Students still have (some) First Amendment rights.Lisa McIntyre/Unsplash This article is part of the Free Speech Project, a collaboration between Future Tense and the Tech, Law, & Security Program at American University Washington College of Law that examines the ways technology is influencing how we think about speech.
Images of maskless students packing the hallways between classes at North Paulding High Schoolin Georgia became the viral symbols this week of a nationwide battle over whether and how to reopen schools in the midst of a pandemic that is still really not under control. It was widely reported on Monday and Tuesday that the schoollocated about an hour outside of Atlantahad reopened with a masks-optional policy, despite an outbreak among football players who had worked out in a crowded indoor gym, and despite multiple positive tests among players and school staff. The district has taken the position, despite recommendations fromCenters for Disease Control and Prevention health officials, that mask-wearing was a personal choice and that social distancing will not be possible to enforce in most cases. Virtual enrollment for the school had filled up rapidly, so most students had no other choice but to attend class in person or risk suspension.
The public health story was itself soon eclipsed by Thursdays news that two North Paulding students had been suspended for taking and posting other photos and a video. One of the teens, 15-year-old Hannah Watters, told BuzzFeed News she had received a five-day, out-of-school suspension for posting a photo and a video on Twitter. Watters announced Friday that her suspension had been rescinded. Meanwhile, the school went to remote learning on Thursday and Friday in order to assess and refine its health policies.
While the matter of Watters suspension seems to have been resolved, the larger question of student speech rights, especially on social media, and especially during a public health disaster, is far from settled. What Watters was doing was journalism. In addition to her viral photos, she had also been posting tallies of the proportions of students wearing masks in her classes. The viral photo she posted was captioned, Day two at North Paulding High School. It is just as bad. We were stopped because it was jammed. We are close enough to the point where I got pushed multiple go to second block. This is not ok. Not to mention the 10% mask rate.
School superintendent Brian Otott, who confirmed the North Paulding student suspension in an interview with the Atlanta Journal-Constitution on Thursday, initially would not say whether the discipline was connected with the photos. (He would not comment, he said, out of regard for the students privacy.)Otott told the media that the photo was taken out of context. But he also told parents and guardiansin a letterthat there is no question that the photo does not look good. Wearing a mask is a personal choice, and there is no practical way to enforce a mandate to wear them. BuzzFeed further reported that on Wednesday, school principal Gabe Carmona threatened any student found criticizing the school on social media. Anything thats going on social media thats negative or alike without permission, photography, thats video or anything, there will be consequences, Carmona told students over the intercom.
Put to one side that I have heard this week from numerous parents in Georgia about daughters who have been sent home from school for wearing spaghetti straps, miniskirts, or shorts deemed too short for public viewing. (How is science-based public health a matter of personal choice whereas girls dressing demurely is an enforceable mandate?) Lets focus instead on why a school district thought it could suspend a student for posting newsworthy images.
Watters said she was called into the schools office Wednesday and told she had violated three policies from the school districts student code of conduct: She had used her phone during class time; she had used her phone during school hours for social media; and she had posted photos of minors without consent on a social media platform. But as Watters told CNN, high school students are exempt from the district policy on phones (its targeted toward younger students), and she didnt post the photo until after school was over. She admitted to violating the policy on posting images of students to social media, but, of course, students violate that rule every day.
Everyone loves to mouth the platitude that students dont shed their First Amendment rights at the schoolhouse gate, as set forth in the landmark 1969 Tinker case, when the Supreme Court ruled that a high school student had the right to wear a black armband to protest the Vietnam War. But Tinkers holding has been eroded over the decades since, such that student speech can be regulated in schools to ensure that substantial disruptions do not occur on school grounds. Anxiety over new media, bullying, sexting, and porn have only added to the tensions felt by school administrators who try to regulate online conduct by putting blanket policies in place.
