Less government is main focus for Libertarian candidate Darcy Neal Donnelly – The Review Newspaper

The best government is very little government, according to Darcy Neal Donnelly.

The Libertarian Party of Canada candidate in Glengarry-Prescott-Russell has been part of a combination of three federal and provincial elections in the past.

Theres only so many laws our country needs, said Donnelly.

He explained that the only necessary laws are for protecting individual rights, freedoms, and markets.

The Libertarian Party supports having police, courts and the military for the purpose of protection, and not control.

On climate change, Donnelly explained that the government has given big corporations the right to pollute and that property rights should be the basis of environmental protection. He said that the environment would be better protected by private owners who had to take responsibility for it, including for environmentally significant places like national parks.

When asked about ethics issues like the SNC Lavalin scandal, Donnelly said problems like corruption occur when governments and corporations are too big. He said the influence of global corporations and government bureaucracy needs to be reduced.

Donnelly strongly criticized the spending of taxpayer dollars on corporate welfare. As an example, he referred to the $18 million in support the Trudeau government announced over the summer for Heico, the American parent company of Ivaco Rolling Mills in LOrignal.

According to Donnelly, Canada has a mixed economy containing some free markets, fascist markets, and communist markets. The Libertarian Party wants a free market for everything.

Competition leads to better solutions in markets, Donnelly said.

According to Donnelly, the Libertarian Party of today is more in line with the Liberals during the days of Sir Wilfrid Laurier.

Donnelly said the Libertarian Party would end the federal income tax for everyone and the governments sources of revenue would be through trade and voluntary gifts. Health care and social services for the less fortunate could be provided through benevolent organizations. He highlighted how successful private institutions such as Shriners Hospitals are, as an example.

Libertarians see themselves as influencers on other parties, said Donnelly. He said the party is not totally dedicated to some day governing, but tries to influence existing candidates and parties with its ideas. He said the Peoples Party of Canada, led by Maxime Bernier has ideas that represent 80 per cent of what the Libertarians have been recommending, and he is pleased that they have had that influence on Berniers party.

Donnelly is also the Secretary of the Libertarian riding association for Glengarry-Prescott-Russell. He is hoping more people get involved. More information is available at libertarian.ca

James Morgan is a freelance contributor.He has worked for several print and broadcast media outlets.James loves the history, natural beauty, and people of eastern Ontario and western Quebec.

Read the rest here:

Less government is main focus for Libertarian candidate Darcy Neal Donnelly - The Review Newspaper

Could our next president be a Libertarian? | TheHill – The Hill

As they look ahead to the 2020 election, few political pundits have considered the possibility that a Libertarian Party candidate could be elected president. Yes, I know it's a long shot, but not as long a shot as it might initially seem.

Because of the Electoral College system of voting, third-party candidates have a better chance of winning than most people think. If no candidate gets a majority of the electoral votes, the House of Representatives chooses the president from among the three candidates with the most electoral votes.

To be in the running, all that a third-party candidate must do is receive enough electoral votes to ensure that neither the Democratic nor Republican nominee wins an Electoral College majority, in which case the spoiler becomes a credible final contender. In a close race, the candidate might need to win just one state to send the election to the House of Representatives.

At that point, the third-party candidate would have to convince members of the House to vote for him or her rather than for the major-party candidates. It's unlikely, but not impossible. It depends on who's running.

Libertarian ideas on social policy appeal to Democrats, while libertarian ideas on economic policy appeal to Republicans, so a skillful pitch on those ideas might win over Representatives dissatisfied with their own partys candidates. Although the Libertarian Party is often perceived as a fringe party, libertarian ideas are about as widely held as consistent liberal or conservative views by the general public. Many Americans have views that are socially liberal and economically conservative.

Currently, its not a complete stretch to think that many Republicans might abandon their president to vote for a third-party candidate. President TrumpDonald John TrumpKamala Harris calls for Twitter to suspend Trump account over whistleblower attacks Clinton jokes she 'never' had to tell Obama not to 'extort foreign countries' John Dean: 'There is enough evidence' to impeach Trump MORE is not that popular with House Republicans, judging by the significant numbers of GOP lawmakers who have announced they will not be seeking re-election. If the Democratic nominee is way outside the mainstream as is easy to picture given the partys current field of candidates then a coalition of Democrats might join with some Republicans to support the third-party candidate.

For a Libertarian to win the presidency, the first step is for the Libertarian Party to choose a candidate who appears more reasonable to Americans, and especially to members of the House of Representatives, than the major-party candidates.

The second step is to campaign in just a few key states. In a close election, a third-party candidate could win only Texas, for instance, and still prevent rivals from winning an electoral majority thus throwing the election to the House of Representatives. The candidate should publicly announce this strategy beforehand, so that voters can see that the candidate has a real chance of victory and that their Libertarian votes would not be wasted .

An attractive Libertarian candidate with only a few electoral votes would then have the same status before the House of Representatives as the major-party candidates and a coalition of disgruntled Democrats and Republicans could put a Libertarian in the White House.

Keep in mind Ross Perot. In 1992 he received 19 percent of the popular vote, but his support was spread throughout the country, so he didn't receive a single electoral vote. If he had concentrated his campaigning in a few states, however, he might have converted his popular support into enough Electoral College votes to pitch the contest to the House. And who knows what might have happened then.

Could something similar happen in 2020? It is unlikely. But if 2016 proved anything, its that we must not dismiss improbable-sounding electoral outcomes out of hand.

Randall G. Holcombe is a research fellow at the Independent Institute and DeVoe Moore Professor of Economics at Florida State University. His latest book is Liberty in Peril: Democracy and Power in American History (Independent Institute, 2019).

Link:

Could our next president be a Libertarian? | TheHill - The Hill

Who’s Right on Impeachment: Rand Paul, Justin Amash, or Jeff Flake? – Reason

Sen. Rand Paul (RKy.) says it's a "fake witch hunt" ("BASTA!"). Rep. Justin Amash (IMich.) is in the same "impeachable conduct" camp he's been in since May; adding such recent commentary as "Nearly every Trump ally's defense has been an effort to gaslight America." And now-retired Rep. Jeff Flake (RAriz.), from the much-hated temperamental center, has in this morning's Washington Post charted out a third way between those two poles, arguing that "the president's actions warrant impeachment," but that Flake still has "grave reservations" about launching those proceedings, so instead wants elected Republicans to not endorse the president's re-election because Trump is "manifestly undeserving of the highest office that we have."

So which of these libertarian-leaning legislators, current and former, has the better argument? That's the subject of this week's editors' roundtable edition of Reason Podcast, featuring Nick Gillespie, Katherine Mangu-Ward, Peter Suderman and Matt Welch. Is it possible or meaningful to separate out impeachment proceedings from articles of impeachment from a Senate conviction thereof? Are there important differences between Trump's conduct and that of previous administrations? What is the role/position/rooting interest for those outside of the two corners? We talk through all of this and more, while fighting a losing battle against profanity, invoking Inception, and explaining how all art is basically a primer on management.

Audio production by Ian Keyser and Regan Taylor.

'Rocking Forward' by XTaKeRuX is licensed under CC BY 4.0

Relevant links from the show:

"Trump's Civil War Tweet Is Bad. This Other Tweet May Be Unconstitutional." By Elizabeth Nolan Brown

"Whether Trump Stays or Goes, We Need To Rein in Presidents and Congress," by Nick Gillespie

"Did Trump Commit a Crime by Seeking a Ukrainian Investigation of Joe Biden? And Does It Matter for Impeachment Purposes?" By Jacob Sullum

"Evidence Increasingly Indicates Trump's Ukraine Pressure Tactics Usurped Congress' Power of the Purseand that he may have Committed a Federal Crime in the Process," by Ilya Somin

"Did the President Commit Witness Tampering?" By David Post

"Is Impeachment a 'Constitutional Duty'?" By Keith Whittington

"Trump's Ukraine Call Was an Abuse of Powerand This Time, He Can't Claim Ignorance or Inexperience," by Peter Suderman

"John Yoo Warns That Impeachment Would Undermine Presidential Power. That's the Point." By Jacob Sullum

"Whistleblower Report Alleges Trump Used Presidential Power for Personal Gain," by Elizabeth Nolan Brown

"Congress Should Not Be Satisfied With Ukraine Call Transcript, Given the Trump White House's History of Fiddling With Records," by Eric Boehm

"Nancy Pelosi Announces Trump Impeachment Inquiry Over Ukraine Scandal," by Billy Binion

Original post:

Who's Right on Impeachment: Rand Paul, Justin Amash, or Jeff Flake? - Reason

#CivilWarSignup Trends on Twitter After Trump Suggests His Impeachment Will Lead to Civil War – Mediaite

After President Donald Trump posted a quote on Sunday which claimed Democrats would cause a civil war if the President were impeached, several civil war-related hashtags began to explode on social media. One hashtag, #CivilWarSignup, became the number one trending topic on Twitter, Monday, and a wave of political and media figures made both serious and humorous comments in response.

Maybe instead of #CivilWar2 we could just make the government smaller so this isnt a problem ever again? declared the Libertarian Partys official Twitter account.

Mr. President, maliciously attacking a whistleblower and promoting civil unrest to avoid impeachment wont save you. You should have already been impeached for your bigotry, corruption, and disloyalty to our country, reacted Rep. Al Green (D-TX).

Former U.S. Navy senior chief petty officer Malcolm Nance accused President Trump of being backed by communists in his response to the civil war hysteria.

TRUMP IS A DICTATOR: Call him #DictatorDonald. Only a communist backed wannabe tyrant lacking all morals, loyalty to his oath & steeped in immeasurable stupidity would call for American lawmaker to be arrested for for investigating his own crimes, Nance wrote. Beware. He wants #CivilWar2.

As soon as Im done with hot yoga, Ill be there. Im not so good with the fighting stuff but Ill help with the tweets, jested author and journalist Molly Jong-Fast, before making a more serious observation: The sad truth is that trump threatening civil war is so good for traffic that twitter will never suspend him.

