MIT Suspends Another Professor for Epstein Ties – Futurism

Busted

MIT has placed tenured mechanical engineering professor Seth Lloyd on administrative because of a failure to disclose ties to Jeffrey Epstein, the deceased and disgraced financier accused of sex trafficking and other crimes.

Over the years, Epstein donated $225,000 to Lloyds research and also gave him a personal gift of $60,000, according to an extensive report about Epsteins connections to MIT that the university released Friday. Lloyd hid the source of the donations by processing them through various administrators ultimately tainting his research by linking it to Epsteins disgraceful legacy.

The news about Lloyd and his subsequent suspension is just the latest in a string of grim revelations regarding MITs ties to Epstein. While Lloyd admitted to having visited Epstein in prison, Epsteins influence on the university extended far beyond one engineering professor.

Joi Ito, the since-resigned director of the MIT Media Lab also accepted and obscured the source of hundreds of thousands of dollars from Epstein and millions more that were funneled through Epsteins company. Computer scientist Richard Stallman also resigned in the wake of controversy surrounding off-color comments he made about the scandal.

As news about Epsteins contributions to MIT continued to break, university president Rafael Reif vowed to donate an amount equivalent to Epsteins donations to a charity supporting victims of sexual abuse.

So far, Reif has committed to donating $850,000. But as InsideHigher Ed reports, he hasnt yet determined what organization its going to support.

READ MORE: More Epstein Fallout at MIT [Inside Higher Ed]

More on Epstein and MIT: Bizarre MIT Meeting About Jeffrey Epstein Ends in Tears, Yelling

Read the original post:

MIT Suspends Another Professor for Epstein Ties - Futurism

How futurists from the past predicted life in 2020 – 9News

Futurists, academics and technologists have always wondered what life will be like in the years ahead.

Making bold predictions can be a risky move, leaving one looking more fool than oracle especially when the crystal ball gazing is done from several decades away.

We've put together seven predictions for life in 2020, from as far back as the 1960s and as recent as 2017.

In 1984 it turned out Apple founder Steve Jobs was already envisioning how a Siri-like AI companion would be assisting us in our day-to-day lives, in 2020. "The next stage is going to be computers as 'agents,'" he said in a 1984 interview with Newsweek's Access Magazine. "In other words, it will be as if there's a little person inside that box who starts to anticipate what you want. Rather than help you, it will start to guide you through large amounts of information. It will almost be like you have a little friend inside that box." Jobs was bang on the money, as underlined by the advancing digital butler-type tech rolled out by Google, Apple and Amazon.

In 2017 John McAfee, the controversial computer antivirus mogul, predicted that by the end of 2020 the price of a single Bitcoin would reach $1 million. The current Bitcoin price is hovering just over AUD $10,000, so the world's most popular cyptocurrency has a lot of work to do over the next 365 days. McAfee has promised to eat a body part if his bold prediction does not happen.

The average human living 100 years

Thirty years ago, futurist Ray Kurzweil predicted the average life expectancy for humans would be 100. While Kurzweil may have missed the mark with that call, turns out he foresaw the rise of wearable tech and how that kind of data could potentially help us live healthier lives. "Computerised health monitors built into watches, jewellery, and clothing which diagnose both acute and chronic health conditions are widely used. In addition to diagnosis, these monitors provide a range of remedial recommendations and interventions," he wrote in The Age of Spiritual Machines.

In 1968, with the world under the foreboding shadow of a perilous Cold War, a Stamford professor predicted nuclear power would rise to become the dominant force in US energy by the year 2020. Professor Charles Scarlott also believed any advances in renewable energy would be negligible and not figure large in the US energy mix. Turns out his estimations were wildly off-target. According to US government figures, nuclear electric power makes up about 9 per cent of total US energy production. Fossil fuels still dominate, with 79 per cent, and renewables coming in on 12 per cent.

In 2009 Microsoft released a promotional video, laying out its vision for life in 2020 (watch above). Microsoft doesn't proposes anything too radical. A lot of the featured technology hinted at was already in early stage development when the film was made. There is a lot of glass screen computing, touch screen tech and augmented reality too. A man slides apart his mobile phone into a series of cards, which isn't something we can do yet, but Samsung did give us with a foldable phone last year.

In a 1968 paper, a political science professor at world-renowned MIT predicted humans would become a cohesive band of happy and loving people, thanks to better communication, translation of language and a deeper understanding of what makes us tick emotionally and psychologically. "By the year 2018 nationalism should be a waning force in the world," Ithiel de Sola Pool wrote. While we are more connected than ever before, and supposedly know more about ourselves and the human condition than at any other time in history, global nationalism has never been more fierce since the end of WWII.

Read the original here:

How futurists from the past predicted life in 2020 - 9News

NASA Proposed Sending Japanese Astronauts to the Moon – Futurism

Japan on the Moon

NASA administrator Jim Bridenstine secretly proposed using US rockets to send Japanese astronauts to the Moon, Japanese newspaper The Mainichi reports, citing multiple sources familiar with the talks.

According to the paper, Bridenstine made the proposal during an unofficial September 2019 visit in which he met with space industry leaders, including the head of the Japanese governments Space Policy Committee. Bridenstine reportedly encouraged attendees to consider a future in which Japanese astronauts joined Americans on the lunar surface.

NASA has some very ambitious plans to return US astronauts to the Moon as part of the agencys Artemis program by 2024, using a research space station in the Moons orbit called the Lunar Gateway as a stepping stone.

In May, Japanese prime minister Shinzo Abe met with president Donald Trump, in part to discuss a cooperation in space exploration. Less than four months later, NASA and the Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency officially announced they will work together under the Artemis program, with Japan assisting the US in building the Gateway.

According to The Mainichi, the move could also represent a way to keep Chinas space ambitions in check.

The globes most powerful nations are racing to make the Moon a strategic outpost and China is well on its way to make its first crewed mission to the Moon a reality.

READ MORE: US and Japan in talks to boost space ties, send Japanese astronauts to moon in 2020s [The Mainichi]

More on Japans space efforts: Japanese Rockets Launch Pad Inexplicably Bursts Into Flames

See the original post here:

NASA Proposed Sending Japanese Astronauts to the Moon - Futurism

Elon Musk Hints That a Cybertruck Is Headed to Mars – Futurism

Enigmatic Elon

When SpaceXs Starship heads to Mars in 2022, its payload could include a Tesla Cybertruck. Maybe.

SpaceX and Tesla CEO Elon Musk has been hinting that his companies might once again team up to send a car into space and depending on how you interpret one of his latest tweets, its starting to look even more likely that a Cybertruck could be headed to the Red Planet.

In November 2019, Musk declared via Twitter that a pressurized version of Teslas Cybertruck would be the official truck of Mars. The following month, he noted in another tweet that Starship would have the payload capacity for a Cybertruck.

Then, on December 29, a Twitter user straight up asked Musk if a Cybertruck will be on board the 2022 Starship mission. His response? A single emoji:

None of this is exactly a definitive confirmation, but right now, it seems one of the following is certain: either SpaceX is seriously considering sending a Cybertruck into space, or Musk really enjoys trolling people with the idea.

READ MORE: Pressurized Tesla Cybertruck To Be Official Pickup Truck Of Mars [Inside EVs]

More on the Cybertruck: Elon Musk Might Send a Tesla Cybertruck to Space

Read more from the original source:

Elon Musk Hints That a Cybertruck Is Headed to Mars - Futurism

The Australian Wildfires Are So Bad You Can See Them From Space – Futurism

Big Picture

Australia is in the midst of an environmental catastrophe, with raging wildfires making parts of the nation look like a blood-red apocalyptic hellscape.

As dramatic as the scene on the ground might be, though, the view from above may be even more disturbing as images of the wildfires taken from space show the full extent of the devastation.

