Conspiracy theories are a threat to democracy – Canton Repository

Charita M. Goshay|The Repository

When I was little, I was a conspiracy theorist.

The shocking assassination of President John F. Kennedy, and thedevastated responses ofthe adults in my small universe,were profound and searing.

It was a traumatic introduction to the wider world.

The circumstances surrounding JFK's death spawneda cottage industry that's still going strong. A 2017 survey conducted by FiveThirtyEight found that 61 percent of Americans still don't believe accused assassin Lee Harvey Oswald acted alone.

No one wants to believe history can turn on a moment generated by a single, disaffected, lucky-shot twerp like Oswald, or John Wilkes Booth, James Earl Ray, orGavrilo Princip.

When I was a kid, there were fish-wraptabloids claiming that JFK wasn't really dead, that he actually was a wheelchair-bound vegetable being cared for on one of Aristotle Onassis' private islands.

I wanted to believe it because the alternativewas too hard to accept.Even now, when I see photos of the Kennedys in Dallas, I wish I could reach through time and tell them to get back on theplane.

There were rumors that Vice President Lyndon B. Johnson was behindthe crime, and ifnot Johnson, thenFidel Castro, or maybe the mob, or the FBI/CIA/military-industrial complex.

It's a virtual cast of thousands all of whom managed to keep it a secret?

No matter.I gobbled it all downlike Boston baked beans.

But at some point, you have to put away childish things. John F. Kennedy was dead, and no amount of wishing or theorizing was going to bring him back.

For some people, the result of the recent election has become the stuff of conspiracy. Thosearguing that the results are bogus and riggedcannot fathom that more peoplevoted for incumbent President Donald Trump's opponent than for him.

They're ignoring that most down-ballot Republicans won their races. They're dismissing the math which shows that more eligible voters cast ballots this time than in 2016, including in Ohio, where 74 percent of eligible voters, cast a ballot.It's as if the lines of people waiting sometimes forhours to cast their votesnever happened, or thatthe ElectionAssistance Commission, Republican governorsandstate attorneys general, and former Department ofHomeland Security cybersecurity chief Christopher Krebs haven'tpublicly statedthat the Nov. 3 election was the safest ever.

Somesupporters have rejectedthe results of the recounts and the recounts of the recounts despite the dozens oftimes the federal courts have swatted down contentions that something is amiss.It denigrates the poll workers andboards of election stafferswho risked their health to ensure we could exercise our constitutional right to have a say in our government.

Last week, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 3rd Circuit unanimously rejectedaccusations of "deep state" chicanery, withTrump-appointed Judge Stephanos Bibas writing:Free, fair elections are the lifeblood of our democracy. Charges of unfairness are serious. But calling an election unfair does not make it so. Charges require specific allegations and then proof. We have neither here.

We have a transactional president who can't seem to grasp how a judge might place more priority on followingthe law and precedentthan reciprocation for his or her appointment. This presents a serious threat previously seen only in banana republics. We've been so worried about the Russians; now we knowthe call is coming from inside the house.

Latching onto conspiracy theories because things didn't turn out the way you wantedisa rabbit hole that can corkscrewto the point whereit'll turn out that Barack Obama fixed the 1919 World Series, and Hunter Bidenkilled Biggie and Tupac.

History reminds us that many elections have been contested, including Kennedy's own, in which he won the popular vote by just 112,827votes, but capturing the Electoral College 303 to 219. Rumors persist that Kennedy was helped by the Democratic machinein Chicago, where the dead were saidto vote early and often.

Yethis opponent, Richard Nixon, did not weaponize the courts to get his way.

That would come later.

Sowing chaos and doubt when things don't go our way only servesto harm the nation's ability to move forward as it must.

Read the original post:

Conspiracy theories are a threat to democracy - Canton Repository

liberty | Definition & Examples | Britannica

Liberty, a state of freedom, especially as opposed to political subjection, imprisonment, or slavery. Its two most generally recognized divisions are political and civil liberty.

Liberty Leading the People, oil on canvas by Eugne Delacroix, 1830; in the Louvre, Paris. 260 325 cm.

Read More on This Topic

human rights: Libert: civil and political rights

The first generation, civil and political rights, derives primarily from the 17th- and 18th-century reformist theories noted above (i.e.,...

Civil liberty is the absence of arbitrary restraint and the assurance of a body of rights, such as those found in bills of rights, in statutes, and in judicial decisions. Such liberty, however, is not inconsistent with regulations and restrictions imposed by law for the common good. Political liberty consists of the right of individuals to participate in government by voting and by holding public office. Since the proletarian and socialist movements and the economic dislocations after World War I, liberty has been increasingly defined in terms of economic opportunity and security. In Anglo-American countries liberty has often been identified with constitutional government, political democracy, and the orderly administration of common-law systems.

Martin Luther King, Jr., during the March on Washington, D.C., in 1963.

In a more particular sense, a liberty is the term for a franchise, a privilege, or branch of the crowns prerogative granted to a subject, as, for example, that of executing legal process. These liberties are exempt from the jurisdiction of the sheriff and have separate commissions of the peace. In the United States a franchise is a privilege, the term liberty not being used in such cases. The concept of liberty as a body of specific rights found in English and U.S. constitutional law contrasts with the abstract or general liberty enunciated during the French Revolution and in the French Declaration of the Rights of Man and of the Citizen. However, modern liberty involves, in theory, both the support of specific rights of the individual, such as civil and political liberty, and the guarantee of the general welfare through democratically enacted social legislation.

Visit link:

liberty | Definition & Examples | Britannica

UMass football out of its league in blowout loss to Liberty – The Boston Globe

Quarterback Malik Willis passed for 223 yards and three touchdowns, and the Liberty rushing attack accrued a season-high 378 yards in a 45-0 rout over UMass Friday afternoon at Lynchburg, Va.

Liberty, which was ranked No. 21 in last weeks AP poll before a 15-14 loss to North Carolina State and is in its second full season in the FBS, improves to 9-1. UMass, in the FBS since 2012, is 0-4.

Willis connected on a 31-yard touchdown pass to Kevin Shaa midway through the first quarter to put Liberty up, 7-0. After UMass fumbled on the ensuing drive, Joshua Mack capped off a two-play, 72-yard drive with a 59-yard TD run. Willis then added a pair of touchdown passes in the second quarter and Alex Barbir kicked a 24-yard field goal to give the Flames a commanding 31-0 halftime lead.

Mack (11 carries, 109 yards) and Peytton Pickett (10 carries, 125 yards), who scored the final touchdown of the game on 16-yard run late in the third quarter, paced the ground game. Pickett began his collegiate career at UMass but transferred after his freshman year (2016).

Willis also added a rushing touchdown in the third quarter and finished with 63 rushing yards.

UMass had 227 total yards and just 12 first downs (Liberty had 31), and quarterback Garrett Dzuro was 9-of-22 passing for 172 yards and an interception.

The Minutemen currently do not have another game on their schedule this season. They were outscored by opponents, 161-12, during their four-game campaign.

Continued here:

UMass football out of its league in blowout loss to Liberty - The Boston Globe

Liberty Global to Present at the UBS Global TMT Virtual Conference – Business Wire

DENVER, Colorado--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Liberty Global plc (Liberty Global) (NASDAQ: LBTYA, LBTYB and LBTYK) will be presenting at the UBS Global TMT Virtual Conference on Monday, December 7, 2020 at 11:10 a.m. Eastern Time. Liberty Global may make observations concerning its historical operating performance and outlook. The presentation will be webcast live at http://www.libertyglobal.com. We intend to archive the webcast under the Investor Relations section of our website for approximately 30 days.

ABOUT LIBERTY GLOBAL

Liberty Global (NASDAQ: LBTYA, LBTYB and LBTYK) is one of the worlds leading converged video, broadband and communications companies, with operations in seven European countries under the consumer brands Virgin Media, Telenet, UPC, the combined Sunrise UPC, as well as VodafoneZiggo, which is owned through a 50/50 joint venture. Our substantial scale and commitment to innovation enable us to invest in the infrastructure and digital platforms that empower our customers to make the most of the digital revolution.

Liberty Global delivers market-leading products through next-generation networks that connect customers subscribing to 50 million broadband, video, fixed and mobile telephony services across our brands. We also have significant investments in ITV, All3Media, ITI Neovision, LionsGate, the Formula E racing series and several regional sports networks.

For more information, please visit http://www.libertyglobal.com.

Read more:

Liberty Global to Present at the UBS Global TMT Virtual Conference - Business Wire

Northeast High Principal to take over Liberty High, month after its principal was removed – The Advocate

A month after its previous principal was removed amid a flap over rising for the national anthem, Liberty High learned Monday that its new leader is Brandon Levatino, the longtime principal of Northeast High School in Pride.

Levatinos selection as Liberty High principal was announced to the school Monday morning, and he is scheduled to take over the job Dec. 7. He was one of six finalists, said Taylor Gast, a spokeswoman for the East Baton Rouge Parish school system.

