genetic engineering | Definition, Process, & Uses | Britannica

Genetic engineering, the artificial manipulation, modification, and recombination of DNA or other nucleic acid molecules in order to modify an organism or population of organisms.

Read More on This Topic

origins of agriculture: Genetic engineering

The application of genetics to agriculture since World War II has resulted in substantial increases in the production of many crops. This...

The term genetic engineering initially referred to various techniques used for the modification or manipulation of organisms through the processes of heredity and reproduction. As such, the term embraced both artificial selection and all the interventions of biomedical techniques, among them artificial insemination, in vitro fertilization (e.g., test-tube babies), cloning, and gene manipulation. In the latter part of the 20th century, however, the term came to refer more specifically to methods of recombinant DNA technology (or gene cloning), in which DNA molecules from two or more sources are combined either within cells or in vitro and are then inserted into host organisms in which they are able to propagate.

The possibility for recombinant DNA technology emerged with the discovery of restriction enzymes in 1968 by Swiss microbiologist Werner Arber. The following year American microbiologist Hamilton O. Smith purified so-called type II restriction enzymes, which were found to be essential to genetic engineering for their ability to cleave a specific site within the DNA (as opposed to type I restriction enzymes, which cleave DNA at random sites). Drawing on Smiths work, American molecular biologist Daniel Nathans helped advance the technique of DNA recombination in 197071 and demonstrated that type II enzymes could be useful in genetic studies. Genetic engineering based on recombination was pioneered in 1973 by American biochemists Stanley N. Cohen and Herbert W. Boyer, who were among the first to cut DNA into fragments, rejoin different fragments, and insert the new genes into E. coli bacteria, which then reproduced.

Most recombinant DNA technology involves the insertion of foreign genes into the plasmids of common laboratory strains of bacteria. Plasmids are small rings of DNA; they are not part of the bacteriums chromosome (the main repository of the organisms genetic information). Nonetheless, they are capable of directing protein synthesis, and, like chromosomal DNA, they are reproduced and passed on to the bacteriums progeny. Thus, by incorporating foreign DNA (for example, a mammalian gene) into a bacterium, researchers can obtain an almost limitless number of copies of the inserted gene. Furthermore, if the inserted gene is operative (i.e., if it directs protein synthesis), the modified bacterium will produce the protein specified by the foreign DNA.

A subsequent generation of genetic engineering techniques that emerged in the early 21st century centred on gene editing. Gene editing, based on a technology known as CRISPR-Cas9, allows researchers to customize a living organisms genetic sequence by making very specific changes to its DNA. Gene editing has a wide array of applications, being used for the genetic modification of crop plants and livestock and of laboratory model organisms (e.g., mice). The correction of genetic errors associated with disease in animals suggests that gene editing has potential applications in gene therapy for humans.

Genetic engineering has advanced the understanding of many theoretical and practical aspects of gene function and organization. Through recombinant DNA techniques, bacteria have been created that are capable of synthesizing human insulin, human growth hormone, alpha interferon, a hepatitis B vaccine, and other medically useful substances. Plants may be genetically adjusted to enable them to fix nitrogen, and genetic diseases can possibly be corrected by replacing dysfunctional genes with normally functioning genes. Nevertheless, special concern has been focused on such achievements for fear that they might result in the introduction of unfavourable and possibly dangerous traits into microorganisms that were previously free of theme.g., resistance to antibiotics, production of toxins, or a tendency to cause disease. Likewise, the application of gene editing in humans has raised ethical concerns, particularly regarding its potential use to alter traits such as intelligence and beauty.

In 1980 the new microorganisms created by recombinant DNA research were deemed patentable, and in 1986 the U.S. Department of Agriculture approved the sale of the first living genetically altered organisma virus, used as a pseudorabies vaccine, from which a single gene had been cut. Since then several hundred patents have been awarded for genetically altered bacteria and plants. Patents on genetically engineered and genetically modified organisms, particularly crops and other foods, however, were a contentious issue, and they remained so into the first part of the 21st century.

Originally posted here:

genetic engineering | Definition, Process, & Uses | Britannica

Viewpoint: Fish farming has a sustainability problem and genetic engineering might be the solution – Genetic Literacy Project

As the world endures the impacts of a rapidly changing climatesea level rise, extreme weather events, warming and acidifying oceans (among many others)policy makers and the public should critically examine how food production contributes to these worrying trends. Animal agriculture may be the best place to start since, many scientists argue, its the single biggest cause of biodiversity loss and a significant source of greenhouse gas emissions.

Over a quarter of the worlds land surface is currently dedicated to raising animals for food, but that practice can be exceptionally wasteful. Despite taking up almost 80 percent of global agricultural land, livestock represents less than 20 percent of the worlds calories. Proper stewardship of the land, which absorbs nearly one-third of global greenhouse gas emissions, is critical in our fight against climate change, but human activities degrade roughly a quarter of it, and livestock production is perhaps the primary culprit.

To help combat these growing environmental challenges, concerned citizens around the world are eating more sustainable and arguably healthier diets that partially or entirely replace meat with fish, crustaceans, and other aquatic animals. Fish production generally has a lower environmental impact than land animal farming, owing to the fact that fish require less feed. Most fish are poikilotherms, which means they dont use energy to heat their bodies. And unlike most land animals (homeotherms), fish dont need to constantly maintain their body temperatures, which tend to fluctuate with their external environment. Moreover, the density of water carries the weight of the fish, eliminating the requirement for heavy bones.

Despite its lower environmental footprint, global fish productionwhich includes wild capture and aquaculture (fish farming)has its own sustainability issues. Around one-third of the worlds marine fish stocks have reached unsustainable levels due to overfishing. Simultaneously, the global demand for fish and nutritional oils containing omega-3 fatty acids is increasing rapidly as more consumers recognize that consuming them is linked to reduced cardiovascular disease risk. Saturation in capture fishing since the early 1990s means aquaculture is filling consumer demand for fish. But without significant changes, aquaculture isnt a long-term solution.

Fortunately, a valuable but misunderstood tool can help the industry become more sustainable. Of course, Im talking about biotechnology. Genetic engineering has sped up the production of fish, and enabled the development of sustainable fish feed sources and nutritional oils. All three innovations are marching toward commercialization, and the evidence indicates their collective impact will be enormous.

While commercial fish farms have greatly improved their production systems over the years, feeding fish with fish (primarily fishmeal and oils) still poses a significant sustainability threat. In 2018, global fish production reached around 179 million tons, and humans ate about 88 percent of the produce (156 million tons) while about 10 percent (18 million tons) went towards producing fishmeal and fish oils. Finding alternative feed sources would slash the environmental footprint of aquaculture and contribute to global food security goals.

Breeding better fish

Fish maturity is based on physical features such as shape and size. The faster fish grow, the lower their environmental impact, so innovators have targeted faster growth rates as a solution to the industrys sustainability problem. In 2015, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved a bioengineered Atlantic salmon for consumption after decades of rigorous scientific review. The FDA concluded that the genetically engineered AquAdvantage salmon is as safe to eat as any non-genetically engineered Atlantic, and also as nutritious. This salmon is approved for sale in Canada and is slated for commercialization in the US.

Scientists at the biotech firm AquaBounty introduced two different bits of genetic information from other fish species into a bioengineered salmon: a growth hormone gene from the fast-growing Chinook salmon controlled by a DNA switch (promoter) from the ocean pout. Because the Chinook growth hormone gene works overtime, AquaBountys salmon grows to full size in about half the time required by conventional salmonand consumes 25 percent less feed as a result.

Faster growth means the energy and carbon emissions required to produce the fish are lower. And since AquaBountys land-based aquaculture facilities are located in Canada and the US, transporting these fish to market generates lower carbon emission than delivering conventional salmon by air or ship. Additionally, the expansion of genetically engineered fish production could significantly reduce overfishing, since some of salmon feed comes from other wild fish.

Some environmentalists have voiced concerns about the consequences of bioengineered fish escaping into the wild. In theory, genetically engineered fish may flee to the wild, breed with their wild relatives and create a hybrid that could out-compete other fish in the marine ecosystem. Quite rightly, these are serious concerns that require proper attention and strong mitigation plans.

Considering the trade-off between hypothetical risks and the demonstrated benefits of biotechnology in fish production helps us evaluate the situation. AquAdvantage salmon are produced in land-based facilities and are sterile. Regulators at the FDA have therefore concluded its extremely unlikely that the fish could escape and establish themselves in the wild.

Shorter production time and lower feed and energy requirements clearly outweigh the low risk of fish escaping into the wild. And we get all these without compromising the nutritional value of the fish itself. AquaBounty is scheduled to begin producing its bioengineered salmon in the US before the end of 2020, making it the first genetically engineered food animal to hit US markets. As COVID-19 continues to put pressure on food supplies, the introduction of genetically engineered salmon helps illustrate how biotechnology can help solve critical problems.

Alternative fish feeds and fish oils

Bioengineered fish is an important step in the right direction, but it doesnt fully address aquacultures sustainability issues. The industry has developed non-fish based feeds, cutting use of fishmeal and fish oil from 30 million tons in 1994 to about 18 million tons in 2018. But there are concerns that fish products grown on alternative feeds arent providing the same nutritional value as those fed real fish, which is high in omega-3 oils. To understand why, we need to look at the chemistry of these fatty acids.

Omega-3 oils are long-chain polyunsaturated fatty acids existing mainly in three types: -linolenic acid (ALA); eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA); and docosahexaenoic acid (DHA). Plant oils contain ALA, which is the shorter version of EPA and DHA omega-3 fatty acids, typically found in marine organisms like microalgae and phytoplankton.

Our bodies cant make omega-3, so we mostly get it from eating fish, which incidentally also cant make omega-3 but accumulate it by eating microalgae and phytoplankton. As vegetable oils replace fish oil in aquafeeds, the level of beneficial fatty acids, EPA and DHA, have also declined considerably, reducing the nutritional value that fish offer. Therefore, the aquaculture industry needs to identify aquafeeds that are derived from alternative sources and provide the same level of nutrition.

Algae are a promising source to replace fish oil, but extracting algal oil is more expensive than producing fish oil and fishmeal, though the extraction technology is rapidly developing. Additionally, algae cultivation for aquafeed is sometimes limited to species that only produce DHA fatty acids, which means the algae-fed fish lack EPA, compromising their final nutritional value.

Again, scientists have turned to biotechnology to address this problem. Research teams have engineered plants like camelina and canola that contain high levels of EPA and DHA in their seed oil. These plants naturally produce the shorter version of omega-3, ALA, and scientists introduced microalgal genes that convert ALA into EPA and DHA omega-3 fatty acids typically found in fish. Research shows that fish fed with seed oil from these camelina plants show good growth, maintain feed efficiency and dont lose nutritional valueindicating that genetically engineered plants can provide a sustainable substitute for fish oil feeds.

Now innovators are aiming to produce omega-3 oils from camelina for aquafeeds and nutritional supplements. Biotech startup Yield10 Bioscience has fused artificial intelligence with synthetic biology to create a technology that identifies trait targets to produce better plants. Using their technology platform and genome editing, they have generated camelina plants that produce double seed yields with a high content of both EPA and DHA omega-3 oils. The company has recently launched field trials of their genome-edited seeds. They are scaling seed production, aiming to plant thousands of acres of camelina to produce plant-based omega-3 oil products for fish feed and human nutrition soon. Crucially, the USDA announced in January 2020 that it wont regulate gene-edited camelina, accelerating development of this sustainable omega-3 oil source.

Biotechnology is already accelerating production of environmentally friendly salmon, and is poised to provide more sustainable fish feed and nutritional oils in the coming years. It could also bring aquaculture production costs down, reducing incentives to overfish our oceans, which will no doubt be better for the marine ecosystem.

Surging fish demand will only be met by sustainable, low-cost solutions, enabled in key instances by biotechnology. Technical details aside, the benefits of broader biotechnology adoption in aquaculture will extend beyond the developed world to improve the lives of those most in needimpoverished people in the developing world.

