How Tesla defined a new era for the global auto industry – Reuters

FRANKFURT/BEIJING/DETROIT (Reuters) - Tesla Incs (TSLA.O) rapid rise to become the worlds most valuable carmaker could mark the start of a new era for the global auto industry, defined by a Silicon Valley approach to software that is overtaking old-school manufacturing know-how.

FILE PHOTO: Tesla Inc CEO Elon Musk dances onstage during a delivery event for Tesla China-made Model 3 cars in Shanghai, China January 7, 2020. REUTERS/Aly Song/File Photo

Teslas ascent took many investors by surprise. But executives at Daimler AG (DAIGn.DE), the parent company of Mercedes-Benz, had a close-up view starting in 2009 of how Tesla and its chief executive Elon Musk were taking a new approach to building vehicles that challenged the established system.

Daimler, which bears the name of the man who invented the modern car 134 years ago, bought a nearly 10% Tesla stake in May 2009 in a deal which provided a $50 million lifeline for the struggling start-up.

That investment gave Mercedes engineers an inside view of how Musk was willing to launch technology that wasnt perfect, and then repeatedly upgrade it, using smartphone style over-the-air updates, paying little regard to early profitability.

Mercedes engineers helped Tesla develop its Model S luxury sedan in exchange for access to Teslas partially hand-assembled battery packs, but in 2014 Daimler decided to sell their stake amid doubts Teslas approach could be industrialized at scale.

Tesla would go on to pioneer new approaches in manufacturing, designs in software and electronic architecture which enable it to introduce innovations faster than rivals, leaving analysts to draw comparisons with Apple (AAPL.O).

Three people directly involved with the Mercedes side of the collaboration said the brief partnership highlighted the collision of old and new engineering cultures: the German obsession with long-term safety and control, which rewarded evolution, and the Silicon Valley carmakers experimental approach which embraced radical thinking and fast innovation.

Elon Musk has been walking on the edge of a razorblade in terms of the aggression with which he pushes some technologies, said a former Mercedes engineer who worked on the partnership.

By contrast, Mercedes and other established automakers are still not comfortable about releasing a new technology, such as partially automated driving, without years of testing.

Tesla did not respond to requests for comment.

Investors favor the Tesla model, in an industry undergoing fundamental and dizzying change even though the U.S. carmaker will face an onslaught of competing electric vehicles from established automakers during the next few years.

They are putting their money on Musk and his company, even though Mercedes-Benz alone sold 935,089 cars in the first half of 2020, dwarfing the 179,050 delivered by Tesla in the same period.

Today, Tesla is worth nearly $304.6 billion, more than six times Daimlers 41.5-billion-euro ($47.7 billion) market capitalization.

Tesla electrifies the auto industrys new era

TWO CULTURES COLLIDE

Daimler and Tesla began collaborating after Mercedes engineers, who were developing a second-generation electric Smart car, bought a Tesla Roadster. They were impressed by the way Tesla packaged batteries, so arranged a visit to Silicon Valley to meet Musk in January 2009 and ordered 1,000 battery packs.

The collaboration expanded. At a joint press conference in the Mercedes-Benz museum in Stuttgart in May 2009, Tesla said the partnership would accelerate bringing our Tesla Model S to production and ensure that it is a superlative vehicle.

For its part, Mercedes wanted to use Teslas batteries to power an electric version of its compact Mercedes-Benz B-Class. The Tesla Model S would hit the road in 2012. An electric B-Class, arrived in showrooms two years later.

Despite having batteries supplied by Tesla, the Mercedes had a shorter operating range after Daimler engineers configured the B-class more conservatively to address their concerns about long-term battery degradation and the risk of overheating, a second Daimler staffer who worked on the joint projects told Reuters.

German engineers found that Tesla engineers had not done long-term stress tests on its battery. We had to devise our own programme of stress tests, the second Daimler engineer said.

Before starting production of a new car, Daimler engineers specify a Lastenheft - a blueprint laying out the properties of each component for suppliers. Significant changes cannot be made once the design is frozen.

This is also the way you can guarantee that we will be profitable during mass production. Tesla was not as concerned about this aspect, the second Daimler source said.

Daimlers engineers suggested the underbody of the Model S needed reinforcing to prevent debris from the road puncturing a battery pack, the first Daimler engineer said.

To quash doubts about safety and security, following a series of battery fires, Tesla raised the ride height of its vehicles, using an over-the-air update, and a few months later, in March 2014, said it would add a triple underbody shield to new Model S cars and offered to retrofit existing cars.

Musk was able to make adjustments quickly thanks to Teslas ability to burn through more cash during development.

At Mercedes you can make such adjustments every three years at best, the engineer said.

The Model S, a four-door electric sedan would go on to outsell the flagship Mercedes-Benz S-Class in the United States in May 2013, and outstrip S-Class deliveries globally by 2017.

Musk's relentless focus on innovation explains, in part, why he has disrupted the traditional auto world. In an interview here at the 2020 Air Warfare Symposium, published on YouTube, he was asked about the importance of innovation among his employees.

We certainly need those that do advanced engineering to be innovative, Musk said. The incentive structure is set up ... such that innovation is rewarded. Making mistakes along the way does not come with a big penalty. But failure to try to innovate at all ... comes with a big penalty. You will be fired.

Established automakers are playing catch-up to Tesla, designing their own software operating systems and dedicated electric cars.

Mercedes will release its EQS next year - a four-door limousine built on a dedicated electric vehicle platform, with an operating range of 700 km. A new version of the Mercedes S-Class, which will have combustion and hybrid powertrains and semi-autonomous driver assistance systems, is due this year.

From an investor perspective, traditional players face billions of dollars in restructuring costs as they transform product lines and factories to move away from internal combustion technology

No one is going to give an OEM (established automaker) a five-year window to say ... you can totally retool your business, and I am going to buy in and fund this journey, said Mark Wakefield, co-leader of automotive and industrials practice at consulting firm AlixPartners.

Start-ups, however, get time from investors to learn, make mistakes and grow, he added.

Investors are betting on Teslas ability to scale up manufacturing just as they once backed Toyota Motor Corp (7203.T), which defined the auto industrys last era with its mastery of highly efficient, high-quality lean production.

Toyota overtook the market capitalization of former industry leader General Motors(GM.N) in 1996, though it wasnt until 2008 that it sold more vehicles than its Detroit rival.

The Japanese giant also cultivated ties with Tesla, with the U.S. startup helping it design an electrified RAV4 compact sports utility vehicle under a 2010 deal.

Toyota was impressed by the speed with which Tesla came up with the new design, but ultimately decided Teslas methods were not suitable for mass production by a mainstream manufacturer when Toyotas standards for product quality and durability were applied, two company insiders familiar with the partnership said.

Toyota said the joint project involved cooperation on the development of electric cars, parts and production system.

Toyota accomplished what the project set out to achieve, and it ended in October 2014 after Tesla delivered roughly 2,500 electric powertrain systems over three years for an electrified RAV4 crossover SUVs, a spokeswoman said.

Both the Toyota and Daimler collaborations were agreed before the Volkswagen (VOWG_p.DE) emissions-cheating scandal in 2015, which prompted a global regulatory backlash and forced carmakers to step up investments in electric cars.

That was all before dieselgate, which changed the economics of electric and combustion-engined cars, a senior Daimler manager said. Tesla has a lead. Lets see if they can scale up.

Reporting By Edward Taylor, Nori Shirouzu and Joe White; Additional reporting by Paul Lienert; Editing by Joe White and Pravin Char

Read the original:

How Tesla defined a new era for the global auto industry - Reuters

Last Tesla Roadster ever built listed for more than $2 million – CarAdvice

Only 2500 Lotus-based Tesla Roadsters were built, and the final one is for sale in Switzerland for more than AU$2 million.

The last original Tesla Roadster to be built has come onto the market in Switzerland for more than AU$2 million.

The 2012 car's Lotus-designed chassis is fitted with a 185kW electric motor that propels it from 0 to 100kmh in a claimed 4.0 seconds.

When new, a battery range of 393km was estimated.

The listed car is finished in sparkling white and has a white and black interior trim, full carbon package, carbon diffusor, and VIN 2500 badging (recognising that it was the 2500th and last Roadster built).

Dozens of Tesla employees also signed the car's battery pack on completion, and a scribble in the bottom left-hand corner strongly resembles the signature of company CEO Elon Musk.

According to the listing the car has been stored on tyre pillows on marble floor and was never registered.

It has just 200km on the odometer.

The vehicle is listed for 1,390,000 (approximately AU$2,082,220) which, if sold, would make it the world's most expensive electric car.

In Australia the 2012 Roadster was initially sold from $191,888 plus on-road costs slightly less than a Porsche 911 at the time.

Only one version of the car is currently listed for sale in Australia.

Located in Blackheath, NSW, the red MY2011 car is listed at $144,000.

The seller, Simon Crawford-Ash, told CarAdvice the Roadster represented a "pivotal moment" in automotive history.

"The rawness of it is what makes it so special. It is raw, unpolished and incredible to drive," he said.

"It is inspiring to touch and see how much had to be redesigned from an ordinary car. It is exposed and raw, and it feels very much like the prototype of future cars."

In 2017 Tesla announced plans for a new Roadster (pictured below), this time with a fixed roof, and claimed it would be capable of accelerating from 0 to 100kmh in 1.9 seconds faster than any production car available today.

After initially stating the car would be available by 2020, Tesla now says the Roadster will be launched in 2022.

Last Tesla Roadster ever built listed for more than $2 million

More:

Last Tesla Roadster ever built listed for more than $2 million - CarAdvice

The Tesla Model Y Made In Germany Will Be Quite Different – The Drive

Good morning and welcome back to Speed Lines, The Drive's roundup of what matters in the world of cars and transportation. It's Friday, and that is always a good thing. On tap for today: the "fundamental architecture" of the Tesla Model Y will be differentwhen it comes to Germany, Volvo's hybrid gamble pays off and BMW's still trying the hydrogen thing.