At least in theory, student speech, say, archly advocating drug useas in the 2007 Bong Hits 4 Jesus casecan still be banned by authorities. (Posting the same sentiment from home outside of school hours is safer.) But a student raising life and death questions about matters of life and death in school hallways should be protected even under the more constrained free speech rights in public schools. Hadar Harris, executive director of the Student Press Law Center, which just filed a letter of complaint to the school in this matter, suggests as much: We are very concerned that this is the first of many such instances that we are going to see as schools reopen and administrators try to manage the narrative of opening during a pandemic to their benefit.
Harris also notes, Only 14 states have legislation that protects student journalists from censorship by school officials. In the rest of the country, school officials in public schools have the ability to censor student journalists due to the Hazelwood v. Kuhlmeier decision, which carved out an exception to Tinker for student journalists. In that 1988 case, the Supreme Court held that schools did not violate students First Amendment rights in killing news items about pregnancy and divorce. In an email, Harris colleague Mike Hiestand, the Student Press Law Centers senior legal counsel, was more blunt: Tinker is very much alive. (Both the [Supreme Court] decisionand the plaintiffs, who I took a free speech bus tour with a few years back.) I think its the school districts legal officeif they truly think they can stop students from peacefully sharing lawful, accurate information in the way students do in 2020 about their going back to school during a global pandemicthat may be dead. Give me a break.
Prof. RonNell Andersen Jones, who teaches First Amendment law at the University of Utah says in an email that punishing students for speechespecially speech on pressing matters of public concernisnt just harmful to individual students, although it certainly is that. Its harmful to the vibrancy of our conversations about school safety policies, because those students are some of the most important contributors to those conversations. And its harmful to our democracy, because we are inappropriately modeling to the next generation that government can simply stifle free speech to shelter itself from criticism.
Professor Sonja West, who teaches First Amendment law at the University of Georgia adds that it appears that the school punished Hannah not for legitimatepedagogical reasons but becauseher photos were bad PR. This is exactly the kind of move the First Amendment is meant to prohibit. Censoring speech because its embarrassing may be very much in vogue these days, but that doesnt make it constitutional. And the state of Georgia, one would be remiss not to note, ranked fifth in the country for the number of total COVID-19 cases, eighth for cases per capita, and fourth in new cases in this past week.
In aninterviewwith CNN, Hannah Watters explained that she had posted the images early in the week because she was worried about the safety of everyone in the school building. My biggest concern is not only about me being safe, its about everyone being safe, because behind every teacher, student and staff member there is a family, there are friends, and I would just want to keep everyone safe. Americas schools are now ground zero for both ill-conceived pandemic planning and student endangerment, all dressed up under the guise of unfettered student choice and freedom. It is frankly astounding that those same same students who are free to die from a lethal virus are being singled out to be punished for chronicling it.
Future Tense is a partnership of Slate, New America, and Arizona State University that examines emerging technologies, public policy, and society.