On Friday, Business Insider published a series of images and videos of the wildfires taken from space.

One particularly striking visual is courtesy of the Japan Meteorological Agencys Himawari-8 satellite, which photographs the Earth every 10 minutes. The agency produced an animation of the scene in Australia from space by stringing together a days worth of the images, providing agrim off-world view of both the brushfires and their smoke plumes.

Another powerful image shared by Business Insider shows what the situation looks like during the day from the perspective of the European Space Agencys Sentinel-2 satellite. It was taken on December 31 over the bushfire in Bateman Bay, Australia, and its impossible to even see the ground in some parts of the photo through all of the heavy smoke.

As of Friday, the wildfires have killed at least 19 people and destroyed more than 1,400 homes. Theyre now so big, theyre even generating their own self-perpetuating weather phenomena and according to experts, Australias situation will likely get worse before it gets better.

We dont usually see fires like this until January or February, but these have been going on since spring, Australia-based climate scientist Sarah Perkins-Kirkpatrick told NBC News.Its already the worst fire season on record, and were really just in our first month of summer.

READ MORE: Stunning images from space reveal the shocking extent of Australias bushfire crisis [Business Insider]

More on wildfires: Devastating Fires in Amazon Rainforest Can Be Seen From Space

Continue reading here:

The Australian Wildfires Are So Bad You Can See Them From Space - Futurism

China Quietly Confirms Birth of Third Gene-Edited Baby – Futurism

On Monday, Chinese state-run news agencyXinhuareported that He Jiankui, the researcher responsible for creating the worlds first gene-edited babies, had been sentenced to three years in prison on the charge of illegally practicing medicine.

Given that China condemned Hes research almost immediately after he announced the births of the twin babies, its not particularly surprising to hear that the researcher is being punished for his controversial experiment.

But included in Xinhuas latest report was a bit of news we thought we might never hear: a third gene-edited baby has officially been born.

Back in November 2018, when He first announced the existence of the gene-edited twins, he also let slip that another woman was pregnant with an additional edited embryo.

In January, Stanford bioethicist William Hurlbut told news agency Agence France-Presse that hed talked extensively to He about that third gene-edited baby. He said believed the woman was likely 12 to 14 weeks pregnant at the time, which would make her due to give birth around June or July 2019.

July came and went without any news about the third gene-edited baby, though but now, China has quietly confirmed its birth, with Xinhua reporting that He was sentenced for his experiments in which three genetically edited babies were born.

The report doesnt include any additional information on the baby. We dont know its sex, its health status, whether the birth involved any complications or if the baby is even still alive.

But we do know this baby was born, meaning that at some point this year, there were not two, but three genetically engineered humans walking or, more likely, crawling the Earth.

See more here:

China Quietly Confirms Birth of Third Gene-Edited Baby - Futurism

Jetpacks, surveillance, and a 26-hour workweek. Here’s what past generations expected for 2020 – WUSA9.com

WASHINGTON D.C., DC Jetpacks, surveillance, and a life expectancy of 100 years old. Those were just some of the predictions for 2020, made by past generations.

So which were on the right path, and which were way off the mark? WUSA9 looked into it.

Anti-Gravity Belts:

This prediction was made in 1968 by a mathematician and scientist named DG Brennan. In that year, he predicted that anti-gravity belts would "revolutionize the tactics of land warfare."

In particular, Brennan believed Jetpacks and anti-gravity vehicles would become a normal tool in warfare. Clearly this hasn't been developed on a widespread basis.

Although a quick search of Youtube will show various videos of Jetpacks being tested. So perhaps, this technology isn't far from being used in war.

Life-Expectancy:

Here's one we all wish were true. Futurist Ray Kurzweil predicted in 1999 that life expectancy would rise to 100 years old by 2019.

Unfortunately, this has not come true. Globally the rate hovers just below 75-year-old, and in the United States, that number sits just below 80-years-old.

Widespread Tracking:

Kurzweil made another ominous prediction, writing that privacy would become a huge political and social issue in 2020. He predicted that every move we make would be tracked and "stored in a database somewhere."

This prediction has indeed come true in a lot of ways. Smartphones can track our exact location at any given moment. Every Google search and Facebook post is collected and analyzed, creating a digital footprint.

And this new technology has become even more apparent when looking at countries like China, where widespread surveillance programs have been initiated.

China - A Global Power:

Another prediction came from futurists Peter Schwartz and Peter Leyden, who wrote their prediction in a 1997 article, titled 'The Long Boom.'

"By 2020," they wrote. "The Chinese economy [will have] grown to be the largest in the world."

They proved correct that China would see massive economic growth. However, they were wrong that China would surpass the United States. Currently, China has the second-largest nominal GDP at $9 trillion. By comparison, the United States has a nominal GDP of over $21 trillion.

Boris' Rise To Power (Scary Accurate):

What's startling about this prediction is that Boris Johnson was just a journalist at the time, who had never held public office.

World Population:

In 1994, The International Food Policy Research Institute made a prediction for 2020 as well, estimating the world population would reach 2020. That would mean a massive jump of 2.5 billion people in a quarter-century.

This prediction proved to be very close, as the most recent estimate by the United Nations puts the world population at 7.7 billion people.

That same U.N. report estimates that the population will continue rising, jumping by another 2 billion people by 2050.

Nationalism:

Most experts would probably argue that this one has not panned out. In 1968, a political science professor at MIT named Ithiel de Sola Pool, made the following optimistic prediction:

"By the Year of 2018," he wrote. "Nationalism should be a waning force in the world.

Many would argue that the global attitude has in fact gone in the other direction. Whether it's the 'Brexit' fight in England, the 'America First' mentality in the United States, or the rise of populist strongmen in countries like China, the Philippines, and India, this Nationalist sentiment is on full display.

Work-Week:

Here's one we all wish was true. In 1968, physicist Herman Kahn and futurist Anthony J. Weiner said that Americans would have 26-hour work-weeks by 2020.

In reality, Americans work on average 35 hours per week, according to the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development.

Maybe there's a good chance for 2021?

RELATED: These are 7 of the most popular New Year's resolutions

RELATED: A look at the DMV's most-read crime stories of 2019

Download the brand new WUSA9 app here.

Sign up for the Get Up DC newsletter: Your forecast. Your commute. Your news.

Read the original here:

Jetpacks, surveillance, and a 26-hour workweek. Here's what past generations expected for 2020 - WUSA9.com

Mysterious Swarms of Giant Drones Have Officials Baffled – Futurism

Giant Drones

On December 24, The Denver Post reported that fleets of up to 17 drones, each with an estimated wingspan of six feet, had been spotted flying over Colorados Phillips and Yuma counties at night for more than a week.

Since then, the sightings have expanded to six counties in Colorado and Nebraska, with as many as 30 drones spotted in the sky at once and,ominously, no one seems to know who they belong to.

Phillips County Sheriff Thomas Elliott told the Postthat the giant drones appeared each night around 7 p.m. and disappeared by 10 p.m. They maintained an altitude between 61 and 91 meters (200 and 300 feet), flying in square patterns of about 40 kilometers (25 miles).

Theyve been doing a grid search, a grid pattern, Elliott said. They fly one square and then they fly another square.

So far, the list of organizations that deny knowing anything about the giant drones includes the Federal Aviation Administration, the Air Force, the Drug Enforcement Administration, and the United States Army Forces Command.

Elliot told the Post that the Sheriffs office is hoping someone will spot one of the drones on the ground but Colorado-based drone pilot Vic Moss warns that residents shouldnt try to shoot one down as their batteries can cause fires.

If you shoot a drone down over your house and it lands on your house, he told the Post, you might not have a house in 45 minutes.