Shawona Ross, an assistant principal who has been serving this past month as Libertys acting principal, will replace Levatino at Northeast High, Gast said.

Barely two years after taking over a prominent Baton Rouge public high school, Liberty High Principal Rob Howle is being replaced and a search

Levatino also informed Northeast High faculty and staff of his move to Liberty on Monday morning. Later that day, he sent a letter parents and students.

"The last eight years have been some of the best years of my career," Levatino writes. "I can't begin to thank this community enough for trusting me to lead your school. While I may be leaving, a piece of my heart will always live in Viking Country."

Rob Howle was removed as Liberty Highs principal on Oct. 27, 12 days after he was placed on leave when a text message became public in which he suggested football players who don't stand for the national anthem shouldn't be on the team. The national anthem has been a flashpoint nationwide since football player Colin Kaepernick knelt during a 2016 playing of the anthem to protest police brutality and racial injustice.

The text prompted an internal investigation. School officials have not shared the conclusions of that inquiry. Liberty High parent Corey Delahoussaye told The Advocate that he spoke with Interim Superintendent Adam Smith during the investigation. He said they spoke not just about the football incident, but also about what Delahoussaye views as Howle's autocratic management style and role in the departure ofdozens of staff members during Howles two-year tenure as principal of the prominent Baton Rouge magnet school.

Howle has been reassigned to the districts Transportation Department as a principal on assignment for the remainder of the school year.

From sports jerseys to signs to outdoor benches, renaming Lee High to Liberty High will take several months to complete, with the East Baton R

Liberty High was renamed from Lee High in July in the wake of protests across the country that targeted symbols of the Confederacy. Lee High opened in 1959 as Robert E. Lee High School, named after the Confederate general.

Levatino, a career educator with the school system, was a social studies teacher as well as athletic director at Lee High when it was still a neighborhood high school. During his time there, he helped to guide students who successfully lobbied the parish School Board in 2008 to rebuild the dilapidated school, which it did in 2016.

Liberty, home to nearly 1,200 students, has about three times as many students as Northeast. Northeast is also the only rural high school in an otherwise urban and suburban school district. In 2017, Levatino was named principal of the year for high schools in the parish.

Visit link:

Northeast High Principal to take over Liberty High, month after its principal was removed - The Advocate

30 of Walter Williams’s Best Quotes on Liberty, Rights, Property, and Coercion | Gary M. Galles – Foundation for Economic Education

Walter E. Williams, who many consider one of the greatest modern economists, has passed away at age 84.

My connections with Walter go back to UCLA, where we both got our doctorates (though I was a bit later, and it was my misfortunate we did not overlap). Then I started writing popular articles in defense of Americans liberty not too long after he did, which made me very aware of his writing (in fact, I once jokingly told my wife that I didnt like him because his articles were often too good a substitute for mine). And I know lots of people with connections to George Mason University and stories about him.

Because many were closer to Walter than I, the large outpouring of appreciation and endorsements upon his passing is better done by others. But I believe that I have something worth adding for those who didnt know about him but whose interest in his work has been piqued by the powerful response to his passing.

In 2016, I published a book titled Lines of Liberty, in which I curated what I felt were the best quotes on liberty I could find, by those who had labored in the front lines to defend it. Walter was not included, like his best friend, Thomas Sowell. But that was only because I had restricted my attention to people who had died, so I could consider the entirety of their work. Now, while I have not yet had time to do more than scratch the surface of his work, offering an initial collection of some of his most important insights may be the best tribute I can offer.

I must say that after many years of thinking about liberty, I can get a thrill out of a well-made, ear-catching argument on its behalf. Reading Walters words gave me such a thrill. But it was quickly obvious that there was far too much inspiration and wisdom to fit in a compact space. So I limited my collection to very short statements on only a few of the core issues he dealt with.

Consider my top ten lists (so far) in three different areas Walter thought deeply about as just the beginning of wisdom that can be found in Walters work, and as an invitation to further consideration.

1. My definition of social justice: I keep what I earn and you keep what you earn. Do you disagree?...how much of what I earn belongs to you--and why?

2. If one person has a right to something he did not earn, of necessity it requires that another person not have a right to something that he did earn.

3. Nothing in our Constitution suggests that government is a grantor of rights. Instead, government is a protector of rights.

4. There is no moral argument that justifies using the coercive powers of government to force one person to bear the expense of taking care of another.

5. Government has no resources of its owngovernment spending is no less than the confiscation of one persons property to give it to another to whom it does not belong.

6. We dont have a natural right to take the property of one person to give to another; therefore, we cannot legitimately delegate such authority to government.

7. Exercise of a right by one person does not diminish those held by another.

8. No matter how worthy the cause, it is robbery, theft, and injustice to confiscate the property of one person and give it to another to whom it does not belong.

9. The better I serve my fellow manthe greater my claim on the goods my fellow man produces. Thats the morality of the market.

10. The act of reaching into ones own pockets to help a fellow man in need is praiseworthy and laudable. Reaching into someone elses pocket is despicable.

Most of the great problems we face are caused by politicians creating solutions to problems they created in the first place.

Walter Williams had a great deal of wisdom to offer, and he passed that wisdom on to many. But there are many more of us who could still benefit from it.

I hope the examples here touch a chord with readers and lead them to further consideration of what he understood.

Walter will be gone, and widely missed, but his insights are not.

Read the original post:

30 of Walter Williams's Best Quotes on Liberty, Rights, Property, and Coercion | Gary M. Galles - Foundation for Economic Education

Liberty Hall hosts Festival of Trees this week, but online viewing options also available – Lawrence Journal-World

photo by: John Young

In this file photo from Nov. 29, 2015, Lawrence resident Nilou Vakil puts the finishing touches on a tree for the annual Festival of Trees at Liberty Hall.

Over 30 trees and 25 wreaths will be on display in Liberty Hall this year as part of the annual Festival of Trees fundraiser.

The holiday decorations which include sugar plum, Candyland, and Grinch-themed trees will be on display Monday through Sunday both in-person and online. The Festival of Trees is a fundraiser for The Childrens Shelter, a nonprofit that provides temporary residential care, foster care placement and other services for at-risk children.

Maren Ludwig, the event organizer, said special care is being taken to ensure the safety of visitors due to the COVID-19 pandemic. To view the trees and wreaths in-person at Liberty Hall, 644 Massachusetts St., people must sign up for a slot in advance at lawrencefot.givesmart.com. For those who would prefer to view the trees from home, Ludwig said a video showing all the homemade trees should be on that website Tuesday.

To see the trees in person or to view the video, there is a suggested donation of $5. Children under the age of 12 can view the trees for free. All the trees and wreaths are decorated and donated by locals, and Ludwig said there are more wreaths this year because some groups that previously made trees together opted to do individual wreaths instead.

This year, there is a cactus-themed tree, a Scandinavian-themed tree and a Victorian garden-fencing tree made by local artist Nick Schmiedeler, among others.

Instead of an in-person auction, The Childrens Shelter is running an online auction that is also available at lawrencefot.givesmart.com. Bidding will start Monday around noon and will continue until Friday at 8 p.m. The trees and wreaths will start to be delivered to the highest bidders after the viewing hours conclude on Sunday.

The Festival of Trees typically includes a cookies with Santa event. This year, Santa will be making an appearance on Monday and Tuesday nights, but from a distance. Santa will be waving down at children from the balcony of Liberty Hall from 5 to 7 p.m. both nights. Kids are encouraged to write a letter to Santa. To receive a letter back from Santa, a $5 donation is encouraged.

Heres a complete schedule of the viewing hours:

Monday through Thursday: 10 a.m. to 8 p.m.

Friday and Saturday: 10 a.m. to 4 p.m.

Sunday: 10 a.m. to 2 p.m.

Go here to see the original:

Liberty Hall hosts Festival of Trees this week, but online viewing options also available - Lawrence Journal-World

Q&A with A Sixers Odyssey Author and Former Liberty Baller Dave Rueter – Liberty Ballers

Ive always loved Willie Green. I do not know why.

He wasnt a flashy player during his seven seasons with the Sixers from 2003 to 2010. His scoring average never reached 13 points per game, he didnt have some boisterous, brandable personality that hooked me he wasnt even a full-time starter in six of those seven seasons. But I loved him. Still do. My only theory as to why is that when I was a kid, green was my favorite color. Ipso facto, you see the correlation. I met him once at a Verizon store near a California Pizza Kitchen. I just remember being so happy to learn we were on the same wireless coverage plan.

My peers could never share in my appreciation or fascination of Green. Most of them actually very actively disliked him.

What Im now realizing is that the charm of Willie Green, for me, was that he was somewhat emblematic of the NBA everyman. He was far from a star honestly, he was often a pretty unhelpful basketball player. But he served as a placeholder for me for so many guys who played on the Sixers over the years who I found impossibly endearing.

Dave Rueter not only shares in this phenomenon, but he just wrote the book about it.