- OPINION: The new free speech bullies - The Richmond Observer - September 5th, 2021
- Are Censures of Politicians a Form of Free Speech or a Threat to It? - The New York Times - September 5th, 2021
- War-Thirsty Media Demanding Another War - Free Speech TV - September 5th, 2021
- Joe Biden Has Officially Ended a 20-Year War - Free Speech TV - September 5th, 2021
- New Texas Abortion Law Likely to Unleash a Torrent of Lawsuits Against Online Education, Advocacy and Other Speech - EFF - September 5th, 2021
- [COMMENTARY] Twitter Is Not a Town Square; We Should Stop Treating It Like One - HillReporter.com - September 5th, 2021
- Stopping online hate speech is hard. New research teaches machines to find white nationalist content - The Star Online - September 5th, 2021
- Opinion | It's up to all of us to increase political freedom of speech on campus - UI The Daily Iowan - June 15th, 2021
- Clarifying Confusion in Greenwich on Illegal Signs and Protected Free Speech - Greenwich Free Press - June 15th, 2021
- Lazy Thinking in the Free Speech Debate Could Be Exploited by Extremists - Politics.co.uk - June 15th, 2021
- The World Loves Free SpeechExcept When They're Offended - Reason - June 15th, 2021
- Law Students: Interested in Helping With Proofreading on the Journal of Free Speech Law? - Reason - June 15th, 2021
- Opinion: Canada needs a tough online hate speech law now - The Globe and Mail - June 15th, 2021
- Indian Government in Standoff with Twitter Over Online Speech - Voice of America - June 15th, 2021
- View from the right: social media and their left-leaning leaders attack free speech - Norwich Bulletin - June 15th, 2021
- Free speech and the culture wars The Justice Gap - thejusticegap.com - June 15th, 2021
- Worcesters Abby Kelley Foster to be honored with lighted lectern sculpture created by two artists - MassLive.com - June 15th, 2021
- Editorial: Against For the People: Free speech is the most important right and cannot be curbed - Yahoo News - June 15th, 2021
- Opinion/Owens: Making the case against 'critical race theory' - The Providence Journal - June 15th, 2021
- Free speech is the most important right and cannot be curbed - Grand Haven Tribune - June 15th, 2021
- Representative Sherrill Statement on Biden-Putin Meeting - Mikie Sherrill - June 15th, 2021
- Mass GOP cancels fundraiser with Texas U.S. Rep. Dan Crenshaw over threat of protests - Boston Herald - June 15th, 2021
- India And Tech Companies Clash Over Censorship, Privacy And 'Digital Colonialism' - NPR - June 15th, 2021
- The Complicated Impact the Pentagon Papers Had on Free Speech - The New York Times - June 10th, 2021
- The New York Times' Culture-War Definition of Free Speech - The New Republic - June 10th, 2021
- Once a Bastion of Free Speech, the A.C.L.U. Faces an Identity Crisis - The New York Times - June 10th, 2021
- In some countries, people think they have too much freedom of speech - The Economist - June 10th, 2021
- Free speech protects ideas, including the right to truthfully advertise - Pacific Legal Foundation (PLF) - June 10th, 2021
- Digital sovereignty vs freedom of speech? - The News International - June 10th, 2021
- OPINION: How defamation suits are used to stifle free speech - The Richmond Observer - June 10th, 2021
- EDITORIAL | South Koreas New Limits on Free of Speech are At Odds with a Seat at the G7 Table - JAPAN Forward - June 10th, 2021
- Readers write: Points on free speech and public school - Yahoo News - June 10th, 2021
- Free speech matters for all at UCL, and so does disruptive thinking - Jewish News - June 10th, 2021
- Survey suggests people think there is too much free speech - Newstalk ZB - June 10th, 2021
- Universities must be open to free speech, says head of UCL - Evening Standard - June 10th, 2021
- Obscure Musicology Journal Sparks Battles Over Race and Free Speech - The New York Times - February 15th, 2021
- My Turn: Our biggest threats to free speech - Concord Monitor - February 15th, 2021
- Letter to the editor: Free speech and politics in Iowa - Little Village - February 15th, 2021
- University Names New Committees on Free Speech and the Historic Landscape at UVA - UVA Today - February 15th, 2021
- Letters: The limits of free speech and the dangers of violence and insurrection - The Advocate - February 15th, 2021
- COLUMN: Free speech failures of the left and right - Montrose Daily Press - February 15th, 2021
- Letter: The culture of free speech | Letters to the Editor | tillamookheadlightherald.com - Tillamook Headlight-Herald - February 15th, 2021
