even an official image, the names plastered on the screen were enough:Robert De Niro,Al Pacino, Joe Pesci, Harvey Keitel, Martin Scorsese. In a script by Steven Zaillian, The Irishman follows Jimmy Hoffa and a cast of mob characters that includes his former bodyguard, who later confessed to murdering him. Recently, Netflix dropped the teaser trailer, providing a sneak peek ofThe Irishmanthat showed off its notorious use ofCGI technology to de-agethe older cast to their thirties, forties, and fifties.Using technology completely foreign to what weve seen in theMCU, or will see in Ang LeesThe Gemini Man starring Will Smith, The Irishman has positioned itself for multiple, possible double-digit nominations in technical and above-the-line categories, including possible nominations for its three leads. There isa tendency with awards films to categorize supporting performances as leads and vice-versa were looking you Alicia Vikander but from what we saw, De Niro was firmly in the lead category, with question marks forthe rest.

WhenTaron Egerton sat down with us earlier thisyear and broke down how hebecame Elton John,he confessed it was a transformative experience, nothing short of life-changing.It was something like that for many who watched it, too.The film premiered to acclaim at theCannes Film Festival earlier this year, andboth Egerton and his co-star Jamie Bell were singled out for their memorable performances. In an ultra-crowded field,Egertonhas a harder road to get to Oscar night than, say, Rami Malek had last year. His performance has the goods, but as our exhaustive list of lead and potential lead performances suggests, this year is going to be a murderers row of talent.

If Joaquin Phoenix can pull off another Oscar nomination for his upcoming role in Todd PhillipsThe Joker, he will officially be in Meryl Streep territory.Not to say he equals Streep inaccomplishments, but whenever he takes a role theres a safe bet hes going to be in the conversation even if its a comic-book movie. Its one of the reasons why were giving his performance in Todd Phillips take on the iconic Batman villain a chance.We dont know much about the film itself, which will debut at the Venice Film Festival, but weve detailed what we doknow about the upcoming feature here. One thing we know for sure is that this is a complete departure from the DCEU. Phoenix takes the lead as the titular villain, giving us a detailed backstory to Batmans greatest rival; and while many predict itwill borrow heavily from the comics, it remainsindependentfrom any previous origin story. The Gladiator star, whofell short of an Oscar nomination in 2018 for Lynne Ramsays You Were Never Really Here, looks to have dived headfirst into this new iteration of the character. And though Phillips is mostly known for comedies, he does seem to get the best out of his actors. After all, Bradley Cooper didnt show up for the Hangover III because he was bored.

Star power could be the thing that differentiates these two performances in a crowded field. Because, well, theyreLEO AND BRAD!Even if the duo doesnt campaign hard, their starry sheen and pedigreecould be enough to earn nominations. Also, they gave two of the most universally acclaimed performances of the year even if the movie they were featured in has divided some critics.DiCaprio is brilliant as the hapless, self-absorbed, aging TV star Rick Dalton, and Pitts quiet confidence and cocksure smile as strong and silent stuntman Cliff Booth have charmed both critics and audiences alike. Theyre dynamite together, too.Add in the fact thatbothstars and co-star Margot Robbie are staples on the awards circuit, with recent nominations (and a couple of wins), and youd be hard-pressed argue against eitherof them making the cut.

If you had told us, afterseeing his breakthrough performance in Robert RodriguezsDesperado, that Antonio Banderas wouldbe the frontrunner for a Best Actor prize some day, we would have said: Of course! He may have been a rarity in awards chatterover the past few decades, but Banderas hasalways had the chops. Action, romance, comedy, drama:TheMask of Zorrostar has excelled in all. This year, however, his eighth collaboration with director Pedro Almodvar could very well be his time. In a semi-autobiographical story about a filmmaker who struggles with pain and melancholy, partly inspired in part by 8 1/2,Banderas is vulnerable, heartbreaking, and captivating to watch. Since the film premiered at Cannes, Banderas has been getting buzz as believe it or not one of the few frontrunners who could unseat the likes of De Niro, DiCaprio, Pesci, or Pitt. A foreign language film is not the safest bet for an acting nomination stats-wise, but after AlfonsoCuarn won Best Director forRoma, anything is possible.

Like this? Subscribe to our newsletter and get more features, news, and guides in your inbox every week.

Thumbnail image: Sony, Warner Bros., Universal Pictures

See the original post:

Find the Original Source Image of your Favorite Movie - News Lagoon

Penn law and engineering students built these accessible tech projects for Philly nonprofits – Technical.ly

A group of rising third-year law students at the University of Pennsylvania have teamed up with engineering students to create two tech-focused legal projects to be used by underserved communities navigating legal issues.

One project, a digital lockbox of sorts, will operate inside Broad Street Ministry (BSM) and be able to hold important documents like a birth certificate or medical records for housing insecure people. The other is a collaboration with Community Legal Services (CLS) on a form that would walk users through tricky tax law documents to see if in-person legal advice is needed.

The students work closely with Professor Cynthia Dahl, director of the Detkin Intellectual Property and Technology Legal Clinic, where she and students collaborate with startup founders on a variety of needs.

Zachary Furcolo and Maria Tartakovsky, both third-year law students with tech backgrounds, have spent the last academic year working on a guided interview project with CLS. The project is designed to help at-risk populations, like veterans or seniors, with property tax burdens.

In talking with CLS, we found out that people in these populations often come in when theyre about to get evicted, and CLS was looking for a way to get them enrolled before that happens, in a way that wouldnt force them to take off work and come in, Furcolo said. These forms and procedures can sometimes get a little complicated to fill out at home.

The tech behind the Property Tax Abatement Eligibility Survey aka the PhilaForm helps a user fill it out, asks questions and reminds them about documents they might need. It will also alert a user if theyre eligible for a number of tax programs. The tool itself is done, but the team is currently working with CLS and the engineering students who built the tool to vet it before rolling it out to the public.

But the group realizes theres work outside of creating the tool, Tartakovsky said. They also intend to target individuals or communities that could use the tool and promote it so that the public knows its available to them.

The group brought their project to the Iron Tech Invitational, a Georgetown University-based tech competition for the legal field. They didnt win, but it was a great experience to see that what the group thought was a niche area was actually being invested in by people across the country, Furcolo said.

For outreach purposes, the PhilaForm team identified property parcels that were likely to qualify for certain tax abatement programs and generated heat maps. (Courtesy image)

I do think AI in the legal space is looking pretty beneficial for lawyers, Tartakovsky said. Its important to make sure attorneys have access to relevant information, and the variables in place to help their clients. I think tech is proven to be prevalent in the legal space.

Another group of Penn students also created a project with Iron Tech standards in mind, although it didnt end up competing. Rising third year law student Matthew Copeland worked with a group of law and engineering students to develop a digital lockbox called Keep.id for BSM. Guests who use the nonprofits services could upload and have a place to store important documents so they wouldnt have to carry them around.

Copelands role involved learning data security law, which he said is ever-evolving in Pennsylvania. Currently, the project is being worked on by 13 independent contractors, all students or recent grads, from universities across the northeastern United States.

Having incorporated and secured an interest amongst our customers to beta test the product, were in the process just now of establishing a bank account for our organization and of setting up the nonprofit-focused (donations-focused) pages of the website, said the projects comms lead, Jackson Foltz.

Copeland said learning about the securities involved, like how the tech could be HIPAA-compliant, was difficult.

But its worth it having the guests have something to call their own, even if its digital, he said. Its work well worth it.

View post:

Penn law and engineering students built these accessible tech projects for Philly nonprofits - Technical.ly

Lord Ram not the ‘property’ of BJP: Congress MP Shashi Tharoor – Deccan Herald

With the Congress under attack from various quarters over what was seen by many as a subtle shift in its position on the Ram temple issue, senior Congress leader Shashi Tharoor on Wednesday rejected allegations that the grand old party was being "BJP-Lite" and asserted that Lord Ram is not the "property" of the saffron party.

Seeking to clear the air on what he said were "widespread misrepresentations" he had heard during the course of the day, Tharoor put out a series of tweets to spell out his party's stand on the Ram temple issue.

In his tweets, Tharoor also addressed those Muslims who say that they feel let down by the Congress and cited verses from the holy Quran, asking "who exactly betrayed you?"

"Not those who stand for an inclusive India, who have neither attacked you nor preached hatred against you," he said, addressing the section of Muslims riled by the Congress' stand.

Tharoor's remarks assume significance as they came after Indian Union Muslim League, a major ally in the Congress-led United Progressive Alliance, passed a resolution expressing displeasure over Priyanka Gandhi Vadra's statement on the construction of Ram temple in Ayodhya.

Ahead of the 'bhoomi pujan' ceremony in Ayodhya, the Congress general secretary in-charge of Uttar Pradesh issued the statement, hoping that the groundbreaking ceremony becomes "a celebration of national unity, fraternity and cultural affinity". Priyanka's remarks were seen by its allies, including the Muslim League, as a subtle shift in Congress' position on the emotive issue.

Several Congress leaders had also welcomed the "bhumi pujan" ceremony and hailed the Ram temple construction.

Former party president Rahul Gandhi said Lord Ram is the ultimate embodiment of supreme human values and can never appear in cruelty, hatred or injustice.

Hitting out at the BJP, Tharoor said, "Shri Ram is not the property of BJP. He is the ideal man whose image is deeply etched in the hearts and minds of millions. Gandhiji always sang his hymns and died with "Hei Ram' on his lips. He talked about a Ram Rajya where all would live in peace and prosperity. Can't let his name be hijacked!"

The universal appeal of Ram and Sanatan Dharma cannot be commandeered by those who chant either hymns or slogans, he said, asserting that Lord Ram belongs to all humanity.

For Hindutva, Ram is a God to be worshipped; for Gandhi, Ram represented ideal qualities that every person should practise and seek to emulate, he said.

"Let's be clear: @INCIndia was NEVER opposed to the construction of a Ram temple in Ayodhya, but to the criminal demolition of the Babri Masjid. In 1989, Rajiv Gandhi ji allowed VHP to do shilanyas on non-disputed land nearby as an alternate site: At the same time it was NOT Rajiv Gandhi who ordered opening of the locks at the masjid, but the district judge of Faizabad who ordered the locks to be opened in 1986!!" Tharoor said in his tweets.

