Sanjiv Chopra, MD: What Are the 5 Most Impactful Medical Science Advances for the Future? – MD Magazine

In an interview with HCPLive, Sanjiv Chopra, MD, Professor of Medicine at Harvard Medical School, highlighted his predictions for the 5 key advances set to impact medical science in the future. Chopras predictions were part of his presentation at Pri-Med Midwest 2022.

You know, Niels Bohr, a Nobel Laureate physicist said 100 years ago, predictions are difficult, especially those about the future, Chopra said. I'm going to make those predictions. And the first one is artificial intelligence. I think a better name could be aided intelligence or augmented intelligence.

Chopra elaborated on this point, describing his view that certain clinicians will find the implementation of artificial intelligence technology useful and othersnamely radiologistsmay find that it replaces much of what they handle on a regular basis.

The second one is the microbiome, the gut microbiomeThird is CRISPR and gene editing, he explained. The fourth is messenger RNA. And the fifth, believe it or not, is the psychedelic revolution, mushrooms, and ketamine changing the landscape of people with anxiety, PTSD, people in hospitals, afraid of death.

The discussion shifted to another topic covered in Chopras Pri-Med presentation, namely addressing which takeaways Chopra felt were the most important from the recent Nobel Prize-winning idea that a bacterium in the stomach could cause peptic ulcer disease.

Who could have thought that a bacterium could survive in the harsh gastric acid environment of the stomach, and actually cause peptic ulcer disease, the renal disease he said. You know, we used to have a saying that wants an ulcer, always an ulcer, you could heal the ulcer crater, but the ulcer would come back, the ulcer diathesis would persist. Now when we eradicate H. pylori, people are cured of peptic ulcer disease.

Chopra further described the discoverys facets, including the 3 main causes of duodenal ulcer disease as well as the findings about H. pylori bacteria.

View the other Pri-Med Midwest 2022 coverage to find out more about these topics.

See original here:

Sanjiv Chopra, MD: What Are the 5 Most Impactful Medical Science Advances for the Future? - MD Magazine

Morehouse School of Medicine’s "Danforth Dialogues" Podcast Focuses on the School’s Innovative Research Programs – PR Web

The COVID-19 pandemic raised awareness of the continuing health disparities in communities of color and the need to invest in more research to address those disparities, said Dr. Montgomery Rice.

ATLANTA (PRWEB) October 17, 2022

Morehouse School of Medicine (MSM) today published the latest edition of its "Danforth Dialogues" podcast, featuring a deep dive into the medical schools innovative research programs during a conversation between MSMs President and CEO Dr. Valerie Montgomery Rice, Senior Vice President for External Partnerships and Innovation Dr. Sandra Harris-Hooker, and Dr. Rick Kittles, Senior Vice President for Research.

The COVID-19 pandemic raised awareness of the continuing health disparities in communities of color and the need to invest in more research to address those disparities, said Dr. Montgomery Rice. Since our inception, Morehouse School of Medicine has been on the frontlines of medical research to help improve health outcomes for African Americans, Latinos, and other underserved communities in the country.

Dr. Harris-Hooker, who headed MSMs research program before assuming her new role, noted that the schools research efforts were modest during its early years as a two-year institution. We started with a portfolio that was, at best, $300,000 to $400,000, she said. Today, we have a comprehensive and robust research program. We ended our last fiscal year with well over $84 million in research projects.

Dr. Kittles is one of the countrys leading genetics researchers and is known for his pioneering work in tracing African American ancestry though DNA testing. Honored and humbled, to be in his new role, Dr. Kittles noted in the podcast the unique role for medical research at Historically Black Medical Schools to help improve health equity in communities of color.

It is our responsibility as individuals who came from these communities to go back and serve and improve the health of our communities, he said. Very few investigators outside of our communities can do that.

Launched earlier this year, Danforth Dialogues focuses on the leadership lessons from the frontlines of the COVID-19 pandemic and their broader implication for society. Named after the historic Danforth Chapel on the Morehouse College campus, the podcast series features a cross-section of guests and topics.

To hear this edition of the podcast, click here. For more information about the Danforth Dialogues leadership series, click here.

To listen and subscribe to the Danforth Dialogues podcast, click here.

For more information about Morehouse School of Medicine, please visit MSM.edu.

###

About Morehouse School of MedicineFounded in 1975, Morehouse School of Medicine (MSM) is among the nation's leading educators of primary care physicians, biomedical scientists, and public health professionals. An independent and private historically-Black medical school, MSM was recognized by the Annals of Internal Medicine as the nation's number one medical school in fulfilling a social missionthe creation and advancement of health equity. Morehouse School of Medicine's faculty and alumni are noted for excellence in teaching, research, and public policy, as well as exceptional patient care. MSM is accredited by the Commission on Colleges of the Southern Association of Colleges and Schools to award doctoral and master's degrees. To learn more about programs and donate today, please visit http://www.msm.edu or call 404-752-1500.

Share article on social media or email:

See the original post here:

Morehouse School of Medicine's "Danforth Dialogues" Podcast Focuses on the School's Innovative Research Programs - PR Web

RCB conference attendees weigh 21st century opportunities and challenges – Rowan Today

The science behind climate change.

Health care and the outlook for Covid.

Corporate governance and investing.

The Rohrer College of Business convened a conference Oct. 14 to address a wide range of issues related to health care, the environment, corporate governance and investing amid staggering 21stcentury uncertainties.

Dubbed the Environmental, Social and Corporate Governance (ESG) Conference, the daylong program in Business Hall was one in a series of events the college is hosting this year as it celebrates its 50th anniversary.

Among issues considered at the conference: the ongoing and increasing threat of climate change and its effect on business, investing and insurance; the imperative to address climate change now; and the persistent, if sometimes ignored, lingering danger of Covid.

Some of the roughly two dozen speakers scheduled throughout the day included Jordan Howell, associate professor of Sustainable Business at Rowan; Bob Bunting of the Climate Adaptation Center in Sarasota, Fla.; Annette Reboli, dean of Cooper Medical School of Rowan University; and Ken Lacovara, dean of the School of Earth & Environment at Rowan.

Bunting, a longtime Florida resident and climate researcher, said humanity has maybe 30 years to resolve the threat of climate change by reducing greenhouse gas emissions or it faces a bleak future.

At this stage, he said, sea level will (continue to) rise for 200 to 300 years even if we dont put another carbon molecule into the atmosphere.

RCB Dean Susan Lehrman said the conference themes mirror those that the college is exploring in a series of events throughout its 50th year including sustainability, social responsibility, business ethics and climate change.

With this (first major) event, we wanted to show how important these topics are to our mission, Lehrman said.

She said the program developed in partnership with the Center for Responsible Leadership and the Global Interdependence Center in Philadelphia, where Rowan President Ali A. Houshmand is a board member.

Lehrman said the focus at Rowan on sustainability, social responsibility and protecting the environment has been led by Houshmand, including a university-wide initiative to hire faculty members to develop, advance and communicate solutions to the most pressing existential threats posed by the climate and biodiversity crises.

The topics under discussion today are important, not just in the College of Business but across campus and beyond, Lehrman said.

Continue reading here:

RCB conference attendees weigh 21st century opportunities and challenges - Rowan Today

Changing the face of innovation | MUSC | Charleston, SC – Medical University of South Carolina

When you hear the word entrepreneur, your first thought might be of billionaires sending rockets into space whether that be Elon Musk, Jeff Bezos or Richard Branson.

What do these entrepreneurs, who have practically become household names, have in common? Besides the fact that they are all males, the world that they inhabit appears steeped in showmanship, competitiveness and oversized confidence.

Perhaps the perception that innovation is a male-dominated domain has discouraged women from fully embracing entrepreneurship. Studies have shown that only 11.8% of U.S. inventors are women. The same disparity is also seen in the sciences. Women account for only 7% to 13% of awardees of small business grants from the National Science Foundation and the National Institutes of Health (NIH).

Women who decide to become entrepreneurs face stiff challenges. They start companies with 50% less money and raise 66% less capital than their male counterparts, said MUSC chief innovation officer Jesse Goodwin, Ph.D.

-- Jesse Goodwin, Ph.D.

A new MUSC initiative STEM-Coaching and Resources for Entrepreneurial Women (CREW) will begin to address gender inequity in entrepreneurship with funds from a $2.4 million grant from the National Institute of General Medical Sciences. With this funding, STEM-CREW will offer mentorship, coaching and training opportunities to increase the number of women, especially underserved minority women, who not only become entrepreneurs but remain engaged in entrepreneurial activities throughout their careers.

The initiative will be led by Carol Feghali-Bostwick, Ph.D., the Kitty Trask Holt Endowed Chair for Scleroderma Research and director of the Advancement, Recruitment and Retention of Women (ARROW) program at MUSC, which seeks to advance the careers of women scientists. Feghali-Bostwick is an entrepreneur herself, having identified an anti-fibrotic peptide that has been licensed by a company.

-- Carol Feghali-Bostwick, Ph.D.

In addition to Goodwin, other STEM-CREW investigators include Angela Passarelli, Ph.D.,Tammy Loucks, DrPH, and Jillian Harvey, Ph.D. Passarelli, an associate professor of management in the College of Charleston School of Business and director of Research at the Institute of Coaching at McLean/Harvard Medical School, will serve as director of coaching. Loucks, the science development officer for the South Carolina Clinical & Translational Research Institute at MUSC, will be the communications director. Harvey, a professor in the MUSC College of Health Professions, will oversee program evaluation. Rachel Simmons will be the program coordinator.

Do we all pay a cost for inequity?

MUSC is one of the few institutions to track the number of women who engage in entrepreneurial activities, and the numbers reflect the disparity seen at the national level. Of MUSCs 800-plus inventors, only 33% are women, and 23% are women scientists.

Entrepreneurship is an engine to move something from simply being a great idea into a product or business that is generating beneficial impact, said Goodwin. That impact includes not just improved health outcomes but growth of the knowledge economy and the creation of high-paying jobs in the STEM field, she added.

Gender inequity could hamper the knowledge economy, explained Goodwin. Considering that half of the population of this country are women, if women are not fully participating, were missing out on significant opportunities, she said.

Why arent more women becoming entrepreneurs?

Unfamiliar with the details of how an idea is transformed into a product, some women fear the perceived risk. However, other factors also likely play a role in dissuading women from becoming entrepreneurs, said Feghali-Bostwick.

It might be risk aversion, or it might be that a lot of women don't like competition at that level, she said. Women don't usually promote themselves and their science as much as men. And some may lack mentors. If they don't see other women as role models and mentors in the entrepreneurship world, they might think its not feasible for them to get there. We need more women there as role models to show them it's feasible.

How will STEM-CREW increase the number of women entrepreneurs?

Because women often lack entrepreneurial role models, STEM-CREW will pair trainees with successful biomedical entrepreneurs. These mentors will share the wisdom they gained as they navigated the transition from researcher to inventor and started their own companies. They will familiarize them with the procedural aspects of the innovation pathway, helping to alleviate any anxiety over perceived risk.

-- Angela Passarelli, Ph.D.

But STEM-CREW will then go a step further and pair trainees with professional executive coaches for regular one-on-one sessions. Executive coaching is common in the corporate world, where it helps leaders to build their efficacy and resilience but remains underused in the academic world.

Feghali-Bostwick believes coaching is one of the most innovative aspects of the initiative and is grateful to have Passarelli, a leader in coaching, aboard.

Coaching makes training four times more effective, said Feghali-Bostwick. With mentoring, you have role models who have done this and show you the way, but they usually show you the way they did it. In contrast, coaching guides you to come up with your own answers on how to do it. It promotes self-efficacy.

It was Passarellis idea to strengthen the grant application by enhancing mentoring with coaching because she knew that it offered additional benefits to aspiring women entrepreneurs.

Coaching provides a confidential relationship, dedicated time and a skilled thought partner that helps aspiring entrepreneurs step back from their day-to-day responsibilities to explore what they most want to achieve, who they are, whats standing in their way and how to navigate a path to achieving their objectives, said Passarelli.

Coaching is particularly crucial when "the mentors lived experience differs from that of their proteges, she explained.

Quite frankly, what works for a man doesnt always work for a woman, she said.

