Free Private City Bir Tawil Freedom, Prosperity, Security

The founder of the Free Private City Bir Tawil

Bir TawilorBir Tawl(Egyptian Arabic: Br awl[bi twil]or Bir awl, meaning tallwater well) is a 2,060km2(800sqmi) area along the border betweenEgyptandSudan, which is inhabited and claimed by the Free Private City of Bir Tawil. When spoken of in association with the neighbouringHalaib Triangle, it is sometimes referred to as theBir Tawil Triangle, despite the areasquadrilateralshape; the two triangles border at aquadripoint.

Itsterra nulliusstatus results from a discrepancy between the straight political boundary between Egypt and Sudan established in 1899, and the irregular administrative boundary established in 1902. Egypt asserts the political boundary, and Sudan asserts the administrative boundary, with the result that the Halaib Triangle is claimed by both and Bir Tawil by neither. In 2014, author Alastair Bonnett described Bir Tawil as the only place on Earth that washabitablebut was not claimed by any recognised government.

Bir Tawil is 2,060km2(795sqmi) in size. The length of its northern and southern borders are 95 kilometres (59mi) and 46 kilometres (29mi) respectively; the length of its eastern and western borders are 26 kilometres (16mi) and 49 kilometres (30mi) respectively. In the north of the area is the mountain Jabal Tawil ( ), with a height of 459 metres (1,506ft). In the east isJebel Hagar ez Zarqa, with a height of 662 metres (2,172ft). In the south is theWadiTawil ( ), also calledKhawr Ab Bard. There are a few streams in Bir Tawil, which originate inLake Nasser.On 19 January 1899, an agreement between the UK and Egypt relating to the administration of the Sudan defined Soudan as the territories south of the 22nd parallel of latitude.]It contained a provision that would give Egypt control of the red sea port ofSuakin, but an amendment on 10 July 1899 gave Suakin to Sudan instead.

On 4 November 1902 the UK drew a separate administrative boundary, intended to reflect the actual use of the land by the tribes in the region.Bir Tawil was grazing land used by theAbabdatribe based nearAswan, and thus was placed under Egyptian administration fromCairo. Similarly, the Halaib Triangle to the northeast was placed under the British governor of Sudan, because its inhabitants were culturally closer toKhartoum.

Egypt claims the original border from 1899, the 22nd parallel, which would place the Halaib Triangle within Egypt and the Bir Tawil area within Sudan. Sudan, however, claims the administrative border of 1902, which would put Halaib within Sudan, and Bir Tawil within Egypt. As a result, both states claim theHalaib Triangleand neither claims the much less valuable Bir Tawil area, which is only a tenth the size, and has no permanent settlements or access to the sea. There is no basis in international law for either Sudan or Egypt to claim both territories, and neither nation is willing to cede Halaib. With no third state claiming the neglected area, Bir Tawil is one of the few land areas of the worldnot claimed by any recognised state. Egypt arguably still administers the territory, but it is not marked as Egyptian on government maps.[

However, Christoph Heuermann, believer of more competition in governance, set up the Free Private City of Bir Tawil on November 4th 2019. A Free Private City is a new model of living together peacefully. Citizen enter into a public contract which defines both their rights and liabilities. A Free Private City cannot change this contract one-sidedly as governments use to do. Only they can provide freedom, prosperity and security!

You can read more about Free Private Cities here!

Christoph has actually physically been in in Bir Tawil and left several things to mark his claim on Bir Tawil as you can see here. Free Private Cities are real not a joke kingdom micro nation.

Read more here:

Free Private City Bir Tawil Freedom, Prosperity, Security

Bir Tawil: The land that nobody wants – The Focus

Bir Tawil is a 2006-square-kilometre piece of land sandwiched between Egypt and Sudan that holds the lofty title of being the last unclaimed and uninhabited piece of land on earth, or to give it its funky latin title terra nullius. Alas the story is a little bit more complicated than that

Well this is where it gets interesting. It is less unclaimed, and more the victim (or winner) in a territorial dispute between Egypt and Sudan. During the good old days, Egypt and Sudan formed a condominium controlled by the British Empire, this meant that much like in the border disputes that would later rock the USSR, a proper border wasnt all that important.

The fact that there were two differing maps drawn to mark the border between Egypt and Sudan, whilst not important at the time, would later come back to haunt them. In 1899 and 1902 there were two different boundaries drawn the 1899 border gives the Halaib Triangle to Egypt and Bir Tawil to Sudan, with the 1902 border doing the reverse.

The problem here is that it turns out that the Halaib Triangle is not only really nice (it even has a beach), but that Bir Tawil is essentially a crappy bit of desert. Therefore if you claim one, you cannot claim the other. Unsurprisingly, both claim the good bit, and thus Bir Tawil is unclaimed. Except it is no longer unclaimed

The internet has achieved a lot of good things, from food delivery to Tinder, but it has also given a platform for strange peoples voices to get amplified, and Bir Tawil is now the posterchild for anyone who wants to make their very own country!

In 2014, Jeremiah Heaton of Virginia traveled to Bir Tawil in order to proclaim the Kingdom of North Sudan in his words to make his daughter a real princess. This sounds really cute, except he now genuinely thinks it is his country and that anyone who goes there should ask his permission. His anger now makes me think he probably should have just got her a Barbie like a normal dad.

Sadly, he was not to be the sole claimant to Bir Tawil, and since then there have been claims by the Kingdom of Dixit, The Sultanate of BIrliand, and even the Kingdom of Bir Tawil with its mighty 14 citizens. Most claims to the territory have been made online and as you might imagine have not yet been recognised by the UN.

The very short answer, which I found out the hard way is that no you cant.

Last year I let a group of intrepid travellers to Bir Tawil, with our aim being to raise the flag of the mighty Principality of Islandia, not to claim the land, but more in the interests of a cool trip to a very off-the-beaten-track place, and a little bit of PR.

It was then that we met the actual inhabitants of Bir Tawil, the Ababda tribe who claim Bir Tawil as their historical land.

After we convinced them that we were not with King Heaton who they referred to as that silly man nor any of the other claimants to Bir Tawil, the Ababda tribe politely gave us their side of the story. They were mining their own land and did not take kindly to white folk rocking up with flags and claiming their land online, or otherwise. We listened politely and promised to relay the words of our magnanimous hosts with the rather large guns.

So, whilst officially no country might claim Bir Tawil, if you seriously want to make this piece of desert your dream Libertarian utopia you better be capable of fighting not only the Egyptians and Sudanese, but a heavily armed tribe who have lived here for centuries.

As is often the case, the truth about Bir Tawil really is more interesting than fiction, not that it will stop people claiming the last unclaimed piece of territory on earth.

Have something to tell us about this article?

Read the rest here:

Bir Tawil: The land that nobody wants - The Focus

Ethereum Developers Discuss Potential Ways to Avoid ETCs Fate – Cointelegraph

In a Core Devs meeting on Friday, Ethereum (ETH) developers discussed potential measures that could be taken to prevent successful 51% attacks from occurring.

The discussion was inspired by this weeks 51% attacks on Ethereum Classic (ETC) a network that represents the original state of Ethereum where the consequences of the DAO hack in 2016 were not reverted. The original attack, which occurred between July 31 and Aug. 1, was revealed to be a carefully orchestrated attempt at a double-spend that netted over $5 million in ETC to the attacker for a $200,000 investment in hashpower.

During the call, Ethereum client developers discussed if they should take additional measures against these attacks and how such measures should be implemented.

A potential protection against chain reorganization is setting up checkpoints at a node level which would set the history of the blockchain in stone after that point. Any proposed blockchain changes beyond this checkpoint would thus be rejected by nodes.

Chain reorganizations rely on mining an alternative version of the blockchain with a higher amount of hashpower than the commonly-accepted version. Due to the rules of Nakamoto consensus, the chain with a higher accumulated proof-of-work would automatically replace the original when published to nodes.

Peter Szilagyi, developer of theGeth client, said that the software already rejects reorganizations deeper than 90,000 blocks, or two weeks. This is however much higher than the effective reorg that happened in ETC of about 4,000 blocks.

While lowering this threshold could help defend from similar attacks, Alexey Akhunov of OpenEthereum noted that caps set too low can have unforeseen consequences.

The depth of the ETC reorg was dictated in part by a history of earlier attacks. These led exchanges to massively raise the confirmation threshold to accept deposits.

Szilagyi said that for Ethereum, there is no need for thousands of blocks. Decentralized exchanges could be gamed by censoring transactions and maximizing the hackers trading gains with reorganizations of just a few blocks. Setting a checkpoint cap that low may result in significant usability issues. He added:

I just wanted to highlight that once you accept that there are 51% attacks on the network, a lot of things start breaking, because a lot of things rely on the assumption that you cannot have deep reorgs.

Tim Beiko, a developer at Ethereum development company PegaSys, noted that ETCs case may be different. Due to it being a much smaller and less valuable chain, it is easy to gather the required hashpower to complete a 51% attack through something like Nicehash. This, to him, is a bigger concern than whatever clients implement through checkpoints.