A Sixers Odyssey: Exploring The Forgotten Players of 76ers Yesteryear dives deep into the Sixers tenure of Green and 75 others. Each chapter features a different nondescript Sixer, and the book serves as a tribute to the forgotten players on our favorite, stupid team.

Dave or Where Is Ben Rivera, on Twitter is known by many fans for honing his literary voice right here at Liberty Ballers. While with the site, Dave and his colleagues took on the mammoth task of trying to make the Doug Collins-era Sixers interesting. We thank him for his service.

I recently had the chance to speak with Dave via email and ask him about his career at Liberty Ballers and the process that went into crafting his inventive new book. Enjoy.

As a Liberty Ballers alum, Id love to first hear about what your experience was like writing for the site. How did you get involved? Are there some fun pieces or breaking news stories from that time that stick out?

I loved my time with Liberty Ballers. There was a sense of community with LB that I always enjoyed the interaction between the writers and commentators, the inside jokes that organically developed on the site, etc, etc. Heck, when I was with LB gosh, probably almost ten years ago at this point we worshiped a Giant Tanking Octopus named Lucy to secure a top pick. Even writing that last sentence a decade later doesnt seem odd to me. Lucy will provide.

(The first-ever LB community meet-up saw a resounding victory over the Hawks. Al Horford struggled. The more things change, et al).

I was the fifth writer to join LB and rounded out the starting line-up. If the OG writing staff was Michigans Fab Five, I was certainly Ray Jackson the least-heralded of the bunch. We had Jordan Sams (the founder), Mike Levin (now hobnobbing in Hollywood), the movie critic and tag team specialist, Tanner Steidel, and Godner (Derek Bodner). Like many LB writers, I started writing Fan Posts. I previously had a blog that no longer exists on a platform that got swallowed up by the internet years ago. But I enjoyed writing and wanted to make people laugh. I just needed a new forum. Eventually, I was asked to join the staff. I knew my role. If you wanted to know the strengths and weaknesses of a prospect from the Missouri Valley Conference, ask Derek. Writing a few jokes about Kevin Ollie was more my speed.

I was around during the Doug Collins Years, so outside of an upset of the Bulls thanks to half the residents in Chicago tearing their ACLs, we didnt have that much excitement. We were right in the thick of the Andrew Bynum acquisition but all we got was this lousy Pressure Makes Diamonds T-shirt. Oh, and the writers also said a lot of mean things about Damien Wilkins. Nobody played better in March and April when his team was 20 games under .500.

A Sixers Odyssey is so unique in that its a book about an NBA teams least talked-about players. This isnt The Jordan Rules. At what age do you remember growing a particular affinity and fascination for these miscellaneous guys? Did it start with one Sixer in particular?

I mention this in the prologue of A Sixers Odyssey, but my best friend growing up had this coffee table book ranking the Top-100 basketball players of all-time. I mustve read it a hundred times. Even today, I can visualize the pages and the pictures. With each passing, my focus shifted to the players in the background of the photos. Like I know who Kevin McHale is. Whos the guy bodying him up? Couple that with my memories from watching the Sixers on Prism and SportsChannel, and my obsession with basketball cards (I have over a dozen Jim Lynam cards Im willing to barter), and I have this treasure trove of knowledge and memories of these random and forgotten players.

As for a particular player, it may have been Greg Grant, the 5-foot-7 guard from Division-III Trenton State. He was different, you know? He was an outlier. The Law of Averages says he shouldve been playing overseas somewhere, but he held his own. I dug him.

What do you think it was about these guys that hooked you? Do they all have something in particular in common?

That these players all have a story, yet their stories arent widely known. The Juice Man Michael Cage traveled with a 50-pound blender. Don MacLean, not Kareem or Bill Walton or Reggie Miller, is the leading scorer in UCLA history. Manute Bols passport said he was 5-foot-2, because the photo was taken while he was sitting down. Ron Anderson didnt even play high school basketball. The list goes on and on.

The majority of books about the Sixers focus on Iverson or Dr. J, or the 01 or 83 championship team. The books play the same hits, and I get the appeal. Im not nave. Iverson is my favorite Sixer ever. But I didnt have an interest in rehashing, say, the AI practice rant. I wanted to give the reader credit. There are stories in this book a Sixers fan may not know. There are others he or she havent relived in years. Either way, I wanted to tell them in a funny and entertaining way.

Did you set out to write a full-length book? Or did you start to jot stuff down and it sort of snowballed organically?

While writing my blog, someone asked me if I had a plan for these player essays and I joked, Yeah, Im gonna create a coffee table book. But the idea always stuck with me. Like, what if

That was over ten years ago. Charles Shackleford was the first essay I ever wrote, back sometime in 08 or 09. There are 76 chapters in the book. Each chapter is devoted to one former Sixer from the last 30 years.

Do you think that theres something specific about the players who have passed through this particular franchise that makes the Sixers especially rife with these types? Could A Mavericks Odyssey exist just the same?

Id love to read A Mavericks Odyssey! I hope he or she includes former Sixer legends Lucious Harris and Shawn Bradley. But to answer your question, I think a lot of bizarre things have happened to this franchise in the past 30 years. The Jeff Ruland Incident from 1992 is one of the most bonkers stories in NBA history, yet because it happened pre-social media, its barely a blip on the radar. Sixers coach John Lucas accused former lottery pick, Sharone Wright, of feigning injury to avoid playing against Shaq and David Robinson. Vernon Maxwell is Vernon Maxwell.

From a content perspective, Im fortunate to be a Sixers fan.

From what Ive read, you intersperse many chapters about different Sixers with anecdotes from your personal life. Was that something you learned to do while writing for LB, or did that evolve and develop as you were writing the book?

I brought that from my blogging days, but the LB editors always gave me the freedom to write outside the box. I never covered the team in a traditional sense. Ive never been in the locker room or in the press box. Im a fan, so why pigeonhole myself as something Im not?

(As an aside, writing game previews was my least favorite part of the LB gig. The game starts at 7. The thread will be up by 6:45. Sixers by a million. What else do you need to know?)

I have a chapter about Willie Burton and his 53-point outing from 1994. I read articles written from the night and included quotes from that game. But I also have this vivid memory of me, a 10-year-old kid, watching Willie Burton go ballistic on his former team. Why not include that? I think, or my hope anyway, is that those personal memories will resonate with the audience. That someone will read that chapter and say to themselves, Man, I remember watching that game with my mom, or I watched James Anderson drop 36 at Locust Rendezvous. What a crazy night. Something like that.

Would you mind spoiling a small excerpt of the book for our readers?

Sure. This is the opening to my chapter on Greg Buckner.

The Six Years

Name: Greg Buckner

Height: 64

College: Clemson

Sixers Tenure: 2002-2004

It appeared Buckner was the Sixers No. 1 priority this offseason as Brown and King wooed him from the beginning of free agency. (Moser 2002).

Greg Buckner is still on the books. There will come a point when Buckners deal transitions from albatross to trade chip, but were not there yet. Buckner was like a Blockbuster membership card. You havent rented a movie since 2004, but theyre still collecting late fees from your checking account. In a cabinet full of head-scratching and curious deals doled out by GM Billy King, Greg Buckners contract was perhaps the most puzzling. In July 2002, King and the Sixers inked Buckner to an astonishingly long six year (six!), $18 million dollar deal.

Giving Buckner six years? What was he, a senator? Buckner wasnt an unknown. He had been in the league for three seasons and thats what was so perplexing. If Buckner was a mystery, then the gamble may have been justified. If he was some guy tearing up the Serbian League, and the only grainy footage of him was locked in a safety deposit box owned by Fran Fraschilla, then ok. Lets roll the dice on upside. Lets get nuts. The Clemson product was fresh off a season where he averaged under six points per game. Certainly, theres value in a defensive wing, but for a half a dozen years, youd hope he comes with at least one made jumper a week. Six years was a long time to wait for a player to develop an offensive game. Six years was a long time by any measure.

Larry Browns fingerprints were all over the Buckner acquisition. Coach Brown ended up abandoning the Sixers for the Pistons job after Gregs first year with the team. Not to play conspiracy theorist, but have we considered this was all part of Larry Browns strategy? Hamstring the Sixers with all these bad contracts and mediocre players, and then jump ship to an Eastern Conference rival? This was an inside job. Im not accusing anyone of anything. Actually, I am accusing someone of something. Larry Brown enjoyed a cake walk to the Finals, while Sixers fans were stuck contributing to a GoFundMe to hire Buzz Braman to fix Buckners jump shot.

Early on, Buckner had an impressive five steal performance against the Cavs, which made fans briefly forget there were still five years and eleven months on his contract. He was ok in year one, but the limitations on the other end of the court were glaring. To justify playing a wing who brought so little offensively, they need to basically be Marty Brodeur on the other end. Buckner only shot 27% from behind the arc for the Sixers, so Im thinking that GoFundMe that I contributed to never got off the ground.

If you could share any meal with any three Sixers from your book, which meal and which Sixers would you choose? How would they get along?

