4 reasons why Richard Nixon would be too liberal for the GOP and Trump supporters of 2020 – Salon

It was 46 years ago, on August 8, 1974, that President Richard Nixon overwhelmed by the Watergate scandal announced his resignation. And the following day, Vice President Gerald Ford was sworn in as president of the United States. Nixon, in his day, was considered arch-conservative, promoting anti-communist hysteria, a "law and order message" and the War on the Drugs. And in 2020, President Donald Trump's reelection campaign is responding to the George Floyd protests by echoing the paranoia and divisiveness of Nixon's 1968 presidential campaign. Yet in many respects, Nixon was to the left of today's GOP.

Here are some reasons why Nixon, as right-wing as he was, would be way too liberal and nuanced for the Trumpistas and the Republican Party of 2020.

1. Nixon favored universal health care

When President Barack Obama was working on a health care reform package in 2009 and 2010, one of the people he consulted was Stuart Altman who was Nixon's consultant on health care reform in the early 1970s. Nixon was a proponent of universal health care, and the health care reform plan he had in mind almost half a century ago was quite comparable to what is now known as Obamacare and it some respects, it was more aggressive. Nixon opposed the type of government-operated single-payer program that Sen. Bernie Sanders and Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez now describe as "Medicare for all," but he favored universal health care via the private sector.

2. Nixon championed the launch of the EPA

Trump has a terrible environmental record, undermining the Environmental Protection Agency at every turn and expressing his love of fossil fuels and disdain for green energy. But the EPA started under Nixon's watch, and by today's Republican standards, Nixon would be considered a "tree hugger." If Nixon were alive today and ran on the environmental platform that he favored in the early 1970s, Trumpistas would consider him hostile to energy companies.

3. Nixon supported Medicare

Trump, the Tea Party and many other far-right Republicans have favored harsh cuts to Medicare and Medicaid both of which came out of President Lyndon B. Johnson's Great Society in the 1960s (Trump was lying when, in 2016, he insisted he would protect Medicare). But Nixon, in the late 1960s and early 1970s, made it clear that he supported Medicare. Nixon vehemently attacked Democrats on many occasions, slamming them as a party of lawlessness and moral decay. But when it came to safety net programs, there were times when he wasn't shy about agreeing with them.

4. Nixon favored elements of the New Deal and the Great Society

Newt Gingrich, a devoted Trump supporter, has stressed that one of his political goals is the total destruction of President Franklin Delano Roosevelt's New Deal and LBJ's Great Society. But Nixon, like President Dwight D. Eisenhower in the 1950s, stressed that he wanted to protect parts of the New Deal and the Great Society. And arguably, it was Nixon's paranoid anti-communism that inspired him to support programs like Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid: he believed, one could argue, that allowing a certain amount of socialism and having a strong social safety net would discourage the spread of communism in the United States. And unlike the Tea Party wingnuts of 2020, he had no desire to privatize Social Security.

Visit link:

4 reasons why Richard Nixon would be too liberal for the GOP and Trump supporters of 2020 - Salon

What is WeChat and why does Trump want to ban it? – WKTV

President Donald Trump wants to ban WeChat, dramatically escalating tensions with China. But what is WeChat, and why is it so controversial?

The popular Chinese messaging app is used across the Chinese diaspora but may be unfamiliar outside of those circles.

WeChat, called Weixin in China, functions like Facebook, LinkedIn, Uber, Instagram and several other apps all at once. For many Chinese people, WeChat is an indispensable app for staying in touch across the world.

Some of that success has been aided by the government. China blocked many American apps including Facebook, Google and Twitter, so state-sponsored apps have become the norm.

WeChat is owned by Tencent, China's biggest tech company and the world's largest gaming company. In March, Tencent reported that WeChat has nearly 1.2 billion monthly active users. The company does not disclose user numbers by country, but industry analysts say the vast majority of them are in China.

The app has been subsidized by the Chinese government since its creation in 2011.

WeChat has a lot more functionality in China than it does in the United States. While in America, you can hail a cab, play mini games, post to your "story" and send money.

By comparison in China, where stores regularly accept WeChat Pay as a form of payment and QR codes are all over cities, the sky's the limit. Inside WeChat, you can pay bills, check out restaurant menus, find local hangouts, book doctor appointments, reach out to new business contacts, file police reports, read the news and access bank services.

President Donald Trump issued executive orders late Thursday night that would ban WeChat and TikTok, the short-form video app owned by Beijing-based ByteDance, from operating in the United States in 45 days if they are not sold by their parent companies.

According to the order, a ban would apply to "any transaction that is related to WeChat" made by any person or "any property" subject to the jurisdiction of the United States.

Trump wrote in his executive order, "Like TikTok, WeChat automatically captures vast swaths of information from its users. This data collection threatens to allow the Chinese Communist Party access to Americans' personal and proprietary information."

He continued, "The United States must take aggressive action against the owner of WeChat to protect our national security."

WeChat has a reputation for being heavily monitored. That's despite Tencent's attempts to convince users to "rest assured, respecting user privacy has always been one of WeChat's most important principles," as the company wrote in a 2018 blog post.

In an 2016 Amnesty International report on user privacy, Tencent scored a zero out of 100 for WeChat's lack of freedom of speech protection and lack of end-to-end encryption. Tencent doesn't disclose when the Chinese government requests user data and gives no detail about the kind of encryption, if any, it employs.

The hit to Tencent so far would be mostly symbolic, given the small market share WeChat has in the United States. But if it expands into gaming apps, a massive part of the company's business, that could be a big problem.

Tencent owns Riot Games, the maker of the world's biggest PC game "League of Legends," and has a stake in Epic Games, parent company of "Fortnite." It also has a huge mobile games business and is working with the Pokmon Company to make what looks to be a cross between "Pokmon" and "League of Legends," called "Pokmon Unite." The game was announced in June and has no release date yet. It would arrive on Nintendo Switch and mobile.

Tencent has dealt with government restrictions before, when the Chinese government stopped approving new games for nine months in 2018. Tencent stock lost 25% of its value in that the time period.

China's Ministry of Foreign Affairs on Friday said it "firmly opposes" the executive orders targeting WeChat and TikTok.

"The United States is using national security as an excuse and using state power to oppress non-American businesses," ministry spokesperson Wang Wenbin said during a daily press briefing, accusing the United States of "political manipulation and oppression."

A Tencent spokesperson said the company "is reviewing the executive order to get a full understanding."

Read this article:

What is WeChat and why does Trump want to ban it? - WKTV

Modi sets new history of oppression in Kashmir: Qureshi – The News International

LAHORE: Foreign Minister Shah Mehmood Qureshi Saturday met Punjab Chief Minister Sardar Usman Buzdar at the CM's Office here where matters of mutual interest, political situation, and Southern Punjab Secretariats affairs came under discussion.

Punjab Minister Dr. Muhammad Akhtar, Chief Whip National Assembly MNA Aamir Dogar, MNA Zain Qureshi, Principal Secretary to the CM Punjab and officers concerned were also present on the occasion.

The meeting decided to take prompt administrative steps to make Southern Punjab Secretariat fully functional.

Qureshi said the government was fulfilling all its promises made to the people. He said establishment of Southern Punjab Secretariat would bring relief to the people and their problems would be solved at the grassroots level.

Qureshi, Usman Buzdar and other members of the assembly strongly condemned the worst military siege and oppression of Modi government in the Indian Occupied Jammu and Kashmir.

Qureshi said Pakistan was incomplete without Kashmir adding that Modi had orchestrated Muslims genocide in IOJ&K and set a new history of oppression on Kashmiris.

Buzdar said the government under the leadership of Prime Minister Imran Khan had been highlighting Indian atrocities at all levels and the entire nation observed Youm-e-Istehsal.

One road in every division of Punjab, including Lahore, would be named after Srinagar, he said, adding, the government paid tribute to everlasting struggle of the Kashmiri people against the illegal Indian occupation.

He termed Kashmir a jugular vein of Pakistan and said Pakistan could not back off from the core issue of Kashmir cause. He said Modi had blatantly violated the UN resolutions on August 5, 2019. He said Pakistan would continue to expose Indias stubbornness and illegal steps at every level.

Usman Buzdar said the secretaries of different departments would soon be posted in Southern Punjab Secretariat and the secretaries would be fully empowered.

The Southern Punjab Secretariat would be given administrative and financial autonomy so that affairs related to Multan, Bahawalpur and Dera Ghazi Khan Divisions could be dealt with locally, the chief minister stated.

Meanwhile, Foreign Minister Shah Mahmood Qureshi Saturday said Pakistan remained steadfast in support of an inclusive political settlement in Afghanistan.

Good to speak (with Mike Pompeo) and to reiterate Pakistans continued stand for regional peace and security. We remain steadfast in support of an inclusive political settlement in Afghanistan, he said on Twitter. He was referring to his Fridays telephonic conversation with US Secretary of State Mike Pompeo wherein in the two sides discussed the bilateral and regional matters including Kashmir dispute as well as Afghan peace process.

Qureshi said Pakistan looked forward to strengthening bilateral relationship with the US and to continuing as anchors of stability.

The foreign ministers tweet came in response to an earlier tweet by Pompeo saying, Productive call with Pakistani Foreign Minister Shah Mahmood Qureshi today about continued cooperation on Afghan peace and the importance of supporting regional stability. I look forward to advancing our shared goals and increasing partnership.

Read more:

Modi sets new history of oppression in Kashmir: Qureshi - The News International

The ‘Unlock’ in Kashmir Has to Take Into Account Human Rights Violations – The Wire

Amongst the bleakest in the history of Jammu and Kashmir (J&K), these past 12 months beginning with the revocation of Articles 370 and 35A on August 5, 2019 have witnessed unprecedented violations of the human rights to health and life.

Decades of oppression and humiliation of the people of J&K were escalated further through indefinite curfews, unconstitutional arrests and detainment, unprecedented military presence, and the clampdown on democratic and public institutions. The imposition of an indefinite lockdown among the longest in J&K, as early reports by media and civil society (August to December 2019) flagged impacted every dimension of life in Kashmir. People were deeply affected by the arrests and detentions, shelling and pellet injuries, economic distress, health problems, and breakdown of public services including education and health. Inevitably, the impact on peoples physical and psychological health and access to healthcare was severe.

Life-saving medicines were in short supply and stock-outs were evident. The lack of transport caused pregnant women to travel long distances on foot for delivery and created barriers for reaching the hospitals in time. Patients suffering from cancer, those requiring dialysis were unable to reach hospitals or access healthcare, andpatients discharged from hospitals were unable to return home due to lack of transport. Roadblocks and the communications shutdown had also affected healthcare providers and frontline health workers like ASHA workers, and prevented them from providing regular health care services due to restrictions as well as fears with regard to their safety.

Hospitals had to use ambulances to ferry hospital staff to and from their homes because private vehicles were not allowed in some areas. Doctors were stopped repeatedly at multiple barricades for identity checking and interrogated about the purpose of their travel, delaying them from reaching health facilities. Peoples experiences of severe distress, trauma and high levels of psychosocial stress were seen to worsen.

Despite narratives of normalcy that began gradually emerging, a visit to Kashmir in February 2020 by a group of activists and academics witnessed a far-removed reality of widespread experiences of distress, fear, anger and violations. Interactions with people in Kashmir during the visit exposed the facade of normalcy, reiterating the huge daily challenges including access to health services, particularly due to the continued restrictions on movement, curfews, absence of transport and communications, as well as the fear of violence.

Illustration: Pariplab Chakraborty

The lockdown had precipitated a public health crisis evident from, for instance, the significant increase in numbers of stillbirths, foetal distress and severe postpartum anaemia because pregnant women could not come for regular check-ups. Moreover, the exponential rise in mental health problems reported since August 2019 provided more clues about the effects.

Further, the shutdown of internet, landlines and mobile phones disabled the functioning of health systems and programmes for the benefit of people, especially for the poorest. The narratives of daily humiliation and distress due to the sway of absolute power, control and disruption of all aspects of their lives, was a constant refrain.