Rupesh Paudyal holds a PhD in plant science and covers agriculture and the environment as a freelance writer. Visit his website and follow him on Twitter @TalkPlant

More here:

Viewpoint: Fish farming has a sustainability problem and genetic engineering might be the solution - Genetic Literacy Project

13 Important Genetic Engineering Pros And Cons | Bio Explorer

Over the last century, the field of genetics and biotechnology has greatly developed because of the better understanding of the gene. Because of the improvement of technology, scientists have already gone up until the manipulation of the genome (complete set of genes) of organisms. This process is called genetic engineering. In this article, we will explore 13 important genetic engineering pros and cons.

The sharing of genetic material among living organisms is known to be a natural event. This phenomenon is known to be very evident among bacteria, hence they are called natures own genetic engineer. Such phenomenon is the inspiration of scientists in this endeavor.

In literature, there are in fact many synonyms of the term genetic engineering: genetic modification, genome manipulation, genetic enhancement, and many more. However, this term shall not be confused with cloning because genetic engineering involves the production of new set of genes while the latter only involves the production of the same copies of genes in the organism.

Genetic engineering is the process of manipulating an organisms genome using biotechnology and the products of it are either referred to as genetically modified or transgenic organisms. Check out the disadvantages of genetically modified foods here.

Basically, genetic engineering is done by inserting a gene of interest from sources like bacteria, viruses, plants, and animals into the target organism. As a result, the organism with the inserted gene of interest is now able to carry out the new trait or characteristic.

This technology grants us the ability to overcome barriers, exchange genes among organisms, and produce new organisms with favorable traits.

For a more detailed explanation of the process, check out this video below:

Now we will dive into the pros and cons of Genetic Engineering now.

Supporters of genetic engineering believe that genetic engineering is indeed safe and is still comparable to the traditional process of breeding in plants and animals. Advocates of genetic engineering support the technology primarily because of the following reasons:

On the other hand, there are several types of potential health effects that could arise from the insertion of a novel gene into an organism. Critics disagree with the methods of genetic engineering because of:

Because of the technology used to create genetically modified crops and animals, private companies that produce them do not share their products at a reasonable cost with the public.

In addition, they believe that the process is somewhat disrupting the natural way and complexity of life. In addition to this, critics fear the misuse and abuse of biotechnology.

Indeed, genetic engineering will always have two opposite sides. While the possibilities of what science can create are endless, and the harmful effects also are. At present, it is important to know that the real risks and benefits of genetic engineering lie in how science is interpreted and used.

But theres really no doubt that with the rapid advancements in technology, the creation of GM organisms are also increasing.

What do you think? Are GM organisms slowly becoming the future?

See the article here:

13 Important Genetic Engineering Pros And Cons | Bio Explorer

Genetic Engineering – humans, body, used, process, plants …

Photo by: Gernot Krautberger

Genetic engineering is any process by which genetic material (the building blocks of heredity) is changed in such a way as to make possible the production of new substances or new functions. As an example, biologists have now learned how to transplant the gene that produces light in a firefly into tobacco plants. The function of that genethe production of lighthas been added to the normal list of functions of the tobacco plants.

Genetic engineering became possible only when scientists had discovered exactly what is a gene. Prior to the 1950s, the term gene was used to stand for a unit by which some genetic characteristic was transmitted from one generation to the next. Biologists talked about a "gene" for hair color, although they really had no idea as to what that gene was or what it looked like.

That situation changed dramatically in 1953. The English chemist Francis Crick (1916 ) and the American biologist James Watson (1928 ) determined a chemical explanation for a gene. Crick and Watson discovered the chemical structure for large, complex molecules that occur in the nuclei of all living cells, known as deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA).

DNA molecules, Crick and Watson announced, are very long chains or units made of a combination of a simple sugar and a phosphate group.

Amino acid: An organic compound from which proteins are made.

DNA (deoxyribonucleic acid): A large, complex chemical compound that makes up the core of a chromosome and whose segments consist of genes.

Gene: A segment of a DNA molecule that acts as a kind of code for the production of some specific protein. Genes carry instructions for the formation, functioning, and transmission of specific traits from one generation to another.

Gene splicing: The process by which genes are cut apart and put back together to provide them with some new function.

Genetic code: A set of nitrogen base combinations that act as a code for the production of certain amino acids.

Host cell: The cell into which a new gene is transplanted in genetic engineering.

Human gene therapy (HGT): The application of genetic engineering technology for the cure of genetic disorders.

Nitrogen base: An organic compound consisting of carbon, hydrogen, oxygen, and nitrogen arranged in a ring that plays an essential role in the structure of DNA molecules.

Plasmid: A circular form of DNA often used as a vector in genetic engineering.

Protein: Large molecules that are essential to the structure and functioning of all living cells.

Recombinant DNA research (rDNA research): Genetic engineering; a technique for adding new instructions to the DNA of a host cell by combining genes from two different sources.

Vector: An organism or chemical used to transport a gene into a new host cell.

Attached at regular positions along this chain are nitrogen bases. Nitrogen bases are chemical compounds in which carbon, hydrogen, oxygen, and nitrogen atoms are arranged in rings. Four nitrogen bases occur in DNA: adenine (A), cytosine (C), guanine (G), and thymine (T).

The way in which nitrogen bases are arranged along a DNA molecule represents a kind of genetic code for the cell in which the molecule occurs. For example, the sequence of nitrogen bases T-T-C tells a cell that it should make the amino acid known as lysine. The sequence C-C-G, on the other hand, instructs the cell to make the amino acid glycine.

A very long chain (tens of thousands of atoms long) of nitrogen bases tells a cell, therefore, what amino acids to make and in what sequence to arrange those amino acids. A very long chain of amino acids arranged in a particular sequence, however, is what we know of as a protein. The specific sequence of nitrogen bases, then, tells a cell what kind of protein it should be making.

Furthermore, the instructions stored in a DNA molecule can easily be passed on from generation to generation. When a cell divides (reproduces), the DNA within it also divides. Each DNA molecule separates into two identical parts. Each of the two parts then makes a copy of itself. Where once only one DNA molecule existed, now two identical copies of the molecule exist. That process is repeated over and over again, every time a cell divides.

This discovery gave a chemical meaning to the term gene. According to our current understanding, a specific arrangement of nitrogen bases forms a code, or set of instructions, for a cell to make a specific protein. The protein might be the protein needed to make red hair, blue eyes, or wrinkled skin (to simplify the possibilities). The sequence of bases, then, holds the code for some genetic trait.

The Crick-Watson discovery opened up unlimited possibilities for biologists. If genes are chemical compounds, then they can be manipulated just as any other kind of chemical compound can be manipulated. Since DNA molecules are very large and complex, the actual task of manipulation may be difficult. However, the principles involved in working with DNA molecule genes is no different than the research principles with which all chemists are familiar.

For example, chemists know how to cut molecules apart and put them back together again. When these procedures are used with DNA molecules, the process is known as gene splicing. Gene splicing is a process that takes place naturally all the time in cells. In the process of division or repair, cells routinely have to take genes apart, rearrange their components, and put them back together again.

Scientists have discovered that cells contain certain kinds of enzymes that take DNA molecules apart and put them back together again. Endonucleases, for example, are enzymes that cut a DNA molecule at some given location. Exonucleases are enzymes that remove one nitrogen base unit at a time. Ligases are enzymes that join two DNA segments together.

It should be obvious that enzymes such as these can be used by scientists as submicroscopic scissors and glue with which one or more DNA molecules can be cut apart, rearranged, and the put back together again.

Genetic engineering requires three elements: the gene to be transferred, a host cell into which the gene is inserted, and a vector to bring about the transfer. Suppose, for example, that one wishes to insert the gene for making insulin into a bacterial cell. Insulin is a naturally occurring protein made by cells in the pancreas in humans and other mammals. It controls the breakdown of complex carbohydrates in the blood to glucose. People whose bodies have lost the ability to make insulin become diabetic.

The first step in the genetic engineering procedure is to obtain a copy of the insulin gene. This copy can be obtained from a natural source

Phototake

(from the DNA in a pancreas, for example), or it can be manufactured in a laboratory.

The second step in the process is to insert the insulin gene into the vector. The term vector means any organism that will carry the gene from one place to another. The most common vector used in genetic engineering is a circular form of DNA known as a plasmid. Endonucleases are used to cut the plasmid molecule open at almost any point chosen by the scientist. Once the plasmid has been cut open, it is mixed with the insulin gene and a ligase enzyme. The goal is to make sure that the insulin gene attaches itself to the plasmid before the plasmid is reclosed.

The hybrid plasmid now contains the gene whose product (insulin) is desired. It can be inserted into the host cell, where it begins to function just like all the other genes that make up the cell. In this case, however, in addition to normal bacterial functions, the host cell also is producing insulin, as directed by the inserted gene.

Notice that the process described here involves nothing more in concept than taking DNA molecules apart and recombining them in a different arrangement. For that reason, the process also is referred to as recombinant DNA (rDNA) research.

The possible applications of genetic engineering are virtually limitless. For example, rDNA methods now enable scientists to produce a number of products that were previously available only in limited quantities. Until the 1980s, for example, the only source of insulin available to diabetics was from animals slaughtered for meat and other purposes. The supply was never large enough to provide a sufficient amount of affordable insulin for everyone who needed insulin. In 1982, however, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration approved insulin produced by genetically altered organisms, the first such product to become available.

Since 1982, the number of additional products produced by rDNA techniques has greatly expanded. Among these products are human growth hormone (for children whose growth is insufficient because of genetic problems), alpha interferon (for the treatment of diseases), interleukin-2 (for the treatment of cancer), factor VIII (needed by hemophiliacs for blood clotting), erythropoietin (for the treatment of anemia), tumor necrosis factor (for the treatment of tumors), and tissue plasminogen activator (used to dissolve blood clots).

Genetic engineering also promises a revolution in agriculture. Recombinant DNA techniques enable scientists to produce plants that are resistant to herbicides and freezing temperatures, that will take longer to ripen, and that will manufacture a resistance to pests, among other characteristics.

Today, scientists have tested more than two dozen kinds of plants engineered to have special properties such as these. As with other aspects of genetic engineering, however, these advances have been controversial. The development of herbicide-resistant plants, for example, means that farmers are likely to use still larger quantities of herbicides. This trend is not a particularly desirable one, according to some critics. How sure can we be, others ask, about the risk to the environment posed by the introduction of "unnatural," engineered plants?

The science and art of animal breeding also are likely to be revolutionized by genetic engineering. For example, scientists have discovered that a gene in domestic cows is responsible for the production of milk. Genetic engineering makes it possible to extract that gene from cows who produce large volumes of milk or to manufacture that gene in the laboratory. The gene can then be inserted into other cows whose milk production may increase by dramatic amounts because of the presence of the new gene.

One of the most exciting potential applications of genetic engineering involves the treatment of human genetic disorders. Medical scientists know of about 3,000 disorders that arise because of errors in an individual's DNA. Conditions such as sickle-cell anemia, Tay-Sachs disease, Duchenne muscular dystrophy, Huntington's chorea, cystic fibrosis, and Lesch-Nyhan syndrome result from the loss, mistaken insertion, or change of a single nitrogen base in a DNA molecule. Genetic engineering enables scientists to provide individuals lacking a particular gene with correct copies of that gene. If and when the correct gene begins functioning, the genetic disorder may be cured. This procedure is known as human gene therapy (HGT).

The first approved trials of HGT with human patients began in the 1980s. One of the most promising sets of experiments involved a condition known as severe combined immune deficiency (SCID). Individuals with SCID have no immune systems. Exposure to microorganisms that would be harmless to the vast majority of people will result in diseases that can cause death. Untreated infants born with SCID who are not kept in a sterile bubble become ill within months and die before their first birthday.

In 1990, a research team at the National Institutes of Health (NIH) attempted HGT on a four-year-old SCID patient. The patient received about one billion cells containing a genetically engineered copy of the gene that his body lacked. Another instance of HGT was a procedure, approved in 1993 by NIH, to introduce normal genes into the airways of cystic fibrosis patients. By the end of the 1990s, according to the NIH, more than 390 gene therapy studies had been initiated. These studies involved more than 4,000 people and more than a dozen medical conditions.

In 2000, doctors in France claimed they had used HGT to treat three babies who suffered from SCID. Just ten months after being treated, the babies exhibited normal immune systems. This marked the first time that HGT had unequivocally succeeded.

