Photo: Ernst Mayr, by University of Konstanz / CC BY (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5).
Editors note:Dr. Shedingeris a Professor of Religion at Luther College in Decorah, Iowa. He is the author of a recent book critiquing Darwinian triumphalism,The Mystery of Evolutionary Mechanisms. See also the earlier entries in this series:
The phenomenon of convergent evolution is well documented in the literature of evolutionary biology. In StrickbergersEvolution, Brian K. Hall and Benedikt Hallgrimsson make frequent reference to it. But what does it mean? In the 19th century, St. George Jackson Mivart made convergence a central aspect of his criticism of theOrigin of Species. If the variations on which natural selection acts are produced randomly, Mivart reasoned, one would expect different kinds of variations to arise in geographically isolated populations, leading to evolutionary divergence, not convergence. But the latter is what we see. StrickbergersEvolution, while acknowledging the reality of convergence, tries mightily to ignore the non-Darwinian character of this phenomenon, leading to some striking inconsistencies.
In a chapter outlining evidence for evolution we read:
The evolution of different organisms, or parts of organisms, in similar directions convergent evolution (convergence) indicates that selection for similar features in different evolutionary lineages can, and often does, lead to functionally similar anatomical structures.
But how and why do these similar features arise in different lineages so that natural selection can preserve them? Hall and Hallgrimsson do not say. They even note that air-breathing evolved 67 times, but ignore the larger implications of how such a complex series of similar mutations could occur repeatedly if the mutations are produced without reference to the needs of the organism, or randomly.
This problem becomes even more acute when Hall and Hallgrimsson write:
As in parallelism, convergence derives from the exposure of different lineages to similar environmental factors evincing similar selective forces. Common adaptive features thus can be attained in each group through independent genetic changes.
But selection does not produce the independent genetic changes. It only preserves them once they arise. The phenomenon of convergence thus raises real questions about just how independent those genetic changes are. Also, by focusing so much on the environment as driving evolutionary change, do Hall and Hallgrimsson realize they sound a lot more like Lamarck than they do Darwin?
Nevertheless, in a startling reversal on the very next page, Hall and Hallgrimsson contradict everything they have just said in a discussion of the work of Sandra Mitchell, a philosopher of science who proposed a scheme of hierarchical levels of complexity in organisms. The third level of her hierarchy is called evolved complexity, the principle that similar adaptive challenges have resulted in a diversity of forms of organisms, not a single form. But I thought similar adaptive challenges drove evolution to produce similar adaptive forms! Hall and Hallgrimsson ignore the contradiction.
In fact, just two pages later, seemingly unaware of Mitchells work whichtheycited, they write:
When similar organisms are exposed to similar environments in different localities, evolution can produce strikingly convergent or parallel features, whether a structure, function, or behavior.
Mitchell is correct that Darwins theory predicts evolutionary divergence. Unfortunately for Darwin, evolutionary convergence is often what we observe.
Still, Hall and Hallgrimsson press on undeterred by this gap between theory and observation. In a discussion of plant evolution we read:
Not surprisingly, these beautiful adaptations reflectconvergenceas selection under similar environmental conditions produced similar plant phenotypes in different lineages residing in different geographical localities.
George Ledyard Stebbins, the biologist who brought botany into the fold of the modern evolutionary synthesis in the 1940s, also wrestled with the meaning of convergence among plants. He saw convergence as evidence for some type of guiding force in plant evolution either natural selection or orthogenesis. As an orthodox Darwinian, Stebbins discarded orthogenesis as a possibility and opted for natural selection by default. But observing how plants with primitive features continue to exist alongside plants with more evolved features, rather than the latter replacing the former, Stebbins wrote:
The differentiation of orders and families of flowering plants through the action of natural selection under present conditions is well-nigh impossible to imagine.
I couldnt agree more. And this is the reason the phenomenon of convergence still stands as a powerful challenge to Darwinian evolution, just as Mivart understood as early as the 1870s.
More recently, paleontologist Simon Conway Morris has made convergent evolution the focus of his work. In a striking passage Conway Morris writes:
Wherever one looks it seems as if evolution has very little choice. If, then, we can discover the details of the metaphysical map across which life must navigate to the very few available solutions, then are we not on the threshold of a predictive biology? This view of life cuts cleanly across one of the central areas of neo-Darwinian thinking, an area that insists on the randomness of evolution and the unpredictability of its outcomes.