A quick programming note: due in large part to the extremely slow auto industry news cycle as of late, Speed Lines will be running on Monday, Wednesday and Friday from now on for the foreseeable future. If you have strong feelings about this move or general feedback, I'd love to hear them in the comments.

Tesla had another great week, posting its fourth consecutive quarterly profit at $104 million and even more deliveries than in Q1. It announced its next factory will be in the Austin, Texas area. Its stock price continues to soar until it becomes the standard by which all global currency is judged by. All good things for the most-watched automaker on the planet.

But this is Elon Musk we're talking about, so there's always a chance he'll pull a fast one on the rest of us. Buried in Tesla's Q2 earnings call is a detail that didn't catch a lot of headlines: the fact that the Model Y crossover sounds like it will be significantly retooled when its production begins in Germany's Giga Berlin plant sometime next year. Here's a transcript of that call from Seeking Alpha, emphasis mine:

Well, we bring a massive amount of effort into manufacturing engineering, the machine that makes the machine. There's probably 1,000%, maybe 10,000% more engineering required for the factory then for the product itself. So we're certainly making progress. I mean, battery and powertrain factory, Gigafactory in Nevada is, you know, alien dreadnought version 0.5, something like that, starting to approach version 1.

We're getting way better at making cars. You can see that in Giga Shanghai. You'll see that even more with Berlin. And we're really changing the design of the car in order to make it more manufacturable. The fundamental architecture of Model Y will be different in Berlin, it may look the same, but the internals will be quite different and fundamentally more efficient architecturally than what we've done to date.

And Tesla manufacturing exec Drew Baglino followed up:

Yes. I was going to expand on that. I think part of the Alien Dreadnought concept is not just automation, but minimizing the number of process steps and complexity involved in the manufacturing system, which involves really integrating design and manufacturing across from like when the raw materials enter the factory to the finished goods exit. And we're learning so much through doing that.

It's extremely rare, if not entirely unprecedented, for an all-new car to be retooled completely with a year or two of its launch while it still looks the same. Having said that, quality issues around the Model Y are already well-documented, and considering the many, many production problems its sibling the Model 3 had, it does not surprise me that Tesla is trying to retool things as it gets that car out to the global masses.

This could well be a catch-up movelike a software patchafter Tesla rushed to get the Model Y out on time. Baglino is talking about production; Musk seems to be talking about the car itself. An Electrek post from earlier this month indicates it's a mix of both.

Presumably, those manufacturing techniques will be adapted at the Fremont and Shanghai plants, so it will be interesting to see if the Model Y itself is really that much of a different car. Somebody get Sandy Munro on the phone.

Gone, somewhat sadly, are the days when Volvo subsists on turbocharged five-cylinder engines. But in their place have been a new generation of plug-in hybrid, forced-induction motors across the entire range. They're impressive powerplants for sure; I was just testing a T8 XC90 and was won over by its power and efficiency.

These motors are clicking with buyers, too, reports Automotive News. Plug-in hybrid sales are now up 80 percent in the first half of 2020. From that story:

"In the first half 14 percent of the cars we sold globally were hybrids," Volvo CEO Hakan Samuelsson toldAutomotive News Europe in a telephone interview. "In Europe, it was close to a quarter of the cars we sold."

The actual figure was 24 percent, up from 9 percent in the first half of 2019, according to Volvo's figures for Europe, which include the EU, Britain and the European Free Trade Association (EFTA) countries.

Globally Volvo sold 37,775 plug-in hybrids during the first six months, up from 21,015 during the same period last year.

It's been especially good for Volvo in Europe, where, like all automakers, it is trying to wean itself off diesel sales and still appeal to customers who don't want to pay high prices for petrol. I'm in favor of it too because increased hybrid sales can only help to drive battery costs down as the market gradually shifts to fully electric cars.

Speaking of alternate powertrains, BMWwhich along with Honda and Toyota was on the hydrogen train longer than it probably should have beenhasn't given up on the fuel cell game. It's doing a hydrogen version of the X5 starting in 2022, reports Bloomberg:

BMW AG will make a version of its X5 SUV that runs on hydrogen fuel-cells, part of the carmakers plan of producing as many drive variants as possible until one technology proves dominant.

The i Hydrogen NEXT will get a limited production run starting in 2022, the German manufacturer said in a statement Friday. Toyota Motor Corp. will supply the fuel cells for the vehicle.

The technology could have the potential to become another pillar in the portfolio of BMW, Chief Executive Officer Oliver Zipse said.

View original post here:

The Tesla Model Y Made In Germany Will Be Quite Different - The Drive

What Are EV Regulatory Credits And Why Is Tesla Selling So Many Of Them? – Yahoo Finance

Tesla Inc (NASDAQ: TSLA) reported its fourth consecutive profitable quarter on Wednesday after the company generated 50 cents in GAAP EPS in the second quarter. Despite an earnings and revenue beat, Tesla shares fell 5%on Thursday, and regulatory credits may be to blame.

Tesla reported $6.04 billion in revenue in the second quarter. However, despite opening a new plant in China and launching the new Model Y, Teslas automotive sales were down 4% from a year ago.

Tesla also reported just $104 million in GAAP net income in the second quarter, but that profit includes $428 million in regulatory credit sales.

What Are Regulatory Credits? Environmental emissions programs around the world, such as the Zero Emissions Vehicle (ZEV) program in California, give out credits to automakers that produce and sell electric vehicles. In addition to California, there are at least 13 other U.S. states that have similar programs in place. If an automaker doesnt have enough credits by the end of the year, it could face punishment from state regulators.

Since Tesla produces nothing but EVs, the company racks up way more credits than it needs to meet the minimum regulatory requirements, so it turns around and sells the excess credits to other automakers so that they can avoid penalties.

For example, Fiat Chrysler Automobiles NV (NYSE: FCAU) has reportedly committed to buying $1.27 billion in credits from Tesla to comply with new European environmental regulations that go into effect in 2021.

See Also:ARK Invest Analyst Discusses Tesla's Path To ,000 Share Price

Why Does It Matter? Since Tesla receives these regulatory credits for free, they're able to sell them at 100% profit margins, which boosts the companys overall margins. Teslas regulatory credit sales revenue in the second quarter was up nearly 200% from a year ago.

Tesla is seemingly relying heavily on these credits to turn a profit, according to GLJ Research analyst Gordon Johnson.

In fact, given TSLA is guiding 2020 credit sales of $1.2bn vs. the current consensus EBIT estimate of $1.2bn, TSLA is effectively guiding to zero profits from actually selling cars, again, in 2020, Johnson wrote in a note.

To make matters worse, Johnson and other analysts say demand for these credits is unsustainable in the long-term as automakers around the world roll out their own EV models in coming years. Without this 100%-margin revenue boost, Johnson estimates Teslas actual automotive gross margin was just 18.7% in the second quarter, its lowest level in a year.

TSLA Chart by TradingView new TradingView.widget( { "width": 680, "height": 423, "symbol": "NASDAQ:TSLA", "interval": "D", "timezone": "Etc/UTC", "theme": "light", "style": "1", "locale": "en", "toolbar_bg": "#f1f3f6", "enable_publishing": false, "allow_symbol_change": true, "container_id": "tradingview_8e1fc" } );

Benzingas Take: Tesla certainly isnt doing anything wrong in profiting off of its excess regulatory credits, but investors can bet their bottom dollar other auto companies like Fiat Chrysler are doing everything they can to wean themselves off of buying credits and boosting Teslas numbers as soon as possible.

A big part of Teslas 500%gain in the past year has been proving a sustainably profitable business model, but its unlikely that regulatory credit sales will be part of that equation in the long-term.

Latest Ratings for TSLA

View More Analyst Ratings for TSLA View the Latest Analyst Ratings

See more from Benzinga

2020 Benzinga.com. Benzinga does not provide investment advice. All rights reserved.

See original here:

What Are EV Regulatory Credits And Why Is Tesla Selling So Many Of Them? - Yahoo Finance

Huston-Tillotson University announces partnership with Tesla on learning initiatives, programs for students – KXAN.com

AUSTIN (KXAN) Huston-Tillotson University, Austins only Historically Black College and University, is partnering with Tesla to begin working on innovative learning opportunities for its students.

On Wednesday, the Tesla car company announced it will build its next Gigafactory in the Austin area, and now the university says its plans with Tesla are even closer to fruition.

Huston-Tillotson said its collaborating with Tesla to form strategies involving faculty collaborations, undergraduate research and more.

The university said it hopes the employment opportunities that will be possible because of the Tesla partnership will help prepare students for mid- to-high-skilled careers.

Huston-Tillotson said in its welcome letter to Tesla:

We anticipate our collaboration with Tesla to lead ultimately to internships, apprenticeships, externships, and fruitful careers for HT students. Tesla is an organization that aligns with and supports Huston-Tillotson Universitys core values and mission. Tesla, welcome to Austin, Texas!

Originally posted here:

Huston-Tillotson University announces partnership with Tesla on learning initiatives, programs for students - KXAN.com

Options traders bet Tesla’s earnings report will add $75 billion to the stock’s market cap – CNBC

Tesla speeds into Wednesday afternoon's earnings report having added more than $142 billion to its market cap since it last reported on April 29.

Some options traders are betting that the electric automaker can add another $75 billion to that number by the end of this week.

The stock price has doubled during that period, and has soared by nearly 275% in 2020. Tesla would have to bounce another 25% out of earnings to complete that market cap move by Friday, but options traders are more than willing to bet that Elon Musk's company is more than capable of doing exactly that.

"We saw call volume outpace put volume today by [a ratio of] about 2 to 1. Most of that was very short-dated. Right now, the options market is implying a move of about 14% by the end of the week," Optimize Advisors CIO Michael Khouw said Tuesday on CNBC's "Fast Money."

