NASA’s head warned that China may try to claim the Moon two space scholars explain why that’s unlikely to happen – The Conversation

NASA Administrator Bill Nelson recently expressed concerns over Chinas aims in space, and in particular, that China would, in some way, claim ownership over the Moon and stop other countries from exploring it. In an interview with a German newspaper, Nelson cautioned, We must be very concerned that China is landing on the Moon and saying: Its ours now and you stay out. China immediately denounced the claims as a lie.

This spat between the administrator of NASA and Chinese government officials comes at a time when both nations are actively working on missions to the Moon and China has not been shy about its lunar aspirations.

In 2019, China became the first country to land a spacecraft on the far side of the Moon. That same year, China and Russia announced joint plans to reach the South Pole of the Moon by 2026. And some Chinese officials and government documents have expressed intentions to build a permanent, crewed International Lunar Research Station by 2027.

There is big difference between China or any state for that matter setting up a lunar base and actually taking over the Moon. As two scholars who study space security and Chinas space program, we believe that neither China nor any other nation is likely to take over the Moon in the near future. It is not only illegal, it is also technologically daunting the costs of such an endeavor would be extremely high, while the potential payoffs would be uncertain.

Legally, China cannot take over the Moon because it is against current international space law. The Outer Space Treaty, adopted in 1967 and signed by 134 countries, including China, explicitly states that Outer space, including the moon and other celestial bodies, is not subject to national appropriation by claim of sovereignty, by means of use or occupation, or by any other means (Article II). Legal scholars have debated the exact meaning of appropriation, but under a literal interpretation, the treaty indicates that no country can take possession of the Moon and declare it an extension of its national aspirations and prerogatives. If China tried to do this, it would risk international condemnation and a potential international retaliatory response.

While no country can claim ownership of the Moon, Article I of the Outer Space Treaty allows any state to explore and use outer space and celestial bodies. China will not be the only visitor to the South Pole of the Moon in the near future. The U.S.-led Artemis Accords is a group of 20 countries that has plans to return humans to the Moon by 2025, which will include the establishment of a research station on the lunar surface and a supporting space station in orbit called the Gateway with a planned launch in November 2024.

Even if no country can legally claim sovereignty over the Moon, it is possible that China, or any other country, would attempt to gradually establish de facto control over strategically important areas through a strategy known as salami slicing. This practice involves taking small, incremental steps to achieve a big change: Individually, those steps do not warrant a strong response, but their cumulative effect adds up to significant developments and increased control. China has recently been using this strategy in the South and East China seas. Still, such a strategy takes time and can be addressed.

With a surface area of nearly 14.6 million square miles (39 million square kilometers) or almost five times the area of Australia any control of the Moon would be temporary and localized.

More plausibly, China could attempt to secure control of specific lunar areas that are strategically valuable, such as lunar craters with higher concentrations of water ice. Ice on the Moon is important because it will provide water to humans that wouldnt need to be shipped from Earth. Ice can also serve as a vital source of oxygen and hydrogen, which could be used as rocket fuel. In short, water ice is essential for ensuring the long-term sustainability and survivability of any mission to the Moon or beyond.

Securing and enforcing control of strategic lunar areas would require substantial financial investments and long-term efforts. And no country could do this without everyone noticing.

China is investing heavily in space. In 2021, it led in number of orbital launches with a total of 55 compared to the U.S.s 51. China is also in the top three in spacecraft deployment for 2021. Chinas state-owned StarNet space company is planning a megaconstellation of 12,992 satellites, and the country has nearly finished building the Tiangong space station.

Going to the Moon is expensive; taking over the Moon would be much more so. Chinas space budget an estimated US$13 billion in 2020 is only around half that of NASAs. Both the U.S. and China increased their space budgets in 2020, the U.S. by 5.6% and China by 17.1% compared to the previous year. But even with the increased spending, China does not seem to be investing the money needed to carry out the expensive, daring and uncertain mission of taking over the Moon.

If China assumes control over some part of the moon, it would be a risky, expensive and extremely provocative action. China would risk further tarnishing its international image by breaking international law, and it may invite retaliation. All this for uncertain payoffs that remain to be determined.

More here:

NASA's head warned that China may try to claim the Moon two space scholars explain why that's unlikely to happen - The Conversation

NASAs plan to return to the Moonand stay – EL PAS USA

Astronaut Eugene A. Cernan during the 'Apollo XVII' mission, the last time the Moon was walked on.NASA

At the end of 2017, coinciding with the 45th anniversary of the last flight of the Apollo program to the Moon, former US President Donald Trump signed a presidential directive that urged NASA to renew its efforts to return to the Moon as soon as possible. He did not set a date, but just a year later, former Vice President Mike Pence did: 2024. He was presumably counting on an eventual re-election of Trump, who would attempt to repeat John F. Kennedys achievement from half a century earlier. But the deadline was too tight. NASA had neither the right ship nor the right rocket, nor a concrete plan of how to do it. The Apollo program had been conceived essentially as a gesture for national prestige, with limited scientific ambitions. A return to the Moon would be an exploration mission with broader objectives than just planting the ceremonial flags. Thus was born the Artemis program, NASAs plan to reconquer the Moon.

The initiative is named after Apollos twin sister in Greek mythology. Its delays began to accumulate almost as soon as the plan was conceived. NASA never officially revealed its intentions beyond the first three flights: the first would depart without a crew; the second would include astronauts, who would orbit around the Moon; and the third would touch down on its surface. The landing was scheduled for 2025, which many experts considered an impossible deadline.

The lunar spacecraft Orion and its carrier rocket, the SLS, have not yet flown. Both should debut this summer. The Orion is an orbital capsule, which cannot descend to the Moons surface. The mission has been entrusted to Space Xs StarShip, which presented the best financial offer.

On paper, the Starship seems as promising as it is revolutionary: a freighter, an orbital spacecraft with capacity for dozens of crew members, a suborbital vehicle for transporting passengers, an in-flight refueling tanker, a landing capsule on the Moon andfinallya Mars explorer. So far, though, its prototype has not reached more than 15 kilometers in height, and it has only managed to complete one successful landing.

A draft of the plans for future flights has just appeared, leaked to the media outlet Ars Technica. Artemis 4 would be used to begin construction of an orbital station around the Moon, which would involve substantial European cooperation. That would take place between 2027 and 2029, at the soonest, and would require at least two or three more flights.

NASA contemplates five more Artemis missions in the next decade. They plan to take elements to the Moon to build a small permanent base, as well as a pressurized vehicle that would be something like a rolling laboratory similar to the one from the movie Mars. The last planned flight is the Artemis 9, scheduledwith great optimismfor 2034.

The plans greatest obstacle is its staggering cost. It is not clear that Washington will agree to cover bills that will exceed $4 billion dollars per flight, almost 20% of NASAs total current budget. And questions are already being raised concerning the use of the new SLS superrocket, now resting on its ramp at the Kennedy Center.

The process of designing the SLS began before Space X demonstrated the possibility of recovering the rockets for reuse. Since then, Elon Musks company has recycled some of its launchers in more than a dozen flights, consequently decreasing the cost of each operation. When it takes off, the SLS will be a throwaway rocket: its four main enginesharvested from old space shuttleswill go to the bottom of the Atlantic.

Since it used engines, center tank and side throttles all from the Shuttle program, the SLS should have been cheaper than the Saturn 5 of the 1960s. But it wasnt. Each moon rocket in the Apollo program cost about $1.4 billion in current dollars; each shuttle, about $1.5 billion. The SLS will start at $2.2 billion, without counting its astronomical development costs. For future lunar operations, an even more powerful version will be necessary.

SLS is not the only Achilles heel of the Artemis program. Many believe that the Gateway base around the Moon makes less sense than providing a secure high-altitude mooring point for the Orion capsule, whose engines would not allow it to pull itself out of a low lunar orbit. The future StarShip (known as HLS: Human Landing System) will also have to dock on the orbital station, but it will be much larger than the Gateway itself, and the two structures would have numerous duplicated systems. It is not clear whether the cost and time spent building the station are justifiable and whether a cheaper alternative is possible.

Perhaps the answer should be sought not in technology but in politics. Twelve years ago, the SLS program was designed to appease large aerospace contractors who were concerned about the end of shuttle operations and the subsequent job loss. Almost all the states got a more or less important piece of the pie, depending on the negotiating skills of their representatives in Washington. All together, they received $24 billion in development expenses alone.

We are no longer in Kennedys times, when going to the Moon was a matter of national pride. Now it is just a matter of business.

Excerpt from:

NASAs plan to return to the Moonand stay - EL PAS USA

World View Assembles Space Flight Safety Experts from NASA, Virgin Galactic, and Blue Origin to Establish Safety Program and Technical Oversight…

The new team builds on World Views existing safety protocols as the company readies for human flights in 2024

TUSCON, Ariz. (World View PR) World View, the leading stratospheric exploration and space tourism company, hired three new industry experts to establish and lead a new safety program that includes the companys testing and safety protocols ahead of human space flights starting in 2024. The new personnel will build on World Views existing safety protocols and risk assessment procedures that have successfully guided more than 100 uncrewed flights and remote sensing missions for commercial and government customers. In turn, the committees work will provide the additional measures needed for World View to begin space tourism missions in two years.

Experts leading World Views safety expansion include Greg Ray J Johnson, a former NASA astronaut and Blue Origin executive; Ron Failing from Virgin Galactic; and Charlie Precourt, former NASA astronaut.

Mr. Johnson will serve as World Views Chief Test Pilot. While at NASA, Mr. Johnson was a research pilot, astronaut, and pilot for NASA Shuttle Mission STS-125. He is also a naval officer (retired), Navy test pilot, and aviator with considerable aerospace engineering experience. Most recently a Senior Vice President at Blue Origin, Mr. Johnson led the New Shepard suborbital rocket, overseeing four test flights, and was responsible for engineering logistics, operations, and portions of their West, TX launch and landing site. As World Views Chief Test Pilot, he will help develop and execute testing for space tourism flights and play a critical role in developing safety protocols.

Mr. Failing will serve as World Views Vice President of Aviation Safety. Mr. Failing brings decades of aerospace and aviation safety expertise having implemented several safety management systems, including human factors analysis, risk mitigation, and hazard controls. He was most recently Director of Safety at Virgin Galactic and also worked at Virgin America, Frontier, and Continental Airlines. Drawing from this extensive experience, Mr. Failing will oversee flight safety and the overall development of World Views flight safety program.

Mr. Precourt will lead the development of World Views independent Technical Oversight Committee, which will standardize the key safety and risk assessment protocols needed to ensure successful human flights. While at NASA, Mr. Precourt served as an astronaut, pilot, and commander. He was also Chief of the Astronaut Office from 1998 to 2002, where he led the NASA Astronaut Corps and served as a top advisor to NASA Administrator Daniel Golden during the Clinton and Bush administrations on issues related to training and operations. Following NASA, Mr. Precourt served as the Vice President and General Manager of the Propulsion Division at Northrop Grumman. As a retired U.S. Air Force Colonel with advanced degrees in aeronautics and engineering, Mr. Precourt brings deep technical and leadership knowledge to his new role that will be essential for advancing World Views safety standards.