Such an idea is, of course, anathema to the biological establishment. According to Conway Morris, the best way to enrage an evolutionary biologist is to sidle up and suggest that evolution has a remarkable directionality. If you are lucky, he quips, all youll need is a clean handkerchief to dab the spots of spittle, but sometimes the response is closer to foaming.
Remarkably, even Ernst Mayr (pictured above) was forced to tacitly acknowledge the challenge to Darwinism posed by convergence. Earlier in his career, Mayr agreed with Francois Jacob that a tinkerer made a better analogy for the action of natural selection than an engineer. Engineering was just too teleological a comparison for a process said to have no foresight or directionality. But in his final bookWhat Evolution Is, written in his nineties, Mayr positively marveled at the phenomenon of convergence:
Convergence illustrates beautifully how selection is able to make use of the intrinsic variability of organisms to engineer adapted types for almost any kind of environmental niche.
So much for the tinkerer bumbling about in his garage. Natural selection, according to Mayr, does work more like the intelligent engineer after all.
StrickbergersEvolutionrepeatedly acknowledges the widespread nature of the phenomenon of convergent evolution. But by consistently ignoring the profound challenge convergence poses to Darwinian natural selection, the textbook denies students the opportunity to grapple with big and important questions about the history of life on Earth, questions that got the attention of Mivart in the 1870s, Conway Morris more recently, and that even did not escape the notice of Ernst Mayr. This greatly undermines the very educational process a textbook should be designed to foster.
- Woke Comes Back to Bite the Darwinists and They Deserve It - Walter Bradley Center for Natural and Artificial Intelligence - January 11th, 2022
- Confusing Artificial Selection with Darwinism - Discovery Institute - January 11th, 2022
- Is Darwinism a Theory in Crisis? - Discovery Institute - October 20th, 2021
- DNA Energy Code: Survival of the Fittest Phenomenon Is Only Part of the Evolution Equation - SciTechDaily - February 20th, 2021
- Remembering Tom Bethell: Wordsmith of Courage and Controversy - KMJ Now - February 20th, 2021
- A True Portrait of Tom Bethell - Discovery Institute - February 20th, 2021
- Iconoclast: Farewell to Tom Bethell - Discovery Institute - February 20th, 2021
- What Is Mutual Aid? | How to Get Involved in the Community Movement - MarieClaire.com - February 20th, 2021
- Random Evolution Doesn't Produce Algorithmic Functions in Animals - Walter Bradley Center for Natural and Artificial Intelligence - February 20th, 2021
- One People, One House: The truth about race IS there is no race - masslive.com - February 20th, 2021
- Darwin's theory of evolution got us thinking about our understanding of God, says Bharat Jhunjhunwala - Free Press Journal - February 11th, 2021
- Darwin and Race: Three Strikes, He's Out - Discovery Institute - February 11th, 2021
- DigiPlus Conclave: Optimism and imagination are key approaches for dealing with technology - ETBrandEquity.com - February 11th, 2021
- Jonathan Wells: Scientific Revolutions and Counter-Revolutions - Discovery Institute - February 11th, 2021
- Past and prologue: Engaging with our history | Columnists | eastoregonian.com - East Oregonian - February 11th, 2021
- Excerpt: Darwinism and Design - Discovery Institute - December 5th, 2020
- Darwin's Finches: Galpagos Islands as an Evolutionary Model - Discovery Institute - December 5th, 2020
- Agency Darwinism: Will Covid-19 force the agency world to drag itself into the future? - The Drum - September 8th, 2020
- Alfred Russel Wallace: Shedding Light on Darwin's Shadow - Discovery Institute - September 8th, 2020
- Darwinism Paved the Way to Our Perilous Cultural Moment - Discovery Institute - August 11th, 2020
- Darwinism - Wikipedia - August 6th, 2020
- Darwinism | Definition & Facts | Britannica - August 6th, 2020
- An Evolution Definition of Darwinism - ThoughtCo - August 6th, 2020
- Social Darwinism - HISTORY - August 6th, 2020
- Darwinism 2048 | Addicting Games - August 6th, 2020
- How Darwin Shaped the Young Joseph Stalin - Discovery Institute - July 27th, 2020
