NATO urges Turkey, Germany to settle air base row – Reuters

BRUSSELS/BERLIN (Reuters) - NATO's Secretary General has urged the Turkish and German foreign ministers to resolve their differences over visits to Turkish air bases, part of a wider row between the two allies.

Germany has refused to extradite asylum seekers Turkey says were involved in a coup attempt last year, Berlin is demanding the release of a Turkish-German journalist, and Ankara has refused to let German lawmakers visit soldiers at two air bases.

German soldiers contribute to a NATO air surveillance mission at Konya, 250 km (150 miles) south of the Turkish capital Ankara, and its troops stationed at another air base, in Incirlik, have already been moved to Jordan.

NATO said Jens Stoltenberg had called Sigmar Gabriel and Mevlut Cavusoglu on Friday to ask them to settle the dispute.

"We hope that Germany and Turkey are able to find a mutually acceptable date for a visit," a NATO spokesman said.

Germany's armed forces are under parliamentary control and Berlin says the lawmakers must have access to its soldiers.

German Chancellor Angela Merkel insisted in a television interview on Sunday that German lawmakers should be allowed to visit the Bundeswehr soldiers at the NATO air base in Konya.

"This whole issue is unfortunate, very unfortunate," Merkel told public broadcaster ARD, adding that more talks were needed to find a solution, also with the help of NATO.

On whether Ankara had asked Berlin to extradite asylum seekers in exchange for granting lawmakers access to the air base, Merkel said she was not aware of any such a request.

"If this was the case..., we would reject this entirely," Merkel said.

There could be no negotiations with Ankara about the extradition of Turkish asylum seekers and granting German lawmakers access to the soldiers at Konya air base because both issues were completely unrelated, she added.

Reporting by Robert-Jan Bartunek in Brussels and Michael Nienaber in Berlin; Editing by Louise Ireland and Giles Elgood

Read the original:

NATO urges Turkey, Germany to settle air base row - Reuters

Ukraine to start NATO talks: Russia angry, the West uncertain – FRANCE 24

With your existing account from... {* loginWidget *} With a traditional account... {* #signInForm *} {* signInEmailAddress *} {* currentPassword *} {* /signInForm *} Welcome back, {* welcomeName *} {* loginWidget *} Welcome back! {* #signInForm *} {* signInEmailAddress *} {* currentPassword *}

Sign In

Your account has been deactivated.

You must verify your email address before signing in. Check your email for your verification email, or enter your email address in the form below to resend the email.

Please confirm the information below before signing in. Sign In

We have sent a confirmation email to {* emailAddressData *}. Please check your email and click on the link to activate your account.

We've sent an email with instructions to create a new password. Your existing password has not been changed.

{| foundExistingAccountText |} {| current_emailAddress |}.

{| existing_displayName |} {| existing_provider_emailAddress |}

Created {| existing_createdDate |} at {| existing_siteName |}

Thank you for verifiying your email address.

Check your email for a link to reset your password.

Thank you for verifiying your email address.

Password has been successfully updated.

We didn't recognize that password reset code. Enter your email address to get a new one.

We've sent an email with instructions to create a new password. Your existing password has not been changed.

{* photoManager *}

{* loginWidget *}

{* publicPrivate *} {* journalistContact *} {* aboutMe *} {* usernameTwPublic *} {* preferedContactLanguages *} {* arabicUsername *} {* persianUsername *} {* skypeId *} {* usernameTw *} {* journalistContact *} {* publicPrivate *} {* profession *}

{* newsMenu *} {* optinalert *} {* optinBestofWeek *} {* optinBestofWEnd *} {* optinBestofObs *}

{* newsMenuEn *} {* optinalertEn *} {* optinBestofWeekEn *} {* optinBestofWEndEn *} {* optinBestofObsEn *}

{* newsMenuAr *} {* optinalertAr *} {* optinBestofWeekAr *} {* optinBestofWEndAr *} {* optinBestofObsAr *}

{* newsMenuEs *} {* optinalertEs *} {* optinbestofweekEs *} {* optinbestofwendEs *}

{* optinQuotidienne *} {* optinBreaking *}

{* optinAutopromo *} {* optinPartenaires *}

{* optinActuMonde *} {* optinActuAfrique *} {* optinAlert *} {* optinRfiAfriqueFootFr *} {* optinMfi *} {* optinActuMusique *} {* optinOffreRfi *} {* optinOffrePartenaire *}

{* savedProfileMessage *}

Are you sure you want to deactivate your account? You will no longer have access to your profile.

See more here:

Ukraine to start NATO talks: Russia angry, the West uncertain - FRANCE 24

5000 NATO, partner troops stage exercises in Romania – News & Observer

5000 NATO, partner troops stage exercises in Romania
News & Observer
Some 5,000 troops from NATO and partner countries are staging exercises in Romania watched by a senior NATO official and Romania's president. President Klaus Iohannis and NATO Military Committee head Gen. Petr Pavel, who is on a two-day visit to ...

and more »

Read this article:

5000 NATO, partner troops stage exercises in Romania - News & Observer

Newest Russia Threat? Military Challenges US And Europe By Winning In Syria, Entering Mediterranean – Newsweek

Russia's support for the Syrian government in its war against jihadists and other insurgents has given Moscow a newfound military foothold in the Mediterranean, one that could present a serious challenge to another foe: NATO.

The Institute for the Study of War, a Washington-based think tank that monitors global conflicts, released a report Thursday linking Russia's commitment toSyrian President Bashar al-Assad and his armed forces with Moscow's desire to increase its leverage against U.S.-led alliance NATO, which dominates much of Europe. For years, Russia and NATO have been engaged in an international arms race, the likes of which have not been seen since the Cold War, and each side accuses the other of pushing the limits of peace among the world's leading military powers. By coming to the rescue of an old ally in the Middle East, Russia may have secured a new, strategic entrance to the heavily contested theater of Europe.

Related:Trump's War: From bombing Syria to challenging Russia and Iran

Daily Emails and Alerts - Get the best of Newsweek delivered to your inbox

A still image taken from a video footage and released by Russia's Defense Ministry on June 23, 2017, shows a missile being fired from a Russian warship to positions held by the Islamic State militant group (ISIS) in Syria's Hama province, from the Mediterranean Sea. In helping Syrian President Bashar al-Assad and his armed forces defeat the insurgents and jihadists attempting to overthrow him, Russia was able to build up its forces in the Mediterranean Sea. MINISTRY OF DEFENSE OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION/HANDOUT VIA REUTERS TV

"Russian President Vladimir Putin is establishing a long-term military presence in the Mediterranean Sea in part to contest the United States ability to operate freely and hold NATOs southern flank at risk," the report, authored by analysts Charles Frattini III and Genevieve Casagrande, found.

Casagrande told Newsweek that Russia's approach to the conflict in Syria "almost immediately" showed signs of an underlying campaign to creep into NATO's southern flank, especially in Moscow's interaction with NATO member Turkey. Turkey was a leading sponsor of militants that took arms against Assad's government in 2011, accusing the Syrian leader of perpetrating human rights abuses and political oppression. Early on, rebels began to receive significant support from Western countries such as the U.S. and Gulf Arab states such as Qatar as well. The Syrian military was forced to withdraw from much of the country, leaving only a few major cities as bastions of government support.

This changed in 2015, however, when Russia staged a direct military intervention at Assad's request. Syria's Baathist government and Moscow have kept ties for decades and, under the cover of Russian airstrikes, Syria's armed forces were able to regainmuch of the country. Rebels, whose ranks had already been largely decimated by infighting with ultra-conservative Sunni Muslim fighters from Al-Qaeda and the Islamic State militant group (ISIS), had little choice but to surrender nearly every population center under their control. In what was perhaps the biggest turning point in the war, insurgents were beaten in Aleppo in December. Turkey, which continued to sponsor rebels after rising jihadist influence compelled the U.S. to partially abandon its own backing, entered into an unprecedented agreement with Russia to give up whatwas once a bastion of anti-government support in Aleppo.

The move marked the beginning of the Astana peace process, an effort to find a political solution to the war that parallels ongoing U.N.-sponsored talks. Casagrande said Russia's ability to convince a "conflicted" Turkey, a primary opponent of Assad's government that often disagrees with its NATO partners as well, to come to the table with the Syrian government and Iran, another major ally of Assad, signaled a turn in Moscow's favor.

"Russia is using this to drive a wedge between Turkey and other NATO allies," Casagrande told Newsweek. "It's part of Russia's global plan to constrain and disrupt NATO at large."