Controversy remains. Human gene therapy is the source of great controversy among scientists and nonscientists alike. Few individuals maintain that the HGT should not be used. If we could wipe out sickle cell anemia, most agree, we should certainly make the effort. But HGT raises other concerns. If scientists can cure genetic disorders, they can also design individuals in accordance with the cultural and intellectual fashions of the day. Will humans know when to say "enough" to the changes that can be made with HGT?

Photo Researchers, Inc.

Despite recent successes, most results in HGT since the first experiment was conducted in 1990 have been largely disappointing. And in 1999, research into HGT was dealt a blow when an eighteen-year-old from Tucson, Arizona, died in an experiment at the University of Pennsylvania. The young man, who suffered from a metabolic disorder, had volunteered for an experiment to test gene therapy for babies with a fatal form of that disease. Citing the spirit of this young man, researchers remain optimistic, vowing to continue work into the possible lifesaving opportunities offered by HGT.

The commercial potential of genetically engineered products was not lost on entrepreneurs in the 1970s. A few individuals believed that the impact of rDNA on American technology would be comparable to that of computers in the 1950s. In many cases, the first genetic engineering firms were founded by scientists involved in fundamental research. The American biologist Herbert Boyer, for example, teamed up with the venture capitalist Robert Swanson in 1976 to form Genentech (Genetic Engineering Technology). Other early firms like Cetus, Biogen, and Genex were formed similarly through the collaboration of scientists and businesspeople.

The structure of genetic engineering (biotechnology) firms has, in fact, long been a source of controversy. Many observers have questioned the right of a scientist to make a personal profit by running companies that benefit from research that had been carried out at publicly funded universities. The early 1990s saw the creation of formalized working relations between universities, individual researchers, and the corporations founded by these individuals. Despite these arrangements, however, many ethical issues remain unresolved.

Link:

Genetic Engineering - humans, body, used, process, plants ...

Dealing with New Biotechnology Realities in USMCA | AG – KMAland

(Washington, D.C.) -- When the original NAFTA agreement was implemented in 1994, biotechnology processes intended for practical agricultural use was in its early stages. But genetic modification has come a long way in the past quarter-century and advances continue daily.

Laboratory-based genetic sequencing and manipulation is clearly addressed in the new U.S.-Mexico-Canada trade agreement rules. So now, scientific processes and regulations that evolved independently for more than 25 years need to be standardized for the US, Mexico, and Canada.

Ian Affleck is Vice-President of Biotechnology for Crop Life Canada, with an agribusiness membership that includes seed companies and plant breeders. Crop Life Canada is working to align regulations spelled out under the new USMCA. And Affleck says those rules will require systemic changes because the American and the Canadian GMO development rules evolved very differently.

With the USMCA coming into force, theres a biotechnology chapter thats supposed to help the two countries align their approaches. Most countries around the world, the US included, chose a Process-based approach. So, their first step would be to say, Did you use genetic engineering, and create a GMO? If so, we want to take a look. Canada took a different approach, to say It doesnt matter how you made it, its really about what you made. Is the Product you made so new that we to take a look, as a government, to ensure its safety. We just start from a different foot to get to those approvals.

To say that genetic modification changed farming practices is an understatement. Glyphosate-tolerance, BT-insecticide integration, and trait-stacking made for huge and obvious changes to crops and yield. But Affleck says that recent advances in Gene Editing technology are far more subtle - and small differences can make big problems for seed-breeders accessing new markets.

The advent of gene editing is a really new technology for plant breeders. It adds a new wrinkle into the equation. With GMOs usually the changes were always big. With gene editing its not so certain. It may be able to make a larger or drastic change, or it might be a smaller change. So, this is why we need this policy guidance of what is new, to make sure that as plant breeders are embarking on products, they know what it is they have to do, to meet their regulatory expectations.

Crop Life Canada is lobbying in favor of the U.S. processed-based approach - for very practical reasons. Ian Affleck doesnt want Canadian farmers to miss out on American products.

The USDA-APHIS rules, if you were to boil them down its have you done something thats something that plant couldnt have done on its own, and if you did, youre going to need an assessment. If you didnt, you dont need an assessment. Thats a very rational way forward. If were not clear on our policies going forward, it could make launching US varieties in Canada a little more tricky.

Originally posted here:

Dealing with New Biotechnology Realities in USMCA | AG - KMAland

Genetic Engineering Industry Market Research Growth by Manufacturers, Regions, Type and Application, Forecast Analysis to 2025 – CueReport

The research report on Genetic Engineering Industry market provides a granular analysis of this industry vertical wherein notable market activities are thoroughly researched. Various market segmentations based on product type, application spectrum, and regional terrain are surveyed in-depth, while estimated share held by each segment by the end of forecast period is encompassed in the report.

The report also highlights the current remuneration of the market and offers an insight regarding the growth rate attained over the analysis timeframe. Vital parameters which will influence the market growth positively as well as negatively are enlisted. Further, the impact of COVID-19 pandemic outbreak on Genetic Engineering Industry market is also documented in the report.

Request Sample Copy of this Report @ https://www.cuereport.com/request-sample/20013

Citing the regional analysis:

Request Sample Copy of this Report @ https://www.cuereport.com/request-sample/20013

Additional insights from Genetic Engineering Industry market report:

Major Points Covered in TOC:

Overview:Along with a broad overview of the global Genetic Engineering Industry market, this section gives an overview of the report to give an idea about the nature and contents of the research study.

Analysis of Strategies of Leading Players:Market players can use this analysis to gain a competitive advantage over their competitors in the Genetic Engineering Industry market.

Study on Key Market Trends:This section of the report offers a deeper analysis of the latest and future trends of the market.

Market Forecasts:Buyers of the report will have access to accurate and validated estimates of the total market size in terms of value and volume. The report also provides consumption, production, sales, and other forecasts for the Genetic Engineering Industry market.

Regional Growth Analysis:All major regions and countries have been covered in the report. The regional analysis will help market players to tap into unexplored regional markets, prepare specific strategies for target regions, and compare the growth of all regional markets.

Segmental Analysis:The report provides accurate and reliable forecasts of the market share of important segments of the Genetic Engineering Industry market. Market participants can use this analysis to make strategic investments in key growth pockets of the market.

Key questions answered in the report:

Request Customization on This Report @ https://www.cuereport.com/request-for-customization/20013

Read the original post:

Genetic Engineering Industry Market Research Growth by Manufacturers, Regions, Type and Application, Forecast Analysis to 2025 - CueReport

Gene Editing Technologies in Diagnostic Platforms Market is expected to grow at a CAGR of 14.4% during the forecast period due to the rise in research…

There has been a rise in government funding and research programs which is paving the way for the growth of the gene editing technologies in diagnostic platforms market. For example, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) has allocated funding on the study of clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR) from 2011 to 2018. The NIH spent about US$ 3,083.4 million between the fiscal year 2011 and 2018 on a total of 6,685 projects. The funding has been increased by 213.1% between the fiscal year 2014 and 2015.

Request for Sample Copy of This [emailprotected] https://www.absolutemarketsinsights.com/request_sample.php?id=477

Moreover, with the help of NIH Common Funds support, National Institutes of Health (NIH) launched Somatic Cell Genome Editing (SCGE) program on January 2018 which is working to improve the effectiveness and specificity of gene editing techniques to assist in the diminishing of the burden of common and erratic diseases caused by genetic variations. The program aims at developing quality tools to execute and determine effective and harmless genome editing in somatic cells of the body. These tools will be made extensively available to the research community to lessen the time and expense which is required to develop new therapies. Furthermore, Somatic Cell Genome Editing program will award approximately US$ 190 million to biomedical researchers over the six years starting from 2018 till 2023. Hence, these types of research programs and funding given to the researchers will help the diagnostic platforms to get the tools which will aid them in carrying out gene editing and will drive the future market of the gene editing technologies in diagnostic platforms.

The number of CRISPR related publications, as listed in the SCOPUS database of peer-reviewed research, shows the surge in funding. Between 2015 and 2016, the number of such publications raised 117.5% which is 1,457. In 2019, the number surpassed 3,900 and increased at a rate of 4.8%. Overall, 12,900 papers associated with the technique have been published since 2011, Thus, this increasing research is expected to assist in the gene editing technologies in diagnostic platforms market growth over the forecast period.

Enquiry Before Buying @ https://www.absolutemarketsinsights.com/enquiry_before_buying.php?id=477

The detailed research study provides qualitative and quantitative analysis of gene editing technologies in diagnostic platforms market. The market has been analyzed from demand as well as supply side. The demand side analysis covers market revenue across regions and further across all the major countries. The supply side analysis covers the major market players and their regional and global presence and strategies. The geographical analysis done emphasizes on each of the major countries across North America, Europe, Asia Pacific, Middle East & Africa, and Latin America.

Key Findings of the Report:

In terms of revenue, the gene editing technologies in diagnostic platforms market is expected to reach US$ 7,004.8 Mn by 2027, expanding at 14.4% CAGR during the forecast period due to the rising government funding for genome editing and engineering

Beam Therapeutics, Bio-Connect Group, CRISPR Therapeutics, Editas Medicine, GeneCopoeia, Inc., GenScript, Horizon Discovery Ltd., Inscripta, Inc., Integrated DNA Technologies, Inc., Intellia Therapeutics, Inc., Lonza Group Ltd., Merck KGaA, New England Biolabs, OriGene Technologies, Inc., Pairwise, Precision Biosciences, Sangamo Therapeutics, STEMCELL Technologies Inc., Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc., Transposagen Biopharmaceuticals, Inc. are the key market participants operating in the gene editing technologies in diagnostic platforms market.

Request for [emailprotected] https://www.absolutemarketsinsights.com/request_for_customization.php?id=477

Gene Editing Technologies in Diagnostic Platforms Market:

By Technology

CRISPR

TALEN

ZFN

Others

By Application

Cell Line Engineering

Genetic Engineering

Animal Genetic Engineering

Plant Genetic Engineering

Others

By End-User

Biotechnology & Pharmaceutical Companies

Academic and Research Institutions

Contract Research Organization (CROs)

By Geography

North America

U.S.

Canada

Mexico

Rest of North America

Europe

France

The UK

Spain

Germany

Italy

Nordic Countries

Denmark

Finland

Iceland

Sweden

Norway

Benelux Union

Belgium

The Netherlands

Luxembourg

Rest of Europe

Asia Pacific

China

Japan

India

New Zealand

Australia

South Korea

Southeast Asia

Indonesia

Thailand

Malaysia

Singapore

Rest of Southeast Asia

Rest of Asia Pacific

Middle East and Africa

Saudi Arabia

UAE

Egypt

Kuwait

South Africa

Rest of Middle East & Africa

Latin America

Brazil

Argentina

Rest of Latin America

Get Full Information of this premium [emailprotected] https://www.absolutemarketsinsights.com/reports/Gene-Editing-Technologies-in-Diagnostic-Platforms-Market-2019-2027-477

About Us:

Absolute Markets Insights assists in providing accurate and latest trends related to consumer demand, consumer behavior, sales, and growth opportunities, for the better understanding of the market, thus helping in product designing, featuring, and demanding forecasts. Our experts provide you the end-products that can provide transparency, actionable data, cross-channel deployment program, performance, accurate testing capabilities and the ability to promote ongoing optimization.

From the in-depth analysis and segregation, we serve our clients to fulfill their immediate as well as ongoing research requirements. Minute analysis impact large decisions and thereby the source of business intelligence (BI) plays an important role, which keeps us upgraded with current and upcoming market scenarios.

Contact Us:

Company: Absolute Markets Insights

Email id: [emailprotected]

Phone: +91-740-024-2424

Contact Name: Shreyas Tanna

The Work Lab,

The rest is here:

Gene Editing Technologies in Diagnostic Platforms Market is expected to grow at a CAGR of 14.4% during the forecast period due to the rise in research...

Biomedical Engineering Researcher Receives $5 Million Grant To Further Cancer Studies – Texas A&M University Today

A college of images of cells, each of which was collected from a 384 well plate using high throughput imaging.

Courtesy of Tanmay Lele

A new faculty member in the Department of Biomedical Engineering at Texas A&M University recently received a multi-million dollar grant to support groundbreaking cancer research.