The COVID-19 pandemic and the health situation in J&K

By the end of March 2020, the feigned rhetoric of normalcy was further shattered by the imposition of a sudden and total lockdown by the Central government in all states as a response to the COVID-19 pandemic. While most parts of the country experienced this for the first time, for J&K, the pandemic lockdown deepened the implications of the pre-existing lockdown since August 2019.

The response to this unprecedented global health catastrophe of COVID-19 has been an authoritarian lockdown implemented by an aggressive state, creating an severe humanitarian crisis. For the people of J&K, this has further exacerbated the trauma and impact of the ongoing clampdown as well as the fractures in the health system, and its consequences for the health and lives of the people. The COVID-19 lockdown has provided legitimacy for further repression under the garb of a public health necessity.

The lockdown not only continues to limit movement but also suppress the ground realities, including conditions of work of healthcare providers and barriers to access healthcare in the pandemic. For instance, on April 1, 2020, the Directorate of Health Services in Kashmir issued a circular threatening strict action against government servants who criticise the governments efforts to combat the pandemic on social media or in the press. This was to challenge the prerogative of healthcare providers to flag concerns about the unavailability of personal protective equipment (PPE) during the pandemic, the lack of safe working conditions or the absence of response by relevant authorities.

Watch | Economic Damage to Kashmir Is Worse Than What Is Being Reported: Former Srinagar Mayor

Whether the senior cardiologist in Srinagar who was detained and beaten up by the police and later lodged in a police station in Srinagar, the three gynaecologists of the Lal Dedh Hospital who alleged harassment by the police deployed outside the hospital, or the ambulance driver who was beaten up by police personnel in Pulwama district while transporting patients, the harassment and violence against healthcare providers preventing them from carrying out their healthcare duties have raised serious concerns.

As has been seen in other parts of the country, the pandemic has exposed the inadequacy of the public health infrastructure and human resources even in J&K. Given the non-availability of primary health care, patients develop secondary symptoms and need advanced health care including critical care involving ICUs, ventilators and oxygen supply. With merely two multi-specialty hospitals in the Kashmir Valley, patients are deprived of timely treatment.

Doctors have also called for increased home quarantine and for the home quarantining of asymptomatic patients to reduce the burden on the healthcare system. ASHA workers, who were engaged in contact tracing and door-to-door surveys, also reported the non-availability of surgical masks and sanitisers.

Although the J&K high court, in April 2020, sought a report from the Department of Health and Medical Education on the availability of safety equipment for healthcare professionals and on the provision of care for the families of healthcare and government employees or officials engaged in the fight against COVID-19, concerns about safety of healthcare providers has been most visible in the context of the pandemic located in the larger context of surveillance, violence and control.

The prolonged blockade of 4G internet services is one such example. With only low-speed 2G services available, especially in areas of South Kashmir, the functioning of doctors and patients accessing healthcare have been severely affected. The absence of fast-speed internet can affect the health of the entire community in general and particularly in a pandemic context, where immediate communication and widespread outreach are critical public health imperatives.

Women in J&K continue to experience trauma because of their inability to access timely health services for delivery due to lack of transport, stigmatisation and delays and denial of maternal healthcare, which have resulted in morbidities or even in the death of women. There were reports about a full-term pregnant woman who was denied services, allegedly on the pretext of waiting for her COVID-19 test results.

Also read | Excluded from Law-Making for Two Years, Kashmiris are Angry and Alienated

In July 2020, a PIL was filed in the J&K high court, on the basis of which the court directed the health authorities of all districts to maintain separate maternity hospitals for pregnant women and children, equipped with all facilities and trained staff. This ruling mandates a magisterial enquiry into all incidents of medical negligence resulting in the death of a child or a pregnant woman, and compensation to be deducted from the salary of the employees guilty of medical negligence.

Furthermore, the anxiety and distress of day-to-day survival, financial uncertainty, job loss, isolation, fear of illness or violence, grief, inability to access health services, inability to pay medical bills, lack of communication with relatives outside Kashmir, and many other psychological effects are increasingly evident.

Undoubtedly, there is an urgent need to address these issues through immediate as well as sustained strategies, given their potential social and economic impact. However, despite the overwhelming current focus on the COVID-19 pandemic and its consequences, the narrative in Kashmir cannot be isolated from the more deep-seated, fundamental factors that determine the health and lives of the people here clampdown and violence that have created constant fear and humiliation, surveillance and control of every aspect of their lives.

The unlock process in J&K limited merely to the pandemic would be a travesty of justice, public health and human rights. This public health crisis will eventually pass, but is likely to leave a trail of social and economic devastation. In Kashmir, this is linked to the violation of peoples health and their rights as citizens.

The author acknowledges Roshmi Goswami, Kalpana Kannabiran, Navsharan Singh and Pamela Philipose, who were a part of the five-member team that visited Kashmir during February-March 2020. A few parts of this essay has drawn from the report Interrogating the Normal: Report of a Visit to the Valley.

Special thanks to Deepa V. and Ranjan De for their valuable inputs, and Abhiti Gupta for research support.

Sarojini Nadimpally is a public health practitioner and National Co-Convenor of Jan Swasthya Abhiyan.

Continued here:

The 'Unlock' in Kashmir Has to Take Into Account Human Rights Violations - The Wire

Israeli state is worried about questioning of its history – Socialist Worker

Seth Rogen was right to say there there were people in Palestine before 1948 (Pic: Palestine Solidarity Project/Flickr)

All it took was one comment from actor Seth Rogen for one of Israels leading politicians to spring into action.

Rogen said on a podcast that as a Jewish person I was fed a huge amount of lies about Israel. Referring to the Israeli states founding in 1948, he added, They never tell you that, Oh by the way, there were people there.

Shortly afterwards Isaac Herzog tweeted that Rogen had apologised for his commentsa claim the actor denies.

Herzog is an Israeli Labour politician and chairperson of the Jewish Agency, set up in 1929 to promote Zionism among Jewish people and colonisation in Palestine.

This fragility in the face of criticism shows the Israeli state is worried about the worldwide outcry against its oppression of the Palestinians.

In the US, in particular, Israel is facing a crisis of support among left wingers and liberals, including many younger Jewish people.

Annexation

There is opposition to Binyamin Netanyahus right wing government, such as its annexation of Palestinian land and embrace of Donald Trump and Europes far right.

But it also includes a questioning of Israels founding ideology of Zionism.

This response to antisemitism in Europe argues for an exclusively Jewish state in Palestine, and justifies Palestinian dispossession and oppression.

One poll in San Franciscos Bay Area found that only40 percent of Jews aged 18 to 34 were comfortable with the idea of a Jewish state.

Rogen is by no means an anti-Zionist.

But what he said questioned one of Zionisms main mythsthe claim that Palestine was a land without a people for a people without a land. Israels was built on the ethnic cleansing of more than 800,000 Palestinians, a process known as the Nakba or catastrophe.

Paramilitary forces that went on to become the Israeli army drove Palestinians from villages and towns through massacres and terror.

Since its foundation, Israel has grabbed more Palestinian land and brought more Palestinians under its rule.

In 1948 Israeli forces conquered land beyond what was stipulated in the UN partition plan for the Britishruled Mandate of Palestine. Then in 1967 Israel captured East Jerusalem, the West Bank and the Gaza Strip.

But Israeli politicians are obsessed with maintaining a demographic majority. Israels first prime minister David Ben-Gurion said, Only a state with at least 80 percent Jews is a viable and stable state.

So what happens to the Palestinians under its rule?

Since the 1993 Oslo Accords, US and Israeli leaders have talked of a viable Palestinian state alongside Israel. But throughout this time Israel further cemented its control in the Occupied Territories.

Today more than 600,000 Israeli settlers live in the West Bank, their vast settlements connected to Israel with exclusive roads.

And some 3 million Palestinians live as Israeli subjects while the Palestinian Authority acts as a subcontractor for the occupation.

Solution

The idea that the USwhich supports Israel to safeguard its interests in the Middle Eastwould deliver a twostate solution was always a sham.

But Donald Trumps peace deal has further exposed this.

It would make formal the apartheid that Palestinians already live under.

This situation isnt just down to the policies of the Netanyahu government. Occupation and apartheid flow from the logic of the settler colonial project.

One state is inevitable. The question is whether it will be the Israeli apartheid state or a democratic state with equal rights for Palestinians and Jews.

Herzogs reaction shows how concerned the Israeli government is about the sense of unease about its foundations and actions.

As more people question Israeli occupation, its time for the left to stand up and make the argument.

Winning liberation means supporting the Palestinian struggle against colonialism and apartheid.

Read the original post:

Israeli state is worried about questioning of its history - Socialist Worker

A call to unite against the scourge of gender-based violence – IOL

By Siboniso Mngadi 4h ago

Share this article:

SIBONISO MNGADI

Durban - Businesswoman Zanele Mbokazi-Nkambule has called upon women to unite, like those who did in 1956, to fight the scourge of gender-based violence and to resuscitate the country's ailing economy.

As the country will embrace the power of women on Sunday, August 9 in honour of fearless women who marched against the apartheid governments the pass laws in 1956, she was on a mission to spread her words.

The date resembles the power of women who staged a march on the Union Buildings in Pretoria in 1956 to protest against the proposed pass laws.

Women from all parts of the country came together for a common purpose.

Mbokazi-Nkambule, a founder of Crown Gospel Awards said she would be hosting a "Woman to Woman" online Conference, to discuss the empowerment of women in different sectors including entrepreneurship and the role of women in a fight against Gender-based violence.

We need to come together like the women of 1956, their common mission regardless of their position, profession and age.

This years commemoration comes at the time when the world is facing a Covid-19 pandemic which is causing havoc on our economy. The country is also facing a scourge of gender-based violence, we need to take initiative and find a solution.

I urge all women in their formation, maybe it churches, stokvel, workplace or society to come together to transform one another.

We have different expertise and capabilities, we need unity and courage to change our challenges.

We can draw strength and courage from our heroines, they rose against all the odds which we can also do, she said.

Mbokazi-Nkambule also reflected on the fact that the countrys workforce was dominated by men.

She called on women in high positions not to distance themselves from communities, where women are hopeless, unemployed and victims of violence.

It's time to stop relying on men on issues affecting us and our children. We have many women in business and some are occupying senior positions in government. We need to work as a collective. We are capable of great things and we can defeat gender-based violence if women of 1956 fought against the oppression, she added.

Mbokazi-Nkambule online conference will take place on Sunday on social media platforms.

Sunday Tribune

More here:

A call to unite against the scourge of gender-based violence - IOL

The Impact of COVID-19 on Human Rights and Democracy – International Policy Digest

The world is facing an unprecedented crisis. At its core is a global public health emergency on a scale not seen for a century, requiring a global response with far-reaching consequences for our economic, social, and political lives.

The emergency imposed extraordinary measures to fight the pandemic, both dictatorships and democracies curtailed civil liberties on a massive scale.

Guaranteeing human rights for everyone poses a challenge for every country around the world to a differing degree. But, the measures of emergency to face the pandemic affected peoples livelihoods and security, their access to healthcare, work, education, the movement inside and outside of countries, as well as to leisure.

The impact of the pandemic poses fundamentals questions: How will the pandemic impact human rights and democracy?

Impact of COVID-19 on human rights

The COVID-19 pandemic legitimately prompted countries to take drastic measures to protect public health. These measures are restricting a number of individual rights and liberties enshrined in constitutions and in international conventions on human rights.

The effects of the pandemic were not only limited to the global economy but extended to the rights and freedoms of citizens due to the imposition of emergency laws, exceptional laws, curfews in a number of countries, and the isolation of specific cities or regions.

The measures taken by governments have increased concerns about governments exploiting these exceptional circumstances to abort principles of democracy and human rights.

In this regard, we can cite many examples.

The pandemic allowed China to have more control over the population. China resorted to quarantining the entire city of Wuhan. Foreign journalists, including journalists from the New York Times, The Washington Post, and The Wall Street Journal were expelled.