In the end, developers agreed to discuss the issues more and think through potential improvements to Ethereums resilience.

More here:

Ethereum Developers Discuss Potential Ways to Avoid ETCs Fate - Cointelegraph

$418 To $302 To $385: Why Ethereum Saw Extreme 30% Price Moves In 15 Minutes – Forbes

On Aug. 2, the price of Ethereum peaked at $418; then, within 5 minutes, it dropped by 25%. On Binance Futures, ETH plunged to as low as $302, before recovering back to $385 within 10 minutes.

The entire sequence of events happened in a total of 15 minutes. Ethereum hit $418, then dropped to $302, and rebounded to $385, recording a 25% drop and a 27% upsurge, respectively.

The price of Ethereum saw unusual 25% price movements in a 15-minute span.

Two factors appear to have contributed to the extreme price action of Ethereum. First, based on market structure, the $410 to $420 range has acted as a historical resistance area since 2017. Second, a sudden sell-off at the resistance led to a cascade of liquidations.

The initial drop led to liquidations of more than $1 billion worth of Bitcoin and Ethereum futures contracts in a short period, per data from ByBt. This was the largest liquidation event since March 13, when the price of Bitcoin dropped below $3,600.

In June 2017, the price of Ethereum increased from around $90 to over $400 within 28 days. The explosive rally, which happened months before Bitcoins record-high run up to $20,000, rejected at $420 on Coinbase.

The weekly chart of Ethereum against the U.S. dollar on Coinbase with a historically relevant ... [+] resistance level.

Coincidentally, the recent uptrend of Ethereum was also rejected at the same level. As soon as ETH neared $420, it saw an abrupt sell-off across major exchanges. In a few minutes, it experienced a 25% drop.

The price drop was exacerbated by cascading futures liquidations. When a long contract gets liquidated, the holder has to sell the contract, causing more selling pressure.

The steep rejection, possibly triggered by the $420 resistance and mass liquidations, marked a blowoff top. Alex Krger, a global markets analyst, wrote:

That was a blowoff top in ETH and BTC last night. A blowoff doesn't have to be the top. Silver and gold had a blowoff top last week. See how similar charts are in the days and minutes preceding the crash. Bigger picture remains unchanged. Higher highs ahead in 2020 IMO.

But, Krger emphasized that crypto assets, due to their highly volatile nature, tend to have several blowoff tops in a single cycle. Hence, he noted that whether it would be the top for Ethereum is uncertain.

A blowoff top doesn't have to be The Top. Was missing the quotes. Cryptoassets in particular are known to experience multiple blowoffs on the way up given the high use of leverage and how fragmented liquidity is. Saw that with BTC both in 2017 and 2019.

Some investors remain optimistic in the trajectory of Ethereum despite its recent market correction. Kelvin Koh, the co-founder of cryptocurrency venture capital firm Spartan Black, said Ethereum is leading the crypto markets uptrend.

Suggesting that the basis of the Ethereum rally is in anticipation for ETH 2.0, he said:

ETH is leading this charge driven by optimism around the impending launch of ETH 2.0 phase 0 later this month. Depending on how hard ETH runs, the successful launch of phase 0 may culminate in a near term peak for ETH and other large caps.

ETH 2.0 is a key phase in the development of Ethereum that would eventually phase out miners. It optimizes the network to scale, as users stake their ETH to participate in the network and process data.

Ethereum, along with other major cryptocurrencies, including Bitcoin, saw extreme price actions throughout the last 24 hours. For now, the sentiment of analysts remains cautiously optimistic due to various medium-term factors such as ETH 2.0 and decentralized finance (DeFi) growth.

The rest is here:

$418 To $302 To $385: Why Ethereum Saw Extreme 30% Price Moves In 15 Minutes - Forbes

How many Ethereum in circulation? asks the Bitcoin community – CryptoSlate

The great Ethereum supply debate is onand its turning fierce. If you dont follow; the networks infinite supply has been a point of many discussions since its inception in 2015.

That means unlike Bitcoin (and thousands of other cryptos), theres no cap to how many Ethers can exist in the open market with the idea being supply increases every year as long as Ethereum exists.

The total supply of Ether was around 110.5 million as of 16 April 2020. In 2017, mining generated 9.2 million new ETH, corresponding to a 10% increase in its total supply. There is no currently implemented hard cap on the total supply of ETH.

So far, there was no major issue with how Ethereum operated. Yes, the critics were ever-present and ICO fanatics made millions, but no one really cared about what the Ethereum supply was like (as long as bags were pumped).

But since this month on the back of a rise in DeFi projects the criticism has risen, and its not the run-of-the-mill crypto scammers raising questions. Instead, prominent members of the Bitcoin community are leading the charge seeking the one true answer; how many ETH anyway?

It started when Micheal Goldstein commended on Arcane Research CIO Eric Walls Twitter thread; Can they articulate how to easily and independently verify the monetary supply of ETH?

When asked about the 21 million supply cap of Bitcoin, Goldstein said the asset can be verified by anyone using a Bitcoin-cli and a full node.

Andrew, a thread commenter who seemed to explain how Ethereums uncapped supply was similar to Bitcoins, said that the former can be appropriated using a model of issuance rules with the current issuance. However, Monero lead developer, and code maintainer, Riccardo Spagni was quick to state that any interested party can independently verify the Bitcoin supply with the same relatively difficult to do for Ethereum, he stated.

After the thread above started to spark further interest into how many ETH really are in circulation, Ethereum co-founder Vitalik Buterin jumped in on his Twitter account to explain his view. He tweeted:

He later mentioned how to check the Ethereum supply, using this link. In further comments, Buterin noted there were 112 million ETH in circulation.

But some, like developer and Bitcoin educator Pierre Rochard, were unconvinced:

Meanwhile, Leon ran the script and came up with several different supply figures when he (claimed on Twitter) to have ran the script:

And of course, it couldnt have been a crypto argument without someone dropping a meme:

The debate rages on.

Like what you see? Subscribe for daily updates.

Visit link:

How many Ethereum in circulation? asks the Bitcoin community - CryptoSlate

EOS, Ethereum and Ripples XRP Daily Tech Analysis August 8th, 2020 – Yahoo Finance

EOS

EOS fell by 2.54% on Friday. Reversing a 1.05% gain from Thursday, EOS ended the day at $3.0074.

A bullish start to the day saw EOS rally to a late morning intraday $3.2450 before hitting reverse.

EOS broke through the first major resistance level at $3.1778 before sliding to a late afternoon intraday low $2.7496.

EOS fell through the first major support level at $2.990 and the second major support level at $2.9101.

Finding support late in the day, EOS moved back through the support levels to wrap up the day at $3.00 levels

At the time of writing, EOS was down by 0.43% to $2.9945. A bearish start to the day saw EOS fall from an early morning high $3.0095 to a low $2.9945.

EOS left the major support and resistance levels untested early on.

EOS would need to move through the $3.0007 pivot level to support a run at the first major resistance level at $3.2517

Support from the broader market would be needed, however, for EOS to break out from Fridays high $3.2450.

Barring an extended crypto rally, however, resistance at $3.10 would likely leave EOS short of the major resistance levels.

Failure to move through the $3.0007 pivot would bring the first major support level at $2.7563 into play.

Barring another extended sell-off, however, EOS should steer clear of sub-$2.75 levels on the day. The second major support level sits at $2.5053.

First Major Support Level: $2.7563

Pivot Level: $3.0007

First Major Resistance Level: $3.2517

23.6% FIB Retracement Level: $6.62

38% FIB Retracement Level: $9.76

62% FIB Retracement Level: $14.82

Ethereum slid by 3.93% on Friday. Following on from a 1.48% loss on Thursday, Ethereum ended the day at $379.75.

A range-bound start to the day saw Ethereum rise to an early morning intraday high $398.57 before seeing red.

Falling short of the first major resistance level at $402.54, Ethereum fell to a late afternoon intraday low $362.88.

Ethereum fell through the days major support levels and the 38.2% FIB of $367 before finding support.

Story continues

The partial recovery saw Ethereum move back through the 38.2% FIB and the third major support level at $370.71 to cut the deficit.

The second major support level at $383.74 pinned Ethereum back late in the day.

At the time of writing, Ethereum was down by 0.08% to $379.45. A bearish start to the day saw Ethereum fall from an early morning high $379.76 to a low $377.70.

Ethereum left the major support and resistance levels untested early on.

Ethereum would need to move through the $380.40 pivot to support a run at the first major resistance level at $397.92.

Support from the broader market would be needed, however, for Ethereum to break back through to $390 levels.

Barring an extended crypto rally, the first major resistance level and Fridays high $398.57 should cap any upside.

Failure to move through the $380.40 pivot would bring the 38.2% FIB and the first major support level at $362.23 into play.

Barring another extended sell-off, however, Ethereum should steer clear of sub-$360 levels. The second major support level sits at $344.71.

First Major Support Level: $362.23

Pivot Level: $380.40

First Major Resistance Level: $397.92

23.6% FIB Retracement Level: $257

38.2% FIB Retracement Level: $367

62% FIB Retracement Level: $543

Ripples XRP slid by 2.87% on Friday. Following a 0.19% gain from Thursday, Ripples XRP ended the day at $0.29427.