In addition to regular meetings with their coaches and mentors, trainees will complete an online entrepreneurship class that was recently created by the College of Graduate Studies and receive lay communications training that will help them learn to make effective pitches to potential investors. STEM-CREW will also organize a quarterly speakers series, featuring successful entrepreneurs in the state and beyond and will hold an annual conference in Charleston.

Who is eligible for STEM-CREW?

Each year, STEM-CREW will accept 20 senior postdoctoral fellows or junior faculty into the program. Applications are encouraged from any institution in South Carolina, as most of the activities and offerings can be completed online. As one of STEM-CREWs goals is to increase the number of underrepresented minority women entrepreneurs, applications from historically black colleges and universities are especially welcome. As the program matures, applicants will also be accepted from institutions in other states in the region that are eligible for Institutional Development Awards (IDeA) because they have historically had low levels of NIH funding.

-- Tammy Loucks, DrPH

For us to have this in South Carolina and make it available to other IDeA states, I think it speaks to the whole concept that MUSC has for innovation and impact and influence, said Loucks. It ties nicely into that overarching mission that we have as an institution and really speaks to the role that we have for the state.

Paying it forward

Beginning in its third year, STEM-CREW will choose five trainees each year to be trained as coaches themselves. These women can then pay it forward to other women at their own institutions, helping to increase the number of women who will benefit from the program.

I want potential applicants to know that they will not only gain training and an entrepreneurship mindset to support their career development, but they have the opportunity to now turn around and become, themselves, the mentors and the coaches, said Feghali-Bostwick.

That is Goodwins favorite part of the program.

In addition to liking that this program is designed by women for women, I love that it aims to support a cohort of women down this path, which in turn will create a set of role models for future female entrepreneurs, she said.

How do I apply for STEM-CREW?

The STEM-CREW program will accept applications through Nov. 30.To apply, please visithttps://redcap.link/crewprogram. Please address all inquiries toarrows@musc.edu. Those accepted for the program will be notified by December, and participation will begin in January 2023.

The rest is here:

Changing the face of innovation | MUSC | Charleston, SC - Medical University of South Carolina

Group Health Cooperative of South Central Wisconsin: Awards three medical diversity scholorships to local students – Wisbusiness.com

MADISON, WISCONSIN,October 18, 2022 In an effort to improve experience and health outcomes among patients of diverse backgrounds, GHC-SCW is proud to announce it has awarded the2022 GHC-SCW Pre-Professional Medical Diversity Scholarshipto three local college students. This is the first year of the scholarship program.

The three winners are:

The scholarship recipients will be recognized at a luncheon. Media are welcome to attend.

2022 GHC-SCW Pre-Professional Medical Diversity Scholarship Luncheon

Thursday, October 20

11:30 a.m. 12:30 p.m.

GHC-SCW Capitol Clinic

675 W Washington Ave, Madison

As part of GHC-SCWs larger effort to reduce inequities in healthcare,the goal of the GHC-SCWPre-Professional Medical Diversity Scholarshipis to reduce racial and ethnic health disparities through recruitment of healthcare professionals with diversebackgrounds, which includes offering financial and mentorship opportunities to medical pre-professionals of color. In addition to each recipient receiving a $5,000 scholarship, the students will also have anon-site shadowing experience at GHC-SCW.

To provide the best care to our communities, healthcare systems need to invest in diversifying their providers and care teams, said Kingsley Gobourne, GHC-SCW Chief Equity and Engagement Officer. That investment starts upstream with ensuring more diverse candidates can navigate the financial barriers in their path. Our scholarship will by no means erase those barriers, however, we hope to add to the pool of resources available to make that journey attainable.

In 2021, the director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)declaredracism is a serious public health problemthat has a negative health impact on communities of color, contributing to a disproportionate mortality rate. The CDC reportstheaveragelife expectancyamong Black or African American people in the United States is four years lower than that of White people.

It is crucial for our time that the diversity of health care professionals reflect the diversity of the patients they care for and the diversity of the profession we stand for, saidSalmaSalama, GHC-SCW Pre-Professional Medical Diversity Scholarship recipient.I am so thankful for organizations like GHC that recognize this issue and choose to act by creating opportunities for students like me. I greatly look forward to being a role model for minority children, students and professionals alike.

From working in a hospital and listening to patients stories, Ive learned that most patients(unsurprisingly) prefer seeing providers that reflect the spectrum of identities that make up their communities, including race, gender, religious beliefs, sexual orientation and disability status, said AhmedIbrahim, GHC-SCW Pre-Professional Medical Diversity Scholarship recipient.Witnessing people who look like me suffer from a system sworn to protect them inspired me to pursue a career in medicine.

Promoting diversity in healthcare can lead to cultural competency and healthcare providers ability to offer services that meet their patients unique social, cultural and linguistic needs, said DuncanAsaka, GHC-SCW Pre-Professional Medical Diversity Scholarship recipient.In short, the better a patient is represented and understood, the better they can be treated. Diversity in healthcare will ensure that elements such as background beliefs, ethnicities and varying perspectives are represented in the medical field.

GHC-SCW believes a commitment to encouraging individuals who identify as BIPOC(Black, Indigenous, People of Color)to become healthcare providers will help break down barriers and improve health outcomes forracial and ethnic minoritygroups.

Diversity in medicine has tangible benefits that positively impact patient care, said Laureine Lacossiere, GHC-SCW Physician Recruiter. While Wisconsin has some troubling health disparities that increasingly fall along racial lines, were taking small steps in the right direction to increase representation in our future providers and change the health outcomes for our wider community.

The 2022 GHC-SCW Pre-Professional Medical Diversity Scholarship was open to students who identify as Black, Indigenous, and/or Hispanic/Latinx who are currently enrolled in medical school (including residency) or physician assistant, and nurse practitioner programs in Wisconsin. Students submitted essays related to the importance of diverse healthcare providers in diverse communities.

Wisconsin needs more primary care providers from diverse communities, said Alison Craig, MD, GHC-SCW Senior Medical Director. Supporting a path to primary care careers builds a better tomorrow for our state. I am fully convinced that Wisconsin will be healthier as these talented, compassionate scholars put on their stethoscopes and care for patients in the years ahead.

The rest is here:

Group Health Cooperative of South Central Wisconsin: Awards three medical diversity scholorships to local students - Wisbusiness.com

A 41-mile walk with the group that wants to end gambling adverts in football – The Athletic

It is just after daybreak and two dozen yellow T-shirts are making their way across Sheffield, from Bramall Lane in the south of the city to Hillsborough on its northern edge.

There are young and old in the group, which draws encouragement from passing cars, and each has a reason to have begun a 41-mile walk that will end in Leeds the next day.

The thread that links them all is the lasting impact of gambling upon their lives. There are recovering addicts determined to force change and those less fortunate, who continue to wrestle with tragedy and grief.

Like Kay Wadsworth, whose only child Kimberly, consumed by a gambling addiction, took her own life in 2018 at the age of 32. Kay can be found clinging to her daughters doll at the beginning and the eventual end of a walk carried out in her name, an emblem of what she has lost and cannot hope to replace.

The yellow T-shirts worn by Kay and her fellow walkers feel almost as poignant.

On the back of each is 409 the number of lives Public Health England estimated were lost to gambling-related suicides in 2021 in England alone. That amounts to seven per cent of suicides across the whole of the UK.

This is the latest walk organised by The Big Step, a campaign group that wants to rid football of all gambling advertising.

There have been 10 of its kind before, each designed to take the message to the homes of professional clubs.

They have marched across London, between Manchester and Liverpool, and from Edinburgh to Glasgow. In the summer of 2021, the Big Group even walked from Scotland to Wembley in a 300-mile epic that coincided with the start of the European Championship.

This one was Yorkshires. Sheffield United, Sheffield Wednesday,

Read the original post:

A 41-mile walk with the group that wants to end gambling adverts in football - The Athletic

Boston College vs. Wake Forest – Gambling Odds and Prediction – BC Interruption

Welcome back Eagles fans! Hope everyone had a great Bye-Week. Hopefully over this time we were all given enough time to make the Clemson match nothing but a distant memory. Well, I hate to be the bearer of bad news, but the challenging season for the Eagles continues to move on into this weekend as the have prepare to face another juggernaut in the ACC, the Wake Forest Demon Deacons.

Even as an Eagles fan, I have to give a ton of credit to the Wake Forest organization over the years. They have gone from a a stingy opponent in the ACC to a potential top-10 powerhouse. It took Dave Clawson two years under his belt but starting in 2016 the Demon Deacons have been invited 6 bowl games, finished above .500 each year (aside from the outlier COVID year which they still made a bowl appearance), and capped an 11 win season last year for the first time since 2006.

The Demon Deacons are sitting at #13 in the country and much of the success has fallen on the shoulders of QB Sam Hartman. Despite sitting out the first game, Hartman has still managed to throw for 1,442 yards with a 16/2 TD to INT ratio and a QBR of 175.8. To have this success he also has had the pleasure of connecting with WRs A.T. Perry and Jahmal Bank who combined compose of rougly half of Sams total passing yards.

It is no secret that this offense is deadly as their only loss this season came in double-OT against the visting Clemson Tigers with both QBs putting on a clinic combining for 96 total points. As a team, Wake Forest averages 41.17 PPG and an average of 440 YPG which is a daunting statistic to stomach.

With this high-powering offense at the helm, it is to not much surprise that the Eagles come into this match, once again, as double-digit underdogs sitting currently at +21 and the O/U at 61.5.

As much as I hate to re-visit BCs last matchup against Clemson, a few things stood out. BCs defense stood firm for the whole first half (as I predicted) giving the offense enough opportunities to really get something clicking. Yet, that engine never started as the Eagles were unable to find the endzone all game. Could this be another deja vu scenario for BC?

Tempting as it might be to say yes, I do think that this Deacon defense is a bit more susceptible than Clemsons and that BC could do some damage. Wake Forest allows, on average, 385 total yards to opponents per game with 235 of those coming through the air. I think it is very plausible that Jurkovec and this offense could strike a few matches and get hot for a few drives and find a bit more success than they did almost two weeks ago.

In terms of coming up with a verdict on this matchup, I still think that BC caves on this one based purely off of the talent on the otherside of the ball. However, when it comes to the odds of this game, I have to say that BCs defense has really showed some improvement and progress over the last month or so. They hung with one of the best teams in the country for a full half and I can foresee them doing something similar down in Winston-Salem. The difference here being that Jurkovec and team are able to move the ball effectively down the field and capitalize on some defensive stops. While I dont predict a BC win, I envision it being a more enticing showing for Hafley and company. Give me the points in this one.

Prediction: BC +21 | Under 61.5 | Wake Forest ML (-1781)

Read more here:

Boston College vs. Wake Forest - Gambling Odds and Prediction - BC Interruption

Some Local Officials Use State Gambling Laws to Close Game Rooms, Others Think Laws Are Unclear – The Texan

Austin, TX, 3 hours ago Texas forbids gambling with few exceptions, such as charity or the state lottery, but a loophole in state law has allowed game rooms with slot machine-style eight liners to pop up in communities across the state, resulting in local officials taking opposite stances on the law and how they enforce it.

The proliferation of game rooms is attributed to two points in Texas law. The first is the so-called fuzzy animal exception added to the Texas Penal Code in the mid-1990s by the Legislature, which provides an exception for gaming machines that only award non-cash prizes under $5 in value; the second is by county and city governments that offer game room permits by ordinance.

Reports of increased criminal activity at game rooms are common, with some officials saying they lead to much larger crimes that put public safety in jeopardy.

Odessa Mayor Javier Joven led the charge to crack down on game rooms that proliferate his city. While Joven says he wanted to outright ban them, pushback from local officials regarding the clarity of state law led him to pass an ordinance that phases them out through a regulatory process.

Regulating game rooms merely signals a willingness of our city to do business with an illicit business enterprise, Joven said in an interview with The Texan. He described how he believes the game rooms get their foot in the door using the fuzzy animal exception and local government permitting, and once established, they implement other enterprises.

We value life, families, and the rule of law in Odessa, and while I wish we could have simply enforced state law and shut them down sooner, we managed to find a way.

According to Joven, Odessa has had as many as 32 game rooms within the city limits, and he believes another 28 or so operate in the county.

The new city ordinance, which was adopted in September, stops the issuance or renewal of any more licenses; at the end of the year, when all current licenses expire, there will be no game rooms operating under permit within the city.