The pandemic suspended public gatherings and social protests in a number of countries such as Algeria, Lebanon, and Iraq, where the authorities persuaded street protesters to end their mass protests that might exacerbate the health crisis.

The exceptional measures also restricted the freedom of the press. Journalists were not allowed to report on developments on the ground except with the permission of authorities.

The spread of the pandemic led to economic stagnation in most countries, due to the closure of a number of factories and industrial and commercial institutions, which caused the loss of jobs for many workers, which raises the issue of social rights, including the right to work.

In Russia, President Vladimir Putin seized the opportunity to expand the already tremendous apparatus of oppression in the Kremlin in the form of thousands of facial recognition cameras that would enable the police to locate and target people participating in street demonstrations.

Moscow police had caught and fined people who violated quarantine and self-isolation using facial recognition.

The COVID-19 pandemic is now giving Russian authorities an opportunity to test new powers and technology, and the countrys privacy and free-speech advocates worry the government is building sweeping new surveillance capabilities.

Journalists, bloggers, and those covering the COVID-19 response have been targeted. In Venezuela, journalist Darvinson Rojas was arrested by security forces for his reporting on the pandemic. Similarly, there are numerous reports of journalists and human rights activists being arrested, placed under house arrest, harassed, and threatened for the criticisms of their governments handling of the pandemic. These countries include China, El Salvador, Iraq, Turkey, Serbia, Egypt, Iran, Belarus, and Vietnam.

Protecting individuals from the pandemic is necessary, but international human rights laws provide a framework to guide government actions, as states have an obligation to protect a range of rights such as the right to work, to housing, to education, and freedom of expression.

Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on democracy

Some countries have employed exceptional measures to achieve political goals. For example, Egypt announced the extension of the state of emergency throughout the country, and the goal of the emergency is not necessarily confronting the pandemic, but rather facing the opponents of the political system.

In Hungary, Prime Minister Viktor Orbn took advantage of the pandemic to dismantle democracy in the country.

On March 30, Hungarys parliament passed an emergency law granting the government indefinite, sweeping powers. The new statute goes well beyond those emergency statutes passed elsewhere in Europe.

The Hungarian law enables rule by decree, bypassing the legislature on any law, as long as the crisis lasts. All elections until then will be suspended.

In the Philippines, President Rodrigo Duterte acquired complete legislative power, with no time limits, and issued a law against false news, and gave orders to the police to impose a state of emergency. Thousands of people have been arrested for violating curfews.

The war on coronavirus has given extraordinary powers to governments at the expense of laws and various constitutions, which draws attention to the fact that democracy and human rights are subject to a difficult test.

COVID-19 constitutes a major stress test for societies, states, and international order. When it comes to the human rights dimension, many countries are failing this test. Neoliberal economic policies, austerity, and hostile environmental policies have left social protection threadbare.

They have undermined public services, social security, and workers rights, and exposed ever more people to their harmful consequences.

States have an obligation to protect, promote and give effect to human rights for all groups under their jurisdiction, first and foremost the most vulnerable, such as children, older people, refugees, migrants, and persons with disabilities.

States are obligated to fight the pandemic by exceptional measures, but they must respect the fundamental values of democracy, rule of law and human rights.

Read this article:

The Impact of COVID-19 on Human Rights and Democracy - International Policy Digest

Education at the mercy of the market – Frontline

It is an intriguing, but by now hardly surprising, fact that on June 24, the Ministry of Human Resource Development finalised a loan with the World Bank as the culmination of a process allowing for its third and final intervention in determining the structure, content and governance of the entire system of school education, from pre-nursery to Class 12, through its Strengthening Teaching-Learning and Results for States (STARS) programme. (The earlier interventions were the District Primary Education Programme or DPEP of 1993-2002 and the Sarva Shiksha Abhiyan since 2002.)

Just a month later, on July 30, Ramesh Pokhriyal, the Minister for Human Resource Development, told mediapersons in New Delhi that the Central Cabinet had passed for immediate implementation the long-delayed New Education Policy or NEP 2020. Both events occurred amid the COVID-19 pandemic that is showing no signs of abating across the nation. A series of lockdowns, in various stages in States, districts, cities, towns and urban localities, has brought the economy to a halt. Lakhs of migrant workers, deprived of even the barest incomes, returned to their home towns and villages in the most atrocious conditions.

Schools, colleges and universities have been closed since March and examinations have either not been held or are being held or are threatened to be held online, creating confusion and panic among the majority of students.

The last thing one would have expected is the Cabinet to pass the NEP without presenting and debating it in Parliament at a time when the people are concerned only with getting their lives back on track and coping with the unprecedented health and economic situation.

But it comes as no surprise, since the Government of India has been utilising the COVID-19 crisis to great advantage by passing several of its reform programmes without observing democratic niceties or permitting any democratic resistance.

It has abrogated protective labour laws and collective bargaining, disinvested in the public sector and the Railways, allowed privatisation of the electricity sector, reorganised banks, and cleared environmentally sensitive projects at breakneck speed.

NEP 2020 states that its priority, like that of the World Bank, is ensuring that quality education be made accessible to all children from pre-nursery to Class 12. So, one would be justified in assuming that the World Bank must be providing a hefty grant, or at least a significant loan, to assist in realising this laudable goal.

However, the finalised loan constitutes a mere 1.4 per cent of the total investment required for the Samagra Shiksha Abhiyan of which the STARS programme is a part. The Centre and the governments of States and Union Territories would be contributing 98.6 per cent.

Yet, the STARS programme will focus on the whole school approach and teacher education in the Samagra Siksha Abhiyan in the selected high performance States of Kerala, Himachal Pradesh and Rajasthan and the learning States of Madhya Pradesh, Maharashtra and Odisha. It will thereby allow the World Bank to acquire an overarching role in influencing the teaching-learning content, practices and outcomes of the entire system of school education; training and monitoring faculty for implementing it; setting up merit-based learning assessment systems to measure achievement based on the above; and formulating and implementing governance reforms to cover the training of educational officials and function as an extensive outreach to train parents to participate in implementing the programme.

This raises the next obvious question. Is the World Bank an international educational institution? If not, why is it being asked to design such a comprehensive programme for quality school education in India? Further, what has been the banks experience of earlier interventions in Indias school education system?

The World Bank as an international financial institution creates, regulates and safeguards markets for advancing the interests of international finance capital. It is neither concerned with the educational rights and pedagogical concerns of providing quality education to the majority of Indias children who are deprived of the benefits of such education, nor equipped for that.

From the 1980s onwards, the World Bank has concentrated, particularly in former colonies, on persuading governments to withdraw public resources from education and encourage the entry of private investors and a variety of non-state actors.

As NEP 2020 itself advocates, this omnibus term may include multinational corporations and corporate investors, non-governmental organisation (NGOs), civil society, charitable and/or religious organisations and even volunteers.

Under the garb of being philanthropic rather than merely private partners, the NEP promotes and commends their initiatives and role in sharing resources as well as in synergising the interaction between the public system and private agencies.

To further enhance cooperation and positive synergy among schools, including between public and private schools, the twinning/pairing of one public school with one private school will be adopted across the country, so that such paired schools may meet/interact with each other, learn from each other, and also share resources, if possible. Best practices of private schools will be documented, shared, and institutionalized in public schools, and vice versa, where possible, states the NEP. (7.10)

However, it has become more than evident that with the collaboration of these players, governments can neither be held effectively accountable nor remain responsible for the state of the education system.

The experience of the DPEP, designed and sponsored by the World Bank, should have made this clear already. Implemented in 18 States and nearly half of Indias districts, it incorporated low-cost solutions in government schools to fill the need for greater accessibility and quality. The rapid deterioration of state-funded primary schools (Classes I-V) and the loss of credibility among those who depended most on the system, such as the Scheduled Castes (S.Cs), the Scheduled Tribes (S.Ts), members of Other Backward Classes (OBCs) and Muslims and other impoverished sections, resulted in the privatisation and commercialisation of school education with the mushrooming of low-budget fee-charging private schools at a faster pace than ever since Independence.

This damaging experience was systematically ignored and the World Banks intervention in the Sarva Shiksha Abhiyan from 2002 onwards only carried it further. The Right to Education Act, 2009, which legislated a quota of at least 25 per cent for students belonging to the Economically Weaker Sections in admissions to private schools, functioned as a Trojan horse that set up privately funded school education as a desirable option and failed to emphasise its inherently defective pedagogical character that fuses quality in education with the capacity to pay.

Yet, the Centre has finalised the third intervention with the World Bank.

Therefore, the governments claim that it has embarked on a path-breaking direction 34 years after the 1986-92 NEP is misleading. It is only advancing the same strategy as previous governments that followed the perspective and approach of the World Bank model after the adoption of the neoliberal reforms policy in 1991.

Public-private partnership (PPP) strategies, which lie at the core of the World Banks approach, do not provide better quality education. They increase the exclusion of the deprived and the marginalised, exploit a highly discriminatory multi-track system of education promoted by the play of market forces and divert from the constitutional goal of establishing a nationwide system of quality education for all.

Although the NEP states that the aim of the public school system will be to impart the highest quality education so that it becomes the most attractive option for parents from all walks of life for educating their children (8.9), and the document opens with the assertion that substantial investment in a strong, vibrant public education system as well as the encouragement and facilitation of true philanthropic private and community participation will determine government policy, the hackneyed solutions offered by it belie the claim. It says: To facilitate learning for all students, with special emphasis on socio-economically disadvantaged groups (SEDGs), the scope of school education will be broadened to facilitate multiple pathways to learning involving both formal and non-formal education modes.

Open and Distance Learning (ODL) Programs offered by the National Institute of Open Schooling (NIOS) and State Open Schools will be expanded and strengthened for meeting the learning needs of young people in India who are not able to attend a physical school.

It adds: NIOS and State Open Schools will offer the following programmes in addition to the present programmes: A, B and C levels that are equivalent to Grades 3, 5, and 8 of the formal school system; secondary education programmes that are equivalent to Grades 10 and 12; vocational education courses/programmes; and adult literacy and life-enrichment programmes. States will be encouraged to develop these offerings in regional languages by establishing new/strengthening existing State Institutes of Open Schooling (SIOS). (3.5)

According to the document, .... various successful policies and schemes such as targeted scholarships, conditional cash transfers to incentivise parents to send their children to school, providing bicycles for transport, etc., that have significantly increased participation of SEDGs in the schooling system in certain areas.... must be significantly strengthened across the country. (6.4)

The NEP also declares that to make it easier for both governments as well as non-governmental philanthropic organisations to build schools, to encourage local variations on account of culture, geography, and demographics, and to allow alternative models of education, the requirements for schools will be made less restrictive. The focus will be to have less emphasis on input and greater emphasis on output potential concerning desired learning outcomes. (3.6)

Does the much-needed inclusion of the Early Childhood Care and Education (ECCE) programme as an integral part of the school system offer any new directions? For universal access to the ECCE programme, it offers the old idea of strengthening anganwadi centres and equipping them with high-quality infrastructure, play equipment, and well-trained anganwadi workers and teachers.

State governments would be responsible for training those educated up to 10+2 for six months while those with lower educational levels would receive training for one year. Anganwadis would be fully integrated in school complexes. (1.5) There is nothing new here, for they would continue to remain under several Ministries such as Education, Women and Child Development, and Health. Their separate functions are still not conceived of as integral parts of a significant and cohesive stage of the education system.

An unexamined proposal for establishing ashramshalas and alternative schooling for tribal areas earmarks them for targeted attention. The document mentions a plan for Special Educational Zones only once and does not elaborate. It is not clear if these are zones, with large populations of the underrepresented (a euphemism for the deprived/marginalised) sections, that will be separated from the rest of the system or if they will receive special attention and support.

