Freedom of speech advocates find ruling to be upsetting

(CNN) -

A court in Turkey this week sentenced two cartoonists to 11 months and 20 days in prison for insulting Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan. Soon after, the court changed the jail sentence to a fine of 7,000 Turkish lira or about $2,700 each.

Cartoonists Bahadir Baruter and Ozer Aydogan draw for the weekly satirical magazine Penguen. Founded in 2002 with a weekly average of 65,000 readers, the irreverent comic book -- similar in many ways to the French magazine Charlie Hebdo -- regularly skewers Turkish politicians.

A defamation suit was filed against an August cover of Penguen in which a cartoon figure of Erdogan is welcomed to the presidential palace by a public servant. Erdogan tells him, "But this is so dry. We could have at least slaughtered a journalist."

In a statement to the press, the Penguen team explained that a citizen who described himself as an Erdogan supporter "sent an email to the Prime Ministry Information Center. ... According to the notice, the employee (in the cartoon) 'made the gay signal with his fingers.' "

Turkey's public prosecutor eventually launched an investigation, claiming that both the speech bubbles and the "hand drawing" insulted Erdogan.

While the court ruled Wednesday in favor of Erdogan, a full-length explanation of the verdict will be released in a week to 10 days. It is so far unclear whether the judge ruled that the speech bubbles or the "gay hand gesture" or both were an insult.

The ruling comes amid an increase in criminal cases lodged against journalists, students and public figures for "defamation against a public officer." In 2014, Turkey was ranked one of the world's worst jailers of journalists by the media watchdog group Reporters Without Borders and its press status "not free" by Freedom House.

The Council of Europe's commissioner for human rights, Nils Muinieks, expressed his concern about the ruling against Penguen as well as the surge in criminal cases against people accused of insulting Erdogan.

"This sentence is misguided and, along with a pattern of criminal prosecutions, sends a chilling message to media professionals and all those who want to exercise their right to free expression," Muinieks said.

Read the original:

Freedom of speech advocates find ruling to be upsetting

Students must fully understand the principles that make America great

If U.S. high-school graduates don't understand the principles of freedom and equality essential to American government and the historical roots of these principles, how can we expect them to affirm and defend these principles as adults?

Many people are quick to blame teachers for the shortcomings of America's schools. And the shortcomings should be obvious.

The National Assessment of Educational Progress has shown consistently that many students, in the fields of U.S. history and government, among others, are not even mastering the basics

For example, the most recent NAEP U.S. history exam, in 2010, found just 12 percent of all U.S. high-school seniors scoring at or above the "proficient" level, which the Institute of Education Sciences describes as the level representing "solid academic performance to which all students ... should aspire."

In civics - the test covering the subject of U.S. government - the scores were somewhat better, but still, slightly less than one fourth of all high school seniors performed at or above the "proficient" level.

We often hear about the need to improve education in the STEM subjects of science, technology, engineering and math. But American students perform worse on American history tests than in any other subject.

It's unfair to blame America's 125,000 social studies teachers, however. In the 17 years I've been with the Ashbrook Center at Ashland University in Ashbrook, Ohio, some 8,000 teachers from across the country have participated in our educational programs. So I've had ample opportunity to interact with many teachers and know from first-hand experience they're not the problem.

The problem is the way teachers are trained. Teachers spend too much time learning how to teach - the mechanics of pedagogy - and not enough time learning what to teach.

Without a major change in how teachers are taught, America will continue down the same path, raising generation after generation of students who do not understand what it means to be an American, who equate freedom of speech with "selfies," who believe freedom of religion requires purging religion from the public square, who think our Founding Fathers - denigrated in popular culture as dead old white men - are irrelevant.

They also may end up thinking of Sam Adams solely as a beer company. Or associate Washington and Lincoln as having something to do with President's Day, a holiday when everybody goes shopping. Or The Fourth of July merely as an occasion for fireworks and a cookout.

See the original post here:

Students must fully understand the principles that make America great

Tamil embodies the epitome of Freedom of Speech and Expression – Avvaiyar – Video


Tamil embodies the epitome of Freedom of Speech and Expression - Avvaiyar
Murugan, is a Tamil Siddhar (Siddhar means specialist or scientist). He specialized in martial arts. Later on, he came to be revered as a God. A famous legend about him says that at one point...

By: Nirmaleswar T

Go here to read the rest:

Tamil embodies the epitome of Freedom of Speech and Expression - Avvaiyar - Video

"Unconstitutional": Supreme Court scraps section 66A, protects online freedom of speech – Video


"Unconstitutional": Supreme Court scraps section 66A, protects online freedom of speech
The Supreme Court has scrapped a contentious law that was seen as a major infringement of the freedom of speech online because it allowed the arrest of a person for posting offensive content....

By: NDTV

More:

"Unconstitutional": Supreme Court scraps section 66A, protects online freedom of speech - Video

SC: Section 66A Violation Of Fundamental Right Of Freedom Of Speech – Video


SC: Section 66A Violation Of Fundamental Right Of Freedom Of Speech
In a landmark verdict, the Supreme Court has struck down Section 66A of the IT Act, that allowed the government to take anyone into custody for posting objectionable content on the internet....

By: Aaj Tak

Visit link:

SC: Section 66A Violation Of Fundamental Right Of Freedom Of Speech - Video

Several people were victimised under Section 66(A), says Prashant Bhushan – Video


Several people were victimised under Section 66(A), says Prashant Bhushan
The Supreme Court on Tuesday scrapped out a controversial law seen as a big violation of the freedom of speech online as it allowed the arrest of a person for posting offensive content. Introduced...