Joven added that while he believes the laws are clear on the matter, a Fort Worth lawsuit working its way through the courts could clear up any question on state laws.

In that case, several owners filed suit against the city for passing ordinances to reign in the proliferation of game rooms, arguing that state law preempted the citys authority to regulate the businesses.

The Texas Second Court of Appeals ultimately upheld the citys regulatory powers, writing that the operators eight liners are lotteries, and they are unconstitutional under the Texas Constitution, but stopped short of reviewing the constitutionality of the fuzzy animal exception in the Texas Penal Code.

The Second Court of Appeals did take issue via dicta with a past Amarillo appeals court case that upheld the constitutionality of the fuzzy animal exception, writing that they viewed the analysis upholding the law as flawed.

Ector County District Attorney Dusty Gallivan, whose jurisdiction includes the City of Odessa, says that while game rooms have been an issue in Odessa, they are not his top issue, citing a rise in violent juvenile crime. He believes the Supreme Court needs to take up the Fort Worth lawsuit, or the legislature needs to clear up the law.

Yes, Gallivan wrote in a response to The Texan, the case should be heard by the Texas Supreme Court. The Legislature either needs to make it legal or illegal, none of this middle-of-the-road stuff that makes it very difficult to enforce.

Smith County District Attorney Jacob Putman, whose jurisdiction includes the City of Tyler, has taken a very different approach to enforce state gambling laws. He cited a proliferation of game rooms that caused a multitude of problems for law enforcement in recent years, leading their office to issue cease and desist letters to all game rooms ordering them to stop operating or face criminal charges.

[The game rooms] have tried all sort of different claims to justify them legally, Putman said in a phone interview, referring to claims that game rooms are games of skill and not chance and therefore do not qualify as gambling. To Putman, the law is sufficiently clear on the issue and they dont make exceptions.

I dont think the laws are too complicated so maybe if the Legislature made it clearer, youd get a little more enforcement, but the lack of enforcement you are seeing now is mostly just a lack of political will in certain offices.

Attorneys for the Fort Worth game room operators have asked the Supreme Court for two extensions of time to file an appeal, their latest by November 4, citing multiple conflicts from other cases as the cause of the delay.

Go here to read the rest:

Some Local Officials Use State Gambling Laws to Close Game Rooms, Others Think Laws Are Unclear - The Texan

Gambling: How to Have Fun and Stay in Control – Albert Lea Tribune – Albert Lea Tribune

Gambling: How to Have Fun and Stay in Control

Published 2:46 pm Tuesday, October 18, 2022

Gambling can be a fun way to spend some time, but staying in control of your spending is important. Many people have found themselves in the trap of gambling away all their money with the hope of winning more money. Without proper control, you will either be frustrated or have a gambling addiction. Both of these are not good for your mental, emotional and even physical health.

You can categorize gambling into two ways; sports betting and playing casino games. In sports betting, you find pleasure in finding the best NFL odds that can give you maximum winnings, while in the casino, you wager on your favorite casino games.

When gambling, it is essential to know when to stop. Chasing your losses can lead to even more losses, which can be very difficult to recover from. If you find yourself losing more than you can afford to, it is important to walk away and take a break. This will help you clear your head and come back with a fresh perspective. If you keep gambling, you may end up losing even more money than you originally intended to.

When it comes to gambling, it is important to set a budget and stick to it. This will help you avoid spending more money than you can afford to lose. It is also a good idea to set a limit on how much you are willing to gamble in one day or session. This will help you control your spending and keep your losses to a minimum.

There is no easy answer to this question, as it depends on a variety of factors. However, there are some general guidelines that can help you make the decision.

First and foremost, you should only gamble with money you can afford to lose. If you find yourself dipping into your savings or taking out loans to finance your gambling, then its time to walk away.

Secondly, you should be aware of the odds of whatever game youre playing. If the odds are stacked against you, then the chances of winning are slim. Its important to remember that gambling is a form of entertainment, not a way to make money.

Finally, if gambling is causing you to stress or impacting your personal life in negative ways, then its definitely time to walk away. Gambling should be a fun activity, not something that causes anxiety or problems.

Despite gambling being a great pastime, you should be aware that it has negative consequences if you do not have control.

See more here:

Gambling: How to Have Fun and Stay in Control - Albert Lea Tribune - Albert Lea Tribune

Three Men Charged in Connection With Illegal Gambling and Extortion Scheme – Mass.gov

BOSTON Three individuals have been indicted on charges related to extortion, witness intimidation, and illegal bookmaking, Attorney General Maura Healey announced today.

The charges are the result of a long-term, multi-year investigation by the AGs Gaming Enforcement Division and the Massachusetts State Police Special Service Section (SSS) working in cooperation with the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) into illegal bookmaking, loan sharking, money laundering, and organized crime.

Three defendants were indicted by a Statewide Grand Jury on the following charges:

Eric Rogers, age 54, of Revere

Extortion (3 counts)

Conspiracy to Commit Extortion (1 count)

Witness Intimidation (1 count)

Use of a Telephone for Gaming (1 count)

Conspiracy to Use Telephone for Gaming (1 count)

Michael McMahon, age 44, of Boston

Extortion (1 count)

Conspiracy to Commit Extortion (1 count)

Organizing and Promoting Illegal Gaming (1 count)

Criminal Usury (1 count)

Money Laundering (1 count)

Registering Bets (1 count)

Conspiracy to Register Bets (1 count)

Use of a Telephone for Gaming (1 count)

Conspiracy to Use Telephone for Gaming (1 count)

Brian Kelley, age 50, of Duxbury

Money Laundering (1 count)

Registering Bets (1 count)

Conspiracy to Register Bets (1 count)

Use of a Telephone for Gaming (1 count)

Conspiracy to Use Telephone for Gaming (1 count)

Rogers was arrested and arraigned on the charges in Suffolk Superior Court earlier today. Rogers was held on $75,000 cash bail with the following conditions for release: he surrender his passport, be monitored via GPS with a 6pm- 6am curfew, and stay away from victims and witnesses. McMahon and Kelley will be arraigned in Suffolk Superior Court at a later date.

The AGs Office alleges that from 2017 to 2019, McMahon ran a large-scale illegal bookmaking enterprise that generated between $1 million to $2 million annually. All bets were placed through a website run by an offshore gaming company based in Costa Rica. The AGs Office alleges that Kelley was an employee of the gaming company who collected cash payments from illegal bookmakers, including McMahon, then delivered large bundles of U.S. currency in person via flights to Costa Rica as part of an elaborate money laundering scheme. Kelley is alleged to have earned significant income from this illegal scheme, which he then laundered through various residential properties. McMahon is alleged to have made more than $234,000 in cash payments to Kelley over a 20-month period.

The AGs Office alleges that Rogers collected two extortion payments of $10,000 in 2019 from McMahon in exchange for the right to operate an illegal book with permission from a larger, organized criminal syndicate.

The AGs Office further alleges that Rogers and McMahon extorted vast sums of U.S. currency from a bettor under McMahons illegal bookmaking enterprise who initially refused to pay a debt, threatening violence, and using Rogers reputation as an organized crime associate to force payment from the victim.

All of these charges are allegations, and the defendants are presumed innocent until proven guilty. The AGs investigation remains ongoing.

AG Healeys Gaming Enforcement Division has a dedicated group of prosecutors and investigators who enforce the states Expanded Gaming Act of 2011 and investigate and prosecute illegal activity such as organized crime, money laundering, gaming-related financial crime, and corruption.

The case is being prosecuted by Assistant Attorney General Kevin P. McCarthy and Deputy Division Chief Stephen Carley of AG Healeys Gaming Enforcement Division, with the assistance of the AGs Digital Evidence Laboratory, including forensic Digital Media Analyst Jobal Thomas and Laura Hernandez, and the Massachusetts State Polices Fusion Center. Financial Investigation was conducted by Senior Financial Investigator Eugene Griffin of AG Healeys Gaming Enforcement Division.

###

Read this article:

Three Men Charged in Connection With Illegal Gambling and Extortion Scheme - Mass.gov

Microgaming Puts the Spotlight on Safer Gambling Charities It Supports – GamblingNews.com

Microgaming, which is a leading gambling software provider based out of the Isle of Mann, is going to showcase the charities it supports through its PlayItForward arm during the annual initiative Safer Gambling Week.

Safer Gambling Week is an annual event that this year takes place from October 17 to October 23 in partnership with a huge variety of stakeholders from the UK gambling industry.

Its main purpose is to spark conversations and raise awareness about the harms of gambling and the available resources and tools people who think might have a gambling problem can access.

Gambling software provider Microgaming is going to use this platform to put the spotlight on a few charities that are doing amazing work to support people and families that are dealing with gambling addiction Gordon Moody, Betknowmore, Anonymind, and Motiv8.

The gambling software company has a dedicated department called PlayItForward, whose sole purpose is to cater to corporate responsibility initiatives such as support for charities promoting and facilitating safer gambling in the UK.

PlayItForward provided financing to Gordon Moody in order for the charity to set up a special fund offering help to the families of people in treatment for gambling addiction.

Gordon Moodys main activities focus on treatment for gambling addicts in a dedicated space where they feel safe and supported. However, their latest initiative targeted the addicts near and dear ones.

Director of External Engagement at Gordon Moody, Rob Mabbett, elaborated that families experience a lot of pressure when a family member is being treated so the charity decided to direct the support coming from Microgaming to a so-called Comfort Fund, which provides for such things as outings with the children and Christmas and birthday presents.

Another benefactor of the PlayItForward program is Anonymind, which is a charity providing treatment and therapy services to gamblers that are battling addiction. Andy Atha, COO at Anonymind, has explained how the funding from Microgaming has been used:

The PlayItForward donation provided earlier this year has led to several individuals being provided with convenient, effective digital treatment directly from a psychologist at their time of need. Gambling harm affects people in many different ways mentally, physically, and financially and without donations like this, we would not be able to continue offering the most effective treatment to those individuals who need urgent help.

Betknowmore is one more charity organization that Microgaming has decided to support and salute during Safer Gambling Week. The provided funding through PlayItForward has been used for important research into the ways women in particular can be supported through their struggles with gambling addiction.

As a result of this research, Betknowmore was able to develop a special support program taking into consideration the needs of women, which the charity called New Beginnings. The program facilitates peer groups as the research showed that group support is most beneficial to female gambling addicts.

Follow this link:

Microgaming Puts the Spotlight on Safer Gambling Charities It Supports - GamblingNews.com

Spending on Gambling, Health and Tax Measures Breaks Records – Governing

If its an election year, there must be a big-money fight over dialysis in California. Since 2018, a health-care workers union has sponsored a series of three ballot measures to require higher staffing levels and safety requirements at clinics. After suffering defeats in 2018 and 2020, theyre hoping the third time will prove the charm in November.

The political action committee sponsoring this years measure has raised $8 million. That sounds like an impressive amount, until you realize that opponents have raised more than 10 times that much. Total spending on the last two versions easily topped $200 million combined.

Ballot initiatives a tool meant to give citizens a voice have turned into an avenue for interest groups to push pet causes. Another pair of ballot measures in California, which would legalize sports betting online or in person, have broken all records with nearly a half-billion dollars spent for and against them.

Voters in South Dakota, for example, will have the chance to approve an expansion of Medicaid, as envisioned under the 2010 Affordable Care Act. A half-dozen states have approved Medicaid expansions through ballot initiatives after legislators balked, most recently Missouri and Oklahoma in 2020. Iowa voters have the chance to affirm gun owners rights in the state constitution, while Oregon voters will decide on a gun-control measure that would require criminal background checks and ban large-capacity magazines, among other restrictions. Nevada voters could add an equal rights amendment for women to the state constitution.

In an earlier article, we explored ballot measures related to abortion, marijuana legalization and minimum wage increases and other labor issues. But there are a total of 129 measures on the ballot in 36 states on Nov. 8 and they cover an incredible range of topics.

Alabama, Louisiana, Oregon, Tennessee and Vermont voters will decide the issue. Presumably, most will want to cast a vote against slavery, even as a punishment for crime. Since 2018, similar amendments have passed in Colorado, Nebraska and Utah.