As we enter human flight, a robust and thorough safety program is one of our most serious and important initiatives, said Ryan Hartman, World Views President and CEO. We have brought together a team with world-class expertise ranging from NASA Shuttle missions to aircraft safety and other aerospace programs to ensure our approach to space tourism and remote sensing is the safest and most reliable in the industry. This is a major step forward in World Views ability to not only establish rigorous standards but demonstrate our commitment to safety as we take space tourists to the new frontier.

World View is also seeking AS9100 certification, a quality standard for aerospace, aviation, and defense companies.

About World View

World View is the leading stratospheric exploration company on a mission to inspire the global community to rediscover Earth. Through both its legacy Stratollite imaging and newly launched space tourism and exploration businesses, World View is working to ensure its ultimate objective: honor the planet so that future generations will feel blessed to call it home. For more information, visit worldview.space.

Read the rest here:

World View Assembles Space Flight Safety Experts from NASA, Virgin Galactic, and Blue Origin to Establish Safety Program and Technical Oversight...

Garbage on International Space Station- here is how NASA throws it out in space – HT Tech

ISS crew members now have a new way to dispose of garbage on the space station.

The rising number of satellite launches and spacecraft are causing a tremendous amount of traffic in space. Not just that, there is so much space junk floating around in Earth orbit that it threatens the lives of those on the International Space Station (ISS). However, here we focus on the garbage generated on the ISS, which too is adding to the trash floating in space. Massive amounts of trash is created by those living in Space. Now, there's some good news for the astronauts, at least! The crew members on the ISS have got a new way to dispose of garbage. The International Space Station has recently ejected roughly 172 pounds (78 kilograms) of garbage within a specialized trash bag on July 2 from the station's commercial Bishop Airlock, Nanoracks informed in a press release. Nanoracks created these airlock systems to dispose of garbage in space.

"We have some incredibly exciting news to share from the weekend: as of 7:05 PM Central on Saturday, July 2, we successfully cycled the Bishop Airlock aboard the International Space Station (ISS) and deployed Nanoracks first-of-its-kind technology to dispose of approximately 172 lbs of waste from the station!" Nanoracks announced in a statement. This was a test of new orbital waste-disposal tech conducted by Nanoracks in collaboration with NASAs Johnson Space Center and according to the report, it went swimmingly well.

Till now, Astronauts aboard the ISS used to collect trash and store it in their orbiting home for months. It is the Cygnus cargo vehicle which used to arrive and collect their bags of trash before it was released from the space station for de-orbit. Later, the entire spacecraft filled with the bags of garbage used to burn up while reentering the Earths atmosphere. But now, with this new waste disposal system, the ISS crew can fill the container with up to 600 lbs of trash, which will then be released and the Airlock is re-mounted empty.

"..individual pieces of hardware have been jettisoned from ISS, and a few bundles of equipment have been hand jettisoned during spacewalks, this is the first use of an airlock trash bag ejection system on the ISS," a tweet by Jonathan McDowell, an astronomer at the Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics reads.

This might be the first time for ISS to dispose of garbage in an Airlock disposable system, but it is not new to space flights! Yes, the same trash disposal system was earlier used a number of times. McDowell says in another tweet, Worth recalling that trash bags were regularly jettisoned from the Soviet Salyut space stations in the 1970s and 1980s."

Read the original post:

Garbage on International Space Station- here is how NASA throws it out in space - HT Tech

NASA wants to build a swarm of tiny, wedge-shaped robots to look for life on faraway worlds – ZME Science

Ethan Schaler, a robotics mechanical engineer at NASAs Jet Propulsion Laboratory in Southern California, loves the idea of exploring new worlds. He also loves acronyms, based on his project called Sensing With Independent Micro-Swimmers (SWIM). SWIM was recently awarded $600,000 inPhase II fundingfrom the NASA Innovative Advanced Concepts (NIAC) program, with the goal of proving the feasibility of the mission and 3D printing workable designs.

Then, if everything goes according to plan, NASA may start preparations to include the swarm in its future missions that will search for life on ocean worlds

The next decades of space exploration in our solar system will focus on the so-called Ocean Worlds ice-covered satellites like Europa or Enceladus that are thought to host liquid water beneath their frozen crust.

Decades ago, astronomers wouldnt have given much thought to these worlds as a priority, but increasingly, recent research is showing that theres more to them than meets the eye.

Despite not being planets (theyre satellites), the ocean worlds in our solar system are considered some of the likeliest places to host life. They may be very far away from the Sun, which is why their surface is frozen, but tidal friction ensures that beneath the surface, theres enough heat for liquid water. Basically, tidal interactions caused by their giant host planets cause the interior of these satellites to flex, which generates enough heat to melt the ice and keep it liquid.

Its more than just a hypothesis, researchers have actually observed signs of liquid water on these worlds and where theres liquid water, there could be life. But how do you look for it?

The prospect of a mission to a world like Europa is daunting in several ways. It would be by far the most complex mission NASA has undertaken, and not just because Europa is so much farther away from Earth. Unlike Mars, you cant just land your rover on the surface and then have it explore. Sure, you can get valuable information from the surface of Europa, but the real prize is the water underneath the ice. This is where Schalers mini-robots come in.

The first innovation in this proposal is the shape and size of the robots: theyre much smaller and wedge-shaped, which means many of them could be equipped on a lander, which further increases the area you can explore and the chance of finding signs of life (should such signs exist).

My idea is, where can we take miniaturized robotics and apply them in interesting new ways for exploring our solar system? Schaler said. With a swarm of small swimming robots, we are able to explore a much larger volume of ocean water and improve our measurements by having multiple robots collecting data in the same area.

Each robot would have its own propulsion system, along with basic sensors for temperature, salinity, acidity, and pressure as well as chemical sensors to look for biological markers. The robots would also have an ultrasound communications system, through which they could communicate with the surface lander, which would in turn communicate with NASA.

The robots, which would measure only a few centimeters long, would be deployed either individually or as a swarm from a single robot mothercraft. This flexibility of the swarm would enable NASA to explore multiple locations around the entry point, which is very useful. After all, theres not much info at all regarding where your best odds of finding signs of life are. What if you send your robot somewhere and theres something really cool and important closeby, but not quite there? Well, the robot swarm will be able to explore that and give you a wider view.

What if, after all those years it took to get into an ocean, you come through the ice shell in the wrong place? What if theres signs of life over there but not where you entered the ocean? said SWIM team scientistSamuel Howellof JPL, who also works on Europa Clipper. By bringing these swarms of robots with us, wed be able to look over there to explore much more of our environment than a single cryobot would allow.

Its a bit like how the Ingenuity helicopter helps explore Mars by offering a much broader view of whats going on around the rover.

The helicopter extends the reach of the rover, and the images it is sending back arecontext to help the rover understandhow to explore its environment, he said. If instead of one helicopter you had a bunch, you would know a lot more about your environment. Thats the idea behind SWIM.

Now, its time for Schaler to prove that this concept can work and produce a functional design that can be tested. If it works, we may soon send our robot swarms to another world looking for life.

Read the original:

NASA wants to build a swarm of tiny, wedge-shaped robots to look for life on faraway worlds - ZME Science

How engineers got NASA’s James Webb Space Telescope ready to take its first images – The Verge

For the past six months, Scott Friedman and a team of roughly 160 scientists and engineers have been working through one of the most daunting to-do lists in all of science. Nearly every day, they dropped everything at 1:30PM ET to meet and find out how much closer theyve gotten to their goal: getting NASAs James Webb Space Telescope, the most powerful space observatory in history, fully operational.

During each meeting, they reviewed all the work they had done over the last 24 hours with the observatory, which is currently zooming through deep space roughly 1 million miles from Earth. Sometimes their testing and measurements had gone well the day before, and theyd forge ahead with the next task. Other times, thered be hiccups.

We would have our scheduler there too and say, All right, this one didnt work so it has to be rescheduled. Lets get it in the schedule as soon as we can so we can continue, Friedman, the lead commissioning scientist for the James Webb Space Telescope at the Space Telescope Science Institute, or STScI, tells The Verge. And that was a tricky business.

It was always going to be a monumental task to get the James Webb Space Telescope, or JWST, up and running. Equipped with the largest mirror weve ever sent into space, the observatory is set to fundamentally transform astronomy as we know it by capturing the light from stars and galaxies that formed while the Universe was in its infancy. But, before JWST can start collecting all these baby pictures of the cosmos, NASA and STScI, which oversees the telescopes operations and science, needed to know that all of JWSTs state-of-the-art instruments and hardware could actually work in tandem to get the job done.

Now, the commissioning team is wrapping up their work, having successfully completed all their assignments just a few weeks late of their summer deadline. For a telescope thats already a decade behind schedule, the team was remarkably punctual all things considered. Thanks to their efforts, JWST is on the cusp of starting its first year of epic science observations. This transformational period of astronomy will begin with the release of the first full-color images taken by the observatory on July 12th. NASA hasnt said yet what exactly the images will be, but we do know theyll include a detailed look at the atmosphere of a planet outside our Solar System and the deepest image of our Universe that has ever been taken, according to NASA administrator Bill Nelson.

What I have seen just moves me, Pam Melroy, NASAs deputy administrator, said during a press conference ahead of the image release, as a scientist, as an engineer, and as a human being.

JWST has been on quite the odyssey. The observatory, which has taken about two and a half decades and nearly $10 billion to build, first had to survive the intensity of its launch on Christmas Day last year. Then, once it got into space, it underwent an intricately complex unfurling process to get into the right configuration for observing the cosmos. (JWST was just far too large to launch in its final form, so it had to launch folded in on itself like a tightly packed Swiss Army knife.)

The unfolding was a two-week-long nerve-racking process that included hundreds of moving parts and more than 300 events known as single point failures: procedures that had to work or they could jeopardize the entire mission. But, miraculously or perhaps thanks to years of engineering and testing the unfurling went exactly to plan, with the mission team working well into the night on New Years Eve to deploy some of JWSTs most crucial hardware.

But, almost as soon as the unfolding was over, the engineering team began to focus on JWSTs mirror. The observatorys iconic gold-plated mirror, spanning more than 21 feet across, is actually made up of 18 hexagonal mirror segments that have to be aligned ever so precisely so that they function as if they were one single mirror. And they were nowhere near ready to do that. To get started, engineers first had to remove each of the segments off of devices known as snubbers: equipment that kept the mirrors in a snug position for the journey to space. We launched them in a position that is safe for launch, but it doesnt necessarily allow you to move the mirrors back and forth to align them, Lee Feinberg, the optical telescope element manager for JWST at NASA, tells The Verge.

That process took a little more than a week, with each segment moving half an inch from their launch positions. Still, that was only the beginning. That wasnt even alignment, Feinberg says. That was just getting to the point that we could start, really. The team then had to wait for JWSTs main infrared camera, NIRCam, to cool down enough that they could start using the instrument to collect images. Once NIRCam was nice and frigid, they used the mirrors to take their first picture with JWST, pointing all the mirror segments at a single bright star. The result: 18 different versions of that same star.

That was what the team expected; the segments were all pointing in marginally different directions. Thus began the painstaking process of moving each mirror segment ever so slightly so that those 18 pieces ultimately behaved as one. To tweak the position of one mirror, the team had to move the actuator on the back of the segment, adjusting it slowly by a minuscule amount. The alignment team would then use JWSTs instruments and take pictures of their progress, sending those images down to Earth. A series of algorithms would analyze the work and determine how to make further adjustments. Then the entire process would happen all over again. Step and repeat.

