Sizing up press freedom

By BOB TEOH

Press freedom in Malaysia has taken an unprecedented plunge according to the latest ranking by Reporters Without Borders (RSF) released last week. But the government doesn't think so. The Prime Minister's Office responded immediately, insisting that the press in Malaysia is freer than it ever has been. So who is right?

To begin with the index tabulated by RSF is flawed in its methodology so we need to take its ranking with caution. The government's claim, on the other hand, is mere rhetoric so we need to be equally cautious.

Out of the 180- countries ranked in the 2014 RSF press freedom index, Malaysia stood at 147 out of 180 countries surveyed, dropping 23 spots from the previous year. Compared to the 2006 index, Malaysia was in the 92nd spot, or a drop of 55 places over eight years!

The RSF index measures the level of press freedom using six criteria pluralism, media independence, environment and self-censorship, legislative framework, transparency and (news production) infrastructure. But it also include another criterion for measuring violence against journalists which is given a weight of 20 percent. This might have skewed the overall tabulation. The index also lacks what is known as inter-coder reliability, a device for double checking data normally used in content analyses.

For instance the Philippines, which is among the freest press in the region, is ranked three spots below Malaysia, possibly due the violence against journalists in some remote provinces which are controlled by warlords. In Brunei, where violence against journalists is largely unheard of, the country is given a higher ranking of 117, or 32 spots higher than Philippines in terms of press freedom.

It is also incredulous that the US is ranked 46, or just one spot above Haiti, Japan at 59, is just two spots above Hong Kong and Britain at 33 is six spots below Ghana!

So how free is the press in Malaysia then? We can measure it against the government's declared intentions. Within six days of Najib Razak taking office Prime Minister on 3 April 2009, he called a closed door meeting of top editors. Najib told the top editors, "I will give latitude to the media" and went on to say "I'd rather be criticised by the media than be rejected by the people."

Najib even took the initiative to visit Sin Chew Daily, the country's largest newspaper just days before he became PM. Some months later, he made another visit, this time officially, making him probably the first Prime Minister to visit a Chinese newspaper. This contrasted with former PM, Dr Mahathir Mohamad, who shut down Sin Chew Daily together with The Star and Watan for six months in a massive clampdown on civil liberties known as Ops Lalang in Oct 1987 which resulted in the arrest of over 100 dissidents.

Najib went on to reform press laws, in particular the amendments to the Printing Presses and Publications Act 1984 on 20 April 2012. The amendments removed the need for annual renewal of press licences. The absolute power of the minister in revoking or imposing arbitrary conditions was also removed. But anyone wishing to start a newspaper is still required to get a licence from the Home Ministry.

Visit link:

Sizing up press freedom

VHS vs. Communism: In Romania, a Voice of Freedom | Op-Docs | The New York Times – Video


VHS vs. Communism: In Romania, a Voice of Freedom | Op-Docs | The New York Times
In Communist Romania in the 1980s, a young translator became an unlikely voice of freedom. She illicitly dubbed thousands of foreign films, distributed on VH...

By: The New York Times

Read the original post:

VHS vs. Communism: In Romania, a Voice of Freedom | Op-Docs | The New York Times - Video

UPDATE! One World Trade Center / Freedom Tower 2/1/2014 construction progress part 3 – Video


UPDATE! One World Trade Center / Freedom Tower 2/1/2014 construction progress part 3
So here I continue walking around the site and take another look at Two World Trade Center and Three World Trade Center before walking back to One World Trad...

By: NJTAmtrakGuy

Read the original:

UPDATE! One World Trade Center / Freedom Tower 2/1/2014 construction progress part 3 - Video

UPDATE! One World Trade Center / Freedom Tower 2/1/2014 construction progress part 4 – Video


UPDATE! One World Trade Center / Freedom Tower 2/1/2014 construction progress part 4
After I arrive at Brooklyn Bridge Park we can now take another evening look at One World Trade Center and Four World Trade Center. As usual both towers look ...

By: NJTAmtrakGuy

Continued here:

UPDATE! One World Trade Center / Freedom Tower 2/1/2014 construction progress part 4 - Video

Night Update! One World Trade Center / Freedom Tower 2/1/2014 Antenna spire lights up! – Video


Night Update! One World Trade Center / Freedom Tower 2/1/2014 Antenna spire lights up!
After seeing the antenna spire light up from Brooklyn Bridge Park I decided to return back to the site to take a much better look at the antenna spire. As I ...

By: NJTAmtrakGuy

Read more from the original source:

Night Update! One World Trade Center / Freedom Tower 2/1/2014 Antenna spire lights up! - Video

Freedom payments a red flag

CHARLESTON, W.Va. -- In the year before it filed for bankruptcy, Freedom Industries paid more than $6 million to its former owners and to companies affiliated with its current owners, court filings show.

CHARLESTON, W.Va. -- In the year before it filed for bankruptcy, Freedom Industries paid more than $6 million to its former owners and to companies affiliated with its current owners, court filings show.

These payments to what bankruptcy law calls "insiders" will be closely examined by Freedom's creditors and could be ordered returned to the company if they're deemed improper, bankruptcy lawyers said.

