Gambling Sponsorships in UK Sports on the Rise, New Study Finds – Casino.Org News

Posted on: August 4, 2022, 07:42h.

Last updated on: August 4, 2022, 01:47h.

An effort to ban gambling sponsorships of sports teams in the UK has a lot of momentum. However, a new study by Caytoo, a sponsorship relations company, shows an increase in sponsorship deals.

The English Premier League (EPL) will likely sign off on a voluntary front-of-shirt sponsorship ban, even as some of its clubs sign new deals. This would appease gambling opponents everywhere and respond to what the league says is overwhelming support from its fans.

However, in other sports, sponsorships are on the rise. Caytoo reports that rugby, cricket, and others are embracing the gambling industry more than before.

Over the past few years, the number of gaming companies holding prime real estate on sports jerseys dropped by 48%. This has been particularly evident in the EPL. Most league clubs reportedly support the idea that sports and sports betting dont mix well.

However, beginning last year, the number of gaming-related sponsorships grew, according to the surveys findings. Caytoo looked closely at 226 soccer, rugby, and cricket teams across England and Wales before finding the surprising results.

Gambling is the fourth-most prevalent front-of-shirt sponsor and the third-fastest growing sector in sports sponsorships. However, even with a growth rate of 9.2% and a 7.5% penetration, it still only holds a small piece of the market.

[Deals] in rugby and cricket have resulted in a mini comeback which will surprise many as publicity on gambling sponsorship centres on football. So, the big questions are: will the Premier League voluntary ban happen and if so, will other divisions or sports such as rugby and cricket follow suit? reads the Caytoo report.

Gaming regulators, certain politicians, and gambling opponents have been behind a campaign to eliminate all forms of gambling advertising in the UK, including sponsorships. However, recent rumors indicate that the governments forthcoming white paper on gambling wont include a mandatory sponsorship ban.

Instead, it may suggest a voluntary ban, which the EPL will likely vote on in September. Eight of the leagues 20 teams still have gaming-related front-of-shirt sponsorships.

Previously, financial services, construction, and travel and tourism sectors took prominent positions on sports shirts. However, these sponsors have fallen by at least 4.4%.

Last year, the financial services sector was second in sports sponsorships. However, it has now dropped from 8.4% to 6.1%. Liquor and alcohol deals are also down, going from 3.1% to 1.3%.

Even with the increase in gambling sponsorships, they still have their preferred segments for cricket and rugby. For cricket, automotive companies now control 17.7% of the shirts. This is up from 13.1% a year ago. Alcohol took its biggest loss, going from 9.8% to just 3.2%.

In rugby, for both the rugby union and the rugby leagues, retail is the leader. It moved up from 7% to 13.3%. In addition, financial services plummeted from 15.8% to 5%.

It still isnt clear what the future holds for gambling in the UK. There are a lot of unanswered questions that the white paper will address. However, continued delays in its release only make it more difficult for gaming operators to make long-term plans.

See the article here:

Gambling Sponsorships in UK Sports on the Rise, New Study Finds - Casino.Org News

Mashantucket Pequot Tribal Nation, diversifying beyond gambling and entertainment at Foxwoods, acquires government contracting firm – Hartford Courant

The parent company of Foxwoods Resort Casino announced Wednesday its latest business acquisition intended to generate revenue regardless of business conditions and pandemics.

Command Holdings, the Mashantucket Pequot Tribal Nations holding company with expertise in government, health care, facilities management and technology, acquired WWC Global, a Tampa, Florida-based government contracting firm focusing on federal agencies. Terms of the deal were not disclosed.

[Connecticuts two casinos generate $175M million in online and sports gambling revenue; foot traffic slows as gas hits $5 a gallon]

The tribe definitely was intentional about diversifying its economy in industries that can weather different economic downturns and cycles and away from gaming, said Angelina Casanova, a Mashantucket Pequot Tribal member and chairwoman of the Command Holdings board of directors.

With a little less than $100 million in annual revenue and 350 employees, WWC Globals portfolio of customers includes the departments of Defense, Homeland Security and State and Agency for International Development.

WWC Global is a professional services contractor, working on the business side of government, including financial management, budgets, training and other programs. Jon Panamaroff, chief executive officer of Command Holdings, said federal contracting is more sustainable than seasonal type businesses that are exposed to up and down cycles.

WWC Global was founded by women who were barred from working with their husbands on overseas military bases, Chief Executive Officer Lauren Weiner said.

We had come out of professional level careers ourselves, she said. We were told that we basically needed to sit home and enjoy being military spouses overseas and not work. It was not what we wanted to hear. It was not what we wanted to do.

Tribal leaders decided to focus on diversifying the Mashantucket Pequot business following the Great Recession, Casanova said. Slot revenue was off nearly 11% in 2008, a loss of $88.7 million from before the recession in 2006.

More than a decade later, the pandemic and a nearly three-month shutdown of Foxwoods in 2020 to slow the spread of COVID-19 led to a collapse in revenue. It began to climb back slowly as the pandemic receded.

But even before COVID-19, revenue was under pressure as casino competition intensified in the Northeast. MGM Springfield opened in August 2018 and Wynn Resorts Encore Boston Harbor opened the following year, drawing gamblers and visitors from Foxwoods and Mohegan Sun and adding to an already crowded market in Connecticut, Massachusetts, New York and Rhode Island.

Daily

Catch up on the days top headlines sent directly to your inbox weekdays at 3 p.m

Slot revenue at Foxwoods fell in each of the three years before the pandemic, from $468 million in 2017 to $431.3 million in 2019, a nearly 8% decline.

Foxwoods, which the Mashantucket Pequot Tribal Nation needs to support its credit, creates vulnerability to competition and an inability to sell assets to repay debt, Moodys Investors Service analysts John E. Puchalla and Keith Foley wrote in an April 21 note.

Casino competition and the clear field in sports betting and online gambling that some states enjoyed were critical issues in negotiations last year with the administration of Gov. Ned Lamont to craft legislation authorizing sports betting and expanded gambling on phones, tablets and laptops.

Nationally, tribal enterprises are economic engines, locally and regionally, according to a report by the Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis. As of January 2020, tribes provided more than 1.1 million jobs in the U.S., most of which were held by nontribal members. Tribes are active in numerous industries, including hospitality, tourism, energy, manufacturing and development and financial services, the report said.

The recent acquisition by the Mashantucket Pequots is not the first for Command Holdings, which wrapped up two other deals in July 2021. It acquired CeLeen Inc., a St. Louis-based information technology company, and Quattro Consulting in Washington, D.C.

It owns a fourth company, Copperhead Technologies, a computer programming and systems design company.

Stephen Singer can be reached at ssinger@courant.com.

Follow this link:

Mashantucket Pequot Tribal Nation, diversifying beyond gambling and entertainment at Foxwoods, acquires government contracting firm - Hartford Courant

Gambling addiction in teens a key focus for MDHHS – WOODTV.com

GRAND RAPIDS, Mich. (WOOD) While we work through the dog days of summer, lots of sports fans are gearing up for football season. High schoolers are working through two-a-days, college teams are preparing for their openers and the NFLs preseason kicks off Thursday night with the annual Hall of Fame game.

The rush toward football season also means a spike at sportsbooks across the country and more stress for people who deal with gambling addictions.

While soccer is the most popular sport for gamblers across the world, football is tops in the U.S. According to the Sports Encyclopedia, NFL wagers make up nearly half of all sports bets in the country and the Super Bowl is the most commonly bet sports event in the nation.

According to the National Council on Problem Gambling (NCPG), one out of every 100 Americans has a severe gambling addiction. In the four years since gambling restrictions were overturned in 2018, researchers have noticed a sharp rise among gambling addiction in teens and young adults.

The world of gambling was thrown off its axis in 2018 when the U.S. Supreme Court overturned the Professional and Amateur Sports Protection Act. The federal anti-gambling law was signed in 1992 and took effect in 1993. The law banned sports betting outside of four states: Delaware, Montana, Nevada and Oregon. Those states were grandfathered in because they already had an established sports betting industry.

Former New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie started the movement, challenging the law in 2014. His successor, Phil Murphy, took office in 2018 and continued the push. The Supreme Court ultimately declared the law unconstitutional with a 6-3 vote, allowing other states to implement its own laws for sports gambling.

Business boomed. By May 2022, 35 states including Michigan had legalized some form of sports betting or online gaming. Sportsbooks are taking bets in 30 of those.

According to the American Gaming Association, approximately $57 billion was spent on sports bets in the United States in 2021, up 177% from the 2020 haul of $21.6 billion. Sports betting alone accounted for more than $4 billion in revenue last year for American casinos and sportsbooks.

In 2021, the NCPG released the results of a massive survey on the public attitudes toward gambling. More than 28,000 people were surveyed and the study was able to break down more than 170 data points.

Some of the biggest takeaways were that people under the age of 35 were at a higher risk to develop a gambling addiction and that sports bettors were more likely to exude problematic behavior.

The NCPG included four common problematic gambling behaviors in the survey: the need to place larger bets to generate excitement, feeling restless or irritable when actively trying to stop gambling, relying on others to pay gambling debts or lying or hiding gambling habits.

According to the survey, 93% of people 75 years and older said no to all four signs of problematic gambling. For the 55-64 age group, the response dropped to 79%. For people between the age of 18 and 35, that number was only 48%.

Thats why for Alia Lucas, the gambling disorder program manager for the Michigan Department of Health and Human Services, the focus on educating the public on gambling addiction is centered on teens and young adults. The main tool? A gambling disorder prevention curriculum called Stacked Deck.

Right now, we are disseminating that curriculum and training for that curriculum to different leaders in the state, to community facilitators, community partners to have it promoted amongst the youth within their regions, Lucas told News 8.

Lucas is also working to get the curriculum integrated into school systems because of another set of data points. According to the NCPG survey, between 60% and 80% of high school students admitted to gambling for money in the past year and an estimated 4% to 6% of high schoolers are considered gambling addicts.

Detroit Public Schools, along with Shiawassee, Genesee and Lapeer counties, are serving as a pilot program to teach the Stacked Deck curriculum in classrooms and Lucas is in talks with the state education coordinator on expanding it.

Lucas says its important that the teachers using the curriculum can connect with students in a way that transcends the classroom.

When you were in school, who were the cool teachers? The gym teachers, drivers ed, were thinking along the lines of where the relationships lie, Lucas said. So were working at the state level to strategically focus our messaging and create opportunities for relationships that allow us to get the information into the schools, or at least in front of the prominent authorities that will then be more amenable for us to get it into the schools.

Virginia has taken a similar tactic. A bill there requiring all public schools to teach students about gambling risks received nearly unanimous support in the state legislature and was signed into law by Gov. Glenn Youngkin in April.

State Delegate Sam Rasoul, who introduced the bill, told Stateline that the rise in youth gambling addiction is a problem that needs to be addressed.

I had some Virginia families contact me saying, This is a problem, what should we do about it? Rasoul told Stateline. (This) is a great step for Virginia.

There is no bill on gambling addiction curriculum up for consideration in the Michigan Legislature.

Lucas is set to launch another tool that she hopes will help teens and young people dealing with gambling addiction: an anonymous text and chat line.

The state already has a toll-free hotline for people struggling with a gambling addiction, connecting them to trained counselors 24 hours a day. Lucas hopes that by introducing a less personal text-based platform, more people will feel comfortable enough to reach out.

