CIOs empower female students to achieve personal and academic success – University of Virginia The Cavalier Daily

Despite underrepresentation of women in academic arenas like STEM and business fields, as well as in recreational spaces such as fitness centers, many women-led CIOs at the University have risen to the challenge and continue to create spaces that offer support and empowerment to female students. As the spring semester begins, CIOs like Girls Who Code, Society of Women Engineers, Smart Women Securities and Changing Health, Attitudes and Actions To Recreate Girls are open to new women and non-binary and gender nonconforming peers who are looking for a community of supportive people with shared passions.

Entering into a male-dominated field as a woman can be intimidating and even off-putting, especially because of underlying possibilities to feel undervalued as a team member. With the intention of opposing this discriminatory dynamic, which is particularly dominant in STEM, Mara Hart, third-year College student and president of Girls Who Code, founded the organization to give people a community of support and solidarity.

The main mission of Girls Who Code at the core of everything we do is to create a more gender-inclusive tech field, Hart said. Whether that involves having more women, having more nonbinary people ... anything to build up that empowerment.

At the University, female students make up 55 percent of the general student body, but only 32 percent of the School of Engineering and Applied Science. Feeling intimidated by this disproportionate ratio, Rebecca Della Croce, fourth-year Engineering student and president of Society of Women Engineers an organization focused on empowering girls pursuing careers in engineering and technology joined the CIO her first year. Rising to her position of leadership within the organization, she has since continued to help her fellow female engineers to feel represented and appreciated.

When I got to U.Va. I felt how big of a deal it was to be a woman in engineering in some regards, Della Croce said. Not only was it weird to not see a lot of other women in the room, but sometimes my male peers really wouldn't take what I was saying seriously. I really wanted to find that community of other women in engineering, and I loved seeing how the women in SWE empowered each other.

Hart shared similar experiences of being blatantly disregarded and disrespected by her male colleagues in her computer science education internship. She has turned to the Girls Who Code community as a support system to learn from and grow with as she continues to face such challenges in the male-dominated field of computer science.

Regularly my boss would disregard what I had to say, including picking up his phone while I was talking during meetings then putting it down as soon as I stopped talking [and] making provocative comments toward me when I was talking about education and trying to discuss professional matters, Hart said. Aside from that, I have come back and learned that there may be a lack of representation, but there are people to reach out to.

The competitive nature of the Universitys STEM programs presents a challenge for women to overcome the existing gender barriers in many professional fields. However, this obstacle for women pursuing professional careers is not exclusive to STEM fields, as it exists in the business sectors as well. Claire Duffy, third-year McIntire student and chief executive officer of Smart Women Securities, was initially intimidated by the competitive applications required to join most investment clubs, so she decided to get involved in SWS because it was an open space for women to learn about investment with less pressure and more support.

SWS really prides itself on our focus on education, Duffy said. I know in general at U.Va. a lot of clubs have really competitive application processes [but] women are so underrepresented in finance, we want to give any girl who is interested in learning about finance and investing the opportunity.

SWS executes this mission of supporting all women interested in commerce by holding open seminars to educate students rather than expecting prior knowledge and experience. They also emphasize networking with women currently in finance to provide insight and expertise about navigating a career in the male-dominated finance industry.

Alongside education, we are very focused on mentorship and building connections between women currently in finance, especially those who have graduated from U.Va. and are alumnae of SWS, Duffy said. This semester in particular, we are putting a large focus on corporate events, so partnering with companies to come speak to our members and give them the opportunity to hear from women in finance. We want to be that lead into breaking more women into the industry.

Girls Who Code takes a similar approach by offering open instruction on the foundations of coding. They also bring these educational pursuits to the greater community in order to empower girls from a young age.

We want to make sure we are partnering with other members of our community, whether that is us teaching girl scouts or having Capital One come teach us, Hart said. Over winter break, the curriculum co-directors [and I] held a six-week coding workshop so that local girl scouts in middle school could earn all of their coding badges. We are all about integrating ourselves into the community and working to give back as much as possible.

Beyond academic and professional empowerment, woman-led CIOs at the University have dedicated their efforts to fostering personal growth by emphasizing physical and mental wellbeing. Cassie Korcel, third-year College student and president of CHAARG, has worked to establish a strong community of womens empowerment through physical health and group fitness.

Our mission is to show our members that fitness can and should be fun, Korcel said. We strive to remind our members to always be the best version of themselves and to take charge of their mental, physical and emotional health. We are encouraging people to make that change and live a healthy lifestyle.

Going to the gym and especially entering the weight room as a woman can be a very intimidating experience that can turn women away from working out. CHAARG strives to reduce that pressure by creating a community of supportive women with a shared passion for fitness.

Maybe it is unintentional that women feel pressured and even sometimes unwelcome in the space at the gym, but a lot of women do, so we can't discount that, Korcel said. Personally, even going to the gym sometimes can feel scary, you don't know what to do and you are unsure of where to go, but the beauty of CHAARG is being able to go with friends who make you feel comfortable to enter the space and to try new things.

The Universitys woman-led CIOs have created welcoming communities that are working hard to combat the gendered stigmas and barriers that women face in academics, the workplace and in their personal lives. The leaders of these organizations are setting great examples as women who are taking control of the space and opening the doors to empower other passionate women.

If you are in a situation and there is not a chair for you at the table, pull up your own chair, Della Croce said. Show up anywhere you want to be and make a place for yourself. It is OK for you to show up somewhere that you feel unwelcome because you can change that experience for the women who come after you.

Visit link:

CIOs empower female students to achieve personal and academic success - University of Virginia The Cavalier Daily

SRJC alum Peltz The Prodigy mourns and reflects on inspiring new album Lessons from Losses – The Oak Leaf

Lessons from Losses is a personal hip-hop diary detailing the darkest and brightest corners of a young man dealing with the heartache of losing his father, and the necessary positives and negatives in coping.

Peltz, 24, is a Santa Rosa Junior College graduate who studied communications and graduated in 2020.

Music has always been a part of Peltzs life. As a kid, his sister burnt him a CD of OutKast, Jay-Z and Ice Cube, which sparked his love of hip-hop. He wrote poetry growing up, and he began freestyling and honing his rap skills in high school. He proceeded to make music with friend and fellow rapper PB, making fun and classy rap tracks.

Comparatively, Peltz The Prodigys first solo record Lessons from Losses is much more stripped back, forlorn and introspective. Peltz reflects on the pains of losing his father at such a young age on nearly all eight songs.

Ive always enjoyed hip-hop thats vulnerable. Like, just dont be afraid to feel that shit, Peltz said.

Songs like Constellations show Peltz unveiling coping mechanisms and being vulnerable in his lyrics. Peltz raps, No more tough guy shit, Ill see my therapist, Ill be a fool to cut my wrist. As he rides over a crisp but haunting beat, Peltz advocates for self-help and confronting your emotions head-on.

All My Life finds Peltz turning his anguish into self-empowerment and expressing how his past problems seem small now that he has gone through a tragic life-changing loss. While very personal, All My Life succeeds at being a low-key track with a solid hook and great relatable messages.

With features from local artists Marelle, J. Lately and Yungstud, Lessons from Losses also expresses deep Bay Area love, as well as the power of working with people who inspire you. Peltz either finds instrumentals from free sites or videos online, or he collaborates with local producers to make his lyrics come to life.

Ive learned to take care of my mental and spiritual side. I believe God has a purpose for me, and I hope everyone else can find theirs too, Peltz said.

Lessons from Losses is a wonderful rollercoaster of emotions with slick flows, tight production and an endearing sense of passion from Peltz himself. A truly personal and inspiring project from an SRJC alumni whos only getting started.

See more here:

SRJC alum Peltz The Prodigy mourns and reflects on inspiring new album Lessons from Losses - The Oak Leaf

Empowerment will be at the heart of the new healthcare experience – strategy+business Today

Healthcare is never one-size-fits-all, and COVID-19 has brought this fact into sharp relief. A 65-year-old diabetic woman, a healthy 40-year-old man, a pregnant woman, and an elementary school student all take on a different level of personal risk every time they step outside. Each individual handles the mental toll of this prolonged pandemic differently, too. And those who live alone struggle with their health needs in different ways than those who live with others and in multigenerational households.

But some common needs unite all types of patients, no matter the circumstances. Everyone needs access to timely, accurate information and a better understanding of the care options they have. Everyone needs a safe, easy way to see doctors and monitor chronic conditions. People need greater control over their own care. They need to be able to take responsibility for the management of their health and well-being. And everyone including care providers needs to have their voice heard so they can function as co-creators in the healthcare experience. In short, patients, families, and healthcare professionals need to be empowered.

Everyone needs timely, accurate information. Everyone needs a safe, easy way to see doctors and monitor chronic conditions. And everyone including care providers needs to have their voice heard.

Achieving empowerment will require greater communication between and among the patient, family caregivers, and providers. It will also require an acute understanding and consideration of how social determinants of health such as where people live and their access to nutritious food, transportation, quality housing, and healthcare affect specific individuals and cohort groups.

These needs didnt originate with COVID-19, nor will they disappear once weve put the virus behind us. The urgent dynamics of the pandemic, however, have forced healthcare organizations to refocus and adapt in various ways that will help increase empowerment. Here are three areas where progress is already being made and where further developments could revolutionize the healthcare experience.

The move to virtual delivery during the pandemic has advanced the adoption of some of the technological innovations that had already started transforming the healthcare experience. Telemedicine, for example, has been around for a couple of decades, but the pandemic has made it commonplace. Remote monitoring of blood pressure, oxygen saturation levels, blood sugar readings, cardiac rhythms, and much more is now common. Long before the pandemic, apps that connect patients to medical expertise had been in development, and they continue to crop up. ResAppDx, developed by physicians at Massachusetts General Hospital, diagnoses acute respiratory disease in children by analyzing how their coughs sound. Another app, called i-Prognosis, coordinated by the Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Greece, tracks a variety of biological cues that, when added together, can signal the onset of Parkinsons disease. And Instant Heart Rate, developed by researchers in Canada, analyzes blood flow in the tip of a persons index finger to indicate artery health. All of these technologies make it easier for patients and caregivers to proactively monitor their health, building a sense of empowerment.

Wearable health devices are another fast-growing and empowering technology. Canadian company Myant is pioneering connected apparel that features sensors and actuators knitted directly into everyday clothing. The company is partnering with leading technology and healthcare companies, such as Mayo Clinic and Carlisle Interconnect Technologies, to test and perfect its solutions. VitalConnect, a Silicon Valleybased company, has also been on the cutting edge of digital monitoring with devices such as a monitoring patch that continuously streams 11 vital signs using telehealth-enabled software and another patch, approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, for monitoring COVID-19 patients.

The data from these sorts of devices can empower not only patients but employers and caregivers. For example, new predictive models used in some parts of the world employ artificial intelligence (AI) to analyze data related to the well-being of an entire organizations workforce, forecasting when an individual might become diabetic or develop other serious complications five, 10, or even 15 years in the future, and enabling early intervention.

Healthcare, especially among households sheltering in place, can be a family affair. Many patients rely on relatives, both inside and outside of their home, to help them coordinate care. Family members might be called on to administer medication, work with apps and other technology that the patient isnt familiar with, translate information, schedule appointments, and support care in other ways. A healthcare experience that empowers not just the patient but the entire household or support system is therefore necessary.

And there are other reasons aside from the purely practical aspects of shared responsibility for care that might make patients home situations relevant to their health. Social determinants of health have a significant impact on well-being. For example, a faith-based health system in the midwestern United States is working with a Fortune 500 technology company to factor social determinants of health into determining the likelihood that certain patients discharged from the hospital will be readmitted. These societal influences can help answer basic questions such as:

Historically, healthcare systems have lacked this context, limiting the effectiveness of the patient experience.

Empowering caregivers to attend to the needs of not only patients but themselves is also important. St. Elizabeth Health Care, in Toronto, created the website elizzbot, a self-described lifestyle destination that inspires daughters and sons to live well while caring for their aging parents. The interactive, confidential site provides on-demand, unbiased emotional support, including a chat feature, and resources such as psychotherapy techniques, self-learning AI, and a journal that caregivers can use to boost their mood and build resilience and self-awareness.

The Social Care Institute for Excellence in the U.K. has created an online guide for those who are supporting adults and children with learning disabilities or autism during COVID-19. The guide provides tips and facts for all aspects of the patient and caregiver journey during the pandemic.

Experience design teams are learning that small tweaks in the patient journey can provide benefits to one party while creating problems for another. Bringing everyone to the table patients, families, caregivers, partner organizations, community resources, local and national governmental agencies, and advocates during redesign brainstorming and implementation assures a greater opportunity for success and helps to prevent costly mistakes and do-overs.

Co-creation with key stakeholders and partner organizations is at the heart of the patient experience designed for the Ministry of Health in New South Wales, Australia. Patients were invited to offer feedback on pain points, such as accessing the online patient interface system, working within the system to make or cancel appointments, scheduling procedures, and obtaining clear and easy-to-understand post-discharge care information. And then, solutions were implemented in response, such as proactive reminders and delivery of the right information to the patient at the right time.

Another example of a co-created experience is a project in the works in Italy related to a womans pregnancy journey. This effort is a collaboration between experience designers, healthcare institutions, and pregnant women, together with their physicians and midwives.

At the beginning of her pregnancy, a woman in Italy today must complete a set of paper forms and submit them to her local health office. The forms, specific to the area in which she lives, are scanned and shared with those involved in her care. If she decides to change physicians for any reason or move out of the area, she must start all over to create a new paper record.

The new digital pregnancy journey eliminates the systems reliance on paper forms, makes transfer and sharing of records easy, and creates a real-time log of the womans condition and health needs so she and her caregivers can access critical information. Development of this digital system relied heavily on input from patients and caregivers about usability.

The pregnancy journey is a promising example of how the empowering healthcare tools that are being developed today might shape the future of the patient and caregiver experience. After a baby is born, the journey continues, after all. Health systems that can evaluate a mothers online search history, for example, or call up her and her childs previously recorded health records, couldsend push notifications to the mothers mobile phone, reminding her of any tests or health interventions her child might need or alerting her to discounts available on products or services that might be helpful to her.

One day, data analytics could track environmental conditions and match them to individual health issues. So, for instance, a person with asthma who is a runner could be alerted to poor air quality along her route on a certain day.

These scenarios arent some far-fetched vision of the future; they are very clearly possible when considered together with the advances we are seeing every day in all three of the critical areas weve covered technological innovation, whole-household solutions, and co-creation. And in all cases, it will be the empowerment of patients, families, and healthcare providers that will ensure our worlds collective safety and health.

PwC Italy senior manager Tommaso Nervegna and PwC Australia partner Diane Rutter also contributed to this article.