The World Banks strategy since 1994 has been based on the promotion of a model of knowledge adjusted to the requirements of corporate job markets and a market model of education delivery that involves the privatisation, commercialisation and corporatisation of education. The latter model places the entire burden of education on the individual family and fee-paying parents or students. They are the consumers who make it profitable for the investor or provider to enter the education market. PPP strategies encourage the transition to a market where edu-businesses strengthen their hold over public assets through government reimbursement and voucher schemes.

Governments indirectly further the process by starving and dismantling state-funded education systems through budgetary fund cuts, with subsequent rationalisation proposals for the merger and/closure of crisis-ridden schools. NEP 2020 repeatedly endorses these strategies, which will continue to lead to a massive exclusion from education of backward communities that constitute almost 85 per cent of the population. These strategies leave neither access nor agency for S.Cs, S.Ts, OBCs, Muslims, Denotified Tribes and girls, transgenders and the disabled within these already disempowered categories. The proposed creation of inclusion funds for them will neither change the commercialised character of the system nor even provide meaningful relief to individual recipients.

NEP 2020 also shares the main features of the World Bank approach to the model of knowledge. It approves of and promotes a perspective that is detrimental to establishing an equitable system of quality education in India. The contemporary merchandisation of education requires it not only to conform more closely to the needs of the job market, but also to initiate its own transformation into a new and highly lucrative market. Knowledge as a resource for critically comprehending the contemporary world, societies and value systems is now treated as being too heavy for current teaching-learning methodologies and curricula to handle. The skills approach, a functional assembly of performance-oriented qualities that signal their own desired level of achievement, now defines the basic unit, module, and topic of learning.

The learning outcome too is predetermined. The teaching-learning process is reduced to acquiring procedural competencies that can be appropriately graded for different levels. NEP 2020 is firmly committed to classroom transactions shifting towards competency-based learning and education. It says: The assessment tools (including assessment as, of, and for learning) will also be aligned with the learning outcomes. (4.6)

The proposal for multiple exit and entry points from pre-nursery to Class 12, which begins early with the re-introduction of examinations at classes 3, 5 and 8, is based on the identification of skill levels.

It says: Specific sets of skills and values across domains will be identified for integration and incorporation at each stage of learning, from pre-school to higher education. (4.4)

However, depriving students of the content of formal learning, which not only develops fundamental disciplines, critical thinking and the creativity to innovate and conceptualise opposition to social injustices and all forms of discrimination, makes a mockery of learning as it cultivates conformism in thought and produces citizens only fit to be cogs in the economic and technological machine.

Regulatory centralisation, as achieved through the Higher Education Commission of India (HECI), has been a long-standing demand of private investors.

The loss of democratic freedoms and academic autonomy, with supreme authority being granted to boards of governors of institutions that must compulsorily become autonomous, is a painful reality.

The vision of NEP 2020 is to instill among the learners a deep-rooted pride in being Indian, not only in thought, but also in spirit, intellect, and deeds, as well as to develop knowledge, skills, values, and dispositions that support responsible commitment to human rights, sustainable development and living, and global well-being, thereby reflecting a truly global citizen.

To this end, the entire curriculum and pedagogy, from the foundational stage onwards, will be redesigned to be strongly rooted in the Indian and and ethos.... in order to ensure that education is maximally relatable, relevant, interesting, and effective for our students. (4.29)

The document repeatedly makes such exhortations but the idea of India and Indianness that is endorsed appears to be quite distinct from what is usually associated with the plurality and diversity of India.

India has always been identified with being open to absorbing and negotiating with philosophical, religious, cultural and technological knowledge from other parts of the world. NEP 2020 states that the knowledge of India will include knowledge from ancient India and its contributions to modern India and its successes and challenges, and a clear sense of Indias future aspirations. (4.27) This leap across centuries misses the changing experiences of numerous tribal communities; the powerful anti-caste cultural ideologies, monotheistic movements and cults; and the philosophical contestations within various sects of Hinduism.

The political, cultural and technological impact of the exposure to central Asia, the arrival of Islam and the richness and complexity of its intellectual, cultural and sociological consequences that surround us in our daily lives, are also absent.

Equally surprising is the neglect of the period of colonial domination and the decades-long struggle of the people, who, united as a nation, survived the tragedy of Partition and emerged as an independent, constitutional republic. India is far greater, far more expansive, far richer in detail and far deeper in its experience of inequality and oppression than the Sanskrit knowledge systems (4.17), theory and literature that NEP 2020 attempts to confine it to.

The policys failure to recognise the worth of the totality of our subcontinental history, culture and lived experience immeasurably diminishes the very idea of India.

An education policy that is unable to reflect this sweep of history does itself and the youth of India a grave injustice.

Madhu Prasad is with the All India Forum for the Right to Education.

Read the original here:

Education at the mercy of the market - Frontline

I Founded BLAQUE Fitness to Make Sure Black Communities Had an Inclusive Place to Work Out – Well+Good

Think about any gym or boutique studio locker room youve ever walked into. Have you ever seen a product that was specifically designed for Black hair or skin? Because after a decade in the industry, I hadnt. Companies put a lot of thought into who their customer is and how to serve them well, and it became clear to me that Black people simply werent being thought of. So much money was being spent on gym memberships, but many of us still had to bring our own products. Ultimately its not really about the products, it is about what those products represent. This is why I decided to create BLAQUE, a luxury fitness experience designed for the Black community, by the Black community.

The Black community has a specific need for fitness and wellness services because of the disproportionate rate at which preventable diseases affect us. And yet traditionally, its been a challenge to find a fitness space that feels like its for us. Boutique fitness studios are usually located in white neighborhoods (I used to have to commute an hour and 15 minutes in each direction to train at a luxury gym), and many are exorbitantly expensive. Because of this, theres never been a sense of ownership as a Black person walking into a gyminstead, theres a feeling like were infringing on something thats not ours.

With BLAQUE, I wanted to develop a luxury fitness experience where the Black community is the priority. We are being very intentional about ensuring that our first physical space will be in a Black neighborhood in NYC, and were considering more inclusive pricing strategies like a sliding price scale so that the offerings are affordable for everyone who wants to participate, no matter how much theyre able to spend on fitness. We often dont see luxury associated with something designed specifically for Black people, but its so important. Black folks experience so much trauma and often carry heavy burdens in our everyday lives. We deserve a space that feels luxurious and makes us feel cared for, honored, and valued. Luxury doesnt have to mean inaccessible.

We want members to walk into our gym or log on to our platform and feel like theyre home. Theyll see people who look like them, theyll hear music and experience visuals that are meaningful to them. Our signature classes are being designed with music and motion that resonates with our culture in a way that we havent seen anywhere. Often in the Black community, movement is a form of celebration, release, and healing. We are bringing that into our space with classes that focus on the joy of movement. When we move, its to express something and it usually feels good to us, so this is central to our class structure. The Black experience is unique and comes with trauma that often manifests in our bodies, so we are doing the work to address this in our offerings and to acknowledge the impact of systemic oppression on Black wellness.

So often in fitness and wellness, Black culture is taken, repackaged, and sold to non-Black members. But when Black culture is used to bring healing to the same people who created it, its powerful. Were committed to upholding certain tenets as we design our class structure. We are being mindful about how our instructors resonate with our community. We want people to be able to identify with those guiding them through their wellness journey. As a Black member, being able to see yourself in your instructors begins to break down elitist barriers of what fitness looks like.

In a lot of ways, were working on shifting the narrative of what fitness is in the Black community. Its so often looked at as an add-on, instead of as something that we need for our well-being. The level of exclusivity that the industry has held for itself has made a lot of Black folks feel like fitness just isnt for them. And when a community is just trying to survive, the way ours is, its hard to think of this additional amenity as a necessity. But in reality, we know that fitness and wellness is not something that is an add on to quality of life. So we want to let our community know that BLAQUE is designed to make you feel good, this is an environment you want to be in, and this is for you. Ambiance, classes, beauty products, and all.

BLAQUE had planned to open its brick and mortar gym before COVID-19 hit. The brand is currently raising funds to launch its digital platform and outdoor classes sometime this year and their physical space next year. Donate here.

As told to Zo Weiner

More here:

I Founded BLAQUE Fitness to Make Sure Black Communities Had an Inclusive Place to Work Out - Well+Good

Watch now: A heightened focus on Central Illinois police agencies’ efforts to diversify – Bloomington Pantagraph

You are the owner of this article.

You have permission to edit this article.

Watch now: A heightened focus on Central Illinois police agencies' efforts to diversify

Please subscribe to keep reading. You can cancel at any time.

Sign Up Today and Support Local Journalism

Enjoy more articles from Bloomington's Most Trusted Information Source. Subscribers can log in for unlimited digital access

Normal Police officer Jasmine Johnson calls for people to work together to end unjust police actions during the "United Against Police Brutality" event Thursday, June 18, 2020. Johnson helped organize the event, which saw officers and protesters walk together through uptown Normal.

Normal Police Department officer Jasmine Johnson says earning the badge has been her dream come true. Johnson said police agencies in general will have to look at changing their approach to minority hiring if they want their departments to reflect their communities. She said Normal was working in the right direction.

Normal Police Department Chief Rick Bleichner says recruiting qualified minority police officers has become one of his primary goals in staffing the department. Making adjustments to the process, such as doing long-distance assessments to make it easier for candidates in other cities to qualify, has helped the department.

BLOOMINGTON The years-long efforts of Central Illinois law enforcement agencies to diversify their forces are getting more attention in the months since George Floyd was killed in Minneapolis police custody.

Floyds death sparked protests in Bloomington-Normal and around the country. Some advocates have called for police reforms that include restructuring and defunding, or shifting resources to other positions, like social workers. Many also pointed to departments across the U.S. that dont look like the communities they serve.

You need to have people, law enforcement, going into the community that represents the community, said Linda Foster, president of the NAACPs Bloomington-Normal Branch. Thats how you learn, thats how you understand and thats how you are able to build relationships and its not seen as us against them.

Bloomington-Normal NAACP President Linda Foster addresses the topic of "change" during a rally May 31 outside the Law and Justice Center in downtown Bloomington.

Its too soon to tell whether Floyds death will make that harder, they said, but overall heavy scrutiny and negative media coverage of the profession in recent years have not helped.

It's only been a couple of months since that incident, said Bloomington Police Chief Dan Donath, who anticipates it will have an impact on recruitment of minorities and new officers overall.

In Bloomington, data provided by the department shows that 92.7% of the departments 123 officers are white and 7.3% are people of color, including seven Hispanic officers. Compare that with U.S. census data that shows the citys population is 73.4% white and 10.1% Black.

The Normal Police Department has 82 officers, of whom 90.2% are white and 9.8% are minorities. The towns population is 77.4% white, 11.2% Black and 5.8% Hispanic.

The McLean County Sheriffs Office has 54 officers, of whom 94.4% are white and 5.6% are minorities. The countys population is 79.2% white, 8.4% Black and 5.2% Hispanic.

At Illinois State University, the police force is 79.3% white and 20.7% minority officers. Roughly 71.2% of the students enrolled in fall 2019 were white; 10.8% were Hispanic, and 9% were Black.

Leaders of all four departments acknowledge the disparity and say diversity remains a high priority in recruitment and hiring. Theyre competing with departments across the region that are working toward similar goals, and several said they face an uphill battle because of the stigma surrounding police work these days.

We have not initiated a testing cycle for deputy sheriff since before the George Floyd incident, McLean County Sheriff Jon Sandage said. However, we are seeing an overall decline in applicants to be police or correctional officers, I believe largely due to the anti- police sentiment that is being pushed.

Meanwhile, advocates for police reform say a focus on diversity could distract from other changes that need to be made.

As long as our policing system continues to operate the way it does now, we will continue to have problems no matter the racial makeup, said Bloomington Ward 6 Alderwoman Jenn Carrillo, who has been involved with the local Black Lives Matter movement. ... People do get stuck in this whole diversity angle of things. Diversity isn't the same as racial justice.

Black Lives Matter of Bloomington-Normal member Jenn Carrillo, also Ward 6 Alderwoman on the city council, leads the crowd in raising their fists for solidarity duringthe organization's meeting June 7 at Miller Park in Bloomington.