I think we can all agree that when you think about text and chatting, the demographic thats going to take advantage of those opportunities are younger adults. It also provides a greater amount of anonymity. It might be easier for someone to simply sit there on their phone and text and chat, Lucas said.

The platform is set to launch Oct. 1, though there are still some problems to be worked out.

They have the platform. They are going through implementation training now. Theyre developing the way theyre going to disseminate the program, Lucas said. But are we going to use the current helpline staff and in their downtime have them answering texts and chats? Or will it be necessary to hire additional staff solely to address that aspect of service delivery.

If you or someone you know has a gambling problem and needs help, you can reach the Michigan Problem Gambling Helpline at 1.800.270.7117.

More here:

Gambling addiction in teens a key focus for MDHHS - WOODTV.com

‘Will he be gambling instead?’: Knut explains why xQc is a D-tier possible Camp Knut addition – Dot Esports

While ranking potential future Camp Knut prospects with Nmplol, Norwegian bodybuilder and livestreamer Knut predicted that Twitchs most viewed streamer, xQc, would likely not fair well at the fitness boot camp.

Camp Knut is a month-long fitness event spearheaded by coaches Knut and Wake Wilder, training various OTK members in weightlifting, dieting, and other forms of physical wellness. Two weeks into the boot camp, Camp Knut has drawn a significant following and led to notable bumps in viewership for nearly every participant. The lucrative success of Camp Knut so far, both in terms of viewership and results, has already led to speculation about future fitness events and potentially new streamer rosters.

While on stream with OTK co-founder and Camp Knut participant Nmplol, the multi-time bodybuilding champion ranked a wide array of streamers in regards to how he believed they would do at his intensive workout camp. Knut showed an interest in recruiting different streamers for any future iteration of the camp, with some ambitious requests.

When it came time to rank Twitchs single most-viewed English-speaking streamer, Knut explained why he would eventually place him at the D category in a tier list of potential Camp Knut attendees. Knut referenced xQcs notorious dependabilityor lack thereofin regards to collaborative streaming events, citing his concerns that xQc may suddenly stop showing up or fail to respond.

The thing is about xQc, you would never know. Thats the problem, Knut said. Will he show up? Will he respond? Will he be there playing some random game? He will show up the first day and then get stuck playing games. We dont know. Will he be gambling instead? Who knows? Maybe Jubilee will post a new video that he had to react to, might happen as well.

After listing his barrage of concerns for the Twitch star, Knut solemnly placed xQc in the D tier, amongst the likes of Mitch Jones, Forsen, and Sodapoppin. Still, it was not the worse possible placement for xQc, as he stood mere centimeters above the F tier.

More here:

'Will he be gambling instead?': Knut explains why xQc is a D-tier possible Camp Knut addition - Dot Esports

Singapore’s New Gambling Regulatory Authority Became Operational as of August 1 – European Gaming Industry News

Reading Time: 4 minutes

The Indian government requested Apple and Google to remove Battlegrounds Mobile India (BGMI) from their app stores on July 28th, one year after it launched in the country. Our research shows that the popular battle royale game, published by South Korean firm Krafton, is no longer available for download. The request comes in the wake of several allegations made against the game for being a rebranded version of PUBG Mobile, which was banned in September 2020 due to national security concerns. These concerns were recently raised in the Indian Parliament, with the Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology (MeitY) stating that BGMI was a different app to PUBG Mobile, suggesting it was not a national security concern. Its unclear what changed to cause MeitY to pull the app.

While the government has not issued a statement to confirm the game is permanently banned, Reuters reported that the title was pulled by MeitY using Section 69A of the Information Technology Act, the same act that was used to justify the ban of 321 mobile apps since June 2020. BGMI is the 57th game pulled due to this regulation. The bans have primarily targeted mobile apps from China, primarily citing national security risks. BGMIs takedown comes just 5 months after the ban of Garena Free Fire, the most popular battle royale game in India until then.

Krafton launched BGMI after PUBG Mobile was banned

MeitY originally banned PUBG Mobile in September 2020 due to national security and data privacy issues following, though not necessarily as a result of border tensions with China. While the PUBG IP is owned by Krafton, PUBG Mobile was developed and published in India by Chinese gaming giant Tencent. At the time of its ban,PUBG Mobile was the #1 game in Indiaby both revenue and downloads and had been a key driver of mobile gaming growth in the country. The ban had a profound impact on the battle royale segment and broader gaming ecosystem, with the unserved demand satiated by Garena Free Fire over time.

Krafton announced in November 2020 that it would bring its core battle royale experience back to India, with BGMI launching in July 2021. Krafton fully committed to the Indian market by self-publishing the title, introducing local servers to store user data securely and in country, and by announcing it would invest over US$100 million in the Indian gaming, esports, entertainment and IT industries, which it has done. The game saw significantly high uptake at launch given the popularity of battle royale games in the country, with 40 million registrations prior to launch and 16 million daily active users in its first 10 days.

BGMI had over 100 million downloads in its first year

BGMI has been a huge success for Krafton and the title was on track to reach the 200 million download mark that PUBG Mobile had achieved prior to its September 2020 ban. The title had quickly become the #2 highest grossing mobile game in India and its 2022 revenue was set to exceed that of PUBG Mobiles peak year. BGMI has also become the leading esports title in India with Krafton investing heavily in the space to set up the Battlegrounds Mobile India Pro Series, an official league for Indian teams with a prize pool of US$260,000.

According toNikos Asia Esports Tracker,BGMI is the #1 title by prize pool in India, with its total 2022 prize pool accounting for 35% of total prize pool revenue for all local and regional esports tournaments. The game also saw massive endorsement from streamers, esports organizations, and teams with high participation across key events. The BGMI Masters Series LAN event was also the first tournament to be televised live on Indian TV, reaching 12.3 million viewers.

How this impacts Indias mobile game market

If BGMI does not return to app stores, we believe it may have a material impact on the short-term growth rate of Indias mobile game market and the esports ecosystem. Battle royale is the most popular mobile game genre by player spending in India according to data from Sensor Tower, accounting for over 1/3 of total mobile game spending in 2021. BGMI and Free Fire accounted for over 95% of total spend on mobile battle royale games in 2021 and H1 2022, but both titles have been removed from app stores this year. However, Nikos research shows that Free Fire MAX, a high-end version of Free Fire from Garena, remains available on Google Play. Its unclear how MAX is still operating on Google Play, but the MAX version was not specifically included in the ban list where Free Fire was banned.

There will also be a negative impact on the broader BGMI ecosystem, especially within esports and live streaming. Everyday players will now be looking for a new title to play, and we expect most to shift over to Free Fire MAX assuming the title continues to operate. Call of Duty: Mobile (Activision Blizzard) may also benefit given its strong position in the market as an established shooter game with a battle royale mode that consistently ranks in the top ten game revenue chart. Apex Legends Mobile (Electronic Arts), New State (Krafton Title was formerly PUBG New State) and Farlight 84 (Lilith Games) are core battle royale games that may also benefit, but we note that these titles are not as established as Call of Duty Mobile and Free Fire MAX.

Related

View post:

Singapore's New Gambling Regulatory Authority Became Operational as of August 1 - European Gaming Industry News

Casino Games Studio 4ThePlayer Launches In New Jersey after receiving transactional waiver from NJ DGE – Gambling Industry News

Game developer 4ThePlayer.com has announced today that it has been granted a transactional waiver by the New Jersey Division of Gaming Enforcement (DGE) and is live across New Jersey, with its partnered gambling operators.

This allows 4ThePlayer.com to launch its top-performing titles at licensed operators in the state of New Jersey, the first of many US states into which 4ThePlayer.com will enter this year.

The first game to be launched is 9k Yeti followed by 6 Wild Sharks and 3 Secret Cities in the coming months. Each title has a player-centric innovation that sets it apart from other titles on the market, as well as Big Reel Portrait Mode, 4ThePlayers proprietary mobile display mode that overcomes the challenges of portrait mobile play to create an immersive player experience.

Chris Ash, Business Development Director of 4ThePlayer.com, said,

We are delighted to be granted our transactional waiver and to be live in the USA this is a milestone for 4ThePlayer and our first step into the exciting US market. We cannot wait for players in New Jersey to enjoy our games and we look forward to further US expansion in additional states soon!

The games are available on Gaming Realms, via a platform distribution deal that was announced in 2021.

4ThePlayer.com is a leading challenger brand game supplier with a focus on innovation and player entertainment! Their games include 9k Yeti, 4 Fantastic Fish, 90k Yeti, 3 Secret Cities and 6 Wild Sharks.

Their mission is to create the most exciting games for players with concise, engaging game mechanics and the best math profiles for big-win potential. Using innovation to create new gambling-focused entertainment experiences!

The London based supplier was founded in 2018 by industry veterans Andrew Porter, Chris Ash, Thomaz Scalzilli, and Henry McLean to create player-centric games that enhance the iGaming industry and champion the player! The team are players themselves and have over 50 years of industry experience, as well as a proven track record having already created success in start-ups and FTSE 250 companies.

Ciaran has a decade of experience writing for some of the biggest names in the eSports, poker, and casino industries.

More:

Casino Games Studio 4ThePlayer Launches In New Jersey after receiving transactional waiver from NJ DGE - Gambling Industry News

US casinos had best month ever in March, winning $5.3B from gamblers – FOX 5 DC

Odds you win the lottery are slim

What are the odds you win the lottery? You're more likely to be struck by lightning.

ATLANTIC CITY, N.J. - Inflation may be soaring, supply chains remain snarled and the coronavirus just won't go away, but America's casinos are humming right along, recording the best month in their history in March.

The American Gaming Association, the gambling industry's national trade group, said Wednesday that U.S. commercial casinos won more than $5.3 billion from gamblers in March, the best single-month total ever. The previous record month was July 2021 at $4.92 billion.

The casinos collectively also had their best first quarter ever, falling just short of the $14.35 billion they won from gamblers in the fourth quarter of last year, which was the highest three-month period in history.

Three states set quarterly revenue records to start this year: Arkansas ($147.4 million); Florida ($182 million), and New York ($996.6 million).

The roulette wheel spins at Caesars Atlantic City July 8, 2006 in Atlantic City, New Jersey. (Photo by William Thomas Cain/Getty Images)

The numbers do not include tribal casinos, which report their income separately and are expected to report similarly positive results.

But while the national casino economy is doing well, there are pockets of sluggishness such as Atlantic City, where in-person casino revenue has not yet rebounded to pre-pandemic levels.

"Consumers continue to seek out gamings entertainment options in record numbers," said Bill Miller, the association's president and CEO. He said the strong performance to start 2022 came "despite continued headwinds from supply chain constraints, labor shortages and the impact of soaring inflation."

The trade group also released its annual State of the States report on Wednesday, examining gambling's performance across the country.

As previously reported, nationwide casino revenue set an all-time high in 2021 at $53.03 billion, up 21% from the previous best year, 2019, before the coronavirus pandemic hit.

RELATED: Lottery winner says mistake led to $1 million prize

But the report includes new details, including that commercial casinos paid a record $11.69 billion in direct gambling tax revenue to state and local governments in 2021. That's an increase of 75% from 2020 and 15 percent from 2019. This does not include the billions more paid in income, sales and other taxes, the association said.

It also ranked the largest casino markets in the U.S. in terms of revenue for 2021:

The Las Vegas Strip is first at $7.05 billion, followed by: Atlantic City ($2.57 billion); the Chicago area ($2.01 billion); Baltimore-Washington D.C. ($2 billion); the Gulf Coast ($1.61 billion); New York City ($1.46 billion); Philadelphia ($1.40 billion); Detroit ($1.29 billion); St. Louis ($1.03 billion); and the Boulder Strip in Nevada ($967 million).