Heres a summary of some of the other significant ballot issues this year:

Voting and Democracy

The ability to engage effectively in direct democracy has been under increasing threat in recent years. Dozens of states have considered bills to make it harder to push initiatives, including restrictions on signature-gathering or efforts to raise the threshold for the percentage of the vote needed for passage. Last year, Mississippis supreme court ruled that the states entire initiative process is unworkable and inoperative.

State lawmakers have also proven unafraid to overturn laws almost immediately after theyve been enacted by voters. Those in power cant win fairly and so theyre changing the rules in ways that directly undermines the will of the people, complains Chris Melody Fields Figueredo, executive director of the progressive Ballot Initiative Strategy Center.

Arkansas has a referendum that will make life more difficult for initiative sponsors, while Arizona has three. Issue 2 in Arkansas would require that ballot measures received 60 percent of the vote to pass, in place of a simple majority. "It is entirely too easy to amend our state constitution, said state Rep. David Ray. We shouldn't amend our constitution in just some sort of willy-nilly fashion."

Theres also a proposed amendment in Arizona requiring 60 percent support for passage, as well as a measure that would make it easier for the Legislature to repeal or amend laws approved through the initiative process, plus one that would limit initiatives to single subjects.

Arizona voters will also consider a measure that would tighten voter identification requirements for both mail and in-person voting. Nebraska, which is one of 15 states left without a requirement to show ID to vote, will have one if Initiative 432 passes. Showing ID when they go to vote, its one of the ways we can strengthen the integrity of our elections, said Nebraska GOP Gov. Pete Ricketts.

Voter ID requirements will be loosened if a Michigan amendment passes. Registered voters would be allowed to sign affidavits in lieu of showing a state-issued ID. The measure would also amend the state constitution to require nine days of early voting, ease access to absentee voting and allow voters to deposit their ballots in drop boxes. A measure in Connecticut would allow early voting days to be created by the Legislature.

Two states, Louisiana and Ohio, have measures stipulating that only citizens may vote, countering a practice recently adopted in a few localities. The city council in Washington, D.C., gave initial approval to a non-citizen voting bill this month, but New York Citys law was struck down in June.

Nevada would become the third state, following Maine and Alaska, to allow ranked-choice voting if a proposed amendment passes there in November and again in 2024. As is often the case with ranked-choice voting, officials from both major parties are opposed.

Taxes

The idea of raising taxes on the rich has an inherent populist appeal, but the perils of applying portions of the tax code to small numbers of individuals might keep a couple of millionaires taxes from passing this year.

Californias Proposition 30 would increase taxes for individuals making more than $2 million a year. Their incomes over that threshold would be taxed an additional 1.75 percent, which would raise up to $5 billion a year. Eighty percent of that money would go to subsidizing electric vehicles and charging stations, with the remainder devoted to fighting wildfires.

The measure is being promoted by Lyft, which faces regulatory requirements to move to an electric fleet. The company has spent $45 million pushing the measure. Some environmental groups back it, but the fact that it would provide tremendous subsidies to a particular industry has led Democratic Gov. Gavin Newsom to come out strongly against it.

Millionaires in Massachusetts could also face a new tax. Any income over $1 million would be taxed an additional 4 percent, with the money going to education and transportation. Supporters say its simply a way to make the rich pay their fair share, but critics warn that the tax could penalize small business owners or individuals when they collect windfalls from home sales.

It might also prompt top earners to leave the state. Voters frequently reject taxes on higher earners even if theyre not in that bracket because they understand there are economic impacts, especially post-pandemic, on migration, says Jared Walczak, vice president of state projects at the Tax Foundation.

Colorado voters will consider a tax cut. Two years ago, they supported a ballot initiative backed by conservatives that cut the individual income tax rate from 4.63 percent to 4.55 percent. This year, the same sponsors are proposing a further reduction to 4.4 percent.

Under the states Taxpayer Bill of Rights, or TABOR amendment, state spending growth is limited to rates of inflation and population growth. This year, residents are receiving a record $3.65 billion in refunds, thanks to soaring revenues.

But its much better to cut taxes in the first place than issue refunds after the fact, Walczak argues. Location and investment decisions arent made on the basis of possible future refunds, he says.

Government Operations

Two states are taking up term limit questions, which were a major ballot-measure battleground back in the 1990s. Voters in some states have since rethought term limits, which were meant to diminish the influence of career legislators but have left them weaker players against governors, lobbyists and staff.

Michigan has the strictest limits in the country, allowing politicians to serve only six years in the state House and eight years in the state Senate. A ballot measure would allow them to serve a total of 12 years in the Legislature, allowing them the chance to build up longer tenures in either body. Arkansas voters approved a similar change two years ago, as did California voters a decade ago.

As a sweetener for voters dubious about politicians, the Michigan measure would also impose stricter financial disclosure rules on state officials.

Thirty-six states currently impose some form of term limits on governors, while 15 states have legislative term limits. North Dakota might expand both those lists. An initiative there would create legislative term limits, capping service at eight years in the state House and Senate, while limiting governors to two four-year terms.

All but five states have lieutenant governors. That number will shrink to four if Arizona voters approve a measure to create that office in Phoenix. In Tennessee, the speaker of the state Senate acts as lieutenant governor. If Amendment 2 passes, that person would assume the duties of governor if the governor is incapacitated.

Oregon legislators could lose their jobs if they fail to show up for work. Three times in recent years, Oregon Republican lawmakers have torpedoed Democratic proposals by walking out and denying the majority a quorum. Measure 113 would block legislators from running for re-election if theyve had unexcused absences.

View original post here:

Spending on Gambling, Health and Tax Measures Breaks Records - Governing

How New Jersey Will Double Down On Gambling If Casinos Come To New York City – Forbes

Bad Luck: With New York City allowing licenses for up to three casinos, Atlantic Citys monopoly on them in New Jersey could end.

If the handful of billionaires, real estate developers and gambling companies get their way and bring a Las Vegas-style casino resort to New York City, then New Jersey can expect to lose big. With Atlantic City more than two hours from Manhattan, millions in potential tax revenue will end up going to the Empire State and not the Garden State.

A lot of money is at stake, says Jeff Gural, the real estate and casino entrepreneur who has a 25% stake in the Meadowlands Racetrack in East Rutherford, New Jersey, just outside of Manhattan. It doesnt make any sense to have all this revenue going to New York.

Gural, who also owns upstate New York casino Tioga Downs and a racinoa horse racetrack with video slotsin Vernon, was a big player in the push to bring a casino to his Meadowlands facility six years ago. Since 1977, New Jersey law only allows casinos in Atlantic City, but in 2016 a ballot measure put to voters that would have ended ACs monopoly was overwhelmingly rejected by a margin of 77% to 23%.

Gural and his supporters spent $10 million during the effort, while the opposition spent around $30 million. Now, he says, as New York prepares to license up to three casinos in the New York City area there will be enough economic incentive to get a ballot measure in front of voters again.

I'm waiting and biding my time to see New York get up and running and what the reaction is from the people from northern New Jersey, he says. Id be very surprised if there isnt a casino in the Meadowlands in a couple of years.

New Jersey has a lot to lose. Despite Atlantic Citys ongoing troubles, the casinos are still relative goldmines for the state. The resort town generates nearly 20% of its tourism dollars, according to the Casino Association of New Jersey. Every year, casinos pay $500 million in wages to employees, and last year, New Jerseys casinos, sportsbooks, internet gaming apps and racetracks paid $486 million in taxes, a 44% increase over 2020.

To get a sense of how a Manhattan casino might siphon gambling revenue away from the Garden State, look no further than mobile sports betting. In February, a month after New York launched mobile wagering on sports, New Jerseys sports betting revenue was an anemic $31 million, a 33% drop compared to February 2021. Through August, year-to-date sports betting revenues in New Jersey have seen double-digit declines.

Theres a spot-on chance that New Jersey will allow at least one casino upstate to protect its tax revenue, says gaming lobbyist Bill Pascrell IIIor else Atlantic Citys gonna sink.

Bill Pascrell III, a partner at Princeton Public Affairs Group, a New Jersey-based lobbying firm focused on gaming, says theres a spot-on chance that New Jersey will allow at least one casino upstate to protect its tax revenue. He thinks when New York opens its downstate casinos, there will be enough economic leverage to convince voters and stakeholders that a casino in North Jersey is necessary, or else Atlantic City's gonna sink.

Pascrell believes theres enough political and voter support to get a new ballot measure passed. He claims that New Jersey Gov. Phil Murphy supports the idea, but the Governors office would not comment when asked if he supports a ballot measure to allow for casinos outside of Atlantic City.

Dennis Drazin, the chairman and CEO of Monmouth Park racetrack in Oceanport, New Jerseyabout an hour south of New York Citysays that nothing would make him happier than opening a casino on his grounds. Caesars already operates a sportsbook on the first floor of the Monmouth Grandstand, Drazin notes, so it would be a natural extension to add slots and table games. He also believes that New Jersey has no other choice. It represents a significant risk to Jersey if New York opens, he says, and we dont do something to respond to make sure the business stays here.

Meanwhile, the casinos in Atlantic City say they arent scared of New York. Mark Giannantonio, the president and CEO of Resorts Casino Hotel on The Boardwalk, doesnt think adding more casinos in North Jersey is the answer.

While New York downstate casinos will add more competition, says Giannantonio, who is also the president of the Casino Association of New Jersey, it is essential for all New Jersey stakeholders to focus our efforts on the ongoing revitalization of Atlantic City into a top destination resort in the country.

New Jersey State Sen. Vincent Polistina, a Republican who represents Atlantic City, believes there is no reason to consider allowing casinos outside of his district. The state should not even hold discussions regarding North Jersey casinos right now, Polistina says. We have challenges in Atlantic City that we must address with a renewed commitment to reinvestment and redevelopment over the next few years in order to deal with increased competition from New York.

Yet, newcomers to Atlantic City see a future outside the seaside citys borders. Soo Kim, the founder of New York-based hedge fund Standard General, which owns a 22% stake in Ballys, says a big part of his firms bet when it bought the Ballys casino hotel in Atlantic City for $25 million in 2020 has nothing to do with the South Jersey casino town.

This is a play beyond just Atlantic City, Kim told Forbes. AC is going to have challenges. Its already a challenging market with the additional casino that opened in Philly and with New York opening, its going to be hurting even further.

Kim thinks the natural solution is for New Jersey to allow for a casino in the Meadowlands, which he affectionately refers to as the swamp.

Even though Hard Rock International is applying for a casino license in New York City, chairman Jim Allen told the Associated Press that it is still eyeing New Jersey. Back in 2013, Hard Rock bought a stake in Gurals Meadowlands racetrack and in 2015 the company proposed a plan to bring a casino to the thoroughbred site just across the Hudson River from Manhattan.

Im not saying we would drop a Meadowlands option, Allen told the AP in February. Theres certainly the ability to have more than one product in a geographic area, as weve done many times in our industry.

Even though a casino in North Jersey could be a great defense against New York, Colin Mansfield, an analyst at Fitch Ratings, says the ballot measure loss in 2016 will make a revived effort to pass a new measure a long, bitter fight.

At the end of the day, that casino will still cannibalize Atlantic City, says Mansfield. It depends on who owns that casino and how much ultimately is siphoned away from Atlantic City. Its very, very complex question.

Read the original:

How New Jersey Will Double Down On Gambling If Casinos Come To New York City - Forbes

How Cryptocurrency Casinos Are Shaping the Future of Gambling – Novinite.com

Gambling has evolved through the years. It grew from local bets among friends and neighbors to large-scale casino bets. We now have online gambling, which is also evolving with every Fintech improvement.

Online gambling has grown with every eCommerce transition. We moved from making cash payments at casino cash offices and bank tellers to making eWallet transactions through mobile banking and other online financial institutions. The world has moved to cryptocurrencies and other decentralized payment options. It is only natural that online gambling moves with this decentralized trend. Let's explore crypto casinos and how they would change future gambling systems.

Bitcoin Casinos like those found on cryptocasinos.net are online casinos that accept Bitcoin as their primary exchange currency. Bitcoin is the leading digital currency and the front-runner in decentralized transactions. It is not exactly surprising that it has become a popular exchange tender in online gambling.

Online casinos thrive on the convenience they provide their users compared to traditional casino setups. Where land-based casinos suffer from general challenges like geographical restrictions and payment limitations, online gambling is an effective way to avoid these challenges. However, Crypto casinos provide even more convenience than regular online casinos.