I will bring hundreds of Star Trek uniforms to form my own zouave unit. We will be strictly posting spicy takes, joked journalist Wilson Dizard, while Ellen Show Executive Producer Andy Lassner asked, What do you even wear to a civil war?

The Bulwark founder Charlie Sykes posted, Lets be clear here. The president is tweeting about Civil War. In a Civil War, Americans would be killing one another, while New York Times contributing oped writer Wajahat Ali commented, People we are joking about a Civil War because Trump, with utmost seriousness, warned of #CivilWar2 if Congress did it job and kept him in check. None of this normal. Please realize he will get worse and someone will get hurt.

What Trump means by Civil War is that a bunch of racists will attack people of color. Hes a racist, pure & simple, remarked director Morgan J. Freeman, while conservative blogger Carmine Sabia claimed, The progressives want a #CivilWar2. No one takes your impeachment seriously when you have been calling for it since Election Day. You wanted to find any reason. But I would not support a war to fight fellow Americans.

Journalist Deborah Copaken also did not see the humour in a potential second civil war.

Call me a killjoy, but Im not finding the #civilwar2 jokes funny. I spent 4 years covering civil wars. Ive seen their human toll. Our president just signaled, with 1 tweet, a large swath of our population with all the guns to get ready to use them, she declared. This shakes me to my core.

Other pundits who joined in with the online conversation included the Daily Shows Roy Wood, writer Elie Mystal, Pod Save The People co-host Brittany Packnett, NBC News legal analyst Glenn Kirschner, Democratic Coalition co-founder Jon Cooper, former Obama Administration staffer Brandon Friedman, commentator Bob Cesca, former Stormy Daniels attorney Michael Avenatti, The Atlantic staff writer Adam Serwer, and Mediaites own Tommy Christopher.

[Photo via Richard Ellis/Getty Images]

Have a tip we should know? tips@mediaite.com

Read more:

#CivilWarSignup Trends on Twitter After Trump Suggests His Impeachment Will Lead to Civil War - Mediaite

Williams: Youth and ignorance | Opinion – Longview News-Journal

Camille Paglia is a professor of humanities and media studies at the University of the Arts in Philadelphia, where she has been a faculty member since 1984. Paglia describes herself as transgender, but unlike so many other transgender people, she is pro-capitalism and hostile to those whod restrict free speech. Shes a libertarian.

As to modern ideas that include gender-inclusive pronouns such as zie, sie and zim, Paglia says it is lunacy. In a 2017 interview, she was especially irritated by the thought police running college campuses today. In defending University of Toronto professor Jordan Peterson, who has become a pariah for his refusal to cave in to nonsensical gender-inclusive pronouns, Paglia said that the English language was created by great artists such as Chaucer and Shakespeare, Wordsworth and Joyce. She added: How dare you, you sniveling little maniac, tell us how were gonna use pronouns! Go take a hike.

On feminism, Paglia criticizes what she calls the antisex and repressively doctrinaire side of feminism. She calls it victim feminism and complains that everything wed won in the 1990s has been totally swept away. Now we have this endless privileging of victimhood, with a pathological vulnerability seen as the default human mode. Everyone must yield to it in the workplace, in universities, in the demand for safe spaces. Paglia adds, What I am saying throughout my work is that girls who are indoctrinated to see men not as equals but as oppressors and rapists are condemned to remain in a permanently juvenile condition for life.

Paglias bold statements got her in a bit of hot water last April. University of the Arts students demanded that she be fired over public comments shed made that were not wholly sympathetic to the #MeToo movement, as well as for an interview with the Weekly Standard they called transphobic. That latter denunciation is particularly slapstick, because Paglia describes herself as transgender, writes Tunku Varadarajan, Hoover Institutions institutional editor, in his Aug. 30 Wall Street Journal article A Feminist Capitalist Professor Under Fire.

The students demand that Paglia be fired fell on deaf ears. Fortunately, there are a few college presidents with guts and common sense. President David Yager is one of them. He wrote in an open letter to students: Artists over the centuries have suffered censorship, and even persecution, for the expression of their beliefs through their work. My answer is simple: not now, not at UArts.

Theres another part of this story thats particularly interesting considering todays young peoples love of socialism. Paglia says children now are raised in a far more affluent period. Even people without much money have cellphones, televisions, and access to cars. Theyre raised in an air-conditioned environment. I can still remember when there was no air-conditioning.

Paglia says: Everything is so easy now. The stores are so plentifully supplied. You just go in and buy fruits and vegetables from all over the world. Young people ignorant of history and economics have a sense that this is the way life has always been. Because theyve never been exposed to history, they have no idea that these are recent attainments that come from a very specific economic system.

Young people led by Sen. Bernie Sanders and Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez fail to realize that capitalism has produced this cornucopia around us. But the young seem to believe in having the government run everything, and that the private companies that are doing things for profit around them, and supplying them with goods, will somehow exist forever. For the feminists, Paglia says, I insist that capitalism has produced the glorious emancipation of women. Today, they can support themselves and live on their own, and no longer must humiliatingly depend on father or husband.

Reading Varadarajans article made my day knowing that theres at least one intelligent radical feminist. But what else is to be expected from anyone whos a libertarian capitalist?

Walter E. Williams, a professor of economics at George Mason University, is a columnist with Creators Syndicate. His column appears Tuesday.

See more here:

Williams: Youth and ignorance | Opinion - Longview News-Journal

Early voting starts soon | News – Kokomo Perspective

On Oct. 8, early voting starts in Howard County for this years municipal election. At stake is the mayors office, which is up for grabs for the first time in 12 years in a wide-open race between Democrat Abbie Smith and Republican Tyler Moore. In addition, every seat on the Kokomo Common Council is up for election, as is the city clerk position.

After early voting commences voters can cast an early ballot at the Howard County Government Center, 120 E. Mulberry St., from 8 a.m. to 4 p.m. until Nov. 1. Then, on Oct. 26, early voting opens at Indiana Wesleyan, 1916 W. Markland Ave., from 8 a.m. to 3 p.m.

On Oct. 29 early voting will ramp up, with additional locations open at Indiana Wesleyan, Carver Community Center, Russiaville Lions Club, Titan Annex, and UAW Local 685. Through Nov. 3 these locations will be open from 12 p.m. to 7 p.m. with the exception being that Indiana Wesleyan will be open from 10 a.m. to 7 p.m. On Nov. 2 and 4 the Howard County Government Center will reopen for early voting. From 8 a.m. to 3 p.m. on Nov. 2, and on Nov. 4 from 8 a.m. to 12 p.m.

Absentee voting also will commence on Oct. 8.

Voting on Election Day on Nov. 5 runs from 6 a.m. to 6 p.m. In total, 13 vote centers will be open throughout Howard County. Those are Indiana Wesleyan, Carver Community Center, Russiaville Lions Club, Titan Annex, UAW Local 685, Eastern Performing Arts Center, First Assembly of God Church, Good Shepherd Church, Kokomo High School, Maple Crest School, Oakbrook Church, Senior Citizens Center, and Kokomo-Howard County Public Library South Branch. To see the locations of these vote centers, view the accompanying map.

The deadline to register to vote is Oct. 7.

In total, 11 positions within Kokomo government are up for election this year. However, only nine races are contested with the incumbents in Kokomo Common Council District 5, Republican Cynthia Sanders, and District 6, Thomas Miklik, not facing challengers this year.

In the mayoral race, Moore and Smith will be listed on the ballot alongside Libertarian Michael Virgin. However, Virgin recently announced a withdrawal from the mayoral race while endorsing Moore. But because the Libertarian didnt make the decision prior to a state-mandated deadline, he still will appear on the ballot.

Voters also will be tasked with selecting three candidates for the three at-large positions on the Kokomo Common Council. In that race, the incumbent candidates are Democrats Robert Hayes and John Michael Kennedy. Republicans Matthew Grecu, Kara Kitts-McKibben, and Antonio Stewart as well as Democrat Matthew Sedam also are on the ballot. The three candidates with the most votes will earn the at-large offices.

In the District 1, Republican Jason Acord faces incumbent Democrat Michael Wyant. In District 2, Democratic incumbent Robert Cameron is pitted against Republican Lynn Rudolph. For District 3, voters will select either Republican Ray Collins or Democrat Cathy Cox-Stover, who both seek to replace Councilwoman Janie Young after she chose not to seek reelection this year. Theres a three-way race in District 4, with Democratic incumbent Donnie Haworth facing Republican Greg Jones and Libertarian Danial Purvis.

And in the city clerk race, Republican Diane Howard is going against incumbent Democrat Brenda Brunnemer-Ott.

See the original post:

Early voting starts soon | News - Kokomo Perspective

November election will include many contested races – OBSERVER-REVIEW.COM

TRI-COUNTY AREA--Despite several one-candidate elections, voters in Yates, Schuyler and Steuben County still have plenty of contested local elections to sort through come November.Three districts in the county legislature have contested elections, with five candidates vying for four seats in District 1, four candidates and three seats in District 2 and six candidates for four seats in District 3. District 1 consists of Italy, Jerusalem and Middlesex, District 2 encompasses Benton, Potter and Torrey and District 3 is Milo.Along with voting for county positions, Benton, Jerusalem, Italy and Milo also have contested elections along with Barrington. Wayne and Urbana will see some contested elections while the village of Hammondsport will not. The county judge race highlights a number of contested elections in Schuyler.