"Whatever you feel about today's events, the Masjid's demolition is a blot on our conscience. As Rahul Gandhi said in 2007, 'My father said to my mother that he would stand in front of Babri Masjid. They would have had to kill him first'," the MP from Thiruvananthapuram said.

Hitting out at some Left-liberal intellectuals accusing the Congress of being "BJP-Lite", Tharoor said many leaders welcomed the Ram temple after the Supreme Court judgement, but they did not instigate Hindus against Muslims.

"They did not make hate speeches against the Muslim community. They hailed the ideal Ram ji," he said.

"To those who insist there is no difference between the political parties in India, I ask: is there is no difference between those who would respectfully have come to an accommodation with the Muslim community on a Ram mandir, and those who, with rage and hate, destroyed the mosque?" the former Union minister asked.

Earlier in the morning, ahead of the foundation laying ceremony, Tharoor tweeted, "Lord Shri Ram epitomises justice for all, righteous conduct, fairness and firmness in all dealings, moral rectitude and courage."

"These values are much needed in such dark times. If they spread throughout the land, Ram Rajya would not be an occasion for triumphalist bigotry," he said, using the hash tag 'JaiShriRam'.

In a highly-anticipated event watched by millions on television, Prime Minister Narendra Modi during the day laid the foundation of the Ram temple in Ayodhya.

The wait of centuries has ended, Modi said after performing the groundbreaking ceremony, made possible by a Supreme Court verdict last year that allowed the construction of the temple at the site where the Babri mosque was demolished by kar sevaks in 1992.

See the rest here:

Lord Ram not the 'property' of BJP: Congress MP Shashi Tharoor - Deccan Herald

Search-and-rescue inquiry ‘better late than never,’ says former Torngat Mountains MHA – CBC.ca

A former LabradorMHA who took part in the search for the missing Burton Winters in 2012 says he hopes the search-and-rescue inquiry will help improve future operations.

Randy Edmunds, Liberal MHA for Torngat Mountains from 2011 until he lost his seat to the PCs' Lela Evans last year, said it's good the inquiry will finally be going ahead.

"Better late than never. There's so many of us that spend time out on the land and out on the ocean in this province," Edmunds told CBC Radio's On The Go on Tuesday.

"Accidentshappen, people do get lost, and this inquiry I'm hopeful that we'll adjust protocols, adjust procedures and have a plan in the event that something like this happens again."

Details of the inquiry into Newfoundland and Labrador'sground search-and-rescue operations for lost and missing persons will be released this fall, the result of a process that began in 2018 after years of advocacy following the Burton's death.

Burton, 14, died afterhis snowmobile becamestuck onsea ice nearMakkovik, Labrador.He had walked 19 kilometres before succumbing to the cold.His body was found three days after he was missing including two days before a military aircraft was dispatched to aid in the ground search.

"I think it was the missed communication, for lack of a better word, between provincial search and rescue and federal search and rescue protocols, and the confusion and the explanations that came after totally caused more confusion," said Edmunds.

"I'd like to say that this should not have happened, but it did, and some of the excuseswe heard as to why they indeed couldn't come up, these are the things that need to be addressed and we need to have a plan that's ready to be implemented, designed for these types of accidents."

Former judge James Igloliorte of Hopedale wasappointed to lead the inquiry last week.

Edmunds said there's no better choice than Igloliorteto take the lead.

"I think Jimmy Igloliorte is knowledgeableof the land, knowledgeableof the people andhe has the insight of communicating with the people on the coast of Labrador," he said.

Edmunds said withIgloliorteat the forefronthe hopes asearch-and-rescue plan can be developed on the national and provincial scale, but most importantly on the local scale, where search-and-rescue members have pre-existing knowledge of the area.

"Local is the one I trust the most. These fellows know the land, they know the environment and they always come forward in situations like this, above and beyond what they're called to do."

Read more from CBC Newfoundland and Labrador

View post:

Search-and-rescue inquiry 'better late than never,' says former Torngat Mountains MHA - CBC.ca

What exactly is ‘old growth’ BC forest, and how much is protected? – Agassiz-Harrison Observer

B.C. Forests Minister Doug Donaldson has had an independent report on old-growth forest preservation on his desk since May, but it will be some time before it is released and longer before any of its recommendations are acted upon.

Donaldson appointed two experts to conduct the strategic review in October, with the forest industry struggling with poor economic conditions, the B.C. governments latest logging restrictions and continued protests calling for a moratorium on old growth logging.

Questioned on his ministrys $489 million budget at the B.C. legislature, Donaldson said the report is expected to be released soon, but that will be followed by engagement on the recommendations. The terms of reference require government-to-government talks with first nations before any decisions are made, which is expected to take several months.

Donaldson made a couple of things clear in his answers to B.C. Liberal MLA John Rustad. He isnt considering any change to the provinces definition of old growth forest, or a moratorium on old-growth logging for an industry that has seen steady increase in protected areas and restrictions on the Crown land base.

B.C.s definition of old growth is 250 years old in the Coast region, and 140 years old in the Interior. Overall, about 13.7 million hectares or 23 per cent of the total B.C. forest base is considered old growth, and 3.75 million hectares, 27 per cent of the old growth, may be harvested, Donaldson said.

Asked by Rustad if he is considering a short-term moratorium on old-growth logging until the report is considered, Donaldson responded: I have never used, and weve never used as a government, the word moratorium.

RELATED: B.C. has the most sustainably managed forests in the world

RELATED: Teal-Jones shuts down B.C. coast logging operations

The Coast region, which includes Vancouver Island, the Central Coast area designated as the Great Bear Rainforest timber supply area and Haida Gwaii, has 7.55 million hectares of forest, with 42 per cent old growth. And 33 per cent of the west coast region is protected or reserved, Donaldson said.

Vancouver Island forests are 73 per cent Crown land and 27 per cent private, much of it the legacy of colonial Governor James Douglas 1850s deal with coal baron James Dunsmuir to trade land for construction of the Esquimalt and Nanaimo (E&N) Railway.

A focus of anti-logging protests for decades, Vancouver Islands Crown forests are 39 per cent old growth, nearly half of which are protected or reserved.

The review was completed in January by Garry Merkel, a professional forester and member of the Tahltan Nation in northwest B.C., and Al Gorley, a professional forester and former chair of the Forest Practices Board that audits logging in B.C.

@tomfletcherbctfletcher@blackpress.caLike us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter.

BC legislatureforestry

Go here to read the rest:

What exactly is 'old growth' BC forest, and how much is protected? - Agassiz-Harrison Observer

The worlds biggest land grab – Part I – The News International

Indias credentials as a responsible member of the international community faced a serious challenge in 2019, and continue to do so into 2020. New Delhi, long seen as a possible anchor for stability in Asia, plunged the region and the world in a territorial and religious dispute under the shadow of a nuclear war.

India did this by taking a brash unilateral action in Kashmir on 5 August 2019, revoking semi-autonomous rule in a disputed territory, and inviting Indian citizens a billion of them to throng Kashmir to buy land and turn roughly 13-million Kashmiris into a minority. And since India is predominantly Hindu and Kashmir is predominantly Muslim, this is a recipe for a Bosnia-style genocide that would drag in nuclear-armed neighbors Pakistan and China, and likely other powers.

The crisis is compounded by a communication blackout and nearly a million Indian soldiers patrolling the streets of Kashmir. Sporadic curfews have led to shortages in food and medicine. When the crisis began, it was so sudden it caught regional and big powers off guard. The world was busy in the Iran crisis, Syria, the China trade war, and fresh attempts at peace between Palestinians and Israel. Pakistan and the United States were busy making headway in an Afghan peace deal. The surprise Indian escalation in Kashmir threatened to derail Islamabads peace efforts in Afghanistan, and negatively impact President Trumps 2020 reelection bid.

If India keeps upping the ante in Kashmir, public anger inside Pakistan will push Pakistani leaders into a corner. Pakistan, the decades-old flagbearer of Kashmirs right to self-determination, has made it clear it will not allow India to annex Kashmiri territory and push Kashmiris out as refugees.

The Indian action triggered an unprecedented global reaction. This is likely the first time that Indian leaders find themselves at the receiving end of a global backlash, a situation they did not experience at any time since India became a country out of British colonies in 1947.

This is a stunning fall from grace for a country that was expected to play a role commensurate with its size, and where liberal values were supposed to foster a tolerant, constructive view of the neighborhood and the world. Instead, India is undergoing the birth pangs of a violent, segregationist, fascist ideology based on a twisted version of the peaceful religion of Hinduism. This new ideology targets Christianity, Islam, and Indias own underprivileged class of untouchables, the Dalits.

Behold the latest version of India: the worlds largest democracy is embroiled in the worlds largest military curfew and the largest communication blackout. This international dispute, simmering since 1947, is the worlds oldest pending conflict in the UN Security Council, preceding even the Palestinian-Israeli conflict, which hogs the spotlight but is probably not as urgent as Kashmir at this stage, both militarily and in terms of the humanitarian crisis.

For all its international stature, India is unable or unwilling to maturely resolve a territorial dispute with a smaller neighbour. Kashmir has not been resolved mainly because Indian leaders will not sit down with Pakistan and work around an impartial UN-supervised referendum where Kashmiris decide their future.

Up until now India had hoped to ride out the conflict by stalling Kashmir peace talks, knowing that smaller parties Pakistan and Kashmiris cannot force India to come to the negotiating table. New Delhi uses this stalemate to its benefit to perpetuate the conflict.

India is not ending the war in Kashmir by choice. But India invites potential global intervention by stalling the Kashmir settlement.

On August 16, 2019, the inability of Indian leaders to resolve the conflict with Pakistan forced the international community to take baby steps towards what can become an international intervention in Kashmir. On that day, the UN Security Council held its first formal meeting on Kashmir in more than a half-century. Not much came out of it, but the die is cast.

This stunning setback for Indian diplomacy should have been met in New Delhi with introspection and a review of Indias policies in Kashmir. Instead, India protested international communitys interference in the conflict, in a move reminiscent of Milosevic after the Bosnia genocide and Saddam after the Kurd massacre.