Continue reading here:

Empowerment will be at the heart of the new healthcare experience - strategy+business Today

Editor’s Notebook: January 6 disturbed what immigrants call ‘the preciousness of the ordinary’ – Chinook Observer

Like a gale that rips off the roofs in a small town, the lingering trauma of Jan. 6 has exposed basic truths about American life. Some of these are intellectual, as they pertain to the U.S. Constitution. The 12th Amendment to our founding document was being implemented inside the U.S. Capitol at the moment violent insurrectionists were breaking down its doors and windows.

Another foundational element of American life was violated that day an aspect of American life that is more emotional than intellectual, but one with a profound influence on our national prosperity and level of contentment.

Many values constitute America. There is freedom of speech. Also freedom of religion. For many Americans, personal empowerment is defined by the right to bear arms.

Underneath these and other bedrock freedoms lies an emotional truth that is not written down. For lack of a better word, call it consistency. In the most basic terms, we have a justified expectation that when we wake up in the morning the lights will turn on. We expect that we will not find that theres been a coup overnight within City Hall. We expect that when we drive down our citys streets, well not be stopped by a mob. We assume the banks will operate.

We take all of this for granted. But that is not the case in many other countries. And thats one reason why the United States has always beckoned immigrants as well as investment.

Heres how one local immigrant sees it. The ordinary is truly precious. She adds: Immigrants know this. They have come to America from places where all manner of daily disruption is commonplace. This kind of chronic instability is like being in an inescapable bad relationship inescapable, that is, except by taking the drastic step of relocating to a different nation.

Countries that become mired in cycles of political volatility suffer brain drain, as those with gumption and resources seek security elsewhere. For the majority who either choose to endure in place or who have no practical choice, life becomes a toothache dogged by worry and underachievement. Who wants to start a new family or business in a place where officials are corrupt, where public services are undependable, where warring political factions can destroy decades of work in a single riot?

This is what the U.S. risks if we are unable to coalesce around a rational middle ground that cherishes an element of stability and predictability. Far from being boring, the traits that made America great serve as a foundation for creativity and risk taking. Just as children who grow up in supportive families with high expectations may never fully realize how lucky they had it, citizens of smoothly functioning nations can scarcely recognize how privileged they are.

The dividends of living in such a country may be invisible to most. But they enrich us in countless ways. Americas stability means we are able to inexpensively borrow whatever we need to springboard us out of what might otherwise be a pandemic-induced depression. Our reputation for strength shields us, to some extent, from attacks by our adversaries.

The horror show of Jan. 6 badly bruised our reputation for stability. Prolonged civil unrest has also stripped the luster off several U.S. cities including Portland.

Its often said that the first step toward getting better is recognizing you have a problem. In todays U.S., theres no shortage of those who decry both real and imagined shortcomings nor should we ever cease striving to ensure political, legal and economic justice for all. Our problems are comparatively easy to see.

Ben Franklin, our pragmatic founding father, wrote in 1789 that Our new Constitution is now established, everything seems to promise it will be durable; but, in this world, nothing is certain except death and taxes.

If transported to today, Franklin would worry about how many of us fail to appreciate what we have. Franklin would recognize citizens who cherish the extraordinary value of normal operations are the key to an enduring republic.

Even Franklin admitted he didnt like every bit of the Constitution, but he recognized the whole package was a recipe for enduring American success. Healing the damage to our nation starts with recommitting ourselves to preserving the preciousness of the ordinary.

Steve Forrester is president of EO Media Group and Matt Winters is publisher-editor of the Chinook Observer.

Read the original here:

Editor's Notebook: January 6 disturbed what immigrants call 'the preciousness of the ordinary' - Chinook Observer

Amazon Has Transformed the Geography of Wealth and Power – The Atlantic

Portraying the phenomenon as a widening urban-rural divide is the simplistic version of a more nuanced and bigger story, MacGillis emphasizes. In 1969, the 30 metropolitan areas with the highest per capita personal income included Detroit, Cleveland, and three other midwestern cities. In 2019, only two midwestern namesChicago and Minneapolisappeared on that list, and nearly all the rest were on the coasts. Meanwhile, within the coastal cities that have grown wealthier, the gains have been disturbingly uneven. Rising rents and a lack of affordable housing have left the Seattle area, for example, with the third-biggest population of homeless people in the U.S., after New York City and Los Angeles, according to 2019 data.

These numbers document a stark divergence, but they dont capture its human dimensions. That is MacGilliss goal, as he explores what the erosion of power and possibility means for regular people. Internally, Amazon uses the word fulfillment in reference to processing customers orders. MacGillis, of course, has another usage in mind: the very American emphasis on the chance to seek satisfactiona sense of meaning, purpose, and value; a feeling of personal empowerment and communal solidarityin our labor. No corporation provides a clearer vantage, or more angles, than Amazon does on the strategic choices that have expressly contributed to foiling that quest.

F ulfillment begins in a basement. Hector Torrez (a pseudonym) is an Amazon warehouse employee in Thornton, Colorado, who earns $15.60 an hour moving packages and boxes all night long. When the book opens, he has learnedfrom co-workers, not the companythat he has been exposed to the coronavirus on the job, and his wife has exiled him downstairs. From Torrezs basement, MacGillis travels to Seattle and Washington, D.C., where so much of Amazons wealth is concentrated, as well as to cities in Maryland, Ohio, and Pennsylvania that have Amazon to blame, at least indirectly, for their historic decline in fortunes since the 90s.

In some of MacGilliss stories, the connection to Amazon is so tenuous as to be almost indiscernible; the characters problems seem to arise more from larger forces, such as globalization, gentrification, and the opioid crisis, than from any one corporations influence. A young man from small-town Ohioalienated by his experience in D.C., where he starts collegereturns home and enters Democratic politics. After scoring a local success, he runs for Congress, determined that the party not write off his opioid-ravaged, Trump-supporting region, but he fails to drum up more than a couple of union endorsements. A gospel singer who became a cultural force in Seattle during the 80s watches as her neighbors are pushed out of the citys historically Black Central District one by one.

Follow this link:

Amazon Has Transformed the Geography of Wealth and Power - The Atlantic

Self-Service is the Future And It’s Time To Embrace It – Integration Developers

The pace of digitization is accelerating. The volume, velocity, and variety of data is exploding.

Customers, clients, partners, and programs are screaming for more data, faster. Central IT is under more pressure than ever, but our budgets are neutral, so we have to do more with less. At times, it can feel like were trapped in a perpetually spinning wheel with no destination.

But there is a way out:

The answer is the democratization of data through empowerment and advanced automation strategies. When secure, relevant data is readily available to all of our users, we can build a culture of data self-reliance, get more from our existing data resources, and promote innovation across an organization.

These are the ingredients of a new recipe for agile and responsive self-serve analytics.

A business user needs to have confidence in the data they are using. Implementation of solutions that automatically assess the health, relevance, and usefulness of the data and point out any problems, provide an easy way to remedy any trust issues.

Data preparation is a vital step that will ensure your data is accurate, of the required quality, and useful for specific situations including machine learning. For example, if a non-business user is combining data from two different sources and they are different formats, errors and analysis problems can arise.

Automated, intelligent self-serve analytics solutions recognize and fix issues, so the organizations data is useful for everyone involved in the environment.

Todays modern data lakes and complementary technologies for data integration and governance are also working to set users up for self-service success. They help empower business users to easily gain access and analyze data in a cloud data warehouse from either an on prem or a SaaS application.This is where a number of non-tech user focused data ingestion tools come in.Then, your next step is to get out of the way.

Lets explore possibilities

CIOs are responsible for satisfying the data demands of every department across the organization. Their customers don't want them to be a bottleneck just as much as CIOs don't want to be the bottleneck; they're just trying to solve problems.

Some of those problems require a lot of data analysis, but there are many narrower problems that only require a subset. It just doesnt make sense to treat every problem the same way.

Central IT is a necessary resource for questions that demand a lot of analysis. But its often delivering an overpowered solution for simpler problems with smaller, department-specific datasets. We need to do something different to accelerate the process a newer methodology to liberate our customers.

Most lines of business have somebody who is data literate. They're usually not technologists, but they have enough technical skill to build a complicated spreadsheet or run some basic SQL. Lets look at some modern solutions that can leverage the data-savviness of many of todays knowledge worker without all the IT over-engineering.

Nimble datasets: New data lake technology makes it possible to empower these users to get the data for themselves. They are already familiar with the business, and they understand the data. Users can provide a copy of a dataset so that they can help shape the data and improve its quality of the data by doing simple tasks.

These nimble datasets dont require a very high degree of technical skill or time. Most importantly, they don't need to bring a developer into the picture. With modern data lakes, the cost of liberating data is surprisingly low. You can give users a view of the data, instead of creating a full duplicate.

Best of all, users can still hide sensitive or personal information and expose only what is necessary, so you can comply with all the governance and policy rules. And when users create a copy in modern technologies, you don't consume a whole new infrastructure or double your data storage.

User-Friendly Data Catalogues: Another tactic is to provide a data catalog which provides an inventory of all the data that is available within a company. It essentially maintains all the metadata that describes the data and shows users that have access to the catalog what data is available, where and how to find it, and how to use it.In some cases, there are also some additional capabilities that allow users to put their own tags, ratings, etc. on a dataset to give further information on the relevance and usefulness of the dataset.

Data catalogs have traditionally been used by IT organizations.That said, as they are more and more being made available to non-IT business users, they also need to become more user friendly and easier to use by these non-tech users.

Rapid access to information changes the way we make decisions.

For example, say you wanted to add more headcount to your SMB segment. You dont have the data, but your gut tells you that this segment has potential. Suddenly you get an SMB segment report that tells you, Oh, by the way, the southeast quadrant is doing really well.

You would never have seen that if you didn't have the right breakdowns, but now you wont waste resources on a region where theres already a natural demand and can instead invest more heavily in the regions that need help. You may have spread headcount equally in all regions, rather than by demand, if you didn't have insight at this level of detail.

We make such decisions all the time, but we are not 100 percent data-driven by any means. As we receive more data, we become better and better at assessing it. Once you see the data clearly, you will find more opportunities. You always do.

The transition and transformation to user self-sufficiency is just beginning its a journey, as they say. There's plenty of opportunity for growth and innovation. Whats exciting about this evolution is that it does not preclude central IT from doing all the right things in the right way for the future.

CIOs can empower departments to take care of their business and still do everything they need to do for the long-term health of their data. The secret to success is to get away from central planner thinking. Central IT doesnt have to be the source of all innovations for your data. In fact, there are benefits to a more de-centralized approach.

For instance, when you so much data at the central level, you have to worry about every action. One wrong step can compromise the business by exposing the data to the wrong people.

But now, IT doesnt have to design and deploy everything. IT is now empowered to enforce policy throughout the process.

It works like this:

IT continues to own and configures the storage and the computing environments. Meanwhile, The team prescribes the framework for integrating new data in a way that everyone can follow. They establish policy and standardize tools every step of the way, from collection to storage, to wrangling, to analysis. With these methods and models in place for all the standard data processing, IT just has to deal with exceptions, not every request.

As humans, we have our failings, and by bringing more humans into the picture you could multiply the failings, as well. But with more people doing more things, any one mistake is more likely to be caught and less likely to be catastrophic. And when you work with data constantly, you get better at it.

By empowering our customers with self-service access to the data they need, we free up IT to think about higher-level, higher-order functions that provide so much value and facilitate data literacy. We can anticipate the next big thing and gain insight with an incredible amount of detail instead of reacting to the last one and, more importantly, help our customers anticipate.

This is the future. Our customers demand it, our performance requires it, and our success depends upon it. The time has come to wake up and solve the need.

As CTO at Talend, Krishna Tammana is responsible for scaling the companys product and engineering organizations. Previously, Krishna spent nearly a decade as VP of Engineering at Splunk where he led global engineering teams and cloud operations during the companys successful portfolio expansion and transition to the cloud.

See the article here:

Self-Service is the Future And It's Time To Embrace It - Integration Developers

[Full text] Women Diagnosed with Ovarian Cancer: Patient and Carer Experiences and | PROM – Dove Medical Press

1School of Health Sciences, University of Notre Dame Australia, Fremantle, Western Australia, Australia; 2Telethon Kids Institute, Centre for Child Health Research, The University of Western Australia, Nedlands, Western Australia, Australia; 3Institute for Health Research, University of Notre Dame Australia, Fremantle, Western Australia, Australia; 4Division of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia

Correspondence: Sharolin BobanSchool of Health Sciences, University of Notre Dame Australia, Fremantle, Western Australia, AustraliaEmail 32009365@my.nd.edu.au

Purpose: By directly engaging with women diagnosed with ovarian cancer, this study aimed to explore and identify their view of the health symptoms and outcomes that matter most to them as they traverse their disease pathway.Background: Patient-reported outcome measures in ovarian cancer have tended to focus on physical symptoms rather than the more complex psychosocial aspects of living with the disease. Using a ground-up approach, this study sought to comprehensively understand the health concerns that matter most to women with ovarian cancer as a first step in generating items for development into an ovarian cancerspecific patient-reported outcome measure.Patients and Methods: Following an extensive literature review, we sought to capture the patient voice through a qualitative descriptive approach including a community conversation with ovarian cancer patients, their carers and clinicians, and interviews and focus groups with women with ovarian cancer. Thirteen women were interviewed individually, and two focus groups were conducted. A template thematic analysis was used to analyze the data.Results: Key themes included challenges related to clinical diagnosis, treatment phase, altered relationships with family/friends, financial issues, relationships with health professionals and coping strategies. Within each key theme, several sub-themes emerged that were identified as various challenges experienced by participants. Diagnostic delay, chemotherapy and surgery-related challenges, negative impact of sexual well-being on partner relationship, communicational challenges with health professionals were among the few issues identified. In addition, self-empowerment was identified as a coping mechanism among participants.Conclusion: By identifying priorities for women diagnosed with ovarian cancer we have highlighted the need for strategies to reduce diagnostic delays and improve quality of life for these women. Data will inform the development of an ovarian cancerspecific patient-reported outcome measure.

