2020 could see an end to safe, legal abortion anywhere in America – The Guardian

If you care about the rights of women to make their own reproductive choices, 2020 is the year that matters.

Its too late to do anything about the current makeup of the court except, of course, for women and the people who love them to be very, very loud in our support of abortion rights, and signal that there will be a serious cost if the court overturns or scales back Roe.

But abortion rights supporters need to understand that the anti-abortion movement will not be content to simply overturn Roe. Nor will they be content with what they say is their goal to let the states decide. They will campaign not just at a state level but at a federal one to outlaw abortion wholesale in the United States.

This is the very real threat of 2020: Not just the end of Roe, which itself would be catastrophic, but an end to safe, legal abortion anywhere in the United States of America.

Democratic candidates, and voters, must face this threat head-on.

That means, yes, expecting that a Democratic president will do as Trump has done and appoint as many federal judges as possible the younger the better. If Roe is overturned, it will throw state abortion laws into chaos, and lawsuits over abortion rights (and abortion restrictions) will proliferate. Federal appeals courts will have the final say in most of these cases. Good judges who are not rightwing ideologues will be crucial to retain any semblance of basic human rights for women.

It also means a president who understands abortion rights are not safe in the courts alone, and require proactive protective measures. A federal law enshrining the right of all women to make intimate decisions about reproduction, including a right to abortion and contraception, is more necessary than ever.

Refreshingly, several Democratic candidates, including Elizabeth Warren, Cory Booker, Pete Buttigieg and Bernie Sanders, support such a law. Kamala Harris has even suggested an abortion rights version of the Voting Rights Act, requiring states with a history of misogynist anti-abortion laws to get federal approval before they are permitted to enact new abortion restrictions.

That codifying abortion rights into federal law is no longer a fringe Democratic position is a testament to the good work of abortion rights groups, who have spent decades pushing politicians to be proactive on abortion, not just reactive to restrictions. But offering rhetorical support for a position is easy. One question pro-choice voters should ask all candidates: is protecting reproductive freedom a very top priority?

There is a long list of other ideas progressive Democratic candidates should be putting on their agendas. Repealing the Hyde amendment, which restricts federal Medicaid dollars from paying for elective abortions, has already been embraced if not prioritized by most of the Democratic field. They should all pledge to repeal the Helms amendment, too, which places similar restrictions on US dollars spent on health and development overseas. A Democratic president should push Congress to permanently repeal the Global Gag Rule, which restricts not just abortion but even speech about abortion outside of US borders.

The US also lags in access to abortion medication, thanks to a spate of state restrictions; a federal abortion rights law should address that, too, and offer protections for women who self-induce their own abortions because they dont have access to a safe, legal, affordable option. Abortions are also largely relegated to clinics because many hospitals wont perform them. Any hospital that receives federal funds should be required to offer patients a full slate of reproductive healthcare, including contraception, emergency contraception and abortion. Insurance companies, too, should be required to fully cover abortion and contraception and if the leftiest of Democratic candidates wins and their universal healthcare plans come to fruition, abortion must be treated like any other medical procedure and covered accordingly.

If Donald Trump (or any Republican) wins in 2020, it could signal the end of abortion rights as we know it. Its more crucial than ever to have a Democrat in office who wont just pay the usual lip service to womens rights, but prioritize and push forward a plan to secure abortion access for all American women no matter what the supreme court does.

View post:
2020 could see an end to safe, legal abortion anywhere in America - The Guardian

Research Fellow in Microfluidic Medical Devices job with UNIVERSITY OF LEEDS | 188671 – Times Higher Education (THE)

Do you want to participate to the translation of a research idea in a real commercial solution? Do you want to improve methods for animal research and reduce the use of animals in research? Are you excited about contributing to scientific research in fertility? Are you able to manage a multicentre project, connect with international users and analyse their feedback?

We are looking for a proactive individual to join our multidisciplinary team in Leeds and to validate our new technology with end users and define a commercial product.

Our group is focused on the development of new techniques and devices for improving for diagnosis and treatment of infertility. In our team we couple our knowledge and experience in engineering and entrepreneurship with reproductive science and assistive reproductive technology to propose new solutions to current limitation in animal and human reproduction.

This vacancy is created by an NC3Rs Medical Research Council (MRC) Business Growth Scheme (BGS) grant awarded to Dr. Pensabene which aims to complete the validation of a microfluidic device for mouse embryo culture, to complete a thorough stakeholder and market analysis in preparation for the commercialization of the technology. You will work on theBGS project(From challenge to solution: definition of the characteristics of a new disposable product to improve murine embryos handling and transfer procedures) managing the full project and all the activities.