More disturbingly, variations of the term The Final Solution are increasingly propping up in Indian public discourse, often coupled with condemnation of Kashmiris for their unpatriotic act of rejecting Indian military control.

Indias actions of August 5 have internationalized the Kashmir issue, and could force an international intervention at some future point if India fails to control the situation.

To be continued

The writer is a journalist focused on national security and human rights.

Twitter: @_AhmedQuraishi

See original here:

The worlds biggest land grab - Part I - The News International

Election Live, August 6: ‘CovidCard’ – trial of tracer app replacement announced – The Spinoff

Welcome to Election Live for August 6, bringing you the latest on election 2020 and other breaking news. For key dates in the election season click here. For all you need to know about the cannabis referendumclick here. For the assisted dying referendumclick here. Policy launching soon. Get in touch atstewart@thespinoff.co.nz

Jacinda Ardern has paid tribute to Winston Peters, as parliament officially wraps up ahead of the election campaign.

During her adjournment speech, Ardern thanked the leaders of her coalition and confidence and supply partners New Zealand First and the Greens. She also thanked her own party members.

When talking of the upcoming campaign, Ardern hinted at the fact there will likely be a bit of mud-slinging from her government partners. But, she said that in her mind, that wont diminish her the achievements from the past term.

About time Judith Collins thanks MPs during adjournment speech

Nationals leader has thanked her MPs for their support, joking that its about time she got to deliver an adjournment speech. She also paid tribute to her predecessors in the role, Simon Bridges and Todd Muller. Bridges, in particular, was singled out for providing an opposition voice at the start of this parliamentary term.

During a highly critical speech, Collins made it clear she expects to be prime minister after September, saying Ardern will soon be famous for being a one-term prime minister. She also hit out at the MPs in Arderns government, questioning why Phil Twyford and Kelvin Davis were so high-up the party list.

Finally, she called out Winston Peters for considering himself the handbrake on Labour and the Greens, calling him the enabler.

Winston Peters: I made the right decision in 2017

That was eyebrow raising stuff, Peters said, responding to a quite extraordinary adjournment speech by Judith Collins. The deputy prime minister said he made the right call choosing Jacinda Ardern in 2017, rather than forming a government with National. He also criticised some in the media for saying the government wouldnt make it through an entire term: they said we wouldnt last. Well, last we did.

We have got through by agreeing on most things or making compromise, Peters said, praising his partners in government for working alongside him over the last three years.

James Shaw: NZ First stop progress

Greens co-leader James Shaw has used his adjournment speech to criticise his government partner, New Zealand First and its leader Winston Peters.

Its always a pleasure to follow the right honourable Winston Peters Ill miss it. He also suggested New Zealand First should adopt a new slogan, saying: Labour will campaign on keeping New Zealand moving while New Zealand First will campaign on stopping it. Its a great slogan for NZ First: You can stop progress.

However, he finished his speech by thanking Peters saying everything that the Greens have achieved in government has been done alongside New Zealand First.

Shaw also said hed give National some false hope, saying that when he gave his 2017 adjournment speech the Greens were polling below the 5% threshold and yet on election night the result was much higher.

Hamilton City Council will switch to the single transferable vote (STV) system for the 2022 local election and onwards, its been confirmed. As Stuff reports, the 11-2 vote in favour of switching from the first past the post (FPP) system was made in a council meeting on Thursday. It followed a recent council that had 78.1% in favour of changing to STV. of which were in favour of moving to the system that asks voters to rank their candidates in order of preference.

The STV voting system allows for voters to rank candidates in order of preference.

Police say two thieves who tried to blow up an ATM machine at a Hamilton mall were armed with seven pipe bombs. The two suspects were caught on CCTV, but have not yet been found.

Hamilton City area commander inspector Andrea McBeth told media the explosives were unsophisticated, but that it was incredibly dangerous.

New Zealand has no new cases of Covid-19, the director general of health Ashley Bloomfield has announced. There remain 23 active cases, all in quarantine facilities.

It comes as the government announces a Rotorua-based field trial for its new contact tracing device the CovidCard. The bluetooth-enabled card would allow for close contacts to be easily identified, should a second wave of Covid-19 hit New Zealand. More information on the CovidCard is available below (1pm update).

Kiwis asked to add face masks to emergency supply kits

The Ministry of Health has updated its advice on the use of face masks. It is now recommending that households add sufficient masks for everybody who normally lives there, in preparation for a possible outbreak. There is currently no community transmission of Covid-19, so in the mean time there is no need for a mask to be worn in public, the health minister Chris Hipkins said.

But, he said that if our alert level rises, people will be required to wear masks in situations where social distancing isnt possible.

Bloomfield said masks are just one tool in the toolbox to help reduce the risk of Covid-19 being spread, if another outbreak occurs. He said adding masks to the overall toolbox is part of the ministrys plan to try keep us at alert level one. Bloomfield said hell be featured in a new Facebook video showing people how to properly use a mask.

The government has revealed a small scale trial of an alternative to its Covid tracer app will go ahead in Rotorua.CovidCard is a bluetooth enabled tracking device that would make the need for QR codes in contact tracing redundant.

The trial comes as the government is seeking to increase contract tracing options ahead of a feared second wave of Covid-19 in New Zealand.

In a release, health minister Chris Hipkins said effective contract tracing is a vital part of the governments Covid-19 response.

While manual processes remain the critical component for contact tracing, we know digital solutions can help make contact tracing faster and more effective. This is important from a public health perspective and also in supporting our economic and social recovery, Hipkins said.

The government funded a trial run by the University of Otago in conjunction with the Nelson Marlborough DHB during lockdown, digital services minister Kris Faafoi said. Now, a community trial will take place: After consultation with community leaders and iwi, we have selected the Rotorua region for a further trial involving around 250-300 people, he said.

There is no mention of how much this trial will cost.

The CovidCard is a wearable swipecard-sized plastic tag fitted with a Bluetooth chip. It sends a constant signal and picks up and registers signals from cards it comes into contact with. The card carries no personal information and requires nothing from the wearer but to remember to carry it.

Faafoi said the trial will allow the government to understand how the cards work in a real-world scenario, whether they are compatible with our contact tracing systems, and whether the public would accept and use the cards if they were rolled out.

Any decision on whether to deploy the CovidCard will be made later this year.

Its fair to say that no single technology to solve contact tracing has been identified anywhere in the world. Thats why we need to explore all available technology options, Hipkins said.

But, despite this, the government remains attached to its Covid tracer app. Hipkins said it will continue to be improved.

Read more: Despite its starry backers claims, the CovidCard is no magic solution

Updated

Police have confirmed they located several homemade explosives at the Chartwell shopping centre, in Hamilton. The explosives were part of an attempted scheme to blow up an ATM machine, located on the exterior wall of the shopping centre at its southern end.

A cordon remains in place around the mall, which is still closed. A comprehensive search of the shopping centre and surrounds is now underway, to ensure nothing of concern is left unnoticed.

Initial indications suggest two devices had already detonated before police were notified, with damage contained to the ATM and immediate surrounds. Earlier, locals in the area reported hearing loud bangs. No people have been injured.

The Spinoffs politics podcast Gone By Lunchtime is back for another week.

This week:The height of the summit for the National Party? A poll came out last week with Labour at 53%, and that was considered good news for Judith Collins and the Strong Team.

Annabelle, Ben and Toby assess the state of the race, as well as the Act surge and Seymourmania, the valedictory speeches, the state of social liberal thinking in National, the battle for Auckland Central, the Mori seats (which are up for grabs), and the Operation Burnham inquiry.

Read more here and subscribe here

Following the 2018 census, 35 electorates have been modified in some way ahead of the upcoming election. At the same time, theres also been the creation of a new seat Takanini. The Spinoffs new South Auckland editor Justin Latif has written about what it means, whos running, and who will be voting.

Heres an extract from his piece:

The name of New Zealands newest electorate can be traced back to a prominent Te kitai Waiohua chief of the 19th century, Ihaka Takaanini.

A significant landholder and powerful leader in South Auckland during the 1850s and 60s, he held the important role of land assessor for the Crown. His story ended in tragedy, however, as he was falsely accused of being a sympathiser with Mori rebels wanting to invade Auckland. Stripped of his roles and land holdings he was imprisoned without trial, along with his wife, elderly father, and three children. He would eventually die on Rakino Island in the Hauraki Gulf, never to see his home again.

Read the full article here

The killer of British backpacker Grace Millane is back in court today, appealing his conviction and prison sentence. The 28-year-old, who still cannot be named for legal reasons, was found guilty in November last year, almost a year on from Millanes death.

Hes appealing a life sentence, with a minimum 17-year non parole period.

There was criticism during last Novembers trial about the way in which victim blaming played a part in the defence case. You can read some of The Spinoffs coverage of the trial here.

A new poll this morning shows a majority of New Zealanders want our strict border measures to stay in place. The NZ Herald-Kantar poll shows 68% of those surveyed are happy with the current border policy. 29% think the ban should be relaxed, so long as those coming into New Zealand cover the cost of quarantining.

The results will sit comfortably with government, who yesterday passed legislation allowing for returning New Zealanders to be charged.

One of those who will not be in the 68% is former prime minister John Key, who yesterday told The Spinoff our border restrictions should be softened to allow businesspeople and international students into the country.

Reports this morning that a number of possible homemade explosives have been located at a Hamilton mall. Roads around the Chartwell shopping centre have been cordoned off, with the bomb squad alerted.

The bomb squad has been alerted of the situation and are now attending.

Well keep you updated if the situation evolves.

Its the final sitting week of this parliament, which means the government has been attempting to push through as many new laws under urgency as possible before the election campaign kicks off.

Yesterday, the legislation allowing the charging of returning New Zealanders passed. Later, new rental regulations passed into law. According to associate housing minister Kris Faafoi, the new rules increase the security of tenure for tenants and promote good-faith relationships in the renting environment. You can read a bit more about what it all means on The Spinoff right now.

The government has also tackled the issue of over-priced petrol. The Fuel Industry Bill does a number of things to encourage competition in the fuel market and hopefully drive down prices.