Yates CountyDistrict 1 (Italy, Jerusalem, Middlesex) - two-year term (four seats open)Edward A. Bronson - Republican, ConservativeTimothy P. Cutler - Republican, ConservativeDouglas Paddock - Republican, ConservativeK. Dixon Zorovich - DemocraticPatrick Killen - Republican

District 2 (Benton, Potter, Torrey) - two-term (three seats open)Terry L. Button - RepublicanPeggy Focarino - DemocraticRichard L. Wilson - RepublicanRichard J. Harper - Republican

District 3 (Milo) - two-year term (four seats open)Earle Gleason - RepublicanLeslie Church - RepublicanDaniel Banach - RepublicanCarlie Chilson - RepublicanValerie Brechko - DemocraticTeresa Hoban - Democratic

BarringtonTown Council - four-year term (two seats open)Calvin C. Crosby - RepublicanThomas J. Petro III - Republican, Barrington RenewalSteven Brigham - Barrington Renewal

BentonTown Council - four-year term (two seats open)Alan D. Tomion - RepublicanRichard J. Harper - RepublicanBill Roege - Democratic

Highway Superintendent - four-year termJayson Hoover - RepublicanSteven Vaughan - Conservative

ItalyTown Council - four-year term (two seats open)Debra Cook - RepublicanBenjamin A. Dempsey - RepublicanMalcolm MacKenzie - Vote MacKenzie

JerusalemTown Supervisor - two-year termJamie L. Sisson - RepublicanK. Dixon Zorovich - Democratic

MiloTown Council - four-year-term (two seats open)Dale Hallings - RepublicanArden G. Sorenson Jr. - RepublicanValerie Valerie Brechko - DemocraticMildred A. Phillips-Espana - Democratic

Steuben County (Observer coverage area)WayneTown Supervisor - two-year termThomas A. Dunbar - Democratic, RepublicanSteve Butchko - Our TownChristopher Curry - Chris For Wayne

Town Clerk - two-year termMary Cornish Starkweather - Democrat, ConservativeWilliam Mahr - Republican, Independence

Councilman - four-year termLiz Kenyon - Democrat, Republican, IndependenceShona Freeman - RepublicanJulie A. Haar - Home Sweet Home

Superintendent of Highways - two-year termGary E. Perz - DemocraticDouglas Howard - Republican

UrbanaTown Supervisor - four-year termBee Keck - DemocraticEdward P. Stull - Republican, Wise Owl

Councilman - four-year term (two openings)Michele Foster - DemocraticDavid J. Luppino - RepublicanAlzina L. Turner - DemocraticDavid Shaw - RepublicanSchuyler County (Observer coverage area)

County Judge - ten-year termMatthew C. Hayden - Democratic, WOR/Schuyler First, SamSteven J. Getman - Republican, LibertarianJessica M. Saks - Independent, About JusticeDaniel J. Fitzsimmons - Home Town Law

Legislator District 7 - four-year termPaul J. Bartow - Democratic, UnityMark F. Rondinaro - Republican, Libertarian

Legislator District 8 - four-year termMaggie Coffey - Democratic, Working 4 YouGary L. Gray - Republican, Libertarian

TyroneCouncil Member - four-year term (two openings)Thomas R. Allen - Democratic, IntegrityNorman G. Knight - RepublicanEdward Perry, Sr. - Republican

DixJustice - four-year termBrian T. Eslinger - Democratic, Fair & BalancedKristina A. Vondracek - Republican

Here is the original post:

November election will include many contested races - OBSERVER-REVIEW.COM

MAGA Hat Wearers Harass the Elderly (Kidding, It Was Antifa) | VodkaPundit – PJ Media

Antifa's special brand of bullying madness has arrived in full force in Canada. Left-wing thugs can be seen on video chanting, "Nazi scum! Off our streets! Nazi scum! Off our streets!" at an elderly couple trying to do nothing more than use a public crosswalk. As you can see, the woman can apparently get around only with the aid of a walker, yet still poses some kind of threat to Antifa.

The reason for Antifa's appearance was to "protest" an event at Mohawk College sponsored by Maxime Bernier, leader of the Peoples Party of Canada, and American libertarian political commentator Dave Rubin.

The local Hamilton Spectator reports that more than 100 Antifa showed up at the sold-out event. The school allowed Sunday's show to go on, despite "concerns" raised by various students and faculty members' about PPC's supposed "far-right" agenda.

Bernier is a former Canadian cabinet member under PM Stephen Harper's Conservative party government, but left to form the PPC last year. Bernier complained that the Conservatives had grown too "intellectually and morally corrupt" to take on "extreme multiculturalism," which he believes creates division among Canadians.

Sunday's event sold out the 1,000-seat McIntyre Art Centre at $50 per ticket. Not a bad showing at a school of 30,000 students, and the extra security the administration had to provide wasn't to keep the conservatives and libertarians in line.

Meanwhile in Seattle, Major League Soccer caved to Antifa hooligans, agreeing to allow the black flag to fly during a Seattle Sounders games at CenturyLink, and elsewhere.

Give in to thugs, get more thuggery.

I was about to say things are going to get ugly, but they already have. The question is, how much uglier we'll let things get before the inevitable backlash.

Go here to read the rest:

MAGA Hat Wearers Harass the Elderly (Kidding, It Was Antifa) | VodkaPundit - PJ Media

Protecting Big Tech From Big Government: A Conversation with TechFreedom’s Berin Szoka – InsideSources

The following interview with Berin Szoka, president of TechFreedom, is part of an ongoing series of Q&As with leading policy professionals in Washington, D.C. This interview is edited for brevity and clarity.

InsideSources: What inspired you to found TechFreedom?

Berin Szoka: I started TechFreedom because the Progress and Freedom Foundation (PFF) closed during the financial downturn. One, I wanted to continue the work PFF had been doing, and do the things PFF wasnt but should have been doing, like civil liberties and surveillance work. The reason I went to PFF in the first place is because I wanted to be a principled voice in debates over how to govern the future of technology.

I dont think the perspective we take [at TechFreedom] was or is well-represented. I think there are existing organizations that have a very strong ideological agenda. There are people that start from strong ideological premises on both sides of the debate, and thats just not really what we do.

Were really first and foremost lawyers who try to think through these hard problems and provide good analysis. We have our own philosophical approach, but thats really secondary, and my chief frustration with dealing with the people in our field across the political spectrum is there arent that many people who are honest analysts and thinkers first and advocates for a political view second. Were not activists, were not an advocacy shop, were really a public interest law firm.

InsideSources: Tell me about some of the biggest policy issues TechFreedom is focused on right now.

Berin Szoka: As with everything we do, we ask, is this something people are looking at? Section 230 gets a lot of attention, but very few people take the time to lawyer through. A lot of people defending 230 speak in platitudes about how 230 made the internet possible. Thats not what we do. What would be the practical effect of a reasonableness expectation for immunity [like Sen. Josh Hawleys (R-Mo.) bill]? The practical effect would be you as a website operator would no longer be able to get rid of lawsuits, and after all that hassle and expense, you could perhaps get the lawsuit dismissed. What could be done to open the door into that avalanche of lawsuits? There are very few people in the policy world engaged in that analysis.

The only way were going to safeguard against future abuses of power is to have a combination of statutory protections, transparency, and tools that allow people to blow the whistle, whatever the right thing for the circumstance. For example, I am profoundly concerned about the way the administration appears to have weaponized the enforcement of antitrust laws. It appears to me they are operating to suit the political agenda of the White House. Its pretty clear Trump is trying to use antitrust laws against political rivals.

Our general theme IS about not giving too much discretion to regulators. There are some very specific changes we would like to see made. The presidents war powers under the Communications Act is essentially an internet kill switch. They are very broad, there are essentially no safeguards, and if youre really concerned about someone abusing power in secret and potentially shutting down communications, those are the sorts of things that should be addressed now. So we are reaching out to people across the political spectrum to be engaged. I dont think that gets enough attention, and its very different from what most people in this field do. People are focused on short-term partisan fights.

The next administration will have an opportunity to start implementing these kinds of reforms for all sorts of things, like how we appoint commissioners over agencies, that process is breaking down. We would really like to sit down with people and fix these problems with the regulatory state. They will really have an opportunity to step back from the normal partisan fights and institute safeguards.

InsideSources: What do you think are some of the biggest misconceptions surrounding some of these issues?

Berin Szoka: Most people think that the debate over the last few years has been about net neutrality, when really its been about the FCCs authority over internet services. The only way were going to resolve this issue is to distinguish those two things. Democrats still say Mike Doyles bill will resolve this fight, well no it wont, it restores the FCCs open internet order. It restores the FCCs authority over internet services, and thats something weve always objected to, not the net neutrality principles.

The really big misunderstanding that underlies that whole debate is that people on both sides of the aisle, especially Republicans, is that they really dont understand the problem of scale. The reason Section 230 is so vital is because its one thing for a newspaper to filter all the letters to the editor and third-party op-eds, but any website, not just Google and Facebook, theres no way you or I could manage all the comments. The problem just grows from there.

When Republicans complain about bias and social media content moderation, what theyre really seeing is the result of the vast scale of these services. Its just not possible to make perfectly thoughtful decisions all the time. We cant have the courts litigating every single time someone complains about content on the internet. We have to have cruder, faster mechanisms that are imperfect and will result in a lot of absurd cases of content being taken down that shouldnt be.

The other bigger point I would make that relates to abuse of power: Im constantly amazed at people who propose something like broad power to a regulator with open discretion and then dont think about how that power will be abused when theyre not in power.

When we start thinking not from a knee-jerk ideological perspective and start practically thinking things through, how will this power be abused? What will people on the other side do with it?

InsideSources: Which issue are you most passionate about?

Berin Szoka: At the moment, I would say Im most passionate about defending internet services against Republican hypocrisy.

Last year [when I testified at the April 26, 2018 House Judiciary Committee hearing] I naively expected I would hear some Republican attacks but at least most or some would be willing to say whatever mistakes tech companies might make in content moderation, we dont think the government should dictate what tech companies should do. But instead every single one of them took the opportunity to rave about Republicans being censored without any anecdotal examples.

InsideSources: What triggered your interest in these tech issues?

Berin Szoka: Im essentially doing today what I wanted to do as a freshman or sophomore in college. The book The Future and Its Enemies by Virginia Postrel Ive always said has been my lodestar. Thats sort of generally libertarian, but you dont have to be a libertarian to feel that way about the internet and evolving services. Essentially, [its about how] were better off not trying to put the future in some neat and tidy box.

Beyond that, the net neutrality debate wasnt really my choice, that kind of took over the field, and its the same for Section 230. Groups like the Media Research Center figured out that net neutrality was a great fundraising issue, and are essentially taking the playbook from Fight for the Future and doing the same thing.

InsideSources: Are there any experiences that stand out in how they influenced your political views and policy positions?