Keywords: focus groups, health-related quality of life, qualitative descriptive, patient-reported outcome measures, semi-structured interviews

Ovarian cancer (OC) affects women of all ages but is most commonly diagnosed after menopause. More than 75% of affected women are diagnosed at an advanced stage because early-stage disease is usually asymptomatic, and symptoms of late-stage disease are nonspecific. The strongest risk factors are advancing age and family history of ovarian and breast cancer.1 Currently there is no effective population-level screening test for OC.2,3 Treatment usually involves radical surgery and chemotherapy with subsequent lines of chemotherapy for disease recurrence.4 Treatments can impair health-related quality of life (HRQOL), a concept that pertains to general well-being or outcomes surrounding a specific disease.5,6

Over the previous two decades, patients have had increasing roles in providing information and participating in clinical decisions for managing their cancer. Structured patient provided information without clinician modification and/or interpretation is termed a patient-reported outcome measure (PROM).7 PROMs can be either generic tools such as the hospital anxiety and depression scale or disease-specific tools designed for specific groups of patients such as those with gynecologic cancers.8 Patient involvement has a profound impact on PROM development as it is only the patients who can determine item relevance and comprehensibility of the tool.9,10

Currently, four validated OC specific PROMs have been developed to measure HRQOL of the patients: The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire of Cancer Patients Ovarian Cancer module (EORTC QLQ-OV28), Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy Ovarian Cancer (FACT-O), FACT Ovarian Symptom Index (FOSI) and Measure of Ovarian Symptoms and Treatment Concerns (MOST).1113 However, these tools do not identify all aspects of HRQOL and differences exist in the level of patient involvement in the development of these PROMs, which is vital for PROM development.14

This study is affiliated with an overarching project, Patients First: Continuous Improvement in Care-Cancer (CIC Cancer), that aims to develop an OC PROM to measure HRQOL, through a ground-up approach that includes meaningful patient involvement. As an initial step, this phase of the study involved the collection and analysis of qualitative data to inform the subsequent generation of items necessary for the development of an ovarian cancerspecific HRQOL tool.

Based on an extensive literature review and assessment of the content of existing cancer PROMs, this study utilized a qualitative descriptive approach. A qualitative descriptive approach enables the researcher to obtain comprehensive details of personal events as experienced by individuals and is appropriate for health science researchers as it provides rich and descriptive information from the participants perspective.15 This study employed a community conversation for women with OC, their carers and a clinician (PAC) to shape the subsequent semi-structured interviews and focus groups.

Purposive sampling (non-probability) using a maximum variation sampling strategy was used to identify participants. Purposive sampling enables the researcher to intentionally select participants who have in-depth personal knowledge of the topic which will contribute to the study in alignment with the research aims.16 The participant inclusion criteria were women diagnosed with OC aged above 18 years, who were living in Western Australia and fluent in English. Carers of participants were also invited to participate in the study. Participants were recruited at various time-points from their diagnosis.17

Community conversation, interview and focus group participants were recruited through an advertisement distributed through the media and relevant agencies including Cancer Council Western Australia (CCWA) and Ovarian Cancer Australia (OCA). Interested participants were asked to contact the researcher(s) and/or CCWA & OCA directly. Thereafter, the participants were contacted by the researchers (CB, SB) who provided them with the choice to participate in either interviews or focus groups. Details of date and time along with venue for the community conversations, interviews and focus groups were sent out by e-mails to participants through both the CCWA member database and the OCA networks along with the CCWA regional support coordinator. The initial community conversation facilitated by a qualitative research expert (CB) was held with 15 women with OC (different to those who participated in the interview and focus groups), two consumer advocates, and a gynecologist with experience in gynecological oncology (PAC) to explore some of the key issues of personal importance to key stakeholder groups.

Ethics approval for this study was granted by the Human Research Ethics Committee at University of Notre Dame Australia (018158F) and conforms to Australian 2018 Update of the National Statement on Ethical Conduct in Human Research. The participant information sheet and consent form were provided to participants and the signed consent form was obtained from the participants prior to data collection. All participants provided consent for their de-identified data to be published. Guided by the literature review and the field notes during community conversation, similar question formats were formulated for both interviews and focus groups, Figure 1. In addition, our study processes complied with the Declaration of Helsinki.

Figure 1 Question format used during semi-structured telephone interviews and focus groups.

Along with the qualitative research expert, the student researcher (SB) independently conducted individual telephone interviews of approximately 30 minutes duration with 13 OC patients at their place of convenience. The research team (CB, SB) then conducted two focus groups in metropolitan Perth, Western Australia. A total of 13 participants attended one of the two focus groups, each lasting approximately 90 minutes, with participation of three carers in the second focus group. Participants varied in their age. Most participants were employed and were married/defacto. Four participants were over 5 years since diagnosis, but one participant had received a diagnosis less than 6 months at the time of the interview. Disease status of the participants at the time of the interview was obtained. Six participants were undergoing active treatment, with a completion of at least two full cycles of chemotherapy. The remaining participants confirmed that they were in remission or awaiting treatment. The number of cases of OC in Western Australia is small compared to some other cancers (eg breast, prostate) and it was important to recruit as many women with OC across the disease trajectory as possible. Thus, the focus of this study was the importance of the different experiences of the participants.

Data saturation was achieved, and collected data were audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim by the student researcher (SB). Template thematic analysis was performed which included open and axial coding using the qualitative data management program, QSR NVivo (version 12), Figure 2.18 Template analysis is defined as a method for identifying, analysing19 and reporting themes in the data based on the task question format. It enables the researcher to identify emerging themes in understanding a phenomenon or event.20,21 Key themes identified were categorized as core themes and further emerging themes then became the categorical sub-themes for analysis.

Figure 2 Stages of qualitative analysis process: an illustration.

Member checking also included sending the summary of coding and themes back to four participants who had indicated that they were willing to receive this summary via the CCWA and OCA support group coordinators.

Six key themes emerged regarding various aspects of illness and treatment experiences described by the women and their carers (Figure 3). Within each key theme, several sub-themes and relative sub-themes emerged that were identified as various challenges experienced by participants as detailed below.

Figure 3 Representation of key themes emerged from interviews and focus groups.

Four factors were identified in relation to the symptomatic presentation pertaining to the disease and are shown in Table 1. Participants experienced pre-diagnostic symptoms including abdominal/bowel discomfort and pain, urinary urgency, fatigue, weight gain, abnormal menstrual bleeding and/or menopausal symptoms. Lack of awareness of disease symptoms by both patients and health professionals (HPs) was a related issue. Due to work and family commitments, several participants intentionally ignored their symptoms. In further, majority of the participants expressed diagnostic delay as another challenge faced during their clinical diagnosis phase.

Table 1 Percentage of Participants with Symptoms and Presentation

Challenges related to receiving treatments were highlighted with at least half of the participants feeling vulnerable at times since receiving their diagnosis. Most of the participants were challenged by side-effects. Fatigue, nausea, neuropathy, memory loss and loss of appetite were the most common side-effects identified, with less common side-effects such as mucositis and organ failure also described. Support of family and friends provided strength for the majority of the participants. Some women indicated having to modify their usual diet, lifestyle and physical activity during treatment. Activities such as meditation, cycling, gardening and yoga helped them cope during and after treatment. However, some participants also mentioned how empowering themselves during treatment was vital. Maintaining and having a relaxed mind, a positive attitude and a sense of humor were practiced by a few, despite the situations they were facing at that time.

Another participant spoke of how she had lost the chance of experiencing motherhood. Rurally located participants faced further travel challenges of time and distance. And furthermore, two participants highlighted the issues around having lack of treatment options while travelling, either it be a rural destination or an interstate travel.

Other key themes related to living with a diagnosis of OC across the disease trajectory.

All participants agreed that relationships with their family and friends influenced their lives. Some participants spoke of experiencing lack of support with unpredictable reactions and withdrawal of family and/or friends. Other participants spoke of being avoided and noticed that people around them react differently which then created emotional reactions such as upset and insecurity. Furthermore, sexual relations and a changed level of intimacy with a partner/spouse were identified as an important subtheme in their lives. Many participants described how a lack of intimacy had put pressure on their partner/spouse relationship and affected their emotional well-being. A few participants described their sexual relationship as non-existent and that a counsellor had been consulted.

Most of the participants agreed and acknowledged having support from family and/or friends had a profound impact on their lives. A positive relationship with close family boosted their journey particularly following the diagnosis and during treatment. Participants described drawing strength and emotional support, and an increased interpersonal relationship bond with family and friends.

Almost all participants reported having financial issues such as out-of-pocket expenses for scans, surgery and other practical issues including hospital parking and medication costs. Several participants reported lack of information about accessing health services. Some mentioned the financial toxicity associated with their illness and that they lacked knowledge of how to access support services such as paying the bills without going into debt and having to access their superannuation funds for urgent and necessary expenses.

I guess it was not even initially when I wasnt told about certain things I could access like my super. I had to find out I think two years down the track or something. So it wasnt, nobody even gave me that sort of information.

Some participants had to stop work during treatment and others had to reduce their workload to cope with the challenges and issues faced during their clinical journey.

Participants spoke of their relationships and experiences with their respective HPs. In general, most participants acknowledged having a positive relation with HPs including general practitioners (GPs), gynecological oncology and medical oncology providers in terms of the support and medical treatment provided to them. The advice received by the oncology team was described by one participant as absolutely phenomenal (they) answered any questions with patience and understanding.

Meanwhile, some participants spoke of a perceived negative relationship with their HPs. Overall, many participants felt there were communication gaps in the healthcare system, particularly during treatment, and participants experienced various forms of communication challenges either with or between oncologists and GPs and specialist departments.

Because of my complex medical problem, Ive been out for a few months affected by surgery and by several treatments. So, I found that (hospitals) communication between the different departments just wasnt there.

Furthermore, issues around clinician lack of empathy and compassion, and providing inconsistent information about prognosis negatively impacted the emotional well-being of many participants. A majority had a less than satisfactory relationship with GPs. Half of the participants described the excessive length of time for their symptoms to be investigated leading to a delay in their diagnosis. Some perceived being ignored or that GPs were pretty dismissive about their symptoms thinking they were due to a urinary tract infection or perimenopause and no further action was taken. Furthermore, participants mentioned having difficulties requesting tests such as ultrasound scans and pressed for these.

Insufficient provision of information was one of the key issues in relation to treatment and participants complained that oncologists, did not fully explain the side effects of the prescribed medications. Some participants also reported a lack of involvement in decisions about their treatment and not being provided with treatment options including at disease recurrence.

Participants were asked to share their experiences on how they coped with difficult situations through their clinical journey. They described support from family and friends, lifestyle and physical activity assisted them to cope with difficult situations and kept them moving forward. Walking, listening to music, meditation, nutrition and crafts were some examples. Two participants mentioned how making time for themselves was important for both their mind and body. Several participants sought help from support group organisations through which telephone support services, information booklets and complementary services such as yoga were provided.

Some participants emphasized that taking control of their own lives was their one main strength. Identified factors were being able to look forward, having an attitude of not giving up and learning how to stick up for oneself. Participants expressed that by being independent and knowing their innermost selves provided them motivation and strength throughout their lives. In addition, providing self-encouragement through positive attitude and feeling gratitude helped them.

I do need and want to practice gratitude every day. I am grateful for what Ive got. And Im much more in tune with the little things in life.

Further to this, having a strong spiritual belief system helped to calm them and became a source of comfort explicitly during chemotherapy. In addition, having spiritual belief helped not only the participants but also their families to gain strength in order to cope with difficult situations.

In this study women with OC were able to express their own voices based on their individual experiences. Therefore, the six themes identified describe both HRQOL and contextual themes. Post diagnosis and treatment-related issues, relationships and supports with family and friends, financial issues, relationships with healthcare providers and self-perceived coping strategies were the key themes identified. Each theme had a number of overlapping sub-themes that were identified as priorities for the women. In particular, challenges related to relationships, financial issues, relationships with health-care providers and coping strategies were experienced during and after diagnosis and treatment.

Diagnostic delay was a key concern and our data suggested that lack of early symptom awareness due to insufficient OC knowledge and symptom recognition by participants and HPs contributed to the delay. This is consistent with studies that have low levels of OC symptom awareness are associated with delayed diagnosis.2224 While, lack of cancer detection and inexpedient referral patterns influenced incorrect diagnosis by the physicians,25 and greater public education to increase knowledge of disease symptoms could be helpful.26,27

Most participants received a combination of surgery and chemotherapy. Treatments adversely affected physical well-being with prevalent symptoms such as fatigue, nausea and neuropathy. Research is now focusing on symptom management interventions guided by the implementation of PROMs into clinical settings and trials.5,28,29 Several surgery-related outcomes including change in body image, premature and sudden onset of menopause, and loss of reproductive function may affect psychological well-being.30 The possible loss of fertility during treatment with cancer can be more distressing than cancer itself, according to recent reports where efforts to maintain fertility through techniques such as fertility-sparing surgery are essential in younger women diagnosed with gynecological cancers as they could lead to an improvement in quality of life.31 Another recent study indicated high levels of psychological distress when diagnosed women reach childbearing age as menstrual function and fertility were lost. It is therefore important to monitor the progression of cancer but should also provide appropriate fertility preservation counselling. This has potential to alleviate stress, anxiety and depression and a smaller negative effect on the quality of life.32 Consistent with our findings, a past study showed that those who underwent surgery have experienced psychological distress such as lack of self-esteem, self-worth and loss of femininity.33,34

Survivorship is important in cancer care and recent improvements in treatment have resulted in an increased number of survivors.35 However, our findings highlighted the need for patient-centered care. Patient involvement is vital in clinical care, where a recent study pointed to the significance of patientclinician communication. This communication style provides patients with the platform to raise and discuss issues with clinicians thereby shaping subsequent clinical care processes and outcomes.36

One of the contextual themes of HRQOL identified was perceived lack of provision of adequate information and services. Studies show that educating and communicating patients and their families regarding treatment options and their underlying side-effects will prepare patients to realize the likely outcome of treatment and will assist them in facing upcoming challenges.30,37 Inadequate services such as counselling were identified. Studies show that psychological and other supports are essential in these womens lives, focusing on psychological well-being as well as counselling related to financial and nutritional needs.30,38

Further, our findings illustrated some communication gaps between the women and their health-care providers. Research shows that engagement of patients with their health-care team strengthens and increases the provision of patient-centered care and thus potentially aids cancer control.39 A 2013 study described that patientclinician communication may assist adherence and agreement to treatment, where, for example, two-way communication on treatment-based symptoms could aid in symptom management.40 A recent study that focused on the sexual function of women diagnosed with OC reported that not only was there a communication gap between patient and clinicians, the clinicians expected patients to have disease-related sexual problems and waited until patients spoke about their concerns.41 Improving survival, functional recovery and quality of life while minimizing long-term side-effects are key priorities in cancer care.