Finally, the government has also fulfilled one of its big promises from the last three years, by passing new vaping regulations. The Smokefree Environments and Regulated Products (Vaping) Amendment Bill regulates vaping products and heated tobacco devices. The minister in charge of this bill, Jenny Salesa, said its the most significant change to the Smoke-free Environments Act in 30 years. Salesa said it limits generic retailers such as dairies, service stations and supermarkets to selling only tobacco, mint and menthol flavoured vaping products, but specialist vape retailers will be able to sell any flavours from their shops and websites.

Read more: A landlord tells people to calm the hell down about new renting rules

First of all, its pretty clear that the top-line unemployment figure going down is a misleading picture of the state of the economy.Yesterday new figures from Stats NZ suggested unemployment was now down to 4%, which defied predictions, but of course it isnt the full story.The SpinoffsMichael Andrew has gone through the numbers, and found a big rise in the number of people who are underemployed that is, working less than theyd like to be. There has also been a fall in the number of hours worked, which suggests that many employers have responded to Covid-19 with tightening, rather than extreme mass layoffs.

A lot of the statistical quirks also have more to do with how various states of employment are categorised as well.InterestsDavid Hargreaves has looked at this, and noted that because of lockdown, some people were unable to look for work when they were surveyed because of this, theyre not technically counted towards the unemployment rate, even though they are not employed. He described the drop in unemployment as being frankly nonsensical.

And of course, for those unemployed it remains a really difficult time right now.Radio NZsCharlotte Cook has spoken to several people on the hunt for jobs right now, and its tough to get hired for the sort of full time position that would provide security. One person said theyd applied for about 200 entry level receptionist jobs, and got none of them back.

Read more and subscribe to The Bulletin here

The unemployment rate has dropped to 4%,but the number of people out of the labour force has skyrocketed.

The National Party unveiled its Wellington transport plan, which includes a second Mt Victoria tunnel.

There are two new cases of Covid-19, both in managed isolation.

The legislation for charging returnees has passed, with the new rules to come into effect mid-month.

Rob Fyfe and former PM John Key offered their thoughts on Aucklands rebuildat a conference following the Covid-19 pandemic.

Gerry Brownlee asked whether the government is withholding informationabout the risks of a Covid outbreak.

Amassive explosion in Beirutleft countless people injured, and the death toll continues to climb.

Read yesterdays Election Live here

The Bulletin is The Spinoffs acclaimed daily digest of New Zealands most important stories, delivered directly to your inbox each morning.

Read more:

Election Live, August 6: 'CovidCard' - trial of tracer app replacement announced - The Spinoff

What we know today, Thursday July 30 – InDaily

Adelaide Thursday July 30, 2020

Victoria has recorded 723 new cases and 13 deaths overnight and extended compulsory masks to all of the state. Welcome to your serving of the days breaking news from South Australia, the nation and abroad. Follow this post for breaking news through the day.

A man who had recently returned to South Australia from Victoria has become the states 449th confirmed coronavirus case, SA Health has revealed today.

Chief public health officer Professor Nicola Spurrier today confirmed the new case, but insisted the man in his 20s who had been granted essential traveller status to cross the border had absolutely done the right thing he got tested and is now in a medi-hotel in isolation.

He is stable with mild symptoms after arriving back in the state on July 26.

He realised of course he needed to quarantine, and organised to go into a hotel and make sure he was quarantining safely, Spurrier told reporters, adding the case had one close contact who was also now in quarantine.

This shows that our system here in SA is working, she insisted.

I am very confident this is not posing any risk at all for South Australians but what it clearly does show is a very real risk in Victoria, particularly with a very high case number today [and] with that level of community transmission.

Spurrier said she was very, very concerned about the situation in Victoria, saying: I know many South Australians are seeking that essential traveller status so that they can go to Victoria and return, but Im urging all South Australians about any need to travel to Victoria at this time.

Victoria has recorded 723 more COVID-19 cases and 13 deaths, Australias biggest single-day numbers.

The deaths take the state toll to 105 and the national figure to 189.

Todays spike follows a fall in the number of new infections reported on Tuesday and Wednesday and is more than double yesterdays figure of 295.

Premier Daniel Andrews said the latest fatalities were three men and three women in their 70s, three men and two women in their 80s, and two men aged in their 90s.

The dire numbers prompted the premier to announce a ban on visitors for residents of the Colac-Otway, Greater Geelong, Surf Coast, Moorabool, Golden Plains, and the Borough of Queenscliffe local government areas from Friday.

Andrews also said the mask directive issued to residents of metropolitan Melbourne and Mitchell Shire would be extended to all of regional Victoria from midnight on Sunday.

These are preventative steps it will be inconvenient for some, but at the end of the day, keeping those numbers very very low is about protecting public health, protecting vulnerable people, protecting every family, he said.

The first of five Australian Medical Assistance Teams, which provide disaster relief in critical health situations, will arrive in Victoria on Thursday.

They will join some 1400 Australian Defence Force personnel already on the ground in the state.

Up to 50 nurses from South Australia will head to Victoria to help ease strains on the local health system from tomorrow.

A damning report by South Australias health complaints watchdog has found SA Health failed in its delivery of services to people with a disability in acute settings.

The Health and Community Services Complaints Commissioner (HCSCC) today released a public summary about the investigation, which finds SA Health was in breach of the HCSCCs five guiding principles.

Commissioner Associate Professor Grant Davies said the investigation found that aspects of services posed an unacceptable risk to the health and safety of people living with a disability.

He began the investigation after receiving complaints about the provision of health services to people living with a disability in SA public hospitals and care facilities.

The evidence shows there was a failure in service delivery, Davies said in a statement today.

Every South Australian is entitled to have their rights respected when using a health or community service.

He said SA Health had accepted the findings and expressed concern over the failings.

The commissioner released a summary, but not the full report, produced by an independent expert.

The investigation covered complaints about the treatment of people with a disability in SA public hospitals and care facilities between 2015 and 2017, with the report finding the complaints were substantiated.

I find the systemic delivery of acute services by SA Health hospitals to people with disabilities to be in breach of the HCSCC Charters five guiding principles and three of the rights, namely Diversity, Decision making capacity and Genuine Partnership, the summary says.

I am satisfied, based on the historical evidence before me, the systemic delivery of acute services by SA Health hospitals at that time, posed an unacceptable risk to the health or safety of members of the public with disabilities and their family and carers.

However, I consider the various initiatives and actions taken by SA Health as outlined in this report are reasonable and will adequately resolve the systemic concerns identified in the investigation.

Premier Steven Marshall has defended a Liberal scheme to allocate project funding to target seats.

InDaily revealed yesterday that Marshall Government MPs had been briefed to formally submit a wishlist of infrastructure projects designed to explicitly target seats the party hopes to win at the 2022 state election with the process being overseen by outgoing Speaker Vincent Tarzia, who was yesterday sworn in as the states new Police Minister.

A Joint Party Paper dated March 2020 details a project understood to have been dubbed Project Wishlist which assesses infrastructure priorities in Liberal-held and target seats, to be unveiled in the weeks leading up the March 2022 election.

The scheme, labelled as pork-barrelling by Liberal insiders and the Opposition, appears to be at odds with Steven Marshalls vow that his establishment of Infrastructure SA to vet spending priorities would take politics out of infrastructure spending.

Infrastructure SA will end the current practice of Labor Ministers deciding infrastructure investment based around political considerations and replace it with decisions based on economic imperatives, then-Opposition Leader Marshall said before the last state election.

Speaking today, Marshall said the Liberal Government had always consulted with people in seats about what was important to them at the local level.

This is not new to political campaigning and we put all of those projects out ahead of every election, he told reporters this morning.

There is a big difference between projects that are promised in the lead up to the election and basically what occurred with Labor over 16 years in government where they completely neglected all of country SA and any seat that they didnt think theyd have a political opportunity in.

And I think, by contrast, I mean any reasonable person would look at our performance in terms of projects where weve invested heavily in seats that we would never stand a chance in.

Opposition Leader Peter Malinauskas said it should be condemned, arguing: This sort of pork-barrelling is what drives South Australians crazy.

He noted a leak appearing so soon after the swearing-in of three new ministers yesterday, which followed days of controversy over parliamentary entitlements that prompted the resignations of three members of the Marshall cabinet on the weekend.

This internal division within Steven Marshalls Liberal Party really undermines the ability of good government to be delivering jobs in SA, Malinauskas said.

Read the full story here.

The expenses scandal has claimed another Marshall Government scalp, with Liberal MP Adrian Pederick standing down from his position as government whip.

Three ministers resigned last weekend, with the Legislative Council president also signalling a move to quit, as Premier Steven Marshall attempted to rule a line under the country member allowances scandal which has dogged the Government for weeks.

However, the issue continues to fester, with the ABC reporting last night that Pederick, who says he lives at Coomandook in his country electorate, also maintains a substantial home at Mount Osmond in the Adelaide Hills.

TheABC reportedthat Pedericks wife works as a teacher in the Adelaide Hills and that his children attend a school in Adelaide.

This morning, the Premier said Pederick had told him he would resign his position as whip a role that involves maintaining the discipline of party members in parliamentary voting and other business.

Read the full story here.

Adelaide Oval will host a neutral AFL match between Melbourne and North Melbourne on August 9, four days after the Demons play the Crows at the venue. Picture: AAP/Julian Smith

Adelaide Oval will host a neutral AFL clash due to border restrictions interstate.

The round-11 AFL clash between Melbourne and North Melbourne was originally scheduled to be played on Sunday August 9 at Hobarts Blundstone Arena but that venue was ruled out after Tasmania elected not to open its border to Queensland.

Melbourne play the Crows at Adelaide Oval on August 5 and will remain in South Australia in the lead-up to their game four days later against the Kangaroos.

The Demons are the designated home team for the round-11 match.

The number of dwellings approved fell 4.9 per cent nationally in June, in seasonally adjusted terms, according to data released by the Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) today.

Approvals in South Australia fared slightly better, falling by 4.6 per cent while private sector house approvals in the state fell 2.3 per cent.

The impact of COVID-19 was evident on dwelling approvals in June, said Bill Becker, Assistant Director of Construction Statistics at the ABS.

Falls were recorded in all states, and across both detached and attached dwellings.

