Spiritual coaches aim to ease COVID-19, other health disparities in West Baltimore – Yahoo News

BALTIMORE Diabetes, heart disease and other ailments had been disproportionately cutting lives short in the disadvantaged neighborhoods of West Baltimore for decades when the coronavirus pandemic emerged and piled on.

A group of Episcopal Church members found that to be something of a last straw.

Buoyed by the recent social justice movement, three Black women from the church with backgrounds in health care are launching a program to train peer coaches who can guide, motivate and otherwise help the largely minority populations in some hard-hit neighborhoods figure out how to live healthier.

We need people in the community who are not talking at us but talking with us. said Carol Scott, an emergency room physician and one of the co-directors of the program called Kindred Coaches. We need people who can provide facts and information and can inspire.

She said people who are healthier have a better chance of weathering the coronavirus or avoiding it altogether as well as other diseases that the Baltimore Health Department has said produces a 20-year gap in life expectancy between the citys most well-off and worse-off neighborhoods.

Scott said her faith led her to help organize the program that begins training coaches this week, though the coaches and those they coach do not have to be Episcopalian or any religion.

Peer coaching isnt a new idea, she and others in the program say. This program follows others in Baltimore that have had some success tackling the intractable health problems of violence and overdose deaths.

And public health officials have turned increasingly to the faith community, with deep connections in Baltimore neighborhoods, to get residents such things as regular blood pressure checks, fresh food or health insurance.

Scott said she saw her church, Memorial Episcopal Church in Bolton Hill, as a natural place to launch the program. The church brought in the Episcopal Diocese of Maryland and the Union of Black Episcopalians to broaden the impact.

Story continues

In Maryland, Blacks make up a disproportionate 41% of the deaths from COVID-19, the disease caused by the coronavirus. Baltimore City and Prince Georges County, with large Black populations, have some of the states highest rates of infection.

A recent study from Johns Hopkins University researchers offers further evidence that socioeconomic factors and geography have played a role during the pandemic. The researchers compared data from socioeconomically challenged ZIP codes in seven states including Maryland to data from less burdened ZIP codes and found the risk was far higher in challenged areas nearly across the board.

The study, published in Frontiers of Public Health, surmised that communities comprised largely of racial minorities and economically challenged households were more likely to be exposed to the coronavirus because they have low-wage essential jobs, including in health care. The workers also are more likely to live in overcrowded housing where its harder to keep a distance.

Such results do not surprise Scott, who co-authored a 2003 article in Academic Emergency Medicine about how minorities tap medical care differently due to such factors as lack of access to care or insurance or strong relationships with doctors.

Its a reason she became a coach herself through Wellcoaches, a health and wellness coach training business. She tapped her own relationship with Margaret Moore, the company founder and CEO, who agreed to provide trainers at no cost to Kindred Coaches.

Moore had been moved by the social justice efforts around the country and already had been thinking about how she could help. She reached out to Wellcoaches Black coaches across the country to recruit for the Baltimore program.

We trained 1,000 coaches a year, Moore said. We can scale. Baltimore will be the pilot, but we want to take this around the country.

She said the coaches know how to facilitate conversation where people chose their own way; figure out what motivates them.

Moore considers obesity the biggest scourge, leading to diabetes, high blood pressure and other conditions. Coaches would work on changing peoples mindsets and behaviors by helping them figure out why its important to make a change.

For some, its not wanting to end up a burden on their kids, others want to be a role model or feel less lousy. Others just want to look better in their jeans, she said.

Then, Moore said, the coaches will continue to use that motivation to keep people on track, working with individuals or groups for months or longer.

Rev. Grey Maggiano, rector of Memorial Episcopal Church, said hes struck by the disparities that exist just blocks apart near his church. He believes a spiritual-based coaching team could make a big impact in the West Baltimore neighborhood where he lives and works beyond the pandemic.

Whenever grant money is released around a crisis, often the money disappears when the crisis goes away, he said. Here were trying to build a network of peer coaches who can continue to provide resources and support that can be activated when something else happens but also has continuing resources.

Much of the program is being done on a volunteer basis, with Maggiano looking for small grants to pay some additional speakers during training and produce public service announcements.

Wellcoaches also said it is working generally on getting coaches paid by establishing official billing codes for coaching and getting insurers to provide reimbursements. Then coaching can be a full-time career rather than volunteer work, cementing the availability of the service.

Kindred Coaches first cohort of about 20 coaches is beginning a series of twice-weekly online sessions this week to learn how to direct small groups or individuals to take charge of their own health.

Linda Johnson-Harvey was among those signing on to become a coach.

Shes already been doing work as apostle at Fragrance of Faith Ministry. She has worked to provide care to those suffering trauma and provide fresh food where access is limited. Training with Kindred Coaches will expand my toolbox, she said.

Since the social justice movement took off after the death in May of George Floyd, a Minneapolis Black man in police custody, shes felt a clarion call to address racial inequities. With the pandemic, she said that must include addressing health care inequities.

She views coaching as a means to build trust in disenfranchised communities who have not felt welcomed or comfortable seeking medical care. Many have felt they couldnt afford or access care.

Well look you in the eye and say Im here and how can I help you walk out and take the next step to the doctors office or whatever you need to do, Johnson-Harvey said.

Well help people feel safe, valued and helped, she said. This at a time when were dealing with two major health things, health disparities and inequities both heavy hitters. Its time.

2020 The Baltimore Sun

Visit The Baltimore Sun at http://www.baltimoresun.com

Distributed by Tribune Content Agency, LLC.

View post:

Spiritual coaches aim to ease COVID-19, other health disparities in West Baltimore - Yahoo News

Indulgence for cemetery visits extended to spiritual visits and whole month of November – Aleteia EN

By the special mandate of His Holiness Pope Francis, the Apostolic Penitentiary released on Friday some changes to the normal practice for obtaining indulgences in the month of November. The Decree containing these modifications was signed October 22, the liturgical memorial of Pope St John Paul II.Plenary Indulgence during month of November

Due to the coronavirus pandemic and the need to avoid large groups from forming, the Plenary Indulgence applicable to the deceased by those who visit a cemetery has been extended beyond the normal dates of November 1-8. This year, the indulgence can be obtained by anyone who visits a cemetery, even if only mentally, on any day in November, and devoutly prays for the faithful departed.

Regarding the Plenary Indulgence attached to All Souls Day, November 2, this year, it can be obtained not only on the preceding or succeeding Sunday, or on the actual Feast day, but on any other day of the month chosen by each member of the faithful.

In this case, the indulgence is obtained by devoutly visiting a church or an oratory, along with the recitation of the Our Father and the Creed, and the other requirements associated with a Plenary Indulgence.

For anyone who cannot leave their home for various reasons, including anti-Covid restrictions, they too can obtain the Plenary Indulgence by uniting themselves spiritually to other members of the faithful.

In this case, the condition of being completely detached from sin and the intention of completing the other requirements for obtaining a Plenary Indulgence remain. These conditions are Sacramental Confession, reception of Holy Communion and prayer for the Holy Fathers intentions.

The Decree suggests that such prayer take place before an image of Jesus or the Blessed Virgin Mary. Among the various prayers that are recommended are prayers for the deceased, Morning or Evening Prayer from the Office of the Dead, the Rosary, the Divine Mercy Chaplet, meditating on various Gospel passages proposed for the liturgy of the Dead, or completing a work of mercy by offering to God the suffering and discomforts of ones own life.

Directing a word to priests, the Decree asks that they make the Sacrament of Confession generously available and that they make Holy Communion available to the sick. In addition, as customary, all priests are invited to offer three Masses on All Souls Day.

See the article here:

Indulgence for cemetery visits extended to spiritual visits and whole month of November - Aleteia EN

Russia is fighting coronavirus with prayers: a companion of Putins spiritual father has published a special book – Pledge Times

In Russia, where hospitals complain about the lack of places to store the bodies of those who died from coronavirus infection, a book with prayers against COVID-19 was launched on sale.

As writes Sign, author of the book Coronavirus. Prayers to help the sick and those who are at risk - Vladimir Zobern. He is an associate of Bishop Tikhon Shevkunov, who is called Putins confessor.

The price of the book is about 300 rubles (more than 100 hryvnia).

We will remind that in the spring of this year Shevkunov declared that God is not a humanist, but a philanthropist. They say that is why he allowed the coronavirus epidemic so that people learn to love their neighbors and through this they know God himself.

By the way, the French actor Gerard Depardieu, who recently converted to Orthodoxy, his spiritual father named Tikhon Shevkunov.

Image by Orna Wachman from Pixabay.

21

Read us on Telegram channel, Facebookand Twitter

View post:

Russia is fighting coronavirus with prayers: a companion of Putins spiritual father has published a special book - Pledge Times

We are proud and excited to announce that Terraformers is now part of the Goblinz line up! – Gamasutra

[This unedited press release is made available courtesy of Gamasutra and its partnership with notable game PR-related resource GamesPress.]

Terraformers is a roguelite 3X in which you terraform Mars and establish humanity there.It is developed by the Swiss dev team of Asteroid Lab!

Explore the wonders of the planet, exploit its resources and expand by setting up new cities. Start the terraforming process: warm the planet, create oceans and spread life!

Key features:

Alexis Giard Programmer

Terraformers is targeted for launch in Q2-Q3 2021 on PC in a first stage.

For more information:

Press contact:[emailprotected]

Go here to see the original:

We are proud and excited to announce that Terraformers is now part of the Goblinz line up! - Gamasutra

We asked Kim Stanley Robinson: Can science fiction save us? – TheWestNews

What does the future hold? In our new series Imagining the Next Future, Polygon explores the new era of science fiction in movies, books, TV, games, and beyond to see how storytellers and innovators are imagining the next 10, 20, 50, or 100 years during a moment of extreme uncertainty. Follow along as we deep dive into the great unknown.

We asked Kim Stanley Robinson: Can science fiction save us?can map a positive future in an unrelentingly negative era, we naturally started thinking about Kim Stanley Robinson. The novelist the L.A. Times Review of Books called our last great utopian visionary and the New Yorker called one of the most important political writers working in America today, Robinson is known specifically for dense, thoughtful novels about where Earth might go based on science and culture today. The trilogy hes best known for Red Mars, Green Mars, and Blue Mars uses terraforming in space as a way to raise the issue of reclaiming our own Earthly environment, and to consider how we interact with it. His 2017 novel New York 2140 is set in a future New York thats flooded due to climate change, and like many of his other books, it presents utopian alternatives to capitalism.

And his latest book, The Ministry for the Future, again models a series of attempts to contain and control climate change, in a sprawling story that acknowledges personal and public problems with systemic change, but still comes across as more hopeful than pessimistic. Polygon spoke with Robinson by phone to discuss the problems with science fiction utopias, how theyre sparked real change in the past, and how we use science fiction in everyday thinking.

Can science fiction save us in our present political and cultural circumstances? Is it a useful teaching tool to help us think about how to solve our present problems, or model better ways of living?

Well, its the latter, for sure. Whether its the former depends on whether we pay attention. But let me answer a little more at length.