A graphic provided by the Institute for the Study of War shows the extent of the Russian Black Sea Fleet's new Mediterranean Task Force. While Moscow's intervention in Syria has turned the tides of war for Syrian President Bashar al-Assad, it has also granted a strategic point of access for Russia near NATO's southern flank in Europe. INSTITUTE FOR THE STUDY OF WAR

The strategy appears to be working, too, she noted. On a tactical level, the Syrian army and its allies have made a significant comeback with even French President Emmanuel Macron rescinding Assad's departure as a precondition to ending a war that's raged on for more than six years, killing hundreds of thousands and displacing millions more. The Syrian military has largely secured the western part of the country, save for the rebel hub of Idlib, and has begun moving east, rapidly cutting through ISIS territory toward the city of Deir Al-Zour, which has been under siege by the jihadists since 2014.

Russia, on the other hand, is looking west. It's contributed extensive naval resources, including 15 warships from its Black Sea Fleet, toward developing a Permanent Mediterranean Task Force as of July 5. The ships are based out of the coastal Syrian city of Tartous, where Moscow secured permission from Damascus to establish a naval base for nearly the next half a century. Russian warships and a submarinein the Mediterranean have already fired advanced, supersonic Kalibr cruise missiles against ISIS positions in Syria. The same nuclear-capable weapons could soon easily be in range of NATO targets as well, if they aren't already.

"Regarding Russia's engagement in Syria, I think it's absolutely linked to a desire by Moscow to project power on a greater scale in the region as a whole," Neil Hauer, lead analyst at SecDev Group, told Newsweek, noting upcoming renovations to both Russia's naval base in Tartous and air basein Latakia.

"All of this goes far above and beyond what the remaining campaign against Syrian rebels and the Islamic State requires, and thus appears to be pretty clearly aimed at establishing Russia as a major player in the region and challenger to NATO's aims for years to come," he added.

Syria's President Bashar al-Assad visits a Russian air base at Hmeymim, in western Syria in this handout picture posted on the state-run Syrian Arab News Agency (SANA) on June 27, 2017, Syria. Hmeymim is one of the crucial military installations lent by the Syrian military to its Russian allies for at least 49 years. SANA/Reuters

It may not end with Syria, either. Russia's special forces have already reportedly been spotted in Egypt, potentially courting Libyan military leader Khalifa Hifter, who has become increasingly influential politically over his war-torn nation. Yemen, which has been devastated by a Saudi Arabia-led campaign against a local majority-Shiite Muslim militant group known as the Houthis,could also serve as a venue for Russian military ventures where the U.S. and its allies have significantly struggled to achieve theirown objectives. As Russia and NATO's rivalryplays out in the Baltics and other parts of Europe, the latter may find itself caught off guard by an expandingRussian sphere of influence reminiscent of Moscow's Soviet legacy.

"Putin has already set some pretty strategic conditions in countries like Libya, Egypt and Yemen," Casagrande told Newsweek. "What Russia does pretty well in the Middle East is set itself to benefit from opportunities in the long run."

See the original post here:

Newest Russia Threat? Military Challenges US And Europe By Winning In Syria, Entering Mediterranean - Newsweek

Is History a New NATO Weapon against Russia? – International Policy Digest (press release) (blog)

On Wednesday NATO and Russia received a new reason to argue and make claims to each other. NATO posted an 8-minute online documentary video glorifying the activity of the Baltic partisan movement Forest Brothers.

For the Baltic States WWII did not end in 1945, as well as for the Soviet army soldiers who faced unexpected violent resistance from national partisans. The Forest Brothers actively fought the Soviet army from 1948 until the late 1950s or early 60s.

It should be noted that the Forest Brothers activity is little known and a controversial piece of history of the Baltic States. There are two radically opposite points of view. From one point of view the Forest Brothers were partisans who continued armed resistance to the Soviet occupation of Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania after the end of the Second World War. From the second point of view such treatment of their activity is very contradictory, because there are facts that many of the Forest Brothers were former Nazi collaborators and members of the Baltic Waffen SS, and that members of these groups killed thousands of civilians in their raids.

Where is the truth? It seems as if in this particular case NATO has gone about the Baltic States and puts itself in an uncomfortable position, supporting the possible misinterpretation of historical facts.

A similar dispute has become a source of contention between Ukraine and Poland, which differently interpret Stepan Banderas role in history. Ukraine considers Stepan Bandera a hero. Poles mainly remember him for collaborating with the Nazis and for his followers slaughtering Polish civilians. Poles find Ukraines version of a common history a problem and emphasize, that they will not accept ideology and actions that allow murder of innocent civilians, even in the name of the highest goals, to which undoubtedly fight for state independence belongs. The matter is very similar to what is going on between NATO and Russia just now.

Such political interference into the history of separate countries, in bitter moments of the past wont make NATO stronger, wont make relations between opponents warmer, and wont make the continent more peaceful. There are enough problems in contemporary history that should be solved immediately and a new one makes the situation even harder. As for the Baltic States they simply want NATOs attention, and past conflict with the Soviet Union provides an opportunity to attract that attention and, probably, money

See original here:

Is History a New NATO Weapon against Russia? - International Policy Digest (press release) (blog)

At NATO Headquarters, Trump Fails Another Leadership Test

Even when a moment designed to affirm some of Americas basic principles is dangled before him, President Donald Trump has a way of batting it aside. In Brussels on Thursday, as he stood at a rostrum at a ceremony in front of the new NATO headquarters, Trump had, to his left, a mangled girder from the World Trade Center; to his right, broken slabs of the Berlin Wall, both of which were being dedicated as memorials; and, behind him, the leaders of the twenty-seven other countries in the alliance. One of them, Germanys Chancellor, Angela Merkel, had just delivered remarks that served as a reminder that, until she was thirty-five years old, she had lived behind that wall, and had been part of the civic movement that peacefully reunified Germany. Jens Stoltenberg, the Secretary-General of NATO , who had introduced Merkel, noted that she had been among the crowds filling the streets of East Berlin on the night the Wall came down. A few minutes later, when Stoltenberg introduced Trump, he summoned a personal connection for him, too, noting that the 9/11 terrorists struck at the heart of your own home town, New York. That attack marked the only time that NATO has invoked Article 5 of its charter, the mutual-defense provision, which the new headquarters 9/11 memorial was also supposed to commemorate. In what may have been an attempt at Trump-friendly sloganeering, Stoltenberg summed up Article 5 by declaring, gamely, All for one, and one for all! But Trump had come to praise other ideals, other lands, and other leaders.

He had just come from Saudi Arabia , Trump told the NATO leaders, in a brief speech. There, I spent much time with King Salman, a wise man who wants to see things get much better rapidly.That meeting had beenhistoric, Trump said. The leaders of the Middle East had promised him that they would stop funding the radical ideology that leads to this horrible terrorism all over the globe. So that should take care of the problem. He did not define radical ideology,or acknowledge that he was praising a monarch in what seemed to be an attempt to put the assembled elected leaders of democracies to shame. Trumps world view seems to combine a distaste for Islam with a predilection for monarchs of any backgroundfor anyone with a decent palace, really. In viewing his world travels, that mixture can be confusing, but it should not be mistaken for a sign of budding tolerance. (As has been widely noted, Trump once called Brussels ahellhole, on account of its large number of immigrantsmany of whom came from countries whose repressive leaders had joined him at the summit in Riyadh. He has said similar things about Paris: No one wants to go to Paris anymore. When Trump was in Riyadh, though, he couldnt stop talking about how fancy the new buildings were.)He did express his sympathy to Prime Minister Theresa May, of the United Kingdom, who was also in attendance, for the Manchester attack (terrible thing), and called for a moment of silence to honor the dead. But he quickly moved to chastising the leaders for not having taken seriously enough the need for building walls, rather than taking them down.

Terrorism must be stopped in its tracks, orthe horror you saw in Manchester and so many other places will continue forever,Trump said. You have thousands and thousands of people pouring into our various countries and spreading throughout, and in many cases we have no idea who they are.He seemed to suggest that thetracksthat terrorism was on were the same paths that refugees followed, or perhaps just the roads that ran through the deliberately unpoliced borders of the European Union. We must be tough. We must be strong. And we must be vigilant,he continued. The other leaders watched him, with whatever sort of vigilance each thought necessary, as he went on to tell them that they needed to spend more money on defense, and offered his explanation for why.

The NATO of the future must include a great focus on terrorism and immigration, as well as threats from Russia and on NATO s eastern and southern borders.These grave security concerns are the same reason that I have been very, very direct with Secretary Stoltenberg and members of the Alliance in saying that NATO members must finally contribute their fair share and meet their financial obligations.(It is worth noting thatimmigration,without any qualifying phrase, is on Trumps list ofgrave security concerns, which raises the question of where and when he thinks that immigration, including to America, makes a country stronger.) Twenty-three NATO countries were not meeting the alliances target of spending at least two per cent of their G.D.P. on defense, he said, while the UnitedStateswas exceeding that number. This is not fair to the people and taxpayers of the United States,Trump said. The idea that other things might be unfair to the American peoplethat, for example, the levelof defense spending might be too high at a time when the Trump Administrations budget is cutting money meant to help children and the disabledhad not seemed to enter his mind. Still, the NATO members had already agreed to spend more money.