In May, Tanmay Lele received a $5 million Recruitment of Established Investigators grant from the Cancer Prevention and Research Institute of Texas(CPRIT) to further knowledge about cancer and how it progresses.

Leles research focuses on mechanobiology the mechanical aspects of biology where he works to understand how cells sense external mechanical forces as well as how they generate mechanical forces, and how these mechanical forces impact cell function.

In cancer, both cellular mechanical forces and the mechanical properties of resisting cellular structures go awry. These errors cause abnormalities in cell structure. A particularly striking feature of cancer cells is the highly irregular and/or distended shape of the nucleus.

The nuclei in normal tissue have smooth surfaces, but over time the surfaces of cancer nuclei become irregular in shape, Lele said. Now, why? Nobody really knows. Were still at the tip of the iceberg at trying to figure this problem out. But nuclear abnormalities are ubiquitous and occur in all kinds of cancers breast, prostate and lung cancers.

Pathologists study biopsies and note abnormalities in the shape of the cell and its nucleus to grade the severity of cancer. Lele and his team are computerizing the analysis of nuclear shapes to research the cause of abnormal cancer structures.

Using photos of nuclei and cells in human tissue taken by a pathologist, Leles team has developed a computational algorithm to measure the degree of irregularity in the nucleus. With the algorithm, the team can run statistical analyses of the abnormalities and search for correlations between the extent of the irregularity, changes to genetic or molecular signatures in tumors and, ultimately, patient outcomes.

Leles research aims to help the medical community develop new knowledge of human cancers and how they progress, to better diagnose and manage cancers. Understanding the mechanisms behind the abnormalities can help develop therapies to better treat cancers by targeting the nucleus.

Like any other basic field, we are trying to make discoveries with the hope that they will have long-term impacts on human health, Lele said.

Lele will have two laboratories, one in College Station and one in the Texas A&M Health Science Centers Institute of Biosciences & Technology in Houston. The cancer grant from CPRIT is a collaborative effort with Dr. Michael Mancini and Dr. Fabio Stossi from the Baylor College of Medicine. He said he is looking forward to collaborating with researchers in both College Station and Houston.

Lele received his doctoral degree in chemical engineering from Purdue University. Before coming to Texas A&M, he served as the Charles A. Stokes Professor of Chemical Engineering at the University of Florida. At Texas A&M, in addition to being in biomedical engineering, he will be a joint faculty member in the Artie McFerrin Department of Chemical Engineering.

All my career has been spent in chemical engineering departments, but my research is also now in the biomedical space, Lele said. The move to Texas A&M was an opportunity for me to also be part of a different culture, if you will, of research. Being in the biomedical engineering department, in addition to the chemical engineering department, brings new opportunities to collaborate with researchers who have closely shared research interests.

Excerpt from:

Biomedical Engineering Researcher Receives $5 Million Grant To Further Cancer Studies - Texas A&M University Today

Future Prospects of Nucleic Acid Isolation and Purification Market Set to Witness Huge Growth by 2026 | Agilent Technologies, Bio-Rad Laboratories,…

Nucleic acid isolation and purification is an initial step in molecular biology studies and recombinant DNA techniques. The process of isolation includes mechanical and chemical disruption, enzymatic digestion, while the purification involves combination of extraction/precipitation, chromatography, centrifugation, electrophoresis, and affinity separation. This technique has wide applications in the field of genetic engineering, life science research, forensics and molecular diagnostics. Nucleic acid isolation helps in processing of more sample in less time, minimizes nucleic acid loss ad degradation and increases laboratory efficiency and effectiveness.

Get the PDF Sample Copy of This Report:

https://www.a2zmarketresearch.com/sample?reportId=86326

Note In order to provide more accurate market forecast, all our reports will be updated before delivery by considering the impact of COVID-19.

Top Key Players Profiled in This Report:

Agilent Technologies, Bio-Rad Laboratories, F.Hoffmann-La-Roche, GE Healthcare, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Abcam, Bioline, Biotechrabbit, BioWORLD, Danaher, Epicentre, Hamilton, New England Biolabs, Omega Bio-tek, Promega, Qiagen, Sigma-Aldrich, Takara Bio

The key questions answered in this report:

Various factors are responsible for the markets growth trajectory, which are studied at length in the report. In addition, the report lists down the restraints that are posing threat to the global Nucleic Acid Isolation and Purification market. It also gauges the bargaining power of suppliers and buyers, threat from new entrants and product substitute, and the degree of competition prevailing in the market. The influence of the latest government guidelines is also analyzed in detail in the report. It studies the Nucleic Acid Isolation and Purification markets trajectory between forecast periods.

Segmentation analyzation- To experience profitability and make critical decisions for business growth, it is very essential to understand this complex Nucleic Acid Isolation and Purification market. So to reduce this complexity, the Nucleic Acid Isolation and Purification market is divided into various segments.

Market Segmentation by Type:

DNA Isolation and PurificationRNA Isolation and Purification

Market Segmentation by Application:

HospitalResearchOthers

Buy Exclusive Report @:

https://www.a2zmarketresearch.com/buy?reportId=86326

Global Nucleic Acid Isolation and Purification Market report provide insights on following points:

Table of Contents

Global Nucleic Acid Isolation and Purification Market Research Report 2020 2026

Chapter 1 Nucleic Acid Isolation and Purification Market Overview

Chapter 2 Global Economic Impact on Industry

Chapter 3 Global Market Competition by Manufacturers

Chapter 4 Global Production, Revenue (Value) by Region

Chapter 5 Global Supply (Production), Consumption, Export, Import by Regions

Chapter 6 Global Production, Revenue (Value), Price Trend by Type

Chapter 7 Global Market Analysis by Application

Chapter 8 Manufacturing Cost Analysis

Chapter 9 Industrial Chain, Sourcing Strategy and Downstream Buyers

Chapter 10 Marketing Strategy Analysis, Distributors/Traders

Chapter 11 Market Effect Factors Analysis

Chapter 12 Global Nucleic Acid Isolation and Purification Market Forecast

If You Have Any Query, Ask Our Experts:

https://www.a2zmarketresearch.com/enquiry?reportId=86326

If you have any special requirements, please let us know and we will offer you the report as you want.

About A2Z Market Research:

The A2Z Market Research library provides syndication reports from market researchers around the world. Ready-to-buy syndication Market research studies will help you find the most relevant business intelligence.

Our Research Analyst Provides business insights and market research reports for large and small businesses.

The company helps clients build business policies and grow in that market area. A2Z Market Research is not only interested in industry reports dealing with telecommunications, healthcare, pharmaceuticals, financial services, energy, technology, real estate, logistics, F & B, media, etc. but also your company data, country profiles, trends, information and analysis on the sector of your interest.

Contact Us:

Roger Smith

1887 WHITNEY MESA DR HENDERSON, NV 89014

[emailprotected]

+1 775 237 4147

View original post here:

Future Prospects of Nucleic Acid Isolation and Purification Market Set to Witness Huge Growth by 2026 | Agilent Technologies, Bio-Rad Laboratories,...

Chromatography Resins Market 2020: Global Industry Analysis, Size, Share, Trends and Forecast by 2026 | GE Healthcare, Merck KGaA, Pall Corporation -…

The latest published report on Global Chromatography Resins Market Analysis and Forecast from 2019 to 2026 delivering key insights and providing a competitive advantage to clients through a detailed report. Additionally, the report focuses on Chromatography Resins industry key players, to define and analyze the sales volume, value, market share, market competitive landscape, and recent developments.

Global Chromatography resins market is estimated to reach $3.61 Billion by 2026; growing at a CAGR of 3.58% from 2019 to 2026.

Get The Sample Report PDF with Detail TOC & List of[emailprotected]https://marketresearchport.com/request-sample/46592

About Global Chromatography Resins Market

Firstly, the report offers a basic overview of the industry including, definitions, classifications, applications, and industry chain scenario. The Chromatography Resins industry analysis is provided for the global market including development history, segment analysis, major regional developments, and a thorough competitors evaluation.

Secondly, growth policies and plans are reviewed as well as manufacturing processes and cost structures. This report also discusses supply and consumption figures, import/export data, cost, price, revenue and gross margins by prime regions such as the U.S. Europe, China, and Japan along with other key regions. Moreover, Global Chromatography Resins Market proposes market trend analysis, drivers, and challenges by consumer behavior, and various marketing channels.

Competitive Glimpse

Top listed manufacturers for Global Global Chromatography Resins Market are:

Avantor Performance Materials Inc.Bio-Rad LaboratoriesGE HealthcareMerck KGaAMitsubishi Chemical CorporationPall CorporationPurolite CorporationRepligen CorporationThermo Fisher Scientific Inc.

With the slowdown in world economic growth, the Chromatography Resins industry has also suffered a certain impact, but still maintained a relatively optimistic growth, the past four years.

How has the competitive landscape of this industry been categorized?

The competitive scope of Global Chromatography Resins Market spans firms listed above, as per the report.The report includes substantial information pertaining to the produced goods, company profile, revenue graph, as well as other production patterns.The research study also presents details with respect to the market share that every company accounts for, as well as gross margins and price prototypes of the products.

Market Segmentation:

Esticast Research offers a crystal clear view of the various sections such as segmental analysis, regional analyst, product portfolios, followed by detailed information about market leaders and their strategies about mergers and acquisitions.

By Type

Natural polymerSynthetic polymerInorganic media

By Technique

Ion exchangeAffinitySize ExclusionHydrophobic InteractionMultimodalOthersBy Application

Pharmaceutical & biotechnologyFood & beverageWater and environmental analysisOthers (genetic engineering, diagnostics, and biochemistry)

Geographically, this report studies the top producers and consumers, focuses on product capacity, production, value, consumption, market share and growth opportunity in these key regions, covering

North AmericaEuropeAsia-PacificSouth AmericaThe Middle East and Africa

Do Enquiry For Customized Report as per Your[emailprotected]https://marketresearchport.com/enquiry-before-buying/46592

Major Points From TOC:Market IntroductionResearch MethodologyChromatography Resins Market OverviewType OverviewTechnique OverviewApplication OverviewChromatography Resins Market Regional OverviewCompany Profiles

About Us:Market Research Portis one of the best report resellers in the market bringing to you accurate and trustworthy market research reports by reputed publishers. Our trusted publishers have compiled their reports and findings after painstaking research and studies, set up against varied business parameters. Each report is detailed and then vetted for accuracy by industry experts. In each report, you will find deep analysis, risk analysis, market forecasts, emerging trends, different market segments, technological advancement and its impact, and a multitude of economic factors, giving you the most comprehensive market research report. You get many advantages with such comprehensive reports.

Contact Us:Market Research Port,Brighton Street, Providence,Rhode Island 02929, United StatesContact No: +1 401 433 7610Email:[emailprotected]Website:https://marketresearchport.com/

Excerpt from:

Chromatography Resins Market 2020: Global Industry Analysis, Size, Share, Trends and Forecast by 2026 | GE Healthcare, Merck KGaA, Pall Corporation -...

Why Is It So Hard to Adapt Brave New World? – The Ringer

In the back half of the 1970s, when miniseries adaptations like Rich Man, Poor Man and Roots became runaway hits, a great book could make or break a TV careerso the influential NBC producer Deanne Barkley scooped up as many great books as she could. By 1978, shed locked down the rights to James Micheners Centennial, recruited Natalie Wood for a six-part adaptation of From Here to Eternity, and picked up James Clavells Shogun for a lavish production destined to become a ratings sensation in 1980. And perhaps inspired by the Star Warsstoked interest in all things science fiction, she also commissioned an adaptation of Aldous Huxleys 1932 dystopian landmark Brave New Worlddespite it being, as a profile of Barkley described at the time, a tricky property everyone in Hollywood had been afraid of. Starring 2001: A Space Odysseys Keir Dullea and Harold and Maudes Bud Cort, it was set to debut in 1979 and run for six hours across several nights. Only it never did. NBC found out that adapting Brave New World was tricky indeedand not for the last time.