Vernon Maxwell has the best Twitter feed in the game, so definitely him. Probably Todd MacCulloch because Im fascinated by the Professional Pinball Circuit. Then probably Tony Wroten. Maybe there are a few Team WHOP B-sides he could play for us between courses.

Wed get along great and eat scrapple and wuder ice until our hearts and bellies were content.

My immense thanks to Dave for taking the time to revisit his old stomping grounds, tell us about the book and even share with us an exclusive excerpt. His book is a must-have for anyone whos spent a lifetime being obsessed with the Sixers. Below are some links to buy.

Bookshop

Powells

Amazon

The rest is here:

Q&A with A Sixers Odyssey Author and Former Liberty Baller Dave Rueter - Liberty Ballers

Crisis response team called to Liberty Twp. standoff – WKBN.com

Police were called to the home in the 3000 block of Northgate Drive about 10:41 p.m.

by: Patty Coller

LIBERTY TOWNSHIP, Ohio (WKBN) A crisis response team was called to a residence in Liberty Township Thanksgiving Day after a woman reported being assaulted.

Police were called to the home in the 3000 block of Northgate Drive about 10:41 p.m.

When they arrived, a woman said that 32-year-old Spencer Borom assaulted her and that he was still in the house.

Police said the woman told them that Borom had made statements in the past about having a gun, so officers secured a perimeter around the house and attempted to get him to come out.

After multiple attempts, officers called in the Mahoning Valley Crisis Response Team and evacuated a nearby home for safety reasons.

The crisis team entered the home and found Borom barricaded inside a closet.

Officers found a .22 caliber magazine, ammunition, and a box for a pistol but did not locate a firearm, the report stated.

On the way to the jail, officers said Borom became agitated and hit his head several times against the Plexiglass divider in the cruiser and also fought with officers at the jail, according to a police report.

Borom was booked into the Trumbull County Jail on charges of domestic violence, inducing panic and obstructing official business.

More headlines from WKBN.com:

Read more:

Crisis response team called to Liberty Twp. standoff - WKBN.com

FLOOD | The War on Drugs, Live Drugs – FLOOD Magazine

The War on DrugsLive DrugsSUPER HIGH QUALITY RECORDS7/10

In September 2014back when he was merely a cantankerous musician and hadnt been accused of sexual misconduct, harassing music journalists onstage, or anything else worthy of populating his Wikipedia Controversies sectionMark Kozelek took issue with The War on Drugs. The Red House Painters/Sun Kil Moon songwriter was playing (billed as the latter) at the Ottawa Folk Fest at the same time as the Philadelphia band, becoming irritable due to the fact he could hear them. I hate that beer commercial lead-guitar shit, Kozelek announced onstage. This next song is called The War on Drugs Can Suck My Fucking Dick. It wasnt, of course, but Kozelek did later record and release a track called War on Drugs: Suck My Cockan explication of a band he publicly described as sounding like Don Henley meets John Cougar meets Dire Straits meets Born in the USAera Bruce Springsteen. Hes not wrong. Thats exactly what The War on Drugs sound like. But, as Kozelek also said, thats not a criticism, its an observation.

Thats something that this, the bands first live album, only confirms. Spliced together from performances between 2014when they started touring for that years breakthrough third album, Lost in the Dreamand 2019before the coronavirus pandemic took its devastating toll on the music industryLive Drugs makes these songs sound even more lush, textured, and, yes, 1980s than they do on their recorded counterparts. In fact, theres a depth to these recordings thats rarely found on actual studio albums, let alone live ones. Just listen to the melancholy, heartwarming chug of Strangest Thing and its explosive yet muted beer commercial lead-guitar shit, or the dreamy skygazing of crowd favorite Under the Pressure, which is extended to almost twelve minutes and is full of both more vitality and vulnerabilityespecially in singer Adam Granduciels weathered, husky vocalsthan it has on Lost in the Dream.

In fact, while the band can sound rather one-dimensional on their actual albums at times, here, songs like Pain, Red Eyes, and Thinking of a Place all bloom into full, unrestrained life. And while their cover of Warren Zevons Accidentally Like a Martyr cant match the haunted-heart majesty of the original, it comes pretty close. Unlike most live albums, then, which tend to be geared toward people who are already fans of the band, Live Drugs actually serves as a decent primer for the uninitiated. And it certainly shows that Kozelek probably should have just kept his mouth shut and listened. He might have even enjoyed himself.

See more here:

FLOOD | The War on Drugs, Live Drugs - FLOOD Magazine

A live treat from The War on Drugs – Livemint

The next best thing to attending a live concert by a band you like is to listen to a recording of a live concert by the band. So when The War On Drugs (Twod) released an album, pithily titled LIVE DRUGS, this month, fans (such as this writer) exulted. Twods gigs are enjoyable, their already large soundscape expansively fills arenas, and theres never a dull moment. Now that most gigs have been cancelled owing to the pandemic, Twods move to release a live album couldnt have been timelier.

LIVE DRUGS is not the usual live album. Those happen to be recordings of a single or a set of gigs that are released as an album and normally are in toto reproductions of what a band plays at a concert. For their album, however, Twods frontman, Adam Granduciel, who sings and plays one of the two lead guitars for the band, sifted through around 40 hard drives full of recordings of the bands concerts from 2014-19 and selected some of the best tracks that he and a producer then sequenced to appear like a full gig. The result is a brilliant album that showcases the Philadelphia-based bands unique brand of music, in which neo-psychedelia meets and mates with heartland roots rock.

Twods albums are always filled with surprises. Granduciels vocals can remind you of Bruce Springsteen, Bob Dylan and Tom Petty all rolled into one. A little more than three years ago, this column had covered A Deeper Understanding, Twods last studio album. It was a great album and a good way to explore Twods psychedelia-meets-classic rock style. With LIVE DRUGS, however, they take their game to another level. The carefully chosen 10 songs have Granduciel in the spotlight. Nine of them are written by him; the lead guitar solos are mostly his. And the soundscape of each song expands as it unfolds.

A Twod song can begin innocuously, like a basic, no-frills roots rock track. But then, before you know it, the guitar solos kick in, and within minutes, your ears are on a totally different trip. Thats probably why critics tend to classify Twods music in the neo-psychedelic genre. On LIVE DRUGS, Granduciel and the co-producer, guitar techie Dominic East, have chosen songs that appear to segue from one to another as if they have been played during the same gig. Half of the songs, however, were part of the bands 2014 studio album, Lost In The Dream, which was Twods breakthrough album, bringing with it mainstream recognition and tons of fans.

LIVE DRUGS clocks in at just 70 minutes and that is perhaps the albums only shortcoming. It could have been longer, with more songs. Listening to Twod live, however, is always a treat. There is a bonus too. One of the 10 songs is a brilliant cover of the late Warren Zevons Accidentally Like A Martyr. Zevon, who died at 56 in 2003, was an influential singer and songwriter and the cover of one of his hits is like a tribute to the much admired musician.

But the song that stands out in the new album is the nearly 12-minute Under The Pressure. It brings to the fore Granduciels true genius as a songwriter and performer. It opens with a spaceyguitar riff that is as much a delight on headphones as on good stereophonic speakers and can easily transport the listener to a blissful musical heaven. And then Granduciel launches into the song (Well the comedown here was easy/ Like the arrival of a new day/ But a dream like this gets wasted/ Without you/ Under the pressure/ Is where we are/ Under the pressure/ Yeah, its where we are babe).

Twod began as a local indie band with fans mainly in and around Philly, but soon grew into a mainstream draw. Mixing noise rock style guitar with classic roots rock is not something you would normally expect a band to do, let alone pull off with lan. Twod does it effortlessly. When it began, Twod was a venture of Granduciel and Kurt Vile but after the first full-length album, Vile left the band and now has a flourishing solo career. Since then Twod has released three more full-length albums, and, of course, this years LIVE DRUGS.

Twods success as a band not only has much to do with Granduciels talent but with the fact that the bands music is so accessible. Older generations of listeners weaned on classic rock like the rootsy feel of their music and take to their improvisations and fuzzy, synth-driven lines as easily as younger listeners do. In that sense, their studio albums cut across the generation gap, appealing to a broad audience.

But it is their live performances that make Twod really stand out. LIVE DRUGS songs are not new, and they arent from very recent gigs. But the 10 songs on the album are essential for fans and a great place to start if someone isnt familiar with the band.

Five tracks from LIVE DRUGS to bookend your week

1. Under The Pressure

2. An Ocean In Between The Waves

3. Thinking Of A Place

4. Red Eyes

5. Accidentally Like A Martyr

First Beat is a column on whats new and groovy in the world of music.

@sanjoynarayan

Originally posted here:

A live treat from The War on Drugs - Livemint

After A Hard Fought Battle, Drugs Continue To Win The "War On Drugs" – Technical420 – Technical420

Earlier this week, the United Nations Commission on Narcotic Drugs (CND) announced a major milestone and voted in favor of a recommendation from the World Health Organization (WHO) to remove cannabis and cannabis resin from Schedule IV of the 1961 Single Convention on Narcotic Drugs.

