GE Will 3D Print the Bases of Wind Turbines Taller Than Seattle’s Space Needle – Singularity Hub

If youve seen a wind farm in action, you know modern wind turbines are pretty awe-inspiringhulking giants all in a row, massive blades turning in the barest breeze. In the last few decades, turbine heights have more than tripled to go after greater gusts at higher altitudes, and theyve sprouted rotors long as football fields to more efficiently catch all that energy.

The taller the turbine and the bigger its blades, the more electricity it can produce. But this only makes sense to a pointand that point is defined by simple economics.

In recent years, the trend toward taller wind turbines, in particular, has plateaued. Limited by manufacturing, labor, and transportation challenges, current technologies have faced some stiff headwinds. Which is why GE is looking to the future to break the stalemate. The company thinks 3D printing can double the height of its turbines without breaking the bank.

The company said this week that theyre working with partners COBOD and LafargeHolcim to engineer giant 3D printers that can print concrete turbine bases on site. The final design would be a hybrid, with the concrete base supporting a steel tower and turbine. The group completed a prototype base in fall 2019 and is aiming for production in 2023.

At 200 meters tall, the new turbines would dwarf todays 80-meter models and would even look down on Seattles Space Needle. Its hoped these gentle giants can further drive down the cost of wind power and maybe even spread it to less breezy locales.

Its well-known things get gustier the higher you go. A National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) analysis found wind speeds in much of the US, especially in the eastern half, are up to 6 miles per hour greater at heights of 160 meters compared to 80 meters.

Building taller wind turbines makes intuitive sense. But its not that simple.

The height of highway overpasses, for example, is a key limiting factor. Because you need a wider base to support a taller turbine, beyond a certain tower height, the bases are too wide to be driven from factory to wind farm. You could build bases on site by assembling pre-cast concrete pieces or making molds and pouring the concrete there. But whichever method you favor, itll take more labor, time, and money. At some point, the added expense outweighs the extra energy a taller turbine can harvest.

According to the NREL report, current technologies may be able break the economic bottleneck, but none are an obvious silver bullet. The authors, however, do mention that 3D printing concrete bases on site, while not yet proven feasible, could solve many of these problems. Much of the process, for example, would be automated, requiring less labor and time.

No surprise then that GE, one of the biggest wind turbine makers in the world and a manufacturing titan with 3D printing experience, figures the technology is worth a shot.

At peak hype, desktop 3D printers got all the love, even though affordable machines mostly maxed out at the fabrication of plastic tchotchkes. Industrial 3D printing, on the other hand, has been making greater strides. Large industrial 3D printers can whip up rockets and houses. And the latter are, obviously, most relevant to GEs wind turbine work.

Printing large structures, like houses, requires special concrete thats strong, doesnt gum up the printer, and dries just fast enough. The dream of 3D printed houses goes back at least two decades, but recently, things have heated up. Just last year, for instance, ICON and New Story 3D printed a community of 50 concrete houses.

GE will likely print their turbine bases using similar techniques. Their prototype base, printed last October in Copenhagen, is 10 meters tall and was printed layer by layer, its two walls joined together by a sinuous line of concrete layered into the middle.

GE will design the wind turbines, COBOD will build the 3D printer, and LafargeHolcim will make a proprietary blend of concrete for the job. In the next few years, the group hopes to finish a full-scale wind turbine prototype with 3D printed base, a production printer, and enough materials to scale. If it all works out, the new turbines could produce as much as 33 percent more power and become practical in more places.

What youre looking at is a technology that enables the industry to go to a new level, Paul Veers, chief engineer at the National Wind Technology Center and a senior research fellow at the National Renewable Energy Laboratory, told the Verge. Its a stepping stone into the next generation of wind plants.

While less sexy manufacturing methods are usually still most economically practical, sometimes 3D printing can save time, moneyand in this case, maybe the planet.

Image credit: Jan Kopiva /Unsplash

Read the original:

GE Will 3D Print the Bases of Wind Turbines Taller Than Seattle's Space Needle - Singularity Hub

HBO Releases Terence Nances Random Acts Of Flyness For Free To Amplify Black Experiences And Voices – Deadline

Terence Nances wildly visionary, conceptual and socially poignant HBO series Random Acts of Flyness is now available for free. As the American culture shifts and heals as a result of the landscape of violence and trauma, the renowned artist has worked with the premium cabler to release the first season of the series to the masses in an effort to further conversations highlighting Black experiences, voices and storytellers.

All episodes are available on HBOs YouTube channel through June 26. Nance released the following statement in regards to the free offering of his series:

Greetings to the universe the most low and high. Greetings to the beings whose names we speak with intention, attention, and discretion. Greetings to my ancestors who survived enslavement to dream me and ours forth. We celebrate your transformative embodied and astral imagination(s) out loud today on Juneteenth and all days we are blessed to draw breath. Gratitude to you for allowing our existence our sublime.

Related StoryBritish Film & TV Stars Sign Open Letter Demanding An End To "Systemic Racism" In The Industry

We thank you for the lives of our beloved Lloyd Porter and Natalia Harris. Two transformative spirits who made Random Acts possible. We love Natalia and Lloyd from here and feel both you as we do all of the spirits who have transitioned with respect to the most recent imbalances in this universe. We know the balance of life to be dynamic, evolutionary, and transformative. We have faith in the process of restoration we are enacting. We remain in deep gratitude and imagining backwards and forwards in spacetime.

It seems like everyday people ask me if and when Random Acts of Flyness will come back.

I suspect their curiosity is due to the fact that Program I was born of conversations that were moving at light speed in 2018 and have orbited around an unquantifiable mass of violence arriving at some devastating and inspiring event horizon that feels like spaghettification. I dont speak for the wonderful group of artists who made the show but I hypothesize that we were working to process and heal through the constant acceleration of the violence we survive centering our body-spirit(s) and our swarms in the doing. Heal how? Heal by using the tools we are given by our ancestors, our progeny, and being(s) whose nature we have no words for: movement, touch, stories, our time, vibe, irresolution, rest, folly, and fun.

All that to say I hope the show can help us heal in real time from the violence: the misogynoir, the transphobia, the white supremacy the socialism for whites that we misname capitalism. There is chaos and clarity in equal infinince in my energy field and I dont know how this heal up thing works or what its called, plus, words fail me as they do often nowadays and will often in the future but I feel like watching Random Acts will be useful now because It seems like every day people ask me, T, where is Season II at? and I say, outside.

So. We asked HBO to let us post the show for free on youtube and they granted our request. Season 1 is available now until June 26.

I hope it can be a part of the understanding, the reading, the feeling, the healing. I intend this on behalf of my ancestors, backward and forward in spacetime, Season II coming soon.

The Peabody award-winning series debuted its six-episode season on HBO on August 2018 and was renewed for a second season two weeks into its series premiere. Written and directed by Nance (An Oversimplification of Her Beauty), Random Acts Of Flyness explores evergreen cultural idioms such as patriarchy, white supremacy and sensuality from a thought-provoking perspective. A fluid, stream-of-consciousness response to the contemporary American mediascape, the series features a handful of interconnected vignettes in each episode, featuring an ensemble cast of emerging and established talent. The show is a mix of vrit documentary, musical performances, surrealist melodrama and humorous animation, weaving together themes such as ancestral trauma, history, death, the singularity, romance and more.

See the article here:

HBO Releases Terence Nances Random Acts Of Flyness For Free To Amplify Black Experiences And Voices - Deadline

What is the first football game you remember playing? – Windy City Gridiron

Were wrapping up SB Nations Video Game week by asking our staff to give us the first football game they remember playing. Some of us are old enough to remember a time where video games didnt exist, which is why we opened the question up to any type of football game at all.

Sure, some of us will mention an early version of a video game, but there were so many fun choices before holding a joystick Are they still called joysticks? was even an option.

Once I became a football fan, I was obsessed with playing anything I could find, but probably the first football game I ever played was a hand-held version that looked very much like this...

I was so enthralled with football that I would actually play full seasons worth of games, for the Chicago Bears of course, and track the stats. It was a tedious exercise, but I just had to know how many yards and touchdowns I was getting with my virtual Sweetness.

I also played the vibrating electronic version of football like the one in the accompanying article pic. My cousin had it and we would set up elaborate plays that would never work, and once we lost the men that went to the game we used the game-pieces from Risk to fill out our rosters.

My cousin, who was a year older so he got all the cool stuff first, also had Strat-O-Matic Football which was a card based dice game that also allowed us to track all the stats.

When it comes to video games, I had the very first Madden game ever made for the Commodore 64, and I also played a horribly lame looking game called Computer Football Strategy, also for the Commodore 64.

That game looked awful, but me and several of my friends would hold a fantasy draft to stockpile full rosters of real players, then wed have to declare which player we were running or passing to before we clicked on play, all so we could track the stats for a complete made up season.

Now that Ive shown how nerdish I was with numbers back then, lets check in on the first football game some of our other staffers remember...