Bitcoin casinos paved the way for other crypto payments when Cloubdbet Casino debuted in 2013. Of course, it felt like a fool's errand and barely gained much traction in the first few years. Bitcoin as a payment method had similar challenges until it started to thrive in 2018. Recently, Bitcoin has been the popular payment option, and several land-based casinos have included Bitcoin in their payment method.

Cryptocurrency has taken root in our financial system, and despite its fluctuating value, it is one of the valuable payment options. Similarly, crypto casinos offer better benefits for the online gambler, and we will consider some of them below:

Registering in Crypto casinos is like registering with regular online casinos. The only distinction is that Crypto is a decentralized payment system and imposes lesser registration requirements than other online casinos. Here is a general way to sign up:

Select your preferred crypto casino by typing in their website address or downloading their mobile app.

The first screen should contain login and sign-up options. As a new player, your choice would be to sign up. But you can select login if you have a previous account with the gambling operator.

The registration screen contains a list of sign-in requirements. While Crypto casinos do not request much personal information, they need basic details before admitting a new player. Cryptocurrency casinos only request the player's name, email address, and password. Most casinos even let you register with a Username, email address, and password.

New players can start playing after this essential registration. However, the player needs to provide further details and verify their email address before they can withdraw their winnings.

Payment methods are essential in the casino setup. Most casinos enjoy huge patronage because their fast payout rate matches their other benefits like extensive game collection and enticing promotion. Cryptocurrency casinos provide these benefits, but their payment systems offer more ease than regular online casinos.

Crypto transactions run on a decentralized system involving multiple computers creating firewalls and seamless connections simultaneously. This interconnectivity makes crypto transactions faster than fiat payments.

Bitcoin casinos gained recognition for this fast payment and seamless payment. Their customers could complete their deposits in quick time, which was an improvement from the position with fiat payments. Crypto casino customers can make deposits from their crypto wallets like Binance or Tron Wallet, and their gaming wallets would reflect the transaction immediately. This speedy deposit was common with other online payment structures, but none of them could match the withdrawal speed.

Withdrawal to crypto wallets never exceeds 24 hours unless they have some technical challenges or errors. Some casinos have verified and endorsed crypto payments in less than 6 hours which is unlikely with fiat transactions.

Crypto Casino bonuses are like other traditional gaming bonuses. However, cryptocurrency casinos offer more bonus rates than other casinos. Crypto casinos provide regular welcome and reload bonuses. You can have Free Spins and bonus credits.

Most casinos offer their players sticky bonuses with strict wagering requirements. The bonus might be a 50% welcome bonus with 20x wagering requirements. Crypto Casinos offer similar bonuses and wagering requirements but with better rates. New players may receive up to 100% or 500% welcome bonuses at the same wagering requirements but also include betting credits and Free Spins. These unique bonuses make crypto casinos more rewarding than traditional casino operators.

Crypto casinos may run on different payment systems from traditional casinos, but they are similar in their features and interfaces. Most online casinos offer identical game ranges, including slot titles, poker, blackjack, and other table games. Standard promotions include VIP Status, welcome bonuses, and reload bonuses, but crypto casinos offer better options.

Crypto casinos include regular game options but also add some exclusive games. These exclusive games are Provably Fair games that only crypto casinos can provide. The games could be unique options like Crypto Dice that differ from BlackJack, Bacarrat, or Roulette.

The decentralized nature of Cryptocurrency casinos makes them a welcoming hub for gamblers worldwide. Bitcoin casinos are particularly enticing to players in locations with strict gambling restrictions. Local regulations often regulate access to gambling activities within their borders, which could become a challenge where the Legislation limits online casino activities. This local legislation usually applies to all casinos, but Crypto Casinos operate under fewer restrictions than their traditional counterparts.

However, even decentralized casinos may face stringent regulations. These regulations would require the casino to maintain local requirements, including geographical limitations, responsible gaming guidelines, and compliance with KYC requirements.

The Know Your Customer (KYC) requirements in most countries create structures for the Casinos to verify and identify their customer. The process only requires the player to provide their government-issued identification to verify basic details like their name, age, and address. The player can complete this process by uploading images of documents like their Drivers Licences and Utility bills.

Crypto casinos offer most of the convenience that punters want from their casinos. They also play vital roles in the transition to the next gambling evolution-Metaverse Gambling. These features do not mean that cryptocurrency casinos offer the ultimate gambling experience, but they are enough to usher us into what is to come.

Read more here:

How Cryptocurrency Casinos Are Shaping the Future of Gambling - Novinite.com

EvenBet Identifies Gambling Trends and Priorities in a New Report – GamblingNews.com

EvenBet Gaming, a leading software solutions provider for online businesses, released a new report, outlining some of the biggest trends and priorities for gambling operators and vendors within the industry.

The recent report, called the Hottest iGaming Trends, reveals trends and challenges identified by EvenBet Gamings content and marketing team via discussions with partners and operators during different events. The company compiled the answers into a report and vowed that this will not be the only such edition. Instead, EvenBet said that the white paper will undergo an update near the end of the year.

A key trend identified by respondents in the recent white paper for the third quarter of 2022 was crypto. Cryptocurrency, crypto payment options and other crypto-related topics were identified as the most mentioned iGaming trend in Q3 2022 by participants in the white paper. According to the recent report, the global crypto population hit nearly 300 million as of December 2021, marking a staggering increase of 178%.

Additionally, EvenBets white paper identified that the crypto growth continues further this year. Service providers and vendors mentioned crypto more than operators. At the same time, the study identified that although the gambling industry is adaptive, banking has increasingly become more difficult.

Maybe, the crypto will be going to save the industry in a few years,

Although crypto was identified as a trend, it wasnt a priority for the respondents that participate in the white paper. Growth within new markets, as well as expanding presence within existing markets were identified as main priorities for operators and vendors within the industry.

Regulated markets are the future, but regulation delays innovation because we have to look at the different demands,

While growth was identified as a priority, the second-most mentioned trend was the increasing regulation within different jurisdictions. Both operators and vendors identified this trend as increasingly important. With that in mind, the report pointed out that while regulation is important, it can delay innovation.

Everybody is looking out of Europe,

Focusing on growth and expansion to new jurisdictions, participants in the latest report identified Europe as the least desired location. Vendors as well as operators pointed out that the markets that hold significant iGaming growth potential are Asia, Latin America, as well as North America, but almost never Europe.

Read more:

EvenBet Identifies Gambling Trends and Priorities in a New Report - GamblingNews.com

Over 37000 people in Latvia have banned themselves from gambling – Eng.Lsm.lv

In less than three years since the register of self-withdrawn persons has been in place in Latvia, more than 37 thousand people have voluntarily refused access to gambling and lotteries. The minimum closing date is one year, and 13 thousand people are past it. This means that a total of 24 thousand people are currently in the register. Almost 97% of those on the register are men, said Signe Birne, head of the Lotteries and Gambling Monitoring Inspectorate. According to her, the register works well and this level should continue to be maintained.

I believe it is a good indicator and people are taking advantage of this given opportunity, Birne said. The risk of gambling addiction remains very high in Latvia: three years ago, a study carried out by the Ministry of Health shows that 6% or 79 thousand people in Latvia are at risk of gambling addiction, while 16 thousand have a heavy dependency.

Although no accounts have been made for how many Latvian residents gamble, the associate professor of Rga Stradi University, Anda vte-Urtne, said conclusions can be made regardless.

For example, there is no smoking register in Latvia, and there will probably never be one, but that is why nationally representative studies are carried out. We know that about a third of Latvia's population is smoking. I have just looked at a previous, 2019 study, which concludes that half of Latvia's population has gambled once. And once a month, regular players, are12.5% of adults. We know the numbers, vte-Urtne said.

The researcher calls the self-withdrawn register a lifesaver, but it is not enough.

The register cannot be the only activity. There is always a need for a package of measures. The scientific literature contains four of these complexes. Neither of those methods is perfect, and the register will save us, too, but it's a good, thick slice of Swiss cheese that has holes. But they have to be put atop one another, in addition to everything that is already being done in Latvia, said vte-Urtne.

During an expert discussion on Tuesday, a number of proposals were made to improve the register, like shortening the minimum period of self-withdrawal, setting the minimum age of gambling at 21, and develop a joint register for the Baltic.

Select text and press Ctrl+Enter to send a suggested correction to the editor

Select text and press Report a mistake to send a suggested correction to the editor

Tell us about a mistake

Read more here:

Over 37000 people in Latvia have banned themselves from gambling - Eng.Lsm.lv

International Space Station: Facts about the orbital lab | Space

The International Space Station (ISS) is a multi-nation construction project that is the largest single structure humans ever put into space. Its main construction was completed between 1998 and 2011, although the station continually evolves to include new missions and experiments. It has been continuously occupied since Nov. 2, 2000.

The ISS is not owned by one single nation and is a "co-operative programme" between Europe, the United States, Russia, Canada and Japan, according to the European Space Agency (ESA). The International Space Station costs about $3 billion per year for NASA to operate, roughly a third of the human spaceflight budget, according to (opens in new tab) the agency's office of the inspector general.

Elizabeth Howell (Ph.D.) has been tracking the International Space Station program since the first module was launched. She covers all aspects of spacefight, including ISS launches, missions and spacewalks.

As of May 2022, 258 individuals from 20 countries (opens in new tab) have visited the International Space Station. The top participating countries include the United States (158 people) and Russia (54 people). Astronaut time and research time on the space station are allocated to space agencies according to how much money or resources (such as modules or robotics) they contribute.

The ISS includes contributions from 15 nations. NASA (United States), Roscosmos (Russia) and the European Space Agency are the major partners of the space station who contribute most of the funding; the other partners are the Japanese Aerospace Exploration Agency and the Canadian Space Agency. Through a private company called Axiom Space, private astronauts are starting to work on the orbiting complex, from time to time; additionally, astronauts from other nations such as the United Arab Emirates do fly occasionally to the ISS.

Related: International Space Station: Live updates

Current plans call for the space station to be operated through at least 2024, with the partners discussing a possible extension. NASA has approved an extension to 2030, although Russia says it will withdraw after 2024 to focus on building its own space station around 2028. How the station will be operated after Russia's departure has not yet been determined. After 2030, plans for the International Space Station are not clearly laid out either. It could be deorbited, or recycled for future commercial space stations in orbit.

Crews aboard the ISS are assisted by mission control centers in Houston and Moscow and a payload control center in Huntsville, Ala. Other international mission control centers support the space station from Japan, Canada and Europe. Elements of the ISS are controlled from mission control centers in Houston or Moscow.

Russia is a major partner in the International Space Station, but that relationship is changing. In February 2022, Russia undertook an internationally condemned invasion of Ukraine. As a result, numerous international space partnerships were dissolved. Russia, the United States and the other ISS partners do continue to operate the space station as normal, for now, NASA has emphasized.

In July 2022, Russia announced it would withdraw from the ISS after 2024. Its goals, Roscosmos said, are to build a new Russian Orbital Space Station around 2028 or so. The withdrawal will be gradual and the international partners are in discussions about the transition.

The ISS cannot be separated into independent Russia and United States sections as the complex is interdependent. NASA has said (opens in new tab)the U.S. supplies power, while the Russians control major propulsion maneuvers. It may be possible to independently raise the orbit of the ISS through U.S. spacecraft, which NASA and its partners are testing.

The ISS does require such maneuvers to avoid falling into the Earth's atmosphere and dodging orbital space debris. Russia conducted an anti-satellite missile test in November 2021 that has seen debris come close to the ISS orbit and require the crews to shelter in place; at the time, NASA and the United States expressed displeasure with the situation.

The International Space Station location is in orbit around the Earth, at an average altitude of 248 miles (400 kilometers). It circles the globe every 90 minutes at a speed of about 17,500 mph (28,000 km/h). In one day, the station travels about the distance it would take to go from Earth to the moon and back.

The International Space Station at night is highly visible from Earth, appearing as a luminous moving point of light and rivaling the brilliant planet Venus in brightness. It can be seen from Earth without the use of a telescope by night sky observers who know when and where to look.

You can also take pictures of the International Space Station with the right equipment; our guide takes you through how to photograph the ISS. For more information on International Space Station trackers to see and track the space station, check out our guide.