If you think of science fiction as just a kind of modeling exercise, everybody is a science fiction writer in their own lives. You make plans based on modeling in your mind. When youre feeling hopeful, you have a kind of utopian plan: if you do these things, youll get to a good place. And then when youre afraid, you have these worries that if you do these things, youll get to a bad place. So the fundamental exercise of science fiction is a very natural human thing. And then when it gets written down in long narrative forms, like science fiction novels, everybody recognizes the exercises involved there. Although when I say that, I realize that, actually, lots of people dont like to read science fiction, so theyre not recognizing the way books are the same as what they do for their own lives. Thats surprising to me, but it happens a lot.

Anyway, science fiction is a modeling exercise where all the science fiction put together, especially all the near-future visions, they range from totally horrible to perhaps quite nice. Its heavier-weighted at the disaster end than at the utopian end, maybe because its easier, or maybe because its more shockingly interesting to read. Its not like going to town meetings and reading blueprints for plumbing facilities. The utopian end of science fiction has a reputation for being a dull, eat-your-greens type fiction, so theres less of it compared to the disaster stuff. But there is both. And if you read a lot of it, one hopes youre prepared for anything.

[quads id=3]

That isnt 100% true, but youre maybe better prepared than if you hadnt read it. In that sense, I think science fiction could be a great teaching tool for people. You cant read all science fiction, and if youre reading nothing but space opera, none of this would obtain. Because the problems of spaceships flying faster than light across the galaxy are not always immediately applicable to the situation were in here on Earth. So its a specific wing of science fiction Im talking about that could be helpful if people read it.

With a book like New York 2140, are you actively out to teach people? To model a positivist future where people can make real individual change?

Yeah, I am! I consider my novels, amongst many other things, to be my political activism. Im interested in portraying futures where there are more cooperative, altruistic, post-capitalist systems that are working well. I try to model them on things already going on in this world that seem to be better to me than the dominant global neoliberal order. And then pretend that those small communal efforts around the world intensify and take over, so their emergence signals an emerging world order that would work better with reconciling humanity and the biosphere. Because we have to come into a balance with our biosphere, or else were in terrible trouble.

I do that on purpose in the New York novel, very explicitly so. I was trying to work on how to make people think about how finance works, how it can be made to work for us, rather than for extracting our money for the 1%. So yeah, for sure.

Youre celebrated for a level of research and realism in your novels, regardless of whether theyre near-future or set in space. Is part of the urge for that level of realism just that you cant model a real and inspiring future if youre not working from real facts?

Thats one way of putting it, and I would agree with that. But what Id also say is that, along with thinking of my novels as my political activism, Im just an art-for-arts-sake kind of English-major guy. I would like to write good novels. And thats my overriding consideration. And its a kind of life-quest thing, or a religious quest. What makes a good novel? When I think about them as a reader, what I like in a novel is that kind of dense feeling of reality, where you read it and go, Yeah, thats the way life really is.

If you set novels in the future, like I seem compelled to do, and you want your readers to say, Yeah, thats the way life really is, you have to overcompensate a little bit. I used to call it cardboard sets. You know how you look at the TV Star Trek from the 1960s, and you can see that the spaceships bridge was made of cardboard and plywood? Science fiction, to me, has too many cardboard sets and backdrops, and it reduces your ability to take the story in as something serious and moving. So in other words, to make a good novel, and yet also have the story set in the feature, which is a bit of a crazy thing, I had to overcompensate and try to make them even more realistic than your ordinary realist novel.

So then they become a little fact-heavy. Ive had to work against being too ponderous, or overcompensating too far. But yeah, thats the reason Ive gotten caught up, in its almost like Im in a double bind. Im trying to do two things at once that dont match up very well. And it causes the distortions in my books that make them weird. Ive long since reconciled myself to that. Its actually a good thing to be different. And its a good thing to have weird novels, because there are too many novels that arent weird enough. Theyre too easy and too ordinary, and they slip through your mind, and then youve forgotten them and the writer. So to be a little bizarre and obdurate, so its actually a bit of work, and even sometimes irritating? Well, thats part of the experience of reading one of my novels, and afterward, you remember it better. [Laughs]

[quads id=4]

At least I hope so. I mean, thats a good way of looking at it. You know, they are very controversial books. Im highly aware that I get a high positive and a high negative. There are a lot of people who think Im just simply inept, because I dont do it like other people do. And Im not very fast-paced, although I would like to be. Id like to show people are wrong. I have fast-paced sections in my book all the time. But the ultimate effect is that my books are these big monsters.

The LA Review of Books referred to you as our last great utopian visionary. What do you think of that title, or at least the utopian visionary part?

I think thats fine. Ive rolled the dice toward doing utopian fiction. There isnt very much of it the canon of utopias could be listed on your fingers and toes. And yet I think theyre very valuable. Occasionally, they have effects in the real world. Edward Bellamys Looking Backward from 1888 was a big part of the progressive movement 120 years ago. H.G. Wells utopian novels had a huge impact on the Bretton Woods agreement and the settlements after World War II. A good utopian novel can, a generation later, or even a few years later, have an impact on how people think the future should go.

I felt a deep kinship and love for Ursula K. Le Guin and Iain Banks, these two great utopian writers. Theyve died, and I do feel a bit lonely for my own generation. But I also see a lot of young writers coming up who call themselves solarpunk, or hopepunk, or the new utopians, and whatnot. Theyre forming schools, theyre trying to get enthusiastic about improvising our way to a green future. I think theyre utopian, but perhaps a little bit outdated or scared by the term utopia, because its so often used as a weapon to mean unrealistic and never going to happen. So they make up different names. Im glad to see these. I dont think utopian fiction will ever go away. Its like a necessary blueprint for thinking our way forward. So it seems like its a good time for utopian fiction. Im sad at losing colleagues I loved, but Im encouraged at the way the genre itself is ratcheting its way back into peoples attention.

Its surprising how many classic novels described as utopian fiction are actually disguised as dystopian novels.

This is worth talking about! In the Greimas rectangle, theres the thing thats not you, and theres the thing thats against you. These are not the same. In that model, the opposite of utopia is dystopia. But the thing against you is anti-utopia. What that model is saying is, if you try to get to utopia, it would necessarily be bad. So its against the idea of utopia itself. Dystopian fiction isnt against the idea of utopia. Its just saying, Oh, we tried, and we lost. But anti-utopian ideas say that trying to make utopias necessarily rebound, and boomerang into disaster.

So for example, 1984 is a dystopia. Big Brother is not trying to make you happy. That government is putting its boot on your neck. But Brave New World is the great anti-utopian novel, where they try to make everybody happy, so they drug them and electroshock them, and then everybodys supposed to be happy, and it doesnt work. Those two very, very famous novels service, the great dystopia, and the great anti-utopia. And the fourth term in the rectangle this comes out of Fredric Jamesons Marxist literary criticism would be anti-anti-utopian. That gets super mysterious, but it just refers to insisting that its possible to make a better world. So thats the mysterious fourth term in that particular rectangle. I am anti-anti-utopian, but Im also utopian, which is a little more obvious.

Yeah! Yeah, it is!

Supposedly utopian fiction cant have a story, because it cant have conflicts or imperfections. How have you approached that problem as youre thinking about all this philosophically?

Yes, sure. I think there are some. One strategy I used in Pacific Edge is, you show that in a utopia, its still possible to be extremely unhappy. In a utopia, theres still A falls in love with B, whos in love with C, whos in love with A, and theyre all miserable. Or A is in love with B, and then he dies. Utopia does not guarantee human happiness. It just takes away unnecessary suffering by way of political oppression.

Another way is to define utopia as not a perfect end-state society. Thats impossible anyway. You define it as a progressive movement in history, with each generation doing better than the generation before, in substantial ways, in terms of equality, justice, and sustainability. Its a process, not a product. So utopia is just a name for one kind of history. I do that a lot. Lastly, Iain Banks was great at this. In his space-opera novels, there was a post-scarcity galactic utopia, but its always under assault by forces that dont like it. He was one of the greatest writers of my generation, in so many ways, but especially in terms of stage business and exciting plots, Iain was the master. His utopian society always had to defend itself, sometimes quite violently. So the defense of utopia becomes like a war zone, and suddenly youre back to war novels. And then the utopia sits there as a kind of a given, but it has to be defended. Thats a great strategy that I havent used as much as Iain.

I learned from him, and I learned from Le Guin. She always went right to the heart of the contradictions: if everybodys free to do what they want, who takes out the trash? What happens when theres a drought? Is there a police force? If there isnt, how do you control a violent person? In The dispossessed, she basically went to every one of the problems utopia would have in terms of contradiction, and dramatized that. I learned a lot from her, too.

What else interests you in science fiction right now? Whats going on that you find intriguing or inspiring or enlightening?

I like a lot of feminist science fiction, from the women who are basically my generation of writers. Theyre still doing good work. I like the new, young solar utopians. I like British science fiction. Im a little hampered here, because theres way more going on than Ive had a chance to see. I read my friends, who tend to be my age, I read interesting new things to try to keep track of stuff. I see utopians like Cory Doctorow, or leftist science fiction thats political and intense. And that and the leftist feminist wing, I think, is strong right now in community.

[quads id=3]

People see science fiction as a way to write out your social, political, and personal hopes. I think its at a pretty healthy status right now. Science fiction seems almost central to the culture in a way that wasnt when I was young. Everybodys aware of it. Theres no prejudice against it. Most of thats gone away. So I like the feeling of it being an aspect of the mainstream. Im a public intellectual and a political figure Im really just a novelist and a science fiction writer, but because this culture now takes science fiction seriously, that means theyre taking me seriously.

When you bring up women writers of your age that you particularly admire, who are you thinking of?

Karen Fowler. Molly Gloss. Eleanor Arnason. Kathy Goonan. Pat Murphy. Lisa Goldstein. Gwyneth Jones and Justina Robson in England. The list could go on and on. A thing happened in academia and in culture at large Le Guin, Joanna Russ, and James Tiptree, Jr., [the pseudonym of] Alice Sheldon, they took all the attention. People like to reduce their attention to a few charismatic figures and forget about the rest. Academic critics are like that too, creating their canon. So the Le Guin/Russ/Tiptree combine sort of represented feminist science fiction as if it was the only thing there. And this whole cohort of women my age, who are just a little younger than Le Guin/Russ/Tiptree, they got sidelined by academia, and had a tough time catching readership, even people like Sheri Tepper, or Suzy McKee Charnas. Names will keep coming to me.

They are all great writers, and they havent gotten the academic attention they deserve, because academics tend to flock to what everybody else has already read, so theres a mutual shared understanding of what youre talking about. So theres a natural canonization is a weird increasing-returns situation, where early attention to someone like Le Guin as great a figure as she is, she wasnt writing novels that were any more distinctive than, say, Suzy McKee Charnas.

Ive been a beneficiary of a very much slower, smaller increase in returns. A lot of writers of my generation are very fine writers, so I see it happening all over. Also, cyberpunk came in in the 80s and said, Oh, everything going on in the 70s was junk, and that included all these women science fiction writers who got erased by a publicity-hound machine that wasnt interested in feminism, per se. So the 80s were bad in many ways, politically, and that was one of them.

Where would you like to see science fiction go from here?

Thats a good question, because Im feeling kind of mystified. If science fiction is mainstream, and its the realistic fiction of our time, what now? The future seems to be getting really hard to foresee or predict. The bottom line is, you could you could have a horrific mass extinction event next, or a superb Golden Age. It isnt like were on any obvious trajectory.