While options contract pricing in Tesla may be implying a move of 14% in either direction, the most popular strike in Tuesday's session were actually those that required a 25% move higher just to break even.

"Most of that activity was concentrated in the weekly 2,000-strike calls," said Khouw. "Almost 20,000 of those traded for around about $25 [per contract]. Buyers of those calls are obviously betting that the stock could go above that $2,000 strike price by the end of the week."

While these traders are confident in Tesla completing this mammoth move higher in such a short period of time, the overall options market is less certain of the stock's ability to get it done. According to Khouw, the market is predicting only a 14% chance that these contracts end up being profitable.

Tesla was trading 1% higher Wednesday morning.

Disclaimer

Continue reading here:

Options traders bet Tesla's earnings report will add $75 billion to the stock's market cap - CNBC

Tesla and Microsoft Earnings Will Move the Market – Barron’s

ROBYN BECK/AFP via Getty Images

Text size

The most important events for the stock market Wednesday will come after the closewhen Microsoft and Tesla will report earnings.

Tesla stock is up 275% year to date, and its now the worlds most valuable car company, worth almost $300 billion. Microsoft is up a paltry 32%, but after adding $380 billion in market cap, its now worth $1.5 trillion, making it the second most valuable company in the U.S., trailing only Apple.

Newsletter Sign-up

A morning briefing on what you need to knowin the day ahead, including exclusive commentary fromBarron's and MarketWatch writers.

Expectations are high. Officially, Tesla is expected to post a small second-quarter loss, but that estimate appears stale. Teslas second-quarter deliveries crushed forecasts, and analysts have been slow to adjust their numbers. The so-called whisper number could be closer to 50 cents in per share profit. The stakes are high: If Tesla produces a quarterly profit, its stock could be added to the S&P 500.

Microsoft is expected to earn $1.36 a share and, like Tesla, it will have to do better than the official numbers to meet heightened expectations. The company has topped earnings estimates for 16 straight quarters. The last time Microsoft missed estimates the stock dropped 7.2%. There will be less drama at Microsoft, but earnings still matter.

Come to think of it, earnings always matter.

Al Root

The U.S. State Department ordered Chinas foreign ministry to close its Houston consulate Wednesday.

Whats Next: The U.S. governments approach toward China could continue through November as President Donald Trump and Secretary of State Mike Pompeo have blamed China for the coronavirus outbreak. Retaliation by China could inject more uncertainty into already-shaken markets.

Archie Mitchell

The U.S. Department of Justice says two men who worked for Chinas intelligence service gained unauthorized access to computers around the world and stole terabytes of data, targeting everything from gaming software development to Covid-19 research.

Whats Next: Li and Dong are unlikely to face trial over the charges because China doesnt have an extradition treaty with the U.S. But the indictment serves to raise awareness of the financial and intellectual property threat posed by such hacksand deter others who might lack the same protections.

Anita Hamilton

President Trump held his first coronavirus briefing since April on Tuesday, during which he told reporters at the White House that the Covid-19 pandemic would probably get worse before it gets better.

Whats Next: Trumps briefing also comes as he trails in polls to former Vice President Joe Biden. Given the spike in cases paired with polling that shows many Americans dont approve of how he has handled the pandemic, the president might look to such briefings as a way to win over the American public.

Connor Smith

Former Vice President Joe Biden laid out his latest economic proposal, a plan for child and elder care, on Tuesday. The presumptive Democratic presidential nominee called for $775 billion to be spent over the next 10 years on tax credits for early childhood care, universal prekindergarten for 3- and 4-year-olds, and increased spending on in-home care for the elderly and disabled.

We cant just build back to the way things were before ...This is about dignity and respect for working people. Joe Biden

Whats Next: Even if Biden is elected and Democrats win a majority in the Senate in November, Republicans would likely still have enough votes to use a filibuster to block Bidens proposals. To push any plans through, Biden would either have to work with Republicans or convince the Senate to eliminate the filibuster entirely.

Ben Walsh

A fourth Covid-19 rescue package wont pass until early August, House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy (R., Calif.) and Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R., Ky.) said Tuesday. The extra unemployment benefits that more than 30 million workers are receiving would expire before a deal to extend or modify them can be struck.

Whats Next: Senate Republicans, still trying to navigate fissures in their own caucus and with the White House, have yet to present their proposal. Without that, the one thing that needs to happen for a bill to passnegotiationscant begin in earnest.

Ben Walsh

Dear Moneyist,

My dad passed away from Covid-19 in early April, 2020. He was a first responder at a walk-in clinic, and was in great health with no underlying health conditions. His death is still a shock to me as he and I were very close.

Me, my sister, our stepmother of five years, and her son are left behind. He did not leave a will. It has been over two months, and we have now just received financial information regarding our dads estate.

My stepmother hired a lawyer who wants us to sign papers to say she gets everything (money, house and car) and my sister and I basically get nothing (just enough to cover one semester of college).

She originally agreed to split everything evenly, and now she is denying any mention of that. She claims she wants all of this to be fair and the court system is fair when she knows none of this is respectable.

She said if we dont sign our rights over, she will put everything through probate, including memorable items like family heirlooms, clothes, pictures or anything she possibly could. What should our next move be?

Feeling Trapped

Read The Moneyists response.

Quentin Fottrell

Newsletter edited by Stacy Ozol, Anita Hamilton, Matt Bemer, Benjamin Levisohn

Original post:

Tesla and Microsoft Earnings Will Move the Market - Barron's

Will The German Car Giants Ever Catch Tesla? – Forbes

Its becoming a bit of a clich to say that Tesla TSLA has a lead on its competitors. But when the CEO of Audi Markus Duesmann claims his company is years behind its American rival, it makes you wonder if they can ever make up the distance. Although Audis e-tron electric SUV has been a popular seller, driving it back-to-back with Teslas Model X is very informative about exactly where both companies strengths lie. Overall, the comparison doesnt look good for Audi.

Tesla's cars have clear technological advantages over their German competitors. (Photo by Yichuan ... [+] Cao/NurPhoto via Getty Images)

In the UK, the e-tron is quite a bit cheaper, starting at 60,650 ($77,500) where the Model X begins at 82,980 ($106,000). But in the US the e-tron is about the same price as it is in the UK, whereas the Model X Long Range is $84,990. If youre in the market for a luxury SUV, the price difference might not be so important, and its not that much in America anyway. What you get for your extra money is, though, and as Audis Duesmann points out, the most significant factor is range. The basic e-tron has a 71kWh battery, 30% less than the Model Xs 100kWh. But its WLTP range is just 190 miles, where the Model X Long Range has a 314-mile WLTP rating. So the Audi has around 60% the range of the Tesla from 70% as much battery. The difference is not just because the Model X has more batteries, it also gets more mileage out of them. The more expensive e-tron 55 Quattro has 95kWh of batteries, yet still only offers 271 miles of WLTP range.

One of the reasons for this is the aerodynamics of the two cars. Despite being a massive SUV, the Model X has a drag coefficient of 0.25, where the e-trons is 0.28. Both are good, when you consider that a Porsche 911 has a drag coefficient of 0.29, but the Model X has a major edge. The greater battery quantity is worth noting, too, when you sit inside a Model X and wonder where Tesla has actually put them all. Duesmann agrees that that is an area where Tesla has an engineering lead. The e-tron is resolutely a five-seater, while the Model X has six- and seven-seat options, plus a much bigger luggage space if you drop the rear seats down. It can tow 2.3 tons too, compared to the e-trons 1.8.

Audi's e-tron has won some popularity, but it lags behind the Tesla Model X in key specifications. ... [+] (Photo by Joe Scarnici/Getty Images for Audi)

Most car enthusiasts will agree that Tesla interiors are a bit bleak compared to their German competitors. There are precious few discrete button controls for things like the air conditioning, with virtually everything operated via the central LCD panel. The general sense of luxury is lower, too, with Audis, BMWs and particularly Mercedes having a much greater sense of attention to detail in the seating designs and fit and finish. Tesla also has a controversial reputation for quality control, and came tenth from bottom in a recent used car reliability survey in the UK.

Whichever Tesla Model X you buy, though, it will be faster than the e-tron, both to 60mph and in top speed. The e-tron tends to understeer and you can feel all of its 2.5-ton weight, whereas the Model X weighs around the same but somehow manages to handle much more nimbly. If you look at the Mercedes alternative, the EQC, the differences are similar. Its about the same price as the e-tron, but with similar deficiencies in range, interior space, towing capacity, handling and performance, albeit enjoying an interior design that many would prefer over the Model Xs.

The battery placement within the Tesla Model X chassis leaves room for loads of interior space. ... [+] (Photo by Sjoerd van der Wal/Getty Images)

Tesla isnt resting on its battery laurels, either. Weve already discussed how Tesla is already looking towards the next generation of Cobalt-free battery technology, but the company has also been great at making deals with battery manufacturers, such as the recently announced expansion of its joint venture with Panasonic to three years. The Cobalt-free batteries are rumored to be part of a deal with Chinese battery maker CATL.

To explain Teslas lead as coming mostly from its battery advantage would be wrong, however. Jack Dolan of A2Mac1 reckons its no individual advantage that gives Tesla the lead, but the combination of lots of factors. A2Mac1 is a global company that takes apart new vehicles from every manufacturer and builds a database of how they are put together, which major carmakers around the world subscribe to. So A2Mac1 knows a thing or two about what some cars do better than others. Everything from battery density to how the dashboard instruments are attached to a crossbar give Tesla cars incremental benefits. Nikkei Business Publicationss teardown of the Model 3 has also claimed to find electronics that was at least six years ahead of what a major Japanese automaker could achieve in self-driving.