The manufacturing will be conducted by an external company, that will be instructed by you in terms of device characteristics, materials and delivery time. The external validation will be carried out at the Francis Crick Institute and at the University of Oxford and you will coordinate the experiments and analyse the results. A final phase will be dedicated to the definition of the end users needs and the optimization of the product for commercialization purpose.

Holding a PhD (or close to completion) in Biotechnology, Biomedical Engineering, Material Science, Biology, Physics or related disciplines, you will have a proven laboratory experience and track-record in biotechnology, cell culture and microscopy, together with a proactive, enthusiastic approach to research and innovation.

To explore the post further or for any queries you may have, please contact:

Virginia Pensabene, PhD, University Academic Fellow in Electronic and Electrical Engineering

Tel: +44 (0) 771 3371521 or email:v.pensabene@leeds.ac.uk

Further information

The Schools in the Faculty of Engineering & Physical Sciences are proud to have been awarded theAthena SWANBronzeorSilverAwardfromthe Equality Challenge Unit, the national body that promotes equality in the higher education sector. Ourequality and inclusion webpageprovides more information.

Location: Leeds - Main CampusFaculty/Service: Faculty of Engineering & Physical SciencesSchool/Institute: School of Electronic & Electrical EngineeringSection: The Pollard InstituteCategory: ResearchGrade: Grade 7Salary: 33,797 to 40,322 p.a. pro rataWorking Time: 50% full time equivalentPost Type: Part TimeContract Type: Fixed Term (Up to one year, available from 15 January 2020, to end by 14 January 2021)Release Date: Wednesday 04 December 2019Closing Date: Sunday 05 January 2020Interview Date: To be confirmedDownloads: Candidate Brief

Original post:
Research Fellow in Microfluidic Medical Devices job with UNIVERSITY OF LEEDS | 188671 - Times Higher Education (THE)

Human Reproduction : Audio Productions, Inc. : Free …

The Film I Never Got to See...

The lead-in is a vignette of a little boy who presses his parents for more information about why Mommies bring babies into the world. The scripting is thin, but it serves it's purpose well enough.

When I was in grade school, neither my school nor my parents wanted anything to do with informing me about sex, or the anatomy of a man. Those were to be avoided at all costs. (I remember saying "Eewwww! I would NEVER touch a man there!!!) In the end, I got the information from the secret section in the reference department of the school library where books that were never to be taken out lived.

Some parents may balk at the idea that their child will become sexually aware, but the sad news is, holding back because your religion or upbringing prevents it, can, in this day and age, have dire health consequences. With the collapse of the laws that protected children from televised references to sex, we are seeing more and more foul language. The "F" word has become so common that it's bandied about carelessly, and using it quickly became as annoying and repulsive as "Y'know" or "Gag me with a spoon!" during the Valley Girl days came to be.

Video games and anime are both rife with sexual content, little of which is balanced or "healthy" Chances are very good that your children will know the meanings of "hentai", "yaoi", and "ecchi", long before you ever get around to talking to them yourself, and given that some Japanese sexual material is STILL couched in old traditions, they may also be exposed to depictions of forced sex and sex with children. (In ages past in Japan, it was possible to buy or trade goods for the virginity of a young girl. That would mean her first experience would be with someone much older, and whom she barely knew.)

While Japan is making solid inroads in making cultural and societal changes that ban such manga material, they will not achieve it for sometime to come, and given the spectrum I've seen thus far, no child, who has full, unsupervised access to the Internet, will be immune, and given that the Internet is the ultimate source of freely available information, any parent would be foolish not to guide the child in a safe and responsible way. After all, pioneers, trekking across the US, and the Native Americans in their many tipis all conceived and brought up families in close proximity to older children. They can handle it, if you can, and if you can't, this film might be a really good place to start. If they know that they can come to you for straight answers, they will enter the world of adults with a backup team that can support them and dispel rumors as they mature. It would be far worse if the bulk of their knowledge on the subject came from lurid cutscenes in Grand Theft Auto V.

Therefore, in summation, I heartily recommend this film for its accuracy and for its candor, and for its depiction of a functioning family able to communicate with each other.

Read the original:
Human Reproduction : Audio Productions, Inc. : Free ...