- social Darwinism | Definition & Facts | Britannica - July 21st, 2020
- Darwinism Would Fare Poorly Against Pandemics - Discovery Institute - July 11th, 2020
- On "Darwinism" - Scientific American Blog Network - June 9th, 2020
- Darwinism Quotes (148 quotes) - Goodreads - June 9th, 2020
- Darwinism in full play as the pandemic rages - Deccan Herald - June 9th, 2020
- Behe Vindicated Again: Sherpas Climb Everest Easier, Because Darwin Devolves - Discovery Institute - June 1st, 2020
- 52 ideas that changed the world - 49. Ecology - The Week (UK) - June 1st, 2020
- Sickle Cell, Darwinism, and COVID-19: Is My Life Worth Less Than... - Sickle Cell Anemia News - April 27th, 2020
- What Is Darwinism? - ThoughtCo - April 24th, 2020
- 'Kiss the Son, lest He be angry' | Columns - Weatherford Democrat - April 12th, 2020
- Darwinism: Survival without Purpose | The Institute for ... - April 2nd, 2020
- As Netanyahu and Gantz prepare for unity, social Darwinism is at the gates - Haaretz - April 2nd, 2020
- Culling the old & weak: Eugenics and social Darwinism rear their ugly heads in the Covid-19 pandemic - RT - April 2nd, 2020
- How Emily Dickinson Wrestled with Darwinism - JSTOR Daily - March 21st, 2020
- VIDEO: The Unholy Trinity Atheism, Feminism and Darwinism - 5Pillars - March 9th, 2020
- Was Darwin wrong about 'survival of the fittest'? Collaboration may be just as natural as competition - Genetic Literacy Project - January 30th, 2020
- Darwin on Trial As Fresh and Relevant as Ever - Discovery Institute - November 8th, 2019
- Your Witness, Mr. Johnson: A Retrospective Review of Darwin on Trial - Discovery Institute - November 8th, 2019
- Bible revelation: Richard Dawkins reveals Charles Darwin theory for Noahs Ark - Express.co.uk - October 16th, 2019
- Pop Social Darwinism in Contemporary American Capitalist Society: the Marketization of Che as Individualist Symbol - CounterPunch - October 8th, 2019
- Darwinism | biology | Britannica.com - April 20th, 2019
- Darwinism - New World Encyclopedia - April 20th, 2019
- An Evolution Definition of Darwinism - thoughtco.com - April 20th, 2019
- Social Darwinism - Wikipedia - April 20th, 2019
- social Darwinism | Definition & Facts | Britannica.com - March 6th, 2019
- Urban Dictionary: Darwinism - March 6th, 2019
- Darwinism - Free online games at Gamesgames.com - December 27th, 2018
- Challenge B Origins Six More Summers - October 5th, 2018
- What is Social Darwinism - AllAboutScience.org - August 24th, 2018
- Pseudo-scientific racism and Social Darwinism | South ... - August 24th, 2018
- The Politically Incorrect Guide to Darwinism and ... - August 19th, 2018
- Challenge B Origins | Six More Summers - July 2nd, 2018
- Neo-Darwinism - Wikipedia - June 23rd, 2018
- Social Darwinism: The Theory of Evolution Applied to Human ... - June 8th, 2018
- Digital Darwinism (9780749482282) - Kogan Page - May 21st, 2018
- Nazi racial ideology was religious, creationist and ... - May 21st, 2018
- Marketing Darwinism | by Paul Dunay - May 8th, 2018
- What is Social Darwinism - Science - AllAboutScience.org - April 24th, 2018
- Digital Darwinism: How Disruptive Technology Is Changing ... - April 24th, 2018
- Social Darwinism: The Theory of Evolution Applied to Human Society - April 10th, 2018
- Darwin's Influence on Ruthless Laissez Faire Capitalism - March 26th, 2018
- What is Social Darwinism - March 22nd, 2018
- The Institute for Creation Research - March 22nd, 2018
- The Royal Society's Evolution Meeting: James MacAllister ... - March 22nd, 2018
- Darwinism: Survival without Purpose - The Institute for ... - March 19th, 2018
- How Darwinism Corrodes Morality: Darwinism, Immorality ... - March 16th, 2018
- Economic Darwinism | On the origin of crises by unnatural ... - March 16th, 2018
- The Imminent Death of Darwinism and the Rise of ... - February 24th, 2018
- FitzRoy, Captain of the Beagle, Fierce Critic of Darwinism - February 24th, 2018
- The eclipse of Darwinism - Wikipedia - January 26th, 2018
- Modern synthesis - Wikipedia - August 25th, 2017
- The Effect of Darwinism on Morality and Christianity | The ... - August 25th, 2017
- Darwinism and the Nazi race Holocaust - creation.com - August 25th, 2017
- 'Radical' new biography of Darwin is unreliable and inaccurate - New Scientist - August 25th, 2017