Things moved at a snails pace, as each movement had to be done sequentially. And the team had to be extra careful when they moved each segment, verifying the exact position of each piece when they were done so that the mirrors didnt inadvertently run into each other. But finally, after three months of tedious work, JWSTs mirrors came into tight focus.

When the mirrors started to be aligned, they were off from one to the next by millimeters, says Feinberg. And by the time we were done, they were aligned to nanometers so a factor of a million improvement in the alignment.

While mirror alignment was underway, the rest of the commissioning team turned their focus to JWSTs four main instruments. In addition to NIRCam, theres NIRSpec, MIRI, and FGS / NIRISS. All four contain spectrographs, which break light into a spectrum that scientists can analyze to learn more about distant objects. Three of them also have cameras (NIRSpec is the odd one out). Just as the strings of a guitar need to be properly tuned before theyre used, so too do the highly complex instruments on JWST. The commissioning teams job was to calibrate each of the instruments to ensure that they were ready and functioning properly when the observatorys first year of science begins.

JWSTs instruments were booted up and first checked out when the mirrors were still being aligned since the team needed the camera and other instruments to help adjust the mirror segments. Still, the more robust calibration work couldnt begin in earnest until the mirrors were fully lined up, which took about four months.

Now, over the last two months, the team has been putting the instruments through their paces, running through a long list of time-consuming measurements. Sometimes they were quick, but sometimes they were 12 hours of observing time with many observations associated with it, Friedman says.

Some of that work entailed simply using the instruments to observe standard stars, measuring their light and positions in the sky. The team then cross-referenced what they measured with what they know about these stars based on decades of past research to look for corrections that needed to be made. Every camera, even JWSTs NIRCam, has some built-in distortion in its images. By measuring those distortions, the teams can correct for them in the future, according to Friedman.

Some of the calibrations entailed demonstrating JWSTs prowess. The observatory may only have four main instruments, but each instrument has different operating modes that offer various capabilities, and the commissioning team had to test out and verify each mode. The observatory as a whole also has different operating modes that had to be calibrated. For instance, JWST will need to be able to track relatively fast moving objects like asteroids and the moons of the outer planets in our Solar System, so the commissioning team practiced this capability by locking onto test asteroids, using guide stars as references in the sky to make the asteroid appear still. Its all complicated work that hadnt been tested in space before. Its one thing to write that down on a piece of paper and to test everything you can on the ground, but its not the same as in flight, Friedman says. We have to demonstrate these things.

For the most part, Friedman says the entire calibration and commissioning process went very smoothly, though there were a few hiccups along the way. JWST went through half a dozen safe haven events when the spacecraft detects something it doesnt like and goes into a safe operating mode to preserve its instruments and power. In total, those events, mostly related to attitude control, only lasted four days, and the JWST team says such moments are typical of a new spacecraft.

Every spacecraft has a very unique personality when it gets on orbit, Bill Ochs, the project manager of JWST at NASA, said during a press conference. There are unique things about it that no matter how much ground testing you do, you do not learn until you actually get on orbit, and we had those experiences.

Adding to that stress, one of JWSTs 18 mirror segments was struck by a larger than expected micrometeoroid in May, leaving a small dimple. While NASA says the observatory can still perform the extraordinary science its designed to do, the mirror segment had to be adjusted slightly to correct for the damage.

But, despite these minor issues, the commissioning team was able to finish up all the work on their to-do list during their allotted six-month period, only a couple weeks behind schedule. To them, it was nothing short of a miracle. If you had asked me before launch, Do you really think youre going to finish in six months, or within a few days? I would have said, Well, I hope so. But man, theres a zillion things that could go wrong, Friedman says. And you know what? None of those zillion things went wrong. They all went right.

Now, the commissioning team is entering a new phase. Soon, JWST will enter its first year of science observations whats known as Cycle 1 science which is jam-packed with plans to target exoplanets, galaxies, exotic stars, and more. Those working with JWSTs instruments will move into a support role for the astronomers who have time with the observatory in the first year. Those scientists will inevitably have questions about how to use this powerful new observatory or how to interpret their results, and the instrument teams at NASA and STScI will need to be on hand to provide answers. The observatory will be used in ways that we havent completely experienced yet, says Friedman. So well be watching that carefully.

While the work still isnt done, its a bittersweet time for the people working on the team. The daily commissioning briefings are coming to an end, and many of those who put in long hours to tee up JWST for its first year of science are winding down. That isnt necessarily a bad thing for some.

For me personally, I just want to sit back and now enjoy it, says Feinberg, whos been working on JWSTs development in some form for the last 20 years. You know, let the scientists have their day and do great things. Im just looking forward to looking at the images with the rest of the planet and enjoying discovering the Universe.

More:

How engineers got NASA's James Webb Space Telescope ready to take its first images - The Verge

JGR: Planets Author Aboard the International Space Station – Eos

Editors Vox is a blog from AGUs Publications Department.

Dr. Jessica Watkins is a NASA astronaut, planetary geologist, and lead author of a recent manuscript accepted for publication in JGR: Planets, entitled Burial and exhumation of sedimentary rocks revealed by the base Stimson erosional unconformity, Gale crater, Mars. Dr. Watkins recently arrived at the International Space Station as part of NASAs SpaceX Crew-4 and is serving as a Mission Specialist on the mission that will last around 6 months. We recently spoke with Dr. Watkins about her career path and the path to publication in JGR: Planets.

What first interested you in geology, and led you to choose to complete a Ph.D. in geology?

As an undergraduate at Stanford University, I was originally a mechanical engineering major, but during my sophomore year I realized that I just wasnt passionate about the subject. I started looking at other course offerings in the sciences, some of which had intriguing titles such as What Makes a Habitable Planet? and Planetary Materials. So, I signed up for my first geology course and quickly became hooked. I distinctly remember being captivated by a lecture on the process of planetary accretion and deciding then that I wanted to be a planetary geologist.

What led to your interest in studying landslides on Mars during your Ph.D, and what other Mars-related research have you done?

Mars is Earth-like in many ways, and I found it fascinating that we could study Earth processes and landforms to better understand those observed on Mars (and vice versa!). My Ph.D. research focused on investigating the mechanisms that led to long run-out distances associated with both Martian and terrestrial landslides, such as material properties and the role of water at the time they formed. I went on to continue studying Mars geological processes as a post-doctoral student at California Institute of Technology, where I utilized data from NASAs Mars Science Laboratory mission to help characterize the sedimentary depositional history at Gale crater.

Could you describe the major findings from your recent manuscript that is now in-press at the Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets, and the significance?

This paper describes the discovery of an unconformity in a sequence of sedimentary rocks on Mars. An unconformity represents a discontinuity in the time of deposition between sequences of rocks. In this case, it separates the rocks which record a time in which a lake was present at Gale crater, and an overlying sequence of rocks which record a time when the climate was much drier leading to the formation of eolian sand dunes. The unconformity is significant in that it records not only the transition between environmental regimes, but also substantial erosion of the older (lacustrine) rocks before the younger (eolian) rocks were deposited.

I understand that there was a significant delay between when the paper was first submitted and the time to acceptance. Can you share your story about the path to publication?

Well, the paper was first submitted back in 2017, but prior to that, I had applied to become a member of NASAs astronaut corps. Shortly after the paper was returned to us by the journal editor with reviewer comments, I was selected by NASA and unable to complete the revisions before reporting for duty as an Astronaut Candidate. However, after a few years of focusing on training, I was able to return to it with the help of my co-authors, and the final manuscript was accepted for publication at about the time I launched as part of Crew-4.

Do you have any advice to offer to younger students who are interested in geology, planetary science, and/or space exploration?

My advice would be to find a subject that excites you, and dont be afraid to proactively pursue it. Look for opportunities to continue to learn and explore- internships are a great way to help you narrow down your career interests and gain valuable experience. Finally, seek out supportive mentors who can be sources of encouragement and help you navigate your way toward your goals.

Dr. Jessica Watkins (Jessica.a.watkins@nasa.gov, 0000-0002-4706-8569), NASA Astronaut; A. Deanne Rogers (0000-0002-4671-2551), Editor, JGR-Planets; and Dr. John Grotzinger (0000-0001-9324-1257), California Institute of Technology, manuscript co-author and Dr. Watkins post-doctoral advisor.

See the original post here:

JGR: Planets Author Aboard the International Space Station - Eos

Mars Is More Beautiful Than Ever – The Atlantic

When Corrine Rojas comes into work, Mars is waiting for her. She drives to the office, grabs a cup of coffee, and then pulls up the latest dispatches from Perseverance, a car-size NASA rover situated inside a crater in Marss northern hemisphere. Rojas, an operations engineer at Arizona State University, checks that the rovers main cameras are working well, and that they took the shots scientists back home had asked for. Then, she basks in the wondrous sights of our celestial neighbor. I am often the first person to lay eyes on photos from Mars taken by the rover, Rojas told me.

And Mars has been looking particularly good lately. Thats not to say that the planet has been working on its appearance; aside from the winds blowing around some dust, it has remained mostly unchanged for a few billion years. The difference is us, and particularly the Perseverance mission, which has captured some of the sharpest views of the Martian surface to date. The rovers job is to search for potential signs of fossilized life in the rock, but since it arrived last February, it has become quite the landscape photographer.

In more detail than ever before, we can see that the red planets rocky outcroppings are bursting with texture, layer after layer. The soft, muted browns and oranges of the terrain look remarkably vivid. The soil looks almost silky. In our night sky, Mars is nothing more than a gleaming tangerine speck. In Perseverances pictures, it looks like not only a real planet but also a real place. Its one thing to look at a zoomed-out shot of Mars as a perfect sphere against the darkness of space. Its quite another to gaze upon something you could easily imagine finding on a Tripadvisor page about the best state parks in Arizona.

You just want to go hiking in that environment, says Jim Bell, a planetary scientist at Arizona State University who leads the camera team Rojas works on. Bring some water; bring some oxygen. Mars would actually be a terrible place to hike, let alone live. In reality, the place would be trying to kill us in so many ways, Bell told me. But the pictures are still swoon-worthy.

Read: Marss soundscape is strangely beautiful

Scientists and engineers have come a long way from the earliest attempts to capture close-up views of Mars. In 1965, a NASA probe called Mariner 4 made the first flyby and beamed home its observations. Back on Earth, converting the data into real images was a slow processso slow that the staff at the Jet Propulsion Laboratory, excited and impatient, pulled numbers from Mariners data that corresponded with color, printed the numerals on paper, and then painted the makeshift canvas with pastels that one of them had bought at a local art store. When the real deal finally came in, it marked the first time humankind had gotten a close-up of the surface of another planet.

The first pictures taken on the Martian surface were captured by another NASA mission in 1976. The Viking 1 lander, which stayed put on the Martian soil, revealed a reddish field of boulders stretching all the way to the horizon. In the late 1990s, NASA began sending a steady stream of robots that, unlike landers, could move around and capture the Martian environment from different angles. The Curiosity rover, which arrived in 2012, is still going strong and filling up its camera roll on the side of a mountain, about 2,300 miles (3,700 kilometers) away from Perseverances turf.