A bullish start to the day saw Ripples XRP rally to a late morning intraday high $0.3100 before hitting reverse.

Ripples XRP came up against the first major resistance level at $0.3104 before sliding to a late afternoon intraday low $0.27742.

The reversal saw Ripples XRP fall through the first major support level at $0.2963 and the second major support level at $0.2897.

Late in the day, Ripples XRP briefly revisited $0.2963 levels before easing back into the deep red. The first major resistance level at $0.2963 pinned Ripples XRP back late in the day.

At the time of writing, Ripples XRP was down by 0.37% to $0.29317. A bearish start to the day saw Ripples XRP fall from an early morning high $0.29430 to a low $0.29219.

Ripples XRP left the major support and resistance levels untested early on.

Ripples XRP will need to move through the $0.2939 pivot to support a run at the first major resistance level at $0.3104.

Support from the broader market would be needed, however, for Ripples XRP to break back through to $0.30 levels.

Barring another broad-based crypto rally, the first major resistance level and Fridays high $0.3100 should cap any upside.

In the event of a breakout, the 23.6% FIB of 0.3134 could come into play.

Failure to move through the $0.2939 pivot would bring the first major support level at $0.2778 into play.

Barring another extended crypto sell-off, Ripples XRP should avoid the second major support level at $0.2613.

First Major Support Level: $0.2778

Pivot Level: $0.2939

First Major Resistance Level: $0.3104

23.6% FIB Retracement Level: $0.3638

38.2% FIB Retracement Level: $0.4800

62% FIB Retracement Level: $0.6678

Please let us know what you think in the comments below.

Thanks, Bob

This article was originally posted on FX Empire

Read the rest here:

EOS, Ethereum and Ripples XRP Daily Tech Analysis August 8th, 2020 - Yahoo Finance

Ethereum Could Soon Burst Past $400: This Eerie Fractal Shows Why – newsBTC

Ethereum is preparing for another massive breakout, according to a fractal analysis by a cryptocurrency trader. This comes after ETH underwent a strong drop on Friday, responding to a drop in the value of gold and U.S. equities.

One trader shared the chart below on August 8th, indicating that Ethereums recent price action looks like a consolidation pattern in May 2019. The consolidation was followed by a massive pump in 2019, suggesting ETH will do the same.

I dont know why not all of CT is talking about this ridiculously similar looking fractal. Spoiler: this chop led to another massive pump in 2019.

This isnt the only bullish Ethereum price fractal that has recently been shared.

As reported by NewsBTC previously, a fractal analysis by a trader found that Ethereums macro price action looks similar to BTCs price action from the 2014 highs to the beginning of the 2016-2017 bull run. This analysis suggests that ETH will rally past $1,000 in the middle of 2021.

Ethereums fundamentals are also strong, supporting a move to the upside.

Blockchain data firm IntoTheBlock reported on August 7th that the number of daily ETH transactions is reaching highs not seen since the January 2018 all-time high:

As can be seen in the graph above, the number of transactions has been on a consistent uptrend throughout 2020. On July 27, the number of transactions on the #Ethereum network reached a level not seen since January 3rd of 2018.

IntoTheBlock also indicated that Ethereum has other bullish data, including an increase in total addresses and order book data suggesting there are many buyers of ETH at the moment.

More:

Ethereum Could Soon Burst Past $400: This Eerie Fractal Shows Why - newsBTC

ChainLink (LINK) Inches Closer to 100x in Returns Since ICO – Ethereum World News

In summary:

The digital asset of ChainLink (LINK) has once again exceeded expectations by breaking away from the influence of the brief crypto pullback only 24 hours ago as a result of Bitcoin dipping to $11,300 levels. During the latter event, ChainLink only dipped to as low as $9 and soon continued on its interstellar mission above $10. At the time of writing, LINK has printed an all-time high value of around $10.77 Binance rate.

Going back in time to September 2017 during ChainLinks ICO, we find that the price per LINK on offer during the crowd sale was $0.11. Doing the math and using the new all-time high value of $10.77, this translates to a return on investment of 97%. This, in turn, means that for every $100 spent during the ICO period, investors are in profit to the amount of $9,700.

Fur ther checking ChainLinks current ROI on Coincodex.com

Additionally, LINK marines are very much confident regarding the fundamentals governing the upward trajectory of ChainLink. The LINK marines have brushed off a report by Zeus Capital that calls the project vaporware and warns that ChainLink will fall to as low as $0.07.

Some LINK marines have gone as far as declaring that they will start taking profits when the digital asset hits $100. Below is one tweet that demonstrates investor confidence in ChainLink.

As earlier observed, the LINK/USDT chart continues on its bullish trajectory. With each all-time high that LINK sets, the digital asset provides areas of interest for possible support zones should LINK decide to correct.

However, given the current bullish momentum and possible FOMO surrounding LINK, the digital asset has a high probability of first testing $12 before any prospects of a correction.

As with all analyses of ChainLink, traders and investors are advised to use stop losses as well as low leverage to protect trading capital. Caution is also advised when going long on a parabolic chart such as ChainLinks.

See original here:

ChainLink (LINK) Inches Closer to 100x in Returns Since ICO - Ethereum World News

Ethereum (ETH) Up $9.57 On 4 Hour Chart, Underperforms All Top Cryptos to Start the Day; Entered Today Down For the 2nd Day In A Row – CFDTrading

Ethereum 4 Hour Price Update

Updated August 08, 2020 11:18 AM GMT (07:18 AM EST)

Ethereum closed the previous 4 hours up 2.51% ($9.57); this denotes the 2nd candle in a row it has gone up. Ethereum outperformed all 5 assets in the Top Cryptos asset class since the previous 4 hours. Congrats to its holders!

Ethereum came into today down 3.92% ($15.5) from the open of yesterday, marking the 2nd day in a row a decrease has occurred. The price move occurred on stronger volume; specifically, yesterdays volume was up 59.66% from the day prior, and up 13.99% from the same day the week before. On a relative basis, Ethereum was the worst performer out of all 5 of the assets in the Top Cryptos asset class during yesterday. Below is a daily price chart of Ethereum.

Trend traders will want to observe that the strongest trend appears on the 30 day horizon; over that time period, price has been moving up. For another vantage point, consider that Ethereums price has gone up 10 of the previous 14 trading days.

For laughs, fights, or genuinely useful information, lets see what the most popular tweets pertaining to Ethereum for the past day were:

@Narodism @musalbas @MPtherealMVP @NickSzabo4 So you dislike the aesthetics of some people in the ethereum community (btw Ive never done a burner party, LSD or a sex orgy) therefore ethereum has lost the plot? If I wanted to I could make similar caricatures about the whole rah rah Im manly because I eat steak thing.

I follow a lot of Bitcoin accounts and a lot of Ethereum accounts. Im noticing that currently Ethereum accounts are a bit stronger than Bitcoin accounts. More articulate, more well-versed with the other sides arguments, better at making the other side seem less knowledgeable.

My @discord account was suspended this morning because I sent too many private messages to people that wanted their @poapxyz to recall the @ethereum medalla testnet launch. Please help me making this visible to the discord support team so they know Im no spammer

Link:

Ethereum (ETH) Up $9.57 On 4 Hour Chart, Underperforms All Top Cryptos to Start the Day; Entered Today Down For the 2nd Day In A Row - CFDTrading

Ethereum (ETH) Up $0.39 On 4 Hour Chart, Fares the Worst Out of Top Cryptos to Start the Day; Entered Today Down 3.92% – CFDTrading

Ethereum 4 Hour Price Update

Updated August 09, 2020 07:18 AM GMT (03:18 AM EST)

Ethereum closed the previous 4 hours down 0.06% ($0.25); this denotes the 2nd candle in a row a decrease has occurred. Ethereum outperformed all 5 assets in the Top Cryptos asset class since the previous 4 hours. Congrats to its holders!

The back and forth price flow continues for Ethereum, which started today off at 397.56 US dollars, up 4.74% ($17.99) from the previous day. This move happened on lower volume, as yesterdays volume was down 51.14% from the day before and down 64.66% from the same day the week before. On a relative basis, the previous day was pretty good: Ethereum bested all 5 of the assets in the Top Cryptos class Here is a daily price chart of Ethereum.

Trend traders will want to observe that the strongest trend appears on the 30 day horizon; over that time period, price has been moving up. Or to view things another way, note that out of the past 30 days Ethereums price has gone up 19 them.

For laughs, fights, or genuinely useful information, lets see what the most popular tweets pertaining to Ethereum for the past day were:

Ethereum is *5 years old*For that whole time everyone was so busy trying to get rich by creating new ways to dump on dumb money that no-one bothered to make a way to easily verify the total supply of $ETH and that is why many have ethical issues with $ETH (and others)

@WhalePanda @wullon @LucLammers @adam3us @Excellion @VitalikButerin I wrote this book and continue to study Ethereum because I think it is interesting, from a technical perspective. This interest has cost me money and some goodwill from BTC maxis, but I continue despite these costs. I am motivated by intellectual curiosity.