Recruiting efforts

By the time Jasmine Johnson joined the Normal Police Department in 2016, the department had been working for years to recruit more officers of color. Police Chief Rick Bleichner had spoken publicly for months about it as a priority, something Johnson, who is Black, said she appreciated reading in a news article.

To her, hiring a diverse workforce just makes sense. Its important for a number of reasons, but it mainly builds trust between officers and community members while placing potential victims at ease.

From my experience, it seems as though with everything thats going on, if you can see someone who looks like you, its more of a comfort thing, said Johnson, 29. They can relate to you more. I dont think its a racial thing by any means, but I think its important.

Johnson said she sometimes encounters women who are more comfortable speaking with her than with a male officer. Ive also had where Ive interacted with someone whos African-American and they feel more comfortable speaking with someone whos African-American, as opposed to someone who is Caucasian, because we can understand the experience, she said.

Normal Police Department patrolman Jasmine Johnson is the third generation of police officers in her family. She said one tip she would give potential minority applicants is to be determined in meeting the requirements for a police department's screening procedures.

Bloomington police this spring added five new officers, three of whom were people of color. But Donath stressed that they were hired for their qualifications, not skin color.

I am very adamant about hiring only highly qualified candidates to ensure we provide great service to our community, he said. In addition, we would like people of color to see working at our police department as a real possibility. Sometimes, people in general fall into a trap that any given career field is not for their race or sex, etc.

But, this is a good job that gives a person an opportunity to help others and make a good living for themselves and their family.

City Manager Tim Gleason, who also is a chairman on the Illinois Law Enforcement Training and Standards Board, said the city has taken measures to improve minority officer recruitment and there is still more to do.

This is definitely a priority, Gleason said. In no way am I satisfied with where we are at as an organization, but over the last two years, our minority employees have increased from 7.5 to 11.5%, and my direction to staff is let's be targeted and intentional. Lets cast a wider net on government employment, specifically public safety.

Of the 29 officers on the Illinois State University Police force, 23 are white, three are Black, two are Hispanic, and one is listed as other.

Officers Jasmine Johnson, right, and Brad Park led the Normal Police Department's "United Against Police Brutality" walk across Uptown Normal on Thursday, June 18, 2020.

Hiring for diversity has been, and always will be, a primary focus for our department, said Chief Aaron Woodruff, but its just too early to say if there has been any impact recently, since we havent had any vacancies posted. Prior to the George Floyd murder, we had already seen a downturn in overall applications for police officer. We attributed that to a number of factors, including the healthy economy (prior to COVID-19); the type of work which requires working weekends, overnight, and holidays; decreasing benefits; and the continuing fallout over the previous policing issues after Ferguson.

Woodruff said the key is to develop personal relationships when recruiting.

That includes, but is not limited to, working with our local community organizations to help us find good people who still want to make a positive difference in our communities, despite the current stereotypes surrounding policing.

In Normal, the police department made minority hiring a top priority when Bleichner was hired nearly nine years ago. However, he said, the department is committed to hiring the best candidate for the job, which means attracting a diverse talent pool.

One of the most important things I think I do, or functions as a chief, is hiring people, said Bleichner. At the end of the day, I could retire, somebody else could come in and they could change every directive within the police department, but one thing they cant change very easily is the people. Thats the legacy.

The department follows a comprehensive recruitment plan that is evaluated each year. Most candidates are pulled from within an 80-mile radius of the department, and Normal actively recruits at colleges, universities and in military magazines.

We certainly arent where we would like to be, but we have made progress, said Bleichner. We dont have a specific number in place that once we get there we can declare victory. Our approach is hiring the best people that we can because theyre going to be representatives of us.

Community policing

Johnson feels the Normal Police Department has had some success in recruiting minority officers because of its commitment to creating a welcoming culture and engaging with people through programs such as the Minority and Police Partnership.

But, as conversations and opinions toward police shift, Johnson said it is more important now than ever to focus on community policing. That doesnt just mean attending events, she said; it includes getting out of the patrol vehicle and interacting with people on the streets.

I know sometimes thats very hard to do when were getting calls for service, she said. I think if we can get back to community policing, engaging with the community and hosting more events that actually engages the community, that will be a way to not only change the narrative, but show the community that we are more than what we have been in the past perceived to be.

As part of an effort to connect with the community, Normal and Illinois State University police officers held a march June 18 at which they walked alongside protesters carrying Black Lives Matter signs. Johnson came up with the idea for the event and brought it to Bleichner, who readily agreed. Officers who attended said it was important for them to show the community that they did not agree with the excessive force shown in Minneapolis.

Miltonette Craig, an assistant professor in the Criminal Justice Sciences Department at Illinois State University, said community engagement is crucial for departments.

The underlying premise is that the police are supposed to protect and serve, she said, and it is very hard for them to work with the community that views them as illegitimate.

Craig, who is Black, described growing up in a Florida community where her experience with law enforcement was different from some in other communities where most residents are white.

When it comes to those that are disadvantaged, high-crime, high poverty, then they dont see the police unless they are coming in for law enforcement purposes, Craig said. I did not see the service part of policing until much later in my life.

Bloomington city leaders in December 2017 formed a group, the Public Safety and Community Relations Board, to handle appeals from people unhappy with how the police department handled complaints about officers.

Art Taylor, who was the boards first chairman and is still a member, said the group has only had two complaints to review since it was created. But the board plays a vital role because it serves as a factor in officers decision-making while on duty and could prevent incidents from escalating, he said.

We have had no police brutality in Bloomington, to my knowledge, in the same kind of light of what is going on with George Floyd and others who have lost their lives in other communities because of police brutality, Taylor said. I think the PSCRB has created something where the police at least have some pause to think and consider, before anything happens.

More work ahead

Advocates of police reform say there is still much work to be done, both in Central Illinois and nationally. Some believe the problems cant be solved by only diversifying the force.

Theres a systemic problem in policing and putting Black bodies or bodies of color into the blue uniform is not really addressing the issue that we see within police departments nationally, said Ky Ajayi, a leader with Black Lives Matter Bloomington-Normal.

Efforts to increase minority recruitment are needed, but Ajayi fears a hyper focus on the former will overshadow the pressing need for widespread police reform.

There needs to be radical restructuring of policing, he said. We have seen officers of color brutalize citizens, brutalize residents of communities. Weve come to the conclusion that when we focus on diversifying law enforcement, it doesnt address the systemic problems within policing.

Black Lives Matter of Bloomington-Normal member Ky Ajayi speaks to attendees of its meeting Sunday, June 7, 2020, at Miller Park in Bloomington.

The solution, he said, is police reform and decreasing the number of interactions between officers and citizens. To do this, Ajayi suggested funding social service programs and having people equipped to handle calls for service for mental health crises and homelessness.

Taylor, of the review board, has said that he felt concerned about a recent interaction with Bloomington police in his neighborhood. He and his wife, Camille, were approached as part of a complaint of disorderly conduct involving a vehicle that matched the description of their car.

Donath said last week that a review of the situation found the officer acted appropriately.

Art Taylor, of Not In Our Town, left, talks with Bloomington Police Chief Dan Donath on Monday, June 8, 2020, after a rally of the Bloomington-Normal Branch of the NAACP, NIOT and local law enforcement departments.

But Art Taylor said they were approached in a way that put them on the defensive, and he wrote to several local officials and community leaders about his concerns with the experience.

The Taylors have been active in community service projects and nonprofit organizations during the 30 years theyve lived on Bloomingtons east side; Art Taylor had been named chairman of the review board at its first meeting because of his reputation for this work.

If that can happen to us and we understand that we are known in this community and I am on the PSCRB it can happen to anybody, he said.

Whole new era

It is not enough for police departments to simply increase minority recruitment efforts, said Foster, of the NAACP. Agencies must be transparent with their efforts to recruit and hire officers.

It comes down to hiring, Foster said. Thats the proof. We need to see an intentional effort to make a difference in our community.

People need to see police departments recruiting in areas out of their comfort, and the department needs to show there are minority officers who have been promoted to higher ranks, Foster added. That means having minority officers who are sergeants, lieutenants and captains, not just patrol officers.

The Bloomington-Normal NAACP is working on a list of recommendations for law enforcement agencies to increase transparency and minority recruitment. While the list has not been finalized, Foster said the organization plans to unveil the recommendations soon.

We really do need to move forward toward a more aggressive stance on making our community a community that is inclusive of all individuals that are willing to put the work in, she said. Its going to take some work.

If law enforcement agencies are serious about increasing diversity, then they need to evaluate what barriers are preventing them from achieving that goal, said Robert Moore, a retired U.S. Marshal and police community relations consultant who chairs the Illinois NAACP criminal justice committee.

You have to know whats stopping you from being successful, he said. If you have a department that is constantly losing your African Americans or minorities, you know theres something wrong.

These barriers include not having a proper recruitment plan, not having trained recruiters, a lack of resources and tense community relations. Once the barriers are identified, Moore said, the police department can move on to developing a comprehensive recruitment plan.

Moore was lead consultant in a 2016 case study of the Springfield Police Department as it made diversity a priority. When he was first brought on, Moore and his team started by evaluating the police departments mission statement, past newspaper clippings and interviews with community members.

What we found was that mayors and city council people had been promising minority recruiting for 20 years and nothing had changed, he said, which further damaged community relations. We also found that there was no recruiting plan.

Moore added that Springfield, like many police agencies from the 1980s to 2000s, had essentially cut off the hiring process and was not actively recruiting officers.

The Springfield department has since increased its number of black officers by nearly 150%. But the issues that led to the lack of diversity will likely be felt for years to come, Moore said.

Today, the Illinois NAACP and the Illinois Chiefs of Police have developed a list of 10 principles to building trust. They include treating all people with dignity and respect, rejecting discrimination, embracing community policing and undergoing de-escalation training.

Moore travels with the Illinois Chiefs of Police to promote the 10 principles, bringing residents and law enforcement agency leaders together for dialogue. Officers need to be held accountable and disciplined when they behave badly, he said.

Were heading into a whole new era when it comes to policing and accountability, he said.

Can you help? The latest Crime Stoppers of McLean County cases

Keith C. Conway, 24, was wanted as of Aug. 7, 2020, on a charge of delivery of cannabis. He is5 feet7 inches tall and weighs143 pounds. He hasblack hair andbrowneyes. His last known address is in Bloomington.

Daniel P. Simpson, 43, was wanted as of July 31, 2020, on a charge of burglary. He is5 feet8 inches tall and weighs190 pounds. He hasbrown hair andblueeyes. His last known address is in Bloomington.

Davis W. Hopkins, 42, was wanted as of July 3, 2020, on a charge of possession of a controlled substance. Heis5 feet11 inches tall and weighs190 pounds. He hasblack hair andgreeneyes. His last known address is in Lexington.

Hopkinsis

Crime Stoppers will pay cash rewards of up to $1000 for information leading to the arrest and indictment of people who commit felony crimes in McLean County. Call (309) 828-1111.

Elizabeth A. Johnson, 39, was wanted as of June 27, 2020, on a charge of obstructing justice. She is5 feet4 inches tall and weighs140 pounds. She hasblack hair andblueeyes. Her last known address is in Bloomington.

Darius D. French, 31, was wanted as of May 19, 2020, on a charge of aggravated driving under the influence. He is6 feet1 inches tall and weighs295 pounds. He hasblack hair andbrowneyes. His last known address is in Bloomington.

Star A. Jones, 26, wasnamed as of May 15, 2020, on a warrant charging her with theft over $500. Sheis 5 feet 4 inches tall and weighs 115 pounds. She has brown hair and brown eyes. Her last known address was in Normal.

Timothy L. King, 21, was wanted as of May 5, 2020, on a robbery charge. He is6 feet tall and weighs155 pounds. He hasblack hair andbrowneyes. His last known address is in Bloomington.