By: NewsX

See the rest here:

Several people were victimised under Section 66(A), says Prashant Bhushan - Video

Supreme Court strikes down Section 66A of IT Act, says it violates right to speech – Video


Supreme Court strikes down Section 66A of IT Act, says it violates right to speech
In a landmark judgment on the Right to Freedom of Speech on the Internet, the Supreme Court on Tuesday quashed Section 66A of the Information Technology Act that empowers the police to make...

By: India News

Go here to see the original:

Supreme Court strikes down Section 66A of IT Act, says it violates right to speech - Video

Discussion on Supreme Court Section 66(A):Supreme Court Sides With Free Speech| iNews – Video


Discussion on Supreme Court Section 66(A):Supreme Court Sides With Free Speech| iNews
The Supreme Court has scrapped a contentious law that was seen as a major b of the freedom of speech online because it allowed the arrest of a person for posting "offensive" content. Section...

By: I News

Continued here:

Discussion on Supreme Court Section 66(A):Supreme Court Sides With Free Speech| iNews - Video

ROC Constitutional country,unconstitutionality,illegal off I do a miscarriage of justice – Video


ROC Constitutional country,unconstitutionality,illegal off I do a miscarriage of justice
Constitutional country, as dare unconstitutional Article 11 (freedom of speech, freedom of the press)! (Constitution) conflict (legal), then (the Constitution) is greater than the (law) of...

By: bi bi Chang

The rest is here:

ROC Constitutional country,unconstitutionality,illegal off I do a miscarriage of justice - Video

Pc upgrades and trouble, Bloodeborne and what seems like randomness. – Video


Pc upgrades and trouble, Bloodeborne and what seems like randomness.
I didn #39;t mention it in the video but if anyone takes offense to what I told the rep on the phone that I talk about in the video, I do not apologize because we have freedom of speech. If someone...

By: Nate Decker

Read more:

Pc upgrades and trouble, Bloodeborne and what seems like randomness. - Video

Meet Shreya Singhal, the 'saviour' of freedom of speech

New Delhi, March 25: The deepest concern over freedom of speech and expression and the threat posed to it by Section 66A of the IT Act, was the prime reason for Shreya Singhal to file a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) in the Supreme Court in November 2012.

After a gap of three years, the verdict of Supreme Court came on Tuesday, March 24 scrapping the 'draconian' law.

It is a cheerful moment for the 24-year old because she became a saviour of free speech by challenging the provision in the cyber law which provided power to arrest a person for posting allegedly "offensive" content on websites.

[Internet freedom at last: Section 66 A of IT act struck down]

However, the section 66A was also used by political parties to arrest people for posting online content against their leaders.

Shreya had been noticing several high-profile arrests of people, which came under the section. The arrests of cartoonist Aseem Trivedi in Mumbai and a Puducherry buinessman also sparked thoughts in the minds of Shreya.

[Section 66A of IT Act: Explained]

The arrest of two college girls in Palghar over a Facebook post questioning the bandh in city on the death of Shiv Sena supremo Bal Thackeray, irked Singhal.

She was really shocked and the incident also became a turning point in her battle against online freedom.

"I got really angry. The law was blatantly being misused. The provision was extremely vague in its definition of what should go on the Internet," she said.

Original post:

Meet Shreya Singhal, the 'saviour' of freedom of speech

Freedom of Speech on Internet: SC Strikes Down Section 66A of the IT Act

This day marks freedom for Internet in India. The Supreme Court today passed a judgement on Section 66A of the Information Technology Act terming it as unconstitutional. This landmark ruling upholds the fundamental right to freedom of speech and expression given under the Constitution of India.

In the past there have been many cases where citizens used the Internet as a means of free speech but were convicted or harassed under the senseless Section 66A of the IT Act. These included airing of free opinions such as criticism over the near shutdown of Mumbai city due Bal Thackerays death or political cartoons and many other cases, where the citizens were arrested for contravening the law. The new SC ruling upholds the freedom of speech in such cases.

Further, Supreme Courts reading down of the provision under section 79(3)(b), will now make it necessary to take legal permission from a court to takedown any content with the exception that the government can still issue orders to block access to websites under 69A rules. This will reduce liability on intermediaries and will go a long-way in setting up a free, fair and independent ecosystem.

Section 66A reads: Any person who sends by any means of a computer resource any information that is grossly offensive or has a menacing character; or any information which he knows to be false, but for the purpose of causing annoyance, inconvenience, danger, obstruction, insult shall be punishable with imprisonment for a term which may extend to three years and with fine.

Expressing his views on the development, Mr. R. Chandrashekhar, President, NASSCOM, said, Internet as a medium is meant to be free and transcend territorial borders with minimal regulation and monitoring. The IT Act has well served the objective to provide the legal framework for data security and internet laws in the country. The changes enabled by the Supreme Court judgement would provide much needed boost to the citizens of the country and help the objective of a digitally connected India.

See the original post:

Freedom of Speech on Internet: SC Strikes Down Section 66A of the IT Act

Section 66(A) of IT Act unconstitutional, Supreme Court rules – Video


Section 66(A) of IT Act unconstitutional, Supreme Court rules
The Supreme Court on Tuesday scrapped out a controversial law seen as a big violation of the freedom of speech online as it allowed the arrest of a person for posting offensive content. Introduced...

By: India News

Continued here:

Section 66(A) of IT Act unconstitutional, Supreme Court rules - Video

Government not in favour of curtailing communication on social media, says Ravi Shankar Prasad – Video


Government not in favour of curtailing communication on social media, says Ravi Shankar Prasad
Union Communications and Information Technology Minister Ravi Shankar Prasad on Tuesday said that Prime Minister Narendra Modi-led government at the Centre respects freedom of speech and ...

By: NewsX

Continue reading here:

Government not in favour of curtailing communication on social media, says Ravi Shankar Prasad - Video