The association divides most of Pennsylvania's casinos into three separate markets: Philadelphia, the Poconos and Pittsburgh. Their combined revenue of nearly $2.88 billion would make them the second largest market in the country if judged as a single entity. It also counts downtown Las Vegas, and its $731 million in revenue, as a separate market.

Seven additional states legalized sports betting and two more added internet gambling in 2021.

The group reported many states saw gamblers spending more in casinos while visiting them in lower numbers compared to pre-pandemic 2019.

The average age of a casino patron last year was 43 1/2, compared to 49 1/2 in 2019.

Americans bet $57.7 billion on sports last year, more than twice the amount from 2020. That generated $4.33 billion in revenue, an increase of nearly 180% over 2020.

Internet gambling revenue reached $3.71 billion last year, and three states New Jersey, Pennsylvania and Michigan each won more than $1 billion online. West Virginias internet gambling market reached $60.9 million in revenue in its first full year of operation, while Connecticuts two internet casinos reported combined revenue of $47.6 million after launching in October.

Read the rest here:

US casinos had best month ever in March, winning $5.3B from gamblers - FOX 5 DC

Gambless Brings Responsible Gambling Into The App Age – Sports Handle

Free apps I got free apps!

This line was first uttered by Stanley Stinky Womack, proprietor of the fictitious Johnson Inn in the 1996 coming-of-age (in ones late twenties) film Beautiful Girls. Stinky, of course, was referring to small plates of pre-meal food on his bars menu, but his message free apps! has since been co-opted for modern times.

Today, in the age of the internet, theres like an app for everything, said Jeff Ifrah, a D.C.-based attorney who specializes in sports betting.

But while the sports betting industry at large features free apps galore, thats not the case when it comes to responsible gambling resources which is what makes Gambless such a surprisingly revolutionary concept.

Gambless, which was a finalist for the annual Ifrah Pitch Competition (named after Jeff) at last months EGR North America East Coast Briefing in New York City, aims to provide an array of therapeutic tools to people who need or think they might need help with a gambling problem. The app includes diagnostic and risk-assessment tests to gauge how advanced a gamblers problem might be, classes (free to those with serious issues) and articles on an array of gambling-related topics, coping exercises, an online diary, an AI-powered chatbot, and information about related conditions like depression and anxiety all sourced from psychologists.

Gambless is designed not only for individuals dealing with gambling addiction, but its also useful as a prevention tool a proper mental health app that can help users with other struggles, which can in turn lead to the development of a gambling addiction, said Gambless CEO Maurizio Savino, whos based in Italy.

What the app isnt set up to do, however, is quickly connect a gambler in crisis to a live person ideally a professional therapist with whom they can talk.

There is currently no way to be connected to a live therapist via the app, said Savino. However, we have a contact module, and if users request this, we can signpost them to therapists in our network. The app is purely for self-help, and the chatbot serves a different purpose. It is built to guide users through some coping techniques in the event of strong anxiety or panic attacks.

Click emergency on the Gambless app and youll be connected to Savinos cartoon visage, which is the chatbots avatar. Youre then given a few multiple choice questions that help hone in on the problem youre experiencing before being given the freedom to type in what, exactly, is causing distress.

The chatbot is polite, soothing, and doesnt say anything wrong. But in terms how effective it is for a gambler at the end of their rope, it leaves a lot to be desired.

If someones really in crisis, it should be about getting someone help immediately, observed responsible gambling consultant Brianne Doura-Schawohl. I liked the mindfulness stuff, I liked the diary, but in my mind, apps are supposed to be conduits to important information and support, and I think this gets a little clunky. Why arent we connecting people to emergency help in a market? People in crisis arent really in a place to Google something.

But as Savino said, Gambless is, at its core, purely for self-help. And given that primary objective and the apps potential appeal to a younger generation of gamblers, it has considerable usefulness.

I love that there is an app around this really important public health issue, said Doura-Shawohl. We spend a lot of time talking about how gambling is evolving, which is bringing a host of new, younger customers, and an app is a perfect way to reach them. These are not people who are calling helplines. This app should not be such the anomaly that it is. The industry embraces technology and innovation, and so too should problem gambling.

About a quarter of the people who access Gambless hail from the United States, which is about the same number as the U.K. and Ireland combined. But Savino, whose company has yet to embark upon any customer acquisition campaigns, said the amount of Americans using the app has grown in recent months.

Online gambling in the U.S is still at its early stages, said Savino, but I hope it will not repeat the same mistakes done in Europe and in the U.K.

Gambless is currently in the process of seeking additional funding from investors and grant-making institutions, some government-based. But, to date, Savino has been frustrated by gaming companies reluctance to collaborate.

Honestly, we thought that gambling companies would be more eager to partner with us, but unfortunately, thats not the case, he said. We tried last year to connect with various companies in Europe and the U.K., but we soon realized that perhaps gambling companies were not the most interested stakeholders. This was by far the biggest disappointment. There is a lot of talk in the industry about responsible gambling, but it seems that companies are just interested in the visibility part.

Continue reading here:

Gambless Brings Responsible Gambling Into The App Age - Sports Handle

A general introduction to gambling law in USA (Nevada) – Lexology

All questions

Overview

Nevada legalised casino gambling in 1931 when Governor Fred Balzar signed Assembly Bill 98 into law. The Nevada Legislature voted to legalise gambling to help lift Nevada out from under the impact of the Great Depression, and undid a ban on casino gambling in the state that had been in place since 1909. Gambling has been legal in Nevada for over 85 years.

The definition of 'gambling game' in Nevada is 'any game played with cards, dice, equipment or any mechanical, electromechanical or electronic device or machine for money, property, checks, credit or any representative of value'.2

The definition excludes 'games played with cards in private homes or residences in which no person makes money for operating the game, except as a player, or games operated by charitable or educational organisations which are approved' by the Nevada Gaming Control Board (the Board).3 Under Nevada law, a 'wager' is 'a sum of money or representative of value that is risked on an occurrence for which the outcome is uncertain'.4

In 1949, Nevada began allowing wagering on horse racing and professional sports at 'turf clubs', which were independent from casinos. In 1975, the Nevada Legislature authorised race and sports wagering to be offered in Nevada casinos. Nevada sportsbooks offer a variety of wagering options for patrons. Patrons can place parlay wagers, wagers on point spreads and pari-mutuel wagers (participants wagering with each other).5 Many Nevada sportsbooks offer a mobile wagering application that allows people to place wagers with licensed Nevada race and sportsbooks without the need of going to a betting window in a casino. The registration process for a mobile wagering account must occur in a Nevada race and sportsbook.6 Currently, any wagers made via the mobile sports wagering application must be initiated from within Nevada.7

In 2011, the Nevada Gaming Commission (the Commission; collectively, the Board and Commission will be referred to as the Nevada Gaming Authorities) adopted regulations for interactive (online) gaming in Nevada. By statute, online gaming in Nevada is limited to poker. The first online poker website went live in Nevada in April 2013. In an effort to increase liquidity for the online poker websites in Nevada, the governors of Nevada and Delaware signed a compact in February 2014 to establish a legal framework for interstate poker between players in both states, and the states began sharing online poker players in March 2015.

During the 2015 Nevada legislative session, Chapter 463 of the Nevada Revised Statutes (the Nevada Act) was amended to allow games of skill and hybrid games of skill and chance to be available on casino floors in Nevada. A 'game of skill' is defined as 'a game in which the skill of the player, rather than chance, is the dominant factor in affecting the outcome of the game as determined over a period of continuous play'.8 A 'hybrid game' is defined as a 'game in which a combination of the skill of the player and chance affects the outcome of the game as determined over a period of continuous play'.9

In October 2015, the Board issued a notice stating its position that pay-to-play daily fantasy sports (DFS) met the definition of a gambling game under Nevada law and, therefore, anyone offering DFS in Nevada must possess a licence to operate a sports pool issued by the Commission. The Board defined DFS as a gambling game but did not take a position on traditional season-long fantasy sports.

Section 24 of the Nevada Constitution prohibits the state of Nevada from authorising a lottery. Nevada is one of five states in the United States that does not have a state-affiliated lottery. The other four states are Alabama, Alaska, Hawaii and Utah. In Nevada, a lottery is defined as 'any scheme for the disposal or distribution of property, by chance, among persons who have paid or promised to pay any valuable consideration for the chance of obtaining that property'.10 Nevada allows charitable raffles to be offered by 'bona fide charitable, civic, educational, fraternal, patriotic, political, religious or veterans organization[s] that [are] not operated for profit' to conduct a lottery, raffle or gift enterprise for the benefit of charitable or non-profit activities in the state.11

Today, Nevada is home to one of the world's most recognisable skylines the Las Vegas Strip. The gaming industry is vitally important to the state's economy and the welfare of its residents.12 As such, the gaming industry is heavily regulated at the state level by the Nevada Gaming Authorities to ensure its integrity and longevity.13 Nevada recognises the importance of strict regulation in order to maintain the industry's significance, stating that:

To Nevadans, the presence of the gaming industry is a part of daily life. A limited number of slot machines can be found on the bar tops of neighbourhood pubs and taverns and in grocery stores, convenience stores and even airports. Casinos are commonplace and offer more than just table games and slot machines. Casinos are home to restaurants, theatres, bowling alleys, convention spaces, spas and salons.

Unlike other states with state-run lotteries, Nevada does not own any part of the gaming industry. Nevada's gaming industry relies solely on private and public ownership and investment in the operation of gaming establishments. While there is no rule prohibiting the same owner from having an interest in multiple gaming establishments, the Nevada Act and the regulations promulgated by the Commission pursuant to the Nevada Act (the Regulations) are designed to encourage competition. If the same entity or individual wishes to own multiple casinos in Nevada, the Nevada Gaming Authorities consider a number of factors, such as whether such licensing will have an adverse impact upon the public health, safety, morals, good order and the general welfare of the public.15

As noted above, gaming in Nevada is regulated at the state level by the Board and Commission. In addition, city and county governments also regulate gaming in Nevada. In general, the Board and Commission handle detailed background investigations for casino applicants, while local agencies primarily focus on the regulation and control of liquor sales and issuing ancillary business licences for the operation of various businesses located in a casino. In Las Vegas, for instance, casinos located on the Las Vegas Strip need to receive licences from the Clark County Department of Business License, and casinos located in downtown Las Vegas need to obtain licences from the City of Las Vegas Business License Department.

The Board and Commission have the ability to license gaming operators in the state of Nevada and individuals affiliated with such companies. Those that operate gaming contrary to the laws of the state are prosecuted by the Nevada Attorney General or the appropriate federal authorities.

There may be regulatory consequences for companies that have operated illegally in the past and then apply for licensure in Nevada. A few years ago, the Board and Commission indicated their likely approach when companies that have operated offshore gambling businesses in the United States come before them for licensing. In 2011, the Nevada Gaming Authorities addressed Caesars Entertainment's application to approve its association with 888 Holdings, a company that had offered online poker in the United States before 2006. When the Unlawful Internet Gambling Enforcement Act (UIGEA) was enacted in 2006, 888 Holdings pulled its operations from the United States. By ultimately approving Caesars' business dealings with 888 Holdings, the Board and Commission indicated a general willingness to allow companies that ceased operations in 2006 upon the passing of UIGEA to be able to operate in Nevada going forward if they came forward for licensing.