Deonte K. Spates, 21, was wanted as of May 2, 2020, on a warrant charging him with robbery. He is 5 feet 10 inches tall and weighs 135 pounds. He has black hair and brown eyes. His last known address was in Bloomington.

Terrell D. Moon, 33, was wanted as of April 3, 2020, of a warrant charging him with delivery of a controlled substance. He is 5 feet 10 inches tall and weighs 150 pounds. He has black hair and brown eyes. His last known address was in Bloomington.

James L. Fields, 22, was named as of March 27, 2020, on a warrant charging him with delivery of a controlled substance. He is 5 feet 10 inches tall and weighs 200 pounds. He has black hair and brown eyes. His last known address was in Bloomington.

Regina M. Evans, 43, was wanted as of March 4, 2020, on a charge of aggravated driving under the influence. She is5 feet8 inches tall and weighs140 pounds. She hasred hair andgreeneyes. Her last known address is in Normal.

Carl R. Herrman, 74, was wanted as of Feb. 25, 2020, on a charge of theft. He is 6 feet 2 inches tall and weighs180 pounds. He has white hair andbrowneyes. His last known address is in Bloomington.

Continued here:

Watch now: A heightened focus on Central Illinois police agencies' efforts to diversify - Bloomington Pantagraph

U.S. to raise naturalization application fee by more than 80 percent – Fall River Herald News

Immigrants' Assistance Center to hold Citizenship Fair Aug. 27 from 10 a.m. to 4 p.m.

WASHINGTON - The U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) announced last Friday that it is increasing naturalization application fees from $640 to $1,170 a more than 80% increase as of Oct. 2.

This steep increase in the cost of U.S. citizenship is part of a final rule announced by the Department of Homeland Security that will raise fees for certain immigration and naturalization benefit requests, which the USCIS described as necessary in order to meet operation needs as the agency is fee-funded.

Immigrant advocates immediately decried the fee increases saying they will create roadblocks to the integration of immigrants, especially at a time when non-citizens face particularly devastating job losses due to the Covid-19 pandemic.

The announced increase in immigration fees is very concerning, to say the least. It is a very substantial increase that will make it much more difficult for immigrants to attain their dream of becoming U.S. citizens, said Paulo Pinto, Executive Director of the Massachusetts Alliance of Portuguese Speakers. The fees were already very expensive for most immigrants, and the announced increase, added to the current unemployment levels, will severely impact our communities.

Alirio Pereira, Director of Immigrant Integration and Elder Services at MAPS, urged all eligible immigrants to file their citizenship applications prior to the increase.

Even though we expect this decision to be challenged in the courts, it is more important than ever for our community members who are eligible to become U.S. citizens to do so, said Pereira. If youre eligible to start the naturalization process, reach out to MAPS or other local organizations that can help you navigate the process at no cost.

Helena da Silva Hughes, the executive director of the Immigrants Assistance Center, said she would like to hold several citizenship fairs before October to help as many immigrants as possible file their citizenship applications prior to the increase. Due to current Covid-19 restrictions, those citizenship clinics will most likely happen outside in the parking lot with participants wearing facial masks.

We will also do applications everyday, helping as many people as we can, she said. This fee increase is a burden and it will be a huge barrier, especially for our immigrant community because so many of them have lower incomes.

In her view, the rule will prevent many immigrants from seeking and obtaining the right to vote. She questioned whether the increase was intentionally seeking to suppress potential low- and middle-income immigrant voters.

As we know, the majority of our immigrants when they become U.S citizens, they vote at higher rates than natural born citizens, she said. They know the majority of them vote democratic. We have a Republican president and Republican Senate and I really believe they dont want people to become U.S. citizens. I feel its sort of intentional.

The rule removes certain fee exemptions, includes new nominal fees for asylum applicants, and reduces fee waivers to help recover the costs of adjudication.

Several applications for immigration benefits will be impacted by the fee hike. For example, the fee to request a hearing on a decision in naturalization proceedings will increase from $700 to $1,725 (146 percent). The application fee to preserve residence for naturalization purposes will increase from $355 to $1,585 (346 percent).

The USCIS maintains the current fees would leave the agency underfunded by about $1 billion per year.

USCIS is required to examine incoming and outgoing expenditures and make adjustments based on that analysis, said Joseph Edlow, USCIS deputy director for policy in a prepared statement. These overdue adjustments in fees are necessary to efficiently and fairly administer our nations lawful immigration system, secure the homeland and protect Americans.

USCIS officials say the rule accounts for increased costs to adjudicate immigration benefit requests, detect and deter immigration fraud, and thoroughly vet applicants, petitioners and beneficiaries. The rule also supports payroll, technology and operations to accomplish the USCIS mission.

This final rule also encourages online filing by providing a $10 reduction in the fee for applicants who submit forms online that are electronically available from USCIS.

For a full list of changes and a complete table of final fees, see the final rule at https://s3.amazonaws.com/public-inspection.federalregister.gov/2020-16389.pdf.

* * *

The Immigrants Assistance Center (IAC) will host a citizenship clinic at its location on 58 Crapo Street, New Bedford on Thursday, Aug. 27 from 10 a.m. to 4 p.m.

Guidance will be offered to anyone seeking help completing a citizenship application, including the first step of screening for eligibility.

At the same time, the IAC is partnering with the City of New Bedfords Complete Count effort to encourage participation in the 2020 Census. Census workers will be available for assistance during this time as well.

The IAC will also be encouraging voter registration for new citizens, with mail-in forms available.

Centers for Disease Control (CDC) guidelines for safe interaction will be strictly followed. Please wear a mask.

For those unable to attend in person on Aug. 27, the IAC continues to provide phone consultations for many of its services, including citizenship applications. Please call 508-996-8113 to make an appointment.

Whether in phone or in person, the following documents and information are required to begin the citizenship process:

1. Green Card

2. Passport

3. Drivers License or State I.D.

4. Social Security Card

5. Complete addresses where you lived in the past 5 years

6. Spouses information: name, date of birth and date of marriage

5. Previous marriages: name, date of birth, date of marriage and end of marriage

7. Childrens information: name, date of birth, current address, country of birth, a phone number, if applicable

8. A payment of $725.00 payable to U.S. Department of Homeland Security (can be a money order, bank check or personal check).

Excerpt from:

U.S. to raise naturalization application fee by more than 80 percent - Fall River Herald News

Richland Source joins statewide collaborative to shed light on local voters in ‘Ohio Values’ – Richland Source

CINCINNATI Every four years, America turns its attention to Ohio. And for good reason.

Our Midwestern "flyover state" has voted for the winning presidential candidate in 29 of the last 31 presidential elections. That's from 1896 on.

As the 2020 election and the COVID-19 pandemic looms large in the media landscape, Richland Source has joined a collaborative project with a more localized focus.

Journalists from six news outlets across the state came together to give local national and global audiences some advanced insights into our state's electoral magic, straight from the people who know it best Ohioans. All kinds.

The nonprofit audio storytelling platform, A Pictures Worth (APW),supported the creation ofOhio Values, a collaborative suite of audio stories and related images that center community members in narratives focused on their core values and how those values "show up" when they vote in 2020.

To keep up with the latest news on Ohio Values, click here to sign up for our email newsletter.

Not only will Ohio Values provide a suite of local-media-branded audio and digital stories available for use by national and international media outlets looking to gain authentic insights from the state, it will serve as a scalable test case to increase the reach, depth and connections between local and national media outlets in a concerted effort to tell more responsible, authentic and representative narratives about the concerns and priorities of citizens from disparate areas and backgrounds, said Elissa Yancey, co-founder and chief creative officer of APW.

The new statewide responsible journalism collaborative started in February with APW providing specialized training and support to reporters across the state. Journalists learned how to use the story-gathering methods of "A Pictures Worth" and agreed to make the resulting content free and open for all to use, with credit to original sources, of course.

Collaborative members of the Ohio Values project include:

WCPO, Cincinnati

The Cincinnati Herald, Cincinnati

Richland Source, Mansfield

Ashland Source, Ashland

Knox Pages, Mount Vernon

The Devil Strip, Akron

Ohio Values intentionally connects local newsrooms and reporters with one another throughout Ohio to provide them with valuable exposure to and hands-on experience with an exciting new methodology for practicing responsible journalism. Based upon years of journalism practice, research and neuroscience, "A Pictures Worth" provides actionable training and support that enables journalists to:

Acknowledge the inherent power dynamics in their work alongside communities where distrust in journalism is the norm

Center their community members in their narratives

Build thoughtful, effective, community-focused engagement efforts that nurture trust and understanding across differences

Share these community-centered narratives to audiences across the state, the country and the world.

This audio story series, Ohio Values, is intentionally not political, although you will hear some stories that involve political topics and issues. Instead, we made an intentional choice to focus on our people, sharing photographs and stories about what they value the most, whether they're heading into a voting booth or weathering a pandemic.

Visit http://apicturesworth.org for more details about the Ohio Values collaborative.

Do you want to know the who, what, where, why and how in local news? Become a Source member to support the most diverse coverage of our region.

See the original post:

Richland Source joins statewide collaborative to shed light on local voters in 'Ohio Values' - Richland Source

The Crypto Daily Movers and Shakers August 9th, 2020 – Yahoo Finance

Bitcoin, BTC to USD, rose by 1.59% on Saturday. Reversing a 1.52% fall from Friday, Bitcoin ended the day at $11,764.

It was a mixed start to the day. Bitcoin fell to an early morning intraday low $11,523 before finding support.

Steering clear of the first major support level at $11,304, Bitcoin rose to a mid-day intraday high $11,796.

Falling short of the first major resistance level at $11,878, Bitcoin fell back to a low $11,601.

Avoiding sub-$11,600 levels, Bitcoin moved back through to $11,700 levels to deliver the upside on the day.

The near-term bullish trend remained intact, supported by the latest move through to $11,000 levels. For the bears, Bitcoin would need to slide through the 62% FIB of $6,400 to form a near-term bearish trend.

Across the rest of the majors, it was a bullish day for the majors on Saturday.

Cardanos ADA and Tezos led the way, with gains of 5.74% and 9.84% respectively.

Binance Coin (+2.64%), Ethereum (+4.67%), Litecoin (+2.15%), and Trons TRX (+3.19%) also found strong support.

Bitcoin Cash ABC (+1.61%), Bitcoin Cash SV (+1.25%), EOS (+1.89%), Moneros XMR (+1.08%), Ripples XRP (+0.40%), and Stellars Lumen (+0.97%) trailed the pack.

In the current week, the crypto total market cap rose from a Monday low $322.88bn to a Thursday high $355.09bn. At the time of writing, the total market cap stood at $349.48bn.

Bitcoins dominance fell to a Tuesday low 61.24% before rising to a Friday high 63.16%. At the time of writing, Bitcoins dominance stood at 62.15%.

At the time of writing, Bitcoin was down by 0.08% to $11,755. A mixed start to the day saw Bitcoin rise to an early morning high $11,777.1 before falling to a low $11,746.0.

Bitcoin left the major support and resistance levels untested early on.

Elsewhere, it was a mixed start to the day.

Cardanos ADA and Tezos led the way down, with losses of 1.23% and 1.38% respectively.

Binance Coin (-0.75%), EOS (-0.11%), Litecoin (-0.21%), Moneros XMR and Stellars Lumen (-0.44%) also saw red.

Bitcoin Cash ABC (+0.80%), Bitcoin Cash SV (+0.80%), Ethereum (+0.06%), Ripples XRP (+0.09%), and Trons TRX (+0.47%) found early support.

Bitcoin would need to avoid a fall through the $11,694 pivot to support a run at the first major resistance level at $11,866.

Support from the broader market would be needed, however, for Bitcoin to break out from Saturdays high $11,796.

Barring an extended crypto rally, the first major resistance level and Saturdays high would likely cap any upside.

In the event of a crypto breakout, Bitcoin could eye the second major resistance level at $11,967.

A fall through the $11,694 pivot level would bring the first major support level at $11,593 into play.