READ MORE: Mysterious swarms of giant drones have started to appear in the Colorado and Nebraska night sky, and nobody knows where theyre coming from [Business Insider]

More on drones: Man Uses His Heat-Seeking Drone to Find Missing Child

Here is the original post:

Mysterious Swarms of Giant Drones Have Officials Baffled - Futurism

Hypersonic planes and robots: Futurist predicts what we can expect by end of decade – Daily Star

We will wake up to a new decade tomorrow. And while the 2010s brought us innovations in areas such as technology, transport and music, what could the 2020s offer?

The Daily Star spoke to leading futurist Dr Ian Pearson - who correctly predicted the invention of the text message - about what we can expect by the end of this decade.

I think we will see more spectacular improvements in things such as robotics and artificial intelligence.

I think drones will become smarter. For example, I think theyll be able to fly themselves and hold a position.

I expect to see lots of insect-sized drones that can be used for monitoring and surveillance.

Also, at the moment people use selfie sticks, but instead people could have a drone a couple of metres in front of them and a couple more at the side taking a bunch of shots from different angles.

I think we will also see augmented reality devices making an appearance on the market, where people will wear a headset or something the same size as your glasses, that will do the job of your phone but project virtual images for example, of items or celebrities straight on to your retina, removing the need for a mobile.

By 2030 augmented reality contact lenses may even be available.

Lab-grown meat is coming, although I dont think it will come in vast quantities during the 2020s.

Its a technology that is developing quite slowly.

Even though veganism became a big trend in the 2010s, I dont think stem cell meat will replace regular meat fully at the end of this new decade, but it could be something that happens by 2050.

Some people have become vegan for health reasons, but weve already seen some studies that showed red meat being unhealthy have been debunked, so theres a possibility they could switch back and veganism could be a passing fad.

Its been a bit of an overhyped technology, but 3D printing may have a role in food as you could have 3D printed kitchen items or cake decorations, for example.

Weve seen a lot of development in this area, especially in terms of fibres. Already, companies are using clever manufacturing techniques to turn objects such as coconut and sweetcorn husks into fabrics.

These are also more sustainable items, as people become increasingly concerned about the environment.

We may see people wearing clothes that are resistant to stains or stop you sweating much.

What is most exciting for me is the tech that is built into it.

By 2030 you could have people wearing clothes that change colour, have patterns on that move like a video or Christmas jumpers that have a mini light show built in.

You may see hypersonic jets, which are currently in development with the aim of being used by the military, brought in that could get people from London to Sydney in just four-and-a-half hours, and London to New York in two hours.

If people carry on being very concerned about the environment, they may take fewer foreign holidays by plane.

However, virtual reality wouldnt replace holidays like in the film Total Recall, people wont go into a VR landscape for two weeks.

"But what itll be used for will be a way of exploring the rooms of a resort or hotel youre considering booking, or taking a quick look at the area, so itll be a tool for decision-making.

People can also use VR virtual reality to try out activities such as skiing or snowboarding.

We are likely to see more people using voice-activated technology to do things such as switching off all the lights or switching on the security.

There could also be smart heating, that will heat the person rather than heat the room using either smart fabrics or specially-directed infrared beams.

Hi-res or virtual displays could also replace paintings, and ovens and microwaves could be programmed to talk to food packaging to get cooking instructions.

By 2050, Id imagine that androids would do most of the cooking and cleaning in peoples homes.

However, there is a chance that people could hack into smart objects like your fridge or microwave to steal information about you that could be a major concern by 2030.

Weve all been reading about the self-driving cars for the last few years, and they are making a lot of progress. I imagine there will be some on the roads by 2030.

They are currently very expensive, at least 30,000, but people will build driverless pods for 300-400.

Some city centres will be designed to have driverless pod systems. People could get in and be dropped off exactly where they want.

It also increases social inclusivity. If people can be driven where they need to be, they may leave home more often and get involved in their community. Ten years is a long time in tech, so it is feasible.

See http://www.futurizon.com

Read more here:

Hypersonic planes and robots: Futurist predicts what we can expect by end of decade - Daily Star

We live so fast I can’t even finish this sent… – The Register

Something for the Weekend, Sir? Call me an idiot* but I have no idea what you are talking about, why you're saying it or indeed what's going on any more.

Oh, and welcome to the Year 51-85-139.

Do you know what I'm talking about? No? Then you know exactly what I'm talking about.

Worried that my weekly outbursts of cynicism here might simply betray a weakening grip on the fast pace of tech disruption, last summer I began reading futurist Tom Cheesewright's High Frequency Change. The book tries to explain why idiots (ie, anyone who isn't a futurist) perceive modern tech business as being founded on the cult of fleeting unsustainability, and how to go about convincing oneself that it isn't.

Unfortunately, I never got past chapter three as I had other pressing things to do. By the time these were half-done, I'd moved on to other things. Sorry, Tom, but that's how it is these days. Always looking to the future, me.

What I did learn from the book is that things are not really intended to make specific sense as they whizz by across a rapidly morphing cultural landscape so there's no point worrying my idiotic but pretty little head about questions such as "why?"

For example, did you guess what the aforementioned "Year 51-85-139" business was about? Well, colour experts Pantone have declared its Classic Blue ref. 19-4052 TPG (that's 51 Red, 85 Green, 139 Blue) to be the theme colour for 2020.

Here it is. Now you know what 2020 is going to look like.

My (clearly foolish) reaction to this news is to wonder why a year should be assigned a colour from a Pantone reference library. Is it like the 12-year cycle of Chinese animals? Or is it a plot by rogue freemasons to design a coat of arms replete with colour symbolism to revive the Knights Templar with the support of Vatican 2 agents, Agnes Nutter and Bigfoot? Are we being led annually towards an ultimate Pantone reference that lies beyond the spectrum of human visibility and whose first implementation in a CSS tag will trigger the awakening of the Old Ones?

Nope. The idea is to buy a Pantone 19-4052 TPG espresso mug and keychain, then turn our goldfish-like attention to the next thing. Trying to make sense of it is an idiot's game. Don't stand still, move along please.

Youtube Video

I found that if you spend long enough wondering "why?", your brain tricks itself into deducing a ludicrously unlikely purpose behind this stuff and then convinces you that it makes sense. For example, take this advertising poster I found just inches from my face when I nipped to the gents during a journalists' Christmas bash in the typically drunken and debauched surroundings of a central London church.

You've heard of town-twinning, right? Well, the latrine into which I was artlessly jimmy-riddling at that very moment had been twinned with the one pictured in the photograph, in Uganda. For those of you working in spy agencies seeking something to stave off the workplace boredom other than secrete "always-on" code into other people's Alexa skills, have a peek at the Ugandan convenience at your convenience via live satellite: the map references are given on the poster.

Nice logo at the, er, bottom. Shitting infographics, it's all the rage, didn't you know?

Give yourself five minutes and I'm sure you can come up with a valid and worthy reason for toilet-twinning to exist. However, I think you might be missing the point, which is that there isn't one. It's a thing, that's all. Move along please, zip it up, let the next customer have a go. By the time you've Googled toilet-twinning, the fad will be over and replaced by fridge-twinning or eraser-at-the-end-of-a-pencil-twinning.

It's not that earnest charitable endeavours are mere objects of smug amusement so much that everything has become slave to the prevailing culture of short-termism. We exist in an era where are unproven, unworkable ideas change ownership for billions of dollars and failed businesspeople are hailed as heroes that we should try to emulate.

At this point, your brain's reasoning function stumbles into cynicism. My smartphone, my car, my trousers: I'll get around to changing them all soon enough, so why bother giving it any serious thought?

And so here we are, welcome to my world. This is how I handle high-frequency change, Tom: I ignore it or take the piss out of it.

