Seasteading – Would you move? | The Hearty Soul

Posted on: June 24, 2020 at 3:28 pm

With global warming becoming an increasingly urgent problem and much of the world having been under lockdown for months due to the coronavirus pandemic, many people are thinking about alternative ways of living in the future. This rocky period in human history has pushed forward the once very fringe idea of seasteading living out on the open ocean.

Just as it sounds, seasteading is living life out on the sea. Were not talking about living in a houseboat, however. No, seasteading is the building of floating homes and entire communities out on the open water. (1)

Chad Elwartowski, software engineer, bitcoin trader, and the current leader in the seasteading movement, began his second attempt at building one of these homes off the coast of Panama in May. The ultimate goal is to build entire independent cities out on the water, free from the confines of traditional government restrictions on movement the way land-dwelling nations are. The COVID-19 pandemic has bolstered the seasteading libretarian fringe group pushing for this new way of life.

Coronavirus is an opportunity to show the world that what were building is actually going to be very useful in the future, he said in a recent video. (1)

In April of 2019, Elwartowski and his girlfriend attempted to build and live in a seasteading home off the coast of Thailand, only to be chased out by the Thai government. The home was seen by the nation as a threat and the couple narrowly escaped being thrown in prison for life or worse. After a few weeks of fleeing Thai patrol boats, they eventually made it to Singapore. From there, they moved to Panama where they re-launched their company.

Groups like Seasteading have seen a surge in interest and support since the lockdowns began, as there are many conspiracists and people who believe the lockdowns are just a way for governments to have more control over their citizens.

This anti-government sentiment is what the Seasteading Institute was founded on in San Francisco back in 2008. Started by Google software engineer Patri Friedman and financially supported by PayPal founder Peter Thiel, the companys goal statement was:

to establish permanent, autonomous ocean communities to enable experimentation and innovation with diverse social, political, and legal systems (1)

Essentially, these Silicon Valley tech guys believed that governments and their regulations stifle innovation. They have dreams of building a society where that never happens. The citizens of these envisioned communities would have freedom of movement. If they didnt like the way one community was being governed, they could simply pack up and go move to another. No visas or any of the complexities involved with moving to another land country.

Read: Couple Lives Off The Grid After Spending 20-Years Building Self-Sustaining Floating Island

Theils donations only stretched so far, and Friedman only got so far as hosting a sort of river boat festival reminiscent of Burning Man. Though he has since moved towards focusing on land-based communities, the Seasteading helm has been taken up by Joe Quirk, who is an author and self-proclaimed seavangelist.

Quirk believes that water communities can help to heal all of humanity. He even wrote a book that talks of how floating cities can restore the environment, enrich the poor, cure the sick, and liberate humanity from politicians. (1)

In January 2017, however, after years of planning, feasibility studies, and government negotiations, he and his team reached an agreement with French Polynesia. They were to build their floating nation in the 5 million square kilometers of sea owned by the island country. There was a misunderstanding of purpose however and what each group would do for the other. The French Polynesian government was looking for them to address environmental concerns and the threat of rising sea levels. The Seasteading Institute was, of course, more interested in building a nation with complete autonomy.

The local people were not supportive of the project and eventually, it came to a halt. Marc Collins Chen, former minister of tourism of French Polynesia who founded the company Blue Frontiers along with Quirk, has since realized that these floating nations need to work with host countries more, and in order to have support, they need to pay taxes.

I realised that the real future for these sorts of projects has to be closer to cities, he explains. They have to be an extension of an existing citys infrastructure, they need to be run by the mayor, and they have to pay their taxes as opposed to being enclaves for the wealthy. (1)

Collins Chen has now moved to New York to build a new company focused on creating these floating cities, called Oceanix City. He believes that these floating cities could be a way to accommodate growth without disturbing the already struggling ecosystems on land. Using drag-and-drop building, you can add, move, and takeaway sections whenever you need. The cities could be powered by water and solar and essentially become self-sustaining.

Read: A community of voluntary anarchists is taking off-the-grid living to the next level

UN-Habitat, the sustainable development branch of the United Nations, hosted a discussion about the Oceanix City project in April 2019. Maimunah Mohd Sharif, UN-Habitat executive director, says that floating cities could be one of the potential solutions to current housing and climate issues facing countries around the world.

Actually having floating cities ready to live in is not something that will happen soon. Currently a factory where the citys structures will be built is under construction in Panama. The main feature of the factory will be a giant 3D printer that will print both the floating homes with underwater rooms wrapped in eco-restorative 3D printed coral reef. The cost will be between $200,000 and $800,000 per home.

Current CEO Grant Romundt says the focus is making homes that are a safe place for people to be during times such as the coronavirus pandemic.

They should be a safe place to escape to and be totally energy independent, with solar panels on the roof, water desalination on board, waste collection by drone, and aeroponic systems to grow your own food. (1)

He says they are building holiday homes that will be registered as boats under the Panama flag, but as time goes on he believes they will morph into actual real, independent cities. The best part, he claims, is that if these seasteads fail, the people can just disassemble and go away. It would be as if they were never there at all.

What do you think? Would you move to an independent floating nation?

Keep Reading: Pandemic Leads To Urban Exodus As Families Turn To Self-Reliance And Off-The-Grid Living

https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2020/jun/24/seasteading-a-vanity-project-for-the-rich-or-the-future-of-humanity

Originally posted here:

Seasteading - Would you move? | The Hearty Soul

Seasteading – RationalWiki

I'm gonna go build my own theme park! With blackjack, and hookers!

Seasteading is the libertarian fantasy of attempting to establish a society on (or under) the sea. Given that a large swath of the oceans are international waters, outside the jurisdiction of any one country, some people see seasteading as the most viable possibility for creating new, autonomous states with their own pet political systems in place.

Given that international maritime law doesn't, as such, recognize ginormous boats or artificial islands as stateless enclaves or independent nations, diplomatic recognition, if the owners actually need it, is somewhat problematic.

Seasteading is inspired by real life examples of boat-based provision of services not legal in certain countries. Examples include casino boats (ships that, upon reaching international waters, open up their gambling facilities to passengers) and the organization Women on Waves, which provides abortion services in countries (such as Poland, Portugal and Spain) where abortion is illegal or in which the rules are stricter than they would prefer. Another example is pirate radio stations, which got their name from the fact that many of them operated from boats in international waters.

Several seasteading projects have been started; only two have ever been completed (three if you count Sealand and its 'Prince'), and the vast majority have never even really begun. It is quite possible that herding libertarians is difficult.

Some cryonicists are seasteaders, which implies truly remarkably compartmentalised thinking about the value of large, stable social structures.

As they age, some libertarians are realising that replacing government may be more work than they can personally achieve as actualised individuals.[2] Reason, of course, tells them not to stop thinking about tomorrow.[3]

There have been four seasteading projects that could be considered "successful" in any sense of the word.

The longest-lived and most successful was the "Republic of Minerva," an artificial island in the South Pacific constructed by real estate millionaire Michael J. Oliver and his Phoenix Foundation using dredged sand to expand the tiny Minerva Reef. The intention was to establish an agrarian anarcho-capitalist utopia; presumably the libertarian supermen would evolve past the need to drink, as there was no source of fresh water on the island (nor any land at high tide, at least initially). Minerva formally declared independence in 1972 and attempted to establish diplomatic relations with the surrounding nations, though it was mostly ignored. The small settlement lasted for approximately five months, until the government of Tonga sent a military expedition (along with a convict work detail, a brass band, and HRM King Taufaahau Tupou himself) to claim the island by force (or rather, re-claim it; the original reef had been considered a culturally important Tongan fishing region). In 1982 a second group of libertarians tried to reclaim the atoll but were again forced off by the Tongan military. Since then, the project collapsed, and the island has since been mostly reclaimed by the sea.

Unabashed, Oliver tried to funnel funds into various separatist groups and revolutionaries in the Bahamas and Vanuatu, but was met with extremely little success. Today, the Phoenix Foundation still chugs on, eyeing tiny islands like the Isle of Man and the Azores and grumbling to themselves.

Rose Island, officially the "Respubliko de la Insulo de la Rozoj" (Republic of the Island of Roses) was a 400-square-meter artificial platform in the Mediterranean founded by an Italian casino entrepreneur in 1968. It styled itself as a libertarian capitalist state with Esperanto as its official language, but was in fact little more than a tourist resort complex, and had virtually no space for permanent residents. The Italian government, seeing the project as nothing more than a ploy to avoid having to pay taxes on revenue from the resort, seized the platform with police a few weeks after it opened and destroyed it with explosives[4].

Operation Atlantis was an American attempt by Libertarian soap-magnate Werner K. Steifel to create an anarcho-capitalist utopia (noticing a trend here?) in the Bahamas by building a large ferro-cement ship, sailing it to its destination, anchoring it there and living on it. The boat was built, launched from New York in 1971, and (after capsizing once on the Hudson river and catching fire) taken to its final position in the Caribbean, where it was secured in place. Preparations were made for the residents to immigrate to their new floating city-state, but unfortunately for them it sank almost immediately.[5][note 1] After two more attempts and eventually pouring a lot of money into an island off the coast of Belize that he couldn't get autonomy for, the project collapsed.