Barring another extended crypto sell-off, however, Bitcoin should steer clear of sub-$11,400 support levels. The second major support level at $11,421 should limit the downside.

This article was originally posted on FX Empire

See the rest here:

The Crypto Daily Movers and Shakers August 9th, 2020 - Yahoo Finance

The Crypto Daily Movers and Shakers August 3rd, 2020 – Yahoo Finance

Bitcoin, BTC to USD, slid by 6.36% on Sunday. Reversing a 4.01% rally from Saturday, Bitcoin ended the week up by 11.11% to $11,053.8.

A bullish start to the day saw Bitcoin rise to an early morning intraday high $12,097 before hitting reverse.

Bitcoin broke through the first major resistance level at $12,022.8 before sliding to an early morning intraday low $10,548.0.

Bitcoin fell through the first major support level at $11,406.8 and the second major support level at $11,008.9.

Steering clear of the third major support level at $10,392.9, Bitcoin briefly revisited $11,300 levels before easing back.

Bitcoin broke back through the second major support level to limit the loss on the day.

The near-term bullish trend remained intact, supported by the latest move through to $11,000 levels. For the bears, Bitcoin would need to slide through the 62% FIB of $6,400 to form a near-term bearish trend.

Across the rest of the majors, it was a bearish day on Sunday.

Bitcoin Cash ABC (-11.53%), Bitcoin Cash SV (-11.14%), EOS (-10.93%) led the way down.

Cardanos ADA (-7.16%), Litecoin (-8.02%), and Trons TRX (-7.24%) also saw heavy losses

Binance Coin (-3.10%), Ethereum (-3.92%), Moneros XMR (-5.16%), Ripples XRP (-1.25%), Stellars Lumen (-4.85%), and Tezos (-4.89%) saw relatively modest losses on the day.

While it was a bearish Sunday, it was a mixed week.

Ripples XRP rallied by 33.5% to lead the way.

Bitcoin Cash ABC (+13.82%), Bitcoin Cash SV (+15.09%), Ethereum (+19.52%), and Litecoin (+17.95%) also found strong support.

Binance Coin (+7.10%), EOS (+8.23%), Moneros XMR (+8.71%), Stellars Lumen (+3.29%), and Trons TRX (+2.29%) trailed the front runners.

Cardanos ADA (-9.99%) and Tezos (-3.19%) bucked the trend in the week, however.

In the week, the crypto total market cap rose from a Monday low $284.79bn to a Sunday high $362.06bn. At the time of writing, the total market cap stood at $331.14bn.

Bitcoins dominance rose to a Tuesday high 64.58% before sliding to a Sunday low 61.66%. At the time of writing, Bitcoins dominance stood at 62.07.

At the time of writing, Bitcoin was up by 0.69% to $11,130.5. A mixed start to the day saw Bitcoin fall to an early morning low $10,943.0 before rising to a high $11,169.0.

Bitcoin left the major support and resistance levels untested early on.

Elsewhere, it was a bullish start to the day. Stellars Lumen was up by 2.46%, at the time of writing, to lead the way.

Bitcoin would need to move through the $11,233 pivot to support a run at the first major resistance level at $11,918.

Support from the broader market would be needed, however, for Bitcoin to break out from $11,500 levels.

Barring an extended crypto rally, the first major resistance level would likely cap any upside.

In the event of a crypto breakout, Bitcoin could eye the second major resistance level at $12,782.

Failure to move through the $11,233 pivot level would bring the first major support level at $10,369 into play.

Barring an extended crypto sell-off, however, Bitcoin should steer clear of sub-$10,500 levels on the day.

This article was originally posted on FX Empire

Here is the original post:

The Crypto Daily Movers and Shakers August 3rd, 2020 - Yahoo Finance

Opinion: Starting a conversation: What could SC do? – Greenville News

Oran Smith, Special to the Greenville News Published 11:59 a.m. ET Aug. 7, 2020 | Updated 12:00 p.m. ET Aug. 7, 2020

Lyrics are from songs performed by Elvis Presley.

We have a long way to go in the living out of our all men are created equal national creed. So to make real progress as a nation and as a state, all Americans and all South Carolinians conservative, moderate and liberal -- must take stock.

But where will we find common ground in the political world that is 2020?

If I could be you, if you could be me for just one hour. If we could find a way to get inside each other's minds. If you could see through my eyes instead of your ego, I believe you'd be surprised to see that you've been blind.

I know I have looked into my own heart in recent weeks and gotten very uncomfortable. I have asked myself as both a believer and as a person who works in public policy: How have I been blind? What can I do?

"Dowe simply turn our heads and look the other way?"

Perhaps for a person of faith and a policy researcher like myself, it starts with refusing to look away, to understand that there are statues and statutes that are hurting many of my fellow South Carolinians in soul and in sustenance.

Purely political common ground is hard, so perhaps we should start with opportunities for agreement around policy.

1.Civil asset forfeiture. Police can take property without the owner being convicted of any crime.

Recent from the Greenville News: Sweeping civil forfeiture reform could come in SC with case drawing national attention

2. Court fees. According to an Institute for Justice survey of state laws, South Carolina is fourth-worst in the nation for taxation by citation, regressive court fees that trap people financially for minor offenses.

3. Payday lending. The endless cycle of debt lives also in the predatory practices of some in the payday loan industry.

4. Education segregation. A students destiny shouldnt be determined by district lines. Parents should be able to choose any public school that has a seat for their child.

5. Energy inequality. South Carolinians pay the highest power bills in the nation. We know who that hurts most.

6. Reverse Robin Hood. Perhaps without intention, the South Carolina Education Lottery is a wealth transfer from poor to middle-class South Carolinians. More need-based aid is needed.

7. Barriers to work. Small businesses often can't hire willing workers for simple tasks because of overly burdensome licensure requirements from state government.

Oran P. Smith is Senior Fellow at Palmetto Promise Institue.(Photo: Submitted photo)

"If I can dream of a better land where all my brothers walk hand in hand, tell me why, can't my dream come true?"

My list is a only a small part of the answer. But perhaps it could jump start a conversation about specific ways to expand opportunity and grow equality not for the few, but for the many, in the state we love.

Oran Smith is a Greer native and resident who serves as Senior Fellow at Palmetto Promise Institute.

Lyrics are from songs performed by Elvis Presley, who passed away 43 years ago this month in Memphis, eight miles from The Lorraine Motel, where Dr. Martin Luther KingJr. was assassinated. King was killed in the year that until 2020 was Americas worst: 1968.

Read or Share this story: https://www.greenvilleonline.com/story/opinion/2020/08/07/starting-conversation-what-could-sc-do/3288526001/

Read more from the original source:

Opinion: Starting a conversation: What could SC do? - Greenville News

Speak out before it is too late | Journal-news | journal-news.net – Martinsburg Journal

Betty DeHaven

Martinsburg

"Silence in the face of evil is itself evil: God will not hold us guiltless. Not to speak is to speak. Not to act is to act" quoted by Dietrich Bonhoeffer.

Are we disgusted yet by the liberals, Democrats, George Soros and Black Lives Matter? Why isn't our Congress doing something about this? People are being killed. Where is the voice of the people who work for the American citizens? Are we supposed to put up with this anarchy? When will it cease? Are we to allow these thugs to break into our homes and rob, injure and kill us? The liberal leaders are undermining our Constitution. These mayors and governors are no better than the czars who have run other countries and have taken them down to nothing.

We have to fight off the communism encroaching our nation. I will definitely vote for President Donald Trump, Vice President Mike Pence, Representative Alex Mooney, and the conservatives who represent the State of West Virginia. They are the only ones whom I can trust to lead us. I am in fear that this country will end up in a war between the liberals and conservatives. The governors tell us we can't go to the beaches, but allow the thugs to run the streets.

The citizens in Cuba and Venezuela have lost their freedoms. Is this what we are willing to do? To give in to a bunch of thieves, bullies, murderers? When are the rest of you going to speak up?

These thugs don't even know their history, because they are tearing down our statues and even threatening to tear down our Jesus statues. They want to keep the chaos going on. Let us fight this tyranny with our words.

While Jack and I were reading scripture this morning from Nehemiah 4:4-5, the words jumped out at me. "Hear us, O our God, for we are despised. Turn their insults back on their own heads. Give them over as plunder in a land of captivity. Do not cover up their guilt or blot out their sins from your sight, for they have thrown insults in the face of the builders." It is always right to pray that God will put down his enemies and their intentions to destroy his work or harm his people. To you thugs out there, do know that there are righteous people who are praying against your evil deeds.

It is despicable how these thugs are treating our police in these liberal cities. To think that each day the police goes out to protect the people and are abused by these criminals is disgusting. John 15:13 "Greater love has no one than this: that he lay down his life for his friends." I want my family protected by the police. Thank you to the police who watch over us. To de-fund them is totally absurd.

When are you going to stand up for what is right? Speak out before it is too late.

Go here to read the rest:

Speak out before it is too late | Journal-news | journal-news.net - Martinsburg Journal

[Herald Interview] Flying leaflets into NK was against basic rule of democracy: senior official – The Korea Herald

The floating of leaflets and other items posed serious risks to the lives of residents in the border regions by raising inter-Korean tensions; dealt a blow to the regional economy by resulting in a (local governments) ban on entry (into off-limits zones in border areas to fly things into the North) and decline in the number of tourists. Also, most of the leaflets flown were found in the South, increasing the load of trash to clean up, Lee Jong-joo, chief of the ministrys humanitarian cooperation bureau, told The Korea Herald in an email interview.

The ministry has asked the groups dozens of times to stop sending the leaflets into the North via official documents, meetings with them and telephone calls.

The ministry in June canceled its approval for the incorporation of two groups that floated balloons carrying anti-Pyongyang leaflets and other items into the skies hoping they would land in North Korea.

The groups filed an administrative lawsuit against the ministrys action, and the leader of one of the groups claimed that the ministry never asked them to refrain from floating the leaflets.

What is so wrong about sending rice to starving North Koreans? he asked.

Lee rejects this criticism.

Should (private groups) wish to send rice to North Korean residents or promote their right to know, there are various ways to do so while complying with domestic laws, and without infringing on the rights of residents in border areas, she said.

The ministry is also inspecting 25 North Korea-related nongovernmental groups registered with the ministry, including 13 run by North Korean defectors, to see if they are run according to the provisions under which they were allowed to register with the government.

In return for the governments approval of their incorporation, the nonprofit, private organizations are required to submit annual reports on their income and spending, lists of their property, and activities that they have engaged in.

The UN Special Rapporteur on North Korea (Tomas Ojea Quintana) recommended in an email to the Unification Ministry that we put the inspection on hold, and continue dialogue with the groups, Lee said.

The government has understood this request as an emphasis on communication with the groups.

The government has already explained its position to the groups pending inspection via individual meetings or phone calls, and has been hearing them out, Lee said.

The senior official also said she anticipates that such communication allowed the groups to better understand the governments intent regarding its inspection.

Inter-Korean exchanges have been stalled for over a decade since Seoul imposed its own sanctions against Pyongyang in response to North Koreas torpedo attack on a South Korean naval ship Cheonan in March 2010.

South Korean nongovernmental groups, which had engaged in projects in North Korea such as hospital building and helping improve farming techniques for 10 years under the liberal administrations until 2007, were not able to enter North Korea in the next decade under former Presidents Lee Myung-bak and Park Geun-hye whose North Korea policy prioritized denuclearization.

Unification Minister Lee In-young, who was sworn in late last month, is pushing for a breakthrough in the impasse through resumption of humanitarian projects, starting with health and medical aid.

The ministry has already approved 21 requests from private groups this year to send disease prevention and medical supplies to North Korea, including 800 million won ($673,000) worth of COVID-19 prevention devices approved in late July.

Last week, it announced the provision of $10 million for a World Food Program project to supply food and nutrition to young children and women in North Korea.

As for matters that have to do with eating, illnesses and seeing things before dying, the government will immediately push for nonstop inter-Korean cooperation, without any political or national security-related calculations, the bureau chief Lee said, referring to the three priority areas set by the unification minister.