Center for Human Reproduction

Country Select Country United States Afghanistan Albania Algeria American Samoa Andorra Angola Anguilla Antarctica Antigua and Barbuda Argentina Armenia Aruba Australia Austria Azerbaijan Bahamas Bahrain Bangladesh Barbados Belarus Belgium Belize Benin Bermuda Bhutan Bolivia Bosnia and Herzegovina Botswana Bouvet Island Brazil British Indian Ocean Territory Brunei Darussalam Bulgaria Burkina Faso Burundi Cambodia Cameroon Canada Cape Verde Cayman Islands Central African Republic Chad Chile China Christmas Island Cocos (Keeling) Islands Colombia Comoros Congo Congo, The Democratic Republic of The Cook Islands Costa Rica Cote D'ivoire Croatia Cuba Cyprus Czech Republic Denmark Djibouti Dominica Dominican Republic Ecuador Egypt El Salvador Equatorial Guinea Eritrea Estonia Ethiopia Falkland Islands (Malvinas) Faroe Islands Fiji Finland France French Guiana French Polynesia French Southern Territories Gabon Gambia Georgia Germany Ghana Gibraltar Greece Greenland Grenada Guadeloupe Guam Guatemala Guinea Guinea-bissau Guyana Haiti Heard Island and Mcdonald Islands Holy See (Vatican City State) Honduras Hong Kong Hungary Iceland India Indonesia Iran, Islamic Republic of Iraq Ireland Israel Italy Jamaica Japan Jordan Kazakhstan Kenya Kiribati Korea, Democratic People's Republic of Korea, Republic of Kuwait Kyrgyzstan Lao People's Democratic Republic Latvia Lebanon Lesotho Liberia Libyan Arab Jamahiriya Liechtenstein Lithuania Luxembourg Macao Macedonia, The Former Yugoslav Republic of Madagascar Malawi Malaysia Maldives Mali Malta Marshall Islands Martinique Mauritania Mauritius Mayotte Mexico Micronesia, Federated States of Moldova, Republic of Monaco Mongolia Montserrat Morocco Mozambique Myanmar Namibia Nauru Nepal Netherlands Netherlands Antilles New Caledonia New Zealand Nicaragua Niger Nigeria Niue Norfolk Island Northern Mariana Islands Norway Oman Pakistan Palau Palestinian Territory, Occupied Panama Papua New Guinea Paraguay Peru Philippines Pitcairn Poland Portugal Puerto Rico Qatar Reunion Romania Russian Federation Rwanda Saint Helena Saint Kitts and Nevis Saint Lucia Saint Pierre and Miquelon Saint Vincent and The Grenadines Samoa San Marino Sao Tome and Principe Saudi Arabia Senegal Serbia and Montenegro Seychelles Sierra Leone Singapore Slovakia Slovenia Solomon Islands Somalia South Africa South Georgia and The South Sandwich Islands Spain Sri Lanka Sudan Suriname Svalbard and Jan Mayen Swaziland Sweden Switzerland Syrian Arab Republic Taiwan, Province of China Tajikistan Tanzania, United Republic of Thailand Timor-leste Togo Tokelau Tonga Trinidad and Tobago Tunisia Turkey Turkmenistan Turks and Caicos Islands Tuvalu Uganda Ukraine United Arab Emirates United Kingdom United States United States Minor Outlying Islands Uruguay Uzbekistan Vanuatu Venezuela Viet Nam Virgin Islands, British Virgin Islands, U.S. Wallis and Futuna Western Sahara Yemen Zambia Zimbabwe

State (USA-only) Choose State (USA-only) AK AL AR AS AZ CA CO CT DC DE FL GA GU HI IA ID IL IN KS KY LA MA MD ME MI MN MO MP MS MT NC ND NE NH NJ NM NV NY OH OK OR PA PR RI SC SD TN TX UT VA VI VT WA WI WV WY

Please tell us about the service you're interested in and your fertility history.

Read the rest here:
Center for Human Reproduction

infertility problems | Best ivf centre in India | Best ICSI Clinic in India – Video


infertility problems | Best ivf centre in India | Best ICSI Clinic in India
Virk Fertility Services is the first IVF centre in India to be accredited by NABH Safe-I. VFS Centre For Human Reproduction, an ISO 9001-2008 certified ART Centre offers a comprehensive range...

By: Centre of Human Reproduction

Continued here:
infertility problems | Best ivf centre in India | Best ICSI Clinic in India - Video

best infertility treatment in india | Best ivf centre in India | Best ICSI Clinic in India – Video


best infertility treatment in india | Best ivf centre in India | Best ICSI Clinic in India
Virk Fertility Services is the first IVF centre in India to be accredited by NABH Safe-I. VFS Centre For Human Reproduction, an ISO 9001-2008 certified ART Centre offers a comprehensive range...