The passing of the recommendation could prove to be a major catalyst for the global medical cannabis industry. From regulatory oversight to scientific research, the potential avenues for growth that are associated with the development are wide ranging and of significance.

The vote was closer than we expected, and 27 people voted in favor of the recommendation. There were 25 votes against the recommendation and the CND voted against five other recommendations.

The recommendations that were not approved by the CND include:

The recommendation that was passed by the CND is significant and acknowledges the potential medical benefits that are associated with cannabis. The passage of this particular recommendation could support medical cannabis legalization efforts around the globe and will monitor how it impacts the industry in 2021.

The outcome of the vote could start a process where countries re-evaluate how cannabis is classified on their respective lists of narcotics. It could also potentially pave the way for more research into the use of medical cannabis as a treatment for a variety of debilitating ailments and conditions.

Although most of the recommendations were not passed by the CND, we believe that the passage of one recommendation is an important milestone for the industry. We expect 2021 to be a period of growth for the international cannabis market and will monitor how other countries adapt to a changing market environment.

Authored ByMichael Berger

Michael Berger is Managing Partner of StoneBridge Partners LLC. SBP continues to drive market awareness for leading firms in the cannabis industry throughout the U.S. and abroad.

Go here to read the rest:

After A Hard Fought Battle, Drugs Continue To Win The "War On Drugs" - Technical420 - Technical420

Should the United States Decriminalize the Possession of Drugs? – The New York Times

Students in U.S. high schools can get free digital access to The New York Times until Sept. 1, 2021.

Attitudes around drugs have changed considerably over the past few decades. Voters approval of drug-related initiatives in several states in the Nov. 3 election made that clear:

New Jersey, South Dakota, Montana and Arizona joined 11 other states that had already legalized recreational marijuana. Mississippi and South Dakota made medical marijuana legal, bringing the total to 35.

The citizens of Washington, D.C., voted to decriminalize psilocybin, the organic compound active in psychedelic mushrooms. Oregon voters approved two drug-related initiatives. One decriminalized possession of small amounts of illegal drugs including heroin, cocaine and methamphetamines. (It did not make it legal to sell the drugs.) Another measure authorized the creation of a state program to license providers of psilocybin.

What is your reaction to these measures? Do you think more states or even the entire country should decriminalize marijuana? What about other drugs?

In This Election, a Divided America Stands United on One Topic, Jonah Engel Bromwich writes about the growing support to decriminalize drugs in the United States:

Election night represented a significant victory for three forces pushing for drug reform for different but interlocking reasons. There is the increasingly powerful cannabis industry. There are state governments struggling with budget shortfalls, hungry to fill coffers in the midst of a pandemic.

And then there are the reform advocates, who for decades have been saying that imprisonment, federal mandatory minimum sentences and prohibitive cash bail for drug charges ruin lives and communities, particularly those of Black Americans.

Decriminalization is popular, in part, because Americans believe that too many people are in jails and prisons, and also because Americans personally affected by the countrys continuing opioid crisis have been persuaded to see drugs as a public health issue.

Then, Mr. Bromwich explores the history of the war on drugs:

President Nixon started the war on drugs but it grew increasingly draconian during the Reagan administration. Nancy Reagans top priority was the antidrug campaign, which she pushed aggressively as her husband signed a series of punitive measures into law measures shaped in part by Joseph R. Biden Jr., then a senator.

We want you to help us create an outspoken intolerance for drug use, Mrs. Reagan said in 1986. For the sake of our children, I implore each of you to be unyielding and inflexible in your opposition to drugs.

Americas airwaves were flooded with antidrug initiatives. An ad campaign that starred a man frying an egg and claiming this is your brain on drugs was introduced in 1987 and aired incessantly. Numerous animal mascots took up the cause of warning children about drugs and safety, including Daren the Lion, who educated children on drugs and bullying, and McGruff the Crime Dog, who taught children to open their hearts and minds to authority figures.

In 1986 Congress passed a law mandating severe prison sentences for users of crack, who were disproportionately Black. In 1989, with prison rates rising, 64 percent of Americans surveyed said that drug abuse was the most serious problem facing the United States.

The focus on crack meant that when pot returned to the headlines in the 1990s, it received comparatively cozy publicity. In 1996, California voters passed a measure allowing for the use of medical marijuana. Two years later, medical marijuana initiatives were approved by voters in four more states.

Students, read the entire article, then tell us:

Do you think marijuana should be legal in the United States? Do you think the country should decriminalize the possession of small amounts of other drugs, like heroin, cocaine and methamphetamines, as Oregon did this election cycle? Why or why not?

What do you think might be the potential dangers of decriminalization? Do you think it will increase the number of people abusing drugs? Will it downplay the threat that drugs pose, especially to children? Could it pose safety risks, like traffic accidents and violence? Which of these dangers would you be most worried about and why?

What do you think might be the benefits of decriminalization? Do you think it will encourage people to get treatment for addiction? Will it reduce drug violence, or keep more nonviolent people out of prison? Will it allow the government to regulate drugs, as it does alcohol and tobacco? Could it reduce government spending, stimulate the economy and create jobs? Which of these benefits would be most important to you and why?

In your opinion, do the benefits of decriminalization of drugs outweigh the risks? Why or why not?

How do you feel about drug use in your community and state? Do you know if there is a concern about addiction or overdose in your region? Do you think decriminalization would benefit your community?

Read this article:

Should the United States Decriminalize the Possession of Drugs? - The New York Times

Colombia Is Considering Legalizing Its Massive Cocaine Industry – VICE

MEDELLN, Colombia - VICE World News sat down with Senator Ivn Marulanda to talk about his cocaine legalization bill, which is currently moving through Colombias congress.

After 40 years of U.S. - backed anti-drug policy that criminalizes the coca leaf, Marulanda and a group of members of congress want to change tack.

The bill attempts to create a legal industry that distributes cocaine to users for pain relief, not recreational use. Like that in Bolivia, it also hopes to bring hundreds of thousands of illegal coca farmers out of the shadows into a legal, homegrown industry.

VICE World News: So what does your bill propose exactly?

Senator Ivn Marulanda: It proposes that the state buy the entirety of Colombias coca harvest.

There are 200,000 farmer families linked to coca growing. The state would buy coca at market prices. The programs for coca eradication each year cost four trillion pesos ($1 billion). Buying the entire coca harvest each year would cost 2.6 trillion pesos ($680 million). It costs less to buy the harvest than to destroy it.

With that intervention from the government, two fundamental things would happen. First, you would bring 200,000 families into a legal sphere where they would no longer be persecuted by the state. Usually, these farm families end up displacing themselves, deforesting new areas, and re-planting coca while theyre running from the authorities. Second, Colombia is destroying around 300,000 hectares of forest per year. Its estimated that coca-growing families are responsible for 25 percent of that annual deforestation. Colombias ecosystems are the collateral damage.

What would the government do with all the coca leaves?

The state would supply raw materials to artisanal industries - primarily of indigenous origin - that would produce foods, baking flour, medicinal products and drinks like tea. Those ancestral industries in Colombia havent had the chance to develop because the raw material is stigmatized and persecuted by the justice authorities. So, on one hand, its about developing these industries. Indigenous groups have a strong relationship with the leaf because theyve taken care of it for hundreds of years.

Now, the coca leaf has other properties too. Studies show it has a significant amount of calcium. There are nutritional properties. And so there are opportunities to open up to industrial production. There are also ways to make fertilizers.

The other thing the state would do is produce cocaine. It would supply that cocaine to users. And then it would supply coca and cocaine to research groups around the world who could study it for analgesic (pain-killing) uses. It hasnt been easy to do that because it hasnt been easy for these research groups to obtain cocaine. So, this would mean companies would enter into contracts with pharmaceutical companies with state-of-the-art research and top security protocols to buy it in pure form from the state.

In Colombia, the personal consumption of cocaine is legal. Its legal because of a court ruling that recognizes personal consumption as a human right. In Colombia we have those freedoms and the state cant intervene. However, what we dont have is the legal cocaine to meet that demand. Instead, we have consumers who are in contact with organized crime groups who supply them cocaine in local drug markets. Its poor quality cocaine and its often mixed with unregulated substances. Its everywhere: in our schools, in universities, in parks and bars. Its in all these public spaces.

So this policy would mean cutting organized crime off from the coca leaf, and it would cut consumers off from organized crime. The Colombian state would distribute it to users under a public health program, effectively through physicians who would evaluate if a person is apt for taking cocaine for their pain. Do they have the right physical and mental conditions? Thats the question we would have to ask. And then it would be high-quality cocaine. Another important thing here is that not all consumers are addicts. Less than 10 percent of cocaine consumers are addicts.

How successful has Colombias war on drugs been?

Colombia has a military and police-driven drug policy that dates back to the 1980s, when drug-trafficking was the powerful weapon of the cartels. Colombias first reaction - and also the response of the international community - was to start a war on drugs. The war on drugs is a law-and-order policy against drugs that thinks of drugs as a criminal offence. Its also a persecution against the coca plant, the leaves of which are used to produce cocaine.