Talking of public signs, here's one I saw in a local park on New Year's Day. It warns visitors that a steep hill lies ahead. It is particularly heart-warming that the infographic-inspired icons target three very specific types of park user: someone in a wheelchair; oldsters sharing a stick; and my Dad.

Hang on isn't that Pantone Classic Blue?

Youtube Video

* content experience user interactivity prompt

More here:

We live so fast I can't even finish this sent... - The Register

This Tiny Particle Accelerator Fits on a Microchip – Futurism

For Ants

Particle accelerators are usually large. The Large Hadron Collider, for instance, is 17 miles in circumference.

But now a team of scientists at Stanford have created a silicon chip that can act as a particle accelerator and its only 30 micrometers long, about the width of a human hair.

On the most basic level, particle accelerators are machines that speed up beams of charged particles using electromagnetic fields.

The new Stanford accelerator is essentially a nanoscale channel made out of silicon, sealed inside a vacuum, which accelerates electrons using an infrared laser pulse.

While the device is still a prototype, the team is hoping that similar designs could allow the construction of much smaller particle beam accelerators for use in scientific experiments, foregoing the needfor massive facilities like the Large Hadron Collider.

The largest accelerators are like powerful telescopes, team lead Jelena Vuckovic said in a statement. There are only a few in the world and scientists must come to places like [Stanford facility] SLAC to use them. We want to miniaturize accelerator technology in a way that makes it a more accessible research tool.

READ MORE: Researchers build a particle accelerator that fits on a chip [Stanford University]

More on accelerators: Vast New Particle Accelerator Would Dwarf Large Hadron Collider

More here:

This Tiny Particle Accelerator Fits on a Microchip - Futurism

Brett King produces the future in Qatar – Euromoney magazine

Brett King disrupts the old order at the Qatar conference

Dont just walk on stage. Make a video, and preferably one that sends yourself up.

So while delegates at a Euromoney conference in Doha in December were expecting renowned futurist Brett King to launch straight into his vision for the next generation of banking, instead they saw him wielding a variety of musical instruments before making his way to the gym for some weight lifting and a rigorous rowing machine session, only stopping halfway through to remove his suit jacket.

The video produced by Euromoneys own Rebecca Chamberlain got the attention of everyone at the Euromoney Qatar Conference on Banking 4.0, as King proceeded to explain what banks in Qatar, and everywhere else, need to do to avoid being left behind in a world of disruptors and challenger banks.

His introductory video was designed to showcase how hard banks need to work to meet these challengers, and perhaps what a multi-tasker a futurist needs to be. It went down a storm with the hundreds of delegates in attendance.

King didnt mince his words once he was on stage, either.

As we look at new emerging technologies and AI, how is this further going to change the banking space? King asked the audience. To understand this, we have to look back at history at how innovations have disrupted industries. Henry Ford said if hed asked his customers what they wanted, they would have said a faster horse

If you want to be a bank that competes in the future, you have to compete against Jack Ma, you have to be technology savvy, you have to be technology first; if you are a traditional bank, its like competing with both hands behind your back. The biggest threat to banking is not other banks, its not even fintech, its the fact that the role banking has in our world is going to fundamentally change, and the model we built back in the 1400s that we have just iterated on is no longer going to be competitive.

They didnt do banking conferences in the 1400s either. Perhaps King has reinvented the wheel for speaker introductions in the 2020s.

Read this article:

Brett King produces the future in Qatar - Euromoney magazine

How Farmers Can Rule the World With Technology – Successful Farming

Nikolas Badminton is a futurist and researcher who focuses on helping clients shift from what is to what if. His clients include NASA, Google, Microsoft, Dell, United Nations, and hundreds of others.

Badminton is a keynote speaker at the Land Expo 2020 in Des Moines on January 14, where he will focus on how farmers can fuel their imaginations and creativity to create a future thats more resilient, profitable and equitable.

Register for the Land Expo here.

Successful Farming caught up with Badminton to get a preview of his talk.

NB: There are four main technologies that are really starting to make waves. They're going to gain pace and see a huge amount of adoption.

1. Renewable energy. Were seeing huge solar and wind projects popping up all over the world. There are solar panels that can live on stilts above crops. We're going to slowly wean ourselves off of our reliance on coal and other fossil fuels for energy.

2. Sensors. We are putting the internet of agricultural things into the field, onto cattle as wearable devices, and embedded into farm equipment. These sensors harvest data from the environment and give farmers a new view of their operations. That gives them a lot of power.

3. Data. Farmers are becoming more data savvy in a number of different ways. They are applying analytics, employing data science teams to help them unlock value, and working with agronomists.

4. Artificial intelligence. Farmers will use machine learning to unlock even more value from data. Artificial intelligence is driving automated vehicles. Automated robotics can help on the farm in certain ways, or provide surveying through drones.

NB: We need to decouple those. Bitcoin is a crypto currency that lives on the blockchain. And blockchain is an anonymous, immutable ledger that's completely secure. So everyone shares all of the information and everyone validates all transactions on the blockchain.

Bitcoin is still there, and so are other cryptocurrencies. Facebook tried to come out with their Libra coin, which is a stable coin attached to the U.S. dollar, but a lot of banks and partners dropped out because they just don't trust Facebook to make that work.

There are about 2 billion unbanked people in the world that could be helped through cryptocurrencies, although I don't necessarily think it will be Bitcoin. It will be something from Facebook, Amazon, Google or one of the other big tech players.

Underneath that is the blockchain. There are some really interesting things happening with food supply chains there. You can store transactions or logistical steps in the supply chain on the blockchain and find that information very quickly because its not distributed across a bunch of databases in different companies. Companies like IBM and Walmart are teaming up to build blockchain systems for food supply. They can find problems in the food supply chain almost immediately versus it taking days and days of trolling through data. Blockchain is super interesting from the food supply perspective. There are other applications in the world, but it's logistics where it's starting to catch on fire.

NB: Its coming out of the laboratory and into the farms somewhat. There are smaller farms that are starting to be experimental and teaming up with scientists. Theres lots of really cool stuff happening, but its not rolled out on a commercial scale yet. Scientists have to prove that it's not going to be harmful for the overall environment. Once they've done that, it's going to be a technology that's available to a lot of different farmers all over the world.

With all technologies, there are going to be some farmers that are going to be able to afford it and some farmers that aren't. That is going to cause an unfair advantage. Is the farming industry suddenly going to be thrust into the hands of big corporates versus smaller farmers? That's a really interesting debate that's going to be had over the next couple of years.

NB: AI is going to affect every single industry in the world and every single part of agriculture. It will streamline the processes and systems we use to connect to other farmers and to suppliers. For example, we will use facial recognition on cattle to see if they're well.

I think the biggest application of AI is collecting surveying data very quickly, finding new insights from that, and allowing farmers to improve operations on their farms. Artificial intelligence is going to drive small robotics on farms and also large scale vehicles. Its going to be a game changer.

NB: People have always underestimated how much farmers are technologically savvy. Bill Gates wasnt sure farmers would use a computer, and now he is one of the biggest agricultural landowners in North America. Farmers picked up on handheld devices, like phones and iPads, quickly. They're looking for technology to help them build out the resiliency of their farm. With the right amount of subsidies and incentives and help, farmers are going to be some of the most technologically advanced people operating in the business world. Technology is a huge advantage for farmers.

NB: Farmers are futurists. They consider the next harvest, the next crop, the schedule, weather patterns, and everything that could affect them in the next year. But we're stuck in a world of what is. We're looking at the problems in front of us and we have to deal with them. I've been talking a lot to farmers in Canada, and it's tough times. It's really difficult.

I invite farmers to ask the question, "What if?" What if we take on new technologies and how does that change the farm? What if we make that investment? What if we take a brave step forward into a new world with big data, artificial intelligence, and sensors? What future is that going to build for us?