The value of total building approved rose 7.3 per cent in June, in seasonally adjusted terms.

The value of non-residential building rose 17.8 per cent, while residential building rose 0.1 per cent. The ABS said residential building value was buoyed by an 11.4 per cent increase in the value of alterations and additions to residential buildings.

The State Government will extend its land tax relief scheme for residential and commercial landlords with tenants impacted by COVID-19 until the end of September.

Under the scheme, eligible landlords can receive up to a 25 per cent reduction on their land tax liability on affected properties provided they pass on the full benefit to their impacted tenants.

Impacted tenants may include, gyms, clothing retailers, medical and dental practices, motels and hotels, restaurants, cafes, beauty salons and hairdressers.

Eastern states authorities fear a spike in COVID-19 clusters following a quarantine breach by two Brisbane teens as cases spread to Sydneys densely populated eastern suburbs.

Queensland is bracing for its first community transmission cases since May after the 19-year-old girls returned to Brisbane from Melbourne via Sydney with the virus and have since visited a number of Queensland restaurants and bars.

They are under investigation for allegedly giving false information on border declarations and have reportedly been fined $4000 each.

Three people tested positive to COVID-19 in Queensland yesterday including the two teens, sparking a criminal investigation into how the girls bypassed mandatory hotel quarantine despite returning from a declared hotspot.

The pair returned from Melbourne, via Sydney, on July 21 and spent eight days in the community before testing positive.One of them is a cleaner at a school.

NSW yesterday reported 19 new cases including two in hotel quarantine.

Queensland Premier Annastacia Palaszczuk will ban all visitors from Sydney from Saturday.

Im absolutely furious that this has happened, Palaszczuk said of the breach.

We need people to tell the truth we do not want a second wave here. We do not want widespread community transmission.

These two have been out in the community and hopefully it has not spread but time will tell.

Several European countries ramped up restrictions on Wednesday in a bid to contain rising coronavirus infections.

The number of new coronavirus infections in France rose by 1392 on Wednesday the highest daily tally in a month taking the countrys total number of confirmed cases to 185,196.

French health authorities said that, leaving aside the continuous decline of people in ICU units, all COVID-19 indicators showed an increase of the viral circulation.

Italy has extended its state of emergency, testing for returning travellers has started in Germany and Britains largest tour operator extended its suspension of trips to Spain.

Dutch authorities bucked the trend, with the government announcing on Wednesday it will not advise the public to wear masks because the evidence of their effectiveness was unclear.

US deaths from the coronavirus have surpassed 150,000, a number higher than in any other country and nearly a quarter of the worlds total, according to a Reuters tally.

Of the 20 countries with the biggest outbreaks, the United States ranks sixth in deaths per capita, at 4.5 fatalities per 10,000 people.

Only the United Kingdom, Spain, Italy, Peru and Chile have a higher per capita rate, the tally shows, with US deaths making up nearly 23 per cent of the global total of 660,997.

Brazils coronavirus outbreak has set daily records with both 69,074 new confirmed cases and 1595 related deaths, as the worlds second-worst outbreak accelerates toward the milestone of 100,000 lives cut short.

Meanwhile, Israels Health Ministry on Wednesday confirmed a daily record of 2104 new coronavirus cases the highest number the country has recorded over 24 hours.

More than 16.83 million people have been reported to be infected by the coronavirus globally and 660,997 have died.

Infections have been reported in more than 210 countries and territories since the first cases were detected in China in December 2019.

Picture: AP/ Evan Vucci

The US Government has placed Chinese-owned social media app TikTok under official review following previous threats by Secretary of State Mike Pompeo to ban it

Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin says the app owned by Chinese firm ByteDance is being reviewed by the Committee on Foreign Investments in the US (CFIUS).

The US administration has recently stepped up measures against Chinese tech firms, warning that these companies present a security threat.

TikTok is under CFIUS review and well be making a recommendation to the president on it this week, Mnuchin told reporters alongside President Donald Trump.

Were looking at TikTok, Trump said.

TikTok has insisted it does not share user data with the Chinese government and stresses its US-related bona fides, including its chief executive being a US citizen and its large operations in the country.

TikTok allows users to create short videos, often with some basic effects and music, which have become increasingly popular, particularly among a younger demographic.

Australian tennis player and world No.1 Ashleigh Barty has withdrawn from the US Open in a massive blow to the New York grand slam.

Not comfortable about travelling during the coronavirus pandemic, Barty is the biggest name yet to opt out of the August 31 to September 13 major because of the global health crisis.

My team and I have decided that we wont be travelling to the US and Western and Southern Open and the US Open this year, Barty said.

Get InDaily in your inbox. Daily. The best local news every workday at lunch time.

Thanks for signing up to the InDaily newsletter.

Follow this link:

What we know today, Thursday July 30 - InDaily

Jiro Kuwata, Batmanga and 8 Man Creator, Dead at 85 – Multiversity Comics

Jiro Kuwata

Kuwata was born in Suita, Osaka, on April 17, 1935. He entered the world of manga after the war, when he was only 13 years old, with the comic The Strange Star Cluster. In 1957, he created Maboroshi Tantei (Phantom Detective), which was adapted into a live-action TV series two years later. 8 Man, which debuted in 1963, also became an anime series in the same year, and subsequently inspired a video game, two live-action films, and more anime and manga in the 90s.

After the Adam West Batman TV series popularized the character in Japan, Kuwata created a manga starring the character that was featured in the magazines Weekly Shnen King and Shnen Gah from 1966 to 1967. The comics were the subject of Chip Kidds 2008 book Bat-Manga!: The Secret History of Batman in Japan, and eventually re-released by DC under the title Batman: The Jiro Kuwata Batmanga in 2014.

Kuwata battled depression and alcoholism throughout his life: he was arrested in 1965 for possession of a handgun, which he bought while contemplating suicide. (As a result, the original version of 8 Mans final issue was completed by other artists.) In 1977, he converted to Buddhism, and produced several art books about the life of Buddha, in addition to continuing his work in comics.

Other comics by Kuwata included Chken Leap and Elite, as well as adaptations of other (Japanese and American) TV shows like Moonlight Mask, Ultra Seven, The Time Tunnel, and The Invaders.

See the original post:

Jiro Kuwata, Batmanga and 8 Man Creator, Dead at 85 - Multiversity Comics

Speech and Slavery in the West Indies | by Fara Dabhoiwala – The New York Review of Books

The Freedom of Speech: Talk and Slavery in the Anglo-Caribbean World

by Miles Ogborn

University of Chicago Press, 309 pp., $105.00; $35.00 (paper)

by Vincent Brown

Belknap Press/Harvard University Press, 320 pp., $35.00

by Tom Zoellner

Harvard University Press, 363 pp., $29.95

In June thousands of people, provoked by the Black Lives Matter protests sweeping America, took to the streets in the United Kingdom to demonstrate against racism in their own country. One target of their anger was statues honoring British men of the seventeenth, eighteenth, and nineteenth centuries who prospered by enslaving and oppressing others, among them one in Bristol of Edward Colston that was pulled down and thrown into the harbor. Its hardly surprising that many such monuments exist, for the apathy of the English, Scots, Welsh, and Irish toward their historical complicity in slavery has always been as striking as their indifference to its enduring legacy. Compared to the United States, and despite the work of many outstanding British (and non-British) historians,1 slavery remains a marginal subject in the public imagination, its reality and consequences mentally separated from the identity and experiences of the nation.

Across the British Isles there are also numerous public monuments to the abolition of the slave trade in 1807permanent celebrations of national enlightenment and redemption (though in reality, British slave-owning continued for decades and was phased out only gradually after 1834). As far as I know, only a single recent sculpture, on the quayside of the former slaving port of Lancaster, simply honors the millions of victims. Its as if every memorial in postwar Germany primarily commemorated the liberation of the death camps and the ousting of the Nazis, rather than the Holocaust itself.

Slavery was foundational to Britains prosperity and rise to global power. Throughout the eighteenth century the empires epicenter lay not in North America, Africa, or India but in a handful of small sugar-producing Caribbean islands. The two most importanttiny Barbados and its larger, distant neighbor Jamaicawere among the most profitable places on earth. On the eve of the American Revolution, the nominal wealth of an average white person was 42 in England and 60 in North America. In Jamaica, it was 2,200. Immense fortunes were made there and poured unceasingly back to Britain. This gigantic influx of capital funded the building of countless Palladian country houses, the transformation of major cities like London, Bristol, and Liverpool, and a prodigious increase in national wealth. Much of the growing affluence of North American ports like Boston, New York, and Philadelphia was likewise based on trade with the West Indies. Sugar became Britains single largest import, and the craze for it revolutionized national diets, spending habits, and social lifenot least because of its association with that other newly fashionable drug, tea. Between 1700 and 1800, English consumption of sugar skyrocketed from about four pounds per person per year to almost twenty, roughly ten times as much as that of the French.

All this abundance, luxury, and social progress at home derived from the brutal exploitation of huge numbers of enslaved African men, women, and children across the Atlantic (thousands of whom were brought over to the British Isles as well): by the eighteenth century, Britons were the worlds preeminent slave traders. As its defenders liked to point out, slavery was not new. It had been taken for granted in biblical and classical times, and practiced by virtually every previous civilization. It was common in Africa itself. But there had never been anything like the plantation culture that the British helped pioneer in the Americas, where so many slaves were held in proportion to the population of free people.

And even within this new system of mass bondage, the West Indian sugar islands were exceptional. In Virginia, which had by far the most enslaved people of the thirteen mainland colonies, they made up perhaps 40 percent of all pre-revolutionary inhabitants: whites always remained in the majority. Only in South Carolina and French Louisiana, which were much more sparsely populated, did the balance ever tip slightly the other way. In eighteenth-century Jamaica, by contrast, enslaved men and women vastly outnumbered their captors. In some rural parts of the island the proportion was as high as fifteen to one; overall, more than 90 percent of the population was held in bondage.