Merkel, in her remarks, expressed her countrys unending gratitude toward NATO for the role it played in German reunification. But she also focussed on the people of Central and Eastern Europe, whosecourage,she said, was one of the reasons that pieces of the Berlin Wall were now justa memento.Their courage included crossing borders and, in some cases, risking and even losing their lives in dashes across the no mans land that separated East and West Berlin. Ronald Reagans 1987 Berlin speech, in which he demanded,Mr. Gorbachev, tear down this wall,expressed valuesopenness and democracy among themthat Trump seemed to shrug at. But, as important as Reagans message may have been at the time,andas well as it has stood up in the judgment of history, the moment two years later, when the Wall was brought down not by a Soviet official but by crowds of ordinary East Germans, caught NATO by surprise. The force of the aspiration for freedom, and the will to move to where it can be found, often comes upon governments unexpectedly. ButReagans voice had been one of leadership. Trumps was not, unless you define leadership as always getting to be the one in front. A video caught Trump winning that position by shoving aside the Prime Minister of Montenegro, and then seeming not to notice him. (During the campaign, Trump had wondered why Americans would want to defend countries whose names they couldnt even remember.)

European leaders were reportedly hoping for an affirmation of Article 5 in Trumps remarks; they didnt get it. In general, the approach of his hosts on this trip seems to have been to hope very much that he doesnt actually break anything. Remarks have been kept short, flattery longa reminder, as with the international and unmerited fting of Ivanka, of how Trumpism lowers the level of dialogue all around. Trump does like it when people give gifts (though he may not have appreciated it when Pope Francis, at the Vatican, handed him a copy of his encyclical on climate change), and so he thanked the 9/11 Museum, in New York, which had donated the girders, and Merkel, as a representative of Germany, for donating the slabs. He spoke a few sentences about the memorials symbolic power. But, as he looked around at the new headquarters, he seemed, again, to be dwelling on a different definition of a value.

And I never asked once what the new NATO headquarters cost,he said, as if he should be thanked for that act of restraint. I refuse to do that. But it is beautiful.It was not, perhaps, what Trump would have built. But what would have been the price of that?

Read this article:

At NATO Headquarters, Trump Fails Another Leadership Test

NATO, Moscow Squabble Over Russian War Games Near Alliance Borders – Wall Street Journal (subscription)


Wall Street Journal (subscription)
NATO, Moscow Squabble Over Russian War Games Near Alliance Borders
Wall Street Journal (subscription)
At NATO headquarters in the Belgian capital, Russian representatives outlined the troops, ships, aircraft and weaponry that will participate in the joint Russian-Belarusian regional exercises scheduled for September, partly on Belarus's.

More:

NATO, Moscow Squabble Over Russian War Games Near Alliance Borders - Wall Street Journal (subscription)

NATO military drills in Eastern Europe begin in Bulgaria – The Seattle Times

BUCHAREST, Romania Major NATO exercises in Eastern Europe have begun in Bulgaria on Tuesday involving 25,000 military personnel from more than 20 allied and partner countries as the U.S. seeks to reassure NATOs European allies.

The Saber Guardian 17 exercises are being led by U.S. Army Europe and run until July 20. The training will also take place in Hungary and Romania, including at the countrys Mihail Kogalniceanu Air Base near the Black Sea. The opening ceremony was held at the Novo Selo military camp in southern Bulgaria.

The drills aim to increase the interoperability of participating countries and demonstrate resolve and readiness to act in support of security and stability in the Black Sea region. There will be a total of 18 specialized exercises.

A U.S. European Command statement said the drills are designed as a deterrent. The U.S. has beefed up its presence in Eastern Europe since Russia annexed Ukraines Crimea Peninsula to reassure NATOs East European members, which were formerly in Moscows sphere of influence.

The exercises will feature an air defense artillery live fire exercise, field training and live fire exercises, multiple river crossings and a mass casualty exercise.

The statement said that smaller U.S. and European-national exercises will be held in the Black Sea region this summer to support Saber Guardians objectives of supporting security and stability in the Black Sea region.

The Saber Guardian exercises have been held annually since 2013 in the Black Sea region.

See original here:

NATO military drills in Eastern Europe begin in Bulgaria - The Seattle Times

President Trump’s claim ‘billions and billions’ are ‘pouring into NATO … – Washington Post

President Trump consistently misstates his impact on NATO's budget and how that budget works. (Meg Kelly/The Washington Post)

Americans know that a strong alliance of free, sovereign and independent nations is the best defense for our freedoms and for our interests. That is why my administration has demanded that all members of NATO finally meet their full and fair financial obligation. As a result of this insistence, billions of dollars more have begun to pour into NATO. In fact, people are shocked. But billions and billions of dollars more coming in from countries that, in my opinion, would not have been paying so quickly. President Trump, speech in Warsaw, July 6, 2017

Whenever we delve into Trumps rhetoric on the funding of NATO, the North Atlantic Treaty Organization, we find that he fundamentally mischaracterizes the way NATO works. This was true of candidate Trump, who received Three Pinocchios for a series of misleading claims about NATO funding, and of President Trump, who received anupdated rating of Four Pinocchios for his failure to correct his talking points.

Trump now says new money is pouring into NATObecause of his administration. We logged versions ofthis claim at least 15 times in our Fact Checker database tracking every false or misleading claim by Trump in his first full year as president.

This is yet another case where Trump is quick to take credit for decisions others made prior to his election, or unrelated to his presidency. Lets dig into the facts.

Trump started making this claim when head-libbed itin his maiden speech to Congress at the end of February a month into his presidency. I can tell you the money is pouring in. Very nice, he said, mentioning he was pressing NATO allies in very frank and strong discussions. As we noted at the time, this is nonsensical.

NATO was established in the aftermath of World War II. It began with 12 members in a defense alliance among Western European countries, the United States and Canada to counter the Soviet Union and its satellite countries in Eastern Europe (known as the Warsaw Pact). After the Soviet Union collapsed and the Warsaw Pact unraveled, NATO expanded to include many Eastern European nations and even former parts of the Soviet Union. There are now 28 member countries in NATO.

There are two types of funding for NATO: direct and indirect. Direct contributions are shared among the 29 member states to pay for the costs of the actual alliance (for example, maintenance and headquarters activity). But when Trump talks about financial obligation and money pouring into NATO, he is talking about indirect spending. (The White House did not respond to our request for explanation.)

Indirect spending is the money NATO countries spend on their own defense budgets. These contributions are voluntary and not legally binding. Each country decides what to contribute based on their own defense capability.

Each NATO member has had this 2 percent spending guideline since 2006, but not everyone had been actively working toward that. Then during a 2014 summit in Wales, NATO members pledged to stop cutting their defense expenditure and move toward that 2 percent guideline within 10 years. This decision, taken just months after the annexation of Crimea, was a response to Russian aggression in Ukraine.

That means long before Trump started complaining about other countries NATO contributions during the campaign and into his presidency, members had committed to having defense spending account for 2 percent of each nations gross domestic product by 2024.

Since the 2014 meeting, defense expenditures from member countries increased steadily. The cumulative spending increase from 2015 to 2017 above 2014 level is an additional $45.8 billion, according toNATOs announcement from June 29, 2017.

Defense spending from non-U.S. members is estimated to increase $13 billion in 2017. But there is no evidence the Trump administration had anything to do with these countries independent decisions to bolster their own defense spending. These budget decisions were made during the 2016 calendar year, before Trump became president.

In 2017, six countries met the 2 percent goal. United States leads the pack at 3.6 percent. The other countries are Greece, Estonia, Britain, Romania and Poland. (Greece met the guideline even though it slashed defense spending, because its economy collapsed. This is whysome experts say the guideline is rather arbitrary.)

Other nations especially ones that border Russia or Ukraine have bolstered their defense spending in response to perceived threats from Russia.Romania and Poland are former members of the Warsaw Pact.

Who deserves the most credit? Vladimir Putin. It was the invasion of Crimea, the launching of insurgency backed by Russia in Eastern Ukraine, that was the wake-up call for the majority of the allies, said Alexander Vershbow, former deputy secretary general of NATO. It took a while to see the results; 2015 was not a year of substantial increases but 2016 was. So again, Vladimir Putin and his aggressive behavior deserves more credit than the president of the United States.

Every U.S. president in recent memory similarly called on other countries to increase their defense spending, experts say, but Trumps rhetoric may have lit a fire for countries setting their budgets for 2018 and beyond. For example, at the May 25 NATO meeting, member countries agreed to develop a plan by the end of 2017 showing how they would meet the 2 percent guideline.