BMW only just officially announced the iX3, its first electric SUV. (Photo credit should read ... [+] NICOLAS ASFOURI/AFP via Getty Images)

All of these advantages stem from one prime mover. Tesla took electric cars seriously when the German manufacturers were still putting all their motor design eggs in the diesel basket, because they thought CO2 emissions were the biggest problem. Then it turned out NOx particulates were an issue as well, and they had been massaging their CO2 figures anyway. Only once they realized their mistakes did they decide that they needed an EV strategy as well. Audi may have five different EV platforms to choose from, but the company has only been producing pure EVs for a couple of years, and VWs much-anticipated ID.3 just became available to order a few days ago. BMWs may have been launched its i3 in 2014, but has taken its eye off the ball since then and only just recently announced its first electric SUV, the iX3.

Overall, then, Tesla is ahead because it has been building mainstream EVs for longer than other car manufacturers and taken a more bullish stance on driving the market in new directions. The German automakers are still hedging their bets with hybrids and plug-in hybrids alongside pure electric vehicles, clinging onto internal combustion engines for as long as they can. They have lots of manufacturing history and huge capacity, but as the market shifts towards electric, a lot of what they were good at will become less relevant, and they may never catch Tesla. Thats why Teslas shares tripled in value over the last year, and theyre still going up. The investment community can see which direction things are headed.

Excerpt from:

Will The German Car Giants Ever Catch Tesla? - Forbes

Tesla On A ‘Hiring Spree’ In China As It Readies For Model Y Production: Report – Benzinga

Tesla Inc (NASDAQ: TSLA) has launched a large recruitment drive in China as it prepares to manufacture the Model Y vehicle at its Shanghai factory, Reuters reportedlate Monday.

The electric vehicle maker is hiring both designers and factory workers, according to job posts seen by the newswire.

Tesla is reported to have posted the jobs on its human resources departments WeChat account and is hiring designers in China for the first time, though the company didn't say how many it planned to hire.

The Palo Alto-based automakersaid in January it wanted to open a research and design center in the country to make Chinese-style cars.

Tesla is also looking to hire 600 workers for its assembly plant in Shanghai, a local government job posting revealed. It's hiring another 150 workers for quality checks, 200 for logistics, and 20 for security.

The Elon Musk-led EV maker is planning to construct facilities to make the Model Y SUV in China and the hiring is in relation to those plans, people familiar with the matter told Reuters.

In March, Tesla advertised to hire solar project managers for the expansion of its energy business on the Chinese mainland.

Wedbush Analyst Daniel Ives estimated this monththat Teslas growth in China is worth at least $400 per share and EV penetrationwould ramp up significantly over the next 12 to 18 months.

The companysold 15,000 Model 3 vehicles in China in June and 11,000 in May.

Tesla shares closed 8.65% higher at $1,539.60 on Monday and added another0.2% in the after-hours trading.

2020 Benzinga.com. Benzinga does not provide investment advice. All rights reserved.

Read the original here:

Tesla On A 'Hiring Spree' In China As It Readies For Model Y Production: Report - Benzinga

Watch Out, Tesla: BMW Is Racing Ahead With Its Electric Vehicle Plans – The Motley Fool

Accelerating its push into the electric vehicle (EV) market, BMW (OTC:BAMX.F) announced Monday that it will have 25 electric models -- half of them fully electric -- on the market by 2023. Of particular note in the announcement was the revelation that the German automaker will be manufacturing a fully electric version of its 5 Series, though it didn't indicate when consumers can expect to see them in showrooms. Looking farther into the future, BMW stated that "In ten years, the goal is to have a total of more than seven million electrified BMW Group vehicles on the roads around two thirds of them with a fully electric drive train."

The company's move to expand its EV lineup reflects its increasing focus on sustainability. Over the next decade, for example, BMW is targeting an overall carbon dioxide reduction per vehicle of at least one third. "This new strategic direction will be anchored in all divisions from administration and purchasing to development and production, all the way to sales," CEO Oliver Zipse stated. "We are taking sustainability to the next level."

Image source: BMW.

Tesla (NASDAQ:TSLA) already has been facing the prospect of higher competitive pressures from private companies like Lucid Motors and Fisker, as well as from recent IPO Nikola (NASDAQ:NKLA), which is coming closer to starting production of its Tre and Two models. But news of BMW's plans should serve as a reminder to investors that it's not only start-ups that represent a potential threat to Tesla -- industry stalwarts also have plans to grab shares of the electric vehicle market.

Read the original:

Watch Out, Tesla: BMW Is Racing Ahead With Its Electric Vehicle Plans - The Motley Fool

Nike Taps Former Tesla Executive as Its New Diversity Chief – Bloomberg

Nike Inc. promoted a former Tesla Inc. executive to become its new head of diversity, turning to a Black veteran of Silicon Valley to help make the sportswear giant more inclusive.

Felicia Mayo, who worked at Tesla Inc., Juniper Networks Inc. and Oracle Corp. before joining Nike last year, will take the title of chief talent, diversity and culture officer, the company said Monday in an emailed statement. Kellie Leonard -- who had served as Nikes chief diversity and inclusion officer, a slightly different title -- is stepping down.

Chief Executive Officer John Donahoe has said the company aspires to be a leader in building a diverse, inclusive team and culture. Though Nike is known for sponsoring Black athletes and appealing to Black consumers, it has fallen short of its ideals internally, he said in a memo to employees last month.

What I have learned is that many have felt a disconnect between our external brand and your internal experience, said Donahoe, who became CEO in January. You have told me that we have not consistently supported, recognized and celebrated our own Black teammates in a manner they deserve. This needs to change.

Leonard, an 18-year veteran of Nike, is leaving to pursue other interests, the company said. We thank Kellie for her many contributions to the brand and her leadership.

When she was named to the job in 2018, becoming Nikes first chief diversity officer, the company was working to change its male-dominated culture after complaints of bullying and sexist behavior by executives. In recent months, addressing racial injustice has become a growing priority.

When we say that Black Lives Matter, it applies to the world outside of Nike and, importantly, it applies to our Black teammates within Nike, Donahoe, a longtime tech executive before taking the reins at Nike, said in the June memo. Simply put, we need to hold ourselves to a high standard given the heritage of our company and our brand.

The Financial Times previously reported on Mayos appointment, saying Donahoe described the change as a structural shift focused on providing equal access to opportunity for all employees. At Tesla, Mayo served as head of diversity. She joined Nike last year as a vice president of human resources, according to her LinkedIn page.

Last month, Nike also turned Juneteenth, a date set aside to celebrate the end of slavery in the U.S., into a paid company holiday.

(Updates with details on title in second paragraph.)

Before it's here, it's on the Bloomberg Terminal.

See the original post:

Nike Taps Former Tesla Executive as Its New Diversity Chief - Bloomberg

Tesla Van With Camping & SpaceX Packages Brings It All Together Could It Replace Your Home? – CleanTechnica

July 26th, 2020 by Paul Fosse

After Elon Musk mentioned that Tesla was working on a couple more vehicles, a compact car and high capacity vehicle, my mind started to race about how this van-like vehicle could use all of the technologies that Elon has mentioned in various interviews. First, lets cover the basics that Im 99% sure the vehicle will have. I got some of these ideas from one of my Cybertruck articles. After that, Ill take things in a little different direction than our previous Tesla Cybervan article.

Now, just out of that box, it would be a very desirable vehicle for those with large families or for operating a large-capacity robotaxi or intercity shuttle. Just as a base vehicle, it could sell up to a million a year, as people (especially Americans) like a vehicle that can haul their belongings and tow their toys. The Off Road Edition adds the following features:

The Camping and Home Office option would have the following features:

Those options would mean it can replace a house for many people. You would need a place to park your van, but it doesnt really need any hookups for water, power, or sewage like a traditional RV. I listed a $99 a month charge for HOA for the fee to park it somewhere. This is much less than RV parks charge, but since it needs fewer hookups, RV parks would have to lower their prices for Tesla Vans. Instead of buying a car and a house, you could buy this van and use it as your home and car.

The Tesla Cybervan would also be designed to navigate in the tunnels built around the world by The Boring Company to avoid the heavy traffic in many urban environments. For longer distance travel, you could take your Cybervan on a HyperLoop tunnel at about 600 MPH or on a SpaceX Starship to go anywhere on the globe in about 30 minutes.

The SpaceX Crew Dragon Option really adds some far-out capabilities. With this option, you can load it into a SpaceX Starship and it will be airtight so you can take your vehicle to the moon or Mars. It will have air locks so you can get in and out of the vehicle. This version will cost a lot more and not have the regular doors since you couldnt use them in those harsh environments.

Ive had a lot of fun speculating about how the Cybervan could combine the features of the HVAC system, The Boring Company tunnels, SpaceX Starlink internet service, HyperLoops, and SpaceX Starships for Earth, Moon and Mars targeted flights. What do you think I got right or wrong? What ideas do you have for the Tesla Cybervan?

Appreciate CleanTechnicas originality? Consider becoming aCleanTechnica member, supporter, or ambassador or a Patreon.

Tags: HVAC, Octovalve, SpaceX, Starlink, Tesla, Tesla Cybervan, Tesla Vans

Paul Fosse A Software engineer for over 30 years, first developing EDI software, then developing data warehouse systems. Along the way, I've also had the chance to help start a software consulting firm and do portfolio management. In 2010, I took an interest in electric cars because gas was getting expensive. In 2015, I started reading CleanTechnica and took an interest in solar, mainly because it was a threat to my oil and gas investments. Follow me on Twitter @atj721 Tesla investor. Tesla referral code: https://ts.la/paul92237

Read more from the original source:

Tesla Van With Camping & SpaceX Packages Brings It All Together Could It Replace Your Home? - CleanTechnica

Is Now The Time To Short Tesla’s Stock? – Benzinga

Tesla Inc (NASDAQ: TSLA) shares took another big hit on Friday and are now down 9.8%since the company reported second-quarter earnings on Wednesday. The sell-off has eased some pressure of a short squeeze in the stock that has endured throughout 2020, and some traders are speculating now may finally be the time to short Tesla stock.