The Principality of Sealand is a cute little boy in a sailor outfit with delusions of grandeur an abandoned British anti-aircraft platform of World War II vintage located in international waters east of the British Isles. In 1967 it was claimed and occupied by Paddy Roy Bates, the self-proclaimed "Prince Roy of Sealand" (29 August 1921 9 October 2012), former offshore pirate radio station operator, who also proclaimed his wife Joan Bates (2 September 1929 - 10 March 2016) "Princess Joan". The population of this nation has never been more than one can count on both hands; nonetheless, the Principality of Sealand was invaded and conquered in 1978 by a group of German and Dutch nationals (including the kidnapping of Prince Roy's son Michael) whose coup was promptly reversed by Prince Roy who hired a helicopter to help him retake the artificial island. To this day it's as close as anyone has ever come to a functioning seastead and that isn't really saying much.

An internet service provider, HavenCo.com, actually attempted to set up its servers on Sealand circa 2000 but the deal fell through when HavenCo's founder had a falling out with Prince Paddy Roy. In 2013, a HavenCo website has appeared, stating, "Havenco is launching new services in early 2013 to facilitate private communications and storage" and boasting "The next generation of online privacy coming soon!"

Prince Roy had listed the Principality of Sealand for sale, but since one cannot technically "sell" a monarchy, it was in actuality being offered for transfer of title or something along those lines.

Such is Sealand's reputation that the nation actually has athletes who represent the country, ships who have attempted to negotiate with Prince Paddy Roy to buy the right to flag their ships under the Sealand flag, the German hip hop group Fettes Brot shot the video for their 2013 track Echo at Sealand, and a phony-baloney outfit based in Germany selling counterfeit Sealand coins, stamps, and passports (not recognized by the de facto Sealand government of Prince Roy, who considers the outfit a criminal gang descended from the earlier coup attempt). It is an inspiration to micronation buffs who see it as an example of a successful micronation. However, Sealand has never been recognized by any other country as a sovereign nation (though a British court decision held that the U.K. had no sovereignty over it).

Sealand is depicted in the anime Hetalia: Axis Powers as a child in a sailor suit,[6] and in the webcomic Scandinavia and the World as a little boy wearing a crown and a t-shirt modeled after its national flag.[7]

Prince Roy died 9 October, 2012, leaving his son and heir, Michael Bates (who had been serving as Prince Regent Michael), as Sealand's Head of State, and the author of the Principality's historical book, Holding the Fort. The Prince is dead, long live the Prince!

Libertarians are hardly the only people to try and colonize the ocean. China, for instance, has used a version of seasteading in order to enforce its claims on the Spratly Islands, an archipelago in the South China Sea that's claimed in whole or in part by six nations (the PRC, the ROC, Vietnam, the Philippines, Malaysia, and Brunei). They've been hard at work using land reclamation to build artificial islands with airstrips, piers, harbors, and helipads, which they say are for military "and civilian" use.[8]

In the 1970s, relatively apolitical seasteading project was proposed for the North Sea, "Sea City", based on the idea that "Man is fast running out of living space."[9]

Eccentric right-wing entrepreneur Peter Thiel founded the Seasteading Institute in 2008 with the intent of building a floating city. In 2017 the Institute, by then Thiel-less, signed a deal with the government of French Polynesia, an autonomous territory of France in the south Pacific, but soon after French Polynesia reneged on the deal.[10][11]

In an effort to throw in as many libertarian buzzwords as possible into one news story, in 2019 bitcoin entrepreneur Chad Elwartowski attempted to set up a floating home in what he thought were international waters 26 km (14 nautical miles) off the west coast of Phuket, Thailand. He and his partner Supranee Thepdet planned to construct up to 20 homes, Chad calling himself "probably the freest person in the world". Unfortunately the Thai navy didn't agree with his interpretation of the law and boarded the floating home, pointing out it was in Thailand's exclusive economic zone and therefore a violation of Thai sovereignty, an offence potentially carrying the death penalty.[12]

The video game BioShock[13] features what is probably the best-known example of a seastead in popular culture both in form of the underwater city of Rapture and the flying city of Columbia. Spoiler: neither really panned out as intended.

View original post here:

Seasteading - RationalWiki

Seasteading: How Floating Nations Will Restore the …

In these thought-provoking visions of the future (The Wall Street Journal), Joe Quirk and Patri Friedman of the Seasteading Institute explain how ocean cities can solve many of our environmental, technological, and civic problems, and introduce the visionaries and pioneers who are now making seasteading a reality.

Our planet has been suffering from serious environmental p

Our planet has been suffering from serious environmental problems and their social and political consequences. But imagine a vast new source of sustainable and renewable energy that would also bring more equitable economies. A previously untapped source of farming that could produce significant new sources of nutrition. Future societies where people could choose the communities they want to live in, free from the restrictions of conventional citizenship. This extraordinary vision of our near future as imagined in Seasteading attracted the powerful support of Silicon Valleys Peter Thieland it may be drawing close to reality. Facing growing environmental threats, French Polynesia has already signed on to build some of the worlds first seasteads.

Joe Quirk and Patri Friedman show us how cities built on floating platforms in the ocean will work, and they profile some of the visionaries who are implementing basic concepts of seasteading today. An entrepreneurs dream, these floating cities will become laboratories for innovation and creativity. Seasteading offers hope for a future when life on land has grown grim (Kirkus Reviews), proving the adage that yesterdays science fiction is tomorrows science fact.

See more here:

Seasteading: How Floating Nations Will Restore the ...

Five Years Since Launch, Is Ethereum Creating a New Boom? – Cointelegraph

The Ethereum network has just turned five years old. Although the project was first announced at the North American Bitcoin Conference in January 2014, its genesis block was only mined on July 30, 2015. Since then, Ether (ETH) has become the dominating altcoin in market capitalization, popularity and network value settlement, having even surpassed Bitcoin in the latter.

Ethereum was created with myriad possibilities in sight, allowing for smart contracts, powerful tokenization, complex decentralized applications and decentralized fundraising campaigns. The latter of these became extremely popular in 2017, as initial coin offerings took over the crypto space and amassed incredible gains for participants.

Ether became the primary funding mechanism for ICO projects. As said projects and their underlying ERC-20 tokens left the ICO stage, speculation for their tokens grew, and so did the price of Ether, whose price reached an all-time high of $1,412 on Jan. 10, 2018. Although currently far from that number, ETHs price reached a 2020 record of almost $357 on Aug. 1.

Although ICOs helped take the cryptosphere to new heights, the hype was short-lived, and the entire crypto market came crashing down at the start of 2018. Shortly before, the United States Securities and Exchange Commission had announced that ICOs were considered security offerings and began a crackdown to protect investors.

Now, some worry that Ethereum is heading down a similar path like in 2018 with the growth of DeFi. While regulatory oversight has pushed for improvements in the crypto ecosystem, in the short-term, it can have devastating consequences like the loss of funds for investors and lawsuits for the project operators.

While price speculation seems to be rampant, its largely known that decentralized finances actual financial impact and liquidity are rather insignificant. With Ethereum recently becoming the biggest blockchain in terms value settled, how much of this activity in Ether can actually be attributed to DeFi?

ConsenSys estimates that DeFi protocols collectively hit an all-time high of 3.3 million Ether locked in protocols in the second quarter of 2020. Messari has suggested that the Ethereum blockchain settles around $2.5 billion every day. When comparing DeFi to the actual crypto market, its also easy to see that DeFi is still but a drop in the ocean, smaller than the market cap of XRP and Bitcoin Cash (BCH), and it makes up only 1.5% of the entire cryptocurrency market.

DeFi sector vs. BCH and XRP - Market capitalization. Source: Messari

While funding rates for DeFi protocols are dwarfed by the 2017-era ICO-based funding campaigns, it could be concerning that a handful of DeFi tokens have rallied thousands of percent in a short period of time. For example, Aave (LEND) rose 7,300% from $0.0046 to $0.344, and Compounds (COMP) price quadrupled in its first week of trading in June. In fact, more than 10 other DeFi-related tokens have rallied by over 100% in 2020. While impressive, this still pales in comparison to the return on investment provided by ICOs in 2017.

While DeFi has reached milestones, such as $4 billion in locked funds, the sheer size of investment obtained by DeFi protocols is way smaller than what ICOs gathered. Still, Ethereum co-founder Vitalik Buterin seems worried that people may be underestimating the risks associated with these protocols, which have been exploited by hackers in the past.

While another bubble is not ideal, it may be an inevitable part of the current crypto innovation cycle. Projects and concepts are prone to be hyped out of proportion before more organic adoption and investment comes in. This is exactly what happened with ICOs, security token offerings, Bitcoin and altcoins. As the DeFi sector continues to rapidly expand, its biggest challenge may come in the form of future regulation, much like it did with ICOs.

While only time will tell if DeFi is seeing a bubble phase, there are certainly other reasons for why Ether is outperforming Bitcoin, like becoming the basis for stablecoin transfers. According to ETH Gas Station, Tether (USDT) is the biggest gas spender on the network and continues to grow. While Ethereum did overtake Bitcoin in network activity, it was mostly due to stablecoin transfers, which were themselves overwhelmingly fueled by inter-exchange settlements.

This year, positive steps like the issuance of real-life securities within the blockchain and $1 billion in Ether futures volume were also reached. These factors contributed to Ethereums growing adoption in these last five years, but they also point to a looming dead end when it comes to scalability and congestion. However, Ethereum 2.0 staking has finally begun testing, and this brings hope for a new and improved network.