Still, Trump goes way too far taking credit, and no new commitments have been made since he became president.

Even if you wanted to take a look at the impact that Trump had on defense spending, you have to wait a few years, said Jim Townsend, former deputy assistant secretary of Defense for European and NATO policy. If you see a huge surge in 2018, you can ask: Was that a Trump surge or something else causing that? But you have to get there first. The money that is in the budget this year was set in motion last year.

Trump certainly is not the first president to insist other members of NATO increase their defense spending. Yet he says that because of his insistence, countries are spending billions and billions more. Defense spending by NATO countries increased since they agreed in 2014 to work toward the 2 percent guideline, in response to threats from Russia. Increases in spending since then were the countries voluntary, independent decisions precedinghis presidency.

This over-the-top rhetoric goes way too far, once again pushing him into Four-Pinocchio territory.

(About our rating scale)

Send us facts to check by filling out this form

Keep tabs on Trumps promises with our Trump Promise Tracker

Sign up for The Fact Checker weekly newsletter

Do you rate this claim as true or false? More Pinocchios for false, fewer based on your opinion of the statement's truthfulness. (The check mark means you think the statement is true, not that you agree with the rating.)

We need to verify that you are an actual person.

This is a non-scientific user poll. Results are not statistically valid and cannot be assumed to reflect the views of Washington Post users as a group or the general population.

Share the Facts

2017-07-12 11:26:27 UTC

1

1

5

Four Pinocchios

"That is why my administration has demanded that all members of NATO finally meet their full and fair financial obligation. As a result of this insistence, billions of dollars more have begun to pour into NATO. "

Donald Trump

President of the United States

speech in Warsaw

Thursday, July 6, 2017

2017-07-06

View original post here:

President Trump's claim 'billions and billions' are 'pouring into NATO ... - Washington Post

NATO bristles at ‘unsafe behavior’ by Russian pilots – POLITICO.eu

Russian Su-27 jet fighters and MIG 29 jet fighters fly over Red Square during the Victory Day military parade in Moscow on May 9, 2016 | Kirill Kudryavtsev/AFP via Getty Images

Rising concerns come after series of confrontations between allies and Russian aircraft in the crowded airspace over the Baltic Sea.

By David M. Herszenhorn

7/11/17, 6:08 PM CET

Updated 7/12/17, 12:56 PM CET

Increasingly angry NATO allies will tellthe Kremlin on Thursday of their objection toaggressive and dangerous maneuvers by Russian military pilots over the Baltic Sea, including unsafe behavior by Russian pilots on intercepts, an alliance official said.

NATOs frustration over what it views as unnecessary provocations by Russian military aircraft will be conveyed ata meeting in Brussels of the NATO-Russia Council, a forum in which Western allies and Russia maintain dialogueeven amid heightened tensions.

NATOs rising concerns come after a series of confrontations between allies and Russian aircraft in the crowded airspace over the Baltic Sea, including an incident last month in which a Russian Su-27 fighter jet came within several feet of a U.S. RC-135 reconnaissance plane. The Pentagon released dramatic photos of that incident.

The NATO official, speaking on condition of anonymity, said the actions by Russian pilots would be among severalconcerns raised by allies in Thursdays meeting. Allies are also bristling over plans by Russia for a large-scale military exercise, called Zapad, or West, which NATO officials say should be reported under a 2011 international accord known as the Vienna Document.

TheVienna Document, agreed by membersof the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe, which includes Russia and NATO allies, calls for official notice of exercises exceeding 9,000 troops and allows OSCE states to observe any exercises involving more than 13,000 soldiers.

NATO officials said they believed that Russias Zapad exercises would involve about 100,000 troops but that the Kremlin was dividing up the drills so it could claim not to be exceeding the threshold for notification or observation.

Relations between Russia and the West have been deeply strained since Russiasinvasion and annexation of Crimea in 2014 and the ensuing warin eastern Ukraine, in which Moscow has backed opponents of the Ukrainian government.

In response to an inquiry from POLITICO, a spokeswoman for the Russian mission to NATO said she couldonly confirm that the meeting of the NATO-Russia Council was scheduled for Thursday.

Because the airspace over the Baltic Sea is among the most crowded on the planet, civilian aviation regulators have worked out agreements by which Russian military aircraft traveling to the Russian enclave of Kaliningrad stay within a pre-determined corridor. Other countries have complained that Russian military aircraft were often traveling without using transponders or making radio contact, creating dangerous conditions for passenger jets.

NATOs most senior uniformed officer, General Petr Pavel, the chairman of the NATO military committee, has said that the actions by Russian pilots created undue risks.

There is always risk that something will go wrong when two forces that are not friendly are too close to each other and we are close to each other not only in the Baltic Sea airspace but in the Black Sea airspace, all around the border in Syria, Pavel said at a POLITICO Playbook breakfast interview.

In most of these cases, we havent been observing the situation thatwould be clearly hostile against NATO. There are some violations of airspace, not necessarily incursion into NATO territory, but we are mostly witnessing what we call non-professionalbehavior in the air.

Go here to see the original:

NATO bristles at 'unsafe behavior' by Russian pilots - POLITICO.eu

NATO secretary general honors Ukraine, speaks out against Russia – DefenseNews.com

WASHINGTON NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg visited Ukraine last weekend to honor 20 years of partnership, according to a NATO announcement.While there, Stoltenberg pointedly spoke out against Russian aggression during his remarks.

Russia has maintained its aggressive actions against Ukraine. But NATO and NATO allies stand on your side,he said. NATO allies do not, and will not, recognize Russias illegal and illegitimate annexation of Crimea.

At a press conference, Stoltenberg said it was clear the ceasefire in eastern Ukraine was not effective and urged Russia to pull its thousands of troops from Ukraine, emphasizing that the Minsk agreements must be fully implemented and Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe monitors be granted in full. The OSCE sponsors a special Ukraine mission that monitors all regions of the country.

Ukraine President, Petro Poroshenko was optimistic about NATO-backed defense against Russia.

I am absolutely confident that effective solidarity and unity, European, trans-Atlantic, global, informal of G7 is an effective instrument to keep Russia at the table of negotiation, he said in his remarks.

Stoltenberg complimented Ukraine for its movement toward NATO standards and for being the only partner participating in all NATO missions and operations, including in Afghanistan and in Kosovo.

Meanwhile, NATO has been assisting Ukraine through a Comprehensive Assistance Package, which was signed last year at the Warsaw Summit. Stoltenberg said NATO plans to continue this support, which will make [Ukraine] more democratic, more resilient and more prosperous.

During his visit to Ukraine, Stoltenberg attended the opening of the new premises of the NATO representation to Ukraine alongside Vice Prime Minister for European and Euro-Atlantic Integration, Ivanna Klympush-Tsintsadze.

Read the original:

NATO secretary general honors Ukraine, speaks out against Russia - DefenseNews.com

NATO Unveils JANUS, First Standardized Acoustic Protocol for Undersea Systems – IEEE Spectrum

Aquatic robots are busier than ever. They have seabeds to mine, cable pathways to plough, and marine data to gather. But they and their aquatic brethrenincluding submarines and scuba diversstill struggle to communicate.

For decades, global standards defining Wi-Fi and cellular networks have allowed people to exchange data over the air. But those technologies are worthless below the waves, and no such standards have existed for underwater communications.

Aquatic systems have instead used a mishmash of acoustic and optical signals to send and receive messages. However, manufacturers sell acoustic modems that operate at many different frequencies, which means those systems often cant speak to each other.

We live in a time of wild west communications underwater, says Joo Alves, a principal scientist for NATO.

Now, Alves and other NATO researchers have established the first international standard for underwater communications. Named JANUS, after the Roman god of gateways, it creates a common protocol for an acoustic signal with which underwater systems can connect.

Acoustics has long been a popular medium for underwater communications. Generally, optical signals can deliver high data rates underwater at distances up to 100 meters, while sound waves cover much greater distances at lower data rates.

The main role of JANUS is to bring todays acoustic systems into sync with one another. It does this in part by defining a common frequency11.5 kilohertzover which all systems can announce their presence. Once two systems make contact through JANUS, they may decide to switch to a different frequency or protocol that could deliver higher data rates or travel further.

In this way, Alves compares JANUS to the English languagetwo visitors to a foreign country may speak English to one another before realizing they are both native Spanish speakers, and switch to their native tongue.

Chiara Petrioli, a specialist in underwater sensors and embedded systems at La Sapienza, the University of Rome, says JANUS could be the first step toward an Internet of Underwater Things"a submerged digital network of sensors and vessels.