"It is a red flag," said Bob Simons, a bankruptcy lawyer with the Pittsburgh firm Reed Smith. "Any transfer within a year, to even as much as four years before the bankruptcy, can be scrutinized to see if those transfers should be returned to the bankruptcy estate."

Simons added that it is good that Freedom is being forthcoming and not trying to hide the payments.

He said if the transfers were made when the company was insolvent, or they helped make the company insolvent, then they could be "clawed back."

"The distinguishing feature of this case is that the spill arguably was unforeseen, so how do you plan for it?" Simons said. "You could argue that, if you transferred a lot of the money out of the company, you left it with unreasonably small capital. It would be tough to establish that, because this was an unforeseen liability, but I must say, not impossible under the right circumstances."

Freedom, which contaminated thousands of West Virginians' water with a chemical leak into the Elk River on Jan. 9, filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy on Jan. 17. Under the bankruptcy code, Chapter 11 permits a company to reorganize and continue operating.

Three men identified as former owners of Freedom -- Dennis Farrell, Charles Herzing and William Tis -- all received at least $180,000 from Freedom in the year before the chemical leak.

Farrell, who remains with Freedom but no longer is an owner, received more than $288,000 in 33 "withdrawals or distributions" from the company in the past year, according to bankruptcy filings.

See the rest here:

Freedom payments a red flag

Islam, Freedom and Salvation

February 20, 2014

by Zairil Khir Johari

http://themalaysianinsider.com/opinion/zairil-khir-johari/article/islam-freedom-and-salvation

Islam and freedom are two inseparable concepts, though one may not arrive at this conclusion based on the behaviour of many Muslims worldwide, particularly those claiming to carry the torch for the religion.

When the Prophet Muhammad introduced Islam in the 7th century, he not only brought with him a new deen (faith), but also through it delivered fundamental moral and social reform to the Arabian society. As it were, Islam brought light to end the darkness of slavery, female infanticide and social injustice.

At its height of glory during the Islamic Golden Age from the 8th to the 13th century, the Arab-Muslim world transformed from a warring, largely illiterate society to one characterised by major intellectual advancement in culture, mathematics, life sciences and philosophy.

It was an era of inclusiveness, symbolised by the establishment of the Baitul-Hikmat, or House of Wisdom, in Baghdad, where scholars both Muslim and non-Muslim converged to exchange and produce knowledge. Inspired by the call to ijtihad (independent reasoning), the goal was always to expand and include, and not to retreat and exclude.

There was no narrow-minded attempt to discard the works of other civilisations, or to brand certain knowledge as belonging solely to Islam and therefore unusable by non-Muslims. Instead, knowledge was cultivated, documented and shared with all.

Unfortunately, Muslim civilisation has suffered a sharp decline since then. Today, Muslim countries throughout the world are associated with authoritarian regimes, gaping income inequality and the suppression of civil liberties and human rights ironic for a religion that promises the gift of freedom and enlightenment.

In our part of the world, contemporary Islamic discourse appears to be captured by the likes of the Harussanis and Ridhuan Tees. However, such belligerent parochialism actually masks the rich history of progressive thought by great local Muslim thinkers and advocates of freedom.

Go here to read the rest:

Islam, Freedom and Salvation

CMFR: Online libel further threatens free expression, press freedom

Media watchdog Center for Media Freedom and Responsibility (CMFR) on Thursday joined the opposition to the online libel provision of the Cybercrime Prevention Act of 2012, saying it threatens a person's right to free expression and press freedom.

"While crimes committed over the Internet such as child pornography need legal sanctions, the Cybercrime Act throws such a wide net it penalizes even legitimate expressions of opinion online," the CMFR said in a statement.

According to the CMFR, the "original" libel law in the Revised Penal Code has been "problematic for free expression and press freedom since 1932," and has been used to "silence" journalists.

"The libel law has also been declared excessive by the United Nations Human Rights Committee, which in 2011 asked the Philippine government to review the law towards eliminating the penalty of imprisonment," it noted.

However, the group said the government still used the libel provisions of the Revised Penal Code as part of sanctions against online libel, and raised the penalties.

"The Act adopts the 82-year old Revised Penal Code (RPC) provisions on libel, but raises the penalties by one degree, from a minimum of six months imprisonment in the RPC per count of libel to a minimum of six years," the CMFR said.

"Libel as provided for in the RPC thus remains today as problematic as it has been for over 80 years to press freedom and free expression, and in addition has become an even bigger constraint on free expression when committed online," it added.

The Supreme Court on Tuesday ruled that the online libel provision in the controversial Cybercrime Prevention Act of 2012 is constitutional, although it struck down others, including one that empowers the Department of Justice (DOJ) to restrict or block access to data violating the law.

However, the high court clarified that only original authors of libelous material are covered by the cybercrime law, and not those who merely received or reacted to it.

President Benigno Aquino III signed the law in 2012 to stamp out cybercrimes such as fraud, identity theft, spamming and child pornography.

Read more:

CMFR: Online libel further threatens free expression, press freedom