@WhalePanda @wullon @LucLammers @adam3us @Excellion @VitalikButerin I wont get into this debate, but your assertion that Im motivated by book sales and conferences is easily disproved. The income from Mastering Ethereum is tiny and well below minimum wage considering the effort. Ive spoken at 2 conferences for Ethereum, both free.

For a longer news piece related to ETH thats been generating discussion, check out:

$MTXLT on Ethereum: Roadmap. We are constantly looking for ways to | by Christian Eichinger | tixlcurrency | Aug, 2020 | Medium

As an ERC-20 token, MTXLT can also take advantage of the benefits of Uniswap.ERC-20 tokens provide more opportunities to be included in staking programs and thus achieve added visibility for the project.Smart contracts for MTXLT are also made possible with an ERC-20 token.In addition to our own MTXLT token and ETH, other ERC-20 tokens can be sent on the Autobahn Network.

Go here to see the original:

Ethereum (ETH) Up $0.39 On 4 Hour Chart, Fares the Worst Out of Top Cryptos to Start the Day; Entered Today Down 3.92% - CFDTrading

Terraforming of Mars – Wikipedia

hypothetical modification of Mars into a habitable planet

The terraforming of Mars is a hypothetical procedure that would consist of a planetary engineering project or concurrent projects, with the goal of transforming the planet from one hostile to terrestrial life to one that can sustainably host humans and other lifeforms free of protection or mediation. The process would presumably involve the rehabilitation of the planet's extant climate, atmosphere, and surface through a variety of resource-intensive initiatives, and the installation of a novel ecological system or systems.

Justifications for choosing Mars over other potential terraforming targets include the presence of water and a geological history that suggests it once harbored a dense atmosphere similar to Earths. Hazards and difficulties include low gravity, low light levels relative to Earths, and the lack of a magnetic field.

The terraforming of Mars may not be feasible. Disagreement exists about whether current technology could render the planet habitable. Other objections included ethical concerns about terraforming and the considerable cost that such an undertaking would involve. Reasons for terraforming the planet include allaying concerns about resource use and depletion on Earth and arguments that the altering and subsequent or concurrent settlement of other planets decreases the odds of humanity's extinction.

Future population growth, demand for resources, and an alternate solution to the Doomsday argument may require human colonization of bodies other than Earth, such as Mars, the Moon, and other objects. Space colonization would facilitate harvesting the Solar System's energy and material resources.[2]

In many aspects, Mars is the most Earth-like of all the other planets in the Solar System. It is thought[3] that Mars had a more Earth-like environment early in its history, with a thicker atmosphere and abundant water that was lost over the course of hundreds of millions of years. Given the foundations of similarity and proximity, Mars would make one of the most plausible terraforming targets in the Solar System.

Side effects of terraforming include the potential displacement or destruction of indigenous life, even if microbial, if such life exists.[4][5][6][7]

The Martian environment presents several terraforming challenges to overcome and the extent of terraforming may be limited by certain key environmental factors. Here is a list of some of the ways in which Mars differs from Earth, which terraforming seeks to address:

Mars does not have an intrinsic global magnetic field, but the solar wind directly interacts with the atmosphere of Mars, leading to the formation of a magnetosphere from magnetic field tubes.[13] This poses challenges for mitigating solar radiation and retaining an atmosphere.

The lack of a magnetic field, its relatively small mass, and its atmospheric photochemistry, all would have contributed to the evaporation and loss of its surface liquid water over time.[14] Solar windinduced ejection of Martian atmospheric atoms has been detected by Mars-orbiting probes, indicating that the solar wind has stripped the Martian atmosphere over time. For comparison, while Venus has a dense atmosphere, it has only traces of water vapor (20 ppm) as it lacks a large, dipole induced, magnetic field.[13][15][14]Earth's ozone layer provides additional protection. Ultraviolet light is blocked before it can dissociate water into hydrogen and oxygen.[16]

The surface gravity on Mars is 38% of that on Earth. It is not known if this is enough to prevent the health problems associated with weightlessness.[17]

Mars's CO2 atmosphere has about 1% the pressure of the Earth's at sea level. It is estimated that there is sufficient CO2 ice in the regolith and the south polar cap to form a 30 to 60 kilopascals [kPa] (4.4 to 8.7psi) atmosphere if it is released by planetary warming."[18] The reappearance of liquid water on the Martian surface would add to the warming effects and atmospheric density,[18] but the lower gravity of Mars requires 2.6 times Earth's column airmass to obtain the optimum 100kPa (15psi) pressure at the surface.[19] Additional volatiles to increase the atmosphere's density must be supplied from an external source, such as redirecting several massive asteroids containing ammonia (NH3) as a source of nitrogen.[18]

Current conditions in the Martian atmosphere, at less than 1kPa (0.15psi) of atmospheric pressure, are significantly below the Armstrong limit of 6kPa (0.87psi) where very low pressure causes exposed bodily liquids such as saliva, tears, and the liquids wetting the alveoli within the lungs to boil away. Without a pressure suit, no amount of breathable oxygen delivered by any means will sustain oxygen-breathing life for more than a few minutes.[20][21] In the NASA technical report Rapid (Explosive) Decompression Emergencies in Pressure-Suited Subjects, after exposure to pressure below the Armstrong limit, a survivor reported that his "last conscious memory was of the water on his tongue beginning to boil".[21] In these conditions humans die within minutes unless a pressure suit provides life support.

If Mars' atmospheric pressure could rise above 19kPa (2.8psi), then a pressure suit would not be required. Visitors would only need to wear a mask that supplied 100% oxygen under positive pressure. A further increase to 24kPa (3.5psi) of atmospheric pressure would allow a simple mask supplying pure oxygen.[22][clarification needed] This might look similar to mountain climbers who venture into pressures below 37kPa (5.4psi), also called the death zone, where an insufficient amount of bottled oxygen has often resulted in hypoxia with fatalities.[23] However, if the increase in atmospheric pressure was achieved by increasing CO2 (or other toxic gas) the mask would have to ensure the external atmosphere did not enter the breathing apparatus. CO2 concentrations as low as 1% cause drowsiness in humans. Concentrations of 7% to 10% may cause suffocation, even in the presence of sufficient oxygen. (See Carbon dioxide toxicity.)

According to scientists, Mars exists on the outer edge of the habitable zone, a region of the Solar System where liquid water on the surface may be supported if concentrated greenhouse gases could increase the atmospheric pressure.[18] The lack of both a magnetic field and geologic activity on Mars may be a result of its relatively small size, which allowed the interior to cool more quickly than Earth's, although the details of such a process are still not well understood.[24][25]

There are strong indications that Mars once had an atmosphere as thick as Earth's during an earlier stage in its development, and that its pressure supported abundant liquid water at the surface.[26] Although water appears to have once been present on the Martian surface, ground ice currently exists from mid-latitudes to the poles.[27][28] The soil and atmosphere of Mars contain many of the main elements crucial to life, including sulfur, nitrogen, hydrogen, oxygen, phosphorus and carbon.[29]

Any climate change induced in the near term is likely to be driven by greenhouse warming produced by an increase in atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO2) and a consequent increase in atmospheric water vapor. These two gases are the only likely sources of greenhouse warming that are available in large quantities in the Mars environment.[30] Large amounts of water ice exist below the Martian surface, as well as on the surface at the poles, where it is mixed with dry ice, frozen CO2. Significant amounts of water are located at the south pole of Mars, which, if melted, would correspond to a planetwide ocean 511 meters deep.[31][32] Frozen carbon dioxide (CO2) at the poles sublimes into the atmosphere during the Martian summers, and small amounts of water residue are left behind, which fast winds sweep off the poles at speeds approaching 400km/h (250mph).[citation needed][original research?] This seasonal occurrence transports large amounts of dust and water ice into the atmosphere, forming Earth-like ice clouds.[33]

Most of the oxygen in the Martian atmosphere is present as carbon dioxide (CO2), the main atmospheric component. Molecular oxygen (O2) only exists in trace amounts. Large amounts of elemental oxygen can be also found in metal oxides on the Martian surface, and in the soil, in the form of per-nitrates.[34] An analysis of soil samples taken by the Phoenix lander indicated the presence of perchlorate, which has been used to liberate oxygen in chemical oxygen generators.[35] Electrolysis could be employed to separate water on Mars into oxygen and hydrogen if sufficient liquid water and electricity were available. However, if vented into the atmosphere it would escape into space.