The Numbers: Prior to Teslas earnings report, short sellers had endured a $20.9 billion year-to-date mark-to-market loss in their aggregate positions, according to S3 Partners analyst Ihor Dusaniwsky. Teslas meteoric rise has forced a steady short squeeze throughout the year, triggering more than 13.8 billion shares worth of short covering year-to-date.

TSLAs short covering has been relatively consistent throughout the year with only a 2 month stretch of time, in March and April, when short selling increased or remained flat, Dusniwsky said.

However, even after the huge losses and mass exodus of short sellers, Dusaniwsky said Thursday that Tesla still has the single largest outstanding short position of any U.S. stock at around $19.9 billion in short interest.

Kass Going Short: While other short sellers are throwing in the towel, Seabreeze Partners Management president Doug Kass said Thursdayhe initiated a short position in Tesla at $1,642 onafter waiting patiently for an opportunity to short the stock for years.

Kass said Teslas potential inclusion in the S&P 500 is more than reflected in its recent share price.

Tesla, with a market capitalization of over $300 billion, reached profitability by virtue of a heavy dose of regulatory credits, so it was a poor quality report, Kass said of this weeks earnings report.

Kass said Tesla will be facingEV market competition in the years ahead, and the stock is finally easy enough to borrow that short sellers wont bleed to death paying fees.

It is my view that Tesla will trade at $1,000/share before it trades at $2,000/share, Kass said.

Benzingas Take: At this point, Kass call has been spot on with Tesla trading at around $1,432 on Friday. Tesla bears are hoping its S&P 500 eligibility continues to be a textbook example of a buy the rumor, sell the news trade.

Related Links:

What Are EV Regulatory Credits And Why Is Tesla Selling So Many Of Them?

Tesla's Valuation Still 'Appears Overcharged' Following Q2 Earnings

View More Analyst Ratings for TSLA View the Latest Analyst Ratings

2020 Benzinga.com. Benzinga does not provide investment advice. All rights reserved.

Link:

Is Now The Time To Short Tesla's Stock? - Benzinga

People Called Us Tesla Biased For Years. Perhaps We Just Analyzed The Story Decently? – CleanTechnica

Cars

Published on July 26th, 2020 | by Zachary Shahan

July 26th, 2020 by Zachary Shahan

I have no intention here to rub anything in the faces of people who were wrong about Tesla [TSLA]. Frankly, Im sure there were plenty of good, honest people who were just on the wrong side of a complicated analysis. I have known some of them. Disruptive transitions are disruptive because they can be sort of hard to see coming, or the inertia of human thought is just so strong that our mind blocks out whats obvious. Either way, the point is that you can be smart, thoughtful, and genuine but still have a faulty analysis about a disruptive technology and a disruptive company.

Weve been criticized by some parties for years for being Tesla fans or biased or simply irrational. There is no doubt we make mistakes. We make mistakes every day. You cant be in this industry full time and not make a lot of mistakes. This is not scientific research in which you perform a regression analysis and come to rigorous scientific conclusions on everything before you publish about it. Nonetheless, the mistakes are no less humbling and sometimes horribly embarrassing. It happens, and we own up to mistakes when we make them even if it is painful.

Regarding Tesla, though, I think there was actually such an anti-Tesla bias permeating the industry the auto industry, Wall Street, broader journalism, and beyond that any site that reported a consistently positive story on Tesla was written off by many as an illogical and biased fan site. At this point in time, though, I think its time for a bit of a reckoning, and while I dont want to boast (boasting sucks), I think its high time to reframe the view of the media landscape. We took a ton of unwarranted, illogical, biased heat for reporting the actual story of Tesla. Looking back several years, people who have been critical of our analyses and media outlets that have been highly skeptical or biased against Tesla should recognize:

Perhaps we just analyzed the Tesla situation and the Tesla story well, much better than many others.

We didnt write in large volume about some of the other EV efforts, such as clear compliance cars (electric cars built only to comply with regulations), and we didnt always have the prettiest take on certain startups or products because they simply were not as notable or compelling on a comprehensive level. We didnt see others on a path to disrupting the auto industry like Tesla was because, when we analyzed things, they didnt have the clear foundation or potential to do so.

Of course, we have also written thousands of articles on non-Tesla electric vehicles and the companies creating them. Its not like we didnt cover others as well. We are specifically not a Tesla fan site. However, no one is yet to rise to the level of Tesla when it comes to an individual electric vehicle product or the comprehensive e-mobility ecosystem it offers. We could see that years ago, as Tesla rolled out Supercharger after Supercharger, built Gigafactory 1 in Nevada, and then built Giga Shanghai more recently. Many others were overly skeptical of Tesla and its plans, but assuming they were right, we got put into a not fair and balanced category. People who didnt come to the same conclusions as we did saw us as overly optimistic on this young company. Thats fine. Have a different opinion and follow and support the sites that you think offer the best analysis. But, at some point, when reality plays out, recognize analyses were what they were more accurate or less accurate. Continuing down a path just because its the one you were on is wrong if you started out on the wrong path.

If Tesla is doing something that we think is leading in a bad direction, we report on it. Sometimes our writers even report on a new story from vastly different points of view, because we do not have one monolithic opinion here at CleanTechnica. However, we also dont avoid saying when something looks like it is going to be successful and highly popular. We do not shun making bold conclusions and sharing them. We do not hide behind a pretend to not have a human brain when reporting on the news ethos. We try to use our brains to understand the topics we are covering and then try to report both the news and our analyses of the news.

Over time, Im sure many people have come to the conclusion that CleanTechnica is a Tesla site, not an unbiased news and analysis site. Looking at things from the point of view of what has played out in reality, though, I hope some of those people will come up with the same humility we have to muster when we make mistakes and will recognize that what may have seemed like biased reporting to many a few years ago has turned out to be realistic, accurate reporting and analysis.

As for the future: no guarantees. We may screw up the story. But we have a few dozen people on our team who strive in a way that is above and beyond the norm to try to understand what is happening in cleantech and share insights on that. They do more than we can adequately reward them in financial compensation. If they offer a strong opinion on a technology or a topic, consider that it may well have come from an enormous amount of research and hours or years of thought. Also reflect on this: is it a good or bad thing if a news site is full of writers who have opinions on the things they write about?

We are dramatically far from perfect. We fail every day. But we try really freakin hard to do a good job. In the case of Tesla, it appears from the companys clear success to date, that seeing through the fear and negative hype was more accurate, realistic, and professional than hiding behind fake objectivity ad fashionable skepticism.

But thats just my biased take on things. If Tesla goes bankrupt in a year, I will take a deep breath and come out publicly to acknowledge that we did a horrible job reporting on the story and should reconsider our approach to our work. (If only media outlets that seem to have screwed up the Tesla story for so long would do the same.)

Side note: If you find this valuable and youd like to see us create more in-depth analyses and more voluminous news coverage, please do consider a monthly contribution of $3 or $5 or $10. Weve got to be worth more than a cup of coffee a month, right?

Tags: Tesla

Zachary Shahan is tryin' to help society help itself one word at a time. He spends most of his time here on CleanTechnica as its director, chief editor, and CEO. Zach is recognized globally as an electric vehicle, solar energy, and energy storage expert. He has presented about cleantech at conferences in India, the UAE, Ukraine, Poland, Germany, the Netherlands, the USA, Canada, and Curaao.Zach has long-term investments in Tesla [TSLA] after years of covering solar and EVs, he simply has a lot of faith in this company and feels like it is a good cleantech company to invest in. But he does not offer (explicitly or implicitly) investment advice of any sort on Tesla or any other company.

Continue reading here:

People Called Us Tesla Biased For Years. Perhaps We Just Analyzed The Story Decently? - CleanTechnica

Texas Matters: Pandemic Politics And The Tesla Effect On Texas – Texas Public Radio

Texas is losing in the fight against COVID-19. The refusal of Republican state leaders to mandate face masks and put in place a serious lockdown has given the coronavirus a clear path to burn through the states population. COVID-19 is infecting communities, filling up hospitals and leaving so many dead that many bodies are being stored in refrigerated trucks.

Meanwhile the state has been urging schools to reopen which public health experts agree will only make the situation much worse.

Its impossible to have a disaster of this magnitude occur and not have the people in power, who ignored the warning signs, pay a political penalty. But what will that look like?

For insight Harvey Kronberg, founder of the Quorum Report, explains how has the pandemic changed politics in Texas.

This week billionaire Elon Musk, the CEO of Tesla Motors, announced that they will be building their Cyberturck Gigafactory in Austin. This sounds great, but what is a gigafactory and what is a cybertruck? But more importantly, the question we need to be asking is what is the future of transportation? Many authorities in the auto industry predict that the next time you buy a brand new car, its likely going to be electric.

Zac Cataldo is the co-host of the Youtube channel "Now You Know" which produces "Tesla Time News." He answers the question: why did Elon Musk pick Austin?

David Martin Davies can be reached at DMDavies@TPR.org and on Twitter at @DavidMartinDavi.

TPR was founded by and is supported by our community. If you value our commitment to the highest standards of responsible journalism and are able to do so, please consider making yourgift of support today.

Originally posted here:

Texas Matters: Pandemic Politics And The Tesla Effect On Texas - Texas Public Radio

Charting Tesla, Apple, and Netflix. – TheStreet

Some of the most widely traded stocks in the market just happen to have incredible charts this week. Let's get right into it.

APPLE (AAPL)

Lots of questions about Apple as earnings are just a few days away. Despite Apple's recent pullback, the stock remains within a bull channel. As long as Apple stays within that channel, the bullish trend is intact.

If you've been waiting for a pullback to buy Apple, now could be the time. The stock's relative strength index, or RSI, is no longer giving an overbought reading. Instead, Apple's RSI is near 50, indicating a neutral reading.

TESLA (TSLA):

Friday's pullback should have been anticipated, due to the candlestick pattern that preceded it. That pattern, known as bearish engulfing, signaled that a pullback was about to occur. The large red candle actually engulfs several candles, shaded in yellow.