Related: Ethereum 2.0 Likely to Affect DeFi and DApps With PoS Introduction

As time goes on, its likely that DeFi will continue to grow even if it does suffer some setbacks in the short term. This means that the Ethereum network will likely continue to ride on the back of that success.

See original here:

Five Years Since Launch, Is Ethereum Creating a New Boom? - Cointelegraph

EOS, Ethereum and Ripple’s XRP Daily Tech Analysis August 8th, 2020 – FX Empire

For the day ahead

Ethereum would need to move through the $380.40 pivot to support a run at the first major resistance level at $397.92.

Support from the broader market would be needed, however, for Ethereum to break back through to $390 levels.

Barring an extended crypto rally, the first major resistance level and Fridays high $398.57 should cap any upside.

Failure to move through the $380.40 pivot would bring the 38.2% FIB and the first major support level at $362.23 into play.

Barring another extended sell-off, however, Ethereum should steer clear of sub-$360 levels. The second major support level sits at $344.71.

First Major Support Level: $362.23

Pivot Level: $380.40

First Major Resistance Level: $397.92

23.6% FIB Retracement Level: $257

38.2% FIB Retracement Level: $367

62% FIB Retracement Level: $543

Ripples XRP slid by 2.87% on Friday. Following a 0.19% gain from Thursday, Ripples XRP ended the day at $0.29427.

A bullish start to the day saw Ripples XRP rally to a late morning intraday high $0.3100 before hitting reverse.

Ripples XRP came up against the first major resistance level at $0.3104 before sliding to a late afternoon intraday low $0.27742.

The reversal saw Ripples XRP fall through the first major support level at $0.2963 and the second major support level at $0.2897.

Late in the day, Ripples XRP briefly revisited $0.2963 levels before easing back into the deep red. The first major resistance level at $0.2963 pinned Ripples XRP back late in the day.

At the time of writing, Ripples XRP was down by 0.37% to $0.29317. A bearish start to the day saw Ripples XRP fall from an early morning high $0.29430 to a low $0.29219.

Ripples XRP left the major support and resistance levels untested early on.

Go here to read the rest:

EOS, Ethereum and Ripple's XRP Daily Tech Analysis August 8th, 2020 - FX Empire

Bloomberg: Ethereums Rise is Speculative While Bitcoins Price Is Based on Fundamentals – Cointelegraph

In its August crypto outlook, Bloomberg remained unimpressed with Ethereum, calling its rally speculative. The publication contends, however, that Bitcoins (BTC) rise is based on solid ground:

Ethereum has extended last year's highs and leaped to one of the top-performing major crypto assets in 2020, but we view its rally as more speculative vs. the favorable demand vs. supply conditions supporting Bitcoin.

The report points out that Ethereum faces plenty of competition from similar crypto platforms and about 6,000 tradable coins. On the other hand, Bloomberg has remained consistently bullish about Bitcoin, noting its gold-like qualities and increased institutional demand.

The success of the DeFi space has led to the appreciation of Ether, with some comparing it to the ICO boom. As more smart contract platforms mature, competition will only get tougher. When it comes to the world of professional investors, Ether does not have a clear selling point like Bitcoins limited supply.

Original post:

Bloomberg: Ethereums Rise is Speculative While Bitcoins Price Is Based on Fundamentals - Cointelegraph

Top 3 Price Prediction Bitcoin, Ethereum, Ripple: Bitcoin may extend the recovery once Gold resumes the rally – FXStreet

Bitcoin has been creeping higher towards $12,000, ETH struggles at $400, while some altcoins rush forward to new highs. Thus, Bitcoin Cash and Monero gained 10% in the recent 24 hours, while EOS increased by 6%. The total capitalization of all digital assets in circulation is registered at $359 billion, while an average daily trading volume is set at $91 billion.Meanwhile, gold retreated from the recent high and broke the longest bullish streak since 2006 despite the further escalation of US-China spat about Chinese-owned TikTok and WeChat apps. The U.S. residents will be prohibited by having business with these companies in 45 days from now as President Donald Trump signed executive orders to that effect.The precious metal gained over 35% since the start of the year, which is the biggest annual growth in more that forty years. Moreover, Bank of America analysts expect further gains after a short-lived correction. They believe that the price may hit $3,000 an ounce in 18 months.Once gold resumes the upside momentum, Bitcoin may follow the lead.

ETH/BTC settled at $0.0335 after a bearish correction from a recent high reached at at $0.03528. At the time of writing, the cross is changing hands at $0.0339, unchanged both on a day-to-day basis and since the beginning of Friday. The RSI on a daily chart stays flat on a border of overbought territory, which means that the cross may stay sidelined during the nearest sessions. The local support created by the previous recovery high of $0.03260 and the upper line of the weekly Bollinger Band at $0.03250. If it is cleared, the sell-off may be extended towards a psychological $0.0300. On the upside, once the recent high is cleared, $0.04000 will come into view.

Above the current price, the first resistance level is at 0.03500, then the second at 0.04000 and the third one at 0.0450.

Below the current price, the first support level is at 0.0325, then the second at 0.03100 and the third one at 0.0300.

Bitcoin extended the recovery jumped above $11,900 during early Asian hours. Once this local resistance is cleared, the upside will be extended towards psychological $12,000. A sustainable move above this area is needed for the upside to gain traction. The next resistance is created by the upper line of the daily Bollinger Band at $12,500. The coin has gained 1% in the recent 24 hours and stayed unchanged since the start of the day. A sustainable move above $12,000 will bring more bulls to the market and increase the chances that $13,000 is reached in the nearest future. Meanwhile, the RSI on a daily chart stays flat on the border of the overbought territory. It means that the price may spend some time in a range before the recovery is resumed.

Above the current price, the first resistance level is at $12,000, then the second at $12,500 and the third one at $13,000.

Below the current price, the first support level is at $11,350, then the second at $11,000 and the third one at $10,500.

ETH/USD stays in a tight range after several unsuccessful attempts to settle above $400.00. Once it is cleared, the recovery may be extended towards $415.00, which is the highest level of the recent bullish wave. Once this happens, the next resistance of $430 will come into focus. this barrier is reinforced by the upper line of the daily Bollinger Band. On the downside, the first support comes at $360. It is followed by the middle line of the daily Bollinger Band at $320.00 followed by $300.00.

Above the current price, the first resistance level is at $400, then the second at $430 and the third one at $500.

Below the current price, the first support level is at $360, then the second at $320 and the third one at $300.

XRP/USD extended the recovery and hit the intraday high of $0.3071. The next strong resistance comes at the psychological $0.3100. Once it is out of the way, the upside is likely to gain traction with the next focus on the recent high of $0.3250, followed by the upper line of the daily Bollinger Band at $0.3320. On the downside, $0.3000 is the key support for the con in the short run. It is likely to slo down the sell-off; however, once is is broken, the downside momentum may be extended to $0.2900 and $0.2840, which is the lowest level of the week.

Above the current price, the first resistance level is at $0.3100, then the second at $0.3250 and the third one at $0.3320.

Below the current price, the first level of support is at $0.3000, then the second at $0.2900 and the third one at $0.2840.

Originally posted here:

Top 3 Price Prediction Bitcoin, Ethereum, Ripple: Bitcoin may extend the recovery once Gold resumes the rally - FXStreet

Ethereum (ETH) Up $8.22 On 4 Hour Chart, Fares the Worst Out of Top Cryptos to Start the Day; But Still in an Uptrend Over Past 14 Days – CFDTrading

Ethereum 4 Hour Price Update

Updated August 08, 2020 11:18 AM GMT (07:18 AM EST)

Ethereum closed the previous 4 hours up 2.51% ($9.57); this denotes the 2nd candle in a row it has gone up. Ethereum outperformed all 5 assets in the Top Cryptos asset class since the previous 4 hours. Congrats to its holders!

Ethereum came into today down 3.92% ($15.5) from the open of yesterday, marking the 2nd day in a row a decrease has occurred. The price move occurred on stronger volume; specifically, yesterdays volume was up 59.66% from the day prior, and up 13.99% from the same day the week before. On a relative basis, Ethereum was the worst performer out of all 5 of the assets in the Top Cryptos asset class during yesterday. Below is a daily price chart of Ethereum.

Trend traders will want to observe that the strongest trend appears on the 30 day horizon; over that time period, price has been moving up. For another vantage point, consider that Ethereums price has gone up 10 of the previous 14 trading days.

For laughs, fights, or genuinely useful information, lets see what the most popular tweets pertaining to Ethereum for the past day were:

@Narodism @musalbas @MPtherealMVP @NickSzabo4 So you dislike the aesthetics of some people in the ethereum community (btw Ive never done a burner party, LSD or a sex orgy) therefore ethereum has lost the plot? If I wanted to I could make similar caricatures about the whole rah rah Im manly because I eat steak thing.

I follow a lot of Bitcoin accounts and a lot of Ethereum accounts. Im noticing that currently Ethereum accounts are a bit stronger than Bitcoin accounts. More articulate, more well-versed with the other sides arguments, better at making the other side seem less knowledgeable.

My @discord account was suspended this morning because I sent too many private messages to people that wanted their @poapxyz to recall the @ethereum medalla testnet launch. Please help me making this visible to the discord support team so they know Im no spammer

Link:

Ethereum (ETH) Up $8.22 On 4 Hour Chart, Fares the Worst Out of Top Cryptos to Start the Day; But Still in an Uptrend Over Past 14 Days - CFDTrading

Saying goodbye to dying wife likely cost 90-year-old ‘Romeo’ his life. He had no regrets, family says. – USA TODAY

Autoplay

Show Thumbnails

Show Captions

LAKELAND, Fla. Not even the risk of acquiring a possibly fatal disease could deterSam Reck from seeing his dying wife a final time.