The Perseverance rover, meanwhile, has the best set of robotic eyes on Mars yetthough theyre not as sophisticated as you might think. By todays consumer-electronics standards, these cameras that are up on Marsand elsewhere in the solar systemare nowhere near as high-resolution, Bell said. Theres no high-speed internet between Earth and Mars, so there are limits on the data that a rover can transmit home. But Perseverance has 23 cameras, six more than Curiosity, and theyre more advanced than the ones used for previous missions. Perseverance was designed to explore Mars more autonomously than earlier rovers, which meant developing cameras good enough to support that capability, according to Katie Stack Morgan, the deputy project scientist for the mission at NASA. So while some of Curiositys cameras photograph in black-and-white, the same set on Perseverance shoots in color, which helps scientists back home guide the newer rover toward scientifically interesting targets. That feature means that even Perseverances hazard cameraswhich serve a similar purpose to the back-up camera on a carproduce gorgeous, high-resolution images. You can practically hear the gravel crunch beneath the rovers wheels.

The Perseverance rover also has more opportunities for photo shoots than Curiosity, Bell said. In order to operate their instruments during the cold Martian mornings and evenings, rovers need to use extra fuel to keep themselves warm. Curiosity, now a decade old, avoids overexerting itself during these hours to conserve its power supply; sometimes theres more important work to do than taking pictures. But Perseverance is still spry, which means it can take advantage of a classic photography trick. If you want to really bring out the texture in a rocky surface, take pictures of it when the sun is low, Bell said. And then all the little ridges and jagged imperfections and bumps and all that will start to cast shadows and be seen much better.

Read: No, youre crying about a helicopter on Mars

New Mars pictures reach Earth every dayor every sol, the term for the slightly longer-than-ours Mars day. Bells camera team typically doesnt work weekends, but theres a number of us who just cant resist just logging in and checking what came in. Rojas is in charge of stitching together images from the rovers main camera to create sweeping panoramas for public consumption (and which she wishes she could use as wallpaper in her home). The views never get old for them, or for any scientist or engineer who has the surreal privilege of seeing a new spot in the solar system before anyone else. And it is especially thrilling when the photos reveal something scientifically useful.

The sedimentary rock recently photographed by Perseverances hazard cameras is exactly the kind that the rover was designed to study. The ancient terrain here, in a crater called Jezero, was shaped by mud, silt, and water more than 3.5 billion years ago, when Mars was, scientists believe, a balmy world with rivers and lakes. If any microbial life was around at the time, it might have been flattened into these layers and preserved to this daya thrilling prospect for the nosy aliens next door who are wondering whether life arose elsewhere in the solar system. Theres nothing quite like having them right in front of the rover and saying, Aha! This is what we came here for, Morgan said.

The rest is here:

Mars Is More Beautiful Than Ever - The Atlantic

Princess of Mars – Wikipedia

2009 American film

Princess of Mars (retitled and re-released in 2012 as John Carter of Mars[1]) is a 2009 direct-to-DVD science fiction film made by American independent studio The Asylum, loosely based on the 1917 novel A Princess of Mars by author Edgar Rice Burroughs. The film's promotional art mentions how the original story inspired some elements of James Cameron's 2009 film Avatar, but neither the credits nor promotional material mention Edgar Rice Burroughs. It is not to be confused with the higher-budget 2012 film John Carter, which is an adaptation of the novel. In the UK, the film was released with the title The Martian Colony Wars.

John Carter (Antonio Sabato, Jr.) is a modern-day U.S. Army sniper serving in Afghanistan, wounded in the line of duty and used in a teleportation experiment wherein he is transferred to Barsoom, a planet outside of Earth's solar system, where he exhibits the ability to leap amazing distances. Initially enslaved by the Tharks, he earns a rank among them and later saves a rival group's princess, the human-looking Dejah Thoris (Traci Lords), from death.

The group of Tharks, led by Tars Tarkas, takes Carter to their leader Tal Hajus, guarded by Tars Tarkas' daughter Sola. Learning that Tarkas gave Carter a military rank only Hajus can give, Tarkas and Carter are forced to duel. Upon winning, Carter faces Sarka, an Afghan mercenary who had betrayed him. When Sarka escapes, Carter helps Tarkas kill Hajus and become the new leader of the Tharks.

Captain Carter then learns that Dejah Thoris has fled to the planetary air-cleaning station that keeps Barsoom habitable, which Sarka damages, causing the atmosphere to deteriorate. John Carter and Sarka face each other in a duel, but Sarka is killed by an insect during the fight. After Carter and Dejah Thoris reactivate the station, Carter is returned to Earth, where he declines to tell his superiors about his adventures for fear they will colonize Barsoom, and returns to military duties while hoping one day to return to the planet.

This film makes extensive use of the Vasquez Rocks for its alien landscape, appearing throughout the film as different locations.[citation needed]

Visit link:

Princess of Mars - Wikipedia

Elon Musks Plan to Send a Million Colonists to Mars by 2050 Is Pure …

Artists conception of a Martian colony, with SpaceX Starship rockets in the background. Image: SpaceX

In a recent interview, Elon Musk repeated his stated goal of wanting to transport one million people to Mars by 2050. The SpaceX founder says the future of humanity is at stake, which, okay, but the timeline he offers is ludicrous, and heres why.

Before we plunge into this, I need to make it crystal clear that many of the challenges addressed in this article are not insurmountable. Technological feasibility is not my gripe, nor do I take issue with the desire to colonize the Red Planet, though, as Ive written before, the colonization of Mars will necessitate the transformation of the human species as we know it.

That the fourth planet from the Sun may host bustling cities at some point in the distant future is possible. My issue with all of this has to do with the stupendously unreasonable timelines under which Musk believes this will happen. In an April 2022 interview with TED curator Chris Anderson, the billionaire rehashed his plan to send one million colonists to Mars by 2050, and he did so while maintaining a remarkably straight face.

Speaking to a seemingly credulous Anderson, Musk spoke of a herculean Battlestar Galactica-like effort to transport thousands of colonists to Mars with a thousand SpaceX Starship rockets. Musks vision remains aligned with a series of tweets from 2020, in which he articulated a plan to build 100 Starships each year over a 10-year period.

Departing inbatches, each Starship would leave for Mars during key 30-day windows that open once every 26 months (the launch interval is to take advantage of the Earth-Mars alignment, when the two planets are closest to each other). Should launches begin in 2028, and assuming this intense launch cadence can be realized, Musk figures the Martian city of his dreams, with its million inhabitants, could come to fruition in just 22 years.

For Musk, the lofty figure of one million isnt just a goal or a predictionits a necessary requirement for sustaining a colony on Mars. The critical threshold, he told Anderson, is if the ships from Earth stop coming for any reason, which could decide the fate of the Martian colony and ultimately of humanity itself. Musk is claiming a philanthropic motive, saying our inability to colonize Mars and transition to an interplanetary species could serve as a filter that ultimately results in our doom. As he told Anderson, I think this is important for maximizing the probable lifespan of humanity or consciousness, but the probable lifespan of civilizational consciousness as we know it is like a small candle in the vast darkness of the universea delicate candle that could just go out.

Conceptual image of a Starship spacecraft arriving at Mars. Image: SpaceX

But as Musk also told Anderson, life on Mars, especially in the beginning, will not be luxurious. Rather, it will be dangerous, cramped, difficult, hard work, and you might not make it back, he said, adding: But itll be glorious.

Glorious for Elon Musk, maybe, but certainly not for the colonists relegated to eking out an existence in a supremely hostile and unaccommodating world. Well, assuming they ever get there. The SpaceX CEO told Anderson that almost anyone can work and save up and eventually have $100,000 and be able to go to Mars if they want, in reference to the hypothesized cost of each journey. Alternatively, prospective Martians could procure funding from government sponsors or by taking out a loan, Musk said.

Musk, I would argue, is getting way ahead of himself. NASA, by comparison, is hoping to land the first humans on Mars by the late 2030s or early 2040s. A modest human presence would follow, but very slowly and cautiously, with pioneering explorers, scientists, and possibly even some colonists, taking their first tentative baby steps on this hostile, alien world in the years and decades to follow.

These disparate visions of how and when Mars might get colonized are completely out of alignment. Its as if Musk and NASA inhabit two different realities. And its not as if the truth lies somewhere in between. Someone is not just wrong; someone is catastrophically wrong, and that someone is Elon Musk.

Back-of-the-envelope calculations are fun, but they can lead to erroneous and over-simplified conclusions. A necessary reality check suggests its going to take significant time and effort for SpaceX to develop, test, and certify Starship and then build these megarockets in the quantities Musk desires.

Conceptual view of a SpaceX Starship rocket blasting off. Image: SpaceX

To be clear, the fully integrated Starship has not yet reached space. Im confident SpaceX will eventually have its jumbo rocket, but the heavy launcher, a key element of Musks Martian plans, doesnt yet exist. The current plan is to send a fully integrated, uncrewed Starship on a super-quick orbital spaceflight later this year, but further testing and refinements will be required before the vehicle can be put to functional use.

Importantly, Starship is meant to be reusable, requiring SpaceX to develop an unprecedented Mechazilla tower that will somehow catch the rocket during vertical descent and landing. Nothing like this has ever been done, and it could take some time to develop.

Musk is also having to contend with regulators; the Federal Aviation Administration and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers are concerned about potential environmental damage at the SpaceX launch site in south Texas. As of this writing, SpaceX has not received FAA approval to launch the two-stage Starship at the Boca Chica facility.

Once Starship becomes an actual thing, SpaceX will then have to contend with the daunting challenge of building these rockets en masse. Musks hand-waving proclamation that 100 Starships will be built each year is truly ambitious, but Ill believe it when I see it. The company isnt currently able to produce its Raptor engines at the pace required to sustain operations. Late last year, Musk said this Raptor production crisis threatens a genuine risk of bankruptcy if SpaceX cannot launch a Starship rocket once every two weeks. Yet were supposed to believe that, in around six years or so, SpaceX will have solved its engine production problems and somehow figured out a way to manufacture Starships in vast quantitiesa logistical challenge that will require the steady flow of human labor, materials, propellants, and everything else that will make up this future rocket.

Should SpaceX be capable of transporting so many people to Mars across such a short time frame, there will still exist a tremendous number of challenges to overcome. First and foremost, theres the human factor to consider. Very simply, our meat suits are not built for space or hostile alien worlds. The Red Planet, with its achingly thin atmosphere, cold temperatures, and non-existent magnetosphere, offers no oxygen to breathe, no water at the surface, and no protection from deadly ionizing radiation.

Conceptual image showing humans on the Martian surface. Image: SpaceX

Fulfilling Elon Musks dream of establishing a self-sustaining colony on Mars entails risks that are far beyond those of sending a small group of humans on a round-trip mission to that planet, Thomas Lang, a professor at the UCSF Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging in San Francisco, explained to me. The risks of a relatively small Mars mission, which might comprise six-month transits to and from the destination and 18-month sojourns on the surface, are already daunting.

These challenges, he said, include the maintaining of human physiology at the functional level, protecting colonists from radiation, and dealing with the effects of extreme isolation. Space agencies around the world are currently investigating these risks, and Lang believes well eventually find ways to overcome them.