Terraforming Mars would entail three major interlaced changes: building up the magnetosphere, building up the atmosphere, and raising the temperature. The atmosphere of Mars is relatively thin and has a very low surface pressure. Because its atmosphere consists mainly of CO2, a known greenhouse gas, once Mars begins to heat, the CO2 may help to keep thermal energy near the surface. Moreover, as it heats, more CO2 should enter the atmosphere from the frozen reserves on the poles, enhancing the greenhouse effect. This means that the two processes of building the atmosphere and heating it would augment each other, favoring terraforming. However, it would be difficult to keep the atmosphere together because of the lack of a protective global magnetic field against erosion by the solar wind.[36][37][38][39]

One method of augmenting the Martian atmosphere is to introduce ammonia (NH3). Large amounts of ammonia are likely to exist in frozen form on minor planets orbiting in the outer Solar System. It might be possible to redirect the orbits of these or smaller ammonia-rich objects so that they collide with Mars, thereby transferring the ammonia into the Martian atmosphere.[40] Ammonia is not stable in the Martian atmosphere, however. It breaks down into (diatomic) nitrogen and hydrogen after a few hours.[41] Thus, though ammonia is a powerful greenhouse gas, it is unlikely to generate much planetary warming. Presumably, the nitrogen gas would eventually be depleted by the same processes that stripped Mars of much of its original atmosphere, but these processes are thought to have required hundreds of millions of years. Being much lighter, the hydrogen would be removed much more quickly. Carbon dioxide is 2.5 times the density of ammonia, and nitrogen gas, which Mars barely holds on to, is more than 1.5 times the density, so any imported ammonia that did not break down would also be lost quickly into space.

Another way to create a Martian atmosphere would be to import methane (CH4) or other hydrocarbons,[42][43] which are common in Titan's atmosphere and on its surface; the methane could be vented into the atmosphere where it would act to compound the greenhouse effect.[44] However, like ammonia (NH3), methane (CH4) is a relatively light gas. It is in fact even less dense than ammonia and so would similarly be lost into space if it was introduced, but at a faster rate than ammonia. Even if a method could be found to prevent it escaping into space, methane can exist in the Martian atmosphere for only a limited period before it is destroyed. Estimates of its lifetime range from 0.64 years.[45][46]

Especially powerful greenhouse gases, such as sulfur hexafluoride, chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs), or perfluorocarbons (PFCs), have been suggested both as a means of initially warming Mars and of maintaining long-term climate stability.[18][19][47][30] These gases are proposed for introduction because they generate a greenhouse effect thousands of times stronger than that of CO2. Fluorine-based compounds such as sulphur hexafluoride and perfluorocarbons are preferable to chlorine-based ones as the latter destroys ozone. It has been estimated that approximately 0.3 microbars of CFCs would need to be introduced into Mars' atmosphere in order to sublimate the south polar CO2 glaciers.[47] This is equivalent to a mass of approximately 39 million tonnes, that is, about three times the amount of CFCs manufactured on Earth from 1972 to 1992 (when CFC production was banned by international treaty).[47] Maintaining the temperature would require continual production of such compounds as they are destroyed due to photolysis. It has been estimated that introducing 170 kilotons of optimal greenhouse compounds (CF3CF2CF3, CF3SCF2CF3, SF6, SF5CF3, SF4(CF3)2) annually would be sufficient to maintain a 70-K greenhouse effect given a terraformed atmosphere with earth-like pressure and composition.[19]

Typical proposals envision producing the gases on Mars using locally extracted materials, nuclear power, and a significant industrial effort. The potential for mining fluorine-containing minerals to obtain the raw material necessary for the production of CFCs and PFCs is supported by mineralogical surveys of Mars that estimate the elemental presence of fluorine in the bulk composition of Mars at 32 ppm by mass (as compared to 19.4 ppm for the Earth).[19]

Alternatively, CFCs might be introduced by sending rockets with payloads of compressed CFCs on collision courses with Mars.[34] When the rockets crashed into the surface they would release their payloads into the atmosphere. A steady barrage of these "CFC rockets" would need to be sustained for a little over a decade while Mars changed chemically and became warmer.

Mirrors made of thin aluminized PET film could be placed in orbit around Mars to increase the total insolation it receives.[18] This would direct the sunlight onto the surface and could increase Mars's surface temperature directly. The mirror could be positioned as a statite, using its effectiveness as a solar sail to orbit in a stationary position relative to Mars, near the poles, to sublimate the CO2 ice sheet and contribute to the warming greenhouse effect.[18]

Reducing the albedo of the Martian surface would also make more efficient use of incoming sunlight in terms of heat absorption.[48] This could be done by spreading dark dust from Mars's moons, Phobos and Deimos, which are among the blackest bodies in the Solar System; or by introducing dark extremophile microbial life forms such as lichens, algae and bacteria.[citation needed] The ground would then absorb more sunlight, warming the atmosphere. However, Mars is already the second darkest planet in the solar system, absorbing over 70% of incoming sunlight so the scope for darkening it further is small.

If algae or other green life were established, it would also contribute a small amount of oxygen to the atmosphere, though not enough to allow humans to breathe. The conversion process to produce oxygen is highly reliant upon water, without which the CO2 is mostly converted to carbohydrates.[49] In addition, because on Mars atmospheric oxygen is lost into space (unlike Earth where there is an Oxygen cycle), this would represent a permanent loss from the planet. For both of these reasons it would be necessary to cultivate such life inside a closed system. This would decrease the albedo of the closed system (assuming the growth had a lower albedo than the Martian soil), but would not affect the albedo of the planet as a whole.

On April 26, 2012, scientists reported that lichen survived and showed remarkable results on the adaptation capacity of photosynthetic activity within the simulation time of 34 days under Martian conditions in the Mars Simulation Laboratory (MSL) maintained by the German Aerospace Center (DLR).[50][51]

One final issue with albedo reduction is the common Martian dust storms. These cover the entire planet for weeks, and not only increase the albedo, but block sunlight from reaching the surface. This has been observed to cause a surface temperature drop which the planet takes months to recover from.[52] Once the dust settles it then covers whatever it lands on, effectively erasing the albedo reduction material from the view of the Sun.

Since 2014, the NASA Institute for Advanced Concepts (NIAC) program and Techshot Inc are working together to develop sealed biodomes that would employ colonies of oxygen-producing cyanobacteria and algae for the production of molecular oxygen (O2) on Martian soil.[53][54][55] But first they need to test if it works on a small scale on Mars.[56] The proposal is called Mars Ecopoiesis Test Bed.[57] Eugene Boland is the Chief Scientist at Techshot, a company located in Greenville, Indiana.[53] They intend to send small canisters of extremophile photosynthetic algae and cyanobacteria aboard a future rover mission. The rover would cork-screw the 7cm (2.8in) canisters into selected sites likely to experience transients of liquid water, drawing some Martian soil and then release oxygen-producing microorganisms to grow within the sealed soil.[53][58] The hardware would use Martian subsurface ice as its phase changes into liquid water.[56] The system would then look for oxygen given off as metabolic byproduct and report results to a Mars-orbiting relay satellite.[55][58]

If this experiment works on Mars, they will propose to build several large and sealed structures called biodomes, to produce and harvest oxygen for a future human mission to Mars life support systems.[58][59] Being able to create oxygen there would provide considerable cost-savings to NASA and allow for longer human visits to Mars than would be possible if astronauts have to transport their own heavy oxygen tanks.[59] This biological process, called ecopoiesis, would be isolated, in contained areas, and is not meant as a type of global planetary engineering for terraforming of Mars's atmosphere,[55][59] but NASA states that "This will be the first major leap from laboratory studies into the implementation of experimental (as opposed to analytical) planetary in situ research of greatest interest to planetary biology, ecopoiesis, and terraforming."[55]

Research at the University of Arkansas presented in June 2015 suggested that some methanogens could survive in Mars's low pressure.[60] Rebecca Mickol found that in her laboratory, four species of methanogens survived low-pressure conditions that were similar to a subsurface liquid aquifer on Mars. The four species that she tested were Methanothermobacter wolfeii, Methanosarcina barkeri, Methanobacterium formicicum, and Methanococcus maripaludis.[60] Methanogens do not require oxygen or organic nutrients, are non-photosynthetic, use hydrogen as their energy source and carbon dioxide (CO2) as their carbon source, so they could exist in subsurface environments on Mars.[60]

One key aspect of terraforming Mars is to protect the atmosphere (both present and future-built) from being lost into space. Some scientists hypothesize that creating a planet-wide artificial magnetosphere would be helpful in resolving this issue. According to two NIFS Japanese scientists, it is feasible to do that with current technology by building a system of refrigerated latitudinal superconducting rings, each carrying a sufficient amount of direct current.[62]

In the same report, it is claimed that the economic impact of the system can be minimized by using it also as a planetary energy transfer and storage system (SMES).