Legal and regulatory framework

The Nevada Act and the Regulations provide the primary legal framework for the regulation of gaming in Nevada. The laws, regulations and supervisory procedures of the Nevada Gaming Authorities are based upon declarations of public policy. These public policy concerns include, among other things:

The Nevada Act provides for a two-tier state regulatory system. The Board is a full-time regulatory agency consisting of two members and a chairperson, all appointed by the governor. The Board employs staff allocated among divisions, which perform various functions related to the regulation of gaming, including investigations related to applications for licences and findings of suitability. The Board makes recommendations to the Commission as to how licence applications should be handled. The Commission is a part-time body consisting of four members and a chairperson, all of whom are also appointed by the governor. The Commission makes the final determination on licence applications.

The Nevada Act and Regulations provide for the Board to license and regulate both online and land-based gambling. On 22 December 2011, the Commission adopted regulations for the establishment of a regulatory framework for the state regulation of internet poker pursuant to Assembly Bill 258 enacted by the Nevada Legislature. These regulations address the licensure of operators, service providers and manufacturers of 'interactive gaming systems', which are currently limited to internet poker. The core components of an interactive gaming system must be located in the state of Nevada except as otherwise permitted by the Board.17

While licensed gambling is legal in Nevada, there are some restrictions as to where a gaming establishment may be located. In 1997, the Nevada Legislature enacted laws to regulate the location of future casinos in counties with a population of 700,000 or more.18 As a result, the laws currently only apply to Clark County, where the Las Vegas Strip is located. One of the purposes of restricting the location of future casinos in Clark County is to concentrate:

New non-restricted gaming establishments20 in Clark County must be located in a gaming enterprise district (GED).21 Clark County publishes a map that indicates where the GEDs are located. Gaming establishments that were not located within a GED when the law was enacted in 1997 are grandfathered, but 'the establishment may not increase the number of games or slot machines operated at the establishment beyond the number of games or slot machines authorized for such a classification of establishment by local ordinance on December 31, 1996'.22 The Commission may approve the placement of a gaming establishment outside of a GED if the petitioner demonstrates that certain enumerated development criteria, such as the enhancement of the local economy and the welfare of the community, have been met.23

The Nevada Act and Regulations authorise casinos to offer mobile gaming to their patrons. For a patron to participate in mobile gaming, he or she needs to go through an in-person registration process at the casino. Once authorised, the patron is provided a device that allows him or her to gamble remotely on the casino property. The mobile devices should not work outside the property. Additionally, Nevada's race and sportsbooks allow customers to place bets remotely on games and approved events on their mobile sports betting apps (provided the wagers are made in Nevada). Currently there are also two companies licensed to conduct interactive gaming (poker only) in Nevada. While one operates only within Nevada, the other pools customers in Nevada, Delaware and New Jersey pursuant to a Multi-State Internet Gaming Agreement. Delaware and Nevada entered into this shared liquidity agreement in 2014 and New Jersey was added to the agreement in 2017.

The manufacture, sale or distribution of gaming devices without a licence is illegal in Nevada.24 A 'gaming device' is any object used remotely or directly in connection with gaming, or any game that affects the result of a wager by determining win or loss and that does not otherwise constitute associated equipment.25

If a particular device is not a gaming device, it may be considered associated equipment in Nevada. Associated equipment is any equipment used in connection with gaming or mobile gaming, which connects to progressive slot machines, equipment that affects the proper reporting of gross revenue, computerised systems of betting at a race book or sports pool, computerised systems for monitoring slot machines and devices for weighing or counting money.26 Any manufacturer or distributor of associated equipment for use in Nevada must register with the Commission pursuant to NRS 463.665.27 The Commission has the discretion to require any manufacturer or distributor of associated equipment to file an application for a finding of suitability.28

Additionally, Nevada registers certain service providers. A service provider includes any person who:

When the Commission issues a licence to a gaming operator, certain individuals affiliated with the casino licensee and the casino licensee's holding companies need to file applications and be investigated and found suitable. Generally, the Commission will impose a condition on a casino's licence requiring the general manager of the casino to file an application as a key employee of the casino.

For privately held businesses, the licensing requirements vary depending on the type of entity involved. No person may acquire a 5 per cent or greater interest in a privately held licensee or a holding company, nor become a controlling30 affiliate of such licensee or holding company, nor become a holding company of such licensee or holding company, without first obtaining the prior approval of the Commission.31 The Commission may require any or all of a privately held business entity's lenders, holders of evidence of indebtedness, underwriters, key executives, agents or employees, as applicable, to be licensed or found suitable.32 For a corporate licensee, in addition to owners of 5 per cent or more of the equity securities issued by the corporate licensee, all officers and directors of a privately held corporation that holds or applies for a state gaming licence must be licensed individually.33 Owners under 5 per cent must register with the Board.

Publicly traded corporations (PTCs) are treated differently under Nevada law than privately held business entities. The Nevada gaming statutes that deal with PTCs focus on voting control rather than on equity ownership. Each officer, director and employee of a PTC that the Commission determines is or is to become actively and directly engaged in the administration or supervision of, or is to have any other significant involvement with, the gaming activities of the corporation or any of its affiliated or intermediary companies must be found suitable and may be required to be licensed by the Commission.34 A holder of more than 5 per cent of the voting securities of a PTC registered with the Commission must notify the Commission within 10 days after filing notice with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC).35 A holder of more than 10 per cent of the voting securities of a PTC must file an application with the Commission for a finding of suitability within 30 days after the chairman of the Board mails written notice to the owner.36 Qualified institutional investors can hold up to 25 per cent of the voting securities of a PTC, but they need to obtain a waiver from the Commission in order to do so.37

In March 2016, the Commission adopted Regulation 15C, which created a unique licensing framework for private investment companies. Regulation 15C defines a private investment company as:

A private investment company is regulated similar to a PTC but does not have the burdensome SEC reporting obligations and can maintain the confidentiality of its proprietary financial information.

In January 2019, the Commission adopted amendments to the Regulations pertaining to race books and sports pools. The adopted amendments provide, in part, clarification on permitted wagers. For example, licensed race books and sports pools may accept wagers on professional sport or athletic events sanctioned by a governing body, Olympic sporting or athletic events sanctioned by the International Olympic Committee, collegiate sporting or athletic events and virtual events.38 Wagers may be accepted on other events upon the Chair's approval, so long as the other event has been sanctioned by an organisation included on the list of sanctioning organisations maintained by the Board, or the other event is listed on the list of pre-approved other events.39

See more here:

A general introduction to gambling law in USA (Nevada) - Lexology

How this casino addict came back from the brink after nearly losing it all – New York Post

Christina Cook had never heard of gambling addiction. But she was already on her way to being hooked eventually losing nearly half a million dollars and, almost, her own life.

In 2007, at 28, the Tulsa, Okla., native was separated from her first husband, grieving the death of her beloved grandmother and living at home with her mother.

Then her mom, with whom she is very close, had a heart attack.

After rushing her to the hospital, I went home to get her pajamas and stuff to make her comfy recalled Cook, now 43. On her way back, feeling emotionally taxed, Cook took a detour to Osage Nation Casino in Sand Springs, outside Tulsa. The flashing lights, friendly faces and anticipation of a jackpot gave her a jolt of relief from stress.

I sat down at a slot machine and won a $1,201 jackpot, Cook recalled. My sister was calling me saying, Wheres Moms stuff? But it was such a high.

Feeling shame mingled with euphoria, Cook returned to the hospital with her mothers things. They were all mad, asking me, Where have you been? she recalled.

That is when it all started to be a secret.

Gambling would become Cooks escape from her struggles with cervical cancer, a hysterectomy and grief that came from knowing she would never be a biological mother.

My friends all had babies, she remembered. I didnt want to listen to talk about showers and feedings, so I started going gambling Friday nights.

During years of intensifying addiction from 2008 to 2015, Cook, a lifelong people pleaser, became romantically involved with her boss, whom she describes as a narcissist.

He would tell me we were going out and then ghost me, she recalled. He always wanted to meet late at night. He was all about control, and he kept me feeling low, like I couldnt look good enough or get anything right.

She remembers being at a work auction where they were selling slices of strawberry cake, her favorite kind. It happened to be her birthday and she told her boyfriend she was going to get a piece.

He said, You dont need that, she remembered. But I got a slice anyway. Her boyfriend looked at her with disgust, refusing to sit with her for the rest of the night.

He did everything in his power to isolate me which, looking back, made it easier for the addiction to do the same, Cook said. Those machines had no expectations of me. I just had to feed them to feel good.

Her gambling addiction worsened in the years she was with her toxic lover, who refused to meet her family.

In the early years of her gambling addiction, Cook would often sit down at a slot machine (her game of choice) and hit.

She would bet a significant portion of her paycheck, about $300, on paydays.

At first, she had luck. Some nights it seemed like I was absolutely on fire, she recalled. Every machine I sat at, I won. People were screaming, Youre so lucky! and I started thinking, Maybe I am.

But she wound up pouring her winnings and then some back into the slots. The last few years it didnt matter what I won, I wouldnt leave with it.

The most she ever lost in one day was about $17,000.

I had started out with $300, she said. At one point, she had won $16,000 and $5,000 jackpots. I remember a casino worker saying, Youre going home with this, right?

She played it back in.

I walked out with $4,000 of the $21,000 I had won. I took the $4,000 back the next day and lost it plus $2,000 of my own money.

In all, from 2008 to 2021, Cook estimates that she lost half a million dollars gambling.

She borrowed from her mother and her sister in those years money she has yet to fully repay.

Her relationship with her twin, Michelle, became strained because Michelle co-signed a car loan for her and Cook fell behind on the payments. We had always helped each other and then I did that, she said. She couldnt trust me. Though she never once made me feel like she wouldnt be there for me.

The last tally of what I borrowed from my mom was $8,000 and from Michelle, $5,000, she said. The real numbers are probably higher. I would say, My cars broken down for the fifth time or Someone stole my wallet. Once, my mom said, You should win an Oscar because these lies are getting more outrageous.

She also owed $35,000 in back taxes, $15,000 in credit card debt, $7,000 in medical debt, and $3,000 in miscellaneous debt.

Her mother tried to persuade her to get help. She told me she wanted to be there for me when I hit rock bottom, Cook recalled.

But Cook was in denial, characterizing her gambling addiction as financial problems.

She ended her toxic relationship and met a nice easygoing guy on PlentyofFish.com in 2015. He got along with her friends and family. They got married. His acceptance, and kindness, were especially attractive qualities after her previous relationship; however, she was still an addict leading a double life.

He didnt question why we never hung out on Friday nights, she said.

In January 2021, crippled by debt and anxiety, Cook quit gambling cold turkey.

She didnt hit bottom, however, until March 6.

I had a bad day at work, she said. I blew my whole paycheck, my husbands paycheck, and everything we had saved in the bank. I placed my last bet just after midnight.

After I left the casino the morning of March 6, I couldnt see a way out and I was thinking of ways I could end my life so I wouldnt be such a burden to the people in my life, said Cook. Theres a big bridge that goes from the casino to my home. I was thinking, Can I drive off it?

I didnt really want to end my life, I wanted to end the addiction that had become my life.

I felt, Ill never be cured, Ill keep ruining my life, my familys life, she said.