Heres what I could say: Theres lots of different kinds of science fiction. Theres the kind that is a disguised version of today. Theres space opera that takes us off into the galaxy, and its millions of years from now, and its basically magic. And then theres that middle time thats talking about various futures about 100 years out, maybe 200 years out at the most. I call it future history, and thats been my zone. And its relatively depopulated, compared to the other two. Ive done a lot of near-future, day-after-tomorrow, science fiction really talking about right now, like the New York novel. I would like to see that zone become really vibrant, so people begin to see how important what we do now is for determining the next couple hundred years, and that huge spread of possibility. So I guess I would just say more future history.

Go here to see the original:

We asked Kim Stanley Robinson: Can science fiction save us? - TheWestNews

As U.S. election nears, researchers are following the trail of fake news – Science Magazine

By Greg MillerOct. 26, 2020 , 1:25 PM

It started with a tweet from a conservative media personality, accompanied by photos, claiming that more than 1000 mail-in ballots had been discovered in a dumpster in Sonoma county in California. Within hours on the morning of 25 September, a popular far-right news website ran the photos with an exclusive story suggesting thousands of uncounted ballots had been dumped by the county and workers had tried to cover it up.

In fact, according to Sonoma county officals, the photos showed empty envelopes from the 2018 election that had been gathered for recycling. Ballots for this years general election had not yet been mailed. Even so, within a single day, more than 25,000 Twitter users had shared a version of the false ballot-dumping story, including Donald Trump Jr., who has 5.7 million followers.

This election season, understanding how misinformationand intentionally propagated disinformationspreads has become a major goal of some social scientists. They are using a variety of approaches, including ethnographic research and quantitative analyses of internet-based social networks, to investigate where election disinformation originates, who spreads it, and how many people see it. Some are helping media firms figure out ways to block it, while others are probing how it might influence voting patterns.

The stakes are high, researchers say. This narrative that youre not going to be able to trust the election results is really problematic, says Kate Starbird, a crisis informatics researcher at the University of Washingtons Center for an Informed Public. If you cant trust your elections, then Im not sure democracy can work.

In 2016, Russian operatives played a major role in spreading disinformation on social media in an attempt to sow discord and influence the U.S. presidential election. Foreign actors continue to interfere. But researchers say the bulk of disinformation about this years election has originated with right-wing domestic groups, attempting to create doubt about the integrity of the election in general, and about mail-in voting in particular. An analysis by the Election Integrity Partnership (EIP), a multi-institution collaboration, showed that the false story about the Sonoma ballots was spread largely by U.S.-based websites and individuals with large, densely interconnected social media networks. Theyre just sort of wired to spread these misleading narratives, says Starbird, who is an EIP collaborator.

Much of the election disinformation EIP has tracked so far originates in conspiratorial corners of the right-wing media ecosystem. What were seeing right now are essentially seeds being planted, dozens of seeds each day, of false stories, says Emerson Brooking, a resident fellow at the Atlantic Councils Digital Forensic Research Lab, which is part of EIP. Theyre all being planted such that they could be cited and reactivated after the election by groups attempting to delegitimize the result by claiming the vote was unfair or manipulated.

So far, most of the disinformation EIP has documented focuses on election integrity. But as Election Day draws near, Starbird and Brookingexpect to see more attempts to create confusion about voting procedures and attempts to suppress turnoutby raising fears about violence at polling places, for example.

Election deception can take various forms on social media. Joan Donovan, research director of Harvard Universitys Shorenstein Center on Media, Politics and Public Policy, has been doing digital detective work on Facebook groups targeting Latinos with proPresident Donald Trump messages that appear to be run by non-Latinos who have assumed fake identities. These groups coordinate their campaigns and recruit participants on public message boards or chat apps, allowing researchers to observe their operations; the postings also provide clues the researchers can follow to investigate who the members are and what motivates them.

Purveyors of disinformation have become expert at exploiting the dynamic between social and mainstream media, researchers say. Right-wing conspiracy groups like QAnonwhich promotes a false narrative that a cabal of cannibalistic, Satan-worshiping pedophiles are trying to bring down Trumphave learned how to create content and trade up the chain of social media users and hyperpartisan websites with increasingly large followings, Donovan says. When the falsehoods start to get traction, mainstream media outlets often feel compelled to debunk them, which can end up further extending the storys reach. Several stories that had been circulating in QAnon networks got mainstream coverage around the time of the first presidential debate, for example, including unfounded claims that former Vice President Joe Biden might take performance-enhancing drugs or cheat by wearing an earpiece during the debate. What were seeing is that the ways in which news media traditionally operate is now being turned into a vulnerability, Donovan says.

Not all election disinformation is coming from the bottom up, however. Yochai Benkler, co-director of the Berkman Klein Center for Internet and Societyat Harvard, and colleagues recently examined how claims of potential fraud associated with mail-in ballots entered public discourse. The researchers analyzed more than 55,000 online news stories, 5 million tweets, and 75,000 posts on public Facebook pages between March and August. They found that most spikes in media coverage and social media activity on the topic were driven by Trump himselfeither through his own hyperactive Twitter account, press briefings, or appearances on the Fox TV network. Donald Trump has perfected the art of harnessing mass media to disseminate and reinforce his disinformation campaign, the researchers write in a preprint posted earlier this month.

EIP is working with social media companies to help them refine and clarify their policies so they can react more quickly to disinformation. Several companies have taken recent steps to flag or remove content, or make it harder to sharesteps experts say are welcome, if long overdue. (Some platforms are also trying to nudge users toward better habits, as with Twitters recent experiment with prompts that appear when someone tries to share a link to an article they havent opened, encouraging them to read it first before sharing.)

The impact of disinformation on the election wont be easy to measure. Some clues, however, might come from a research collaboration with Facebook aimed at studying the platforms impact on this years election. The company has given 17 academic researchers access to data on the Facebook activity of a large number of users whove consented to be involved. (Facebook expects between 200,000 and 400,000 users to volunteer.) Participants agree to answer surveys and, in some cases, go off Facebook for a period of time before the election to help researchers investigate the effects Facebook use on political attitudes and behavior.

Among other things, the Facebook users will be asked at different times to rate their confidence in government, the police, large corporations, and the scientific community. Were able to look at things like changes in attitudes and whether people participated in the election and link it to their experiences on Facebook and Instagram, including exposure to election disinformation, says Joshua Tucker, one of the projects coordinators and a professor of politics and co-director of New York Universitys Center for Social Media and Politics.

Some evidence suggests the impacts might not be as great as feared, says Deen Freelon, a political communication researcher at the University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill. Theres a long history of research, for example, showing that political ads only have marginal influence on voters. And more recent studies have suggested misinformation did not have a major effect on the 2016 election. A study published in Science in 2019 found that 80% of exposure to fake news was concentrated within just 1% of Twitter users. A survey study reported in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS) found no evidence that that people who engaged with Russian troll accounts on Twitter exhibited any substantial changes in political attitudes or behavior.

Freelon, who was a co-author on the PNAS paper and is also a member of the Facebook collaboration, says hes more worried about second order effects of disinformation on our culture, such as the general sense of paranoia and distrust it creates. When people look at social media and cant figure out whats true and whats not, it degrades the overall informational quality of our political conversations, he says. It inserts doubt into a process that really shouldnt have any.

Read the original here:

As U.S. election nears, researchers are following the trail of fake news - Science Magazine

No matter who wins the US election, the world’s ‘fake news’ problem is here to stay – CNN

As journalists assembled for a photo op, setting up cameras, Trump quipped: "Get rid of them. Fake news is a great term, isn't it? You don't have this problem in Russia, but we do."

"We also have, it's the same," Putin replied.

Meanwhile, some of those same leaders have greenlit the deliberate spread of real disinformation -- US intelligence agencies concluded that Russia, for example, had used false news to interfere in the 2016 election.

"There is no question that the fact that the President of the United States is using this term to attack independent media gives an element of license to other politicians elsewhere."

For experts like Jankowicz, who have closely followed the President's war on facts and the undemocratic behavior they inspire, the potential coup de grace could be yet to come: After November, any suggestion that the US election results are phony would have a devastating effect -- and not just in America.

At a time when authoritarians are working to stamp out domestic dissent and roll back fundamental rights, undermining elections at the heart of the world's beacon of democracy sets a dangerous precedent -- one likely to be embraced by other leaders trying to maintain their grip on power.

Trump was, however, the first US President to deploy it against his opponents. And over the last four years, he has brought the phrase into the mainstream, popularizing it as a smear for unfavorable, but factual coverage.

This has given cover and conferred legitimacy to other politicians hoping to do the same. "Fake news" has been invoked by dozens of leaders, governments and state media around the world, including Syrian President Bashar al-Assad, Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro, Philippine President Rodrigo Duterte, Polish President Andrzej Duda, former Spanish Foreign Minister Alfonso Dastis, Chinese Ambassador to the United Kingdom Liu Xiaoming and former Malaysia Prime Minister Najib Razak, just to name a few.

"It [fake news rhetoric] has emboldened authoritarians, who are capable of taking even more brutal action against domestic opponents than President Trump can in the US."

"There is no question that the fact that the President of the United States is using this term to attack independent media gives an element of license to other politicians elsewhere, including some authoritarian leaders to dress up their own attacks on independent media and point to the example of the US," said Rasmus Kleis Nielsen, director of the Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism.

Patrcia Campos Mello, who has been harassed for her reporting on alleged corruption in Brazil, told Pence that President Jair Bolsonaro had mirrored Trump's rhetoric and attacks on the press, even canceling the government's subscription to her publication, Folha de S.Paulo, after the US President did the same to The New York Times and The Washington Post newspapers. Other reporters at the event also flagged the worrying rise in "fake news" legislation, used to target critical media.

"It [fake news rhetoric] has emboldened authoritarians, who are capable of taking even more brutal action against domestic opponents than President Trump can in the US," said Allie Funk, a senior research analyst for technology and democracy at Freedom House, pointing to an escalation of arrests and violence.

Trump's promotion of the phrase "fake news" will have lasting implications for democracy around the world, say academics, press freedom advocates and policymakers -- not least because the global laws enacted in the wake of his rhetoric will be difficult to overturn.

"It's been almost four years of equating journalists with fake news. And we've seen that taken up by countries and leaders around the world, from the obvious ones like China and Russia, Egypt, which need no excuse for their press freedom crackdowns but are nonetheless happy to have the cover of the United States doing the same, through to Hungary, Poland, across Europe and in Latin America," said Courtney C. Radsch, CPJ's advocacy director.

"I doubt that's going to somehow dissolve once you have a new administration in place. I just don't see the genie being put back in the bottle."

The timeless problem of powerful people trying to mislead the public has been compounded by social media platforms, which allow demonstrably false information to be shared to very large audiences with limited regulation or oversight. The content moderation policies that do exist are often applied unequally -- politicians' posts that break the rules and misleading political advertisements are rarely removed, because they are considered to be in the public interest. Addressing that reality requires more transparency on the part of the platforms -- specifically, revealing how their algorithms work -- as well as political will to improve the online information ecosystem and hold tech companies, which are almost entirely headquartered in America, to account.

"Never before has a leader in the highest office in one of the world's most powerful, if not the most powerful, democracies, taken the hammer himself, to start breaking down the very principles that the country once was proud to defend."