After pulling Brave New World from its schedule several times, NBC finally aired it in March 1980. A version of it, anywaythe miniseries had shrunk from six, to four, then finally three hours and been reduced to a TV movie. (What would have been the four-hour version, running just over three hours without commercials, eventually aired on BBC and is now the easiest cut to find.) The network returned to Huxleys World State again in 1998, with a TV movie starring Peter Gallagher and Leonard Nimoy. Then, for a few years in the late 00s, Brave New World seemed likely to become a feature film starring Leonardo DiCaprio and directed by Ridley Scott. Instead, its coming to us once again as an ongoing series, one of the flagships of Peacock, NBCs new streaming service (though this Brave New World was developed first for Syfy then for USA before finding its current home). A glossy take on the material filled with TV-MA-friendly amounts of explosive violence and tightly choreographed orgies, it proves that Huxleys book can be easily mined for concepts and incidents. Adapting it, on the other hand, proves far trickier.

Thats partly because much of the novel is short on incident and long on ideas, effectively climaxing with one character arguing why the dystopia of New London, however awful in its implications, makes sense as the only recourse against humanitys excesses. Which speaks to the books other tricky element: Brave New Worlds 600-years-in-the-future societyone thats banned monogamy and family, done its best to erase history, mandates the use the euphoria-inducing drug Soma, and uses a combination of genetic engineering and brainwashing to create a rigid caste systemis quite functional, maybe even desirable. After all, war has been eliminated. And whats the difference between drug-induced happiness and the real thing when you get down to it (to say nothing of all that attachment- and consequence-free sex)? On the one hand, Huxleys World State takes some worrisome tendencies from the years of its creation to their logical, if nightmarish, extremes, combining the most dehumanizing elements of communism and capitalism in a culture that despises individualism, places all control in the hands of the state, and reveres Henry Ford for inventing the assembly line and Sigmund Freud for demystifying the soul (even though it sometimes confuses the two men). On the other, it has a certain undeniable appeal.

Much of the power of Brave New World comes from just that tension. It often reads like a novel at war with itself, in part because it was written by a man occasionally at war with himself. The product of Eton and Oxford, Huxley had more faith in the elites than the masses, whom he estimated to make up 99.5 percent of the population, and enthused about the potential of eugenics (with some reservations). Like the books New Londoners, Huxley had little use for monogamy (though he and his first wife Maria incorporated that into a by-all-accounts successful marriage). While Brave New World sounds like a caution against all these feelings, they were hardly alien to its author, and Huxleys ability to convey their allure helps make the book so haunting.

Its a funny book, too, less a break from Huxleys earlier satiric writing than an extension of it. But each adaptation of Brave New World has struggled to convey that. The 1980 version comes closest simply because it hews closest to the source materialat times painfully close, dedicating its first act to backstory Huxley takes care of in a few paragraphs. Helmed by actor-turned-journeyman director Burt Brinckerhoff, its set in a white-surface- and jumpsuit-filled future that makes Logans Run look tasteful by comparison. It also makes Logans Run, whose hedonistic vision borrows heavily from Brave New World, look lively, trudging along from plot point to plot point while attempting to provoke yucks by supplementing Huxleys habit of giving his characters surnames like Marx and Bonaparte with characters named Bowie and Jagger. Only Cort, playing an oddball in a society with no tolerance for oddballs, and Superfly star Ron ONeal, as the erudite and unapologetic enforcer of the World Orders strictures, seem to have much of a take on the material.

Brinckerhoffs strict adherence to Huxleys novel extends to its depictions of the Savage Lands, an untamed, impoverished portion of the American Southwest with a culture that adheres to the old ways, mixing Christianity and Native American beliefs. Its not a happy place, but at least its free in ways that surprise John, a New Londoner raised in the Savage Lands, when hes taken back to civilization. In the 1998 adaptation codirected by Leslie Libman and Larry Williams, the Savage Lands are populated by Gen Xinspired no-goodniks who look like they stepped out of a Surge commercial, all decked out in baggy pants and stocking caps. (This fact, a rave scene, a scratch-heavy score, a featured Portishead song, and some distressed fonts make it a vision of a future dystopia deeply rooted in the late-1990s.) It takes other considerable liberties with Huxleys novel as well, including an out-of-nowhere happy ending at odds with the sources deeply pessimistic finale, one that suggests that the World State might represent some kind of end point from which humanity can never escape except via exile or death (unless, this version suggests, youre Peter Gallagher).

In 2008, it seemed likely both these already largely forgotten stabs at updating Huxley would become footnotes thanks to Ridley Scott. After all, who better to bring one of the defining literary utopias to life than the filmmaker who, with Blade Runner, created one of the defining cinematic utopias? Without naming the title, Scott enthused to an interviewer that hed waited for a book for 20 years and had finally secured the rights to it. That same year, the Los Angeles Times revealed the book to be Brave New World, a film that would star Leonardo DiCaprio, be produced by his father George DiCaprio, and be written by Andrew Niccol, writer of the Brave New Worldindebted Gattaca. When talk of the project stirred again in 2009, Niccol was out and Apocalypto screenwriter Farhad Safinia was in. Three years later, everyone seemed to have moved on. While insisting the film remained a possibility, Scott sounded resigned in an interview with Collider, saying I think Brave New World, in a funny kind of way, was good in [1932], because it had a very interesting revolutionary idea. When you reanalyze it, maybe it should stay as a book. I dont know. We tried to get it.

Whatever kept them from getting it, the Scott/DiCaprio Brave New World remains one of the big what-ifs of both their careers (even more so than the other project Scott was developing around his time: an adaptation of Monopoly). That doesnt mean it wouldve worked, or that the issues that dogged previous attempts to adapt it wouldnt have resurfaced. Would Scott have the clout he didnt have with Blade Runner in 1982 to keep its pessimistic ending? Would Leo have chosen this sci-fi blockbuster over the Christopher Nolan one he ended up going with? Would there have been too much money at stake not to turn it into a tale of resistance, like the many other early-2010s dystopias it would have appeared alongside, from The Hunger Games to the never-completed Divergent series?

That appears to be the direction in which Peacocks Brave New World is heading, however slowly. Developed by Brian Taylor (Crank, Mom and Dad), David Wiener (Homecoming), and comics great Grant Morrison, the series updates Huxleys world while somehow making it feel less relevant. In spite of smart touches like a privacy-erasing contact lens that feels like a direct descendant of Instagram and a Savage Lands that caricatures 21st-century working-class lifeas well as nice moments like John the Savage (Alden Ehrenreich) getting awakened to a richer, wider world by discovering a Radiohead songit plays less like an adaptation of Huxleys novel than an extremely watchable dilution, with little of the ambiguity that makes the novel so disturbing. Its New London society is so stuffed with obvious villains that of course it has to come crumbling down (however fun its pansexual dance-floor orgies might look).

But maybe a dilution is the best we can hope for. Or maybe the novel works best as a set of building blocks. Beyond Gattaca and Logans Run, Brave New World inspired Kurt Vonneguts Player Piano, George Lucass THX 1138, and other works (to say nothing of one of the Buzzcocks best songs). Or perhaps its just one of those books best left to work its disquieting spell on the page. Writing of it appreciatively on its 75th anniversary, Margaret Atwood, no stranger to disturbing visions of the future, contrasted it to George Orwells 1984, which she describes as a horrific vision of a brutal, mind-controlling totalitarian state. Orwells world might be tough to prevent, but its easy to spot; were in the midst of a presidential administration thats used its power to batter away at the very idea of truth in plain sight.

Huxleys softer totalitarianism is more insidious, and more seductive. It takes the form of pleasure and safety and a willingness to abdicate responsibility and individuality to maintain the status quo, no matter who gets reduced to a figure in an equation in the process. Brave New World is either a perfect-world utopia or its nasty opposite, a dystopia, depending on your point of view, Atwood continues. Its inhabitants are beautiful, secure, and free from diseases and worries, though in a way we like to think we would find unacceptable. For an adaptation of Brave New World to stay true to its origins, it would have to capture the difficulty of saying no to a too-good-to-be-true world always waiting to become reality. So far, no creator has been able to do that.

See the rest here:

Why Is It So Hard to Adapt Brave New World? - The Ringer

The Case For COVID-19 Antibody Therapies – The ASEAN Post

As many countries progressively relax their COVID-19 containment measures, preventing a renewed spread of the coronavirus from emerging infection clusters will be key to controlling the pandemic. And this will require the world to develop innovative new treatments.

So far, policymakers have relied on non-pharmaceutical interventions such as testing, contact tracing, and quarantines to prevent a second wave of infections. Meanwhile, the search for COVID-19 therapies and prophylactic medicines has focused on products that could be immediately available, meaning existing drugs that were developed to treat other conditions.

This approach has been largely unsuccessful, although a recent randomised clinical trial in the United Kingdom (UK) revealed that the dexamethasone corticosteroid reduced COVID-19 mortality in the most severe cases.

Vaccines will of course be essential to overcoming COVID-19. But if and when they become available, it will still take many months to vaccinate enough people so that societies reach the level of collective immunity needed to halt the coronavirus. And the efficiency of any vaccine will likely vary depending on a persons genetic background, associated diseases, and age.

Furthermore, vaccine access and coverage might be limited by production capabilities, economic considerations, and anti-vaccine sentiment among the population.

That means we must also focus on developing new weapons that can directly target SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes COVID-19. And, besides anti-viral chemical drugs, genetically engineered antibodies might be ideal for this purpose.

Such antibodies are precisely tailored to neutralise the proteins that allow the SARS-CoV-2 virus to penetrate human cells. Moreover, they provide immediate immunity, which is critical not only to minimise organ damage but also to protect health-care professionals and the infected persons contacts.

The concept behind this type of immunotherapy was pioneered in France and Germany more than a century ago, when antibodies contained in the serum of immunised animals saved the lives of thousands of children during diphtheria epidemics. The same principle lies behind the current clinical trials using plasma from recovering COVID-19 patients. But because not all antibodies are protective indeed, some can even aggravate disease researchers are focusing on those known for their anti-viral activity.

Contemporary genetic engineering can produce highly specific humanised antibodies. Although these biological agents are best known for revolutionising the treatment of cancer and autoimmune diseases, there is already evidence of their efficacy as anti-infectious agents.

For example, the palivizumab antibody is used to prevent respiratory syncytial virus infections in infants, while other antibodies have been found to prevent or treat anthrax. And another has proven effective in helping HIV-infected people who are resistant to standard treatments. Most recently and relevantly, a cocktail of antibodies soon to be approved by the United States (US) Food and Drug Administration (FDA) was found to reduce Ebola mortality among patients.

Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, the US biotechnology firm that produced the Ebola antibodies, is now using its proprietary technology to develop a cocktail of two COVID-19 antibodies that are currently being tested in human trials. On 7 July, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals announced that it had received a US$450 million contract to manufacture and supply the antibody cocktail as part of the Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authoritys (BARDA) Operation Warp Speed.

Several other companies are developing antibodies with the help of US government funding via the Accelerating COVID-19 Therapeutic Interventions and Vaccines partnership. This initiative involves BARDA, the National Institutes of Health, the FDA, and the US Department of Defense, together with major pharmaceutical firms and philanthropic organisations such as the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.

Unfortunately, antibody therapies are currently receiving less attention in the European Commissions Coronavirus Global Response. This effort, which the Commission developed in collaboration with other governmental, corporate, and philanthropic organisations, aims to support the Access to COVID-19 Tools (ACT) Accelerator that the World Health Organization (WHO) and other global partners launched in April.

But the Economist Intelligence Unit reports that the COVID-19 Therapeutics Accelerator, a co-convenor of the ACT initiative, had so far invested only US$59 million, mostly in clinical trials exploring the potential benefits of repurposed drugs.

Several challenges still need to be addressed before genetically engineered antibodies can join the fight against COVID-19. These include increasing the antibodies stability in vivo to optimise the number of doses required, and decreasing manufacturing costs in order to make the therapy economically viable.

Funding organisations must now invest more resources to overcome these remaining hurdles. The rewards are potentially huge: antibody treatments that not only rapidly control viral replication in COVID-19 patients, but possibly also prevent vulnerable individuals from contracting the disease.

Related Article:

Are We Any Closer To A COVID-19 Vaccine?

Has A Secretive Institute Found A COVID-19 Cure?

Link:

The Case For COVID-19 Antibody Therapies - The ASEAN Post

Downstream Processing Market The Biggest Trends to Watch out for 2018-2026 – Kentucky Journal 24

Market Scenario

Global Downstream Processing Marketwas valued US$ 10.46 Bn in 2017 and is expected to reach US$ 32.88 Bn by 2026, at a CAGR of 15.39 % during a forecast period.