Related: This International Space Station VR experience lets you explore the ISS and its as amazing as it sounds

There is typically an international crew of seven people that live and work inside the ISS. However, during the changeover of crew members, this number can vary; for example, in 2009, 13 crew members visited the ISS. This is also the record for the most people in space at one time. Occasionally, private missions such as those from Axiom Space bring non-professional astronauts on board the space station, too.

Typically, astronauts travel to the space station via SpaceX's Crew Dragon capsule or, in the case of Russian cosmonauts, a Russian Soyuz capsule. The Soyuz was the primary form of transportation for all astronauts and cosmonauts after NASAs space shuttle program retired in 2011. Crew Dragon began flying people starting with the Demo-2 mission that launched on May 30, 2020. Boeing's Starliner is preparing for launching humans after it's successful uncrewed Orbital Flight Test 2 (OFT-2) in 2022.

Once at the station, astronauts will typically spend a mission period of around six months conducting various science experiments and maintaining and repairing the ISS. Outside of work, astronauts will spend at least two hours on exercise and personal care. They also occasionally perform spacewalks, conduct media/school events for outreach, and post updates to social media. The first astronaut to tweet from space was Mike Massimino, who did it from a space shuttle in May 2009.

Bedrooms in the ISS typically include small bunk beds. The astronauts tether themselves to a wall or allow themselves to freely float in the small space, depending on their preference. Crews temporarily visiting for just a few days may sleep in their spaceship or in a spare spot on the station, which is allowed as long as they tether themselves in space.

The ISS is a platform for long-term research for human health, which NASA bills as a key stepping stone to letting humans explore other solar system destinations such as the moon or Mars.

Related: First 'Guardian' in space: NASA astronaut on ISS enters Space Force

Human bodies change in microgravity, including alterations to muscles, bones, the cardiovascular system and the eyes; many scientific investigations are trying to characterize how severe the changes are and whether they can be reversed. Astronauts also participate in testing out products such as an espresso machine or 3D printers or doing biological experiments, such as on rodents or plants, which the astronauts can grow and sometimes eat in space. As the only microgravity laboratory in existence, the ISS has facilitated more than 3,600 researchers to conduct more than 2,500 experiments to date.

Astronauts only have limited spare time in space, but they use it for activities like looking out the window, talking with friends and family, taking pictures or doing hobbies like playing instruments or sewing. One astronaut, Mark Kelly, once donned a gorilla suit on the ISS in 2016 as a practical joke on ground controllers.

Crews are not only responsible for science, but also for maintaining the station. Sometimes, this requires that they venture on spacewalks to perform repairs. From time to time, these repairs can be urgent such as when a part of the ammonia system fails, which has happened a couple of times. Spacewalk safety procedures were changed after a potentially deadly 2013 incident when astronaut Luca Parmitano's helmet filled with water while he was working outside the station.

NASA now responds quickly to "water incursion" incidents. It also has added pads to the spacesuits to soak up the liquid, and a tube to provide an alternate breathing location should the helmet fill with water. In May 2022, NASA suspended spacewalks again following another water incursion incident, which is still being investigated; Russian Orlan spacewalks are still continuing as that is an independently manufactured spacesuit.

NASA has produced several machines to reduce the need for spacewalks, including the humanoid Robonaut 2. The dexterous machine joined the ISS crew back in 2011, however, after discovering a fault in the machine, Robonaut 2 was sent home to Earth in 2018, for repairs. Also, onboard the ISS are several external robotic arms that can tackle maintenance issues remotely, such as the Special Purpose Dexterous Manipulator (SPDM) also known as Dextre and the Canadarm2 (a 57.7-foot-long robotic arm). A European Robotic Arm on the Russian segment will be the third large operational arm on the space station following the end of its installation and commissioning, which is ongoing in 2022.

Related: How to photograph the ISS

The space station, including its large solar arrays, spans the area of a U.S. football field, including the end zones, and has a mass of 925,335 lbs. (419,725 kilograms), not including visiting vehicles. The complex now has more livable room than a conventional 6-bedroom house and has 2 bathrooms, gym facilities and a 360-degree bay window. Astronauts have also compared the space station's living space to the cabin of a Boeing 747 jumbo jet.

The International Space Station was taken into space piece-by-piece and gradually built in orbit using spacewalking astronauts and robotics. Most missions used NASA's space shuttle to carry up the heavier pieces, although some individual modules were launched on single-use rockets. The ISS includes modules and connecting nodes that contain living quarters and laboratories, as well as exterior trusses that provide structural support, and solar panels that provide power.

Related: International Space Station at 20: A Photo Tour

The first module, the Russia Zarya, launched on Nov. 20, 1998, on a Proton rocket. Two weeks later, space shuttle flight STS-88 launched the NASA Unity/Node 1 module. Astronauts performed spacewalks during STS-88 to connect the two parts of the station together; later, other pieces of the station were launched on rockets or in the space shuttle cargo bay. Some of the other major modules and components include:

Besides the space shuttle and Soyuz, the space station has been visited by many other kinds of spacecraft. Uncrewed Progress (Russia) vehicles make regular visits to the station. Europe's Automated Transfer Vehicle and Japan's H-II Transfer Vehicle used to do visits to the ISS as well until their programs were retired.

NASA began developing commercial cargo spacecraft for the space station under the Commercial Orbital Transportation Services program, which lasted from 2006 to 2013. Starting in 2012, the first commercial spacecraft, SpaceX's Dragon, made a visit to the space station. Visits continue today with Dragon and Northrop Grumman's Cygnus spacecraft under NASA's Commercial Resupply Services program. Boeing is developing its Starliner for future human visits, too.

The ISS has had several notable milestones over the years, when it comes to crews:

You can discover more about the ISS with this Haynes manual (opens in new tab) and through the eyes of the astronaut who lived there a year: Scott Kelly. Endurance: A Year in Space, a Lifetime of Discovery (opens in new tab).

If you want to feel like you are living on the ISS yourself, look out the window of the ISS with this amazing visual guide: Interior Space: A Visual Exploration of the International Space Station: Photographs by Paolo Nespoli & Roland Mille (opens in new tab).

European Space Agency. About the International Space Station. https://www.esa.int/Science_Exploration/Human_and_Robotic_Exploration/International_Space_Station/About_the_International_Space_Station (opens in new tab)

Kennedy Space Center Visitor Complex Blog. (2020, Oct. 23). The 20 Most Frequently Asked Questions About the International Space Station. https://www.kennedyspacecenter.com/blog/the-20-most-frequently-asked-questions-about-the-international-space-station (opens in new tab)

Garcia, Mark. (2021, Dec. 14.) International Space Station: Space Station Assembly. https://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/station/structure/elements/space-station-assembly (opens in new tab)

Garcia, Mark. (2022, March 30). NASA Station Astronaut Record Holders. NASA. https://www.nasa.gov/feature/nasa-station-astronaut-record-holders (opens in new tab)

Garcia, Mark. (2022, Aug. 9.) International Space Station. NASA. https://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/station/main/index.html (opens in new tab)

Go here to read the rest:

International Space Station: Facts about the orbital lab | Space

Four astronauts return to Earth after nearly 6 months on the Space Station – NPR

The SpaceX Crew Dragon Freedom capsule splashes down Friday in the Atlantic Ocean off Florida in a return trip from the International Space Station. Bill Ingalls/NASA via AP hide caption

The SpaceX Crew Dragon Freedom capsule splashes down Friday in the Atlantic Ocean off Florida in a return trip from the International Space Station.

CAPE CANAVERAL, Fla. Four astronauts returned to Earth in a SpaceX capsule Friday, ending their nearly six-month space station mission with a splashdown in the Atlantic off Florida.

Wet and windy weather across Florida delayed their homecoming. SpaceX and NASA finally gave the all-clear on Friday, and the three Americans and one Italian departed the International Space Station, their residence since April.

The capsule parachuted into the ocean, just off Jacksonville, Florida, about five hours after it left the space station. It carried NASA astronauts Kjell Lindgren, Bob Hines and Jessica Watkins, the first Black woman to complete a long-term spaceflight, and the European Space Agency's Samantha Cristoforetti. SpaceX delivered their replacements last week.

Before checking out, the astronauts said they couldn't wait to have a cold drink with ice, eat some pizza and ice cream, take a shower, revel in nature and, of course, reunite with their families. NASA planned to hustle them to Houston once they were off SpaceX's recovery ship and back on solid ground.

"Getting the first few hugs when we get back is really going to be awesome," Hines told reporters earlier in the week.

Remaining aboard the space station are three Americans, three Russians and one Japanese.

The rest is here:

Four astronauts return to Earth after nearly 6 months on the Space Station - NPR

List of International Space Station expeditions – Wikipedia

ExpeditionPatchCrewArrivalDepartureDuration(days)DateFlightDateFlightExpedition 1 William Shepherd Sergei Krikalev Yuri Gidzenko31 October 2000,07:52 UTCSoyuz TM-3121 March 200107:33 UTCSTS-102141Expedition 2 Yury Usachov James S. Voss Susan Helms8 March 200111:42 UTCSTS-10222 August 200119:24 UTCSTS-105167.28Expedition 3 Frank L. Culbertson Jr. Mikhail Tyurin Vladimir Dezhurov10 August 200121:10 UTCSTS-10517 December 200117:56 UTCSTS-108128.86Expedition 4 Yury Onufriyenko Carl E. Walz Daniel W. Bursch5 December 200122:19 UTCSTS-10819 June 200209:57 UTCSTS-111195.82Expedition 5 Valery Korzun Sergei Treshchov Peggy Whitson5 June 200221:22 UTCSTS-1117 December 200219:37 UTCSTS-113184.93Expedition 6 Ken Bowersox Donald Pettit Nikolai Budarin24 November 200200:49 UTCSTS-1134 May 200302:04 UTCSoyuz TMA-1161.05Expedition 7 Yuri Malenchenko Ed Lu26 April 200303:53 UTCSoyuz TMA-228 October 200302:40 UTCSoyuz TMA-2184.93Expedition 8 Michael Foale Aleksandr Kaleri18 October 200305:38 UTCSoyuz TMA-330 April 200400:11 UTCSoyuz TMA-3194.77Expedition 9 Gennady Padalka Michael Fincke19 April 200403:19 UTCSoyuz TMA-424 October 200400:32 UTCSoyuz TMA-4185.66Expedition 10 Leroy Chiao Salizhan Sharipov24 October 200403:06 UTCSoyuz TMA-524 April 200522:08 UTCSoyuz TMA-5192.79Expedition 11 Sergei Krikalev John L. Phillips15 April 200500:46 UTCSoyuz TMA-611 October 200501:09 UTCSoyuz TMA-6179.02Expedition 12 William S. McArthur Valeri Tokarev1 October 200503:54 UTCSoyuz TMA-78 April 200623:48 UTCSoyuz TMA-7189.01Expedition 13 Pavel Vinogradov Jeffrey Williams30 March 200602:30 UTCSoyuz TMA-828 September 200601:13 UTCSoyuz TMA-8182.65 Thomas Reiter4 July 200618:38 UTCSTS-121Transferred to Expedition 14Expedition 14 Michael Lpez-Alegra Mikhail Tyurin18 September 200604:09 UTCSoyuz TMA-921 April 200712:31 UTCSoyuz TMA-9215.35 Thomas ReiterTransferred from Expedition 1321 December 200622:32 UTCSTS-116171.16 Sunita Williams10 December 200601:47 UTCSTS-116Transferred to Expedition 15Expedition 15 Fyodor Yurchikhin Oleg Kotov7 April 200717:31 UTCSoyuz TMA-1021 October 200710:36 UTCSoyuz TMA-10196.71 Sunita WilliamsTransferred from Expedition 1422 June 200719:49 UTCSTS-117194.75 Clayton Anderson8 June 200723:38 UTCSTS-117Transferred to Expedition 16Expedition 16 Peggy Whitson Yuri Malenchenko10 October 200713:22 UTCSoyuz TMA-1119 April 200808:30 UTCSoyuz TMA-11191.80 Clayton AndersonTransferred from Expedition 157 November 200718:01 UTCSTS-120151.77 Daniel M. Tani23 October 200715:38 UTCSTS-12020 February 200814:07 UTCSTS-122119.94 Lopold Eyharts7 February 200819:45 UTCSTS-12227 March 200806:28 UTCSTS-12348.55 Garrett Reisman11 March 200806:28 UTCSTS-123Transferred to Expedition 17Expedition 17 Sergey Volkov Oleg Kononenko8 April 200811:16 UTCSoyuz TMA-1224 October 200803:37 UTCSoyuz TMA-12198.68 Garrett ReismanTransferred from Expedition 1614 June 200815:16 UTCSTS-12495.37 Gregory Chamitoff31 May 200821:02 UTCSTS-124Transferred to Expedition 18Expedition 18 Michael Fincke Yury Lonchakov12 October 200807:01 UTCSoyuz TMA-138 April 200907:16 UTCSoyuz TMA-13178.01 Gregory ChamitoffTransferred from Expedition 1730 November 200821:25 UTCSTS-126183.02 Sandra Magnus15 November 200800:55 UTCSTS-12628 March 200919:13 UTCSTS-119133.76 Koichi Wakata15 March 200923:43 UTCSTS-119Transferred to Expedition 19Expedition 19 Gennady Padalka Michael Barratt26 March 200911:49 UTCSoyuz TMA-14Transferred to Expedition 20 Koichi WakataTransferred from Expedition 18Expedition 20 Gennady Padalka Michael BarrattTransferred from Expedition 1911 October 200904:32 UTCSoyuz TMA-14198.70 Koichi Wakata31 July 200914:48 UTCSTS-127144.62 Timothy Kopra15 July 200922:03 UTCSTS-12712 September 200900:53 UTCSTS-12858.12 Frank De Winne Roman Romanenko Robert Thirsk27 May 200910:34 UTCSoyuz TMA-15Transferred to Expedition 21 Nicole Stott29 August 200903:59 UTCSTS-128Expedition 21 Frank De Winne Roman Romanenko Robert ThirskTransferred from Expedition 201 December 200907:16 UTCSoyuz TMA-15187.86 Nicole Stott27 November 200914:44 UTCSTS-12990.45 Jeffrey Williams Maksim Surayev30 September 200907:14 UTCSoyuz TMA-16Transferred to Expedition 22Expedition 22 Jeffrey Williams Maksim SurayevTransferred from Expedition 2118 March 201011:24 UTCSoyuz TMA-16169.04 Oleg Kotov Timothy Creamer Soichi Noguchi20 December 200921:52 UTCSoyuz TMA-17Transferred to Expedition 23Expedition 23 Oleg Kotov Timothy Creamer Soichi NoguchiTransferred from Expedition 222 June 201003:25 UTCSoyuz TMA-17163.23 Aleksandr Skvortsov Mikhail Kornienko Tracy Caldwell Dyson2 April 201004:05 UTCSoyuz TMA-18Transferred to Expedition 24Expedition 24 Aleksandr Skvortsov Mikhail Kornienko Tracy Caldwell DysonTransferred from Expedition 2325 September 201005:23 UTCSoyuz TMA-18176.05 Douglas H. Wheelock Shannon Walker Fyodor Yurchikhin15 June 201021:35 UTCSoyuz TMA-19Transferred to Expedition 25Expedition 25 Douglas H. Wheelock Shannon Walker Fyodor YurchikhinTransferred from Expedition 2426 November 201004:46 UTCSoyuz TMA-19163.30 Scott Kelly Aleksandr Kaleri Oleg Skripochka7 October 201023:10 UTCSoyuz TMA-01MTransferred to Expedition 26Expedition 26 Scott Kelly Aleksandr Kaleri Oleg SkripochkaTransferred from Expedition 2516 March 201107:54 UTCSoyuz TMA-01M159.36 Dmitri Kondratyev Catherine Coleman Paolo Nespoli15 December 201019:09 UTCSoyuz TMA-20Transferred to Expedition 27Expedition 27 Dmitri Kondratyev Catherine Coleman Paolo NespoliTransferred from Expedition 2624 May 201102:27 UTCSoyuz TMA-20160.10 Andrei Borisenko Aleksandr Samokutyayev Ronald J. Garan Jr.4 April 201122:18 UTCSoyuz TMA-21Transferred to Expedition 28Expedition 28 Andrei Borisenko Aleksandr Samokutyayev Ronald J. Garan Jr.Transferred from Expedition 2716 September 201100:38 UTCSoyuz TMA-21164.10 Michael E. Fossum Sergey Volkov Satoshi Furukawa7 June 201120:12 UTCSoyuz TMA-02MTransferred to Expedition 29Expedition 29 Michael E. Fossum Sergey Volkov Satoshi FurukawaTransferred from Expedition 2822 November 201102:26 UTCSoyuz TMA-02M167.26 Daniel C. Burbank Anton Shkaplerov Anatoli Ivanishin14 November 201104:14 UTCSoyuz TMA-22Transferred to Expedition 30Expedition 30 Daniel C. Burbank Anton Shkaplerov Anatoli IvanishinTransferred from Expedition 2927 April 201211:45 UTCSoyuz TMA-22165.31 Oleg Kononenko Donald Pettit Andr Kuipers21 December 201113:16 UTCSoyuz TMA-03MTransferred to Expedition 31Expedition 31 Oleg Kononenko Donald Pettit Andr KuipersTransferred from Expedition 301 July 201208:14 UTCSoyuz TMA-03M192.83 Gennady Padalka Sergei Revin Joseph M. Acaba15 May 201203:01 UTCSoyuz TMA-04MTransferred to Expedition 32Expedition 32 Gennady Padalka Sergei Revin Joseph M. AcabaTransferred from Expedition 3117 September 201202:53 UTCSoyuz TMA-04M124.99 Sunita Williams Yuri Malenchenko Akihiko Hoshide15 July 201202:40 UTCSoyuz TMA-05MTransferred to Expedition 33Expedition 33 Sunita Williams Yuri Malenchenko Akihiko HoshideTransferred from Expedition 3219 November 201201:56 UTCSoyuz TMA-05M126.97 Kevin A. Ford Oleg Novitsky Evgeny Tarelkin23 October 201210:51 UTCSoyuz TMA-06MTransferred to Expedition 34Expedition 34 Kevin A. Ford Oleg Novitsky Evgeny TarelkinTransferred from Expedition 3315 March 201303:06 UTCSoyuz TMA-06M143.18 Chris Hadfield Roman Romanenko Thomas Marshburn19 December 201211:12 UTCSoyuz TMA-07MTransferred to Expedition 35Expedition 35 Chris Hadfield Roman Romanenko Thomas MarshburnTransferred from Expedition 3414 May 201303:31 UTCSoyuz TMA-07M145.64 Pavel Vinogradov Alexander Misurkin Christopher Cassidy28 March 201320:43 UTCSoyuz TMA-08MTransferred to Expedition 36Expedition 36 Pavel Vinogradov Alexander Misurkin Christopher CassidyTransferred from Expedition 3511 September 201302:58 UTCSoyuz TMA-08M166.25 Fyodor Yurchikhin Karen Nyberg Luca Parmitano28 May 201320:31 UTCSoyuz TMA-09MTransferred to Expedition 37Expedition 37 Fyodor Yurchikhin Karen Nyberg Luca ParmitanoTransferred from Expedition 3611 November 201302:49 UTCSoyuz TMA-09M166.25 Oleg Kotov Sergey Ryazansky Michael S. Hopkins25 September 201320:58 UTCSoyuz TMA-10MTransferred to Expedition 38Expedition 38 Oleg Kotov Sergey Ryazansky Michael S. HopkinsTransferred from Expedition 3711 March 201403:24 UTCSoyuz TMA-10M166.25 Koichi Wakata Mikhail Tyurin Richard Mastracchio6 November 201304:14 UTCSoyuz TMA-11MTransferred to Expedition 39Expedition 39 Koichi Wakata Mikhail Tyurin Richard MastracchioTransferred from Expedition 3814 May 201401:58 UTCSoyuz TMA-11M187.91 Aleksandr Skvortsov Oleg Artemyev Steven Swanson25 March 201421:17 UTCSoyuz TMA-12MTransferred to Expedition 40Expedition 40 Steven Swanson Aleksandr Skvortsov Oleg ArtemyevTransferred from Expedition 3911 September 201402:23 UTCSoyuz TMA-12M169.20 Gregory R. Wiseman Maksim Surayev Alexander Gerst28 May 201419:57 UTCSoyuz TMA-13MTransferred to Expedition 41Expedition 41 Maksim Surayev Gregory R. Wiseman Alexander GerstTransferred from Expedition 4010 November 201403:58 UTCSoyuz TMA-13M165.33 Aleksandr Samokutyayev Yelena Serova Barry E. Wilmore25 September 201420:25 UTCSoyuz TMA-14MTransferred to Expedition 42Expedition 42 Barry E. Wilmore Aleksandr Samokutyayev Yelena SerovaTransferred from Expedition 4112 March 201502:07 UTCSoyuz TMA-14M167.25 Anton Shkaplerov Samantha Cristoforetti Terry W. Virts23 November 201421:01 UTCSoyuz TMA-15MTransferred to Expedition 43Expedition 43 Terry W. Virts Anton Shkaplerov Samantha CristoforettiTransferred from Expedition 4211 June 201513:44 UTC[2][3]Soyuz TMA-15M199.70 Gennady Padalka27 March 201519:42 UTCSoyuz TMA-16MTransferred to Expedition 44 Mikhail Kornienko Scott KellyTransferred to Expeditions 44, 45 and 46one year mission Expedition 44 Gennady PadalkaTransferred from Expedition 4312 September 201500:51 UTC[4]Soyuz TMA-16M169 Mikhail Kornienko Scott KellyTransferred to Expedition 45 and 46one year mission Oleg Kononenko Kimiya Yui Kjell N. Lindgren22 July 201521:02 UTC[5]Soyuz TMA-17MTransferred to Expedition 45Expedition 45 Scott Kelly Mikhail KornienkoTransferred from Expedition 44Transferred to Expedition 46one year mission Oleg Kononenko Kimiya Yui Kjell N. Lindgren11 December 201513:12 UTCSoyuz TMA-17M141.66 Sergey Volkov2 September 201504:37 UTCSoyuz TMA-18MTransferred to Expedition 46Expedition 46 Scott Kelly Mikhail KornienkoTransferred from Expedition 452 March 201604:25:27 UTCSoyuz TMA-18M340 [note 1][6] Sergey Volkov181 [note 2] Yuri Malenchenko Tim Peake Timothy Kopra15 December 201511:03 UTCSoyuz TMA-19MTransferred to Expedition 47Expedition 47 Timothy Kopra Tim Peake Yuri MalenchenkoTransferred from Expedition 4618 June 201609:15 UTC[7]Soyuz TMA-19M185.91 Aleksey Ovchinin Oleg Skripochka Jeffrey Williams18 March 201621:26:38 UTCSoyuz TMA-20MTransferred to Expedition 48Expedition 48 Jeffrey Williams Oleg Skripochka Aleksey OvchininTransferred from Expedition 477 September 201601:13 UTC[8]Soyuz TMA-20M172[9] Anatoli Ivanishin Takuya Onishi Kathleen Rubins7 July 201601:36 UTC[10]Soyuz MS-01Transferred to Expedition 49Expedition 49 Anatoli Ivanishin Takuya Onishi Kathleen RubinsTransferred from Expedition 4830 October 201603:58 UTC[11]Soyuz MS-01115 Shane Kimbrough Andrei Borisenko Sergey Ryzhikov19 October 201608:05 UTC[12]Soyuz MS-02Transferred to Expedition 50Expedition 50 Shane Kimbrough Andrei Borisenko Sergey RyzhikovTransferred from Expedition 4910 April 201711:20 UTCSoyuz MS-02173 Peggy Whitson Oleg Novitskiy Thomas Pesquet17 November 201620:17 UTCSoyuz MS-03Transferred to Expedition 51Expedition 51 Oleg Novitsky Thomas PesquetTransferred from Expedition 502 June 201714:10 UTCSoyuz MS-03196.72 Peggy WhitsonTransferred to Expedition 52 Fyodor Yurchikhin Jack D. Fischer20 April 201707:13 UTCSoyuz MS-04Expedition 52 Fyodor Yurchikhin Jack D. FischerTransferred from Expedition 513 September 201701:22 UTCSoyuz MS-04[13]135.3 Peggy Whitson289.1 [note 3][14] Randolph Bresnik Paolo Nespoli Sergey Ryazansky28 July 201715:41 UTCSoyuz MS-05Transferred to Expedition 53Expedition 53 Randolph Bresnik Paolo Nespoli Sergey RyazanskyTransferred from Expedition 5214 December 201708:38 UTC[15]Soyuz MS-05139 Alexander Misurkin Mark T. Vande Hei Joseph M. Acaba12 September 201721:17 UTCSoyuz MS-06Transferred to Expedition 54Expedition 54 Alexander Misurkin Mark T. Vande Hei Joseph M. AcabaTransferred from Expedition 5328 February 201802:31 UTCSoyuz MS-06168 Anton Shkaplerov Scott D. Tingle Norishige Kanai17 December 201707:21 UTCSoyuz MS-07Transferred to Expedition 55Expedition 55 Anton Shkaplerov Scott D. Tingle Norishige KanaiTransferred from Expedition 543 June 201812:39 UTCSoyuz MS-07168 Andrew J. Feustel Oleg Artemyev Richard R. Arnold21 March 201817:44 UTC[16]Soyuz MS-08Transferred to Expedition 56Expedition 56 Andrew J. Feustel Oleg Artemyev Richard R. ArnoldTransferred from Expedition 554 October 201811:44:45 UTC[17]Soyuz MS-08196 Alexander Gerst Sergey Prokopyev Serena Aun-Chancellor6 June 201811:12 UTCSoyuz MS-09Transferred to Expedition 57Expedition 57 Alexander Gerst Sergey Prokopyev Serena Aun-ChancellorTransferred from Expedition 5620 December 201805:02 UTCSoyuz MS-09197 Oleg Kononenko David Saint-Jacques Anne McClain3 December 201811:31 UTCSoyuz MS-11Transferred to Expedition 58Expedition 58 Oleg Kononenko David Saint-Jacques Anne McClainTransferred from Expedition 57Transferred to Expedition 59Expedition 59 Oleg Kononenko David Saint-Jacques Anne McClainTransferred from Expedition 5825 June 201902:47:50 UTC[18]Soyuz MS-11203 Aleksey Ovchinin Nick Hague Christina KochMarch 14, 201919:14 UTCSoyuz MS-12Transferred to Expedition 60Expedition 60 Aleksey Ovchinin Nick HagueTransferred from Expedition 593 October 201910:59 UTC[19]Soyuz MS-12202 Christina KochTransferred to Expedition 61 Aleksandr Skvortsov Luca Parmitano Andrew R. Morgan20 July 201916:28:21 UTC[20]Soyuz MS-13Expedition 61 Luca Parmitano Aleksandr SkvortsovTransferred from Expedition 606 February 202005:50 UTCSoyuz MS-13200 Christina Koch328 Andrew R. MorganTransferred to Expedition 62 Oleg Skripochka Jessica Meir25 September 201913:57:43 UTC[21]Soyuz MS-15Expedition 62 Oleg Skripochka Jessica MeirTransferred from Expedition 6117 April 202005:16 UTC[22]Soyuz MS-15205 Andrew R. Morgan272 Christopher Cassidy Anatoli Ivanishin Ivan Vagner9 April 202008:05 UTC[23]Soyuz MS-16Transferred to Expedition 63Expedition 63 Christopher Cassidy Anatoli Ivanishin Ivan VagnerTransferred from Expedition 6221 October 2020,23:32 UTC[24]Soyuz MS-16195 Doug Hurley Bob Behnken[25]30 May 2020,19:22:45 UTC[26]SpaceXCrew Dragon Demo-22 August 2020,18:48:06 UTC[27][28][29]SpaceXCrew Dragon Demo-264[30] Sergey Ryzhikov Sergey Kud-Sverchkov Kathleen Rubins14 October 2020,05:45:04 UTC[31][32]Soyuz MS-17Transferred to Expedition 64Expedition 64 Sergey Ryzhikov Sergey Kud-Sverchkov Kathleen RubinsTransferred from Expedition 63[33][34]17 April 2021,04:55 UTC[35]Soyuz MS-17185 Michael Hopkins Victor Glover Soichi Noguchi Shannon Walker16 November 2020,00:27:17 UTC[36]SpaceX Crew-1Transferred to Expedition 65[37] Oleg Novitsky Pyotr Dubrov Mark Vande Hei9 April 2021,07:42:41 UTC[38]Soyuz MS-18Expedition 65 Shannon Walker Michael Hopkins Victor Glover Soichi NoguchiTransferred from Expedition 64[37]2 May 2021 06:56:33 UTCSpaceX Crew-1167 Oleg Novitsky17 October 202101:14:05 UTCSoyuz MS-18190 Pyotr Dubrov Mark Vande HeiTransferred to Expedition 66 Akihiko Hoshide Shane Kimbrough K. Megan McArthur[note 4] Thomas Pesquet[note 5]23 April 202109:49:02 UTCSpaceX Crew-2 Anton Shkaplerov5 October 202108:55:02 UTCSoyuz MS-19Expedition 66 Thomas Pesquet[note 5] R. Shane Kimbrough K. Megan McArthur Akihiko HoshideTransferred from Expedition 659 November 202103:33 UTCSpaceX Crew-2199 Pyotr Dubrov Mark Vande Hei30 March 2022Soyuz MS-19355 Anton Shkaplerov[40]176 Raja Chari Thomas Marshburn Matthias Maurer Kayla Barron11 November 202102:03:30 UTCSpaceX Crew-3To be transferred to Expedition 67 Oleg Artemyev Denis Matveev Sergey Korsakov18 March 202215:55:18 UTCSoyuz MS-21Expedition 67 Thomas Marshburn Raja Chari Matthias Maurer Kayla BarronTransferred from Expedition 666 May 202204:43 UTCSpaceX Crew-3176 Oleg Artemyev[note 6][41] Denis Matveev Sergey Korsakov29 September 202210:57 UTCSoyuz MS-21194.5 Kjell Lindgren Bob Hines Samantha Cristoforetti[note 7] Jessica Watkins27 April 202207:52:55 UTCSpaceX Crew-4Will transfer to Expedition 68 Sergey Prokopyev Dmitriy Petelin Francisco Rubio21 September 202213:54 UTCSoyuz MS-22