But even if these risks can be addressed, establishing a one-million-person colony on Mars still represents a leap into the unknown, both in terms of engineering and social evolution, Lang said. Private firms like SpaceX, and also government agencies, could eventually build the spacecraft and several of the different supporting technologies like habitats, power generation, and transport, he said, but those challenges would be small compared to the challenge of figuring out how to live off the land, extracting from Mars the resources needed to support this population. And if some solutions were to emerge for the on-site production of resources during initial Martian missions, its not clear that it could be successfully scaled up to support a large population, Lang added.

Jill Sohm, director of the Environment Studies Program at the University of Southern California, thinks of the problem in terms of basic human needs. Humans can go a few minutes without breathing, a few days without drinking, and a few weeks without eating, so oxygen, water, and food are the bare necessities, she told me. Without these, we could not survive, let alone thrive.

Altering the atmosphere of Mars such that air is breathable within a few decades is clearly not possible. This means colonists will need to live in enclosed environments and have efficient recycling systems to remove carbon dioxide and generate oxygen to keep the air breathable, explained Sohm. Providing water to a million people represents another very difficult challenge. Sohm said water can be made with hydrogen, oxygen, and a lot of energy, but those things arent readily available on Mars.

Bringing water that distance from Earth for a large colony is also not possible, so ice would have to be found and melted on Mars. Ice can apparently be found at the poles and perhaps below the surface, but the poles are extremely cold and far away from warmer areas where a colony would likely be built, Sohm said. If enough ice could be located and extracted to provide water, again we would need an efficient recycling system that kept it from leaving the colony. All waste would need to be captured and cleaned and put back into circulation.

Its a daunting challenge, no doubt. Now, an infrastructure to support a million Martians may eventually be built, but the unspoken suggestion that such an infrastructure will spontaneously and instantly come to exist with the arrival of these thirsty colonists is nothing short of a joke.

Then theres the question of how to feed them. Sohm estimates that the settlers would require approximately 580 square miles (1,500 square kilometers) of agricultural crop land to feed a colony of that size.

This may not sound like a lot, but its around the size of the city of Los Angeles, where I live, she said. Colonists would need good quality soil, water, and some form of fertilizer, the latter of which could be produced through wastewater treatment and composting food, she added. Sohm, admitting shes not an engineer, said she cant say how feasible any of this is, but I would say that this assessment makes clear to me that it is a monumental task, and the hard truth is that we dont have a handle on how to replicate on a large scale the natural processes that make our planet so special and habitable.

To which she added: Id point out that all of this would only provide the bare minimum of survival for anyone living in a Mars colony, so we would actually need to ask ourselves the question of what we would consider a good life on Mars that would make it worth it for anyone to take the risk.

Serkan Saydam, a mining engineering professor from the University of New South Wales in Australia, says we currently possess the technology required to send people to Mars, but we lack the tech to establish a Martian colony, and we will very likely lack the capacity to sustain a Martian city inhabited by a million people by 2050. Because to establish an off-Earth city, we will need to establish many other off-Earth operations to construct the city and also support its people, Saydam said.

Firstly, colonists will need new technologies to extract resources locally, as bringing these required materials from Earth would be very risky, extremely expensive, and simply not feasible, he explained. Colonists will have to source and extract the majority of the required materials on Mars and possibly from nearby asteroids, and also establish beneficiation systems for processing the raw materials and facilities for manufacturing products, he said. These activities will require human labor, which will in turn require water and food, Saydam added.

To allow for these sorts of operations, the technology must produce more energy and materials than whats needed for basic survival on Mars, he said, and these elements will also need to be stored for future use in the colony. Saydam said robots would make these processes easier, but even our terrestrial mining systems are not fully autonomous yet.

Saydam provided me with a daunting list of other challenges that will need to be overcome, such as acquiring a deeper geological and geotechnical understanding of Mars, establishing a reliable power supply, creating markets to support the supply chain, reducing risks for business and other stakeholders, forging legal standards and ethical guidelines for the settling of new land, and safeguarding space for peaceful endeavors, among other issues.

Artists conception of a Martian colony. Image: SpaceX

Sohms earlier point about our inability to replicate natural processes on a large scale reminded me of the failed Biosphere 2 experiments from the 1990s. The two sealed missions demonstrated the formidable challenges of managing closed ecosystems. That a large colony on Mars could survive and thrive without this ability seems doubtful.

Kevin Olsen, a physicist at the University of Oxford who does data analysis for the ExoMars Trace Gas Orbiter mission, said its fundamentally impossible to create a completely closed environment in space. Air, water, and fuel will be slowly lost over a long time period, so a colony needs to become a factory and produce these things, he said.

This technology is far, far behind the technology of space flight and habitation construction, explained Olsen. A recent experiment involving NASAs Perseverance rover, in which oxygen was extracted from the carbon dioxide in the Martian atmosphere, was an interesting advance, said Olsen. Thats true, but we are not even remotely close to transforming this proof-of-concept experiment into something practical.

Earth, unlike Mars, has a strong magnetic field that protects us from ionizing radiation. Our magnetic field is large enough that it also offers protection to the International Space Station, Olsen told me, so even our long-term stays and radiation experiments in space wont really prepare us for the dangers of long-term exposure on a cruise to Mars and life on its surface.

During the recent TED interview, Anderson and Musk discussed a vast array of subterranean tunnels to protect Martian settlers from dangerous levels of radiation. Thatll make for quite the travel brochure, as migrants will essentially be asked to live like moles, making only brief appearances at the surface.

Radiation presents a serious health risk, as does isolation. Indeed, the level of isolation of this community would be unprecedented, and success in this endeavor would ultimately mean establishing a whole new human civilization, said Lang, who says were still learning about the social dynamics of groups and individuals in the context of isolation.

We have data from a range of environments, including nuclear subs, polar research stations, the ISS, and the Russian-based Mars 500 experiments, Lang explained. However, what about the social dynamics of a large society, so isolated from the Mother Planet, living in a hostile environment? The price that such a society would pay for episodes of social chaos or group psychosis could be immediately fatal. To flourish, such a society would have to maintain a very high level of cohesion across a million people.

On the topic of social stability, Musk told Anderson that theres certainly risk there, and hopefully the people of Mars will be more enlightened, and will not fight amongst each other too much.

The colonization of Mars, said Olsen, will be a fundamentally difficult undertaking, and the desire to do it quickly makes it even more dangerous. The space industry, whether private or public, is currently very safety conscious, with governments and the public unwilling to risk the lives of astronauts. Setting up a colony will go far beyond the experimentation and exploration we are used to in terms of complexity, difficulty, and danger, and we need to be prepared for it to not go smoothly, he said. This will be an industrial undertaking, and well need to treat it more like we do Earths other high-risk industries such as commercial fishing, mining, or steel working.

Sohm wonders about the point of it all. Why attempt to build a million-person colony on Mars? We have a planetary crisis here on Earth, she said, and I think we have the moral obligation to spend our time, effort, and money on helping to solve it for all the 7 billion-plus people that live here now, rather than transporting a small fraction of what would surely be some of the most privileged people on Earth to escape its problems and attempt to make a new life on another planet.

Lang says the construction of a large colony will be a multi-stage process that will take decades to achieve. Itll also require continuous support from multiple generations of humans.

I believe that this support would be worthwhile, Lang told me. If achieved, the establishment of a self-sustaining society on Mars would be a landmark in human history, and would set the stage for spreading human civilization across the whole solar system.

Sohm and Lang are both right, and wed be wise to take care of our business on Earth while also seeking to build an existence outside of our home planet. We can do both, and its wrong to suggest these goals are somehow mutually exclusive.

At the same time, its important for us be realistic about the future and when we can reasonably expect to do the things that Musk is promising. Musk, whether intentionally or unintentionally, is peddling a false view of humanitys short-term potential. There are consequences to this at the individual level, as many of Musks fans and followers take him at his literal word. The worlds richest man needs to start taking this responsibility far more seriously than he does.

Read more:

Elon Musks Plan to Send a Million Colonists to Mars by 2050 Is Pure ...

Elon Musk is confident that ‘humanity will reach Mars in our lifetime’ but Twitter is NOT! – India TV News

Tech billionaire Elon Musk is optimistic and has expressed confidence that "humanity will reach Mars in your lifetime". On Twitter, the Tesla and SpaceX CEO wrote that "without a common goal, humanity will fight itself". "Moon brought us together in a69, Mars can do that in the future," Musk said. But Twitter has something different to say. They asked Musk several times when humanity was planning to reach their current residential planet.

A user wrote, "will common citizens be able to afford mars ?" Another said, "its like going to the northpole but with no oxygen, and no one likes going to the northpole, so why would anyone would want to go to mars?"

Last month, the tech billionaire said that his space venture SpaceX aims to build over 1,000 Starships to transport life to Mars. The Tesla CEO had stated that making life multi-planetary will help back up the ecosystems on Earth and added that apart from humans no other species can transport life to Mars. ALSO READ:Elon Musk had twins last year with his company's top executive, netizens are in shock!

Referring to Biblical patriarch Noah who built an Ark that survived the great flood on Earth, Musk said his Starship models will be "modern Noah's Arks", that can save "life from a calamity on Earth". SpaceX is developing Starship to take people and cargo to the moon, Mars and beyond. The vehicle consists of two elements: a first-stage booster called Super Heavy and an upper-stage spacecraft known as Starship.

Read more:

Elon Musk is confident that 'humanity will reach Mars in our lifetime' but Twitter is NOT! - India TV News

Learning hands-on to inspire her students – Atmore News

Marcia Adams participates in the moon walking exercise

By MELISSA DANIELSpecial to Atmore News

Five action-packed 12-hour days provided Escambia County Middle School math teacher Marcia Adams an experience of a lifetime. Recently, she had the opportunity to attend Space Academy for Educators (aka Space Camp) with 70 other educators in Huntsville.She was able to be an astronaut and travel into space. She was able to be an engineer and build a rocket. She was a scientist and performed experiments on the international space station. (ISS)She was able to feel what it would be like to walk on the moon and feel 3Gs. She experienced the stress of being a flight director on a NASA mission. She landed a rover on Mars and built a lunar colony. She was able to reenact a helicopter crash and be lifted to safety. She experienced space travel and saw the Earth from up above.In all activities, Ms. Adams could see how math and science work together to further knowledge here on Earth. She was challenged by former astronaut Bob Gibson to find ways to integrate reading, writing and communication of the English language to her students while engaging them in the exciting world of math and science.NASA chemist, physicist and engineer Lowell Zoeller shared that NASA has a job for everyone. Trade jobs are needed because once a colony is built on the moon, every job will be needed. He stated that teamwork, communication and writing were the key to success in job force. Thinking spontaneously and being able to problem solve is a key to teaching skills for the future as there are jobs that have yet to be created.Ms. Adams is excited to bring back this knowledge and share the resources provided to her with the students of Atmore.

Melissa Daniel, formerly a teacher at ECMS, now teaches at Robertsdale Elementary.

Read the original:

Learning hands-on to inspire her students - Atmore News

Human rights on Mars wont be the same as those on Earth – Gulf News

Kim Stanley Robinson writes best-selling novels about a colony on Mars. Elon Musk talks of actually colonising Mars. There is even a 30-page constitution, courtesy of a Yale political science class, for a Mars settlement. The actual prospects for a settlement remain uncertain, but the question of how it should be organised could stand some further scrutiny.