Berin Szoka: The April 26, 2018 hearing was, for me, the last straw. It was at that hearing that I realized the Republican Party is completely lost. If that hearing happened a year before, every single Republican there would have said all the same things about how terrible the Fairness Doctrine was, and now they turn around and push that exact same idea for social media. Theyre the ones who have rushed to say for 10 years that net neutrality is the Fairness Doctrine for the internet.

InsideSources: What politicians, economists and other influencers have influenced your views and policy positions?

Berin Szoka: Virginia Postrel and her book, which I really cannot recommend enough. In college I also read The Innovators Dilemma by Clayton Christiansen, and its fundamental point is still quite right, that the really important thing about innovation is that Facebook isnt going to be disrupted by another Facebook, but by someone who does something completely different that disrupts their business model.

Thats the heart of our work, to make sure regulation doesnt lock in a way of doing things because that will lock in our current giants and their interests. I also read an early law and economics take on internet regulation, Information Rules by Hal Varian and Carl Shapiro, thats still a great work. Also Hayek.

InsideSources: Do you have any nerdy, unique hobbies?

Berin Szoka: Well,I row.I row on the Anacostia and have the river to myself and think about things.LanguageIm a pretty good French speaker, andIm taking German again, but my German is pretty bad.My license plate is BAROQUE, I love baroque music. Bach is my favorite.

View post:

Protecting Big Tech From Big Government: A Conversation with TechFreedom's Berin Szoka - InsideSources

What to Know About Ridesharing Accidents – The Libertarian Republic

Uber, Lyft, Juno and other ridesharing services have grown extremely popular in recent years. At this point in time, you or someone else you know regularly relies on these services to obtain a ride to a specific destination. Ridesharing services are very convenient and inexpensive, which makes them so hugely popular. Unfortunately, due to the large number of ridesharing drivers now taking to the roads to transport passengers from point A to point B on a daily basis, there are even more vehicles on the road than ever. As a result, many more car accidents are bound to happen. Its important to understand the situation based on your particular circumstances with a ridesharing vehicle and how you can recover the compensation you are due if you are injured in such an accident.

Basic Steps to Take After a Car Accident

First and foremost, if you are involved in an accident involving an Uber, Lyft or other ridesharing vehicle or in any car accident, in general, there are certain basic steps you must take. They include the following:

Make sure everyone is okay after the crash. If there are any injuries, it might be possible to administer basic first aid. However, if anyone is seriously injured, its important that they get immediate medical attention and get checked out by a doctor and other healthcare professionals at the hospital. At the same time, even if you or anyone else feel completely unharmed, adrenaline is running high after such a harrowing experience, which means you may not even realize that you are injured. The symptoms, including aches and pains, may not show up until hours or even days later. Additionally, there may be internal injuries that require immediate medical attention. Call 911 to summon police officers to the scene of the accident. The police should come to assess the situation and make a police accident report. If you later decide you want to file a personal injury claim, you can also use a copy of the police report in your case. A Lyft accident attorney can use it as part of the evidence to back up your claim for damages. Snap plenty of photos of the scene of the accident. Snap as many as possible and get shots of the vehicles, the damage they have sustained, the road, skid marks, road conditions and weather conditions. You can use a digital camera or your smartphones built-in camera. Gather up the names and contact information of everyone involved in the accident. Specifically, you should focus on information belonging to the other drivers, including their names, phone numbers, drivers license and license plate numbers. Talk to people around the scene who were witnesses to the accident. Ask them to make a statement of what they saw and get their names and phone numbers. You may want to ask them to write down what they recall or record their statements. Contact your insurance company and inform someone that you were injured in an accident. Keep a journal and write down anything and everything you can think of pertaining to the accident. This can be helpful when you decide to speak with a uber accident lawyer about starting your own injury claim. Always stay calm. Panicking can only make the situation worse.

What Happens When a Ridesharing Vehicle Gets Into an Accident?

These days, ridesharing services are a big part of regular everyday life for many people. Lyft, Uber, Juno and other ridesharing services are so popular because its easy to request a ride. All you have to do is download the app of the ridesharing service of your choice to your smartphone, open the app and request a ride. You only have to wait for the vehicle to show up and dont have to fight for a car to take you to your desired destination. This plus the cheaper price is what makes ridesharing services so much more convenient than traditional taxi cabs, which require you to stand on the street and gesture for a ride.

In a nutshell, ridesharing services have essentially been a game-changer in the transportation industry as a whole. As of the summer of 2018, there were more than 75 million users relying on ridesharing services. This means there are now millions of vehicles on the road providing the service. Considering this fact, its only natural that there would be so many more accidents involving ridesharing vehicles.

Situations Involving Ridesharing Accidents and Claims

If you use Lyft, Uber, Juno or any other ridesharing service, you are unfortunately at risk of being involved in an accident with one of those vehicle. Furthermore, even if you are merely a bystander a pedestrian you can become injured if you are the unfortunate victim of an accident involving a ridesharing vehicle. Its important to know what your rights are and how you can claim compensation for your medical expenses and other damages. The various situations include the following:

You are a passenger in the ridesharing vehicle: If you are a passenger in a ridesharing vehicle that suddenly gets into a crash, you can rely on the ridesharing companys $1 million insurance policy, which covers injuries to passengers. Its wise to take advantage of this coverage, but you should definitely speak with a lawyer to ensure that your rights are protected. You are a bystander and the driver didnt have the app on: If you were injured in an accident with a ridesharing vehicle but the driver did not have the app on, you would have to rely on the drivers personal auto insurance policy to cover your medical expenses and other damages. Unfortunately, the ridesharing companys policy would not apply. If the drivers policy is insufficient in effectively compensating you, you would have to use your own underinsured or uninsured policy as well. You are a bystander and the driver has the app on while waiting for a ride request: If the driver is riding around with the app on while waiting for a request for a ride and hits you, the ridesharing companys insurance policy applies. Coverage includes $50,000 up to $100,000 max per person per injury and $25,000 per property damage. You are a bystander and the driver is traveling to pick up a passenger: If you are a bystander who is injured in an accident with a ridesharing driver who is on the way to pick up a passenger, the ridesharing companys $1 million insurance policy applies. Its easy to prove that the ridesharing company is liable for your medical expenses, lost wages and other damages due to the drivers GPS. Regardless, its smart to speak with an attorney so your rights can be protected. You are a bystander and the driver is transporting a passenger to a destination: If you were injured in an accident as a bystander after a ridesharing vehicle crash and the driver was transporting a passenger, the $1 million insurance policy again kicks in. However, you should still retain an experienced lawyer to ensure you get the compensation you deserve.

Unfortunately, accidents involving ridesharing vehicles are not going away anytime soon. If you have suffered an injury using one of these vehicles or as a pedestrian, its important to speak with a Lyft accident attorney at West Coast Trial Lawyers. When you contact West Coast Trial Lawyers, you can discuss your case with a skilled ridesharing accident attorney and can learn about your options.

See the rest here:

What to Know About Ridesharing Accidents - The Libertarian Republic

Former GOP Gov. Weld backs Joe Kennedy in his bid to unseat Sen. Markey – Greenwich Time

Annie Linskey, The Washington Post

It might not be the support he's looking for, but Bill Weld, the former Republican Massachusetts governor, said Thursday he backs Rep. Joe Kennedy in his bid to oust Sen. Edward J. Markey in the Democratic primary.

The race between Kennedy and Markey is shaping up to be among the most watched intramural contests this election cycle, pitting the scion of one of the country's more famous political families against Markey, a longtime member of Congress.

Kennedy is expected to formally launch his Senate bid on Saturday in Boston.

"I'm for Kennedy," said Weld, who held a wide-ranging conversation with Washington Post reporters. "I've known him since the day he was born."

"He doesn't want my endorsement," Weld added quickly.

He also praised Markey.

"I've known Ed for a long time and he's a hero in a lot of areas," Weld said, listing Telecom and the environment as two key issues where he said Markey has provided leadership.

Emily Kaufman, a spokeswoman for Kennedy, said, "Joe appreciates the kind words. He'll be making a a campaign announcement this Saturday and looks forward to speaking with folks then."

Weld, who served as governor from 1991 to 1997, waged an unsuccessful bid for Senate in 1996, trying to unseat then-Sen. John Kerry. Weld is currently seeking the Republican presidential nomination, taking on President Donald Trump. His strategy involves trying to win New Hampshire, where he's been heavily campaigning. There have been few public polls of the Republican primary in New Hampshire, but an April survey showed Trump more than 60 percentage points ahead of Weld.

During his conversation with reporters, Weld ruled out running on the Libertarian ticket or as an independent if he fails to secure the GOP nomination. In 2016, Weld clinched the Libertarian Party's nod for vice president and ran on a ticket with Gary Johnson.

Weld avoided offering any endorsements on the Democratic side, but shared some thoughts about the candidates.

About fellow Bay Stater Sen. Elizabeth Warren, Weld said: "She sure is smart and she sure is filled with energy." But he added that her economic policies are too far left for the country and predicted she would lose in a general election.

Weld sounded more impressed with former vice president Joe Biden, who is atop most of the Democratic polls. "I've known Biden the longest of any of these folks," Weld said.

See the article here:

Former GOP Gov. Weld backs Joe Kennedy in his bid to unseat Sen. Markey - Greenwich Time

Trump launches ambitious play to turn New Mexico red – POLITICO

The Trump campaign has an unprecedented war chest to spend on watch-list states like New Mexico. | Patrick Semansky/AP File Photo

2020 elections

The strategy centers on wooing Hispanics in the state, which has voted for a Republican presidential candidate only once since 1992.

By GABBY ORR

09/16/2019 05:03 AM EDT

ALBUQUERQUE, N.M. John McCain lost New Mexico by nearly 15 percentage points in 2008. Four years later, Mitt Romney pulled two top staffers from the ground here with weeks to go before Election Day admitting defeat even before Barack Obama trounced him by 51 points in the Santa Fe area.

The Land of Enchantment has voted for a Republican presidential candidate only once since 1992. With a considerable nonwhite voter population and all-Democratic congressional delegation, its not exactly fertile ground for a surprise GOP victory.

Story Continued Below

But then, President Donald Trump has seldom shied away from a long-shot challenge.