Three weeks after a deathbed reunion with his beloved JoAnn, Sam Reck has followed her into everlasting rest. The couple were christened asRomeo and Juliet for their distant visits at Florida Presbyterian Homes, where pandemic restrictions prevented closer contact.

Reck, 90, died Saturday after contracting COVID-19, the viral illness that claimed his wife on July 12, family members said. He died at Lakeland Regional Health Medical Center, just as JoAnn had.

Holly Reck of Orlando, one of Sams two grown children, acknowledged that her father probably became infected while visiting JoAnn at the hospital.

Most likely, and he knew the risks, she said Monday. There wasnt anything any of us could have done to have talked him out of that. He would have gotten himself there one way or the other to see her. I do believe that.

Scott Hooper, JoAnn Recks son from her first marriage, confirmed that.

After Sam tested positive for COVID, I asked him if he regretted his visit to the hospital, Hooper wrote in a Facebook post. Without pause he replied, Not one second. He said no matter what happens, he was very happy he had the opportunity to say goodbye and hold her hand one more time.

Sam and JoAnn Reck, married nearly 30 years, received national attention after aMay story in The Ledger described the anguish of their forced separation during the pandemic. Residents of Florida Presbyterian Homes in Lakeland, they were barred from close contact after an executive order from Gov. Ron DeSantis suspended visits to nursing homes.

JoAnn Reck, 86, diagnosed with dementia about a year ago, lived in a skilled nursing area at Florida Presbyterian Homes, while Sam lived in a nearby apartment on campus. Before the governors order, the couple spent most waking hours together in JoAnns room.

Coronavirus in Florida: Health directors told to keep quiet as Florida leaders pressed to reopen classrooms

Watch: What Florida's recent surge in COVID-19 cases means for the state

With help from the facilitys staff, Sam and JoAnn devised a way of seeing each other regularly. He would perch on a balcony outside his second-floor apartment, while she sat in a shady dining area below.

Those thrice-weekly assignations prompted the staff at Florida Presbyterian Homes to call the Recks Romeo and Juliet. In Shakespeares romantic tragedy, the young lovers prevented by family conflict from direct meetings secretly converse at night as Juliet leans from her window to find Romeo waiting below.

In Shakespeares play, young Juliet takes her own life, unable to accept family dictates keeping her apart from her lover. Romeo finds her in a vault and soon drinks poison to join her in death.

Though the balcony sessions seemed a romantic way of accommodating the separation, JoAnn endured anguish and failed to understand why Sam no longer spent his days with her.

I think they had gone through so much emotional stress the prior three months because they couldnt see each other, really, they couldnt touch each other, Holly Reck said. Even though they were able to see each other from the balcony, it wasnt the same. My father would go every day and spend eight hours or more with her, and then COVID happened. So I think it really took an emotional toll on both of them.

JoAnn Reck, in the courtyard, talks with her husband, Sam Reck, on the balcony at Florida Presbyterian Homes in Lakeland, Florida, in May. When Joann was moved from their apartment into the skilled nursing area of the facility, the couple were separated due to a state mandate closing nursing home visits. However, they would meet three times a week in this distant setting.(Photo: [PIERRE DUCHARME/THE LAKELAND LEDGER])

In July, JoAnn Reck developed a cough and fever and displayed drowsiness, prompting her transfer to the hospital, where a test confirmed she had COVID-19. Family members decided not to have her placed on a mechanical ventilator, and instead she moved to the palliative care unit.

The hospital staff allowed family members to visit JoAnn as she neared death. A photo that Scott Hooper shared later showed Sam wearing full protective gear, including a gown, two face masks and surgical gloves.

In the photo, Sam sits beside JoAnns bed, staring raptly toward her upturned face. She died hours later.

After being reported in The Ledger, the story of JoAnn Recks death gained international attention.

Holly Reck said she had to refrain from visiting her father in the hospital because she cares for her elderly mother and feared bringing the virus into her home. She said she held daily video-chat sessions with her father after he entered the hospital July 24.

Reck expressed gratitude to Hooper and his wife, Julie, for offering to visit Sam at the hospital, where they found him in the same room in which JoAnn Reck had taken her final breaths.

I was very appreciative because I didnt want my dad to be alone when he passed, and thankfully they were there with him when he passed, Holly Reck said. So that meant a lot to me, that they were willing to risk that and be with him.

Sam Reck spent his career working for the National Park Service at various sites in eastern states, finishing his career in Boston. After retirement in the late 1980s, he moved to Jacksonville, and at a church event he met JoAnn, who was recently widowed.

Sam, a devotee of bluegrass music, had a collection of instruments, and JoAnn embraced the genre. The couple traveled in a Winnebago to attend bluegrass festivals as far away as Canada, and they sometimes performed as Sam played guitar or banjo and JoAnn played autoharp and sang.

The couple moved to Lakeland in 2005 to be closer to their grown children in Central Florida. They lived in an apartment at Florida Presbyterian Homes before JoAnns dementia forced her move into the skilled nursing area.

Sam Reck on the final visit with his wife, JoAnn: "They suited us all up in all protective gear. We might have looked rather ominous, but we could hold her hand and talk to her to try to reassure her that we loved her."(Photo: [PIERRE DUCHARME/THE LAKELAND LEDGER])

After the governors order in March, Sam Reck proposed an arrangement under which he would spend all day in JoAnns room and return home at night, not having any contact with anyone outside the skilled nursing unit. The administration at Florida Presbyterian Homes noted that the governors order allowed for no exceptions.

Reck wrote directly to DeSantis at least once to plead his case and expressed disappointment at getting no response.

More than 40 elder-care centers in Polk County have reported at least one case of COVID-19 among residents or employees, and at least 143 of the countys 271 COVID-related deaths are linked to such facilities.

Watch: Retired cop learns identity of his liver donor

Watch: Frontline workers cheered on all over the world.

As of Monday afternoon, Florida Presbyterian Homes reported only one resident and one staff member positive with COVID-19.

I will miss Sam greatly, Joe Xanthopoulos, CEO and executive director of Florida Presbyterian Homes, said Monday by email. We often had robust discussions about politics, COVID, religion. Sam was a very smart man who loved his wife and had great strength of faith.

In his Facebook post, Hooper wrote that his mother, depressed after the death of her first husband, reluctantly accepted her pastors suggestion to attend a church social, at which Sam asked her to dance and they immediately connected.

In the past year, my mom suffered with dementia and Sam helped her get through her daily struggle, Hooper wrote. She was moved into a skilled nursing floor. He would drive his scooter every morning and stay with her all day until he kissed her goodnight and went back to his room. Thank you Sam, for everything you have done for our family, and for loving my mother. We all love you. I know you are now back with my mom playing bluegrass music together.

Holly Reck said she and her father had a meaningful conversation via FaceTime a few days before he died, when he was still alert and coherent.

He told me he had lived a good life, she said. He never expected to live to 90, and the most important thing to him was that he had taken care of his family, and he let me know how much he loved all of us and I let him know how much I loved him and how much I appreciated everything he had done for me as a father through the years.

In addition to his two grown children, Sam Reck leaves behind five grandchildren and one great-grandchild. The family is still considering plans for a service.

The cremated remains of Sam and JoAnn Reck will be interred together in a memorial garden on the campus of Florida Presbyterian Homes.

Follow Gary White on Twitter @garywhite13.

Autoplay

Show Thumbnails

Show Captions

Read or Share this story: https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2020/08/07/florida-coronavirus-deaths-final-goodbye-likely-cost-husband-his-life/3324484001/

Continued here:

Saying goodbye to dying wife likely cost 90-year-old 'Romeo' his life. He had no regrets, family says. - USA TODAY

20 new coronavirus cases have been reported in Maine – Bangor Daily News

Another 20 cases of the new coronavirus have been detected in Maine, health officials said Friday.

Fridays report brings the total coronavirus cases in Maine to 4,014. Of those, 3,599 have been confirmed positive, while 415 were classified as probable cases, according to the Maine Center for Disease Control and Prevention.

New cases were reported in Androscoggin (10), Cumberland (6), Kennebec (1) and York (3) counties, state data show.

The agency revised Thursdays cumulative total to 3,994, down from 3,997, meaning there was a net increase of 17 over the previous days report, state data show. As the Maine CDC continues to investigate previously reported cases, some are determined to have not been the coronavirus, or coronavirus cases not involving Mainers. Those are removed from the states cumulative total.

No new deaths were reported Friday, leaving the statewide death toll at 124. Nearly all deaths have been in Mainers over age 60.

So far, 393 Mainers have been hospitalized at some point with COVID-19, the illness caused by the coronavirus. Of those, 10 are currently hospitalized, with five in critical care and one on a ventilator.

Meanwhile, four more people have recovered from the coronavirus, bringing total recoveries to 3,479. That means there are 411 active and probable cases in the state, which is up from 398 on Thursday.

A majority of the cases 2,236 have been in Mainers under age 50, while more cases have been reported in women than men, according to the Maine CDC.

As of Friday, there have been 186,632 negative test results out of 192,323 overall. Just over 2.5 percent of all tests have come back positive, Maine CDC data show.