Electric football, definitely. I had one as a kid, repainted one team to be the Bears and the other team to be the Packers. Before painting them, I picked out all the best guys (guys who went strait) and they were who I painted into the Bears. ~ Ken Mitchell

I do remember playing Atari Real Sports Football with my brother when I was really little. I probably wasnt more than 6 or 7 years old, but I remember that whoever got the ball first usually won the game because scores were usually in the neighborhood of 84-77. ~ Bill Zimmerman

NFL Football 94 (Genesis)... Ah, back when I thought running fake punts for 90 yards on first down was smart football. Because it worked. ~ Steven Schweickert

NFL Blitz for the N64, and unfortunately this was before my football singularity so I didnt understand why the game was supposed to be fun. Its a real shame I didnt, because now I pump a minimum of $3 into any NFL Blitz console I see at an arcade. ~ Robert Schmitz

ESPN NFL 2K5... Lets talk about The Crib! ~ Jack Salo

Thanks to Madden 06, I used to think Donovan McNabb was the gold standard of modern quarterbacks. After all, his field vision cone was only second to Peyton Mannings (of whose contributions we dont recognize). And sometimes, McNabb could pull out short five-yard runs on a whim. Sometimes, with a lot of effort. A magician! The man was a surgeon, a visionary. Madden 06 taught me as such. ~ Robert Zeglinski

Madden 07 on the original XBOX. Six-year-old me would take control of both controllers and play as both the Bears and the NFL Europes Cologne Centurions, and I would purposefully turn the ball over as the Centurions so the Bears could score over 100 points. I bragged to all of my friends in kindergarten about how good I was in Madden, but they never found out the truth. ~ Jacob Infante

Madden 07... Id always cut Rex Grossman and start Brian Griese. ~ Erik Christopher Duerrwaechter

And while were here, Happy Fathers Day to all the Dads out there!

Read this article:

What is the first football game you remember playing? - Windy City Gridiron

Jon Hopkins remixes Flume and Toro y Mois The Difference – NME

Jon Hopkins has released a remix of the Flume and Toro y Moi song The Difference.

Flume aka Harley Streten released the collaboration with Toro y Moi and an accompanying video earlier this year. The Difference was Flumes first new music of 2020, following his 2019 Hi This Is Flume mixtape and a collaborative EP, Friends, with Reo Cragun.

Listen to The Difference (Jon Hopkins Remix) below:

Hopkins remix follows the release of Singing Bowl (Ascension), a track the producer created using a 100-year-old singing bowl found in an antique shop in Delhi. The unique song appeared on a specially curated playlist for Spotify as part of a 24-hour meditation series.

Hopkins released the song Scene Suspended in February and the song Luminous Spaces with Kelly Lee Owens. His last album was 2018s Singularity.

Flume is currently working on his third studio album, the follow-up to 2016s Grammy award-winning Skin. I want to try and write a record in four months, he told Billboard late last year.

The idea of an album is not so stressful after doing the mixtape, he added. Im really looking forward to it and seeing what happens, seeing what comes out.

He also recently teased a new remix of Eiffel 65s Blue (Da Ba Dee).

Toro y Moi released his last full-length album Outer Peace in January last year. He followed the LP with the Soul Trash Mixtape three weeks later.

Read the rest here:

Jon Hopkins remixes Flume and Toro y Mois The Difference - NME

A New WURI Ranking of Innovative Universities Released by Four International Organizations: HLU, UNITAR, FUS and IPSNC – PRNewswire

SEOUL, South Korea, June 16, 2020 /PRNewswire/ --The World's Universities with Real Impact (WURI), which aims to discover innovative universities that prepare for the world in the fourth industrial revolution through new education and research efforts, released its first ranking on June 11, in both Switzerland and South Korea.

The WURI ranking online conference was co-hosted by the four institutions of the Hanseatic League of Universities (HLU), the UN Institute for Training and Research (UNITAR), Franklin University of Switzerland, and Institute for Policy and Strategy on National Competitiveness (IPSNC).

WURI, the first global innovative university ranking, was created to stimulate and evaluate universities' flexible and innovative efforts to foster the workforce that meets the demand from industry and society. The WURI ranking is composed of the global top 100 and top 50 in each of thesefour areas: Industrial Application, Entrepreneurial Spirit, Ethical Value, and Student Mobility and Openness.

While traditional ranking systems heavily weigh on the quantitative metrics for evaluating universities, such as the number of journal publications and the employment rate of graduates, WURI accounts for the more qualitative aspects by evaluating the innovative programs of universities.

Moreover, unlike the traditional rankings that evaluate only the accredited traditional type of universities, WURI attempted to reflect the perspective of the younger generation of students. As a result, the innovative schools, which are popular among the young generation, such as Minerva Schools at KGI (5th) of the U.S., Singularity University (16th) of the U.S., Ecole 42 of France (17th), and SADI of South Korea (68), are included in the global top 100.

The overall result of this new approach showed Stanford and MIT as the first and the second in the ranking, with Aalto University that leads innovation in Europe following close as the third, and Arizona State University of the U.S. as the 7th, which has been lauded as an excellent case of an innovative university in the U.S.

In the global 100, 32 universities from the U.S., eight from the U.K., seven from China, six from South Korea, five from Japan, four from Germany, three from France, and three from India were included.

For Industrial Application, Stanford University and Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) ranked the first and the second, respectively. Minerva Schools at KGI followed as the third, and California Institute of Technology (Caltech) ranked fourth.

For Entrepreneurial Spirit, Aalto University of Finland ranked top, followed by Hanze University of Applied Sciences of the Netherlands and Princeton University of the U.S.

In the Ethical Value area, Harvard University ranked the top with the University of Pennsylvania, Ecole 42, Duke University, and Columbia University following in the noted order.

In the Student Mobility and Openness area, National University of Singapore, Seoul National University, University of Copenhagen, Boston University, and Free University of Berlin made the top five.

Related Images

wuri-2020-global-top-100.png WURI 2020: Global Top 100 Innovative Universities (1-100)

wuri-2020-industrial-application.png WURI 2020: Industrial Application (Top 50)

wuri-2020-entrepreneurial-spirit.png WURI 2020: Entrepreneurial Spirit (Top 50)

wuri-2020-ethical-value-top-50.png WURI 2020 Ethical Value (Top 50)

wuri-2020-student-mobility-and.png WURI 2020: Student Mobility and Openness (Top 50)

SOURCE IPSNC

See the original post:

A New WURI Ranking of Innovative Universities Released by Four International Organizations: HLU, UNITAR, FUS and IPSNC - PRNewswire

Why Gravity Is Not Like the Other Forces – Quanta Magazine

Physicists have traced three of the four forces of nature the electromagnetic force and the strong and weak nuclear forces to their origins in quantum particles. But the fourth fundamental force, gravity, is different.

Our current framework for understanding gravity, devised a century ago by Albert Einstein, tells us that apples fall from trees and planets orbit stars because they move along curves in the space-time continuum. These curves are gravity. According to Einstein, gravity is a feature of the space-time medium; the other forces of nature play out on that stage.

But near the center of a black hole or in the first moments of the universe, Einsteins equations break. Physicists need a truer picture of gravity to accurately describe these extremes. This truer theory must make the same predictions Einsteins equations make everywhere else.

Physicists think that in this truer theory, gravity must have a quantum form, like the other forces of nature. Researchers have sought the quantum theory of gravity since the 1930s. Theyve found candidate ideas notably string theory, which says gravity and all other phenomena arise from minuscule vibrating strings but so far these possibilities remain conjectural and incompletely understood. A working quantum theory of gravity is perhaps the loftiest goal in physics today.

What is it that makes gravity unique? Whats different about the fourth force that prevents researchers from finding its underlying quantum description? We asked four different quantum gravity researchers. We got four different answers.

Claudia de Rham, a theoretical physicist at Imperial College London, has worked on theories of massive gravity, which posit that the quantized units of gravity are massive particles:

Einsteins general theory of relativity correctly describes the behavior of gravity over close to 30 orders of magnitude, from submillimeter scales all the way up to cosmological distances. No other force of nature has been described with such precision and over such a variety of scales. With such a level of impeccable agreement with experiments and observations, general relativity could seem to provide the ultimate description of gravity. Yet general relativity is remarkable in that it predicts its very own fall.

General relativity yields the predictions of black holes and the Big Bang at the origin of our universe. Yet the singularities in these places, mysterious points where the curvature of space-time seems to become infinite, act as flags that signal the breakdown of general relativity. As one approaches the singularity at the center of a black hole, or the Big Bang singularity, the predictions inferred from general relativity stop providing the correct answers. A more fundamental, underlying description of space and time ought to take over. If we uncover this new layer of physics, we may be able to achieve a new understanding of space and time themselves.

If gravity were any other force of nature, we could hope to probe it more deeply by engineering experiments capable of reaching ever-greater energies and smaller distances. But gravity is no ordinary force. Try to push it into unveiling its secrets past a certain point, and the experimental apparatus itself will collapse into a black hole.

Daniel Harlow, a quantum gravity theorist at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, is known for applying quantum information theory to the study of gravity and black holes:

Black holes are the reason its difficult to combine gravity with quantum mechanics. Black holes can only be a consequence of gravity because gravity is the only force that is felt by all kinds of matter.If there were any type of particle that did not feel gravity, we could use that particle to send out a message from the inside of the black hole, so it wouldnt actually be black.

The fact that all matter feels gravity introduces a constraint on the kinds of experiments that are possible: Whatever apparatus you construct, no matter what its made of, it cant be too heavy, or it will necessarily gravitationally collapse into a black hole.This constraint is not relevant in everyday situations, but it becomes essential if you try to construct an experiment to measure the quantum mechanical properties of gravity.