To date, however, efforts in the US to police the platforms have been hindered by a belief that any regulation would impinge on the First Amendment's guarantee of free speech. Marietje Schaake, international policy director at Stanford University's Cyber Policy Center, says that framing ignores the way that data collection, algorithmic amplification, artificial intelligence, curation and virality influences the way speech travels online -- including hate speech, conspiracy theories and propaganda. And that can have a perilous impact on public discourse.

Facebook and Twitter have begun to add fact-checks and warning labels to misleading or false posts from politicians, and, in some cases, are taking them down altogether. But a narrow focus on factually incorrect content ignores what is possibly more dangerous -- rhetoric that, over time, undermines faith in democracy itself, says Deborah Brown, senior researcher and advocate on digital rights at Human Rights Watch. "They're looking at information that could mislead voters about when or where the poll is taking place, or specific charges that can be proven untrue. But I think what we've seen with Trump's strategy is he's calling into question the entire legitimacy of the process," she said.

So what happens, for example, if the US President does take to Twitter on election night and calls the results "fake"?

Casting doubt over any adverse outcome is a tactic that other foreign leaders have deployed for decades, but it would be unprecedented for a sitting President of the United States. "Never before has a leader in the highest office in one of the world's most powerful, if not the most powerful, democracies, taken the hammer himself, to start breaking down the very principles that the country once was proud to defend," said Schaake, whose research focuses on disinformation, digital democracy and election security.

"No matter who wins. I think it's also going to be very hard to repair, if it's even possible."

The rest is here:

No matter who wins the US election, the world's 'fake news' problem is here to stay - CNN

Comics can teach readers how to identify fake news – The Conversation CA

At this point, most of us know the drill when it comes to COVID-19: proper hand hygiene, mask wearing and social distancing.

But does setting fire to cell towers make your list? Probably not. A conspiracy theory linking 5G mobile technology to the COVID-19 outbreak has ignited fears worldwide, prompting just this response from a few individuals in Qubec, who set ablaze seven mobile towers.

Read more: Cell tower vandals and re-open protestors why some people believe in coronavirus conspiracies

Although such destructive responses are rare, thousands of digital consumers have absorbed aspects of this falsehood, pushing fringe beliefs into the mainstream despite refutations from the World Health Organization and multiple agencies in Canada and the United States. What started as a conspiracy turned into a real crisis for the people who immediately believed what theyd heard.

My research focuses on critical media studies and ideological representations in news and popular culture. I regularly offer workshops to schools and community groups that engage the public in contemporary media literacy issues. My book, Wont Get Fooled Again: A Graphic Guide To Fake News, helps readers identify the underlying purpose of the messages they receive and learn how to do basic research before accepting the validity of whats being presented to them.

Fake news is an increasingly pressing problem. In fact, a 2019 poll found 90 per cent of Canadians reported falling for false information online.

As consumers, we need to learn how to filter content and become our own educators, editors and fact-checkers to ensure the information we act upon is trustworthy. In a constantly changing informational and political environment, its no wonder we often struggle to separate fact from fiction.

Research indicates people create misinformation for two primary reasons: money and ideology.

Articles, videos and other forms of content can generate large amounts of money for the websites that host these pieces. Most of their income comes from clicks on advertisements, so the more people who visit their sites, the better chances they have of boosting ad revenue. This feedback loop has led many publishers to lean on false information to drive traffic.

The threshold for making believable fake news has fallen as well. A conspiracy theorist, for example, can create a web page using a professional template with high-quality photos in just a few clicks. Once the content has been added, sharing it on Facebook, Twitter, Instagram and other platforms requires even less effort.

These misinformation and fake-news campaigns amplify and circulate through false digital accounts using automated programs known as bots that use certain keywords to influence and impact conversations among like-minded clusters of people. The results can foment discord on hot-button Canadian policy issues like immigration and refugees possibly disrupting election outcomes.

Canadians are expressing anxiety about the social impact of fake news, with 70 per cent fearing it could affect the outcome of a federal election. The Pew Research Center warns that fake news may even influence the core functions of the democratic system and contribute to truth decay.

Dubious and inflammatory content can undermine the quality of public debate, promote misconceptions, foster greater hostility toward political opponents and corrode trust in government and journalism.

The effects of misinformation have been evident throughout the COVID-19 epidemic, with many citizens confused as to whether a mask will decrease the chances of spreading the infection. Similar tactics are being levelled against Black Lives Matter protesters, such as labelling them all as rioters when videos and photos show most behaving peacefully.

Conspiracy theories about the Chinese virus, amplified by politicians in Canada and the U.S., have fanned the flames of anti-Asian sentiments following the spread of COVID-19. Data from law enforcement and Chinese-Canadian groups has shown an increase in anti-Asian hate incidents in Canada since the start of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Read more: Anti-Asian racism during coronavirus: How the language of disease produces hate and violence

Aside from a few social media platforms that identify misleading content and provide a brief explanation, most information online or in print can appear factual. So how can we figure out which sources to trust?

As a sociologist who focuses on critical media studies, I formed focus groups and collected input from my students to create a resources to guide readers through identifying fake news. While regulation and legislation are part of the solution, experts agree we must take swift action to teach students how to seek verification before acting on fake news.

In my findings, students identified several reasons why media outlets post or re-publish fake news, including making mistakes, being short-staffed, not fact-checking and actively seeking greater viewership by posting fake news.

The students pointed to holistic media literacy and critical thinking training as the best responses. This finding runs counter to the tactics currently used by publishers and tech companies to label or fact-check disputed news.

One student summarized this mindset best: As citizens and consumers, we have a responsibility to be critical. Dont accept stories blindly. Hold those in power responsible for their actions!

Getting multiple perspectives is a great way to expand our digest of viewpoints. Once we can see a story from more than one angle, separating truth from falsehood becomes much simpler.

At this point, I transitioned from recording perceptions of fake news to determining how to identify it. Providing students with information about the nature and agendas of fake news, in an immersive format, seemed to be a key step in engaging and cultivating their critical literacy capabilities. Information delivery was a key consideration.

Researchers have shown graphic narratives can accelerate cognition by focusing the readers attention on crucial information. Images clarify complex content, especially for visual learners. Comic books require readers to create meaning using multiple factors that helps develop a complex, multi-modal literacy.

A major goal of my book involves unpacking the motivations behind the news we consume. Consider why a particular person was interviewed: Who do they represent? What do they want us to believe? Is another point of view missing?

Wont Get Fooled Again: A Graphic Guide to Fake News is the culmination of my research and the insights drawn from media literacy scholarship. This guide helps readers understand what fake news is, where it comes from, and how to check its accuracy.

If theres one habit my students and I hope everyone will develop, its this: pause before sharing news on social media. Double-check anything that immediately sparks anger or frustration and, remember, fake news creators want a reaction, not thoughtful reflection.

More:

Comics can teach readers how to identify fake news - The Conversation CA

A small dose of fake news: The mouse that roared? – Anadolu Agency

ANKARA

While the scourge of fake news is blamed for people worldwide making unwise choices, when it comes to COVID-19, the stakes for personal health could be truly life threatening.

But according to a recent study, limited exposure to misinformation may not be enough to achieve behavioral change.

Recent years have seen an enormous quantity of misinformation circulating via social media, including a virtual tidal wave infodemic of false reports about the coronavirus pandemic.

Public health officials have feared that such fake news could dissuade people from widely accepted health measures such as wearing masks or even push them to refuse to take a vaccine.

Researchers from Ireland wanted to test whether brief one-time exposure to online misinformation is actually as harmful to public health as some might suppose.

They exposed the studys 3,746 participants to fabricated news stories saying, for example, that certain foods might help protect against COVID-19, or that an vaccine in the pipeline might not be safe.

Over half of the participants were well-educated, with 2,395 participants (64%) having earned at least an undergraduate degree.

"Surprisingly, what we observed is that behavioral effects of one-off fake news exposure might be weaker than previously assumed," Ciara Greene, a professor of psychology at University College Dublin and one of the studys co-authors, told Anadolu Agency.

The study also examined whether providing a warning about fake news might reduce susceptibility a measure media critics might be interested in but, perhaps surprisingly, found that such warnings had no effects.

It suggested that if fake news does affect public behavior on matters of health, then generic warnings used by governments and social media organizations might be effective in combating this, or perhaps not.

Fast falsehoods

According to Greene, most of the research on fake news tends to just focus on targeted fact-checking, which aims to debunk the contents of specific stories.

Critics talk a great deal about how top platforms like Facebook and Twitter can protect people from misinformation and what governments can do about it, she noted.

"Yet they cannot warn all of us since there has been lots of misinformation out there," she added.

"By the time someone's already been exposed to something, it's kind of too late to come around and say, oh not that's not right," she explained.

Or, to quote the well-known saying: A lie gets halfway around the world before the truth has a chance to get its pants on.

This is the reason why, Greene suggested, governments should warn people in advance, giving them a kind of toolkit to help ensure that they are not influenced by fake news in the first place.

There are already some measures in place trying to make people think more critically about fake news, she said, but the people who sign up for such measures are unlikely to be the sort to be fooled by fake news, but rather people who think more critically anyway.

Such measures are maybe not getting to who needs it," she said.

Misinformation warnings

The researchers also looked at the effectiveness of measures to fight fake news.

For example, generic warnings that governments tend to use, such as public service announcements on the radio or posters saying: "Hey look out for fake news, be media smart."

She said they employ different warnings ones framed positively, such as, "Be a good citizen," or ones framed negatively, such as, "This is dangerous, don't do it" and in some cases people get no warnings at all.

"We were very surprised because we expected the warnings to have a considerable effect on people's response to misinformation, and we found absolutely nothing, regardless of its framing," she said.

This finding, she stressed, runs contrary to research suggesting that general warnings about misinformation may be the best way of encouraging critical engagement with suspicious online material.

She said governments possibly cannot target every piece of misinformation out there, as this would be a losing battle.

It is actually very difficult for governments to change or direct citizens' behavior for the public good, she added.

"Think about the amount of money that is put into elections to try and make people change their behavior, even whether it's to vote for a particular candidate, or even just register to vote," she explained.

"So they need to train people to be more critical consumers of news, she said.

Such training should be included in schools, she suggested, with children taught about media literacy.

Given the results of the study, the researchers argued that real-world behavioral effects might result from multiple exposures to a story. Multiple sources might increase consumers faith in a story, and thus influence their subsequent behavior.

Indeed, demagogues have long employed the technique of repeating a falsehood again and again to break down resistance and finally win over listeners.

What are the factors that will actually lead to someone changing their behavior as a result of exposure to fake news?

The new research provides one important piece of the puzzle, but in order to answer the question more fully, more research on the issue needs to be done for the good of both governments and the public.

Read more:

A small dose of fake news: The mouse that roared? - Anadolu Agency

Should we fear fake news in our politics? – RNZ

Fears that foreign political consultants and fringe parties would turn Facebook followers and fake news into votes in the election proved unfounded. The major parties mostly ran a clean game online too. So is misinformation in political messages really something to worry about?

Dr Mona Krewel Photo: RNZ Mediawatch

At the last election in 2017 worries about the political impact of misinformation were only beginning to emerge here as people tried to make sense of the role it played in the UKs Brexit Vote and the 2016 US election.

In subsequent elections in France and Australia and elsewhere, fake stuff and degrees of misinformation on social media became part of the campaign strategy even from established political parties.