By: Centre of Human Reproduction

Go here to see the original:
best infertility treatment in india | Best ivf centre in India | Best ICSI Clinic in India - Video

how much is IVF treatment in india | Best IVF and ICSI Treatment in india – Video


how much is IVF treatment in india | Best IVF and ICSI Treatment in india
VFS Centre For Human Reproduction, an ISO 9001-2008 certified ART Centre offers a comprehensive range of infertility services under one roof and we are known for our innovation, integrity,...

By: ICSI Treatment

More:
how much is IVF treatment in india | Best IVF and ICSI Treatment in india - Video

Best IVF centre in India | best ICSI treatment | IVF Treatment | Fertility | best IVF in india – Video


Best IVF centre in India | best ICSI treatment | IVF Treatment | Fertility | best IVF in india
VFS Centre For Human Reproduction, an ISO 9001-2008 certified ART Centre offers a comprehensive range of infertility services under one roof and we are known for our innovation, integrity,...

By: Infertility Treatment

Read the rest here:
Best IVF centre in India | best ICSI treatment | IVF Treatment | Fertility | best IVF in india - Video

Life Science 007: Human reproduction: hormonal control of female reproductive cycle – Video


Life Science 007: Human reproduction: hormonal control of female reproductive cycle
Life Science 007: Human reproduction: hormonal control of female reproductive cycle Lesson objectives: To explain the interaction of the different hormones t...

By: SABC Education Shows

View original post here:
Life Science 007: Human reproduction: hormonal control of female reproductive cycle - Video

Human Reproduction – CPALMS

Subject(s): Science

Grade Level(s): 9, 10, 11, 12

Suggested Technology: Computer for Presenter, Computers for Students, Internet Connection, LCD Projector

Instructional Time: 2 Hour(s) 30 Minute(s)

Resource supports reading in content area:Yes Freely Available: Yes

Keywords: Seminal vesicle, testes, prostate gland, urethra, penis, scrotum, epididymis, vas deferens, ovaries, oviduct (fallopian tubes), uterus, vagina, cervix, implantation, morula, blastocyst, gastrulation, neurulation, amniotic fluid, amnion, placenta, umbilical cord, amniotic sac, reproduction

Sorry! This resource requires special permission and only certain users have access to it at this time.

Students will:

Assessing Prior Knowledge: Why do organisms need to reproduce? Students should recall that organisms need to reproduce to continues as a species.

The teacher can review the concept maps of the reproductive system on the board.

Commit and Toss: This can be done at the end of the unit. Ask the class the question "Why is it important for a woman to be cautious of her diet and health during the first trimester of pregnancy?" The students answer the question on a small piece of paper and toss their paper across the room. The teacher calls on other students to read the answers. The teacher can make comments on the answers.

The card activity can be colored for visual learners. The activity can be cut into individual cards. The students can use the book as a resource.

High Level Extension - Students can explore the ethics and dilemmas of teen pregnancy as well as the changes that occur during pregnancy.

Students can explore the case study Amber's Secret.

The teacher may want to create the worksheet to accompany the NOVA episode "Life's Greatest Miracle."

The teacher may want to check the local school/district media centers to see if they carry a copy of the video.

The teacher needs to make a class set of the Reproductive Cards ahead of the activity.

Contributed by: Cathy Organt

Name of Author/Source: Cathy Organt

District/Organization of Contributor(s): Escambia

Is this Resource freely Available? Yes

Access Privileges: Public

Original post:
Human Reproduction - CPALMS

Toxic Exposure: Chemicals Are in Our Water, Food, Air and Furniture – University of California

When her kids were young, Tracey Woodruff, PhD, MPH, knew more than most people about environmental toxics. After all, she was a senior scientist at the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). But even she never dreamed, as she rocked her children to sleep at night, that the plastic baby bottles she used to feed them contained toxic chemicals that could leach into the warm milk.

Back then, in the late 1990s, it wasnt widely known that the chemicals used in plastic sippy cups and baby bottles can potentially disrupt child development by interfering with the hormone system. That, in turn, could alter the functionality of their reproductive systems or increase their risk of disease laterin their lives.