Our understanding of the other forces of nature is built on the principle of locality, which says that the variables that describe whats going on at each point in space such as the strength of the electric field there can all change independently. Moreover, these variables, which we call degrees of freedom, can only directly influence their immediate neighbors. Locality is important to the way we currently describe particles and their interactions because it preserves causal relationships: If the degrees of freedom here in Cambridge, Massachusetts, depended on the degrees of freedom in San Francisco, we may be able to use this dependence to achieve instantaneous communication between the two cities or even to send information backward in time, leading to possible violations of causality.

The hypothesis of locality has been tested very well in ordinary settings, and it may seem natural to assume that it extends to the very short distances that are relevant for quantum gravity (these distances are small because gravity is so much weaker than the other forces).To confirm that locality persists at those distance scales, we need to build an apparatus capable of testing the independence of degrees of freedom separated by such small distances. A simple calculation shows, however, that an apparatus thats heavy enough to avoid large quantum fluctuations in its position, which would ruin the experiment, will also necessarily be heavy enough to collapse into a black hole!Therefore, experiments confirming locality at this scale are not possible. And quantum gravity therefore has no need to respect locality at such length scales.

Indeed, our understanding of black holes so far suggests that any theory of quantum gravity should have substantially fewer degrees of freedom than we would expect based on experience with the other forces. This idea is codified in the holographic principle, which says, roughly speaking, that the number of degrees of freedom in a spatial region is proportional to its surface area instead of its volume.

Juan Maldacena, a quantum gravity theorist at the Institute for Advanced Study in Princeton, New Jersey, is best known for discovering a hologram-like relationship between gravity and quantum mechanics:

Particles can display many interesting and surprising phenomena. We can have spontaneous particle creation, entanglement between the states of particles that are far apart, and particles in a superposition of existence in multiple locations.

In quantum gravity, space-time itself behaves in novel ways. Instead of the creation of particles, we have the creation of universes. Entanglement is thought to create connections between distant regions of space-time. We have superpositions of universes with different space-time geometries.

Furthermore, from the perspective of particle physics, the vacuum of space is a complex object. We can picture many entities called fieldssuperimposed on top of one another and extending throughout space. The value of each field is constantly fluctuating at short distances.Out of thesefluctuating fieldsand their interactions, the vacuum state emerges. Particles are disturbances in this vacuum state. We can picture them as small defects in the structure of the vacuum.

When we consider gravity, we find that the expansion of the universe appears to produce more of this vacuum stuff out of nothing. When space-time is created, it just happens to be in the state that corresponds to the vacuum without any defects. How the vacuum appears in precisely the right arrangement is one of the main questions we need to answer to obtain a consistent quantum description of black holes and cosmology. In both of these cases there is a kind of stretching of space-time that results in the creation of more of the vacuum substance.

Sera Cremonini, a theoretical physicist at Lehigh University, works on string theory, quantum gravity and cosmology:

There are many reasons why gravity is special. Let me focus on one aspect, the idea that the quantum version of Einsteins general relativity is nonrenormalizable. This has implications for the behavior of gravity at high energies.

In quantum theories, infinite terms appear when you try to calculate how very energetic particles scatter off each other and interact. In theories that are renormalizable which include the theories describing all the forces of nature other than gravity we can remove these infinities in a rigorous way by appropriately adding other quantities that effectively cancel them, so-called counterterms. This renormalization process leads to physically sensible answers that agree with experiments to a very high degree of accuracy.

The problem with a quantum version of general relativity is that the calculations that would describe interactions of very energetic gravitons the quantized units of gravity would have infinitely many infinite terms. You would need to add infinitely many counterterms in a never-ending process. Renormalization would fail. Because of this, a quantum version of Einsteins general relativity is not a good description of gravity at very high energies. It must be missing some of gravitys key features and ingredients.

However, we can still have a perfectly good approximate description of gravity at lower energies using the standard quantum techniques that work for the other interactions in nature. The crucial point is that this approximate description of gravity will break down at some energy scale or equivalently, below some length.

Above this energy scale, or below the associated length scale, we expect to find new degrees of freedom and new symmetries. To capture these features accurately we need a new theoretical framework. This is precisely where string theory or some suitable generalization comes in: According to string theory, at very short distances, we would see that gravitons and other particles are extended objects, called strings. Studying this possibility can teach us valuable lessons about the quantum behavior of gravity.

Originally posted here:

Why Gravity Is Not Like the Other Forces - Quanta Magazine

A Human-Centric World of Work: Why It Matters, and How to Build It – Singularity Hub

Long before coronavirus appeared and shattered our pre-existing normal, the future of work was a widely discussed and debated topic. Weve watched automation slowly but surely expand its capabilities and take over more jobs, and weve wondered what artificial intelligence will eventually be capable of.

The pandemic swiftly turned the working world on its head, putting millions of people out of a job and forcing millions more to work remotely. But essential questions remain largely unchanged: we still want to make sure were not replaced, we want to add value, and we want an equitable society where different types of work are valued fairly.

To address these issuesas well as how the pandemic has impacted themthis week Singularity University held a digital summit on the future of work. Forty-three speakers from multiple backgrounds, countries, and sectors of the economy shared their expertise on everything from work in developing markets to why we shouldnt want to go back to the old normal.

Gary Bolles, SUs chair for the Future of Work, kicked off the discussion with his thoughts on a future of work thats human-centric, including why it matters and how to build it.

Work seems like a straightforward concept to define, but since its constantly shifting shape over time, lets make sure were on the same page. Bolles defined work, very basically, as human skills applied to problems.

It doesnt matter if its a dirty floor or a complex market entry strategy or a major challenge in the world, he said. We as humans create value by applying our skills to solve problems in the world. You can think of the problems that need solving as the demand and human skills as the supply, and the two are in constant oscillation, including, every few decades or centuries, a massive shift.

Were in the midst of one of those shifts right now (and we already were, long before the pandemic). Skills that have long been in demand are declining. The World Economic Forums 2018 Future of Jobs report listed things like manual dexterity, management of financial and material resources, and quality control and safety awareness as declining skills. Meanwhile, skills the next generation will need include analytical thinking and innovation, emotional intelligence, creativity, and systems analysis.

With the outbreak of coronavirus and its spread around the world, the demand side of work shrunk; all the problems that needed solving gave way to the much bigger, more immediate problem of keeping people alive. But as a result, tens of millions of people around the world are out of workand those are just the ones that are being counted, and theyre a fraction of the true total. There are additional millions in seasonal or gig jobs or who work in informal economies now without work, too.

This is our opportunity to focus, Bolles said. How do we help people re-engage with work? And make it better work, a better economy, and a better set of design heuristics for a world that we all want?

Bolles posed five key questionssome spurred by impact of the pandemicon which future of work conversations should focus to make sure its a human-centric future.

1. What does an inclusive world of work look like? Rather than seeing our current systems of work as immutable, we need to actually understand those systems and how we want to change them.

2. How can we increase the value of human work? We know that robots and software are going to be fine in the futurebut for humans to be fine, we need to design for that very intentionally.

3. How can entrepreneurship help create a better world of work? In many economies the new value thats created often comes from younger companies; how do we nurture entrepreneurship?

4. What will the intersection of workplace and geography look like? A large percentage of the global workforce is now working from home; what could some of the outcomes of that be? How does gig work fit in?

5. How can we ensure a healthy evolution of work and life? The health and the protection of those at risk is why we shut down our economies, but we need to find a balance that allows people to work while keeping them safe.

The end result these questions are driving towards, and our overarching goal, is maximizing human potential. If we come up with ways we can continue to do that, well have a much more beneficial future of work, Bolles said. We should all be talking about where we can have an impact.

One small silver lining? We had plenty of problems to solve in the world before ever hearing about coronavirus, and now we have even more. Is the pace of automation accelerating due to the virus? Yes. Are companies finding more ways to automate their processes in order to keep people from getting sick? They are.

But we have a slew of new problems on our hands, and were not going to stop needing human skills to solve them (not to mention the new problems that will surely emerge as second- and third-order effects of the shutdowns). If Bolles definition of work holds up, weve got ours cut out for us.

In an article from April titled The Great Reset, Bolles outlined three phases of the unemployment slump (were currently still in the first phase) and what we should be doing to minimize the damage. The evolution of work is not about what will happen 10 to 20 years from now, he said. Its about what we could be doing differently today.

Watch Bolles talk and those of dozens of other experts for more insights into building a human-centric future of work here.

Image Credit: www_slon_pics from Pixabay

Visit link:

A Human-Centric World of Work: Why It Matters, and How to Build It - Singularity Hub

Devin Townsend shares an hour of new ambient music – Louder

Since the lockdown began, Devin Townsend has kept himself busy with his Quarantine Concerts and podcast series.

And now the Canadian musician has uploaded a stream titled Guitar Improvisation #1 a flowing ambient piece which clocks in at just over an hour.

Townsend says: Its been a strange week and I have been writing a lot of strange music. Amidst the more tumultuous stuff thats appeared, I often find it therapeutic for me to just simply play guitar in the mornings, and over the years I've kind of 'developed' a sort of chilled-out, ambient guitar technique.

This isn't meant to be focussed on, its meant to be a sort of wash that you can play while working, chilling, or creating something thats my hope at least.

I like playing like this, and in fact, I would say 80% of what I play with a guitar in my hand over the last decade or so ends up sounding something like this.

I had recorded some of it in the background of the podcasts which I will be continuing and was asked to post it, but it made more sense to me to do a fresh one here.

Townsend adds: Lots of people still think Im secretly the same raging metalhead I was in my mid 20s, but it has been a few decades since I legitimately felt that way.