The coronavirus has hit hardest in Cumberland County, where 2,075 cases have been reported and where the bulk of virus deaths 69 have been concentrated. It is one of four counties the others are Androscoggin, Penobscot and York, with 558, 152 and 668 cases, respectively where community transmission has been confirmed, according to the Maine CDC.

There are two criteria for establishing community transmission: at least 10 confirmed cases and that at least 25 percent of those are not connected to either known cases or travel. That second condition has not yet been satisfied in other counties.

Other cases have been reported in Aroostook (33), Franklin (45), Hancock (35), Kennebec (170), Knox (27), Lincoln (34), Oxford (53), Piscataquis (3), Sagadahoc (54), Somerset (33), Waldo (62) and Washington (12) counties.

As of Friday morning, the coronavirus has sickened 4,888,070 people in all 50 states, the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, Guam, the Northern Mariana Islands and the U.S. Virgin Islands, as well as caused 160,157 deaths, according to Johns Hopkins University of Medicine.

Here is the original post:

20 new coronavirus cases have been reported in Maine - Bangor Daily News

Coronavirus in Pa.: 758 new cases as infections have dropped in recent days – PennLive

The Pennsylvania Department of Health reported 758 new coronavirus cases Friday, continuing a decline in new infections over the past week.

The number of new cases has dipped in recent days, after steadily climbing since the middle of June. Over the past seven days, the state has reported, on average, 747 new cases each day. During the previous seven-day period, the state recorded more than 900 new infections, on average, each day. The health department hasnt reported 1,000 new cases in a single day since July 28.

Since the pandemic began, 117,279 Pennsylvanians have contracted the coronavirus, according to the health department.

Across Pennsylvania, 7,297 deaths have been tied to COVID-19, including 15 new fatalities reported Friday. More than two-thirds of the states coronavirus deaths have occurred in long-term care facilities, such as nursing homes.

Fewer people are dying or requiring hospital care, compared to the peak of the virus in the spring. But Gov. Tom Wolf and Health Secretary Dr. Rachel Levine expressed concern over the rise of cases throughout late June and July, especially as more young adults were getting infected.

Between July 31 and August 6, the state administered 148,658 coronavirus tests. There were 24,388 test results reported to the department Thursday by 10 p.m.

Since the pandemics first cases in Pennsylvania were reported, 1,199,620 people have tested negative, the health department said.

A closer look

The state data show the trend of new cases over recent weeks.

July 4-10: 5,135 new cases, an average of 733 per day

July 11-17: 5,602 new cases, an average of 800 per day

July 18-24: 6,093 new cases, an average of 870 per day

July 25-31: 6,477 new cases, an average of 925 per day

Aug. 1-7: 5,231 new cases, an average of 747 per day

The governor has said the state is continuing to boost its testing capacity. The state has been averaging about 22,000 tests per day, far above the peak in April, when about 8,000 tests were done each day.

Were going to continue to build up our testing and contact tracing, Wolf said in a news conference Thursday.

The governor also said the state needs to do a better job of turning test results around, as some are waiting for up to two weeks to get their results.

Wolf said Thursday the states positive test rate is just under 5 percent, a level health care experts has said is a level indicating problems controlling the spread of the virus.

On Thursday, Wolf recommended high schools hold off on sports until Jan. 1, 2021. The governors office later said it was a strong recommendation but not a mandate.

Republican lawmakers criticized Wolfs recommendation and said schools should decide on their own about the fall sports schedule and whether to move forward. The Pennsylvania Interscholastic Athletic Association, which oversees high school sports, said it would release a statement Friday afternoon.

Nursing homes

Statewide, 4,968 coronavirus deaths have occurred in long-term care facilities, including nursing homes and personal care homes.

There are 19,860 residents in long-term care facilities who have contracted COVID-19, along with 4,122 employees. A total of 23,982 in those facilities have been infected. Cases have been found at 872 long-term care facilities in 61 counties.

Statewide, 8,573 health care workers have been infected with the coronavirus.

The health department said 77 percent of all Pennsylvanians who have been infected have recovered. The department considers patients to have recovered when they are 30 days beyond the date of infection or the onset of symptoms.

Thanks for visiting PennLive. Quality local journalism has never been more important. We need your support. Not a subscriber yet? Please consider supporting our work.

More from PennLive

Everyones fearful of exposure: How families and daycare centers balance childrens needs with virus risks

Micah Parsons will leave Penn State, prep for the NFL draft instead of taking his chances with COVID-19: Heres why

GOP lawmakers say Pa. Gov. Wolf is out of bounds in calling for no high school sports until 2021

Bishop McDevitt student tests positive for COVID-19 days after attending graduation

Pa. schools respond to Gov. Wolfs stance on school sports: Im hoping theres more clarity

Original post:

Coronavirus in Pa.: 758 new cases as infections have dropped in recent days - PennLive

Do You Want to Be a Vaccine Volunteer? – The New York Times

Only a Phase 3 trial allows researchers to study if their vaccine works. They do this by enrolling tens of thousands or hundreds of thousands of volunteers, giving one-half of the group to two-thirds of them the vaccine, and giving the rest a placebo or an alternative treatment. They do not expose anyone to the coronavirus, but they try to enroll a large enough group in locations with enough cases that they can bank on some people getting infected in the normal course of their lives. They then evaluate whether the vaccine reduced the frequency of acquiring the infection and lessened the severity of the disease in the test group, Dr. Corey said.

Theres no guarantee that youll actually be protected from the coronavirus at any phase of a vaccine trial, no matter how hyped the product has been. By a Phase 3 trial, of course, theres more to suggest that it works than a Phase 1 trial. But you might not get the vaccine at all. It might be an inactive placebo or an alternative intervention.

Researchers have to give these to some subjects to create a control group, said Nir Eyal, the director of the Center for Population-Level Bioethics at the Rutgers School of Public Health.

Otherwise what do you compare the results to? Dr. Eyal asked.

During the Ebola outbreak, there was a push to try to run efficacy trials without a control group, he said. But eventually most researchers came around to the idea that, without a control group, a study would tell them basically nothing because as with the coronavirus its spread is mercurial, and very different in different areas at different times.

It could be a few hundred or a few thousand dollars. It varies by the trial.

What you are doing is providing compensation for time and trouble, said Dr. Daniel Hoft, director of the Saint Louis University Center for Vaccine Development.

Organizers try to avoid creating a financial incentive. So even if they could pay much more, they dont.

If the money seems extraordinarily attractive to you, think again, Arthur L. Caplan, a bioethicist, said. You dont want to let compensation blind you to the need to pay attention to the risks.

Read the original post:

Do You Want to Be a Vaccine Volunteer? - The New York Times

What Can Blockchain Really Do for Advertising? A Perfect Use Case With SaTT – Benzinga

In a highly competitive and rapidly digitizing business ecosystem, advertising plays a major role in a brands success. So much so, that according to MarketingDive, global ad spending was expected to grow at 5%, reaching $600 billion by the end of 2019, nearly half of which was to come from digital ads.

Apart from the direct use of technology, the boom in social media has significantly contributed to this growth. After all, advertisement is all about getting a brand in front of people: the more targeted, the better. With an expected 3.43 billion global user base by 2023, social media platforms are some of the best resources to do so.

But despite rapid growth and rising importance, there are dark sides to traditional models of advertising.

According to Juniper Research, by 2020marketers around the world could be losing around $44 billion to ad frauds by far, the biggest problem with traditional advertising. This is largely due to the fact that the industry is highly centralized and opaque.

Advertising agencies often act as intermediaries between advertisers and their audiences. Often, advertisers have to pay a hefty initial fee and a monthly subscription for running their advertisements. The advertiser has very little to no control over where their ads are placed or who clicks on them. Consequently, they bear the cost of the agencys ineffective placement, while the overall advertising cost also ends up being significantly high.

While social media is a major space for running ad campaigns, traditional methods do not encourage the platforms users to participate. The end-users of social media are seen merely as consumers and not contributors. To a great extent, this limits the scope of ad campaigns on platforms that mostly run on user-generated content.

Most of the shortcomings of traditional advertising are due to the industrys centralized nature. In this context, Distributed Ledger Technology, especially blockchain, enables a more user-centric approach to advertising.

In blockchain advertising, advertisers can directly interact with end-users who, in turn, can contribute and monetize content and efforts towards an ad campaign. Before trying to understand this better with an example, lets briefly outline the main benefits of using blockchain for advertising.

First, the elimination of intermediaries results in reduced costs. Usually, a major share of ad spending pays for the fee and other charges of the intermediaries. By using blockchain, advertisers dont need to rank high on Google, alleviating thevicious cycle of having to consistently invest time and money into ranking high on Google search. In turn, this also significantly widens the scope as advertisers are no more dependent solely on certain agencies or oligarchies.

Second, with blockchains inherent transparency and security features (such as smart contracts), its possible to reinstate the consumers trust in advertising. Most importantly, this makes ad fraud virtually impossible, while making the industry more accountable as a whole.

Third, in blockchain advertising, consumers have complete control over the data that they share with advertisers. Further, blockchain technology ensures that advertisers cannot use this data in any other way than what has been previously agreed upon.

The SaTT solution was developed byAtayen, Inc and is an Ethereum-based platform that uses smart contracts and an ERC20 token to facilitate advertisements transactions. Apart from safe, instant, and automated transactions, the decentralized platform employs robust applications to transparently quantify campaign results.