That approach of creativity and imagination, mixed with really thorough business knowledge and acumen, is going to liberate farmers to be able to do more in the long term.

See the original post:

How Farmers Can Rule the World With Technology - Successful Farming

Robot Bartender Developer Wants to Pay the Humans It Replaces – Futurism

Consolation Prize

Makr Shakr, the robotics firm behind the robo-bartender Toni, has announced plans to distribute monthly stipends to the human bartenders that it threatens to automate out of a job.

Its an unusual twist on the concept of basic income: the company directly responsible for putting people out of work is also the one extending them some sort of lifeline. Details on the program are sparse, Digital Trends reports, and theres a chance its all a big PR stunt. But the company has already selected the first recipient of a monthly $1,000 stipend: 50-year-old American hospitality worker Brian Townsell, who Makr Shakr says willnow be able to pursue his dream job in a brewery.

The plan is to give out a monthly stipend to someone whose job Toni puts at risk for each robot sold, Digital Trends reports. But it remains unclear how, specifically, Makr Shakr will select people, how long those people will receive monthly payments, or even if the company will continue doing this at all.

That said, its great to see a tech company acknowledge the harsh reality that its products threaten livelihoods. And while leaving basic income programs up to the automators themselves wont solve the systemic problems of job loss or the lack of a social safety net, offering these payouts is a first step. Maybe.

READ MORE: Robot bartending company is handing out cash to the people it is replacing [Digital Trends]

More on automation: Futurist Predicts The End of the World as We Know It

See original here:

Robot Bartender Developer Wants to Pay the Humans It Replaces - Futurism

Heres What Would Happen if Earth Collided With a Black Hole – Futurism

November 4th 19__Dan Robitzski__Filed Under: Hard Science

A new online tool calculates just how much cosmic destruction a run-in between the Earth and a black hole would cause.

The aptly-named Black Hole Collision Calculator determines how much a black hole would expand and the amount of energy it would release if it absorbed the Earth or any other object, since the calculator is totally customizable, Space.com reports.

Particle physicist lvaro Dez created the tool, which is hosted on the calculator database project Omni Calculator. Based on his calculations, a black hole swallowing the Earth would release some 55 quintillion times the planets annual energy consumption.

But even that destructive event would be a light snack for a supermassive black hole its event horizon would only expand by a hundredth of a trillionth of a percent, per the calculator.

The main flaw with the calculator? The artistic rendering of a black hole obliterating the Earth that pops up next to the results doesnt change to match any increasingly goofy collisions.

READ MORE: See What a Black Hole Would Do to Earth with Online Collision Calculator [Space.com]

More on cosmic annihilation: Two Supermassive Black Holes Are on a Devastating Crash Course

Up Next__Heres How Boeing is Planning to Get Astronauts to the Moon >>>

Excerpt from:

Heres What Would Happen if Earth Collided With a Black Hole - Futurism

This AI Decodes Your Brainwaves and Draws What You’re Looking at – Futurism

Researchers have created an AI that draws what a person in looking at in real time just by reading and decoding their brain waves. Perhaps most impressive of all, the technique is noninvasive, with all the brainwave information gathered througha cyberpunk-looking, electrode-covered electroencephalography (EEG) headset.

Researchers used to think that studying brain processes via EEG is like figuring out the internal structure of a steam engine by analyzing the smoke left behind by a steam train, researcher Grigory Rashkov said in a press release. We did not expect that it contains sufficient information to even partially reconstruct an image observed by a person. Yet it turned out to be quite possible.

The team, from the Moscow Institute of Physics and Technology and Russian corporation Neurobotics, started their study available on the preprint server bioRxiv by placing a cap of electrodes on participants scalps so that they could record their brain waves.

They then had each participant watch 20 minutes worth of 10-second-long video fragments. The subject of each fragment fell into one of five categories, and the researchers found they could tell which category of video a participant was watching just by looking at their EEG data.

For the next phase of the research, the scientists developed two neural networks. They trained one to generate images in three of the tested categories from visual noise, and the other to turn EEG data into comparable noise. When paired together, the AIs were able to draw surprisingly accurate images of what a person was looking at solely from their real-time EEG data.

Under present-day technology, the invasive neural interfaces envisioned by Elon Musk face the challenges of complex surgery and rapid deterioration due to natural processes they oxidize and fail within several months, Rashkov said. We hope we can eventually design more affordable neural interfaces that do not require implantation.

READ MORE: Neural network reconstructs human thoughts from brain waves in real time [Moscow Institute of Physics and Technology]

More on AI: What Are YOU Looking At? Mind-Reading AI Knows

See the original post:

This AI Decodes Your Brainwaves and Draws What You're Looking at - Futurism

An Oral History Of Blade Runner’s 2019 Los Angeles, Because The Future Has Arrived – laist.com

The Blade Runner future that we haven't quite reached. (Courtesy Warner Bros.)From Blade Runner's opening titles. (Courtesy Warner Bros.)

Los Angeles November, 2019.

Early in the 21st century, LAist has put together an L.A.-centric oral history of the 1982 seminal science fiction film Blade Runner.

Thirty-seven years after it came out, we are now in the month that the movie took place. At the end of the month, Blade Runner's Los Angeles of the future will officially take place in the past. Hold on tight for this trip through time and space.

We've spent months speaking with some of the minds that helped bring you the film.

Below is an account of how they created Blade Runner's fictional November 2019 and what they think about how the real one turned out.

SETTING BLADE RUNNER IN LOS ANGELES

As the movie was developed, the plan wasn't always for it to be set in L.A.

Screenwriter Hampton Fancher: There were a lot of elsewheres. There were some great places to overlay our deal on, citywise Hong Kong, Mexico City. In the beginning, we were talking about about London.

Visual Futurist Syd Mead: Originally, the theoretical city in which Blade Runner was taking place was called "San Angeles," on the imagination that it would be constant city from San Francisco all the way down to the border to Mexico.

Los Angeles was just convenient for cost purposes for shooting you didn't have to move out of the city.

Production Executive Katy Haber: I went with [Blade Runner director] Ridley [Scott] looking for locations in Chicago and New York, because he was looking for the most appropriate city where he could find the best locations, and we couldn't find any locations that represented his vision of what Blade Runner would be. And so we decided to stick to Los Angeles, and shoot the whole film on the Warner Brothers lot.

Fancher: But in the writing, before that, Ridley's got a rich imagination, and I'm crazy so I kept writing for different climates and different circumstances, mechanically and weatherwise. So it did change around a lot, before it finally got simple, into L.A.

Art Director David L. Snyder: The whole idea was, OK, we would shoot in L.A. wherever we could the Bradbury Building, Union Station.

HOW RAY BRADBURY GAVE US BLADE RUNNER

One of Hampton Fancher's friends gave him money to option an existing property, with the hope of Fancher legitimizing himself in Hollywood.

Fancher: It shows how out of it I was in trying to be in it, acknowledging that I was out of it to myself, and then thinking, "OK, how do I stop being out of it? Well, I get some legitimate illogical narrative ideas" some novel, you know?

So I decided on three writers that I might be able to option their material and get some producer, or myself as producer, and then get some writer to do a screenplay on it, and maybe make a movie.

And so the three projects were Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep, Naked Lunch, and a collection of Bukowski. Which, in 1975, forget it I mean, that was nuts. Hollywood would not touch any of that, but I was looking for something "commercial," and I thought that all of these things were coming.

There would be no Blade Runner if there was no Ray Bradbury. I couldn't find Philip K. Dick. His agent didn't even know where he was. And so I gave up.

And then I was walking down the street and I ran into Bradbury he directed a play that I was going to do as an actor, so we know each other, but he yelled "hi" and I'd forgot who he was.