She went to see her mother the next day, handing her the 1099s shed received from the casino for $5,000 she had won, then lost. (In the U.S., gamblers receive a 1099 for any winnings over $1200 even if they subsequently lose it).

My mother was happy because she thought I was there to pay her back, Cook remembered. I broke down when I saw the disappointed look on her face.

At her mothers suggestion, she contacted Gamblers Anonymous (GA). One of the volunteers took time to give me hope, she said.

She placed [her] last bet on March 6, 2021 and regularly been attending GA meetings, as well as weekly therapy sessions, and joined support groups on social media. Finding few resources for women with gambling addiction, she decided to recover out loud by sharing [her] journey and other womens stories on her podcast, The Broke Girl Society and starting a Broke Girl Society support group.

Cook also broadcasts a YouTube show with fellow recovered addict Brian Hatch, The Bet Free Life. She has come clean to her husband.

In her search for resources to help others, she reached out to Gamban.com, a company providing software to block online gambling sites. Its a resource she recommends as a good tool for people struggling with online gambling addiction, which is on the rise.

She wants compulsive gamblers, including women, to know that help and recovery are available.

Once youre honest, theres no guarantee people wont abandon you, but there is help, she said. Its about building a life you dont need to escape from.

Resources for help with gambling addiction: National Council on Problem Gambling hotline (1-800-522-4700);Gamblers In Recovery;RecoveryRoadOnline.com;GamblersAnonymous.organd, for online gamblers,Gamban.com.

Read the rest here:

How this casino addict came back from the brink after nearly losing it all - New York Post

Steph Shilton on husband Peter’s gambling addiction, his lost football millions and helping others recover – iNews

When Steph Shilton, wife of former England goalkeeper Peter Shilton, first spotted him sneaking away to make telephone calls in private, it ignited suspicions that he was cheating on her with another woman.

She later discovered he was in the grip of a chronic gambling addiction which saw him fritter away millions of pounds betting on horses, losing everything hed ever earned.

Discovering Peter wasnt being unfaithful to her was little solace to Steph. The way it makes you feel, its as though you have been cheated on, she explains. It was exactly like Peter had been having an affair.

You realise youve been lied to and you find out they have been having a secret life and that makes you feel the same way as if there had been another woman.

Youre competing with a third party in your relationship and for me, that was a gambling company.

Peter Shilton, 72, is one of Englands footballing greats, with a 30-year career spanning 11 clubs, more than 1,000 league games, and he holds the title of Englands most capped player.

But Peter was also hiding a 45-year gambling addiction which he only conquered after falling in love with Steph, whom he married in December 2016 the same year he finally quit gambling.

During Mental Health Awareness Week, Steph has exclusively shared with i that she has started a new role as an ambassador for Addiction Recovery Agency (Ara)s Six To Ten project, which seeks to support those affected by someone elses gambling.

The pilot project, across the North West and South West of England, and all of Wales, is the first of its kind to offer direct support to loved ones rather than the addict. If successful, it will be rolled out nationally.

Steph says a lot of existing work centres around the gambling addict and she describes loved ones as the silent victims research suggests on average, six to 10 people are at risk of gambling-related harms as a result of a loved ones addiction.

Loved ones can be the key to someone quitting and recovering from a gambling addiction and can be the antidote, she says. They can be just as much a victim as the addict.

The couple first met 10 years ago in a hotel lift when Steph, a former NHS manager and semi-professional jazz singer, was away on a spa weekend with friends and Peter was at a conference.

She confesses that she was unaware how big a sporting giant he was and knew nothing about football. We got talking and just clicked straight away, she says. But, I could sense a real sadness about him. I could see it in his eyes.

Despite having a great career and wonderful friendships and a social network, I hadnt told anyone, but I was lonely. I looked at Peter and thought: You look like how I feel, she says.

The couple fell in love and Peter soon moved into Stephs home in Colchester, but before long, her suspicions were aroused by some odd behaviour.

He kept going outside to use his phone rather than in front of me, she explains. He was behaving shiftily, and I became suspicious and thought he had another woman.

Steph turned detective and asked to borrow Peters phone. Noticing a number he was dialling frequently, she scribbled it down and called it when he wasnt at home.

To her surprise, it was a betting company.

At this stage, I didnt realise it was a problem, she says. I initially thought he liked a flutter and was being sweet and gentlemanly by hiding it from me as we had not been together very long.

I knew he liked watching horse racing and it fell into place that when we went out for lunch or somewhere, Peter would sometimes get anxious about getting home for a certain time.

Steph raised this with Peter and told him that he didnt need to sneak around or hide his enjoyment of gambling. However, as time went by, the severity sunk in.

She would wake up in the middle of the night to find he wasnt there. I sneaked downstairs one night and I saw him on his laptop watching horse racing in Australia and placing bets.

It dawned on me that this was a huge problem. But talking proved fruitless as Peter was in denial. He just blocked me out and the more I pushed it, the more defensive he became.

This went on for two or three years until Peter proposed to Steph. She told him until he addressed his gambling they could not get married.

I had always been financially stable and had a good job and savings and knew I needed to protect myself. I was worried I would be jointly liable for any debts.

At the same time, I loved Peter and realised he had a serious problem.

Things came to a head in August 2013 when Peter went to India for three weeks and Steph engaged in a cat and mouse endeavour to access his gambling accounts.

Then a bank statement arrived. I knew that would give me the answers, recalls Steph.

She tussled with her conscience for three days. I knew Id be breaking the law by opening the mail and also betraying Peters trust. But I was so worried about him and knew I had to do it.

Stunned by pages and pages of transactions, Steph calculated that Peter had lost 18,000 in just one month. The shock was horrendous, she remembers. I knew he had a problem but didnt realise the severity of it until I saw that bank statement.

She contacted the betting company begging them to help Peter. However, she says they cited data protection and said they couldnt discuss it with her.

I later had it forensically looked into and Peter had lost 800,000 with that company. Of course they werent going to do anything when he was such a good customer, she says.

Steph says Peter lost millions to gambling Peter has previously written about not knowing exactly how much he has lost. He lost everything, she says. Everything he earned in his career ended up with the bookies.

For those with an addiction the compulsion to spend is like a heroin addiction, says Steph. They will bet everything they have coming in and when thats gone, theyll look for other ways to fund it.

As soon as Peter quit, I made him promise he would never look back as that doesnt help with the mental anguish.

When Steph confronted Peter about the bank statement he was furious with her for opening his mail. But she knew she had the evidence she needed that he needed help.

A month later, Steph suffered a miscarriage. Through the tragedy came a glimmer of hope. Peter nursed me for three days and didnt leave my side, she recalls. He was an amazing support and I noticed he didnt gamble once during those days.

Something inside me felt there was light at the end of the tunnel and that maybe he could do this and beat gambling for me; for us.

I never threatened to leave him as I knew that was the worst thing I could do when he was living with immense mental anguish, says Steph.

But one night, she moved out of their bedroom into the spare room saying she needed some time out. It gave Peter the wake-up call he needed fearing he might lose her and he finally acknowledged it was time to quit. But there was no quick fix.

Some people wrongly presume Peter quit gambling and we ran off into the sunset to live happily ever after.

Peter went into really bad withdrawal which shocked me, she remembers. It was like going cold turkey with a drug addiction. His body craved a bet just like a drug.

He couldnt function at all and had to start a whole new life and was all over the place. His withdrawal symptoms went on for three months, but he didnt fully settle for around a year. Peter was so up and down with his moods and I felt I was on eggshells as I didnt want anything to upset him as I feared hed go back to gambling.

As well as struggling with Peters withdrawal, Steph was also hit with loneliness as she felt she couldnt talk to anyone in case the story was leaked.

The new Six To Ten pilot will give loved ones a designated support worker to tackle loneliness and help arrange support for issues ranging from legal, financial and housing support to emotional support and arranging counselling all free of charge.

Ara, Beacon Counselling Trust and DrugFAM came together to develop the service which Steph feels is desperately needed.

Steph says their awareness-raising efforts are also looking to tackle stigma and the language used about gambling addiction. Gambling addiction is a mental illness and the public arent fully educated.

Ultimately, she says, her biggest fear was that gambling could end Peters life. I had this fear Petes gambling was spiralling so out of control that if I walked out, he might do something to himself.

It just broke my heart that this great man who had achieved so much on a global scale was struggling so much with this crippling mental illness of gambling addiction.

Steph adds that looking at Pete now fills her with pride and joy. My love and commitment to Pete was never in question and I never considered leaving him.

To see him in the best place is my reward.

For more information about Addiction Recovery Agency and the Six To Ten project, call: 0330 1241274 or email info@thesixtoten.co.uk

Go here to read the rest:

Steph Shilton on husband Peter's gambling addiction, his lost football millions and helping others recover - iNews

Tour Confidential: Sergio’s rant, Phil’s gambling and the spicy PGL letter – Golf.com

By: GOLF Editors May 8, 2022

Sergio Garcia and Phil Mickelson were both in the headlines last week.

Getty Images

Check in every week for the unfiltered opinions of our writers and editors as they break down the hottest topics in the sport, and join the conversation by tweeting us@golf_com. This week, we discuss the Sergio Garcias dustup with a Tour rules official, Phil Mickelsons reported gambling debts and much more.

1. Both start-up tours made headlines this week. Lets start with the LIV Golf Invitational Series, the Saudi-funded tour headed by Greg Norman, where the field for its first event, in early June, is beginning to take shape. Ahead of this weeks British Masters, Lee Westwood and Richard Bland expressed their interest, and a report from The Telegraph said Martin Kaymer would also request a release to play. Perhaps most notably was the revelation from Sergio Garcia following a ruling at the Wells Fargo Championship. There, Garcia said, I cant wait to leave this Tour, and later, various outlets reported that Garcia was, in fact, looking to play in the first event. How much, if at all, do these developments alter your view of the fledgling tours prospects?

Sean Zak, senior editor (@sean_zak): Absolutely zero change in my opinion. Players like Westwood, Bland and even Garcia are exactly who weve been assuming will take part in these events. The youngest and best players have all committed to the PGA Tour. Older players outside the top 10 in the world seem to be considering LIV Golf. So this checks out completely.

Josh Sens, senior writer: Seans right about all of that. I also dont think there was ever much doubt that the LIV was here for the long haul, given the financial muscle behind it. So the prospects question is really two pronged. Theres longevity. And then theres allure. Yes. Its got the former. What remains to be seen is how interesting it will be for fans. Big purses alone do not guarantee interesting golf.

Alan Bastable, executive editor (@alan_bastable): Right, an archetype for LIV A-listers is now coming to the fore: past-their-primers who (1) are no longer regularly competitive in the majors, (2) cant cash in on PIP money or the Tours other bonus structures and (3) as Westwood demonstrated last week, dont appear fazed by the weighty moral and ethical questions before them. Question is, as these guys start to cash monster checks, how many other notables especially those struggling to find their games will continue to be content watching from the sidelines as Sergio and Co. fill up their Brinks trucks. This new tour will have as much longevity as it wants, for one simple reason: it has endless Saudi capital.

Josh Berhow, managing editor (@josh_berhow): I dont think any of these names being interested in that tour is surprising and its a group of players late in their career, already made some good money, European, etc. we thought might be joining this tour in the first place. So my view hasnt changed, but it was pretty entertaining to see Sergio get upset and act childish on his way out.

2. How much should the Tour be concerned that other players could threaten to leave should they disapprove of Tour policy/governance? Remember, we heard Charley Hoffman make a similar remark in February at the Waste Management Open.