In addition to designating a frequency, JANUS also provides a modulation encoding scheme to describe how data should be encoded onto a sound wave, and describes the particular waveform that should be used (known as FH-BFSK). It also spells out which redundancies should be added to the data stream to minimize transmission errors.

In order to use JANUS, a system would first emit three optional tones to indicate that it intends to broadcast a JANUS data packet hitched to a sound wave. Then, the system would pause for about 400 milliseconds to allow other devices in its vicinity to wake up. Next, the system would broadcast a fixed series of tones to ensure both systems were properly synchronized to the JANUS protocol. Finally, the system would send the JANUS packet, consisting of 56 bits followed by a redundancy check, which tests for transmission errors.

The JANUS standard was developed by Alves team at NATOs Centre for Maritime Research and Experimentation in La Spezia, Italy and sponsored by NATOs Allied Command Transformation. It is the first underwater communications standard to be defined by an international body.

Milica Stojanovic, an expert in oceanic engineering at Northeastern University, expects other standards will soon follow. She says the 11.5 kHz frequency used by JANUS is great for transmitting data between 1 and 10 kilometers, but a lower frequency, perhaps 1 kHz, would be better for sending data over longer distances of 10 to 100 km.

Even with JANUS and other standards, any future underwater Internet will probably be cursed by far lower data rates than modern Wi-Fi or cellular networks. Sound travels at much lower frequencies, and on much longer waves, than the signals used for consumer electronics. Though sound waves travel faster in water than on land, they still travel more slowly through water than radio waves through air.

To develop JANUS, Alves team relied on the Littoral Ocean Observatory Network, a collection of tripods that NATO researchers have placed on the seafloor in the harbour of La Spezia, Italy. Each tripod emits acoustic signals to other tripods, which send performance reports to researchers through undersea cables. Those reports helped the team understand how fluctuations in water temperature, and other environmental changes, will affect JANUS signals.

The tripods also allowed researchers to build a JANUS receiver, advanced versions of which could minimize decoding errors and account for the Doppler effect. The Doppler effect describes shifts in sound waves caused by motion, such as the whirl of an ambulance siren as it drives by.

In another series of tests, researchers aboard the research vessel Alliance, a NATO ship operated by the Italian Navy, measured the performance of JANUS signals along the surface of the ocean.

Once deployed, aquatic systems could use JANUS to send data directly to each other, or to gateway buoys bobbing on the waters surface. The buoys could then use radio waves to relay that data to nearby control centers.

In one demonstration, Alves group helped the Portuguese Navy set up a buoy that converted data about the positions and speeds of nearby ships to JANUS. The buoy rebroadcast this information to Portuguese submarines lurking below.

Based on their work, Alves says submarines could also use JANUS to issue calls for help to ships and rescue crews. Using an open scheme like JANUS to issue distress calls would increase incredibly the chances of those being picked up, he says.

Now that JANUS is available, manufacturers of aquatic systems must decide whether or not to adopt it. Alves is confident they will, and Petrioli, who contributed feedback to the development of JANUS, agrees that adoption is essential to the industrys future.

But Stojanovic is not so sure. If there starts to develop a serious market, then everybody will have to play to the same tune, she says. If not, and everybody finds their own niche market with their own protocols, then they will do that.

IEEE Spectrums general technology blog, featuring news, analysis, and opinions about engineering, consumer electronics, and technology and society, from the editorial staff and freelance contributors.

Sign up for the Tech Alert newsletter and receive ground-breaking technology and science news from IEEE Spectrum every Thursday.

The new JANUS acoustic signal will connect aquatic robots and sensors into an Internet of Underwater Things 8Jul

So far, harvesters can get milliwatts of electricity from sound. That might be enough for some things26Apr2011

A prototype from the University of Washington leverages a backscattered radiofrequency wave to transmit analog signals 7Jul

As fictional geniuses in HBO's "Silicon Valley" seek to reinvent the Internet, Mozilla and the NSF offer $2 million in prizes to decentralize it in the real world 30Jun

Intel says its new Olympics sponsorship is about changing the experience for the digital generation 21Jun

With massive MIMO, future 5G networks will be able to cram more data onto the same amount of spectrum 17Jun

Instant photo sharing celebrates its 20th birthday today, proving that building a prototype when your wife is in labor is sometimes a good idea 11Jun

The Pied Piper of the TV show's fictional quest to reinvent the Internet trails the progress of MaidSafe and the University of Michigan 9Jun

Afghan Wireless has overcome many challenges in its efforts to bring wireless service to the country 1Jun

Startup Phazr has emerged from stealth mode and quickly become a darling of the wireless industry 23May

High-frequency millimeter waves will greatly increase wireless capacity and speeds for future 5G networks 6May

Proponents say the new LTE-based technology will be deployed like Wi-Fi in factories, hotels, and airports 1May

Were closer than ever before to the next generation of wireless, but expectations have cooled slightly 21Apr

Facebook's Yael Maguire talks about millimeter wave networks, Aquila, and flying tethered antennas at the F8 developer conference 19Apr

Full duplex could double the capacity of wireless networks, making it a key technology for 5G 1Apr

Just hold it in front of your face, and youre in 29Mar

University of Michigan researchers spoof an accelerometer by hitting the right note 17Mar

Instead of a dedicated antenna, the company's approach radiates radio-frequency signals from the ground plane 14Mar

Dont expect early 5G service in South Korea to reflect what carriers elsewhere have described 8Mar

The company knows it needs to ditch the dongle, and believes Li-Fi-enabled chipsets will be here soon 1Mar

See original here:

NATO Unveils JANUS, First Standardized Acoustic Protocol for Undersea Systems - IEEE Spectrum

Ukraine Recommits To NATO Membership Over Moscow’s Objections – NPR

Ukrainian President Petro Poroshenko, right, and NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg attend a joint news conference in Kiev on Monday. Efrem Lukatsky/AP hide caption

Ukrainian President Petro Poroshenko, right, and NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg attend a joint news conference in Kiev on Monday.

Ukraine is set to begin talks with NATO about eventual membership in the western alliance a move that has long raised the ire of Russia.

Petro Poroshenko, Ukraine's president, met with NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg in Kiev on Monday.

After their meeting, Poroshenko said he had "clearly stated that we would begin discussion about a membership action plan and our proposals for such a discussion were accepted with pleasure."

Since 2014, Ukraine has been battling a Russian-backed insurgency sparked by Moscow's forced annexation of the Crimean Peninsula. The chain of events was set in motion by Poroshenko's election defeat of then-President Viktor Yanukovych, who had been publicly pro-Russia.

As far back as 2008, Ukraine, an integral part of the old Soviet Union, agreed with NATO's leadership that it would work toward eventual membership in the alliance. But moves in that direction were ignored by Yanukovych.

During a joint news conference with Poroshenko on Monday, the NATO secretary-general also called on Russia to withdraw its troops from Ukraine and said that the alliance would be supplying hardware to protect Ukraine's computers from cyberattacks. Kiev has accused Moscow of being behind a massive ransomware attack last month that quickly spilled across Ukraine's borders and infected computers worldwide.

And as Reuters reports following the meeting: "Russia, deeply opposed to enlargement of NATO towards its borders, weighed in quickly, saying the prospect of NATO membership for Ukraine would not promote stability and security in Europe."

According to Reuters, 69 percent of Ukrainians who were surveyed in a June poll supported joining NATO a sharp increase from before Moscow's forced annexation of the Crimean Peninsula in 2014.

Poroshenko has pledged that Ukraine will undertake a series of reforms aimed at qualifying the country for NATO membership by 2020. Those reforms, according to a NATO spokesman quoted by Reuters, would occur in the areas of defense, anti-corruption, governance and law enforcement.

The meeting with NATO's top official comes after Washington appointed Kurt Volker, a former U.S. representative to NATO, as a special representative to Ukraine. It also follows President Trump's public reluctance to commit to NATO's charter, which calls for mutual defense of its members.

See the original post here:

Ukraine Recommits To NATO Membership Over Moscow's Objections - NPR

Fact check: Trump on the ‘blazing’ economy, Russia, NATO – Bismarck Tribune

WASHINGTON (AP) How's that "blazing" economy?

At home and abroad over the past week, President Donald Trump described an America where everyone's getting rich off the stock market, money has started gushing into NATO and practically everything's on the upswing since he took office. On Russian meddling in the U.S. election, he expressed an enduring uncertainty that his U.N. ambassador convinced of Moscow mischief doesn't share.

A look at some of his statements:

TRUMP, on whether Russia interfered in the 2016 U.S. elections: "Nobody really knows." He added: "So, it was Russia, and I think it was probably others also." news conference in Poland on Thursday.

NIKKI HALEY, U.S. ambassador to the U.N.: "Everybody knows that Russia meddled in our elections." on CNN's "State of the Union."