This improvisation is one take with a bathroom break I edited out and I used a Sadowsky Telecaster and a Fractal AX-8 for the sound. Art for this and the podcast are done by my good friend Travis Smith at Seempieces.

Hopefully its helpful to some of you who need a sonic break. Thanks again for the ability to do this. Ill release this in a physical form if theres any interest. I really like echo.

Townsend will also release Empath: The Ultimate Edition this coming Friday (June 5) through InsideOutMusic.

The revamped version of his 2019 album will be spread across 2CDs and 2 Blu-ray and, along with the original album, will feature a wealth of bonus material, including demos and live cuts.

Devin Townsend: Empath - The Ultimate Edition

CD11. Castaway2. Genesis3. Spirits Will Collide4. Evermore5. Sprite6. Hear Me7. Why?8. Borderlands9. Requiem10. Singularity: Adrift11. Singularity: I Am I12. Singularity: There Be Monsters13. Singularity: Curious Gods14. Singularity: Silicone Scientists15. Singularity: Here Comes The Sun!

CD21. The Contrarian (Demo)2. King (Demo)3. The Waiting Kind (Demo)4. Empath (Demo)5. Methuselah (Demo)6. This Is Your Life (Demo)7. Gulag (Demo)8. Middle Aged Man (Demo)9. Total Collapse (Demo)10. Summer (Demo)

Blu-ray 11. Castaway (5.1 Surround Mix)2. Genesis (5.1 Surround Mix)3. Spirits Will Collide (5.1 Surround Mix)4. Evermore (5.1 Surround Mix)5. Sprite (5.1 Surround Mix)6. Hear Me (5.1 Surround Mix)7. Why? (5.1 Surround Mix)8. Borderlands (5.1 Surround Mix)9. Requiem (5.1 Surround Mix)10. Singularity: Adrift (5.1 Surround Mix)11. Singularity: I Am I (5.1 Surround Mix)12. Singularity: There Be Monsters (5.1 Surround Mix)13. Singularity: Curious Gods (5.1 Surround Mix)14. Singularity: Silicone Scientists (5.1 Surround Mix)15. Singularity: Here Comes The Sun! (5.1 Surround Mix)16. Castaway (Stereo Mix Visualizer)17. Genesis (Stereo Mix Visualizer)18. Spirits Will Collide (Stereo Mix Visualizer)19. Evermore (Stereo Mix Visualizer)20. Sprite (Stereo Mix Visualizer)21. Hear Me (Stereo Mix Visualizer)22. Borderlands (Stereo Mix Visualizer)23. Why? (Stereo Mix Visualizer)24. Requiem (Stereo Mix Visualizer)25. Singularity: Adrift (Stereo Mix Visualizer)26. Singularity: I Am I (Stereo Mix Visualizer)27. Singularity: There Be Monsters (Stereo Mix Visualizer)28. Singularity: Curious Gods (Stereo Mix Visualizer)29. Singularity: Silicone Scientists (Stereo Mix Visualizer)30. Singularity: Here Comes The Sun! (Stereo Mix Visualizer)

Blu-ray 21. Empath Documentary2. Empath Album Commentary3. Genesis 5.1 Mixing Lesson4. Acoustic Gear Tour5. Intro (Live in Leeds 2019)6. Let It Roll (Live in Leeds 2019)7. Funeral (Live in Leeds 2019)8. Ih-Ah (Live in Leeds 2019)9. Deadhead (Live in Leeds 2019)10. Love? (Live in Leeds 2019)11. Hyperdrive! (Live in Leeds 2019)12. Terminal (Live in Leeds 2019)13. Coast (Live in Leeds 2019)14. Solar Winds (Live in Leeds 2019)15. Thing Beyond Things (Live in Leeds 2019)16. King (Official Video)

More:

Devin Townsend shares an hour of new ambient music - Louder

How to Play a Market That Shrugs Off Everything – Barron’s

Text size

The stock and options markets are suffering from what might be called Neropathy. Just as the Roman emperor Nero played his fiddle as Rome burned around his palace, the markets are seemingly oblivious to the pain and destruction that has enveloped much of the U.S. and the world.

Despite massive unemployment and severe economic contractions sparked by an as-yet incurable virus, the Dow Jones Industrial Average and the S&P 500 index are nearing their highest levels ever. Not even days of nationwide protests sparked by the death of George Floyd while he was being arrested in Minneapolis have tarnished the stock markets momentum.

Tens of thousands of people are demonstrating in the streets, venting their anger about police brutality and social inequities that never seem to go away. President Donald Trump is bellicose. He berated governors for being weak, while his defense secretary told them to dominate the battlespace in their cities.

Earlier in the week, the Congressional Budget Office warned that it could take more than a decade for the economy to recover from the coronavirus pandemic. Yet the stock market marches ever higher. A key measure of the risk of owning stocks, the Cboe Volatility Index, or VIX, is purring like an innocent kitten that is lapping up dour economic reports like sweet milk.

Some credit the Federal Reserve for rescuing stocks for the second time in a decade with low rates and easy-money policies, but others fret that the mighty Fed put could ultimately be overcome by the added risks of the latest events.

Newsletter Sign-up

Exclusive data, tables and charts from Barron's Market Lab.

Michael Schwartz, Oppenheimer & Co.s chief options strategist, told Barrons that he is increasingly struck by the singularity of this moment in market history.

I have lived through many unique events over the past five decades on Wall Street, he says, but this market seems to defy all logic based on historical experiences and data.

Stock prices are driven by corporate earnings, and earnings are influenced by economic conditions here and abroad. The equity market doesnt seemingly reflect reality.

Since the S&P 500 bottomed on March 23, it has gained more than 37%, while many stocks and sector funds have experienced more dramatic advances.

Chris Jacobson, a Susquehanna Financial Group strategist, told clients that investors appear eager to look past headwinds including deteriorating relations between the worlds two largest economies, U.S. and China, that should suppress investor enthusiasm to buy equities.

The market is done with Buy the dip and sell the rip. Its now Buy the dip and buy the rip, Dennis Dick, a Bright Trading proprietary trader, tweeted on Wednesday.

Many investors are caught in the middle. They arent willing to sell and miss this extraordinary rally, but dont want to put new money in stocks at these high levels. We know that people are curious about how to participate in the stock market without taking on incredible risk. A solution: selling put or call options on the S&P 500.

Calls give a buyer the right to buy stocks at a certain price and time; selling them is a bet on the markets expected trading range. Puts give a buyer the right to sell stocks at a certain time and price; selling them expresses a view that prices will rally higher.

If the sellers are right, they collect a wad of cash, and if they are wrong, they roll the trade to another month and try again. Tax treatment is favorable60% of gains are taxed at long-term rates, while 40% are taxed as short-term gains.

The traditional S&P 500 trade is selling puts or calls that are 100 points above or below the indexs level, but some investors are updating the strategy to reflect the current market. They are using strike prices that are 200 points away from the market, reflecting the extraordinary price swings that now define this Neropathic market.

Email: editors@barrons.com

See the rest here:

How to Play a Market That Shrugs Off Everything - Barron's

Conversations on social progress: Week 3 at TED2020 – TED Blog

For week 3 of TED2020, global leaders in technology, vulnerability research and activism gathered for urgent conversations on how to foster connection, channel energy into concrete social action and work to end systemic racism in the United States. Below, a recap of their insights.

When we see the internet of things, lets make an internet of beings. When we see virtual reality, lets make it a shared reality, says Audrey Tang, Taiwans digital minister for social innovation. She speaks with TED science curator David Biello at TED2020: Uncharted on June 1, 2020. (Photo courtesy of TED)

Audrey Tang, Taiwans digital minister for social innovation

Big idea: Digital innovation rooted in communal trust can create a stronger, more transparent democracy that is fast, fair and even fun.

How? Taiwan has built a digital democracy where digital innovation drives active, inclusive participation from all its citizens. Sharing how shes helped transform her country, Audrey Tang illustrates the many creative and proven ways technology can be used to foster community. In responding to the coronavirus pandemic, Taiwan created a collective intelligence system that crowdsources information and ideas, which allowed the government to act quickly and avoid a nationwide shutdown. The country also generated a publicly accessible map that shows the availability of masks in local pharmacies in order to help people get supplies, along with a humor over rumor campaign that combats harmful disinformation with comedy. In reading her job description, Tang elegantly lays out the ideals of digital citizenship that form the bedrock of the countrys democracy: When we see the internet of things, lets make an internet of beings. When we see virtual reality, lets make it a shared reality. When we see machine learning, lets make it collaborative learning. When we see user experience, lets make it about human experience. And whenever we hear the singularity is near, let us always remember the plurality is here.

Bren Brown explores how we can harness vulnerability for social progress and work together to nurture an era of moral imagination. She speaks with TEDs head of curation Helen Walters at TED2020: Uncharted on June 2, 2020. (Photo courtesy of TED)

Bren Brown, Vulnerability researcher, storyteller

Big question: The United States is at its most vulnerable right now. Where do we go from here?

Some ideas: As the country reels from the COVID-19 pandemic and the murder of George Floyd, along with the protests that have followed, Bren Brown offers insights into how we might find a path forward. Like the rest of us, shes in the midst of processing this moment, but believes we can harness vulnerability for progress and work together to nurture an era of moral imagination. Accountability must come first, she says: people have to be held responsible for their racist behaviors and violence, and we have to build safe communities where power is shared. Self-awareness will be key to this work: the ability to understand your emotions, behaviors and actions lies at the center of personal and social change and is the basis of empathy. This is hard work, she admits, but our ability to experience love, belonging, joy, intimacy and trust and to build a society rooted in empathy depend on it. In the absence of love and belonging, theres nothing left, she says.