That policy has not changed since the 1980s. Actually, Colombias drug policy has only become more entrenched, more stubborn and more severe in its application. Were now in the year 2020. Yet Colombia exports 90 percent of the cocaine in the world today. There are about 1,500 tonnes that leave the country each year. And there are about 200,000 hectares of land under cultivation of coca. Were inundated with cocaine and inundated with deaths and violence. Weve lost sovereignty over Colombian territory to the dominion of organized criminal mafias.

Over this period of 40 years, Colombias anti-drug policy has become almost like a religion for two generations. Two generations that were born and raised with this way of thinking about drugs. But this policy is now part of our culture and dogma. Yet in 40 years, we havent had a real, honest conversation about this policy and its results. Its a policy thats been reinforced by the international community and above all the United States.

How would you decouple the cocaine trade from criminal organizations?

You have to remember the state has a large margin here. The state is spending $1 billion on eradication. Buying coca leaves would cost the state $680 million. Theres a strong fiscal margin and they could push up the price if they need to. And if you need more, youd have to feed the program with more public spending. But the important thing here is to save lives.

The thing is, we have to recover control over the state. Were losing control of the state to corruption, narcos in politics. Theyre in municipalities, in departments and in congress. All the way to the highest echelons of government.

Colombian Senator Ivan Marulanda at his home in Rionegro, Antioquia department, Colombia, on September 15, 2020. Photo by JOAQUIN SARMIENTO/AFP via Getty Images

What do you think the U.S. would think about a legal cocaine trade in Colombia?

The U.S. has been an important partner for Colombia.

Weve been going 40 years with a policy that costs billions of U.S. dollars with zero success and so much cost and destruction. Lets try out this other policy. Because something that hasnt worked in the last 40 years is something thats just not going to work.

The United States is just like Colombia. Were throwing away enormous quantities of money on the war on drugs in the garbage, instead of dedicating it to social and human development in order to improve peoples well being.

The scenario for relations between Colombia and the United States will be very different [under President-elect] Biden.

Does Colombia have the right to do what it wants with cocaine?

This is the thing. Anti-drug policy doesnt have the same effect for a country like the United States or a European country as it does for Colombia. Were the producers. That means this is destroying the lives of our youth, of our soldiers and police. The economy is totally disfigured because of this business. And look at the problems of corruption. Its brutal. Our current anti-policy is destroying Colombia.

There are countries in solidarity with Colombia on this issue. Colombia has all the right in the world to look for an exit from this problem. But I dont rule out the possibility that other countries want to implement a public health policy that would supply cocaine from the state to their consumers. They would buy from the Colombian state and distribute. And it would be distributed outside of the blackmarket.

What are the biggest obstacles and threats to this bill?

The first big obstacle is to open up the conversation among public opinion. This has been a giant taboo. Colombians are born and raised under this assumption that drug-trafficking is a war. Theres no information about coca and cocaine. So, with this bill we hope to open the conversation.

Right now, there are a lot of parties that hold power right now, and theyve gained that power by selling the war on drugs. Its their political flag and its won them lots of votes. Those parties - the ruling party Centro Democratico, the Conservative party, Cambio Radical - this has always been their traditional policy stance: to fight cocaine as a crime.

In our upcoming presidential elections in 2022, I hope that candidates get asked by the public: What do you think about the legalization of cocaine? Because thats never happened before in Colombia.

See the original post:

Colombia Is Considering Legalizing Its Massive Cocaine Industry - VICE

Democratic lawmakers introduce a resolution to amend the 13th Amendment to end forced prison labor – KNBR

Congressional Democrats want to amend a section of the 13th Amendment, which abolished slavery, to end what they refer to as another form of slavery forced prison labor.

Sen. Jeff Merkley of Oregon and Rep. William Lacy Clay of Missouri introduced a joint resolution this week that would remove the 13th Amendments punishment clause, or language that excepted convicted prisoners from the ban on slavery and involuntary servitude.

Our Abolition Amendment seeks to finish the job that President Lincoln started by ending the punishment clause in the 13th Amendment to eliminate the dehumanizing and discriminatory forced labor of prisoners for profit that has been used to drive the over-incarceration of African Americans since the end of the Civil War, Clay said in a statement.

When it was ratified in 1865, the 13th Amendment made slavery illegal except as punishment for a crime of which one has been convicted, the amendments text reads.

The Abolition Amendment would strike that clause from the 13th Amendment and end forced labor among prisoners, the congressmen said. Work programs for prisoners would continue on a voluntary basis.

Avi Soifer, a professor and former Dean of the University of Hawaii at Manoas Richardson School of Law, told CNN that its unlikely that efforts to amend the constitutional amendment will succeed.

It may be more beneficial to institute partial remedies, he said, like the federal statute that outlaws voluntary and involuntary peonage, a type of servitude by which people who owe debts work until those debts are paid.

It thus could have immediate relevance in efforts to address the terrible ways that we now treat prisoners and those jailed because they are unable to make bail, said Soifer, a 13th Amendment expert.

Merkley and Clay, in their release, call the punishment clause in the 13th Amendment indisputably racist in origin and in impact.

Because the South relied on slave labor for its economy in the 19th century, that line in the amendment was used as a loophole to continue the forced labor of Black Americans who were imprisoned, according to the non-profit Equal Justice Initiative, which works to end mass incarceration.

The punishment clause led to higher rates of arrests among Black Americans throughout the Jim Crow era to the War on Drugs in the 1980s, the congressmen said in the release, by effectively creating a financial incentive for mass incarceration renting forced labor of disproportionately Black prisoners.

Prison labor is a lucrative industry. NPR reported in July that as of the last federal count in 2005, over 1.5 million prisoners were working. UNICOR, a federal prison labor program, generates over $500 million in revenue every year, NPR reported.

But the practice exploits prison laborers, its opponents say. Many states, mostly in the South, dont pay inmates for working regular prison jobs, according to the Prison Policy institute, and the high end of their wages for regular prison jobs rarely exceed $1.

Sens. Bernie Sanders and Ed Markey, among others, have cosponsored the amendment, which has earned the support of social justice organizations like Human Rights Watch, Amnesty International and Color of Change.

Continued here:

Democratic lawmakers introduce a resolution to amend the 13th Amendment to end forced prison labor - KNBR

U.S. Tech Giants Face Tighter Regulation in Europe – The Wall Street Journal

The European Union plans to introduce in coming weeks new proposals aimed at changing behaviorand, in some cases, business modelsat large online platforms, reasserting the blocs role as global tech cop.

The European Commission, the blocs executive arm, is completing regulatory plans outlining how online platforms should remove illegal content quickly and refrain from using their power to quash rivals or push their own products on their sites. The commission plans sanctions for violators that include fines and possible separation of assets, according to people familiar with the matter.

Under the plans, the bigger and more influential a companybased on criteria including market share and revenuethe more obligations it will shoulder. The rules, though not targeting any specific company, are likely to apply to U.S. tech companies including Alphabet Inc.s Google, Facebook Inc. and Amazon.com Inc., according to EU officials.

In response to the coming regulations, tech companies and industry groups have warned against creating a new set of competition rules that could hobble innovation.

Were at risk of limiting entire ecosystems because of concerns that a handful of U.S. companies have gotten too big, said Kayvan Hazemi-Jebelli, competition and regulatory counsel for the Computer & Communications Industry Association, a lobbying group that represents companies including Amazon , Facebook and Google.

More here:

U.S. Tech Giants Face Tighter Regulation in Europe - The Wall Street Journal

Breaking up the tech giants won’t be enough to rein in their power – Open Democracy

Hardly any tech giant is spared an antitrust investigation these days. In the United States, Google is facing the biggest antitrust case in a generation. Across the Atlantic, the European Commission has brought formal antitrust charges against Amazon. In the UK, the Parliament has launched an enquiry into music streaming by platforms such as Spotify, Apple Music, Amazon Music and Google Play.

This was overdue. A decade of light to no regulation enabled a historical consolidation of platform wealth and power. The COVID-19 pandemic has made it painfully obvious how much we depend on digital platforms and how our lives are entangled with them. Crucial platform products and services like health technology (Google and Apple), food and groceries delivery (Deliveroo), transport (Uber) and the supply of essential goods (Amazon) underline to what extent they have become indispensable intermediaries of everyday life. Tech regulation is coming, and we need changes that thoroughly democratise their governance and challenge concentrated corporate ownership.

Breaking up platforms is a popular proposal for antitrust action. But this might not be enough to tackle the true source of platforms monopolistic power. Breaking up Facebook (Facebook, Instagram, WhatsApp) or Alphabet (Google, Youtube, Nest) wont profoundly change their dominant position in their respective markets. Facebook and Google are dominant because they have built network effects. The value users derive from using the platform increases with the number of other users. Owning and operating the digital structure through which these users interact allows platforms to extract valuable data and charge for access to the platform (e.g. in form of subscription or commission fees). This essentially makes platforms the big rentiers of our time, receiving revenue flows from the digital space they enclose.