Using this incentivized platform, advertisers can launch campaigns in which other users can participate by sharing related content on their social networks. In return, they are rewarded with pre-determined SaTT tokens, which are based on several KPIs such as views, likes, and shares.

All users on the application are eligible to apply to promote a product or service they like and get rewarded in SaTT tokens and play the role of an influencer.

As companies are very attentive to their most engaged followers on social networks, SaTT is positioning itself as a revolutionary solution to reward them and considerably increase a company's exposure on social networks, without depending on a centralized entity.

Centralization, opacity, and high costs are some of the major problems with traditional advertising. Also, theres a serious lack of user participation. Using blockchain technology, innovative startups are coming up with innovative solutions to these problems, ultimately helping revolutionize advertising.

As any user with a substantial social network following can create and monetize content for ad campaigns, these blockchain-based platforms also enable a paradigm shift in influencer marketing.

Disclaimer: Please consult your financial advisor before investing in any cryptocurrencies as they are volatile and pose risks for the average investor. This post is informational in nature and does not constitute financial advice. The writer of this article does not hold and has never held any position in SaTT.

2020 Benzinga.com. Benzinga does not provide investment advice. All rights reserved.

Read more:

What Can Blockchain Really Do for Advertising? A Perfect Use Case With SaTT - Benzinga

Huobis COO Thinks Blockchain Regulation Needs to be Better Defined – Cointelegraph

Robin Zhu, Huobi Global Groups COO, told Cointelegraph at a China Great Bay Area International Blockchain Week pre-event interview on August 3 that lack of defined regulations and infrastructure services are preventing the mass adoption of blockchain and crypto.

Zhu explained that, in addition to concerns about hacking, users are put off by the lack of defined regulations, infrastructure services, and user-friendly asset management systems. He continued that:

Security has always been on the top of the list. Lack of defined regulations and infrastructure services means that it is hard for mass users to entrust their cryptocurrency with most institutions and cooperates in this industry without any doubt.

He says that another key factor is the preconception of cryptocurrencies. He stressed that while Bitcoin has become a household name over the past decade, many still dont know what to do with it, let alone other cryptocurrencies. It will take a long time for the mainstream to figure out unless more robust infrastructures and user-friendly applications are built in the near future.

Blockchain, according to Zhu, has long been highlighted by the government as one of the keys to technological innovation and industrial revolution. Huobi, as one of the biggest crypto exchanges, sees it as an opportunity to provide much needed infrastructure and services.

Zhu says that Huobi University, which provides Blockchain education, has created multi-dimensional course modules for students from a variety of backgrounds. He says more than 100 free lectures are provided to government employees and employees from medium-sized enterprises globally. He added that:

Driven by the supportive policy environment and pouring-in capital, demands for high-quality talents, technology innovation-oriented corporates and commercialized cases grow rapidly over the years. Huobi sees the rising opportunities in training talents, empowering real economy, project incubation and setting industry standards.

Zhu believes that in the future, blockchain and cryptocurrency will change the world. He notes that in the future, global economic activities will become more efficient and convenient thanks to this technology-oriented revolution. Providing examples, he said:

Singapore, London, Hong Kong, and Japan have already begun regulating crypto with defined policies; first-tier corporates like Huobi are dedicated to build up more infrastructures including crypto payment system, digital asset management platform, custody, and etc[...]For the world, the value of blockchain is to change the ways that value circulates and the business model works; for you and me, blockchain is the life-changing opportunity that you wont miss.

As Cointelegraph reported previously, Blockchain is attracting more institutional investors to the crypto space as regulation becomes more clear.

Read the original post:

Huobis COO Thinks Blockchain Regulation Needs to be Better Defined - Cointelegraph

Kadena implements the first crypto gas station on blockchain – Invezz

Kadena, a network that unites public applications with private blockchains, has successfully implemented the worlds first crypto gas station on its blockchain. The network communicated the news through a blog post on its official medium channel on August 6. Kadena seeks to resolve the onboarding process of people looking to pay using cryptocurrencies through the creation of gas stations.

According to the post, the most significant barrier to the use of decentralized applications (dApps) is the hectic onboarding process where a user needs to create a wallet and use an exchange to buy the said cryptocurrency with a unit of gas. Kadenas solution to this nightmare is the use of gas stations which is an account that funds gas payments under specific conditions.

In a past post by Kadenas co-founder, Will Martino noted,

The biggest impediment to the broad adoption of decentralized applications (dApps) is the requirement that participants onboard to a cryptocurrency first. Overall, the contemporary dApp user journey is closer to about as painful as opening a bank account when it needs to be as simple as signing up for Instagram.

To implement the project, Kadena has floated two types of gas stations through an open-source for the community to review. The first is a gas guard type which are gas stations where the limit of gas used in a transaction lies within a threshold. The other is dubbed gas payer where only approved accounts are allowed, or certain functions are used. The gas guard concept has been used to facilitate transactions on ZelCore multi-currency crypto wallet. The flexible and user-friendly nature of the gas payer type of gas station displays the power of blockchain.

The innovative concept of gas stations will be a game-changer for how people use blockchain-based apps. Through them, using blockchain wont be limited to tech-savvy individuals but anyone who has access to the internet. dApp creators need to embrace the concept since it will allow users to get pre-paid gas fees which are a low-cost investment that yields high returns.

Read this article:

Kadena implements the first crypto gas station on blockchain - Invezz

NSA Sheep 2020 to be a virtual sheep show – South West Farmer

The National Sheep Association is holding NSA Sheep 2020 virtually this year.

A summer of celebration was planned for the National Sheep Association (NSA) in 2020 to celebrate 40 years at its home on the Three Counties Showground, near Malvern, Worcestershire, however due to the ongoing Covid-19 outbreak, the event has been put on ice until larger gatherings are once again permitted.

Nevertheless, in recognition of the desire of NSAs members and supporters to partake in ongoing development, NSA has decided to proceed with aspects of the NSA Sheep event that people know and enjoy, with a series of two day virtual events starting this August.

Chief executive Phil Stocker said: Of course, all at NSA were incredibly disappointed to cancel our flagship event this summer. But as work progresses on bringing a new, exciting, virtual event to our members our team at head office as well as the extended NSA organisation is excited to see how our members and others will engage with our series of virtual events.

The Virtual celebration of sheep farming will give sheep farmers the opportunity to log in to a new NSA website for the series of events. They are invited to take part in online seminars and workshops, browse interactive videos from trade and breed society stands, enter competitions and more.

Read next: South West Ram Sale to go ahead despite coronavirus

Each event is themed to allow a focus to be made that is relevant to the season and the tasks that sheep farmers might be undertaking or policy that could be affecting them at that time.

The series will start with the first event titled Breeding the best on Wednesday, August 12 and Thursday, August 13, a theme that will allow NSA affiliated breed societies the chance to share information at a time when many farmers will be considering their plans for the upcoming breeding season.

Advice and guidance will also be delivered by a packed webinar timetable. Webinars will be open to everyone to join, with free registration for each webinar available in advance and on the two days of the events.

The opportunity to view new products and demonstrations is an event highlight and this will still be available with trade stand exhibitors delivering information through their own dedicated area of the website.

Those with a competitive nature will be able to get involved in a series of competitions that can be entered before and during the event that will give visitors to the site a chance to win an array of excellent prizes.

Competitions will include a fleece competition managed by long standing NSA supporters, British Wool, a photography competition, carcase competition, sponsored by meat processors Mutchmeats, and breed society stand contests.

To join in visit nsavirtualevent.org.uk.

The rest is here:

NSA Sheep 2020 to be a virtual sheep show - South West Farmer

Posted in NSA

All you need to hijack a Mac is an old Office document and a .zip file – TechRadar

A sequence of interconnected bugs could allow hackers to hijack devices running on macOS using little more than an infected Office document and a .zip file, an expert has warned.

The vulnerability was identified by ex-NSA researcher Patrick Wardle, now working for security firm Jamf, who found that even fully-patched macOS Catalina systems were at risk.

The exploit uses a rigged Office document, saved in an archaic format (.slk), to trick the target machine into allowing Office to activate macros without consent and without notifying the user.

The attack then takes advantage of two further vulnerabilities in order to seize control of the machine. By including a dollar sign at the start of the filename, a hacker can break free of the restrictive Office sandbox, while compressing the file within a .zip folder bypasses macOS controls that prevent downloaded items from accessing user files.

Apples macOS has long enjoyed a stellar reputation from a security and data privacy perspective, but Apple devices are by no means unhackable. This misconception, Wardle suggests, could lead both users and security personnel to underestimate the potential threat level.

In the world of Windows, macro-based Office attacks are well understood (and frankly are rather old news). However, on macOS, though such attacks are growing in popularity and are quite en vogue, they have received far less attention from the research and security community, he wrote in a recent blog post.

Triggered by simply opening a malicious (macro-laced) Office document, no alerts, prompts, nor other user interactions were required in order to persistently infect even a fully-patched macOS Catalina system.

The researcher did concede that the attack requires the target individual to log in and out of their device twice, with a further step in the process fulfilled with each login. However, this does not necessarily make the attack any less feasible for criminals, who are content to play the long game.

According to Wardle, Apple did not respond to his disclosure. Microsoft, for its part, has conducted an investigation into the issue and verified the researchers findings.

[The company has] determined that any application, even when sandboxed, is vulnerable to misuse of these APIs. We are in regular discussion with Apple to identify solutions to these issues and support as needed, said a Microsoft spokesperson.

