‘Extraction’ and the Evolution of Chris Hemsworth – Hollywood Reporter

Extraction comes from the Russos production company AGBO, and is its second feature following last falls 21 Bridges (2019), starring Chadwick Boseman. So far, the Russos have primarily used the film side of AGBO as a chance to develop non-superhero stories with a troupe of MCU actors. With the exception of the upcoming Sundance horror hit, Relic, also produced by Jake Gyllenhaal, AGBO has placed its development attention on mid-budget action thrillers, a source of lifeblood for theatrical experiences before the superhero boom of the 2000s. The production companys next film, Cherry, also directed by the Russo Brothers, stars Tom Holland as a bank robber with an opioid addiction. AGBO also has a remake of The Thomas Crown Affair on the docket, and it wouldnt come as a surprise to see a Marvel star at the front of that film as well. There is an interest at the production company, it would seem, in finding a new way to take these superhero actors who possess the kind of star power that would have made them bigger than any one character in the '90s, and pair them with old-school premises, all for a reasonable price.

Extraction revels in the kind of old-school action of the '90s, boasting crazy stunts and a surplus of gunplay. While the plot is reminiscent of Man on Fire (1987) and (2004), and Hargraves direction is sure to draw fair comparisons to the John Wick franchise, Extraction is even simpler than that. It eschews world building of the Keanu Reeves franchise for the kind of pure action movie spectacle that those raised on the films of Stallone and Schwarzenegger might expect. But Hemsworth is different from the leading men of old, and even while placed within a story that feels like a throwback, his performance is uniquely modern in terms of our expectations of the action lead. Hemsworths mercenary, Tyler Rake, isnt entirely unlike characters weve seen before, men with military backgrounds and tragic pasts who are forced to serve as both protector and caretaker. But whereas so many of these types of characters begin as emotionally detached at best, and assholes at worst, Rake is likable without trying to come across as so. Theres an inherent charisma to the character, and his relationship with 14-year-old Ovi (Rudhraksh Jaiswal), while not close initially, isnt without some sense of kinship, manifested in Rakes early referral to him as mate and his consideration of him as more than a package but a person. Whats interesting about Hemsworths performance here is that the role of Tyler Rake is not so different from the kind of roles he was offered at the start of his career. Yet, his filmography has given him the tools to transform his inherent good looks and stoicism into something more compelling and worthy of the star power he now possesses.

Its easy to imagine seeing Extraction in theaters, as the film certainly looks theatrical, and features action and set pieces that would look incredible on a big screen. But the film stands to get more eyes on it on Netflix than it would in the theatrical marketplace, and this would have been true before the COVID-19 pandemic. Boasting a strong performance from Boseman,21 Bridges, a weaker film than Extraction, made $50 million on a $33 million budget. Not a big loss for STXFilms, but its a prime example of a film that would have undoubtedly found a larger audience and served Bosemans star power better on Netflix. As we see cinemas become increasingly event-driven, with audiences more willing to shell out for ticket prices only for the biggest films, it becomes harder for actors to attract general audiences for anything beyond the superheroes they play. Just because everyone turned out to see Boseman as Black Panther, doesnt mean that theyll do the same to see him play an NYC cop. But with streaming services, and nonevent level expectations that come with those releases, actors have a better chance to see their star power utilized in the same way those marquee names of the '90s did. While "lets watch the new Thor" is far more likely to be heard than "lets watch the new Hemsworth" at cinemas, the latter statement is far more likely when considering the age of streaming.