I dont want New Zealand to fall into the trap of the negative fake news style campaigns that have taken place overseas in recent years, Labour Party leader Jacinda Ardern said in January.

But political parties here - including hers - had to be prompted to sign up for the Facebook transparency tool which reveals how much parties spend on specific online ads, how often and who they target with those ads. (Labour, the Greens and ACT signed up before Facebook made it compulsory in mid June.)

As the election drew closer, the so-called Bad Boys of Brexit claimed they had done a deal with NZ First to deliver Winston on steroids via social media.The National Party was putting out misleading memes on Facebook and Twitter and statistically-unsound graphics,some of which were deemed merely mischievous rather than misleading by the advertising watchdog.

Billy Te Kahika Jr seized on Covid-19 misinformation and conspiracy theories in his bid to build support for his new political movement - later joined by former Botany MP Jami-Lee Ross and his Advance NZ party. Just two days from the end of polling Facebook removed Advance NZ's page for "repeated" violations of its misinformation policy.

Co-leader Billy Te Kahika Jr said he was "horrified beyond belief" at being de-platformed - while others asked what took Facebook so long to enforce its own long-standing terms and conditions.

But last weekend it became clear they had converted only a fraction of their Facebook following into votes.

Do we really need to fear political fake news disrupting our democracy?

Victoria University of Wellington Professor Jack Vowles told a university podcast early in the election campaign social media messages were definitely reaching more potential voters.

He said 3 percent of people surveyed received political ads on social media in 2011. By the 2017 elections that was up to 12 percent. And another thing which means we ought to pay attention to parties social media election messages: were all paying for a lot of them.

It is an effective means of political communication now for parties and we've seen them transfer the resources they use to campaign from television to social media," he said.

One of several National Party online ads featuring statiscaly exaggerated graphic. Photo: screenshot

The New Zealand Social Media Study (NZSMS), led by Dr Mona Krewel and Professor Jack Vowles from Victoria University of Wellingtons Political Science department, scrutinised thousands of social media posts from political parties during the final four weeks of the campaign.

Its part of the Digital Election Campaigning Worldwide project which analyses elections around the globe. In time it will reveal whether our political players are as prone to political misinformation as others.

Dr Krewel told Mediawatch the study found New Zealands parties and their leaders overall ran positive messages during the campaign.

Judith Collins and also the National Party have been more negative than Labour. However, this is normal, as challenger parties ... they use all forms of communication to level the playing field.

They not only post more, but also show a higher incidence of negativity and the traditional media pick up on that, she said.

For the same reason, the study found minor parties and their leaders have also been more negative than the major parties - and they are also more dependent on media attention.

But Dr Krewel said the amount of fake news and half-truths in the campaigns was pretty low. Several parties did not post any fake news at all - and most posts with misinformation were half-truths.

National Party leader Judith Collins was criticised for posting a selective soundbite of Jacinda Ardern from the first live leaders TV debate. But Dr Krewel noted the party leaders were far less likely to post fake news and half-truths themselves.

That was generally left to parties online accounts - presumably to minimise the risk of blowback for the individuals.

During the 2017 general election campaign, the Advertising Standards Authority (ASA) received only 16 complaints about advertising with false content.

But with 10 days to go before the 2020 election, Newsroom.co.nz reported it had received 80 - and even some Advance NZ ads were still circulating even after they had been deemed misleading by the regulator.

The news media focused on Advance NZ and Billy Te Kahika Jr for online misinformation.

Talk to the hand - Newshub's political editor Tova O'Brien accuses Advance NZ leader Jami-Lee Ross of "peddling misinformation" during the election campaign. Photo: screenshot / Newshub Nation

The media were right to focus on them, Dr Krewel told Mediawatch.

She said the worst offender was Advance NZ (half-truths: 31 percent, fake news: 6 percent) and the New Conservatives (half-truths: 16 percent, fake news: 3.7 percent).

Our data also shows that most of the misinformation was around Covid-19 and if this misinformation becomes widely spread, it has the potential to become life-threatening, she said.

News media have upped the game a with fact-checking during this campaign, such as Stuffs The Whole Truth and Australian news agency AAP factchecks reported by other media.

Dr Krewel said the higher the trust in the established media, the better are the chances that this fact-checking has a positive effect.

I think it is definitely very welcome when the traditional media fulfills its role as watchdog and keeps a sharp eye on the parties in an election campaign. The politicians get wind of being fact-checked pretty soon and might fear reputational damages. In particular, the major parties wont risk too much reputational damage, she said.

Dr Krewel said some use traditional media criticism of their social media campaigns strategically.

Parties such as Advance New Zealand might care a lot less about this, as it is part of their rhetoric that the media elites want to silence them and that they are the ones who tell the truth, she said.

Regulatory authorities in all countries must understand how fast social media is and react faster to complaints, Dr Krewel said.

But she said she thinks in general the study shows that regulations around campaigning in New Zealand are working. Compared to some other countries, there are more ways to complain about fake news in New Zealand and - if its bad enough - stop it from being repeated.

The Advertising Standards Authority takes complaints about political party advertising. The Broadcasting Standards Authority, the New Zealand Media Council and the Electoral Commission also have a role.

However, this monitoring still has some limits: if a Facebook post is unpaid content, then it falls outside the brief of complaints about advertising. And it can take some time until misleading content is taken down and until then it is on display, said Dr Krewel.

Read more:

Should we fear fake news in our politics? - RNZ

ACMA: Tech giants’ code to handle fake news fails to meet expectations – Sydney Morning Herald

Loading

"The draft code released by DIGI for public consultation is a long way from the model that we proposed to address these important issues."

Under the proposed model, a tech company would agree to measures to address the ACMA's concerns, which are based on the risk of harm to a user, as well as how they will report back on their attempts to meet these measures.

But the draft code does not provide the specific measures. Instead, it outlines examples such as flagging or demoting content and stopping receiving revenue on ads based on disinformation.

The code defines disinformation as "inauthentic behaviour" for economic gain or that is designed to mislead and may cause harm. It does not include misleading ads, satire or clearly identified news and commentary.

Decisions on what measures need to be taken will be based on factors such as the severity of the post or article, who is involved in its creation, the speed at which it is disseminated and whether it is "maliciously motivated".

This could mean that posts or articles from anti-vaxxers or conspiracy theories that are not published with malice may not be removed or placed lower in a newsfeed.

The code also explicitly states companies will not have to remove content on the basis that it is misleading or false if it isn't unlawful, to balance removal of harmful content with rights of users to engage in free speech.

The companies can opt in or opt out of the code as they wish. It excludes articles sent on private messaging apps such as Facebook Messenger and WhatsApp.

Ms O'Loughlin said the ACMA will meet the tech platforms later this week for further discussions. Consultations about the code are taking place until November 24.

Loading

DIGI's code is the first voluntary proposal to be created by the tech giants. It also has been published at a crucial time for the tech giants, which are awaiting the imminent release of a finalised compulsory code that will make Facebook and Google pay news outlets for use of their content.

Separately, a report published by the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission last week found Australians were being "extensively tracked" online, with Google and Facebook the key recipients of the data.

The ACCC analysed the 1000 most popular websites in Australia and found Google's third party scripts on 80 per cent of the websites, while Facebook's were present on 40 per cent. Third party scripts can be embedded into websites to collect analytics or for advertising purposes.

The report also found that Google and Facebook had increased their dominance of the online advertising market to 81 per cent in 2019, up from 73 per cent in 2018.

"Based on information provided to the ACCC, for a typical $100 spent by advertisers ononline advertising in 2019, $53 went to Google, $28 to Facebook and $19 to all otherwebsites and ad tech," the Digital Platform Services interim report said.

ACCC chairman Rod Sims said the figures underscored the difficulty faced by news media businesses, in particular newspapers, in competing for a slice of the digital advertising pie.

"It's a difficult environment to be in if you're relying on online advertising with Google and Facebook growing so quickly," Mr Sims said.

Zoe Samios is a media and telecommunications reporter at The Sydney Morning Herald and The Age.

Lisa Visentin is a federal political reporter at The Sydney Morning Herald and The Age, covering education and communications.

See the original post:

ACMA: Tech giants' code to handle fake news fails to meet expectations - Sydney Morning Herald

Upset in Seychelles presidential election as incumbent loses – The Associated Press

NAIROBI, Kenya (AP) The Seychelles presidential election has seen an upset, with the electoral commission on Sunday declaring longtime opposition contender Wavel Ramkalawan the winner over incumbent Danny Faure. The ruling party has been knocked from power for the first time since 1977.

Opposition leader Ramkalawan, a 59-year-old priest who has largely devoted himself to politics, received 54% of the vote in the Indian Ocean island nation while Faure received 43%, the commission chair Danny Lucas said, calling the race hotly contested.

Mr. Faure and I are very good friends and an election does not mean the end of ones contribution to ones motherland, Ramkalawan, a six-time presidential candidate, said shortly after the announcement. He promised a consultative approach and no interference by the executive in the work of the countrys various institutions.

Faure accepted his loss and added I wish you all the best, the Seychelles News Agency reported. The outgoing president promised to continue living in the country and said he would be available to dispense advice.

The new president is expected to be sworn in Monday.

Ramkalawans party also won more than a two-thirds majority of National Assembly seats, the news agency reported.

The voting turnout was roughly 75% in the archipelago nation of just under 100,000 people whose tourism-heavy economy has been hit hard by the coronavirus pandemic.

The United States and other nations quickly congratulated citizens of the Seychelles for the peaceful election, with the U.S. calling the vote orderly and free.

The U.S. congratulated Ramkalawan, saying that your historic election is evidence that Seychelles has become a truly democratic nation. The countrys history includes a stretch of one-party rule, a coup in 1977 and a coup attempt in 1981.

Faure, who has been outspoken on the dangers of climate change and the need to protect island nations like his own, assumed the presidency in 2016 after longtime President James Michel stepped down after the ruling United Seychelles party lost parliamentary elections to an opposition coalition.

Visit link:

Upset in Seychelles presidential election as incumbent loses - The Associated Press

Seychelles is likely to maintain its record of free and fair elections in upcoming polls – The Conversation CA

The Seychelles takes to the polls this week for its presidential and legislative elections. The elections are running concurrently in order to save money. This is because the COVID-19 pandemic has taken a toll on the tourism-based economy since the Seychelles closed its borders in March and only began phased re-opening in June.

In accordance with recently developed Southern African Development Community Guidelines for observation of elections in the region under public health emergencies, pre-election consultations by observer groups were conducted virtually in August. The post-election analysis will also be virtual.

There are three candidates in the running for the top seat. Incumbent Danny Faure represents the United Seychelles Party, Wavel Ramkalawan is from the Seychelles Democratic Union, and Alain St Ange is from the One Seychelles Party.

The United Seychelles Party has been in power since 1977 in various incarnations. It maintained victory at the polls even after the electoral system was democratised in 1993.

However, for the first time since 1993, the opposition Seychelles Democratic Union, won a parliamentary majority in the 2016 elections and party leader Ramkalawan is set to contest his sixth presidential election this year.

Based on the last election, the candidates from the United Seychelles Party and Seychelles Democratic Union are evenly matched. President Faure has focused on the economy in his campaigns, especially the rebuilding of national reserves; reducing partisanship in politics; and representing people from all walks of life.