So at [my girlfriend Barbara Hershey's] urging I was with her at that moment she said, "Talk to him! That guy really wants to talk to you," and I said "No, f- him," and keep walking.

But then I did, and then I realized who it was, and I thought, "Wait, he's in that realm, maybe he knows Philip K. Dick." I said, "You know a guy named" "Yeah, sure you want his phone number?"

My friend paid my rent for a year while I wrote, because it turned out we couldn't get a writer. My friends kept on me about, well [if you can't get a writer,] then you write.

So then, as soon as I started, I got totally involved. I was really immersed, and I worked hard at it, and the rest is Blade Runner. It was mercenary. But when I started writing it, then I became sincere, and it became significant to me.

DESIGNING NOVEMBER 2019's LOS ANGELES

Syd Mead hadn't worked in Hollywood before, so when Ridley Scott wanted to bring him on board to design the future, Haber came up with the idea of crediting him as a "visual futurist."

Snyder: Ridley was the executive production designer, due to the fact that he had been a BBC art director and had art directed and directed in films, shot camerawork, many commercials.

Syd Mead was the futurist. If I were doing a film on, say, the second World War, I'd go back to the archives and do the research, and there's plenty of it stills, magazines, print, film archives.

And in this case, because the film took place 40 years in the future, we depended on Syd, who was an industrial designer he's not an art director, or a production designer, he's a real-life designer.

We all decided, let's do something great.

Mead: [My primary influence was] from Chicago and New York, because they're grid cities. And New York already had buildings over 1,000 feet well, the Empire State Building. And so I thought, well let's add another thousand feet or so why not?

So I had this vision of these incredible tall buildings, and that triggered the idea of how do you get in and out of a building that's 3,000 feet tall? Well, you need access on the ground plane. And that's why they had these pyramids at the bottom, for greater access around the perimeter to get into the building in the first place.

Snyder: What Ridley said was, he would draw, and Syd Mead would draw, and everyone would draw, and then "the poor bastard art departments" had to build everything.

On the first day of shooting, Ridley would look through the lens, and everything would change. My job became the reconstructor art director, turning everything upside-down and sideways, to better effect because Ridley's brilliant.

AN ENVIRONMENTAL MESSAGE BASED IN ITS TIME

Fancher: The reason I was able to write the movie, and not be distracted as I always am by a million other things, is because I was very serious about the demise of the planet. You know, this is '75. This is acid [rain]. Until 1980, it was like, Whole Earth Catalog, CoEvolution. It was important to me.

Snyder: It was an idea that the environment is crumbling, and the idea was that the rain in the film was like acid rain. That's why people were moving off-world to get off this planet before it disintegrated.

I think we were making a statement about the government, and the future, and the climate, and the disparaging rift between rich and poor.

Fancher: I mean, I was devastated that animals were disappearing at the rate they were disappearing the rainforest was going bye-bye. It was like, "this is f-ed up," and I was angry and sad.

And so that idea kept me rolling, because I had something to write for. I got the cue from the book, but I was in that mindset anyway.

Fancher was replaced on the film by writer David Peoples, who executed Ridley Scott's vision for what needed to happen with the screenplay.

Fancher: I was devastated. I hated it. I didn't understand that it might be a good idea. If David Peoples hadn't have come, there would be no Blade Runner that's for sure.

Because where I was going was not right I mean, it would have been a different movie. If he hadn't have come, if I would've stayed, Blade Runner would have been one of those little movies Soylent Green, or something that maybe you could rent once in a while or something, but we wouldn't know about it.

FINDING A NEW WAY TO SHOOT THE BRADBURY BUILDING

Fancher: [Ridley] was location hunting when I was writing, and I remember him coming back from a scout, telling me that he'd seen a building that he liked. And I remember screaming, "What?! You can't use the Bradbury Building!"

And he said, "Why Not?" I said, "Because you're a Brit you don't understand, that's been in every f-ing TV show, every other day, for 50 years."

He was walking out the door, and I said, "I'm telling you, you're making a big f-ing mistake." And he said, "No, I'm not." And I said something about the way that it had been done it had been done in every detective show, and every hot show it's been seen.

And then he laughed, and he looked at me "Not the way I'll do it." And I thought, "You arrogant idiot."

Snyder: That was a working building at the time, and when I built the marquee outside, the canopy, we couldn't touch their building at all. So what we had to do, old-school, was take a calipers and measure the building, and then cut everything to it, and then gently push the building into place without even touching their building.

So if you look close at those scenes, with Pris Darryl Hannah if you look close, you can see that there's a tiny little space between my set, and the Bradbury Building.

Haber: We shot the entire end of the film, and J.F.'s apartment, in the Bradbury Building. But the Bradbury Building is a fully functioning and existing office block.

Snyder: The interior, we started shooting at 6 o'clock at night, and we had to be out by 6 o'clock in the morning, and we had rain inside the building.

What we did was, we got barrels of crumbled cork, which looks like dirt. So we spread the cork all over the floors, as opposed to dirt, because it looks like dirt. And in the morning, we would just sweep up the cork, which had absorbed the majority of the water, and mop the floors down, and we had to do it every night.

It was really treacherous and difficult. And with Ridley, there was no "I can't do it, I don't know how" it just had to be done.

Fancher: Boy, was [Ridley] right. There's reasons for his confidence. He f-ing nailed it.

CREATING A FAKE DOWNTOWN L.A. BUILDING

The movie features a climactic chase, with Rutger Hauer's Roy Batty hunting down Harrison Ford's Rick Deckard.

Snyder: So we went to a building downtown it's called the Rosslyn Hotel, the Million Dollar Hotel. Many films have been shot there, music videos, and it has a heart-shaped neon sign on the rooftop.

He has to jump from one rooftop to the other. Well, of course, it's quite dangerous. I consulted an engineer, and he said the building was built in 1912. It was derelict when I was there I mean, it was really in bad shape.

So he said that we would have to build another platform on top of the rooftop to take the weight of all the equipment and the crew, and it was going to be maybe 50,000, 100,000 dollars.

I said to Ridley, look, you know what: I can build a building on the backlot that's 20 feet high, 20 feet wide, and 20 feet deep, and I'll put it on wheels, and we'll be able to move it around. Which we did, frequently.

So it's a landmark building it's the one landmark building that I reproduced, meticulously. I mean, it's a dead match to the building. And that cornice on the roof is made of steel well mine is made of fiberglass, but who knows, except me.

And Harrison Ford was able to climb up to the rooftop because I had him get on a lift, and he would put his hands where he would reach, and I would mark the chalk, and we'd cut out a hole and put rubber tubing so he could grab it. So when he's ascending the rooftop there, he looks like he's pretty good at it, but I gave him a little help.

[Ridley] would say "Do this," and I would do that, and he would say "OK, I want something moving in the frame" at 3 o'clock in the morning, and I would come up with things like the landmark piece in the film.

All those fans turning and strobe-lights they weren't there the day we got there. They were made up of paper plates and cardboard, and put on C-stands, and there were no motors, and so the prop guys would have to spin the fans and then run out of the shot. [laughing]

It was a DIY situation for me, where he would say "Make something happen," and I would say "What do you want me to make happen?" And he said, "Well you're the art director, you figure it out."

WHY BLADE RUNNER'S WRITER GOT REPLACED

Fancher: [Ridley Scott and I] definitely had disagreements. And it was my fault. I was naive and stupid. I didn't know I thought that the project was mine, you know?

He was extremely inspiring. But I also had trouble. By the way, the things I disagreed with it turns out he was right and I was wrong, for sure. I was naive about heroes.

Haber: I spent many weeks at the Chateau Marmont with David [Peoples] rewriting Hampton Fancher's original screenplay.

The problem was that Hampton was around when David was at the Chateau Marmont, and at first he didn't know it was happening.