Despite the Democratic Partys statewide success here last November winning two congressional seats up for grabs, defending a third and defeating Republican nominee Steve Pearce for the governors mansion Trump and his aides are betting they can flip New Mexico next fall and expand his electoral playing field.

Their efforts begin Monday night with a campaign rally in Rio Rancho, which sits in a county Trump lost by 1,800 votes in 2016. The Hispanic-heavy city is four hours north of El Paso, Texas, where the president held a reelection rally in August that prompted campaign manager Brad Parscale to add New Mexico to his watch list a list of nontraditional battleground states, including Maine, Colorado, Minnesota and Virginia, that the Trump campaign has its sights set on.

Ive continued to say the presidents policies are a win for Latino voters across America and one of the first symbols of this was the El Paso rally, Parscale told reporters on a call last week. We saw in the data thousands of voters who did not vote for the president in 2016 show up to a rally, come listen to the president and register [to vote].

As we started doing polling there, we saw a dramatic increase from 2016 and I went over this with the president and he said, Lets go straight into Albuquerque, Parscale recalled.

poster="https://static.politico.com/eb/36/868c6ab4463cb2341d00657e5d89/immigration-eugene.png" true

Political forecasters and local officials remain puzzled by claims that Trump with his restrictionist immigration policies, white-identity politics and below-average approval ratings can woo enough voters to turn New Mexico in his favor.

What weve seen of the presidents immigration policy has been cruel and inhumane. I think Democrats and New Mexicans, in general, are much more interested in making sure our communities feel welcome and safe, said Miranda van Dijk, a spokeswoman for the Democratic Party of New Mexico, which is counterprogramming Trumps rally with an event focused on unity and diversity.

Hes a batshit racist, adds Chris Luchini, a New Mexico native who sits atop the states Libertarian Party. Im very skeptical that New Mexico is up for grabs with him.

The Libertarians of New Mexico earned major-party status in 2016 after Gary Johnson the states former Republican governor, who became the Libertarian presidential nominee in the past two elections carried nearly 10 percent of the statewide vote. Luchini contends that the party has become somewhat of a refuge for disaffected Democrats who are too conservative for the progressive politics of their state Legislature, but too appalled by Trump to reregister as Republicans.

Traditionally, the normal thing that most political operatives have believed is that people who vote Libertarian are disaffected Republicans. That is no longer true in New Mexico, he explained.

Luchini said he often calls voters when they reregister as Libertarian to ask what prompted the change, and what I get on the phone calls a lot are traditional conservative Democrats who can no longer stomach being called a Democrat, but are self-selected not to be Trump voters.

The trend he describes is consistent with the Trump campaigns attraction to New Mexico, though questions remain about whether the current political climate here is truly advantageous for the president. His net approval rating in the state has decreased by 34 percentage points since he took office, and recent matchup polls in bordering red Texas have shown him losing to the top three candidates in the Democratic presidential field.

Sign up today to receive the #1-rated newsletter in politics

By signing up you agree to receive email newsletters or alerts from POLITICO. You can unsubscribe at any time.

But Trump campaign officials say the numbers theyre looking at paint a different picture of a state in which Hispanic Catholics and rural voters feel abandoned by progressive lawmakers who have pushed to codify reproductive rights, increase taxes and mandate the creation of gender-neutral restrooms in commercial buildings. Furthermore, they maintain that the presidents actions on immigration are attractive to a particular subset of Hispanic voters who support border security or have family members who entered the U.S. legally.

That is, only if Trump can ditch the harsh rhetoric he typically employs when discussing his immigration policies and preferences, says Pearce, the failed gubernatorial candidate, who has spoken to the campaign about the presidents language in his current capacity as chairman of New Mexicos Republican Party.

This is a lot about tone, and youve got to watch that, Pearce said. You dont have to be cautious about saying you want to secure the border. You just have to say it with firmness and without anger.

Republicans in New Mexico are also eyeing retiring Democrat Tom Udalls Senate seat as a means to boost voter turnout and help the president in 2020. Two Republican candidates have already declared in addition to 10 different people who are interested in running, whom Pearce says he has spoken to though neither is viewed as particularly competitive in what is seen as a relatively safe seat for Democrats.

Still, van Dijk says Democratic activists and state party officials are not taking anything for granted for this cycle and will focus heavily on defending Udalls seat and appealing to voters from every corner of the state.

Were really excited about supporting our eventual nominee for Senate and lucky to have an incredible county party structure, she said. We are in every part of our state and were making sure our initiatives are focused in every part of our state.

By Parscales telling, Trump who hasnt visited New Mexico since October 2016 has long been eager to return. Campaign officials believe that Johnson attracted tens of thousands of would-be Trump voters during the presidents first White House bid. And if they can just win over those voters this cycle, it will bring Trump closer to having five more electoral votes in his pocket.

It wasnt until mid-August, though, that Trump himself was convinced of the idea. The president has spent months polling his inner circle about the political landscape in New Mexico, according to two people familiar with those conversations, one of whom recalled his asking an aide whether coming here would be a waste of time.

I started talking to them saying they shouldnt write off New Mexico in January. They didnt believe that in the least, Pearce said.

He continued: Eventually Brad began to watch it, and three to four months ago he said he wanted to come into New Mexico and do a little something with the party, and that morphed into Don Jr. coming with him, and then the president started wanting to come about the time of his New Hampshire rally in August.

With an unprecedented war chest, the Trump campaign has ample cash to spend on watch-list states like New Mexico, where at least a half-dozen staffers are expected to be stationed before the end of the year. If Mondays rally meets expectations, the president could turn the state into a regular stop on the campaign trail as 2020 draws near particularly if his prospects begin to dim in key battleground states.

He starts off with 164 electoral votes automatically, a Republican official familiar with Trumps strategy recently told POLITICO. What I would tell you is, I feel like hes going to win Texas, but I dont know that we have opportunities in Colorado, Virginia [or] New Mexico.

Missing out on the latest scoops? Sign up for POLITICO Playbook and get the latest news, every morning in your inbox.

More here:

Trump launches ambitious play to turn New Mexico red - POLITICO

YAL Updates: Fall 2019 – Driftwood

The Young Americans for Liberty (YAL), the nations largest libertarian student-led activist organization, recently hosted their regional convention in Austin, Texas, from Friday, Sept. 6, to Sunday, Sept. 8. This years attendees included Travis Kieff ([emailprotected]), rising junior, mechanical engineering major, and President of UNOs YAL chapter. Guests for YALCON Austin 2019 included, among others, Ron Paul, author, libertarian, and retired politician; Nick Freitas, Republican politician from the Virginia House of Delegates; Chip Roy, Republican representative for Texass 21st congressional district; and Dave Rubin, a self-identified classical liberal, political commentator and YouTube personality.

Kieff, who has headed the local chapter for the past year, expressed interest in attending the convention to develop a closer working relationship with other YAL members in the Great Plains region and to converse with leaders of non-profit organizations or interest groups focusing on different intellectual and social issues. The convention, held in the Sheraton Austin Hotel at the Capitol, featured discussion tables by a number of such organizations, including the Alliance Defending Freedom (ADF), conservative Christian Foundation devoted to, according to their official site, religious freedom, sanctity of life, [and] marriage and [the] family; the Foundation for Individual Rights in Education (FIRE), a non-partisan organization dedicated to protecting free speech rights on college campus around the country; and the Cato Institute, a libertarian think tank focusing on domestic economic and political issues.

Because were still a newer group on campus, Kieff explained, elaborating on his position as President, its mainly been a process of figuring out how to do things; thankfully the Executive Board has been graciously helpful.

Though Kieff laments that his major doesnt tie in well to his political activities, he emphasized the excitement with which he met Great Plains Regional Director Ian Brennan and networked with other student activists, attending even a live taping of Dave Rubins The Rubin Report, a politically themed talk show broadcast regularly to Rubins official YouTube channel.

The convention also motioned Kieff to discuss upcoming events for the UNO chapter with other members. Events for the fall 2019 semester include Constitution Day, Sept. 17, in which pocket-sized copies of the US Constitution are handed out to students and discussed at a public table, and Change My Mind open discussion tables on the following topics: the First Amendment, the Second Amendment and the Electoral College.

I want to make it easy for [UNO] students to disagree on these things, Kieff expressed, to dissuade them from hiding their political views.

In addition, Kieff hopes to increase membership in the local chapter and participate in YALs second annual Operation: Win at the Door campaign, in which members of the organization knock on doors in their local neighborhoods, engaging with voters directly, to sponsor a candidate of their choosing. YAL has stated its goal for this campaign is to elect 250 legislators who share [their] commitment to liberty by the end of 2022. Last year the group secured 39 of those 250 legislators in 14 states.

Though all members attending YALCON are by invitation only and require prior registration, registering as a member for life, Kieff reassured, only takes a few moments and costs no more than $10. Please contact Kieff or campus advisor David Manry ([emailprotected]) for information on upcoming meetings.

Go here to read the rest:

YAL Updates: Fall 2019 - Driftwood

Entering the Echo Chamber of the Alt-Right – Hyperallergic

Glossary in the entrance area of the exhibition The Alt-Right Complex On Right-Wing Populism in the Net at HMKV in Dortmunder U (photo by Hannes Woidich; image courtesy HMKV in Dortmunder U)

DORTMUND, Germany The lexicon of tyranny has a long history, but perhaps an even more complicated present.An exhibition, The Alt-Right Complex: On Right-Wing Populism Online, at the Hartware MedienKunstVerein (HMKV) in Dortmund, attempts to shine light on the verbiage of alt-right movements, including 12 projects by 16 contemporary artists that unravel the ethos, ideology, terminology and aesthetics of contemporary right-wing extremism. Crucially, the exhibition also contains a glossary of 37 entries that offer a window into the alt-rights cryptic language, including words, symbols and phrases that members of this nebulous group use to promote an intersection of xenophobic, racist, libertarian, and ethno-nationalist ideas online.