Ramkalawan is equally focused on the economy. He has also committed to boosting the local economy should he win the seat. St Ange has pledged to decriminalise marijuana and install a technocratic government.

Read more: How to hold elections safely and uphold democracy during the COVID-19 pandemic

The Seychelles is relatively new to democracy. It held its first multiparty presidential and legislative elections in 1993. The country had been a one-party state since since 1979. The transition to a multiparty democracy was entrenched by the 1993 constitution.

Since then, it has built up a fairly good reputation for well-functioning, democratic governance. Barring some allegations of corruption in the electoral process, it has shown rapid improvement, thanks to a strengthened anti-corruption legislative framework.

As we observe in our paper on the quality of elections in Africas small island states, Seychelles is an electoral democracy. It has committed itself to holding free, fair, and regular elections in accordance with its constitution. Its elections are managed by an objective, credible and responsible electoral institution although it has been accused of inefficiency in the past.

The country is also a signatory to the African Unions 2002 Declaration on the Principles Governing Democratic Elections in Africa as well as the 2007 African Charter on Democracy, Elections and Governance.

The Seychelles has done fairly well in adhering to the principles of free and fair elections. Since 1993, it has conducted five multiparty presidential and legislative elections. Observers have consistently praised its elections for being generally credible, transparent, peaceful, free, and fair.

However, in the last elections (2015/2016), the Seychellois Electoral Commission faced criticism for being inconsistent in enforcing its mandate. There were allegations of attempted vote buying, lack of efficiency in the electoral system, and limited civic education on voter registration and other voting procedures.

Read more: Constitutional Court ruling heralds changes to South Africa's electoral system

There were also concerns about definitions of the terms votes cast, valid votes cast and spoiled ballot paper. The lack of clarity muddied the results of the presidential election.

The election was one of the most closely fought presidential elections in Seychelles history. Only 193 votes separated the two leading candidates following a second round runoff.

James Michel won 50.15% of the vote and opposition leader, Ramkalawan, 49.85 percent. The closeness of the result, irregularities noted above, and Ramkalawans allegations of vote buying prompted a review of the countrys electoral framework. Michel later resigned and Faure took over.

In reviewing the framework, the commission consulted political parties and civil society. This was based on the African Unions suggestion for more transparency in the system. It presented its reforms recommendations in 2017.

Based on those recommendations the National Assembly approved 17 amendments to the Election Act in August 2020. The aim was to ensure a fair and just electoral process. A 2018 amendment had already established a permanent chief electoral officer to oversee the Electoral Commissions secretariat and its operations.

As the Seychellois people go to the ballot, it is worth mentioning that historically, the youth vote has not been actively sought. This is despite campaign promises to include young people in matters of governance. The youth are considered to be the most important and dynamic segment of the population. They are becoming an increasingly influential demographic. Yet, they have shown relatively little interest in exercising their right to vote, and should be encouraged to do so.

Also, women are not as active in the countrys politics as they could be. Womens representation in the Seychellois parliament dropped from 43.75% in 2011 to 21% in 2019. This is below the 23% world average. Moreover, in the history of the Seychelles, only one woman Alexia Amesbury has contested a presidential election.

Amesbury is a well-known Seychellois lawyer, politician and human rights activist who has since been elected to the African Commission on Human and Peoples Rights. The absence of women representation is a worrying trend because it means less participation across all levels of decision-making. This has dire consequences for attempts to achieve equality and sustainable development for everyone.

There needs to be more discussion on longstanding traditional beliefs about the role of women in leadership. Despite the Seychelles general appearance as a matrifocal society, when it comes to political leadership, women are often perceived as having been promoted through the benevolence of a male presidency.

Read more: Nigeria: why having fewer political parties isn't enough

Away from the limited representation of women and the youth, there is nothing to suggest that the coming elections will not be free and fair. What remains to be seen is how the virtual election observation will play out in upholding the credibility of the process.

Nevertheless, even with the above points of contention, the electoral management body appears to be playing its role fairly well. And the amendments to the electoral laws are an indication that the Seychellois government is intent on upholding the principles of electoral procedure and practice that it has committed to.

Go here to see the original:

Seychelles is likely to maintain its record of free and fair elections in upcoming polls - The Conversation CA

Weekend Rally In South LA Held To Raise Awareness of Domestic Violence in BIPOC Communities – LAist

An attendant of the rally holds a sign that reads "Brown and Black Girls Unite! Be The Change." (Chava Sanchez/LAist)

Our news is free on LAist. To make sure you get our coverage: Sign up for our daily newsletters. To support our non-profit public service journalism: Donate Now.

If you or someone you know is dealing with domestic violence, call the National Domestic Violence Hotline at 1-800-779-7233.

By Katie Licari

Since the coronavirus pandemic became widespread, there has been a nationwide spike in domestic violence. In addition to an increase in the number of reported cases in domestic violence, there has been an increase in first time domestic violence reports and there is an escalation of domestic violence causing more severe injuries. The National Domestic Violence Hotline recorded a 9% increase in calls for help from March 16, two days before stay-at-home orders went into effect in California and nearly every other state and Washington, D.C. followed suit in the coming weeks, to May 16.

About 40 people gathered in Leimert Park Saturday afternoon as part of a community rally to increase awareness around domestic violence and the impact sexual violence has on BIPOC communities in South LA. #Standing4BlackGirls, which coordinated the event, is a local partnership of Black gender justice organizations, including the Women's Leadership Project, California Black Women's Health Project and The Positive Results Center. The event comes during Domestic Violence Awareness Month, which has been recognized every October since the 1980s.

Historically, the BIPOC community has been disproportionately impacted by domestic violence. Particularly, Black women are most likely to be killed as a result of domestic/intimate partner violence. "There is a basic need for accessible resources," said Sikivu Hutchinson, who leads the Women's Leadership Project. "I think the way [domestic violence] issues are being addressed is still very piecemeal, and a microcosm of that particular dynamic is the fact that you have [Black] girls who are crying out for therapy and crying out for resources."

The Women's Leadership Project is a Black feminist mentoring, civic engagement and personal empowerment program made for South L.A.'s school-age girls (a companion program, Young Male Scholars, is for the boys). Over the summer, two students in the program, Kim Ortiz and Mariah Perkins, conducted a study about the impact of sexual violence in their high school community. Forty-six percent of survey respondents said they had been sexuallly abused or assaulted, and 70% said they hadn't received any services to deal with the trauma.

"When I first saw the survey responses, I was kind of shocked because I didn't realize how many people have had situations where they don't talk to anyone about.I didn't know that could happen in my community," said Ortiz. "I feel like I want to make a change in my community because I'm surrounded by these people. I want to help them in any way I can."

Brianna Parnell, an alumna of the Women's Leadership Project and current student at Sacramento State, said, "I'm a Black girl. A lot of times we have to fight our own battles, and we have to be our own nurses. So, it's like, we come out here, and we have the support of other Black girls."

The #Standing4BlackGirls coalition advocates for more resources for BIPOC sexual abuse and assualt survivors, including trauma-informed mental health care where practitioners are trained to understand how racism and sexism compound the trauma of abuse. The group also advocates for prevention education to teach young people about sexual harassment and sexual violence.

Hutchinson says that she understands personally the dire need for increased resources and services. Herself a survivor, Hutchinson recalls what it was like when she was a child being abused. "There were no outlets, there were no advocates, there was no language. There was no #MeToo movement that validated my experience," she said. "The same kind of victim-blaming and victim-shaming and erasure that Black girls are experiencing now was tenfold then, because these systems were not in place to recognize and humanize Black girl survivors."

While all groups and gender identities are impacted by domestic violence, there are specific historical and systemic nuances in how sexual violence is experienced in the Black community.

"There is a big regime of silence that is imposed upon Black girls and women when it comes to these experiences. You are not supposed to rebuke in any way, shape, or form Black patriarchy," said Hutchinson.

"We are seeing the victims who were brutalized by R. Kelly being victim-blamed and shamed in our community as somehow trying to undermine a good Black man, and that rhetoric has been used to demonize Black women and girls," Hutchinson continued. This has not been dealt with in a lot of our discourse about Black community self-determination. We want to put that [discussion] on the table."

Quincy Reese and a few of his co-workers who came out on Saturday said they wanted to show solidarity to the cause. They brought juices and snacks for attendees from the smoothie and juice bar, Neighborhood Organics, they work at together.

Reese said the things like rape and sexual abuse often happen without being talked about. "We want to let the women know that we got their backs at all times," Reese said. "We just want to do our part to let them know...we're with them in the fight."

According to Assemblymember Sydney Kamlager, who was originally slated to attend and speak at Saturday's event, the role of policing and the criminal justice system within the BIPOC community is another factor for many survivors when seeking help to stop domestic violence.

"We are given bail at higher rates, we are on probation for longer terms. [Blacks are] 8% of the population [in Los Angeles County], and we are three-quarters of the population that's incarcerated," said Kamlager. "The reality is that survivors in many communities do not see law enforcement as a viable option for themselves and their families."

Kamlager, who represents several majority-Black Los Angeles communities including Crenshaw, Baldwin Hills and Ladera Heights (in addition to Mid City, Windsor Hills, all of Culver City, and parts of West L.A.) introduced the Community Response Initiative to Strengthen Emergency Systems (CRISES) Act before the state legislature in February. Known as AB 2054, the CRISES Act funds alternatives to policing in emergency situations like public and mental health crisis, individuals experiencing homelessness and intimate partner violence. It was designed to provide options for communities where trust in law enforcement is low.

The bill was vetoed by Gov. Newsom earlier this month. If it had passed, it would have provided three years of grant funding, about $16 million, to community-based resources, including those for domestic violence.

"Many of these organizations are already doing the work," said Kamlager. "They just don't have the funding that they need to scale, [and] the CRISES Act would have afforded that level of scalability." Although it didn't pass this legislative cycle, she plans to reintroduce the CRISES Act next year.

Chava Sanchez contributed to this story from the event.

CORRECTION: This story initially listed Peace Over Violence as a Black gender justice organization; it is actually a community partner of the #Standing4BlackGirls coalition We regret the error.

Read this article:

Weekend Rally In South LA Held To Raise Awareness of Domestic Violence in BIPOC Communities - LAist

7 Black Lifestyle Brands That Will Enhance Your Personal Space – HelloBeautiful

If youre like us, you are dedicated to supporting Black-owned brands. And with an emergence of Black-owned brands that provide everything from candles to stationary products, you take pride in spending your coin with your people.

But its not just about being Black, these brands cater to our needs by incorporating our culture into products we use daily. All while providing inspiration because many of these brands started with a dream from a hopeful entrepreneur. They are all unique in their own way. From one brand-owner, who used their personal struggles to create a space for empowerment to another brand that showcase the beauty of the African diaspora, there is something for everyone to enjoy.

Check out this list of Black-owned lifestyle brands with products that will enhance your personal space.

The brainchild of Shakirah Brightly, My Secret Scent is a lifestyle brand thats all about providing the masses with luxury candles, body lotions, soaps,and other essentials to put your mind at ease and empower you all at the same time.

Aya Paper Co. is a sustainablestationary brand that provides the gift of words to celebrate people and the moments that matter the most. In addition to cards, Aya has produced notecard sets, journals, tote bags, and candles.