Fancher: [Ridley's] good. He knows the business of making a movie, and what has to happen, and I never have. I'm not realistic that way. And he's very realistic.

So we had two falling outs. I left the picture, but I came back at the end, and we continue to know each other. I adore him.

For a while, I didn't want anything to do with the picture I tried to get my name off it. So that's how stupid I am.

WHAT CHANGED FROM THE ORIGINAL BLADE RUNNER SCRIPTS

Fancher: I didn't like that Rachel, I thought, was weakened. I wanted her to be more powerful than everybody mentally, emotionally. [In mocking voice] "Oh, god, what am I going to do?" I didn't want that, and I fought that and I was wrong.

And I wanted Deckard to be even more vulnerable, and I was wrong there too. When Batty's going to drop him off the roof, Ridley wanted me to have Deckard be defiant. I said, "He'll suck his d-! He'll do anything he's not defiant!"

The chess game I thought that was ridiculous. He gets into the Tyrell Corporation playing chess? The most surveilled place on the planet? He goes up an elevator with Roy Batty the most sought after renegade in the world? Noooo. I had another way to do it.

Then I think, they're whispering behind my back, "Well, Hampton doesn't seem to understand movies, Saturday matinees, whatever." You can get away with things, the audience will love it whatever that is. And I was being, in some stupid artistic way, conservative. So there were a lot of things I resisted in fact, I didn't cooperate.

SHOOTING ON THE WARNER BROS. BACKLOT

Mead: Once we got going, the whole Warner Brothers backlot became Blade Runner Land.

Snyder: That was when the decision was made that we only shot at nighttime. Because at nighttime, like in Tokyo or whatever the distance from the camera across the backlot, you don't know what's beyond that it could be Hong Kong.

Mead: I knew Ridley wanted to have a very dense, packed set look to the whole thing. So once I got pictures of the backlot, I started to overlay them with a lot of stuff wiring, and tubing, and so forth.

The idea of the city as a machine took on a whole new idea we called the look "trash chic," or "retro deco." I mashed together every single architectural style I could think of, indiscriminately, just to make it look packed up and eclectic.

Snyder: This is the first film that Ridley did in Hollywood, L.A. So he had this idea, the most brilliant idea of all: we would go night-scouting in downtown L.A., which was really treacherous, really tough.

And so, Ridley said, "Look there's 1920 on this building, and then they put a layer of 1940 on the building, and then they put a layer of 1960 on the building," and it was a stratification thing.

So when it was decided that we were going to shoot on the Warner Brothers backlot the buildings that were built on the backlot started in 1924. And then went through all those periods, from 1924 to 1980.

When we were in pre-production, Ridley took us into the screening room and we ran the film Logan's Run. And at the end of the film, he said, "Do you see that? We don't want to do any of that, at all. This is exactly what we don't want to do the Earth is leveled, and you start over again."

Mead: The first thing Ridley said out of his mouth was, "This is not going to be Logan's Run." I thought, "Well, that gives me a clue."

Snyder: We started with 1920, and 1940 the backlot, various structures over time and then we added 2019 to it. The layers, and layers, and layers of stuff is what really makes that film look like it does.

Fancher: I didn't understand money at all. I remember a scene, and they told me, "We don't have the money for the street." I said, "What do you mean, money for the street?" "We can't lengthen the f-ing street in the backlot of Warner Brothers to accommodate that." And I said, "Well, just do it it's movies."

THE TERRIBLE, TERRIBLE VOICEOVER AND WHY YOU SHOULD WATCH THE FINAL CUT

Snyder: We all, filmmakers, prefer the Final Cut, because [Ridley] was in charge of the Final Cut. As far as the "director's cut," he wasn't that involved in it.

Haber: We shot the last two weeks in one week, so as not to lose Ridley, god forbid and then the directors strike never happened. So we shot two weeks in one week, and the overtime for the crew meant they shot 24/7, [which cost] 5 million.

That put the movie over-budget, leading to Scott and the other producers being removed from the film, with financiers Bud Yorkin and Jerry Perenchio taking over post-production. Haber was the one member of the producing staff kept on under the new administration.

Haber: When Ridley wanted to do his next two cuts on DVD, he had to get permission from them, because they owned the film.

[When the movie came out,] I felt like I was giving birth in public. And it was really difficult, because it was Bud Yorkin's version of the film, which is why it was not so successful.

The narration, which Bud Yorkin and I dubbed with Harrison Ford, with Harrison doing it very badly in the hope that it wasn't going to be used it was not written by Hampton Fancher or David Peoples. It was written by Bud Yorkin's writer [Roland Kibbee].

And unfortunately, it was used, to Bud Yorkin's and Ridley Scott's demise. Ridley originally called it "Irving the explainer." [Yorkin] used it to tell the story, so Irving the Explainer was the perfect term to describe how irrelevant it was and unnecessary it was, and expecting the audience not to understand the film, so you needed Deckard to explain it.

Read more:

An Oral History Of Blade Runner's 2019 Los Angeles, Because The Future Has Arrived - laist.com

Scientist Rita J. King wears sparkly dress to NASA talk – TODAY

Scientists can be sparkly, and Rita J. King, a scientist who co-directs Science House in Manhattan, is out to prove it.

King is a futurist, which means she analyzes data and makes projections. In her LinkedIn bio, King explains, "I work with teams and organizations to help them take ideas from mind to market, and individual leaders to help them navigate an increasingly chaotic world."

In a tweet earlier this month, King shared photos of herself in a sparkly golden dress, giving a talk at NASA.

Trending stories,celebrity news and all the best of TODAY.

"I came across this gown and remembered the little girls who sent me a letter and asked me to wear something sparkly... so they could believe that scientists could also be sparkly," King wrote in the post.

King's Twitter followers were quick to praise her for showing young girls the best of both worlds.

"My daughter is obsessed with all things sparkly, and she also likes to use tools and tinker," wrote one Twitter user. "I love that she can see women like you!"

"Yes. You have inspired me to take my tiara to work and wear it while Im grant writing!" wrote another.

King made time to respond to her followers' comments, with heart emojis and heartfelt words.

And, in one reply, she said that while she won't always dress in sparkles, she was glad to do it this once.

"I bought it for that talk and thats the only time Ive ever worn it," she wrote.

"I hope you find occasion to wear it again," the follower responded. "It, like you, is born to shine."

Never miss a parenting story with the TODAY Parenting newsletter! Sign up here.

Terri Peters is a writer and editor for TODAY.com and editor of the TODAY Parenting Team. She lives in a small beach town on the Atlantic coast of Florida with her husband and two kids. When she isn't writing, Terri can be found feeding her backyard flock of chickens or exploring Florida's theme parks and beaches with her family.

Read the original:

Scientist Rita J. King wears sparkly dress to NASA talk - TODAY

Scientists Discover New Class of Tiny Black Holes – Futurism

It almost seems like astronomers are in a race to unveil the biggest black holes they can find. Most recently, a team of German astronomers claimed to have discovered a black hole 40 billion times the mass of the Sun.

But what if there are also black holes many magnitudes smaller?

In a study published today in the prestigious journal Science, a team of astronomers from Ohio State University claim to have discovered an entirely new and previously missing class of black holes.

Were showing this hint that there is another population out there that we have yet to really probe in the search for black holes, lead author Todd Thompson said in a statement.

If confirmed, current theories would have to take intoaccount an entirely new class of black hole forcing us to rethink how we understand the way stars and other kinds of celestial objects are born and die.

Thompson and his team were puzzled by the huge gap between the size of the biggest neutron stars extremely dense and relatively small stars that form after larger stars implode after a supernova and the smallest black holes we know of.

Neutron stars are fairly small two to three times the mass of the Sun but stars any larger than that tend to collapse in on themselves and form black holes.