Zak: The PGA Tour has a responsibility to host tournaments played under the Rules of Golf. If that is a reason a player actually leaves, the Tour should send them on their way. In case it wasnt clear with Hoffman, the Rules of Golf will never be the reason a player leaves the PGA Tour.

Sens: The occasional rules snafu is a non-issue. Name a sport that doesnt have the occasional rules hiccup. They all do. The concern, I would think, isnt guys leaving over governance. Its guys being part of an antitrust suit if the Tour tries to block them signing on to a rival. Every legal expert Ive spoken with about this says there would be a legitimate case to be made.

Bastable: Let us not forget that LIVs rules department will be run by the very rules sharpie who used to lord over PGA Tour events: Slugger White! So if Sergio is looking for some fresh officiating blood, he best find another tour. But, no, the PGA Tour isnt out of the woods yet in terms of managing discontent players. Its membership will continue to force the Tour to evolve and make paydays fatter. Hopefully that also means revising the endless slog of the Tour schedule. The team/F1-inspired format in play on LIV, which is exactly what the PGL has been pushing for years, makes sense on a lot of levels most especially for fans.

Berhow: I dont think a few bad apples should shape what the PGA Tour is doing. Its still the league 99% of the worlds best professional golfers want to play in, and you cant make everyone happy. When these players complain when they are on the course it says more about them than it does the PGA Tour.

3. Another player connected to the Saudi-backed tour, Phil Mickelson, was also in the news, albeit for a different reason. In an excerpt from an upcoming book, published on firepitcollective.com, Mickelson, according to source, accumulated more than $40 million in gambling debt from 2010 to 2014, or roughly the equivalent of his estimated annual income during that period. Whats your takeaway from the latest Phil news?

Zak: That there was merit to anyone who called it a gambling addiction. You dont build that amount of debt up without being addicted to it.

Sens: If youve paid even loose attention to news around Mickelson over the years, you can only be shocked by this in the Casablanca sense. The reported numbers? Not hard to imagine either, given the kind of earnings Mickelson has pulled in and the sort of allegations that have swirled around him. Anyone who has ever been around gambling and gamblers knows how quickly it can get out of hand.

Bastable: Im not sure we can just laugh off 40 mil as Phil being Phil. Thats a huge sum, and another reminder that he was in deep. Remember, this a guy who the SEC alleged acted on a stock tip to pay off a seven-figure debt to notorious gambler Billy Walters. Pretty dark stuff. You have to wonder what, if any, effect losing that kind of dough had on his play. Distracting? Hard to say. He did win five times from 2010-14, including a pair of majors.

Berhow: Its a staggering number. Just yet another unsavory question hell have to face when he returns and meets with the media. Im not sure if hell actually answer it, but wow is there a lot going on in Phil Mickelsons world right now.

4. The Premier Golf League, meanwhile, sent a letter to PGA Tour players asking that they message your player representatives on the PAC and the Policy Board and tweet/retweet: As a member of the tour, I instruct you to obtain and publish an independent valuation of the PGL Proposals #playerpower #transparency. If seventy or more of you do this, it will happen. Can it? Will it? Whats the future of the PGL?

Zak: I havent seen a Tour player send those tweets yet! So no, it probably wont happen. The Premier Golf League needs this, though, so I dont see them giving up. I see them talking to as many influential players as possible. They dont have the various stigmas facing LIV Golf, and theres clearly enough interest in changing something about how elite golfers get paid. I think their days of playing a passive role letting LIV take their format and run with it might come to an end soon.

Sens: I try to steer clear of Twitter as much as possible. Lifes too short, but if Sean says he hasnt seen it, I believe it. Seriously, though, like the Saudi-backed Tour, the Premier Golf League isnt going anywhere. At this point, it costs relatively little to keep agitating for change. Whether they can put together a circuit that gets fans excited is another matter. The idea of elite golfers getting paid more is not especially interesting to most of us. There has to be more to it than that.

Bastable: Agitating for change may cost relatively little but it does cost something, and, as I understand it, the PGLs financial backers are getting antsy, thus last weeks letter. PGL brass is deeply frustrated that the Tour wont give its proposal the attention they believe it deserves. As I mentioned above, theres actually a lot to like about the team model in particular in terms of drumming up fan interest but the Tour seems unwilling to capitulate, and PGL cant keep lobbying forever.

Berhow: In the public eye, one of the biggest things working against the PGL is that most people think its the same thing as the LIV Golf league. I can hardly keep all of this straight, but no, I cant see this league working.

5. One of the more famed holes in golf, the dramatic, par-4 8th at Pebble Beach, is undergoing a makeover. The work came to light Friday when Twitter user @GlorifiedDonkey, who identifies himself as a Pebble Beach caddie, posted four photos of the construction project. A source familiar with the project told GOLF.com that the green is being enlarged and its back-to-front slope made less severe to create more hole locations. Give us another design tweak youd like to see at Pebble.

Zak: Cut down the tree in the fairway on 18. It doesnt do much for me.

Sens: Somehow, I think we can all guess where Sean has left his drives on that hole. Personally, I liked the 11th green better before they changed it. The tilt on it was exciting stuff. Also, for every day play, Id shorten the par-3 12th hole and give the average player some hope of actually hitting it.

Bastable: The pushover par-3 7th is way too short. Extend the peninsula into the bay so it can play 220-230 on calm days. I kid! I kid! The par-4 1st is a ho-hum opener. How about removing one or two trees from the corner of the dogleg so mere mortals can fly the corner like the pros do?

Berhow: Dont people on Twitter always say Pebble would benefit from a re-routing? I dont know if it does and I cant think of a good answer here, but dont you dare take that tree out, Sean.

6. With the PGA Championship a week away, Joe Buck confirmed that he would lead a Manningcast-style broadcast for the tournament. In the football version, brothers Peyton and Eli Manning invite guests so who would you like to see join Buck?

Zak: I would like to see randomness join Buck. Chevy Chase. Jerry Rice. Not just folks who have played in the Pebble Beach Pro-Am, but people who we can actually learn something about while they watch! Shaquille ONeal. Kristin Stewart. People from the industry who we should listen to more often. Meg Maclaren. Nancy Lopez.

Sens: I cant think of any broadcast that Charles Barkley doesnt make better.

Bastable: Theres only one right answer: Phil.

Berhow: Phil. Anthony Kim. Tony Romo. Juli Inkster. Cristie Kerr. Gil Hanse. And a bunch of big-name pros who might miss the cut and offer to join on the weekend.

Link:

Tour Confidential: Sergio's rant, Phil's gambling and the spicy PGL letter - Golf.com

Revealed: betting giants lobbied UK government over proposed crackdown – The Guardian

Some of Britains betting giants are revealed to have quietly lobbied Treasury officials against a proposed industry crackdown, claiming it will cost millions of pounds in lost tax receipts.

Executives representing Bet365, Paddy Power and Ladbrokes met officials from the Treasury and Revenue and Customs, warning a radical overhaul of the industry could drive gamblers to the black market. The meeting was with tax officials rather than ministers and was therefore not required to be automatically disclosed.

The betting industry claims there is a very real risk that the taxes of about 3.2bn a year it hands to the Treasury could be hit by tougher rules for the sector. A government white paper on gambling reforms is due to be published shortly.

Matt Zarb-Cousin, director of campaign group Clean Up Gambling, said: The industry is trying to water down the proposed reforms in the gambling review by lobbying tax officials under the radar. This is massive propaganda from an industry that has engaged in tax avoidance for years. I hope the Treasury isnt buying it. There needs to be full transparency over this lobbying campaign.

The Department for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport announced a review of the gambling laws in December 2020 amid concerns that too many people are suffering significant harm. An NHS survey in 2018 showed there were about 245,000 problem gamblers in England. A Public Health England study last year estimated there are 409 suicides a year associated with problem gambling.

Campaigners want a new levy on the industry to fund research and treatment for problem gamblers. They also want to see stricter checks on what gamblers can afford to pay, new stake limits on online slot games, a ban on gambling advertising in sport and a ban on VIP schemes.

Documents released under freedom of information laws reveal that executives from Bet365, Flutter, which operates the Paddy Power and Betfair brands, and Entain, which operates the Ladbrokes, Coral and PartyCasino brands, held an online meeting with the Treasury and Revenue and Custom tax specialists on 7 October last year and warned against what they feared may be excessive proposed regulations in the review.

The betting firms submitted a report by PricewaterhouseCoopers, commissioned by the industry, which found an increase in unlicensed online gambling in the UK. The betting firms warned the black market could be fuelled by a wide-ranging overhaul of gambling laws.

A two-page document presented to officials warned: It is vital that the government takes a holistic view of tax and regulatory changes over the coming months or there is the very real risk that the UKs remote gambling sector is hit in a way that not only reduces its economic and fiscal contribution, but also increases levels of gambling-related harm by incentivising a shift to unlicensed gambling operators that pay no UK tax.

It added that executives would be keen to engage in further dialogue with tax officials to discuss developments as DCMS prepares its white paper for publication. The betting industry opposes proposals for a statutory levy and what it claims would be overzealous checks on what customers can afford to bet.

The details of the lobbying by the industry have angered relatives of those who have lost their lives while in the grip of gambling addiction. The charity Gambling with Lives, a community of families bereaved by gambling-related suicides, has spearheaded the campaign for reform. Judith Bruney, 62, from Sheffield, whose 25-year-old son Chris killed himself in April 2017 after he gambled 119,395 in five days without spending checks, said: The industry wants to get away with the minimum change that they can. Surely they must know what damage it causes.

Charles Ritchie, co-founder with his wife Liz of Gambling with Lives, said there needed to be a package of new reforms, including redesigning the most addictive games, and tougher sanctions against the industry when it failed to implement player safeguards. He said: You have a highly profitable industry and the fines can be viewed as a cost of business. There needs to be a more effective punishment regime.

Matt Gaskell, clinical lead of the NHS Northern Gambling Service, supports a statutory levy for the industry to fund research and treatment.

He said: Many of the operators havent fulfilled their obligations under the voluntary system. A statutory levy would ensure a system of stable and sustained funding.

The Betting and Gaming Council, which represents the gambling industry, says it supports the gambling review, but that it also needs to strike the right balance between protecting vulnerable people and not spoiling the enjoyment of those who bet safely. It says the industry is taking a package of measures to protect gamblers who may be at risk of harm, and that Gambling Commission figures show the number of problem gamblers is falling.

Betting firms have faced criticism over the years for basing their operations overseas including in Gibraltar and Malta which can reduce their tax bills. Bet365 has its headquarters in Britain and says it is one of the countrys biggest taxpayers.

A spokesperson said: It is absolutely normal and appropriate for the government generally to engage with us and others in our industry in the context of its ongoing review of the Gambling Act, as would be the case across all sectors undergoing potentially significant regulatory changes.

An Entain spokesperson said: Entain is proud to be among the top 20 corporate taxpayers to the UK Treasury. As such, and in common with thousands of other UK companies, we are of course in regular contact with HMT and HMRC officials.

A Flutter spokesperson said: Flutter paid 1.6bn in tax globally last year, including more than 600m in the UK where we are one of the largest corporate taxpayers. We engage with a range of stakeholders, including HMT, and we are proud of the significant contribution we make to the UK economy.

Treasury officials said they regularly meet stakeholders from across industry to hear their views.