The Yale proposal is about how to make a Mars settlement democratic, as is an earlier proposal published in Space Legal Issues. But I fear a harsher question needs to be addressed first: Should a Mars settlement allow for contractual servitude?

When the New World was settled, it was common practice for workers to sign multi-year contracts, receiving passage across the ocean but giving up a share of their earnings and some of their freedom.

Financing the voyage to Mars

Contractual servitude is distinct from slavery in the sense that it is chosen voluntarily. But once the contract is signed, the worker is in an uncomfortable position, in both an economic and democratic sense. And once these individuals land in the New World or, as the case may be, on Mars their protection by mainstream legal institutions cannot be assumed.

It is easy to inveigh against contractual servitude, but it has one valuable function: It creates incentives for someone to finance the voyage in the first place. If I had to finance my own passage to Mars, and then sustain myself when I got there, and pay off the travel costs, I would never go. But if a company can send a few thousand people, keep half the profits, and remain in charge, the voyage might stand a chance, at least decades from now when the technology is further along.

That said, I am fine with banning contractual servitude on Mars, if that is what a democratic society decides. My point is that this is a more pressing question than what kind of new participatory rights the new Martians will have. Keep in mind the economic point about trade-offs: If poorer people are not allowed to sign up for these funded voyages, then maybe only billionaires will visit Mars.

The tension is that most people have well-developed moralities for wealthy, democratic societies in which most citizens can earn their keep or be provided for by a well-funded social welfare state. Neither of those assumptions holds for Mars, which at least at the beginning will be a kind of pre-subsistence economy.

The upshot is that feasible Mars constitutions will probably offend the educated classes dearly.

Another option for a Mars constitution is to have the US government fund the voyage and apply some version of military law to the venture, as one might find on an aircraft carrier. Earlier Nasa voyages were based on military command and involved no democracy.

I support such a plan, but also note that governmental space exploration has slowed dramatically since its peak in the 1960s and 1970s. It is the private sector that has revived interest in a Mars settlement.

Ideally I might like Mars to be settled by a religious group rather than by a government or a corporation. After all, various Puritan groups helped to settle North America, and they had the unity and sense of mission to pull off a very difficult and dangerous endeavour. Similarly, Mormons helped settle the American West.

Not surprisingly, many of these early governments had strong theocratic elements. While I dont view theocracy as either efficient or just, if the key question is motivating the settlers, then the religion option ought to be taken seriously. Like contractual servitude, it could serve a practical purpose.

Yet religious settlements willing to go to Mars may be hard to come by. Relative religious freedom is available in many places on Earth. A victim of persecution in, say, North Korea, will find it far easier now and maybe forever to seek asylum in South Korea instead of Mars.

I suspect that no feasible constitution for a Mars settlement would be very popular in the broad sense. Ages of exploration tend to encourage strong non-democratic or anti-democratic elements. Perhaps the best that can be hoped for is a very democratic philosophy for life on Earth, with the understanding that Mars will be very different.

Can we accept and indeed embrace such a dialectical and contradictory set of perspectives? Can the proper answer to such a fundamental question as how society should be organised so firmly depend on which planet we are talking about? Might some sceptics suggest that, with illiberal values ascendant on Earth, it would be better for Mars to offer an alternative?

These are all valid questions. The debate over a Martian constitution is interesting, but it may also be premature.

Tyler Cowen is a Bloomberg Opinion columnist. He is a professor of economics at George Mason University and writes for the blog Marginal Revolution.

Read this article:

Human rights on Mars wont be the same as those on Earth - Gulf News

NASA Announces Plan To Put Moon On Mars By 2040 – The Onion

WASHINGTONSaying the ambitious new project would be a historic, once-in-a-generation leap forward in the annals of space exploration, NASA announced Friday its plan to put the moon on Mars by 2040. Ever since we first sent a man to the moon half a century ago, the American people have been waiting for us to take the next step and send the moon to Mars, said NASA administrator Bill Nelson, adding that within two decades, the famed image of Apollo 11 commander Neil Armstrongs first footprint on the moon would be joined in the public consciousness by photos of the 1,500-mile-wide crater the moon was expected to leave on the Red Planet. No space mission is without risks. The moon could descent too quickly and disintegrate on impact with the Martian surface, or it could, upon its return, fail to achieve the velocity needed to escape the gravity of Mars and make it back home to its orbit around the Earth. But should we succeed in our mission, it could open up many other opportunities for us, such as putting the Earth on Mars, putting Mars on Venus, and so on. Nelson added that it might also one day be possible to build a colony on Mars that could be inhabited by hundreds of moons.

Read more here:

NASA Announces Plan To Put Moon On Mars By 2040 - The Onion

7 great shows or movies about the Moon to watch after ‘Moonhaven’ – Syfy

With the current condition of our planet right now, escaping to the Moon is looking more and more attractive. WriterPeter Ocko(Lodge 49)is clearly feeling it too, as evidenced by his latest creation, the AMC+ series, Moonhaven. The drama starsEmma McDonald(Queens of Mystery),Joe Manganiello(True Blood),Kadeem Hardison(Black Monday), andDominic Monaghan(Lost) as a cast of characters who all end up in the Moon-based utopian community in our near(ish) future. Although the community is meant to be a tactile think tank working to find solutions to save humanity on the doomed Earth, McDonald'sBella Sway discovers a lot of secrets going on inside this slice of space "heaven".

Of course, moon-based cinematic stories go all the way back toGeorges Mlis's 1902 film,A Trip to the Moon. But, they've certainly gotten more complicated and compelling in the last 120 years. With the premiere of Moonhaven today, July 7, on AMC+, SYFY WIRE got inspired to dig up some other choice, Moon-centric, sci-fi stories that are worth your exploration.

For All Mankind is in the midst of its third season on Apple TV+ and the Moon has been central to all three seasons of its storytelling. The series poses an alternative scenario for the Soviet/U.S. space race, where the U.S.S.R. actually beat the United States in the race to land on the Moon which creates a cascade of history-changing events. Along with some great "what if" riffs on geopolitical outcomes and scientific advancements led by a more global space race, For All Mankind also tells great personal stories about the astronauts, scientists, civil servants, and NASA members who are behind the advancements that drive the seasons. Earth's Moon is a central player to it all, as an initial goal and then as a lunar outpost for several countries looking to conquer Mars next. A high water mark in Moon/space episodic storytelling on TV.

Away (2020) only lasted one season on Netflix but theHilary Swankstarring drama uses the Moon as the literal launching pad for NASA's mission to Mars expedition. Taking a more soapy/family drama angle to its storytelling, Away focuses on the astronauts who leave their families behind as they break new boundaries in space exploration. For the moon fans, there's some cool lunar set pieces in the early episodes as it helps prep the astronauts for their longer mission. If you like family dramas like This is Us and Parenthood mashed together with your space stories, then this might be the perfect series for you.

Director Duncan Jones' first film Moon garnered both audience and critical acclaim when it debuted in 2009. It stars Sam Rockwell asSam Bell, an alternative fuel miner heading a solitary three-year project on the dark side of the Moon. Separated from his family and humans for the whole mission, Bell's only companion is an A.I. namedGERTY (Kevin Spacey), and let's just say that relationship hasn't left him in the best headspace. Go into this one pure if you can because there are a lot of great twists and turns coming 'atcha as Bell inches closer to his impending return home date.

Yes, the astronauts don't actually make it to the Moon in Ron Howard's now-classic dramatization of the Apollo 13 mission, but the whole goal is to get there so let's not split hairs. Apollo 13 stars Tom Hanks, Kevin Bacon, and Bill Paxton playing the crew of NASA's doomed return mission to the Moon. When their mission experiences early failures, the film shifts into a thriller about how theMission Control scientists and the trio orbiting the Earth feverishly problem solve how to get their lifeboat back to Earth safely. From the cinematography to the performances, Apollo 13 still holds up as a breathtaking watch that gets micro nerdy with its portrayal of science and history.

After the success of Apollo 13, Ron Howard and Tom Hanks reunited to produce this12-part miniseries that uses the docuseries format to tell the story of the Apollo program which ran from the 1960s to the early 1970s. Mixing actor dramatizations and actual era footage, From the Earth to the Moon is all about NASA taking to heart John F. Kennedy's mandate to have a U.S. astronaut be the first to walk on the Moon. Compelling and exhaustive, this will give the Moon geeks a whole lot of context and history about how we got to Neil Armstrong's walk on the Moon.

For those looking for some lighter fare,Aardman Animation first introduced the world to Wallace and Gromit in the classic short, A Grand Day Out. The Academy Award-nominated claymation classic finds the two cheese-loving roomies building a rocket to get them to the Moon for a top-up of some choice fromage. Once there, they meet a coin-operated robot who yearns to return to Earth with them. Hilarious, silly yet heartfelt, the majority of the story takes place on the Moon so you get your fill of the lunar landscape and some stellar laughs.

The Minions are still having their moment at the current box office, and that's amazing because it's been 12 years since the whole franchise kicked off in 2010 with Despicable Me. Many may not remember that the mission at the heart of that film is supervillain Gru's plan to steal the Moon as the ultimate flex against his baddie competition. Looking to shrink the Moon for easier yoinking, Gru (Steve Carrell) and his Minions spend the film looking up at the big orb until they actually achieve their crazy plan... and then quickly discover that the shrinking is temporary. Let's just say the gravitation pull is not good. As the strong start to the beloved ongoing franchise and a celebration of the Moon, this one is a fun adventure for families.

You can stream lots of great sci-fi right here on Peacock.

It's a fan thing

Join SYFY Insider to get access to exclusive videos and interviews, breaking news, sweepstakes, and more!

Sign Up for Free

Original post:

7 great shows or movies about the Moon to watch after 'Moonhaven' - Syfy

Elon Musk Secretly Fathered Twins With a Neuralink Exec Who Reported to Him – Jalopnik

Photo: Patrick Pleul (Getty Images)

Elon Musk, the worlds richest man, CEO of Tesla, and co-founder of brain-computer startup Neuralink, has been revealed to have fathered twins with Shivon Zilis, a Neuralink executive who reports directly to him, Business Insider reports.

The news was discovered through court documents filed in Spring of 2022, after Musk and Zilis sought to change the last names of the twins, born in November 2021. Per Business Insider:

In April, Musk, 51, and Zilis, 36, filed a petition to change the twins names in order to have their fathers last name and contain their mothers last name as part of their middle name. The order was approved by a judge in Austin, Texas, this May.

The twins were born weeks before Musk and Claire Boucher, the musician who performs as Grimes, had their second child via surrogate in December.

Zilis met the Tesla boss through her work with artificial intelligence research startup OpenAI, co-founded by Musk, who left his role there in 2018. She then moved to Tesla in 2017 before becoming director of operations and special projects for Neuralink, according to Business Insider. Neuralink, co-founded by Musk in 2016, is focused on creating brain-machine interface technology, using devices implanted in the human brain to communicate with computers.

Photo: Jim Watson/AFP (Getty Images)

At most American companies, a sexual relationship between a supervisor and a direct-report employee is grounds for dismissal, even when the relationship is consensual. In February of this year, CNN president Jef Zucker resigned after it was revealed that he had carried out an undisclosed romantic relationship with an employee described as his key lieutenant. In 2020, McDonalds fired CEO Steve Easterbrook and later sued him to try to recoup his exit bonus after his sexual relationship with an employee was made public. Most companies frown on relationships between supervisors and direct-report employees, because the professional power imbalance can never be completely disentangled from the personal relationship.