The downstream processing market is segmented into technique, product, application, end-user, and region.

In terms of technique, downstream processing market is segmented into purification, solid-liquid separation, clarification & concentration. Based on product segment, downstream processing market is classified into chromatography columns and resins, filters, membrane adsorbers, single-use products, and other products. Further application, downstream processing market is divided into monoclonal antibody production, vaccine production, insulin production, immunoglobulin production, erythropoietin production, and other applications. In terms of end-user, downstream processing market is classified into biopharmaceutical manufacturers, and contract manufacturing organizations.

Based on regions, the global downstream processing market is divided into five main regions are North America, Europe, Asia-pacific, Latin America and Middle East & Africa.

Global Downstream Processing Market

On the basis of product, the chromatography columns and resins segment accounted for the largest share of the downstream processing market. Columns and resins are the most important component of a chromatography system and are extensively used in the separation, recovery, and purification of components of a bioactive sample. The constant need for newer and different types of columns and resins is likely to fuel market growth.

Based on application, Antibodies are one of the most predominant modalities offered by the biopharmaceutical industry today. Moreover, as antibiotic resistance is on the rising, there is an increase in demand for the development of antibodies that act against resistant strains. This, in turn, is increasing the demand for downstream processing for antibody production at industrial scale.

Request for Report Sample: https://www.trendsmarketresearch.com/report/sample/11395

The rapid growth of the biotechnology sector is one of the key trends boosting the demand for downstream processing market. This is majorly due to the high adoption of biotech processes in the pharmaceutical, agricultural, and bio-services industries. In addition, developments in the field of gene therapy and genetic engineering are estimated to propel the market during the forecast period.

The high cost of instruments used in downstream processing is expected to restrain the growth of the market.On the other hand, patent expiration of blockbuster biopharmaceutical products represents significant growth opportunities for the key players in the downstream processing market.

In terms of region, North America is expected to account for the largest share of the global downstream processing market, followed by Europe. North America is the worlds largest pharmaceutical market and a leader in biopharmaceutical research. Rising quality requirements have emphasized the need for advanced bioproduction technology in this region.

Key players operating in global downstream processing market are 3M Company, Repligen, Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH, Eppendorf AG, Lonza Group Ltd, Corning Corporation, Ashai Kasei, Dover Corporation and Ferner PLC.

Covid 19 Impact Analysis@ https://www.trendsmarketresearch.com/report/covid-19-analysis/11395

Scope of Global Downstream Processing Market:

Global Downstream Processing Market, by Technique:

Purification Solid-liquid Separation Clarification & ConcentrationGlobal Downstream Processing Market, by Product:

Chromatography Columns and Resins Filters Membrane Adsorbers Single-use Products Other ProductsGlobal Downstream Processing Market, by Application:

Monoclonal Antibody Production Vaccine Production Insulin Production Immunoglobulin Production Erythropoietin Production Other ApplicationsGlobal Downstream Processing Market, by End-User:

Biopharmaceutical Manufacturers Contract Manufacturing OrganizationsGlobal Downstream Processing Market, by Region:

North America Europe Middle East & Africa Asia Pacific Latin America

Key players operating in Global Downstream Processing Market:

3M Company Repligen Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH Eppendorf AG Lonza Group Ltd Corning Corporation Ashai Kasei Dover Corporation Ferner PLC

See the original post:

Downstream Processing Market The Biggest Trends to Watch out for 2018-2026 - Kentucky Journal 24

African women are leading biotechnology’s advance across the continent – Alliance for Science

Women researchers are strongly influencing the adoption of agricultural biotechnology in Africa.

As African women, we are the ones who suffer most whenever drought and food shortages strike, despite the availability of technological solutions to these problems, said Dr. Felister Makini, deputy director general in charge of crops at the Kenya Agricultural and Livestock Research Organization (KALRO).

We are looking for new solutions and how we can use technology to give our people and ourselves better and improved crop varieties to fight hunger and improve the quality of living, said Dr. Priver Namanya Bwesigye, who leads Ugandas banana research program at the National Agricultural Research Laboratories (NARL) at Kawanda. We also need varieties that can give us more in terms of nutrients.

Throughout Africa, women are in labs developing crops that produce high yields and can tolerate or resist disease, as well as healthier, more productive livestock. They are also found in meeting rooms and gardens informing the public about their innovations and how these improved crops can aid the fight against hunger across both the continent and the globe.

It is time to tell the public about the positive side of biotechnology, said Professor Caroline Thoruwa, chairperson for African Women in Science and Engineering.

In Uganda, where bananas are an important staple food and cash crop, Bwesigye is in charge of developing varieties that offer farmers better options.

She and her team are using the tools of genetic engineering to develop banana varieties that are resistant to nematodes, bacterial wilt and weevils. The most advanced of these genetically modified varieties is a banana biofortified to provide vitamin A. It should reach farmers immediately after Uganda implements a legal biosafety framework guiding the use of GMOs.

We have trialled the technology in multiple locations all the four banana planting regions of Uganda and it will be ready by the time we have a legal framework, Bwesigye said. We have to do this [multi-location field trials] before we can give it to the farmers. We want to be sure that different farmers across the country can plant the variety and have similar results. In this case, all the banana yields should be rich in pro-vitamin A.

But Bwesigyes program does much more than develop improved bananas using biotechnology. It also employs conventional plant breeding tools to produce heartier varieties, including a banana resistant to black sigatoka disease. When shes not in the lab, Bwesigye conducts extensive outreach to farmers and young people to explain agricultural biotechnology and why Uganda, Africa and the world need this tool.

Dr. Barbara Mugwanya Zawedde is also championing the adoption of agricultural biotechnology in Africa. Shes currently director for research at Ugandas Zonal Agricultural Research and Development Institute in Mukono, which is under the jurisdiction of the National Agricultural Research Organization (NARO).

But before that, she was the coordinator for the Uganda Biosciences Information Center (UBIC) NAROs knowledge and information-sharing hub. It champions an appreciation of modern biosciences research for agricultural development and works to educate stakeholders on the importance of biosafety.

In that role, Zawedde engaged religious leaders, local communities, farmers, extension agents, legislators, public ministries, women in agriculture, students and others to raise awareness about new technologies and their safety.

After earning a doctorate in plant breeding, genetics and biotechnology from Michigan State University, Zawedde returned home to Uganda in 2013 to discover we had gaps in communication as well as in regulation, she recalled.

So, she worked with Dr. Yona Baguma, now deputy director general for NARO, to set up the biosciences information center. Their goal was to bring to the fore these new technologies that people were not talking about and to emphasise the importance of regulating them.

The regulatory framework [we have been calling for] is not just for the introduction of these new technologies, but for their regulation as well, Zawedde said.

To an extent, Zawedde and UBIC have been successful.

Parliament passed the National Biotechnology and Biosafety Bill on two occasions, though President Yoweri Museveni has yet to sign it into law. Additionally, more Ugandans now appreciate the science and what it can do to improve their lives. Biotechnology and biosafety elements also have been included in the countrys school curriculums.

It will be easier to adopt these technologies [once we have a regulatory framework] because more people today understand these technologies and how they can help improve agriculture and food security in Uganda and the region, Zawedde said

Similarly, the Women in Biosciences Forum is working in Kenya to make everyone sure knows about the value of biotechnology and the role that women are playing to advance the science.

We need to raise the status of women in biotechnology and also encourage women to network in order to achieve the noble goal of sharing their science, Thoruwa said. Women must be involved for Africa to advance in agri-biotech.

Several African countries have approved the cultivation of GMO crops and others have conducted trials for GM crop varieties. But in many of the countries that are conducting research, GM seeds have yet to reach farmers and consumers because the political leadership is swayed by opposition and remains afraid to adopt biotechnology, the women scientists observed.

We need to speak with one voice and advocate for a predictable policy environment, said KALROs Makini.

The detractors will always be there, Bwesigye said. But we need to understand that these technologies, pretty much like everything else in life, have advantages and disadvantages. We just have to harness the advantages.

One such advantage is being able to develop a staple food crop, like a banana, that delivers vitamin A, a crucial nutrient that is lacking in almost 30 percent of Uganda children below the age of 5. It is a no brainer, Bwesigye said about the value of adopting the pro-vitamin A banana.

Despite the political obstacles, Bwesigye and her colleagues remain undiscouraged. Zawedde said that women will continue to conduct communication and outreach, calling on governments to give farmers a chance to plant some of these improved crops.

We only need awareness, awareness and more awareness, Bwesigye said. Then mind-sets will change and adoption of these technologies will be easier.

Read the original here:

African women are leading biotechnology's advance across the continent - Alliance for Science

Genetic Engineering Market Growing Rapidly with Significant CAGR, Leading Players, Innovative Trends and Expected Revenue by 2025 – Cole of Duty

The Latest Research Report on Genetic Engineering Market size | Industry Segment by Applications, by Type, Regional Outlook, Market Demand, Latest Trends, Genetic Engineering Industry Share & Revenue by Manufacturers, Company Profiles, Growth Forecasts 2025. Analyzes current market size and upcoming 5 years growth of this industry.

The report presents a highly comprehensive and accurate research study on the globalGenetic Engineering market. It offers PESTLE analysis, qualitative and quantitative analysis, Porters Five Forces analysis, and absolute dollar opportunity analysis to help players improve their business strategies. It also sheds light on critical Genetic Engineering Marketdynamics such as trends and opportunities, drivers, restraints, and challenges to help market participants stay informed and cement a strong position in the industry. With competitive landscape analysis, the authors of the report have made a brilliant attempt to help readers understand important business tactics that leading companies use to maintainGenetic Engineering market sustainability.

Download Premium Sample Copy Of This Report:Download FREE Sample PDF!

Global Genetic Engineering Market to reach USD XX billion by 2025.

Global Genetic Engineering Market valued approximately USD XX billion in 2017 is anticipated to grow with a healthy growth rate of more than XX% over the forecast period 2018-2025. The major driving factor of global Genetic Engineering market are surging utility of technologies such as CRISPR, Talen & ZNF and rising focus on innovation in Gene Therapy in Genetic Engineering. In addition, increasing funding for research and development of medical products is the some other driving factor that drives the market. However, one of the major restraining factors of Genetic Engineering market is high amount of investment. Genetic engineering is also known as genetic modification or genetic manipulation. It is the direct manipulation of an organisms genes using biotechnology. It is a set of technologies used to change the genetic makeup of cells, including the transfer of genes within and across species boundaries to produce improved or novel organisms. Genetic engineering allows of plant or animals to be modified so their maturity can occur at a quicker pace. Genetic modification can also help to create resistance to common forms of forms of organism death. Genetic engineering can also change the traits of plants or animals so that they produce greater yield per plant. Any genetic mutation caused by environmental mutagens may also be corrected through genetic engineering.

The regional analysis of Global Genetic Engineering Market is considered for the key regions such as Asia Pacific, North America, Europe, Latin America and Rest of the World. North America has dominate the market of total generating revenue with 40% across the globe in 2016 due to increasing use of genetic engineering for use of gene therapy, high incidence of cancer and increasing awareness for the use of stem cells. Europe is also contributing second largest major share in the global market of Genetic Engineering. Asia-Pacific region is also anticipated to exhibit higher growth rate / CAGR over the over the coming years due to presence of developing countries, companies grabbing these opportunities and extracting their presence in the region. The Middle East and Africa holds the least share in global genetic engineering market owing to limited availability of medicine facilities.

The major market player included in this report are:

Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc.

Merck KGAA

Horizon Discovery Group Plc

Transposagen Biopharmaceuticals Inc.

New England Biolabs

Genscript Biotech Corporation

Lonza Group Ltd.

Origene Technologies Inc.

Integrated DNA Technologies Inc.

Amgen Inc.