The curator of both the exhibition and glossary, Inke Arns, admits that defining the alt-right can problematic. The term Alt-Right itself is controversial because it seeks to mask precisely these political beliefs; namely, Islamophobia, antisemitism, racist nationalism and contempt for the constitution, Arns writes in the edited text and glossary accompany the exhibition (available for free online).

Entering the exhibition, one is confronted with the glossary of terms and symbols printed on the walls of a transparent, illuminated tunnel. Words like transhumanism, cuckservative, and accelerationism describe the vocabulary the alt-right uses to promote ideas closely linked to their extremist political beliefs.

The word cuck, for example, from the old French word for cuckoo (cucu), has become a go-to insult that captures toxic masculine behaviours and incel anxieties that define the alt-right today. In online porn, a cuck is short for cuckold, a word from the same root referring to a man who allows his female partner to have sex with someone else (often Black). The term has evolved to encapsulate a political meaning, one that now equates mainstream conservatives with effeminate values, with the term cuckservative used to denote someone who willfully absorbs conservative values with a liberal/centrist bent.

The symbiosis of words, symbols, and visual culture at the heart of alt-right discourse is sometimes difficult to discern one case in point being the numerology of 168:1. The number is code for the Oklahoma City bombing in which 168 people died, identified in the glossary of the exhibition. When used on message boards like 4chan and 8chan, image message boards frequented by right-wing trolls, 168:1 gives fodder to would-be extremists who support mass murder, the same macabre glorification of neo-Nazi ideology promoted by the Oklahoma City bombings perpetrator, Timothy McVeigh. (The numerical code also appears on some of the poster motifs for the exhibition, embroidered on the collar of a black jacket wearing mouthpiece.)

The exhibition prefaces how the alt-right became an internet subculture dripping with irony by making use of techniques like trolling, meme-making and pranking. Using a combination of strategic words, symbols and memes, the alt-right disseminates extreme right-wing ideology first through forums like 4chan and 8chan, then through broader platforms like Reddit, Twitter, and Facebook, which sometimes then make it onto more mainstream conservative blogs, websites, and even newsrooms like Fox Newss. The trolls discovered that the best way to get lulz was to employ politically incorrect rhetoric and/or subject such a position and so raid existing online communities, Arns writes in her exhibition text.

Entering the exhibition, walking through the illuminated glossary, 12 projects and art works look into the rise of the alt-right not only in the US, but also in Germany and Europe more broadly. One project by the artist duo DISNOVATION.ORG, by Maria Roszkowska and Nicolas Maigre, presents a large scale cartography of alt-right memes in the form of a political compass, wallpaper, and poster. The graphic interface presents about 100 symbols and figures on a four-quadrant, horizontal and vertical axis divided between authoritarian and libertarian, economic-right and economic-left. Entitled Online Culture Wars (2018-1019), the work graphically interprets how brands, celebrities, and symbols become linked along an ideological spectrum.

Alongside the political compass, a hacked version of the immensely popular board game, Life, by the artist Simon Denny, offers a speculative post-national future in which colonies at sea and in space vie for supremacy on a planet in which the welfare state has collapsed. The goals of the Silicon Valley entrepreneur and investor, Peter Thiel, which the exhibition leans on heavily, include the idea that transhumanism mixed with temporary libertarian autonomous zones can facilitate a future society in which the individual reigns supreme. In Dennys apocryphal board game, Game of Life: Collective vs Individual Rules (2017), the end-game of Theil and others like him are inscribed into the rules itself, offering a speculative scenario in which players are tasked with disposing of nation states via Cloud Lords who utilize tools like deregulation, optimism and R&D (research and development) to fight against unadaptable monsters like legal systems beyond the expiry date, transparency, democracy and fair elections.

In a work by the Canadian video artist Dominic Gagnon, a montage of censored amateur videos from YouTube is interspersed with footage of conspiracy theorists known as preppers, people who live in perpetual fear of an eventual doomsday scenario. Like Peter Thiel, preppers project a fundamental mistrust of the current political and social system. Informed by an intense wave of paranoia, rage, and suppressed anxieties, preppers tend to espouse views deeply critical of migrants and a fundamental distrust in mainstream narratives, using these ideas to give fodder to post-apocalyptic near future scenarios in which only the rich will survive.

In a dual-channel video work by the Hungarian artist Szabolcs KissPl, From Fake Mountains to Faith (Hungarian Trilogy) (2016), the focus shifts beyond preppers to understand how grand narratives and national symbols of authoritarianism intersect. Looking into his native Hungary, KissPl posits how quickly democratic societies can devolve into illiberal democracies, often under strong-man leaders, such as Hungarys current Prime Minister Viktor Orbn. The docu-fiction brings to light an imagined scenario involving a museum that seeks to counter the ideological foundation of race and nation. It deconstructs how forms of ethno-nationalism manifest in supposedly neutral institutions, but also how this becomes a romantic myth that supports political references in support of the nation state, and with it forms of political belonging and social communities therein.

Not far from these ideas, a project by Vanja Smiljani examines how religion and nationalism are used to reinforce one another based on a comparative investigation into the internet-based movement of the Cosmic People and the Flag Nation Society, a Christian community that bases its ideology around allegiance to an ominous flag. Taking up the mantle of a Minister of the Cosmic People for the countries of ex-Yugoslavia, Portugal and the former Portuguese colonies, the lecture performance and documentation offers a buoyant and timely criticism responding to dangers of worship, albeit here in a dystopian, cyber-ruled world.

In Jonas Staals 10-channel video installation Steve Bannon: A Propaganda Retrospective (visual ecology) (2018), the artist presents a visual encyclopedia of visual tropes taken from Banons work as a Hollywood filmmaker. The work consists of 10 separate screens Staal filmed and edited between 2014-2018. In them, we see how the cacophony of right-wing ideology is filtered from fringe groups and message boards all the way up to the mainstream media. It narrows in on Steve Bannon, the veritable architect and propagainst-in-chief of US President Donald Trumps successful campaign in 2016, who prior to that served as executive chairman of Breitbart News. Staals work offers a timely and potent examination of Bannons ideology through the prism of film and cinematic editing and references, it is very Eisenstein or Michael Moore-esque, with the end result being scenes that employ visual references to themes and mythologies long since debunked. One of these themes involves the false and often cited narrative of the triumph and former golden age of Western white civilization. Here, we encounter how Trumps problematic narrative feeds into alt-right groups who often attempt to prolongate a false ancient mythology in order to reinforce ethno-nationalist and xenophobic world views today. (The pseudo-historiography of white erasure and Western civilization has been debunked numerous times, including in the annals of Hyperallergic by the Classicist scholar Dr. Sarah Bond, whose recent article The Origins of White Supremacists Fear of Replacement argues that the fear of being replaced can be traced to the French far right, but racist fears regarding supposed White genocide, and invasion by varied ethnic groups, go back centuries). In Staals work, we encounter how Bannons scripted ideological narrative continues to obfuscate the truth, with the purpose of furthering a highly divisive political ideology.

Leaving the exhibition, I was reminded of the unnerving parallels between the alt-right online and in real life. 8chan, the image and message board modelled after 4chan, has recently been in the news after the revelation that the El Paso shooter used the forum to post his far-right manifesto moments before his killing spree, which marks the third time a right-wing mass shooter has posted plans and/or manifesto on the site. Hence, the title of the exhibition, The Alt-Right Complex, is an exhibition that draws nuanced parallels between hateful ideology and imagery online, bearing in mind the psychological minefield that transcends the internet and enters into mainstream consciousness and into real life political events.

The Alt-Right Complex: On Right-Wing Populism Online continues at HMKV Dortmund until September 22, 2019.

See the rest here:

Entering the Echo Chamber of the Alt-Right - Hyperallergic

Inside Conservative Groups Effort to Make Dishwashers Great Again – The New York Times

Dishwasher makers themselves dispute that dishwasher performance has gotten worse because of environmental regulations and they say they arent looking for weaker standards. A study from Consumer Reports said this year that todays dishwashers use roughly half the water and energy of 20 years ago. In fact, using a modern dishwasher tends to be more energy- and water-efficient than doing the dishes by hand.

Its confounding, its hard to explain, this blanket attack on regulations, said Jason Hartke, president of the Alliance to Save Energy, a bipartisan nonprofit organization that represents businesses, environmental groups and consumer advocates. I dont think theyre listening to industry, he said. Theyre trying to put out-of-date, inefficient products in American homes.

Much of the support for these rollbacks has come instead from a small group of conservative, free market organizations, many allied with the fossil fuel industry. For example, a secretive policy group financed by corporations, the American Legislative Exchange Council, worked alongside the gasoline producer Marathon Petroleum to urge legislators to support weakening the clean-car rules.

The Washington-based Competitive Enterprise Institute, a group that disputes that climate change is a problem, has promoted the effort to roll back dishwasher regulations, filing a petition that directly prompted the dishwasher review. As a nonprofit organization, the Competitive Enterprise Institute isnt required to disclose its donors, though a recent gala organized by the institute showed that the institute counts among its donors groups that have long been aligned with fossil fuel interests.

Sam Kazman, the groups general counsel, said its policies are based on our principles, not on what our supporters think about specific issues. He added, We wouldnt be surprised if they support this initiative especially if they do their own dishes.

The FreedomWorks regulatory policy manager, Daniel Savickas, said the Competitive Enterprise Institute had flagged the dishwasher issue and the groups had decided to combine their efforts. We try and roll back burdensome regulations and make life easier for consumers and manufacturers, he said.

The dishwasher in my apartment is absolute garbage, and I have to run cycles multiple times, Mr. Savickas said.

Go here to read the rest:

Inside Conservative Groups Effort to Make Dishwashers Great Again - The New York Times

Five candidates vie for open seat in House District 70 in East Baton Rouge – The Advocate

Education, transportation and drainage are among the issues of thecandidates running to fill the open seat in House District 70.

The five contenders three Republicans, one Democrat, and one Libertarian are vying to succeed longtime GOP Rep. Franklin Foil, who is in his third four-year term and is now running for the state Senate in District 16.

District 70 extends from the edges of LSUs campus down to south Baton Rouge. Sixty-nine percent of its nearly 30,000 registered voters are white and 24 percent are black. Early voting will last from Sept. 28 to Oct. 5, except Sunday, Sept. 29. Election Day is Oct. 12.