As atrocious as the treatment of the enslaved was in North America, it was incomparably worse in the Caribbean. West Indian sugar estates were not just the largest agricultural businesses in the world but also the most destructive of human life. By the mid-eighteenth century, North American planters no longer needed to import many captive Africans, because their existing slave populations increased through a natural surplus of births over deaths. In the West Indies, by contrast, men and women were worked to death so ruthlessly that this transition to demographic self-sufficiency never took place. As most plantation slaves survived only for a few years, very large numbers of fresh imports were continually needed to maintain the workforcelet alone increase it, as the colonists steadily did. Of the roughly six and a half million Africans taken as slaves across the Atlantic by Europeans in the eighteenth century alone, around 350,000 were sent directly to the North American mainland. During the same period, more than two million were shipped to the British Caribbean. (A further million or so ended up on the nearby French islands, primarily Saint-Dominguepresent-day Haitiwhose demography and economy ran on similar lines.)2

These extraordinary circumstances raise obvious questions about how this uniquely West Indian brand of slavery was imposed, experienced, and resisted, day to day, month to month, year to year. One answer that leaps out immediately is the sickening degree of extreme violence that Caribbean slaveowners routinely inflicted on their human chattels. In Barbados in 1683, an old Negro Man was moved to anger about the bloody flogging of some other slaves: for his insolent words he was burned at the stake. At other times, black people were judicially electrocuted, maimed, beaten to a pulp, decapitated, drawn and quartered, roasted alive over a Slow fire, or publicly starved to death while suspended in iron cages (gibbeted).

Beyond such horrific formal penalties lay the lawless universe of everyday enslavement, in which whites tortured, killed, raped, and mutilated black people with complete impunity. Thomas Thistlewood, an ordinary, bookish young Englishman who came to Jamaica in 1750 to seek his fortune, left a matter-of-fact diary of his three and a half decades as a rural overseer and small-time slaveowner. He considered slaves to be rational human beings and treated them as individuals. Like almost all West Indian whites, he also took for granted that they needed to be frequently and harshly punished. He flogged them incessantly and savagely, rubbing salt, chili peppers, lemon juice, and urine into the scarified flesh to increase their suffering. At his whim, any man or woman might be scourged, branded, chained, dismembered, or exposed naked in the stocks day and night, covered in treacle and swarmed by biting flies and mosquitoes. Sometimes he would then force another slave to defecate into the injured victims mouth, and gag it shut for 4 or 5 hours. In his diary are also recorded 3,852 acts of rape or other forced intercourse with almost 150 enslaved women. Other than in the thoroughness of his record-keeping, he seems to have been entirely typicalif anything, relatively restrainedin his behavior.3

White Caribbeans shared the general European conviction that black people were inherently inferior. But ironically their primary justification for perpetrating such relentless sexual, mental, and physical abuse was a deep fear of their slaves. Driven by their own greed and maltreatment to import more and more Africans, the tiny bands of white islanders were acutely conscious of being surrounded by a potentially overwhelming force of hostile captives. In Jamaica especially, this huge numerical disparity gave enslaved people much more autonomy than they ever gained on the North American mainland. They lived in large groups, and their spiritual and cultural practices were largely free of white oversight. They fed themselves, and much of the white population as well, by growing produce on land given to them to cultivate. As well as possessing and inheriting such individual plots, livestock, and goods, Jamaican slaves often kept and carried guns, moved around the countryside unsupervised, and congregated at their own Sunday markets to trade, drink, and talk. In addition to a small population of free blacks, the island was also home to several groups of so-called Maroons, runaway slaves and their descendants, who controlled semiautonomous strongholds in its mountainous interior and whose relations with the British fluctuated between uneasy truce and outright war.

White supremacy was always unstable and incomplete. Despite the vast imbalance of power between slaveholders and enslaved people, Jamaican slavery was marked by continuous violent resistance. In addition to numerous smaller conspiracies, and full-blown wars between the colonists and Maroons in 17281739 and 17951796, we know of major plots, involving hundreds, sometimes thousands, of slaves, in 1673, 1676, 1678, 16851687, 1690, 1745, 1760, 1766, 1776, 17911792, 1808, 1815, 1819, 18231824, and 18311832. Throughout this period, too, the Caribbean was an important theater in the ongoing hot and cold global contests among Britain, Spain, and France. The threat of an invasion that would spark slave mutiny was never far away; nor was the inflammatory news of risings in neighboring colonies. In the 1790s, following a mass slave insurrection on Saint-Domingue and the outbreak of the French revolutionary wars, repeated military expeditions from Jamaica and Britain tried unsuccessfully to capture the territory from rival French and Spanish forces and to reimpose slavery. Altogether, perhaps as many as 350,000 people died on all sides before the establishment of the free black republic of Haiti in 1804.

Between 1500 and 1865, in the lands that became the United States, enslaved people were almost always outnumbered, physically separated, and economically disempowered. By the mid-eighteenth century most of them were locally born and had no experience of any other life. In such circumstances, open revolt was rare, difficult, and relatively easy to suppress. But in the West Indies, for as long as it lasted, slavery was always a much more sharp-edged state of conflict.

How did peopleblack, brown, and white, male and female, master and slavespeak to one another under such conditions? That is the simple but rich question the English geographer Miles Ogborn sets out to explore in his fascinating new book, The Freedom of Speech. Its a daunting task. Speech has always to be reconstructed from fragmentary, unreliable, written traces, and its notorious that in such records the enslaved are given voice only through the hostile ears and pens of their oppressors. But Ogborns concern is not to recover exactly what people in eighteenth-century Jamaica and Barbados said, but rather to analyze how they spoke. Like Indian Ink, his previous book on imperial geography and communication,4 The Freedom of Speech draws on an eclectic range of social theorists, above all Bruno Latour, whose methods Ogborn uses here to explore various forms of talk: legal, political, scientific, religious, and abolitionist. In each of these domains, the rules and effects of spoken words were different, and the force and meaning of speech acts always contingent and relational; yet in each, too, the conditions of speakingwho could say what, when, where, and howwere invariably shaped by race, gender, class, and religion.

A limitation of this approach is that each chapter turns into a self-contained case study of a particular discourse, with different speakers, sources, and subjects. One takes us deep into the world of gentleman botanists, their plant talk, correspondence, public lectures, and patronage networks; the next surveys ideas about religious speech among Anglicans, Methodists, Baptists, and adherents of obeah (a contemporary term for the spiritual practices of enslaved West Africans). Moreover, as Ogborn is well aware, his records and categories of talk are essentially those of white propertied men: they map only imperfectly onto the mental and discursive worlds of his other subjects. Because of this, we mainly learn how educated white colonists and abolitionists saw the world, and how they interpreted and (mis)understood enslaved men and women. The voices and outlook of black and brown people themselves come into focus only piecemeal and intermittently.

Nonetheless, taken as a whole, this is a remarkably original and insightful contribution. As Ogborn contends, speech was central to the culture of enslavement. Spoken words were both representations and actions: their utterance was the most ubiquitous way in which the boundaries between liberty and bondage were constantly reinforced, negotiated, or contested. During the eighteenth century, freedom of speech, a concept previously associated only with parliamentary debates, came to be seen as foundational to all political liberty. For propertied, Protestant, white male Britons of this era, it was both an immensely potent new ideology and a constant practical marker of their superiority over others. Colonial law and politics alike were transacted through verbal ritualslike the taking of oaths, the giving of evidence, or the making of public speechesfrom which women, slaves, and other lesser humans (such as Jews, Quakers, mulattoes, Indians, and free blacks) were to a greater or lesser extent excluded. The exact contours of this power to speak, to be heard, and to silence others were frequently disputed, both within the colonial population and across the different legal and political zones of empire, but thats precisely because it was so central to the meaning of freedom.

Even more than that, speech was pivotal in eighteenth-century definitions of humankind. Abolitionists claimed that the eloquence of slaves and Africans proved their equal humanity, but most Europeans had long taken for granted that black utterances were inherently inferior, even bestial. This was why, when the philosopher David Hume set out to prove in 1753 that whites were intrinsically superior to all other human breeds, he confidently discounted a seemingly contrary West Indian example by appealing to the same prejudice: In Jamaica indeed they talk of one negroe, as a man of parts and learning; but tis likely he is admird for very slender accomplishments, like a parrot, who speaks a few words plainly.5 No black voice could ever be more than a brutish squawk.

Reasoning like this buttressed acceptance of the slave trade. But though Hume disdained to name him, the subject of his dismissive remark was no slave but an unusually privileged free black Jamaican, Francis Williams, a man of property who had been educated at the Inns of Court in London, was an accomplished Latin poet and mathematician, and owned slaves himself. Because white West Indians were so heavily invested in trying to make the distinction between slavery and freedom synonymous with the supposedly straightforward difference between black and white, it was deeply aggravating that (as one leading slaveowner complained) Williams had not the modesty to be silent and instead publicly insisted that skin color was irrelevant to intelligence (virtue and understanding have no color; there is no color in an honest mind, nor in art, he wrote). White Jamaicans tried repeatedly to quiet his voice, yet never with complete success. When in 1730 the islands Assembly passed a law degrading his legal rights (as an uppity negro), Williams successfully petitioned the imperial authorities in England (as an educated, wealthy, free-born slaveowner) to overturn it. He knew that how speech was received and what force it carried always depended on its audience, not just its author.

Through their martial prowess, the Maroons likewise compelled the British to accept the authority of their words. When in 1739 they ended their decade-long war with the colonists and entered into peace treaties, neither side gave much credence to the written documents that were drawn up and signed. Instead, they reposed their trust primarily in a carefully choreographed, ritualized public exchange of verbal oaths: under the right conditions, such performative speech acts were more authoritative than any piece of paper. Slave utterances, of course, were normally granted no such power. And yet its striking how much effort was put into physically, as well as legally, silencing enslaved people. As a young boy on a Virginia plantation in the mid-1750s, Olaudah Equiano (recently transported there, via the West Indies, from the Guinea coast) was terrified by the appearance of a black house slave who moved around fixed in an iron muzzle, which locked her mouth so fast that she could scarcely speak; and could not eat nor drink. Some slaveowners ordered such equipment from London; others, like Thistlewood, improvised their own revolting gags.