The vulnerabilities have now been patched with the latest versions of Office for Mac. Users are therefore advised to update their Office software and operating system as soon as possible, to shield against attack.

Via VICE

Read the original post:

All you need to hijack a Mac is an old Office document and a .zip file - TechRadar

Posted in NSA

Silicon Valley’s Vast Data Collection Should Worry You More Than TikTok – Jacobin magazine

If a world historical crisis being mismanaged by a far-right leader werent bad enough, it now seems the government is coming for your beloved social media apps.

Trumps latest gambit to distract from his monumental mismanagement of the pandemic response is a threat to ban the social media app TikTok, a video sharing service with 800 million users across several continents, many of them teens and young adults.

But Trumps threat is more than the desperate flailing of a leader whose reelection chances are rapidly sinking. It marks the culmination of a rising, bipartisan drumbeat of hostility toward the app, both in the United States and globally.

There are three principal objections to TikTok: the vast amounts of its users personal data that it vacuums up, its potential reach into the homes and minds of the unsuspecting public, and the threat of censorship. All are intimately connected to TikToks ownership by ByteDance, a Chinese company headquartered in Beijing. They are therefore also tangled up in the growing swell of anti-Chinese sentiment here and abroad.

Although theres no hard evidence, there is more than a good chance that the data TikTok collects is, at the very least, accessible by the Chinese government. As this ProtonMail report points out, not only does TikToks privacy policy assert the right to share information with members of its corporate group, which would include its parent company, but ByteDances CEO has already promised to further deepen cooperation with official party media, on top of the ideological censorship it has already engaged in on behalf of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). Whats more, a 2017 law lets the Chinese government force companies to secretly hand over data, including data on foreign citizens.

Its this that led Congress to ban federal employees from carrying the app on their phones, leading to headlines asking if its spying on you for China and posing a risk to US national security, and to secretary of state Mike Pompeo warning that it puts your private information in the hands of the Chinese Communist Party.

India banned the app in June, charging that its mining and profiling by elements hostile to national security and defense of India requires emergency measures (though, significantly, TikTok was one of a suite of Chinese mobile apps banned by India, a ban that only came following a June border skirmish between the two countries).

In Australia, poised to launch a probe into the app, the MP who chairs the countrys Committee on Intelligence and Security suggested its potential data collection could be used to manipulate the countrys politics in the years and decades ahead.

Theyre our future leaders, he said about the apps largely teenage user base. Theyre our future political, economic, cultural and military leaders and we need to protect their information long term.

In US political discourse, where the largely media-manufactured idea that Russian bots and fake news swung the election is unassailable, some fear China will use the data it hoovers up to interfere in elections a Chinese Cambridge Analytica data bomb waiting to explode, in other words.

Others warn that TikToks willingness to censor at Beijings request poses a threat to free speech beyond Chinas borders, given the global nature of the app. In this case, nobody in the world would be able to access the content on TikTok once removed, writes Lawfares Justin Sherman. The takedowns would be global.

All of this is made worse by the Chinese governments increasingly repressive, borderline genocidal nature, making its control of information and private data all the more perilous. Its these worries that have united everyone from the hard right, to China hawks more generally, to even some progressives.

And none of this is unreasonable. We should be worried about private companies and governments potentially collecting data on millions of unsuspecting people and censoring content they dont like. But those based in China represent just a sliver of that threat.

The fact is that everything people fear TikTok and the Chinese government are doing or someday will do is already being done by a host of other tech giants and governments. The only difference is, they happen to be situated in Western countries.

The mass collection of personal data? As commentators note (even those critical of the app), Tik Tok doesnt appear to do anything over and above the prying data grabs typical of all social media platforms. Several experts told Wired the apps data collection is in the same ballpark as other apps. Even ProtonMail, which does argue TikToks collection is more extreme than other social media platforms, suggests others are little better. How much user data does TikTok collect? it asks. As with just about every social media platform, the answer is: a lot.

This is nothing to be sanguine about. From your web browser, to your email, to your various social media accounts, to your phone, to its most innocuous-seeming apps, your lives are being constantly tracked, documented, and packaged, often for advertisers and corporations. If youve shelled out for any of the newfangled smart products, youre having data about your most intimate life harvested.

It was only two years ago we found out Facebook allowed, through its lax data protections, one single app to harvest the data of 87 million users, including their work history and political vies, even though only 270,000 downloaded the app.

This is the same company that once secretly experimented with its users moods and emotions. Worse, its becoming increasingly clear that, whatever steps we take to protect our privacy, we likely cant stop companies from collecting our private information.

Collaborating with government? That too is hardly a Chinese innovation. Despite some significant resistance to the US governments snooping, the big US-based tech companies have become what one cybersecurity expert dubs surveillance intermediaries, continuing to hand over data at the request of the US government.

Thanks to the Snowden leaks, we know the NSA hoards data including photos, videos, emails, and more from a whos who of Silicon Valley since 2007, swimming in so much of our personal information that even its analysts complain it makes their jobs harder.

Despite initially eliciting fiery outrage, that programwhose first target was a pro-democracy critic of Fijis authoritarian leader has been reauthorized with little objection. And even without the cooperation of tech firms, the UK government taps undersea cables to scoop up phone calls and internet activity, which it then shares with its Five Eyes partners, which of course includes the United States.

The blurred line between government and business that TikToks critics point to likewise isnt unique to China. Silicon Valley has a close relationship with one of the United Statess two ruling parties, hiring alumni of the last Democratic administration while funneling many millions of dollars to the partys candidates.

In fact, this election is seeing a handful of tech billionaires throwing millions of dollars at creating data infrastructure and partisan news sites aimed at electing the partys 2020 presidential nominee.

Lastly, while a reluctance to censor may have once distinguished Western tech firms from their Chinese counterparts, the panic that followed the elections that brought us Brexit and Trump has all but neutralized that distinction.

Under increasing pressure from the liberal end of the Washington spectrum, tech companies have become increasingly censorious, working with outfits like the NATO-aligned and corporate-funded Atlantic Council and even the Israeli government to purge content those bodies deem inappropriate.

In one particularly egregious example, Facebook, egged on by CNN, suspended a left-wing news outlet from its platform for two crimes: not disclosing its funding from Russian state media, something Facebook had never required until then; and, even more menacingly, for being critical of Western government policies, or as the report put it, being generally critical of US foreign policy and the mainstream American media, which CNN suggested made it tantamount to Kremlin propaganda.

Unsurprisingly, this liberal-led push for censorship has also backfired, with Facebook hiring conservative fact-checkers who promptly censored content according to their own right-wing biases.

Whether youre an American citizen or a foreigner worried about how shadowy governments and unaccountable corporations might misuse the data of leaders current and future, its not clear why you should only be worried about those in China.

Indeed, given the Five Eyes member countries extensive history of meddling in other countries and given the massive amounts of money US tech firms spend to influence their own countrys politics this should be a worry at least as pressing as China, especially given the larger number of US-based social media platforms that we use without a care in the world on a daily basis.

TikToks critics might point to the increasingly scary behavior of Chinas government as to why Chinese control of information is particularly alarming. Theyre right about the behavior, but they curiously ignore the fact that the United States itself is currently governed by a far-right demagogue with his own concentration camps and authoritarian repression, and that the party behind him, which aligns entirely with his politics, reliably cycles into power at least once every eight years.

This is what the era of mass surveillance and nationalist neoliberalism has produced. Seven years ago, the vast scope of public-private spying was a global scandal. Now, weve so normalized mass surveillance that the only time were allowed to worry about it is if the people doing it live in whatever the worlds current evil empire happens to be.

The answer isnt to dismiss the potential menace of Chinas surveillance programs, or to cheerlead for a rival set of tech oligarchs who simply happen to live in California and speak English.

We should broaden the concerns and criticisms of TikTok and its relationship to China to tech firms more generally, and push for an across-the-board guarantee of online privacy and free speech for all of the worlds people, whether theyre more worried about being tracked and manipulated by people in the United States or China.

What might that look like? Perhaps it would involve negotiating a set of rules for surveillance and data collection that all governments and the tech firms associated with them would have to play by.

The trouble is, just as US opposition has hindered everything from a cluster bomb ban and the International Criminal Court to a multilateral agreement on space militarization, it would be difficult to get the US government to agree to so much as curtail a set of tools it pioneered and enjoys significant geopolitical advantage from. And thats before we got to the vehement opposition that would come from tech firms themselves.

Still, as ambitious as it is, even simply shifting the conversation to such an idea would, at the very least, be more productive than the current solutions. As is, were left with a rival video sharing platform, Triller, trying to capitalize on TikToks troubles by promising a form of patriotic capitalism, and Microsoft, now looking to buy the app, pledging to keep all its data in the United States ripe and ready for the NSA and other Western government agencies to then ladle up, patriotically of course.

Silicon Valley and the NSA would love us to think that its who does the spying, not the spying itself, thats the real problem. We shouldnt let them get away with the impression a mere seven years is all it takes for us to lose our sense of outrage.

View post:

Silicon Valley's Vast Data Collection Should Worry You More Than TikTok - Jacobin magazine

Posted in NSA

In the Pandemic, Students Free Speech Rights Are More Important Than Ever – Slate

Students still have (some) First Amendment rights.Lisa McIntyre/Unsplash This article is part of the Free Speech Project, a collaboration between Future Tense and the Tech, Law, & Security Program at American University Washington College of Law that examines the ways technology is influencing how we think about speech.