Counting the newly-revealed twins, Musk now has nine living children with three different women: five with ex-wife Justine Wilson, two with musician Grimes, and two with Zilis. The Zilis-Musk twins were born just a few weeks before Musks second child with Grimes.

Notably, Musk has repeatedly voiced concerns over the shrinking global birth rate. Whatever the reason, it seems to be a real fixation for the billionaire, who cites it as one of the biggest threats to humanity, alongside the climate crisis and rogue artificial intelligence. According to Business Insider:

He began sounding the alarm about declining birth rates in 2017, when he tweeted, The worlds population is accelerating towards collapse, but few seem to notice or care.

Since the beginning of 2022, the mogul has tweeted more than a dozen times about population issues.

Some have speculated that Musks concern about population growth are related to his goal of establishing a human colony on Mars an effort that would doubtless require lots of manpower.

I guess if you have enough money to singlehandedly fix humanitys most pressing concerns on Earth, but choose not to, youve got to come up with a few new crazy problems to fret over.

See the article here:

Elon Musk Secretly Fathered Twins With a Neuralink Exec Who Reported to Him - Jalopnik

It’s a freaking adventure with these upcoming Summer Game Fest titles – NAG

Violence is not always the answer. Sometimes, a sarcastic comment will do more damage. Or maybe you finally have a role for that large wheel of cheese you stuffed into your pants. Adventure games are rarely concerned about the physics of storage, and they welcome wit as much as brawn.

The genre that ruled the Nineties has never returned to mainstream glory. But its very much alive and active on the indie scene, as these titles from Summer Game Fest demonstrate.

Sunday Gold [Steam Link]

Sunday Gold is a funky, gritty dystopian point-and-click adventure meets turn-based RPG game. Play as a trio of fugitives out to destroy a conspiracy in a grim cyberpunk city. The locations look great for the neon hell-hole they represent, and the visual style makes this feel almost like a comic book.

Highwater [Steam Link]

The world ended on a Sunday, but rumour has it that some people plan to escape to Mars. Travel the flooded apocalypse in this RPG adventure with turn-based combat. Highwater emphasises exploration with a lot of story, which is always a great combo if you get it right, and the minimalist art style makes it stand out from other upcoming RPGs.

NAIAD [Steam Link]

NAIAD is one of those hand-crafted solo-developer gems that just overflows with character and exciting ideas. Play as the mermaid Naiad as she swims through numerous spaces, including orchards, forests and caves, learning new tricks from creatures to overcome obstacles.

Time Flies [Steam Link]

Were all going to die. This is the inspiration for Time Flies, a game where you play as a fly and live about as long as one. Tasked with an extensive bucket list but little time, what will you choose to do in the open world where you explore and try different things. The art style and philosophical nature wont be to everyones taste, but it looks intriguing.

Instinction [Steam Link]

Theres not much on the plot of Instinction, except that its based in a world where dinosaurs still live, yet you are armed with modern weapons. Still, this first-person adventure game looks incredible and very atmospheric. The lack of gameplay footage or a release window is concerning is it just a tech demo? But it is also a recent beneficiary of an Epic MegaGrant, so it might well be very legit.

Puzzles for Clef [Steam Link]

Its Clefs birthday, and she goes to the island of her ancestors for a treasure hunt a setup for this whimsical exploration platform game. Solve puzzles to unlock new areas of the world with pleasant exotic regions. If youre over chasing monsters or blowing things up for the red key, this looks like a nice change of pace.

A Twisted Tale [Steam Link]

Taking inspiration from the golden age of point-and-click adventure games, A Twisted Tale is bright, funny and full of promise. But thats all we know there isnt anything yet about its plot. The art looks good (if a little unpolished), and this is definitely a wishlist item for genre fans looking for some old-school nostalgia.

Last Time I Saw You [Steam Link]

Last Time I Saw You looks pretty fantastic. A young teen keeps seeing a specific girl in his dreams, and he starts wondering if theres more to his visions. The hand-drawn art is stunning, and the locations feel very lush. This is that type of game where youll play just to see the next area and find new characters.

Phonopolis [Steam Link]

When the city of Phonopolis is at risk of takeover by a tyrant, only a young boy seems to notice and its up to him to stop that from happening! Indie adventure games often distinguish themselves with creative art styles and gameplay. Phonopolis is a perfect example: the graphics and sound design are whimsical, the puzzles look lateral, and the gameplay will be more elaborate than your standard adventure experience.

Once Upon A Jester [Steam Link]

Two best friends want to steal the royal diamond, so they concoct an elaborate plan that includes touring around the kingdom as an improv comedy show! This game even has a proper theme song that explains some of the plot, and the bold visuals really work for the zany premise and world.

Snufkin: Melody of Moominvalley [Steam Link]

Fans of the Moomins (and Moomin-inspired memes), pay attention! Snufkin, the friend of the creatures of Moomin valley, appears in his own game a musical adventure where he tries to return harmony to the valley after some villain built a bunch of parks there. Visually it evokes the feel of a storybook, and the gameplay encourages exploration across the world of the Moomins.

This Rain Will Never End [Steam Link]

Dont let the child-like pixel art fool you: This Rain Will Never End comes across as a dark and intense adventure game, based in a morbid city with many shady characters and dark alleys. You are investigating the mayors suicide and the neverending rain that seemed to follow his death. Talk to characters, collect clues, stay alive and solve the mystery or the rain will never end.

Deliver Us Mars [Steam Link]

Deliver Us Mars is the ambitious sequel to Deliver Us Moon, offering a bend between narrative-rich adventure and Tomb Raider-style exploration. Take control of an astronaut as she investigates the fate of crucial colony ships and recovers them from a mysterious group. The whole package looks excellent, including motion-capture and highly realistic graphics.

Read the original:

It's a freaking adventure with these upcoming Summer Game Fest titles - NAG

Agencies respond to gender inequality in the industry – AdNews

Source: Tim Mossholder via Unsplash

Agencieshave quickly responded to a call to reveal what they are doing to supportgender equality in the advertising industry

The UN Womens recent campaign, in partnership with The Monkeys, part of AccentureSong, called on Australians to examine its efforts for gender equality, saying as robo-farms, humans walking on Mars, and a Moon colony aremore likely to happen before we reach global gender equality.

Mums in Ads, via LinkedIn, called on agencies to share what they are genuinely doing: The recent research is showing the major hurdle for women everywhere is the clash between child-rearing and workplace equality.

When careers and kids arent facilitated to work together, thats when womens equity starts to really plummet. And Adland has been historically bad at helping women overcome this.

Thinkerbell: We have gender pay equity and this is reviewed six monthly with the CFO and Head of People and Culture measured on this. We have 58% females in leadership and a 61% female workforce.

We offer 10 weeks parental leave for the primary carer and 4 weeks for the secondary carer, along with up to 52 weeks paid superannuation for the primary caregiver as we are aware of the significant long term impact this has on nest eggs for retirement.

We hope one day to get to parity for primary and secondary carer as we know how important it is for the secondary carer to be available in the early development of the baby.

Weve always been flexible and offer flexibility to those who need it (not just parents). We have multiple people working overseas to visit family for extended periods as well as many who have relocated outside of Sydney and Melbourne, and we make this work with regular check-ins and ensuring they are included in Thinkerbell events and training.

We have a lot of part timers (parents and non-parents) and offer flexibility to those who need it, this includes remote working, and parents structuring their days around school runs, child pick ups and other commitments.

We have full time and part time mums working with us in leadership roles and they bring invaluable skills and knowledge to these roles. We will always consider part timers for promotions. In terms of recruitment, we would make hiring a part timer for a role if they bring the right skills and experience to the role like anyone else.

We make sure those on parental leave are kept across training and events throughout their leave, with regular check-ins, and keeping in touch days. We work on a dedicated phased return to work plan allowing both family and career roles to flourish to ensure a smooth and enjoyable transition back to work.

Clemenger Group Limited said: We conduct a pay gap analysis every year for Clemenger Group and will continue to do so annually.

Our paid parental leave policy is gender neutral and offers primary carers up to 20 weeks of leave (including in the unfortunate event of a stillbirth).

Our flexible guidelines are open to every person in Clemenger Group, and empower them to do their best work from wherever that may be.

We have strong part-time permanent representation across the Clemenger Group agencies, including in management roles.

We have the ambition for 50% of key leadership roles across the Group being held by females by the end of 2024 and are reviewing our recruitment and promotion practices to fulfil this

Host/Havas said: Its a brave (and nave) agency that can honestly say they are doing everything they can. So the short answer is no, were not - but the longer answer is below for what its worth.

We look at gender pay and distribution at ever level and in every team. We can confirm that we have no gender pay gap at any level and are assessed by WGEA annually.

We offer paid parental leave to all parents, regardless of gender, with a minimum of 3 month paid leave and no upper limit based on tenure. We also offer comprehensive return to work support including (but not limited to) optional paid stay in touch days throughout leave, paid child care of any type or flying family members out to support the transition, and encouraging a gradual return to work if thats preferred.

We have had core hours in place for a number of years. We also have staff members (both men and women) who work part time and even partly interstate or overseas to accommodate their family commitments.

The transition back to work from parental leave is so fraught (and a bit awful for many). Having senior leaders who navigated it themselves helps build empathy around the complexity of it, and offer support and mentoring.

Howatson+Company said: We can confirm we have no gender pay gap and review annually.

We have 3 months paid parental leave, regardless of sex and pay for 12 months continuation of super for all primary carers regardless of gender. In addition, we offer paid leave for pregnancy loss, those undergoing fertility treatments, surrogacy, adoption and menopause. We offer gradual transitions back to work depending on the individuals needs, support networks and role.

We have men and women, parents and non-parents working full and part time, in some cases fully remote or hybrid. We just ask that our team work in a way that suits them, and does not impact their clients or colleagues.

We offer 5 days pay for 4 days work, or 4 days pay for 3 days work for returning primary carers. Currently we have 5 staff taking advantage of this. But definitely agree that continuing to look at job redesign for each role on an individual basis is important.

We pride ourselves on promoting based on achievement and have recently promoted two of our superstars about to go on parental leave.

We support gradual transitions back to work (per question 2) and each carer (primary or secondary) has a one on one with another parent before and after leave to help them ask any questions around how they might best come back to work and adjust their working arrangements if needed.

We offer each individual a training budget, and many of the team have moved into new roles in the agency with support from the team e.g. from EA/office management to finance, from account management to strategy.

Communicado said: 50% of our team are part time mums including 70% our leadership team and 100% of the owners of the company. We have adapted roles to suit (whether that be 2 to 4 days or entirely remote) and we support parents doing work in the hours that they can. This isnt limited to new mums, we have always supported parents at all stages of parenting, for example those trying to get pregnant as well as parents to teens and late teens, particularly during the crucial VCE stage.

We feel paid parental leave is challenging for smaller predominantly female businesses and we acknowledge more needs to be done here in addition to a broader industry solution to make it more achievable for us to offer more.

Overall, we celebrate flexible working arrangements for everyone (even prior to the pandemic) which includes 100% remote work, team members that have made the sea change interstate, or the hybrid working model.