Freedom of speech and the power to silence may have been preeminent markers of white liberty, Ogborn argues, but at the same time, slavery depended on dialogue: slaves could never be completely muted. Even in conditions of extreme violence and unfreedom, their words remained ubiquitous, ephemeral, irrepressible, and potentially transgressive. In that sense, even the speech of the unfree was always free. Talk was the most common way for enslaved men and women to subvert the rules of their bondage, to gain more agency than they were supposed to have. Moreover, Africans, too, came from societies in which oaths, orations, and invocations carried great potency, both between people and as a connection to the all-powerful spirit world. To be prevented from speaking, an Akan proverb warned, was akin to being murdered; to silence another unjustly was a grievous crime. Just as the British Empire was an oral creation, sustained through spoken as well as written and printed words, so too (and to a much greater degree) were the spiritual, legal, and political cultures into which most West Indian slaves had been born, and that they adapted in their Caribbean purgatory. For all these reasons, slaveowners obsessed over slave talk. They could never control it, yet feared its power to bind and inspirefor, as everyone knew, oaths, whispers, and secret conversations bred conspiracy and revolt.

The largest uprising the British Empire had ever faced erupted on Jamaica at Easter, 1760. For almost a year of intermittent guerrilla warfare, over a thousand slaves across the island rose up in successive waves of violent rebellion, seizing guns, killing scores of white and free black people, torching plantations, and establishing camps in the inaccessible, densely forested uplands. Already within a few weeks of fighting, so many insurgent corpses littered the jungle that, far away on his estate near the coast, Thistlewood began to smell on the wind the awful odor of the dead Negroes in the Woods. It was only with difficulty and at huge cost, after mobilizing the combined might of the imperial navy, battle-hardened marines, the British army, and local Maroon forces (bound by their treaties to assist the British against their slaves), that the colonists managed finally to subdue the rebels.

Many quietly gave up and slipped back into servitude. But scores of others killed their children and committed mass suicide rather than return to bondage. At least five hundred rebels were killed or executed; another six hundred or so were permanently exiled. Those publicly put to death often displayed striking defiance. They burned alive without flinching or crying out; one, already half-consumed by the fire, snatched a blazing log and flung it in the face of his executioner. Two rebels named Fortune and Kingston, gibbeted in May 1760, survived for seven and nine days respectively, surrounded by their countrymen, treating white onlookers with hardened insolence and laughter. A few months later, another condemned man, called Cardiff, warned the colonists that Multitudes of Negroes had took Swear that if they faild of success in this rebellion, to rise again: they would never capitulate.

Despite its scale, we know little about this extraordinary episode. The rebels left no record of their names, aims, alliances, or planning: all their communication was verbal. What survives is only the prejudiced speculation of their British enemies, whose written interpretations determined the revolts subsequent history. They portrayed it as a rising of dangerous, naturally warlike Coromantees (their label for the different peoples of the Gold Coast) against their masters, mainly focused around a slave named Tacky, one of the leaders of the first outbreak.

In an inspiring feat of scholarship, Vincent Browns Tackys Revolt transforms our understanding of the events of 1760 and 1761. It does so by expanding our sense of their scale and geography, and by developing the contemporary insight (expressed, for example, by Equiano and before him by John Locke) that slavery itself was always a state of war. Instead of a doomed local rising by desperate, enslaved victims, Brown sees something much more consequential: the Coromantee War, a serious military campaign led by experienced African fighters, part of an ongoing, transnational, interlocking network of wars that stretched across Europe, Africa, and the Americas. By tracing the entwined journeys of its different groups of combatants, he connects this insurgency directly to the major West African conflicts that fed the slave trade and to the global imperial wars that expanded slavery and capitalist agriculture, as well as to the day-to-day race war of whites against slaves, the retaliatory insurrections of the enslaved, and the constant struggles among black people themselves.

Because theres so little direct evidence, and the scale of Browns reframing is so ambitious, all this requires a lot of scene-setting and circumstantial analysis. We dont get to the revolt itself until halfway through the book, and at every step Brown carefully spells out how contingent events and alliances in this world always were, and how uncertain our knowledge of them is. The exact connection between the different incidents of 17601761 remains ambiguous: perhaps there was an island-wide conspiracy, or perhaps each uprising simply provoked the next. Nor can we presume solidarity among enslaved men and women of different backgrounds and trajectories. One of the questions the book illuminates is why so many other slaves, Maroons, and free blacks passively stood aside or actively opposed the rebels. Caught up in empires of war on both sides of the Atlantic, dark and light-skinned groups and individuals alike were forced into constant strategic calculations and maneuvers while trying to survive, minimize risk, or improve their lot.

Yet though this is a dense, cautious, and eminently learned book (rich with with digressions into everything from the design of West African war clubs to the details of the British navys code of war), its also an impassioned argument about human agency, with lessons for our own age of imperial overreach, asymmetrical warfare, and indigenous insurgency. Brilliantly transcending the silence of the written archive, it manages to present rebel and nonwhite backgrounds, perspectives, and politics in as rich, complex, and conflicted detail as those of their literate opponents.

Even the ultimate military failure of the Coromantee War, Brown suggests, should be viewed primarily as a consequence of subaltern decisions and divisions rather than of a stable colonial hegemony. Nor was any defeat in battle ever final. Enslaved men, women, and children fought not only to win freedom (whatever that might mean in such circumstances), or territory, or simply a space to live their own lives, but to uphold their human dignity: to fight was to raise hope, to create possibilities, to refuse to be subjugated. And it always inspired others. Well into the next century, when newly captured Africans arrived in Jamaica, their fellow plantation slaves would instruct them in the history of Tackys Revolt. Slavery was always violently contested from within: even if every individual battle was lost, the struggles of the enslaved did at least as much to hasten its collapse as the efforts of abolitionists.

In the decades following the Coromantee War, Jamaican slavery expanded and flourished as never before. In 1760 there had been about 150,000 slaves on the island; by 1808 there were over 350,000. To safeguard its white inhabitants, the colony became ever more heavily militarized. In the aftermath of rebellion, new laws severely curtailed the rights and movements not only of slaves but also of all other nonwhites: white solidarity was increasingly seen as crucial to security. Meanwhile, the widely noticed writings of the planters leading apologist, Edward Long, whod lived through the rebellion, helped develop new, scientific theories of black inferiority and racial danger that had a lasting impact on European and American thought.

Yet the end of the war did not bring peace but only a return to the jittery status quo of plots, uprisings, and white anxieties about black power. Across the Americas, many passionate defenders of slavery, including Long, came to believe that the future lay in breeding an entirely native-born population of slaves, purged of militant Africans. In Virginia and Pennsylvania during the 1760s and 1770s, the specter of what had happened in Jamaica spurred slaveholders to restrict slave importationeven as, on both sides of the Atlantic, it also inspired early abolitionists.

The British finally outlawed the transatlantic trade in 1807 (the same year the United States did). But the fantasy of an acquiescent, native slave class, governed by benevolent masters, never materialized, nor did the gradual withering away of slavery that abolitionists had hoped for. On the contrary, as Tom Zoellner argues in Island on Fire, it was another Jamaican insurrection that finally precipitated the end of British slavery in the West Indies. Shortly after Christmas 1831, between 30,000 and 60,000 men and women rose up and ran away, refusing to work any longer as slaves. Hundreds of plantations were set on fire, but with conspicuously little personal violence: probably only two whites lost their lives in direct attacks. In reprisal, more than a thousand black people were lynched, shot on sight, or summarily executed. A year and a half later, the newly reformed British Parliament, lobbied by abolitionists and fearful that the continuation of slavery would only lead to further revolts, risking the loss of the Caribbean colonies, passed the Slavery Abolition Act of 1833.

Island on Fire, which tells both parts of this story, focuses especially on the uprisings best-known leader, a charismatic, educated, Creole house slave named Samuel Sharpe. Zoellners vivid, fast-paced book stresses Sharpes Baptist theology, his message of nonviolent passive resistance, and the rebels misguided belief that the British king had, in fact, already emancipated them. Yet just as striking are the many continuities with previous uprisings: the sophisticated planning, the importance of oaths and spiritual rituals, the rebels geographical knowledge and tactics, and the critical participation of the Maroons in deciding the outcome.

Equally resonant is the perpetual question of the meaning of freedom in a racialized world. The Slavery Abolition Act didnt apply to India or Ceylon, and though it technically liberated over 800,000 British slaves in the Caribbean and Africa, all of them (excepting only small children) were forced to continue to labor as unpaid apprentices for a further six years, on pain of punishment. Under the terms of the act, they were protected against overwork and direct violence from employers, but remained their transferable property, subject to punishment for indolence, insolence, or insubordination. So many black West Indians were jailed for resisting these outrageous terms that full emancipation was eventually brought forward to August 1, 1838. That moment provides the dramatic climax of Zoellners account, but it, too, didnt much change colonial attitudes or practices. In 1865, largely unarmed protests over the continued blatant suppression of black economic, legal, and voting rights were met with renewed, murderous white rage: hundreds of nonwhite men and women were indiscriminately shot or executed.

A century on, the independence of most Caribbean colonies in the 1960s was followed by decades of racist British immigration policies that not only sought to prevent black West Indians from coming to the UK but eventually, under the Conservative governments of the past decade, ended up deliberately destroying the lives of thousands of lifelong legal residents by treating them as illegal migrants.6 In the meantime, for almost two hundred years, British taxpayers funded the largest slavery-related reparations ever paid out. Under the provisions of the 1833 act, the government borrowed and then disbursed the staggering sum of 20 million (equal to 40 percent of its annual budgetthe equivalent of 300 billion in todays value). Not until 2015 was that debt finally paid off. This unprecedented compensation for injustice went not to those whose lives had been spent in slavery, nor even to those descended from the millions who had died in captivity. It was all given to British slaveowners, as restitution for the loss of their human property. Black lives, white rights.

Read more:

Speech and Slavery in the West Indies | by Fara Dabhoiwala - The New York Review of Books

Drug addiction a mental health issue: Lock-em-up mentality not the answer – Hattiesburg American

Brett Montague, Guest columnist Published 5:00 a.m. CT Aug. 1, 2020

DEA data obtained by The Washington Post showed the opioid prescription boom from 2006 to 2012. Montgomery Advertiser

The average citizen today can see problems associated with issues like overcrowded prisons, police-community relations, and racial economic disparities.