If youre familiar with the name Alexandra Winbush, then you probably know that Issa Rae is one of her biggest fans. Known for creating scent-soothing candles that come with a tea and curated playlist, this young lady knows just what you need to set the vibe. And who doesnt love to calm their spirit while sipping on a beverage thats good for the mind, body, and soul?

There is no better feeling than having gorgeous stationary on hand and Under The Sunlight is delivering the goods. This brand is all about encouraging people to enjoy the present moment, honor the parts of ourselves that make us special, and invest in the nourishing practices of self-care and curiosity. Have your pick of postcards, journals, calendars and more.

If youre searching for scented candles that can get you in the holiday spirit, look no further than Blk Sunflower Candles. Right on time for the 2020 holiday season, candle Snow In Love ($29.99, Blksunflower.com) offers notes of pine, vanilla and clove for a cozy aroma.

Every woman knows that there is no such things as having too many feminine products in your arsenal. While there are plenty of brands on the market, The Honey Pot takes personal care to new heights with carefully formulated selections to give your unmentionables the attention it needs.

Chakra Zulu Crystals are the perfect way to clean your energy and your spirit. For those who are new to crystal healing or well-versed on the topic, crystals work wonders to provide zen to your space and your home.

Visit link:

7 Black Lifestyle Brands That Will Enhance Your Personal Space - HelloBeautiful

TransUnion Ranks 16th in the Latest IDC FinTech Rankings – GlobeNewswire

CHICAGO, Oct. 20, 2020 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- TransUnion (NYSE: TRU) announced today they have ranked #16 on the 2020 IDC FinTech Rankings, placing the global information and insights company as the top credit reporting agency on the list.

The Fortune 500-style ranking categorizes and evaluates the top global providers of financial technology based on calendar year revenues from financial institutions for hardware, software and service providers and represents the leading enterprise organizations to the financial services industry from around the world. Last year, TransUnion ranked #31 on the prestigious list.

A FinTech industry leader, TransUnion is at the forefront of lending innovation, providing solutions that help FinTech lenders find and make tailored offers to more consumers. TransUnions unique integration of trended credit and alternative data, in addition to traditional credit data, offers FinTechs deeper consumer insights and provides greater certainty. The information helps FinTechs incubate, diversify and accelerate growth by turning data into action.

Since the early days of the FinTech industry, TransUnion has played a vital role as a partner that helps foster innovation, said Jason Laky, executive vice president of financial services at TransUnion. At the heart of TransUnions FinTech leadership are our unique trended credit and alternative credit data assets, augmented by our Innovation Lab, Startup Credit Kit and Prama suite of solutions. Our team has worked with many of the leading FinTechs through various phases of growth, positioning TransUnion at the center of the FinTech lending ecosystem.

IDC Financial Insights publishes a comprehensive report about the years findings that is available to view or download here.

About TransUnion (NYSE: TRU)TransUnion is a global information and insights company that makes trust possible in the modern economy. We do this by providing a comprehensive picture of each person so they can be reliably and safely represented in the marketplace. As a result, businesses and consumers can transact with confidence and achieve great things. We call this Information for Good.

A leading presence in more than 30 countries across five continents, TransUnion provides solutions that help create economic opportunity, great experiences, and personal empowerment for hundreds of millions of people.

http://www.transunion.com/business

Link:

TransUnion Ranks 16th in the Latest IDC FinTech Rankings - GlobeNewswire

Wealthy Millennial Women Tend to Defer to Husbands on Investing – The New York Times

Many conversations about womens empowerment are focused on negotiating salary increases, Ms. Porter said. But what good does that raise do you if you dont know what your savings plan is going to be with that little bit of extra money? she said. What good does it do to climb that ladder and get that next higher-paying job with better benefits if you dont take the time to invest that retirement fund correctly?

Sallie Krawcheck, chief executive and co-founder of Ellevest, an investment platform for women, said millennials might not have realized that if they do not have financial equality, they do not have independence.

Younger women havent had as many hard-won lessons, she said.

The UBS study has limitations: It did not survey the boomers when they were three decades younger, the age millennials are today, so it is hard to conclude to what extent the differing attitudes are because of age and acquired wisdom versus other changes. And the women surveyed, all of whom had at least a quarter of a million dollars in investable assets, may not be representative of their generation over all.

Erin Lowry, a personal finance adviser and the author of Broke Millennial, said one reason boomer women may be more likely to view financial independence as essential for equality was that they have witnessed what can happen without it: Many were raised by mothers who were denied loans or credit cards in their names, she said.

Ruth Bader Ginsburg, as the director of the A.C.L.U.s Womens Rights Project in the 1970s, litigated a string of cases that paved the way for the Equal Credit Opportunity Act of 1974, which prohibited creditors from asking about sex, marital status or the use of birth control.

I know a lot of millennial women who are feminists, liberated and whatever, who let their husbands handle all the finances, Ms. Lowry said. Its very much still an archetype in heterosexual relationships.

One woman, a graduate student in her 30s, said that when she got married several years ago, her husband made most of the money and handled the couples long-term finances. That meant he had more say than she did in decisions like where their daughter went to school and where they went on vacation, she said.

Read more here:

Wealthy Millennial Women Tend to Defer to Husbands on Investing - The New York Times

New Study Finds Smooth Digital Transactions Essential to Business Survival During and After Pandemic – GlobeNewswire

CHICAGO, Oct. 22, 2020 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- A new global study by the Economist Intelligence Unit and TransUnion (NYSE: TRU) has overwhelmingly found the key to whether or not companies go out of business hinges on providing consumers friction-right digital transactions. Nearly 85% of global executives surveyed as part of the study said they believe smooth digital transactions are essential to business survival rather than merely a competitive edge.

Overwhelmingly Global Executives Believe Smooth Digital Transactions are Essential to Survival

COVID-19 has dramatically accelerated digital transformation with 61% of our survey respondents saying their organization has changed their digital transaction process due to the pandemic, said Shai Cohen, senior vice president of Global Fraud Solutions at TransUnion. But all of this digital progress will be wiped out if we cant remove these barriers to building bilateral digital trust. For instance, two-thirds of executives in the study who said their company changed their digital transaction process as a result of the pandemic experienced glitches."

The report, New Dimensions of Change: Building Trust in a Digital Consumer Landscape, included responses from 1,610 executives in Brazil, Canada, Chile, China, Colombia, the Dominican Republic, Hong Kong, India, the Philippines, South Africa, the U.K. and the U.S. The research uncovered how technologies like artificial intelligence (AI), national digital IDs1 and super-apps2 can help overcome hurdles and possibly create new challenges to building digital trust.

Artificial Intelligence (AI), Biometrics and National Digital IDs Will Play an Increasingly Important Role in Fraud Prevention Overwhelmingly respondents answered that: 1) biometrics3 will be the dominant payment customer authentication method; 2) improved fraud detection and security is the greatest benefit to using AI; and 3) a national digital ID system will help prevent consumer fraud.

Approximately 85% of executives say biometrics are likely to be used to authenticate the vast majority of payments in the next 10 years. About 43% of respondents noted that improved fraud detection and security is the greatest benefit to using AI. This was the top selection by far with smoother customer experience being the second most used answer at 29%. Furthermore, the vast majority of executives, 79%, think national digital IDs will help fraud prevention in consumer transactions.

Ensuring consumer trust starts with preventing fraud. Our research overwhelmingly showed that biometrics, AI and national digital IDs arent just a fad for consumer fraud prevention. They are key for trusted commerce for the foreseeable future, Cohen continued.

_______________1 National digital ID initiatives are government-administered programs to provide a digital identity to residents, often using biometric data to authenticate identity.2 Super-apps are single digital portals, predominantly accessed via smartphones, through which customers access and pay for third-party products and services.3 Biometrics are defined as fingerprint, facial recognition or voice authentication methods.

National Digital IDs Hold the Key to Economic InclusionSeven in 10 executives believe a national digital ID gives low-income groups access to consumer services they would have previously been excluded from. By industry, respondents from consumer lending and telecommunications are most likely to think such IDs give lower-income groups access to services they might otherwise lack. Both industries have led the way over the last decade in reaching the community of financially-underserved customers, manifested in innovations like microfinance and mobile money.

Executives Believe Consumers are Comfortable Sharing Personal DataNearly 73% of executives believe consumers are comfortable sharing personal data with private companies and 71% with governments. Brazilian, Chinese and Dominican Republican executives have vastly differing views about whether or not consumers are willing to share data with private companies versus government bodies (more than 10% difference in each country between sharing with governments and companies). Chinese respondents believe consumers are much more comfortable sharing personal data with government bodies than companies. Brazilian and Dominican Republican executives have the opposite belief.

Technological innovations like AI, biometrics and national digital IDs paired with proven fraud prevention methods like device intelligence can provide a more convenient and inclusive way for consumers to transact that still protects security and privacy, Cohen concluded.

For the survey findings and registration information for a Dec. 3 webinar about the study, go to the report website.

About TransUnion (NYSE: TRU)TransUnion is a global information and insights company that makes trust possible in the modern economy. We do this by providing a comprehensive picture of each person so they can be reliably and safely represented in the marketplace. As a result, businesses and consumers can transact with confidence and achieve great things. We call this Information for Good.

TransUnion Global Fraud Solutions unite both consumer and device identities to detect threats across markets while ensuring friction-right user experiences. The solutions, all part of theIDVision with iovation suite, fuse traditional data science with machine learning to provide businesses unique insights about consumer transactions, safeguarding tens of millions of transactions each day.

A leading presence in more than 30 countries across five continents, TransUnion provides solutions that help create economic opportunity, great experiences and personal empowerment for hundreds of millions of people.

http://www.transunion.com/business

About The Economist Intelligence UnitThe EIU is the thought leadership, research and analysis division of The Economist Group and the world leader in global business intelligence for executives and professionals. We uncover novel and forward-looking perspectives with access to more than 750 analysts, experts and in-country contributors that produce best-in-class intelligence for over 200 countries and regions. More information can be found on http://www.eiuperspectives.economist.com. Follow us on Twitter, LinkedIn and Facebook.

See the original post here:

New Study Finds Smooth Digital Transactions Essential to Business Survival During and After Pandemic - GlobeNewswire

COVID-19 and Economic Impacts from Pandemic Driving Increased Focus on Healthcare Consumerism – Stockhouse

CHICAGO, Oct. 21, 2020 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- The changes brought on by the COVID-19 pandemic are leading to more healthcare consumerism, where patients are taking their medical care and the costs associated with it into their own hands. TransUnion Healthcare’s (NYSE: TRU) second annual patient survey found that nearly six in 10 patients (59%) deferred non-COVID-19 related medical care during the past six months.

TransUnion Healthcare surveyed more than 3,000 people in September 2020 who had either visited a hospital, healthcare clinic, doctor’s office or other healthcare organization for treatment during the past 12 months. In addition to the changes that the pandemic has brought to the healthcare industry, nearly half of survey respondents (49%) indicated that the state of the economy has at least some impact on how they seek medical care. This number was a seven basis-point increase from 2019.

Healthcare consumerism is growing, perhaps in part due to the economic and financial challenges resulting from the COVID-19 pandemic,” said David Wojczynski, President of TransUnion Healthcare. Our latest survey illustrates to providers just how important it is to offer flexible care delivery options and payment experiences for their patients during this period of uncertainty, as well as understand and address individual payment needs.”