- U.Va. creates committees on Free Expression and Free Inquiry, Naming and Memorials - University of Virginia The Cavalier Daily - February 15th, 2021
- Free speech and online content: What can the US learn from Europe? - Atlantic Council - February 1st, 2021
- Academics should put freedom of speech in the context of other values (opinion) - Inside Higher Ed - February 1st, 2021
- Letter to the editor: Silencing free speech by breaking the law not what Edmonds is about - My Edmonds News - February 1st, 2021
- Snapchat boss calls for balance between free speech and social media moderation - IOL - December 31st, 2020
- Hillarie Goldstein: Right to free speech is protected in this country - The Laconia Daily Sun - December 31st, 2020
- Conversation on Free Speech and Inequality Between Prof. Nelson Tebbe (Cornell) and Me - Reason - November 25th, 2020
- TTUs Sumner named to new national task force on campus free speech expression - KLBK | KAMC | EverythingLubbock.com - November 25th, 2020
- Free speech stops at the boundary of giving offence to religion: Shanmugam - The Straits Times - November 25th, 2020
- Cruz '92 conversation ranges from lighthearted Princeton memories to free speech, the 'shrill' left - The Daily Princetonian - November 25th, 2020
- Stephanie Fox and Beth Miller: Pompeo Tramples on International Law, Free Speech, and Human Rights With His Support for Israeli Settlements - YubaNet - November 25th, 2020
- Unions Tell NLRB That Inflatable Rat Display Is Free Speech - Law360 - November 25th, 2020
- 61% Agree with Athletes' Right to Speak Out for Social Justice; But More than a Third Say It Hinders Desire To Watch Games, Ruins Sports as 'Escape' -... - November 25th, 2020
- Don't allow First Amendment rights to be seen as 'wrongs' - The Record - November 25th, 2020
- Hate speech vs free speech: SC gives 2 weeks to Sudarshan TV to respond to Centre's affidavit - The Tribune India - November 25th, 2020
- Britain needs to take a lesson from the US in protecting free speech - Telegraph.co.uk - November 25th, 2020
- Between hate and state - The Indian Express - September 18th, 2020
- Letter: Don't need to agree on issues, do need to respect free speech - Whidbey News-Times - September 18th, 2020
- Opinion: The right to free speech doesn't include hate speech - The Appalachian Online - September 18th, 2020
- New Freedom of Speech and Expression Statement released - The Record - September 18th, 2020
- What Does the Education Department's New Final Rule Mean For... - Diverse: Issues in Higher Education - September 18th, 2020
- Will Trump's Herd Immunity Strategy Crash the Economy? - Free Speech TV - September 18th, 2020
- Fed Troops In US Cities & HeatRay Machines : Is this real life or a Bond movie? - Free Speech TV - September 18th, 2020
- Analysing the Effects of Turkey's Social Media Regulation Bill - JURIST - September 18th, 2020
- Instagram CEO, ACLU slam TikTok and WeChat app bans for putting US freedoms into the balance - TechCrunch - September 18th, 2020
- LETTER: Free speech means freedom to call out bad opinions - St. Albert Today - September 18th, 2020
- TikTok, WeChat ban: UM experts can discuss - University of Michigan News - September 18th, 2020
- From the Editor: The Lines Around Free Speech - Princeton Alumni Weekly - September 6th, 2020
- Excessive regulation can impact free speech, warns Facebooks Oversight Board member - BusinessLine - September 6th, 2020
- Why the Hindu Right, Not Usually a Champion of Free Speech, Is Supporting Charlie Hebdo - The Wire - September 6th, 2020
- Letters: Paying the price for the invaluable right of free speech - Telegraph.co.uk - September 6th, 2020
- Mayor Peduto Says Protesters Will Be Arrested If There Is Continual Denial Of Law - CBS Pittsburgh - September 6th, 2020
- Should the fight against the virus mean sacrificing free speech? - The Age - September 6th, 2020
- Denver neighborhood tiff over yard signs is just the beginning in year filled with polarizing issues - The Denver Post - September 6th, 2020
- Why is free speech different from hate speech? - TheLeaflet - The Leaflet - September 4th, 2020
- Academics Are Really Worried About Cancel Culture - The Atlantic - September 4th, 2020
- Crackdown on free speech a threat to justice - The Tribune India - August 28th, 2020
- Opinion | Putting professor on leave is a crackdown on free speech - The Daily Orange - August 28th, 2020