When I had babies, I did many of the things we now tell people not to do, says Woodruff, who for the past decade has been the director of UC San Franciscos Program on Reproductive Health and the Environment (PRHE). Also a professor in the Universitys Philip R. Lee Institute for Health Policy Studies, she earned her doctorate in 1991 from a joint UCSF-Berkeley program in bioengineering and then completed a postgraduate fellowship at UCSF.

Woodruffs children have since grown into physically healthy teenagers, but many children are not as lucky. Unregulated chemicals are increasing in use and are prevalent in products Americans use every day. Woodruff is concerned by the concurrent rise in many health conditions, like certain cancers or childhood diseases, and the fact that the environment is likely to play a role in those conditions. What motivates her is the belief that we need to know more about these toxics so we can reduce our exposure to the worst of them and protect ourselves and our children from their harmful effects. (Woodruff points out that the word toxics as a noun means any poisonous substances, from either chemical or biological sources, whereas toxins are poisons only from biological sources, either plant or animal.)

The PRHE is dedicated to identifying, measuring and preventing exposure to environmental contaminants that affect human reproduction and development. Its work weaves together science, medicine, policy and advocacy.

For example, research over the past 10 years by UCSF scientists and others has showed that bisphenol A (BPA) an industrial chemical used since the 1950s to harden plastics in baby bottles, toys and other products is found in the blood of those exposed to items made with BPA and that it can harm the endocrine systems of fetuses and infants. As a result, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) outlawed BPA in baby products in 2012, and some manufacturers developed BPA-free products. But now scientists believe the chemicals that replaced BPA may be just as harmful.

Furthermore, BPA is only one in a long, long list of chemicals we encounter every day in our homes, schools, workplaces and communities. And scientists have barely scratched the surface of understanding them. Of the thousands and thousands of chemicals registered with the EPA for use by industry, the agency has regulated only a few.

In the last 50 years, we have seen a dramatic increase in chemical production in the United States, Woodruff explains. Concurrently, theres been an increase in the incidence of conditions like attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), autism, childhood cancers, diabetes and obesity. Its not just genetic drift, Woodruff maintains.

And were all at risk from increasing chemical exposure. The water we run from our taps, the lotion we smear on our skin, the shampoo we rub in our hair, even the dust in our houses is full of synthetic chemicals.

PRHE experts do more than just measure such trends. They also collaborate with clinical scientists and obstetricians at Zuckerberg San Francisco General Hospital (ZSFG), so their findings directly benefit pregnant patients. We partner with the clinical scientists, explains Woodruff, because they look at treatments for disease, and environment might be a missing factor in the cause and prevention of disease.

Though environmental toxics affect us all, theres a reason PRHE focuses on pregnant women and children, Woodruff adds. Exposure to even tiny amounts of toxic substances during critical developmental stages can have outsize effects. So exposure to toxics is especially detrimental to fetuses, infants and young children, as well as preteens and teenagers.

If you prevent the problem at the beginning, you get a lifetime of benefits, says Woodruff.

The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) began measuring human exposure to chemicals in 1976. These so-called biomonitoring studies found a range of toxics in subjects blood and urine substances like DDT, BPA, air pollutants, pesticides, dioxins and phthalates. Phthalates, for example, are a class of chemicals known to be endocrine disruptors but widely used as softeners in plastics and as lubricants in personal-care products. Biomonitoring has determined that women of reproductive age evidence higher levels of phthalates than the population at large. One reason, says Woodruff, is that young women use more products like perfume, deodorant, shampoo and conditioner.

Woodruff herself recently led a study in which UCSF researchers collected blood samples from pregnant women at ZSFG. After the women delivered their babies, the researchers collected umbilical cord blood samples and discovered that almost 80 percent of the chemicals detected in the maternal blood samples had passed through the placenta to the cord blood. It was the most extensive look yet at how the chemicals that pregnant women are exposed to also appear in their babies cord blood (and followed an earlier study by Woodruff that marked the first time anyone had counted the number of chemicals in the blood of pregnant women). Published in the Nov. 1, 2016, print edition of Environmental Science and Technology, the study also found that many chemicals were absorbed at greater levels by the fetuses than by the pregnant women.

Now, Woodruff is hard at work on a new grant from the federal Environmental Influences on Child Health Outcomes (ECHO) Program. It aims to correlate childrens exposure to toxics with their developmental outcomes from birth to age four.

The good news is that the work done by Woodruff and her team shows a clear impact. Following bans (some permanent and some temporary) on certain phthalates, for example, UCSF researchers measured declines in the urinary concentrations of the permanently banned types in a representative sample of the U.S. population.