As long as platforms were perceived to add value and drive innovation they evaded widespread criticism. But this narrative has broken down and concerns about platforms abusing their intermediary power are mounting. The antitrust case against Alphabet focuses on Google harming competition by paying other companies to set its search engine as the default option. Amazon is being sued over using retail data they extracted from their marketplace to boost their own products and compete with sellers. Meanwhile a market study conducted by the Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) showed concern about Facebook and Googles role in stifling innovation and using their market power to raise the price of digital advertising.

The prevalent tech-solutionist discourse makes platform dominance sound inevitable, integral to our contemporary configuration technology and society. But there are alternatives. The challenge is to liberate the democratic potential of the platform from the logics of concentrated corporate ownership and profit maximisation. Crucially, while platforms have encouraged a sense of technological inevitability, the way that our digital economy is run is neither fixed nor certain. Platforms are legal as much as digital institutions; we can recode both and change how they operate and in whose interests. We can disperse and democratise economic coordination rights currently monopolised by the platforms, ensuring private power is not beyond democratic regulation. Central to this must be a new architecture of ownership and control.

Excerpt from:

Breaking up the tech giants won't be enough to rein in their power - Open Democracy

Why we should rein in the big tech giants in 2021 and beyond – The Conversation US

The COVID-19 pandemic has made it clearer than ever that we are at risk of losing control of our economies.

Our institutions have increasingly struggled to meet the challenges of economic development before the crisis, and yet throughout the pandemic weve seen surging stock market valuations of tech giants including staggering CEO salaries the inability of anti-trust regulators, particularly in the United States, to effectively regulate markets and the rise of Chinas tech companies.

Tech giants are not just surviving the pandemic; theyre thriving.

Whats known as the superstar economy is one with a few hyper-productive, gigantic and highly profitable companies.

Superstar firms such as Walmart, Amazon or Facebook use new technologies to redefine markets, and benefit from what are known as network effects simply put, the value of a product is enhanced the more people use it. Facebook is an example people are more likely to join Facebook if their friends and loved ones are on it.

Initially, superstar companies bring new ways of delivering value to customers, but as they grow, they become powerful monopolies. Our institutions have struggled with how to deal with these relatively new firms and, for example, have allowed many mergers and acquisitions that eroded competition in their respective markets. Prominent examples include the acquisition of Instagram and WhatsApp by Facebook.

Superstar firms have also contributed to the shift in wealth distribution from labour to capital. Wealth was once commonly built through labour, rather than via capital that is often inherited or otherwise privileged.

Many superstar firms also have the balance sheets of mid-sized economies and hold more information about us than any country. Take Facebook. Mark Zuckerberg probably knows more about you than your government. However, you have no way of finding out because data ownership is at best a complicated issue, and retaining your data would require you to have next to no online footprint.

That citizens dont have access to data about themselves is problematic. Clearly, the only person who should own your data is you. European data privacy laws are about to become even stricter, but in North America, the erosion began in the aftermath of the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks that resulted in laws that dramatically eroded our privacy. Those laws have provided firms with the right to use the abundant data they collect.

Google is an example. One of the reasons Google is the gold standard of search engines is that it uses advanced machine learning algorithms. These algorithms use our data to learn what we want to see when were online.

Any successful competitor to Google would need to outperform years of learning advantage. That makes competition at best very challenging.

Primarily, we have seen two attempts to address the sheer might of tech giants and their lack of competitors.

In China, superstar firms have been largely nationalized. The state is increasingly involved in the most powerful companies in the country. Chinese regulators recently quashed the initial public offering of a financial company, Ant Group, in a high-profile example of government involvement.

Read more: Ant Group is holding the biggest IPO of all time here's what it is

In such a regime, the state is set up to have unlimited access to your data, so the principles upon which western democracies were built do not apply.

Second, in the western world, we traditionally address issues of market domination with antitrust regulations. Antitrust laws have started to hit the superstar economy hard in Europe. Google alone had to pay fines of US$9.3 billion in the last three years.

However, antitrust measures have so far not been very effective given theres little room for action its either none at all or breaking up companies, which authorities are often hesitant to do.

Examples of such limited success from the past are Standard Oil and, later, AT&T. Standard Oil served America as a monopoly before it was broken up into 34 smaller companies in 1911. Many of these companies are known today under the names Chevron, ExxonMobil, BP and Marathon. Decades later, AT&T was also broken apart into seven smaller, regional companies.

The west also seems ill-equipped to regulate new markets that have emerged outside the traditional boundaries of an industry, including the highly digitized sectors that were fuelled by the growth of the internet over the past few decades.

Antitrust regulations for tech companies in the post-pandemic era need to change. Restricting networked companies to expand beyond their core business, and preventing mergers and acquisitions that inhibit the self-regulating character of markets, could increase the competitive forces in the market.

For example, Amazon as a platform for connecting buyers and sellers has transformed how we buy things. However, there is an obvious conflict of interest and a threat to competition when Amazon offers their own products on their own platform. Microsoft, as a provider of the most popular operating system for computers in the world, is a threat to competitors by offering its own browser.

There is no harm in restricting superstar firms to their core businesses, but a lot of harm when we dont.

Regulators need to better understand the innovative forces in industries and markets to prevent anti-competitive behaviour rather than looking at traditional measures like market share. More competitive markets would offer better outcomes for consumers.

Better antitrust measures also require applying national data security laws. In practice, this would mean that all online platforms need to fulfil the national regulations in the markets where theyre doing business as opposed to only in their home countries. These ideas are currently being advanced in Europe and will likely be a game-changer for tech giants.

A localized market approach could also reduce the effect of data breaches. Competition would become healthier as well, because superstar firms couldnt impose the rules of the game in the same way anymore.

We must better define the role of superstars in our economies and decide whether its wise to readjust our market principles to accommodate tech giants, or whether we should restrict tech giants to adhere to our market principles.

Capital-rich investors will certainly enjoy reaping the benefits from accommodating the Googles and Amazons of the world but the average customer likely wont.

See the original post here:

Why we should rein in the big tech giants in 2021 and beyond - The Conversation US

Tech Giants of Silicon Valley: Friend or Foe to the Fitness Industry? – Club Industry

The Digital Age has been upon us for a while, and yet, as an industry we have been slow adopters, dipping the toe in the water with technology rather than being bold and diving in. The pandemic has been the catalyst that has forced the worlds fitness industry to embrace the possibilities on offer and adjust to meet the needs of the consumer. However, the increased consumer engagement with digital fitness, accelerated by global lockdown restrictions, has also awoken the sleeping giants of Silicon Valley.

As an industry, we have been caught on the back foot by tech giants such as Apple, Facebook, Mirror and Tonal who have been alerted to the consumers appetite for home fitness and fitness tech, recognizing the commercial opportunity, and have launched their own tech-driven fitness services and products. With bigger budgets, seemingly endless resources, established brand loyalty and a global audience, these newcomers to the fitness space have placed a huge amount of pressure on our industry, forcing us to expand digital offerings, enhance quality and meet customer demand in a fast-changing marketplace.

The biggest brands in technology, now with their sights firmly set on the fitness industry, will take no prisoners. How can club operators fight back in a David and Goliath style battle to win over consumers and secure their industry place for the future?

Anything that gets the population moving is a good thing. Getting more people more active more often is the whole reason we all work in the fitness industry. We all have a passion and drive to improve peoples physical and mental well-being through activity. So any new solution that promotes this is positive.

The focus that big players have placed on the fitness industry drives more investment, awareness and interest in exercise, creating a much bigger potential net of customers. As they say, a rising tide lifts all boats. It is also the case that as digital solutions help more people work out from home, confidence and ability increases, and these people may soon seek a facility or club as their next step.

More people engaging in activity is a good thing. The data that digital brings also allows companies to analyze at a whole new level, adjusting offerings to meet real-time engagement. But as a business in the fitness industry, recent moves by these companies have the potential to steal customers from facilities, tempting them with more accessible and affordable digital offers. They can rapidly develop new technology and new high-quality content, and they have the ability to stifle any creative moves the fitness industry makes to open new revenue streams through digital delivery.

An argument exists that some of these companies, including Apple and Google, are operating with a conflict of interest, as they can self-promote their own product, hold data from devices pushing their own product and operate in a developer-locked environment.

Health club operators offer fitness experiences, not just a workout. In-club activity offers a social aspect that cant be replicated through virtual experiences, and the four walls of a facility act as a cathartic change of scene, a space away from both work and home.

Many clubs also offer a range of activities, including spas, work-spaces, cafes and restaurants, sport facilities and child-care, as well as the unrivaled access to experienced professionals and support and a wide range of equipment options that cannot be matched by at-home gyms.