The objective of the study is to define market sizes of different segments & countries in recent years and to forecast the values to the coming eight years. The report is designed to incorporate both qualitative and quantitative aspects of the industry within each of the regions and countries involved in the study. Furthermore, the report also caters the detailed information about the crucial aspects such as driving factors & challenges which will define the future growth of the market. Additionally, the report shall also incorporate available opportunities in micro markets for stakeholders to invest along with the detailed analysis of competitive landscape and product offerings of key players. The detailed segments and sub-segment of the market are explained below:

By Devices:

oPCR

oGene Gun

oGel Assemblies

oOthers

By Techniques:

oArtificial Selection

oGene Splicing

oCloning

oOthers

By End-User:

oResearch Institutes

oAcademic Institutes

oPharmaceutical Industries

oOthers

By Application:

oAgriculture

oMedical Industry

oForensic Science

oOthers

By Regions:

oNorth America

oU.S.

oCanada

oEurope

oUK

oGermany

oAsia Pacific

oChina

oIndia

oJapan

oLatin America

oBrazil

oMexico

oRest of the World

Furthermore, years considered for the study are as follows:

Historical year 2015, 2016

Base year 2017

Forecast period 2018 to 2025

Target Audience of the Global Genetic Engineering Market in Market Study:

oKey Consulting Companies & Advisors

oLarge, medium-sized, and small enterprises

oVenture capitalists

oValue-Added Resellers (VARs)

oThird-party knowledge providers

oInvestment bankers

oInvestors

Have Any Query Or Specific Requirement?Ask Our Industry Experts!

Table of Contents:

Study Coverage:It includes study objectives, years considered for the research study, growth rate and Genetic Engineering market size of type and application segments, key manufacturers covered, product scope, and highlights of segmental analysis.

Executive Summary:In this section, the report focuses on analysis of macroscopic indicators, market issues, drivers, and trends, competitive landscape, CAGR of the global Genetic Engineering market, and global production. Under the global production chapter, the authors of the report have included market pricing and trends, global capacity, global production, and global revenue forecasts.

Genetic Engineering Market Size by Manufacturer: Here, the report concentrates on revenue and production shares of manufacturers for all the years of the forecast period. It also focuses on price by manufacturer and expansion plans and mergers and acquisitions of companies.

Production by Region:It shows how the revenue and production in the global market are distributed among different regions. Each regional market is extensively studied here on the basis of import and export, key players, revenue, and production.

About Us:

We publish market research reports & business insights produced by highly qualified and experienced industry analysts. Our research reports are available in a wide range of industry verticals including aviation, food & beverage, healthcare, ICT, Construction, Chemicals and lot more. Brand Essence Market Research report will be best fit for senior executives, business development managers, marketing managers, consultants, CEOs, CIOs, COOs, and Directors, governments, agencies, organizations and Ph.D. Students.

Top Trending Reports:

https://brandessenceresearch.com/chemical-and-materials/industrial-catalyst-market-industry

https://brandessenceresearch.com/heavy-industry/container-shipping-market-size

More:

Genetic Engineering Market Growing Rapidly with Significant CAGR, Leading Players, Innovative Trends and Expected Revenue by 2025 - Cole of Duty

Biotechnology processes streamlined in USMCA – Drgnews

When the original NAFTA agreement was implemented in 1994, biotechnology processes intended for practical agricultural use were in their early stages. But genetic modification has come a long way in the past quarter-century and advances continue daily.

Laboratory-based genetic sequencing and manipulation is clearly addressed in the new U.S.-Mexico-Canada trade agreement rules. Scientific processes and regulations that evolved independently for more than 25 years, now need to be standardized for the three countries.

Ian Affleck is Vice-President of Biotechnology for Crop Life Canada. He says new regulations will require systemic changes because the American and the Canadian GMO development rules evolved differently.

With the USMCA coming into force, theres a biotechnology chapter thats supposed to help the two countries align their approaches. Most countries around the world, the US included, chose a Process-based approach. So, their first step would be to say, Did you use genetic engineering, and create a GMO? If so, we want to take a look. Canada took a different approach, to say It doesnt matter how you made it, its really about what you made. Is the Product you made so new that we to take a look, as a government, to ensure its safety. We just start from a different foot to get to those approvals.

Affleck says recent advances in Gene Editing technology are more subtle and small differences can make big problems for seed-breeders accessing new markets.

The advent of gene editing is a really new technology for plant breeders. It adds a new wrinkle into the equation. With GMOs usually the changes were always big. With gene editing its not so certain. It may be able to make a larger or drastic change, or it might be a smaller change. So, this is why we need this policy guidance of what is new, to make sure that as plant breeders are embarking on products, they know what it is they have to do, to meet their regulatory expectations.

Crop Life Canada is lobbying in favor of the U.S. processed-based approach because Affleck says they dont want Canadian farmers to miss out on American products.

The USDA-APHIS rules, if you were to boil them down its have you done something thats something that plant couldnt have done on its own, and if you did, youre going to need an assessment. If you didnt, you dont need an assessment. Thats a very rational way forward. If were not clear on our policies going forward, it could make launching US varieties in Canada a little more tricky.

Glyphosate-tolerance, BT-insecticide integration and trait-stacking have all made changes to crops and yield.

The rest is here:

Biotechnology processes streamlined in USMCA - Drgnews

Global Genome Editing Market 2019 | How The Industry Will Witness Substantial Growth In The Upcoming Years | Exclusive Report By Market Research…

Gene editing technologies have an impact across multiple applications areas including plant and animal genetic engineering. However, the area of most disruption is across human cell line engineering, which enables the development of next generations therapies and drugs. However, the agricultural industry has seen more success with gene editing techniques largely due to the less stringent regulatory environment.

You will get latest updated report as per the COVID-19 Impact on this industry. Our updated reports will now feature detailed analysis that will help you make critical decisions.

Browse Full Report: https://www.marketresearchengine.com/upcommingreport/global-genome-editing-market-analysis-by-application-technology-and-end-userforecast-2015-to-2021

This market research report categorizes the genome editing market into the following segments:

The Genome Editing Market is segmented on the lines of Technology, Application, End User and Geographical Region. By Technology this market is segmented on the basis of CRISPR/CAS9, TALENs, ZFNs, Antisense Technology and Other Technologies. By Application this market is segmented on the basis of Cell Line Engineering, Animal Genetic Engineering, Plant Genetic Engineering and Other Applications.

By End User this market is segmented on the basis of Biotechnology and Pharmaceutical Companies sector, Government and Academic Research Institutes sector and Other Research Organizations sectors. By Geographical Region this market is segmented on the basis of North America, Europe, Asia and Rest of the World.

Recent developments across genome editing technologies have resulted in the creation of next generation nucleases that have higher levels of accuracy when correcting genetic mutations and defects. The classes under the genome editing technologies are the 4 broad families of nucleases: ZFNs, TALENs, CRISPR/Cas9, and Mega nucleases.

Global Genome Editing Market is expected to exceed more than US$ 7.5 billion by 2024 at CAGR of 14% in the given forecast period.

The global genome editing market is rapidly increasing due to the increased government funding for genomics technology, rise in the production of genetically modified crops and technological advancements these all factors are driving the growth of this market.

By End User this market is segmented on the basis of Biotechnology and Pharmaceutical Companies sector, Government and Academic Research Institutes sector and Other Research Organizations sectors. By Geographical Region this market is segmented on the basis of North America, Europe, Asia and Rest of the World.

Request Sample Report: https://www.marketresearchengine.com/upcommingreport/global-genome-editing-market-analysis-by-application-technology-and-end-userforecast-2015-to-2021

Table of Contents

1 INTRODUCTION

2 Research Methodology

3 Executive Summary

4 Premium Insights

5 Market Overview

6 Global Genome Editing/Engineering Market, By Technology

7 Global Genome Editing/Genome Engineering Market, By Application

8 Global Genome Editing/Engineering Market, By End User

8.1 Introduction8.2 Biotechnology & Pharmaceutical Companies8.3 Academic & Government Research Institutes8.4 Contract Research Organizations

9 Genome Editing/Genome Engineering Market, By Region

10 Competitive Landscape

11 Company Profiles

11.1 Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.

11.2 Merck KGaA

11.3 Horizon Discovery Group PLC

11.4 Genscript USA Inc.

11.5 Sangamo Biosciences, Inc.

11.6 Integrated DNA Technologies, Inc.

11.7 Lonza Group Ltd.

11.8 New England Biolabs, Inc.

11.9 Origene Technologies, Inc.

11.10 Transposagen Biopharmaceuticals, Inc.

Other Related Market Research Reports:

Gemfibrozil Sales Market Scope, Size, Share, Analysis by 2022

Gas Chromatography Market Size is Projected to be Around US$ 3.50 Billion By 2022

Gabapentin Sales Market Share, Trends and Leading Players By 2022

Media Contact

Company Name: Market Research Engine

Contact Person: John Bay

Email: [emailprotected]

Phone: +1-855-984-1862

Country: United States

Website: https://www.marketresearchengine.com/

Continue reading here:

Global Genome Editing Market 2019 | How The Industry Will Witness Substantial Growth In The Upcoming Years | Exclusive Report By Market Research...

Global Bioherbicides Market Witnessing a Consistency in Growth over the Past Few Years – GlobeNewswire

Covina, CA, July 15, 2020 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- The report"Global Bioherbicides Market, By Mode of Application (Seed Treatment, Soil Application, Foliar, and Post-Harvest), By Source (Microbial, Biochemical, and Others (Plant Phytotoxic Residues and Other Botanical Extracts)), By Formulation (Granular, Liquid, and Others (Pellets, Dust, and Powder Form)), By Application (Agricultural Crops, Cereals & Grains, Oilseeds & Pulses, Fruits & Vegetables, Non-Agricultural Crops, Turf & Ornamentals, and Plantation Crops), and By Region (North America, Europe, Asia Pacific, Latin America, and the Middle East & Africa) - Trends, Analysis and Forecast till 2029.

Key Highlights:

Request Sample PDF of this Business Report @https://www.prophecymarketinsights.com/market_insight/Insight/request-sample/4406

Analyst View:

Growing demand for organic products

Rise in the number of health conscious individuals, growth in environmental concerns, and government support provided by the respective through subsidies and premium market factors are growing demand for organic products in the market. This creates an opportunities to farmers across the globe to produce crops using organic methods, which further boost the global bioherbicides market. Furthermore, the bioherbicides market for organic products is rising at a significant rate due to growing consumer interest. There has been a substantial change in the preferences and eating habits of people, worldwide. The organic food products industry is also projected to benefit from financial aids, subsidies, and R&D programs conducted by different government and non-government organizations- APEDA (Agricultural & Processed Food Products Export Development Authority) (India), FiBL (Switzerland), and the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) (US)-to help traditional farmers shift to organic farming. Thus, growth in the organic food market is triggering the demand for bioherbicides, coupled with organic manures.

Advances in genetic engineering

Bioherbicide finds application in the industries of leisure and crop control chemicals. For example, bioherbicide are useful to treat golf course as well as other grass types. Alternaria Eichhorniae are utilized to control growth of water hyacinth and Phytophthora plamivora help in controlling milk weed units in citrus orchards. Thus, advances in genetic engineering creates a major opportunity for the bioherbicide market as the new generation bioherbicide will be more effective against weeds.

Browse 60 market data tables* and 35figures* through 140 slides and in-depth TOC on Global Bioherbicides Market, By Mode of Application (Seed Treatment, Soil Application, Foliar, and Post-Harvest), By Source (Microbial, Biochemical, and Others (Plant Phytotoxic Residues and Other Botanical Extracts)), By Formulation (Granular, Liquid, and Others (Pellets, Dust, and Powder Form)), By Application (Agricultural Crops, Cereals & Grains, Oilseeds & Pulses, Fruits & Vegetables, Non-Agricultural Crops, Turf & Ornamentals, and Plantation Crops), and By Region (North America, Europe, Asia Pacific, Latin America, and the Middle East & Africa) - Trends, Analysis and Forecast till 2029

Ask for a Discount on the Current Pricing @https://www.prophecymarketinsights.com/market_insight/Insight/request-discount/4406

Key Market Insights from the report:

The global bioherbicides market accounted for US$ 1.7 billion in 2020 and is estimated to be US$ 6.3 billion by 2029 and is anticipated to register a CAGR of 15.7%. The market report has been segmented on the basis of mode of application, source, formulation, application, and region.