Like Apple, Tesla's RSI is no longer in overbought territory.

What's the most important thing to understand about Tesla's chart? Look at the stock's 20 day moving average, in black. Since the beginning of May, Tesla has bounced from that indicator repeatedly (arrows). When Tesla dropped sharply on Friday, where did the stock find support? You guessed it, right on the 20 day moving average. This week, it's crucial to see if Tesla can hold that line.

NETFLIX (NFLX)

Netflix formed a bearish candlestick pattern earlier this month, called a dark cloud cover. Netflix has been moving lower ever since, and is headed toward its 50 day moving average. That moving average has supported the stock a half dozen times over the past four months. Like Apple and Tesla, Netflix currently has a neutral RSI reading.

Tesla and Netflix have already reported earnings, Apple is scheduled for July 30th after the closing bell.

Got a question or a request? Hit me up in the comments section.

Ed Ponsi is the managing director of Barchetta Capital Management, and is the author of three books for publisher Wiley Finance. A dynamic public speaker, Ed has made appearances around the world, in such diverse locations as Singapore, Dubai, London, and New York. For more information about Ed and his work, click here.

Originally posted here:

Charting Tesla, Apple, and Netflix. - TheStreet

‘Radioactive’ and ‘Tesla’ celebrate science through the lens of its pioneers – CNN

Neither film is especially memorable, which is too bad, squandering Rosamund Pike as Marie Curie and Ethan Hawke, very intense and brooding as Nikola Tesla.

The overlapping themes, however, feature notable echoes of our current anti-science impulses -- in response to everything from coronavirus to vaccines to climate change -- in a way that gives these movies additional heft. They stream into homes (itself a relatively modern marvel) at a time when scientists find themselves pleading with segments of the public to heed their advice regarding the worst pandemic in a century.

The parallels between the two films, their protagonists and present-day politics go beyond that, beginning with the fact that both of these historical figures were immigrants -- Curie having left Poland for Paris, Tesla coming from what is now Croatia.

Curie, who discovered radioactivity working alongside her husband Pierre (Sam Riley), is shown struggling to get her ideas recognized and earn the requisite backing to pursue them. That continued after his death, when, among other things, she campaigned to introduce X-ray machines to World War I battlefields.

Tesla, too, must seek support for his innovations regarding electrical power from the likes of financier J.P. Morgan and Thomas Edison -- an inventor as well, but also a more astute businessman -- the latter played by Kyle MacLachlan.

Each movie contains sequences in which the protagonist must go begging for resources, championing breakthroughs that the existing establishment didn't fully grasp.

Both films also utilize the device of offering glimpses of the future that their respective subject's innovations made possible, such as Curie paving the way for the atomic bomb.

"Tesla" even more aggressively incorporates documentary-style techniques and weird anachronisms into the drama. His story is essentially narrated by Morgan's daughter, Anne (Eve Hewson), in a way that gives the movie a decidedly off-kilter spin. At one point, Hawke even sings a few bars of the 1980s song "Everybody Wants to Rule the World," recorded decades after Tesla's death.

Finally, both Curie and Tesla conspicuously chafed against the authority and social conventions of their era, paying a price for that personally and professionally. They're presented as being difficult personalities who didn't suffer fools particularly well, with Tesla balking when he's asked, "Is your brilliance a blessing or a curse?"

In "Radioactive," Curie dismisses being a woman as representing a major impediment to her endeavors, despite an actual photo in the closing credits that shows her as the lone female amid an assemblage of men.

Another shared theme hinges on the notion that an element of madness -- or at least, eccentricity and risk-taking -- goes hand in hand with genius. As Morgan tells Tesla, before writing him a big check, "I believe in the recklessness of great men."

Despite all the marvels introduced during the past 120 years, "Tesla" and "Radioactive" deliver what feels like an unexpectedly timely message -- namely, that great minds need to be heard and cultivated. It's hardly a sign of progress that many in our society, far from heeding that, have chosen to wear resistance to science and expertise as a badge of honor.

Like their protagonists, give the filmmakers credit for some creative risks. Even so, it's a shame that neither film lives up to the greatness of its subject.

"Radioactive" premieres July 24 on Amazon. "Tesla" will be available on demand on Aug. 21.

Visit link:

'Radioactive' and 'Tesla' celebrate science through the lens of its pioneers - CNN

Why Tesla Belongs in the Dow Jones Industrials – Motley Fool

Tesla (NASDAQ:TSLA) inspires both loyal fans and devout haters, but the stock's success is indisputable. Since its IPO 10 years ago, it has delivered amazing returns to its early shareholders. It's also built up an impressive company with a growing customer base, an expanding addressable market, and lofty aspirations.

Now that Tesla has achieved profitability, it's now just a matter of time before it gets an invitation to join the S&P 500 Index (SNPINDEX:^SPX). However, while admission to that club is based largely on objective criteria, the same isn't true for the Dow Jones Industrial Average (DJINDICES:^DJI). As crazy as it might seem, there's an increasingly compelling case for Tesla to join that elite band of 30 companies. Dow. Here are some of the best reasons why.

Image source: Tesla.

As its name suggests, the Dow was initially focused on industrial companies, and for over a century, the auto industry had representation in the average. That started with the admission of the American Car and Foundry Company in 1901, and at various times, companies like Studebaker, Nash Motors, and Chrysler were members of the Dow.

The longest-tenured car company in the Dow was General Motors (NYSE:GM), which had uninterrupted membership from 1925 to 2009. However, its bankruptcy following the financial crisis led to its removal. Since then, the Dow has gone more than a decade without representation from the auto industry.

Many investors note that Tesla's potential goes well beyond its vehicle manufacturing. For now, though, Tesla is squarely focused on cars and trucks. That makes it an industrial stock, and getting it into the Dow would make the average more industrial once again.

There's no market cap requirement for admission to the Dow, as the managers of the index generally seek companies that are representative of the broader economy rather than simply picking the biggest businesses available. However, Tesla's market cap has flirted with $300 billion recently, and that establishes the automaker as a leader in its field.

If Tesla were in the Dow, it would rank among the 10 companies with the largest market caps. It's also nearly nine times more valuable than the Dow stock with the lowest market cap, and it would have a nearly $100 billion margin of safety just to keep it out of the bottom half. Even those who argue that a correction for Tesla stock is long overdue have to admit that the company's size currently warrants giving it consideration for the industrial index.

Just about the only reason why Tesla shouldn't be in the Dow right now is that the average uses a price-weighted methodology in calculating its level. Because its share price has climbed well into four-digit territory, Tesla would have a much larger weighting in the Dow than any other stock.

However, there's precedent for companies with high share prices taking steps that eventually eased their path into the Dow. In the mid-2010s, Apple (NASDAQ:AAPL) stock climbed into the high-triple digits, which would've kept the iPhone giant out of the Dow. So Apple did a 7-for-1 stock split that brought its share price down to a much more manageable level.

A similar 7-for-1 split would put Tesla's stock in the $200 to $250 range based on recent prices. That would give it a substantial weighting in the average, but not an overwhelming one. If Tesla did a 10-for-1 stock split instead, it would find itself squarely in the middle of the index's pack in terms of share price.

Objectively, there are compelling reasons why Tesla deserves a spot in the Dow Jones Industrial Average. Practically, though, the move seems unlikely. The Dow represents old-school Wall Street in a way that CEO Elon Musk would likely reject out of hand.

It's possible that eventually, Tesla could still get an invitation. But it's much more likely that Dow investors will have to go without an auto stock in the index for a while longer.

The rest is here:

Why Tesla Belongs in the Dow Jones Industrials - Motley Fool

Tesla: An Opportunity To Buy The Dip – Seeking Alpha

Tesla's Q2 Report: Sell The News

With the hype surrounding Tesla's (NASDAQ:TSLA) second quarter earnings release, it seemed hard to see the stock racing any higher. Going into the report, retail, sell-side, and buy-side expectations seemed calibrated around a GAAP profit, and inclusion into the S&P 500. Anything other than this would have been disastrous for the stock. This was reflected in options pricing going into earnings. The implied move in the stock was among the highest of companies reporting earnings, standing at ~15% in either direction. If you think about it, with all the hype and increased expectations surrounding the report, a blowout of astronomical proportions would've been required to get that 15% move to the upside. Combined with the insane run-up and being technically overbought, a bit of a pullback was overdue.

While S&P 500 index inclusion is not a direct fundamental catalyst right now, it could be a catalyst for the stock (in the short-term) and for the fundamentals of the business (in the long-term). What do I mean by this?

Well, considering that Tesla reported a GAAP profit of $0.50/share in the Q2 report, the company has become eligible for S&P 500 index inclusion. This inclusion will increase institutional ownership of the stock. When the company is plugged into the S&P 500, index funds and mutual funds will be forced to enter a position in Tesla. A lot of these funds are buy-and-hold investors, not traders. Thus, a large portion of Tesla's float will be bought up by massive institutional holders. Because these managers hardly alter their positions, a large portion of the float will not be traded as frequently. This will likely lead to decreased volatility, which would lower Tesla's cost of capital. Though Tesla is firmly cash flow positive, and already has $8.6 billion in cash, one final massive capital raise could allow them too supercharge (no pun intended) their expansion plans. Think about it, Tesla is still set to expand Fremont factory, the Nevada Gigafactory, Gigafactory Shanghai, Gigafactory Texas, and Gigafactory Berlin. The last of those two factories will be the largest of Tesla's factories. The creation of these plants, and the ramp to full capacity production would be benefited immensely by a large capital raise.

By being included into the S&P 500 index, not only will Tesla gain a prestige by being an S&P 500 component, certain investors will likely be forced to buy Tesla stock in order to get exposure to the S&P 500 index as a whole. Increased buying pressure from large institutional investors will likely lead to higher stock in the short-term, and a less volatile one in the long-term. Lower volatility leads to a lower cost of capital, making large scale equity-based (or convertible) capital raises easier to pull off.