Bullfrog said: While we at Bullfrog certainly don't claim to have it 100% perfect, we are extremely proud of our transparent People Policy, which includes: 6 months' paid Parental Leave including super, 'Leap Allowances' for personal development, Holiday Exchanges and much more see the CB comments for more details.

DDB Remedy Australia said: [We} are continually working on and improving support for all our parents with 3 months paid leave and a non-gendered parental leave policy.

Importantly we support smooth transitions back into the work place with part time and flexible hours as well as job share options.

We support our parents at all stages of the caregiving journey via Circle In - a parenting platform which supports family-inclusive workplaces and helps create a culture that supports caregivers.

There is more to be done of course and we look forward to being inspired by our team and indeed the rest of the industry.

Have something to say on this? Share your views in the comments section below. Or if you have a news story or tip-off, drop us a line at adnews@yaffa.com.au

Sign up to the AdNews newsletter, like us on Facebook or follow us on Twitter for breaking stories and campaigns throughout the day.

See more here:

Agencies respond to gender inequality in the industry - AdNews

Can Disney Unlock the Key to the Bahamas? – Theme Park Insider

July 7, 2022, 10:42 PM If you visit a cruise line's private island in The Bahamas, have you really visited The Bahamas?

That was the Niles family debate as we walked through the U.S. Customs line at Port Canaveral after debarking the media preview "Christening Cruise" of the Disney Wish. The fact that we had to clear customs to re-enter the United States answered our question - legally, at least. But while we all enjoyed our stay in what legally was Bahamian territory, none of us felt like we had left the Disney domain, much less visited a foreign country.

Our only port of call on our Disney Wish cruise was Castaway Cay, Disney's private island in The Bahamas. Castaway Cay provides a Disney-designed perfect day at the beach. No need to ride a tender over, Disney dredged a harbor that allows its ships to dock just a short tram ride or a reasonable walk from the beaches.

Cast members hand you a beach towel as you step off the ship, and thousands of beach chairs and recliners await you on the sand.

Plop down and enjoy the day on one of the family beaches, or ride the tram a bit further up the island for the adults-only Serenity Bay. You can swim in the seawall-protected ocean water, ride down the Pelican Plunge water slide, or rent some snorkeling gear, if you did not bring your own. (Disney has dropped a Nautilus sub from the old Magic Kingdom 20,000 Leagues Under the Sea ride down there for you to discover, among other nautical Easter eggs.)

Kayaks, paddle boards, and glass-bottom boat trips also await you, for an upcharge. Or you can opt for a massage in one of the cabanas next to the Serenity Bay beach.

Hungry? Lunch is included in your cruise fare and served buffet-style at Cookie's BBQ and Cookie's Too.

If you get thirsty for an adult beverage, roaming waiters will take your order on the beach, or you can visit one several open-air bars on the island. Don't bother with your wallet. Your room key is all you need, as drinks and other upcharges will be billed to your account.

All this convenience helps make a day at Castaway Cay feel like the ultimate beach get-away. You just don't feel the insecurity that you might on a public beach where you have to watch your things, including credit cards and cash. No one is running a hustle here, and no one cares if you have a drink on the beach. Heck, they'll even bring it to you.

Two moments illustrated the Castaway Cay experience for us. First, we all had a bit of a moment at water's edge when a stingray glided past us, just a couple yards away. One of my adult kids had gotten stung by a stingray in Malibu last fall, and the memory of that excruciating incident remains fresh. But Disney has removed the barbs from the stingrays at Castaway Cay, allowing guests to see and swim near these graceful creatures without risk.

Second, Laurie lost her sunglasses when doing a turn in the water. She didn't notice them missing for several minutes and figured there would be no chance of finding them in the surf 20 minutes later. But when she returned to where she had been swimming, there they were - easily seen in the shallow, crystal water, protected by Castaway Cay's seawall and left alone by other Disney Wish passengers.

This is not a normal beach.

And while that's a joy for anyone looking to enjoy a carefree day playing in the sun and the water, it can be a little disappointing to someone who enjoys the adventure of traveling to new destinations. Like Gertrude Stein's Oakland, there's no there there at Castaway Cay. As a place, it represents an ideal. There's no real history, no native or long-time residents, no home-grown businesses.

Norwegian Cruise Line created the first private island experience when it bought Great Stirrup Cay in 1977. Disney followed in 1997, when it signed a 99-year lease with the Bahamian government for the 1,000-acre former Gorda Cay, which Disney now calls Castaway Cay. Private islands allowed cruise lines to capture 100% of the money that passengers spent on drinks, equipment rentals, and excursions while in these ports. They also allowed cruise lines to provide a more secure, and thus potentially safer, experience that their guests would have in a public port of call.

For Disney's Imagineers, Castaway Cay provided a canvas upon which they could design the ultimate carefree beach vacation. And they did. Visiting Castaway Cay is a joy and a delightful asset to any Disney Cruise Line itinerary that includes it.

But sitting on the sand watching the ocean at the end of the day, I couldn't help but long for some more Bahamian flavor. Fortunately, Disney has felt that need from its guests and is working on a solution.

In 2019, Disney signed another deal with the Bahamian government, this time to take control of a portion of the island ofEleuthera, which will become the Disney Cruise Line's second private port of call, Lighthouse Point.

Expected to open in the next couple of years or so, Lighthouse Point will be designed to showcase Bahamian art and culture, much like the Disney Vacation Club's Aulani does for Hawaiian culture. (Imagineer Joe Rohde, who oversaw Aulani, also headed the Lighthouse Point project before he retired from Disney.) Work began in April on the project, which will include an Arts & Culture center, displaying works commissioned by Disney from Bahamian artists, along with family beaches and an adventure camp.

But why go to Disney's idealized version of The Bahamas when you could visit the real thing in Nassau or Freeport? Because, one might argue, you can't experience "the real thing" in those port cities any more. Foreign visitors, immigrants, and trade long have influenced the culture of port communities. But the modern cruise industry transforms port communities like nothing else in the travel business. How many jewelry stores and T-shirt shops does one port community need? Apparently, the answer in every port - at least, before the pandemic - has been "more."

Cruise ships also create enormous environmental strains on port communities. Disney boasts about its environmental efforts on the Wish, with its LED lighting saving 30 percent on energy consumption from lights, hydrodynamic hull and propeller design reducing greenhouse gas emissions by six percent, and liquefied natural gas fuel decreasing carbon dioxide emissions by approximately 20 percent compared to traditional diesel or marine fuel. But the infusion of thousands of guests every day into a port community can strain infrastructure when that community has not or cannot design it to accommodate those crowds. That pressure creates environmental damage of its own.

Well-designed private islands can mitigate that damage by diverting tourists to destinations created specifically for accommodating them. But more calls on private islands can mean fewer at traditional ports, robbing them of the income that their residents need. Disney's deal for Lighthouse Point reportedly includes a commitment by the DCL to make more calls on Nassau and Freeport, not fewer - which Disney can do easily by increasing the number of ships it sails on Caribbean routes. (Two more ships are on order following the Wish.)

Beyond the physical environmental issues, Lighthouse Point gives Disney the opportunity to spend its money to commission art and cultural experiences that the free market in Bahamian port communities too rarely supports in the rush to sell more jewelry, T-shirts, and knick-knacks. Yes, that puts Disney in the position of gatekeeping Bahamian culture for its guests. But is that a worse option than watching access to Bahamian culture collapse under the weight of unguided demand for more chain restaurants and indistinguishable shops? Disney's Imagineers have boasted that Aulani contains the largest collection of contemporary Hawaiian art in the world. I would love to see a similarly robust collection for Bahamian artists on Lighthouse Point someday.

Let's not forget, though, that it was Castaway Cay that awakened that desire within me. Like any great entertainment, one day on that lovely beach left me wanting more. Not just more time on Castaway Cay, but more opportunity to discover The Bahamas, too.

* * *For more coverage from the Disney Wish, please see our round-up post: All Aboard the Disney Cruise Line's New Disney Wish.

For more theme park news, please sign up for Theme Park Insider's weekly newsletter.

Read the original post:

Can Disney Unlock the Key to the Bahamas? - Theme Park Insider

What’s New in The Bahamas – TravelPulse

Summer is here, U.S. re-entry restrictions are in our rearview and American travelers are beyond ready to embark on long-awaited vacations. And, the Bahamas is bound to be one of this years hottest destinations, thanks to newly eased entry protocols and a wave of new flights that make accessing the islands easy.

Spanning 100,000 square miles of some of the clearest ocean waters on the planet, the archipelago is a perennial favorite among those in search of blissful weather, tropical terrain, award-winning beaches, colorful coral reefs and pristine wildlife encounters, combined with the islands warm and vibrant Caribbean culture.

ADVERTISING

The Bahamas Pares Down Entry Protocols From June 19, international travelers entering The Bahamas no longer need to apply for The Bahamas Travel Health Visa, regardless of their vaccination status. We acknowledge that the Travel Health Visa was a burden for travellers, and we are pleased to be able to eliminate it, Honourable I. Chester Cooper, Deputy Prime Minister and Minister of Tourism, Investments & Aviation, said in his June announcement.

All unvaccinated visitors aged two years and older still need to submit proof of a negative PCR or antigen test taken within three days (72 hours) of departure for The Bahamas; but vaccinated arrivals are no longer subject to testing requirements.

BahamasAir Relaunches OrlandoGrand Bahama Route From June 30 through September 10, 2022, national airline BahamasAir is making it super easy and affordable to reach Grand Bahama Island, with twice-weekly nonstop flights between Orlando and Freeport. And, Inaugural roundtrip airfares start as low as $297.

Trending Now

Boating Flings Are in Full Swing This summer, The Bahamas Tourist Office will host a series of exhilarating Boating Flings, leading caravans of boaters across the Gulf Stream and into brilliant blue Bahamian waters. Event participants will get to partake in various activities, delight in delicious Bahamian cuisine and engage in authentic cultural experiences across the islands.

Festivals and Events Are Back Also back this year is Nassaus iconic Junkanoo Summer Festivalone of the Caribbean's most lively and colorful carnival celebrationsrunning every Saturday, July 2-30. Grand Bahamas Groombay Summer Festival will also return, running every Thursday, July 7-28. Would-be visitors can find details on many more summer events at Bahamas.com/events.

The Atlantis Paradise Island Music Series Atlantis Paradise Islands Music Making Waves concert series, benefitting the Blue Project Foundation, will feature live performances from big-name music artists like Grammy Award-winning singer and songwriter Ashanti; five-time Grammy nominee Robin Thicke; Grammy, ACM, CMA, and AMA Award-winning group Little Big Town; and Grammy Award winner Sheryl Crow.

Disney Wish Begins Sailing To The Bahamas Disney Cruise Lines newest ship, the Disney Wish, is readying to set sail on its maiden voyage from its homeport in Port Canaveral on July 14. Thereafter, it will carry cruisegoers on three- and four-night voyages to The Bahamas, including stops at Disney's private island near Great Abaco, Castaway Cay.

For the latest insight on travel around the world, check out this interactive guide.

For the latest travel news, updates and deals, be sure to subscribe to the daily TravelPulse newsletter here.

For more information, visit bahamas.com.

See the original post:

What's New in The Bahamas - TravelPulse