This is largely due to the global pandemic in our midst. Make no mistake about it though; these issues are both long-standing and highly interwoven problems that need to be given attention by leaders everywhere. However, there is a fourth area of needed reform that, if tackled, would bring about tremendous progress towards solving these other challenges.

Brett Montague(Photo: Submitted/Special to Clarion Ledger)

We need to fundamentally rethink how we deal with drugs and drug use.

Consider this first just as a matter of practicality.

America first adopted its national policy of drug prohibition in 1914, and catapulted its passage by waging a "War on Drugs." This war was based on the idea that we could end drug use, eliminate drugs from the world by outlawing them, and then crime would fall throughout North America. But after 106 years, drug use and addiction rates today are as high ever, and the illegal drug market today is greater than a $500 billion a year industry, according to the Washington Post.

Opinion: My son died of an opioid overdose. We must change our approach to save lives.

This fact alone plainly shows that the outright prohibition of a substance neither squashes demand, nor eliminates the drug supply.

Over the past year, I have spent time with various mental health professionals, pharmacists, judges, law enforcement officers, and elected officials alike regarding our drug laws. We discuss things like Harm Reduction initiatives, what prohibition does, and what regaining a real law and order control of the drug trade in the long run means. The atmosphere is always open, because virtually everyone knows we have to change our one-size-fits-all criminal approach to drugs, but many valid questions and concerns still remain. The most common objections I get are:

I know that along the path of my own journey, I have wrestled with these same exact concerns. If you study this stuff though, and take the time to think in earnest about the groups in question here our children, addicts, and law enforcement there is no way around the fact that America's kids and cops, alike, are unduly exposed to vast amounts of harm caused by drug prohibition. After all, as the War on Drugs continues, we have unknowndealers selling vast amounts of unknown substances to unknown users all over the place. They don't ask for I.D. And if a rival gang moves in, the only competitive advantage they have is violence.

To be certain, this is going to be hard to wrap our head around, much less embrace. We have all constantly been told that the only way you can control a drug is to prohibit it, and that if we ever reverse course, chaos, crime, and a scourge of death will promptly ensue.

We can kid ourselves no longer! We are losing over 185 Americans daily to overdose, according to the CDC, and nearly 1 million young African American men are currently in America's prisons, according to the Prison Policy Initiative. Law enforcement's capacity to truly protect and serve has suffered. Let's end our criminal approach to drugs. Let's end it for good.

Brett Montague, a Hattiesburg native who is a drug policy reform advocate, served as event coordinator for the End It For Good summit last year in Hattiesburg.The summit was held to discuss the opioid crisis and how drug policy impacts local communities. To contact him, email brettbam.716@gmail.com.

Read or Share this story: https://www.hattiesburgamerican.com/story/opinion/2020/08/01/drug-abuse-mental-health-issue-commentary/5510096002/

Excerpt from:

Drug addiction a mental health issue: Lock-em-up mentality not the answer - Hattiesburg American

Opinion: Permitting Cannabis Businesses Could Be Tax Boon for San Diego County – Times of San Diego

Share This Article:Cannabis plants. Photo via PixabayBy Laura Wilkinson

The Board of Supervisors is being asked by the people of San Diego County to take a step towards permitting and regulating cannabis businesses. Gov. Gavin Newsom has deemed cannabis businesses as essential businesses, and the supervisors can encourage economic opportunity by voting yes as numerous other counties in California have already done successfully.

Support Times of San Diego's growthwith a small monthly contribution

First, lets update the facts.

According to no less an authority than the U.S Drug Enforcement Agency, or DEA, no deaths due to an overdose of cannabis have ever been reported. Zero. According to the NIH and Centers for Disease Control, this year 458 people will die from a Tylenol overdose and over 88,000 from alcohol abuse. Some 130 people will die today and every day this year from an opioid overdose. Those substances are readily available all over our city and country and pose much greater risks.

UC San Diego runs a state-funded medical cannabis research facility conducting peer-reviewed medical studies on cannabis. Cannabis has saved the lives of children with severe seizures and helped cancer patients and many others who cope with daily pain. Even the Department of Veterans Affairs has issued directive 1315 for VA health care providers to discuss the use of cannabis relief with veterans suffering from PTSD and other maladies and assuring veterans that using cannabis will not put their VA benefits at risk.

Thirty-three states have legalized cannabis and eleven have allowed adult use. Seven more have ballot measures this November (including Mississippi and Nebraska). It is evident that San Diego County is falling behind the nation in allowing legal cannabis enterprises.

We use the term cannabis, because the name marijuana (originally spelled marihuana) is a pejorative term coined in 1933 by the then-head of the FDA (then the Federal Bureau of Narcotics), an avowed racist, Harry Aslinger, who thought it sounded foreign and scary because Mexican-Americans used that term. It paved the way for decades of laws allowing people of color to be disproportionately targeted and jailed.

According to Business Insider Magazine, in the first full year after the 1937 Marihuana Tax Act was passed, black people were about three times more likely to be arrested for violating narcotic drug laws than whites. And Mexican-Americans were nearly nine times more likely to be arrested for the same charge. Most of us know someone who was affected by the failed War on Drugs that has destroyed families through the mass-incarceration of so many Americansmostly minorities. Californias Proposition 64 was passed partially to correct this injustice. Developing genuine, workable social equity solutions is critical for the county to truly serve its citizens equitably.

According to BDS Analytics, there is evidence that sales of both prescription and over-the-counter pain killers are down in states where cannabis products, which include tinctures, transdermal patches, beverage and edible forms of the plant, are legally sold all of it in state-mandated child-proof packaging. Property values have risen in neighborhoods that permit and allow cannabis retail dispensary storefronts, according to an initial study conducted in collaboration by several university business schools. Surprisingly, several studies show teen use is trending down in markets where adult-use of cannabis is legal.

The economic opportunity is enormous. Legal cannabis jobs are projected to grow 250% over the next ten years (four times the number of home health aides and solar tech installers) by 2024. And still, San Diego County bears the cost of prohibition by battling illegal market operators and putting law enforcement needlessly at risk.

The Santa Maria Times reported on July 19 that Santa Barbara County cannabis taxes have increased 89% from 2019 to 2020, enough to fully cover the cost of cannabis enforcement, backfill the loss of Proposition 172 funds, and cover the shortfall due to COVID-19 impacts. Supervisor Steve Lavagnino was quoted saying of cannabis legalization, Its been controversial, its been messy, but this budget without cannabis revenue would have been an unmitigated disaster.

San Diego County is facing unprecedented fiscal pain during this public health crisis. Our supervisors can help prevent the same unmitigated disaster. We urge the supervisors to move the cannabis regulation and permitting process forward as other forward-looking counties throughout California have, to help eliminate the illegal market costs and embrace the legal industry to help legal small cannabis businesses thrive and contribute to our economy. It is an idea whose time has come.

Laura Wilkinson is the founder and CEO of AFC Products/Caligrown. She serves on the board of the South County Economic Development Council and is active in the National Cannabis Industry Association.

Opinion: Permitting Cannabis Businesses Could Be Tax Boon for San Diego County was last modified: August 5th, 2020 by Editor

>> Subscribe to Times of San Diegos free daily email newsletter! Click here

See original here:

Opinion: Permitting Cannabis Businesses Could Be Tax Boon for San Diego County - Times of San Diego

Formerly incarcerated woman runs to be 1st Black woman in Congress from Tennessee – Birmingham Times

By Marina MoseleyABC News

(WASHINGTON) Keeda Haynes believes she brings a unique perspective to the race for Tennessees 5th Congressional District. After spending over three years in prison for a crime she says she didnt commit, she hopes a spot in Washington will allow her to speak for vulnerable constituents and make a little history as well.

Haynes, a former public defender, is in a three-way race that includes 17-year Democratic incumbent Rep. Jim Cooper.

The primary election, which is slated for Aug. 6, has no Republican in the race so the winner will almost certainly be elected to Congress come November.

I have a unique perspective that a lot of people dont have. Ive been a defendant and defender, Haynes told ABC News. I really saw just how this war on drugs really decimated Black and brown, low-income communities.

If elected, the progressive Democrat would make history as the first Black woman in Tennessee ever elected to Congress. The state has only had two Black representatives elected to Congress, with the last candidate elected over two decades ago, according to the U.S. House of Representatives.

Along with supporting criminal justice reform and the Black Lives Matter movement, the 42-year-old Haynes is also passionate about issues such as providing access to affordable housing, raising the minimum wage and reducing student loan debt.

We are reimagining each and every system so that Black lives can matter across every single spectrum, she said.

Haynes, who is from Franklin and later moved to the states capital of Nashville, was the second of five children. She graduated from Tennessee State University with a degree in criminal justice and psychology. But just two weeks after graduating college, she had to turn down a position as a legal assistant because she had to report to federal prison.

At 19, she started dating a man in Nashville for a few years and began accepting packages for his cellphone and beepers shop, she told ABC News. She later found out that those packages actually contained marijuana. She spent three years and 10 months in prison on what was initially a seven-year mandatory minimum sentence on charges of conspiracy to distribute marijuana.

In 2006, Haynes was finally released from prison while continuing to maintain her innocence. She went on to pass the bar exam and work in a public defenders office for over six years.

Her historic run comes as a record number of Black women are running for Congress across the U.S. In 2019, a record number of Black women were serving in state legislative offices, according to The Center of American Women and Politics at Rutgers University. In the last two years Black women saw the largest gain in representation at the state legislative level since 1994.

Haynes advice for young Black girls hoping to follow in her footsteps is to remember that you have the ability to make the impossible possible.

Prison did not deter me from doing what I said I was going to do, she told ABC News. There will be people that will tell you that you cant do things and that things are impossible, but you have to stay focused.

Haynes called late civil rights pioneer Rep. John Lewis, who was laid to rest Thursday in Atlanta, an iconic figure in the fight for justice and equality, and expressed eternal gratitude for the work that Lewis accomplished throughout his remarkable life.

Even in the face of police violence, he still believed in something bigger and still fought for liberation. I personally feel obligated to do this work in his name, Haynes said.

Like Loading...

Read the original:

Formerly incarcerated woman runs to be 1st Black woman in Congress from Tennessee - Birmingham Times