Hemsworth is the perfect example through which to consider the wane of traditional star power and its newfound potential. Before landing the career-changing role of Thor in Kenneth Branaghs 2011 film, Hemsworths filmography consisted of a brief role as George Kirk in Star Trek (2009), and small supporting roles in horror movies A Perfect Getaway (2009) and The Cabin in the Woods (2011), which showed early range but didnt necessarily suggest a leading man. Thor and The Avengers, gave him weightier material, including a powerful scene that saw him face off against Anthony Hopkins, but the takeaway from those performances resulted mostly in roles that did little to set him apart from Hollywood's then-current crop of blond leading men. Red Dawn (2012) and Snow White and the Huntsman (2012) were the most immediate signs that Hemsworth's portrayal of a superhero didnt automatically result in a box office following. Snow White was a box office success, but as the sequel, The Huntsman: Winters War, eventually proved, the success of the first had more to do with an attachment to the fairy tale, and a great trailer, than any real interest in Hemsworth as a YA romance styled sword and sorcery hero.

The most important step in Hemsworths post-Thor career was playing James Hunt in Ron Howards Rush (2013). Not entirely a 180 from Thor, Hemsworths charm and swagger, fully on display here, also manifested something deeper, a steely-eyed focus that suggested not only a grand inner monologue but a stormy emotionality. Theres a sense of drive in Hemsworths performance as Hunt, a conscious desire to cover up a formidable and dangerous feeling of inferiority. Further performances in Michael Manns Blackhat (2015) and Howards In the Heart of the Sea (2015), neither critical or box office darlings, showcased the potential of an actor who never seemed quite comfortable in the role of jock or eye candy. In terms of the latter, Hemsworth managed to push against this type of casting and poke fun at himself by entering the realm of comedy, first with Vacation (2015), and then with Ghostbusters (2016). Again, neither film was a critical or box office success, despite Hemsworth being genuinely funny, but they sharpened the tools that took him to his next venture, and allowed him to bring more of himself and comedy to Thor by the time he reached the third entry,Thor: Ragnarok (2017), which revitalized his interest in the role.

Hemsworth tapped into his dark side as a charismatic cult leader, Billy Lee, in the criminally underseen Bad Times at the El Royale (2019), arguably his best performance, and channeled Roger Moore in Men in Black: International. Whats interesting about his career is that despite very little box office success outside of his role as Thor, Hemsworth shows the most consistent evolution as a performer of his Avengers co-stars. Theres never a sense that hes simply settled into the comfort of being an actor known for one type of role, even if he does find himself appearing in some genres more frequently than others. Theres a quality to Hemsworth that makes him comparable to fellow Aussie Mel Gibson, before his directorial fame with Braveheart (1995), and the controversies that have marred the latter part of his career. Theres a quality the two actors share, not only because they both found their fame in franchises, Thor and Mad Max, but because they also managed to deliver engaging, genre-crossing performances in films that werent box office sensations but showed a consistent development of craft. Most important, Hemsworth, like Gibson, is an action hero whose tears are believable. It may seem like a small thing, but theres a vulnerability to Hemsworth that allows him to come across as genuine and personable, an essential quality when so much of action films are built around artifice and grandeur. His ability to convincingly play the vulnerable hero made him the MVP of Infinity War, and its what allows for the investment in Extraction. Tyler Rake is a role Hemsworth could have been cast in immediately after Thor, but he wouldnt be nearly as effective as he is in it without the decade of refinement.

Star power will likely never translate into box office receipts the way it used to, but that doesnt mean the concept is gone. It seems likely that it will simply translate into a new format. While Netflix is typically hush hush on how its features perform, it wouldn't be a surprise to see the streaming service champion the film as one of its biggest hits, especially with households craving new content while under quarantine. Turning star power into streaming service currency seems like a realistic outcome not only for AGBO, which has yet to finalize a distributor for Cherry, but for a number of studios still looking to keep mid-budget films alive, and agents who still bet on the power of a name. Extraction isnt the first of Netflixs big-budget releases, which include Six Underground (2019) and Bright (2017), but it is arguably the best, and the best argument for selling films based on names. Chris Hemsworth may not get his name on theater marquees for opening days, but his name is certainly going to populate a lot of Netflix queues over the weekend.

View post:

'Extraction' and the Evolution of Chris Hemsworth - Hollywood Reporter

Related Posts

Comments are closed.