An inordinate number of current and former state lawmakers are squaring off for seats in the Louisiana Senate in the Oct. 12 primary, putting

Democrats are hoping for a potential pickup of this district. Of the 22 contested House districts currently held by Republicans, District 70 is where President Donald Trump under-performed the most relative to Mitt Romney four years earlier, according to an analysis by Mike Henderson, an assistant professor who directs the Public Policy Research Lab at the LSU School of Mass Communication.

Three of the candidates in the District 70 race have separated themselves from the pack in fundraising upwards of $45,000: Barbara Freiberg, Michael DiResto and Belinda Davis. The two other candidates, Mallory Mayeux and Ricky Sheldon, have each reported raising less than $1,000.

Freiberg, 70, a Republican, has represented District 12 on the Metro Council since 2016. The retired educator pointed to her 30 years as a public school teacher and experience on the East Baton Rouge Parish School Board.

Neither of the two other major candidates has held elected office, though they both highlighted their extensive work in the public sector.

It may sound counterintuitive, said DiResto, but as a first-time candidate, Im running on my experience.

DiResto, 48, a Republican, spent nearly two decades in the public sector, first as press secretary for Congressman Richard Baker and later as assistant commissioner at the state Division of Administration. DiResto is now the executive vice president at the Baton Rouge Area Chamber.

The Advocates records show that DiResto was arrested twice for driving while intoxicated, first in 2008 and later in 2013. In an emailed statement, DiResto said he had made mistakes in his past and he took full responsibility for his actions.

In the years since then, I have been all the more focused on strengthening my faith and working hard to make a positive difference in our community, he wrote.

The sole Democrat in the race, Davis, 48, is an LSU political science professor whose research focuses on evaluating the effectiveness of public policy.

DiResto and Davis said part of what motivated them to run is the desire to make Baton Rouge a better place for their children. DiResto said hed work to make the state friendlier to businesses, while Davis said shed focus on increasing state investment in education.

A portion of District 70 extends into the boundaries proposed for the city of St. George which, if approved, would convert a large part of southeastern East Baton Rouge into the parish's fifth municipality, with a population of more than 86,000. DiResto and Davis both said they were personally opposed to the incorporation. Freiberg would not offer an opinion for or against the measure.

Education topped the agenda for these three candidates. Freiberg said she would work to expand industry based certification programs and college-credit programs in high schools. DiResto, who helped champion the BASIS Baton Rouge charter school while at BRAC, said hed work to make sure that state government has sustainable funding for higher education.

Davis, who heads up the One Community, One School District public education advocacy group, said she would work to reduce reliance on standardized testing and increase state education investment.

She emphasized her commitment to the issue by pointing to testimony she gave at the legislature for teacher pay raises. Im doing that as a mom in my free time. Think of what could be accomplished if I was in the legislature, Davis said.

The three major candidates also all said transportation is a top priority, citing Baton Rouges infamously bad congestion. Freiberg and DiResto both said they would work to identify funding for a new bridge over the Mississippi River. Davis said she would focus on policies that lower insurance rates and invest in infrastructure.

DiResto highlighted his role in establishing CRISIS the Capital Region Industry for Sustainable Infrastructure Solutions a business-led coalition that has advocated for congestion-relief projects.

Both Freiberg and DiResto also said they want to focus on reforms that allow greater flexibility in how the states budget is allocated.

The race also features two less prominent first-time candidates. Mallory Mayeux, 34, a Libertarian, said shes running to give a voice to the third party. The HR manager said shed focus on lowering taxes, which she said are too high and unfair for what we get.

Ricky Sheldon, 28, who describes himself as a progressive Republican, said he decided to run because hes dissatisfied with the partys national leadership in President Trump. The LSU graduate student said hes mainly interested in improving the states healthcare policies.

Success! An email has been sent with a link to confirm list signup.

Error! There was an error processing your request.

See the rest here:

Five candidates vie for open seat in House District 70 in East Baton Rouge - The Advocate

American Universities Are the Envy of the World – National Review

Campus of Columbia University in New York City(Mike Segar/Reuters)There is much that is in need of reform on campus. But there also is much that is wonderful, inspiring, and enriching.

One of these days, I will make a list of all the people who have been right when they have told me: You should know better. There will be a couple of priests, several editors, and at least one police officer on that list, but I am afraid our friend George Leef must be excluded, at least for the moment.

Leef, who does excellent work excoriating the failures and excesses of American university life at the Martin Center, wrote yesterday on the Corner: Lots of people who should know better claim that our higher education system is the envy of the world, but it isnt the best by a long shot. Whats needed, he writes, is ... libertarianism. If we would only implement that, Leef writes, then we would get the optimal system. I do not know if he had me in mind when he wrote that, but given that I have used exactly those words to describe our universities on many occasions, Ill deputize myself to respond, if only because the words optimal system always give me the willies.

I am a libertarian myself, and a few years ago I wrote a book about how many things (including education and health care) might be radically improved by taking a more market-oriented, spontaneous-order approach to them. The title of that book, The End Is Near and Its Going to Be Awesome, refers to the decline of the dominance (often monopoly dominance) of government-based and politically managed programs at the most sensitive pressure points of American life: education, health care, retirement, etc. The book also contains a critique of lazy libertarianism of the sort Leef offers above, treating some variation of the free market will take care of it or private philanthropy will take care of it like the ultimate abracadabra. The free market will take care of health care for the poor? Okay what does that actually look like? It is not that I do not think that we could and should radically improve health care for everyone (providing an especial benefit to the poor in the process) but I want something a good deal less vague than Let markets work.

Some libertarians are conservatives and some are not. Some libertarians are utopians or quasi-utopians, who offer the same answer to every question laissez faire! as though such a thing possibly could be dispositive. What Leef offers is really a kind of variation of the familiar progressive approach. He begins with a study says indictment (A new study by AEI scholars Jason Delisle and Preston Cooper looks at 35 nations higher ed systems and concludes that no nation is the best, he writes) and then follows up with an ideologically satisfying promise: If we (or any other country) would take government out of higher education and allow the spontaneous order of a free society to work, we would get the optimal system.

For the ideologue, take government out is a self-recommending policy. The conservative might take a different view, as I do. There is a lot that is silly, meretricious, distasteful, and genuinely destructive going on in American universities, especially at the second-rate institutions and in second-rate programs. (The thing about second-rate schools is, theyre second-rate.) But there also is much that is splendid, productive, admirable and, indeed, the envy of the world.

And if you do not believe that American universities are the envy of the world, ask the world. The number of students from abroad who travel to the United States to study dwarfs that of any other country: The United Kingdom, whose top universities have for centuries attracted the best and brightest, doesnt have half the foreign students the United States does. France has about a third the number; Germany, a quarter.

And top academics from around the world flock to American campuses, too for good reason. If you are among the worlds best in any significant intellectual field, chances are excellent that an American university is the place you want to be. For a rough indicator, consider which universities have the most Nobel laureates associated with them. What do you imagine that list looks like? The top ten includes the two British universities youd guess (Oxford and Cambridge) and eight U.S. universities: Harvard, Berkeley, Chicago, Columbia, MIT, Stanford, Cal Tech, and Princeton. You wont find a continental European university on the list until No. 13 (Humboldt) and only four more in the top 20 (University of Paris, Gttingen, Munich, Copenhagen). You wont find a single Asian, African, South American, or Middle Eastern university on the list.

Envy of the world? No question.

Libertarianism in action? No, not really. But we ought not to let our ideological commitments blind us to the fact that these splendid universities do a great many wonderful things that enrich our lives and our national life in important ways. There is much to criticize about my alma mater, the University of Texas. But whatever it lavishes on Jim Allisons work is money well spent.

Germany would love to have an MIT, a Berkeley, a Stanford, or a Cal Tech of its own; having all four would be beyond its dreams. (Yes, Berkeley comes with some hippies life is full of tradeoffs, and thats a good one.) American educational excellence has consequences far beyond the college campus: Quick, whats the hot new technology startup in Germany? (Dont worry, Ill wait.) Whats the big innovative Internet company in France? In Italy? More than half of the worlds most valuable firms are domiciled in the United States, according to PwC. China has twelve, the United Kingdom five, Germany four, France four, Switzerland three. Japan, Belgium, the Netherlands, and Denmark each have one. And Europes big companies are big, old-fashioned conglomerates such as Unilever and Nestl, while the United States has enjoyed the growth and innovation of Apple, Facebook, Alphabet, and Microsoft.

Thats nothing to harrumph at.

Conservatism is, at its foundation, a creed of love a love of real things and people as they actually exist, defects and all, rather than a longing after more-perfect glories promised by this or that theory. To love is not to love blindly, but the conservative can only take the world very much as he finds it.

Fallen as he is and imperfect as his works must be, we love man for who and what he is, and so we abhor the inevitably inhumane schemes to produce New Soviet Man, or whatever this years model of progressive perfection is, because such programs of transformation are based on reducing and mutilating man, suffocating his endless inventiveness, forcing conformity and homogeneity upon him, and stamping out the infinite variety of his communities.

This is not to be confused with a creed of sentimentality. Conservatives, as Russell Kirk put it, feel affection for the proliferating intricacy of long-established social institutions and modes of life, as distinguished from the narrowing uniformity and deadening egalitarianism of radical systems. (Harvard, founded 1636, is about as long-established a social institution as this country has.) At the same time, Kirk writes, conservatives understand that to seek for utopia is to end in disaster. ... The ideologues who promise the perfection of man and society have converted a great part of the 20th-century world into a terrestrial hell.

Libertarians can be utopians and ideologues, too. Theirs may be a less destructive and bloody kind of utopianism than that of the nationalists and socialists and national socialists, but it can cause them to undervalue wonderful and productive institutions right here in the real world, right here under our noses, while they dream of theoretical optima.