THE FACTS: The weight of evidence supports Haley's certainty more than her boss' equivocation. Multiple U.S. intelligence agencies have concluded that Russia meddled in the campaign, and for the purpose of giving Trump an advantage over Democrat Hillary Clinton. The full scope of the interference has not been established, nor whether Russian officials colluded with Trump associates in the campaign.

White House officials said Trump confronted Putin about the interference in their private meeting Friday. Kremlin officials had a different account, saying Trump appeared accepting of Putin's denials that Moscow did anything untoward to shape the election.

In Poland, Trump argued alternately that it could have been Russia, probably was Russia and indeed was Russia, while insisting it could have been other countries, too, and adding, "I won't be specific."

President Donald Trump, with first lady Melania Trump, speaks from the Truman Balcony at the Fourth of July picnic for military families on the South Lawn of the White House, Tuesday, July 4, 2017, in Washington. (AP Photo/Alex Brandon)

TRUMP: "No matter where you look, the economy is blazing. And on every front we're doing well. And we do have challenges, but we will handle those challenges believe me." remarks at Fourth of July event at White House.

TRUMP: "Really great numbers on jobs & the economy! Things are starting to kick in now, and we have just begun! Don't like steel & aluminum dumping!" tweet July 3.

THE FACTS: The economy is not blazing. At best, it's at a controlled burn.

The performance under Trump has been remarkably close to the relatively tepid growth under President Barack Obama, a record Trump criticized as a candidate. Most economists agree that any president is unlikely to suddenly transform an economy in a matter of months.

The economy grew at a sluggish annual pace of 1.4 percent during the first three months of the year. Growth can be uneven on a quarterly basis. But Federal Reserve officials estimate the economy will grow 2.2 percent this year, 2.1 percent in 2018 and 1.9 percent in 2019. That is pretty close to growth of roughly 2 percent during the recovery under Obama.

Trump can celebrate a 4.4 percent unemployment rate, but that builds on progress made during Obama's tenure. The lower unemployment rate has also translated into smaller job gains under Trump.

Monthly job growth has averaged 180,000 during the first six months of 2017, compared with an average of more than 186,000 last year, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics.

TRUMP: "Dow hit a new intraday all-time high! I wonder whether or not the Fake News Media will so report?" tweet July 3.

THE FACTS: Peaks and valleys during the day generally don't make for screaming headlines. Investors generally pay more attention to where stock market indexes stand when trading ends at 4 p.m. Because those markets have been setting records for months, Monday's intraday peak wasn't that notable, though the financial media reported on it. The stock market has been rising under Trump's watch, as it rose under Obama's since 2013.

U.S. President Donald Trump, left, meets with Poland's President Andrzej Duda after arriving at the Royal Castle, Thursday, July 6, 2017, in Warsaw. (AP Photo/Evan Vucci)

TRUMP: "When I say that the stock market is at an all-time high, we've picked up in market value almost $4 trillion since Nov. 8, which was the election. Four trillion dollars it's a lot of money. Personally, I picked up nothing, but that's all right. Everyone else is getting rich. That's OK. I'm very happy. " Energy meeting with European leaders in Warsaw on Thursday.

THE FACTS: Everyone else is not getting rich. Most Americans lack meaningful stock market investments. Research by New York University economist Edward Wolff found that just 10 percent of the U.S. population owns 80 percent of stock market wealth.

Also, it's likely the rising stock market has indeed benefited him personally. Financial disclosures show the president has multiple brokerage accounts and extensive stock holdings. He owns shares in Apple Inc. (up 24 percent year-to-date), Caterpillar Inc. (up 15 percent) and Microsoft Corp. (up nearly 12 percent) among other companies. Even if Trump didn't buy into the recent stock market gains, his existing shares probably received a boost.

TRUMP, on NATO's core pledge: "To those who would criticize our tough stance, I would point out that the United States has demonstrated not merely with words but with its actions that we stand firmly behind Article 5, the mutual defense commitment." speech in Warsaw on Thursday.

THE FACTS: Rather than showing a commitment with his actions, Trump has sown confusion with his words. Article 5 has only been used once by other NATO members, to come to the defense of the U.S. after the 2001 attacks on American soil.

Trump suggested during the campaign that NATO members lagging on their own military spending might not be able to count on the U.S. to come to their aid if attacked. And he pointedly did not endorse Article 5 at a NATO meeting in May, unnerving some allies. In June, though, he said: "I'm committing the United States to Article 5." Those words won't be tested with action until or unless a NATO member is attacked.

President Donald Trump announces the approval of a permit to build the Keystone XL pipeline, clearing the way for the $8 billion project, Friday, March 24, 2017 in the Oval Office of the White House in Washington, Friday, March 24, 2017. From left are, TransCanada CEO Russell K. Girling, Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross and Energy Secretary Rick Perry. (AP Photo/Evan Vucci)

TRUMP: "We just approved a big pipeline also the Keystone Pipeline. It was under consideration for many, many years, and it was dead, and I approved it in my first day of office." Warsaw energy meeting.

THE FACTS: He did not approve it on his first day in office. During his first week, on Jan. 24, Trump signed an order asking TransCanada to re-submit its application to build Keystone XL, which had been blocked by Obama. Trump suggested at the time that more negotiations would be required with TransCanada before he would approve the project. The project actually got the go-ahead in late March.

TRUMP: "Americans know that a strong alliance of free, sovereign and independent nations is the best defense for our freedoms and for our interests. That is why my administration has demanded that all members of NATO finally meet their full and fair financial obligation. As a result of this insistence, billions of dollars more have begun to pour into NATO. In fact, people are shocked. But billions and billions of dollars more coming in from countries that, in my opinion, would not have been paying so quickly." Warsaw speech.

THE FACTS: The notion of money pouring into NATO because of his tough talk is one of Trump's most frequent fictions. The actual issue is how much NATO countries spend on their own military budgets. They agreed in 2014, well before he became president, to stop cutting military spending, and have honored that. They also agreed then to a goal of moving "toward" spending 2 percent of their gross domestic product on their own defense by 2024. Most are short of that and the target is not ironclad. His tough talk is aimed at nudging them toward that goal.

See more here:

Fact check: Trump on the 'blazing' economy, Russia, NATO - Bismarck Tribune

Fact check: Trump on the ‘blazing’ economy, Russia, NATO … – La Crosse Tribune

WASHINGTON (AP) How's that "blazing" economy?

At home and abroad over the past week, President Donald Trump described an America where everyone's getting rich off the stock market, money has started gushing into NATO and practically everything's on the upswing since he took office. On Russian meddling in the U.S. election, he expressed an enduring uncertainty that his U.N. ambassador convinced of Moscow mischief doesn't share.

A look at some of his statements:

TRUMP, on whether Russia interfered in the 2016 U.S. elections: "Nobody really knows." He added: "So, it was Russia, and I think it was probably others also." news conference in Poland on Thursday.

NIKKI HALEY, U.S. ambassador to the U.N.: "Everybody knows that Russia meddled in our elections." on CNN's "State of the Union."

THE FACTS: The weight of evidence supports Haley's certainty more than her boss' equivocation. Multiple U.S. intelligence agencies have concluded that Russia meddled in the campaign, and for the purpose of giving Trump an advantage over Democrat Hillary Clinton. The full scope of the interference has not been established, nor whether Russian officials colluded with Trump associates in the campaign.

White House officials said Trump confronted Putin about the interference in their private meeting Friday. Kremlin officials had a different account, saying Trump appeared accepting of Putin's denials that Moscow did anything untoward to shape the election.

In Poland, Trump argued alternately that it could have been Russia, probably was Russia and indeed was Russia, while insisting it could have been other countries, too, and adding, "I won't be specific."

President Donald Trump, with first lady Melania Trump, speaks from the Truman Balcony at the Fourth of July picnic for military families on the South Lawn of the White House, Tuesday, July 4, 2017, in Washington. (AP Photo/Alex Brandon)

TRUMP: "No matter where you look, the economy is blazing. And on every front we're doing well. And we do have challenges, but we will handle those challenges believe me." remarks at Fourth of July event at White House.

TRUMP: "Really great numbers on jobs & the economy! Things are starting to kick in now, and we have just begun! Don't like steel & aluminum dumping!" tweet July 3.

THE FACTS: The economy is not blazing. At best, it's at a controlled burn.

The performance under Trump has been remarkably close to the relatively tepid growth under President Barack Obama, a record Trump criticized as a candidate. Most economists agree that any president is unlikely to suddenly transform an economy in a matter of months.

The economy grew at a sluggish annual pace of 1.4 percent during the first three months of the year. Growth can be uneven on a quarterly basis. But Federal Reserve officials estimate the economy will grow 2.2 percent this year, 2.1 percent in 2018 and 1.9 percent in 2019. That is pretty close to growth of roughly 2 percent during the recovery under Obama.