Through close communication and collaboration with the groups, the government will continue to help expand their autonomy and responsibility, while faithfully playing our part to get exemptions from (international) sanctions and approve exports of items (to the North).

By Kim So-hyun(sophie@heraldcorp.com)

Go here to read the rest:

[Herald Interview] Flying leaflets into NK was against basic rule of democracy: senior official - The Korea Herald

Improve mental health care before forcing it on people – Los Angeles Times

The Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors and a handful of state legislators have been trying to change Californias landmark mental health laws to make it easier to force treatment on people who dont want it. But bills to scrap or change the law that limits forced treatment the Lanterman-Petris-Short Act, signed into law by Gov. Ronald Reagan in 1967 havent made it through the Legislature.

So last year critics tried a different tack: Require an official audit of LPS and how it operates in L.A. and two other counties, presumably to show how badly the act fails, and how outdated the notion is that people should have more say in choosing their own mental health treatments.

Instead, the audit released late last month found that the act gives counties all the authority they need to treat people in crisis. The real problem, the audit found, is not the patients right to self-determination, but the failure of the state and counties to provide sufficient ongoing care and housing after the forced treatment ends. Without those services, patients end up in a dismal and destructive cycle careening from a 72-hour 5150 hold to the street, to another mental health crisis that endangers themselves or others, and back to another three-day hold. Each new breakdown can cause further lasting damage.

Counties sometimes obtain renewable yearlong conservatorships but dont provide sufficient treatment, often because it is unavailable.

Perhaps its time for LPS critics to rethink their approach. The state has to find a way to fund, and counties to provide, ongoing mental health care. Sufficient and humane services (and housing, when needed) that leave patients a voice in important decisions and dont make them feel trapped could go a long way toward meeting the states mental health challenge.

There can be no doubt that California is in the midst of a mental health emergency. Serious mental illness afflicts a significant portion of the states huge homeless population, although contrary to a widespread perception far less than half of the tens of thousands of people on the streets. Between 30% and 40% of jail inmates also suffer a significant mental health condition. Less noticed are the families doing their best to care for a stricken relative. The COVID-19 crisis and the companion isolation and anxiety only exacerbate the condition of people already struggling with psychological problems.

Like other states, California once had a robust but deeply flawed system of mental hospitals that largely kept patients out of public view but too often failed to properly treat them. Forced treatment in warehouse-type institutions was phased out and was to be replaced by community-based outpatient or, when necessary, inpatient treatment.

But the community services never materialized to match the volume of need.

The LPS law, fully implemented in the 1970s, limited the states ability to institutionalize people and to treat them against their will.

Now the debate over mental health care too often breaks down along ideological lines over the question of which is paramount a persons liberty and self-determination, or that persons health and well-being. The results are often surprising. Conservatives might be expected to promote individual rights. If requiring a mask during a pandemic is an unwarranted intrusion on liberty, for example, how much more so is government-enforced psychiatric treatment? Yet many conservatives and other skeptics of government find themselves pressing for re-institutionalization. Liberals who might support masks and government-ordered business closures appear split on compelled mental health treatment.

Beyond ideology, California has a serious shortage of mental health services in any setting. LPS doesnt require the counties or the state to fix that problem. Some county mental health professionals want the act amended to compel them to provide care, because only then, they argue, will counties step up to avoid costly lawsuits.

And there is indeed a crisis, not addressed by LPS, of mentally ill people who are slowly deteriorating but dont recognize their condition (or dont care) and are not undergoing the kind of breakdown that the law deems fair game for a 5150 hold. But Californias priority should be providing people the services they need, not forcing them to use services that are inadequate to keep them out of the street-to-care-to-street cycle.

There will be no way to fix mental health care on the cheap. The need is profound, but its not so much the law standing in the way as it is the failure to live up to the promises of more than half a century ago to provide adequate mental health treatment where it is most effective.

See original here:

Improve mental health care before forcing it on people - Los Angeles Times

Inflation Is Coming, and Big Tech Won’t Protect You – Yahoo Finance

(Bloomberg Opinion) -- Over the past decade, its almost been too easy for Americans to manage their wealth. A textbook 60/40 portfolio in its simplest incarnation, exposure to the S&P 500 Index and Treasury bonds was an effortless winner. The U.S. boasted the worlds best stock market, and bonds, apart from offering interest income, provided a nice hedge against equity risks.

Now we live in extraordinary times thatdemanda reshuffle. Swapping out some bonds for gold and some U.S. technology stocks for Chinese ones could offer a better hedge: Both can be consideredcredit default swaps against President Donald Trumps chaotic policymaking.

You could argue that the wreckage left byCovid-19, combined with whatsquickly shaping up to be a cold war between the worlds two largest economies,is the closest weve come to World War III. And just like wartime episodes of the past, were seeing disrupted global supply chains, border lockdownsand restricted movements in labor.

War is inflationary. The cheap car parts made in Chinas inland city of Wuhan can no longer land in the U.S., and your French wine could cost more as transportation logistics gettrickier.Moreover, the Federal Reserve has been flooding its financial system with cash. In just three months, assets held by the central bank ballooned by two-thirds, to almost $7 trillion. To make matters worse, the Fed is mulling a more relaxed stance towardinflation, ready to abandon preemptive rate hikeseven though consumer expectations have beenticking up since May.

As Ive argued in a recent piece for Bloomberg Businessweek, bonds are no longer effective equity hedges in an ultra-low-rate world that faces inflationary pressure; gold can do a better job. But after a neck-breaking rally, its natural to ask if werealready too late to the game.

History can be our guide. After the collapse of Lehman Brothers in 2008, gold broke out and continued marching higher until September 2011, even asTea Party belt-tighteners took control of the national narrative in the 2010 midterm election. A decade on, the Republican Partys libertarian wing has all but disappeared, and is replaced by a cross-the-aisle nod to modern monetary theorists, who brushaside fiscal austerity. The Tea Party is no longer here to sour the gold rally.

Meanwhile, since were at war, might it be smart tohedge against the possibility of losing? This cold war isnt over a plot of land or sea, but domination over next-generation technology.

The U.S. has the absolute advantage now, withchip and robotic designs far ahead of Chinas,but that edge is slipping away. While Washington is wrangling over trillions of dollars ofstimulusto fend off a recession caused by waves of coronavirus outbreaks, China, which has the pandemic relatively undercontrol, is only strengthening its tech resolve.

For Beijing, its killing two birds with one stone. The $1.4 trillion hard tech invesmentis the nations new fiscal stimulus package. Instead of building more roads to nowhere, China is installing 5G base stations.

Its high time to consider diversifying from U.S. stocks, anyhow. There have been nagging worries about the market being on a tear even withthe economy in the dumps. Meanwhile, Big Techhas become too dominant, with the top five mega-cap names now accounting for more than 20% of the S&P 500 and its entire gain this year. This mighthelpexplain why mainland firms that recently went public in New York are outperforming their U.S. counterparts, despite the Trump administrations attempt to delist China Inc.

Now, I am not advocating that investors plowtheir money into Chinas big tech companies, because they face the exact same problems that U.S. Big Techhas overbought stocks and impossible expectations. This years passive flows only worsened the concentration risk of benchmark indexes. Alibaba Group Holding Ltd. and Tencent Holdings Ltd. account for a third of the MSCI China Index and about 14% of the MSCI Emerging Markets Index.

Rather, investors should do their homework on smaller hard-tech companies. The truth is, once you identify a promising tech seedling, it doesnttake aventure capitalists patience to watch it blossom. Indias Reliance Industries Ltd. joined the Century Club stocks with over $100 billion market cap in just three months. Tencent is another example of a melt-up.

Story continues

Good wealth management is all about diversification. If youreunsure of Trumps wartime strategies, add some of gold and China exposure to your portfolio.

(Adds details on concentration risk of Chinas big tech companies in the 11th paragraph.)

This column does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the editorial board or Bloomberg LP and its owners.

Shuli Ren is a Bloomberg Opinion columnist covering Asian markets. She previously wrote on markets for Barron's, following a career as an investment banker, and is a CFA charterholder.

For more articles like this, please visit us at bloomberg.com/opinion

Subscribe now to stay ahead with the most trusted business news source.

2020 Bloomberg L.P.

Follow this link:

Inflation Is Coming, and Big Tech Won't Protect You - Yahoo Finance

WGFD: A Day In The Life Of Gillette’s Wildlife Biologist – County 17

There we go, Erika Peckham said Thursday evening pulling the big green pickup to the side of a Campbell County gravel road northeast of Gillette.

She grabbed a pair of binoculars from the center console and stepped out of the vehicle glassing a hillside some 200 yards distant.

Two does and two fawns, she said. This time of year, the does and fawns are found together, and the bucks usually roam around in bachelor groups.

Peckham is a wildlife biologist for the Wyoming Game and Fish Department (WGFD). In 2019, she was selected as Wildlife Manager of the Year by the Wyoming Game Wardens Association.

Whats a day in the life of a wildlife biologist like? According to Peckham, thats an impossible question to answer.

No two days are the same, she said. Its definitely not a nine-to-five job.

Its August, and every August, in addition to her other duties, Peckham takes part in a statewide pronghorn count. Shes up before daylight every day, and out until after dark, riding roads and walking trails, counting the animals. The information she gathers will be combined with information from other biologists and game wardens to get a close estimate of how many antelope Wyoming has. The information is used to plan hunting seasons and set limits to ensure the health of the herd.

Peckham is a Michigan native, who grew up southeast of Detroit. A life-long animal lover, as a child she had dreams of being a veterinarian. That changed in college though, when she found the wildlife and fisheries management program at Montana State University. It was a perfect fit.

She worked several seasonal jobs both with the federal government and private corporations, doing consulting work. One of those jobs brought her to Gillette. She liked the area, and when a position opened up with WGFD she jumped at it. She hired on as habitat extension biologist in 2008, then moved into her current role in early 2012. Shes also a private pilot who, when shes not working for WGFD, sometimes contracts for local companies to do aerial surveys. The hours she puts in with both endeavors dont leave much time for outside interests.

I do like to take care of myself, so I make time for the gym, Peckham said. But the way I work doesnt leave a lot of time for hobbies.

From September through December, her duties revolve around hunting season. The days are even longer then, she said. She mans check stations and often finds herself educating hunters, particularly those from out of state, on Wyomings regulations.

Mile after mile Peckham drives the gravel backroads of rural Campbell County, stopping at every antelope sighting, glassing fields and making notations. While she works she talks.

--Advertisement--Story Continues Below

--Advertisement--Story Continues Below

Theyre not really antelope, although we call them that, she explained. In fact, their closest relative is the giraffe, if you can believe that.

Peckham knows her job, and she knows the animals she studies. She stopped on a straight stretch of isolated road and pointed ahead. On a fence post 50 feet away sat a large hawk.

Thats a Ferruginous Hawk, she said. This is neat, because there arent that many of them. Theyre my favorite.

As the hawk took flight Peckhams cell phone rang.

Thats the dying animal number, she said somberly.

As much as she loves her job, theres one duty she dislikes immensely, and shes called to perform it far too often. When a wild animal is injured and a citizen calls for help the call gets routed either to Peckham or to one of the local game wardens she works closely with. Whether its a deer or antelope struck by a car, or a sick animal someone spotted on their property, shes frequently tasked with dealing with the situation.

Its definitely the hard part of my job because most of the time theres not much we can do, she said. Ive been asked before why I cant just take a deer or antelope to an animal hospital, and I have to explain that we dont really have one of those. Often were so far out that theres not a good option.

Sometimes the most merciful thing she can do is end the animals suffering. But its not something she enjoys.

As the sun sets Peckham makes her way back toward town. She will spend the rest of the evening compiling data and entering it into the WGFDs system.

Tomorrow morning before the sun is up she will load up and head out again.

For Erika Peckham, its just another day at the office.

More:

WGFD: A Day In The Life Of Gillette's Wildlife Biologist - County 17