Social well-being is consistent with the concept of HRQOL. The importance of being supported by family and friends, especially partners/spouses, was a critical factor for well-being. Some participants experienced changes in their relationships. Time spent with family was reduced due to treatment demands and withdrawal of loved ones from them. Previous studies have reported that women have felt displeasure from their friends and were unwilling to discuss about the disease.37

Overall, participants experienced highly compromised HRQOL, around the time of diagnosis and during treatment. There is an urgent need to develop new strategies for early detection and screening,3 as diagnostic delay was associated with psychological distress such as anxiety, fear of death, parental stress and uncertainty in the current study and has also been previously reported.37 Additionally, participants experienced challenge in obtaining appropriate information to access and benefit from the healthcare system post diagnosis. Multiple studies have found that unreliable provision of knowledge and information is a driver of poor medical care in many high-income countries, including Australia.42 Involvement of patients in decision-making and public engagement could improve the evidence-based value of their health care43

Emotional domain is another aspect of HRQOL. Emotional distress was experienced particularly during treatment phase. Fear of recurrence was a source of emotional distress. Previous studies related to gynecological and OC research show that women have fear of disease recurrence during the treatment and post-treatment phases and that these fears are poorly understood.44,45 Frustration was also of concern with almost all women frustrated due to their treatment side-effects and symptoms. A 2020 qualitative study that investigated the life experiences of women diagnosed with OC found similar results on how women fall into frustration following treatment completion.46

Understanding and measuring HRQOL outcomes related to the sexual well-being of women diagnosed with OC is vital. Half of the participants had poorer sexual function impacting their overall health and well-being. Changes to body image, sudden onset of menopause, infertility and lack of intimacy were identified and negatively impact emotional well-being with a sense of losing feminine identity. It has also been found that difficulties with body image and lack of intimacy are associated with impaired quality of life.41

Not only do individuals diagnosed with cancer have detrimental impacts on their sexual functioning, it often influences their partners. Studies suggest that cancer partners may suffer equal or even higher levels of distress relative to their sick spouses. Partners of cancer survivors do not often have the resources to offer sufficient care to their female partners.47 Findings from a 2009 study indicate that the sexual perceptions of the partners were influenced by loss of interest in the individual with cancer and tension and fatigue correlated with care tasks. Carers agreed that reduced happiness with the partnership could be followed by poorer quality of life as well as higher levels of anxiety and depression.48

Financial aspects were described, and this influenced participant wellbeing. Due to the amount of time required to spend in treatments, some participants had lost their income stability either due to change to their employment status or being unable to continue in the workforce, impairing their emotional well-being and overall HRQOL.49 Some issues might appear to be more minor, such as related to the lack of car parking availability at respective clinical settings, but when needed on multiple occasions, this was a more major concern. Studies in women with OC found that disease and treatment-related burdens create several issues including social and financial effects on their lives.38,50

Participants also described current strategies they used in daily life. Participants utilized numerous coping strategies such as modified diet and lifestyle, which could be considered as a contextual factor that could influence HRQOL. Family and friend support was another major help sought by these women, which in turn helped improve and maintain their quality of life.51 Self-empowerment techniques such as ability to look to the future, having positive attitude and sense of humor were a few techniques employed by the participants. Recent studies also show similar coping strategies used by women and how changed views and adding humor to their personal experiences was a means of self-healing.52,53 Overall, the participants were able to maintain their HRQOL and continue a modified normal life with the implementation of various strategies and self-management techniques into their lives.54

There are approximately 115 new diagnoses of OC per year in Western Australia,55 potentially compromising data collection using a small sample size. However, maximum variability and data saturation were achieved using small sample size56 and thus should not be considered as a limitation but a strength. While the study sought to explore patient outcomes across the clinical trajectory, participants might not have accurately recalled their perspectives, constituting another limitation.

Moreover, rich and descriptive data were obtained using the qualitative methods,57 where intentionality of the participants and their carers were explored. In addition, utilizing a qualitative approach has enabled a holistic understanding of patients and carers lived experiences. The bottom-up approach of involving patients from commencement and throughout the study will ensure that going forward, priorities are clearly identified by the consumers (women with OC themselves) in consultation with clinicians. We envisage that the proposed OC specific PROM to be developed in a future study would be used in clinical settings to identify and measure specific problems that patients encounter that needed to be discussed.

By identifying key priorities for women with OC using a ground-up community-based approach, we have highlighted the need for strategies to reduce diagnostic delays, assist patients in navigating the healthcare system, and improve their HRQOL and potentially develop a OC specific PROM that will enable better identification and earlier treatment of symptoms during the entire course of the disease.

CCWA, Cancer Council Western Australia; CIC Cancer Project, Continuous Improvement in Care-Cancer Project; GPs, general practitioners; HPs, health professionals; HRQOL, health-related quality of life; OC, ovarian cancer; OCA, Ovarian Cancer Australia; PROMs, patient-reported outcome measures.

We are thankful for the generous involvement of participants, and their carers for sharing their experiences with us.

All authors made significant contributions to the study conception and design, execution, performance of the research, data acquisition, analysis and interpretation of data, took part in drafting the article or revising it critically for important intellectual content; agreed to submit to the current journal; gave final approval of the version to be published; and agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work.

This work was carried out with the support of a Grant provided by the Cancer Research Trust and is part of the CIC Cancer Project, a multi-institutional program of research that seeks to bring value-based health care public and private health-care settings in Western Australia.

Paul Cohen reports personal fees from Seqirus, outside the submitted work. The authors report no other potential conflicts of interest in this work.

1. Doubeni CA, Doubeni ARB, Myers AE. Diagnosis and management of ovarian cancer. Am Fam Physician. 2016;93(11):937944.

2. Natarajan P, Taylor SE, Kirwan JM. Ovarian cancer: current management and future directions. Obstetrics Gynaecology Reproduct Med. 2018;28(6):171176. doi:10.1016/j.ogrm.2018.04.004

3. Henderson JT, Webber EM, Sawaya GF. Screening for ovarian cancer updated evidence report and systematic review for the US Preventive Services Task Force. JAMA. 2018;319(6):595606. doi:10.1001/jama.2017.21421

4. Monk BJ, Anastasia PJ. Ovarian cancer: current treatment and patient management. J Adv Pract Oncol. 2016;7(3):271273.

5. Chase DM, Wenzel L. Health-related quality of life in ovarian cancer patients and its impact on clinical management. Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2011;11(4):421431.

6. Post MWM. Definitions of quality of life: what has happened and how to move on. Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil. 2014;20(3):167180.

7. Meadows KA. Patient-reported outcome measures: an overview. Br J Community Nurs. 2011;16(3):146151.

8. Moss HA, Havrilesky LJ. The use of patient-reported outcome tools in Gynecologic Oncology research, clinical practice, and value-based care. Gynecol Oncol. 2018;148(1):1218.

9. Trujols J, Portella MJ, Iraurgi I, Campins MJ, Siol N, Cobos J. Patient-reported outcome measures: are they patient-generated, patient-centred or patient-valued? J Ment Health. 2013;22(6):555562.

10. Staniszewska S, Adebajo A, Barber R, et al. Developing the evidence base of patient and public involvement in health and social care research: the case for measuring impact. Int J Consum Stud. 2011;35(6):628632. doi:10.1111/j.1470-6431.2011.01020.x

11. Questionnaires. EORTC Quality of Life; 2019. Available from: https://qol.eortc.org/. Accessed April 29, 2020..

12. Questionnaires FACIT; 2019. Available from: https://www.facit.org/. 29, 2020.

13. King MT, Stockler MR, OConnell RL, et al. Measuring what matters MOST: validation of the Measure of Ovarian Symptoms and Treatment, a patient-reported outcome measure of symptom burden and impact of chemotherapy in recurrent ovarian cancer. Qual Life Res. 2018;27(1):5974. doi:10.1007/s11136-017-1729-8

14. Wiering BM, De Boer D, Delnoij D. Patient involvement in the development of patient-reported outcome measures: the developers perspective. BMC Health Serv Res. 2017;17(1):635. doi:10.1186/s12913-017-2582-8

15. Colorafi KJ, Evans B. Qualitative Descriptive Methods in Health Science Research. HERD. 2016;9(4):1625. doi:10.1177/1937586715614171

16. Polit DF, Beck CT. Essentials of Nursing Research: Appraising Evidence for Nursing Practice. Philadelphia: Wolters Kluwer Health; 2018.

17. Willis GB. Cognitive Interviewing: A Tool for Improving Questionnaire Design. Thousand Oaks, Calif: Sage Publications; 2005.

18. Frey B, Vivo N. The SAGE Encyclopedia of Educational Research, Measurement, and Evaluation. Vols. 14. Thousand Oaks, California: SAGE Publications, Inc; 2018.

19. Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol. 2006;3(2):77101. doi:10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

20. Fereday J, Muir-Cochrane E. Demonstrating rigor using thematic analysis: a hybrid approach of inductive and deductive coding and theme development. Int J Qual Methods. 2006;5(1):8092. doi:10.1177/160940690600500107

21. Liamputtong P, Ezzy D. Qualitative Research Methods: A Health Focus. New York: Oxford University Press; 1999.

22. Freij M, Al Qadire M, Khadra M, et al. Awareness and knowledge of ovarian cancer symptoms and risk factors: a survey of jordanian women. Clin Nurs Res. 2018;27(7):826840. doi:10.1177/1054773817704749

23. Brain KE, Smits S, Simon AE, et al. Ovarian cancer symptom awareness and anticipated delayed presentation in a population sample. BMC Cancer. 2014;14(1):171. doi:10.1186/1471-2407-14-171

24. Forbes LJL, Simon AE, Warburton F, et al. Differences in cancer awareness and beliefs between Australia, Canada, Denmark, Norway, Sweden and the UK (the International Cancer Benchmarking Partnership): do they contribute to differences in cancer survival? Br J Cancer. 2013;108(2):292300. doi:10.1038/bjc.2012.542

25. Vandborg MP, Edwards K, Kragstrup J, Vedsted P, Hansen DG, Mogensen O. A new method for analyzing diagnostic delay in gynecological cancer. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2012;22(5):712. doi:10.1097/IGC.0b013e31824c6d0e

26. Robinson KM, Christensen KB, Ottesen B, Krasnik A. Socio-demographic factors, comorbidity and diagnostic delay among women diagnosed with cervical, endometrial or ovarian cancer. Eur J Cancer Care. 2011;20(5):653661. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2354.2011.01259.x

27. Puckett MC, Townsend JS, Gelb CA, et al. Ovarian cancer knowledge in women and providers following education with inside knowledge campaign materials. J Cancer Educ. 2018;33(6):12851293. doi:10.1007/s13187-017-1245-0

28. Friedlander ML, King MT. Patient-reported outcomes in ovarian cancer clinical trials. Ann Oncol. 2013;24(uppl_10):x64x68. doi:10.1093/annonc/mdt474

29. Friedlander ML, Stockler M, OConnell R, et al. Symptom burden and outcomes of patients with platinum resistant/refractory recurrent ovarian cancer: a reality check: results of stage 1 of the gynecologic cancer intergroup symptom benefit study. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2014;24(5):857864. doi:10.1097/IGC.0000000000000147

30. Wenzel L, Vergote I, Cella D. Quality of life in patients receiving treatment for gynecologic malignancies: special considerations for patient care. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2003;83:211229. doi:10.1016/S0020-7292(03)90123-8

31. La Rosa VL, Garzon S, Gullo G, et al. Fertility preservation in women affected by gynaecological cancer: the importance of an integrated gynaecological and psychological approach. Ecancermedicalscience. 2020;14:1035. doi:10.3332/ecancer.2020.1035

32. La Rosa VL, Shah M, Kahramanoglu I, et al. Quality of life and fertility preservation counseling for women with gynecological cancer: an integrated psychological and clinical perspective. J Psychosomatic Obstetrics Gynecol. 2020;41(2):8692. doi:10.1080/0167482X.2019.1648424

33. Schulman-Green D, Ercolano E, Dowd M, Schwartz P, McCorkle R. Quality of life among women after surgery for ovarian cancer. Palliat Support Care. 2008;6(3):239247. doi:10.1017/S1478951508000497

34. McCorkle R, Pasacreta J, Tang ST. The silent killer: psychological issues in ovarian cancer. Holist Nurs Pract. 2003;17(6):300308. doi:10.1097/00004650-200311000-00005

35. Fitzmaurice C, Allen C, Barber RM, et al. Global, regional, and national cancer incidence, mortality, years of life lost, years lived with disability, and disability-adjusted life-years for 32 cancer groups, 1990 to 2015: a systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study. JAMA Oncol. 2017;3(4):524. doi:10.1001/jamaoncol.2016.5688

36. Greenhalgh J, Gooding K, Gibbons E, et al. How do patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) support clinician-patient communication and patient care? A realist synthesis. J Patient Rep Outcomes. 2018;2(1):128.

37. Howell D, Fitch MI, Deane KA. Impact of ovarian cancer perceived by women. Cancer Nurs. 2003;26(1):19.

38. Grzankowski KS, Carney M. Quality of life in ovarian cancer. Cancer Control. 2011;18(1):5258.

39. Lavallee DC, Chenok KE, Love RM, et al. Incorporating patient-reported outcomes into health care to engage patients and enhance care. Health Aff. 2016;35(4):575582.

40. Street RL. How clinicianpatient communication contributes to health improvement: modeling pathways from talk to outcome. Patient Educ Couns. 2013;92:286291.

41. Fischer OJ, Marguerie M, Brotto LA. Sexual function, quality of life, and experiences of women with ovarian cancer: a mixed-methods study. Sex Med. 2019;7(4):530539.

Read more:

[Full text] Women Diagnosed with Ovarian Cancer: Patient and Carer Experiences and | PROM - Dove Medical Press

Bill Gates has a plan to save the world. Will the world listen? – Wired.co.uk

In his new book, How to Avoid a Climate Disaster, Bill Gates argues that there are really only two data points that matter when it comes to tackling humankinds existential challenge: 51 billion and zero. The first is the number of tonnes of greenhouse gases that are typically added to the atmosphere every year. The second is the number we need to arrive at to avoid catastrophe.

While acknowledging that the challenge is daunting, and how we make things, grow things, move around, keep cool and stay warm will all need to fundamentally change, Gates argues that wholesale transformation is possible while maintaining lifestyles in high income countries and continuing to lift billions out of poverty. And he has a plan.

He employs the concept of the green premium. Carbon remains cheaper as a source of energy because its negative impacts or externalities arent priced in. Governments subsidise fossil fuels because they are reliable and proven. The green premium is the additional cost of using a green alternative. In some instances such as producing electricity using wind turbines or solar energy it can be zero, depending on the country. In other sectors, such as concrete, fertiliser or steel production, its enough to deter the use of clean alternatives. While wealthy countries might be able to pay a premium for these zero carbon options, that isnt currently possible for some fast-growing nations in Asia, Africa and South America. The green premium needs to be so low as to make sense to switch.

Sat at a large conference table wearing a blue pullover, Gates spoke with WIRED in December 2020 from his office overlooking Lake Washington in Seattle. He outlined how a number of different technological breakthroughs, large-scale investment in infrastructure, patient capital, government policy and individual action can have an impact, and provides a roadmap to getting to zero carbon emissions by 2050.

Zero is important: just reducing the carbon were putting into the atmosphere, simply extends the extremely limited amount of time humankind has until we hit planetary boundaries. Currently, the concentration of carbon dioxide in Earths atmosphere is around 414.68 parts per million (ppm) there is consensus that, once the level reaches 450ppm it will raise the global temperature above 2 degrees Celsius, triggering extreme weather events and irreversible, catastrophic change. While some advocates of change suggest that the target should be 2030, Gates believes thats unrealistic carbon is too deeply woven into the fabric of everything we do and could provide a distraction to the more significant goal of zero emissions by 2050.