Their smoking gun: a giant red star that was orbiting something that at first appeared to be too small to be a black hole in the Milky Way, but that was much bigger than the neutron stars we know of.

The black hole it was orbiting turned out to be only 3.3 times the mass of the Sun usually the black holes weve found in the past are at least five times the Suns mass or much, much larger.

The discovery could redefine the way we look at the lifecycle of a star.

If we could reveal a new population of black holes, it would tell us more about which stars explode, which dont, which form black holes, which form neutron stars, said Thompson. It opens up a new area of study.

READ MORE: Scientists may have discovered whole new class of black holes [The Ohio State University]

More on black holes: Astronomers Just Spotted One of the Biggest Black Holes Ever

Read more from the original source:

Scientists Discover New Class of Tiny Black Holes - Futurism

Iron man: 10 Things Fans Never Knew About The Mark 1 Armor | CBR – CBR – Comic Book Resources

While Captain America has his shield and the god Thor wields hishammer Mjolnir, Iron Man is pretty much defined by his armor. However, Tony Stark's Iron Man suit isn't made from a secret vibranium-based alloy nor is it adivine godlyrelic. The Iron Man suit is a work of cutting-edge technology and like all tech, it must evolve with the times or riskbecoming obsolete.

RELATED: 10 Beatdowns That Tony Stark Never Should Have Survived

As a futurist, Tony Stark hasprobably strip-mined several major veins of ore to build all his Iron Man armors. But before he developedsuch famed suits as the Hulkbuster armor andEXTREMIS, he builthis firstMark I armor with crude tools from salvaged munitions while held captiveby insurgents. Here are ten facts about the Mark I that only a genius like Tony Stark could know:

Click the button below to start this article in quick view

Tony Stark is basically the Steve Jobs of WMDs. As a teenager, he built revolutionary weapons in his dad's garage, reinventing the scienceof micromunitions with his new miniaturized bomblets, then growinghis fortune by developing new military contracts. While abroad to help advise military operations in the field and oversee American troops using his tech, a bomb went off, sending shrapnel jagging into his chest. He was seizedby enemy combatants, taken alive, but slowly dying from his wounds.

Tony's captors wanted himto build them weapons before he died of his wounds. He built the first Iron Man suit instead, using it tofight his way to freedom. Eventually, he'd made other newer armors. But for a very long time, Tony continued to fight wearing his original Mark I Iron Man armor that he built in captivity.

Iron Man is a founding member of the Avengers. Alongside Hulk, Ant-Man, the Wasp, and Thor, the billionaire inventedhelped establish the greatest superhero team in the Marvel Universe. Unlike the other heroes, Tony Stark had no powers. He was just a smart rich unpowered guy ina fancy metal suit.

When he first helped start the Avengers, his armored suit wasn't even all that cutting edge. In fact, when he joined up with the other heroes, he was still wearing the Mark I, the least sophisticatedof all his armors. Still, even thoughit had beenmade with crude tools and leftover parts, it was good enough to make him one of Earth's mightiest heroes.

Just how high- or low-tech the original Mark I is supposed to be depends on who is writing Iron Man at any given moment. Given that the armored Avenger made his debut in Tales of Suspense issue 39 (way back in 1963!) there was not exactly a lot of digital technology around at the time, suggesting his first suit might be an analog armor. Even recent retcons describe his suit as a piece of equipment so unsophisticated he can operate it after taking extreme brain damage.

RELATED: 10 DC Armors More Powerful Than Iron Man's

However, in the original Tales of Suspense story, it's revealed that the Mark I can actually read brain waves! That kind of technology would make the Iron Man armora brilliant invention by even the most modern standards, showing just how geniusTony Stark really is.

As a weapons designer, Tony Stark hasplenty ofblood on his hands. During the "EXTREMIS" storyline which updated his origin story, a reporter informed Tony that 18% of theseedpod bombs which he made for the Air Force had failed to fire at the proper time, resulting in detonations that killed civilian children across the Theater of War.

When Tony Stark invented the Mark I, it saved his life from the shrapnel burying its way toward his heart. It was the first time he ever made something that saved a life. After that, he became a superhero to help others and began using his wealth to philanthropically do the same.

Another tidbit revealed in the "EXTREMIS" story that had profound implications was that Tony Stark had already come up with the ideafor a protective exosuit which he pitched to the military long before actually making the Mark I. He called it the "Iron Man Project" and Yinsen--the medical futurist who helped save his life--was present at a conference where he described the idea.

This explains why he could build the armor so quickly. A genius like Tony already knew how the exosuit had to work, so it was just a matter of constructing something whose plans he'd already designed.

When the Mark I made its debutin Tales of Suspense, Iron Man seemed like more of a horror character than a superhero, his iron-grey armor transforming him from a charismatic handsome playboy into a mechanical inhuman monster, a humuicular golem whose life was saved at the expense of humanity. When hereappeared in the next issue, the character actually scared away the people he was tryingto save.

RELATED: The 10 Most Impractical Marvel Costumes, Ranked

Wanting to be a symbol of hope instead of an object of fear, he repainted the Mark I with a new gold finish. Almost every future suit would include gold along with thesignature "hot rod red."

In recent stories about Iron Man, the character's origin has been retconned so that he was abducted in Afghanistan, but originally, Tony Stark wasn't in the Middle East at all. He was captured by guerrillas in Vietnam.

There are many reasons to update this origin. For one, the Vietnam War is now decades older than the in-universe age of Tony Stark (who seems to be in his early 40s). The original portrayal of Iron Man in Vietnam involved some really uncomfortable stereotypical depictions of Asian characters, heavy-handed anti-communist propaganda, and dated views on the war.

During the "Extremis" storyline, several key changes occurred, including the previously-mentioned update of Tony Stark's origins. The story explored how futuristsrely on major corporations and military contracts for funding. After being mortally wounded, Tony used the newly-made EXTREMISserum to rewrite his DNA, storing parts of the Iron Man suit in the hollows of his bones.

RELATED: 10 Times Tony Stark Became More Machine Than Man

This story marked the point where Tony Stark becamea true futurist, a superhero powered by his own inventions! A few years later, he would have to downgrade that technology.After storing sensitive information on his brain'shard drive, he began towipe his brain clean to keep that datafrom being accessed by the villainNorman Osborn. He couldn't operate his more advanced armors like that. However, even with half a brain, he could use the Mark I.

When Tony Stark took up his original Mark I while being hunted by Norman Osborn, he knew it was only a matter of time before the villain came after him. After all, Osborn was in charge of Earth's security at the time--a position that Starkhad previously held.

Osborn repurposed one of the more recent Iron Man suits to make a new identity for himself as Iron Patriot--the red, white, and blue warmonger who used the colors of American patriotism to legitimize his Stasi-esquegangsterism. When Iron Patriotfinally caught up with Iron Man, the hero tried fighting him off while wearing the antiquated Mark I. Surprisingly, the old suit held up for quite a while as it was assaulted with a full bombardment fromthe newer mech.

That Iron Man would build gadgets into his suit should surprise no one. However, in the Silver Age, the Mark I seemed less like a streamlined exosuit and more like something out of theInspector Gadget cartoons.

Some of thesegadgets included a miniature saw in his fingertips, a hose that shotoil, and a radio jamming device that both created noise interference andallowed Iron Man to hijack speaker systems to speak through them at a distance. While these were fun in the Silver Age, the comics are better for having moved past them.

NEXT: 10 Hidden Features Of Iron Man's Armor, Revealed

Tags:marvel,iron man

Next5 DC Heroes The Hulk Could Defeat (And 5 He Wouldn't Stand A Chance Against)

Read more:

Iron man: 10 Things Fans Never Knew About The Mark 1 Armor | CBR - CBR - Comic Book Resources