To be clear, at the beginning of 2018, I was a bear on Tesla stock. In my view, anybody who compared Tesla to Apple (NASDAQ:AAPL) or Amazon (NASDAQ:AMZN) was insane. But now, with Tesla's execution on their fundamentals, my mind has been changed. I believe Tesla combines certain attributes of both Amazon and Apple. I don't say this lightly.

Tesla is very reminiscent of Apple in one key respect:

Battery electric vehicles are the new disruptive technology, as smartphones were the new disruptive technology. That being said, smartphones were around in before Apple entered the market. The same is true with BEVs. When Apple unveiled the iPhone, they disrupted the smartphone market. When Tesla launched a practical, attractive, and functional BEV, they disrupted the market. Both companies are on the cutting-edge of innovation (or at least Tesla is nowadays as Apple's innovation slows). Tesla leads in battery chemistry in both efficiency and cost, which helps reduce the COGS (cost of goods sold) and increase the range (i.e. the functionality) of the product. Tesla's blend of functionality with style is something every other "competing" automaker has failed to do. In this was, Teslas are disruptive technologies.

Second of all, Tesla has a strong brand. Think about it. Do people say they intend on buying an electric car, or do they plan on buying a Tesla? The latter right? Even the bears admit Tesla fans are devoted to the company, with a lot of bears believing Tesla is a cult. Tesla's brand is second to none, other than maybe Apple itself. A brand as strong as Tesla's, while an intangible asset, is an asset nonetheless.

Third, Tesla's products are simple, yet sleek. The same can be said about Apple's products, the iPhone in particular. One example of this is Tesla's interior. Try comparing the interior of a mostly buttonless Model 3, versus the complex overcrowded interior of a traditional luxury vehicle. Sometimes, simplicity is best, as we have seen with Apple.

With regards to Tesla's comparison with Amazon, the similarities are a little fewer and further between. The biggest one is scale: grow big fast. Amazon's multi-decade focus on reinvesting profits into scaling the business model has paid off in a huge way. Amazon famously expanded from a digital bookstore to a digital empire. Amazon's business has been a capital intense business, as has Tesla's. CEO Elon Musk confirmed on the last earnings call that the company will be barely profitable while they pass on profits to the customer (likely through price cuts and whatnot) to scale up market share. This is a very similar strategy to Amazon's in terms of reinvesting profits to grow market presence. The other thing that Tesla does (and will continue to do), is reduce prices on their vehicles. While bears continue to misinterpret this as a lack of demand for their product, it is quite the opposite. As Tesla becomes more efficient at producing vehicles, they find internal cost savings. "Normal" companies would use this opportunity to expand their margin profile and improve profitability. Tesla uses this opportunity to lower pricing, passing on the margin to consumers. This lower pricing leads to increased demand, improving Tesla's market share dynamics. We have seen AWS (Amazon's cloud division) employ a similar strategy in growing its customer base and revenue. The parallels are striking.

(source)

As of right now, short interest in Tesla's stock stands at ~7.5% of the outstanding stock. As the stock sprints higher, the value of these short positions balloons, leading too a likely short squeeze. We have seen this play out over the last few months. The problem is, shorts continue to move the goalposts on the stock, something that I (ironically enough) claimed the bulls were doing when I was bearish myself. The argument has evolved:

One by one, Tesla has dismantled the bear case surrounding the stock, and the bears don't like it. So, rather than admitting they made the wrong call on the stock, they move the goalposts on it. Tesla's practice of just executing on their business model has done significant damage to the Tesla bears. Eventually, as Tesla continues to show profitability, bears will make the argument (the only valid one they have in my view) that Tesla's valuation is stretched. The problem is, the compare Tesla to an automaker rather than Amazon. As I have already talked about, Tesla has multiple striking parallels with the Amazon business model. Traditional analysis of Amazon versus other brick-and-mortar retailers would yield a far lower stock price than what Amazon trades at currently. The bears need to understand, Tesla is a disruptive force in the market that cannot be competed with, at least not yet. In addition, Tesla has other growth vertical in both energy and autonomy. Trying to value the stock on earnings, when management explicitly says they have no intention on earning more than the bare minimum, is not wise. Revenue is a better metric.

The clock is ticking on bears and disbelievers in the Tesla story. The company is executing, they are going to be admitted into the S&P 500, their business parallels big tech companies like Apple and Amazon, and bears continually move the goalposts. At a time when Tesla is called one of the greatest bubbles in the market, I would consider it the exact opposite. The recent dip in the stock is an opportunity to buy.

Disclosure: I am/we are long TSLA. I wrote this article myself, and it expresses my own opinions. I am not receiving compensation for it (other than from Seeking Alpha). I have no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article.

Additional disclosure: This is not financial advice. I am not a financial advisor. Please do your own due diligence before initiating a position in any of the aforementioned securities.

See the original post:

Tesla: An Opportunity To Buy The Dip - Seeking Alpha

Tesla Reaches a Milestone With Another Quarterly Profit – The New York Times

Heres what you need to know:Growing sales in China and Europe helped cushion the pandemics negative impact on Teslas sales in the United States.Credit...An Rong Xu for The New York Times

Tesla on Wednesday reported a profit of $104 million for the three months ending in June.

The profit surprised analysts who were expecting the electric carmaker to lose money because it was forced to halt production at its main plant in Fremont, Calif., for nearly two months, from late March until the middle of May. Sales also slowed as much of the economy shut down and as millions of people lost their jobs and cut back on spending.

The profit was achieved despite tremendous difficulties in the quarter, the companys chief executive, Elon Musk, said in a conference call with analysts. We were able to achieve a fourth consecutive profitable quarter. Although the auto industry was down about 30 percent year-over-year, we managed to grow deliveries in the first half of the year.

In a statement, Tesla said revenue in the second quarter fell 5 percent, to $6 billion. Total sales of automobiles declined 5 percent, to about 91,000 cars, an update to preliminary figures it released earlier this month. Growing sales in China and Europe helped cushion the pandemics negative impact on sales in the United States.

The companys profit was also made possible by the sales of $428 million in emissions credits to other automakers who need them to meet regulatory standards. Thats nearly four times as many credits as it sold in the same quarter a year earlier.

Tesla said it ended the quarter with $8.6 billion in cash, up $535 million from the end of March.

The company added that it now has the capacity to produce more than 500,000 cars a year. While achieving this goal has become more difficult, delivering half a million vehicles in 2020 remains our target, Tesla said.

Tesla appears to be weathering the pandemic better than some other automakers. In China, the worlds largest market for electric vehicles, the company has benefited from a new factory near Shanghai that began production late last year. The plant enables Tesla to avoid the tariffs China imposes on imported vehicles and has made its cars more affordable to Chinese consumers.

The company has also added to its lineup a fourth car, the Model Y sport-utility vehicle, which is made in Fremont. Mr. Musk has said that he expects the car to become its biggest seller.

Elon Musk, the chief executive of Tesla, could soon qualify for his second giant payday of the year.

Mr. Musks compensation is driven largely by the performance of Teslas stock. And as the carmakers share price has soared in recent weeks, he stands to receive a stock award worth roughly $2 billion. The awards are part of an unusual compensation package, set up in 2018. The first payout under that plan occurred in May and now is also worth close to $2 billion.

Teslas stock has risen just over 275 percent this year, as investors have become increasingly convinced that the company will have a dominant foothold in the global market for electric vehicles. The rise in the stock has bolstered Teslas stock market value to around $290 billion, or $100 billion more than Toyotas market value.

Mr. Musks 2018 compensation package was designed to release shares in 12 installments as certain milestones are met. The first goal was for Teslas market value to be at least $100 billion on average over two different time periods that was achieved in January. Tesla also had to hit operational milestones. Over 12 months, the company has to have brought in a certain amount of revenue or a measure of profits called earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization. In May, Tesla said it had used the lowest revenue hurdle, $20 billion, to release the first tranche of shares.

Teslas market value recently exceeded $150 billion on average over the past six months and over the last 30 trading days, the threshold for the release of the second batch of shares. Tesla has already hit the lowest profit goal without considering the companys second quarter results released on Wednesday, in theory giving him the operational achievement he needs to get the shares, though the board still has to release the award. If Teslas share price stays close to current levels, Mr. Musk might even qualify for the third tranche of his stock awards this year.

Critics of the 2018 compensation package questioned why it was necessary. Before the award, Mr. Musk already owned a large chunk of Tesla shares that today are worth around $60 billion. Thats more than twice the $25 billion worth of shares available to Mr. Musk through the 2018 package. Amazons Jeff Bezos, another visionary chief executive, has not needed multibillion compensation packages to motivate him as he has led his company to become a dominant force in the American economy.

A surprise profit in the second quarter has set Tesla up for another major milestone: potential inclusion in the S&P 500 index. The index is one the most widely followed measures of the performance American stock market, with more than $11 trillion worth of mutual funds and other investments measured against it.

The company said on Wednesday it earned $104 million in the three months through June, in its fourth consecutive quarter of profitability.

Its unusual for companies with market values as large as Tesla roughly $290 billion not to be included in the S&P 500. But the companys inability to consistently generate profits has made it ineligible so far. (Criteria for inclusion require the sum of the companys fully audited profits in the four most recent quarters to be positive.)

The lack of profits hasnt bothered investors. Teslas share price has logged an astounding gain of more than 275 percent this year. But if Tesla were to be included in the index, it could trigger another upward push by stimulating a surge in demand for the shares by institutional investors.

Index-based funds low cost investment vehicles designed to mirror the performance of indexes like the S&P 500, rather than trying to beat the market must buy any stock included in the index, creating a rush for the shares of companies that are newly added.

When a company goes in that means theres a lot of buying there, said Howard Silverblatt, senior index analyst at S&P Dow Jones Indices, the company that publishes the S&P 500.