WIRED: Why this book and why now?

Bill Gates: I did a TED Talk in 2010 on climate and five years later there was the Paris climate talks, and Id been saying: Hey, how come when they have these meetings, they never talk about R&D? They never talked about innovation, and if you looked at the energy R&D budgets of the rich countries they hadnt increased at all.

So everybody's getting together and talking about the short-term reductions, but the only areas you can make short-term reductions are electric cars and using solar and wind for electricity generation. That's less than 30 per cent of the game 70 per cent is steel, cement, aviation, land use... People arent doing anything about those. If you want to get to a goal, you should start working on the hard things, not just on the easy things. I'm not saying the easy things are easy, they're just relatively easy.

These nationally determined metrics the short-term reductions don't really tell the story. I'm not saying they should go away, those are good things, but what is the true metric of by 2050 can you get to zero?

The resonance of the topic [climate change] is very high now, despite the pandemic, which is impressive. But if we don't have a plan to go with that positive energy it's going to be very sad. You're going to get attenuation: people will almost be cynical that we didn't really get going on the 70 per cent that's the hardest.

So that's why I wrote the book, to suggest that the green premium is a metric that when you call up India in 2050 and say, Hey, when you're building new buildings, use this cement, use this steel will determine whether they tell you get lost, or OK, we'll pay a slight premium. If youve innovated enough and the green premium is zero, they'll say, Of course.

Some green premiums for electricity, for instance are within reach. Others will involve huge amounts of R&D and investment. How do you think about that?

The brute force way to solve climate change is to figure out how to do direct air capture, get the cost per tonne down and then just write the cheque. Unfortunately, if you call up Climeworks [the Swiss company that filters CO2 from the air], its list price is $600 (435) a tonne, and they have some government subsidies. So, even if you dream that you can get to $100 (72) a tonne, youve got 51 billion tonnes of emissions, so that's a $5 trillion (3.6 trillion) a year price tag to brute force climate change.

Only by going into the individual areas and changing the way that, say, you make cement, or the way you power cars to be electric, do you get something that's under $100 a tonne. Electric cars are the magic one as battery volumes go up, charging stations get out there and battery energy density increases to the point that range and charging speed isn't that much worse [than combustion engines]. Eventually you can say the green premium for passenger cars ten years from now will be about zero.

Vaccines typically take a decade or more to produce Covid-19 proved we can accelerate that process, but it took a pandemic to show us whats possible. How can we communicate the urgency of the climate emergency?

There is an analogy to the pandemic which is that citizens depend on their governments to understand natural disasters, meteors, climate change and respiratory viruses. These problems are way too complex individuals aren't going to study climate models. For the pandemic, the risk was there and the idea of how you orchestrate a testing capacity and make a vaccine should have been there.

After Ebola in 2015 there were a few things done such as the creation of CEPI [The Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations] along with Wellcome in the UK, ourselves [the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation] and 12 governments. And we've been funding mRNA stuff (mRNA medicines instruct cells in the body to make proteins to fight diseases) for a long time. But, governments have to take complex problems and essentially think through what you have to do. Unfortunately, when it comes to the climate, it's not like there's any vaccine-like thing, where theres a solution and six months from now things are going to feel utterly different.

With climate, when you have to replace every steel plant, every cement plant, take the electric grid and make it two and a half times bigger with intermittent sources this is the entire physical economy. The physical economy is a miracle. Its taken us since the Industrial Revolution to figure out how to make this stuff so cheap and so reliable that we all just take it for granted. Most people flip that light switch and the miracle of innovation that allows their lights to turn on 99.99 per cent of the time, they have no idea. It's so cost-optimised, but now that we have this constraint on it: how quickly can you switch all that around?

So climate is like a pandemic in that governments need to work on behalf of their citizens and anticipate what will happen in the future, but it's way harder than making a vaccine. If the pandemic had come 20 years ago, we wouldn't have been able to make that vaccine. If it came 10 years from now, with mRNA we'll be able to make it faster, we'll be able to scale up more of those vaccines at a cost of $1 (72p) each. We caught mRNA halfway in its maturity cycle, we hadnt made a single vaccine. CureVac is developing mRNA-based vaccines designed to prevent malaria infection. Moderna is focused on HIV and other diseases.

In order to get to net zero by 2050, we have to innovate at an unprecedented pace. How do we best address that challenge?

We need to up the supply side of innovation and the demand side for innovation. The supply side has got many components, it's got your basic energy R&D budget where you just have a bunch of professors or national labs messing around with different ideas, and that's pre-commercial research. In the US, more than half the federal money spent on biomedical research comes from the $43 billion (31 billion) a year National Institutes of Health (NIH) budget. Weirdly these energy R&D budgets haven't had the examination they deserve when it comes to climate events.

Then venture capital has to be willing to take huge risks, and be very patient and orchestrate way more capital than you need for software, microchips or for medicine. Thats because these are big plants and you have to replace a lot, you have to scale these things up so you need to work on the supply side and innovation.

On the demand side, you could put on a big carbon tax but politically its difficult such as when they increased the price of diesel in France even though economists say that it would be good. In most countries well probably end up with a sector-by-sector approach where we say that, for instance, every building has to have five per cent clean cement, or maybe the highly profitable tech or finance companies pay a premium for buildings.

Everybody mistakenly thinks the learning curve means that you make something, and then it gets cheaper than you expected. That is true for wind, solar and lithium ion batteries, the learning curves have been phenomenal. But how do you bootstrap the clean aviation fuel learning curve, or clean steel?

There's a lot of talk that the recovery funds in Europe will get focused on things such as clean hydrogen. But we really need a mechanism to find who in the world has the best ideas about clean steel or clean cement. And the green premium is the metric.

You had an ambitious aim when you started Microsoft a computer in every home. What lessons did building and scaling a company with that impact have that can be applied to getting to net zero?

I'm amazed at what a nice business software is you get feedback from your customers and you add features. And I was optimistic: I would invest in things that would take ten years to get done. I tried multiple approaches, so we often had teams that might develop a database in two different ways to see which would succeed. I had to anticipate advances in hardware [that would impact] our software. We spent a lot of R&D money, but we had enough products that were always fairly profitable.

I had a broader view that we were going to develop many types of software most of our competitors were single-product companies, and we saw ourselves as a software factory independent of word processing or spreadsheets or operating systems. We had a more crazy view that we were going to do every type of software in one company and we had this vision of personal empowerment through software.

We were able to create this research group Google is the only other company to put money into fundamental research. Because, at first, we all just benefited from what the universities or even Xerox PARC had done that they failed to exploit. We hired specific people from Xerox PARC that helped us with graphics interface, networking and other things, and we almost felt guilty that we needed to get back to this pool of intellect.

Some policymakers and leaders are aiming at 2030, but youre fully focussed on 2050. Why that time frame?

In 2050 I'll be 95 years old and I will be super happy if I live to see the day that we're anywhere near zero. This is very, very hard, as it requires all countries to get involved. And so the 2050 date was picked as the best case because a lot of things have to work. But if you innovate for ten years, deploy for 20 years, and you create the right incentives through government policy, you can get to zero by 2050. You have to get going now on the hard stuff and you have to admit: do we have even a clue how we're going to do the hard stuff and find the craziest thinkers?

I'm not smart enough to know all the different ways you might replace cement or steel. You better be searching the entire IQ of humanity globally to find that person or find ten of them and hope that, even if nine are wrong, one will get you there.

I don't know if that will happen by 2050. If we take the idealism and energy the younger generation has created around this and we make it a priority Biden has it right up there with the pandemic, European recovery funds have it very high then, yes it's doable.

Getting to net zero by 2050 is not going to be easy. So anybody who says, Oh, let's just get it done in 10 years, I want them to go tour all the Chinese steel and cement plants and tell me what I'm going to see there ten years from now.

The digital economy has fooled us in terms of how quickly things can change, because you don't need the reliability and scale, and therefore the capital and the regulations. With software, if it has mistakes its not good, but it evolves quickly.

Institutions deploying capital banks and pension funds are going to be crucial in this process. There's a lot of rhetoric at the moment with businesses claiming to be purpose-driven. How can we best measure the actions large investment funds are making, and keep big organisations honest about their actions?

Most of thats all bullshit. The return on a bond for a wind farm is no different than the return on a bond from a natural gas plant, so it's nonsense. The people who put money into Breakthrough Energy Ventures [the venture arm of Gates organisation Breakthrough Energy thats working towards net zero], that's real. The governments that raise their energy R&D budget and manage to spend it well, the near-billion dollars put into TerraPower [Gates nuclear company] to see if this fourth-generation fission reactor can be part of the solution... Those things are real.

All this other stuff like, we're gonna make companies report their emissions. The idea that some financial metric reporting thing or some degree of divestment how many tonnes? Youve got 51 billion tonnes [of CO2 that needs to be removed]: when you divested, how many of those 51 billion tonnes went away?

Youve got to invest not divest. And the notion that you just happen to own equities or bonds related to the easy things that are already economic, such as solar farms or wind farms... Whenever somebody says there's something called green finance, I say let's be numeric here: is the risk premium for clean investing lower than the risk premium for non-green investing? The answer is: just look at the numbers.

The idea that banks are going to solve this problem or that these metrics are going to solve this problem, I don't get that. Are they going to make the electricity network reliable? Are they gonna come up with sustainable aviation fuel? It's just disconnected from the problem and allows people to go off and blather as though something's happening.

The last couple of weeks have seen the Covid-19 vaccine roll-out begin. Do you think that will increase trust in science, which will impact the urgency to act on the climate crisis?

Whenever you do innovation like social networks, at first you're not sure what phenomenon will emerge out of that. I do think the pandemic has helped social networks realise that the First Amendment is nice, but allowing lots of vaccine misinformation is not good for society.

Drawing the line between the crazy all vaccines are bad, everybody will get autism versus legitimate [commentary] on people who have allergic reactions is very hard. At first the [social networks] thought we will just let the craziness flow, but the fact that the wrong stuff is so titillating draws people in.

We hope that this process has accelerated some maturing of the social networks so that the things that get a lot of attention and are really wrong, that these are greatly reduced or put alongside the truth. I don't know if that will happen, but I have seen it including conspiracy theories that relate to me they're doing a better job of saying, OK, we don't want ten million people to see that today because it doesn't serve their interests or society's interests.

People are more educated today than ever and somehow we've gotten to this point where climate change has become political, mask wearing has become political.

For some types of innovation this has been a period where the normal rules don't apply. The idea of 100 companies all working on one disease is insane, because five or six of these vaccines at most, will end up getting used. So you've got 94 companies efforts that are completely redundant, particularly now.

We still need Johnson & Johnson, AstraZeneca and Novavax, because those [vaccines] are more scalable, cheaper and more thermally stable. But, once we get those five [including Pfizer and Moderna] then we probably don't need any more, because fortunately it turned out it was easier to make a vaccine for this disease than we might have guessed: the first that are proven are working very well.

Science has become politicised in the past few years. We're seeing a transition between administrations in the US, do you think that's going to impact policy as relates to getting to net zero?

In the Democratic primaries people were talking about trillions of dollars being spent against climate. Well there's two problems with that: a) that money will never be allocated and b) spending that scale of money doesn't really connect to the problem, its more about creating jobs [by doing things such as] insulating homes.But those homes should use electric heat pumps, and you should get electricity to zero. You must have people who are in the centre and saying, yes, this is a good goal, but how do you realistically achieve that, and at the minimal price for doing so? You want debate about that, and market-based pricing actually allows a lot of resource choices to be made in a very efficient way. That's why, if you could have a properly done carbon tax, it would be a nice thing, but that's not going to happen in most countries.

So, yes the Biden election is fantastic. He's got climate as one of his top priorities along with the pandemic, he's picked people that know this topic and he's put them not just in specific roles like the Department of Energy, but even people such as Brian Deese to head the National Economic Council. He was the [Obama] White House climate person, and I got to know him when we were doing the Paris climate stuff.

You acknowledge early in the book that youre an imperfect messenger a rich, white guy some people will accuse of having a god complex. How do you communicate the idea that forget Bill Gates in all this its a problem that all of us have to fix?

The fact that we need better metrics in this field surprises me. It's a field with a lot of positive energy but without a plan. And so you have to work backwards from zero. If there was some book that had already explained all this, I wouldn't have written it. I can write books about malaria and HIV and diarrhoea. Now, maybe not as many people would read those, but that global health work we do is truly neglected. You can save millions of lives. And it's hard stuff we don't have an HIV cure yet, but we're trying to use gene therapy and make that super cheap so there's plenty of interesting work for the Gates Foundation, such as improving agriculture with new types of seeds, and even improving photosynthesis.

This field [climate] as I learned about it, the framing wasn't quite right. I actually resisted the idea that I should choose to speak out. Instead I thought, I'll just do a little bit, like that 2010 TED Talk that I did. And then this field, because people care so much about it, would then mature in terms of its metrics and working on the hard things. When we were talking about the 2015 Paris talks, it makes no sense why am I at it, saying there should be an R&D section?

So, I'd say it's strange that the background I have of systems thinking to drive innovation brings a slightly richer perspective. OK, not everybody reads Vaclav Smil, not everybody is that numeric. People read articles saying, this is the equivalent of 20,000 houses or, you know, 50,000 cars, and they don't call up the publications involved and say, why are you spewing these completely confusing metrics?

I have this effort to create an open-source model of electricity demand generation that includes weather models, so the countries that have made really aggressive commitments about renewable use can see that their grid is going to start being reliable. Now that the utilities are being told, Oh, you have to sign up to these things, you need an open-source model that really shows, do you have enough transmission, storage or non-intermittent sources like nuclear fission or fusion?

The fact that Im running an open-source model to test whether these aggressive goals are achievable, it blows the mind why am I funding this model for these electric grids, which is the most obvious thing to do when you look at climate change?

If you had to bet on a single breakthrough happening in the next decade that really was a game changer, what do you think it would be?

Well, part of the point of the book is that [we cant rely on a] single breakthrough, we need artificial meat, we need lithium... But I would say, if you can get super-cheap green hydrogen, it sits in terms of the industrial economy at the peak. So, if you pencil in ridiculously low-cost hydrogen, then I can tell you how to make clean fertiliser and clean steel, and even clean aviation fuel.

We have to be careful: some scientific miracles like a storage one may never occur. Some people are now talking about super-clean hydrogen. They don't get how hard it is, and there's a good chance it will never be possible to make cheap, green hydrogen.

In this space we need about ten breakthroughs before you can really see a path to 2050, but clean hydrogen is higher than most people would expect. And storage miracles, and either fission or fusion. The book is supposed to make you think it's not like the pandemic vaccine, though.

Are you optimistic that we can get to net zero by 2050?