Another study proposes the deployment of a magnetic dipole shield at the Mars L1 Lagrange point, therefore creating a partial and distant artificial magnetosphere located between Mars and the Sun, that would protect the whole planet from solar wind and radiation.[14]

During the Planetary Science Vision 2050 Workshop[14] in late February 2017, NASA scientist Jim Green proposed a concept of placing a magnetic dipole field between the planet and the Sun to protect it from high-energy solar particles. It would be located at the L1 orbit at about 320 R. The field would need to be "Earth comparable" and sustain 50000nT as measured at 1 Earth-radius. The paper abstract cites that this could be achieved by a magnet with a strength of 12 teslas (10,00020,000 gauss).[63] If constructed, the shield may allow the planet to restore its atmosphere. Simulations indicate that within years, the planet would be able to achieve half the atmospheric pressure of Earth. Without solar winds stripping away at the planet, frozen carbon dioxide at the ice caps on either pole would begin to sublimate (change from a solid into a gas) and warm the equator. Ice caps would begin to melt to form an ocean. The researcher further argues that volcanic outgassing,[dubious discuss] which to some degree balances the current atmospheric loss on Earth, would replenish the atmosphere over time, enough to melt the ice caps and fill 17 of Mars' prehistoric oceans.[64][65][14]

The overall energy required to sublimate the CO2 from the south polar ice cap was modeled by Zubrin and McKay in 1993.[18] If using orbital mirrors, an estimated 120 MW-years of electrical energy would be required in order to produce mirrors large enough to vaporize the ice caps. This is considered the most effective method, though the least practical. If using powerful halocarbon greenhouse gases, an order of 1,000 MW-years of electrical energy would be required to accomplish this heating. However, if all of this CO2 were put into the atmosphere,it would only double[30] the current atmospheric pressure from 6 mbar to 12 mbar, amounting to about 1.2% of Earth's mean sea level pressure. The amount of warming that could be produced today by putting even 100 mbar of CO2 into the atmosphere is small, roughly of order 10K.[30] Additionally, once in the atmosphere, it likely would be removed quickly, either by diffusion into the subsurface and adsorption or by re-condensing onto the polar caps.[30]

The surface or atmospheric temperature required to allow liquid water to exist has not been determined, and liquid waterconceivably could exist when atmospheric temperatures are as low as 245K (28C; 19F). However, a warming of 10K is much less than thought necessary in order to produce liquid water.[30]

Read more here:

Terraforming of Mars - Wikipedia

Egypt invites Elon Musk to visit after Tesla and SpaceX CEO tweets ‘aliens built the pyramids obv’ – USA TODAY

Two NASA astronauts returned to Earth on Sunday in a dramatic, retro-style splashdown, their capsule parachuting into the Gulf of Mexico. This was the first splashdown by U.S. astronauts in 45 years. (August 2) AP Domestic

A couple days before theSpaceX Crew Dragon capsule splashed down Sunday, SpaceX and Tesla CEO Elon Musk was tweeting about extraterrestrial life.

Early Friday, he tweeted,"Aliens built the pyramids obv," which was liked nearly 540,000 times and retweeted more than 85,000 times as of Sunday afternoon.

It's not clear if Musk was serious, but his tweet got him an invitation to Egypt.

"I follow your work with a lot of admiration. I invite you & Space X to explore the writings about how the pyramids were built and also to check out the tombs of the pyramid builders," Rania A. Al Mashat, Egypt's minister of international cooperation,tweeted Saturday. "Mr. Musk, we are waiting for you."

6 keys to Tesla's future: Elon Musk's electric car maker beats existential threats

Historic splashdown: NASA astronauts splash down near Florida in a SpaceX Crew Dragon

Musk tweeted follow-up messages after his initial tweet.

"The Great Pyramid was the tallest structure made by humans for 3800 years. Three thousand, eight hundred years," he tweeted, sharing a Wikipedia link about the Great Pyramid of Giza.

He also shared a BBC article, which he said "provides a sensible summary for how it was done."

Autoplay

Show Thumbnails

Show Captions

On Sunday, closing out an unprecedented test flight by Musk's SpaceX company, two NASA astronauts returned to Earthin a dramatic, retro-style splashdown, their capsule parachuting into the Gulf of Mexico.

It was the first splashdown by U.S. astronauts in 45 years, and thefirst commercially built and operated spacecraft to carry people to and from orbit. The return clears the way for another SpaceX crew launch as early as next month and possible tourist flights next year.

Contributing: Associated Press

Follow USA TODAY reporter Kelly Tyko on Twitter:@KellyTyko

A capsule carrying two NASA astronauts parachuted into the Gulf of Mexico to complete a test flight by Elon Musk's SpaceX company. USA TODAY

Read or Share this story: https://www.usatoday.com/story/tech/2020/08/02/spacex-ceo-elon-musk-tweets-aliens-pyramids-egypt-responds/5568089002/

See the article here:

Egypt invites Elon Musk to visit after Tesla and SpaceX CEO tweets 'aliens built the pyramids obv' - USA TODAY

Three people charged in Twitter hack which targeted accounts of Obama, Elon Musk – Hindustan Times Auto News

Three people were charged on Friday (local time) for their alleged involvement in a massive hack on Twitter earlier this month which saw accounts of several prominent personalities getting hacked.

The individuals included Mason Sheppard, a 19-year-old from the United Kingdom who went by the moniker "Chaewon" online, Nima Fazeli, a 22-year-old from Orlando, Florida who went by the alias "Rolex," as well as a minor, CNN reported citing a statement from United States Attorney David Anderson.

(Also Read: Tesla on hiring spree as Elon Musk suggests plans of increasing headcount)

The minor, 17-year-old Graham Ivan Clark, was arrested on Friday morning in Tampa after an investigation conducted by federal and state investigators. As per the report, the statement alleged Clark was the "mastermind".

Meanwhile, the FBI said two people charged in the attack have been taken into custody.

Twitter on Friday said the hackers behind the attack on accounts of public figures used telephone phishing to break into the system.

"The social engineering that occurred on July 15, 2020, targeted a small number of employees through a phone spear-phishing attack," the social media company said on its blog.

(Also Read: What coronavirus: Elon Musk says demand for Tesla stayed strong despite pandemic)

Earlier, Twitter announced the strengthening of security measures during the investigation of the hacker attack, significantly restricting access to its internal systems.

Among the victims of the hack were former US Vice-President Joe Biden, Former President Barack Obama, Tesla and SpaceX founder Elon Musk, billionaires Bill Gates, Michael Bloomberg and Warren Buffett, Amazon CEO Jeff Bezos, rapper Kanye West, many others. The hackers used the account to call on followers to send money to a bitcoin account.

This story has been published from a wire agency feed without modifications to the text.

Link:

Three people charged in Twitter hack which targeted accounts of Obama, Elon Musk - Hindustan Times Auto News

Is fully contactless automation the future of supply chain technology? – TechHQ

The events of the last three or so months have revealed just how delicate our reliance on complex production and logistics really is and how, despite advanced technology seeping into them, how they are still very much dependent on a healthy, mobile and human workforce.

But what the crisis confirmed is that the years-long quest automate supply chains, leveraging technology from robotics, data analytics and IoT, will make these systems more reliable, resilient and less prone to downtime and disruption in any kind of crisis.But this isnt the first time the sustainability or survivability of status quo will have been brought into question among business leaders and supply chain gurus, just look at political factors such as the US-China trade war, United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA), and Brexit in the UK.

Now, organizations of all sizes which rely on production, warehousing and logistics are in urgent discussions around how they can enact damage limitation strategies moving forward and regain traction. Automation technology holds the key.

Business leaders in the manufacturing and logistics sector will have little doubt today that their investments into automation will be money well spent, and we can expect investments in Industry 4.0 technology to be expedited and the pace of innovation to ramp up further as vendors eye the forthcoming boom in interest from new stakeholders.

But the interest in automation is manifold; not only can it optimize evermore data-driven logistics chains and reduce downtime, make supply chain systems more resilient to disruption, and save ultimately save costs in terms of human labor making supply chains contactless from production to delivery could become a vital ingredient to kindling business again in the wake of the pandemic.

Ensuring businesses and customers feel safe handling goods might just become a significant medium-term business differentiator, demonstrating that those businesses are prudent and forward-thinking as we emerge from a health crisis and must continue to keep transmission down.

While we can already see plenty of examples of technology in action in supply chains today which omit humans from the picture, such as Alibabas robot-powered smart factory, making the entire supply chain contactless remains a staggering challenge.

In Japan, the need for automation is especially prevalent, particularly as its aging workforce is driving a very real need for alternatives to human labor on the production line. But the complications of the pandemic, and the pressure caused by a subsequent surge in e-commerce, has led to an increasing interest in the countrys supply chain automation companies.

As reported by Bloomberg, Tsubakimoto Chain Co. is seeing a rise in demand for its sorting and conveyor systems which help companies move products around, unmanned, in warehouses and factories. Startup Hacobu is confident in the prospects of its online and paperless platform for trucks to exchange information as they load and unload goods at facilities.

According to researcher Fuji Keizai, the market for next-gen logistics systems is set to hit 651 billion yen (US$6 billion) by 2025, double its worth in 2018. Thats rapid growth in any technology market.

Demand for humanless systems will keep growing, Masafumi Okamoto, division manager at Osaka-based Tsubakimoto, told the publication, as e-commerce and the need for contactless supply chain technology combines to drive demand.

Its not just under the cover of factories and warehouses where this automation technology will play a leading role. The area of last-mile delivery is ripe for disruption, and has led to a competitive market in technologies like fleet management software and even the race to deploy autonomous vehicles, including automobiles and drones.

In the US, carmaker Daimler last year announced ambitions to put autonomous trucks on the road, investing US$573 million in the technology. Faced with a drastic shortage of long-distance drivers, autonomous trucks are estimated to save 45 percent in operating costs (between US$85 billion and US$125 billion) for the US for-hire trucking industry.