Changes to the index can, and do, occur regularly. For instance, when a company is removed from the S&P 500 after a merger or bankruptcy, requiring a new addition. The additions can occur at any time and are kept especially close to the vest by S&P, because of the money making opportunity someone could have if they learned about an inclusion before everybody else.

Nobody is supposed to know. The company isnt supposed to know themselves, Mr. Silverblatt said. Nobody even calls them.

Tesla has started work on its fourth car factory at a site near Austin, Texas, the companys chief executive, Elon Musk told analysts on Wednesday.

The factory will produce a new electric pickup truck and a new semi truck, along with the Model 3 and Model Y, which it already makes at a factory in the San Francisco Bay Area. The new factory represents a substantial investment for Tesla, which is already expanding a plant in Shanghai and building another one near Berlin.

We will be creating a massive Cybertruck and semi factory in Texas, Mr. Musk said, adding that the plant would be open to the public and have a boardwalk, biking trails and bird sanctuary.

Officials in Travis County, which includes Austin, this month approved a tax break to recruit Tesla, which was also being courted by Oklahoma and other states.

American Airlines and Southwest Airlines on Wednesday became the first major airlines in the United States to broaden their mask requirements to include passengers with a medical condition or disability that would otherwise prevent them from wearing one.

If a customer is unable to wear a face covering or mask for any reason, Southwest regrets that we will be unable to transport the individual, the airline said in a statement, noting that the virus can be spread by individuals who are unaware that they have been infected.

American followed suit, saying: All customers must wear a face covering from the time they enter their departure airport and not remove it until they exit their arrival airport.

The airlines said that children under the age of 2 will still be allowed to fly without a mask, a policy in line with other major carriers. Delta Air Lines still allows exceptions for individuals with a disability or medical condition that prevents them from wearing a mask, and United Airlines says individuals seeking exemptions should reach out to its staff.

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recommends against masks for children under 2 years old and people with a medical condition or disability. A recent study indicated that children under 10 are less likely to transmit the virus than adults and older children, though the risk is not zero.

Southwests policy goes into effect on Monday, while Americans will start on July 29. Earlier in the day, United said it would extend its requirement for masks on planes to any area it operated in an airport. Southwest and Delta already had such policies in place.

Southwest and American are also expected to release financial results from the industrys devastating second quarter on Thursday morning. United said on Tuesday that its operating revenue declined 88 percent during the quarter from a year earlier, leading to a $1.6 billion loss. Delta said last week that its quarterly revenue had dropped 87 percent, resulting in a $5.7 billion loss.

Microsoft on Wednesday said its revenue rose 13 percent in the last quarter despite the slump in the economy. The companys growth was led by big gains in its cloud software offerings as more people work from home.

The company is not immune to shocks from the pandemic. Technology spending has fallen in industries like travel and retail. LinkedIn, the hiring and professional networking site owned by Microsoft, said on Tuesday that it was cutting 962 jobs, or 6 percent of its work force, partly because hiring has fallen sharply. In June, Microsoft announced it was shutting down its 83 retail stores, taking a $450 million charge against earnings, or 5 cents a share.

But the weaknesses were more than offset by higher demand for its cloud businesses including its cloud processing and storage services, known as Azure, and its Office 365 productivity programs.

For the three months ended in June, its fiscal fourth quarter, Microsoft generated revenue of $38 billion. Its operating profit increased 8 percent to $13.4 billion, or $1.46 a share. Both the companys sales and earnings per share surpassed Wall Street estimates.

As Congress struggles to advance negotiations over a new round of federal spending to help people and businesses endure the pandemic-induced recession, new research suggests a previous round of aid helped save millions of jobs but at high cost.

The Paycheck Protection Program, which lawmakers created in March, saved 1.4 million to 3.2 million jobs in small businesses through the beginning of June, according to research released on Wednesday by economists from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, the Federal Reserve and ADP Research Institute. That works out to a cost of $162,000 to $381,000 per job.

Some companies that accepted assistance through the program have emerged in better financial condition and no longer need federal help. But many companies have not seen the uptick in consumer demand that Republicans were counting on reopening plans to deliver and thus could be vulnerable to closure and layoffs without more aid.

Its plausible that, when the money runs out, some of those firms would downsize again, said David Autor, an M.I.T. economist and a lead author of the study.

This was actually a very aggressive policy, Mr. Autor said in an interview. Its useful to know that when Congress sets out and spends a half a trillion dollars, it can get something done.

The new findings appear to run counter to another recent paper from a team of prominent economists at Harvard and Brown, which concluded that the P.P.P. had little material impact on employment at small businesses.

That paper used similar methods to those employed by Mr. Autor and his co-authors. But it used a different, much smaller set of data, from a financial management application used primarily by low-wage workers. Mr. Autor said it was possible that the federal loan program did not do much to help those people, most of whom cannot work from home, even as it succeeded in bringing back jobs elsewhere in the economy.

Trump administration officials had claimed in a news release earlier this month that the program supported over 51 million jobs. Mr. Autor said that the idea that a much larger number of jobs saved was not right, because much of the money appears to have gone to help businesses that would not likely have folded shop without aid.

For several weeks, real-time data has suggested that the U.S. economic recovery could be stalling. Now there is evidence it could be going in reverse.

Data from the Census Bureau on Wednesday showed that the number of employed people fell by more than four million last week, the fourth-straight weekly decline. Taken literally, the results indicate that the economy has given up all the job gains since mid-May, before the recent surge in coronavirus cases.

Just under 52 percent of American adults were employed last week, according the survey, down from 54 percent in June.

The data comes from the bureaus weekly Household Pulse Survey, an experimental effort to track the pandemics economic impact. The survey has a brief track record, but a good one: It correctly signaled the big increase in employment in the jobs report for June.

The latest data corresponds to the survey week for the July report, which will be released in early August. If the results hold up again, it suggests that report could show a loss of millions of jobs, just as enhanced unemployment benefits from the federal government are in danger of expiring.

If the $600 weekly federal supplement to unemployment benefits expires, more than 20 million Americans could soon see their weekly income fall by half. But it wont just be individual recipients who will suffer, Ben Casselman reports:

The federal payments are injecting billions of dollars into the economy each week, money that flows to landlords, grocery stores, retailers and countless other businesses.

Ernie Tedeschi, a former Treasury Department official and an economist at Evercore ISI Research, has estimated that if the payments ceased, the United States gross domestic product would be 2 percent smaller at the end of 2020 and there would be 1.7 million fewer jobs nationwide.

Congress returned from recess this week to consider a new relief package, which could include at least a partial extension of the extra unemployment benefits. Senate Republicans and the White House are considering a roughly $1 trillion package that would retain the program but scale it back. Democrats are pressing to continue paying the full $600 per week.

But Congress seems unlikely to act before benefits lapse.

These unemployment benefit checks are really doing a large job in propping up spending by these unemployed households, said Joseph Vavra, a University of Chicago economist. If they expire, he said, theres a good chance that what is now an unemployment problem becomes a foreclosure crisis and eviction crisis.

Stocks on Wall Street rose on Wednesday, but the gains were constrained by rising tension between the United States and China.

After an early dip, the S&P 500 rose more than half a percent. Shares in Europe and Asia were mostly lower.

Relations between the United States and China, two giant trading partners, have been worsening recent weeks, as the Trump administration has tightened the reins on Chinese diplomats, journalists, scholars and others in the United States. In the latest action, the White House told China to leave the its consulate in Houston by Friday. China warned that it might retaliate.

News of the consulates closure had an immediate impact in financial markets, with stock futures falling and trading in Treasury notes, gold and oil also reflecting a jolt of nervousness.

But investors on Wall Street have shaken off a number of concerns lately, including about the surge in coronavirus cases and deaths in the United States. On Tuesday, President Trump, in a shift from his usual rosy forecasts, told reporters that the outbreak would probably get worse before it gets better. And a valuable economic lifeline for millions of Americans $600 a week in extra unemployment benefits is about to expire if Congress doesnt extend it.

Recent gains have come as lawmakers in Washington haggle over another economic aid package, and as some large businesses have reported better than expected results, or signs of improvement.

On Wednesday, for example, shares of Best Buy jumped almost 8 percent after the electronics retailer reported that sales were rebounding as stores reopened. Also sharply higher Wednesday was Pfizer, which rose more than 5 percent after the Trump administration said it would pay nearly $2 billion for up to 600 million doses of a Covid-19 vaccine. Shares of BioNTech, a German company that is developing the vaccine with Pfizer, were up nearly 14 percent.

After Walmart, Americas largest retailer, announced on July 15 that it would mandate in-store mask-wearing, a flurry of other companies, including Kroger, Target and Walgreens, followed suit. This means that customers will be required to wear face masks in stores even in places without local mask ordinances.

The National Retail Federation has encouraged companies to set nationwide mask policies to protect employees and shoppers.

Some chains, however, have moved in the opposite direction. After putting in place a customer mask requirement nearly two weeks ago, Dollar Tree and Family Dollar reversed course on July 20, saying they would require masks only if mandated by state or local rules.

With profit bolstered by hundreds of millions of dollars in federal stimulus money, HCA Healthcare, the giant for-profit hospital chain, reported much higher second-quarter earnings on Wednesday, even as its revenue fell when its huge network of hospitals treated fewer patients during the pandemic. The company reported $1.1 billion in net income for the three months that ended June 30, a 38 percent jump from the same period in 2019, on lower revenue of $11.1 billion. HCA, already a major beneficiary of hospital bailout money, said it had received a total of $1.7 billion from the federal government so far.

United Airlines said its revenue will max out at about 50 percent of last years haul if a vaccine does not become available. The airline expects passenger revenue in July, August and September to be down about 83 percent from the same period last year, a slight improvement over the nearly 94 percent decline the airline reported for the second quarter on Tuesday.

Go here to read the rest:

Tesla Reaches a Milestone With Another Quarterly Profit - The New York Times