Absolutely. But thats just my personal bias I'm an optimistic person. I lived through the digital revolution, where every dream we ever had about computing came true. So, I don't have proof, but yes I am optimistic.

Greg Williams is the Editor of WIRED. This conversation has been edited for clarity and brevity.

How to Avoid a Climate Disaster: The Solutions We Have and the Breakthroughs We Need by Bill Gates is published by Allen Lane on February 16.

A rebel physicist has an elegant solution to a quantum mystery

Google is rewriting the web. Heres the impact Chromes plan to kill cookies will have

As more Covid-19 variants emerge, attention has turned to N95 and FFP2 face masks

Listen to The WIRED Podcast, the week in science, technology and culture, delivered every Friday

Follow WIRED on Twitter, Instagram, Facebook and LinkedIn

Here is the original post:

Bill Gates has a plan to save the world. Will the world listen? - Wired.co.uk

What To Look For In A Disability Organization – Forbes

Getty Images

Theres an important question that may get too little attention in the world of disability services, activism, and culture. If we really care about people with disabilities and disability issues, we should all do better than just tossing pocket change in every fundraising bucket we see, or signing up for every walkathon a coworkers kid puts in front of us. But how do we choose which disability-related causes and organizations to support?

Some criteria are the same for any kind of charity or organization seeking voluntary support. Look for sound, transparent finances and accounting practices. Make sure they use funds to further an important mission rather than simply enriching top executives. Support organizations that give regular, readable reports of services provided, advocacy accomplishments, and goals achieved. Look for strong oversight by a genuinely representative Board of Directors or similar governing entity.

These are basic tips for choosing any charity or cause, for donations or for volunteering. But what other qualities should we look for specifically in disability organizations? Here are some criteria and questions to ask, and why they are important:

Organization Type and Scope

This is the most traditional and well-known type of disability organization. Their goals are mainly to fund medical research into treatments and cures for specific disabling conditions, and in some cases to help provide some of those treatments to people with those conditions.

The closest thing to an original is the March of Dimes, started by President Franklin D. Roosevelt in 1938 to find a cure for polio. But the model continues, with some modernizing alterations, in the March of Dimes itself and in other legacy organizations like the Multiple Sclerosis Society, Muscular Dystrophy Association, United Cerebral Palsy Association, and the Alzheimers Association. Notably, many of these organizations are better known to the general public for their fundraising events, and less for the work they do.

Most disability organizations provide at least some personal and material assistance directly to disabled people and their families. For some, direct service is the main focus. Services can include funding for adaptive equipment, paying for certain high-cost medical procedures, or enriching experiences like support groups and summer camps. In local chapters and offices, direct services may also include one-on-one information, counseling, and advocacy assistance to address disabled peoples everyday needs, concerns, and barriers.

Two examples of agencies that provide direct services are The Arc, which encompasses hundreds of local chapters that serve people with intellectual and developmental disabilities, and Centers for Independent Living, a nationwide network of local not-for-profit organizations which are governed and staffed mainly by disabled people and serve people with a wide variety of disabilities.

Direct advocacy for individuals facing disability discrimination and other barriers is a type of direct service. But it is also inseparable from activism, in which disability organizations, more loosely organized groups, and individual advocates fight for permanent changes in practices, policies, and laws to make life better, more accessible, and more just for all disabled people.

Some organizations, like the American Association of People with Disabilities and ADAPT focus mainly or exclusively on advocacy, while others like Centers for Independent Living, the National Federation for the Blind, and the Paralyzed Veterans of America combine advocacy and activism with direct practical services.

Some people prefer to focus on people with a particular kind of disability. It might a very specific condition, like Down Syndrome, or a somewhat broader category of disability, like intellectual and developmental disabilities, mental illness, or mobility impairment and wheelchair users. Another approach is to support organizations and coalitions that try to serve and advocate for people with the widest variety of disabilities, on issues and barriers common to all or most people with any kind of disability.

Which approach you choose, or what exact balance you choose between the two, can have a lot to do with how you view disability itself. Some people think of disability in terms of very specific medical conditions or types of impairment. Others see disability as more of a social experience and a political challenge. Some feel that only people with their type of disability can understand them, while others believe that even people with vastly different disabilities share enough common experiences to make collaboration and unity sensible.

Mission and Messaging

Help the disabled isnt much of a distinct mission. Look for more specific goals and indications of the groups philosophy and point of view on disability matters. And if its mission sounds a lot like that of a dozen other similar organizations, think about whether a new entity doing the same thing is really necessary.

Its not always obvious on the surface. Most organizations more complex than an informal social club operate to some extent as businesses. They bring in money, spend it on salaries, supplies, equipment, and maybe rent, and keep account of their finances so they can report to the government and the public. But some sell products and services, primarily to make money for operators or investors, while others raise or make money in order to continue providing a service or pursuing a mission for the public good. You can choose to support both not-for-profit disability organizations and businesses that have a disability angle. Either can be beneficial. But how you judge and support a not-for-profit charity will probably be different from how you assess and patronize a for-profit business.

This is one of the most important and difficult things to assess, because there are few hard and fast rules. However, most disabled people, and others well-attuned to disability culture, will recognize right away the difference between empowerment and pity in a groups slogan, fundraising appeal, or advertisement. It boils down to whether the messaging makes you feel sad for disabled peoples plight, or excited for their potentially better, freer lives.

Some disability organizations promote all the right goals and ideals, which are relatively easy to put together in a mission statement, but avoid opportunities to make a real impact for fear of being seen as controversial. Real, meaningful change for disabled people isnt always popular, so this is a particular danger with local organizations. They face a lot of peer pressure from other area agencies and service providers to be a team player and promote a wholesome, non-confrontational image to the donating public. Diplomacy is good. Being a pushover in the disability field isnt.

Leadership

The point here isnt to say that non-disabled people have no legitimate role in disability organizations. But organizations with disabled people in top governing, executive, and professional positions have an authenticity that others may lack. This should mean more than just one or two disabled people with one or two of the most easily understood and accepted disabilities. Look for people throughout the organization with a variety of disabilities, including some that require more accommodations and pose a greater challenge to public understanding. Leadership of people with disabilities, or lack of it, also indicates a disability organizations commitment, or lack of commitment, to its own ideals of equality and inclusion.

This is another key measure of commitment and follow-through. And a surprising number of disability organizations arent so good at treating their disabled employees the way they ask other employers to treat disabled people. Keep an eye on the disability organizations you support. And take seriously any indications of poor labor practices, especially in regard to disabled employees.

Fair Pay and Workplace Equality

Disability representation isnt just about leadership at the top. Disabled people should be working at every level. This includes not just support positions, but service provision, professional roles, and management.

Somehow, it is still considered acceptable to underpay disabled people for their work. Some assume that disabled people dont need extra money, because they get government benefits. Others may think of disability work as a calling rather than a job, or that they should be grateful for any job at all. But disabled people have terribly high rates of poverty. And being paid for your labor is a cornerstone of civil rights that disabled people absolutely deserve. Any disability organization that wants to be an advocate for equal rights and fairness should pay disabled employees at least minimum wage, and as much as possible, competitive and/or living wages for their work. This doesnt happen by accident. Decisions must be made to not skimp on salaries through use of legal sub-minimum wage, or over-reliance on unpaid interns and volunteers.

Also note that disability organizations that spend a lot of their budgets on salaries arent necessarily wasting money. Paying good disabled staff well is good for a disability organization. Its also an important statement of values.

Hiring disabled people is one thing. Paying them fairly is key. But especially in a disability organization with a complex mission and diverse roles, is there room for career growth and promotion? Is it not only technically possible, but feasible and encouraged for a disabled receptionist to someday become a counselor, or for a disabled barista in a cafe promoted as an employer of disabled people to become a shift manager?

Key Practices

Above all others, disability organizations should be accessible. This should be obvious. But they dont always succeed. Sometimes, disability organizations focused on one or two particular types of disability fail to accommodate others. Some groups become complacent, figuring that their work on disability makes them immune from criticism for accessibility failures. And as services and methods of communication change over time such as websites and live streamed events many organizations overlook making each new avenue fully accessible.

Disability exists among every culture and demographic population. Yet historically, the image of the disability rights movement and disability culture has been overwhelmingly white, male, and straight. Like all organizations, those devoted to disability work must actively strive to achieve greater representation. Disability groups in particular must guard against complacency in this, and reject the notion that representing disability is enough diversity all by itself.

This is perhaps the most significant measure of difference between disability organizations and the philosophies that drive them. It would take too much space to fully explore all the pros and cons. Suffice it to say that the difference between providing individualized services in the community and running facilities is fundamental. Whatever you think about the question, its vitally important to ask which approach a disability organization takes before you decide to support it.

This seems like a lot of questions to ask, and a lot to look into. Really its just a start. But if you are going to support disability causes with your money or time, its important to take your time do do it right. Disabled people and our issues are more than an easy throwaway cause. They should be treated due care and diligence by everyone involved.

Read more here:

What To Look For In A Disability Organization - Forbes

Biden won’t rule out cracking down on Second Amendment rights with executive orders – LawOfficer.com

Share and speak up for justice, law & order...

President Joe Biden reportedly wont rule out using executive orders to crackdown on Americans constitutionally protected Second Amendment rights.

The revelation was made during a White House press conference on Tuesday in response to a statement that Biden put out last week calling for banning semi-automatic firearms in addition to other gun control measures, Daily Wire reported.

What is your timetable for action on what the president calls common sense measures? a reporter asked White House Press Secretary Jen Psaki. And whats the realistic hope that you have this will pass both houses?

Well, we havent proposed a package at this point, Psaki responded. So its hard for me to make a prediction about its likelihood of passing. But I will say that the president is somebody throughout his career who has advocated for smart gun safety measures. He is not afraid of standing up to the NRA. Hes done it multiple times and won on background checks and a range of issues. And it is a priority to him on a personal level, but I dont have a prediction for you, or preview for you on a timeline of a package, and certainly not what it will look like and how it goes through Congress.

WATCH:

Later in the press conference, a second reporter asked Psaki,Does the president still plan to take executive action on gun control?

Next came the disclosure that its feasible.

The president has a range of actions at his disposal, Psaki responded. He hasnt ruled out either of those options.

The question came after Biden called on Congress late last week to enact commonsense gun law reforms, including requiring background checks on all gun sales, banning assault weapons and high-capacity magazines, and eliminating immunity for gun manufacturers who knowingly put weapons of war on our streets.

Law Officer is the only major law enforcement publication and website owned and operated by law enforcement. This unique facet makes Law Officer much more than just a publishing company but is a true advocate for the profession.

Share and speak up for justice, law & order...

Read the original:

Biden won't rule out cracking down on Second Amendment rights with executive orders - LawOfficer.com

Joe Biden’s ‘commonsense gun law reforms’ are the lies of the anti-2nd Amendment left – Washington Times

ANALYSIS/OPINION:

President Joe Biden, on the anniversary of the horrible tragedy called the Parkland school shootings, promised his administration would forever protect innocent Americans from similarly senseless crimes and soon enough, with Democrats holding majorities in both House and Senate, pass commonsense gun law reforms.

What he means by that, of course, is the end of the Second Amendment as we know it.

This administration will not wait for the next mass shooting to heed that call, Biden said.

We will take action to end our epidemic of gun violence and make our schools and communities safer, Biden said.

Today, I am calling on Congress to enact commonsense gun law reforms, including requiring background checks on all guns sales, banning assault weapons and high-capacity magazines and eliminating immunity for gun manufacturers who knowingly put weapons of war on our streets, Biden said.

These are the lies of the left.

The truth, in rapid-fire fashion, is this: Americas epidemic of gun violence is not in the schools, but rather in the streets in the gang-banging, drug-infested streets of mostly Democrat-controlled communities. And if Biden and Democrats really wanted to stem the tide of gun-related violence with a commonsense approach, theyd first go after the guns being carted by lawbreakers i.e., gang-bangers and drug-dealing scum and not those carried by legal owners.

Its not the Second Amendment to blame for Americas gun-related crimes and deaths.

Its the culture.

Or, more to the point, its the blind eyes the Democrats turn to the lawbreakers, so as not to rock politically incorrect boats lawbreakers who then shoot up the culture.

[H]omicides in major cities including Baltimore are not race neutral, wrote John Hudgins, an associate professor of sociology at Coppin State University, in an April 2020, Baltimore Sun piece. Of the more than three hundred people killed in the streets of Baltimore last year, just about all of them were African Americans. The shooters (killers) were most likely black as well.

Hudgins went on to write that stop-and-frisk and mass incarcerations are civil rights hot points but commonsense controls that recognize the real sources of gun violence are nonetheless needed.

Commonsense controls that target illegal weapons, for instance, he said.

His viewpoint coincides with statistics from The Trace that found 3,010 people in 2020 were injured and killed in mass shootings the disproportionate share of which struck black neighborhoods. Why is this?

Its certainly not because of a lack of laws.

After all, its already illegal to shoot to kill; its already illegal to commit crimes with firearms. So the problem, to paraphrase Bill Clinton on the economy, is the culture, stupid.

In 2016, the U.S. Census Bureau found that while the percentage of White children under the age of 18 who lived with both parents was 74.3%, the percent of black minors living with both parents was 38.7%.

The nonprofit Kids Count reported similarly for 2019 that roughly 64%, or two-thirds, of minor-aged Blacks were raised in single-parent homes. Kids Count also reported 42% of Hispanics in 2019 were raised in single-parent homes, compared to only 24% of Whites. With 64% of all Black youth and 42% of all Hispanic youth in the country being raised by single mothers single mothers who have to work, who have to work more than one job, who arent as attentive to the raising of their children as they might be with a father in the home its no wonder the Black communities are breeding grounds for gangs. Its no wonder Hispanic communities face the same issues.

In 1996, the National Youth Gang Survey found the ethnic backgrounds of gang members in America were as follows: 44% Hispanic, 35% Black, 14% White, and 7% Asian or other. And the ages of these gang members? As the National Gang Center reported, between 1996 and 2011, between 35% and 50% of Americas gang members younger than 18 years old.

These are not shocking statistics.

These are well known, well reported, well documented.

Its like the open secret of Americas crime rate the vastly ignored truths of Americas gun crimes.

So commonsense gun law reforms, as put forth by Biden and the Democrats? Seriously. Theres nothing commonsense about it.

If Democrats truly wanted to address gun violence in America, they would address the problems of those who choose guns and violence as viable ways of life. They wouldnt seek to regulate the ones who dont need regulation in the first place.

They wouldnt seek to needlessly restrict Second Amendment rights to needlessly claim the God-given right to self-defend. Theres nothing commonsense about that at all.

Cheryl Chumley can be reached at[emailprotected]or on Twitter, @ckchumley. Listen to her podcast Bold and Blunt byclicking HERE. And never miss her column; subscribe to her newsletter byclicking HERE. Her latest book, Socialists Dont Sleep: Christians Must Rise Or America Will Fall, is available byclickingHERE.