Dr. Phillip Atiba Goff, Rashad Robinson, Dr. Bernice King and Anthony D. Romero share urgent insights into this historic moment. Watch the discussion on TED.com.

In a time of mourning and anger over the ongoing violence inflicted on Black communities by police in the US and the lack of accountability from national leadership, what is the path forward? In a wide-ranging conversation, Dr. Phillip Atiba Goff, the CEO of Center for Policing Equity; Rashad Robinson, the president of Color of Change; Dr. Bernice Albertine King, the CEO of the King Center; and Anthony D. Romero, the executive director of the American Civil Liberties Union, share urgent insights into how we can dismantle the systems of oppression and racism responsible for tragedies like the murders of Ahmaud Arbery, Breonna Taylor, George Floyd and far too many others and explored how the US can start to live up to its ideals. Watch the discussion on TED.com.

More:

Conversations on social progress: Week 3 at TED2020 - TED Blog

Changes in Executive Order raise eyebrows – Daily Nation

By JOHN KAMAU

By making subtle changes within the structure of government, including the name of his office from The Presidency to the Executive Office of the President, President Uhuru Kenyatta has left many confused on the hidden political agenda.

Executive Order No. 1 of 2020 issued Wednesday evening caused a stir with some commentators interpreting the changes to mean the Deputy President's office had been downgraded and tucked under the Executive Office of the President.

This innocent looking nomenclature change has huge legal implications... President denotes singularity of power ... Presidency is shared power, lawyer Donald Kipkorir said in a message on Twitter.

But some constitutional lawyers said nothing has changed, explaining the order as a mere regularisation of changes in government.

In the reorganisation, the National Development Implementation and Communication Committee, headed by Dr Fred Matiangi is not listed as one of the functions of the Interior ministry. Instead, a new role designated as Oversight and Co-ordination in delivery of National Priorities and Flagship Programmes has been created.

Whether the creation of the Cabinet as an institution under OP will lead to power shifts is not clear.

In the previous order, the Cabinet did not exist under institutions and was only listed as a function within the Presidency. It now means that President Kenyatta will have to appoint a substantive Secretary to the Cabinet, a position that is highly regarded within the government.

With the ongoing shifts in the political arena, whoever gets the seat will assume a superior position. The position was scrapped after President Kenyattas attempt to appoint Monica Juma into the seat hit a snag when he failed to get parliamentary approval in 2015.

By renaming the Presidency, the President also appeared to whittle down some of the glamour that comes with a presidential system perhaps in preparation for the constitutional changes proposed under the Building Bridges Initiative.

With this arrangement, DP William Ruto does not get any portfolio, and has to wait to be assigned duties. While he did not appoint his own staff, and his accounting officer was the State House Comptroller, Dr Ruto appears not to have lost anything other than glamour.

Also now within the Office of the President is the Nairobi Metropolitan Services (NMS) headed by Major General Mohamed Badi.

The NMS will now draw its funding from the Consolidated Funds Services (CFS), according to the new order. The order of January 14, and revised last month, thus gives NMS legal backing.

Without a legal instrument, the legitimacy of NMS has always been a subject of discussion with opinion among MPs divided whether it should draw funding from the CFS or the County Revenue Fund (CRF).

The PO shall also now be in charge of parliamentary liaison as well as co-ordination of constitutional commissions. The latter is likely to raise eyebrows considering that the commissions are supposed to be independent from the other arms of government.

In February, State House brokered a deal with Nairobi City County that saw the national government take over key functions from the devolved unit. Planning and management, transport, public works, health and ancillary services were transferred in the deal, which became effective on March 15. However, the NMS ran into headwinds in executing its functions after Governor Mike Sonko declined to sign the Countys Supplementary Appropriation Bill, 2020, effectively locking out of the Sh15 billion to implement the functions.

To save the NMS from a financial crisis, the national government allocated it Sh1.5 billion in the Supplementary Budget II approved by the National Assembly in April. In the 2020/21 budget estimates, the National Treasury has allocated NMS Sh27.9 billion.

This week, President Kenyatta and former Prime Minister Raila Odinga were sighted in Nairobi, at night inspecting the work being carried out by the NMS. The NMS is one of the projects that the President is updated on daily.

The executive order is copied to all key government institutions includng the Attorney-General, Cabinet Secretaries, Chief Administrative Secretaries, Principal Secretaries.

Why an executive order that was issued on May 11 was released Wednesday remains baffling.

Additional reporting by David Mwere.

See the rest here:

Changes in Executive Order raise eyebrows - Daily Nation

Artificial Intelligence Technologies That Are Reshaping the World Right Now – Press Release – Digital Journal

According to Moores Law, the technological solutions we have right now double in power and efficiency every two years which means we are getting closer and closer to the singularity event where technology and humanity intertwined with one another in ways that make both almost indistinguishable.

Artificial intelligence is certainly helping to usher in this new era of technology, especially a handful of breakthrough technologies that are changing the way that almost all businesses leverage AI.

In fact, a study conducted by Narrative Science reported that 62% of businesses around the world were using AI technology by 2018 and the odds are pretty good that this number has increased even more so in just the last 18 months or so.

The world of business and the world of finance have particularly eager early adapters of these technologies, taking advantage of everything AI has to offer to transform the way that we invest, the way that we bank and the way that we diagnose and fight illness and disease.

On top of that, though, you have companies large and small using machine learning technologies to better understand the magnitude of Big Data data collected in aggregate by the decisions all of us make online and through our apps, creating a more efficient and more streamlined world right under our noses.

Add in the fact that Virtual Assistant technology is almost ubiquitous these days (we use it on our phones, our tablets, our computers, our smart enabled devices like speakers at home, etc.) and it is starting to feel like artificial intelligence is everywhere around us.

Thats because it is!

We are closer than ever before to having full-blown robot assistants like they had in The Jetsons or on Star Wars, believe it or not. The combination of AI and robotics is pushing us further and further into the future, even if many technologies remain hidden from the public behind the doors of defense contractors or squirreled away and Silicone Valley (for right now, anyway).

Truth be told, we are still in the infancy of artificial intelligence and the impact it is going to have on our future.

Its impossible to know exactly how our world is going to be shaped and transformed by artificial intelligence in the years and decades to come. The only thing we can know for certain is that the change is very real and AI is going to be leading the charge no matter what.

Read the complete story here: https://www.fifthgeek.com/ai-tech-today/

Media ContactCompany Name: Fifth GeekContact Person: MarvinEmail: Send EmailPhone: +1 (503) 445 9558Country: United StatesWebsite: https://www.fifthgeek.com/

See original here:

Artificial Intelligence Technologies That Are Reshaping the World Right Now - Press Release - Digital Journal

The Bulldozing Effect of the Black Square – Hyperallergic

A timely Get Out meme tweeted by Monkeypaw Productions (original tweet here)

I woke up on Tuesday feeling bitter about the black squares dominating social media. Jamila Thomas and Brianna Agyemang, two Black women music executives, originally began the campaign #TheShowMustBePaused to draw attention to the ways the music industry profits off of Black talent. Though meant to be a show of solidarity against the various brutalizations of Black people, there is something inherently violent about the squares cumulative effect.

The internet is an archive. In a world where the historical materiality related to Black Americans is largely composed of property records, mugshots, and the relics of lynchings, we need to ask ourselves what the black square replaces and how it functions as an image.

Lets begin by considering the black square in relation to what scholar Tina Campt describes as the Black feminist praxis of futurity. This means that part of the critical work of this moment, particularly for Black people, is imagining a liberated future and talking about said future as if that which is required to secure it has already happened. As I consider this future, I imagine historians will look back on our self-documentation for meaning-making. In her book, Listening to Images, Campt asks that rather than solely processing them visually, we evaluate images based on their haptic registers that which is felt. To listen to an image, then, means being attuned to what we feel when we look at it.

In the US, black is the color of mourning. I believe part of what makes the black square powerful is that it communicates collective grief. Still, the flat, black square is an erasure. Where policing in the United States is rooted in hunting down runaway enslaved peoples and protecting the interests of white property owners, the black square gesture draws no connections between capitalism and the police force as protectors of white material wealth. I suspect that was part of the black squares allure: it didnt ask users to confront legacies of anti-Black violence and exploitation, and it fell short of a call to action you can be anti-abolition or pro-capitalist and still post a black square without betraying your values. Hence why businesses with long, anti-Black histories had no qualms about re-sharing the black square on their platforms.

The flat, black square is lifeless. When I imagine future historians confronting the black square, I think of the faces of those slain by police, swallowed up by such voids. Though certainly better than the circulation of videos that document their violent murders, these images are similarly imposed over the lives, joys, and families of Breonna Taylor, Tony McDade, George Floyd, Ahmaud Arbery, and the many who have since been injured or murdered while participating in the global rebellions honoring them. Though meant to memorialize the countless victims of the global anti-Black machine and indicate the non-singularity of their deaths, the black square bulldozes over Black lives, leaving behind only a generalized ink-blot.

The flat, black square also acts as a void, devouring the valuable information protestors and organizers are trying to amplify. It drowns out the concrete, material steps we should take in this urgent moment. In fact, hours after users began posting the black square, activists began decrying the use of the square in conjunction with the Black Lives Matter hashtag, which people on the ground were using to distribute information about protests, protective coverings, and bail funds. Rather than seeing the vital information, those who ran a search for #Blacklivesmatter encountered pages and pages of black squares.