The United States is the worlds financial capital (sorry, London), the worlds technology capital, and the worlds cultural capital, but conservatives detest Wall Street, Silicon Valley, and Hollywood, along with the Ivy League and other elite universities, Broadway, publishing, the media industry, the fashion industry, the architecture and design industry, New York City, Los Angeles... Apparently, Americas dominant military position and its world-beating oil-and-gas industry are the only commanding heights to which conservatives believe it to be worth aspiring. There is something wrong with that. Make America Great Again, But Burn It All Down If Mark Zuckerberg and the Chairman of the Princeton English Department Dont Share My Politics! is a funny kind of way to look at the world.

There is much that is in need of reform on campus and in the church, in the state, and everywhere else in American life. But there also is much that is wonderful, inspiring, and enriching. For that, we should be grateful. A conservatism without gratitude and grace is not one worth having.

The rest is here:

American Universities Are the Envy of the World - National Review

The Mystery Mega-Donor Behind Freitas’ $500K Campaign Donation – Bearing Drift

It was the largest donation in the history of the Virginia House of Delegates half-a-million dollars from a mystery mega-donor deposited into Culpeper Republican Delegate Nick Freitas war chest.

Who was the secret money-bags donor?

In March 2018, Politico called billionaire Richard Uihlein the biggest Republican mega-donor youve never heard of, and profiled the man who had been dumping millions into Libertarian campaigns:

[Uihlein has emerged] as one of the most influential, but still little-known, political donors in the country. His early six- and seven-figure contributions to emerging Republican candidates, and penchant for disruptive politics, have been crucial to building a raft of anti-establishment Republicans seeking to emulate Donald Trumps formula for success during this years midterm elections. [emphasis added]

In addition to donating to tea party groups and the Club for Growth, which Uihlein has supported in the past, hes given several million dollars to super PACs backing specific candidates in Senate races.

his stable of candidates during [2017-18] consisted mostly of conservative bomb-throwers like [Illinois gubernatorial candidate Jeanne] Ives, anti-establishment state Sen. Chris McDaniel in Mississippi and Roy Moore in Alabama.

The investigative piece concluded by re-emphasizing the disruption of the Republican Party by candidates who have been backed by Uihlein:

Skeptics of Uihlein and [Illinois Policy Institutes] approach worry theyve left the Republican Party fractured and they wish hed taken a less combative approach. And they look at Ives inflammatory campaign as a prime exhibit.

If [Uihlein] wants to pull the party to the right, Im all for that. I want people to participate. I want more Republicans, said Pat Brady, former chairman of the Illinois Republican Party. He could support candidates who are conservative that could probably win if they werent the fringe right, homophobic bomb-throwers that these people had convinced him early on to support. [emphasis added]

So Virginia Republican politics may be about to get rockier because now Uihlein has waded into the Commonwealth by way of the 30th District House seat just as Freitas is being forced to mount a write-in campaign after missing the filing deadline. So in November the incumbents name will not appear on the ballot.

If Freitas wins re-election, then what? Freitas who campaigned against fellow Republican House member Christopher Peace in the dumpster fire that took place in the 97th House District earlier this year (see here, here, here, here, here, and here), and whose wife at the same time was running a campaign she lost primarying Valley State Senator Emmett Hanger with a Libertarian mega-donor of her own a wealthy California Libertarian named Chris Rufer who dropped $50,000 into her campaign knows how to rock the Republican boat. But for a weary party that has seen in-fighting for the past decade and that may be ready for less rocking and more stability, his rabble-rousing timing could be off. That, however, remains to be seen in the months ahead as it becomes clear what higher office Freitas is eyeing.

During the just-finished fundraising period, in addition to the half million dollars from Uihlein, Freitas fundraising brought in an additional $13,040.

For now the Freitas campaign is gearing up to educate voters to write in the incumbents name on November 5. In the dominant red district, that should be an easy task.

Background:

Bearing Drift: The Freitas Gambit by Matt Hall

The Star Exponent: Illinois billionaire donates $500K to Freitas campaign; Spanberger endorses Ridgeway by Allison Brophy Champion

Lynn Mitchell is Editor-in-Chief of Bearing Drift.

Continue reading here:

The Mystery Mega-Donor Behind Freitas' $500K Campaign Donation - Bearing Drift

Racism a Top Issue at Democratic Debate, So How Should Libertarians Respond? – The Liberator Online

Race relations is now a political issue all its own at the highest level. Annoying as it may be for libertarians and Republicans, the 2020 Democratic presidential candidates are rapidly securing home-field advantage on this increasingly relevant topic.

When a big government politician says, We need to do something! its a sure bet there will be bad policy. Add racial tension, and theres a spicy recipe for chaos, just the sort of thing bureaucracies feed on.

Libertarians and a few good Republicans understand this power dynamic. So, why does it seem like the Democrats are free to draw the parameters of any debate on race, most treacherously at the presidential level?

Consider the premises laid out during the third Democratic debate. Racism is systemic, they say. Its in gun violence, health care, education, the economy, the environment, the hospital, and the courtroom. White privilege is ingrained in society, were told.

Is it really sufficient to rebut this ideology by telling black voters that Democrats founded the KKK and Republicans passed the Civil Rights Act? Obviously, that boomer argument will never work.

Or how about the suggestions humbly offered by writers Tim Carney and Bonnie Kristian that conservatives and libertarians create ecosystems that dont welcome racists. In fairness, their articles were written days before this latest Democratic debate. But just as the no, actually, the left are the real racists argument fails, so too do their pleas for movement soul-searching.

The correct response matters. This issue is not going away and is no longer a fringe issue for liberals. Debate moderator Linsey Davis of ABC News said several recent polls indicate that the number one concern for young black Americans is racism.

I found a May 2019 poll of young people, aged 18-36, that asked them what is the most important problem facing the country today. Fourteen percent of African-Americans said racism. That was a plurality, with gun control at 11 percent and health care at 10 percent, and every other issue at or below 7 percent. Among Latinxs, the polls word for Latinos, 14 percent said immigration, while 9 percent said racism.

Presidential candidates are promising reparations for slavery in 2020. Is it not feasible that could be a mainstream proposal come 2024? The political consequences arent what they once were a generation ago, when it was only Jesse Jackson urging government payouts to descendants of slaves.

Screaming racist or white supremacist is almost always about shutting down debate. It happens on the left and the right, but more often the right cedes ground to the left.

But instead, we should remember Tom Woods. Does he try to rewrite or draw lines on the 35 card of allowable opinion? Of course not, he sets fire to it!

Todays primary debate is tomorrows general election debate. Libertarians ought to prepare now, while they still have time.

Go here to see the original:

Racism a Top Issue at Democratic Debate, So How Should Libertarians Respond? - The Liberator Online

A Battle for the Soul of the Libertarian Party Part 1 – Liberty Nation

Two giants in the libertarian and Libertarian world fought in Manhattan this week. The capital L is for the political party; the other represents the ideology. It wasnt a fight for leadership or voting control of the party that will come next year. This battle at the SoHo Forum was for the very soul of the party. Are the people in the room about winning political offices, or winning people to the cause, or, perhaps, both?

The Libertarian vs. libertarian war broke hot after the weekend of the Unite the Right Rally in Charlottesville, VA, back in August of 2017. After that infamous weekend which featured the murder of progressive activist Heather Heyer Nick Sarwark, Chairman of the Libertarian Party (LP), took the opportunity to sign a statement disavowing fascism and imploring Tom Woods to do the same. Woods is an Ivy League-educated Ph.D. historian and prominent libertarian author and podcaster, as well as a senior fellow of the Mises Institute. He was also the target of thinly veiled accusations of racism by establishment Libertarians, including Mr. Sarwark, over his involvement in the League of the South, an organization that participated in the Charlottesville rally.

Mr. Woods responded to the petition with scorn. Having made no racist claims or statements, Woods has proclaimed the petitioners drama queens who had no right to a disavowal of a position that couldnt be credited to him.

Sarwark sent out a tweet calling the Mises Institute the preferred choice of actual Nazis. The attack on Woods and his allies aligned as an attack against an entire wing of the LP the Mises Caucus, which values fidelity to core principles over much else, including electoral success becoming a formalized group within the party. They aligned not just in support of Woods but in opposition to an LP that chose Gary Johnson and William Weld as Presidential and Vice-Presidential nominees, respectively, in 2016.

As they were both former Republican governors, Johnson and Weld were hard for many libertarians to swallow this writer included, who contributed a piece critical of the pair and their fidelity to libertarian ideas. From support for drug war proposals to praising Hillary Clinton, the duo gave rise to massive opposition. While Sarwark has control of the party and improved it in the first election after the controversy erupted his position and that of his allies is far from secure. He came to state his case for the future of the party inclusive of candidates like Bill Weld, who, Sarwark argues, raised money and gained members for the LP something Ron Paul and many small l libertarians do not do.

Nick Sarwark

If you were a neo-Nazi, it would be a curious choice to name your think-tank after a Jewish economist who fled the Nazis march across Europe to come to the United States. Dave Smith likes to point that out, as well as how so many from this branch of libertarians approach with worship the works of another Jew, Murray Rothbard. Woods was not present to debate Sarwark, but his side was well represented by a kind of anti-Woods in background and training. Smith has been to many of the Soho Forum events as a pre-show comedian. The series, run by economist Gene Epstein for the Reason Foundation, features debates of special concern to libertarians and free marketeers.

While Smith has little formal training in policy, law, or economics, his razor-sharp intellect, enthusiasm for libertarian ideas, and penchant for slaying statist ones with precision all while being very funny made him a formidable opponent for Sarwark. Ron Pauls presidential bit brought Mr. Smith to libertarianism, and he had the home-field advantage against the LP Chairman.

Mr. Sarwark was introduced to libertarian ideas as a very young man by his father and is an attorney who has been involved in LP leadership at the state and national levels since he was an undergraduate. He now sits as the first LP Chairman to hold the office for three consecutive terms, and he has not said whether he will seek a fourth. Bill Weld praised Hillary Clinton during the campaign as the Libertarian nominee how libertarians reacted to that is indicative of where they think the party should move. Read part two to hear about the debate, its results, and the fight in the green-room before the debate about John Bolton.

~

Read more fromScott D. Cosenzaorcommenton this article.

View post:

A Battle for the Soul of the Libertarian Party Part 1 - Liberty Nation