Trump can celebrate a 4.4 percent unemployment rate, but that builds on progress made during Obama's tenure. The lower unemployment rate has also translated into smaller job gains under Trump.

Monthly job growth has averaged 180,000 during the first six months of 2017, compared with an average of more than 186,000 last year, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics.

TRUMP: "Dow hit a new intraday all-time high! I wonder whether or not the Fake News Media will so report?" tweet July 3.

THE FACTS: Peaks and valleys during the day generally don't make for screaming headlines. Investors generally pay more attention to where stock market indexes stand when trading ends at 4 p.m. Because those markets have been setting records for months, Monday's intraday peak wasn't that notable, though the financial media reported on it. The stock market has been rising under Trump's watch, as it rose under Obama's since 2013.

U.S. President Donald Trump, left, meets with Poland's President Andrzej Duda after arriving at the Royal Castle, Thursday, July 6, 2017, in Warsaw. (AP Photo/Evan Vucci)

TRUMP: "When I say that the stock market is at an all-time high, we've picked up in market value almost $4 trillion since Nov. 8, which was the election. Four trillion dollars it's a lot of money. Personally, I picked up nothing, but that's all right. Everyone else is getting rich. That's OK. I'm very happy. " Energy meeting with European leaders in Warsaw on Thursday.

THE FACTS: Everyone else is not getting rich. Most Americans lack meaningful stock market investments. Research by New York University economist Edward Wolff found that just 10 percent of the U.S. population owns 80 percent of stock market wealth.

Also, it's likely the rising stock market has indeed benefited him personally. Financial disclosures show the president has multiple brokerage accounts and extensive stock holdings. He owns shares in Apple Inc. (up 24 percent year-to-date), Caterpillar Inc. (up 15 percent) and Microsoft Corp. (up nearly 12 percent) among other companies. Even if Trump didn't buy into the recent stock market gains, his existing shares probably received a boost.

TRUMP, on NATO's core pledge: "To those who would criticize our tough stance, I would point out that the United States has demonstrated not merely with words but with its actions that we stand firmly behind Article 5, the mutual defense commitment." speech in Warsaw on Thursday.

THE FACTS: Rather than showing a commitment with his actions, Trump has sown confusion with his words. Article 5 has only been used once by other NATO members, to come to the defense of the U.S. after the 2001 attacks on American soil.

Trump suggested during the campaign that NATO members lagging on their own military spending might not be able to count on the U.S. to come to their aid if attacked. And he pointedly did not endorse Article 5 at a NATO meeting in May, unnerving some allies. In June, though, he said: "I'm committing the United States to Article 5." Those words won't be tested with action until or unless a NATO member is attacked.

President Donald Trump announces the approval of a permit to build the Keystone XL pipeline, clearing the way for the $8 billion project, Friday, March 24, 2017 in the Oval Office of the White House in Washington, Friday, March 24, 2017. From left are, TransCanada CEO Russell K. Girling, Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross and Energy Secretary Rick Perry. (AP Photo/Evan Vucci)

TRUMP: "We just approved a big pipeline also the Keystone Pipeline. It was under consideration for many, many years, and it was dead, and I approved it in my first day of office." Warsaw energy meeting.

THE FACTS: He did not approve it on his first day in office. During his first week, on Jan. 24, Trump signed an order asking TransCanada to re-submit its application to build Keystone XL, which had been blocked by Obama. Trump suggested at the time that more negotiations would be required with TransCanada before he would approve the project. The project actually got the go-ahead in late March.

TRUMP: "Americans know that a strong alliance of free, sovereign and independent nations is the best defense for our freedoms and for our interests. That is why my administration has demanded that all members of NATO finally meet their full and fair financial obligation. As a result of this insistence, billions of dollars more have begun to pour into NATO. In fact, people are shocked. But billions and billions of dollars more coming in from countries that, in my opinion, would not have been paying so quickly." Warsaw speech.

THE FACTS: The notion of money pouring into NATO because of his tough talk is one of Trump's most frequent fictions. The actual issue is how much NATO countries spend on their own military budgets. They agreed in 2014, well before he became president, to stop cutting military spending, and have honored that. They also agreed then to a goal of moving "toward" spending 2 percent of their gross domestic product on their own defense by 2024. Most are short of that and the target is not ironclad. His tough talk is aimed at nudging them toward that goal.

Here is the original post:

Fact check: Trump on the 'blazing' economy, Russia, NATO ... - La Crosse Tribune

AP FACT CHECK: Trump on the ‘blazing’ economy, Russia, NATO – Minneapolis Star Tribune

By CALVIN WOODWARD and JOSH BOAK , Associated Press July 10, 2017 - 2:35 AM

WASHINGTON How's that "blazing" economy?

At home and abroad over the past week, President Donald Trump described an America where everyone's getting rich off the stock market, money has started gushing into NATO and practically everything's on the upswing since he took office. On Russian meddling in the U.S. election, he expressed an enduring uncertainty that his U.N. ambassador convinced of Moscow mischief doesn't share.

A look at some of his statements:

TRUMP, on whether Russia interfered in the 2016 U.S. elections: "Nobody really knows." He added: "So, it was Russia, and I think it was probably others also." news conference in Poland on Thursday.

NIKKI HALEY, U.S. ambassador to the U.N.: "Everybody knows that Russia meddled in our elections." on CNN's "State of the Union."

THE FACTS: The weight of evidence supports Haley's certainty more than her boss' equivocation. Multiple U.S. intelligence agencies have concluded that Russia meddled in the campaign, and for the purpose of giving Trump an advantage over Democrat Hillary Clinton. The full scope of the interference has not been established, nor whether Russian officials colluded with Trump associates in the campaign.

White House officials said Trump confronted Putin about the interference in their private meeting Friday. Kremlin officials had a different account, saying Trump appeared accepting of Putin's denials that Moscow did anything untoward to shape the election.

In Poland, Trump argued alternately that it could have been Russia, probably was Russia and indeed was Russia, while insisting it could have been other countries, too, and adding, "I won't be specific."

___

TRUMP: "No matter where you look, the economy is blazing. And on every front we're doing well. And we do have challenges, but we will handle those challenges believe me." remarks at Fourth of July event at White House.

TRUMP: "Really great numbers on jobs & the economy! Things are starting to kick in now, and we have just begun! Don't like steel & aluminum dumping!" tweet July 3.

THE FACTS: The economy is not blazing. At best, it's at a controlled burn.

The performance under Trump has been remarkably close to the relatively tepid growth under President Barack Obama, a record Trump criticized as a candidate. Most economists agree that any president is unlikely to suddenly transform an economy in a matter of months.

The economy grew at a sluggish annual pace of 1.4 percent during the first three months of the year. Growth can be uneven on a quarterly basis. But Federal Reserve officials estimate the economy will grow 2.2 percent this year, 2.1 percent in 2018 and 1.9 percent in 2019. That is pretty close to growth of roughly 2 percent during the recovery under Obama.

Trump can celebrate a 4.4 percent unemployment rate, but that builds on progress made during Obama's tenure. The lower unemployment rate has also translated into smaller job gains under Trump.

Monthly job growth has averaged 180,000 during the first six months of 2017, compared with an average of more than 186,000 last year, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics.

___

TRUMP: "Dow hit a new intraday all-time high! I wonder whether or not the Fake News Media will so report?" tweet July 3.

THE FACTS: Peaks and valleys during the day generally don't make for screaming headlines. Investors generally pay more attention to where stock market indexes stand when trading ends at 4 p.m. Because those markets have been setting records for months, Monday's intraday peak wasn't that notable, though the financial media reported on it. The stock market has been rising under Trump's watch, as it rose under Obama's since 2013.

___

TRUMP: "When I say that the stock market is at an all-time high, we've picked up in market value almost $4 trillion since Nov. 8, which was the election. Four trillion dollars it's a lot of money. Personally, I picked up nothing, but that's all right. Everyone else is getting rich. That's OK. I'm very happy. " Energy meeting with European leaders in Warsaw on Thursday.

THE FACTS: Everyone else is not getting rich. Most Americans lack meaningful stock market investments. Research by New York University economist Edward Wolff found that just 10 percent of the U.S. population owns 80 percent of stock market wealth.

Also, it's likely the rising stock market has indeed benefited him personally. Financial disclosures show the president has multiple brokerage accounts and extensive stock holdings. He owns shares in Apple Inc. (up 24 percent year-to-date), Caterpillar Inc. (up 15 percent) and Microsoft Corp. (up nearly 12 percent) among other companies. Even if Trump didn't buy into the recent stock market gains, his existing shares probably received a boost.