In the present, the black square says nothing about what is still needed to push things forward, and in the future, the black square will tell historians nothing about what we did.

As a gesture, the black square asks nothing of its viewers or distributors except to re-share and perform alliance with Black people. It prompts no learning, no engagement with any critical thoughts, and no material action. When we try to listen to the haptic registers of the flat, black squares, they exude nothing but deafening silence.

Read more from the original source:

The Bulldozing Effect of the Black Square - Hyperallergic

Idea innovation contest comes to an end – The Financial Express

Jamila Bupasha Khushbu | Published: June 03, 2020 22:04:19

While most people are sitting idly at home spending leisure time or wondering how to spend time, some bright minds are already looking for ways to revive the social and economic conditions of the country after quarantine. In order to get those intellectuals a stage to share their ideas, Interactive Cares organised an idea generation competition.

Interactive Cares is a cloud and artificial intelligence based platform of the country that offers e-learning, health, mental health and legal service to customers through real time communication between users and experts through chatting, video calling and virtual whiteboards, easy ask and resources.

This idea generation competition "Idea Innovation Contest 2020- Crafting Visions" aspires to be one of the biggest entrepreneurial platforms of the nation. Their vision is to create a platform for the young and aspiring entrepreneurs of Bangladesh to facilitate seamless flow of ideas. Due to this pandemic, many businesses are shutting down and the economy is on the brink of collapse. However, to save the economy from this mishap, entrepreneurs of the future has to play a vital role. And to do their part, they first need to come up with feasible business plans. Idea Innovation Contest was launched with the intention to find out those feasible business plans so that the effects of this handicapped situation can be lessened.

The selection round, semi-final and grand finale of this competition took place via online assessment. In the selection round, the participants had to provide meticulous solutions to some prevailing social issues. Out of nearly 256 registered teams, 24 teams went straight to the semi-finals. After heated competition in the semi final only six teams were able to secure their position to the glorious grand finale. Among these six teams, 'Team Cognitive Dissonance' from Bangladesh University of Professionals and 'Team FYB' from IBA, Dhaka University was declared as the champion and runner- up consecutively bagging a total prize money of Taka 100,000.

The idea of the champion team Cognitive Dissonance was to produce Trichoderma bio-compost, an organic fertilizer, from water hyacinths and poultry wastes through a convenient drum composting method that's not only inexpensive but also extremely environment friendly. The runner-up, Team FYB, came up with the idea of RojRoj, a micro-delivery, subscription-based platform that will incorporate small retail stores and vulnerable groups in society to reliably and regularly supply essentials to households.

Rare Al Samir, CEO of Interactive Cares stated, "Idea Innovation Contest was launched to find out the Innovative Business Ideas which can sustain, maintain profitability in pandemic situation and contribute to the economy of the country." CMO of Interactive Cares Fahim Shahriar Swapnil was also present at the grand finale.

The founder and CEO of Hult Prize Foundation and the chief guest of Idea Innovation Contest, Ahmed Ashkar described the importance of young generation to take lead for the growth of Bangladesh and also the discussed effective ways of being a successful entrepreneur.

The event was made successful with the contribution of six partners, 30 university affiliations, a bunch of campus ambassadors, more than 1,000 participants along with special guest Tina F Jabeen, investment advisor, Startup Bangladesh, and esteemed judge panel ornamented with other industry experts - Ghulam Sumdany Don, CEO of Don Sumdany Facilitation and Consultancy, Bijon Islam, co-founder and CEO of Lightcastle Partners, Sumit Saha, co-founder of Analyzen, Nahian Rahman Rochi, senior corporate finance manager, BATB, Syed Ibrahim Saajid, manager, Bkash Limited, Zafir Shafie Chowdhury, co-founder of Singularity and Bondstein and Muqit Ahmed, director of Digital Services, Banglalink. The host of the final was the popular host of What a Show and Senior Strategic Planner of Grey, Rafsan Sabab.

The writer is a content writer at Interactive Cares.She can be reached at khushbu_bhuiyan@yahoo.com

Read the original post:

Idea innovation contest comes to an end - The Financial Express

The Tower of Babel Project: how human beings must prepare for the approaching Singularity – Medium

THE TOWER OF BABEL/PIETER BRUGEL THE ELDER

The Singularity will be able to solve every problem except one: evil.

These days we have no shortage of problems. We struggle with poverty and a lack of affordable housing. Depression, anxiety, substance abuse, and eating disorders are rampant, especially in teens. The world is getting hotter and the consequences may be worse than we thought. COVID-19 shows how vulnerable we are to disease after a century of successes against it. No one knows how it will end.

For all these problems, technology offers answers as long as policy makers are willing to embrace the solutions. Smart cities are the answer to housing and urban woes such as crime, traffic, and pollution. Affordable housing is ripe for tech disruption. Poverty can be fought with tech. Global warming and climate change only need new sources of energy, electric cars, smart homes and factories to become affordable and ubiquitous. Even disease may eventually kneel to human ingenuity in genetics and AI.

Despite modern woes, they are nothing compared to the struggles of the past with diseases like small pox and plague, wars of conquest and religion, brutal oppression of women and minorities, slavery, and backbreaking toil. Life is getting better and better for everyone. Even problems that technology supposedly causes like loneliness and isolation, technology can also help to solve. Moreover, it isnt clear that these are worse than they used to be anyway. In the past, if you didnt fit in, you were often ostracized. Now, there is a community for everyone, and the ways that we can connect with others will only grow and improve. Those who are more vulnerable to loneliness, the elderly, benefit the most from tech such as Virtual Reality.

What technology offers most is choice. If we dont want to live a suburban existence, for example, we can choose a communal one or, if we crave fresh air, we can live out in the country and telework.

The Singularity represents that moment in the future when that choice becomes almost limitless. Any technological solution you can dream up can be created and implemented almost instantly. With Artificial Intelligence as our partners, human beings can choose whatever lives they desire. The problem is that there will always be some who choose to do wrong and be snakes in the garden of paradise rather than enjoy its (permitted) fruits.

As psychologist and Auschwitz survivor Victor Frankl observed in his classic Holocaust autobiography, Mans Search for Meaning,

[T]here are two races of men in this world, but only these two the race of the decent man and the race of the indecent man. Both are found everywhere; they penetrate into all groups of society. No group consists entirely of decent or indecent people. In this sense, no group is of pure race and therefore one occasionally found a decent fellow among the camp guards.

Progress for the human species does not equal progress for the human soul, and the consequences of allowing limitless power fall into the hands of these indecent people could be catastrophic.

This project of constant building to the skies reminds me of the ancient Near East myth of the Tower of Babel, which Biblical authors folded into the Book of Genesis to stand as a testament to Gods power and a warning to human beings who seek to raise themselves up without His guidance or approval. Whatever Higher Power you subscribe to, you cannot deny that human power cannot be increased without limit without a matching elevation of human responsibility at the level of the individual as well as the collective. To do otherwise, is to invite a similar scattering of human potential as our egos grow beyond our ethics.

To give a little background, the Tower of Babel reads like a childrens story sandwiched in between the flood and the story of Abraham. While modern readers interpret it as explaining the origin of languages and nations, it has a far deeper meaning, one that would have been apparent to a reader in the Ancient Near East. There are essentially two groups involved. The people of Babylon (Babel is a transliteration of Babylon from Hebrew) and the heavenly host with God as the Prime Actor. In the story, the Babylonians, who represent all the people on the Earth, decide to build a big tower. The reason they give is that they all want to stay together. Why they need a tower to the heavens to do that is not explained, but there is a lot going on under the surface here. God comes in and sees that they are building a big tower and He says that there is no telling what they will do next. They are too powerful, so he confuses their languages, and they spread out over the Earth instead. The tower is left unfinished.

On the face of it, God seems to be acting like a Jerk. These people are minding their own business building this giant tower and God comes in and messes it up for them. But the issue at stake here is that the people are essentially repeating what happened in the Garden of Eden in that they are taking power for themselves without Gods permission and likewise disobeying his commandments (which was to spread over the Earth). In doing so, they are developing limitless power without having the humility (which is represented by obedience to God) to manage it. (Some Rabbinic interpretations even suggest the tower itself is a big F-you to God.)

In our era, our Tower of Babel is modern technology and institutions and the consequences of ultimate power: power to do evil. If we do not deal with this evil, we will be scattered as God scattered the people of Babylon.

Is evil something that we can solve? Probably not without changing human nature itself. Will technology offer such a cure? Perhaps it will be an anti-evil pill. But would an evil person take such a pill? If the future offers us choices, it must offer us freedoms as well. Freedom inherently contradicts forcing people to change their nature. Perhaps this was really the conundrum that faced the Almighty why not just make people good? But how without taking away who we are?

If we are to protect the Paradise that we seek to build, we must prepare to cast evil out of it. The future cannot be for everyone, but only for those decent people who are worthy of it. This is why even in the post-scarcity society of Star Trek, there are still prisons.

Technology is the Tower not the God. We build higher and higher but we come no closer to heaven. Most of us will be content with an Earthly paradise. Some will choose to explore the stars and others to find new ways of being, but, still others, like the Archangel Lucifer, will seek to destroy it for their own gain.