Images of maskless students packing the hallways between classes at North Paulding High Schoolin Georgia became the viral symbols this week of a nationwide battle over whether and how to reopen schools in the midst of a pandemic that is still really not under control. It was widely reported on Monday and Tuesday that the schoollocated about an hour outside of Atlantahad reopened with a masks-optional policy, despite an outbreak among football players who had worked out in a crowded indoor gym, and despite multiple positive tests among players and school staff. The district has taken the position, despite recommendations fromCenters for Disease Control and Prevention health officials, that mask-wearing was a personal choice and that social distancing will not be possible to enforce in most cases. Virtual enrollment for the school had filled up rapidly, so most students had no other choice but to attend class in person or risk suspension.

The public health story was itself soon eclipsed by Thursdays news that two North Paulding students had been suspended for taking and posting other photos and a video. One of the teens, 15-year-old Hannah Watters, told BuzzFeed News she had received a five-day, out-of-school suspension for posting a photo and a video on Twitter. Watters announced Friday that her suspension had been rescinded. Meanwhile, the school went to remote learning on Thursday and Friday in order to assess and refine its health policies.

While the matter of Watters suspension seems to have been resolved, the larger question of student speech rights, especially on social media, and especially during a public health disaster, is far from settled. What Watters was doing was journalism. In addition to her viral photos, she had also been posting tallies of the proportions of students wearing masks in her classes. The viral photo she posted was captioned, Day two at North Paulding High School. It is just as bad. We were stopped because it was jammed. We are close enough to the point where I got pushed multiple go to second block. This is not ok. Not to mention the 10% mask rate.

School superintendent Brian Otott, who confirmed the North Paulding student suspension in an interview with the Atlanta Journal-Constitution on Thursday, initially would not say whether the discipline was connected with the photos. (He would not comment, he said, out of regard for the students privacy.)Otott told the media that the photo was taken out of context. But he also told parents and guardiansin a letterthat there is no question that the photo does not look good. Wearing a mask is a personal choice, and there is no practical way to enforce a mandate to wear them. BuzzFeed further reported that on Wednesday, school principal Gabe Carmona threatened any student found criticizing the school on social media. Anything thats going on social media thats negative or alike without permission, photography, thats video or anything, there will be consequences, Carmona told students over the intercom.

Put to one side that I have heard this week from numerous parents in Georgia about daughters who have been sent home from school for wearing spaghetti straps, miniskirts, or shorts deemed too short for public viewing. (How is science-based public health a matter of personal choice whereas girls dressing demurely is an enforceable mandate?) Lets focus instead on why a school district thought it could suspend a student for posting newsworthy images.

Watters said she was called into the schools office Wednesday and told she had violated three policies from the school districts student code of conduct: She had used her phone during class time; she had used her phone during school hours for social media; and she had posted photos of minors without consent on a social media platform. But as Watters told CNN, high school students are exempt from the district policy on phones (its targeted toward younger students), and she didnt post the photo until after school was over. She admitted to violating the policy on posting images of students to social media, but, of course, students violate that rule every day.

Everyone loves to mouth the platitude that students dont shed their First Amendment rights at the schoolhouse gate, as set forth in the landmark 1969 Tinker case, when the Supreme Court ruled that a high school student had the right to wear a black armband to protest the Vietnam War. But Tinkers holding has been eroded over the decades since, such that student speech can be regulated in schools to ensure that substantial disruptions do not occur on school grounds. Anxiety over new media, bullying, sexting, and porn have only added to the tensions felt by school administrators who try to regulate online conduct by putting blanket policies in place.

At least in theory, student speech, say, archly advocating drug useas in the 2007 Bong Hits 4 Jesus casecan still be banned by authorities. (Posting the same sentiment from home outside of school hours is safer.) But a student raising life and death questions about matters of life and death in school hallways should be protected even under the more constrained free speech rights in public schools. Hadar Harris, executive director of the Student Press Law Center, which just filed a letter of complaint to the school in this matter, suggests as much: We are very concerned that this is the first of many such instances that we are going to see as schools reopen and administrators try to manage the narrative of opening during a pandemic to their benefit.

Harris also notes, Only 14 states have legislation that protects student journalists from censorship by school officials. In the rest of the country, school officials in public schools have the ability to censor student journalists due to the Hazelwood v. Kuhlmeier decision, which carved out an exception to Tinker for student journalists. In that 1988 case, the Supreme Court held that schools did not violate students First Amendment rights in killing news items about pregnancy and divorce. In an email, Harris colleague Mike Hiestand, the Student Press Law Centers senior legal counsel, was more blunt: Tinker is very much alive. (Both the [Supreme Court] decisionand the plaintiffs, who I took a free speech bus tour with a few years back.) I think its the school districts legal officeif they truly think they can stop students from peacefully sharing lawful, accurate information in the way students do in 2020 about their going back to school during a global pandemicthat may be dead. Give me a break.

Prof. RonNell Andersen Jones, who teaches First Amendment law at the University of Utah says in an email that punishing students for speechespecially speech on pressing matters of public concernisnt just harmful to individual students, although it certainly is that. Its harmful to the vibrancy of our conversations about school safety policies, because those students are some of the most important contributors to those conversations. And its harmful to our democracy, because we are inappropriately modeling to the next generation that government can simply stifle free speech to shelter itself from criticism.

Professor Sonja West, who teaches First Amendment law at the University of Georgia adds that it appears that the school punished Hannah not for legitimatepedagogical reasons but becauseher photos were bad PR. This is exactly the kind of move the First Amendment is meant to prohibit. Censoring speech because its embarrassing may be very much in vogue these days, but that doesnt make it constitutional. And the state of Georgia, one would be remiss not to note, ranked fifth in the country for the number of total COVID-19 cases, eighth for cases per capita, and fourth in new cases in this past week.

In aninterviewwith CNN, Hannah Watters explained that she had posted the images early in the week because she was worried about the safety of everyone in the school building. My biggest concern is not only about me being safe, its about everyone being safe, because behind every teacher, student and staff member there is a family, there are friends, and I would just want to keep everyone safe. Americas schools are now ground zero for both ill-conceived pandemic planning and student endangerment, all dressed up under the guise of unfettered student choice and freedom. It is frankly astounding that those same same students who are free to die from a lethal virus are being singled out to be punished for chronicling it.

Future Tense is a partnership of Slate, New America, and Arizona State University that examines emerging technologies, public policy, and society.

Original post:

In the Pandemic, Students Free Speech Rights Are More Important Than Ever - Slate

Brexit, Frexit, Grexit, Italexit – the whole EU house of cards is about to collapse – Express

Even with the Eurosceptic Lega party out of harm's way and a massive 209bn sweetener from the EU to help Rome's coronavirus woes it still looks like clever money especially when the Italians twig that as net EU contributors it was their cash all along. But I've always favoured the longer shots, the higher stakes / higher reward gamble, and if pushed I'd say don't dismiss an each way flutter on France.

This morning you could get 10/1.

Which is prescient because this morning too on the other side of the Channel a little anti-EU pressure group was started by a fellow called Charles-Henri Gallois with the slogan take back control.

In polite liberal circles of course Mr Gallois (could he be more French with that name) is being mocked as a no-hoper fringe populist.

On this side of the Channel we have a touch more respect for no-hoper fringe populists these days.

Funny piece of political nomenclature that sneering word 'populist' isn't it? As if being popular with the rank and file public is something far too grubby for the great and the good to sully themselves with.

It's actually the root cause of the EU's massive popularity problems the simple inability to see life from the point of view of the voting rank and file.

It's too early to tell what kind of a man Charles-Henri is.

On the face of it he is just the latest among a growing clamour of political activists who've simply had enough.

Had enough of being dictated to by the above-mentioned arrogant, undemocratic burghers of Brussels.

Had enough of being told how they can and can't spend their money.

Had enough of a supranational state being built on the quiet, as very well-paid politicians with their own agendas milk the system use bait and switch tactics to keep us looking the other way.

DON'T MISS:Brexit breakthrough: How Britain could strike 'Ukraine Plus' deal[ANALYSIS]UK closer to FTA as Barnier drops TWO major objections[REVEALED]EU to 'copy Roman Empire with great expansion'[INSIGHT]

And perhaps even more frighteningly have had enough of how this inability to connect with the rank and file gives succour to the real political lunatics the architects of the EU desperately hoped the project would snuff out forever.

But decades of mismanagement and political disconnect has created the exact opposite.

It is entirely understandable that many people, for entirely right and laudable reasons, wish to leave the EU there's 17.2million of us over here for starters.

But the EU has created an environment which fosters real evil too.

There is a gaping chasm between parties and pressure groups who have simply lost patience with Brussels and their more deeply sinister counterparts who use anti-EU rhetoric as a respectable cover to hide their racist, homophobic and politically hideous agendas.

Strangely this gaping chasm does not seem that obvious to all.

But it needs to be. While both the EU (and national governments) continue to fail to properly address the needs of the people and gain their respect they open doors for the viler end of the political spectrum.

Having a flutter on the next country to leave the EU is a bit of harmless fun but unless Brussels starts to properly address the needs and concerns of the man and woman in the streets there will be no winners.

See the rest here:

Brexit, Frexit, Grexit, Italexit - the whole EU house of cards is about to collapse - Express