___

TRUMP, on NATO's core pledge: "To those who would criticize our tough stance, I would point out that the United States has demonstrated not merely with words but with its actions that we stand firmly behind Article 5, the mutual defense commitment." speech in Warsaw on Thursday.

THE FACTS: Rather than showing a commitment with his actions, Trump has sown confusion with his words. Article 5 has only been used once by other NATO members, to come to the defense of the U.S. after the 2001 attacks on American soil.

Trump suggested during the campaign that NATO members lagging on their own military spending might not be able to count on the U.S. to come to their aid if attacked. And he pointedly did not endorse Article 5 at a NATO meeting in May, unnerving some allies. In June, though, he said: "I'm committing the United States to Article 5." Those words won't be tested with action until or unless a NATO member is attacked.

___

TRUMP: "We just approved a big pipeline also the Keystone Pipeline. It was under consideration for many, many years, and it was dead, and I approved it in my first day of office." Warsaw energy meeting.

THE FACTS: He did not approve it on his first day in office. During his first week, on Jan. 24, Trump signed an order asking TransCanada to re-submit its application to build Keystone XL, which had been blocked by Obama. Trump suggested at the time that more negotiations would be required with TransCanada before he would approve the project. The project actually got the go-ahead in late March.

EDITOR'S NOTE _ A look at the veracity of claims by political figures

Excerpt from:

AP FACT CHECK: Trump on the 'blazing' economy, Russia, NATO - Minneapolis Star Tribune

NATO allies look for reassurance from Trump in Warsaw – CNBC

EMMANUEL DUNAND | AFP | Getty Images

US President Donald Trump listens to NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg's speech during the unveiling ceremony of the Berlin Wall monument, during the NATO summit

U.S. President Donald Trump meets eastern NATO allies in Warsaw on Thursday amid expectations he will reaffirm Washington's commitment to counter threats from Russia after unnerving them in May by failing to endorse the principle of collective defense.

En route to a potentially fractious G-20 summit in Germany, Trump will take part in a gathering of leaders from central Europe, Baltic states and the Balkans, an event convened by Poland and Croatia to boost regional trade and infrastructure.

The White House has said Trump will use the stopover in Warsaw to showcase his commitment to the North Atlantic Treaty Organisation, which he once called "obsolete", a likely effort to patch up relations after the tense alliance summit in May.

Poland's conservative and euroskeptic government, which shares views with Trump on issues such climate change, migration and coal mining, has hailed the U.S. president's visit as a recognition of its role as a leading voice in central Europe.

The west Europeans, critical of Poland's democratic record, will be watchful as to whether Trump, who will give a major policy speech on a Warsaw square, may encourage its government in its defiance of Brussels.

Some west European governments are worried over a deepening divide between east and west within the European Union and some diplomats see Thursday's regional summit as a Polish bid to carve out influence outside EU structures.

Poland also wants to buy liquefied natural gas from U.S. companies to counterbalance Russian gas supplies in the region.

"We are simply an important country in this part of the world," Polish President Andrzej Duda said in an interview with the PAP news agency.

"We are among the biggest countries in Europe, we are a leader of central Europe, and President Trump ... understands this."

Follow this link:

NATO allies look for reassurance from Trump in Warsaw - CNBC

NATO Secretary General to visit Ukraine – euronews

Ukraine is set to welcome Nato Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg on July 10th. The visit coincides with the 20th anniversary of the distinctive partnership between NATO and Ukraine and high ranked officials hope it will provide an opportunity to discuss Ukraines prospects of joining the Alliance.

In an exclusive interview for Euronews, the Head of the Ukrainian Parliament Andriy Parubiy stressed that in June Ukrainian MPs adopted a draft law that sets membership of the Alliance as a priority for the country. On the July 6th, the bill was signed by Petro Poroshenko. Now Ukraine needs to step-up its reforms to comply with NATO standards

The Ukrainian army is becoming one of the most powerful armies in the region, he explains. Moreover, the army has real combat experience, the experience of modern warfare which means the Ukrainian army is capable of defending not only the Ukrainian border, but also the eastern border of NATO, and the eastern border of the entire free world.

But experts are not so optimistic about prospects of joining Nato. Oleksandr Sushko, Research Director of the Institute for Euro-Atlantic ooperation, says even receiving a Membership Action Plan is a long-term outlook for Ukraine mainly because of the ongoing military conflict with Russia.

Although there is no direct ban on the accession of a belligerent country, there is a logic which means granting NATO membership to a country must add stability and security to the Alliance and the world as a whole,,explains Oleksandr Sushko. There is a large group of NATO members who would not like to increase tensions in relations with Russia. And it is clear that any move towards Ukraines accession will mean additional tension.

In February, President Poroshenko said he would put Nato membership to a referendum. Recent polls show strong support for membership among Ukrainians.

If a NATO membership referendum was held this year, almost 70% of voters would say yes according to recent surveys. What is remarkable is that since 2012 the number of the North Atlantic Alliance supporters has tripled in the country. The main reason for this is the armed conflict in Ukrainian Donbass. says Euronews journalist Maria Korenyuk.

Read this article:

NATO Secretary General to visit Ukraine - euronews

US names former ambassador to NATO as Ukraine crisis envoy – POLITICO.eu

Kurt Volker will take responsibility for advancing U.S. efforts to achieve the objectives set out in the Minsk agreements | Flickr via Creative Commons

The announcement comes on the eve of Rex Tillersons trip to Kiev.

By Connor Murphy

7/7/17, 7:11 PM CET

Updated 7/7/17, 7:16 PM CET

U.S. Secretary of State Rex Tillerson appointed Kurt Volker, a former U.S. ambassador to NATO, as special representative to Ukraine, the State Department saidFriday.

In a statement, the department said Volker will take responsibility for advancing U.S. efforts to achieve the objectives set out in the Minsk agreements, and accompany the secretary of state on a trip to Kiev on Sunday.

Kurts wealth of experience makes him uniquely qualified to move this conflict in the direction of peace, Tillerson said. The United States remains fully committed to the objectives of the Minsk agreements, and I have complete confidence in Kurt to continue our efforts to achieve peace in Ukraine.

Secretary Tillerson appoints Ambassador Kurt Volker as the U.S. Special Representative for #Ukraine Negotiations. https://t.co/p5H2uRVtdq

Department of State (@StateDept) July 7, 2017

Russia annexed Crimea in 2014 and has been accused of supporting pro-Russian separatists in eastern Ukraine. More than 10,000 people have been killed in the conflict in eastern Ukraine since April 2014, according to theUnited Nations, though Moscow denies direct involvement.

Germany, France, Ukraine and Russia brokered a package of measures in Minsk in 2015 intended to end the conflict, but thisfailed to stop the fighting.

Volker is a career diplomat who served as the U.S. envoy to NATO under both the Bush and Obama administrations.

He is currently an expert in U.S. foreign and national security policy atthe McCain Institute,an American think tank affiliated with Senator John McCain and Arizona State University.

Tillreson will make his first official visit to Kiev following the G20 summit in Hamburg. The U.S. secretary of state will meet with Ukrainian President Petro Poroshenko on Sunday and reaffirm Americas commitment to Ukraines sovereignty and territorial integrity, the State Department said.

Secretary Tillerson will focus on two core pillars while in #Ukraine: sovereignty and supporting reform efforts.

Heather Nauert (@statedeptspox) July 5, 2017

NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg and the North Atlantic Council areholding a meeting of the NATO-Ukraine Commission in Kiev on July 9-10.

The appointment comes as the administrations views toward Russia remain in flux. Speaking yesterday in Warsaw, Trump sent mixed signals on his Russia policy. He reaffirmed Americas commitment to NATOs mutual defense provisions and the importance of Eastern Europe to his administration.

And Trump discussedre-energizing implementation of the Minsk agreements in a meeting with German Chancellor Angela Merkel Thursday in Hamburg.

But in a meeting with Russian President Vladimir Putin on Friday, Trump told the Russian leader its an honor to be with you. He added: But we look forward to a lot of very positive things happening for Russia, for the United States and for everybody concerned, and Its an honor to be with you.

It was unclear if Trump and Putin discussed the crisis in Ukraine in their much anticipated bilateral meeting, which lasted for almost two and a half hours (it was scheduled to last for 30 minutes).

In June the U.S. Senate voted 98-2 for new sanctions on Iran and Russia, including fresh powers for Congress to block Trump from rolling back any penalties against Vladimir Putins government, but the legislation has been blocked in the House of Representatives.

EU leaders extended sanctions against Russia through January 2018 after Merkel and French President Emmanuel Macron updated the European Council on the lack of progress in implementing the Minsk agreements. The EU initially imposed sanctions against Russia in 2014 after its annexation of Crimea.

The rest is here:

US names former ambassador to NATO as Ukraine crisis envoy - POLITICO.eu