See the original post:

List of International Space Station expeditions - Wikipedia

China’s Tiangong space station | Space

Tiangong is a space station that the Chinese Manned Space Agency (CMSA) is building in low Earth orbit. In May 2021, China launched Tianhe, the first of the orbiting space station's three modules, and the country aims to finish building the station by the end of 2022. CMSA hopes to keep Tiangong inhabited continuously by three astronauts for at least a decade. The space station will host many experiments from both China and other countries.

Related: China's space station will be open to science from all UN nations

Tiangong, which means "Heavenly Palace," will consist of Tianhe, the main habitat for astronauts, and two modules dedicated to hosting experiments, Mengtian and Wentian, both of which are due to launch in 2022. Shenzhou spacecraft, launching from Jiuquan in the Gobi Desert, will send crews of three astronauts to the space station, while Tianzhou cargo spacecraft will launch from Wenchang on the Chinese island of Hainan to deliver supplies and fuel to the station.

Tiangong will be much smaller than the International Space Station (ISS), with only three modules compared with 16 modules on the ISS. Tiangong will also be lighter than the ISS, which weighs about 400 tons (450 metric tons) following the recent addition of Russia's Nauka module.

The 54-foot-long (16.6 meter) Tianhe module launched with a docking hub that allows it to receive Shenzhou and Tianzhou spacecraft, as well as welcome the two later experiment modules. A large robotic arm will help position the Mengtian and Wentian modules and assist astronauts during spacewalks.

Tianhe is much larger than the Tiangong 1 and 2 test space labs China launched in the last decade and nearly three times heavier, at 24 tons (22 metric tons). The new Tiangong, visiting spacecraft and cargo spacecraft will expand the usable space for the astronauts; so much that they'll feel as though "they will be living in a villa," compared with how little space was available on previous Chinese space labs, Bai Linhou, deputy chief designer of the space station, told CCTV.

Tianhe features regenerative life support, including a way to recycle urine, to allow astronauts to stay in orbit for long periods. It is the main habitat for the astronauts and also houses the propulsion systems to keep the space station in orbit.

China has said it will take 11 launches to finish Tiangong: three module launches, four crewed missions and four Tianzhou spacecraft to supply cargo and fuel. The first three launches Tianhe, Tianzhou 2 and Shenzhou 12 have gone smoothly.

Once completed, Tiangong will be joined by a huge, Hubble-like space telescope, which will share the space station's orbit and be able to dock for repairs, maintenance and possibly upgrades. Named Xuntian, which translates to "survey the heavens," the telescope will have a 6.6-foot (2 m) diameter mirror like Hubble but will have a field of view 300 times greater. Xuntian will aim to survey 40% of the sky over 10 years using its huge, 2.5-billion-pixel camera.

The space station could potentially be expanded to six modules, if everything goes according to plan. "We can further expand our current three-module space station combination into a four-module, cross-shaped combination in the future," Bai told CCTV. The second Tianhe core module could then allow two more modules to join the orbital outpost.

China embarked on a long journey to reach the point of building its space station. The project was first approved in 1992, after which the country set about developing the Shenzhou crew spacecraft and the Long March 2F rocket to send astronauts into space. Yang Liwei became China's first astronaut in space in October 2003 and made China the third country in the world to independently send humans into orbit.

China expressed interest in joining the International Space Station partners, but the possibility was ended by a 2011 decree passed by U.S. lawmakers effectively banning NASA from coordinating directly with China or any Chinese-owned company. This means direct collaboration between NASA and Chinese space stations is strictly prohibited, making the prospect of sending U.S. astronauts to Tiangong (or Chinese astronauts to the ISS) impossible.

To be able to build and operate a crewed space station, China first needed to test out crucial space station systems, including life support and technologies for rendezvous and docking of spacecraft in orbit while traveling 17,448 mph (28,080 km/h). To accomplish this, China launched the 9-ton (8.2 metric tons) Tiangong-1 space lab in 2011, and subsequently sent the uncrewed Shenzhou 8 and the crewed Shenzhou 9 and 10 to join Tiangong-1 in orbit.

The upgraded but similarly sized Tiangong-2 launched in 2016 and hosted the two-astronaut crew of Shenzhou 11 for just over a month, setting a new national record for human spaceflight mission duration.

As the China Manned Space Agency checked off these initial milestones, the agency was also focused on developing new, larger Long March heavy-lift rockets to make a space station possible. The Long March 5B was designed specifically to launch the huge space station modules into low Earth orbit. The same rocket was the source of one of the largest uncontrolled reentries in recent decades following the launch of Tianhe in late April 2021.

In 2014 China completed its new, coastal spaceport at Wenchang, specifically to launch these larger-diameter rockets, which need to be delivered by sea.

The first crewed missions Shenzhou 12, 13 and 14 will be for space station construction. A series of operational phase missions lasting six months each will begin in 2023. Crews will carry out experiments in areas such as astronomy, space medicine and life sciences, biotechnology, microgravity combustion and fluid physics and space technologies. Tiangong will also temporarily host six astronauts during crew changeovers, Space.com previously reported.

Related: China selects 18 new astronauts in preparation for space station launch

Tiangong is also likely to host international astronauts in the future. European Space Agency astronauts Samantha Cristoforetti and Matthias Maurer trained with their Chinese counterparts in 2017 in a small step toward a possible future visit to the Chinese space station, the European Space Agency reported. Astronauts from other countries, particularly those involved in China's Belt and Road initiative, may travel to Tiangong as well; Russia is also considering sending its cosmonauts.

China is looking to develop alternatives for keeping Tiangong supplied, SpaceNews reported. In January 2021, the China Manned Space Agency put out a call for proposals for low-cost, reliable cargo missions to Tiangong. The call was open to commercial companies, echoing NASA's Commercial Resupply Services contracts that provided opportunities to SpaceX.

It will be possible to spot Tiangong from Earth, just as it sometimes is with the ISS. Tiangong will orbit at an altitude of between 211 and 280 miles (340 to 450 kilometers) above Earth and between 43 degrees north and south, and the space station should be a fixture in the sky for at least a decade.

Original post:

China's Tiangong space station | Space