Read the rest here:

Revealed: betting giants lobbied UK government over proposed crackdown - The Guardian

Lithuanian gambling revenue grows by 90% in Q1 – Quarterly results – iGaming Business

Gambling revenue in Lithuania grew 90.0% to 43.4m in the first quarter of 2022, as neither the return of the land-based sector or a wide-reaching marketing ban stopped the online sector from continuing to grow.

Online gambling revenue came to 26.8m, up 16.7% from Q1 of 2021.

The majority of revenue came from slots which are split between category A and category B machines.

Category A slots, with uncapped payouts and stakes, brought in 15.5m, which was up 24.7% from 2021. This came on stakes of 210.4m.

Category B slots, which limit stakes to 0.50 per spin and have win amounts capped at 200 times the original stake, 683,313, up 57.9%.

Table games brought in 1.6m, up 25.5%, on 19.4m worth of stakes and betting revenue was 9.0m, up 2.1%, on stakes of 125.3m.

Turning to the land-based sector, revenue was 16.9m after the sector recorded negligible revenue in Q1 of 2021 with land-based gaming venues closed.

Again, most of this came from slots. category A machines brought in 3.1m on stakes of 12.4m, while category B machine revenue was 7.2m with stakes of 45.4m.

Retail sports betting revenue came to 2.7m, as players staked 25.9m, while table game revenue was 4.0m with players betting 18.0m.

The increase came despite the fact that the country implemented a ban on any promotions or inducements to gamble, including bonuses, in July 2021. Since the ban was introduced, a number of operators have been fined, including Top Sport, which was fined 25,000 today (10 May).

The Lithuanian government collected 8.2m in lottery and gaming duties during Q1, up from 4.2m in Q1 of 2021.

See the original post here:

Lithuanian gambling revenue grows by 90% in Q1 - Quarterly results - iGaming Business

Sports gambling in Kansas could get done this week – KSN-TV

WICHITA, Kan. (KSNW) Place your bets. Sports gambling has a shot at passing this week.

It should pass in the Senate, said Rep. Stephanie Clayton, D-District 19. Its pretty tight.

Clayton lives in the Kansas City area, where she says casinos and other sports venues could bring in a lot of revenue from sports gambling being legalized inside the State of Kansas. She says the key is the Kansas Senate.

If there are more than 21 votes in the Senate, it would go to the governor, said Clayton.

Wichita Representative Tom Sawyer says if the measure passes, the money the state would make on betting would not have to go to the general fund.

Oh, yeah. The budgets in very strong shape. We were already in pretty strong shape, said Sawyer. But then the consensus estimating group met last week and upped the revenue estimates another $760 million over the next two years.

That could mean up to $10 million in revenue to go straight to a fund that would try to lure a professional sports team, like the Royals or Chiefs, into Kansas.

Im also the ranking minority member on the commerce committee, so Im very familiar with economic development incentives and how they work, said Clayton. I have not spoken with anyone with the Chiefs personally and highly doubt that I am that high up to do that. But Im going to assume that they wouldnt hate it.

The sports gambling would be inside venues like Kansas Casinos. There would also be apps available for download so you could bet on your phone.

The apps would use Geofencing and place detection, so they could only be used inside the borders of Kansas.

We will have to see how all this plays out, said Sawyer. I think that will pass before were done.

Sports gambling is just one issue still to be voted on this session. If its not up for a vote this week, some lawmakers say it will definitely come up again on a second wrap session in a couple of weeks.

Continue reading here:

Sports gambling in Kansas could get done this week - KSN-TV

Johns gives update on sports gambling numbers after first 5 months – American Press | American Press – American Press

In the first five months of sports betting being legalized in Louisiana, $628 million was wagered, generating $7.4 million in taxes, Louisiana Gaming Control Board Chairman Ronnie Johns said Tuesday.

Johns provided information to the Senate Judiciary B Committee on legislation by Senate President Page Cortez, R-Lafayette. Senate Bill 290 passed with amendments and cleaned up some language related to sports betting. It heads to the Senate floor for consideration.

The bill makes sure that all aspects of sports betting comply with a program that allows residents to voluntarily exclude themselves from gambling.

Casinos can share information from that database with the platforms that take actual bets.

The bill also clarifies that sports wagering platform providers cannot claim more than $5 million in eligible promotional play per licensee in any calendar year. The legislation also specifies that the taxes going to local governments of the 55 parishes that approved sports betting will be based on population.

When discussing promotional play, Johns said it will take at least a full year to track how well it will work and to get a clear picture of how many new customers will come on board. States vary when it comes to promotional play, with some offering no credits, others having unlimited credits and some having a tiered system.

He mentioned how casinos are putting up millions of dollars to build out permanent, first-class sports betting facilities.

LAuberge Casino in Lake Charles was the first one to build out a permanent facility, spending $4.8 million, he said.

Golden Nugget Casino plans to spend close to $9 million on its permanent facility. LAuberge Casino in Baton Rouge is spending $6.5 million, and Harrahs Casino in New Orleans is spending $12 million.

Johns said he went to the LAuberge sports betting area at 10:30 a.m. on the first week of the NCAA March Madness basketball tournament and found a packed house.

It will seat 225 people, and there was not a seat available, he said.

Johns said he is excited about how sports betting was implemented.

Weve done it the right way, and weve had zero problems with the program as we rolled it out, he said.

Read the original:

Johns gives update on sports gambling numbers after first 5 months - American Press | American Press - American Press

Dutch Gambling Authority vs Electronic Arts, and the future of loot boxes – GamesIndustry.biz

Share this article

After more than four years of discussion, there finally seems to be clarity about whether the FIFA Packs should be seen as gambling under Dutch legislation.

The Administrative Jurisdiction Division of the Dutch State Council ruled last month that FIFA's card packs do not qualify as a game of chance, because they form an 'inseparable part' of a game of skill: the FIFA Ultimate team mode.

As this court is the highest administrative court in the Netherlands, lodging an appeal is not an option for the Dutch Gambling Authority and this ruling is a landmark case for the treatment of loot boxes under Dutch gambling legislation.

This article takes a closer look at the ruling and its possible consequences for the global video games industry.

First, it is necessary to outline the Dutch legal framework.

The Dutch gambling laws are codified in the Dutch Gambling Act ("Wet op de Kansspelen").

Under this law it is prohibited to offer a game of chance to a person on Dutch territory, except in case the company that offers this game has received a permit of the Dutch Gambling Authority ("de Nederlandse Kansspelautoriteit").

Ren Otto, Van Iersel Luchtman

The Dutch legal definition of a 'game of chance' contains two criteria that have to be met:

The criterium that the participant has an opportunity to win a 'prize or premium' means that the participant should be able to obtain something of economic value in case that he/she/they wins. This could either be money or an item of economic worth.

The criterium that the outcome of the game is determined by chance means that the participant cannot influence the outcome of the game by his/her/their own actions.

One can imagine that there could be quite a few scenarios where both skill and chance are in play. In those cases, a game is still considered a game of chance, except when the participant can exercise a predominant influence of the outcome of the game with his/her/their skill. So games where chance is the major contributor to the outcome of the game are still considered games of chance.

Whether this is the case has to be assessed by evaluating the results that the (large) majority of the players achieve by playing the game. This assessment method has the consequence that even if a few very skilled players are able to determine their outcome by their unusual high level of skill (such as by having extraordinary senses or by spending a lot of time on training), the game will still be considered a game of chance if the vast majority of players rely on luck.

The decision of the Dutch State Council is rather brief and only takes up nine pages. The judge starts with the consideration that in the case of loot boxes, it must first be established whether obtaining or opening them can be regarded as a standalone game. Only if a loot box is a standalone game should it be assessed whether a loot box meets the definition of a game of chance. According to the judge, in order to determine this, it is necessary to look at how the game is played by the majority of players.

The actual in-game economy will be of high importance when assessing the legality of loot boxes

In the case of FIFA Ultimate Team, the judge considers that this is a (mixed) game of skill, because in the end the virtual football matches are won by the best player. The FIFA packs are considered part of this mode, as the packs are acquired and opened in this mode (and would only be opened to get good players for playing the virtual football matches).

According to the judge, the fact that it is possible to buy FIFA packs with real money does not make the situation any different. The judge attaches particular importance to the fact that 92% of the FIFA packs would be obtained by playing the game and only 8% are bought.

In light of the foregoing, FIFA packs are seen as an integral part of FIFA Ultimate Team, which is considered a game of skill. As a result, the Dutch State Council considers that Dutch gambling legislation does not apply to loot boxes and their offering is therefore not prohibited.

According to the Dutch State Council, it could be different in a specific case if it is shown that loot boxes are opened on a large scale for the sole reason of trading their contents.

In all honesty, I find this ruling quite unexpected and surprising. The reason for this is that the Dutch State Council introduces a new standard of assessment.

The fact that the Dutch gambling laws are not applicable to games of chance that form an inseparable part of a game of skill is not new. This had already been ruled by the Dutch Supreme Court in 1991.

What is actually new is the assessment criterion that to determine whether a loot box is an inseparable part of a game of skill, it must be looked at how the game is played by the vast majority of players. If this criterion is also used by the Dutch State Council in the future, this means that the actual in-game economy will be of high importance when assessing the legality of loot boxes.

The fact that the majority of Ultimate Team players earn card pack in-game weighed heavily in Electronic Arts' favour

According to this decision, it seems that loot boxes are not subject to Dutch gambling laws if the following cumulative criteria are met:

This would mean that actually a lot of loot boxes in modern video games are no longer subject to the Dutch gambling laws and would therefore be legally allowed.

A lot of video games include loot boxes in competitive multiplayer games to obtain skins or useful items which might influence the chance of winning any game, but in the end the winner is decided in the online multiplayer match.

Since the Netherlands was at the forefront of the loot boxes discussion, I imagine this could set some informal precedent for other countries

The only exception I can quickly think of is for the new 'play to earn' games where you could argue that players would buy loot boxes for the sake of trading the economic value of the contents thereof (which would not be compliant with the fourth criterium).

What still remains unclear is what the ratio should be between paid loot boxes and loot boxes obtained by playing the game. It seems that at least the vast majority of the loot boxes should be obtained by playing the game, but any tipping point is currently absent. So in cases where 60% of the loot boxes are obtained by playing the game, it is still unclear if the Dutch gambling laws apply.

As such, I could imagine that video game developers offering loot boxes in the Netherlands could maximize the amount of loot boxes (per period of time) that any player can buy to keep this ratio favourable for the argument that the Dutch gambling laws are not applicable.

Nevertheless, it seems that many video games that were not released due to any risk non-compliance with the Dutch gambling legislation could consider to still release their game in the Netherlands after this court decision.

It has yet to be seen whether this decision will set an international precedent. Gambling laws are determined nationally and therefore the legal frameworks are different between countries. However, since the Netherlands was one of the countries at the forefront of the discussion about whether loot boxes were compliant with gambling laws, I could also imagine that the decision could set some informal precedent for other countries as well.

How large or small this precedent is, depends hugely on the similarities between legal regimes across different countries. In countries where gambling laws do not apply to games of chance that are an inseparable part of a game of skill, it could be well possible that the reasoning of the Dutch State Council will be followed. However, that court is free to decide otherwise.

That being said, it seems that loot boxes are less of a legal black box in the Netherlands as of this court decision.

Ren Otto is a video games & esports lawyer at the Dutch law firm Van Iersel Luchtman. He is also a board member of Breda Game City and an ambassador for Women in Games. He was included our Game Changers 2021 feature for his contributions to the industry.