Follow this link:

Joe Biden's 'commonsense gun law reforms' are the lies of the anti-2nd Amendment left - Washington Times

Gun totin’ Republican Lauren Boebert to speak at CPAC 2021, which is taking place in a gun-free zone in Orlando – Orlando Weekly

Republicans at the upcoming Conservative Political Action Conference in Orlando will more than likely be giving fiery speeches about how President Joe Biden and the Radical Left will attempt to strip away their Second Amendment rights, but in reality it will be a hotel policy that does that very thing.

Unfortunately for gun-loving CPAC attendees, the conferencerunning from Feb. 25-28will be held at the Hyatt Regency Orlando, which has strict policies in place for firearms.

Firearms are not allowed at all in the convention center," a hotel security representative told Creative Loafing Tampa Bay. The rep added that guests at the hotel are allowed to have guns in their room, but they must remain locked away in the safe.

Adding to an already robust list of pro-gun speakers, on Tuesday afternoon CPAC announced the addition of congresswoman, Altamonte Springs native and gun-totin' restaurant owner Lauren Boebert, who was recently denied access to the House Floor for setting off a metal detector after refusing to leave her Glock at home, and once vowed to work every day to end ALL gun free zones.

Our indispensable Second Amendment ensures future generations will continue to enjoy the blessings of Liberty, tweeted CPAC chair Matt Schlapp. Colorado's newest representative and staunch 2A advocate Lauren Boebert joins us in Orlando for CPAC 2021.

This wouldnt be the first time that CPAC has been a gun-free zone. The 2016 and the 2018 conferences were also absent of firearms, and notably featured security measures like Boeberts worst enemy: metal detectors.

CPAC could not be reached for comment.

This story first appeared in our sister newspaper Creative Loafing Tampa. Stay on top of Central Florida news and views with our weekly newsletters, and consider supporting this free publication. Our small but mighty team is working tirelessly to bring you Central Florida news, and every little bit helps.

Continue reading here:

Gun totin' Republican Lauren Boebert to speak at CPAC 2021, which is taking place in a gun-free zone in Orlando - Orlando Weekly

Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene Introduces The Second Amendment Preservation Act – AmmoLand Shooting Sports News

Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene Introduces The Second Amendment Preservation Act (Dave Workman photo)

WASHINGTON, D.C. -(Ammoland.com)- Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene has introduced the Second Amendment Preservation Act which is a bill that would prevent federal funds from being used to enforce any measure, law, regulation, or guidance from the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives (ATF) issued after November 1, 2020.

After the Presidential election, the Biden transition team contacted the ATF to see what their top priorities will be for the new administration. Acting ATF Director Regina Lombardo and Acting Assistant Director Marvin Richardson responded that their top priorities were pistol braces and unserialized firearms. As soon as it appeared that Biden won the election, the ATF started tackling their biggest concerns.

The ATF raided Polymer80 and started showing up at firearms dealers that sold unfinished frames. They radically changed what they considered firearms after the Biden victory. According to the agency, a kit with a jig and a frame was enough to consider it a gun. The ATF believed anyone selling the kits was selling unregistered firearms. Bidens win emboldened the ATF.

Then right before Christmas, the ATF submitted a letter to the National Registry, which would make almost every pistol brace on the market into a stock. They were about to turn millions of Americans into felons overnight. Only because of the massive public outcry and enraged Congress members did the ATF pull their letter. No one believes that the ATF will stop trying to change the definition of pistol braces and unfinished frames.

What Rep. Greenes bill will do is stop the ATF in their tracks. Without funding, they will not be able to enforce changes to long-held definitions of devices as they did with bump stocks to make de facto gun laws. Rep. Green believes only Congress can make laws, and the law enforcement agency has overstepped its bounds.

The bill has won praise from firearms advocacy organizations like Gun Owners of America (GOA). The group endorsed Rep Greene during her campaign, citing her commitment to defending the Second Amendment. Greene is a gun owner and a staunch supporter of the right to bear arms.

President Biden has promised to take on gun owners and pursue the most aggressive gun control agenda in history, Aidan Johnston, Director of Federal Affairs for GOA, stated. Hes vowed to attack the gun rights of seniors, ban the distribution of 3D printed gun files, and target pistol braced firearms and 80 percent receivers. However, the Second Amendment Preservation Act cuts at the heart of the enforcement of any legislation by any agencythrough cutting its fundingand prevents any of Bidens measures from going into effect.

This legislation harmonizes with the clear mandate of shall not be infringed in the Second Amendment and gives gun owners a tool to peaceably fight back against unconstitutional gun control measures, Johnston concluded.

Rep Greene has been a lightning rod for Democrats attacks on the Hill. Greene was an ardent Trump supporter and not your average politician. Democrats went as far as to try to remove her from committees and wanted to prevent her from being seated. Greene fought back and refused to bend a knee to the establishment.

The bill will face a tough road through Congress, but Rep Greene vows to keep pushing for pro-gun bills.

About John Crump

John is a NRA instructor and a constitutional activist. John has written about firearms, interviewed people of all walks of life, and on the Constitution. John lives in Northern Virginia with his wife and sons and can be followed on Twitter at @crumpyss, or at http://www.crumpy.com.

Follow this link:

Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene Introduces The Second Amendment Preservation Act - AmmoLand Shooting Sports News

Douglas Andrews: Second Amendment in the Crosshairs The Patriot Post – Patriot Post

In 2008, the District of Columbia v. Heller decision finally affirmed what the Founders knew all along: that the Second Amendment refers to an individual right to keep and bear arms, rather than a collective one meant strictly for militias. Like nearly every other amendment in the Bill of Rights, the Second was meant to empower individuals, not government.

The notion, wrote David Harsanyi in 2018, of individual ownership of firearms was so unmistakable and so omnipresent in colonial days and beyond that Americans saw no more need to debate its existence than they did the right to drink water or breathe the air. Not a single Minuteman was asked to hand his musket over to the Continental Congress after chasing the British back to Boston. If they had been, the Revolution would have been short-lived, indeed.

Still, the Heller decision hasnt deterred the Left from its desire to restrict the gun rights of the citizenry. Like a hardy perennial, the gun grabbers keep reappearing even as cooler election-conscious heads within the Democrat caucus always seem to prevail.

But this time just feels a bit different. Joe Biden has a pen and a phone, and the radical elements of his party seem especially emboldened by both his diminished cognitive capacity and by the fierce urgency of now. One need only consider the continued presence of thousands of National Guard troops in our nations capital to be reminded of the Lefts willingness to use the power of the state to intimidate the people and to let them know whos boss.

According to gun control advocate Peter Ambler following a virtual meeting with White House officials Susan Rice and Cedric Richmond, President Biden is committed to taking executive action and working with Congress to put in place reforms that will keep this countrys kids and communities safe. Todays meeting was a strong affirmation of that commitment.

Biden himself seems like he wishes he could take the National Rifle Association out behind the gym and beat the hell out of [it], if we can redirect the inciteful rhetoric he aimed at then-President Donald Trump in 2018.

When asked whether Biden will resort to executive action, White House Press Secretary Jen Psaki said, First I will say that the president addressing gun violence in the country and putting in place additional safety measures is something that the president has a personal commitment to, and his history on this issue is evidence of that. He has obviously taken on the NRA twice and won and he is happy and eager to do that in the future.

So much for Joe Bidens promise to work as hard for those who didnt vote for me as those who did.

Notably on Sunday, Biden used the third anniversary of the Parkland school assault to challenge congressional Democrats to act: I am calling on Congress to enact commonsense gun law reforms, including requiring background checks on all gun sales, banning assault weapons and high-capacity magazines, and eliminating immunity for gun manufacturers who knowingly put weapons of war on our streets.

This is a strategic redux of Bill Clintons so-called Assault Weapons Ban, which was enacted in 1994 prior to Republicans retaking Congress, and which does not preclude executive action in combination with congressional action.

Both the NRA and the clear language of the Second Amendment are in Joe and Kamala Harriss crosshairs. And because this president has shown no reluctance to dictate via executive action what hes unable to enact legislatively, this story bears watching.

As Justice Joseph Story noted in his classic Commentaries on the Constitution, the right of the people to keep and bear arms is the palladium of the liberties of a republic. Our Founders were clearheaded in its meaning when they ratified the Second Amendment, and we must be no less clearheaded in our zeal to defend it today.

(Updated)

Read the original:

Douglas Andrews: Second Amendment in the Crosshairs The Patriot Post - Patriot Post

Behind NRAs fall, the high cost of betrayal – The Christian Science Monitor

Amid litigation, investigation, and the threat of dissolution, the NRAs gravest threat may be estranged members like Mike Chapdelain.

From a small shooting sports group to one of the nations most powerful lobbying outfits, the association rose to power through its enormous grassroots base. As the politics of gun control changed, the NRA maintained its influence by representing something beyond the Second Amendment. To many, it became a symbol of freedom a David forever fighting their political Goliaths.

But then the NRA itself became Goliath. In the past four years, a saga of lawsuits, scandals, and most recently, bankruptcy filing has painted the association as insular and self-interested. Even if it survives, says Adam Winkler, a gun rights expert, it has lost the faith of many in the gun rights community, who feel abandoned by their once saving grace. It is a parable of how even the mightiest organizations can be taken down by a betrayal of trust.

I felt like I was betrayed pretty good, says Mr. Chapdelain of Green Valley, Arizona, who had been a 40-year member. I think a lot of members [feel] like that.

Mike Chapdelain watched from home as National Rifle Association President Oliver North abruptly resigned at the 2019 convention in Indianapolis.

Usually a display of unity, the weekend-long event had become ground zero for an internal power struggle between Mr. North and longtime NRA leader Wayne LaPierre. Mr. North had lost, but, to Mr. Chapdelain, the NRA had as well.

A 40-year NRA member and maintenance technician in Green Valley, Arizona, Mr. Chapdelain felt internal alarm bells clamor as he watched the feud unfold. He opened his computer and his research got pretty ugly real quick.

Mr. Chapdelain found widespread allegations of graft, greed, and impropriety among the NRAs leadership. But it wasnt until later reports detailing how Mr. LaPierre received a lavish pay raise amid the turmoil that he had finally had enough. A paying NRA member since graduating high school, Mr. Chapdelain canceled his membership.

I felt like I was betrayed pretty good, he says. I think a lot of members [feel] like that.

Even amid litigation, investigation, and the threat of dissolution, the NRAs gravest threat may be estranged members like Mr. Chapdelain.

From a small shooting sports group to one of the nations most powerful lobbying outfits, the association rose to power through its enormous grassroots base. As the politics of gun control changed, the NRA maintained its influence by representing something beyond the Second Amendment. To many, it became a symbol of freedom a David forever fighting their political Goliaths.

But then the NRA itself became Goliath. In the past four years, a saga of lawsuits, scandals, and most recently bankruptcy filing, has painted the association as insular and self-interested. Even if it survives, says Adam Winkler, a gun rights expert at the University of California at Los Angeles School of Law, it has lost the faith of many in the gun rights community, who feel abandoned by their once saving grace. It is a parable of how even the mightiest organizations can be taken down by a betrayal of trust.

The NRA survived all of these years as the political winds have changed [and] the issues in the gun debate have changed, says Professor Winkler. Now, the NRA is definitely suffering from the hubris that comes with success.

Former National Rifle Association President Oliver North, shown in Indianapolis on April 26, 2019, said in court filings that he was thwarted at every step as he tried to raise alarm bells about alleged misspending at the gun lobbying group.

In the 150 years since its founding, success for the NRA has largely meant loyalty.

The NRA has worked for decades to cultivate and enlarge, to the extent they could, a very strong, loyal, and vociferous grassroots base all around the country, says Robert Spitzer, a political scientist and expert on gun politics at the State University of New York, Cortland. That really has been the key to the NRAs strength and durability compared to other groups.

Developing such a large base today around five million members requires attending to its goals, and historically the NRA has done just that. After more than a century focused on accuracy and outdoorsmanship, the organization reoriented its mission toward gun rights advocacy in the late 1970s, when a new generation of members demanded it enter politics.

In the decades since, says Professor Spitzer, its earned a near-monopoly on the gun lobby by prioritizing its political work and adopting an aggressive, uncompromising posture. As gun control laws grew more popular and gun owners grew more anxious, the NRA styled itself as a defender of freedom for salt-of-the-earth Americans.

That message crescendoed in 2016, when the NRAs enormous campaign spendinghelped sow Republican power in Washington.

They conquered the worlds that they had declared were important, says Rich Feldman, a former NRA lobbyist and firearms advocate.

But when left without a foil, the NRA began to splinter.

Starting in 2017 a four-year harvest of scandals, allegations of graft and self-dealing among leadership, and damaging litigation has threatened the crucial bond between members and management.

You claim to represent these very middle-class, working-class folks who are scraping by ... and then youre out there chartering private planes and living the life of a multimillionaire, says Mr. Feldman. Its the reality versus the illusion.

For the Rev. Kenn Blanchard, host of the podcast Black Man with a Gun, that illusion faded long ago, as he worked with the NRA in the 1990s. At first excited to lobby and advertise with the organization, Mr. Blanchard says he grew disenchanted with the NRAs insatiable political wing and elitist management.

Theyre about themselves, he says. Theyre about self-preservation more than anything else.

Yet Mr. Blanchard is still an NRA life member, and plans to remain one. The NRA still has deep roots in Americas gun culture, he says, and four years in the wilderness wont change that. Many states require an NRA certification to become a firearms instructor. The groups endorsement still matters come November.

Everything thats in the gun world is touched by them, says Mr. Blanchard.

That includes other gun rights groups.

The NRA has long been a lightning rod in the firearms community, allowing other advocacy groups to operate with less scrutiny, says Alan Gottlieb, founder of the Second Amendment Foundation. Disaffected NRA members can join other, less embattled groups. But that time of shelter may be over.

Obviously, its not good for the firearms rights community to have the NRA filing bankruptcy, says Mr. Gottlieb. Of course, most of us in various groups around the country are trying to pick up the slack as quickly as we can.

Last week, New Yorks attorney general asked a judge to dismiss the bankruptcy filing, saying the NRA was trying to evade oversight. A lawyer for the NRA called it another transparent move in a partisan crusade to shut down the NRA, and added, it welcomes the opportunity to litigate these contrived claims and the motives which led to their filing.

NRA members are then left with a choice: take their advocacy elsewhere or, as Mr. Blanchard says, hope this too shall pass.

Dave Dellaquila, a life member in Nashville, Tennessee, made his choice years ago after watching management waste the money of too many trusting blue-collar Americans. Mr. Dellaquila plans to leave the NRA but only after making it accountable to the members through internal reform.

Most recently, thats involved filing challenges to the NRAs bankruptcy seeking to stop improper debts from being annulled and to appoint an independent trustee to take control of its finances.