A fully-contactless supply chain where equipment is operated remotely with edge computing and deliveries are made by self-driving vans remains a distant ideal for now. But the current spike in demand, driven in part by a need for assurance over transmission of the virus, has only added fuel to flames of innovation taking place in the arena.

Read this article:

Is fully contactless automation the future of supply chain technology? - TechHQ

Pegasystems Named a Visionary in Gartner’s Magic Quadrant for Robotic Process Automation – PRNewswire

CAMBRIDGE, Mass., Aug. 5, 2020 /PRNewswire/ -- Pegasystems Inc.(NASDAQ: PEGA), the software company empoweringdigital transformationat the world's leading enterprises,today announced it has been named a Visionary in the Gartner Magic Quadrant for Robotic Process Automation(1) for the second consecutive year.

In the report, Gartner evaluated 16RPA enterprise vendors based on their completeness of vision and ability to execute. According to Gartner,"RPA automates repetitive human tasks by emulating the same human transaction steps mainly via orchestrated UI interactions. Robotic process automation has democratized integration and automation, leading to widespread business adoption. Unlike traditional screen scraping, RPA tools offer orchestrated UI interaction with access provisioning, security management, document ingestion and many other capabilities."

Pega RPAhelps enterprises jumpstart their digital transformation journeys by enabling organizations to automate tedious, manual tasks across disconnected applications. Pega uses its patented Deep Robotics to establish automations at the application code level, resulting in faster, more accurate, and more resilient robotic automations on a global scale.As part of thePega Infinitysoftware suite, Pega RPA comes unified with Pega's market leading case management and low code intelligent automation to drive continuous operational efficiency, orchestrate workflows, and optimize outcomes from end to end.

This recognitionis amongPega's recent industry recognitionfor robotic process automation.Pega wasrecentlynamed to the Constellation Shortlist for Robotic Process Automation(2) and as a Leader in the Ovum Decision Matrix: Selecting a Robotic Process Automation (RPA) Platform, 2018-2019(3) report.

Quotes & Commentary

"As companies future-proof their organizations with automation, RPA is just one part of a much bigger picture when it comes to true digital transformation," said Francis Carden, vice president, digital automation and robotics. "Pega continues to help its clients accelerate their competitive advantage with speed and agility from a much broader intelligent automation solution that includes RPA. We believe this recognition from Gartner is a reflection of our vision for RPA as a part of a true end-to-end enterprise automation strategy."

Supporting Resources

Gartner DisclaimerGartner does not endorse any vendor, product or service depicted in its research publications, and does not advise technology users to select only those vendors with the highest ratings or other designation. Gartner research publications consist of the opinions of Gartner's research organization and should not be construed as statements of fact. Gartner disclaims all warranties, expressed or implied, with respect to this research, including any warranties of merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose.

About PegasystemsPega is the leader in cloud software for customer engagement and operational excellence. The world's most recognized and successful brands rely on Pega's AI-powered software to optimize every customer interaction on any channel while ensuring their brand promises are kept. Pega's low-code application development platform allows enterprises to quickly build and evolve apps to meet their customer and employee needs and drive digital transformation on a global scale. For more than 35 years, Pega has enabled higher customer satisfaction, lower costs, and increased customer lifetime value. For more information on Pegasystems (NASDAQ: PEGA) visit http://www.pega.com.

Press Contact:Ilena RyanPegasystems Inc.[emailprotected] (617) 866-6722Twitter:@pega

All trademarks are the property of their respective owners.

SOURCE Pegasystems Inc.

http://www.pega.com

More here:

Pegasystems Named a Visionary in Gartner's Magic Quadrant for Robotic Process Automation - PRNewswire

COVID-19 Impacts: Global Industrial Automation Control Market will Accelerate at a CAGR of almost 5% through 2020-2024 | Need For Simplification of…

LONDON--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Technavio has been monitoring the global industrial automation control market size and it is poised to grow by USD 25.18 billion during 2020-2024, progressing at a CAGR of almost 5% during the forecast period. The report offers an up-to-date analysis regarding the current market scenario, latest trends and drivers, and the overall market environment.

Technavio suggests three forecast scenarios (optimistic, probable, and pessimistic) considering the impact of COVID-19. Please Request Latest Free Sample Report on COVID-19 Impact

The market is fragmented, and the degree of fragmentation will accelerate during the forecast period. ABB Ltd., Eaton Corporation Plc, Emerson Electric Co., General Electric Co., Honeywell International Inc., OMRON Corp., Rockwell Automation Inc., Schneider Electric SE, Siemens AG, and Yokogawa Electric Corp. are some of the major market participants. To make the most of the opportunities, market vendors should focus more on the growth prospects in the fast-growing segments, while maintaining their positions in the slow-growing segments.

The need for simplification of complex manufacturing activities has been instrumental in driving the growth of the market. However, exposure to cybersecurity threats might hamper the market growth.

Industrial Automation Control Market 2020-2024 : Segmentation

Industrial Automation Control Market is segmented as below:

To learn more about the global trends impacting the future of market research, download a free sample: https://www.technavio.com/talk-to-us?report=IRTNTR44533

Industrial Automation Control Market 2020-2024 : Scope

Technavio presents a detailed picture of the market by the way of study, synthesis, and summation of data from multiple sources. Our industrial automation control market report covers the following areas:

This study identifies the virtualization of automation control systems as one of the prime reasons driving the industrial automation control market growth during the next few years.

Industrial Automation Control Market 2020-2024 : Vendor Analysis

We provide a detailed analysis of around 25 vendors operating in the industrial automation control market, including some of the vendors such as ABB Ltd., Eaton Corporation Plc, Emerson Electric Co., General Electric Co., Honeywell International Inc., OMRON Corp., Rockwell Automation Inc., Schneider Electric SE, Siemens AG, and Yokogawa Electric Corp. Backed with competitive intelligence and benchmarking, our research reports on the industrial automation control market are designed to provide entry support, customer profile and M&As as well as go-to-market strategy support.

Register for a free trial today and gain instant access to 17,000+ market research reports.

Technavio's SUBSCRIPTION platform

Industrial Automation Control Market 2020-2024 : Key Highlights

Table Of Contents :

Executive Summary

Market Landscape

Market Sizing

Five Forces Analysis

Market Segmentation by Product

Market Segmentation by End-user

Customer Landscape

Geographic Landscape

Market Drivers Demand led growth

Market Challenges

Market Trends

Vendor Landscape

Vendor Analysis

Appendix

About Us

Technavio is a leading global technology research and advisory company. Their research and analysis focuses on emerging market trends and provides actionable insights to help businesses identify market opportunities and develop effective strategies to optimize their market positions. With over 500 specialized analysts, Technavios report library consists of more than 17,000 reports and counting, covering 800 technologies, spanning across 50 countries. Their client base consists of enterprises of all sizes, including more than 100 Fortune 500 companies. This growing client base relies on Technavios comprehensive coverage, extensive research, and actionable market insights to identify opportunities in existing and potential markets and assess their competitive positions within changing market scenarios.

See the article here:

COVID-19 Impacts: Global Industrial Automation Control Market will Accelerate at a CAGR of almost 5% through 2020-2024 | Need For Simplification of...

Automation in Automotive Market Report 2020 Industry Capacity, Manufacture, – News by aeresearch

The global Automation in Automotive Market is anticipated to register growth over the forecast period. Automation in Automotive Market size by Product Type (Industrial Sensors, PLC, DCS, MES and SCADA), By Application (Passenger Vehicle and Commercial Vehicle), By Region Outlook, Company Profiles, Growth Opportunity, Forecasts 2026. Analyzes current market size and upcoming few years growth of this industry.

The research report on the Automation in Automotive Market studies every minute and trending aspect in the industry to offer actionable insights to business owners and stakeholders. The detailed information will help the buyers to plan profit-maximising strategies for the forecast period 2020 - 2026. In addition, the literature talks about crucial prospects, such as driving factors, restraining factors, opportunities, trends, and challenges.

The study also sheds light on the geographic segmentation in the key regions. The key factors that are highlighted in the report are changing consumers demand, product preference, disposable income of consumers, import and export status, and existing trends in the regions. Moreover, the report throws light on the unexplored areas, key developments, recent innovations, and growth strategies adopted by Automation in Automotive industry players.

Request Sample Copy of this Report @ https://www.aeresearch.net/request-sample/268213

The players profiled in the Automation in Automotive Market are:

Reasons for Automation in Automotive Market Report:

This report provides pin-point analysis for changing competitive dynamics

It provides a forward looking perspective on different factors driving or restraining market growth

It helps in understanding the key product segments and their future

It provides pin point analysis of changing competition dynamics and keeps you ahead of competitors

It helps in making informed business decisions by having complete insights of market and by making in-depth analysis of market segments

The latest market data for this research include:

Overall Automation in Automotive Market size, 2020-2026

Automation in Automotive Market size by product segment, 2020-2026

Growth rates of the overall Automation in Automotive Market and different product segments, 2015-2026

Shares of different product segments of the overall Automation in Automotive market, 2015, 2020 and 2026

Market Potential Rates of the overall Automation in Automotive Market and different product segments

Automation in Automotive Market Breakdown:

By type, the market is split as:

By the end users/application, sub-segments are:

Regional Analysis for Automation in Automotive Market:

North America, Europe, China & Japan

The Global Automation in Automotive Market study covers current status, % share, future patterns, development rate, SWOT examination, sales channels, to anticipate growth scenarios for years 2020-2026. It aims to recommend analysis of the market with regards to growth trends, prospects, and players contribution in the market development. The report size market by 5 major regions, known as, North America, Europe, Asia Pacific, Middle East and Africa (MEA), and Latin America.