More:

Dutch Gambling Authority vs Electronic Arts, and the future of loot boxes - GamesIndustry.biz

Kindred’s revenue from harmful gambling decreased to 3.3 per cent in the first quarter of 2022 – PR Newswire

VALLETTA, Malta, April 26, 2022 /PRNewswire/ --In the first quarter of 2022, Kindred's share of revenue from harmful gambling decreased to 3.3 per cent. Increased focus on improving and optimising intervention measures has contributed to the decrease.Kindred also entered a collaboration with RecoverMe, an app supporting users regain control of their gambling habits.

In the first quarter of 2022, Kindred Group plc's (Kindred) share of revenue from harmful gambling decreased to 3.3 (3.9) per cent. The positive trend has been impacted byseasonal changes, with the first quarter historically seeing lower shares of revenue from harmful gambling year on year, as well as an optimised process for manual interventions towards high-risk customers. This has resulted in fewer customers being re-detected following interventions, leading to a more sustainable gambling behaviour which is one of the ambitions outlined in the Group's roadmap. Kindred also continues their more cautious approach to the younger demographic (age group 18 to 25), since this group is at higher risk to harmful gambling and more prone to addiction. The increased focus has resulted in a larger decrease in the percentage of harmful revenue from this demographic group.

Global statistics from Kindred Group

Q2 2021

Q3 2021

Q4 2021

Q1 2022*

Share of gross winnings revenue from high-risk players

4.3%

3.3%

4.0%

3.3%

Improvement effect after interventions

76.9%

64.9%

79.2%

83.1%

*90 day rolling period between 20 December and 19 March 2022

During the quarter, Kindred has updated the improvement effect metric after interventions. Instead of only focusing on financial indicators, the metric now includes behavioural indicators, which is more aligned with Kindred's detection system, PS-EDS.

"We started 2022 with a focus on targeted deliveries. Our team has specifically focused on optimising our manual interventions further, resulting in a higher percentage of customers showing healthier gambling behaviour after they have been detected and contacted by our responsible gambling team," says Henrik Tjrnstrm, CEO of Kindred Group.

Kindred has also entered a collaboration with the team behind the RecoverMe app, which uses research-proven techniques to help users regain control of their gambling habits. Thanks to the collaboration, Kindred can offer the app to its customers for free, initially in the UK and the US.

"Only eight per cent of individuals with problem gambling seek help due to the stigma associated with the addiction, inaccessibility and lack of awareness of treatment options. RecoverMe's partnership with Kindred is a vital lifeline in helping us provide care to those that need it most. We believe passionately that collaboration with organisations like Kindred will help us reach those that need support and historically have been individuals who are difficult to reach and access therapy," says Tejus Patel, Junior Doctor at King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust and co-founder of RecoverMe.

"I am very proud that we have entered the collaboration with the team behind the RecoverMe app, ensuring we can offer this service for free to all our customers in the UK and the US. We are also sponsoring additional PhD programmes on addiction studies, enabling these students to study and work full-time in academia. Our focus right now is to continue to increase efficiency and speed in engaging with detected customers as early intervention is critical in preventing a harmful behaviour," concludes Tjrnstrm.

About our journey towards zero

Kindred Group is committed to transform gambling by being a trusted source of entertainment that contributes positively to society. Therefore, Kindred has set an ambition to reach zero per cent revenue from harmful gambling by 2023 and to report this metric on a quarterly basis. This is done to increase transparency, to support a fact-based dialogue about harmful gambling, and to raise awareness of the Group's sustainability work. To read more, visit: http://www.kindredgroup.com/zero.

CONTACT:

For more information:Maria Angell Dupont, External Communications Manager, Kindred Group[emailprotected]+46 72 165 15 17

This information was brought to you by Cision http://news.cision.com

https://news.cision.com/kindred-group/r/kindred-s-revenue-from-harmful-gambling-decreased-to-3-3-per-cent-in-the-first-quarter-of-2022,c3552620

The following files are available for download:

SOURCE Kindred Group

Go here to read the rest:

Kindred's revenue from harmful gambling decreased to 3.3 per cent in the first quarter of 2022 - PR Newswire

Illegal gambling ringleader admits violating terms of supervised release The Nevada Independent – The Nevada Independent

Recently outed in a deposition for holding an ownership stake in a restaurant inside Resorts World Las Vegas, a convicted gambling ringleader and bookmaker also faces new special conditions of his supervised release.

David Stroj, known on the street as Fat Dave, has a documented history of organized crime associations. He also has a history of gambling at Strip casinos, and appears to own a piece of Tacos El Cabron inside Resorts World.

Strojs gambling violated the terms of his three-year supervised release, which followed an 18-month sentence in 2018 in a federal case that resulted in the indictment in 2015 of 25 people. In that case, federal prosecutors successfully argued that Stroj was a flight risk who might leave the country to avoid standing trial. That restriction was later modified.

A document filed March 17 by Senior U.S. Probation Officer Tina Nieman in the U.S. District CourtSouthern District of California spells out Strojs probation violation for gambling and also appears to shed light on the business at Resorts World.

It came to this officers attention in January 2022 that Mr. Stroj was gambling in Las Vegas, Nevada, without this officers knowledge or approval, Nieman wrote. Mr. Strojs family recently opened a restaurant in the Resorts World Casino, located in Las Vegas. The family plans to open another restaurant in Las Vegas later this year. These ventures have required Mr. Stroj to travel frequently to Las Vegas and will require future travel as well. However, in all of his trips to date, he did not seek permission from this officer to gamble.

In a statement Wednesday, Resorts World emphatically denied Stroj ever had a presence at the taco shop: David Stroj is not now, nor has he ever been, a manager or owner of Tacos El Cabron. Peter Stroj, who we have learned is David Strojs father, is a manager. Resorts World Las Vegas did a complete due diligence on the tenant prior to entering into the lease agreement.

In an April 5 deposition in connection with an unrelated multimillion-dollar bankruptcy fraud litigation, embattled gambler and business operator Brandon Sattler described facilitating the installation of video-related equipment at Tacos El Cabron and Strojs active role in the restaurant. But Sattlers deposition included several inconsistencies and the company has called his claims maliciously false and unfounded.

After Stroj admitted to his parole officer that he had gambled repeatedly without permission, he provided player card account records for his gambling at Circa Resort and Casino and Treasure Island, Nieman wrote. He lost approximately $16,000 and won around $9,500 gambling in 2021, according to the document.

He also admitted gambling at Resorts World last year, but failed to provide player card information. He claimed the information was unavailable because he had been banned from the casino.

Setting aside the fact that even gamblers who get kicked out of casinos can obtain their player card information for tax purposes, the mystery of how much Stroj played in 2021 at Resorts World should be easily remedied by the licensed casino operator. If it hasnt already done so, this might be a good time for the casino-resort to make that information available.

Prior to his 2015 arrest on illegal gambling and bookmaking charges in a case in which authorities alleged Strojs crew conspired to launder millions through California card rooms and Las Vegas casinos, he had three prior bookmaking convictions in Philadelphia. Those cases had connections to the Philadelphia mob, according to published reports.

Strojs supervised release began March 10, 2020, according to the document. It was modified to allow him to travel outside California in October 2021 under the conditions that he not gamble, bet sports, or frequent casinos without prior approval. He was permitted to play in legitimate poker tournaments with approval.

The violations resulted in tightened conditions, including no gambling of any kind and traveling to Las Vegas for business only, and only then with approval of his probation officer.

Although he has stipulated to the stricter terms of supervision, Stroj has been ordered to appear at a June 6 hearing in federal court in California to explain why his supervised release should not be revoked.

Denials from the casino company notwithstanding, the Sattler deposition and parole officers report raise questions that the Gaming Control Board ought to be demanding answers to.

At a March control board licensing hearing, Member Brittnie Watkins asked Resorts World President Scott Sibella about controversies surrounding gamblers Robert J. Cipriani and [without naming him] Sattler. Sibella downplayed his interaction with the two men. Both have raised the issue of Strojs ownership connection to the restaurant.

Efforts to gather comments from control board members this week were unsuccessful.

John L. Smith is an author and longtime columnist. He was born in Henderson and his familys Nevada roots go back to 1881. His stories have appeared in Time, Readers Digest, The Daily Beast, Reuters, Ruralite and Desert Companion, among others. He also offers weekly commentary on Nevada Public Radio station KNPR.

Here is the original post:

Illegal gambling ringleader admits violating terms of supervised release The Nevada Independent - The Nevada Independent

The State of the Gambling Industry in Canada – Nilsen Report

Wagering money on an events uncertain outcome is a favorite pastime of many, and Canadians are not people to shy away from this activity. The countrys gambling market includes casinos, bingo halls, video gaming machines, lotteries, and sports betting.

In 2020, the largest gambling market fell to the Asia Pacific, accounting for 38% of revenue. Next up was North America, with 29%, and that includes Canada. Although land-based casinos arent the first thing that you think of when you picture the Land of Maple Leaf, the country boasts a robust gaming industry.

Canadians have access to many brick-and-mortar establishments, racinos, and gaming parlors. Even restaurants and bars feature slot machines for their patrons in some provinces. Besides that, this polite population also enjoys unrestricted access to online gambling sites. Whats the state of the gambling industry in Canada today? Lets find out.

Globally, 350 million people have worrying gambling habits, and Canadians arent spared from this fault. Canada is home to 220,000 addicts, and even though this isnt a significant number compared to its overall population of 38 million, its still an issue worth keeping an eye on. While most wager small amounts here and there, others end up losing more than $500,000 per annum.

Interestingly, a whopping three out of four Canadians participate in some form of gambling. In terms of gender demographics, it is a male sport. The populations favorite forms of betting include lotteries and scratchies. Altogether, the country generates around $16 billion in revenue from the industry as a whole.

Gambling in Canada is legal as long as its with a company thats licensed or managed by the government. However, laws and regulations on the industry may be confusing as they change according to territory or province. For example, Saskatchewan and Quebec have differing minimum age requirements to play in a casino.

One recent change that received a lot of attention is the legalization of single-event sports betting in Canada. This came into effect in August of 2021. Despite many participating in the act (illegally) prior to the rule change, Canadians are nonetheless breathing a sigh of relief.

While Canadians are able to wager their money on casino websites, the regulation of these companies is somewhat sketchy. That being said, online gambling companies can operate and welcome Canadian players under a number of international licenses.

Canadians are spoilt for choice when it comes to online casinos. Popular iGaming sites include Jackpot City, Spin Casino, 888 Casino, Wheelz Casino, and Bet365 Casino. Over 19 million citizens actively gamble online, and the country ranks eighth on the list of top spenders. Although many enjoy land-based establishments, the number of people turning to their online counterparts is climbing due to ease of access.

Another fast-growing sector in Canada is eSports betting. Because there are currently no domestic eSports wagering sites, Canadians rely entirely on overseas bookies. The younger population bets on Counter-Strike: Global Offensive, League of Legends, Dota 2, and tournaments like the DreamHack and ESL series.

Canadians will see a more extensive range of games to bet on as time passes. Now, sports games like FIFA and NBA 2K operate their own leagues and tournaments, and lets not forget the popularity of Fortnite betting markets.

Betting on outcomes is an activity that dates back to the Paleolithic period, and if it is still going strong today, you know its here to stay. Canadians who love a bit of risk-taking need not move anywhere. By the looks of things, theyll be able to enjoy their favorite hobby for years to come.

Related

The rest is here:

The State of the Gambling Industry in Canada - Nilsen Report