Digital fitness often offers no personal accountability, individual goal setting or performance reviews. This brings a risk of injury or a lack of professional support with no one focused on the assessment of technique. The nature of the digital fitness scene also highlights trainers with perfect bodies, the fitness ideal, but this is an unrelatable and unrealistic representation, especially to those new to fitness, which many of the home-fitness users are, and can have a negative impact on mental health, self-confidence and self-esteem.

In the United Kingdom, we know that roughly 16 percent of people participate in gym or fitness classes at least on a monthly basis. But these tech giants will attract to fitness a whole new consumer group, reaching a greater percentage of the population, not just in the United Kingdom but globally. Yes, this will grow the interest in fitness and in turn, the industry butand this is a big butunless we can compete we wont get a slice of this pie. When Silicon Valley does something, it does it well. The quality of this product will not be substandard, and we need to up our game with quality content and member engagement in order to remain in the game.One thing the fitness industry does have to its advantage is community. Despite the exciting appeal of some of these new developments, there is still something to be said for working out with people from your local area, socializing with them as a community, training with your trainer who knows you and your goals, and having loyalty for your local gym chain. No one wants to be a faceless number at the back of a digital class when they can be seen and heard, surrounded by a supportive community of people they know.

Digital is here to stay. But there is still a demand for the personable experience that in-club activity can deliverreal people delivering real experiences. Therefore, the hybrid model, a wrap-around combination of both in-club and digital on-demand offerings, is the perfect solution to meet consumer demands, providing personalization, accountability and connection to others while allowing the user the ability to select when and where they train.

Digital cannot replicate the in-person experience and community creation that drives a sense of belonging and the feeling that we are in this together or the face-to-face access to professional support. But digital options can supplement the in-club experience and help consumers integrate their fitness journey into their lifestyle, giving them the ability to train anywhere, anytime.

To date, Silicon Valley does not have the assets to deliver the in-person experience. As long as our sector has brick-and-mortar facilities, thisand the communities we create around themremain our standout unique selling proposition.

There is a lot of talk in the United Kingdom about the missed opportunity of our sector to be considered by government as essential to a preventive health care strategy. Currently, gyms are classified with pubs and cinemas. To protect our market position, we need to think much wider than the fitness outcomes we deliver and focus more on the wider health outcomes. We need to talk more about protection against infection and disease and prevention against long-term health issues such as diabetes, heart disease and some forms of cancer. Our language needs to shift from COVID secure to regulated.

If we shift into the health space and start to link our services more to government prevention rather than cure health care strategies, we create an opportunity to serve a much bigger segment of the population. Most people seeking health outcomes from exercise are likely to be deconditioned non-exercisers who need help and support from professionals to be able to train smart and safely toward personal health outcomes. This will require an in-person service. This is where the opportunity lies for our sector. Let the tech giants support the fit-natics and the health conscious who want to track and monitor health indicators; we will deliver the in-person exercise prescription. I honestly cant see our GP service ever moving online because people need and want a face-to-face consultation. Yes, digital services can enhance and support this, but I dont ever see the personal in-person consultation vanishing from our health care system. This should be the same in the prescription of physical activity plans for a healthy, fulfilling life.

The sector now needs to re-evaluate our market position and ambition for the future. We need to unite via our trade associationsIHRSA, Europeactive, UKactive. The case for change is well established. The positive impact of regular activity on health has been proven time and time again. We dont need any more evidence to support the case for change. What we do need is a joined-up strategy to drive the charge.

Digital will undoubtedly play a part in this, but the ability of brick-and-mortar clubs to deliver an outstanding in-person physical experience remains our biggest selling point. Tech giants from Silicon Valley cant compete with us on this. In fact, we should be collaborating with them rather than competing with them. Their health monitoring and tracking technology will be useful as we move into the health space. If we try to compete with them like for like, we will struggle. Instead, we need to create our own niche in the market.

We must focus on the delivery of an outstanding in-club experience, a unique selling point that Silicon Valley cannot yet match, supported by a quality digital provision. The two together will create a future-proof, closed ecosystem, enabling club operators to become an integral partner in a persons health and fitness journey.

If you would like to discuss the introduction or enhancement of your digital offer, visit http://www.fisikal.com or email: [emailprotected].

BIO

Rob Lander, CEO of Fisikal, has more than 20 years of experience in the health and fitness industry, as a former personal trainer who built a successful business of 50 sessions per week. Lander has also spent many years as an international presenter lecturing on technology in the fitness industry. He started with little knowledge of technology other than the vision that one day we would all be using it for many areas of our lives. Organizations all over the world now come to Fisikal seeking our advice on how systems and processes can be optimized. Landers experience working in all areas of the fitness industry gives him multiple perspectives to help advise on how solutions can be created. His advanced knowledge of technology also gives him insights into what the future holds and how we can adapt internal processes so they can leverage technology efficiently.

Continue reading here:

Tech Giants of Silicon Valley: Friend or Foe to the Fitness Industry? - Club Industry

Tech Giants Threaten to Pull Out of Pakistan Over New Rules on Blocking Content Free Press of Jacksonville – Jacksonville Free Press

Islamabad, Pakistan Tech giants Google, Facebook and Twitter have threatened to withdraw from Pakistan after the government issued new rules that give it more authority to control online content.

The government on Nov. 20 officially issued the Removal and Blocking of Unlawful Online Content (Procedure, Oversight and Safeguards) Rules 2020, which grant the Pakistan Telecommunications Authority (PTA) the power to remove or block access to unlawful online content through any information system.

The rules apply not only to social media platforms, but also to all internet service providers (ISPs). Social media companies and ISPs are now required to provide any information or data in decrypted, readable and comprehensible format if an investigation agency demands it.

The Asia Internet Coalition, an industry association whose members include Google, Facebook, Twitter and other global tech giants, released an extremely critical statement on Nov. 19 expressing its members alarm at the scope of the new law.

The draconian data localization requirements will damage the ability of people to access a free and open internet and shut Pakistans digital economy off from the rest of the world. Its chilling to see the PTAs powers expanded, allowing them to force social media companies to violate established human rights norms on privacy and freedom of expression, the statement reads.

Under the new rules, social media platforms with more than a half-million users in Pakistan must register with the PTA within nine months. A PTA spokesperson could not be reached for comment.

The rules state that ISPs and social media companies can be fined PKR 500 million ($3 million) for violating the new directives. ISPs and social media companies must also restrict hate speech, content inciting violence, pornography, terrorism and threats to national security.

The law states that the blocking of access to online content would be necessary in the interest of glory of Islam; integrity, security and defense of Pakistan; public order; and decency and morality.

The rules indicate that in the near future Pakistan may promulgate a Data Protection Law, making it obligatory for ISPs and social media companies to have their database servers in Pakistan.

The rules also state that once the government reports an issue, the ISPs and social media companies must block access to unlawful content within six hours in case of emergency, otherwise within 24 hours.

Farieha Aziz, co-founder of Bolo Bhi, an organization that promotes digital rights, said that if AIC members withdraw from Pakistan, it would have a severe effect on the countrys economy.

There are so many users earning their livelihoods from social platforms such as TikTok or YouTube, she said. If these companies decide to withdraw from Pakistan or are stopped from providing services what will happen to these users?

Pakistan banned the popular Chinese app TikTok on Oct. 9 for allegedly sharing indecent content. China is an ally of Pakistan, and the ban was lifted later in the month after Tik Tok agreed to remove vulgar content.

We suspect that these rules may create resistance and a conflict-type situation between the government and billion-dollar social media companies, said Asad Baig, founder ofMedia Matters for Democracy, a Pakistan-based nonprofit that promotes freedom of expression.

We are living in a global world, where if billion-dollar companies are doing business in your country, they also create an eco-system where local people also earn. What our policymakers are failing to understand is that we should be working with these companies to take advantage of their investments and services instead of making them accountable, she said. The companies would not be on the receiving end as Pakistan is a small fish and these companies have the whole world to do business with.

The AIC said the government had promised consultation on the new rules, but that never happened.

Prime Minister Imran Khans government faced severe criticism inside and outside of Pakistan after publishing the first draft of the rules in February.

The prime minister then initiated the consultative committee. There is a complete lack of transparency, Aziz told Zenger News. The power and the mandate of the committee were not to formulate rules but to give guidelines to the PTA to formulate rules. But here the committee itself has formulated rules.

What our policymakers are failing to understand is that we should be working with these companies to take advantage of their investments and services instead of making them accountable, she said. The companies would not be on the receiving end as Pakistan is a small fish and these companies have the whole world to do business with.

Pakistan was classified not free in the Freedom on the Net 2020 report of Freedom House, a U.S. government-funded nonprofit.

The online environment in Pakistan is tightly controlled by the government. Internet shutdowns, blocked websites, and arrests for activity online remain authorities preferred tactics in their effort to suppress unwanted speech, Freedom House said in its report.

(Edited by Siddharthya Roy and Judith Isacoff)

Read more here:

Tech Giants Threaten to Pull Out of Pakistan Over New Rules on Blocking Content Free Press of Jacksonville - Jacksonville Free Press