Healthcare consumerism driven by younger generations ; spurred by economic challenges

Findings throughout the survey highlighted that the youngest generations are feeling the greatest impact from the COVID-19 pandemic. In fact, one-third (33%) of Gen Z and 29% of Millennial patients reported their health insurance coverage was impacted due to the pandemic (compared to 22% of overall respondents; 18% of Gen X; and 12% of Baby Boomers).

Our survey found, due to the pandemic, larger percentages of younger generations deferred non-essential care and had their insurance coverage impacted. At the same time, the industry has reported only modest shifts in payer mix despite the economic and financial impacting these individuals, going against expectations and signifying a gap in coverage,” said Jonathan Wiik, principal of healthcare strategy at TransUnion Healthcare. These findings indicate that while a greater percentage of these patients lost health insurance coverage due to the pandemic, the moderate change in payer mix could be because they avoided non-essential care and likely did not seek alternative coverage.”

Interestingly, an updated TransUnion analysis indicates that while patient out-of-pocket (OOP) expenses in 2020 remain near their highest levels across all care settings, the overall change in OOP costs is limited when compared to 2019 levels (inpatient down 5% year-over-year to $5,002; outpatient up 6% year-over-year to $1,095; and emergency department down 7% year-over-year to $485). Given these minimal changes, patients’ focus on understanding costs prior to service and the growth in consumerism appear to be driven by the material, financial impacts of the pandemic and insurance plan disruptions.

Supporting the increasing trend of healthcare consumerism, TransUnion Healthcare’s survey also found eighty percent of respondents utilized either healthcare provider or payer/insurance websites, among other sources, to research healthcare costs up from 75% in 2019. Younger generations are more likely to be researching these costs compared to older generations (90% of Gen Z respondents and 87% of Millennial respondents compared to 69% of Baby Boomer respondents).

What’s more, the desire for a clear understanding of healthcare costs has a direct impact on healthcare providers. Forty-seven percent of recent patients chose their healthcare provider based on cost.

Youngest Generations Driving Healthcare Consumerism amid COVID-19 Challenges

*Gen Z (born 1995 or after); Millennials (1980-1994); Gen X (1965-1979); Baby Boomers (1946-1964).

Price transparency is critical for all stakeholders

With healthcare consumerism taking hold within the industry, price transparency is increasingly more critical for healthcare providers as patients shoulder more of the burden of healthcare costs.

TransUnion Healthcare’s survey revealed that 53% of recent patients received clear cost estimates prior to receiving treatment. While this number is a three basis point year-over-year increase, more may need to be done to educate patients on their healthcare costs and payment options. Only 52% of patients fully understood their financial responsibility for their recent medical bill.

With its new price transparency rule, CMS is also placing a greater emphasis on having clear, accessible pricing information for consumers before service which ties back to the increasing trend of healthcare consumerism. Healthcare providers will need to comply with the new rule by the January 1, 2021 deadline, and with this date fast approaching, it’s critical for providers to consider our latest findings when implementing approaches to best meet all aspects of the mandate,” said Wiik.

Further, when patients clearly understand their healthcare costs, they are more likely to pay for their treatment. Sixty percent of the patients surveyed are at least somewhat likely to pay their bill upfront if a cost estimate is offered in advance or at the time of service. When given an estimate at the time of service, nearly two-thirds of recent patients (65%) said they would make at least a partial payment.

In addition to offering patient estimates, further considerations that can help healthcare providers drive patient engagement and deliver a more streamlined and positive patient financial experience include creating customized patient payment models and providing financing options that fit patients’ individual needs.

To learn more about TransUnion Healthcare’s second annual patient survey and other information on patient financial experience, click here . Additional tips and best practices that healthcare leaders can implement to be ready for CMS’s price transparency mandate can be found here .

About TransUnion (NYSE: TRU)

TransUnion is a global information and insights company that makes trust possible in the modern economy. We do this by providing a comprehensive picture of each person so they can be reliably and safely represented in the marketplace. As a result, businesses and consumers can transact with confidence and achieve great things. We call this Information for Good.®

TransUnion Healthcare, a wholly owned subsidiary of TransUnion, makes mutual trust possible between patients, providers, and payers by helping them navigate payment uncertainty. Our Revenue Protection ® solutions leverage comprehensive data, accurate insights and industry expertise to engage patients early, ensure earned revenue gets paid and optimize payment strategies. TransUnion Healthcare helps over 1,850 hospitals and 550,000 physicians collectively recover more than $1.2 billion annually in revenue.

A leading presence in more than 30 countries across five continents, TransUnion provides solutions that help create economic opportunity, great experiences and personal empowerment for hundreds of millions of people.

http://www.transunionhealthcare.com

Read the rest here:

COVID-19 and Economic Impacts from Pandemic Driving Increased Focus on Healthcare Consumerism - Stockhouse

Hotel Zena, a Groundbreaking Hotel Dedicated to Female Empowerment, Opens with Volara + Google in Every Guestroom – Hospitality Net

October 21, 2020 New York and Washington D.C. When Hotel Zena opened its doors this month in downtown Washington, D.C., Volara was there to get guests talking via Google Nest Hubs in each of its 191 guestrooms. Implementation of Volara's contactless guest engagement and touchless room controls solution is part of a systemwide rollout by Viceroy Hotels & Resorts to voice-enable all guestrooms at its luxury boutique hotels.

This is the fifth Viceroy hotel to add Volara-powered voice assistants to guestrooms, and the second property to feature Google's Hotel Solution. Viceroy Los Cabos added Amazon Alexa devices powered by Volara in 2018, followed by Hotel Zetta San Francisco and Viceroy L'Ermitage Beverly Hills last year. Viceroy Washington DC was first in the system to add Volara + Google in August 2020.

"As an early adopter to the Volara product suite, Viceroy Hotel & Resorts is a proud partner of Volara the leader in voice-activated technology," said Viceroy Hotels & Resorts CEO Bill Walshe. "We are even more grateful now to have technology in place to provide contactless hospitality to ensure guests and colleagues are as safe and comfortable as possible. We are thrilled to introduce the recent iteration of the Google voice assistant powered by Volara at our newest addition to the brand, Hotel Zena, to meet travelers' demands for touchless room controls and services. With Google undoubtedly a household fixture, we look forward to providing a safe, innovative solution that guests are familiar with when they choose to stay with us."

At Hotel Zena, guests are asking the popular voice assistant to make calls, play music, watch shows, bring them toiletries (through an integration with the ALICE Hotel Operations Platform), book services, turn on/off TVs (through an integration with Sonifi Solutions), set alarms and more without ever lifting a finger. They also are accessing a range of entertainment, information, recommendations, and services just by speaking in their rooms:

"Hey Google, call Figleaf Restaurant."

"Hey Google, tell me the story of Rosa Parks."

"Hey Google, listen to Justice Ginsburg."

"Hey Google, watch the U.S. Women's Soccer Team."

"When we began looking at voice technologies, we needed a partner that was innovative and flexible with integrations to other third-party applications, but could also bring our strong brand to life on this new guest facing medium," said Darren Clark, Vice President of Technology for Viceroy Hotels & Resorts. "Volara understood and executed on our vision. It had integrations to more than 40 hotel technologies, including IPTV, room controls, PBX, music, and work order-management. With today's travelers preferring to not touch the guestroom phone, television remote control, light switch, or thermostat, integrations to these guest-facing technologies are critical. We are delighted with the exceptional service provided by Volara and value their flexibility in designing custom voice prompts to meet our guests' diverse requests."

Hotel Zena is a bold, new cultural hub celebrating the accomplishments of women and recognizing their enduring struggle for gender equality. It's an interactive venue where every architectural line, material and art installation was thoughtfully designed and curated to send a message of female empowerment. Situated at the nexus of Downtown D.C. and the vibrant Logan Circle neighborhood, the 191-room hotel is a story about women and a celebration of people who work together to achieve basic civil rights. Hotel Zena offers a warm, dynamic and inviting environment with comfortable spaces featuring over 60 pieces of artwork commissioned to create a message of struggle, empowerment and hope.

"We are thrilled that Hotel Zena is now LIVE with our joint solution with Google," said David Berger, Volara CEO. "This is a fun, interactive, and touchless way for guests to communicate with the hotel; it's also a seamless way for staff to manage and fulfill guests' voice requests. This hotel provides a safe gathering space where travelers can celebrate diversity, respect different points of view, and open the floor to topics worthy of meaningful conversation. It's only fitting that conversation-management technology be part of the guestroom experience, empowering guests along their personal journeys to enjoy the hotel safely and privately on voice command."

Google's hotel solution benefits from Volara's real-time conversation management software and secure integrations hub which seamlessly connects the solution to leading hotel technologies, including: Task Management Solutions (ALICE, Knowcross, Amadeus / HotSOS, SynergyMMS, GXP, Hmobile, and Nuvola), Energy Management and Room Controls (Interel, Telkonet, Schneider Electric, VDA Group, and coming soon Legrande and Lutron), Interactive Television Solutions (Innspire, SONIFI, BeyondTV, and MCOMs), SMS Guest Engagement (Zingle / Medallia, Kipsu, GoMoment, TrustYou Messaging, and Whistle), Staff Alert Technologies (React Mobile), and more.

To see Google's Hotel solution deployed, managed and integrated by Volara at Viceroy D.C., click here.

Volara is THE provider of custom voice-based solutions for the hospitality industry. It's the anchor partner for the Google Assistant's full-service interpreter mode translation solution and Google's hotel solution. Volara's proprietary software creates a hotel business tool atop the leading smart speakers and natural language processing platforms. Volara's hassle free implementation and support ensures seamless execution of voice assistant solutions. Volara's proven best practices ensure high utilization rates and an optimal guest experience that creates personal and remarkable engagement with guests. Volara is the largest manager of voice assistant solution in hotels today and more than 10 million people have used voiced-based solutions powered by Volara. To learn more about Volara's launch of Google's hotel solution, go to Volara.io.

Viceroy Hotels & Resorts inspires travelers with one-of-a-kind, authentic experiences that bring together provocative design and intuitive service. Dynamic destinations are at the core of the Viceroy guest experience, and to better serve travelers the brand has established three unique hotel categories consisting of the Icon Collection composed of unparalleled properties furnishing lavish experiences, the Lifestyle Series offering energizing stays in vibrant locales, and Urban Retreats based in bold, eccentric cities. Viceroy's portfolio of hotels and resorts can be found in a diverse array of breathtaking and inspiring destinations, including Los Cabos, Santa Monica, Chicago, Beverly Hills, Riviera Maya, Snowmass, San Francisco, Washington D.C. and St. Lucia. The brand recently expanded to DC with the opening of the Viceroy Washington D.C. and Hotel Zena (Washington D.C.). Viceroy will also grow its international portfolio with the opening of Viceroy Kopaonik Serbia in early 2021 and the 2022 openings in Portugal's Algarve and Panama's Bocas Del Toro.

Viceroy is a member of the Global Hotel Alliance (GHA) DISCOVERY, a unique loyalty program offering exclusive benefits and experiences to its members at over 500 hotels around the world. For more information, visit http://www.viceroyhotelsandresorts.com. Follow Viceroy on Facebook and Instagram.

Here is the original post:

Hotel Zena, a Groundbreaking Hotel Dedicated to Female Empowerment, Opens with Volara + Google in Every Guestroom - Hospitality Net