The organizations recent missteps, experts say, come from a lack of internal guardrails. If the NRA wants to earn back the trust of its estranged members, accountability may be the place to start.

Scott Gray, a heating and air technician in Nashville, became a member at the height of his interest in firearms, back in his days visiting gun shows each year and never missing an NRA tent.

Ten years later, in the early 2000s, he cancelled that membership, after increasingly feeling like the NRA was an ineffective advocate. To him, the organization seemed like it was distracted, and he felt ignored. If Congress could pass an assault rifle ban, he says, then the NRA wasnt spending his money wisely.

But even though Mr. Gray isnt as involved in the gun community as he once was, he has an open mind as do the other gun owners he knows.

Some people feel like the bankruptcy would be the best thing for them, says Mr. Gray. That way they would restructure and go back to their roots and not their lush lifestyles and asking for donations.

Get the Monitor Stories you care about delivered to your inbox.

To him, that means refocusing on members rights, and being the attentive guard dog the NRA was always meant to be.

People dont mind giving to them, says Mr. Gray. Its just they want to see results.

The rest is here:

Behind NRAs fall, the high cost of betrayal - The Christian Science Monitor

Barrasso ‘Won’t Let Joe Biden Threaten the Right of People’ – K2 Radio

As White House officials are meeting to discuss gun violence prevention, Senator John Barrasso of Wyoming says that attacking the 2ndAmendment Rights of law-abiding citizens isnt the answer.

According to The Hill, Biden Administration officials are meeting with advocates backing gun law reforms, such as strengthening background checks.

Gun sales are on the rise in the U.S., with some believing its due to Biden making his intentions about gun laws very well-known during his presidential campaign.

The Hill reports that during Bidens campaign, he vowed to pass legislation banning the manufacture and sale of assault weapons and high-capacity magazines and buy back the ones already in circulation.

President Bidens campaign website also said that he would enact universal background check legislation.

John Feinblatt, the President of Everytown for Gun Safety, had nothing but encouraging words about his recent meeting with President Biden.

This meeting provided more evidence that the Biden Administration is committed to being the strongest weve ever seen on gun safety, Fleinblatt stated. With COVID making gun violence worse and armed extremists literally holding our democracy at gunpoint, the time for action is now and we fully expect to see it soon.

Of course, any laws that the President tries to enact must also be passed by Congress which has proven difficult on such divisive issues as gun control.

Any laws regarding gun control will inevitably run up against Republican Senate members and, if Senator Barrassos words are any indication, thats going to be an uphill battle.

In a tweet posted Tuesday morning, Senator Barrasso said that he wont let Joe Biden threaten the right of people in Wyoming to keep and bear arms. We all agree that we must wind ways to control violent crime & keep guns out of the hands of criminals. Attacking the Second Amendment rights of law-abiding citizens isnt the way to do that.

Though Democrats control the house, all 50 Democratic members of the Senate would need to support the idea of gun legislation, and they would need to be joined by at least 10 Republican Senators, before any sort of legislation could actually pass.

See the original post here:

Barrasso 'Won't Let Joe Biden Threaten the Right of People' - K2 Radio

North Idaho Rep. Heather Scott discusses gun rights, insurrection, free speech – KREM.com

"The concern is they are going to get rid of that international tie to call you a domestic [terrorist], Scott said.

BONNER COUNTY, Idaho A live meeting with constituents over Zoom had Rep. Heather Scott,, R-Blanchard, talking about gun rights, the federal prosecution of insurrectionists and warning those in the call against public education, as reported by our news partner the Bonner County Daily Bee.

One of the biggest topics of the night, gun rights, was brought up in several questions throughout the video call.

Some constituents expressed concerns over whether President Joe Biden might sign an executive order restricting gun rights.

I do not see any [executive orders] on guns, but apparently, Biden has made some comments that he wants Congress to take up gun legislation, Scott said. That's what we're all afraid of. They're coming for our guns and I keep telling people, by the time they come for our guns it's going to be too late.

Scott encouraged those on the call to look into the Idaho Second Amendment Alliance, a group that describes itself as a no-compromise gun rights organization. Others, Scott said, are not.

You can forget about the NRA, she said.

In response to a question about red flag laws laws that would allow police or family members to petition the state to temporarily remove firearms from someone deemed to be a danger to themselves or others Scott said there are many attempts to push them through, which have been largely unsuccessful.

Still, Scott said, she believes there is an ongoing threat to gun rights.

Scott also discussed federal prosecution of insurrectionists at the Capitol building in Washington D.C. on Jan. 6, acknowledging the Sandpoint man who was arrested Friday in connection with the insurrection.

I don't know if he did something bad there or if he just went to protest, but he's been [charged] with an insurrection. This is a huge problem, she said. We don't have to agree with everything government says or does. And so but they are going to start tightening the screws on American citizens and free speech.

Although there are currently no federal offenses designated for domestic terrorism without connection to a foreign entity, Scott said shes concerned that if one is added it would allow the government to infringe on citizens rights.

The Biden administration says he's going after domestic terrorists. The concern is they are going to get rid of that international tie to call you a domestic [terrorist], she said. What that will do is that will make every single person that says something they don't like a domestic terrorist.

Scott criticized Gov. Brad Little on multiple occasions, saying that he, and many of the state legislators are not truly conservative and claimed many politicians to be influenced by globalism and corporate interests through lobby groups.

The governor is part of the [National] Governors Association, she said. The National Governors Association, guess who they have a new partnership with? The World Economic Forum It's the globalists that are basically running the governors.

Scott went on to make the unsubstantiated claim that the group, or globalists, were responsible for the COVID-19 pandemic and are planning a cyber attack.

They are the ones that came out with COVID. And they are the ones that are coming out with a cyber attack, she said. They just said COVID is going to be nothing compared to the cyber attack coming.

Throughout the meeting, Scott said she believes Idaho is not conservative, and that within the Idaho Legislature she estimates there are probably three conservatives in the Senate, and maybe 20, 25, in the House.

She also blamed other legislators for a lack of legislative progress; namely Republican representative Fred Wood, for not hearing bills by more conservative legislators.

[He] will not hear any bills about vaccinations or the health districts or anything, she said.

In response to questions about education, Scott said she believes college to serve only as indoctrination.

I would not send my kids to college, I would find another route, she said. I feel the same way about public schools, unfortunately.

One caller asked whether there would be consequences for Gov. Little banning hydroxychloroquine as a treatment for COVID-19 and the deaths from the virus during that time.

Hydroxychloroquine, which was touted as a treatment for COVID-19 by former President Donald Trump, despite a lack of evidence.

It's just not, it's not going to get better, she said. We're not going to just do this and it's all going to be fixed. It's going to take a lot more than that. And I hope it doesn't take blood but I'm, I'm beginning to wonder.

The Bonner County Bee is a KREM 2 news partner. For more from our news partner,click here.

Read more:

North Idaho Rep. Heather Scott discusses gun rights, insurrection, free speech - KREM.com

We Fight Two Fights: Second Amendment Rights are Lost without Political Action – USA Carry

I am endlessly amused when I hear a gun owner tell me, I am not political, or, I stay out of politics. In a perfect world, our liberties would be secure enough that we could ignore politics at our convenience. However, we dont live in a perfect world and there are political forces hell-bent on taking your constitutional rights away from you. If you believe in maintaining the tools and skills to defend yourself from evil, then congratulations on preparing for that fight, should it come to you. However, you need to be an active combatant in a second fight: the fight to maintain your liberty.

There is only one firearms-related venue in which I hold my tongue on politics, and that is when teaching people how to shoot. I dont want to turn off new shooters and I applaud them for arming themselves and seeking training regardless of how they vote or what they think. Beyond that, however, I am quite blunt:

If you believe in being armed so that you can defend yourself and your loved ones from violence then you should also be engaged in fighting those who would strip you of that right.

Who is out to take your rights from you? Well, one particular American political party has infringement of the Second Amendment written right into their party platform. I will leave it at that. If you believe in constitutional liberty, that particular party is your adversary. Let us not mince words. If you favor that party over the other because there are different issues that mean more to you, no problem, but be honest with yourself; you are supporting those who seek to strip you of your right to keep and bear arms. True, some on the other side of the aisle seek to do the same, but as a party platform, the choice should be clear to you if you want to protect your 2A rights, and arguably most other Constitutional rights.

So, as a law-abiding gun owner who believes in the founding principles of this nation, what should you be doing to defend those principles? If your answer is to post a come and take it meme on social media, you are not helping. Fighting with your ignorant friends on Facebook or with strangers in a comment section is not particularly constructive. Instead, we must be engaged in a rabid fight in the political and cultural war in a way that matters if we want to preserve our freedoms, and, indeed, win back what has already been lost. How do we do this?

As a gun owner, you should belong to the national gun rights groups as well as your state-level groups. With the NRA in turmoil right now, I will leave joining it to your discretion, but I highly recommend joining Gun Owners of American and Second Amendment Foundation at the national level. Beyond this, join your state-level group. Much of the fight for our rights happens at the state level, so supporting your state group is just as important as supporting the national groups.

Beyond just joining and paying the annual member dues, contribute what you can, when you can. I find that too many shooters who spend thousands of dollars a year on ammunition are not inclined to kick in a hundred bucks to actually protect their rights by supporting the 2A groups. Really? Remember that the anti-gun organizations are well funded by certain billionaires who invest millions upon millions of dollars into the sole mission of disarming you, the law-abiding citizen. We have no such sugar daddies on our side, so it is up to you and me.

Send emails, letters, and most importantly, call your state and federal level representatives. Speak to who picks up, or leave a message. Politely demand that your representatives uphold the constitution and reject anti-gun legislation. The single thing that can override a politicians goal of trampling liberty is the thought of not getting re-elected. When these politicians receive phone calls in favor of rights rather than against them at a ten-to-one ratio they read the cards on their own re-election. Dont let up on this pressure. While the anti-gun radicals have the money, we have the numbers, if we would simply be active.

Be sure to turn out at peaceful rallies that are held to support the Second Amendment. Be sure to turn up when your county or city council has meetings on the subject. Be at the state capital to lobby and make it clear that you and your fellow gun owners are not going to accept further infringements on your rights. The activists for the groups that wish to disarm you always show up. They have big money and organization behind them. We need to show up tenfold compared to what they do. When it comes to electing representatives, be willing to volunteer to help the ones who respect the Constitution. Knock on doors, make phone calls, donate money, do anything you can do to help win this fight.

The best way to cure an emotionally driven fear of firearms is to take the individual suffering from it to the shooting range. Never once have I taken a first-time shooter, no matter their political leaning, to the range that did not have a good time. The best way to fight gun control is to fix the ignorance that too many citizens have on firearms. While those who lead the anti-gun movement are ruthlessly tyrannical, the average sucker that votes in favor of their agenda is simply ignorant. Take people shooting and have civilized conversations with them to give them the facts. It is not rocket science; the places in the United States with the strictest gun laws are the most crime-ridden murder capitols. Arm yourself with the facts and share them.

There are over one hundred million gun owners in the United States, probably well more than this since most gun owners dont volunteer such information to pollsters. If even ten percent were active in preserving our rights, there would be no gun control at all. Time to get motivated and to motivate your fellow gun people. If we take action, we win. If you sit on the sidelines, we lose our rights for ourselves and for our children. Dont let that happen.

Read the original post:

We Fight Two Fights: Second Amendment Rights are Lost without Political Action - USA Carry

Biden Administration Confirms COVID-19 Liability Protections for Federal Contractors, Employees and Volunteers – Lexology

On February 16, 2021, Acting Secretary of the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services (HHS) Norris Cochran, published in the Federal Register the Sixth Amendment to the Declaration Under the Public Readiness and Emergency Act [PREP Act]. 86 Fed. Reg. 9516-9520 (Feb. 16, 2021). This is the second amendment to the Declaration issued since President Biden took office and continues the Trump Administrations practice of providing broad liability protection for those responding to COVID19.

The Declaration originally was issued on January 31, 2020, by former HHS Secretary Azar. Pursuant to the PREP Act, the Declaration allows the Secretary to extend liability immunity to covered persons for taking allowed actions with respect to covered countermeasures, in prescribed circumstances, all as declared by the Secretary. A covered person is immune from suit and liability under Federal and State law for all claims of loss caused by, arising out of, relating to, or resulting from the administration or use of a covered countermeasure, which includes FDA-authorized COVID19 vaccines and tests. See 42 U.S.C. 247d6d(a)(1). Under the PREP Act, covered persons include manufacturers, distributors, program planners, qualified persons, and their officials, agents and employees. 42 U.S.C. 247d-6d(i)(2).

In the Sixth Amendment to the Declaration, the Acting Secretary augmented the covered persons protected from liability with an additional category of qualified persons. Although the Unites States is, by statute, a covered person, the structure of the statutory provision defining covered person does not make clear that direct contractors and employees of the United States are similarly covered. See 42 U.S.C. 247d-6d(i)(2). To clear up that ambiguity, the Sixth Amendment provides that a qualified person includes any Federal government employee, contractor or volunteer who prescribes, administers, delivers, distributes or dispenses a Covered Countermeasure, if the federal department or agency has authorized or could authorize that person even if those authorized duties or responsibilities ordinarily would not extend to members of the public or otherwise would be more limited in scope than the activities such employees, contractors or volunteers are authorized to carry out under this declaration. 86 Fed. Reg. at 9519 (Feb. 16, 2021).

This expanded liability protection is fully consistent with and will support President Bidens National Strategy for the COVID19 Response and Pandemic Preparedness, which envisions federal vaccination sites and deploy[ing] thousands of federal staff, contractors and volunteers to support state and local vaccination efforts. See National Strategy, pp. 9, 52.

Read more from the original source:

Biden Administration Confirms COVID-19 Liability Protections for Federal Contractors, Employees and Volunteers - Lexology

Biden’s assault on 2nd Amendment sparks fears of Civil War – One America News Network

Joe Biden spoke during the First State Democratic Dinner in Dover, Delaware, on March 16, 2019. (Photo by SAUL LOEB/AFP via Getty Images)

Joe Biden is ramping up his push to eliminate Second Amendment rights under the pretext of public safety. In a statement on Sunday, Biden marked the anniversary of the Parkland shooting in Florida, saying he would take new steps to take guns away from Americans.

His plans include a ban on private ownership of military style rifles, tougher background checks and growing bureaucratic obstacles to buying legal guns. Meanwhile, Biden has proposed little to contain the inflow of illegal weapons into the U.S.

Many Americans said if Biden wants their guns, he may come and get them.

Im very worried about this country, where its going, gun dealer Scott Pickett said. If it keeps heading down the same way, theyre going to push people into another Civil War.

Biden baselessly claimed tougher gun control would reduce crime. However, gun violence is at its highest in cities like Chicago and New York that have stringent gun control already in place.

See original here:

Biden's assault on 2nd Amendment sparks fears of Civil War - One America News Network