See original here:

The Tower of Babel Project: how human beings must prepare for the approaching Singularity - Medium

Buildings Consume Lots of EnergyHere’s How to Design Whole Communities That Give Back as Much as They Take – Singularity Hub

Although the coronavirus pandemic has dominated recent headlines, climate change hasnt gone away. Many experts are calling for a green economic recovery that directs investments into low-carbon energy sources and technologies.

Buildings account for 40 percent of total energy consumption in the US, compared to 32 percent for industry and 28 percent for transportation. States and cities with ambitious climate action plans are working to reduce emissions from the building sector to zero. This means maximizing energy efficiency to reduce building energy use, and then supplying the remaining energy needs with electricity generated by carbon-free sources.

My colleagues and I study the best ways to rapidly reduce carbon emissions from the building sector. In recent years, construction designs have advanced dramatically. Net zero energy buildings, which produce the energy they need on site from renewable sources, increasingly are the default choice. But to speed the transition to zero carbon emissions, I believe the US must think bigger and focus on designing or redeveloping entire communities that are zero energy.

Tackling energy use in buildings at the district level provides economies of scale. Architects can deploy large heat pumps and other equipment to serve multiple buildings on a staggered schedule across the day. Districts that bring homes, places of work, restaurants, recreation centers, and other services together in walkable communities also significantly reduce the energy needed for transportation. In my view, this growing movement will play an increasingly important role in helping the US and the world address the climate crisis.

Heating and cooling are the biggest energy uses in buildings. District design strategies can address these loads more efficiently.

District heating has long been used in Europe, as well as on some US college and other campuses. These systems typically have a central plant that burns natural gas to heat water, which then is circulated to the various buildings.

To achieve zero carbon emissions, the latest strategy uses a design known as an ambient temperature loop that simultaneously and efficiently both heats and cools different buildings. This concept was first developed for the Whistler Olympic Village in British Columbia.

In a typical ambient loop system, a pump circulates water through an uninsulated pipe network buried below the frost line. At this depth, the soil temperature is near that of the yearly average air temperature for that location. As water moves through the pipe, it warms or cools toward this temperature.

Heat pumps at individual buildings or other points along the ambient loop add or extract heat from the loop. They can also move heat between deep geothermal wells and the circulating water.

The loop also circulates through a central plant that keeps it in an optimum temperature range for maximum heat pump performance. The plant can use cooling towers or wastewater to remove heat. It can add heat via renewable sources, such as solar thermal collectors, renewable fuel or heat pumps powered by renewable electricity.

One example of a potentially zero-energy district currently being developed, the National Western Center, is a multi-use campus currently under construction in Denver to house the annual National Western Stock Show and other public events focused on food and agriculture.

A six-foot-diameter pipe carrying the citys wastewater runs underground through the property before delivering the water to a treatment plant. The water temperature stays within a narrow range of 61 to 77 degrees F throughout the year.

The wastewater pipe and a heat exchanger transfer heat to and from an ambient loop circulating water throughout the district. The system provides heat in winter and absorbs heat in the summer via heat recovery chillers, which are heat pumps that can simultaneously provide heating and cooling. This strategy serves individual buildings at very high efficiency.

Electricity used to operate the heat pumps, lighting and other equipment will come from on-site photovoltaics and wind- and solar-generated electricity imported from off-site.

Another district that will minimize carbon emissions is the Whisper Valley Community, under construction in Austin, Texas. This 2,000-acre multi-use development includes 7,500 all-electric houses, 2 million square feet of commercial space, two schools, and a 600-acre park. Its design has already received a green building award.

Whisper Valley will run on an integrated energy system that includes an extensive ambient loop network heated and cooled by heat pumps and geothermal wells located at each house. Each homeowner has the option to include a 5-kilowatt rooftop solar photovoltaic array to operate the heat pump and energy-efficient appliances, including heat pump water heaters and inductive stovetops. According to the developer, Whisper Valleys economy of scale allows for a median sale price $50,000 below that of typical Austin houses.

The National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, and other project partners are developing an open source software development kit called URBANopt that models elements of zero energy districts, such as building efficiency/demand flexibility strategies, rooftop photovoltaic arrays, ambient loop district thermal systems. The software can be integrated into other computer models to aid in the design of zero energy communities. NREL engineers have been engaging with high-performance district projects across the country, such as the National Western Center, to help inform and guide the development of the URBANopt platform.

The projects Ive described are new construction. Its harder to achieve net zero energy in existing buildings or communities economically, but there are ways to do it. It makes sense to apply those efficiency measures that are the most cost-effective to retrofit, convert building heating and cooling systems to electricity and provide the electricity with solar photovoltaics.

Utilities are increasingly offering time-of-use rate schedules, which charge more for power use during high demand periods. Emerging home energy management systems will allow home owners to heat water, charge home batteries and electric vehicles and run other appliances at times when electricity prices are lowest. Whether were talking about new or existing buildings, I see sustainable zero energy communities powered by renewable energy as the wave of the future as we tackle the climate change crisis.

This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.

Image Credit: Denys NevozhaionUnsplash

See the article here:

Buildings Consume Lots of EnergyHere's How to Design Whole Communities That Give Back as Much as They Take - Singularity Hub

Artificial Intelligence, China, Russia, and the Global Order – Khabarhub

Air University Press and Air University Library have relaunched the Fairchild Series, which is an academic series that publishes cutting-edge research.

The series is named after General Muir Stephen Fairchild, who served as the first leader of the Air University, located at the Maxwell Air Force Base in Alabama.

This timely volume discusses the impact of advances in artificial intelligence (AI) that will lead to panoptic surveillance and directly contribute to highly authoritarian forms of political control.

This edited volume aims to prepare Anglo-American security practitioners for the impact of AI-related technologies on a countrys domestic political system.

This book contains 27 chapters, which is divided into six sections with 24 expert contributors drawing their insights from mixed professional backgrounds.

Particularly, this book traces the differential impact of AI technology on competing domestic regime types.

Chapters in the book describe how China will seek to further increase its authoritarian control by utilizing AI, while making its citizens prosperous and shielding them from external knowledge influences.

The Chinese model of digital authoritarianism or digital social and political control is likely to emerge as a major and direct rival to free, open, and democratic society a model championed by the Anglo-American alliance.

The Russian model, offers a hybrid approach that relies on a variety of manipulative digital tools to destabilize challenger regimes while maintaining tight state control over critical resources and quashing political rivals.

Part 1 of the book with four framing chapters authored by the editorNicholas D. Wrightfocuses on the impact of AI technologies on domestic politics and its far-reaching impact on the evolving global order.

The remaining five sections of the book are filled with contributions from 23 authors, who are some of the worlds leading experts in the field of AI and Internet technologies.

Part two of the book, with five chapters, focuses on how the Chinese and Russian models of digital authoritarianism are shaping domestic political regimes with tools of surveillance, monitoring, big data-fueled AI led governance, facial recognition, and behavioral pattern recognition.

Collectively these technologies are leading to intensifying political control of citizens. The third section of the book is on the export and emulation of Chinese and Russian models of digital authoritarianism to other parts of the world.

Part four contains four chapters on how AI technologies influence Chinas domestic and foreign policy decision making.

Focus of the fifth section, with five chapters, is on the various military dimensions of AI and its application to the development of modern weapon systems such as hypersonic glide weapons and enhancement of Chinese command authority through artificial intelligence.

Probably the most provocative section in this book is the final part of the book that focuses on Artistic Perspectives and the Humanities.

This section draws on science fiction writings, movies, and art to present various telling scenarios of the future.

The set of five chapters offers a vivid and frightening rendering of AI driven technological futures such as precognition to prevent crime, drones to monitor public spaces and summarily execute offenders, a color-coded social credit ranking system to categorize people in a society by obedience to authority, and AI applications that goes beyond facial recognition to diagnosing depression and mood conditions in individuals.

Drawing linkages between AI technologies and terrifying dystopian futures, this set of chapters has issued a clarion call to policy makers to develop robust rules and regulations for democratic governance of the digital world without which corporate and authoritarian control will become the norm.

For the purposes of this book, AI is defined as a constellation of new technologies that combines big data, machine learning, and digital things (e.g., the Internet of Things).

Application of AI implies the analysis of data in which inferences from models are used to predict and anticipate possible future events (p.3).

Critically, what is important to understand is that AI programs do not simply analyze data in the way they were originally programmed, instead the AI programs respond intelligently to new data and adapt their outputs accordingly (p. 3).

Ultimately AI is understood as giving computers new behaviors and knowledge which would be thought intelligent in human beings (p. 3).

The authors argue that the greatest strength of AI capabilities are primarily perceptual, the ability to process images, speeches, and other patterns of behavior and choosing bounded actions to guide decision making.

Googles Deepmind AI is one such example, which draws data from Googles datacenters and accurately predicts when the data-load is going to increase or decrease and correctly adjusts the cooling systems for the datacenters (p.7).

This book raises legitimate concerns with regards to singularity that represents the fear that an exponentially accelerating technological progress will create an AI that exceeds human intelligence and escapes our control (p. 18).

AI systems will self-learn from data without any human input or management. The precise concern is that AI will become super-intelligent, which may then deliberately or inadvertently destroy humanity or usher changes that are outside the control of humans (p. 18).

The terror of singularity is well captured in the five excellent chapters in the concluding section of the book, which draw on sources from reality, fiction, and art to depict an Orwellian dystopia in which conscious human beings either fight back as depicted in the movie seriesMatrix or the Terminatoror they become mindless tools of these self-thinking and regenerating machines (p. 194).