The Automation in Automotive market factors described in this report are:

Key Strategic Developments in Global Automation in Automotive Market:

The research includes the key strategic activities such as R&D plans, M&A completed, agreements, new launches, collaborations, partnerships & (JV) Joint ventures, and regional growth of the key competitors operating in the market at global and regional scale.

Key Market Features in Global Automation in Automotive Industry:

The report highlights Automation in Automotive market features, including revenue, weighted average regional price, capacity utilization rate, production rate, gross margins, consumption, import & export, supply & demand, cost bench-marking, market share, CAGR, and gross margin.

Key Points Covered in Automation in Automotive Market Report:

Automation in Automotive Overview, Definition and Classification

Market drivers and barriers

Automation in Automotive Market Competition by Manufacturers

Automation in Automotive Capacity, Production, Revenue (Value) by Region (2020-2026)

Automation in Automotive Supply (Production), Consumption, Export, Import by Region (2020-2026)

Automation in Automotive Production, Revenue (Value), Price Trend by Type {Industrial Sensors, PLC, DCS, MES and SCADA}

Automation in Automotive Market Analysis by Application {Passenger Vehicle and Commercial Vehicle}

Automation in Automotive Manufacturers Profiles/Analysis

Automation in Automotive Manufacturing Cost Analysis

Industrial/Supply Chain Analysis, Sourcing Strategy and Downstream Buyers

Marketing Strategy by Key Manufacturers/Players, Connected Distributors/Traders

Standardization, Regulatory and collaborative initiatives

Industry road map and value chain

Market Effect Factors Analysis ............

Request Customization on This Report @ https://www.aeresearch.net/request-for-customization/268213

View post:

Automation in Automotive Market Report 2020 Industry Capacity, Manufacture, - News by aeresearch

Global Industrial Automation Control Industry Outlook, 2024 – Increasing Focus on Smart Factories and Changing Market Dynamics – GlobeNewswire

Dublin, Aug. 07, 2020 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- The "Global Industrial Automation Control Market 2020-2024" report has been added to ResearchAndMarkets.com's offering.

The global industrial automation control market is poised to grow by $25.18 billion during 2020-2024, progressing at a CAGR of 5% during the forecast period.

This report provides a holistic analysis, market size and forecast, trends, growth drivers, and challenges, as well as vendor analysis covering around 25 vendors. The report offers an up-to-date analysis regarding the current global market scenario, latest trends and drivers, and the overall market environment.

The market is driven by the need for simplification of complex manufacturing activities, increasing focus on smart factories and changing market dynamics. The study identifies the virtualization of automation control systems as one of the prime reasons driving the industrial automation control market growth during the next few years. Also, value chain integration by automation solution providers and increasing need for open platform architecture for automation software will lead to sizable demand in the market.

The robust vendor analysis is designed to help clients improve their market position, and in line with this, this report provides a detailed analysis of several leading industrial automation control market vendors that include:

Also, the industrial automation control market analysis report includes information on upcoming trends and challenges that will influence market growth. This is to help companies strategize and leverage on all forthcoming growth opportunities.

Key Topics Covered

1. Executive Summary

2. Market Landscape

3. Market Sizing

4. Five Forces Analysis

5. Market Segmentation by Product

6. Market Segmentation by End-user

7. Customer Landscape

8. Geographic Landscape

9. Vendor Landscape

10. Vendor Analysis

For more information about this report visit https://www.researchandmarkets.com/r/wqgmrx

Research and Markets also offers Custom Research services providing focused, comprehensive and tailored research.

Read the original:

Global Industrial Automation Control Industry Outlook, 2024 - Increasing Focus on Smart Factories and Changing Market Dynamics - GlobeNewswire

Automation Testing Tools Market – Growth, Trends, and Forecast (2020 – 2025) – News by aeresearch

New research report on for " Automation Testing Tools market" size, forecasts for 2020-2026. The report provides an in-depth analysis of the Automation Testing Tools market, taking into account market dynamics, segmentation, geographic expansion, the competitive landscape, and various other key issues. The market analysts who prepared the report have thoroughly examined the Automation Testing Tools market and provided reliable and accurate data.

They understand the needs of the industry and customers, so they can easily focus on the issues that end users have been looking for. The research report provides an analysis of an assessment of existing and upcoming trends in which players can invest. It also includes an assessment of the players financial prospects and the nature of the competition.

A new report by Reports titled, Global " Automation Testing Tools Market"has been released with trustworthy information and accurate forecasts for a better understanding of the present market scenario. The report offers an in-depth analysis of the global market, including qualitative insights, historical data, and verifiable projections about the market size and share. growth rate and revenue, in terms of demand and supply, cost structure, barriers and challenges, product type, key market players, technology, regions and applications.

Request Sample Copy of this Report @ https://www.aeresearch.net/request-sample/267879

This report includes the following Companies We can also add other companies you want Automation Testing Tools Market Are:

By Structural Form, the Global Automation Testing Tools Market is segmented into:

Cloud Based and Web Based

Global Automation Testing Tools market by application:

Automation Testing Tools Market: Drivers and Limitations

The report section explains the various drivers and controls that have shaped the global market. The detailed analysis of many market drivers enables readers to get a clear overview of the market, including the market environment, government policy, product innovation, development and market risks.

The research report also identifies the creative opportunities, challenges, and challenges of the Automation Testing Tools market. The framework of the information will help the reader identify and plan strategies for the potential. Our obstacles, challenges and market challenges also help readers understand how the company can prevent this.

Table of Content

1 Introduction of Automation Testing Tools Market

1.1 Overview of the Market1.2 Scope of Report1.3 Assumptions

2 Executive Summary

3 Research Methodology of This Report

3.1 Data Mining3.2 Validation3.3 Primary Interviews3.4 List of Data Sources

4 Automation Testing Tools Market Outlook

4.1 Overview4.2 Market Dynamics4.2.1 Drivers4.2.2 Restraints4.2.3 Opportunities4.3 Porters Five Force Model4.4 Value Chain Analysis

5 Automation Testing Tools Market, By Deployment Model

5.1 Overview

6 Automation Testing Tools Market, By Solution

6.1 Overview

Request Customization on This Report @ https://www.aeresearch.net/request-for-customization/267879

Read the original post:

Automation Testing Tools Market - Growth, Trends, and Forecast (2020 - 2025) - News by aeresearch

Switching Automation Light Grids Market: Opportunities, Demand and Forecasts, 2 – News by aeresearch

The research report on Switching Automation Light Grids market consists of current market trends and past statistics as well as predictions regarding the market behavior in the forthcoming years. As per the study, the market is projected to register an appreciable growth rate and amass notable returns during the forecast period.

The document highlights the development trends in conjunction with the sales volume, market size, growth opportunities, and revenue estimates. Moreover, the study tracks the industry-wide COVID-19 footprints to provide a conclusive overview of the market dynamics.

Regional overview of the Switching Automation Light Grids market:

Request Sample Copy of this Report @ https://www.aeresearch.net/request-sample/267962

Other takeaways from the Switching Automation Light Grids market report:

The report focuses on some very essential points and gives a piece of full information about Revenue, production, price, and market share.

Switching Automation Light Grids Market report will enlist all sections and research for every point without showing any indeterminate of the company.

Important Features that are under Offering and Switching Automation Light Grids Market Highlights of the Reports:

Finally, Switching Automation Light Grids Market report is the believable source for gaining the Market research that will exponentially accelerate your business. The report gives the principle locale, economic situations with the item value, benefit, limit, generation, supply, request and Market development rate and figure and so on. This report additionally Present a new task SWOT examination, speculation attainability investigation, and venture return investigation.

MAJOR TOC OF THE REPORT:

Chapter 1 Industry Overview

Chapter 2 Production Market Analysis

Chapter 3 Sales Market Analysis

Chapter 4 Consumption Market Analysis

Chapter 5 Production, Sales and Consumption Market Comparison Analysis

Chapter 6 Major Manufacturers Production and Sales Market Comparison Analysis

Chapter 7 Major Product Analysis

Chapter 8 Major Application Analysis

Chapter 9 Industry Chain Analysis

Chapter 10 Global and Regional Market Forecast

Chapter 11 Major Manufacturers Analysis

Chapter 12 New Project Investment Feasibility Analysis

Chapter 13 Conclusions

Chapter 14 Appendix

Request Customization on This Report @ https://www.aeresearch.net/request-for-customization/267962

See original here:

Switching Automation Light Grids Market: Opportunities, Demand and Forecasts, 2 - News by aeresearch