To know the upcoming trends and insights prevalent in this market, click the link below:

https://www.prophecymarketinsights.com/market_insight/Global-Bioherbicides-Market-4406

Competitive Landscape:

The prominent player operating in the global bioherbicides market includes Marrone Bio Innovations, Inc., Emery Oleochemicals, Deer Creek Holdings, Ecopesticides International, Inc., Special Biochem Pvt. Ltd., Verdesian Life Sciences, Bioherbicides Australia, HerbaNatur, Inc., and Engage Agro.

The market provides detailed information regarding the industrial base, productivity, strengths, manufacturers, and recent trends which will help companies enlarge the businesses and promote financial growth. Furthermore, the report exhibits dynamic factors including segments, sub-segments, regional marketplaces, competition, dominant key players, and market forecasts. In addition, the market includes recent collaborations, mergers, acquisitions, and partnerships along with regulatory frameworks across different regions impacting the market trajectory. Recent technological advances and innovations influencing the global market are included in the report.

About Prophecy Market Insights

Prophecy Market Insights is specialized market research, analytics, marketing/business strategy, and solutions that offers strategic and tactical support to clients for making well-informed business decisions and to identify and achieve high-value opportunities in the target business area. We also help our clients to address business challenges and provide the best possible solutions to overcome them and transform their business.

Some Important Points Answered in this Market Report Are Given Below:

Key Topics Covered

Browse Related Reports:

Visit link:

Global Bioherbicides Market Witnessing a Consistency in Growth over the Past Few Years - GlobeNewswire

For The First Time, Scientists Find a Way to Make Targeted Edits to Mitochondrial DNA – ScienceAlert

Most cells in your body come with two genetic libraries; one in the nucleus, and the other inside structures called mitochondria - also known as the 'powerhouses of the cell'.

Until now, we've only had a way to make changes to one.

A combined effort by several research teams in the US has led to a process that could one day allow us to modify the instructions making up the cell's 'other' genome, and potentially treat a range of conditions that affect how we power our bodies.

The molecular foundation of this revolutionary gene editing tool is a toxin called DddA, secreted by the bacterium Burkholderia cenocepacia to sabotage other microbes when competition over resources turns serious.

Researchers from the University of Washington have had an interest in the toxin's talents for a while, finding it converts a nucleic acid base called cytosine into a different one commonly found in RNA, called uracil.

It's far from the first time researchers have looked to bacterial weapons for clues on how to tweak DNA in this way. In fact, a whole family of so-called deaminase enzymes had already been put to use in genetic engineering.

Unfortunately deaminase enzymes tend to only perform their code-swapping trick on single strands of DNA.

To get around this, another research team from the Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard combined their code-swapping deaminase with CRISPR technology, which entails using an RNA template to identify the sequence and then using enzymes to unzip the strands and make changes.

That isn't too much of a problem when you want to make edits to double strands of DNA inside something as welcoming as a cell's nucleus. But smuggling the RNA templates through the more selective membrane of a mitochondrion isn't quite so simple.

That's becausemore than a billion years ago, mitochondria were organisms in their own right, and over time they evolved to share responsibilities with the cells they now occupy, being delegated the business of breaking down glucose for power.

While many mitochondrial genes have long since been filed away in the host's nucleus, these tiny power units have held onto a few important sequences, which are tightly locked away behind a veil of membranes that don't take kindly to stray bits of RNA wafting through.

Fortunately, DddA had a unique talent for making changes to both DNA strands, opening the way to ditching CRISPR and its bulky RNA template in favour of alternative methods for targeting the sequence you want to change.

That third piece of the puzzle came in the form of an old school genetic engineering tool called a transcription activator-like effector, or TALE.

This class of enzyme can be tailored to find specific nucleic acid codes and break them apart. Just the thing for guiding a cytosine-swapping toxin into place.

Teamed up with DddA, a specially crafted TALE enzyme can find a target sequence inside mitochondria and turn any cytosine it finds into a uracil, which will later transform into a similar DNA-specific base called thymine.

In testing, this change occurred roughly half of the time.

A fifty-fifty change might not seem like a big win, but given there were no signs of potentially disastrous changes outside of target sequences, it makes for a promising precision engineering tool.

What's more, given there's no other contenders for editing mitochondrial genes, it's a landmark achievement with even this success rate.

Just as mutations in nuclear DNA can give rise to a wide variety of health conditions, mutations in the mitochondria's genes can also be problematic, affecting anything from brain development to muscle growth, energy levels, metabolism, and immunity.

Usually (though not always) passed through the eggs down from mothers, mitochondria and any damaging mutations can be inherited through the generations. Right now the best we might be able to do is combine cells from two different mothers to remove affected mitochondria.

But with this new DddA technology, we might finally be able to create animal models that mimic a range of debilitating mitochondrial conditions in humans. And, maybe one day, even fix them inside our own bodies.

This research was published in Nature.

Read the original post:

For The First Time, Scientists Find a Way to Make Targeted Edits to Mitochondrial DNA - ScienceAlert

Brave New World Arrives in the Future It Predicted – The New York Times

Ready for a thought experiment?

Imagine a society that has solved the problems of overpopulation and environmental collapse. Crime is a nonissue, as are homelessness and hunger. Racism? Sexism? Homophobia? Sorted. Science has conquered disease and disability. Everyone has useful work, perfect skin, total emotional equilibrium. Every day is a pleasure. Every night is a party.

Pop quiz: Is this a paradise? Or a prison?

Answer: Its the social science backdrop for Brave New World, the flagship drama from Peacock, NBCs streaming service. All nine episodes are available on Wednesday. Based on Aldous Huxleys alarmingly prescient 1932 novel of free love and social control, its a dystopia dressed up as a utopia. Or vice versa.

It seems perfect, said Jessica Brown Findlay, who plays the geneticist Lenina Crowne. But the minute you scratch the surface, you start to discover stuff.

But yeah, a couple of days there? she added. That would be great.

Prestige television likes its glimpses of the future and those futures usually skew dark: Westworld, Black Mirror, The Handmaids Tale. But Brave New World, which most viewers will remember vaguely if at all from some high school or college syllabus, presents a more ambivalent prospect and particular challenges.

Heres one: How do you take a nearly 90-year-old novel, a literary crystal ball so dead-on that many of its predictions (chemical birth control, mood stabilizers, genetic engineering) have already come true, and still make it feel like the future?

A collaboration between Universal Content Productions, which acquired the rights to the novel, and Amblin Entertainment, brought on for their world-building chops, Brave New World began at Syfy, then moved to USA, before landing at Peacock, shedding story and concept and the occasional writer along the way.

What often happens when you have big IP, you keep swinging until you get it right, said Dawn Olmstead, the president of Universal Content Productions.

The showrunner David Wiener (Homecoming, Fear the Walking Dead) apparently had the solution, situating the social theory within a love triangle. The theory part he explained this way: Huxley, he said, was very afraid of a world in which people would become so sexually stimulated, so pharmacologically numb and so distracted by entertainment and media, that they would fail to look within and beyond themselves in uncomfortable ways. So the future is now?

As for the love triangle: Lenina, a scientist inclined to zip-up minidresses, lives in New London, a city-state that has eliminated all social ills. Family, privacy and social mobility have been jettisoned, too. When uncomfortable feelings arise, citizens pop soma think psychoactive Skittles and drug them away.

Eager for a holiday, Lenina accompanies Bernard Marx (Harry Lloyd), an administrator with a thing for turtlenecks, on a pleasure tour of the Savage Lands. A living history park for the upper classes, the Savage Lands offer playlets based on antiquated customs marriage, consumerism. Did I mention that everyone in New London speaks in clipped British accents while the Savage Lands dialect is strictly American?

When the holiday goes wrong the Savage Lands has a sedition issue Bernard and Lenina escape with the help of a sweaty, stubbly John (Alden Ehrenreich) and his raspy, bottle-blond mom (Demi Moore). John returns with them to New London and he, Lenina and Bernard, each of them grasping for greater human connection, form the basic geometry. (No prize for guessing who she chooses, but heres a hint: His genes still encode body hair.)

To envision New London and the Savage Lands and optical interfaces between (in New London, everyone plugs into the internet via biomorphic contact lenses), the show hired the production designer David Lee (Watchmen). Huxleys world, I mean, its a design opportunity beyond belief, Lee said.

He and his team wanted to avoid the look of other films and series, though they did reference Blade Runner for its scale, he said, and Gattaca for its sleek modernism. Mostly, Lee looked to Brutalism Oscar Niemeyers Braslia, Carlo Scarpas elegant interiors, Soviet monuments that stretch heavenward.

Built of gently curved concrete, which can glow warm or cool depending on the lighting, New Londons buildings look both seductive and unyielding, as though Le Corbusiers studio had taken on a commission for a high-end spa (in a good way). The visual references for the Savage Lands: trailer parks and decayed Walmarts.

Theres plenty of C.G.I. involved, though less than you might think. The Savage Lands were shot in Dungeness, England. Lee cheerfully described the found location as a flat, barren wasteland that needed only set dressing. At Dragon Studios, just outside Cardiff, Wales, construction outgrew the buildings and spilled into the backlot and then into another studio, totaling 38 distinct sets and hundreds of thousands of square feet. Brown Findlay remembered stepping into Dragon Studios for the first time and finding this great big concrete church almost, she said.

The costumes, at least a thousand of them, also split the difference between modernism and futurism. Huxley had an obsession with zippers, and the costume designer Susie Coulthard honored it. But she embedded those zippers in vanguard materials, partnering with the Swiss textile innovators Jakob Schlaepfer on fabrics that have an oily or glassine appearance. A few outfits are made of balloon latex.

I felt so immersed in what I was doing by what I was wearing, Brown Findlay, a veteran of period shows like Downton Abbey and Harlots said. Thats saying something when youve worn a lot of huge giant corseted dresses.

Huxleys technology needed updates even beyond textiles, mostly because a lot of what he imagined (videoconferencing, television, test-tube babies) has already come to pass. Even his self-driving aircraft are in the works.

The novels utopian vision, with its ugly flares of racism and misogyny, also required renovation. The books hugely problematic, Wiener said. So the show pivoted toward equality, race-bending and gender-flipping several of the supporting characters.

It turns out theres nothing about those characters that necessarily needed to be white or male, Wiener said.

The main characters have undergone some changes, too. Lenina, a cheerful sex bunny in the book, has been granted interiority. Pompous Bernard has softened. In the novel, John is prissy and deeply neurotic, anti-sex and anti-fun.

Itd be a little like taking Mike Pence to New London, Wiener quipped. No one would want to watch that.

So Ehrenreichs John has loosened up and muscled up, though he remains extremely emo. Ehrenreich, best known as the titular swashbuckler in Solo, prefers to describe John as romantic.

The only thing he has to hold onto in is his ardent belief in a deep, emotional love, he said.

If the novel traffics mostly in satire, the tone here is more ambivalent. It gets to have its promiscuity what is prestige TV, after all, without the occasional orgy? and moralize about it, too.

Maybe you will share that ambivalence. After all, a society organized around pleasure consequence-free sex, party drugs, renewable fashion doesnt sound terrible. There were definitely moments on set where we were like, this is pretty good, Ehrenreich said.

But possibly thats just the prop soma talking. One of the novels spikier and more resonant points is that entertainment is its own drug, numbing us against discomfort. Thats something that we definitely recognize today, Lloyd, who plays Bernard, said. The moment where you sit on your own in the darkness to question what its all about, theres so many things to do on your phone.

Brave New World available soon on the Peacock app! is one more of them. Yes, it traffics in philosophy and muses upon the relationship between happiness and freedom, and what youre willing to risk of each for the other, Lloyd said.

But as Olmstead, the Universal Content president, told me twice the show shouldnt feel like homework. How much thinking will you do while you watch the buildings, the clothes, the toned bodies, the glowing skin? How well do sex and social critique actually mix? Well enough for more seasons, Wiener hopes.

Huxley didnt foresee this exact moment. (Very few of us had both a global pandemic and an overdue racial reckoning on our 2020 bingo card.) But the idea of a computer in every pocket, a social media feed for every mood, entertainment on demand and life as livestream wouldnt have surprised him.

Perhaps he can even imagine us now, pulling up Peacock, clicking on one Brave New World episode and then another. Bingeing while the world burns.

Continued here:

Brave New World Arrives in the Future It Predicted - The New York Times