Middle sections of book focusing on the Chinese model of digital authoritarianism, the hybrid Russian model of authoritarianism, and the American model of digital openness, but dependent on corporate control are temporary predictions of AI usage.

The Chinese, Russian, and American models assume that governments could, should, and will be able to control AI and maybe deploy AI toward social control and military applications.

Given the rate of progress, the singularity may occur at some point this century (p. 18).

The lead author, Wright, adds that although clearly momentous, given that nobody knows when, if or how a possible singularity will occur and limits clearly exist on what can sensibly be said or planned for now (p. 18).

The authors are hoping that humans would be able to master and control AI in the same way that we have been (so far) successful in controlling the use and spread of nuclear weapons, albeit imperfectly.

The key assertion here is that much like nuclear weapons, singularity issues related to AI will require managing within the international order as best we can, although our best will inevitably be grossly imperfect (p. 18).

Our solutions are likely to incomplete, inadequate, imperfect, and potentially counterproductive because singularity potentially represents a qualitatively new challenge for humanity that we need to think through and discuss internationally (p. 18). This is a serious and a major claim of the book that readers should take note!

At a more temporal level, the contributors to this important volume proffer three key recommendations: (1) the United States must pursue robust policies to keep ahead of the digital curve and it must respond by preventing the emergence of a military-industrial complex that is managed by an AI corporate oligopoly and a surveillance state; (2) the United States must build a new global order of norms and institutions required to persuade the world that the American model of free and open digital democracy offers an attractive and viable alternative to the Chinese and Russian models of digital authoritarianism; and (3) the United States should fight back against digital authoritarianism and hybridism so that it manages the risks associated with a multifaceted interstate AI competition.

Go here to read the rest:

Artificial Intelligence, China, Russia, and the Global Order - Khabarhub

Parallel Lives the only book you’ll ever need to read about marriage – Telegraph.co.uk

Novelist Sheila Heti on how Phyllis Roses classic study of five famous Victorian couples unravels the myth of matrimony

I mentioned to some friends last year that I was writing about Parallel Lives, Phyllis Roses 1983 study of five Victorian marriages. One, a man in his 30s who has been with his boyfriend for seven years, but is always falling in love and talks about his relationships constantly, almost fell down in my living room. Another, who claims that thoughts of her husband take up only 10 per cent of her brain, actually did a double-take: it was the only book about marriage she had ever wanted to read.

Parallel Lives had been hiding in the bookshelves of so many of my friends, a shared favourite, without any of us knowing it. These are some of the most exciting books: the ones you feel you have stumbled upon, fortuitously, and that seem so tailored to your interests that its impossible to imagine them having a general, wide readership. Yet Parallel Lives, for all its singularity, does.

One of the virtues of the book and I think one reason it appeals topeople of such different temperaments is its refusal to make sweeping statements about love or life. It remains faithfully close to the factual details of the marriages it depicts, and its mode of conclusion is not generalisation, but the epigram. A generalisation asks to be disagreed with. An epigram unfolds in all directions.

Rereading this book at the age of 42, a decade into a relationship that might well be called a marriage, I cannot perceive the book I first read when I was 23, engaged to a different man, who bought it for me. Back then, I was naively confident about our ability to make a happy marriage of equals, because that is what we wanted to do. I imagined he gave me Parallel Lives as if to say: pick which of these marriages you want, my dear. I am available for any of them. I read the book almost like a mail-order catalogue. But today it seems to be illustrating the opposite point: about the sad and comical fact of our natures, which defines the limits of our most intimate connections.

Rose began writing Parallel Lives when she was 35, a mother, two years divorced. She continued to work on it for six years, while a professor at Wesleyan University. Several years after it was published, she met a man while she was living in Paris researching a book about Josephine Baker; eventually they would marry. This is a heartening fact: though a feminist had attained near X-ray vision for how marriages can develop in all sorts of ways ways that cant be predicted at the start she saw enough value in this arrangement to try it for a second time.

Read more from the original source:

Parallel Lives the only book you'll ever need to read about marriage - Telegraph.co.uk

Lewontin’s Confession and Mamet’s Principle – Discovery Institute

Jerry Coyne and his Darwinist/materialist/atheist brethren make public assertions that are nonsense on their face: they claim to be mindless meat machines, they deny the indisputable evidence for intelligent design in biology and for teleology in all of nature, they deny the obvious evidence for the supernatural in cosmological singularities such as black holes and the singularity at the origin of the Big Bang, and they deny the manifest corruption of modern science by materialism and arrogance and egotism. Materialists tout determinism and deny free will, despite the fact that determinism in physics has been quite decisively refuted and the fact that free will is well supported by neuroscience and that denial of free will negates the ability to make a truth claim of any sort (if a materialists opinion is forced by chemical reactions, theres no reason to think it corresponds to truth. Chemistry is not a propositional and can be neither true nor false). Atheists deny the existence of God because of evil in nature, without realizing that the recognition of evil presupposes an objective moral standard that can only be grounded in a Mind outside of man.

Darwinism/materialism/atheism (the three are nearly always found together) is beset with self-refuting non-sequiturs. This triad is not even a genuine ideological perspective as much as it is an incoherent mistake. Yet, ironically, many who tout it are quite intelligent people.

Playwright David Mamet noted a characteristic in politics that applies broadly to flawed belief systems. It struck me as a key to understanding the philosophical perspective of those who deny free will, design in nature, Gods existence, and the like. Mamet originally applied it to a particular political philosophy, but I apply Mamets principle to Darwinists et al:

in order for [Darwinists, atheists, materialists, etc.] to continue their illogical belief systems they have to pretend not to know a lot of things.

The pretense not to know things is at the root of Darwinist/atheist/materialist ideology. It was stated with astonishing candor by Harvard biologist Richard Lewontin, one of the past centurys leading Darwinists:

Our willingness to accept scientific claims that are against common sense is the key to an understanding of the real struggle between science and the supernatural. We take the side of science in spite of the patent absurdity of some of its constructs, in spite of its failure to fulfill many of its extravagant promises of health and life, in spite of the tolerance of the scientific community for unsubstantiated just-so stories, because we have a prior commitment, a commitment to materialism.

It is not that the methods and institutions of science somehow compel us to accept a material explanation of the phenomenal world, but, on the contrary, that we are forced by our a priori adherence to material causes to create an apparatus of investigation and a set of concepts that produce material explanations, no matter how counter-intuitive, no matter how mystifying to the uninitiated.

Moreover, that materialism is absolute, for we cannot allow a Divine Foot in the door

Lewontins confession is a remarkable invocation of Mamets principle: in order to maintain the Darwinist/materialist ideology, atheists have to pretend not to know a lot of things.

The fundamental reason that Darwinists have vented such fury at the intelligent design movement even to the point that a prominent scientific journal openly advocates government censorship of ID is that ID has forced Darwinists and other atheist and materialist ideologues to publicly explain themselves, and that has made their pretense that there is no design in nature so much harder to pull off.

Photo: David Mamet, by David Shankbone / CC BY-SA (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/).

See the original post:

Lewontin's Confession and Mamet's Principle - Discovery Institute

Director-general of World Health Organization to speak at Collision from Home – BetaKit

Collision from Home has announced that Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, the director-general of the World Health Organization (WHO), will speak at this years virtual conference. Tedros is an Ethiopian microbiologist and malaria researcher who has served in his role at the WHO since 2017.

We are relying on everyone in the field, from world leaders in medicine to the nurses on the frontline.

Ghebreyesus is expected to speak about the global fight against the COVID-19 pandemic from the perspective of the WHO. Collision from Homes organizers intend to put a particular focus on healthcare for this years event, specifically on how the tech industry is accelerating solutions and addressing challenges brought on by the COVID-19 pandemic.

Were incredibly humbled to welcome [Adhanom], one of the most important people in the world right now, to Collision from Home, said Paddy Cosgrave, founder and CEO of Collision from Home. This global pandemic has created a warlike scenario where the health industry is in an arms race, except the arms are not weapons, they are medical advancements that will save lives, such as tracking systems for contact tracing, and super fast testing.

In addition to Ghebreyesus, speakers expected to focus on the pandemic response include Patrice Harris, president of the American Medical Association, Vas Narasimhan, CEO of Novartis, and Leana Wen, visiting professor of health policy and management of George Washington University.

Startups that are expected to speak at Collision from Home, such as Austin, Texas-based Everlywell, are also playing a role in the pandemic recovery. Everlywell, which was also featured in Singularity Universitys virtual summit on COVID-19 in March, recently secured authorization from the Food and Drug Administration to launch self-administered, at-home COVID-19 testing kits.

RELATED: Collision to give 1,000 laid-off Toronto residents free access to virtual conference

We are desperate to return to any kind of normal and now more than ever, we are relying on everyone in the field, from world leaders in medicine to the nurses on the frontline, Cosgrave added. I believe the tech advancements well make over the next year and into 2021 will be incredible, and change the way healthcare is run forever.

Since the in-person portion of Collision was cancelled earlier this year due to the pandemic, the organizers have brought on speakers that address a wide array of issues pertaining to the COVID-19 crisis. NBA All-Star champion turned investor Shaquille ONeal, for example, will be speaking at the 2020 virtual tech conference about unemployment.

Startups, speakers, investors, partners, and attendees will be able to access networking and content experiences through the Collision from Home app. The conference is expected to return to Toronto as a physical event from June 21 to 24, 2021, at the Enercare Centre.

Image source ITU via Flickr.

Read the original:

Director-general of World Health Organization to speak at Collision from Home - BetaKit