Tracy Woodruff spreads the word about toxics at UCSF's Stand Up For Science teach-in. Photo by Noah Berger

Woodruffs degree is in engineering, and she notes that in the 1980s, when she was in school, a lot of engineers went into the defense industry. People talk about joining the military to serve their country, Woodruff says. I also wanted to do something positive for society, and I felt joining the EPA was the best way to serve my country.

She spent 13 years at the federal agency, as a scientist and policy advisor, studying the effects of air pollution on childrens health. The topic interested her, she says, because children are vulnerable and cant speak for themselves. Her analysis of data collected under the Clean Air Act, for example, found that air pollution is linked to infant mortality. She also determined that pregnant African American women had higher exposure to air pollution and more adverse pregnancy outcomes than the population at large.

Nearly 25 years later, her work at UCSF is motivated by the same sense of advocacy and zeal. She joined the PRHE in 2007, shortly after its founding by Linda Giudice, MD, PhD. What we do, she says, is bring the best scientific tools from the varied fields at UCSF to bear on uncovering and better understanding the links between the environment and health and translate that science into prevention by improving public policy.

While Woodruff has many influential scientific publications to her name, shes also a sought-after guest for radio interviews and talk shows. She even appeared in a popular 2013 documentary, The Human Experiment, narrated by Sean Penn. In response to questions from the public, she tries to strike a practical note. You dont want to freak people out, she says. At the same time, people assume if they can buy it, its safe. That is just not the case.

In her own home in Oakland, Woodruff has made slow changes over time. I got rid of carpet. ... The padding can contain toxic chemicals. I waited to buy a couch ... too long according to my family, she laughs. (Couches without flame-retardants didnt become available in California until after the state changed its flammability standard in 2014, making it possible to sell couches that are flammability-safe but are made without flame-retardant chemicals.) I still have a couch that probably has flame-retardants, but I am just ignoring it. We eat mostly organic to reduce pesticide exposure. Less is more in personal-care products, she adds.

Does she make her own shampoo?

Oh, my God, no, she answers. Who has the time? This should not be a burden to people. Systems should be in place so that we can be free of the burden. This is why we need the EPA, and this is where policy comes in.

Its important for people to realize there are things you can do to lower your exposure to toxic chemicals, but some things you cant do.

For example, Woodruff explains, Americans would have had a hard time limiting their exposure to lead before leaded gasoline became illegal in 1996 (though the phaseout started in the mid-1970s). Until then, no amount of personal awareness could protect someone from lead it was in the air that everyone breathed.

She offers another example specific to the PRHEs efforts. When California outlawed flame retardants, she says, we saw levels decrease by about two-thirds in the blood of pregnant patients at ZSFG. Through these studies, we can evaluate the effectiveness of public policy. Its clear that when the government acts to reduce exposures to toxic chemicals ... we see a positive change. We do not always consider EPA a public health agency, but it is.

Woodruff and her colleagues also have been working over the last several years to help strengthen the federal Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) of 1976. It was well recognized that the law was flawed and allowed thousands of chemicals to be used in the marketplace without testing for safety, she explains. When bipartisan calls to strengthen the law led Congress to amend it in 2016, PRHE experts partnered with obstetricians and gynecologists to provide scientific evidence about the need for improved standards, deadlines and transparency. As rules for the amended TSCA are rolled out over the next two years, well be right in there to promote the use of science for the publics health, says Woodruff.

Shes also bringing environmental toxics to the attention of her UCSF colleagues in other disciplines. One of the reasons we love being at UCSF is we can learn from people who are doing completely different things, she says. For example, she is working with researchers who study the placenta, since her 2016 study showed that environmental toxics permeate the placenta. And with developmental biologist Diana Laird, PhD, an associate professor in the Center for Reproductive Sciences, Woodruff is co-leading the Environmental Health Initiative (EHI). The EHIs goal is to involve researchers from throughout UCSF from the biological, population and translation sciences in solving and preventing the environmental burden of disease, starting with ensuring healthy pregnancies.

The EHI will link faculty across the campus, to add an environmental component to their work, Woodruff says. We have already hosted several networking events and symposia with the Research Development Office toward our goal of norming the environment within the research community. We want people to be saying, We need to address the environmental consequences to fully solve health issues.

This is about prevention, she concludes. People talk about nutrition and social competencies of health. Theres another thing, which is the physical environment. The missing ingredient is toxics in the environment.

Read the original:
Toxic Exposure: Chemicals Are in Our Water, Food, Air and Furniture - University of California